Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Employment authorization document

The Employment Authorization Document (EAD), designated as Form I-766, is a issued by the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) that authorizes certain non-citizens to accept in the for a designated period, serving as official proof of work eligibility under federal immigration law. It is required for individuals whose visa status or pending applications—such as those seeking adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident, granted , or —do not automatically confer work rights, distinguishing it from automatic authorizations for categories like holders. Applications for an EAD are submitted via Form I-765, with eligibility confined to over two dozen specific regulatory categories, and approvals typically valid for one to two years, necessitating renewals to maintain uninterrupted work authorization. The document includes the bearer's biographic details, photograph, and category code, and in some instances functions dually as an Advance travel document, enabling re-entry without jeopardizing pending applications. While essential for legal workforce participation among non-citizens, EAD processing delays have periodically strained applicants' financial stability, though USCIS has implemented automatic extensions for renewals filed timely to mitigate such disruptions.

Overview

Definition and Purpose

The Employment Authorization Document (EAD), designated as Form I-766, is a card issued by the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to eligible noncitizens, evidencing their to accept in the for a designated period. This document does not confer immigration status or a path to but specifically permits the holder to engage in lawful work activities. USCIS issues EADs to individuals in various temporary immigration categories who lack automatic work , such as certain asylum applicants, adjustment of status applicants, or those granted . The primary purpose of the EAD is to facilitate compliance with U.S. employment verification requirements under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, which mandates that employers verify the identity and eligibility of all workers using Form I-9. By presenting a valid EAD, noncitizens can demonstrate their legal , reducing the risk of unauthorized employment and associated penalties for both employees and employers. In some cases, the EAD combines authorization with advance parole functionality, allowing travel abroad without abandoning pending applications, as noted on certain combo cards issued since at least 2018. This dual purpose underscores its role in supporting temporary immigrants' integration into the U.S. labor market while maintaining immigration controls. The legal framework for the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) is rooted in section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952, as amended, codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1324a, which imposes civil and criminal penalties on employers for knowingly hiring or continuing to employ unauthorized aliens while defining "unauthorized alien" as one not authorized to work by the INA or U.S. regulations. This provision establishes the baseline requirement for verification via and delineates categories of aliens whose is authorized either incidentally to their immigration status (e.g., lawful permanent residents under INA § 237(a)(1)(A)) or through discretionary approval, such as for certain parolees or adjustment applicants. The INA delegates authority to the executive branch, specifically the (DHS), to regulate authorization, ensuring it aligns with broader goals like preventing unlawful that could incentivize or overstay. Implementing regulations appear in 8 CFR part 274a, promulgated by DHS under its INA authority, which detail verification procedures, eligible classes of aliens, and application processes. Section 274a.12 enumerates specific categories eligible for employment authorization, including refugees (under INA § 207), asylees (INA § 208), and those with pending adjustment of status (INA § 245), often limited to increments not exceeding authorized status periods or five years. Section 274a.13 requires aliens seeking non-incident authorization to file Form I-765 with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), DHS's adjudicating component, providing for issuance of the EAD (Form I-766) as evidence of approval. These regulations emphasize case-by-case for categories not inherently authorized, such as deferred action recipients under 8 CFR 274a.12(c)(14), to balance humanitarian relief with labor market protections. The EAD's role as a List A document under verification stems from 8 CFR 274a.2, integrating it into the employment eligibility confirmation system to mitigate fraud risks through periodic redesigns and security features. Judicial interpretations, such as in (2012), affirm of state interference in this framework, underscoring DHS's exclusive regulatory domain over authorization determinations. Amendments via legislation like the Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 refined eligibility, restricting post-removal authorization under INA § 241(a)(7). This structure prioritizes verifiable status over open-ended permissions, with USCIS guidance clarifying that EAD issuance does not confer immigration status but merely permits work incident to approved categories.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligible Categories

Eligibility for an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) is determined by specific categories under 8 CFR 274a.12, requiring applicants to file Form I-765 unless employment authorization is automatically incident to their status. These categories include refugees, asylees, certain nonimmigrant spouses and dependents, adjustment of status applicants, and individuals under deferred action or temporary protected status, among others. For categories where authorization is incident to status, such as refugees under (a)(3) or asylees under (a)(5), applicants must still file Form I-765 to obtain the physical EAD card, providing evidence like Form I-94 or asylum approval letters. In contrast, categories requiring USCIS approval, like parolees under (c)(11), demand demonstration of eligibility through supporting documents such as advance parole approval notices. Refugees and asylees form a core eligible group. Refugees admitted under section 207 of the Immigration and Nationality Act qualify under category (a)(3), with employment authorization automatic upon admission, evidenced by Form I-94. Paroled refugees fall under (a)(4), while asylees granted under section 208 qualify under (a)(5), filing with their asylum approval letter or Form I-94. Those granted withholding of deportation or removal under (a)(10) must apply and provide an Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) order. Nonimmigrant students and exchange visitors are eligible in limited circumstances tied to practical training or hardship. F-1 students seeking (OPT) apply under (c)(3)(A) for pre-completion or (c)(3)(B) for post-completion, requiring completion of one and Form I-20 endorsement; STEM extensions under (c)(3)(C) allow up to 24 additional months with degree verification. Severe economic hardship permits off-campus work under (c)(3)(iii), supported by financial evidence. J-2 dependents of exchange visitors qualify under (c)(5) with Form DS-2019, ensuring work does not support the principal J-1. M-1 vocational students access post-completion OPT under (c)(6). Spouses and dependents of certain nonimmigrants or principals in employment-based petitions often qualify. Spouses of E-1, E-2, E-3, or L-1 holders receive incident-to-status authorization under (a)(17) or (a)(18), filing for the EAD with status documents. H-4 spouses of H-1B workers apply under (c)(26) with the principal's petition approval. Dependents of diplomatic or personnel, such as A-1/A-2 under (c)(1) or G-series under (c)(4), require Form I-566 endorsements. Compelling circumstances for principal beneficiaries of approved I-140 petitions enable work under (c)(35), with derivatives under (c)(36). Adjustment applicants and humanitarian categories provide broad eligibility. Those filing Form I-485 for lawful qualify under (c)(9), submitting the receipt notice; exceptions apply for asylees or refugees using their primary categories. (TPS) beneficiaries under (a)(12) or pending applicants with prima facie eligibility under (c)(19) file with Form I-821 evidence. (DACA) recipients apply under (c)(33), including economic necessity via Form I-765WS. VAWA self-petitioners under (c)(31) receive incident-to-status authorization post-approval. Parolees, including those under (c)(11), must exclude expedited removal cases. Additional categories cover legalization programs, family unity, and special circumstances. Lawful temporary residents under INA sections 245A or 210 qualify under (a)(2). K-1 fiancé(e)s under (a)(6) gain 90-day post-admission, non-renewable except for replacement. V nonimmigrants under (a)(15) and certain N-8/N-9 under (a)(7) have incident-to-status work rights. Applicants under deferred enforced departure (DED) use (a)(11), while those with final removal orders under (c)(18) require EOIR . The full enumeration, spanning over 40 subcategories, mandates selecting the precise code on Form I-765 to avoid denial.

