Straight, also known as heterosexual, is a sexual orientation characterized by relatively enduring patterns of emotional, romantic, or sexual attraction to individuals of the opposite biological sex.[1][2]This orientation predominates across human populations, with empirical surveys consistently showing that the majority of adults—often exceeding 80-90% in representative samples—report exclusive or primary opposite-sex attractions and behaviors.[3][4] Biologically rooted in sexual dimorphism and reproductive complementarity, heterosexuality facilitates natural propagation through the union of male and female gametes, aligning with evolutionary pressures observed in mammalian species including humans.[5] Research attributes its development to a interplay of genetic, prenatal hormonal, and environmental factors, though twin studies indicate moderate heritability without deterministic outcomes.[5]In modern contexts, straight orientation has drawn ideological critique under frameworks like heteronormativity, which frame it as a socially imposed default rather than an empirically dominant trait, despite data affirming its prevalence and stability in most individuals.[6][7] Such debates often intersect with broader controversies in sexual orientation research, where political sensitivities have historically constrained inquiry into non-heterosexual variations while underemphasizing heterosexuality's adaptive normativity.[7] Notwithstanding these, longitudinal evidence underscores that self-identified straight individuals typically exhibit low rates of same-sex attraction or behavior, distinguishing the orientation from spectrum-based fluidity models lacking robust cross-cultural replication.[8][9]
Fundamental Meanings
Geometric and Mathematical
In geometry, a straight line is a one-dimensional figure with no thickness or curvature, extending infinitely in both directions and uniquely determined by any two distinct points.[10]Euclid defined it as "a line which lies evenly between its end points," emphasizing uniformity along its length.[11] This construct satisfies Euclid's postulates, such as the ability to draw a straight line segment between any two points and extend it indefinitely.[12]Key properties include serving as the shortest path between two points in Euclidean space, where any deviation introduces greater length.[13] Points lie on a straight line if they are collinear, meaning no three such points form a triangle with positive area.[14] In coordinate geometry, a straight line maintains a constant slope, expressed by the equation y = mx + c, where m is the slope and c the y-intercept, ensuring uniform direction throughout.[15]A straight angle measures precisely 180 degrees or \pi radians, formed by two rays sharing an endpoint and extending in opposite directions along a line.[16] This equates to two adjacent right angles and contrasts with reflex or acute angles by aligning fully with the line's direction.[17] In broader mathematics, straight lines underpin concepts like parallelism, where two lines never intersect if separated by a constant distance, as per the parallel postulate.[18]
Physical and Descriptive
In the physical sense, "straight" denotes the absence of curves, bends, angles, or irregularities in an object, path, or structure, representing a uniform, linear extension. This property is fundamental in fields like engineering and manufacturing, where a straight edge—typically a rigid bar with precisely machined parallel surfaces—serves as a reference for alignment and measurement, ensuring accuracy within tolerances as fine as 0.001 inches for precision tools.[19][20]Descriptively applied to human anatomy and appearance, "straight" characterizes features exhibiting linearity or erect alignment, often implying health or aesthetic norms. For instance, straight hair consists of shafts that grow without natural curls or waves, resulting in a smooth, flat-lying texture due to the hair follicle's symmetrical shape, which contrasts with elliptical follicles producing wavy or coiled hair.[21] Straight posture refers to an upright spinal alignment where the back remains unstooped, supporting balanced weight distribution and reducing strain on musculoskeletal structures; deviations, such as slouching, correlate with increased risk of chronic back pain, as evidenced by ergonomic studies showing optimal posture maintains the natural cervical, thoracic, and lumbar curves without excessive flexion.[20][21]In dental contexts, straight teeth describe aligned dentition where incisors, canines, and molars follow a parallel, non-overlapping arrangement, achievable naturally or via orthodontic intervention like braces, which apply controlled forces averaging 1-2 newtons to reposition teeth over 12-24 months.[19] This alignment facilitates efficient mastication and minimizes periodontal disease risk, with misalignment affecting up to 90% of populations in untreated cases globally.[20]
Metaphorical Extensions
Moral and Ethical Connotations
