Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Human security

Human security refers to a paradigm in international policy and security studies that prioritizes the protection of individuals and communities from pervasive threats to their survival, livelihood, and dignity, rather than solely focusing on state sovereignty and military defense.^[1] Introduced in the United Nations Development Programme's 1994 Human Development Report, it encompasses "freedom from fear"—protection against violence and conflict—and "freedom from want"—safeguarding against economic deprivation, hunger, disease, and environmental hazards.^[2]^[3] The framework identifies seven interconnected categories of security: economic stability to ensure access to resources and employment; food security to prevent hunger; health security against disease and malnutrition; environmental security from natural disasters and degradation; personal security from physical violence, including crime and abuse; community security amid ethnic tensions or social conflicts; and political security protecting against repression and human rights violations.^[3]^[4] These elements underscore an interdependent, people-centered approach that emphasizes prevention over reaction and universal applicability across contexts.^[3] Adopted in UN resolutions and national human development reports, human security has influenced initiatives like the 2000 Commission on Human Security led by Sadako Ogata and Amartya Sen, which advocated integrated policies addressing root causes of vulnerability.^[5] However, the concept has drawn academic criticism for its breadth, which can render it conceptually vague and difficult to operationalize into measurable policies or prioritize threats effectively.^[6] Empirical studies on interventions framed under human security, such as those by international NGOs, show mixed results in enhancing outcomes like reduced violence or improved livelihoods, often limited by challenges in causal attribution and implementation amid complex local dynamics.^[7] Critics argue it risks diluting focus on acute military threats or enabling expansive interpretations that justify interventions without clear security gains.^[8]

Definition and Core Principles

UNDP's Foundational Framework

The United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) 1994 Human Development Report introduced human security as a paradigm shift toward protecting individuals rather than territories, prioritizing development over military armament.^[9] This framework defined human security as comprising "safety from chronic threats such as hunger, disease and repression" alongside "protection from sudden and hurtful disruption in the patterns of daily life," whether in rich or poor nations.^[2] The report emphasized a people-centered approach, recognizing security as universal in scope, interdependent across threats, and oriented toward prevention rather than reaction.^[3] Central to this framework were seven interconnected categories of security: economic security (stable income and employment); food security (access to nutritious sustenance); health security (protection from diseases and preventable mortality); environmental security (sustainable resource management); personal security (safety from physical violence); community security (preservation of traditional identities and social bonds); and political security (guarantees of civil and political rights).^[2] These dimensions underscored the interdependence of threats, arguing that vulnerabilities in one area—such as economic instability—could cascade into others, like food shortages or social unrest, necessitating holistic strategies over isolated interventions.^[1] Published amid post-Cold War transitions, the report advocated redirecting resources from arms races to human-centered development, reflecting optimism for global cooperation in addressing non-military risks like poverty and environmental degradation.^[2] It positioned human security as integral to sustainable human development, widening choices for individuals to live freely without fear, while critiquing state-centric models for neglecting subnational and transnational perils.^[9] This foundational articulation influenced subsequent UNDP national reports, embedding human security analyses in country-specific vulnerability assessments.^[1]

Categories of Threats and Freedoms

The United Nations Development Programme's (UNDP) 1994 Human Development Report delineates human security through seven interconnected categories of threats, emphasizing protection for individuals rather than states.^[9] These categories bifurcate into "freedom from fear," which targets violence and coercion, and "freedom from want," which addresses chronic deprivations.^[2] Freedom from fear includes personal security against physical harm from crime, abuse, or warfare; community security against intergroup violence driven by ethnic or religious divides; and political security against state repression or human rights abuses.^[2] Freedom from want encompasses economic security from unemployment and poverty; food security from hunger and famine; health security from disease and inadequate medical access; and environmental security from natural disasters or resource degradation.^[2] Debates persist over the relative emphasis on these pillars, with proponents of a narrow interpretation prioritizing freedom from fear for its direct link to survival threats like armed conflict, arguing it enables concrete policy responses such as disarmament.^[10] Critics of broadening to freedom from want contend that socio-economic threats introduce vagueness, potentially conflating security with general development goals and diluting focus on acute dangers.^[11] Conversely, advocates for integration highlight that want-based vulnerabilities often precipitate fear-based ones, as economic despair can fuel recruitment into insurgencies or heighten susceptibility to coercion.^[12] Empirical evidence underscores these interconnections: horizontal inequalities in resource access correlate with elevated civil conflict risks, with data from 1960–2000 showing that groups facing relative deprivation are twice as likely to engage in violence.^[12] Poverty traps, where low income limits education and health investments, perpetuate cycles amplifying both want and fear; for instance, analyses of sub-Saharan African cases reveal that GDP per capita below $600 annually triples conflict onset probability compared to higher thresholds.^[12] Such causal links necessitate holistic approaches, though operational challenges arise from prioritizing measurable fear threats over diffuse want factors.^[13]