Ineligible Categories

Certain non-citizens are ineligible to apply for an (EAD) via Form I-765 if their immigration status confers inherent or incident-to-status work authorization, or if they fall outside the specific statutory categories permitting employment authorization under 8 CFR 274a.12(a) and (c). Lawful permanent residents (LPRs), including conditional permanent residents, possess unrestricted without needing an EAD and thus cannot file Form I-765 for this purpose. Similarly, nonimmigrants authorized to work incident to their status—such as certain H-1B, L-1, or E dependent spouses—or those tied to a specific employer under 8 CFR 274a.12(b) do not require a separate EAD application. Tourists on B-1/B-2 visas and other short-term visitors lack eligibility for EADs, as their prohibits altogether. Unauthorized non-citizens without a pending qualifying application, such as for (after the 150-day waiting period) or adjustment of , are also ineligible, as is not available absent a specific categorical basis. Specific subcategory restrictions further bar certain applicants: those paroled under expedited removal proceedings per INA 235(b)(1)(A) or with a pending credible fear determination cannot qualify under category (c)(11) for parolees. Spouses of E-2 CNMI investors are ineligible under (c)(12) if the principal's derives from a Foreign Retiree . (TPS) beneficiaries under categories (c)(35) or (c)(36) with a or two or more misdemeanors are prohibited from EAD approval. K-1/K-2 fiancé(e) nonimmigrants cannot renew an initial 90-day EAD and must seek a new category if adjusting . These exclusions ensure EAD issuance aligns strictly with statutory criteria, preventing unauthorized work.

Application Process

Filing Form I-765

Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, must be completed by eligible noncitizens seeking an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). Applicants provide biographical data in Part 1, select an eligibility category (such as (c)(8) for asylum applicants or (c)(9) for adjustment of status pending applicants) in Part 2, and affirm eligibility under penalty of in Part 3, with originals or copies of supporting documents attached as specified in the form instructions. Incomplete or unsigned forms are rejected, and applicants must use the most current edition of the form, available for download from the USCIS website. Supporting evidence varies by category but generally includes two identical passport-style photographs (2x2 inches, unmounted, taken within 30 days of filing), a copy of the applicant's (such as a or ), and category-specific items like a receipt notice for a pending (asylum) or Form I-485 (adjustment of status). USCIS recommends using the optional checklist for initial evidence to ensure completeness, though submission of the checklist itself is not required. For certain categories, such as refugees or asylees, a copy of an approval letter or stamped with status suffices; failure to provide required results in a Request for Evidence (RFE) or denial. The filing fee, updated effective July 22, 2025, under the H.R. 1 Reconciliation Bill, is $520 for paper submissions and $470 for online filings in most categories, with no fee required for specific groups like initial asylum applicants (c)(8), (TPS) beneficiaries, or certain dependents. A separate $85 services fee may apply if required for the category, though many I-765 filings waive it; fee waivers via Form I-912 are available for qualifying applicants demonstrating financial need. Forms postmarked on or after August 21, 2025, without the correct fee are rejected. Payments must be made payable to "U.S. Department of " using , personal check, or ; credit cards are accepted online or via Form G-1450 for mail. Submissions occur online through a USCIS account at my.uscis.gov for faster processing and reduced fees, or by mail to USCIS lockbox facilities determined by eligibility category and concurrent filings (e.g., or Lockbox for most standalone applications). Concurrent filing with related forms like I-485 or I-539 is permitted and often required for categories such as (c)(9), with both sent to the address specified for the primary form. Include Form G-1145 for electronic notification of receipt if desired. appointments are scheduled only if USCIS deems photos inadequate or for identity verification in select cases, typically notified via Form I-797C. Applicants should retain copies of all documents and track status online after 30 days if no receipt notice arrives.

