Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hilary Charlesworth


Hilary Christiane Mary Charlesworth (born 28 February 1955) is an Australian international lawyer, academic, and judge who has served on the since November 2021, marking her as the first Australian woman elected to the position. She specializes in public , , and the intersection of with legal frameworks, contributing significantly to scholarly discourse on these topics through her roles as Melbourne Laureate Professor at the 's Law School and Distinguished Professor at the Australian National University. Educated at the and , where she earned her S.J.D. in 1986, Charlesworth has held academic positions at institutions including the and the Australian National University, and has influenced international legal practice through advisory roles and leadership in organizations such as the American Society of International Law. Her election to the ICJ followed nominations highlighting her expertise in international adjudication and contributions to and studies.

Early Life and Education

Childhood and Family Influences

Hilary Charlesworth was born on 28 February 1955 as one of seven children in a large family, comprising five daughters and two sons. Her parents, Max Charlesworth, an academic philosopher specializing in , and Stephanie Charlesworth, a social worker who later became a lawyer, instilled in their children a strong belief that they could achieve anything regardless of . The family's egalitarian household dynamics, where her father shared domestic tasks like cooking, reflected broader democratic values that shaped Charlesworth's early worldview. Her parents' shared commitment to justice—her father's philosophical inquiries and her mother's practical —profoundly influenced her lifelong engagement with ethical and legal questions of fairness. As a , Charlesworth accompanied her to demonstrations protesting the death penalty and the , experiences that exposed her to activism and highlighted tensions, such as his conflicts with the over anti-war stances, fostering her interest in issues. Attending an all-girls school, Charlesworth encountered limited overt gender discrimination in her immediate environment, which her parents' supportive upbringing mitigated, encouraging intellectual pursuits without imposed limitations. This family emphasis on capability and moral inquiry laid foundational influences for her later academic focus on and , though her parents reportedly viewed her specific research interests as somewhat unconventional.

Formal Education and Early Training

Charlesworth completed her undergraduate studies at the , earning a and a in 1979. Following graduation, she undertook articles of clerkship, a required practical training period for aspiring lawyers in , before serving as an associate to , a justice of the from 1970 to 1982. This role provided early exposure to appellate judicial processes and , building on her through hands-on observation and assistance in case preparation. She later pursued advanced postgraduate study at , obtaining a (S.J.D.) in 1986, with a thesis examining lessons from North American constitutionalism for an Australian . This degree, Harvard's highest law doctorate, emphasized original scholarly research and refined her expertise in comparative , marking a transition from domestic legal practice to international and theoretical dimensions of .

Academic Career

Positions at Australian Universities

Charlesworth commenced her academic career at the Law School, serving as a from 1987 to 1992. She subsequently held the position of John Bray Professor of Law at the Law School from 1993 to 1997. Following her time at Adelaide, Charlesworth joined the Australian National University (), where she taught and , eventually rising to Distinguished Professor in the School of Regulation and Global Governance in 2010. She also held an appointment as Professor of and in ANU's College of Law. At ANU, she directed the Centre for International Governance and Justice within the Regulatory Institutions Network. In 2016, Charlesworth was named Melbourne Laureate Professor at the , a role linked to her Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship (2010–2015), which supported research on international institutions. She assumed the Harrison Moore Professorship there in 2021 while retaining her Distinguished Professorship at . These concurrent appointments reflect her ongoing contributions to legal scholarship in alongside her international roles.

Research Leadership and Centers Founded

Charlesworth served as director of the Centre for International and Public Law (CIPL) at the (ANU), a role she held during the early 2000s, where the center advanced scholarship on international legal institutions, public law, and through seminars, publications, and collaborative research. In 2005, she established the Centre for International Governance and Justice (CIGJ) within ANU's School of Regulation and Global Governance (formerly Regulatory Institutions Network), serving as its inaugural director and fostering interdisciplinary research on global governance, transitional justice, peacebuilding, and the legitimacy of international institutions. The CIGJ, under her leadership, hosted projects such as comparative analyses of post-conflict reconstruction and critiques of international legal fragmentation, producing policy-relevant outputs including reports and workshops that influenced Australian foreign policy debates on multilateralism. These directorships exemplified her broader research leadership, including as an Australian Research Council Laureate Fellow (2005–2010), which funded initiatives integrating feminist perspectives into and supported capacity-building in regulatory governance at . Her efforts prioritized empirical examination of institutional effectiveness over abstract theorizing, emphasizing verifiable impacts on legal practice amid critiques of academic insularity in scholarship.

Judicial Career

Appointment to the International Court of Justice

Hilary Charlesworth was nominated for election to the (ICJ) by the Australian National Group of the , with support from the Australian government. The nomination followed the death of Australian ICJ Judge James Crawford in May 2021, creating a vacancy for the remainder of his term. Charlesworth, then a Laureate Professor at the and , had previously served as a judge ad hoc for the ICJ in the case concerning the Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 ( v. ). The election process required candidates to obtain an absolute majority of votes in both the (UNGA) and the Security Council (UNSC), conducted simultaneously by . On 5 November 2021, the UNGA and UNSC elected Charlesworth from a field of two candidates, with her securing the necessary absolute majority in the 193-member UNGA and the 15-member UNSC. This marked her as the first Australian woman and only the fifth woman overall to be elected to the ICJ since its establishment in 1945. Charlesworth's term began immediately upon election on 5 November 2021 and was scheduled to conclude on 5 February 2024, aligning with the triennial cycle of ICJ terms. Her appointment filled the Australian seat on the Court, maintaining regional representation under the ICJ Statute's provisions for equitable geographical distribution.