Distinction from Broader Security Paradigms

Human security diverges from traditional national security paradigms by prioritizing the protection of individuals from a broad spectrum of threats—such as economic deprivation, disease, and environmental hazards—over the defense of state territories and sovereignty.^[9] Whereas national security emphasizes military deterrence and response to external aggression, human security adopts a people-centered framework that addresses both chronic vulnerabilities and sudden disruptions to human well-being.^[2] This shift recognizes that true security emerges from safeguarding personal freedoms and capabilities, rather than solely preserving institutional borders.^[3] In contrast to the reactive posture of conventional security, which often mobilizes after threats materialize, human security advocates proactive measures like early prevention to mitigate interdependent risks before they escalate.^[3] Its holistic scope integrates dimensions including health, food, and community stability, fostering resilience through addressing root causes like inequality and resource scarcity, as opposed to the narrower focus on armed conflict resolution.^[9] Empirical assessments, such as those evaluating post-conflict recovery, indicate that such preventive strategies enhance individual agency and reduce vulnerability cycles more effectively than isolated military interventions.^[14] Implementation of human security further distinguishes it by empowering non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and local communities as key actors, enabling bottom-up responses tailored to specific contexts, unlike the top-down, state-dominated mechanisms of traditional security.^[15] For instance, NGOs often facilitate community-level threat assessments and capacity-building in fragile settings, leveraging proximity to populations for more adaptive interventions than centralized state apparatuses.^[15] This approach underscores that enduring security stems from localized resilience and participation, bypassing bureaucratic rigidities inherent in state-centric models.^[16]

Historical Development

Intellectual and Post-Cold War Origins

Mahbub ul Haq, a Pakistani economist serving as UNDP's special advisor from 1989, pioneered the human development paradigm in the late 1980s as a critique of GDP-focused metrics, advocating instead for assessments of people's expanded choices in health, education, and income.^[17] This approach drew from Amartya Sen's capabilities framework, developed in the 1980s, which prioritized substantive freedoms enabling individuals to achieve valued functionings over resource distribution alone.^[18] Haq's emphasis on holistic well-being challenged realist international relations theories dominant since the mid-20th century, which centered security on state survival amid interstate military rivalries, arguing that such paradigms overlooked chronic vulnerabilities like poverty and underdevelopment.^[1] The end of the Cold War in December 1991, marked by the Soviet Union's dissolution, diminished existential interstate threats like nuclear confrontation, redirecting focus to intrastate and transnational risks.^[19] In Europe, the Yugoslav federation's breakup triggered wars starting in June 1991, with ethnic violence in Slovenia, Croatia, and Bosnia displacing over 2 million people by 1993 and killing approximately 140,000, exposing failures of state-centric deterrence against civil fragmentation.^[20] Parallel dynamics in Africa, including Burundi's ethnic massacres in October 1993 that killed 50,000 and presaged Rwanda's April 1994 genocide claiming 800,000 lives, highlighted how internal power vacuums post-bipolar stability amplified non-military threats such as famine and displacement.^[20] These crises revealed empirical shortcomings in traditional security models, which prioritized territorial integrity over individual protections from identity-based violence and economic collapse, fostering calls for paradigms addressing root causes of human vulnerability.^[21]

