Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Geopark

A UNESCO Global Geopark is a single, unified geographical area encompassing sites and landscapes of geological significance, managed holistically to integrate of geological , educational , and sustainable socio-economic development. These designations emphasize reconnecting human communities with Earth's 4.6 billion-year geological through , , and local involvement, fostering without compromising natural resources. The framework originated from the Digne Convention's philosophy of geological promotion and evolved into formal endorsement in 2015 via the organization's , which established the Global Geoparks Network to standardize criteria and oversight. As of September 2025, the network comprises 229 geoparks across 50 countries on five continents, reflecting expanded global recognition of geological diversity's role in , , and resilient development models. Notable achievements include enhanced conservation of unique formations like volcanic maars and ancient rock sequences, alongside community-driven initiatives that balance revenues with preservation, though designations require periodic re-evaluation to maintain standards amid varying local governance capacities.

Definition and Core Concepts

Geological and Heritage Criteria

A UNESCO Global Geopark must demonstrate geological of international significance, encompassing sites that represent key stages in Earth's geological history, exhibit rare or exceptional geological processes, or feature unique formations with substantial scientific, educational, or aesthetic value. Such heritage is evaluated by independent scientific experts who assess criteria including representativity, , and rarity, ensuring the sites contribute meaningfully to global geoscientific knowledge rather than merely local or national interest. Geological criteria emphasize the preservation of these features within a defined territorial of sufficient scale—typically encompassing multiple interconnected sites—to allow for comprehensive study and protection, excluding areas where geological value is overshadowed by extractive activities or inadequate safeguarding measures. For instance, qualifying geoparks often include volcanic structures, fault systems, or deposits that illustrate planetary , with evaluations prioritizing empirical geological data over subjective interpretations. Heritage criteria broaden this to integrate geological elements with associated natural and cultural dimensions, requiring demonstrable linkages between geological features and local intangible heritage, such as , , or artisanal practices shaped by the . This connection must foster authentic educational narratives grounded in verifiable historical and ethnographic evidence, avoiding unsubstantiated claims, and support sustainable conservation that respects causal relationships between human activities and geological integrity. Overall, these criteria ensure geoparks serve as laboratories for geoscientific while linking tangible geological assets to enduring cultural expressions.

Sustainable Development Framework

The sustainable development framework in mandates a holistic approach that balances geological with socioeconomic advancement for local populations. Each designated Geopark must implement a management plan, collaboratively developed with stakeholders, to address , economic diversification, and while fostering as a low-impact source. This plan emphasizes long-term viability, requiring ongoing monitoring, capacity-building programs, and partnerships that integrate scientific expertise with local knowledge to mitigate risks like over-tourism or . Geotourism serves as the cornerstone of economic sustainability within this framework, designed to generate employment—such as in guiding, hospitality, and artisan crafts—while educating visitors on geological processes and environmental stewardship. Unlike mass tourism models, it prioritizes site-specific carrying capacities and revenue reinvestment into conservation, with empirical evidence from operational Geoparks showing increased local GDP contributions without proportional ecological degradation. The framework also incorporates principles of inclusive governance, demanding public-private collaborations and political commitment to ensure equitable benefits distribution, particularly in rural or geologically vulnerable areas. Alignment with the (SDGs) is integral, with Geoparks targeting goals like SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth), SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities), and SDG 15 (life on land) through targeted initiatives such as biodiversity mapping, disaster training, and heritage-based . For instance, activities focus on and , drawing on geological to inform land-use policies that sustain livelihoods amid environmental pressures. Re-designation every four to six years enforces adherence, with audits verifying measurable outcomes like job creation metrics or reduced loss. This evidence-based structure distinguishes Geoparks from purely protective designations by embedding causal links between heritage valorization and verifiable socioeconomic gains.

Distinction from National Parks and Reserves

UNESCO Global Geoparks prioritize the conservation and interpretation of geological heritage, integrating , scientific research, and sustainable local development, whereas national parks and reserves focus predominantly on protecting , ecosystems, and scenic values through stringent regulatory measures. parks, established under national laws since the late —such as Yellowstone in 1872—impose legal restrictions on resource extraction, construction, and to maintain ecological integrity, often limiting visitor access and commercial activities to minimize human impact. In contrast, geoparks operate without such statutory protections, relying instead on voluntary management plans, stakeholder partnerships, and designation to promote education and economic opportunities like eco-tourism, which can encompass modified landscapes and human settlements. A core operational difference lies in governance and land-use authority: national parks and reserves typically feature oversight with enforceable zoning and controls to prevent habitat fragmentation or species endangerment, as seen in over 6,000 protected areas worldwide covering 15% of terrestrial land by 2023. Geoparks, however, hold no town and country powers or veto rights over development, , or projects, emphasizing instead collaborative strategies among local authorities, businesses, and communities to balance heritage promotion with viable livelihoods. This approach allows geoparks to function across diverse terrains, including urban fringes or agricultural zones, without the exclusionary boundaries common in reserves, which prioritize preservation over geological storytelling.
AspectUNESCO Global GeoparksNational Parks and Reserves
Primary FocusGeological sites, landscapes, and Earth sciences education, ecosystems, and natural scenery
Legal StatusNon-statutory designation; no enforced protectionsStatutory protected areas under national laws with regulatory enforcement
Human ActivitiesEncourages , , and community involvementRestricts extraction, construction, and intensive use to protect /
Management ApproachBottom-up, multi-stakeholder partnerships without planning veto powersTop-down with and limitations
This framework enables geoparks to complement rather than compete with existing protected areas; for instance, some geoparks overlap with national parks but extend efforts to non-protected zones for broader geoheritage awareness, fostering resilience against threats like or through knowledge dissemination rather than prohibition. Reserves, akin to national parks, similarly emphasize ecological safeguards but may allow limited sustainable use in buffer zones, though their core zones maintain stricter no-interference policies compared to geoparks' integrative model.

Historical Development

European Origins and Early Initiatives (1990s–2000)

The geopark concept emerged in during the late 1980s and early as a framework for conserving geological heritage while fostering sustainable local development through education and . In 1991, the International Declaration of the Rights of the Memory of the Earth, adopted at the Digne-les-Bains symposium in , articulated foundational principles emphasizing the protection of geological records as a shared inheritance, akin to . This declaration, hosted in the Reserve Géologique de Haute-Provence—established as 's first national geological in 1984 covering approximately 200 hectares—highlighted the need for integrated management of geological sites to preserve Earth's historical narrative. By the mid-1990s, experimental geopark-like initiatives proliferated with support from the and , focusing on regions with exceptional geological features. Notable early efforts included the Natural History Museum of the in , founded in 1994 to protect Miocene fossilized woodlands spanning 15-20 million years, and preparatory work in Germany's Vulkaneifel region, where volcanic landscapes from phases dating 45-35 million and 700,000-11,000 years ago prompted the formation of Geopark Gerolsteiner Land by 2000. Similarly, Spain's Maestrazgo area began developing strategies around its karstic and tectonic formations, drawing on local natural monuments like the Puente de Fonseca. These projects emphasized linking geological with economic benefits, such as visitor centers and interpretive trails, amid growing recognition of threats from and resource extraction. The culmination of these initiatives occurred in June 2000 with the establishment of the European Geoparks Network (EGN) by the four pioneering geoparks: Haute-Provence, , Maestrazgo, and Vulkaneifel. This network, initially comprising these members across , , , and Germany, aimed to standardize practices for geological protection and cross-border cooperation. The first EGN annual meeting followed in October 2000 in Molinos, Teruel, , solidifying collaborative protocols under auspices. These developments marked the transition from isolated reserves to a networked model, influencing subsequent global expansions.

