Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Gryphaea

Gryphaea is a genus of extinct marine bivalve mollusks belonging to the family Gryphaeidae, commonly known as "devil's toenails" owing to the distinctive coiled and claw-like appearance of their shells. Established by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in 1801, the genus is defined by its highly inequivalve and often prosogyrous shells, featuring a strongly convex and enrolled left valve used for attachment to substrates and a flat to slightly concave right valve. Gryphaea species were cementing oysters that attached to hard or soft substrates in shallow marine environments, with ornamentation typically consisting of concentric growth lines or squamae and variable radial elements. The genus encompasses numerous species distributed across a wide paleogeographic range, including Europe, North America, and Asia, and is notable for its role in biostratigraphy due to its abundance and evolutionary trends in shell morphology.^[1] Gryphaea originated in the Late Triassic (Carnian-Norian stages) and persisted through the Jurassic, with some species extending into the Early Cretaceous, making it a key index fossil for Mesozoic marine deposits.^[2]^[1]^[3] Their shells, often large and thick-walled, exhibit adaptations for reclining on soft sediments, and studies of their microstructure reveal unique vesicular features in some forms.^[4]^[5]^[6]

Taxonomy and classification

Etymology and nomenclature

The genus name Gryphaea derives from the Greek word gryphos, meaning "hooked" or "curved," a reference to the recurved, hook-like form of the left valve in these bivalve shells.^[7] The genus was established by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck in his 1801 work Système des animaux sans vertèbres, where he applied binomial nomenclature to fossil mollusks, grouping recurved oyster-like forms under this new taxon based on specimens from Jurassic strata in Europe.^[8] The type species was designated as Gryphaea arcuata Lamarck, 1801, a common Early Jurassic fossil from the Sinemurian stage, with the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature formally accepting this designation in Opinion 338 to stabilize the genus's nomenclature for fossil bivalves.^[8] Lamarck's original description emphasized the arched, unequal valves, distinguishing G. arcuata from contemporary oyster genera like Ostrea.^[9] In the 19th and early 20th centuries, taxonomic revisions refined Gryphaea's scope, with James Sowerby describing numerous species in his Mineral Conchology (1815–1825), such as Gryphaea dilatata (now often synonymized) and Gryphaea obliquata, based on British Jurassic collections.^[10] Historical synonyms included forms later transferred to Exogyra Say, 1824, a related genus in the family Gryphaeidae; for instance, some coiled Cretaceous species initially classified under Gryphaea were reassigned to Exogyra to reflect differences in coiling and ornamentation, as clarified in early 20th-century monographs.^[11] These adjustments addressed overlaps in Jurassic-Cretaceous oyster morphologies, ensuring Gryphaea primarily encompassed Triassic to Cretaceous taxa with pronounced left-valve curvature.^[12]

Phylogenetic position

Gryphaea is classified within the domain Eukarya, kingdom Animalia, phylum Mollusca, class Bivalvia, order Ostreida, superfamily Ostreoidea, family Gryphaeidae, and genus Gryphaea.^[13] This placement positions Gryphaea among the irregular oysters, characterized by their cemented attachment and asymmetrical shells, within the broader clade of pteriomorph bivalves.^[14] The genus Gryphaea is distinguished from related genera such as Pycnodonte and Texigryphaea primarily through differences in shell coiling patterns and hinge morphology, as evidenced by cladistic analyses in mid-20th to early 21st-century paleontological studies. Gryphaea typically exhibits a tightly coiled left valve with a pronounced auricle and a hinge lacking prominent denticles, contrasting with the more loosely coiled, elongated forms in Texigryphaea, which features a straighter hinge line and reduced coiling in adulthood for better mobility in soft substrates.^[15] Similarly, Pycnodonte shows less extreme coiling and a hinge with accessory dentition, marking its transition toward more derived oyster forms; these distinctions are supported by microstructural examinations revealing furcate layering in Gryphaea versus vesicular structures in Pycnodonte lineages.^[16] Such analyses underscore Gryphaea's basal position within Gryphaeidae while highlighting iterative evolutionary trends in coiling as a response to ecological pressures.^[17] The monophyly of the family Gryphaeidae remains a point of discussion in bivalve systematics, with Gryphaea serving as a core taxon demonstrating close affinities to the true oysters of Ostreidae. Molecular phylogenetic studies using rRNA markers and secondary structure models confirm Gryphaeidae as reciprocally monophyletic with Ostreidae, separated by compensatory base changes in ITS2 regions and morphological traits like ligament positioning.^[14] However, some cladistic frameworks question the strict monophyly of Gryphaeidae due to polyphyletic signals in superfamily Ostreoidea, suggesting potential paraphyly if certain Cretaceous genera like Texigryphaea are reclassified; nonetheless, seminal analyses affirm Gryphaea's central role in anchoring the family's Jurassic origins and evolutionary stability.^[18] These debates highlight the interplay between fossil evidence and genetic data in refining oyster phylogenies.^[19]