Re-election and Ongoing Tenure

Hilary Charlesworth was nominated by the Australian Government for re-election to the ahead of the 2023 triennial elections. On 9 November 2023, the elected her alongside four other judges, with Charlesworth receiving 117 votes from the 193 member states, meeting the required absolute majority. The election by the Security Council occurred concurrently, confirming her position. Her re-election secured a full nine-year term beginning 6 February 2024 and extending until 2033, succeeding her initial partial term from 5 November 2021, which filled the vacancy left by James Crawford's resignation. This marked the continuation of her service as the first woman on the Court, a milestone noted by Australian legal bodies including the Law Council of Australia. In her ongoing tenure as of October 2025, Charlesworth has engaged in the Court's docket, including deliberations on provisional measures in cases and other contentious proceedings. She maintains affiliations with Australian institutions, such as , while fulfilling her judicial duties in .

Theoretical Contributions to International Law

Development of Feminist International Legal Theory

Hilary Charlesworth's foundational contributions to feminist international legal theory began with the 1991 article "Feminist Approaches to International Law," co-authored with Chinkin and Shelley Wright in the American Journal of International Law. This work critiqued 's purported neutrality and universality, arguing that its doctrines and institutions systematically marginalize women's perspectives and experiences by embedding androcentric assumptions, such as the rigid public-private divide that excludes intra-family harms from state accountability. The article proposed feminist strategies like "asking " in legal analysis—interrogating how rules affect women differently—and emphasized reconstructing to incorporate as a category of analysis, thereby challenging state-centric paradigms that overlook non-state actors' gendered impacts. Building on this, Charlesworth's 1999 article "Feminist Methods in International Law," also in the American Journal of International Law, delineated methodological tools for feminist inquiry, including of abstract, gender-blind concepts (e.g., ) and reconstruction through empirical attention to women's lived realities in areas like and armed conflict. She advocated for intersectional approaches, recognizing how intersects with , , and , while cautioning against universalizing feminist assumptions. This piece addressed methodological critiques by grounding feminist analysis in concrete doctrinal reforms, such as revising interpretations to address gender-specific violations. These efforts culminated in the 2000 book The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis, co-authored with Chinkin and published by Manchester University Press, which systematically examined international law's sources, processes, and substance through a feminist lens. The book contended that the historical exclusion of women from law-making and interpretation has skewed the discipline's boundaries, rendering it inattentive to issues like reproductive rights and economic inequalities under the guise of formal equality. It received the American Society of International Law's Certificate of Merit for creative legal scholarship in 2001, underscoring its influence in prompting feminist re-evaluations of core doctrines like jus cogens norms and treaty law. Subsequent editions, including a 2022 update with a new introduction, reflect ongoing refinements amid evolving global challenges.

Integration of Gender in Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

Hilary Charlesworth has critiqued traditional for its male-centric framing, arguing that it privileges violations while sidelining harms predominantly affecting women, such as and . In her 1995 chapter "Human Rights as Men's Rights," she contended that core instruments like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966) reflect assumptions about autonomy and bodily integrity aligned with male experiences, rendering women's private sphere oppressions invisible under state responsibility doctrines. This analysis posits that without gender-disaggregated scrutiny, enforcement perpetuates structural inequalities, as evidenced by early treaty body practices that rarely addressed sex-based prior to the on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW, 1979). In collaboration with Christine Chinkin, Charlesworth's 2000 book The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis extends this to advocate reconstructing international law's sources—treaties, custom, and general principles—to incorporate empirical evidence of gender-differentiated impacts. The work highlights how state-centric paradigms obscure non-state actors' roles in gender-based harms, proposing feminist methodologies like "asking the woman question" to test legal rules for hidden biases, such as in human rights adjudication where women's testimony is undervalued due to evidentiary standards favoring formal documentation. For human rights integration, they emphasize CEDAW's potential for complementarity with universal covenants, yet note its optional protocol (adopted 1999, entered force 2000) has seen limited ratifications—only 115 states by 2023—limiting enforcement against intersecting discriminations like race and class. Charlesworth's engagement with in mechanisms reveals skepticism toward its bureaucratic implementation. In her 1996 article "," she argues that post-Beijing 1995 strategies reduced "gender" to a proxy for women-focused add-ons, diluting transformative aims by ignoring male complicity in inequalities and institutional resistance, as seen in under-resourced treaty body gender units. She critiques UNTAET's (, 1999–2002) Gender Affairs Unit for marginalization despite inclusion efforts, attributing inefficacy to failure in altering power dynamics rather than mere participation quotas. Proposing alternatives, she calls for redefining mainstreaming to mandate behavioral shifts in male-dominated structures and intersectional monitoring, drawing on empirical data from low female representation in committees (e.g., 15% in mainstream bodies circa 2004). Regarding humanitarian law, Charlesworth's co-authored 2000 work with Judith Gardam, "Protection of Women in Armed Conflict," challenges international humanitarian law's (IHL) , asserting that Additional Protocol I (1977) and overlook conflict-specific vulnerabilities like systematic rape, which empirical records from conflicts such as the (1990s) show as strategic tools rather than incidental. She argues IHL's combatant/civilian binary inadequately protects women as potential actors, not mere victims, critiquing enforcement gaps where customary rules on (e.g., ICTY precedents post-1993) lag due to state reluctance in reporting. In broader feminist critiques, Charlesworth highlights UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) for focusing on women's "special needs" in post-conflict settings while neglecting gendered conflict causation, such as male aggression patterns, urging IHL reconstruction via intersectional lenses to address compounded risks for marginalized groups. These interventions underscore causal links between gendered legal omissions and persistent atrocities, advocating evidence-based reforms over declarative policies.