Formation of Global Networks (2000–2015)

The European Geoparks Network (EGN) was established in June 2000 by four pioneering geoparks from distinct European countries: the Réserve Géologique de Haute-Provence in , Vulkaneifel in , Maestrazgo in , and the in . This initiative aimed to foster cooperation among regions with significant geological heritage, emphasizing the protection of geodiversity, public education on geological processes, and promotion of sustainable economic development through . The network's formation responded to growing recognition of geological sites' vulnerability to and pressures, building on earlier European efforts in geoconservation dating back to the . Under the auspices of UNESCO from 2001, the EGN expanded rapidly, incorporating additional members through a rigorous designation process that evaluated geological significance, management plans, and community involvement. By 2004, the network comprised 17 European geoparks, which, alongside eight Chinese national geoparks, convened at in to establish the Global Geoparks Network (GGN). The GGN emerged as a voluntary to extend the geopark model beyond , particularly integrating China's extensive network of over 100 national geoparks established since 1999, thereby facilitating cross-continental exchange of best practices in geological heritage conservation and . From 2004 to 2015, the GGN operated as a non-governmental entity supported by , focusing on quality standards, joint research, and annual conferences to harmonize geopark operations worldwide. Membership grew to include geoparks from , , and the , with the network emphasizing integrated management that links geological features to cultural and biological heritage while prioritizing local stakeholder participation over top-down conservation models. Key activities included developing common labeling criteria and revalidation protocols every four years to ensure sustained commitment to educational outreach and eco-friendly , which by 2014 encompassed dozens of designated sites across multiple continents. This period marked the transition from regional experimentation to a proto-global framework, laying groundwork for formal institutionalization without yet imposing binding international obligations on member states.

UNESCO Integration and Expansion (2015–Present)

In 2015, the UNESCO General Conference adopted a resolution integrating the existing Global Geoparks Network into the organization's framework, thereby establishing the "" designation as part of its Earth sciences program. This formalization emphasized the holistic management of geographical areas encompassing sites and landscapes of international geological significance, linking geological heritage conservation with sustainable economic development, , and community involvement. The integration aligned geoparks with broader objectives, including the 2030 Agenda for , positioning them as model regions for integrating natural and social sciences in addressing global challenges. Following the integration, the network underwent rapid expansion, with periodic designations of new geoparks by UNESCO's Executive Board based on rigorous evaluations of geological merit, management plans, and sustainable practices. By 2022, the number of reached 177 across 46 countries, reflecting efforts to achieve more equitable global distribution beyond initial concentrations in and . This growth accelerated, adding 18 sites in 2023 (bringing the total to 195 in 48 countries, incorporating first-time entries from and the ) and another 18 in 2024, including expansions into Nordic regions like Denmark's South Fyn Archipelago and Finland's Lappajärvi . As of September 2025, the network comprised 229 geoparks in 50 countries, covering diverse geological features from volcanic maars to ancient canyons. The expansion has prioritized underrepresented regions, such as , , and the Pacific, while reinforcing requirements for revalidation every four to six years to ensure ongoing compliance with criteria. Key initiatives include fostering and local geoproducts to drive economic benefits, as seen in sites like Brazil's Seridó and Southern Canyons, designated in 2022. This period has also seen increased transnational collaborations and aspiring geopark applications, with proposals under review potentially expanding the network further by 2026.

Designation Processes and Types

UNESCO Global Geoparks

constitute areas of international geological significance designated by , emphasizing integrated management of alongside education and sustainable economic activities. These geoparks are defined as single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of outstanding geological value are protected, interpreted for public understanding, and leveraged for local without compromising goals. The label, formally established in 2015 following UNESCO's endorsement by member states, builds on the Global Geoparks Network founded in 2004 to promote best practices in geoconservation worldwide. Designation follows a rigorous, bottom-up process driven by local initiatives. Applicant regions must form a legally recognized managing body, develop a comprehensive management plan addressing geological protection, educational programs, and strategies, and demonstrate community involvement. Applications are submitted annually to , where the secretariat prepares summaries for member state review before evaluation by independent international experts assessing compliance with operational guidelines. Approval by the Executive Board grants the status for a four-year term, during which geoparks must maintain active participation in the Global Geoparks Network, including knowledge sharing and collaborative projects. Core criteria for designation mandate geological features of demonstrable scientific importance, verified through peer-reviewed assessments; effective ensuring holistic ; enhanced public access and interpretation via infrastructure such as interpretive centers, signage, and digital resources; and commitment to that integrates geological heritage with cultural and biological elements. Revalidation occurs every four years via on-site inspections, resulting in a for exemplary performance, yellow for areas needing improvement, or red signaling potential label withdrawal if deficiencies persist. As of July 2025, 229 operate in 50 countries, spanning diverse geological contexts from volcanic terrains to ancient fossil sites, with hosting the majority followed by . This expansion underscores the program's role in global efforts to mitigate geological hazards, advance education, and support rural economies through responsible , though success varies by local implementation fidelity.

National and Regional Variants

In parallel to the UNESCO Global Geoparks framework, numerous countries have established geopark designation systems to identify and protect geological heritage sites, emphasizing local governance, , and community involvement while adapting criteria to domestic priorities. These variants typically require assessments of geological value, integrated management plans, and contributions to regional economies, but they do not undergo UNESCO's evaluation or periodic revalidation. Japan's Japanese Geoparks Network (JGN), founded in 2007 as a specified , exemplifies a robust system, certifying 46 geoparks as of April 2024 through evaluations by the Geopark focused on geological features, educational outreach, and economic viability. Of these, 10 have progressed to Global Geopark status, demonstrating how designations can serve as pathways to international recognition while fostering domestic collaboration among local governments and stakeholders. Indonesia maintains a complementary national geopark program under the Jaringan Geopark Indonesia, designating 10 national geoparks alongside 10 and 4 aspiring sites as of recent records; these focus on volcanic, , and marine geological assets, with management emphasizing and in archipelago contexts. China's national geopark initiative, coordinated by the Ministry of Natural Resources since 1999, represents one of the earliest and most extensive such systems, initially drawing from global geopark concepts to designate sites highlighting diverse formations like landscapes and tectonic features; it has influenced standards through the establishment of a global network of national geoparks, though precise counts fluctuate with periodic reviews and mergers. Regional variants, often sub-national or provincially led, adapt the model further for localized administration; for example, within 's framework, provincial geoparks operate under national oversight to address specific terrains, such as the Danxiashan site's sandstone pinnacles, promoting tailored without federal-level elevation. These systems collectively expand geopark principles beyond UNESCO's scope, enabling broader coverage of geological diversity but varying in enforcement rigor and international comparability.

Transnational and Aspiring Geoparks

Transnational geoparks represent a subset of that extend across international boundaries, necessitating binational or multinational structures to manage geological , , and collaboratively. As of 2023, only four such geoparks exist worldwide, all located in and highlighting unique cross-border geological features like landscapes, volcanic formations, and glacial remnants. These designations underscore the challenges of aligning policies, funding, and across sovereign states, yet they promote shared scientific research and benefits. The Cuilcagh Lakelands Global Geopark, spanning () and the , covers approximately 500 square kilometers of , including the system and Cuilcagh Mountain; originally designated as the Marble Arch Caves Global Geopark in 2001—the world's first cross-border geopark—it achieved full status in 2015 and focuses on conservation alongside trails like the Cuilcagh Boardwalk. The Muscheu Arch/Łuk Mużakowa Global Geopark, between and , protects a post-glacial formed by the Lusatian complex, designated in 2011 with an area of about 740 square kilometers emphasizing rehabilitation and educational programs. The Karawanken/Karavanke Global Geopark, shared by and , encompasses 1,400 square kilometers of and thrust faults, designated in 2014 to integrate geological interpretation with preservation. Finally, the Novohrad-Nógrád Global Geopark, bridging and , features volcanic basalt formations and across 1,000 square kilometers, designated in 2010 as a model for transboundary cooperation in and . Aspiring geoparks are prospective areas actively preparing applications for Global Geopark designation, requiring demonstration of internationally significant geological sites, a dedicated legal management entity, robust strategies, and community involvement. The application process involves submitting detailed proposals to for initial review, followed by field evaluations by international experts, with successful candidates joining after endorsement by the Executive Board. As of 2023, numerous aspiring initiatives exist globally, including seven in —such as those in and —focused on diverse features like ancient shield rocks and glacial deposits, often supported by national geopark networks for . These efforts emphasize pre-designation networking with established geoparks to adopt best practices in and , though success rates remain selective due to stringent criteria on holistic management.