Evolution Through UN and Policy Milestones

The Human Security Network was established in May 1998 through a bilateral initiative between Canada and Norway, marking an early multilateral effort to prioritize individual protection from violence and promote norms like the Ottawa Treaty on anti-personnel landmines.^[22] This network, later expanding to include countries such as Austria, Chile, and South Africa, reflected Canada's foreign policy under Foreign Minister Lloyd Axworthy, which emphasized "freedom from fear" in response to post-Cold War conflicts where state-centric interventions, such as the 1993 UN operation in Somalia, failed to prevent widespread civilian casualties and famine despite military deployments exceeding 25,000 troops.^[23]^[24] In March 1999, Japan proposed the creation of the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security, which was established to finance projects addressing threats to individuals rather than states, with initial contributions focusing on conflict prevention and poverty alleviation in regions like Southeast Asia.^[25] The fund's operationalization in the early 2000s supported over 200 projects by 2010, integrating human security into UN programming by emphasizing empirical assessments of vulnerabilities exposed in 1990s crises, including Somalia's state collapse that displaced over 1 million people and caused an estimated 300,000 deaths from violence and starvation.^[26] The adoption of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in September 2000 at the UN Millennium Summit provided a framework where human security principles indirectly informed targets on poverty reduction and child mortality, though explicit integration was limited; for instance, MDG 1 aimed to halve extreme poverty rates by 2015, aligning with human security's focus on economic threats but without dedicated security metrics.^[27] Building on this, the Commission on Human Security, launched in January 2001 and co-chaired by Sadako Ogata and Amartya Sen, produced the 2003 report "Human Security Now," which advocated for protection and empowerment strategies tailored to local contexts, influencing UN policies by recommending multi-stakeholder approaches to address interconnected threats like those in failed states.^[28]^[29] Japan's sustained advocacy, including funding the Trust Fund with over $500 million by the mid-2000s, positioned it as a key proponent in Asia, where human security was applied to regional challenges such as refugee flows and natural disasters, formalizing the paradigm through UN General Assembly discussions that bridged development and security agendas.^[30] These milestones collectively shifted global discourse from territorial defense to individual resilience, evidenced by the Trust Fund's support for initiatives that reduced vulnerability in post-conflict settings, though critics noted implementation gaps due to reliance on voluntary contributions rather than binding resolutions.^[26]

Recent Applications and Adaptations (2020s)

The COVID-19 pandemic provided a pivotal application of human security frameworks, underscoring interconnected vulnerabilities in health, economic stability, and social cohesion. The UNDP's 2022 Special Report on Human Security analyzed how the crisis amplified existing inequalities, with global disruptions affecting over 1.8 billion workers and reversing human development gains equivalent to five years in mere months.^[31] This lens revealed structural fragilities, prompting calls for enhanced solidarity to mitigate cascading effects across dimensions of well-being.^[32] In parallel, adaptations integrated Anthropocene-scale threats, particularly climate change, into human security paradigms. The same UNDP report framed the Anthropocene—defined by human-driven planetary alterations—as amplifying risks like biodiversity loss and extreme weather, projecting up to 40 million deaths from temperature shifts by 2100 under moderate mitigation scenarios.^[31] These evolutions emphasized preventive, people-centered responses over reactive measures, linking environmental degradation to direct threats against individual freedoms and livelihoods.^[32] The 2020s also saw expanded focus on hybrid threats, including cyberattacks and weaponized migration, within Euro-Atlantic human security discourses. Analyses highlighted how such tactics erode civilian protections by blending digital disruptions with physical incursions, as seen in coordinated operations targeting infrastructure and population movements.^[33] Critiques in these contexts argued for recalibrating state-individual balances, warning that overemphasis on sovereignty could dilute protections against non-traditional aggressions like cyber-enabled information warfare.^[32] Amid rising multipolar tensions, major powers exhibited verifiable shifts toward national security resurgence, diminishing relative priority for human security. The U.S. 2022 National Security Strategy positioned China as a systemic rival, prioritizing military and economic deterrence frameworks that sidelined individual-centric approaches.^[34] China's July 2025 white paper on national security similarly adopted a comprehensive state-led model spanning political, technological, and territorial domains, reflecting a pivot from global human security norms to domestic stability amid great-power competition.^[35] These adaptations underscore tensions between expansive threat definitions and resource allocation favoring territorial defense.^[36]

