Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Full Rate

Full Rate (FR), also designated as GSM 06.10, is a digital speech coding standard developed by the for the , the first widely deployed second-generation cellular network launched in 1991. It serves as the foundational for full-rate channels (TCH/F), compressing 20-millisecond frames of speech—consisting of 160 samples at an 8 kHz sampling rate in 13-bit uniform —into 260 bits at an average of 13 kbit/s, enabling efficient transmission while preserving intelligible speech suitable for mobile communications over limited bandwidth. The encoding process relies on Regular Pulse Excitation with Long Term Prediction (RPE-LTP), a technique that models the human vocal tract to predict and quantize speech signals, dividing each frame into four 5-millisecond subframes for parameter extraction including reflection coefficients, pitch lag, and excitation pulses. This standard, specified in ETSI's EN 300 961, includes both encoder and decoder functions with a theoretical minimum delay of 20 milliseconds, though practical implementations may add 3 to 8 milliseconds for processing, resulting in a total delay of 23 to 28 milliseconds, and incorporates features like codec homing sequences for bit-exact testing and with A-law or μ-law compressed inputs via the A-interface. As the initial for , Full Rate prioritized network capacity and , achieving a balance between quality and efficiency suitable for early mobile environments, though its speech intelligibility was later critiqued for artifacts in noisy conditions. It laid the groundwork for subsequent enhancements, such as the Enhanced Full Rate (EFR) codec introduced in 1995, which improved perceptual quality using (ACELP) at the same , and the Half Rate codec at 5.6 kbit/s for doubled at reduced fidelity. Despite the evolution to more advanced standards like (AMR) in third-generation networks, Full Rate remains relevant in legacy systems and certain embedded applications, with open-source implementations like libgsm facilitating its use in and archival audio processing.

History and Development

Origins in GSM Standardization

The was established in 1982 by the Conference of European Posts and Telecommunications administrations (CEPT) to develop a pan-European standard for digital mobile communications, driven by the need for a unified digital system to replace fragmented analog networks and facilitate cross-border in . This initiative addressed the inefficiencies of existing national systems, aiming for interoperability and efficient spectrum use in second-generation () cellular technology. The speech codec selection process, conducted under CEPT auspices from 1987 to 1988 and later overseen by the (ETSI), involved evaluating multiple candidate algorithms to meet stringent requirements for speech quality, computational complexity, and robustness over noisy mobile channels. Six primary codec proposals were shortlisted for detailed testing in 1986, including submissions from (Regular Pulse Excitation-Linear Predictive Coding, or RPE-LPC), (Multi-Pulse Excitation-Long Term Prediction, or MPE-LTP), and representatives from , , , and the (sub-band coders). The RPE-LTP technique, a hybrid approach combining regular pulse excitation for the residual signal with long-term prediction to model pitch periodicity, was selected as the winner in 1988 for its optimal trade-off between natural-sounding speech reproduction and low processing demands suitable for early digital mobile hardware. Standardization efforts culminated in the publication of specification GSM 06.10 in 1990, which formally defined the Full Rate codec—based on the selected RPE-LTP method—as the foundational standard for Phase 1 deployment in networks. This document outlined the codec's integration into the GSM air interface, ensuring compatibility across European operators. Significant contributions to the codec's development came from industrial research at companies like Research Laboratories in , which advanced low-complexity analysis-by-synthesis techniques, alongside academic expertise from institutions such as the Technical University of Delft. These efforts focused on refining excitation models and prediction algorithms to achieve viable performance on single-chip processors.