Management and Operational Practices

Governance and Stakeholder Involvement

UNESCO Global Geoparks are governed through a dedicated management body that holds legal recognition under national legislation and is empowered to oversee the entire designated territory. This body coordinates activities across governance, protection of geological sites, sustainable economic development, education, and partnerships, without creating new protected area statuses but relying on existing national or local laws for site conservation. At the international level, the Global Geoparks Network (GGN) supports coordination via its General Assembly, which serves as the legislative body comprising member geoparks, and an Executive Board that handles operations and revalidation processes every four years to ensure compliance with criteria. National and regional geopark variants, such as those in Europe or Asia outside UNESCO designation, typically follow similar localized governance models adapted to domestic frameworks, often led by governmental or non-governmental entities without mandatory international oversight. Central to operations is a comprehensive management plan, developed and periodically reviewed by the , which outlines strategies for , development, and monitoring, with clear timelines, responsibilities, and metrics for accountability. These plans emphasize participatory , incorporating transparent and financial through diverse funding sources, while avoiding over-reliance on volunteers by maintaining staffing. Revalidation assessments by evaluate plan implementation, potentially issuing a "" for deficiencies requiring remediation within two years or a "" leading to status revocation if standards are not met. Stakeholder involvement adopts a bottom-up approach, mandating engagement of local communities, groups, landowners, businesses, operators, scientists, and regional authorities from the designation process onward to foster ownership and long-term viability. This includes advisory partnerships, community programs, integration of local into , and collaborative , which enhance benefits while mitigating conflicts over resource use. In practice, such as in models examined for regions like , effective hinges on formalized agreements and regular consultations to balance with economic gains, though challenges arise from varying local capacities and authority overlaps.

Key Activities: Education, Tourism, and Conservation

UNESCO Global Geoparks mandate comprehensive educational programs to foster public understanding of geological heritage, targeting all age groups through structured initiatives such as school curricula integration, interpretive centers, and interactive workshops. These efforts often utilize geoparks as outdoor classrooms, providing hands-on learning about geodiversity, natural hazards, and sustainable practices; for instance, programs in geoparks like Hong Kong's include seminars, rock classrooms, and dinosaur-themed science activities for students. Specific examples encompass "Geokids" interactive sessions for children aged 8-12 in Germany's Bergstrasse-Odenwald Geopark and tailored programs on regional and in Japan's Geopark, emphasizing experiential field trips and guidebooks. Such activities aim to build local capacity and visitor awareness, with many geoparks collaborating with schools to deliver geo-education aligned with broader goals. In tourism, geoparks prioritize as a vehicle for economic diversification, offering guided geological walks, interpretive trails, and eco-friendly accommodations that highlight unique landforms while minimizing environmental impact. This approach integrates geological interpretation with cultural and elements, as seen in practices that develop sustainable visitor management plans to support local economies without compromising site integrity; guidelines stress prioritizing in tourism strategies, such as limiting access to fragile sites and promoting low-impact activities. Geotourism in these areas has demonstrated potential for community involvement and revenue generation, with studies indicating positive correlations between visitor numbers and local growth when paired with effective planning. Conservation activities in geoparks focus on protecting geoheritage through habitat restoration, geological features, and community-led initiatives that address threats like and . Best practices are shared via networks, enabling collaborative efforts such as mitigation education and resource preservation; for example, in China's Xiangxi Global Geopark, designation has correlated with improved ecological quality metrics post-2015. These efforts extend to linked with geological sites, involving local stakeholders in sustainable land-use policies that balance human activities with long-term site viability, often yielding measurable outcomes in reduced degradation rates.

Funding and Revalidation Mechanisms

UNESCO Global Geoparks receive no direct operational funding from or the Global Geoparks Network (GGN), relying instead on self-generated revenues and support from local, regional, and national authorities to implement management plans that address geological , , and sustainable . Primary funding sources include income, such as visitor fees, guided tours, and related services, which contribute to local economies while financing efforts; for instance, studies indicate that in these areas drives measurable without substantial external subsidies. Additional support may come from targeted grants, like the /GGN consultancy grants for aspiring geoparks in , which provide technical assistance rather than cash infusions, covering needs assessments and on-site missions valued at up to €10,000 per project as of 2022. National and regional geoparks, lacking UNESCO's international framework, often depend more heavily on governmental budgets or public-private partnerships tailored to local contexts, with emphasized through diversified income streams like merchandise sales and educational programs to avoid overreliance on volatility. Critics note potential funding disparities, particularly in developing regions where establishment costs and ongoing operations strain limited resources, prompting calls for an international fund—though none currently exists—to bridge gaps between developed and aspiring geoparks. Revalidation for occurs every four years to verify compliance with designation criteria, involving a rigorous evaluation by two international experts who conduct on-site missions assessing management effectiveness, , and progress in , , and . Geopark operators bear the costs of expert travel and accommodation, submitting detailed reports on activities and outcomes beforehand; failure to demonstrate sustained quality can result in loss of status, as the process mirrors initial designation scrutiny to uphold the label's integrity. For national variants, revalidation mechanisms vary, often involving periodic audits by designating bodies but without the standardized international oversight, potentially leading to inconsistencies in long-term viability. This cycle ensures dynamic monitoring, with over 200 geoparks having undergone revalidations since the program's expansion, reinforcing accountability amid claims of bureaucratic overhead.

Achievements and Positive Impacts

Economic Contributions via Geotourism

Geotourism within emphasizes visits to geological heritage sites, integrating educational experiences with natural and cultural attractions to drive local revenue streams. This form of supports expenditures on , transportation, guided excursions, and geopark-branded products, thereby bolstering peripheral economies in often remote or underdeveloped regions. Official guidelines highlight the development of like trails and interpretive centers, which facilitate visitor access while channeling funds into community-led initiatives. Employment generation represents a core economic outcome, with geotourism creating positions for local residents as guides, workers, and artisans promoting regional specialties. In particular, programs for or women's cooperatives have enabled direct participation in service provision, such as homestays and craft sales tied to geological themes. These opportunities extend beyond seasonal , fostering ancillary businesses like food vendors and transport operators, which sustain year-round income in geopark territories. Empirical evidence underscores revenue amplification post-designation; for instance, a survey of eight Chinese geoparks documented geotourism income tripling over the four years following recognition, attributed to heightened visibility and structured promotional efforts. Comparative analyses in Asian contexts, including , Yandangshan, and , affirm that such designations vitalize economic activities through sustained visitor inflows and , though quantitative metrics vary by site governance and marketing efficacy. Overall, these contributions hinge on balancing tourist volumes with resource capacity to avoid .

Educational and Scientific Advancements

advance by integrating geoscientific knowledge into formal and programs, often serving as outdoor classrooms that connect geological with broader themes of and environmental awareness. These initiatives include school curricula, exhibits, guided , and specialized activities such as summer camps and children's clubs, which engage local communities and tourists in understanding Earth's geological processes. A bibliometric of publications from 2012 to 2022 highlights geoparks' role in fostering geosciences , with over 200 documents emphasizing their function in raising awareness of natural and sustainable practices among diverse audiences. Many geoparks collaborate with to develop geoeducation strategies that enhance students' understanding of , as demonstrated in programs that link site-specific fieldwork to classroom learning on topics like and geological hazards. Scientifically, geoparks contribute to advancements through dedicated programs that partner with universities and geological surveys, facilitating fieldwork, data collection, and dissemination of findings on geological formations, , and geohazards. For example, the Sesia Valley UNESCO Global Geopark in features a fossil supervolcano discovered in 2013 by an SMU-led team, which has since informed studies on ancient volcanic activity and regional . Other sites have yielded paleontological discoveries, such as Neanderthal remains in cave deposits, advancing knowledge of and geology. A review of publications from 2001 to 2022 documents a steady rise in geopark-related scientific output, with themes centered on heritage conservation, , and interdisciplinary that bridges with and . These efforts are supported by international networks, enabling cross-geopark collaborations that amplify impact and training opportunities for early-career .