Comparison with Traditional Security

State-Centric vs. Individual-Centric Approaches

Traditional state-centric security paradigms, originating from realist theories of international relations, position the state as the principal referent object of security, focusing on safeguarding territorial integrity, sovereignty, and political independence primarily against external military aggression.^[37] This approach employs mechanisms such as nuclear deterrence, military alliances, and balance-of-power strategies to prevent conquest or coercion by rival powers, as exemplified by the U.S.-led containment policy during the Cold War, which successfully limited Soviet expansion without direct superpower conflict and contributed to the eventual dissolution of the USSR in 1991.^[38] In contrast, human security adopts an individual-centric lens, elevating people as the core referent, addressing pervasive threats to personal survival and dignity including chronic poverty, hunger, disease, and environmental degradation alongside violence.^[1] Philosophically, state-centric models derive from first-principles assumptions of anarchy in the international system, where states act as rational, self-interested actors prioritizing collective survival over individual welfare, often viewing internal human vulnerabilities as secondary to external perils.^[39] Human security, however, posits a causal chain where individual freedoms from fear and want form the bedrock of stable societies, challenging state monopoly by emphasizing bottom-up resilience and rights-based protections that transcend borders.^[40] Practically, this divergence manifests in policy priorities: state-centric efforts allocate resources to defense budgets and armaments—such as the NATO framework established in 1949 to counter perceived threats—while human security advocates redirect focus toward social investments like health infrastructure and poverty alleviation to mitigate daily existential risks.^[37] Empirical illustrations underscore these tensions; the Cold War's containment successes preserved state sovereignty across Western alliances, enabling economic booms that indirectly bolstered individual livelihoods, yet in contexts of state fragility like Haiti, where governance collapse since the 2010 earthquake has perpetuated gang dominance and over 5,600 homicides in 2023 alone, individual-centric threats such as displacement and food insecurity persist amid failed interventions prioritizing symptoms over state rebuilding.^[41]^[42] Causally, robust state institutions provide the enabling environment for human security by enforcing rule of law and resource distribution, as weak states amplify vulnerabilities to non-military hazards, suggesting that individual protections often necessitate prior or concurrent state stabilization rather than isolated pursuit.^[43] Overemphasizing individuals without fortifying state capacity risks undermining collective defense, potentially exposing populations to unchecked external incursions that erode personal securities en masse.^[44]

Empirical Evidence on Effectiveness

Empirical assessments of human security approaches reveal mixed outcomes, with targeted interventions demonstrating reductions in specific threats but broader applications showing weaker causal links to overall conflict mitigation compared to state-centric strategies. The 1997 Ottawa Convention on the Prohibition of Anti-Personnel Mines, embodying human security's emphasis on freedom from fear through disarmament, has correlated with a sharp decline in annual landmine casualties from approximately 25,000 in 1999 to fewer than 5,000 by the early 2020s among ratifying states, predominantly affecting civilians who comprised 85% of victims in 2023.^[45]^[46] This reduction underscores complementary effects in post-conflict zones integrating development and demining efforts, yet persistent violations in non-signatory or rights-abusing regimes, such as those deploying mines despite treaties, highlight failures where individual protections lack state enforcement. Metrics linking human security investments—such as poverty alleviation and health programs—to Human Development Index (HDI) gains exist, with panel data analyses indicating positive correlations between development expenditures and HDI improvements in regions prioritizing multidimensional threats over purely military ones.^[47] However, these associations often conflate human development with security, showing limited independent impact on violence reduction; for instance, HDI rises in stable economies frequently align more closely with robust national defense enabling economic growth and deterrence, as evidenced by higher GDP stability in NATO members versus fragile states.^[48] Studies contrasting paradigms find national security's role in deterrence yields verifiable stability outcomes, such as reduced interstate conflicts during periods of strong military postures, while human security's diffuse focus competes less effectively in high-threat environments without complementary state capacity.^[49] Rigorous evaluation faces inherent constraints, with few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) feasible for security interventions due to ethical and logistical barriers, rendering much human security evidence observational or anecdotal rather than causally robust.^[50] Peer-reviewed critiques note that while human security frameworks highlight vulnerabilities, empirical support for their superiority in conflict outcomes remains tentative, often favoring national approaches' deterrence impacts—such as Cold War-era stability—where quantifiable data on prevented escalations predominates over correlational human-centered metrics.^[51] This disparity underscores a reliance on verifiable state-level deterrence for foundational stability, with human security enhancements proving additive only in supported contexts.