Morphology and anatomy

Shell structure

The shell of Gryphaea is bivalved, consisting of two unequal valves: the left valve is typically coiled in a spiral manner, convex, and can reach lengths of up to 10 cm, while the right valve is flat and acts as a lid-like cover. The hinge is internal and supported by a resilifer, with the ligament embedded in a chondrophore for articulation between the valves. This asymmetry facilitates the organism's attachment to substrates, primarily through cementation of the left valve's umbonal region directly onto hard surfaces such as rocks or other shells. Surface features of the shell include prominent concentric growth lines that reflect periodic increments in shell deposition, with finer radial elements occasionally present in the outer layers.^[20] Juvenile shells often exhibit small spines or tubercles along the margins, which may aid in initial stabilization before full cementation, though these are resorbed or obscured in adults. Attachment in early ontogeny involves temporary byssus threads secreted from the foot, transitioning to permanent calcareous cement as the left valve matures and coils more tightly. Across ontogeny, the shell evolves from a relatively straight, equivalved juvenile form to the characteristic coiled adult morphology, with increasing spiral angle and convexity in the left valve. The shell's mineral composition is predominantly low-magnesium calcite, organized in a foliated microstructure of layered, prismatic crystals that provide thickness and strength, particularly in the convex left valve.^[21] In some fossil specimens, selective silicification replaces portions of the original calcite with chalcedony or quartz, preserving fine details but altering the original texture.^[22] Compared to modern oysters like Ostrea edulis, Gryphaea shells display exaggerated coiling and thicker walls, enhancing durability in soft-bottom environments while maintaining similar calcitic foliation.^[21] Inferences from shell microstructure suggest attachments for mantle and adductor muscles along the inner valve surfaces.^[21]

Soft tissue inferences

The soft tissues of Gryphaea are not directly preserved in most fossils, but inferences about their anatomy can be drawn from muscle scars, shell impressions, and comparisons to extant oysters in the family Ostreidae, to which Gryphaea is closely related. Adductor muscle scars are prominently visible on the inner surfaces of both valves, typically positioned posteriorly and exhibiting a semicircular to semielliptical shape that indicates the attachment sites of robust muscles used to close the shell against predators or environmental stress. These scars vary in size across species and growth stages, with larger individuals showing more expansive scars reflective of increased muscular development. In exceptional cases, such as a phosphatized specimen of a gryphaeid oyster from the Upper Jurassic Oxford Clay Formation of England, portions of the adductor muscle itself are preserved, revealing a fibrous texture and confirming the muscle's role in rapid valve closure; this rare phosphatization near the attachment points highlights the decay-resistant nature of such tissues.^[5]^[23] Mantle and gill structures are inferred primarily from pallial lines and shell cavity impressions, which suggest a fused ventral mantle margin characteristic of oysters, forming a sealed chamber to exclude sediment while allowing water circulation. The mantle likely extended as a thin, secretory epithelium lining the shell interior, with impressions indicating folds that accommodated gill attachment. Gills are reconstructed as paired, lamellibranch ctenidia suspended in the mantle cavity, adapted for filter feeding through ciliary action that draws water inward and traps particulate organic matter on mucus-covered filaments; this mechanism is supported by the overall epifaunal shell form of Gryphaea, which positioned the organism to exploit suspended food in shallow marine waters, analogous to modern Crassostrea species.^[5] Reproductive structures are deduced from the hermaphroditic nature of modern oysters and fossil evidence of population dynamics. Gryphaea individuals likely functioned as sequential hermaphrodites, initially developing as males before transitioning to females, enabling broadcast spawning of gametes into the water column; this strategy maximizes fertilization success in dense populations. Larval development would have produced free-swimming veliger larvae that underwent metamorphosis and settlement, with gregarious behavior inferred from clusters of juvenile shells in fossil beds, where early-settled individuals provided cues—possibly chemical or textural—for subsequent attachment.^[24] The sensory and nervous systems of Gryphaea remain largely conjectural due to lack of direct fossil evidence, but bivalve analogs suggest a decentralized nervous system with cerebral, pedal, and visceral ganglia coordinating basic functions. Mantle margins probably bore sensory tentacles and chemoreceptors for detecting water flow, food, and predators, while water circulation through the mantle cavity—facilitated by short, rudimentary siphonal structures or open inhalant/exhalant apertures—supported respiration and feeding without the elongated siphons of infaunal bivalves. These inferences align with the sessile, cementing lifestyle of Gryphaea, emphasizing reliance on passive water currents over active mobility.^[25]