The metaphorical use of "straight" to denote moral uprightness and ethical integrity stems from its literal sense of being undeviated, extended to describe conduct free from deceit or corruption, with records of this application dating to the 1530s in English.[22] This connotation contrasts sharply with "crooked," which implies moral deviation or dishonesty, reinforcing a binary of ethical straightness versus ethical bending.[23]The phrase "straight and narrow" encapsulates this moral framework, referring to a life of honesty, integrity, and adherence to law-abiding norms, derived from biblical imagery in Matthew 7:14 ("strait is the gate, and narrow is the way") adapted into modern idiom by the 19th century to signify disciplined virtue over licentiousness.[20][24] Similarly, "straight arrow" characterizes a person devoted to clean living, moralrighteousness, and straightforward dealings, originating in American English mid-20th century usage to praise unswerving ethical reliability without compromise.[25][26]In ethical contexts, "straight" thus privileges directness in judgment and action, aligning with principles of rectitude—defined as moral straightness from Latin rectus (straight, right)—over oblique or self-serving maneuvers, as evidenced in historical associations with upright citizenship and fair procedure.[27] This usage underscores a causal realism in ethics, where moral paths are seen as linear and predictable, deviating only through willful distortion, a view persistent in legal and philosophical texts emphasizing probity.[20]
Conventionality and Normality
In metaphorical usage, "straight" signifies adherence to conventional norms, moral integrity, and undeviating conformity to societal expectations, extending from its literal sense of linearity and absence of curvature to imply uprightness and reliability. This connotation appears in phrases like "the straight and narrow," which denotes the path of ethical or law-abiding conduct, evolving from the biblical "strait is the gate, and narrow is the way" in Matthew 7:14, with "strait" (meaning narrow or restrictive) popularly supplanted by "straight" by the 19th century to emphasize direct moral progression.[20][19]Historically, "going straight" emerged in early 20th-century American English to describe criminals reforming and abandoning illicit activities for lawful living, reflecting a transition from deviance to normative behavior, as documented in slang dictionaries from the period.[22] Related terms include "straight-laced" (often variant of "strait-laced"), originating in the 17th century to critique individuals bound by rigid propriety, akin to tightly laced garments enforcing physical restraint as a metaphor for self-denial and conventional decorum. "Straight arrow," coined around the mid-20th century in U.S. vernacular, portrays a person of unswerving honesty and traditional values, evoking an arrow's direct flight path.[28]In broader slang, "straight" contrasts with eccentricity or vice, denoting someone conventional in lifestyle, opinions, and habits—free from narcotics, unconventional pursuits, or deviation from mainstream standards—as seen in mid-20th-century usage where it implied sobriety and orthodoxy.[29] This sense underscores a cultural valuation of predictability and alignment with prevailing social structures, though it can carry pejorative undertones of rigidity when critiquing overly conformist individuals. Empirical surveys of English dialects, such as those in the Oxford English Dictionary's historical corpus, confirm its persistence in denoting "normal" or unadorned straightforwardness across regions, with peaks in usage tied to post-World War II emphasis on societal reintegration.[20][30]
Sexual Orientation
Definition and Historical Usage
In the context of human sexual orientation, "straight" refers to a pattern of enduring romantic, emotional, and sexual attraction primarily directed toward individuals of the opposite biological sex, typically facilitating reproductive pairing between males and females.[31] This orientation aligns with observable biological imperatives for species propagation, as evidenced by cross-cultural patterns of mating behaviors documented in anthropological studies spanning millennia. The term is often used interchangeably with "heterosexual," though "straight" carries connotations of conformity to prevailing societal norms regarding sexual partnering.[32]The usage of "straight" to denote heterosexual orientation originated as slang within homosexual subcultures in the early 20th century, contrasting those who adhered to conventional opposite-sex attractions with those identifying as homosexual. By 1941, a glossary in George Henry’s Sex Variants: A Study of Homosexual Patterns, a clinical compilation of case studies on non-heteronormative behaviors, explicitly defined "straight" as a term employed by homosexuals to mean "not homosexual," with "to go straight" indicating a cessation of homosexual activity in favor of heterosexual relations.[33] This etymology reflects an inversion where the majority orientation was labeled from the perspective of a minority subculture, drawing on broader English idioms like "straight and narrow" for moral rectitude or "straight" as unbent and direct, implicitly opposing archaic slurs such as "bent" for homosexual deviance dating back to at least the 19th century.