Processing Times and Interim EADs

Processing times for Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, vary by eligibility category, USCIS service center or field office, and case complexity, with the agency publishing estimates representing the time to complete 80% of cases. As of September 2025, median processing times range from approximately 1 to 3 months for categories like under (c)(3)(B), to 5 to 12 months or longer for adjustment of status-based applications under (c)(9), though applicants must consult the official USCIS tool for current figures specific to their category and location. Delays often stem from application volume, security checks, or requests for , and USCIS produces approved EAD cards within 2 weeks of , mailing them via USPS. To address renewal processing backlogs, USCIS implemented automatic extensions of employment authorization for eligible categories, initially up to 180 days and temporarily increased to 540 days via a final rule effective May 2022, further extended through April 2025 and reissued in 2024 for certain pending renewals filed on or after May 4, 2022. These extensions apply if the Form I-765 renewal is timely filed before the current EAD expires and remains pending, preventing lapses in work eligibility evidenced by the receipt notice (Form I-797C). Employers verify such extensions using SAVE or by retaining the USCIS webpage confirmation alongside Form I-9 documentation. Interim EADs, providing temporary authorization during delays, are not routinely available for all initial or renewal applications but are issued selectively for specific humanitarian categories facing prolonged waits. For instance, affirmative applicants under (c)(8) may receive interim benefits after a 150-day delay in decision-making, while credible fear screenings allow work authorization post-180 days of review. USCIS policy shifted in recent years, discontinuing local field office adjudication of interim I-765 requests, with central service centers or the National Benefits Center handling such cases only when delays exceed thresholds tied to mandatory reviews, such as beyond 90 days for complex adjudications. Applicants in eligible delayed categories may request interim relief via InfoPass appointments or case inquiries, though approvals remain discretionary and category-specific.

Terms of Authorization

Validity Periods and Automatic Extensions

The validity period of an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), Form I-766, is specified on the card and varies by the bearer's eligibility under 8 C.F.R. § 274a.12, typically ranging from one to five years depending on the underlying status or basis. For categories such as refugees (category A03), asylees (A05), and those granted withholding of removal (A12), initial and renewal EADs were historically limited to a maximum of two years, but U.S. Citizenship and Services (USCIS) policy updated on September 27, 2023, extended the maximum validity to five years for these and similar categories to reduce administrative burdens and renewal frequency. In contrast, EADs for spouses of certain nonimmigrants, such as H-4 (C26), E (A17), and L-2 (A18) dependents, generally align with the expiration date on and do not exceed two years. (OPT) under F-1 student status (C03/C36) authorizes 12 months initially, with a 24-month extension possible for fields, tied to program completion and approval terms. (TPS) EADs (A12 or C19) match the designated TPS period, which can extend up to 18 months per extension but requires re-registration. To mitigate employment gaps during renewal processing delays, USCIS provides automatic extensions of employment authorization for eligible categories when Form I-765 is timely filed before the EAD expires. As of December 10, 2024, this extension is permanent and covers up to 540 days from the EAD's "Card Expires" date for renewal applicants in categories (c)(1) through (c)(36), excluding certain ones like initial or commuter applicants; evidence includes the expired EAD bearing the eligible category code and the Form I-797C receipt notice indicating timely filing. This replaced prior temporary measures, including a 180-day extension and a 2022-2024 expansion to 540 days amid backlogs, aiming to stabilize without requiring interim cards for most cases. For beneficiaries, automatic EAD extensions are limited to one year or the designation duration (whichever is shorter) and may be announced via or individual notice, separate from the general renewal process. Employers verify extended authorization via or by cross-referencing the receipt notice with USCIS guidance, as the physical EAD alone shows only the original expiration. The extension terminates upon USCIS of the renewal or expiration of the 540-day period, whichever occurs first.

Renewal Requirements

To renew an Employment Authorization Document (EAD), applicants must submit Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, under the same eligibility category as their current EAD, selecting the renewal option in Part 1, Item 1.c. Continued eligibility for the specific category, such as (c)(8) for pending applicants or (c)(9) for adjustment of status applicants, is required, and applicants must provide evidence demonstrating ongoing qualification. Renewal is not automatic and depends on USCIS approval, with denials possible if eligibility lapses or if fraud is detected. Applications should be filed no more than 180 days before the current EAD's expiration date but before the employment authorization expires, to qualify for potential automatic extensions during . USCIS recommends submitting at least 90 to 180 days in advance to mitigate delays, which can exceed several months depending on and workload. For categories like (c)(35) under compelling circumstances, renewals must include proof of an approved petition and either visa unavailability per the Visa Bulletin or ongoing compelling factors. Required supporting evidence includes:
  • A copy of the front and back of the expiring EAD.
  • Two identical passport-style color photographs (2 by 2 inches).
  • Category-specific documents, such as a copy of , receipt notices for underlying applications (e.g., ), or approval letters confirming continued status.
The filing fee for EAD renewals is $275 as of 2025, payable by check, , or /; certain categories like initial asylum-based EADs may be fee-exempt, but renewals generally require payment unless specified otherwise. Forms postmarked on or after August 21, 2025, without the correct fee will be rejected. may be required for some renewals, with USCIS notifying applicants if needed.

Verification and Restrictions

Use in Employment Verification

The Employment Authorization Document (EAD), designated as Form I-766, functions as a List A document under the , Employment Eligibility , thereby confirming both the holder's identity and employment authorization without requiring supplementary documents. Employers must physically examine the original EAD presented by the employee within three business days of hire to verify its authenticity, including checking for expiration and signs of tampering or alteration, before recording relevant details in Section 2 of . The employer notes the document title, issuing authority (U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services), card number, and expiration date on the form, retaining copies if using or as per internal policies, while the employee retains the original. For employers enrolled in E-Verify, an internet-based system operated by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the EAD's details from the completed Form I-9 are submitted electronically to cross-check against federal records for confirmation of work eligibility, typically providing results within seconds or up to three business days for further action cases. E-Verify participation, while voluntary in most states as of 2025, is mandatory for federal contractors and required in certain states like Arizona and Georgia, enhancing verification beyond physical inspection by flagging potential mismatches such as expired authorizations. In cases of EAD expiration during employment, employers must reverify authorization using Supplement B of Form I-9, requiring the employee to present an unexpired EAD or other valid document before the previous authorization lapses to avoid unlawful employment. Certain EAD variants, such as combination cards with Advance Parole (Form I-512L), are acceptable for I-9 purposes but must bear a valid employment authorization notation; employers should not accept EADs restricted to specific employers or conditions unless matching the offered position. Failure to properly verify an EAD can result in civil fines ranging from $272 to $27,018 per unauthorized worker as of fiscal year 2025 adjustments, underscoring the legal obligation for diligent review despite the document's embedded security features like holograms and microprinting designed to deter counterfeiting.