Paleobiology and ecology

Habitat preferences

Gryphaea species predominantly inhabited shallow, subtidal marine environments, typically at depths ranging from 0 to 50 meters, within epicontinental seas of the Mesozoic era.^[26] These settings were characterized by low to moderate energy conditions, such as marly or muddy bottoms in offshore infra- to circalittoral zones, as evidenced by their occurrence in alternating marl-limestone sequences influenced by storm events.^[27] Fossil assemblages often include encrusting organisms like serpulids and bryozoans on Gryphaea shells, alongside boring traces from bivalves and algae, indicating attachment and bioerosion on stable but soft substrates like mud or sand.^[28] Gryphaea lived gregariously, forming dense shell beds or low-relief reefs in these benthic communities, which facilitated collective stability on unconsolidated sediments.^[29] Their associations with nektonic fossils such as ammonites (e.g., Arietites bucklandi) and belemnites further suggest placement within open but shallow epicontinental seas, where nutrient-rich waters supported high productivity.^[26] As secondary soft-bottom dwellers, many species adopted a reclining posture on their left valve, allowing them to colonize muddy substrates without requiring hard attachment points, a behavioral adaptation inferred from the cup-shaped morphology of their shells.^[30] These oysters demonstrated tolerance for fluctuating environmental conditions, including periodic oxygen depletion at the sediment-water interface and variations in salinity toward brackish levels.^[27] Shell thickness and overall form varied across strata: thinner, smaller shells in eutrophic, potentially brackish settings with reduced salinity, contrasted with thicker, larger forms in more stable, euhaline waters, reflecting physiological responses to oxygenation and salinity stress.^[31] Such variations, observed in species like Gryphaea arcuata, underscore their adaptability to dynamic coastal marine habitats.^[27]

Feeding and growth

Gryphaea species were suspension feeders, utilizing their ctenidia (gills) to capture plankton and organic detritus from the surrounding water.^[32] This mechanism involved ciliary action on the gill filaments to create water currents and retain particles, similar to that in extant oysters.^[33] Filtration rates for adults are estimated to have been comparable to modern oysters, with individuals capable of processing up to 50 gallons (approximately 190 liters) of water per day, equivalent to about 8 liters per hour, under favorable conditions.^[34] The shallow marine habitats they occupied supplied a steady influx of these food particles, supporting their metabolic demands.^[5] Ontogenetic development in Gryphaea featured rapid juvenile growth, resulting in an initially straight or weakly curved shell that transitioned to the tightly coiled adult morphology as the organism matured.^[35] Shells exhibit annual growth bands, reflecting seasonal interruptions in accretion, often linked to environmental fluctuations.^[36] These patterns indicate lifespans upwards of 20 years for many individuals, with growth ceasing upon reaching sexual maturity.^[37]^[38] Energy allocation in Gryphaea prioritized high calcification rates to construct their robust, often thick shells, a process that demanded substantial metabolic resources.^[6] Calcification efficiency was modulated by nutrient availability in nutrient-rich shallow seas, where elevated organic matter facilitated faster shell deposition during periods of abundant food.^[39] This adaptation allowed for the development of protective structures while balancing feeding and reproductive investments.^[35]

Geological history

Temporal distribution

The genus Gryphaea first appeared during the Late Triassic (Carnian stage, approximately 237–232 Ma), with early records from the North American Cordillera, though its major diversification and peak abundance occurred in the Jurassic period.^[40] The earliest widespread appearances of key species took place in the Early Jurassic Sinemurian stage (~199 Ma), initiating a radiation that continued through the period.^[11] Diversity and abundance peaked during the Middle to Late Jurassic (Toarcian to Kimmeridgian stages, ~183–152 Ma), with numerous species documented across European and North American strata, before a marked decline in the Cretaceous and rare occurrences extending into the Eocene (~37.2–33.9 Ma).^[41] Fossils of Gryphaea are prominently associated with specific stratigraphic formations that reflect their ecological preferences. For instance, G. arcuata is characteristic of Early Jurassic Lias deposits in England, France, and Germany, where it forms dense shell beds in mudstone sequences.^[11] In the Toarcian stage, species such as G. dilobotes occur abundantly in the Jet Rock Formation of the Cleveland Basin, England, within organic-rich shales.^[42] These associations highlight Gryphaea's role in biostratigraphy, serving as index fossils for Jurassic stages and aiding in the definition of local zones, particularly when correlated with ammonite biostratigraphy.^[43] Abundance fluctuations of Gryphaea throughout the Jurassic are closely tied to environmental perturbations, including sea-level changes and anoxic events that influenced benthic habitats.^[44] Peaks in the Early to Middle Jurassic coincided with transgressive phases and expanded shelf seas, while declines during events like the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event (Falzensaren Subzone) reflect reduced oxygenation and habitat stress, as seen in reduced populations in black shales.^[45] Global stratigraphic correlations rely on co-occurring ammonite zones, enabling precise placement of Gryphaea-bearing horizons across basins.^[46]

