Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gau Westmark

Gau Westmark was an administrative division of the National Socialist German Workers' Party (NSDAP) and Nazi Germany, functioning from 1933 to 1945 as a regional unit that integrated the Palatinate and Saarland regions, with the addition of the Moselle department from annexed Lorraine in 1940. Initially formed as Gau Saarpfalz (or Pfalz-Saar) in 1935 after the Saar plebiscite returned the territory to Germany, it was renamed Gau Westmark to reflect its expanded "western march" frontier status. The Gau's seat was in Neustadt an der Weinstraße, and it corresponded to Military District XII. Under Gauleiter Josef Bürckel, who held the position from 1935 until his death in 1944 and concurrently served as Reichsstatthalter, the Gau enforced NSDAP policies including economic mobilization, cultural germanization of annexed areas, and suppression of dissent. Bürckel's administration oversaw the incorporation of Moselle's population into the Reich, involving classifications of inhabitants as "volksdeutsche" or subject to expulsion based on perceived loyalty, amid broader Nazi efforts to consolidate border territories. The region's strategic position near France made it a focal point for fortification and later defensive operations, including the mobilization of the Volkssturm militia in late 1944 as Allied forces advanced. As a Gau, Westmark exemplified the NSDAP's hierarchical structure where the Gauleiter wielded extensive authority over party, state, and sometimes military affairs, blurring lines between political and administrative functions to centralize control under the . Its formation and expansion underscored Nazi expansionism, with policies prioritizing resource extraction from industrial areas like the coal fields and ideological conformity in linguistically mixed zones. The Gau dissolved with Germany's defeat in 1945, its territories reverting to Allied occupation zones and eventual post-war reconfiguration into modern German states.

Formation and Pre-War History

Establishment of the Gau

The Gau, initially designated as Gau Pfalz-Saar, was formed on 1 March 1935 by merging the Nazi Party's Gau Rheinpfalz—covering the Bavarian —with the territory upon its return to German sovereignty following the 13 January 1935 plebiscite, in which 90.8% of voters approved reintegration into the . This merger created an administrative unit of approximately 1.2 million inhabitants, spanning the industrial Saar coal basin and the agricultural and viticultural , as part of the Nazi process that subordinated regional governance to party structures. Josef Bürckel, a former schoolteacher and NSDAP member since 1921, had led Gau Rheinpfalz since his appointment as by on 1 December 1926; he retained leadership of the newly combined Gau, with administrative headquarters established in . Bürckel's role emphasized rapid Nazification, including the dissolution of local autonomy and integration of Saar economic assets like the coal mines into planning. The Gau's creation reflected the pre-existing party subdivisions—Gau Rheinpfalz dating to 1926 and a provisional Gau Saar under NSDAP influence during the League of Nations mandate—but elevated them to full administrative status under the 1933-1935 reforms, enabling centralized control over personnel, , and economic mobilization in the western border region. In January 1936, the name was adjusted to Gau Saarpfalz to prioritize the element, though the territorial extent remained unchanged until wartime expansions.

Saarland Reunification and Renaming

The , detached from after and placed under administration as the per the , conducted a plebiscite on January 13, 1935, to determine its future status. Of the approximately 528,000 eligible voters, 90.73% opted for reunification with , with turnout exceeding 95%. This outcome reflected the region's predominantly German-speaking population and prior cultural-economic ties to the , amid active Nazi campaigning that included promises of economic revival and warnings against influence. Official reintegration occurred on March 1, 1935, marking the end of international administration and the resumption of full German sovereignty over the 1,900 square kilometers of territory with its 800,000 inhabitants. The Nazi regime immediately initiated Gleichschaltung, dissolving local autonomy and integrating the Saar into the party's Gau structure. The region, previously a separate Prussian province, was merged with the neighboring Gau Rheinpfalz—encompassing the Bavarian Palatinate—to form the expanded Gau Pfalz-Saar, headquartered in Neustadt an der Weinstraße. This consolidation under Gauleiter Josef Bürckel aimed to streamline administration, exploit Saar coal resources for rearmament, and enforce ideological uniformity, with Bürckel appointed Reichskommissar to oversee the transition. On January 13, 1936—one year after the plebiscite—the Gau was renamed Saarpfalz to emphasize the unified -Palatinate identity, aligning with Nazi efforts to erase post-Versailles divisions and foster regional loyalty to the . This renaming preceded further pre-war consolidations, such as the 1937 establishment of the Saarpfalz as a party-dominated administrative unit, which prioritized industrial output from the Basin's mines—producing over 15 million tons of annually by 1938—and suppressed opposition through arrests and . The structure persisted until wartime expansions prompted the final redesignation to Gau Westmark in December 1940.

Leadership and Administration

Gauleiter Josef Bürckel

Josef Bürckel (30 March 1895 – 28 September 1944) was a German Nazi politician who served as Gauleiter and Reichsstatthalter of Gau Westmark from its effective formation in 1935 until his death. A former schoolteacher from Lingenfeld in the Palatinate region, Bürckel joined the NSDAP in 1920 as one of its early members and advanced to prominence through party roles, including as a Reichstag deputy from 1933. His appointment followed Adolf Hitler's designation of him as Reich Commissioner for the Saarland's reintegration after the 13 January 1935 plebiscite, which recorded 90.73% approval for rejoining Germany under NSDAP oversight; Bürckel assumed leadership on 1 March 1935, merging the Saar territory with the existing Palatinate Gau to create Gau Saarpfalz (later redesignated Westmark). As , Bürckel centralized authority in , enforcing NSDAP policies on economic recovery, infrastructure projects, and ideological conformity, including the suppression of Catholic and centrist influences prevalent in the region prior to 1933. He coordinated the 1935–1937 transition, renaming the Gau Westmark on 22 August 1937 to symbolize its frontier defensive role, while also serving as to align provincial governance with directives. Bürckel's administration emphasized rapid Nazification, with party membership growing to over 200,000 by 1939 through recruitment drives and purges of non-conformists; he reported directly to Hitler, maintaining loyalty amid internal rivalries, such as disputes over with neighboring . Bürckel's tenure expanded dramatically after the 1940 French campaign, when he incorporated the Department of and Moselle districts into Westmark per a 30 1940 , adding approximately 1.2 million residents and prioritizing industrial output from Saar coal and iron for the . He directed Germanization measures, including mandatory name changes, language shifts from to in schools, and the expulsion of around 100,000 "undesirables" deemed non-Germanic, alongside the Wagner-Bürckel Action on 22–23 October 1940, which deported over 6,500 —primarily women and children—from , , and Saar to internment camps in , resulting in high mortality rates from disease and exposure. These policies reflected causal priorities of ethnic homogenization and resource extraction, though implementation faced resistance from local populations and logistical strains, with Bürckel justifying them as essential for security. Bürckel died suddenly of heart failure on 28 September 1944 in at age 49, amid mounting Allied advances; his passing led to temporary leadership by subordinates like Willi Stöhr before further disruptions in 1945. Contemporary assessments, including party records, portrayed him as an efficient administrator focused on regional stabilization, though postwar analyses highlight the coercive nature of his rule in suppressing dissent and enforcing racial policies without independent verification of long-term efficacy.