Documented Conservation Successes

In the Xiangxi UNESCO Global Geopark, , designation and subsequent management activities led to measurable improvements in ecological quality, with data indicating enhanced vegetation cover and reduced between the pre-designation phase (before 2018) and post-global recognition stages, attributed to integrated conservation planning and stricter land-use regulations. These outcomes were quantified using indices such as the Ecological Index (RSEI), which rose from 0.62 in 2010 to 0.68 by 2020, reflecting better habitat stability amid landscape pressures. The Toba Caldera UNESCO Global Geopark, , achieved reaffirmed compliance with conservation criteria in September 2025, earning "" status after addressing prior deficiencies in and community-based protection around , where pollution from and had previously threatened and endemic species s. Community empowerment programs, including local training in and habitat , contributed to this recovery, with initiatives reducing illegal fishing and shoreline through participatory since 2020. In Japan's Mount Hakusan UNESCO Global Geopark, collaborative efforts with local stakeholders have preserved alpine , including rare flora like the endemic Hakusan orchid, through geotourism-funded trail maintenance and control, resulting in sustained population stability documented in annual monitoring reports from 2015 onward. Similarly, Russia's Altai Geopark has integrated geopark activities with reserve protections to safeguard transboundary ecosystems, achieving reduced of snow leopards and sheep via programs that increased patrol coverage by 40% between 2018 and 2022. These cases highlight how geopark frameworks can yield targeted gains when aligned with verifiable monitoring and local enforcement, though broader empirical validation across the network remains limited to site-specific studies.

Criticisms, Challenges, and Effectiveness

Environmental and Sustainability Shortfalls

Despite their mandate to foster and , have documented environmental shortfalls, including persistent and degradation from human activities. A of ten geoparks across eight countries revealed significant in five (50%), with contaminants such as trace metals and metalloids—, , , lead, and —exceeding safe thresholds in soils, , and sediments. In Global Geopark, , cadmium concentrations in reached 0.08 mg/L, over ten times regulatory limits, linked to agricultural runoff, production, , and tourism-related waste. Similarly, levels in Terras de Cavaleiros Geopark, , hit 62.2 μg/L in sources, stemming from legacy and agricultural practices. Tourism intensification exacerbates ecological strain in several sites. In Bohemian Paradise UNESCO Global Geopark, Czech Republic, overtourism has induced man-made erosion, littering, excrement pollution along trails, and deliberate damage like carvings and spray-painting on rock formations, prompting closures such as the Apolena rock town since 2010 due to visitor vandalism. Residents report overcrowding and habitat disruption at key sites including Hruboskalsko Rocks and Prachovské skály, where proximity to unregulated facilities attracts irresponsible behavior without correlating directly to visitor volume. In Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu UNESCO Global Geopark, Indonesia, pre-COVID tourism surges caused litter accumulation, vehicle exhaust emissions, and traffic congestion, fostering a "dirty" landscape that challenges sustainability claims. Management gaps further compound vulnerabilities. Daknong Global Geopark, , experiences ongoing land encroachment due to absent plans and weak oversight, hindering effective geoheritage protection amid expanding crop areas from 119,883 hectares in 2015 to 184,563 hectares by 2024. Malaysian geoparks, including fragile and peat swamp terrains, suffer and facility decay from monsoonal rains, worsened by chronic funding shortages and manpower deficits that delay low-impact repairs. In Xiangxi Global Geopark, , development correlates with persistently poor ecological quality in eastern and southern zones, despite overall improvements in remote-sensing indices post-2017 designation measures. These cases highlight causal links between under-resourced governance, unchecked geotourism, and extractive legacies, where aspirational sustainability frameworks falter against empirical pressures, often prioritizing economic gains over verifiable environmental safeguards.

Overtourism and Resource Strain

In UNESCO Global Geoparks, overtourism manifests when visitor volumes surpass site carrying capacities, resulting in overcrowding, habitat disruption, and infrastructure overload. A 2025 study in the Bohemian Paradise Geopark, Czech Republic, utilized participatory mapping to identify hotspots where tourism intensity exceeds sustainable thresholds, leading to soil erosion, trail degradation, and biodiversity loss in sensitive geological areas. Similarly, post-COVID surges in Indonesian geoparks have triggered congestion at key sites, exacerbating litter accumulation and improper waste disposal, which contaminate geological features and water sources. Resource strain intensifies as tourism growth outpaces management capabilities, straining supplies, , and local transport networks. In Hong Kong's UNESCO Geopark, encompassing Sai Kung islands, October 2025 reports documented thousands of daily visitors trampling coral reefs and excavating , depleting fragile ecosystems and violating protocols. Malaysian geoparks face chronic underfunding for facility upkeep, with limited budgets and personnel shortages hindering responses to tourism-induced wear on trails, signage, and interpretive centers as of 2025 assessments. Stakeholder surveys in dual-designated sites reveal that 40% express alarm over resource pressures from rising visitor numbers, including heightened demands on energy and sanitation that compromise long-term geological preservation. In China's Xiangxi Geopark, ethnic tourism activities have demonstrably lowered ecological quality indices through and , underscoring how promotional can inadvertently accelerate degradation without adaptive limits. These patterns highlight a tension between economic incentives and mandates, where unchecked visitation risks eroding the very geoparks aim to protect.

Bureaucratic Overhead and Questionable Value

The pursuit of Global Geopark designation requires aspiring areas to submit extensive applications detailing geological significance, management structures, and strategies, followed by expert evaluations and potential revisions. Once designated, geoparks must adhere to ongoing obligations, including the preparation of comprehensive management plans and participation in the Global Geoparks Network, which entails networking events and reporting. Revalidation occurs every four years through a rigorous process involving detailed progress reports on , , and outcomes, supplemented by international expert site visits to verify compliance. These requirements impose measurable administrative burdens, with costs for preparation, implementation, and revalidation varying by region but often reliant on public funding, grants, or private contributions, potentially straining local budgets in under-resourced areas. In North American contexts, park managers have noted the significant effort demanded, questioning the necessity amid existing designations like Heritage sites. Critics contend that such overhead can hinder rather than enhance local initiatives, as evidenced by concerns in proposals where stakeholders, including agricultural interests, feared added regulatory layers—termed ""—that could restrict without commensurate benefits. Similarly, analyses of the highlight risks of escalating bureaucracy from centralized oversight, which may erode the bottom-up, community-driven ethos originally envisioned for geoparks. The tangible value of these designations remains debated due to limited quantitative assessments of net benefits versus costs. While proponents cite potential revenues, empirical data on socioeconomic gains are inconsistent, with some regions experiencing minimal visitation increases or management challenges from uneven global geodiversity coverage in selected sites. In cases like geoparks, bureaucratic and financial hurdles have compounded implementation difficulties, underscoring how administrative demands may not always yield proportional advancements in protection or development. Independent evaluations, less influenced by institutional promotion, suggest that the program's effectiveness hinges on local capacity, often revealing opportunity costs where resources could alternatively support direct without international labeling.