Geographic range

Gryphaea fossils are primarily distributed across the Northern Hemisphere, with the most abundant occurrences in Europe and North America during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods. In Europe, key localities include the United Kingdom, where specimens are common along the Yorkshire-Cleveland Coast, particularly at Redcar Beach, exposing Hettangian–Sinemurian strata of the Redcar Mudstone Formation.^[47] Additional significant sites are found in France, such as the Calcaire à Gryphées in Xeuilley, Lorraine, yielding well-preserved Gryphaea arcuata from the Middle Jurassic, and in Germany, where Jurassic deposits contain diverse species.^[39] In North America, Gryphaea exhibits a broad distribution from the Late Triassic to Cretaceous, with notable concentrations in the western and central United States. Triassic forms occur in the Cordillera, including Alaska, British Columbia (though Canadian), Oregon, and Nevada, indicating dispersal along the eastern Panthalassa margin.^[40] Jurassic and Cretaceous species, such as Gryphaea washitaensis and G. mucronata, are prevalent in the Gulf Coastal Plain, extending from New Jersey westward to Texas, Kansas, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico, as well as into Colombia.^[11] Middle and Upper Jurassic Gryphaea in this region coexisted with European taxa, showing minimal faunal provincialism.^[48] Asian records are less frequent but significant in the Tethyan realm, particularly in India, where Upper Cretaceous Gryphaea limestones form prominent beds in the Kallankurichi Formation of Tamil Nadu, such as the "Gryphaea graveyard" at TANCEM mine near Ariyalur.^[49] Occurrences in China during the Jurassic further highlight Tethyan dominance, with species migrating via long-distance larval dispersal across the Tethys seaway into northwestern Europe.^[50] These distributions reflect broader paleogeographic patterns tied to Jurassic continental configurations, including the fragmentation of Pangaea and expansion of epicontinental seas.^[48] Fossils are rarer in the Southern Hemisphere, with isolated reports from Africa and Australia. In Africa, sporadic finds occur in North African Jurassic sequences, though not as extensively documented as northern records. In Australia, Cretaceous species like Gryphaea minuta appear in the Gingin Chalk of Western Australia. Modern collection efforts at sites like Redcar Beach yield abundant specimens, but export is restricted in regions such as the UK and India under cultural heritage laws to protect paleontological resources.^[47]

Evolution and development

Origins and diversification

Gryphaea, a genus of extinct oysters within the family Gryphaeidae, traces its origins to the Late Triassic period, with the earliest known representatives appearing around 230 million years ago in the Carnian stage.^[51] Ancestral links connect Gryphaea to flat-lying oyster forms from the Early Triassic, such as Liostrea, which emerged shortly after the end-Permian mass extinction approximately 252 million years ago and are considered a potential progenitor due to shared morphological features in shell structure and attachment strategies.^[51] These early oysters likely inhabited open-marine environments, adapting to post-extinction recovery in stable, deep-water settings before Gryphaea's lineage diverged.^[51] A key evolutionary innovation in Gryphaea occurred during the Early Jurassic Sinemurian stage, around 190 million years ago, with the development of pronounced coiling in the left valve, enhancing stability on soft, muddy substrates in shallow epicontinental seas.^[52] This adaptation facilitated attachment and resistance to burial, marking a shift from the flatter shells of Triassic ancestors and enabling exploitation of new benthic niches.^[52] By the Hettangian to Lower Sinemurian interval, morphological variation in umbo shape and coiling tightness had already produced multiple forms, setting the stage for further radiation.^[39] Diversification accelerated in the Early Jurassic, particularly during the Liassic, with a burst of speciation resulting in over 20 described species across Europe and beyond, driven by niche partitioning in expanding shallow-marine habitats amid rising sea levels and tectonic fragmentation of Pangea.^[53] This radiation involved trends toward increased coiling and size variation, allowing species to occupy diverse substrates from intertidal to subtidal zones, with centers of origin in the European epicontinental seas facilitating migration to other regions.^[53] Phylogenetic hypotheses, derived from fossil stratigraphic sequences and analogous molecular clock estimates for bivalve evolution, support this trajectory, highlighting convergence in coiling morphology with unrelated coiled bivalves like certain rudists, though driven independently by similar ecological pressures.^[53]