Administrative Hierarchy and Key Officials

The administrative hierarchy of Gau Westmark adhered to the standard NSDAP Gau structure, with the Gauleiter exercising supreme authority over party operations, civil administration, and—as —state governance within the territory. This position centralized power, enabling direct implementation of national policies on mobilization, Germanization, and . The Gauleitung, or Gau leadership staff, supported the Gauleiter through specialized departments (Ämter) for organization, , personnel, and finance, each headed by an Amtsleiter appointed by the Gauleiter. Below this level, the Gau was subdivided into Kreise (districts), managed by who oversaw local Ortsgruppen (branches) and enforced directives down to the level for grassroots control. Josef Bürckel served as Gauleiter and from the Gau's formation in 1935 until his death on 28 September 1944, extending his oversight to annexed regions like . Key subordinates included Deputy Gauleiter Ernst Ludwig Leyser, a SA-Brigadeführer and deputy with prior experience in occupied eastern territories, and Gauobmann Georg Stahl, responsible for economic coordination. Additional figures in administrative roles encompassed Gauhauptmann Werner and deputies such as Barth, who acted as Regierungspräsident in Saarbriücken. These officials facilitated the integration of diverse territories, though documentation on mid-level Amtsleiter remains sparse due to the regime's emphasis on personal loyalty over formalized records.

Territorial Expansion

Annexation of Lorraine and Moselle

Following the German victory in the and the signed on June 22, 1940, the Nazi regime initiated the de facto annexation of the French department of , corresponding to the German-speaking portion of . This territory, historically contested between and , was designated as the Civil Administration Area of Lorraine (CdZ-Gebiet Lothringen) to facilitate its administrative integration into the Third Reich without formal international ratification, in violation of the armistice terms. Gauleiter , already overseeing Gau Westmark comprising and the , was appointed Chief of Civil Administration (CdZ) for Lothringen, extending his authority over the newly occupied region. Under his direction, preparatory measures for incorporation began, including the suppression of administrative structures and the imposition of governance. The annexation aimed to reclaim areas deemed ethnically , aligning with Nazi racial policies that prioritized regions with perceived Germanic populations. On November 30, 1940, CdZ-Gebiet Lothringen was formally merged into , expanding the Gau's territory by approximately 6,200 square kilometers and incorporating around 700,000 inhabitants into the Nazi administrative framework. This integration was enacted through internal decrees rather than legislation, reflecting the regime's unilateral approach to territorial expansion. The move consolidated control under Bürckel's unified leadership, preparing the ground for subsequent Germanization efforts.

Integration of Annexed Territories

Following the Franco-German armistice on June 22, 1940, the German department of in was de facto annexed and administratively integrated into the Westmark, expanding the Gau's territory westward to the pre-1871 borders established by the Treaty of . This incorporation occurred in July 1940, with , the existing of Westmark, appointed as for the new sector on August 7, 1940, granting him authority over both the original Palatinate-Saar core and the annexed region. The integration aimed to assimilate the territory into the Nazi administrative structure, subjecting it to Reich laws, oversight, and centralized governance from , while establishing a branch of the Mittelstelle Westmark in to coordinate ethnic and cultural policies. Central to the integration were aggressive population policies designed to enforce Germanization through selective expulsion and reclassification. By the end of 1940, over 60,000 individuals deemed "undesirable"—including , North Africans, Asians, recent recipients, and those expressing sentiments—were expelled to unoccupied , contributing to a total population loss exceeding 100,000 in . Bürckel's administration classified residents into racial categories, prioritizing those of purported descent for while barring others from return or integration; plans for additional deportations of up to 80,000 were drafted in early 1942 but largely unrealized due to advancing Allied forces. These measures reflected Nazi causal priorities of ethnic homogenization, with expulsions serving to replace "alien" elements through inbound settlers and labor transfers, though implementation faced logistical constraints from wartime demands. Cultural and linguistic efforts accompanied administrative changes, enforcing "de-Francification" by prohibiting use in official contexts, , and ; renaming streets, monuments, and surnames to Germanic forms; and replacing currency, postage, and with German equivalents starting in 1940. Nazi organizations, including the Party, , and Labor Front, were imposed to control social life, with mandatory participation in and ideological training; local faced expulsion if , with over 400 priests removed by September 1940. Economic involved , resource extraction for the , and forced labor classification, aligning the region with industrial policies under Bürckel's oversight. Despite these initiatives, persisted, underscoring limits to coerced in a region with deep cultural ties.