Controversies and Debates

Conflicts with Local Development Priorities

In certain regions, Global Geopark designations have sparked tensions when conservation priorities appear to constrain local economic activities, such as resource extraction or expansion, which communities view as essential for growth. Although official guidelines state that Geopark status imposes no direct restrictions on compliant economic pursuits, national or regional laws implementing the designation can introduce regulatory hurdles that prioritize geological preservation over immediate development needs. For instance, in , the National Geopark Regulations of 2001 explicitly ban within designated geoparks to protect geoheritage sites, a measure that has conflicted with livelihoods in resource-dependent areas where extractive industries historically provided and . A prominent recent example of local occurred in with the proposed Georgian Bay Aspiring Geopark, spanning approximately 48,000 square kilometers. In June 2025, Gore Bay Town Council on passed a strongly opposing inclusion, arguing that the designation could undermine local and impose indirect controls on and development decisions without sufficient input. Similarly, Billings Township joined the opposition in October 2025, highlighting fears that Geopark oversight might favor promotion at the expense of traditional economic sectors like and small-scale , potentially leading to "unsustainable " burdens on . These resolutions reflect broader concerns among rural municipalities that international , while promising long-term gains, risks sidelining short-term priorities like development or resource utilization in economically stagnant areas. Such conflicts often stem from mismatched timelines between Geopark-driven sustainable models, which emphasize gradual benefits, and local demands for rapid industrialization or extraction to address or . In Indonesia's geoparks, for example, ongoing activities have persisted despite designation efforts, illustrating causal frictions where enforcement of heritage protection disrupts established economic practices without immediate alternatives, leading to land disputes and uneven partnership dynamics in transitions. Critics, including affected communities, contend that these designations can inadvertently global environmental narratives over empirically grounded local needs, though proponents argue that holistic management eventually aligns with viable .

Perceived Greenwashing and Globalist Influences

Critics contend that UNESCO Global Geoparks engage in greenwashing by emphasizing sustainable development and conservation while facilitating tourism-driven activities that exacerbate environmental degradation. For example, in the Bohemian Paradise UNESCO Global Geopark, overtourism has resulted in overcrowded viewpoints, visitor rule violations such as entering prohibited areas, and resultant habitat disturbance as of 2025 surveys. Systematic reviews reveal environmental pollution from sources like agricultural runoff, mining, and waste disposal in multiple Geoparks, including Langkawi, yet such issues have been formally studied in fewer than 4% of all designated sites, indicating potential gaps in monitoring and mitigation. Geopark guidelines have drawn scrutiny for promoting as a pathway to without incorporating strategies, leading to conflicts with resource conservation; documented cases include wildfires in Torres del Paine linked to expansion and of local ecological practices. This duality—between proclaimed holistic protection and selective emphasis on geological sites—has been argued to undervalue broader ecosystems and displace , rendering protection claims superficial. Instances of non-compliance, such as two Canadian Geoparks (Cliffs of Fundy and ) facing potential delisting in 2025 for inadequate improvements, further underscore perceived inconsistencies between rhetoric and outcomes. Perceptions of globalist influences arise from the program's deep integration with frameworks, particularly the 2030 Agenda for , which Geoparks explicitly support through , education, and community initiatives aligned across 17 SDGs. As part of 's International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme, designations involve international evaluation and ongoing compliance, prompting concerns among sovereignty advocates that such networks prioritize supranational standards over local , akin to broader critiques of UN environmental programs. Official defenses maintain that Geopark imposes no legal restrictions on or planning, countering claims of external control. on these influences remains anecdotal, with limited peer-reviewed analysis isolating Geoparks from general UNESCO debates.

Empirical Evidence on Long-Term Outcomes

A of 94 studies on geoparks and found that while and geoconservation efforts contribute to economic job creation and in case studies, longitudinal evidence remains sparse, with most analyses focusing on short-term or potential rather than verified long-term impacts. Only 9% of reviewed articles explicitly linked geopark activities to UN with empirical backing, highlighting a gap in rigorous, multi-year tracking of outcomes like sustained or economic diversification beyond initial spikes. In economic terms, case studies from Asian indicate designation can vitalize local activities, such as increased revenue from products, but long-term financial sustainability varies; for instance, one geopark derived 80% of revenue from tickets post-designation, supporting village incomes up to 8.5 million annually from agro- integration. Surveys of 103 geoparks reported 87% contributing to SDG 8 ( and ) through sustained community enterprises, yet 7% faced limited funding, constraining scalability in developing regions. Independent assessments note that while visitor numbers often rise post-designation, spillover to non-tourism sectors like remains inconsistent over 5-10 years, with risks of dependency on volatile tourism flows. Environmentally, temporal analyses show mixed results; in China's Xiangxi UNESCO Global Geopark, ecological indices (e.g., remote sensing-based quality metrics) declined from 2015-2017 amid pre-designation pressures but improved 2018-2020 following conservation measures tied to application, with northern protected zones exhibiting the strongest recovery due to vegetation restoration. However, broader reviews indicate tourism-driven pressures, such as land-use intensification in Indonesia's Geopark post-2018 designation, have accelerated built-up areas by measurable percentages in lakeside zones, potentially straining and habitats over the subsequent 5-7 years. Less than 4% of geoparks have undergone dedicated pollution monitoring, underscoring insufficient data on decade-scale degradation like or despite stated goals. Social outcomes, including and cohesion, show self-reported persistence; 80% of geoparks noted high geoheritage gains enduring beyond initial programs, with examples like Mexican indigenous training yielding ongoing female-led enterprises. Yet, evaluations, reliant on participant surveys, may overstate durability due to toward successful sites, as only 56% of geoparks conduct formal impact studies, limiting causal attribution to designation versus confounding factors like regional growth. Overall, while positive trends emerge in protected subsets, the scarcity of independent, pre-post longitudinal designs—spanning 10+ years—hampers definitive claims on net long-term efficacy, with calls for standardized indicators to address this evidentiary shortfall.