[34]Prior to its adoption in sexual slang, "straight" lacked a specific orientation denotation, appearing instead in general vernacular for linearity or propriety, as in 14th-century usages for uncurved physical forms.[22] Its sexual application proliferated post-World War II amid urban gay communities in the United States, where it signified escape from criminalized same-sex pursuits toward legally sanctioned heterosexual unions, amid a backdrop of psychiatric classifications pathologizing homosexuality until 1973.[33] By the mid-20th century, the term entered mainstream lexicon through media and literature, solidifying as a neutral descriptor despite its subcultural roots, though some critiques note its reinforcement of binary norms without empirical challenge to innate attractions.[35]
Biological and Genetic Basis
Heterosexual orientation, characterized by primary sexual attraction to individuals of the opposite sex, aligns with the evolutionary imperative for sexual reproduction in humans, as evidenced by its near-universal prevalence across populations and its direct facilitation of gene propagation through opposite-sex mating.[36] This reproductive adaptation is supported by fossil and genetic records indicating that human ancestors, like other sexually reproducing species, exhibited behaviors consistent with heterosexual pairing to ensure species continuity, with deviations appearing as rare variants rather than the norm.[37]Twin studies provide empirical support for a genetic component in sexual orientation, including heterosexuality, with monozygotic twins showing significantly higher concordance rates for heterosexual orientation compared to dizygotic twins, suggesting heritability estimates ranging from 30% to 50% for overall orientation stability.[38][39] For instance, in large-scale analyses of over 3,000 twin pairs, familial aggregation patterns indicate that heterosexuality clusters within families, implying shared genetic liabilities that predispose toward opposite-sex attraction as the modal outcome.[40] Genome-wide association studies (GWAS), while primarily identifying loci linked to same-sex behavior (e.g., five significant variants in a cohort of 477,522 individuals), underscore the polygenic nature of sexual orientation, where heterosexual outcomes predominate due to the cumulative effect of common alleles favoring reproductive fitness over rare variants associated with non-heterosexual traits.[41][42] No single "heterosexual gene" exists; instead, sexual orientation emerges from the interplay of thousands of genetic variants, each with small effects, explaining why DNA alone predicts orientation with limited accuracy (8-25% variance attributable to genetics).[43]Prenatal hormonal influences, particularly androgen exposure, play a critical role in establishing heterosexual orientation by sexually differentiating the brain during fetal development, with typical levels organizing neural circuits for opposite-sex attraction in both males and females.[44] Studies of congenital adrenal hyperplasia, where females experience elevated prenatal androgens, reveal shifts toward male-typical behaviors but generally preserve heterosexual orientation, supporting the hypothesis that standard hormone profiles reinforce species-typical attractions essential for reproduction.[45] Evidence from digit ratio (2D:4D) proxies for prenatal testosterone exposure further correlates lower ratios (indicating higher exposure) with enhanced heterosexual responsiveness in males, while deviations correlate with atypical orientations.[46] These biological mechanisms interact with genetic factors, as epigenetic modifications responsive to intrauterine hormones can modulate gene expression, contributing to the stability of heterosexual development in the majority of individuals.[47] Environmental postnatal influences modulate but do not override these foundations, as longitudinal data show orientation stability emerging by adolescence in most cases.[1]
Prevalence and Stability
Heterosexual orientation predominates in population surveys, with approximately 85-86% of U.S. adults self-identifying as straight in 2024-2025 Gallup polls aggregating telephone and web-based responses from over 12,000 adults annually.[48][49] Globally, a 2021 Ipsos survey across 27 countries found 80% of adults identifying as heterosexual, based on self-reports from over 19,000 respondents aged 16-74.[50] These figures contrast with higher non-heterosexual identification among adolescents, such as 25.3% in U.S. youth aged 13-17 per 2019-2021 analyses of national health data, suggesting potential age-related reporting differences influenced by social or developmental factors.[51] Self-identification metrics, while widely used, may reflect cultural shifts or response biases rather than innate prevalence, as physiological measures like genital arousal show greater consistency with majority heterosexual patterns in lab studies.