Economic and Industrial Policies

Resource Mobilization and Industry

The economy of Gau Westmark relied heavily on extraction in the and adjacent areas, which formed the backbone of regional resource mobilization before and during . Following the 's reintegration into via the January 13, 1935 plebiscite, its fields were fully oriented toward -wide demands, contributing to the national push for under the Four-Year Plan initiated in 1936. Annual black production across , incorporating output from 1935 onward, rose from approximately 137 million metric tons in 1933 to 174 million metric tons by 1938, with the basin accounting for roughly 10-12 million tons yearly in this period to fuel steelmaking and processes. These resources supported armaments production, as coal shortages elsewhere in the prompted intensified extraction quotas enforced by through coordination with the Coal Association. The 1940 annexation of the French department () expanded Gau Westmark's industrial base by incorporating the minette fields, which yielded high-volume, low-grade vital for production despite its content requiring specialized processing. German authorities rapidly integrated these deposits to offset pre-war import reliance, which had constituted up to 70% of needs in ; by 1942, annexed territories including supplied an estimated 87 million tons cumulatively toward the war economy, with outputs directed to steel mills via networks under Westmark administration. policies emphasized maximal , with Bürckel's overseeing infrastructural upgrades like expanded lines to eastward, aligning with Hermann Göring's directives for strategic security. Labor shortages from conscription led to widespread deployment of forced workers in Westmark's mines and nascent steel facilities, including prisoners from concentration camps and requisitioned civilians from occupied France and Eastern Europe. In the annexed Moselle and Saar regions, foreign laborers and camp inmates were funneled into coal pits and iron works, comprising a significant portion of the workforce by 1943-1944 to sustain output amid Allied bombing disruptions. This regimentation mirrored broader Reich practices but was intensified locally due to the Gau's frontier status, where Bürckel's administration balanced ideological Germanization with pragmatic exploitation to meet quotas—evidenced by correlations between Gauleiter economic performance metrics, such as employment growth, and central oversight. Production declines in 1944 from sabotage and air raids nonetheless underscored the Gau's role in bridging resource gaps until late-war collapse.

Labor Policies and Forced Integration

In Gau Westmark, labor policies under Gauleiter emphasized rapid mobilization for the Reich's war economy, integrating local and annexed territories' workforces while suppressing independent unions and enforcing compulsory membership in the (DAF) from July 1942. Industries such as coal mining, Palatinate chemicals (e.g., in ), and steel production (e.g., Hagondange foundries) prioritized armaments output, with labor shortages addressed through expulsions of non-Germanizable populations and importation of foreign workers. Forced integration began with the 1940 annexation of the Moselle department from Lorraine, where Bürckel oversaw the expulsion of 47,187 individuals deemed unassimilable between July and November 1940, creating vacancies filled by Eastern European Ostarbeiter, Soviet POWs, and Western European civilians. Racial screening classified residents as "Germanizable," mandating name Germanization, language adoption, and labor assignment under threat of deportation; over 100,000 were processed through Umsiedlungslager for re-Germanization before workforce integration. Compulsory Reichsarbeitsdienst (RAD) was imposed from spring 1941, drafting tens of thousands of Mosellans into infrastructure and factory labor, often transitioning to Kriegshelfsdienst in munitions plants. Foreign forced labor peaked amid shortages, with hosting 93 Soviet POW camps, 60 camps, and 13 for , Belgian, and workers by 1944, where thousands transited through XII-F and XII-E under harsh conditions including high mortality. In the , employed 21,243 civilian foreigners by December 1943 (totaling ~50,000 over the war), predominantly (7,498), Soviets (5,069), and Poles (1,796) in chemical production, with relying on 13,727 foreigners at its peak in April 1943 under performance-based rationing. Frankenthal's XII B managed up to 40,000 prisoners by late 1941 for armaments like V-2 components at KSB factories. These measures, aligned with Reich-wide decrees under from 1942, treated annexed workers as expendable resources, with minimal assimilation for non-Germans beyond coerced compliance.

Social and Ideological Policies

Germanization and Cultural Assimilation

In the annexed Moselle department of Lorraine, incorporated into Gau Westmark by decree on 18 July 1940, Nazi authorities pursued aggressive Germanization to reclaim territories viewed as inherently German but corrupted by French influence since 1918. Gauleiter Josef Bürckel oversaw these efforts, classifying the region as ripe for racial and cultural reintegration into the Reich, with policies emphasizing the expulsion of "non-assimilable" elements and the imposition of German norms to foster loyalty. This process targeted linguistic, administrative, and social structures, aiming to erase French identity through state-directed assimilation rather than outright extermination, though tied to broader racial hierarchies. Key measures included the immediate prohibition of French in official, educational, and public spheres, mandating as the exclusive language of , , and by autumn 1940. Place names, street signs, and personal nomenclature were systematically germanized, reviving pre-1918 forms to symbolize historical reversion—such as altering regional designations to evoke medieval German ties. Schools shifted to German-medium curricula infused with Nazi , including and völkisch history, while French textbooks were confiscated and teachers required to swear or face dismissal. Population engineering complemented this: authorities screened evacuees and residents via racial exams, expelling or denying return to tens of thousands deemed "Frenchified" or politically unreliable, with resettlement of ethnic Germans from the and elsewhere to dilute remaining francophone elements. Cultural assimilation extended to media, churches, and associations, where French publications ceased, Catholic clergy of Gallican orientation were replaced by pro-Reich figures, and Nazi organizations like the categorized inhabitants for citizenship tiers based on perceived German affinity. glorified the region's "return" to the , though compliance varied; many locals outwardly adapted while harboring resentment, as evidenced by underground francophone networks. These policies, enforced through and penalties, achieved partial linguistic shifts but failed to eradicate underlying bilingualism or loyalty to , particularly amid wartime hardships.

Education, Youth, and Propaganda

In the annexed territories of Gau Westmark, including the Department of and portions of , Nazi authorities rapidly imposed a Germanized as part of broader efforts following the 1940 . -language instruction was prohibited, with German declared the sole of education and administration, replacing curricula with Nazi ideological content emphasizing racial purity, to the , and anti- sentiment. Schools were restructured under Josef Bürckel's oversight, with non-compliant teachers dismissed or deported; by late 1940, new National Socialist-oriented schools were planned to indoctrinate students in party doctrine. On July 5, 1941, Reich-wide directives mandated compulsory enrollment in this system for re-Germanizable , integrating subjects like and with on and . Youth organizations served as primary vehicles for ideological mobilization, with membership in the () for boys and Bund Deutscher Mädel (BDM) for girls made obligatory in January 1942 under threat of fines or imprisonment. In Gau Westmark, these groups enrolled tens of thousands of local youth, countering residual French cultural influences through camps, sports, and drills that promoted and racial awareness; approximately 70,000 Alsatians and Mosellans, including youth via the Reich Labor Service (RAD) introduced in spring 1941, underwent mandatory service blending physical training with Nazi indoctrination. Non-participation was equated with disloyalty, leading to deportations of families resisting assimilation, as enforced by Bürckel's administration to forge a generation aligned with Reich goals. Propaganda efforts complemented education and youth programs, utilizing rallies, renamed institutions, and media to reinforce Germanization. Bürckel's policies included mass expulsions of over 47,000 deemed unassimilable from Moselle and Lorraine between July and November 1940, framing these as purification for a unified Volk. Local NSDAP branches disseminated posters, films, and speeches portraying the annexation as historical reclamation, while street and town renamings erased French traces; youth events often featured HJ-led demonstrations glorifying the Führer and decrying "alien" elements. Despite coercion, participation remained uneven due to local resistance, prompting intensified measures like mandatory NSDAP oaths for naturalization by September 1940.