Key Judicial Opinions and Positions

Opinions in Major ICJ Cases

In Ukraine v. Russian Federation (allegations under the and related conventions), Charlesworth authored separate opinions on preliminary objections and jurisdictional matters. In her January 31, 2024, separate opinion concerning the International Convention for the Suppression of the (ICSFT), she advocated for a broader of "funds" to include non-financial assets of every kind, such as weapons or facilities used for terrorist acts, arguing that the treaty's drafting history and purpose support this view over the Court's narrower exclusion of direct-use items. She found that violated Article 12 of the ICSFT by unduly delaying responses to 's requests for assistance in investigating , citing specific delays exceeding eight months without justification following 's detailed submissions in November and December 2014. In a February 2, 2024, separate opinion, she voted against upholding 's second preliminary objection under Article IX of the , reasoning that the dispute encompassed the and application of the Convention—particularly whether 's invocation of genocide justified force—rather than requiring proof of violation at the jurisdictional stage, emphasizing that merits questions like the propriety of such actions should not bar admissibility. In Application of the Genocide Convention in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Charlesworth issued a declaration on March 28, 2024, supporting the Court's supplemental provisional measures amid the escalating humanitarian crisis following Hamas's October 7, 2023, attacks and Israel's response, which had caused over 1,200 Israeli deaths and massive displacement and casualties in Gaza. She endorsed the finding of plausible risk to Palestinians' rights against genocide but critiqued subparagraph (2)(b) of the order for excessive opacity in directing Israel to enable humanitarian assistance, proposing instead that Israel suspend its military operations in Gaza to facilitate aid delivery and urging both parties toward a humanitarian ceasefire, based on UN reports of impeded access exacerbating famine risks. In v. (under the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and ICSFT), her November 12, 2024, separate opinion endorsed the Court's rejection of Armenia's first preliminary objection on claims predating Azerbaijan's September 15, 1996, entry into force of the CERD, framing it as an admissibility issue where Azerbaijan lacked standing for pre-1996 acts absent individualized injury, while affirming for post-entry disputes. She also supported dismissal of the second objection regarding landmines and booby-traps, viewing it as a merits argument rather than a preliminary bar, though disagreeing with the Court's characterization of it as "without object." Regarding advisory proceedings on the Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (July 19, 2024 opinion), Charlesworth's declaration emphasized that prohibited under entails unjustified differential treatment, particularly highlighting intersectional impacts on , such as policies on and settlements disproportionately burdening women through heightened economic vulnerability and children through family separations via permit denials and demolitions. In the advisory opinion on Obligations of States in respect of (delivered July 23, 2025), Charlesworth joined a declaration with Judges Brant, , and Nolte underscoring the interplay between and treaty obligations in addressing climate impacts, with her additional remarks stressing disproportionate effects on vulnerable groups including and those in small island states.

Stances on Contemporary Conflicts

In the Ukraine v. Russian Federation case before the , initiated in 2022, Judge Charlesworth issued a separate on preliminary objections, voting against upholding Russia's second objection and affirming the Court's jurisdiction ratione materiae under Article IX of the . She argued that the dispute—concerning Russia's allegations of Ukrainian as justification for its invasion—is indivisible and directly engages the interpretation and application of the Convention, rejecting Russia's attempt to bifurcate it into separate elements. This position supported 's claim that Russia's invocation of genocide falsely misrepresented facts and breached obligations under the Convention, emphasizing the need to address such misuse through judicial scrutiny rather than deferring to merits phase alone. Charlesworth's opinion aligned with the Court's broader finding of jurisdiction to examine whether Ukraine committed genocide in Donbas, as alleged by Russia, while underscoring Russia's failure to substantiate its claims adequately at the provisional stage. In a related aspect of the proceedings under the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (ICSFT), the Court determined in February 2024 that Russia violated Article 9(1) by not investigating allegations of terrorism financing in Ukraine, a ruling consistent with Charlesworth's procedural stance favoring accountability for state actions in conflict initiation. Regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict, Charlesworth appended a declaration to the ICJ's 28 March 2024 order in South Africa v. Israel, endorsing provisional measures to protect in from acts of under the 1948 , including risks from starvation as a method threatening group destruction. She highlighted the humanitarian catastrophe—marked by over 30,000 reported Palestinian deaths, widespread displacement, and infrastructure collapse since 's post-7 October 2023 operations—affirming a plausible right to such protection amid evidence of aid blockages. However, she criticized subparagraph (2)(b) of the order for its "elliptical" and "opaque" language, advocating explicitly for to suspend military operations in as essential to enable unhindered delivery and prevent genocidal acts. In subsequent ICJ proceedings on the conflict, including advisory opinions on Israel's obligations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Charlesworth supported measures requiring cooperation with UN efforts for aid and cessation of activities, viewing differential treatment in humanitarian access as discriminatory under . Her positions emphasize immediate provisional relief to avert irreparable harm in ongoing hostilities, prioritizing civilian protection over operational continuity, though without endorsing the underlying allegation at the merits stage.