Prohibitions and Limitations

The Employment Authorization Document (EAD) authorizes eligible noncitizens to engage in in the United States only under the specific terms outlined in the authorizing regulations and on the document itself, with any deviations constituting unauthorized prohibited under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). Working prior to EAD approval, after its expiration date (absent automatic extensions), or outside the scope of the designated category renders the unlawful, subjecting both the worker and employer to civil fines ranging from $375 to $16,000 per unauthorized individual (adjusted for inflation as of 2025) and potential criminal penalties including up to six months for patterns of violations. Category-specific limitations further restrict access and use. For instance, applicants under category (c)(8) must wait 150 days after filing Form I-589 before eligibility for an EAD begins, with USCIS adding another 30 days before issuance, and applicant-caused delays reset the clock per 8 CFR 208.7. Similarly, initial or renewal applications filed prematurely—more than 180 days before expiration or before meeting category wait periods—result in automatic rejection without refund. Certain derivative beneficiaries, such as those under T or U nonimmigrant statuses, face additional hurdles requiring separate Form I-765 filings despite underlying status-based work authorization. Fraudulent use or alteration of an EAD is strictly prohibited and classified as a under INA section 274C, punishable by fines up to $250,000 and imprisonment for up to five years for first offenses, with repeat violations escalating penalties. EADs do not override federal, state, or local laws barring noncitizens from specific occupations, such as certain roles requiring U.S. or clearances. Moreover, while most EAD categories permit unrestricted by location or employer type, any conditions noted on the document—such as for under F-1 status—must be adhered to, with non-compliance risking revocation and removal proceedings. is generally allowable but must comply with all tax and business licensing requirements, as failure to do so does not alter the underlying employment authorization but invites separate enforcement.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Reforms

The authority for issuing employment authorization to certain noncitizen classes in the United States traces to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952, which codified the discretion to permit work for aliens in specific statuses, such as those paroled into the country or applying for adjustment of status under section 245. Prior to widespread standardization, approvals were typically documented via endorsement stamps in passports, approval notices, or temporary letters rather than a dedicated card, reflecting the absence of mandatory employer verification and the focus on permissions for refugees, asylees, and certain family members. This system stemmed from causal incentives in , where work restrictions aimed to prevent public charge burdens while allowing economic contributions from vetted entrants, though enforcement was limited without private-sector mandates. The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 marked the pivotal early reform, amending the INA via section 274A to impose civil and criminal penalties on employers for knowingly hiring unauthorized workers, thereby necessitating verifiable proof of eligibility through Form I-9. Signed into law on November 6, 1986, IRCA expanded issuance of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) to encompass broader categories, including amnesty applicants under sections 201 and 202, who received temporary work permits during legalization processing—over 1.3 million such documents were issued by 1989. The reform introduced Form I-766 as the standardized EAD card in 1987, phasing out less secure paper alternatives to facilitate compliance, with initial designs featuring basic security features like holograms absent in prior formats. This shift was driven by of unauthorized employment's scale—estimated at millions—affecting wage suppression in low-skill sectors, though implementation revealed gaps in document fraud prevention. Subsequent minor adjustments in the late and early refined eligibility, such as extending EAD validity for adjustment applicants from one to two years under regulations, responding to processing backlogs that averaged 6-12 months. These changes prioritized causal deterrence of illegal labor markets over expansive access, yet sources from the era, including congressional reports, note INS's under-resourced verification leading to early abuses, underscoring the reform's incomplete initial efficacy without biometric or electronic checks.

Major Regulatory Changes

The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 fundamentally established the modern framework for employment authorization in the United States by prohibiting the hiring of unauthorized aliens and requiring employers to verify work eligibility through , thereby necessitating documentary proof such as the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) for eligible noncitizens. Prior to IRCA, no centralized system existed for issuing work permits to most nonimmigrants, leading to ad hoc authorizations; the law's implementation on November 6, 1986, introduced for EAD applications and tied eligibility to specific immigration categories under 8 CFR § 274a.12. In 2015, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) expanded EAD eligibility through a final rule effective February 25, 2015, allowing certain H-4 dependent spouses of H-1B nonimmigrants—specifically those with approved I-140 petitions or extended H-1B status beyond six years—to apply for employment authorization via Form I-765. This change, effective for applications filed on or after May 26, 2015, aimed to support families pursuing amid backlogs, potentially affecting up to 179,000 spouses annually, though critics argued it exceeded statutory authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Trump administration proposed rescinding this rule in 2018 to prioritize U.S. workers, but the effort was withdrawn in January 2021 without implementation. Regulatory adjustments under the administration in sought to restrict asylum-based EADs by amending 8 CFR § 208.7 to extend the waiting period for filing Form I-765 from 150 days to 365 days after an asylum application's filing date, eliminate exceptions for applicant-caused delays in the 180-day "EAD clock," and impose two-year bars on future EADs for multiple denials or failures to appear. Known as the "Broader Asylum EAD Rule," it took effect , , but faced legal challenges alleging arbitrary policymaking; a federal court vacated it in February 2022, prompting DHS to restore pre- eligibility via a September 2022 final rule, reinstating the 150-day filing threshold and 180-day clock with standard delay tolerances. To address processing backlogs exacerbated by the , USCIS implemented automatic EAD extensions, initially up to 180 days under a 2017 rule, extended to 240 days in 2022, and further to 540 days via a temporary final rule on April 8, 2024, for timely renewal filers in specified categories like holders and adjustment applicants. This was made permanent in a December 13, 2024, final rule, applying retroactively to eligible pending renewals and aiming to prevent employment gaps amid median processing times exceeding 12 months for some categories in 2022. Concurrently, a September 27, 2023, policy update increased maximum EAD validity periods to five years for initial and renewal issuances in categories such as refugees, asylees, and beneficiaries, up from two years, to reduce renewal volume and administrative burden. These measures prioritized over eligibility expansions, reflecting causal links between backlog surges—partly from increased filings—and lapses in employment continuity.