Military Contributions and War Efforts

Conscription and Defense Preparations

In the core German territories of Gau Westmark, comprising the and Rhenish , adhered to the Reich's universal law enacted on May 21, 1935, requiring all able-bodied men aged 18-45 to undergo training and potential deployment in the , with the Gau falling under the jurisdiction of Wehrkreis XII ( XII) headquartered in for recruitment, equipping, and reserve mobilization. This system processed inductees through local Wehrbezirk commands, emphasizing pre-military conditioning via organizations like the and , which prepared youth for service amid escalating wartime demands after 1939. The 1940 de facto annexation of the French Department of the Moselle and its administrative incorporation into Gau Westmark in December 1940 necessitated adapted conscription measures to assimilate the population militarily. From 1941, eligible Mosellan males born from 1920 onward were first compelled to join the Reichsarbeitsdienst (RAD), a mandatory labor service for youth aged 17-25 that doubled as ideological indoctrination and physical hardening before Wehrmacht entry, affecting thousands in construction projects tied to regional defenses. Full military conscription followed via decrees issued August 19, 1942, mandating service for Mosellan men aged 18-50, integrating them into Wehrkreis XII's replacement units despite their recent French nationality and leading to over 40,000 inductees from the department by war's end, many deployed to Eastern Front divisions amid high casualty rates. These policies encountered substantial noncompliance, including mass desertions—estimated at up to 10,000 from alone—and family-led protests, prompting harsh reprisals such as hostage executions and labor deportations to enforce quotas, as documented in regional Nazi records. Defense preparations complemented through fortification expansions along the Gau's western perimeter, bolstering the () with concrete bunkers, anti-tank obstacles, and minefields constructed via labor from 1938 onward, while local cells organized air raid drills and evacuation plans under Josef Bürckel's oversight to counter anticipated Allied incursions. Wehrkreis XII also maintained training depots in cities like for rapid unit formation, drawing on Gau resources to sustain frontline replacements until 1944.

Volkssturm Mobilization

The , a national decreed by on October 18, 1944, to conscript all able-bodied German males aged 16 to 60 not already in the , was rapidly mobilized in Gau Westmark amid the Allied advance toward the Westwall in late 1944. Under Willi Stöhr, who assumed leadership following Josef Bürckel's death on September 28, 1944, the Gauleitung issued specific call-up orders on October 26, 1944, targeting men born between 1884 and 1928 in districts such as for immediate registration and service. Training directives for formation and instruction followed from September 25, 1944, through early 1945, emphasizing basic combat preparation including handling of Panzerfausts and small arms. Mobilization in Westmark prioritized fortifying the and rear positions like the Hilgenbach and Westmark Stellungen in the Saarbrücken-Trier-Zweibrücken sector, where units were deployed by early December 1944 to support regular divisions such as the 19th Division. A dedicated Volkssturm-Ausbildungsbataillon Westmark was formed, comprising seven companies of 70 to 90 men each—totaling approximately 490 to 630 personnel—all equipped with distinctive armbands for identification; these trainees were rushed into defensive roles amid the U.S. Third Army's . Local battalions, often comprising elderly men and youths, manned bunkers in Moselland and the , with appeals and for anti-tank weapons organized by December 1944 to bolster morale and supply. Performance varied due to inadequate and inexperience, with many units relegated to rear-guard duties and suffering high or desertions during the November-December 1944 breakthroughs; however, in Westmark, enhanced coordination, provisions, and training yielded relatively effective local resistance compared to other gaue, as evidenced by sustained defensive actions before the front's collapse in early 1945. By , ongoing service exemptions for essential personnel, such as postal communications in , reflected desperate manpower shortages as the region fell to Allied forces.

Persecutions, Resistance, and Controversies

Treatment of Jews, Minorities, and Political Opponents

In Gau Westmark, the persecution of Jews adhered to the Reich-wide Nazi framework of discrimination, dispossession, and deportation, with implementation varying by the territory's incorporation timeline. In the Saarland and Palatinate regions—integrated into the Reich following the 1935 Saar plebiscite—Jews numbering around 1,200 in the Saar alone by 1933 faced initial economic boycotts and Nuremberg Laws enforcement from 1935 onward, stripping citizenship and barring professions. Synagogues in Saarbrücken and Speyer were destroyed during the November 1938 pogroms, accelerating emigration and property Aryanization. Following the 1940 annexation of the Moselle department from Lorraine, local Jews—estimated at several thousand, including communities in Metz—underwent immediate registration, asset seizures, and bans on public life, mirroring policies in adjacent Alsace where approximately 2,000 regional Jews perished in deportations. Deportations intensified post-1940. In October of that year, as part of broader southwestern German actions, around 950 from and Saar areas were expelled to the in , part of Operation "Israel Flight" targeting border for removal amid conquests. Remaining in Westmark faced further transports starting 1942, routed via collection points like to extermination camps such as Auschwitz, with survival rates near zero due to systematic gassing policies. , overseeing from 1941 to 1944, enforced these measures administratively without noted deviations from central directives, prioritizing integration of annexed territories over localized extremism. Non-Jewish minorities, chiefly French-speakers in annexed , endured Germanization drives under Bürckel's authority, entailing linguistic suppression, place-name Germanization, and racial screening via the . Inhabitants were sorted into categories: "Germanizable" (D-category) for coerced assimilation, including conscription of over 100,000 men by 1944; "partly Germanizable" for reeducation; and "alien" (E-category) for expulsion to or forced labor in the , displacing tens of thousands deemed racially or politically unreliable. and faced parallel racial persecution, with deportations from mirroring those in nearby , culminating in transfers to Auschwitz by 1943. Political opponents—predominantly communists, socialists, and clerical resisters—encountered swift Gestapo-led repression, building on pre-1935 autonomist sentiments and Lorraine francophile networks. Arrests escalated after 1940 annexation, funneling suspects into local prisons or near , where thousands from Westmark and endured forced labor and executions for or dissent. Bürckel's tenure emphasized bureaucratic control, dissolving opposition groups via bans and informant networks, while successor Willi Stöhr, appointed amid 1944 retreats, authorized harsher reprisals against , including summary shootings under "expiation measures." Overall, such actions suppressed organized , with estimates of several hundred executions tied to Gau security operations by war's end.