Extinction patterns

The genus Gryphaea experienced a gradual decline beginning in the Late Jurassic, coinciding with significant faunal turnover in marine bivalve communities. This decline was driven by environmental shifts, including regional cooling climates associated with the northward migration of the North American plate during the Callovian-Oxfordian boundary around 163 Ma, which led to a transition from carbonate to siliciclastic depositional systems and increased habitat instability.^[45] Sea-level fluctuations, particularly regressions, further contributed to habitat loss for offshore stenotopic species like Gryphaea spp., resulting in higher turnover rates in deeper-water environments compared to more resilient onshore communities dominated by eurytopic oysters such as Liostrea strigilecula.^[45] Most lineages of Gryphaea had their last occurrences in the Early Cretaceous, particularly by the Barremian stage, as evidenced by stratigraphic records showing reduced abundance and diversity in post-Jurassic deposits.^[41] The family Gryphaeidae's overall diversity peaked in the Late Cretaceous (66–72 Ma) before a major decline, but Gryphaea proper did not share this later expansion, suggesting an earlier contraction tied to Jurassic-Cretaceous transitions. Contributing factors to the extinction patterns included ocean anoxic events and broader environmental perturbations, such as those during the Cretaceous period, which affected benthic marine communities through reduced oxygen levels and habitat disruption from shallow sea regressions. Predation pressure also played a role, with escalating durophagous predation on gryphaeid oysters prompting morphological adaptations like thicker shells, though this proved insufficient against intensifying ecological pressures in the Late Cretaceous.^[5] The end-Cretaceous mass extinction event ultimately eliminated remaining gryphaeid lineages, including exogyrids and related forms, due to a combination of asteroid impact, volcanism, and associated anoxia, marking the final disappearance of Gryphaea with no survival into modern times. Diversity analyses indicate two major downturns for oysters at the Triassic-Jurassic and Cretaceous-Paleogene boundaries, underscoring the vulnerability of reclining epifaunal bivalves like Gryphaea to these global crises.^[54]

Notable fossils and species

Key species descriptions

Gryphaea arcuata, the type species of the genus, is characterized by a tightly coiled left valve reaching up to 10 cm in length, with a flat right valve attached near the umbo, and occurs in Early Jurassic (Upper Hettangian to Upper Pliensbachian) strata of Europe, particularly the Liassic formations where it is abundant and serves as an index fossil for biostratigraphy due to its stratigraphic utility in marking horizons.^[35] The species exhibits a trend toward broader shells and looser coiling in younger populations, reflecting ontogenetic and environmental adaptations in shallow marine settings.^[35] Gryphaea dilatata, a prominent Middle Jurassic species, features a larger, saucer-shaped left valve up to 20 cm in diameter with a thicker, more inflated shell and reduced coiling compared to earlier forms, commonly preserved in the Inferior Oolite Group of southern England.^[48] This species displays morphological variation, including subspecies distinctions based on shell breadth and umbo curvature, highlighting biometric trends in regional populations.^[48] Gryphaea nebrascensis represents a key Middle to Late Jurassic species in North America, with a coiled left valve similar to European taxa like G. dilatata, occurring in formations such as the Sundance in Wyoming and Montana during the Callovian to Oxfordian stages.^[55] Its abundance in western interior seaway deposits underscores biogeographic connections between Old and New World faunas, potentially indicating larval dispersal across paleoceanographic barriers.^[48] The genus Gryphaea encompasses approximately 50-60 described species across the Mesozoic, though taxonomic revisions have addressed extensive synonymy, reducing the count of valid taxa through biometric and stratigraphic analyses.^[41]^[53]

Fossil preservation and sites

Gryphaea fossils are commonly preserved as calcitic shells or internal molds in limestone and shale formations, often reflecting their adaptation to soft, muddy substrates where the bowl-shaped left valve anchored the organism. In rare cases, pyritization occurs, particularly in clay-rich deposits like the Oxford Clay, where iron sulfide replacement preserves intricate shell details and even associated epibionts. These taphonomic processes highlight the role of Gryphaea shells as natural traps, with the outer Harper layer bioimmuring soft-bodied attachments and creating high-fidelity external molds through deformation of the periostracal sheet.^[56]^[57]^[58] Iconic discovery sites span Europe, with the Posidonia Shale at Holzmaden, Germany, yielding well-preserved shells of Gryphaea arcuata amid the formation's anoxic conditions that favor articulation. In the United Kingdom, Lower Jurassic outcrops along the Yorkshire coast at Redcar and Whitby expose dense clusters through wave action, while ironstone beds near Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, have historically supplied commercial quantities. Scottish locales, such as the shoreline at Lochaline in the Lochaber Geopark, reveal specimens washed ashore by erosion, and Warwickshire's Jurassic limestones host familiar assemblages.^[56]^[59]^[60] The cultural significance of Gryphaea as "devil's toenails" stems from British folklore, where their curved, banded form evoked demonic claws, leading to 17th- and 18th-century beliefs in their efficacy against arthritis when powdered or worn as amulets—a practice documented in Scottish records as early as 1696 for treating ailments in humans and livestock. Naturalists in 18th-century England initiated systematic collections from coastal exposures, driven by growing interest in stratigraphy, with modern holdings in institutions like London's Natural History Museum supporting detailed taphonomic studies. Coastal erosion continues to reveal new specimens but challenges preservation efforts, as exposure to air and moisture accelerates decay in pyritized examples.^[61]^[62]^[63]