Controversies and Impacts

Fraud, Abuse, and Enforcement Failures

The issuance of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) has been susceptible to various forms of , including fraudulent applications, sham marriages, and counterfeit documents, which enable unauthorized individuals to obtain work authorization. For instance, in Operation Twin Shield conducted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) in 2025, immigration officers identified suspected in 275 cases in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area alone, involving schemes such as marriage and fabricated death certificates that facilitated improper EAD approvals. Similarly, a national was sentenced to 27 months in prison in October 2025 for filing dozens of false claims between 2007 and 2018, profiting from services that led to fraudulent EADs for clients. -based EADs under category (c)(8) are particularly vulnerable, as undetected fraudulent claims allow applicants to work legally while their merits cases pend, with historical data showing multiple identities linked to 1,360 such EAD recipients in USCIS records analyzed by the Department of Homeland Security Office of (OIG). Abuse extends to employment practices, where counterfeit EADs are used to bypass verification systems like , particularly in sectors such as hiring. Government Accountability Office (GAO) investigations have documented employment-related , where individuals use stolen or fabricated identities to secure jobs, undermining the EAD's role in ensuring lawful status; one analysis estimated that fraudulent documents facilitate unauthorized employment despite presentation of seemingly valid EADs. In a 2022 GAO report, USCIS's Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS) directorate was found deficient in staffing models and lacking routine fraud risk assessments, contributing to undetected abuses in benefit adjudications including EADs. These issues persist amid high application volumes, with counterfeit EADs and supporting documents like fake Form I-9s evading detection due to inadequate cross-agency on identity mismatches. Enforcement failures stem from systemic gaps in USCIS oversight and , as highlighted in multiple GAO audits revealing weaknesses in worksite and document fraud prevention since the early 2000s. For example, a 2005 GAO report noted that employer reliance on visual document checks allows fraudulent EADs to proliferate, with limited federal site visits failing to deter violations; this was echoed in later findings that USCIS lacks a comprehensive antifraud strategy, leading to inconsistent detection of high-risk applications. The DHS OIG has criticized insufficient vetting of civil surgeons involved in medical exams tied to EAD eligibility, potentially exposing the system to abuse by uncredentialed or fraudulent providers. Despite USCIS efforts to impose consequences for falsified information as of August 2025, backlogs and prioritization of processing speed over scrutiny have enabled fraud rings to operate, as seen in a Chester County case where a woman allegedly filed fraudulent asylum applications leading to EADs from 2021 to 2024. Overall, these lapses have eroded the EAD's integrity, allowing unauthorized workers to compete in labor markets while legitimate applicants face delays.

Economic Effects on Labor Markets

The issuance of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) expands the pool of legally employable workers in the United States, particularly among non-citizens such as asylum applicants, (TPS) beneficiaries, and (DACA) recipients, thereby augmenting labor supply in sectors where these groups predominate, including , , , and low-skilled services. In fiscal year 2023, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received over 654,000 Form I-765 applications for adjustment-of-status-based EADs alone, amid a broader surge in filings exceeding 10.9 million total immigration-related cases, reflecting heightened issuance rates that integrate hundreds of thousands annually into the formal workforce. This influx, driven by policies enabling work authorization after 150 days for asylum seekers and immediate eligibility for certain parolees, has contributed to recent labor force growth estimated at 100,000 additional workers per month in 2023-2024, primarily bolstering aggregate employment but concentrating in low-wage occupations. Empirical analyses indicate that EAD-enabled immigration exerts downward pressure on wages and employment opportunities for competing native-born workers, especially those without high school diplomas, due to the substitutability between low-skilled immigrant labor and native labor in entry-level roles. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine's comprehensive review found that a 10 increase in the immigrant share of the labor force correlates with wage reductions of 1-6% for prior immigrants and low-skilled natives, with effects varying by methodology but consistently negative for the least-educated U.S. workers over the long term. Economist George Borjas, employing national-level skill-group analyses, estimates larger impacts, with immigration reducing native wages by approximately 3-5% for every 10% rise in low-skilled immigrant supply, as natives and new entrants vie for similar jobs without sufficient demand elasticity to offset displacement. These findings align with causal models emphasizing labor supply shocks, where EAD issuance formalizes previously informal or sidelined workers, intensifying competition in localized markets rather than spurring proportional job creation for natives. Program-specific evidence reinforces these patterns. DACA, which provides EADs to eligible undocumented youth, boosted recipients' employment by 8-15% and wages by up to 20% through enhanced mobility and investment, yet studies detect no offsetting gains for native teens and modest in low-skill sectors. Similarly, expansions have elevated earnings for beneficiaries by 10-20% among men via formal job access, but aggregate data suggest spillover costs to native low-wage workers through heightened supply in and services, where foreign-born participation rose amid stagnant native employment gains. Asylum seeker work authorizations, surging post-2021 with over 1 million approvals tied to border encounters, have sustained labor shortages' resolution in manual trades but correlated with subdued wage growth—real median wages for non-college natives increased only 1.2% annually from 2022-2024 despite low —attributable in part to this added supply. While proponents cite complementary effects—such as immigrants filling vacancies and enabling native —these are empirically weaker for low-skilled EAD cohorts, who often cluster in non-complementary roles, yielding net neutral-to-negative outcomes for native rates among dropouts (down 2-4% in high-immigration metros). Recent surges, including parole programs granting EADs to hundreds of thousands from and , have masked underlying native pressures by inflating participation rates, with adjusted estimates indicating the official 4.1% rate in late 2024 understates native challenges by 0.1-0.2 points when accounting for untracked entrants. Overall, EAD policies amplify labor , benefiting recipients' integration while imposing localized costs on vulnerable natives, consistent with supply-driven equilibrium shifts absent targeted skill complementarity.