Risks of Conceptual Overlap and Dilution

The expansive scope of human security, encompassing threats from poverty, disease, and environmental degradation alongside violence, risks conflating disparate challenges and thereby obscuring the prioritization of acute, existential dangers such as military invasion or large-scale terrorism.^[52] Realist scholars argue that this conceptual breadth dilutes analytical clarity and policy focus, as states must allocate finite resources across non-comparable domains rather than concentrating on core defense imperatives; for instance, diverting military budgets toward socio-economic programs can undermine deterrence against aggressive adversaries who exploit such reallocations.^[53] Empirical analyses of state failures, such as in Somalia during the 1990s or Yugoslavia's disintegration in the early 1990s, demonstrate that institutional collapse at the state level—marked by loss of monopoly on violence and territorial control—precedes and amplifies individual-level insecurities, including famine and ethnic violence, underscoring that human vulnerabilities intensify without a functional sovereign authority to enforce order.^[54]^[55] Critics from a realist perspective contend that elevating individual-centric protections over state survival invites strategic exploitation by rivals, who can undermine weakened polities through hybrid tactics while proponents of human security advocate diffuse interventions that fail to address root power asymmetries.^[56] This overlap fosters policy ambiguity, as seen in NATO's incorporation of human security doctrines, which has blurred distinctions between military operations and civilian policing, complicating command structures and operational effectiveness in conflict zones like Afghanistan post-2001.^[57] The paradigm's polysemous nature further hampers cumulative knowledge and evidence-based decision-making, as varying interpretations—from narrow "freedom from fear" to broad "freedom from want"—impede consistent threat assessment and resource prioritization.^[58] A pivotal illustration of these risks emerged in the policy recalibration following the September 11, 2001, attacks, which prompted a decisive pivot toward traditional national security frameworks emphasizing military preemption, intelligence dominance, and border fortifications over the human security emphases prominent in 1990s UN discourse.^[59] The U.S. National Security Strategy of 2002 explicitly prioritized defeating terrorist networks and rogue states through hard power, reflecting perceived inadequacies in broader human-centered approaches that had not forestalled the coordination of the attacks despite prior socio-economic aid efforts in regions like the Middle East.^[60] This shift validated realist warnings that neglecting state-level defenses in favor of individualized threat mitigation leaves populations exposed to cascading failures, as evidenced by heightened global terrorism fatalities—peaking at over 44,000 in 2014—amid protracted interventions blending security and development without resolving underlying state fragility.^[6]

Interconnections with Allied Concepts

Ties to Economic Development

Human security frameworks emphasize economic dimensions as integral to achieving "freedom from want," positing poverty not merely as a deprivation but as an amplifier of broader threats such as conflict, disease, and instability.^[61] Extreme poverty fosters environments conducive to violence and undermines resilience, as evidenced by World Bank analyses linking low-income conditions to protracted "conflict debts" that hinder recovery and perpetuate vulnerability cycles.^[62] In this view, economic underdevelopment causally precedes and intensifies human insecurities, making sustained growth a prerequisite for mitigating these risks rather than a coincidental parallel outcome.^[63] Empirical data from the World Bank underscore how rising GDP per capita correlates with reduced poverty headcounts, directly alleviating "freedom from want" pressures. Countries achieving rapid per capita growth, such as China and Vietnam, eliminated extreme poverty (defined as under $1.90 daily) by 2015 through market-oriented reforms that boosted incomes and access to essentials.^[64] Similarly, India's GDP per capita expansion contributed to slashing its extreme poverty rate from 16.2% in 2011-12 to 2.3% by 2022-23, lifting 171 million people above the threshold and enhancing household buffers against shocks.^[65] These patterns indicate that economic expansion—via productivity gains and investment—builds the material foundations for security, enabling individuals to withstand threats that overwhelm subsistence-level economies.^[66] Critiques of foreign aid as a primary development tool highlight its frequent failure to deliver causal security benefits, often entrenching dependency and corruption instead. Studies reveal aid inflows can distort local incentives, foster overvalued currencies, and sustain elite capture without spurring growth, as seen in sub-Saharan cases where dependency ratios exceeded 10% of GDP yet poverty persisted.^[67] Empirical audits confirm corruption siphons aid resources, with recipient states scoring low on transparency indices experiencing embezzlement rates up to 20-30% of inflows, undermining intended human security gains.^[68] Redistributive policies, while politically appealing, risk moral hazard by discouraging self-reliance, contrasting with evidence that secure property rights and market mechanisms better enable organic development.^[69] From causal reasoning grounded in economic principles, property rights serve as the bedrock for human security by securing assets against expropriation, thereby incentivizing investment and entrepreneurship over aid-fueled stagnation. Formalizing extralegal property claims, as in de Soto-inspired reforms, has unlocked capital in informal economies, with Peru's 1990s titling program increasing household incomes by 25-30% through collateralized lending.^[70] Free markets, by allocating resources via price signals rather than fiat redistribution, generate the sustained wealth accumulation essential for resilience, as competitive enforcement of rights minimizes externalities and maximizes efficiency in threat-prone settings.^[71] Policies prioritizing these institutions over aid demonstrate superior outcomes in reducing vulnerability, affirming economic liberty as the engine of human security.^[72]