Adoption and Timeline

The first commercial GSM networks launched in 1991 in with the Radiolinja service operated by and Mobira, marking the initial deployment of the Full Rate speech as the default standard for voice transmission. This was followed by the rollout in in July 1992, where initiated its network using the same . The Full Rate enabled efficient use of the 200 kHz carrier bandwidth through (TDMA), supporting up to eight simultaneous voice channels per carrier, which facilitated scalable network capacity in these early deployments. By the mid-1990s, subscriber numbers had surged past 10 million globally, with Full Rate serving as the foundational integral to the technology's rapid expansion. This growth propelled to dominate the market, achieving approximately 80% global by 2000 and underpinning the connection of hundreds of millions of users worldwide. The introduction of the Enhanced Full Rate (EFR) codec in 1995 by improved speech quality while maintaining compatibility with existing Full Rate infrastructure, beginning a gradual shift away from the original standard. This was further accelerated by the Adaptive Multi-Rate () codec's standardization in 1999 through and , which offered adaptive bit rates for better error resilience and efficiency, leading to Full Rate's replacement in most networks during the . By the , Full Rate usage had declined to legacy support primarily in developing regions where infrastructure persisted due to slower migration to higher generations. As of 2025, Full Rate sees minimal active deployment amid widespread , , and migrations, though it remains in some applications and legacy systems reliant on for low-bandwidth connectivity. In the UK, operators like plan to restrict services to and emergency use starting in October 2026, with full national shutdowns targeted by 2033, signaling the codec's ongoing phase-out.

Technical Overview

Core Principles

The Full Rate (FR) speech codec, standardized for the (GSM), employs a coding approach that integrates (LPC) for short-term spectral modeling with long-term prediction (LTP) to capture the periodic components of speech signals. LPC analyzes the speech frame to derive filter coefficients that predict short-term correlations, effectively representing the spectral envelope, while LTP refines this by searching for the optimal pitch lag and quantizing the long-term prediction gain to capture periodicity in voiced speech. This combination allows the codec to efficiently model both the formant structure and pitch of human speech, achieving compression without excessive distortion. At the core of the mechanism is Regular Pulse Excitation (RPE), which approximates the residual signal after LPC and LTP filtering by placing pulses on a fixed grid within sub-frames, rather than using an exhaustive search over all possible positions. This grid-based approximation significantly lowers while maintaining adequate representation of the signal's distribution, making it suitable for the resource-constrained environments of early networks. The RPE process involves downsampling the residual, selecting optimal grid positions and amplitudes, and quantizing them to form the codec's output parameters. Designed to meet the limitations of GSM's , the FR targets toll-quality speech reproduction at a of 13 kbit/s, balancing audio fidelity, low (under 30 algorithmic delay), and modest processing demands compatible with 1990s hardware. Input consists of 13-bit linear (PCM) samples at an 8 kHz sampling rate, processed in 20 frames of 160 samples, while the output comprises 260 bits per frame encoding the LPC, LTP, and RPE parameters for transmission and subsequent . This framework ensured robust performance over noisy channels, prioritizing perceptual quality for conversational use.

Key Parameters

The Full Rate operates at a gross of 13 kbit/s, producing 260 bits per 20 ms , which corresponds to 1.625 bits per audio sample given the 8 kHz sampling rate. This rate encompasses all encoded parameters prior to channel coding for . Speech consist of 160 samples over 20 ms, segmented into four subframes of 40 samples each to enable subframe-level processing of excitation and prediction parameters. This structure supports efficient analysis of speech dynamics within each 5 ms subframe. The employs an 8th-order analysis filter to model the short-term correlations in the speech signal, with reflection coefficients quantized using a total of bits per . Long-term prediction uses lags ranging from 40 to 120 samples (5 to 15 ms), encoded with 7 bits per subframe, along with prediction gains quantized to 2 bits per subframe, for totals of 28 bits and 8 bits, respectively, across the frame. Regular pulse excitation generates the component using 13 evenly spaced pulses within each 40-sample subframe, with positions selected via 2 bits per subframe (choosing among four possible alignments, total 8 bits across the ). The block amplitude is quantized logarithmically with 6 bits per subframe (total 24 bits), while the 13 pulse values are each represented using 3-bit adaptive after normalization, yielding 39 bits for the pulses per subframe (total 156 bits). The design prioritizes low latency, with end-to-end transcoder delay below 30 (theoretical minimum of 20 plus minimal processing overhead) and no look-ahead buffering required for frame encoding.