References

  1. [1]
    Employment Authorization - USCIS
    Sep 6, 2023 · An Employment Authorization Document (EAD) proves non-citizens/permanent residents can work in the U.S. Types include initial, renewal, and ...
  2. [2]
    Employment Authorization Document - USCIS
    Apr 8, 2025 · An Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766/EAD) is one way to prove that you are authorized to work in the United States for a specific time period.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Form I-765, Instructions for Application for Employment Authorization
    Form I-765 is used by certain foreign nationals in the U.S. to request employment authorization and an Employment Authorization Document (EAD).
  4. [4]
    I-765, Application for Employment Authorization - USCIS
    Sep 24, 2025 · Certain aliens who are in the United States may file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization, to request employment ...Employment Authorization · Direct Filing Addresses · Checklist of Required Initial...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    13.0 Acceptable Documents for Verifying Employment Authorization ...
    Jul 15, 2025 · This section provides many samples of documents from the Form I-9 Lists of Acceptable Documents that an employee might present to establish their employment ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Employment Authorization - USCIS
    In order to be legally employed in the United States, employees are required to present documentation to an employer to show evidence of their authorization to ...
  7. [7]
    Form I-9 Acceptable Documents - USCIS
    Jul 15, 2025 · To reduce the risk of fraud and counterfeiting, USCIS redesigns the Employment Authorization Document (EAD) card every three to five years.Examining Documents · Receipts · Combination Documents · Completing Form I-9<|separator|>
  8. [8]
    8 CFR Part 274a -- Control of Employment of Aliens - eCFR
    2 Verification of identity and employment authorization. (a) General. This section establishes requirements and procedures for compliance by persons or entities ...Title 8 · 8 CFR 274a.13 · 8 CFR 274a.14 · Section 274a.2 of
  9. [9]
    8 CFR § 274a.12 - Classes of aliens authorized to accept employment.
    Evidence of employment authorization shall be granted in increments not exceeding 5 years for the period of time the alien remains in that status. (6) An alien ...
  10. [10]
    8 CFR 274a.13 -- Application for employment authorization. - eCFR
    (a) Application. An alien requesting employment authorization or an Employment Authorization Document (Form I-766), or both, may be required to apply on a ...Missing: INA | Show results with:INA
  11. [11]
    13.1 List A Documents That Establish Identity and Employment ...
    1. US Passport or US Passport Card 2. Permanent Resident Card or Alien Registration Receipt Card (Form I-551) 3. Foreign passport that contains a temporary I- ...
  12. [12]
    Chapter 2 - Eligibility Requirements - USCIS
    [^ 5] See 8 CFR 274a.12(a). Employment authorization under this category may not necessarily be associated with an immigration status. For example, aliens who ...
  13. [13]
    Checklist of Required Initial Evidence for Form I-765 (for ... - USCIS
    May 15, 2025 · It is an optional tool to use as you prepare your form, but does not replace statutory, regulatory, and form instruction requirements.
  14. [14]
    USCIS Updates Fees Based on H.R. 1
    Jul 18, 2025 · The new fees in this FRN are: A new fee of $100 for aliens who file Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal.
  15. [15]
    Tips for Filing Forms by Mail - USCIS
    Apr 24, 2025 · You may download and print forms for free from the All Forms page. Please be sure to carefully read and follow the form filing instructions.
  16. [16]
  17. [17]
    Filing Form I-765 with Other Forms - USCIS
    Apr 1, 2024 · You can file Form I-765, Application for Employment Authorization with other forms. This is called concurrent filing.
  18. [18]
    Processing Times - Case Status Online - USCIS
    Alert. USCIS processing times for certain form types may no longer reference a specific service center location (for example, Vermont Service Center). We are in ...I-765 InformationHistorical averages
  19. [19]
    Form I-765: Application For EAD - 2025 Guide - Manifest Law
    Aug 18, 2025 · Processing times in 2025 range from 3 months to over 12+ months for certain adjustment of status cases. Check the USCIS Processing Times tool ...
  20. [20]
    Automatic Employment Authorization Document (EAD) Extension
    Aug 1, 2025 · Your Form I-765 application is for eligibility category (a)(12) or (c)(19); and. The category on your current EAD is A12 or C19. The categories ...
  21. [21]
    Temporary Final Rule to Increase Employment Authorization and/or ...
    Apr 8, 2024 · The temporary increase of employment authorization and/or EADs to up to 540 days also applies to eligible applicants who timely file a Form I- ...
  22. [22]
    5.1 Automatic Extensions Based on a Timely Filed Application to ...
    The eligibility categories are published on the USCIS Automatic EAD Extension page. Some category codes on the EAD may include the letter 'P' such as C09P.
  23. [23]
    Temporary Rule Increasing Automatic Extension Period of ... - USCIS
    Apr 10, 2024 · SAVE will generally verify employment authorization as part of initial verification, including automatically extended EAD validity periods.
  24. [24]
    USCIS Changes Interim Employment Authorization Policy - NAFSA
    This USCIS memo provides that local USCIS offices will no longer accept and adjudicate Form I-765 for an Interim EAD. The Service Centers or NBC will be ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] USCIS Response to Citizenship and Immigration Services ...
    Interim cards will only be issued when adjudication of an application is delayed beyond 90 days due to the required reviews leading to a final decision that ...
  26. [26]
    Interim Employment Authorization Document - Anwari Law
    An interim EAD request should be made by scheduling an appointment at a local office through USCIS's InfoPass system.
  27. [27]