Suppression of Resistance and Local Grievances

In the annexed department of (), incorporated into Gau Westmark in July 1941, ordered the expulsion of approximately 40,000 residents in September 1940, targeting those classified as insufficiently "germanizable"—primarily Francophone locals, , and political nonconformists—relocating them to unoccupied to preempt potential opposition and facilitate . These measures, justified as security necessities amid border vulnerabilities, addressed local grievances over cultural erasure by preemptively removing dissent-prone elements, though evictions were partially halted by November 1940 for those granted "recognized German" status. Repressive policing intensified under Bürckel's oversight, with Gestapo and Sicherheitsdienst (SD) units enforcing germanization edicts that banned French language use in public, mandated name germanization, and suppressed Catholic and regionalist expressions, fostering widespread passive resistance such as language defiance and draft evasion among the 100,000-plus Malgré-nous conscripts forcibly incorporated into the Wehrmacht from 1942 onward. Grievances in core German areas like the Saar-Palatinate centered on economic strains from war mobilization and resource extraction, but these were quashed through surveillance and propaganda portraying complaints as defeatist, with local Nazi organs monitoring worker discontent to prevent strikes or communist agitation. Active resistance remained limited due to proximity to proper and rigorous controls, manifesting in sporadic , intelligence leaks to Allies, and Mennonite-led conscientious objection cases, but responses were swift: arrests escalated in 1943–1944, with suspects routed to camps like Natzweiler-Struthof for interrogation and execution, contributing to hundreds of regional deaths from repression. Following Bürckel's death on September 28, 1944, successor Willi Stöhr amplified countermeasures amid Allied advances, declaring equivalents and executing alleged saboteurs to curb desertions and activities that amplified grievances over shortages. These policies, while stabilizing administrative control, exacerbated underlying tensions by equating local dissent with treason, as evidenced by post-liberation testimonies of coerced compliance.

Dissolution and Immediate Aftermath

Collapse in 1945

As Allied forces launched on 15 March 1945, the U.S. Seventh Army, alongside the French First Army under the U.S. Sixth Army Group, initiated a major offensive to eliminate German resistance in the Saar-Palatinate region, directly encompassing the core territories of Gau Westmark. The attack targeted the weakened German First Army, which defended with understrength divisions positioned along the (Westwall) fortifications, supplemented by ad hoc units including conscripted personnel and remnants of earlier defenses; however, fuel shortages, Allied air supremacy, and superior artillery rendered these positions largely ineffective from the outset. German command under attempted to hold key industrial and terrain features in the Saarland and , but rapid Allied breakthroughs—exploiting gaps in the overstretched lines—led to the encirclement and destruction of several divisions within days. By 21 March, U.S. forces had shattered the main defensive belt, capturing cities such as and , while French units advanced through sectors previously integrated into the Gau. Local Nazi administrative functions, already strained by prior evacuations and resource depletion, collapsed amid the chaos, with party officials unable to maintain control over mobilization efforts like the , which suffered heavy casualties and desertions. The offensive concluded by 24 March 1945, when Allied units reached the Rhine River, effectively liberating the entire Gau Westmark territory and rendering its Nazi governance defunct ahead of Germany's broader capitulation. Remaining German elements fragmented into pockets of resistance, but coordinated administration ceased, paving the way for immediate by U.S. and forces.

Allied Occupation and Denazification

Following the collapse of Nazi defenses in March 1945, U.S. Third and Seventh Armies advanced through during , liberating the and regions between March 11 and 24 as part of the broader that cleared German forces from the west bank of the . The area, encompassing the former Gau territories, transitioned to French after U.S. forces withdrew from the on July 10, 1945, with French troops assuming control to administer the western zones including the and . French authorities established a structure, incorporating former Vichy regime administrators into provincial roles in the , , and , which prioritized administrative continuity over exhaustive ideological purging. The occupation detached the from the main Allied zones, designating it a in 1946 under direct French oversight, with into via the Saar Statute, while the was incorporated into the newly formed state of in 1946. Willi Stöhr, who had assumed leadership in September 1944 following Josef Bürckel's death, was arrested by French forces in May 1945 and interned until 1948. Regional Nazi officials faced initial arrests focused on security threats and high-ranking NSDAP members, but the process emphasized pragmatic governance amid postwar reconstruction needs. Denazification in the French zone proceeded with a narrower scope than in the American or British zones, relying on questionnaires, local tribunals, and categories classifying individuals from major offenders to exonerated followers, but with frequent suspensions and leniency influenced by France's own integration of Vichy collaborators into occupation roles. This approach, critiqued for inconsistencies and scandals akin to France's domestic "little Vichy" issues, resulted in many mid-level Nazis retaining positions or facing minimal penalties, as proceedings prioritized economic recovery and anti-communist stability over comprehensive ideological cleansing. By 1948, the program waned amid pressures, with regional studies in the and documenting high rates of reintegration for lesser offenders, contributing to uneven removal of Nazi influence in local administration and society.

Historical Assessment and Legacy

Nazi Achievements in Administration and Integration

The creation of on 11 December 1940 exemplified Nazi administrative streamlining by consolidating the —encompassing the and —with the annexed western departments of ( and Forbach-Boulay) into a single territorial unit under . This merger dissolved residual French departmental boundaries and prior administration in the Saar, imposing unified oversight that replaced fragmented pre-annexation structures with centralized Nazi party-led governance. The reform enabled coordinated implementation of national policies, including resource mobilization for the , across a region spanning approximately 11,000 square kilometers with a population exceeding 2 million. Integration efforts focused on ethnic reorientation through systematic Germanization, involving racial screening of inhabitants to classify them as "German-blooded" or deportable. Bürckel's administration renamed French toponyms, mandated German as the sole language in schools, courts, and media, and extended Nazi organizations like the Hitler Youth and German Labor Front to enforce cultural assimilation. By mid-1942, over 100,000 residents from Lorraine were processed via the Deutsche Volksliste, with those categorized as assimilable granted citizenship rights while an estimated 40,000 Francophones faced expulsion or forced labor relocation to maintain ethnic purity standards. These policies achieved partial demographic homogenization, aligning the Gau's populace with Reich ideological norms despite underlying linguistic and cultural frictions. Administratively, the Gau's structure fused party and state functions, with Bürckel serving concurrently as , streamlining decision-making from . This dual role facilitated rapid enforcement of the Four-Year Plan, integrating Saar coal mines—producing around 15 million tons annually—and iron resources into armaments supply chains, bolstering wartime output without the delays of federal-era divisions. Such unification contributed to the regime's self-proclaimed efficiency in borderland management, though sustained by coercive measures amid growing Allied advances.