Overlaps with Human Rights Regimes

Human security frameworks intersect with human rights regimes by conceptualizing severe rights violations, such as genocide and mass atrocities, as direct threats to individual and communal stability, necessitating protective responses that extend beyond judicial remedies. The United Nations' human security paradigm, articulated in reports since the 1994 UNDP Human Development Report, aligns with human rights by emphasizing freedom from fear, where systematic abuses like ethnic cleansing undermine personal safety and societal cohesion.^[73] Empirical analyses indicate that atrocity crimes, including genocide, are often preceded by escalating patterns of discrimination and violence, framing such violations not merely as legal infractions but as existential security risks that demand preventive intervention. A key synergy emerges through the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, endorsed by the UN General Assembly at the 2005 World Summit, which reframes state sovereignty as contingent on safeguarding populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity—core human rights breaches that human security identifies as threats to human dignity and survival.^[74] R2P operationalizes this overlap by authorizing international action when states manifestly fail to protect, integrating human rights obligations into security responses and clarifying the scope of human security by prioritizing verifiable threats over vague aspirations.^[75] This linkage has influenced UN Security Council resolutions, where human rights monitoring informs determinations of threats to international peace, though enforcement remains politically constrained.^[76] Tensions arise from human rights regimes' emphasis on legalistic enforcement through treaties and courts, which contrasts with human security's pragmatic orientation toward multifaceted threats requiring adaptive, sometimes coercive measures. Human rights instruments, while binding in theory, often prove ineffective without complementary security mechanisms, as judicial processes alone cannot halt ongoing violence; for instance, the International Criminal Court's indictments have limited deterrent impact absent military stabilization.^[77] The 2011 NATO intervention in Libya, invoked under R2P to avert civilian massacres amid Gaddafi's crackdown, initially protected rights by halting advances on Benghazi but devolved into prolonged instability due to insufficient post-conflict military and governance support, resulting in factional warfare, open slave markets, and over 500,000 displacements by 2016.^[78] ^[79] President Obama later cited the absence of follow-through planning as his administration's gravest error, underscoring how rights-focused legalism falters without sustained pragmatic security commitments.^[80] These overlaps highlight a realist constraint: universal human rights claims frequently overlook state sovereignty's role in enabling verifiable protections, as expansive interpretations invite selective enforcement that dilutes focus on core threats. Human security's broader lens risks undermining rights regimes by prioritizing aspirational outcomes over enforceable legal standards, potentially eroding accountability in favor of vague interventions.^[81] Prioritizing empirical protections—such as bolstering state capacity against atrocities—over ideological universality better aligns both paradigms with causal realities of threat mitigation, avoiding dilutions from cultural or relativist caveats that obscure sovereignty's foundational limits.^[82]