Encoding and Decoding Process

Linear Prediction Analysis

In the linear prediction analysis stage of the Full Rate codec, the input speech signal undergoes pre-emphasis using a high-pass filter to boost higher frequency components and compensate for the spectral tilt of the human vocal tract. The filter is defined by H_p(z) = 1 - \beta z^{-1}, where \beta \approx 0.93 (precisely $28180 \times 2^{-15}), applied to the 13-bit linear PCM samples at an 8 kHz sampling rate. This is followed by windowing the pre-emphasized 160-sample frame (corresponding to 20 ms of speech) with a Hamming window to minimize during autocorrelation computation, ensuring accurate estimation of the short-term spectral envelope. The short-term predictor is modeled as an 8th-order all-pole filter, where the coefficients are derived using the method on the windowed signal. The function r(k) is computed for lags k = 0 to $8 as r(k) = \sum_{n=k}^{159} s_w(n) s_w(n-k), where s_w(n) is the windowed pre-emphasized signal; this yields nine values for the 8th-order analysis. These values are then processed via the Levinson-Durbin (implemented as the Schur for ) to solve for the 8 reflection coefficients k_i (for i = 1 to $8), which lie in the range -1 < k_i < 1 and represent the prediction error feedback in a structure. The reflection coefficients are subsequently transformed into log-area ratios (LARs) using \text{LAR}_c(i) = \frac{1}{2} \ln \left( \frac{1 + k_i}{1 - k_i} \right) to provide a perceptually uniform parameterization suitable for quantization. Quantization of the LPC parameters occurs once per frame on the LARs using scalar quantization with nonuniform codebooks tailored to each coefficient's dynamic range and perceptual importance, allocating a total of 36 bits: 6 bits each for LARs 1 and 2 (64 levels), 5 bits each for LARs 3 and 4 (32 levels), 4 bits each for LARs 5 and 6 (16 levels), and 3 bits each for LARs 7 and 8 (8 levels). This bit allocation reflects the higher sensitivity of lower-order coefficients to quantization error, with the quantized LARs (LAR_c) transmitted as part of the 260-bit frame. At the decoder, the received LAR_c values are interpolated between consecutive frames to generate subframe-specific LAR sets, which are inverse-transformed back to reflection coefficients for the short-term synthesis filter. The synthesis filter reconstructs the speech signal by inverse linear prediction, passing the excitation through an 8th-order lattice all-pole filter \hat{s}(n) = \sum_{i=1}^{8} a_i \hat{s}(n-i) + u(n), where a_i are the derived predictor coefficients and u(n) is the decoded excitation; the output is then de-emphasized with the inverse pre-emphasis filter to recover the original spectral balance.

Regular Pulse Excitation

In the Full Rate codec, the Long Term Prediction (LTP) analysis models the periodic components of the speech signal within the LPC residual. For each 40-sample subframe, an adaptive search is performed to determine the pitch lag in the range of 40 to 120 samples and the associated that best predicts the current subframe from past residual samples. The selected lag is quantized to 7 bits per subframe (28 bits total per frame), and the gain to 2 bits per subframe (8 bits total), for a combined 36 bits for LTP parameters per frame. This periodic component is then subtracted from the LPC residual to yield the LTP residual, which captures the non-periodic . The Regular Pulse Excitation (RPE) encoding further models the LTP by representing it as a sparse set of pulses on a coarse . The 40-sample LTP subframe is processed through adaptive sample rate to select one of four possible grids (encoded with 2 bits per subframe), each defining pulse positions spaced approximately every 3 samples. The amplitudes at these positions are then quantized using 3 bits each via adaptive (APCM), allocating 39 bits per subframe for the pulses (156 bits total per frame). This approach efficiently captures the key energy concentrations in the while minimizing bit usage. To normalize the signal, a separate gain scaling factor representing the subframe is quantized using 6 bits per subframe. This factor, derived from the maximum in the selected , scales the pulses during reconstruction to match the original residual's . In the , the RPE pulses are first reconstructed by placing the quantized amplitudes at their positions within the 40-sample subframe, with zeros elsewhere, and scaling by the gain factor. The LTP contribution is added by shifting the previous frame's by the and scaling by the gain, yielding the full signal. This is then passed through the LPC to produce the output speech samples, followed by post-processing such as de-emphasis.