References

  1. [1]
    UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGp)
    UNESCO Global Geoparks are unified areas managing sites of geological significance with protection, education, and sustainable development, using geological ...
  2. [2]
    UNESCO Global Geoparks
    Jul 23, 2025 · UNESCO Global Geoparks are single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic ...
  3. [3]
    Definition, missions, and history - Géoparc du Chablais
    UNESCO Global Geoparks are single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Geopark History | Visit Global Geoparks Network | UNESCO
    UNESCO Global Geoparks were officialy adopted in 2015 by all the UNESCO State members but they are in process and experiment from more than 20 years!
  5. [5]
    Mission | Global Geoparks Network
    UNESCO Global Geoparks are areasthat use the concept of sustainability, value the heritage of Mother Earth andrecognize the need to protect it.
  6. [6]
    List of UNESCO Global Geoparks and Regional Networks
    At present, 229 geoparks are found in 50 countries. Last update:10 September 2025. Summary. Map of UNESCO Global Geoparks (2025-2026) · Full list of UNESCO ...
  7. [7]
    Geoparks - British Geological Survey
    UNESCO Global Geoparks are areas with internationally important rocks and landscapes, all of which are managed responsibly.
  8. [8]
    IUCN at the 2025 UNESCO Global Geoparks Conference - Blog
    Oct 1, 2025 · 12 new Geoparks and 44 existing Geoparks evaluated​​ The UNESCO Global Geoparks Council determines whether new applications meet the required ...
  9. [9]
    Frequently asked questions - Mourne Gullion Strangford UNESCO ...
    A UNESCO Global Geopark comprises a number of geological heritage sites of special scientific importance, rarity or beauty. These features are representative of ...
  10. [10]
    How to become a geopark - UNESCO
    The aspiring UNESCO Global Geopark must have geological heritage of international value and be managed by a body having legal existence recognized under ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] 3. criteria for unesco global geoparks - CONNECT-Asia
    A UNESCO Global Geopark must have a clearly defined border, be of adequate size to fulfil its functions and contain geological heritage of international ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Guidelines and Criteria for National Geoparks seeking UNESCO's ...
    Sep 6, 2012 · National Geopark initiatives, which seek UNESCO's assistance, should integrate the preservation of significant examples of geological heritage ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Guidelines and Criteria for National Geoparks seeking UNESCO's ...
    – The Global Network of National Geoparks provides a platform of cooperation and exchange between experts and practitioners in geological heritage matters.
  14. [14]
    UNESCO Global Geoparks - GCIDA
    UNESCO Global Geoparks aim to protect geological heritage and realize sustainable development in connection with local communities.
  15. [15]
    Intangible heritage | Visit Global Geoparks Network | UNESCO
    The intangible heritage includes traditions or living expressions inherited from our ancestors and passed on to our descendants.Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
  16. [16]
    [PDF] CODE OF ETHICS final - GLOBAL GEOPARKS NETWORK
    Intangible Cultural Heritage: includes traditions or living expressions inherited from our ancestors and passed on to our descendants, such as oral traditions, ...
  17. [17]
    Sustainable Economic Development - Geopark Management Toolkit
    UNESCO Global Geoparks require a management plan, agreed upon by all the partners, that provides for the social and economic needs of the local population, ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] GGN LONG-TERM STRATEGY 2025-2035 Connecting Earth ...
    In 2025, the network spans 50 countries, with. 229 UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGps), each playing a vital role in shaping a sustainable future. The GGN supports ...
  19. [19]
    Geoparks Fundamental Features | Main Focus Areas - UNESCO
    The promotion of sustainable local economic development through sustainable (geo)tourism is one of the key pillars of a UNESCO Global Geopark. This creates job ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
  20. [20]
    Sustainable Development | Visit Global Geoparks Network | UNESCO
    The UNESCO Global Geoparks work on the definition of quality criteria for their tourist offer while always privileging promotion of the local heritage, ...
  21. [21]
    Sustainable Development | Discovery Geopark
    Global Geoparks advance UNESCO's Sustainable Development Goals by focusing on 10 key areas: 1. Natural Resources. Since the dawn of humanity natural ...Missing: framework | Show results with:framework
  22. [22]
    SDGs updated template for UNESCO Global Geoparks
    It combines the main information on each SDG with possible contributions of the UNESCO Global Geoparks, based on their tasks and activities.Missing: framework | Show results with:framework
  23. [23]
    Sustainable Development Goals - Mourne Gullion Strangford Geopark
    UNESCO Global Geoparks contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals: celebrating earth heritage, sustaining local communities.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Frequently asked questions about UNESCO Global Geoparks ...
    A UNESCO Global Geopark is not a new category of protected area or landscape: therefore, a Geopark can differ from National Parks or Nature Parks, which are ...
  25. [25]
    National Parks, Geoparks, Biosphere Reserves - Senditur
    Mar 18, 2021 · We explain the differences between Natural Park, National Park, Geopark, Biosphere Reserves, what types exist and how many there are in ...
  26. [26]
    What is a Geopark?
    What sets Geoparks apart from other designations, such as National Parks, is that they do not restrict development. Neither UNESCO nor the management ...
  27. [27]
    Frequently Asked Questions - Fforest Fawr Geopark
    Unlike National Parks, Geoparks have no town and country planning functions – though they do support conservation initiatives.
  28. [28]
    Nature Park and Geopark - What Is It? - Natur und Geopark Vulkaneifel
    UNESCO Geoparks are areas of geological sites and landscapes of international geological significance. Since 2015, this category of UNESCO exists alongside ...
  29. [29]
    History of Geoparks - ResearchGate
    Aug 5, 2025 · The philosophy behind the Geoparks concept was first introduced at the Digne Convention in 1991 as a means to protect and promote geological heritage.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] DIGNE DECLARATION
    Digne-les-Bains. Digne, 1991 declaration. Page 2. Declaration of the Rights of the Memory of the Earth. 1. Planets, like people, have their own life history ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Haute-Provence geological nature reserve in Digne-les-Bains
    Created in 1984 by decree, the Haute-Provence geological reserve extends over an area of ​​200 hectares between the Alpes de Haute-Provence and the Var.
  32. [32]
    Geoparks Network | Natural History Museum of the Lesvos Petrified ...
    The European Geoparks Network was established in June 2000 in Lesvos, by operators responsible for the management of areas with special geological heritage in ...
  33. [33]
    Geo-education and geopark implementation in the Vulkaneifel ...
    Jan 1, 2011 · ... establishment of the “Geopark Gerolsteiner Land” that in 2000 evolved into the “Vulkaneifel European Geopark,” Germany's first geopark and ...
  34. [34]
    Geoparque Maestrazgo | UNESCO Global Geopark in Spain
    The Maestrazgo Geopark is home to four Natural Monuments: Puente de Fonseca, Grutas de Cristal de Molinos, Nacimiento del río Pitarque y Órganos de Montoro.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  35. [35]
    History - European Geoparks Network
    The European Geoparks Network was established in June 2000 by four Geoparks: Reserve Geologique de Haute-Provence – France; Natural History Museum of Lesvos ...
  36. [36]
    Introduction - European Geoparks Network
    The European Geoparks Network was established in June 2000 by four Geoparks: Reserve Geologique de Haute-Provence – France; Natural History Museum of Lesvos ...
  37. [37]
    The European Geoparks Network. Geological heritage protection ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The European Geoparks Network was established in June 2000 by four regions of different European Countries-France, Germany, Spain and Greece.
  38. [38]
    GGN / EGN - Geopark Karawanken
    The European Geoparks Network (EGN) was established in 2000 by four pioneer geoparks and has been under the auspices of UNESCO since 2001. It is a very active ...
  39. [39]
    International networks of Geoparks
    Jul 10, 2020 · The Geopark concept arose in the mid-1990s as a response to the need to conserve and enhance the value of areas of geological significance ...Missing: early initiatives
  40. [40]
    Global Geoparks Network | International Association on Geoparks
    The Global Geoparks Network is the official partner of UNESCO for the operation of the UNESCO Global Geoparks. The GGN was initially founded in 2004 as an ...GGN Magazines · JOIN GGN · UNESCO/GGN Grants · About
  41. [41]
    The global geoparks network - Geoparques
    The first steps to form the network took place in the year 2000. The Petrified Forest of Lesbos (Greece), the area of ancient volcanoes of Vulkaneifel (Germany) ...
  42. [42]
    Analysis on Temporal and Spatial Evolution of UNESCO Global ...
    Sep 9, 2022 · ... European Union. Although Geopark originated in Europe, governments of some countries do not fully support Geopark programs (Zhao and Zha 2003b).Missing: initiatives | Show results with:initiatives
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Model regions for sustainable development