Environmental and Resource Dimensions

Environmental resource scarcity poses risks to human security by undermining livelihoods, exacerbating displacement, and fueling localized conflicts, particularly in vulnerable regions where populations depend on agriculture and natural resources for survival. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) identifies established causal pathways from climate variability to increased water stress and scarcity, which can destabilize food systems and heighten individual vulnerabilities to poverty and malnutrition.^[83] Empirical studies confirm that declines in water mass correlate with elevated probabilities of local violent conflicts, driven by competition over diminishing supplies rather than interstate wars.^[84] Climate-induced migration represents a key dimension, with recent analyses estimating millions displaced annually in the Global South due to stressors like droughts and floods, often resulting in internal movements that strain urban infrastructures and social cohesion. For instance, households exposed to rainfall shocks exhibit a 6 percentage point higher likelihood of sending migrants, reflecting adaptive responses to livelihood threats but also amplifying exposure to urban insecurities.^[85] In arid zones such as the Sahel, water conflicts empirically link to soil moisture deficits compounded by population growth, where scarcity intensifies inter-communal tensions over pastoral and farming resources.^[86] The Darfur conflict in Sudan illustrates these dynamics, where prolonged droughts from the 1980s onward, coupled with desertification, reduced arable land and water availability, sparking resource competition between nomadic herders and sedentary farmers that escalated into widespread violence displacing over 2 million people by 2008.^[87] Scholarly assessments attribute a significant portion of the displacement to environmental degradation rather than solely ethnic or political factors, with rainfall reductions exacerbating scarcity in a region already facing land pressure from population growth.^[88] While these threats warrant attention, framing environmental issues through a securitization lens risks policy overreach by prioritizing top-down interventions that overlook local adaptive capacities, as evidenced by historical patterns in non-Western societies where communities endured resource shocks through decentralized innovations like crop diversification and communal resource management.^[89] Causal analysis favors market-driven adaptations, such as technological advancements in irrigation and drought-resistant crops, which have demonstrated higher efficacy in enhancing resilience compared to multilateral pacts that often suffer from enforcement gaps and inefficient resource allocation.^[90] Non-Western historical precedents, including persistence amid Late Bronze Age climatic shifts in regions like the Peloponnese, underscore inherent societal flexibilities that global securitized frameworks may undermine by centralizing control.^[91]

Health Threats and Pandemic Responses

Health threats constitute a core pillar of human security, emphasizing vulnerabilities at the individual and community levels rather than solely state-level defenses. Prior to 2020, the HIV/AIDS epidemic served as a paradigmatic case, with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1308 in 2000 declaring it a threat to international peace and security in Africa due to its destabilizing effects on populations, economies, and military capacities.^[92] The pandemic's indirect impacts, including orphaning millions and exacerbating poverty, underscored how infectious diseases erode human security by impairing access to food, shelter, and livelihoods, prompting calls for integrated responses beyond traditional public health.^[93] The COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020s amplified these dynamics, revealing acute global supply chain frailties in medical products like personal protective equipment and ventilators, which were concentrated in few countries and disrupted by export restrictions and factory shutdowns.^[94] Lockdown measures, implemented variably from March 2020 onward, imposed substantial human costs, including excess non-COVID mortality from delayed care, mental health deterioration, and educational disruptions affecting over 1.5 billion students globally, while empirical meta-analyses indicate they reduced COVID-19 mortality by only 0.2% on average in early 2020 implementations.^[95]^[96] These trade-offs highlight causal trade-offs in human security, where short-term contagion controls clashed with broader welfare erosion, particularly in low-income settings reliant on informal economies. National-level strategies, such as stockpiles and targeted quarantines, demonstrated superior efficacy compared to diffuse international aid mechanisms during COVID-19. The U.S. Strategic National Stockpile enabled rapid distribution of limited inventories like ventilators in 2020, though inadequacies exposed gaps in pre-pandemic planning, while regional quarantines in Chile reduced transmission by up to 40% in high-risk areas through enforced isolation.^[97]^[98] In contrast, global aid frameworks faltered, with insufficient multinational stockpiles failing to meet surging demands, as seen in shortages persisting into 2021 despite WHO-coordinated efforts. Critiques of the WHO's emphasis on human security framing argue it prioritized broad equity narratives over pragmatic, sovereignty-based interventions, potentially delaying decisive border controls and domestic production ramps that proved more effective in containing outbreaks.^[99]^[100]^[101] Looking forward, bolstering health security through biotechnology and national sovereignty offers a more resilient path than universal access paradigms, which risk over-reliance on fragile global networks. Advances in synthetic biology and AI-driven surveillance could enable rapid vaccine platforms and pathogen detection within days, as demonstrated by mRNA technologies accelerating COVID responses, but require sovereign investments to mitigate dual-use risks and supply dependencies.^[102]^[103] Empirical lessons from COVID-19 affirm that self-reliant stockpiling and biotech infrastructure outperform aid-dependent models in preserving individual freedoms and minimizing cascading vulnerabilities.^[104]