Implementations

Software Libraries

The first open-source implementation of the Full Rate speech was libgsm, developed between 1992 and 1994 by Jutta Degener and Carsten Bormann at . This C-based library provides royalty-free encoding and decoding of GSM 06.10 audio, capable of real-time processing on low-end CPUs such as those from the early 1990s. The (ETSI) released the official reference implementation as part of the GSM 06.10 specification, including fixed-point code for the RPE-LTP transcoder and test vectors for verification. This reference code serves as a baseline for compliant implementations and is freely available through ETSI documentation. Integrations of Full Rate support appear in multimedia libraries like FFmpeg, which uses libgsm for decoding GSM audio streams, and (Sound eXchange), which encodes and decodes the format via an external GSM library. Both tools enable media processing workflows, such as converting uncompressed audio to GSM-compressed files. Licensing for these libraries is permissive: libgsm follows a custom copyright allowing free use, modification, and distribution without royalties, while the reference code is freely available under ETSI terms. Original RPE-LTP patents for the codec expired around 2010, eliminating prior encumbrances and enabling widespread adoption post-expiry. Practical usage includes command-line tools; for example, libgsm's toast utility compresses WAV files to GSM format with toast input.wav output.gsm, while SoX supports similar conversions via sox input.wav -r 8000 -c 1 output.gsm. These tools facilitate audio archiving and legacy telephony applications.

Hardware and VoIP Applications

In the , the Full Rate codec was implemented on (DSP) chips from , such as the TMS320C5x series, which powered baseband processing in early GSM mobile phones. These DSPs handled real-time encoding and decoding of the RPE-LTP algorithm at rates up to 20 MIPS, enabling efficient speech compression within the power constraints of battery-operated devices. The Full Rate codec finds continued use in VoIP systems for interoperability with legacy GSM networks, particularly through gateways that bridge IP-based calls to cellular infrastructure. In the Asterisk PBX, support is provided via the built-in GSM codec module (format "gsm"), which implements the GSM 06.10 Full Rate standard to facilitate low-bandwidth audio transmission in hybrid VoIP-GSM setups. However, with global 2G network shutdowns accelerating in 2025 (e.g., T-Mobile in the US beginning February 2025), its use in live networks is declining, though software implementations persist for archival and simulation purposes. Despite the shift to advanced codecs, the Full Rate standard persists in certain legacy devices, including select satellite phones that leverage GSM-compatible audio processing for global coverage in remote areas. It is also embedded in amateur radio equipment for digital voice modes, where its low bitrate suits constrained bandwidth scenarios. On mobile platforms, Android and iOS apps such as VLC Media Player support playback of GSM Full Rate audio files (.gsm format), enabling decoding and reproduction of archived or legacy recordings. In modern niche applications, the Full Rate codec is employed in (SDR) projects, notably within , where encoder and decoder blocks simulate GSM systems for educational, research, and prototyping purposes. These implementations process 33-byte frames to generate 16-bit speech samples, facilitating full network emulation on SDR like RTL-SDR or HackRF.