[52]Longitudinal research indicates high stability in heterosexual identity over time, particularly when assessed via consistent self-reports or objective arousal metrics. In a 10-year study of over 2,000 U.S. adults from the MIDUS cohort, the majority retained their baseline orientation, with heterosexual participants exhibiting fewer shifts than bisexual or homosexual ones, though exact percentages varied by gender and measurement wave.[53] A seven-year panel analysis of over 3,000 U.S. adults found monosexual identities (including heterosexual) more stable than plurisexual ones, with only 8.7% overall changing identities across waves from 2013-2019, implying over 90% retention for straights given their baseline majority.[54][55] Stability exceeds 80% in multi-wave adolescent-to-adult tracking from the Add Health survey, where heterosexual youth were least likely to report changes over six years, though females showed modestly higher fluidity rates than males.[56][57]Objective markers reinforce stability: genital arousal patterns in longitudinal assessments align more fixedly with heterosexual norms than self-reported identities, which can fluctuate due to recall or social desirability biases.[52] Changes, when observed, often involve non-heterosexual groups or transient explorations, with reversion to heterosexual identification common in adulthood; for instance, early-adulthood tracking shows relative stability post-adolescence, with women's trajectories evidencing more variability than men's.[58] These patterns hold across short- and long-term scales, as evidenced by repeated measures in diverse samples, underscoring heterosexual orientation's robustness against reported fluidity claims that may overstate change via self-report vulnerabilities.[59][60]
Societal Debates and Empirical Critiques
Societal debates surrounding heterosexuality often center on its status as a biological norm versus a socially imposed construct, with critics in queer theory and gender studies arguing that "heteronormativity" enforces rigid binaries and marginalizes non-heterosexual identities.[61] These perspectives, prevalent in academic literature, posit heterosexuality as a product of cultural power dynamics rather than innate predisposition, drawing on qualitative narratives from sexual minorities who report experiences of exclusion.[6] However, such claims frequently rely on interpretive frameworks over quantitative data, and sources advancing them often emanate from institutions with documented ideological skews toward deconstructing traditional norms, potentially inflating perceptions of fluidity without robust causal evidence.[62]Empirical longitudinal studies consistently demonstrate high stability in heterosexual identification, with over 80% of individuals maintaining consistent orientations across adolescence and into adulthood, particularly among those identifying as exclusively heterosexual from the outset.[57] For instance, in a 10-year panel analysis, heterosexuality exhibited the greatest persistence compared to bisexual or homosexual identities, with changes more common among non-heterosexual groups and often involving shifts toward exclusivity rather than away from it.[53] Critiques of sexual fluidity hypotheses, which emphasize changeability especially in women, highlight methodological limitations such as reliance on retrospective self-reports from non-representative samples and conflation of behavior with identity, arguing that true orientation—defined by predominant attractions—remains largely fixed for the vast majority.[63] These critiques underscore that fluidity claims, while influential in policy and education, lack generalizability, as population-level data from large cohorts show minimal aggregate shifts, with heterosexual prevalence holding steady at 92-97% across nations and time points.[3][64]Further scrutiny arises from evolutionary and demographic perspectives, where heterosexuality's alignment with reproduction justifies societal preferences in legal and familial structures, as non-heterosexual pairings inherently cannot produce offspring without third-party intervention, impacting fertility rates and child welfare outcomes.[65] Experimental evidence indicates that exposure to narratives promoting fluidity can prompt temporary loosening of self-reported heterosexual exclusivity, suggesting cultural messaging influences labeling more than underlying attractions, a dynamic that challenges constructivist views by implying orientations are resilient to social priming absent biological overrides.[8]Mental health disparities, with non-heterosexuals showing elevated risks for mood disorders (prevalence ratios up to 2.16 for bisexuals versus heterosexuals), are often attributed to minority stress in heteronormative critiques, yet causal analyses reveal confounding factors like behavioral risks and inherent incompatibilities with species-typical mating, warranting skepticism of purely environmental explanations.[66][67] Overall, while debates persist in ideologically driven discourse, empirical data affirm heterosexuality's predominance and stability as adaptive realities rather than arbitrary impositions, informing pragmatic policy over ideological deconstructions.