References

[1]
[PDF] Lab 5: Mollusks
The “Devil's Toenail” bivalves Gryphaea (B8b; Triassic to Jurassic) and Exogyra (B8c- e; Cretaceous) are fossil oysters which evolved a reclining mode of ...
[2]
[PDF] middle and upper triassic bivalve biostratigraphy of the shublik
Gryphaea arcutaeformis is a rather long-ranging species well known from numerous Carnian–Norian localities in northeastern Russia,. Arctic Canada, and ...
[3]
[PDF] Paleontology of the Cretaceous Coon Creek Formation
on isolated bivalves in the Lower Gryphaea Beds of the. Lower Ferruginous Sands ... philadelphiae from North America, expands the temporal range of A.
[4]
Crystallographic Texture of the Mineral Matter in the Bivalve Shells ...
Aug 31, 2022 · The most common and numerous were the species of the genus Gryphaea Lamarck, 1801. The shells of these mollusks were large and thick-walled.
[5]
The ecology of Mesozoic Gryphaea, Exogyra, and Ilymatogyra ...
Gryphaeid bivalves lived on the surface of soft substrates, essentially floating on the sedi ments (Hallam 1968; Stenzel 1971), a habit. Stanley (1970) has ...
[6]
Foamy oysters: vesicular microstructure production in the ...
Sep 30, 2020 · It is uniquely found among living bivalves in a single oyster family, Gryphaeidae. The vesicles are distributed in lenses interleaved with ...
[7]
Direct measurement of age in fossil Gryphaea
Note that the designa- tion of these shells as gryphaeate (from the. Greek word for recurved) precedes the official naming of the genus Gryphaea by Lamarck in.
[8]
Gryphaea Lamarck, 1801 - MolluscaBase
Ostreoidea (Superfamily); Gryphaeidae (Family); Gryphaeinae † (Subfamily); Gryphaeini † (Tribe); Gryphaea † (Genus) ... From editor or global species database.Missing: Paleobiology | Show results with:Paleobiology
[9]
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1593523
[10]
https://www.molluscabase.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1510037
[11]
Gryphaea obliquata J. Sowerby, 1815 - MolluscaBase
May 11, 2021 · Gryphaea obliquata J. Sowerby, 1815 † ; Animalia (Kingdom) ; Mollusca (Phylum) ; Bivalvia (Class) ; Autobranchia (Subclass) ; Pteriomorphia ( ...Missing: James revisions
[12]
[PDF] GEOLOGICAL SURVEY - USGS Publications Warehouse
Genus GRYPHJEA Lamarck, 1801. a. Paul Fischer defines Gryphsea s. s. as follows: "Bord des valves ondule; surf ace plissee plus ou moins." 1 Lamarck ...Missing: Greek | Show results with:Greek
[13]
[PDF] JURASSIC OSTREIDAE OF POLAND - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
Some of them, regarded till now as independent species, were found to be synonyms after the analysis of their morphology. The most abundant and diversified ...
[14]
World Register of Marine Species - Gryphaeidae Vialov, 1936
Gryphaeidae Vialov, 1936 · Biota · Animalia (Kingdom) · Mollusca (Phylum) · Bivalvia (Class) · Autobranchia (Subclass) · Pteriomorphia (Infraclass) · Ostreida (Order) ...Missing: Paleobiology | Show results with:Paleobiology
[15]
Molecular Phylogenetics and Systematics of the Bivalve Family ...
Sep 24, 2014 · Within the superfamily Ostroidea, the family Gryphaeidae (honeycomb oysters) resulted to be separated from Ostreidae by morphology and molecular ...
[16]
Taxonomy and variability of three Texigryphaea (Bivalvia) species ...
May 19, 2016 · The benthic, free-living oyster Texigryphaea was the dominant constituent of many late Albian marine communities in the Texas and southern ...
[17]
app004942018 - Acta Palaeontologica Polonica
This suggests that the subfamily Pycnodonteinae likely originated from the Late Jurassic representatives of the genus Gryphaea (Gryphaeinae) in Berriassian.
[18]
Evolutionary significance of fossil larval shell charactersa case study ...
Jan 1, 2000 · They all indicate monophyly of the Gryphaeidae (Fig. 4c) and the Ostreidae (Fig. 4e–g), and a common ancestor for both families (Fig. 4b) ...
[19]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031018207003951
[20]
Problems concerning early oyster evolution: A reply to Márquez ...
A preliminary cladistic analysis suggests that neither Gryphaea nor Enantiostreon derive from alivincular, crossed-lamellar taxa (Pseudomonotidae and ...
[21]
Gryphaea | University College Cork
Oct 10, 2022 · Gryphaea is an extinct marine oyster. It is a type of shellfish called a bivalve, which had two shells or valves that were joined or hinged at one end.Missing: structure morphology paleontology
[22]
https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/04111051GeolCarp_Vol46_No3_151_159.pdf
[23]