Comparisons and Successors

Versus Enhanced Full Rate

The Full Rate (FR) and Enhanced Full Rate (EFR) codecs both utilize the GSM full rate channel at a gross bit rate of 22.8 kbit/s, but differ in source coding rates and techniques: FR employs Regular Pulse Excitation with Long Term Prediction (RPE-LTP) at 13 kbit/s, while EFR uses Algebraic Code Excited Linear Prediction (ACELP) at 12.2 kbit/s. EFR delivers a marked improvement in speech quality over FR, attaining a Mean Opinion Score (MOS) of 4.1 in clean conditions and demonstrating superior degradation MOS (DMOS) under vehicle and street noise (4.25 and 4.18, respectively), compared to FR's MOS of 3.4 in clean speech and lower noise robustness scores (3.83 and 3.92 DMOS). This upgrade results in more natural-sounding speech and performance nearing wireline telephony standards like G.726 ADPCM. EFR incurs higher computational demands than FR due to its ACELP structure and larger excitation codebooks, requiring approximately 14-18 for encoder and decoder operations, roughly 3 to 5 times that of FR's optimized implementations around 1-5 . Introduced in 1995 by as an optional upgrade for Phase 2+, EFR maintains backward compatibility through network negotiation, allowing fallback to FR when is required.

Transition to Adaptive Multi-Rate

The Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) codec was standardized by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) in December 1999 under specification GSM 06.90, providing a variable bit rate speech coding algorithm operating at rates from 4.75 to 12.2 kbit/s across eight modes. It employs multi-rate Algebraic Code-Excited Linear Prediction (ACELP) to encode narrowband speech signals, enabling dynamic adaptation of the coding mode based on real-time assessments of radio channel quality via uplink and downlink quality indicators. This adaptability allows AMR to optimize speech quality in varying error-prone conditions, marking a significant evolution from the fixed-rate Full Rate (FR) codec. The primary motivations for transitioning from to stemmed from FR's inefficiency in handling the noisy and error-prone mobile radio environments typical of networks, where its fixed 13 kbit/s rate offered limited robustness against channel impairments without flexibility for rate adjustment. addressed this by supporting both full-rate (22.8 kbit/s gross) and half-rate (11.4 kbit/s gross) channel modes, allowing seamless switching to lower-rate modes during good channel conditions to double network voice while maintaining or improving in adverse scenarios. As an interim measure, the Full Rate (EFR) had partially mitigated FR's shortcomings, but AMR's multi-mode design provided a more comprehensive solution for both and demands. AMR's deployment accelerated with its adoption as the mandatory default speech in 3GPP Release 99, finalized in 2000 for systems, ensuring compatibility and widespread integration in both and emerging networks. By the mid-2000s, most operators had upgraded their infrastructure to support AMR, driven by its benefits in spectrum efficiency and the growing prevalence of compatible devices, which hastened FR's obsolescence in modern deployments. Despite AMR's dominance, persists for legacy support of pre-AMR mobile devices in remaining networks, ensuring during the phased transition to higher-generation technologies. However, with global sunsets planned to complete by around 2030 to reallocate for and , FR's role will ultimately be eliminated as these legacy networks are decommissioned. As of 2025, 131 networks are planned to shut down by 2030, with 61 within 2025 and 278 completed, planned, or in progress across 83 countries.

Performance and Quality

Computational Requirements

The GSM Full Rate codec was designed to operate in on the limited processors (DSPs) available in early 1990s mobile phones, requiring approximately 1 for an optimized of both encoding and decoding processes. This low computational allowed it to fit within the constraints of battery-powered devices, with typical implementations achieving under 1 through structural optimizations in datapath design and . Memory requirements were modest, utilizing around 2 of for dynamic buffers, state variables, and codebooks during processing of 20 speech frames at 8 kHz sampling. Fixed lookup tables, such as those for coefficients and excitation pulses, were stored in , typically amounting to several kilobytes depending on the platform. The codec's power efficiency was a key design goal for battery-constrained mobiles, with implementations consuming less than 50 mW at 5 V on contemporary cores. On modern hardware, the Full Rate codec's demands are negligible.