    The collaboration with UNESCO took place in 2015 when the World Geoparks. Network was integrated into the organization's. Earth sciences program, creating the ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Model regions for sustainable development
    UNESCO's Geoparks Programme has existed since 2015. It evolved from the non-govern- mental “Global Geoparks Network” (GGN), which was established in 2004.
  45. [45]
    UNESCO names 18 new Geoparks
    Mar 27, 2024 · The UNESCO Global Geopark designation was created in 2015. It ... Geopark offers a journey through more than 500 million years of geological ...Missing: integration expansion
  46. [46]
    UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation - MDPI
    Mar 13, 2023 · As of 2022, 177 geoparks located in 46 countries have this designation. The aim of this paper is to identify and analyse the worldwide ...
  47. [47]
    UNESCO names 18 new Global Geoparks
    May 24, 2023 · This brings the total number of geoparks to 195 in 48 countries. Two UNESCO Member States join the network: New Zealand and the Philippines.
  48. [48]
    UNESCO names two new Nordic Geoparks - Unric
    Mar 28, 2024 · This brings the total number of geoparks to 213 in 48 countries ... The UNESCO Global Geopark designation was created in 2015. It ...
  49. [49]
    A Genealogy of UNESCO Global Geopark: Emergence and Evolution
    Around the late 1990s, the geopark concept was developed within UNESCO and international geological communities as a new model for geoconservation.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] GGN Map 2024-2025.pdf - Global Geoparks Network
    UNESCO Global Geoparks protect heritage, value sustainability, and analyze the lithosphere/biosphere interaction. They also promote sustainable tourism.
  51. [51]
    UNESCO designates 8 new Global Geoparks
    Apr 13, 2022 · UNESCO designates 8 new Global Geoparks · Seridó UNESCO Global Geopark, Brazil · Southern Canyons Pathways UNESCO Global Geopark, Brazil.<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Geoproducts – Innovative development strategies in UNESCO ...
    In this study we review the different concepts of geoproducts and strategies for their development used in UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGps)Geoproducts -- Innovative... · 3. Unesco Global Geoparks... · 4. Naturtejo Geopark...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    UNESCO Global Geoparks applications
    Feb 21, 2025 · Each year, the UNESCO Secretariat prepares a summary of newly submitted applications, to enable Member States to exercise their oversight ...
  54. [54]
    List of Geopark networks
    The European Geoparks Network (or EGN) was formed in 2000 and has since grown into a network of 75 Geoparks across the continent from Iceland to Cyprus, the ...
  55. [55]
    Outline of Japan and Global Geopark - San'in Kaigan UNESCO ...
    Apr 1, 2024 · 46 geoparks are designated as Japanese Geopark Network by the Japan Geopark Committee. Among them, 10 geoparks are designated as UNESCCO Global Geopark.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Japanese Geoparks Network
    The Japanese Geoparks Network (JGN) includes nearly 50 geoparks, 10 of which are also UNESCO Global Geoparks. The network was established in 2007 to connect.<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Jaringan Geopark Indonesia
    At present, there are 24 geoparks in Indonesia consisting of 10 UNESCO Global Geoparks, 10 National Geoparks and 4 Aspiring National Geoparks. Indonesian ...
  58. [58]
    The Wonders of Meratus Geopark in South Kalimantan | BIMP-EAGA
    Jun 26, 2025 · The Meratus Geopark was designated as a national geopark by the National Geopark Committee of Indonesia in 2018, making it the first geopark in ...
  59. [59]
    China-Global Network of National Geoparks
    UNESCO Global Geopark is the Redstone Park of China. It is located in the northeast of Shaoguan City in Guangdong Province and has a total area of 290 km2.
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Novohrad-Nógrád UGGp: an example of a Transnational Geopark
    Transnational geoparks are special territories even within the GGN, they ... At present there are only four transnational UNESCO Global Geoparks on Earth, all.
  61. [61]
    Cuilcagh Lakelands UNESCO Global Geopark
    The Marble Arch Caves Global Geopark is the World's first UNESCO Global Geopark crossing an international border. It lies in the north-west corner of the ...
  62. [62]
    Submit a UNESCO Global Geopark proposal
    Transnational Geoparks · Karawanken / Karavanke UNESCO Global Geopark, Austria & Slovenia · Muscau Arch / Łuk Mużakowa UNESCO Global Geopark, Germany & Poland ...Missing: four | Show results with:four
  63. [63]
    Call for UNESCO Global Geopark evaluators
    The UNESCO Global Geopark Bureau selects evaluators who are on this roster to carry out field evaluations of new applications for aspiring UNESCO Global ...
  64. [64]
    Aspiring Geoparks
    There are currently seven Aspiring Geoparks in Canada. If your community is interested in pursuing geopark designation please contact Sarah Gamble, ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] General information, definitions, governance and - UNESCO
    UNESCO Global Geoparks are managed by a body having legal existence recognized under national legislation. This management body should be appropriately ...
  66. [66]
    FAQs | Global Geoparks Network
    The Geopark concept arose in the mid-1990's as a response to the need to conserve and enhance the value of areas of geological significance in Earth history. ...Missing: first | Show results with:first
  67. [67]
    Governance & Management - Geopark Management Toolkit
    All Geoparks should have a Management Plan for the Geopark as a territory. It is a plan for the area, not a work programme for the Geopark management body or ...What is meant by “Governance”? · No perfect model · Management plans
  68. [68]
    A proposed governance model for the adoption of geoparks in ...
    This paper explores mechanisms that could be applied in the reintroduction of geoparks into Australia and considers how future geoparks might be managed.Missing: variants | Show results with:variants
  69. [69]
    Education Programmes | Hong Kong UNESCO Global Geopark
    Education Programmes · “The Dinosaur Is Here” School Science Popularization Activity · Rock Classroom · School Seminar · Geopark Schools Programme (2025-2026).
  70. [70]
    (PDF) The Role of UNESCO Global Geoparks in Promoting ...
    Apr 25, 2025 · UNESCO Global Geoparks are excellent opportunities to assist schools as outdoor classrooms and to be incubators of sustainable development.
  71. [71]
    Education - European Geoparks Network
    For example the 'Geokids' programme in the Geopark Bergstrasse-Odenwald, Germany, is an interactive programme for children aged 8 to 12 which provides ...
  72. [72]
    Oki Islands Geopark Education Program
    We created education programs for children to learn about the geology, living things, and culture of the Oki Islands region. These programs are easy to use ...
  73. [73]
    Geo-Education - Geopark Management Toolkit
    UNESCO Global Geoparks offer educational programmes for schools or offer special activities for children through “Kids Clubs” or special “Fossil Fun Days”.1. Introduction · 2. Collaboration And... · 4. The Unesco Context<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Geotourism for UNESCO Global Geoparks: a toolkit for developing ...
    IMPLEMENT SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES • Develop and implement sustainable tourism practices that prioritize conservation, minimize environmental impacts, and respect ...
  75. [75]
    (PDF) The Role of Geoparks in Sustainable Tourism Development
    Jun 17, 2025 · 1. Visitor numbers in geoparks positively impact local economic growth. 2. Higher community involvement leads to better conservation outcom ...
  76. [76]
    Geoparks | NatureScot
    Jul 15, 2025 · UNESCO Global Geopark status recognises an area's outstanding geological heritage value and its benefit to local people through tourism and ...
  77. [77]
    Evidence from Xiangxi UNESCO Global Geopark, China
    Geoparks are home to unique and precious geological sites and have a rich historical and cultural heritage. Most studies have focused on their tourism value ...
  78. [78]
    Practices and Activities - San'in Kaigan UNESCO Global Geopark
    Mar 5, 2024 · At The San'in Kaigan Geopark, activities conserving diverse local resources such as heritages of the earth's activity by collaboration work of local residents.Missing: key | Show results with:key
  79. [79]
    Environmental Pollution in Geopark Management: A Systematic ...
    Apr 14, 2022 · Second, geoparks are tourist attractions, and, thus, pollution in them increases people's exposure to dangerous substances. This situation is ...
  80. [80]
    Economic impact of UNESCO Global Geoparks on local communities
    This study explored how UNESCO Global Geoparks have been contributing to the local economic development by promoting sustainable geotourism.
  81. [81]
    Grants to support the creation of geoparks in Small Island Developing
    The UNESCO/Global Geoparks Network Grant is a tailor-made consultancy service specifically designed to support local teams to develop a UNESCO Geopark project.Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms
  82. [82]
    Global geoparks: Opportunity for developing or “toy” for developed?
    First, it is reasonable to organize a special international fund supporting geopark creation in the developing countries. Apparently, it can be affiliated with ...
  83. [83]
    Revalidation, area modification and renaming - UNESCO
    Sep 23, 2025 · Revalidation. UNESCO Global Geoparks are subject to a thorough revalidation process every four years, to assess their functionality and quality.
  84. [84]
    how to become a unesco global geopark
    Geopark designation is not forever. UNESCO Global Geoparks are reviewed and revalidated every four years. Revalidations are as rigorous as the initial ...
  85. [85]
    Geotourism Destinations – Visitor Impacts and Site Management ...