[PDF] SELECTIVE SILICIFICATION OF CALCITIC FOSSILS AND ... - SAV
The dissolution of the aragonitic shells and the filling of their molds by drusy calcite preceded the silicification. Wilson. (1966) exceptionally found ...
[24]
(PDF) Preservation of the adductor muscle of an Upper Jurassic oyster
Aug 5, 2025 · This paper describes an unusual specimen of a gryphaeid oyster from the Upper Jurassic of England, in which part of the adductor muscle has ...
[25]
[PDF] Ecophysiological tolerances of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas ...
Pacific oysters usually reach maturity within their first year of growth, and are protandrous hermaphrodites (Pauley et al. 1988). Spawning must be followed by ...
[26]
Nervous system development in the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea ...
Apr 11, 2018 · We conclude that the sensory AO in bivalves, as well as in Conchifera, consists of three flask-shaped cells, and that the larval nervous ...
[27]
Stable Isotope Analysis of Gryphaea arcuata Reveals the ...
Aug 13, 2025 · Gryphaea arcuata was living in the warm temperate shallow marine environments (0 to 50 m depth; [69]), fixed to the seabed, and feeding by ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[28]
Form and environment of Gryphaea arcuata | Request PDF
Aug 6, 2025 · Benthic communities lived mainly on soft to firmgrounds in poorly agitated euhaline waters, periodically depleted in oxygen at the sediment- ...
[29]
[PDF] Benthic macroinvertebrate associations on a carbonate-clastic ramp ...
Tha level of abrasion and breakage of shells is very low. Encrusting serpulids, small oysters, and bryozoans as well as boring bivalvas and algae occur.
[30]
[PDF] Oyster life positions and shell beds from the Upper Jurassic of Poland
In the present study I attempt to reconstruct life positions of some Late Jurassic. (Kimmeridgian and Volgian) 'soft-bottom' oysters from Poland and discuss ...Missing: anatomy | Show results with:anatomy
[31]
Geologically oldest oysters were epizoans on Early Triassic ...
Jun 7, 2017 · The second main branch of Triassic oysters is the Gryphaeidae, with Gryphaea Lamarck, 1801 and Liostrea Douvillé, 1904 as the sole genera during ...
[32]
Evidence and cause of small size in Bathonian (Middle Jurassic ...
Analysis of shell thickness (Text-fig. 5) indicates that Dorset forms also have thinner shells, which is another characteristic of growth under reduced salinity ...
[33]
Jurassic Bivalves from Wyoming and South Dakota - jstor
tonectes, Plicatula, and Gryphaea were "low- level" suspension feeders and filtered food from immediately above the bottom. Such an arrangement may have ...
[34]
(PDF) Feeding physiology of suspension-feeding bivalves: Inter
Aug 29, 2022 · The goal of this thesis is to contribute to the mechanistic understanding of how bivalves acquire energy through suspension feeding.Missing: Gryphaea | Show results with:Gryphaea
[35]
Oyster Fact Sheet - Chesapeake Bay Foundation
An adult oyster can filter as much as 50 gallons of water a day. Sediment and nitrogen cause problems in Bay waters.Missing: liters | Show results with:liters
[36]
Morphology, palaeoecology and evolution of the genus Gryphaea in ...
A comprehensive study has been undertaken of Liassic Gryphaea specimens collected from various localities in Great Britain at stratigraphical horizons ...Missing: Database | Show results with:Database<|control11|><|separator|>
[37]
Direct measurement of age in fossil Gryphaea - GeoScienceWorld
Mar 3, 2017 · We prove that size increase in the classic series occurs entirely by faster growth (larger descendant sizes at the same ages as ancestors), and ...
[38]
Direct measurement of age in fossil Gryphaea: the solution to a ...
May 20, 2016 · In this paper, we provide sclerochronological data on sizes and shapes at specified ages marked by annual growth bands in two Jurassic sequences ...
[39]
Form and environment of Gryphaea arcuata
Gryphaea arcuata is one of the most studied fossils, but its detailed palaeoecology has been largely neglected. Specimens were collected within a short ...
[40]
Systematics and paleobiogeography of Late Triassic Gryphaea ...
May 20, 2016 · Morphology, paleoecology and evolution of the genus Gryphaea in the British Lias. ... Larval shells of four Jurassic bivalve molluscs. Bulletin of ...
[41]
Gryphaea - Mindat
Aug 7, 2025 · Gryphaea, common name devil's toenails, is a genus of extinct oysters, marine bivalve mollusks in the family Gryphaeidae. From Wikipedia article ...
[42]