Criticisms and Long-Term Impacts

The administration of Gau Westmark under Gauleiter Josef Bürckel faced criticism for its aggressive Germanization efforts in the annexed Moselle department of Lorraine, where French language and cultural expressions were systematically suppressed, including bans on French signage, media, and education, with schools required to teach exclusively in German by late 1940. These policies extended to forced name changes for individuals and places, aiming to erase French identity and integrate the region as a "colonial outpost" of the Reich, a characterization historians attribute to the disproportionate brutality compared to other occupied French territories. Deportations targeted approximately 100,000 residents deemed insufficiently Germanizable, including French loyalists and Jews, with expulsions peaking in 1940–1941 before labor shortages halted mass actions, though selective removals persisted. Economic policies drew rebuke for prioritizing Reich war production, such as rationalizing the Lorraine iron basin under German ownership and directing output to armaments, which exacerbated local shortages and integrated the Gau into exploitative forced labor networks affecting tens of thousands, including conscripted "malgré-nous" (against our will) draftees into the totaling over 130,000 from alone. Bürckel's oversight, continuing until his death on September 28, 1944, was faulted for enabling repressive measures like under , which failed to quell and instead fueled resentment, as evidenced by persistent and desertions. Post-war, the Gau's dissolution in March 1945 led to fragmented territorial outcomes: the Saarland portion entered a French protectorate until its 1957 integration into West Germany via referendum, while Lorraine reverted to France, retaining hybrid legal elements like the 1907 social code due to administrative continuity. Demographically, the era's policies caused lasting trauma, with surviving conscripts and deportees contributing to elevated post-war suicide rates and identity conflicts in Moselle, where bilingualism and regionalism persist amid debates over collaboration. Material destruction from 1944–1945 battles, including Allied bombings and ground fighting, inflicted widespread infrastructure damage, delaying economic recovery until the 1950s coal-steel boom, though the Nazi period's ethnic engineering left minimal permanent German settler populations due to rapid repatriations. Historical assessments highlight how these experiences reinforced French centralization efforts, mitigating irredentist claims but embedding generational wariness toward pan-German narratives in borderland politics.