Speech Quality Metrics

The speech quality of the Full Rate codec is commonly assessed using the (MOS), a subjective metric on a 5-point scale where 1 indicates poor quality and 5 excellent. In clean speech conditions with no errors, the MOS for Full Rate typically ranges from 3.6 to 3.8, reflecting acceptable but not toll-quality performance compared to uncompressed PCM references. Detailed subjective listening tests conducted by in the late 1980s and early 1990s, including evaluations of six candidate codecs, confirmed an average MOS of approximately 3.71 under error-free conditions (EP0). In the presence of , such as at 15 dB SNR or vehicular at 10 dB SNR, the remains relatively robust at 3.83 to 3.92 under clean channel conditions, though perceived degradation occurs due to the codec's limited handling. Channel errors further degrade quality; for instance, at a carrier-to-interference ratio (C/I) of 7 dB (corresponding to error pattern ), the drops to 2.73 in clean speech and 2.85 in vehicular , approaching fair-to-poor ratings. These results stem from and collaborative evaluations around 1988–1990, which emphasized subjective listening tests with diverse speakers and conditions to ensure robustness in mobile environments. Objective measures provide complementary insights into Full Rate's fidelity. Post-decoding signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) achieves approximately 20–25 dB in error-free conditions, as quantified by noise levels equivalent to 23–25 dB in ETSI tests relative to G.711 PCM benchmarks. Segmental SNR, which averages distortion over short frames (typically 20 ms), exceeds 20 dB for sine wave tests across 100–2000 Hz and is applied separately to voiced and unvoiced frames to capture variations in periodic and noise-like speech segments. These metrics highlight the codec's efficiency in modeling speech but reveal limitations in high-frequency preservation. A characteristic artifact of the Regular Pulse Excitation (RPE) method is a "buzziness" or rattle-like quality, particularly in voiced segments, arising from the fixed pulse grid and long-term prediction mismatches that introduce tonal described as hollow or metallic. Fricatives, such as /s/ and /z/ , exhibit notable due to spectral folding and from RPE down-sampling ( factor of 3), which inadequately regenerates high-frequency noise-like components around 2500–3500 Hz. Overall, Full Rate outperforms analog systems (e.g., superior to 14.7 dB SNR ) but falls short of toll quality, with intelligibility maintained at around 70–90% in moderate error conditions based on diagnostic rhyme tests from evaluations. Real-world channel tests showed graceful degradation, with acceptable performance (e.g., <13% class II errors) down to C/I of 7 dB, equivalent to bit error rates of several percent in environments.