Gaming and Sports
Card Games and Poker
In poker, a straight is a hand consisting of five cards ranked consecutively, regardless of suit, such as 7♥ 8♦ 9♠ 10♣ J♦.[68] It ranks sixth in the standard poker hand hierarchy, above three of a kind but below a flush, making it a moderately strong holding that often wins uncontested pots but loses to higher combinations like full houses or better.[69] The highest card determines the straight's value, with examples including a queen-high straight (Q-J-10-9-8) or the wheel straight (A-2-3-4-5), where the ace functions as low but cannot wrap around to form sequences like K-A-2-3-4.[70][71]Standard rules prohibit wrap-around straights, ensuring sequences must follow numerical order without cycling the ace between high and low in the same hand, a convention established to maintain consistent ranking and prevent disputes in gameplay.[70] In variants like Texas Hold'em, players form straights using any combination of hole cards and community cards, with the probability of hitting a straight by the river estimated at around 4.6% when drawing to an open-ended straight draw on the flop.[68] Straights beat three of a kind, two pair, and one pair but are vulnerable to overcards or draws completing flushes or higher straights, influencing strategic decisions such as semi-bluffing or folding marginal draws.[69]The straight's inclusion in poker hand rankings evolved during the game's 19th-century development from earlier card games like poque and brag, with early rulesets around 1864 listing "straight sequence" alongside pairs but initially ranking it variably or omitting flushes to prioritize sequences over suited hands.[72] This gradual standardization reflected debates on hand strength, as straights proved rarer than pairs yet more achievable than flushes in five-card draws, leading to their fixed mid-tier position by the late 1800s amid poker's spread along the Mississippi River.[72] In non-poker card games, sequential combinations akin to straights appear as "runs" in rummy variants, where three or more consecutive cards of the same suit score points, but the unsuited "straight" terminology remains distinctly tied to poker.[73]In terms of rarity, a straight occurs in approximately 0.392% of five-card poker hands, or roughly 1 in 255 deals, underscoring its value in betting structures like no-limit Hold'em where implied odds justify chasing open-enders.[74] Professional play emphasizes position and board texture when pursuing straights, as disguised holdings like gutshots carry higher variance and fold equity compared to overt pairs.[68]
Billiards and Other Competitions
Straight pool, also known as 14.1 continuous, is a pocket billiards game played on a standard pool table with fifteen numbered object balls and a cue ball, where players score one point for each legally pocketed object ball called in advance.[75] The game proceeds continuously, with players re-racking fourteen balls after pocketing that many, leaving the fifteenth on the table to resume play, typically racing to 150 points in competitive formats.[76] Originating around 1910 as a successor to earlier continuous pool variants, it emphasized precision, strategy, and endurance, becoming the dominant professional discipline in the United States by the 1920s.[77]In competitions, straight pool served as the basis for world championships from 1911 to 1990, with revivals in events like the Dragon 14.1 Tournament and modern challenges such as the AZ Billiards Straight Pool Challenge, where players compete under cue-ball-foul-only rules and varied racking methods.[78] Notable records include Willie Mosconi's verified high run of 526 consecutive balls in 1954 during an exhibition, recognized as the official benchmark for sanctioned play, though unofficial feats like Jayson Shaw's 832-ball run in 2025 highlight ongoing advancements in equipment and technique under less restrictive conditions.[79] The game's decline in popularity by the late 20th century stemmed from the rise of faster-paced formats like nine-ball, yet it persists in niche tournaments testing all-around shot-making without group restrictions.[80]Straight rail billiards, a foundational carom billiards variant played on a pocketless table with three balls (one red object ball and two white balls, one serving as cue), requires the cue ball to strike both object balls in sequence for each point, without initial rail contact mandates in basic rules.