    This paper surveys visitor impacts and site management at geological sites which are geotourism destinations. We describe geotourism which is the engine driving ...
  86. [86]
    UNESCO Global Geoparks vs. Education: a 10-Year Bibliometric ...
    Feb 22, 2023 · UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGps) have become one of the most important territories for teaching geosciences and natural environment awareness in a sustainable ...
  87. [87]
    Discovering the Earth: Design and implementation of geoeducation ...
    Sep 2, 2025 · This study highlights the effectiveness of geoeducation strategies not only in enhancing geology education but also in strengthening students' ...
  88. [88]
    Fossil supervolcano discovered in Italy by SMU-led team is now key ...
    Nov 22, 2013 · Fossil supervolcano discovered in Italy by SMU-led team is now key feature of new UNESCO Geopark. Sessia Valley geopark 400x300 “It is a rare ...
  89. [89]
    UNESCO names 16 new Global Geoparks
    Apr 17, 2025 · Today UNESCO designated 16 new geoparks, bringing the total number of sites in the UNESCO Global Geoparks Network to 229 in 50 countries.
  90. [90]
    Engaging with Science - Geopark Management Toolkit
    Geoparks engage with science through research programs, working with institutions, and promoting research results to the public, acting as active labs.2. Research Programmes · 6. The Unesco Context · 6. B Climate Change
  91. [91]
    Evidence from Xiangxi UNESCO Global Geopark, China
    Linking ecological safety for green building and sustainable development strategies . Ecological quality involves ensuring a balanced ecological environment ...
  92. [92]
    Amidst Fire and Pollution Threats, the Toba Caldera Regains ...
    Sep 8, 2025 · The Toba Caldera has once again received UNESCO Global Geopark green card status, along with the Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu and Rinjani Geoparks.
  93. [93]
    Case Study in Toba Caldera UNESCO Global Geopark
    Active community participation is critical to the success of environmental conservation programs, as evidenced by numerous studies. Research highlights that ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] toba caldera unesco global geopark
    Development of Geopark Areas based on Conservation and Revitalization. 2 ... Socialization of Cultural Heritage Preservation in the Toba Caldera Area UGGp,.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  95. [95]
    Case Studies from Mount Hakusan in Japan and Altai in Russia
    Feb 3, 2022 · UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGps) use a bottom-up approach to engage local communities in capacity building, via tourism development, with the ...
  96. [96]
    Global geodiversity components are not equally represented in ...
    Feb 12, 2024 · The aim of UNESCO Global Geoparks (UGGs) is to protect globally significant geoheritage and geodiversity, but quantitative evidence on the ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Overtourism in the Bohemian Paradise UNESCO Global Geopark
    Mar 29, 2025 · Here, respondents noted issues like limited space at viewpoints, environmental degradation, parking difficulties, and disturbances to local ...Missing: shortfalls | Show results with:shortfalls
  98. [98]
    Evolving sustainability Ciletuh's Global Geopark | Hengky | Business ...
    Global geopark management in Ciletuh faces challenges to the form of dirty geopark environment due to tourism activities. This is a challenge to geopark ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  99. [99]
    The post COVID-19 tourism dilemma for geoparks in Indonesia
    For Ciletuh Geopark, tourism ... Pre-COVID–19 tourism conditions led to environmental impacts such as traffic congestion, littering and vehicle exhaust pollution.
  100. [100]
    Bayesian Belief Network for Assessing Conservation and Tourism ...
    Feb 4, 2025 · In Vietnam, Daknong UNESCO Global Geopark struggles with land encroachment and inadequate management due to the absence of zoning ...
  101. [101]
    The Vulnerability of Industrial Crops in Dak Nong Province, Vietnam
    Aug 10, 2025 · The findings revealed that the area dedicated to industrial crops expanded from 119,883.28 hectares in 2015 to 184,563.37 hectares by 2024.
  102. [102]
    Challenges in Maintaining Geopark Facilities and Assets: Evidence from Malaysian Geoparks - International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science
    Summary of each segment:
  103. [103]
    Overtourism in the Bohemian Paradise UNESCO Global Geopark
    Mar 29, 2025 · Overtourism, as defined by UNWTO, occurs when visitor numbers exceed a destination's capacity, leading to overcrowding, pressure on ...
  104. [104]
    Hong Kong urged to protect Sai Kung islands from overtourism ...
    Oct 3, 2025 · Greenpeace calls for measures after finding large number of visitors trampling corals and digging up marine organisms.
  105. [105]
    Synergies and Conflicts in Dual-Designated UNESCO Sites - MDPI
    Forty percent% of stakeholders voiced concerns about the increased pressure on local resources due to the rise in visitor numbers, but also believed that the ...2. Methodology · 3. Results · 4. Discussions
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Geoparks: Creating a Vision for North America - George Wright Society
    The costs of preparation and running a geopark also vary ... entailed, including administrative burden required for the process; possible adverse public.
  107. [107]
    Graziers concerned about impact UNESCO geopark listing would ...
    Jun 6, 2017 · ... Geoparks network as the only Australian listing. Etheridge mayor ... Mr Burke said there was concern a UNESCO branding would increase red tape ...
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Redefining the UNESCO-Geoparks relationship - UK National ...
    increased bureaucracy within the programme. This could potentially damage the bottom-up Geoparks-led approach which has allowed the network to develop on a ...
  109. [109]
    Global geodiversity components are not equally represented in ...
    Feb 12, 2024 · Our results show that lithological and topographical diversity are more represented in UGGs than outside these sites, while soil type and hydrological ...Missing: variants | Show results with:variants
  110. [110]
    Exploring Greek UNESCO Global Geoparks: A Systematic Review of ...
    In-depth scientific studies contribute to the formulation of effective conservation strategies and the promotion of sustainable practices, thereby ensuring the ...
  111. [111]
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5283205
  112. [112]
    Gore Bay is 'strongly opposed' to Georgian Bay Geopark suggestion
    Jun 4, 2025 · Gore Bay Town council has expressed its strong opposition to Manitoulin Island being included in the proposal to include the town and all of Manitoulin Island ...
  113. [113]
    https://ontarioconstructionnews.com/billings-township-joins-growing-opposition-to-proposed-48000-sq-km-georgian-bay-unesco-geopark
  114. [114]
    Here is what we know about the Aspiring Georgian Bay Geopark
    Jul 7, 2025 · 'Unsustainable tourism' or an 'economic opportunity?' Here is what we know about plans to make Georgian Bay a UNESCO Geopark. Parry Sound ...
  115. [115]
    The Current Observation and Challenges of Tourism Development ...
    While the aim of geopark is to trigger tourism development, some contra-geopark and tourism activities exist, such as sand mining that makes environmental and ...
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Analysis of Conflict Control in The Development of UNESCO Global ...
    The results of the analysis revealed three main conflicts that underlie the issues in sustainable tourism development, namely land disputes, partnership.
  117. [117]
    [PDF] UNESCO's geoparks guidelines: A reflection on policies and practices
    We suggest that conservation/protection attitudes and sustainable development claims need to be revisited. Indeed, as they are currently presented, they can ...
  118. [118]
    Two Canadian UNESCO Geoparks cautioned to make ... - CBC
    Jun 4, 2025 · Two Canadian UNESCO Geoparks cautioned to make improvements or risk losing status · Cliffs of Fundy in N.S. and Discovery in N.L. each received ...<|separator|>
  119. [119]
    [PDF] UNESCO Global Geoparks and the Sustainable Development Goals ...
    UNESCO Global Geoparks contribute to SDGs by supporting local economies, sustainable agriculture, health, education, and sustainable energy projects.Missing: greenwashing | Show results with:greenwashing
  120. [120]
    UNESCO Global Geoparks contributing to the Sustainable ...
    UNESCO Global Geoparks contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals: celebrating earth heritage, sustaining local communities.Missing: greenwashing | Show results with:greenwashing<|control11|><|separator|>
  121. [121]
    Myths about UNESCO Global Geoparks
    UNESCO Global Geoparks are a global brand and not a national statutory designation like a National Park.Missing: differences | Show results with:differences
  122. [122]
    (PDF) Geoparks and Sustainable Development: Systematic Review
    This work aims to better understand the relationship and contributions of geoparks to sustainable development, based on a systematic review.
  123. [123]
    Evaluation of the International Geoscience and Geoparks Programme
    Has UNESCO's work in geoscience and geoheritage contributed or is it likely to contribute to long-term effects for individuals, organisations and institutions?
  124. [124]
    UNESCO Geopark Designation Lake Toba, North Sumatra, Indonesia
    Jan 20, 2025 · This study analyzes land-use changes in the lakeside area of Lake Toba in Toba Regency before and after its designation as a UNESCO Global ...
  125. [125]
    Twenty-Five Years of Scientific Production on Geoparks from ... - MDPI
    The core theme of geoparks is the use of scientific findings for the geological development of regions for education about geotourism; sustainable development; ...<|control11|><|separator|>