References

  1. [1]
    Global system for mobile communications (GSM) - Scholarpedia
    Aug 4, 2008 · Historically, GSM was first launched in Finland in 1991 and at the time of writing about 700 mobile networks provide GSM services in more than ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Full rate speech; Transcoding (GSM 06.10 version 6.0.0 ... - ETSI
    Performance and network aspects of the RPE-LTP codec are contained in annex A. 1.3. Functional description of audio parts. The analogue-to-digital and digital- ...
  3. [3]
    GSM Full Rate (FR) Codec - VOCAL Technologies
    GSM FR describes the detailed mapping between input blocks of 160 speech samples in 13 bit uniform PCM form to encoded blocks of 260 bits and from encoded ...
  4. [4]
    Sorting Through GSM Codecs: A Tutorial - EE Times
    The GSM standard supports four different but similar compression technologies to analyse and compress speech. These include full-rate, enhanced full-rate (EFR), ...
  5. [5]
    Our history - About Us - GSMA
    1982 Groupe Speciale Mobile (GSM) is formed by the Confederation of European Posts and Telecommunications (CEPT) to design a pan-European mobile technology.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The development of speech coding and the first standard coder for ...
    Jan 1, 2005 · Although the GSM full-rate coder is based on RPE and LTP (\long- term prediction" or pitch prediction) we will include the MPE option until ...
  7. [7]
    GSM History: Development Story - Electronics Notes
    To achieve the basic definition of a new system a meeting was held in 1982 under the auspices of the Conference of European Posts and Telegraphs (CEPT).
  8. [8]
    1991 - GSM changes everything - Ericsson
    On July 1, 1991, the new European GSM standard was introduced across many European countries, with GSM calls being made in Germany, Finland, Denmark, and Sweden ...Missing: Rate codec
  9. [9]
    25 years of Deutsche Telekom AG – from state-owned enterprise to ...
    Jan 2, 2020 · The mobile communications business grew at a breathtaking pace, built on GSM, the first European mobile standard, and – from 1992 – driven ...
  10. [10]
    [EPUB] The Creation of Standards for Global Mobile Communication - ETSI
    In a first pragmatic step TC SMG endorsed in 1995/6 the Enhanced Full Rate Codec (EFR) which had been developed in Canada and had been standardized by ANSI T1P ...
  11. [11]
    Smartphone Market Share: Past, Present, and Future | Fortunly
    Dec 3, 2024 · Specifically, GSM would become the leading 2G technology, dominating over 80% of the world's phone market share. It has served as a foundation ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] GSM Enhanced Full Rate Speech Codec
    This paper describes the GSM enhanced full rate (EFR) speech codec that has been standardised for the GSM mobile communication system. The GSM EFR codec has ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ETSI EN 301 703 V7.0.2 (1999-12)
    This European Standard (Telecommunications series) has been produced by Special Mobile Group (SMG). The present document introduces the Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR) ...
  14. [14]
    2G and 3G Sunsetting and What it Means for IoT - 1GLOBAL
    Oct 8, 2025 · An uncontrolled and unmanaged shutdown of the 2G and 3G networks would be operationally disastrous for millions of deployed IoT devices. For ...
  15. [15]
    Switch Off Announcement – O2 2G and 3G - PiBlu Technologies
    Aug 28, 2024 · 1 October 2026 – 2G services will be restricted to existing IoT traffic and emergency calling outside of 4G coverage only. For most customers, ...
  16. [16]
    Voice Codecs - GL Communications
    GSM-FR GSM-FR is a Full Rate speech coder standardized by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) for compressing toll quality speech ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] 9. closed-loop speech coding techniques - Hüseyin Abut
    Order LPC with Autocorrelation method following a Hamming windowing and a pre- ... 13 KB Group Special Mobile (GSM) Full-Rate Codec: • Pan European ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  18. [18]
    The GSM 06.10 lossy speech compression library and its applications
    Carsten Bormann and I have implemented a GSM 06.10 RPE-LTP coder and decoder in C. Its source code is freely available, and we encourage you to use it, play ...
  19. [19]
    FFmpeg Codecs Documentation
    libgsm allows libavcodec to decode the GSM full rate audio codec. Requires the presence of the libgsm headers and library during configuration. You need to ...Codec Options · Video Decoders · Audio Decoders · Audio Encoders
  20. [20]
    SoX - Sound eXchange, the Swiss Army knife of audio manipulation