Criticisms and Intellectual Debates

Realist Critiques of Feminist Approaches

Realist theorists contend that feminist approaches to , including those pioneered by Hilary Charlesworth in works such as her 1988 co-authored article "Feminist Approaches to International Law," overemphasize normative gender analysis at the expense of the material power dynamics that govern state behavior. In an anarchical international system, realists like argue that states prioritize survival and power maximization through capabilities such as military strength, rendering gender deconstruction irrelevant to explaining conflict, alliances, or compliance with legal norms. Charlesworth's advocacy for reframing international legal categories to reveal silences about women's experiences is critiqued as idealistic, ignoring how states act rationally based on self-interest rather than transformative gender lenses. Critics from the realist tradition dismiss the shift in feminist scholarship toward individual or —evident in Charlesworth's integration of into frameworks—as a dilution of the state-centric essential to understanding . Realists maintain that lacks inherent enforcement mechanisms, with adherence stemming from power balances rather than moral imperatives like ; thus, efforts to "engender" treaties or judgments, as Charlesworth has proposed, fail to alter outcomes in high-stakes scenarios dominated by great-power . This perspective views such approaches as lacking a testable , questioning their utility for addressing empirical realities like or territorial disputes over abstract concerns. Furthermore, realists reject the feminist premise that international structures are inherently gendered or patriarchal, asserting instead a gender-neutral focus on objective interactions. Charlesworth's critiques of law's male-dominated development, which highlight exclusions in areas like humanitarian law, are seen as projecting domestic constructs onto interstate relations, where asymmetries—not —determine and efficacy. This dismissal underscores a broader realist toward critical theories that prioritize over predictive models grounded in historical patterns of aggression and balance-of- .

Evaluations of Impact on Legal Enforcement

Evaluations of Charlesworth's scholarly and judicial work reveal a pattern where her emphasis on integrating perspectives into legal norms has primarily advanced discursive and interpretive shifts rather than substantive enhancements in capabilities. In her analysis of regulatory frameworks, co-authored with Chinkin, she identifies a "compliance paradox" in : the proliferation of detailed norms, including those addressing inequalities, has coincided with persistent implementation gaps due to the decentralized nature of , reliant on consent and voluntary rather than coercive mechanisms. This observation underscores that feminist critiques, while exposing structural biases in treaties like the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Against Women (CEDAW), have not demonstrably improved or sanctioning processes, as evidenced by ongoing reservations and uneven rates reported by the CEDAW Committee, which hover below 50% for timely submissions in some cycles. Critics from realist traditions argue that Charlesworth's approaches exacerbate rather than resolve deficits by prioritizing interpretive expansions over pragmatic institutional reforms, such as bolstering Security Council referral powers or protocols. For example, in her separate opinion in the Ukraine v. Federation case (2024), Charlesworth highlighted disparate adverse impacts of law measures on women and children under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, advocating for differentiated treatment in assessments. Yet, the opinion's influence on actual remains negligible, as Russia's non- with ICJ provisional measures illustrates the court's limited coercive , with historical rates for contentious cases averaging around 60-70% and even lower for non-consensual interventions, unaffected by gender-specific framings. Realist scholars contend this reflects causal primacy of geopolitical interests over normative innovations, rendering feminist-infused analyses symbolically potent but empirically inert in altering state behavior. Empirical assessments of broader impacts, such as through UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security—which drew on feminist scholarship including Charlesworth's—show partial normative uptake but weak enforcement outcomes. National action plans under the resolution exist in over 90 countries as of 2023, yet implementation reviews by the UN Secretary-General indicate systemic failures in accountability for conflict-related , with prosecutions rare and influenced more by domestic political will than legal . Evaluations thus attribute limited causal efficacy to Charlesworth's contributions, attributing persistent enforcement shortfalls to law's inherent voluntarism and power asymmetries, rather than oversights in gender analysis. Proponents counter that her work fosters incremental compliance through heightened scrutiny in bodies, but quantifiable data on improved enforcement metrics, such as reduced violations post-feminist doctrinal shifts, remains scarce and contested.

Awards, Honors, and Recognition

Academic and Professional Accolades

Hilary Charlesworth was appointed a Member of the (AM) in recognition of her service to and as an academic and advocate. She received an Australian Research Council Federation Fellowship in 2005 for a five-year project examining the role of in building and in post-conflict societies. In 2006, Charlesworth and Christine Chinkin were jointly awarded the American Society of International Law's Goler T. Butcher Medal for outstanding contributions to the development or effective realization of . In 2016, she was conferred an honorary doctorate by the in for her scholarly work in public . Charlesworth holds the position of Melbourne Laureate Professor and Harrison Moore Professor of Law at the , appointments reflecting sustained excellence in legal scholarship. She was named a at the Australian National University, culminating in the 2022 Peter Baume Award for distinguished contributions to the university's research and teaching mission. In 2021, the International Studies Association presented her with its Distinguished Scholar Award, honoring her interdisciplinary impact on and . That same year, Charlesworth was elected by the and Security Council as a judge of the , marking her as the first Australian woman to hold the position and affirming her expertise in contentious and advisory proceedings. She is also a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia (FASSA), recognizing her influence in disciplines.

International Appointments and Fellowships

In 2011, Charlesworth served as judge ad hoc on the (ICJ) in the Whaling in the case ( v. : intervening), appointed by to adjudicate the dispute over Japan's scientific program under the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. The ICJ ruled in 's favor in March 2014, finding Japan's program not for genuine scientific purposes. Charlesworth was elected as a full member of the ICJ by the and Security Council on November 5, 2021, to complete the term of her compatriot James Crawford, who had died earlier that year; her initial term extended to February 2030. She was re-elected to a full nine-year term in November 2023. Additionally, she currently serves as judge ad hoc in the ICJ case concerning the Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 ( v. ), addressing the validity of a boundary arbitration award. The Australian government appointed Charlesworth to the in , with her second term beginning in 2015. She was elected to the in 2011 and advanced to titular member status in 2023. Charlesworth has held numerous visiting professorships at international institutions, including , New York University School of Global Law, (UCLA), Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, and the London School of Economics. She serves on the Executive Councils of the Asian Society of International Law and the American Society of International Law. In 2023, she was elected an International Fellow of the British Academy.