References

  1. [1]
    History - saarland.de
    Sep 27, 2019 · 1940 – 1945: Following Hitler's French campaign, the department of Moselle is incorporated into the Gau Westmark along with Saarland and Pfalz.
  2. [2]
    War, Borders and Expulsions
    The 'Gaue' (districts) were the regional administrative units of the NSDAP (Nazi party). ... Da es im Gau Westmark immer wieder zu Unregelmäßigkeiten kam, wurde ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Borderlands and Nation-Building in the 19th and 20th Centuries
    Alsace was assigned to Gau Oberrhein. The département of Moselle, the Saarland and the Palatinate (Pfalz) made up Gau Westmark. This was intended to prevent.
  4. [4]
    Hitler's Volkssturm: The Nazi Militia and the Fall of Germany, 1944 ...
    The formation of the Volkssturm was a reaction to the Wehrmacht's devastating defeats in the summer of 1944, as a result of which the Allies reached the Reich's ...
  5. [5]
    Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression - Volume 2 Chapter XV Part 2
    For example, the Gauleiter was bound to confer with his staff officers (such as his deputy, his staff office leader, his organization leader, school leader, ...Missing: Westmark | Show results with:Westmark
  6. [6]
    Hitler and the Saarland - Heinrich Hoffmann Photo Gallery
    Mar 1, 2025 · Gau Rheinpfalz was merged with the Saarland on 1 March 1935 to form Gau Pfalz-Saar (renamed Gau Saarpfalz in January 1936) and Bürckel ...
  7. [7]
    Gaue der NSDAP waren im Deutschen Reich „Hoheitsgebiete“ und ...
    Jan 20, 2014 · Gau Saar-Pfalz (auch: Saarpfalz bzw. bis 1936 Pfalz-Saar) entstand aus dem Zusammenschluss des Gaus Rheinpfalz und Gau Saar (Leiter vom August ...
  8. [8]
    Saargeschichte - Saar-Nostalgie
    Im Laufe des Jahres 1935 erfolgte die Vereinigung des Saarlandes mit dem 1926 unter Joseph Bürckel gegründeten Gau Rheinpfalz zum Gau Pfalz-Saar der NSDAP. ...
  9. [9]
    Josef Bürckel - Neustadt.eu
    Er galt als Anhänger der eher sozialistischen Linie der NSDAP um Georg Strasser. 1926 wurde Bürckel von Adolf Hitler zum NSDAP-Gauleiter der Pfalz ernannt.Missing: appointed Saar
  10. [10]
    Josef Bürckel | Portal Rheinische Geschichte
    Josef Bürckel war ein einflussreicher und populärer Politiker im „Dritten Reich", dem zwischen 1925 und 1940 der Aufstieg vom Volksschullehrer zum ...Missing: appointed | Show results with:appointed
  11. [11]
    Collections Search - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    Jan 2, 2025 · Pin created to commemorate the March 1, 1935, reintegration of the Saar region into Nazi Germany. ... Date: commemoration: 1935 March 01.
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    German Gaue | worldleadersindex.org
    Territories annexed by Germany from 1938-1945 were organised into Reichsgaue. All Gaue and Reichsgaue were abolished after the defeat of Nazi Germany and the ...
  14. [14]
    World War II early German actions Saarland plebiscite
    Apr 28, 2007 · Hitler appointed Josef Bürckel Reichskommissar für die Rückgliederung des Saarlandes. ... Bürckel became Reichskommissar für das Saarland.
  15. [15]
    Pictures of Nazi Gauleiter - Calvin University
    The Gauleiter were the top Nazi regional leaders. There were 43 of them in 1941. The illustrations in Column 1 are from Julius Streicher, Reichstagung in Nü ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Lothar Wettstein, Josef Bürckel: Gauleiter - Perspectivia.net
    Lothar Wettstein, Josef Bürckel: Gauleiter – Reichsstatthalter – Krisenmanager. Adolf Hitlers. 2. überarb. Aufl., Norderstedt (Books on Demand GmbH) 2010, 660.Missing: Westmark | Show results with:Westmark
  17. [17]
    https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/server/api/core/b...
    ... Gauleiter of Baden district, and Josef Bürckel, Gauleiter of the Westmark, deported more than 6,500 local Jews, two-thirds of whom were women, from the ...
  18. [18]
    LORRAINE DECREED GERMAN TERRITORY - The New York Times
    BERLIN. Nov. 30--The incorporation of the former French province of Lorraine into the Reich was announced today by Gauleiter Joseph Buerckel, ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    [PDF] PRESIDENT'~ SECRETARY'S FILE - FDR Library
    Novt in Gau Moselland: ·SIMON (GAuleiter). (.f) Lorraine, Same administration as Gau Westmark: BURCKEL (G·auleiter) .
  20. [20]
    DUTY OF REMEMBRANCE - WORK ON THE ANNEXED MOSELLE
    ... Gau Westmark as a new territory of the Reich. The German annexation of 1940 resulted in four years of suffering for the people of Moselle, who were expelled ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Conference: “When Ruins Speak…” - - Brücke für die Zukunft
    Robert Wagner and Josef Bürckel were appointed as Gauleiters and heads of civil administration for Alsace and Lorraine, respectively. From “Tannenberg ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] REGIMENTING UNFREE LABOUR: ALSACE AND MOSELLE
    Baden to form the Gau Oberrhein, governed by Robert Wagner, and Lorraine was joined with. Saar-Palatinate to become part of the Gau Westmark, run by Josef ...
  23. [23]
    1940 - Germanization and Nazification of Alsace-Moselle
    Their goal was to turn Alsace and Moselle into Nazi territories. Thus, the party was established and organizations were set up to control the social and ...
  24. [24]
    Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 6 - The Avalon Project
    M. Joseph Burckel was appointed on 7 August, Gauleiter of Lorraine and M. Robert Wagner, Gauleiter of Alsace. The first of these provinces was attached to the ...Missing: Josef | Show results with:Josef
  25. [25]
    History of the IPGV - pfalzgeschichte.de
    The beginnings of the present-day institute trace back to the era of National Socialism: in October 1936, the so-called "Mittelstelle Saarpfalz ...
  26. [26]
    None
    ### Summary of Labor Policies and Forced Labor in Gau Westmark, Alsace, and Moselle under Nazi Administration (Josef Bürckel)
  27. [27]
    German Coal Statistics - Panzerworld
    Jan 3, 2024 · Brown coal production in Germany from 1932 to 1937 in million tons. Includes Saarland production from February 1935. 1. Brown coal production ...Brown Coal Production · Black Coal Production · Coal Production SummaryMissing: era | Show results with:era
  28. [28]
    Import Dependence and Strategic War Planning – The German Iron ...
    Mar 7, 2024 · In this paper I analyse the import dependence of the German steel industry between 1933 and 1945 and its strategic implications.
  29. [29]
    Controlling resources (Chapter 4) - The Cambridge History of the ...
    A further 87m tons came from production in occupied but not annexed territories, which remained roughly constant into 1943.Footnote Germany's per capita output ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Die Erforschung der Zwangsarbeit in der Pfalz am Beispiel der ...
    Reichsautobahnlager Frankenthal-Mörsch, in dem später Zwangsarbeiter untergebracht waren[Bild: Stadtarchiv Frankenthal]. Der von hohem Medieninteresse ...
  31. [31]
    Die Kriegsgefangenenlager in Lothringen und Saarland (Gau ...
    Sep 12, 2022 · Zeitzeugenaufruf (1940-1945): Die Kriegsgefangenenlager in Lothringen und Saarland (Gau Westmark) und die NS-Zwangsarbeit. Projektträger.
  32. [32]
    Chronology of Repression and Persecution in Occupied France ...
    Nov 19, 2007 · ... regions of Saarland and Pfalz (Palatinate), and together they formed the Gau Westmark region, under Josef Bürckel's control. French borders ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · This is part of a series of guides prepared by the American Historical Association listing records microfilmed at Alexandria, Va., by the ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] FROM RACIAL SELECTION TO POSTWAR DECEPTION - MacSphere
    105 Pine, Education in Nazi Germany, 138; H.-J. Hahn, Education and Society ... Nazi Gau.147 However, only 12 schools became 'operational' after 1937 ...
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    [PDF] WHO'S WHO IN NAZI GERMANY 1944_0001.pdf - CIA
    Party Gau Westmark BURCKEL - LEYSER - STAHL. Military District XII. Military ... and history, Party official (Students' League), since 1933 Youth. Leader ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] THE HITLER YOUTH ORGANISATION_0001.pdf - CIA