[81] Dating to the early 19th century as the precursor to more complex carom games like balkline and three-cushion, it prioritizes positional control and carom accuracy over speed, with scoring continuing until a predetermined number of points. Competitively, it featured in early international matches and U.S. exhibitions, influencing modern carom disciplines, though overshadowed by evolutions demanding cushion interactions; its simplicity underscores fundamental billiards principles of ball collision and path prediction.[80]In broader pool competitions, a "straight shot"—where the cue ball aligns directly with the object ball and pocket center—represents the baseline test of stroke alignment and speed control, essential for building runs in games like straight pool or nine-ball, with errors amplifying over distance due to minimal cut angle forgiveness.[82] Mastery of straight shots correlates with tournament success, as evidenced in professional analyses emphasizing consistent center-ball contact to minimize deflection.[83]
Subcultural Uses
Straight Edge Subculture
The straight edge subculture originated in the early 1980s hardcore punk scene in Washington, D.C., as a personal pledge of abstinence from alcohol, tobacco, and recreational drugs, countering the hedonistic excesses often associated with punk rock. The term derives from the 1981 song "Straight Edge" by Minor Threat, a band fronted by Ian MacKaye, whose 46-second track explicitly rejected substance use with lyrics declaring, "I'm a person just like you / But I've got better things to do / Than sit around and smoke pot / I know I'm gonna stay clean." MacKaye, influenced by his observations of addiction's toll on peers and family, promoted sobriety as a form of self-empowerment rather than moral superiority, though he later distanced himself from the formalized movement it inspired.[84][85][86]Core tenets center on lifelong commitment to drug-free living, viewing intoxicants as crutches that impair clarity and autonomy, with adherents often framing it as rebellion against both mainstream consumerism and punk's self-destructive stereotypes. While the baseline philosophy avoids alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs, interpretations vary; some include caffeine or prescription medications, and a subset rejects promiscuous sex to prioritize emotional discipline. This ethos gained traction through DIY punk ethics, emphasizing personal accountability over institutional authority, and spread via zines, shows, and bands like Youth of Today, which in the mid-1980s linked straight edge to fitness and anti-drug militancy in songs such as "No More."[87][88][89]The iconic "X" symbol, drawn on the backs of hands, traces to club practices marking underage attendees ineligible for drinks, which straight edgers reclaimed in the 1980s to broadcast sobriety at venues and foster community recognition. Triple "XXX" markings denote stricter adherence, sometimes signaling extensions like vegetarianism. The subculture's visual and performative elements, including tattoos and band logos, reinforced identity amid punk's chaos.[90][91]By the late 1980s and 1990s, straight edge diversified, influencing metalcore and spawning the hardline variant, which integrated veganism, animal rights, and occasionally anti-abortion stances with more confrontational tactics against perceived vices. Bands like Earth Crisis popularized this intensification, blending abstinence with environmental activism, though it drew criticism for veering into vigilantism, including documented assaults on drug users in scenes from Salt Lake City to New York. MacKaye critiqued such militancy as diverging from his intent, emphasizing individual choice over enforcement.[92][93][94]Today, straight edge endures in niche hardcore communities, with active bands such as Have Heart and Turnstile incorporating its themes, though diluted by broader sobriety trends like sober-curious movements. Estimates of adherents remain informal, tied to punk festivals and online forums rather than formal membership, sustaining influence on youth countercultures valuing resilience amid substance normalization. Controversies persist over dogmatic fringes, but empirical accounts highlight its role in aiding recovery for some, with studies noting lower substance experimentation rates among committed participants compared to general punk peers.[95][92][87]
Lifestyle and Drug-Related Slang
In drug-related slang, "straight" refers to an individual who is not using drugs, is sober, or abstains from intoxicants altogether.[96][97] This term distinguishes non-users from those actively intoxicated ("stoned" or "strung out") or seeking substances ("on the street").[98] The usage appears in various glossaries of street and addiction terminology, emphasizing a state of clarity or non-intoxication without the ideological commitment of subcultural movements.[99]In lifestyle contexts tied to drug avoidance, "straight" describes a conventional or disciplined mode of living that rejects substance use, often implying reliability or adherence to norms over hedonistic or altered states.[100] This broader application overlaps with but predates formalized abstention philosophies, serving as a neutral descriptor in recovery or social settings where sobriety signals personal control rather than rebellion.[101] Empirical observations in addiction literature note its prevalence in user communities to self-identify or categorize others, aiding social dynamics around substance access and peer pressure.[99]
Proper Names and Titles
Geographical Locations
The Street Called Straight (Arabic: الشارع المستقيم, ash-Shāriʿ al-Mustaqīm; Latin: Via Recta), located in the Old City of Damascus, Syria, is an ancient east-west Romandecumanus maximus road dating to the Seleucid period around the 2nd century BCE, preserved as one of the city's primary thoroughfares spanning approximately 1.2 kilometers (0.75 miles).[102] Referenced in the New Testament (Acts 9:11) as the location where the Apostle Paul regained his sight after his conversion, it features covered souks, historical chapels like the Chapel of Saint Ananias, and remnants of Byzantine and Umayyad architecture, serving as a key commercial and cultural artery amid Damascus's UNESCO-listed historic core.[103]In the United States, Straight refers to minor unincorporated communities tied to early 20th-century rural development. Straight, Oklahoma, in Texas County within the Oklahoma Panhandle, emerged circa 1930–1931 alongside the construction of the Wichita Valley Railroad line to Keyes, functioning as a short-lived service point for agriculture and transport in the flat, semi-arid High Plains region at coordinates 36°52′37″N 101°26′56″W and elevation 3,130 feet (954 meters).[104] The site, now largely depopulated, reflects the transient boom-and-bust patterns of Panhandle rail-dependent settlements abandoned after the line's 1972 closure.[105]Similarly, Straight in Jones Township, Elk County, Pennsylvania, was a historical logging hamlet established in the late 19th century along Straight Creek, a tributary of the East Branch Clarion River, approximately two miles south of Instanter at around 41°25′N 78°40′W.[106] Named for the creek's course, it supported sawmills and general stores until flooding from dam construction submerged the area in the mid-20th century, leaving it as a submerged ghost town with only archival records of its post office and community structures.[107]
Media and Entertainment Works
The 2007 GermanfilmStraight, directed by Nicolas Flessa, depicts a ménage à trois involving a young German-Polish social worker, her boyfriend, and a Turkish guest worker, exploring themes of infidelity and cultural tensions; it premiered at the Max Ophüls Festival and received mixed reviews for its raw portrayal of relationships.[108]In 2023, Mexican director Marcelo Tobar released Straight, a thriller starring Alejandro Speitzer as a man navigating a love triangle after a breakup, with co-stars Bárbara López and Franco Masini; the film, written by Scott Elmegreen, Drew Fornarola, and Tobar, earned a 5.7/10 rating on IMDb from over 700 users, praised for its emotional intensity but critiqued for pacing issues.[109]The 2019 German television series Straight Forward, created by Wolfgang Groos and others, follows con artist Silvia Polkowski (played by Petra Schmidt-Schaller) as she plots revenge against a crime boss after her family's murder, blending heist elements with personal drama across 12 episodes; it holds a 5.7/10 IMDb rating from 339 reviews, noted for its suspenseful twists despite formulaic tropes.[110]In literature, Chuck Tingle's 2021 novella Straight presents a horror narrative centered on a man's encounter with a supernatural entity challenging his heterosexuality, framed as queer speculative fiction; published independently, it exemplifies Tingle's style of blending absurdity with social commentary on identity.The vocal group Straight No Chaser, formed in 1996 at Indiana University, has produced entertainment works including a cappella albums like Six Pack, Vol. 1 (2004) and holiday specials, gaining mainstream exposure via a 2008 Atlantic Records deal and appearances on programs such as The Sing-Off; their repertoire features covers and originals emphasizing harmonic precision without instrumental backing.[111]