Major Works and Publications

Seminal Books and Co-Authored Texts

The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis, co-authored with Christine Chinkin and first published in 2000 by Manchester University Press, represents Charlesworth's most influential contribution to feminist international legal theory. The text systematically critiques the foundational elements of international law—including its sources, interpretive methods, and institutional practices—for embedding and perpetuating gender biases that exclude women's perspectives and experiences from legal discourse and outcomes. Charlesworth and Chinkin argue that these structural deficiencies limit the law's capacity to address issues like violence against women and economic inequalities, proposing reforms grounded in inclusive reinterpretations of treaties and customary norms. The book earned the American Society of International Law's Certificate of Merit in 2001 for its scholarly rigor and practical insights. A reissued edition in 2021 includes a new introduction reflecting on the persistence of these critiques amid evolving global challenges. In No Country is an Island: Australia and International Law, co-authored with Madelaine Chiam, Devika Hovell, and George Williams and published in 2006 by UNSW Press, Charlesworth explores Australia's selective engagement with international legal obligations, particularly in , , and security domains. The analysis draws on specific cases, such as Australia's ratification of treaties and its policies under the , to illustrate how domestic politics often prioritize over compliance, resulting in inconsistent application of international norms. The authors advocate for a more integrated approach, emphasizing of benefits from deeper alignment with global standards. Charlesworth contributed to the third edition of International Law and World Order, co-authored with Burns H. Weston and and released in 1997 by West Group, a comprehensive that elucidates the principles, institutions, and challenges of maintaining order in an anarchic international system. Spanning topics from to , the volume incorporates case studies and doctrinal analysis to demonstrate how power dynamics influence legal efficacy, with Charlesworth's sections highlighting integration. Updated from prior editions to reflect post-Cold War developments, it serves as an educational resource underscoring the interplay between law and .

Influential Articles and Essays

One of Hilary Charlesworth's most cited articles is "Feminist Approaches to International Law," co-authored with Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright and published in the American Journal of International Law in 1991, which garnered over 2,000 citations and introduced systematic feminist critiques of international law's gender-neutral facade, arguing that core doctrines like sovereignty and sources of law marginalize women's experiences and perpetuate inequalities. The piece proposed reconstruction strategies, such as incorporating gender-specific provisions in treaties and challenging state-centric paradigms, influencing a generation of scholarship in critical international legal theory despite debates over its emphasis on deconstruction over doctrinal reform. In "Feminist Methods in International Law," published in the American Journal of International Law in 1999, Charlesworth outlined practical methodologies for feminist analysis, including consciousness-raising and adapted to legal inquiry, with over 580 citations reflecting its role in operationalizing critiques across interpretation, formation, and institutional practices. This essay extended the 1991 framework by advocating empirical scrutiny of law's gendered impacts, such as in adjudication, though it has been noted for prioritizing narrative over universal norms in some evaluations. Charlesworth's 2002 article "International Law: A Discipline of Crisis," appearing in the Modern Law Review, analyzed how crises—ranging from humanitarian interventions to environmental threats—drive normative evolution in , critiquing the field's episodic progress and reliance on exceptional events for legitimacy, with subsequent references highlighting its prescience amid developments. The work urged a more proactive institutional framework, influencing discussions on law's adaptability without crises as catalysts. Other notable essays include "The Unbearable of ," which questioned the opacity and state practice requirements in formation, drawing analogies to philosophical lightness to underscore evidentiary weaknesses, and "The of " (2023), which broadened methodological horizons by incorporating visual and cultural artifacts into legal study, challenging text-centric traditions in scholarship.

Public Engagements and Lectures

Keynote Addresses and Invited Talks

Charlesworth has delivered keynote addresses and invited talks at numerous academic and professional gatherings, focusing on themes such as , feminist methodologies in legal scholarship, and the role of international courts. These engagements underscore her influence in reshaping discourse on global legal frameworks, often critiquing structural limitations in international institutions while advocating for progressive interpretations grounded in empirical legal practice. In July 2021, she presented the keynote at the 28th Annual of the Australian and New Zealand Society of International Law (ANZSIL), titled "Inertia or Innovation? Reshaping International for a Complex Future," hosted by , where she examined adaptive challenges in international legal norms amid geopolitical shifts. On April 30, 2021, Charlesworth served as a at the Legal Research Master "Law & " at , contributing to discussions on power dynamics in legal systems alongside other jurists. More recently, in September 2023, she delivered the keynote "Searching for Progress in " at the AjV-DGIR Conference organized by the Arbeitskreis junger VölkerrechtswissenschaftlerInnen, livestreamed to address empirical indicators of advancement in treaty implementation and judicial outcomes. In March 2024, as part of the European Society of International Law (ESIL) Lectures series at , she spoke on "Challenges Facing the ," analyzing caseload pressures, advisory opinions, and enforcement gaps based on recent ICJ proceedings. That February, she gave the Foundation Day Lecture at the , focusing on the ICJ's operational dynamics in the second annual series on the court. In 2024, she also presented the Edgar de Picciotto Lecture at the , exploring hopes and fears in international law's evolution.

Contributions to Policy and Advocacy

Charlesworth chaired the ACT Bill of Rights Consultative Committee from 2002 to 2003, which produced a report in May 2003 recommending the incorporation of international human rights standards into domestic law. This effort directly contributed to the enactment of the Human Rights Act 2004 by the Australian Capital Territory Legislative Assembly in March 2004, with the legislation entering into force on 1 July 2004 as Australia's first statutory bill of rights. The Act's framework, drawing on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, has served as a model for similar instruments in Victoria (Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006, effective 2008) and Queensland (Human Rights Act 2019, effective 2020). In addition to her role in the initiative, Charlesworth co-led a research project on in the Australian Capital Territory, examining their integration into local governance and policy frameworks. She has also served as patron of the Women's Legal Service, supporting advocacy for women's access to justice and in domestic contexts. On the international front, Charlesworth co-authored a 2016 report submitted to the , analyzing mechanisms for strengthening the through Council resolutions and proposing policy enhancements for accountability in post-conflict settings. Her collaborative work with non-governmental organizations has focused on practical strategies for states to implement international obligations, including through expert submissions to Australian parliamentary inquiries on and . These efforts emphasize bridging doctrinal with enforceable domestic policies, particularly in and domains.