    such region corresponds to a Gau (district) of the Nazi Party proper. For ... (Corresponding to NSDAP-Gau 40, WESTMARK). GEBIETSPIHRUNG. Neustadt/Leinstr ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    1942 : The Establishment of required military service
    The decrees of 19 August 1942 for the Moselle and 25 August for Alsace forced young men of those regions to be incorporated into the German army.
  39. [39]
    On war and political radicalization: Evidence from forced ...
    This paper investigates when and how political preferences that were shaped by conflict express themselves into electoral outcomes.
  40. [40]
    HyperWar: Handbook on German Military Forces (Chapter 3) - Ibiblio
    Recruiting battalions (Ergänzungs-Sturmbanne) are reserve battalions which undergo 3 months drilling prior to summary transfer to the Waffen-SS. Each company is ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    [PDF] „Deutscher Volkssturm“.- Archivgut des Bundesarchivs
    1884-1928.- Anweisung der Gauleitung Westmark, 26. Okt. 1944. RH 59/15 Aufstellung und Ausbildung des Volkssturms, 25. Sept. 1944 -. 4. März 1945, u.a. ...
  42. [42]
    Chapter 13: The XX Corps Battle at the West Wall
    Oct 12, 2004 · Still another barrier, the Westmark Stellung, existed farther east in the Trier-Zweibruecken area. ... Volkssturm battalion. The latter was ...
  43. [43]
    Volkssturm-Ausbildungsbataillon Westmark - Einheiten des ...
    Nov 14, 2021 · Volkssturm-Ausbildungsbataillon Westmark ... Einsatz: Das Bataillon bestand aus 7 Kompanien mit je 70 - 90 Mann; alle Angehörigen des Bataillons trugen eine ...Volkssturm im Kreis Sankt Ingbert - Forum Geschichte der WehrmachtVolkssturm-Bataillon IV Saarlautern - Forum der WehrmachtMore results from www.forum-der-wehrmacht.de
  44. [44]
    Dillingen and Nalbach, Germany - JewishGen
    Dec 10, 2011 · The fate of the Jews after 1930. Through the special political situation of the Saar district, the National Socialists could not carry out ...
  45. [45]
    Remaining Nazi Sites in the Saarland - Traces of Evil
    The new "Gautheater (Westmark)" was built in 1937 and 1938 according to designs by Paul Otto August Baumgarten in neoclassical style. Officially, Saarland ...Missing: Gau | Show results with:Gau
  46. [46]
    Metz - Jewish Virtual Library
    It was in Metz that the series of anti-Jewish persecutions accompanying the First Crusade began, claiming 22 victims in the town in 1096. Foremost among the ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Alsace-Lorraine - Yad Vashem
    ... had been evacuated or evicted became active members of the French Jewish resistance. Approximately. 2,000 Alsace-Lorraine Jews perished in the Holocaust.
  48. [48]
    Jews are deported from southwestern Germany | Anne Frank House
    ... Jewish holiday. The deportation began after the victory over France, when Nazi leaders from Alsace and Lorraine deported Jews to Vichy France. When Hitler ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] The Hunt for Lost Blood: Nazi Germanization Policy in Occupied ...
    I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Bradley Jared Nichols entitled "The Hunt for. Lost Blood: Nazi Germanization Policy in Occupied Europe.<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Alsace and Moselle - Enzyklopädie: Völkermord Sinti und Roma
    Mar 5, 2024 · ... Gau Westmark, formed by the Saar and the Moselle, was centred in Saarbrücken. Between the summer and the winter of 1940, these spaces were ...
  51. [51]
    Dealing with the “undesired”: a comparative study of dispossession ...
    ... appointed as the representative of the Reich Commissioner for the Consolidation of German Nationhood in Lorraine by Josef Bürckel in September 1940.
  52. [52]
    LORRAINE EVICTIONS HALT; Nazi Decree Protects Rights of ...
    BERLIN, Nov. 25—The evacuation of the French population from Lorraine has been stopped by a decree of Gauleiter Josef Buerckel, Governor of the Province of ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] 277 Krémer against Hitler: A Case of Mennonite Resistance in ...
    They were attached to Gau Oberrhein (Alsace) and Gau. Westmark (Lorraine), submitted to germanization and Nazification by a regime that meant to control all ...
  54. [54]
    The Nazis in Alsace and Lorraine | Foreign Affairs
    THE French Government at Vichy did not have the power to prevent the German Government from virtually annexing Alsace and Lorraine.Missing: Josef Westmark
  55. [55]
    Operation Undertone: The Allies Clear the Rhineland | New Orleans
    Mar 6, 2025 · US Third and Seventh Armies' March 1945 offensive cleared the Rhineland, pushing deep into Germany and decisively weakening German defenses ...Missing: Palatinate | Show results with:Palatinate
  56. [56]
    Rhineland Offensive (February-March 1945) - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · The Rhineland Offensive was designed to drive the German army from the area north of the Mosel River in preparation for the main Allied invasion of Germany.
  57. [57]
    HyperWar: The Last Offensive [Chapter 12] - Ibiblio
    As a military obstacle, the Saar-Palatinate drew strength not only from the West Wall but also from the built-up industrial region, from deep stream valleys, ...
  58. [58]
    Saar Protectorate - Wikipedia
    In 1935, Nazi Germany established its full sovereignty over the territory. Geographically, the post-World War II protectorate corresponded to the current German ...Gau Westmark · Saar franc · Saar Treaty · 1955 Saar Statute referendumMissing: Pfalz- | Show results with:Pfalz-
  59. [59]
    [PDF] The Personnel of the French Occupation in Germany after 1945
    A number of former Vichy administrators became secretary-generals in the military government of the provinces Württemberg, Saar, Palatinate and Rhineland respec ...
  60. [60]
    Denazification - AlliiertenMuseum
    Denazification aimed to cleanse German society of Nazi influences, excluding those involved from key positions, and involved vetting individuals via ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Learning from Defeat. The French Occupation of Germany after two ...
    The presence of tainted Vichy administrators in the French administration led to a more lenient denazification strategy in occupied Germany. In the second ...
  62. [62]
    The Personnel of the French Occupation in Germany after 1945 - jstor
    A number of former Vichy administrators became secretary-generals in the military government of the provinces Württemberg, Saar, Palatinate and Rhineland respec ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] 3783 International Court of Justice - Stacks
    ... 1940 ; but it is significant that it did not become a propaganda instrument of the first magnitude until the Reich had suffered its first reverse in the ...
  64. [64]
    Deportations from Central and Western Europe (Chapter 19) - The ...
    ... Lorraine was added to the Saar-Palatinate under the name Gau Westmark. The heads of these two administrative entities, Robert Wagner and Josef Bürckel ...
  65. [65]
    The Gau Westmark as colonial outpost | Rethinking economic, milita
    Historians of France's Moselle region tend to describe the wartime experience of the borderland as uniquely brutal, at least in comparison to the fate that.
  66. [66]
    Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    The Nazis have attempted to integrate the industrial basin by consolidation of ownership in German hands, by rationalization of operation and by its political ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  67. [67]
    Stress Test for German Nationalism: Protective Custody in Alsace ...
    Aug 18, 2021 · The article finds that protective custody, an emergency measure under martial law, played a central role in the failure of German policy in Alsace-Lorraine.
  68. [68]
    Liberation Route in Alsace and Lorraine | Rough Guides
    In 1940, when Germany invaded France, the Third Reich took what it considered to be its own lands back. Alsace and Moselle were not annexed or occupied; they ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Alsace–Lorraine/Elsaß–Lothringen: destruction, revival and ...
    Widespread material damage was inflicted in this contested territory in both world wars. The first wave of destruction in 1940 was inflicted by German forces, ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects