The Hata model, also known as the Okumura–Hata model, is an empirical propagation model developed to predict the median path loss for land mobile radio services in urban areas, based on extensive field measurements conducted in Tokyo, Japan.[1] Introduced by Masaharu Hata in 1980, it simplifies the graphical data from Yoshihisa Okumura's earlier work into a practical formula suitable for system planning in frequencies ranging from 150 MHz to 1500 MHz, with base station antenna heights of 30 m to 200 m, mobile antenna heights of 1 m to 10 m, and link distances from 1 km to 20 km.[1]The core of the model is a logarithmic equation for urban path loss L_p (in dB), expressed as:L_p = 69.55 + 26.16 \log_{10}(f) - 13.82 \log_{10}(h_b) - a(h_m) + [44.9 - 6.55 \log_{10}(h_b)] \log_{10}(d)where f is the frequency in MHz, h_b is the base station height in meters, h_m is the mobile station height in meters, d is the distance in km, and a(h_m) is a correction factor dependent on f and h_m (e.g., a(h_m) = (1.1 \log_{10}(f) - 0.7) h_m - (1.56 \log_{10}(f) - 0.8) for small/medium cities).[1] Adjustments are provided for non-urban environments: suburban areas subtract $2 [\log_{10}(f/28)]^2 - 5.4 dB, while open/rural areas subtract $4.78 [\log_{10}(f)]^2 + 18.33 \log_{10}(f) - 40.94 dB from the urban value.[1]Due to its computational simplicity and reliance on easily obtainable parameters like frequency and antenna heights—without needing detailed terrain data—the Hata model has become a foundational tool in the design of cellular mobilenetworks, enabling efficient estimation of coverage, power budgets, and signal strength for early generations of wireless systems.[2] It remains influential in research and industry for validating more advanced models, though its predictions can vary in accuracy for specific suburban or obstructed environments.[2]An extension, known as the COST 231 Hata model, adapts the original for higher frequencies (1500–2000 MHz) relevant to personal communication systems (PCS), incorporating similar urban, suburban, and open-area corrections while maintaining the empirical approach for frequencies like 1800 MHz used in 2G networks.[3] This variant, developed under the European COST 231 project, broadens applicability to modern urban mobile radio planning but requires tuning for tropical or mountainous terrains where original assumptions may not hold.[3]
History and Development
Okumura's Empirical Measurements
In the 1960s, Yoshihisa Okumura and his team at Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Public Corporation (now NTT) conducted pioneering field experiments to characterize radio wavepropagation in urban and suburban environments, focusing on land-mobile radio services. These measurements were primarily carried out in and around Tokyo, Japan, using mobile vans equipped with receiving equipment to simulate real-world cellular-like scenarios. The experiments spanned frequencies from 150 MHz to 1920 MHz, capturing data across VHF and UHF bands relevant to mobile communications at the time.[4]The setup employed vertical monopole antennas for both transmitting and receiving, with base stations elevated to heights between 30 m and 200 m to mimic rooftop or tower installations, and mobile antennas positioned at 1 m to 3 m above ground level to represent vehicle-mounted systems. Measurements were recorded along various routes covering distances from 1 km to 100 km, allowing for the analysis of both near-field and far-field propagation behaviors in diverse terrains, including hilly areas and flat urban zones. This comprehensive dataset, gathered over multiple campaigns in 1962, 1963, and 1965, provided the empirical foundation for understanding signal attenuation in cluttered environments.[5][4]Key findings from these experiments demonstrated that median path loss increases systematically with greater transmitter-receiver separation, higher operating frequencies, and taller base station antennas, with urban clutter introducing additional losses compared to open areas—for instance, approximately 20 dB more attenuation in dense urban settings at 200 MHz over similar distances. Okumura's team generated graphical plots depicting median path loss as a function of distance for specific frequencies and antenna heights, differentiated by environmental categories such as quasi-smooth, average, and rugged terrain. These plots also illustrated variations due to location-specific factors, showing standard deviations in field strength typically ranging from 3 to 7 dB.[4][6]The curves derived from these measurements implicitly accounted for terrain irregularities, such as hills and slopes, as well as building clutter and vegetation, by normalizing data against free-space loss and applying empirical corrections based on observed median values across multiple test paths. Rather than using deterministic formulas, the approach relied on averaged field strength readings from hundreds of measurement runs, enabling predictions that captured the probabilistic nature of propagation in non-line-of-sight conditions without isolating individual scattering or diffraction effects. This graphical methodology laid the groundwork for subsequent analytical models.[4][5]
Hata's Formulation and Publication
In the late 1970s, Masaharu Hata, working at the Electrical Communication Laboratories of Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Public Corporation (NTT) in Japan, developed a set of analytical equations to approximate the graphical propagation loss data compiled by Yoshihisa Okumura. This effort aimed to transform Okumura's empirical curves into computationally efficient regression-based formulas suitable for practical cellular radio system planning. By performing curve-fitting analyses on the median field strength versus distance plots, Hata derived simple logarithmic expressions that captured the essential dependencies on frequency and antenna heights.[1]Hata's formulation was detailed in his seminal paper titled "Empirical Formula for Propagation Loss in Land Mobile Radio Services," published in the IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology. The paper appeared in volume VT-29, issue 3, in August 1980, spanning pages 317 to 325. In this work, Hata presented the model as an empirical tool derived directly from Okumura's experimental results, emphasizing its utility for VHF and UHF land mobile services.[1]The model, commonly known as the Hata model in recognition of its primary developer, was initially designed for frequencies between 150 and 1500 MHz, with base station antenna heights ranging from 30 to 200 meters, mobile antenna heights from 1 to 10 meters, and effective distances from 1 to 20 kilometers. To address varying environments, Hata introduced correction factors applied to a fundamental urbanpropagationformula, enabling adjustments for suburban and open-area scenarios without altering the core equation structure. These corrections, such as subtraction terms for non-urban settings, enhanced the model's versatility for early cellular deployments.[1]
Model Fundamentals
Assumptions and Applicability
The Hata model is an empirical propagation model that assumes operation beyond the immediate clutter zone surrounding the base station, starting from distances of 1 km, where local obstructions have less dominant influence on the signal. It does not require line-of-sight conditions between the transmitter and receiver, making it suitable for non-line-of-sight scenarios in macrocellular environments, and relies on knife-edge diffraction over buildings and terrain as a primary propagation mechanism. The model predicts the median path loss, corresponding to 50% location coverage probability, by focusing on large-scale averaging and ignoring small-scale effects such as multipath fading. This empirical basis stems from the collaborative measurements by Okumura and Hata in urban settings around Tokyo, Japan, though it has been generalized for broader use.The model's applicability is limited to specific parameter ranges to ensure reliable predictions: frequencies between 150 MHz and 1500 MHz, base station effective antenna heights of 30 to 200 m, mobile antenna heights of 1 to 10 m, and link distances of 1 to 20 km for urban and suburban environments. In open rural areas, the model can extend to distances up to 100 km, but with caveats regarding reduced accuracy due to varying terrain smoothness and the need for additional corrections. It performs best for frequencies below 2 GHz in macrocellular setups, where the environmental prerequisites include quasi-smooth terrain with buildings or vegetation acting as diffractions sources, rather than highly irregular or forested landscapes. These conditions were derived from measurements in Japaneseurban morphology but have been validated and applied in diverse global contexts for land mobile radio services.
Limitations and Accuracy Considerations
The Hata model exhibits several key limitations stemming from its empirical basis derived from specific measurement conditions. It is inherently restricted to carrier frequencies between 150 MHz and 1500 MHz, rendering it inaccurate for applications above this range without modifications like the COST-231 extension.[7] The model is optimized for macrocellular deployments and performs poorly in microcellular or indoor environments, where base station antennas are typically below roof height or signals penetrate structures, as these scenarios introduce unmodeled diffraction and penetration losses.[8] Additionally, it assumes relatively flat terrain with uniform clutter distribution, such as consistent building heights and vegetation, which leads to degraded predictions in varied topographies including hilly or irregular landscapes.[9]Accuracy assessments through validation against field measurements reveal typical root mean square (RMS) errors ranging from 4 to 10 dB across urban, suburban, and open areas.[9] More specifically, studies report RMS errors of 6 to 9 dB as standard for the model's predictions.[9] Performance varies by environment: the model often overestimates path loss in hilly terrain due to unaccounted elevation variations and clutter effects, while it tends to underestimate losses in dense urban settings with high-rise buildings, where increased multipath and shadowing are prominent.[3][10]The Hata model focuses on median path loss and does not inherently incorporate shadow fading variance or fast fading components; shadow fading is addressed separately via a log-normal distribution with a standard deviation of approximately 8 dB in urban areas, representing location-specific variations due to obstacles.[11] Validation efforts against real-world measurements confirm a 50% confidence interval of roughly ±8 dB, largely attributable to this shadowing effect.[11]To mitigate these issues, practitioners recommend integrating the model with detailed terrain and clutter data adjustments, such as digital elevation models, for improved reliability in non-ideal conditions.[9] However, it is unsuitable for 5G millimeter-wave bands (above 24 GHz), where higher frequencies demand more precise methods like ray-tracing to capture dominant line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight behaviors.[12]
Environmental Propagation Models
Urban Model
The Urban Model in the Hata propagation framework predicts the median path loss for cellular radio transmissions in dense urban environments, where buildings and other structures dominate the landscape, leading to significant multipath fading, reflection, and diffraction effects. Derived empirically from field measurements in built-up areas, this model assumes the base stationantenna is elevated above the average rooftop level by approximately 4-50 meters to ensure line-of-sight over immediate obstacles while capturing urban clutter influences.[13] It forms the core formulation upon which environmental corrections for suburban and open areas are applied, emphasizing propagation over quasi-smooth terrain interspersed with urban features.[13]The path loss L_{p,urban} is expressed in decibels (dB) by the following equation:L_{p,urban} = 69.55 + 26.16 \log_{10} f_c - 13.82 \log_{10} h_{te} - a(h_{re}) + (44.9 - 6.55 \log_{10} h_{te}) \log_{10} dHere, f_c represents the carrier frequency in MHz, h_{te} the effective base station antenna height in meters, h_{re} the effective mobile station antenna height in meters, and d the distance between the base and mobile stations in kilometers.[13] The term a(h_{re}) is a correction factor that adjusts for the mobile antenna height, reflecting its reduced susceptibility to ground-level obstructions in urban settings. For small and medium-sized cities, this factor is computed as:a(h_{re}) = (1.1 \log_{10} f_c - 0.7) h_{re} - (1.56 \log_{10} f_c - 0.8)For large cities, alternative forms account for higher building densities and greater signal attenuation at street level: a(h_{re}) = 8.29 (\log_{10} (1.54 h_{re}))^2 - 1.1 when f_c \leq 200 MHz, and a(h_{re}) = 3.2 (\log_{10} (11.75 h_{re}))^2 - 4.97 when f_c \geq 400 MHz.[13]This model is valid for frequencies between 150 and 1500 MHz, distances from 1 to 20 km, base station heights of 30 to 200 m, and mobile heights of 1 to 10 m, ensuring applicability to early cellular systems like those operating in the VHF and UHF bands.[13] All terms in the equation yield values in dB, providing a straightforward computational tool for system planning in urban macrocell deployments where the base station overlooks typical building heights.[13]
Suburban Model
The suburban model in the Hata propagation framework adjusts the urban path loss prediction to account for environments with lower building density, such as residential areas featuring scattered houses and reduced clutter compared to dense urban settings. This correction reflects decreased signal attenuation due to fewer obstructions, while maintaining similar antenna height gain effects as in urban scenarios. The model is applicable to frequencies from 150 to 1500 MHz, base station heights of 30 to 200 m, mobileantenna heights of 1 to 10 m, and distances ranging from 1 to 20 km, ensuring avoidance of near-field effects within 1 km.The path loss for suburban areas, L_{p,\text{suburban}}, is derived by subtracting a frequency-dependent correction factor from the urbanpath loss L_{p,\text{urban}}:L_{p,\text{suburban}} (dB) = L_{p,\text{urban}} - 2 \left[ \log_{10} \left( \frac{f_c}{28} \right) \right]^2 - 5.4where f_c is the carrierfrequency in MHz. This formula, originally valid up to 1.5 GHz, has been extended in some applications to 2 GHz while retaining the core structure. The correction term typically reduces predicted path loss by 2 to 7 dB across common frequency bands, enhancing coverage estimates for semi-urban deployments.This suburban adjustment originates from empirical plots in Okumura's measurements, which highlighted the median field strength differences between urban and suburban terrains; Hata approximated these disparities to yield the logarithmic correction, emphasizing less diffraction loss over rooftops and vegetation in suburban contexts. Unlike denser urbanpropagation, the suburban variant assumes propagation dominated by ground reflections and sparse multipath, leading to more predictable signal behavior in residential outskirts.
Open Model
The open model within the Hata propagation framework predicts path loss in rural or open environments, specifically targeting flat open fields with minimal obstacles such as sparse vegetation. This model adjusts the base urbanpath loss prediction to account for the reduced attenuation in unobstructed terrains, resulting in lower overall path loss compared to suburban or urban settings. The formulation relies on empirical data from field measurements, incorporating adjustments for environmental factors like earthcurvature and vegetation effects to approximate propagation behavior beyond simple free-space loss. The original model uses the small city mobile station correction factor and applies to base station heights of 30-200 m.The path loss for open areas, denoted as L_{p,open}, is expressed relative to the urban path loss L_{p,urban} as follows:L_{p,open} = L_{p,urban} - 4.78 (\log_{10} f_c)^2 + 18.33 \log_{10} f_c - 40.94where f_c is the carrier frequency in MHz. This equation applies for distances of 1-20 km, though extensions allow validity up to 100 km in open terrains.[14]The model is based on empirical data from field measurements in open areas, providing estimates that account for ground reflections and terrain effects in rural deployments, with path losses lower than those in suburban environments (due to fewer buildings) but significantly higher than ideal free-space conditions, emphasizing the role of terrain and atmospheric influences.