References

  1. [1]
    MLS Laureate Professor first Australian woman to be elected to ...
    Nov 8, 2021 · Professor Hilary Charlesworth has been elected to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the first Australian woman and only the fifth ...
  2. [2]
    United Nations General Assembly and Security Council elect Ms ...
    Nov 5, 2021 · The General Assembly and the Security Council of the United Nations today elected Ms Hilary Charlesworth as a Member of the International Court of Justice (ICJ ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  3. [3]
    Professor Hilary Charlesworth - Melbourne Law School
    Hilary Charlesworth is a Melbourne Laureate Professor at Melbourne Law School. She is also a Distinguished Professor at the Australian National University ...
  4. [4]
    Hilary Charlesworth - The Australian National University
    Biography. Hilary Charlesworth was educated at the University of Melbourne and Harvard Law School. She currently holds an appointment as Harrison Moore ...
  5. [5]
    Hilary Charlesworth S.J.D. '86 elected to the International Court of ...
    Feb 9, 2022 · Charlesworth has taught law for more than 30 years, at the University of Adelaide, Australian National University, and the University of ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  6. [6]
    Hilary Charlesworth | Collège de France
    She has served on the executive boards of the Asian Society of International Law and the American Society of International Law and as President of the ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Nomination to the International Court of Justice | Australian Minister ...
    Professor Charlesworth is a leading scholar and jurist who has made a significant contribution to the study and practice of international law, including by ...
  8. [8]
    Adjudicating international disputes - Pursuit
    Dec 20, 2021 · International law expert and Laureate Professor Hilary Charlesworth is the first Australian woman elected as a judge of the International ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  9. [9]
    Laureate Professor Hilary Charlesworth AM | School of Law News
    Nov 16, 2020 · Hilary's parents were also great influences on her professional life. Hilary's dad was an academic philosopher. Her childhood memories ...
  10. [10]
    Obituary: Max Charlesworth - The Sydney Morning Herald
    Jun 13, 2014 · Max was born in Numurkah, the younger son of William and Mabel Charlesworth. He obtained his BA (Hons) in 1946 and his MA in philosophy in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Law as a site of politics (Part I) - Völkerrechtsblog
    Feb 15, 2016 · I came from a very large family, five girls, two boys – and I went to an all-girls school. My parents were very democratic, my father did a lot ...Missing: early childhood background
  12. [12]
    Chatting with Hilary Charlesworth - Völkerrechtsblog
    Feb 9, 2024 · My parents were both interested in questions of justice—my father as a philosopher and my mother as a social worker. They have deeply influenced ...
  13. [13]
    Laureate Professor Hilary Charlesworth AM - Academically Blonde
    Nov 16, 2020 · She grew up as one of seven children, five of whom were girls. She went to an all-girls school and did not witness the discrimination she would ...Missing: background | Show results with:background
  14. [14]
    Professor Hilary Charlesworth AM - Victorian Government
    May 26, 2022 · Professor Hilary Charlesworth is a leading academic specialising in the areas of international and human rights law. "" Inducted: 2001.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  15. [15]
    There are no set steps in a career - Queen's College
    Sep 27, 2023 · On graduating from Arts/Law at the University of Melbourne, she became an associate to High Court Judge the late Sir Ninian Stephen, who ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] ms. hilary charlesworth
    She has worked at the University of Melbourne Law School (1987-1992) and the University of Adelaide. Law School (1993-1996). She has held visiting ...
  17. [17]
    Law scholar first Australian woman elected to the ICJ | School of ...
    Since 2010, Hilary Charlesworth has held the position of Distinguished Professor in the ANU School of Regulation and Global Governance. She also holds an ...
  18. [18]
    Hilary Charlesworth - The Conversation
    Aug 12, 2013 · ... Australian National University. She also holds an appointment as Professor of International Law and Human Rights in the College of Law, ANU.<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Hilary Charlesworth - Find an Expert - The University of Melbourne
    In 2016 Hilary was awarded an Honorary Doctorate by the Universit Catholique de Louvain in Belgium. She delivered the General Course in Public International Law ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  20. [20]
    2003-05: The Changing Geopolitical Order | Wayne Morse Center
    Hilary Charlesworth is director of the Centre for International and Public Law ... Center of the City University of New York. He was the author of eight ...
  21. [21]
    Contributors - Parliament of Australia
    Hilary Charlesworth is Director of the Centre for International and Public Law in the Faculty of Law at the Australian National University. Chandran ...
  22. [22]
    Centre for International Governance and Justice (CIGJ)
    Established in 2005 by Honorary Professor Hilary Charlesworth, CIGJ has consistently demonstrated leadership in issues of governance and justice, ...Missing: founded | Show results with:founded
  23. [23]
    Hilary Charlesworth on feminism and international law - Informit
    Hilary Charlesworth is the Director of the newly established Centre for International Governance and. Justice at the Australian National University and she ...
  24. [24]
    Hilary Charlesworth | Women in Research
    Hilary Charlesworth. ARC Laureate Fellow. Professor of Human Rights Law, The University of Melbourne.Missing: family | Show results with:family
  25. [25]
    Nomination to the International Court of Justice | Australian Minister ...
    ... nominated Professor Hilary Charlesworth AM FASSA for election as a Judge of the International Court of Justice. The Australian Government has supported the ...
  26. [26]
    General Assembly Elects Judge to International Court of Justice
    Nov 5, 2021 · Elected by secret ballot was Hilary Charlesworth (Australia), who received an absolute majority of votes cast by the 193 Member States of the ...<|separator|>
  27. [27]
    Law scholar first Australian woman elected to the ICJ - ANU Reporter