    SoX has support for GSM's original 13kbps `Full Rate' audio format. It is usually CPU-intensive to work with GSM audio. Encoding names can be abbreviated ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Telecommunications Applications With the TMS320C5x DSPs
    This book belongs to a growing series of digital signal processing application books that Texas Instruments has published over the years. Some of these books ...
  23. [23]
    Asterisk Audio and Video Capabilities
    Asterisk supports various audio codecs and file formats, but video transcoding is not supported. It supports formats like ADPCM, G.711, and H.264.Missing: chan_gsm | Show results with:chan_gsm
  24. [24]
    Ekiga Softphone Features | Ekiga ~ Free Your Speech
    Codecs Features Version 4.0 · SIP Capabilities exchange: Ekiga will automatically select the common codecs between the peers · Video Bandwidth Limitation · Intel ...Missing: Rate | Show results with:Rate
  25. [25]
    Jitsi Features
    Jan 18, 2014 · Security. Encrypted password storage ; Codecs. Audio: Opus, SILK, Speex, G.722, PCMU/PCMA (G.711), iLBC, GSM, G.729 Annex C (requires compilation ...Missing: Rate gateways
  26. [26]
    GSM full-rate Audio Decoder - GNU Radio Wiki
    Dec 10, 2020 · GSM 06.10 Full Rate Vocoder Decoder. Input: Vector of 33 bytes per 160 input samples Output: 16-bit shorts representing speech samples ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Enhanced Full Rate (EFR) speech transcoding; (GSM 06.60 ... - ETSI
    This European Standard (Telecommunications series) has been produced by ETSI Technical Committee Special Mobile. Group (SMG), and is now submitted for the ETSI ...Missing: 1995 | Show results with:1995
  28. [28]
    [PDF] ETSI/SMG11 "Speech Aspects"
    GSM EFR Speech Quality. • GSM EFR speech quality is characterized in. ETSI Technical Report. “Performance Characterisation of the GSM EFR speech codec”, GSM ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Speech Coding Methods, Standards, and Applications - ViVoNets
    Further, we develop several important speech codec functionalities, such as bit rate (or SNR) scalable coding, bandwidth scalable coding, and diversity-based ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] A 1-MIPS GSM Fullrate Vocoder Case Study
    lar architectures and complex memory hierarchies. DSP architectures on the ... GSM 6.10 full-rate encoder and decoder to 0,85 MIPS which is 5 times ...
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    [PDF] ETSI TR 146 076 V16.0.0 (2020-09)
    Most speech codecs including the existing GSM codecs (FR, HR and EFR) operate at a fixed coding rate. Channel protection (against errors) is added also at a ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] STANDARDISATION OF THE ADAPTIVE MULTI-RATE CODEC
    The selection process started with a pre-selection during which five of the most promising codecs out of eleven candidates were chosen to enter selection tests.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Overview of 3GPP Release 99 Summary of all Release 99 Features ...
    These cutting principles, introduced for first time for UMTS, could also apply to GSM as well and to whatever type of network. They were established mainly to ...
  35. [35]
    GSM Audio Codec: Vocoder: AMR, CELP etc - Electronics Notes
    Voice codec technologies used with GSM include LPC-RPE, EFR, Full Rate, Half Rate, AMR codec and AMR-WB codec & CELP, ACELP, VSELP, speech codec technologies.Missing: satellite | Show results with:satellite
  36. [36]
    Full Rate - Wikipedia
    Full Rate (FR), also known as GSM-FR or GSM 06.10 (sometimes simply GSM), was the first digital speech coding standard used in the GSM digital mobile phone ...
  37. [37]
    Technology upgrades and legacy network sunsets on the rise - GSMA
    Jan 23, 2025 · 3G will outnumber 2G shutdowns, accounting for 55% of the total sunsets by 2030.Missing: Rate codec plans
  38. [38]
    [PDF] A 1-MIPS GSM Fullrate Vocoder Case Study
    Taking the GSM Fullrate Vocoder in this paper a structural approach is presented to how datapath add-ons or tailoriza- tions can be applied to increase ...Missing: ARM | Show results with:ARM
  39. [39]
    GSM-FR - Full Rate Speech Coder - Adaptive Digital Technologies
    GSM FR was the first RPELTP (Regular Pulse Excitation-Long Term-Prediction-Linear Predictive Coder) standard used in GSM digital mobile phone system.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] GSM Full-Rate Voice Coding on the TMS320C62xx DSP
    This implementation includes all of the full-rate voice coding functions for the. GSM full-rate voice coder and decoder and supports these GSM specifications:.
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    None
    ### Summary of GSM Full Rate (FR) Speech Codec from Rec. ITU-R M.1309 (1997)
  43. [43]
    None
    ### Summary of Subjective Testing Results from ETSI TR 146 085