    USCIS Increases Employment Authorization Document Validity ...
    Sep 27, 2023 · We are also increasing the maximum validity period to 5 years for initial and renewal EADs for certain aliens who must apply for employment ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Policy Alert - USCIS
    Sep 27, 2023 · Currently, USCIS policy guidance provides for a maximum 2-year validity period for EADs issued to asylees and refugees, noncitizens granted ...
  29. [29]
    Chapter 2 - Employment Authorization for Certain H-4, E, and L ...
    As of November 12, 2021, USCIS considers certain E-1, E-2, E-3 and L-2 nonimmigrant dependent spouses employment authorized incident to status.
  30. [30]
    DHS Announces Permanent Increase of the Automatic Extension ...
    Dec 10, 2024 · The automatic extension period of employment authorization and employment authorization documentation from up to 180 days to up to 540 days for eligible ...
  31. [31]
    USCIS Increases Automatic Extension of Certain Employment ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · Extending EAD validity period for certain categories from 2 years to 5 years, Streamlining the process for refugee EADs, and. Expanding online ...
  32. [32]
    5.3 Automatic EAD Extensions for Temporary Protected Status (TPS ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · DHS may extend the expiration date of a TPS beneficiary's EAD either by Federal Register notice or an individual notice mailed to the beneficiary.
  33. [33]
    5.0 Automatic Extensions of Employment Authorization and ... - USCIS
    Eligible employees with EADs that contain certain category codes are generally eligible for an automatic extension of their employment authorization and/or EADs ...
  34. [34]
    Employment Authorization Document (EAD) Automatic Extension ...
    The extension ends when the noncitizen receives a final decision on their renewal application or when the 540-day period expires. To help employers calculate ...
  35. [35]
    USCIS Immigration Fees Required by HR-1 Reconciliation Bill
    Jul 22, 2025 · The initial asylum fee amount is set at $100 for FY 2025. Id. Because Sec. 100002 imposes this asylum application fee “at the time such ...
  36. [36]
    4.0 Completing Section 2: Employer Review and Verification - USCIS
    Jul 15, 2025 · For more information on what the employee must present along with their EAD to complete Form I-9, please see Section 5. Section 5 Automatic ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Instructions for Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification - USCIS
    Jan 20, 2025 · The form is used to document verification of the identity and employment authorization of each new employee (both U.S. citizen and alien) hired ...
  38. [38]
    Verification Process | E-Verify
    Sep 15, 2022 · The E-Verify process begins with a completed Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification. Next, E-Verify participants create a case in E-Verify.
  39. [39]
    Verify Employment Eligibility (E-Verify) - Homeland Security
    Oct 5, 2022 · E-Verify is a web-based system that allows enrolled employers to confirm the eligibility of their employees to work in the United States.
  40. [40]
    6.1 Reverifying Employment Authorization for Current Employees
    Reverify employment authorization by the expiration date with a List A or C document, using Supplement B attached to the original Form I-9. Some employees are ...
  41. [41]
    8 CFR 274a.12 -- Classes of aliens authorized to accept employment.
    The following classes of aliens are authorized to be employed in the United States without restrictions as to location or type of employment.Missing: prohibitions | Show results with:prohibitions
  42. [42]
    [PDF] g:\comp\ina\immigration and nationality act.xml - GovInfo
    ... Employment authorization for battered spouses of certain non- immigrants.5. TITLE II—IMMIGRATION. CHAPTER 1—SELECTION SYSTEM. Sec. 201. Worldwide level of ...
  43. [43]
    Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 - Office of the Historian
    The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 upheld the national origins quota system established by the Immigration Act of 1924.
  44. [44]
    Chapter 1 - Purpose and Background - USCIS
    B. Background. In 1986, Congress enacted the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) in an effort to deter illegal immigration to the United States. One of ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] E-Verify Brief History and Overview - Bipartisan Policy Center
    The electronic employment verification system we have today originated as an attempt to strengthen this process during the mid-1990s as part of the Illegal ...
  46. [46]
    IRCA in Retrospect: Guideposts for Today's Immigration Reform
    The U.S. government has allocated nearly $187 billion for immigration enforcement since 1986, when Congress enacted the Immigration Reform and Control Act.
  47. [47]
    Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 - EEOC
    "(2) INDIVIDUAL ATTESTATION OF EMPLOYMENT AUTHORIZATION. -- The individual must attest, under penalty of perjury on the form designated or established for ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Verification of Identity & Employment Authorization
    IRCA requires that newly hired employees complete and sign the employee's portion of Federal Form I-9 and present appropriate, original documentation supporting ...
  49. [49]
    Employment Authorization for Certain H-4 Dependent Spouses
    Feb 25, 2015 · DHS confirms that under this rule, H-4 dependent spouses with pending adjustment of status applications are still eligible for employment ...i. H-4 Dependent Spouses of... · v. H-4 Minors · Possible Restrictions on EADs...
  50. [50]
    Employment Authorization for Certain H-4 Dependent Spouses Final ...
    May 26, 2015 · Certain H-4 dependent spouses may now apply for employment authorization under the H-4 rule. On February 24, 2015, USCIS announced that ...
  51. [51]
    DHS Withdraws Proposed Rule to Rescind H-4 Work Authorization ...