    Nov 6, 2021 · Since 2010, Hilary Charlesworth has held the position of Distinguished Professor in the ANU School of Regulation and Global Governance. She also ...
  28. [28]
    https://www.icj-cij.org/statute
  29. [29]
    Nomination of Judge Hilary Charlesworth for re-election to the ...
    The Australian Government welcomes the nomination of Her Excellency Judge Hilary Charlesworth for re-election as a Judge of the International Court of Justice.
  30. [30]
    General Assembly Elects Five Judges to International Court of Justice
    Nov 9, 2023 · The General Assembly today elected five new judges for the International Court of Justice in The Hague to begin their term 6 February 2024.
  31. [31]
    Judge Hilary Charlesworth | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
    Member of the Court since 5 November 2021; re-elected as from 6 February 2024. Biography File Document charlesworth-en-012025.pdfMissing: career | Show results with:career<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Australian Judge re-elected to the International Court of Justice
    Nov 13, 2023 · ... Hilary Charlesworth on her re-election as a Judge of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for the term 2024-2033. ... election in 2021 ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Declaration of Judge Charlesworth | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF ...
    Mar 28, 2024 · The Court found that the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip have a plausible right to be protected from acts of genocide and related prohibited acts.Missing: activities | Show results with:activities
  34. [34]
    Current Members | INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
    Member of the Court since 6 February 2021. bullet Biography · Image · Judge Hilary CHARLESWORTH. Australia. Member of the Court since 5 November 2021; re- ...
  35. [35]
    Judge Charlesworth re-elected to International Court of Justice
    Nov 22, 2023 · Melbourne Law School Professor, Hon. Judge Hilary Charlesworth has won re-election to the International Court of Justice at the United Nations.
  36. [36]
    Feminist Approaches to International Law | American Journal of ...
    Feminist Approaches to International Law. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017. Hilary Charlesworth ,. Christine Chinkin and.
  37. [37]
    Feminist Approaches to International Law - jstor
    May 20, 1988 · FEMINIST APPROACHES TO INTERNATIONAL LAW. By Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright*. I. INTRODUCTION. The development of ...
  38. [38]
    Feminist Methods in International Law | American Journal of ...
    Feb 27, 2017 · Feminist Methods in International Law. Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2017. Hilary Charlesworth.
  39. [39]
    Feminist Methods in International Law - jstor
    Thanks to David Caron, James Morrow, Beth. Simmons and Duncan Snidal for valuable comments. FEMINIST METHODS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW ... See Hilary Charlesworth ...
  40. [40]
    The boundaries of international law: A feminist analysis, with a new ...
    The boundaries of international law provides a feminist perspective on the structure, processes and substance of international law, shedding new light on treaty ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Hilary Charlesworth - Publications - Collège de France
    Sep 11, 2024 · Hilary Charlesworth. Publications. Books and Monographs. Charlesworth ... Weekend, Centre for International and Public Law ANU, pp. 45-61 ...
  42. [42]
    ‪Hilary Charlesworth‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬
    Feminist methods in international law. H Charlesworth. The American Journal of International Law 93 (2), 379-394, 1999. 582, 1999 ; Gender of Jus Cogens, The. H ...
  43. [43]
    Feminism, Approach to International Law
    Hilary Charlesworth has described feminist analysis as twofold: first, deconstruction of the international legal system to challenge its 'claim to ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis
    Indeed, The Boundaries of International Law might be read as an elaboration of the argument first sketched out by the authors along with their colleague Shelley ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations
    Sep 11, 1996 · 3. See HILARY CHARLESWORTH & CHRISTINE CHINKIN, THE BOUNDARIES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW: A FEMINIST ANALYSIS 219 (2000).
  46. [46]
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2600757
  47. [47]
    [PDF] gender perspectives on international humanitarian law
    46 A gender perspective on IHL enforcement attempts to debunk this kind of mythology by traversing more dynamic understandings of the different experiences of ...
  48. [48]
    6 - Feminist Approaches to International Law: The Work of Hilary ...
    Apr 28, 2017 · A seminal contribution to rethinking and recasting the role of international law has been made by feminist approaches to international law.
  49. [49]
    Separate opinion of Judge Charlesworth | INTERNATIONAL COURT ...
    Feb 2, 2024 · This separate opinion explains why I have voted against upholding the Russian Federation's second preliminary objection.
  50. [50]
    Separate opinion of Judge Charlesworth
    Nov 12, 2024 · In this separate opinion, I set out my views on the first and second preliminary objections raised by Armenia. I support the Court's conclusions on these two ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Declaration of Judge Charlesworth - UN.org.
    Jul 19, 2024 · The Court observes that the essence of prohibited discrimination in international law is the unjustified differential treatment between ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Joint Declaration of Judges Charlesworth, Brant, Cleveland and ...
    1. A central issue in this Advisory Opinion is the relationship between customary international law and treaty law with respect to climate change. Customary law ...
  53. [53]
    Analysis of the ICJ Judgment in Ukraine v Russia (CERD and ICSFT ...
    Feb 22, 2024 · The ICJ narrowly found (13:2) that Russia violated Article 9(1) of ICSFT due to its failure to investigate individuals who allegedly committed terrorism ...
  54. [54]
    Australian international court judge calls for Israel to suspend Gaza ...
    Apr 1, 2024 · Wong said during the ICJ re-election campaign last year: “A vote for Judge Charlesworth is a vote to uphold an international legal system ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/vol11(11)/V1111154157.pdf