Derivative and Extended Models
COST-231 Hata Model
The COST-231 Hata model represents a key extension of the original Hata model, developed during the 1990s under the European Union-funded COST 231 project (1986–1996) to facilitate radio propagation predictions for emerging personal communication systems (PCS) and higher-frequency bands relevant to GSM and early UMTS deployments.[15] This semi-empirical model linearly extrapolates parameters from the Hata formulation to address path loss in the 1500–2000 MHz range, focusing on macrocellular environments with base station antenna heights exceeding surrounding structures.[15] It maintains the core structure of distance-dependent and environmental corrections while updating coefficients for elevated frequencies, enabling more accurate planning for urban and suburban cellular networks.[5]The model's path loss equation is:L_{p,\text{COST}} = 46.3 + 33.9 \log f_c - 13.82 \log h_{te} - a(h_{re}) + (44.9 - 6.55 \log h_{te}) \log d + C_mwhere f_c is the carrier frequency in MHz, h_{te} is the effective transmitter antenna height in meters (typically 30–200 m), h_{re} is the effective receiverantenna height in meters (1–10 m), d is the transmitter-receiver separation in km (1–20 km), a(h_{re}) is the receiver height correction factor in dB, and C_m is the environmental correction factor in dB.[15] The model applies to line-of-sight and non-line-of-sight scenarios in built-up areas, with validity limited to the specified parameter ranges to ensure reliability in PCS applications.[5]The receiver height correction a(h_{re}) is refined for urban settings: for metropolitan areas (population > 3 million), it is a(h_{re}) = 3.2 (\log (11.75 h_{re}))^2 - 4.97; for smaller cities, it adopts a(h_{re}) = (1.1 \log f_c - 0.7) h_{re} - (1.56 \log f_c - 0.8).[15] The environmental factor C_m is 0 dB for urban areas (medium-sized city/suburban centres) or +3 dB for metropolitan centres; for suburban environments, the path loss is the urban value minus [2 (\log (f_c / 28))^2 + 5.4] dB, while open/rural areas subtract [4.78 (\log (f_c))^2 - 18.33 \log (f_c) + 40.94] dB from the urban value.[15][5] These adaptations reflect measured data from European cities, prioritizing macrocell coverage predictions.[5]Empirical validation of the COST-231 Hata model yields a root mean square (RMS) error of approximately 7 dB when compared against field measurements in urban and suburban settings, indicating good overall accuracy for network planning though subject to local terrain variations.[16] This error level supports its widespread adoption in standards bodies like ETSI for frequency bands up to 2 GHz, with the model's simplicity facilitating rapid computations in propagation tools.[5]
Extended Hata Model
The Extended Hata (eHata) model, developed by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) between 2015 and 2017, serves as an empirical propagation prediction tool specifically tailored for the Citizens Broadband Radio Service (CBRS) and the 3.5 GHz band.[17][18] It builds upon earlier empirical approaches by tuning parameters to accommodate frequencies ranging from 1500 MHz to 3000 MHz, enabling accurate path loss estimates in diverse environments.[18] This extension addresses the need for reliable modeling in spectrum sharing scenarios, particularly for protecting incumbent radar systems while facilitating commercial broadband deployment.[17]The eHata model for urban environments computes median path loss relative to free space using a formulation that incorporates frequency-dependent attenuation curves refitted from Okumura's data, with terms such as 97.62 + 3.19 \log f + 4.45 (\log f)^2 for the frequency and height corrections, combined with distance-dependent propagation that transitions to a two-slope model beyond a breakpoint distance. The full equation and environmental adjustments for clutter categories including urban, suburban, and open areas are detailed in the NTIA technical report, allowing for morphology-specific refinements.[18] It supports base station heights of 30–200 m and distances from 1 km to 100 km, reflecting contemporary cellular deployments with taller antennas and varied link spans.[18]To handle extrapolations beyond the original Hata model's ranges, the eHata implementation employs spline interpolation for key parameters, ensuring smooth and reliable predictions at extended frequencies and distances.[19] This approach, combined with terrain and reliability factors, enhances applicability to modern scenarios. The model has been validated against U.S.-based measurements, achieving a root mean square error of less than 8 dB, which demonstrates its robustness for practical use in spectrum management.[18] An open-source C++ reference implementation is publicly available, facilitating integration into simulation tools and further research by the wireless community.[19]