    Jan 25, 2021 · The rule was intended to allow families who were pursuing green card status—which can take years to obtain—to secure a second source of income ...
  52. [52]
    Asylum Application, and Employment Authorization for Applicants
    Sep 22, 2022 · The Broader Asylum EAD rule made a number of changes to DHS's regulations governing asylum applications, interviews, and eligibility for ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] All About Employment Authorization Documents FAQs for Legal ...
    ... EAD application? The I-765 instructions define “initial EAD” as an EAD issued to an eligible applicant for the first time under a specific eligibility category.<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Increase of the Automatic Extension Period of Employment ...
    Dec 13, 2024 · SUMMARY: This final rule amends DHS regulations to permanently increase the automatic extension period for expiring employment authorization ...
  55. [55]
    USCIS Announces Results of Operation Twin Shield, a Large-Scale ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · 19 to 28 —immigration officers discovered suspected fraud in 275 cases in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area. The effort focused on site visits and ...
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Individuals with Multiple Identities in Historical Fingerprint ... - DHS OIG
    Sep 25, 2017 · Our analysis of USCIS data showed that 1,360 HFE I aliens received an EAD. According to USCIS, because receiving an EAD is always tied to ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  58. [58]
    Employment-Related Identity Fraud: Improved Collaboration and ...
    May 6, 2020 · Employment-related identity fraud occurs when people use a name or Social Security number (SSN) other than their own to get a job.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] GAO-22-105328, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
    Sep 19, 2022 · USCIS's FDNS staffing model is inaccurate, lacks regular fraud risk assessments, and lacks an antifraud strategy. GAO recommends improving ...
  60. [60]
    GAO-05-813, Immigration Enforcement: Weaknesses Hinder ...
    This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-05-813 entitled 'Immigration Enforcement: Weaknesses Hinder Employment Verification and Worksite ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] GAO-05-813 Highlights, IMMIGRATION ENFORCEMENT
    The current employment verification process is based on employers' review of documents presented by new employees to prove their identity and work.
  62. [62]
    Chester County Woman Indicted for Allegedly Running Years-Long ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · As alleged, from at least December 2021 to July 2024, DeMaria prepared, and caused to be prepared, fraudulent Form I-589 asylum applications in ...
  63. [63]
    USCIS to Enforce Consequences for Aliens Who Falsify Information
    Aug 20, 2025 · Aliens who use false information or deceitful practices to unfairly obtain immigration advantages will face serious consequences. We are ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Immigration and Citizenship Data | USCIS
    This report contains number of pending I-765 petitions by number of days pending, for all EAD categories, as well as for the (c)(8) category for pending asylum ...Reports and Studies · Eligible to Naturalize Dashboard · Understanding Our DataMissing: fraud | Show results with:fraud
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Number of Service-wide Forms Fiscal Year To Date - USCIS
    Sep 30, 2023 · Application for Employment Authorization (Adjustment Of Status). 184,757. 154,767. 25,693. 180,460. 277,677. 5.5. 654,499. 550,988. 185,648.
  66. [66]
    Completing an Unprecedented 10 Million Immigration Cases in ...
    Feb 9, 2024 · In FY 2023, USCIS received 10.9 million filings and completed more than 10 million pending cases– both record-breaking numbers in the agency's history.
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Quantifying the Recent Immigration Surge: Evidence from Work ...
    Edelberg and Watson estimated that immigration raised monthly trend employment growth by about 100,000 persons in both 2023 and 2024, causing monthly trend ...
  68. [68]
    5 Employment and Wage Impacts of Immigration: Empirical Evidence
    The authors found a small negative effect on the wages of low-skilled natives and no wage effect in more-skilled labor markets. A variable quantifying ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Reexamining the Impact of Immigration on the Labor Market
    Immigration is not evenly balanced across groups of workers who have the same education but differ in their work experience, and the nature of the supply.
  70. [70]
    Schooling and Labor Market Effects of Temporary Authorization - NIH
    This paper explores the labor market and schooling effects of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative.Missing: EAD | Show results with:EAD
  71. [71]
    The Impact of Temporary Protected Status on Immigrants' Labor ...
    Our results suggest that TPS eligibility leads to higher employment rates among women and higher earnings among men.
  72. [72]
    Work permit applications suggest prior immigration is still pushing ...
    Mar 13, 2025 · Asylum seekers may apply for work authorization before officially receiving asylum, but they must demonstrate that their application for asylum ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Foreign-Born Workers: Labor Force Characteristics - 2024
    May 20, 2025 · From 2023 to 2024, the unemployment rate of the foreign born increased to 4.2 percent. For the native born, the jobless rate increased to 4.0 ...
  74. [74]
    The Recent Surge in Immigration and Its Impact on Unemployment
    Jan 3, 2025 · The official unemployment rate in October 2024 was 4.14%. Factoring in the missing recent immigrants would raise this rate by a modest 0.10 ...Missing: EAD 2023
  75. [75]
    [PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES IMMIGRATION'S EFFECT ON US ...
    These studies considered immigration as a change to the national supply of a set of labor market skills and examined the effect on natives' wages in the long ...