Geochemical and mineralogical properties of the Lower Callovian ...
Jul 14, 2017 · Three major, organic-rich sequences are present in the Jurassic in the UK (Morris 1980): the Jet Rock Formation ... Gryphaea are abundant ...
[43]
[PDF] CHARACTERISTIC MARINE JURASSIC FOSSILS FROM THE ...
The writer feels that designation of a zonal index fossil should await additional field ... These features distinguish it easily front any other Gryphaea in the ...
[44]
Patterns of speciation in Jurassic Gryphaea
Species durations fall within the range of the majority of Jurassic bivalve species. The detailed study of European Gryphaea indicates a pattern of punctuated ...
[45]
Faunal response to sea‐level and climate change in a short‐lived ...
Gryphaea planoconvexa ... The southern Sundance Seaway records benthic communities from a wide array of depositional environments, ranging from restricted coastal ...Missing: preferences | Show results with:preferences
[46]
A global reference for black shale geochemistry and the T-OAE ...
Oxygen isotope data from calcite shells of benthic fauna (rhynchonellid brachiopods and Gryphaea ... Jet Rock Formation (Lower Toarcian) of the Whitby area, U.K.
[47]
https://www.lyellcollection.org/doi/abs/10.1144/pygs2019-011
[48]
The evolution of British and American Middle and Upper Jurassic ...
Liassic Gryphaea exhibit strong ontogenetic allometry for increased coiling; evolution towards decreased coiling occurred by paedomorphosis affecting all ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[49]
[PDF] Petrography and geochemistry of the Upper Cretaceous Gryphaea ...
Gryphaea limestone beds of Pudupalayam is a mud based biogenic limestone, as per the classification of. Wright (1997). Despite large mega-fossils are being ...
[50]
JURASSIC OSTREOIDA (BIVALVIA) FROM CHINA (TANGGULA ...
Mar 3, 2017 · In the Callovian, migration of this ostreid bivalve only took place in the Tethys and northwestern Europe. Through long-distance dispersal along ...
[51]
https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyx015
[52]
The Evolution of Gryphaea | Geological Magazine | Cambridge Core
May 1, 2009 · The coiling of the Liassic oyster Gryphaea is discussed and the assessment of tightness of coiling investigated.Missing: innovation | Show results with:innovation
[53]
Patterns of speciation in Jurassic Gryphaea | Paleobiology
Apr 8, 2016 · Species durations fall within the range of the majority of Jurassic bivalve species. The detailed study of European Gryphaea indicates a pattern ...
[54]
(PDF) Diversity and Evolution of Living Oysters - ResearchGate
Oct 28, 2018 · Recent molecular studies of living oysters have revealed high genetic diversity at species, population, and genome levels.
[55]
Bivalves - British Geological Survey
The strongly recurved form of some Gryphaea is popularly known as the devil's toenail. Some 17th and 18th century Scottish accounts show that its possession was ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
[56]
The ecology and preservation of the Oxford Clay Fauna at ...
(c) Shell wall in the region where it is partially pyritized and fragmented. Fragmented pieces of shell bear inclusions of pyrite and have been replaced by ...
[57]
The bivalve shell as a preservation trap, as illustrated by the Late ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Densely laterally branched colonies commonly encrust the outside of the gryphaeid oyster Deltoideum delta and sometimes also colonized the inner ...
[58]
Jurassic Oysters – Gryphaea - Scottish Geology Trust
These now-extinct, distinctive bivalves are well-preserved in Lower Jurassic limestone rock formations across the UK, as their thick calcite shells are capable ...
[59]
Devil's Toenails in Warwickshire
Gryphaea shells are made up largely of the mineral known as calcite, just like modern oysters. Oyster shells are strong and thick, which is why our Jurassic ...Missing: silicification composition
[60]
Fossil folklore: Molluscs - Deposits
Jun 28, 2018 · 'Devil's toenails', shells of the Jurassic oyster Gryphaea, are among the most abundant fossils found in the British Jurassic (Fig. 4). The ...Belemnites: Thunderbolts And... · Devil's Toenails · 'osses 'eds<|separator|>
[61]
Rock Legends; Fossil Folklore - Portsmouth Natural History Museum
Sep 30, 2023 · The fossil oyster Gryphaea arcuata has been likened to a large toenail! It occurs very commonly in Jurassic rocks throughout the country ...
[62]
https://portsmouthnaturalhistory.co.uk/collections-stories/blog/rock-legends-fossil-folklore/