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists
    However, feminists often misunderstand or ignore the rationale for the search for more scientific theories offered by early realists such as. Morgenthau. Most ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Realism is Gendered and Historically Skewed - Inkstick Media
    May 30, 2019 · Many realists have pushed back against the encroachment of feminist critique. But simply because realists claim that their conception of the ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Regulatory Frameworks in International Law
    The traditional framework for regulation by rules and principles of international law is unsophisticated in comparison with that of national legal systems.
  59. [59]
    https://brill.com/edcollchap/book/9789004730618/BP000021.pdf
  60. [60]
    [PDF] ARTICLE FEMINISM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE POST- 9 ...
    See generally Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin, & Shelley Wright, Feminist. Approaches to International Law: Reflections from Another Century, in ...
  61. [61]
    Feminist Strategy in International Law: Understanding Its Legal ...
    Feb 16, 2018 · This article draws on feminist scholarship in international law – and a specific feminist campaign for the implementation of United Nations Security Council ...
  62. [62]
    (PDF) Feminism and International Law: Theory, Methodology, and ...
    ... Hilary Charlesworth,. Feminist Methods in International Law. , 93 AM. J. INT'L L. 379, 384. (1999) (citing Chandra Mohanty,. Introduction: Cartographies of ...
  63. [63]
    Professor Hilary Charlesworth receives the highest accolade at ANU
    Distinguished Professor Hilary Charlesworth from the School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet) received the 2022 Peter Baume Award. Named after former ...Missing: honors | Show results with:honors
  64. [64]
    Hilary Charlesworth - Institut de Droit International
    Hilary Charlesworth is a Laureate Professor at Melbourne Law School. She is also a Distinguished Professor at the Australian National University.Missing: early childhood family
  65. [65]
    Judge Hilary Charlesworth FBA | The British Academy
    Judge Hilary Charlesworth FBA. International legal institutions; international legal theories, particularly critical and feminist theories. Elected 2023.<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    The boundaries of international law - Manchester University Press
    A feminist analysis, with a new introduction. By Hilary Charlesworth and Christine Chinkin. The boundaries of international law. Hardcover.
  67. [67]
    No Country is an Island: Australia and International Law | UNSW Press
    No Country is an Island: Australia and International Law. Australia and International Law. Hilary Charlesworth, Madelaine Chiam, Devika Hovell, George ...
  68. [68]
    No Country is an Island: Australia and International Law
    Charlesworth, H., Chiam, M., Hovell, D., & Williams, GJ (2006). No Country is an Island: Australia and International Law. (1st ed.) UNSW Press.
  69. [69]
    International Law: A Discipline of Crisis - Charlesworth - 2002
    Jun 28, 2008 · This article examines the way that international lawyers tend to focus on crises for the development of international law.
  70. [70]
    Full article: International law as a discipline in crisis
    Feb 6, 2025 · Footnote In March 2024, Judge Charlesworth became the first Western ICJ judge to opine that a ceasefire was a necessary provisional measure ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    The Unbearable Lightness of Customary International Law - jstor
    ... contributing to the formation of customary international law. The Unbearable Lightness of Customary International Law by Hilary Charlesworth". The title of ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] The Art of International Law
    Hilary Charlesworth (2023) "The Art of International Law," American University Law Review: Vol. 38: Iss. 3,. Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons ...
  73. [73]
    ESIL Lectures - European Society of International Law
    SPEAKER: Judge Hilary Charlesworth · VENUE: Stockholm University · LECTURE: Challenges facing the International Court of Justice · DATE: 21 March 2024 · SPEAKERS: ...
  74. [74]
    Keynote: Searching for Progress in International Law
    Sep 23, 2023 · We welcome you to the livestream of the keynote speech by Hilary Charlesworth on “Searching for Progress in International Law”, held at the AjV-DGIR Conference ...
  75. [75]
    Events - Melbourne Law School
    Past events hosted by the Australia and the International Court ... Hilary Charlesworth, 2024 Hilding Eek Memorial Lecture, Stockholm University, 21 March 2024 ...Missing: activities | Show results with:activities
  76. [76]
    Legal Research Master Conference 2021: Law & Power - Event
    Apr 30, 2021 · The 2021 keynote speakers are feminist international law scholar prof. Hilary Charlesworth (University of Melbourne), CJEU Judge prof. Sasha ...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    Foundation Day Lecture by Ms. Hilary Charlesworth - YouTube
    Feb 10, 2024 · Judge, International Court of Justice (Second Annual Lecture on the International Court of Justice)Missing: invited | Show results with:invited
  78. [78]
    Reflections on the ACT's Human Rights Bill 20 years on — lessons ...
    The Committee was chaired by Professor Hilary Charlesworth, now a Judge of the International Court of Justice in the Hague. The Human Rights Act passed in March ...
  79. [79]
    2 Background and framework for promotion and protection of human ...
    As recommended by the ACT Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ACT ESCR) research project led by Professor Hilary Charlesworth and Professor Andrew Byrnes.
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Professor Hilary Charlesworth
    Hilary Charlesworth is a Professor in RegNet and Director of the Centre for. International Governance and Justice (CIGJ), ANU. She also holds an appointment ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  81. [81]
    [PDF] S/2016/397 Security Council - the United Nations
    Apr 28, 2016 · The report, authored by. Jeremy Farrall and Hilary Charlesworth (both of the Australian National. University), together with Alan Ryan ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Inquiry into supporting democracy in our region Submission 58
    This submission responds to the terms of reference for the Foreign. Affairs and Aid Subcommittee inquiry into supporting democracy in.