Gender and Cultural Considerations

Incorporation of Gender-Specific Vulnerabilities

Women and girls constitute approximately 49 percent of the world's refugees and asylum seekers as of the end of 2023, facing elevated risks of gender-based violence (GBV) during displacement due to factors such as limited access to resources and heightened exposure in transit and camp settings.^[105] ^[106] Over 60 million forcibly displaced or stateless women and girls worldwide encounter high GBV risks, exacerbated by conflict dynamics that include sexual violence incidents where 70 to 90 percent involve weapons.^[107] ^[108] In 2022, around 600 million women lived within 50 kilometers of active armed conflicts, amplifying vulnerabilities like arbitrary killings, torture, and forced displacement compared to men, who may face combat-related risks but benefit from greater mobility and decision-making roles in many cultural contexts.^[109] ^[110] Human security frameworks address these disparities through targeted protections, notably via United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325), adopted in 2000, which mandates the integration of women's protection and participation in conflict prevention, resolution, and recovery.^[111] Empirical analyses indicate that including female delegates in peace negotiations correlates with more durable agreements, raising the likelihood of sustainability beyond two years by 20 percent and longer-term stability by 35 percent.^[112] ^[113] Local enforcement mechanisms inspired by UNSCR 1325, such as community-based monitoring in post-conflict zones, have demonstrably reduced human trafficking incidents targeting women by enhancing early warning systems and survivor support, though outcomes vary by implementation rigor.^[114] However, incorporating gender-specific measures requires sensitivity to cultural and societal contexts, as universal impositions like rigid gender quotas in conservative environments can trigger backlash, including heightened conservative rhetoric and resistance that undermines security gains.^[115] Studies in such settings reveal that quota-induced female representation often provokes moral panic or reinforcement of traditional gender norms, leading to soft repression tactics like ethical language mobilization against reforms, particularly for private-sphere rights over public ones.^[116] ^[117] Effective human security thus prioritizes context-adapted interventions, such as voluntary local leadership programs, over top-down mandates to mitigate these risks and sustain protections.^[115]

Feminist Theoretical Engagements

Feminist scholars have expanded human security frameworks to incorporate gender-specific vulnerabilities, arguing that traditional conceptions overlook structural gender inequalities and everyday violence against women, such as domestic abuse and sexual assault in conflicts.^[118] This approach securitizes domestic violence by framing it as a threat to individual freedom from fear, with long-term effects on victims' health, family structures, and economic stability, as evidenced by higher rates of children born to abused women and intergenerational trauma patterns.^[119] Similarly, feminists highlight "rape as a weapon of war," positing it as a deliberate tactic to terrorize populations, though empirical accountability remains limited; in Bosnia's 1992-1995 conflict, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) secured convictions for nearly 30 perpetrators of wartime sexual violence by 2011, including the landmark 2001 Foča case establishing rape as a crime against humanity.^[120] ^[121] In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where armed groups have perpetrated mass rapes since the late 1990s, feminist analyses emphasize systemic gender-based targeting, yet conviction rates underscore prosecutorial challenges; a 2014 trial of 39 soldiers for Minova rapes in 2012 resulted in only two convictions, with most acquitted due to evidentiary issues and witness intimidation.^[122] ^[123] Mainstream feminist engagements integrate these issues into human security by advocating for women's inclusion in policy, such as UN resolutions on women, peace, and security, which have heightened survivor support services and reparations claims.^[108] Critical feminism, however, critiques the "human" in human security as an exclusionary, gendered construct that reproduces power imbalances, urging deconstruction of state-centric norms and attention to intersecting identities like race and class in vulnerability.^[124] ^[125] These theoretical advancements have achieved greater institutional focus on gender violence survivors, including expanded humanitarian protocols for medical and psychological aid in conflict zones, as seen in post-Bosnian reforms aiding over 20,000 registered victims.^[121] Nonetheless, critics argue that overemphasizing gender-specific threats risks diverting resources from universal risks, where data from multiple conflicts indicate men comprise the majority of direct casualties—1.3 to 8.9 times more likely to be killed than women—due to combatant roles and targeting of perceived threats, challenging narratives that frame women as primary victims without equivalent empirical scrutiny of male vulnerabilities.^[126] ^[127] Feminist scholarship, often rooted in institutions with documented ideological biases toward emphasizing female agency deficits, may thus underrepresent these disparities, prioritizing structural critiques over aggregate mortality data from sources like the Uppsala Conflict Data Program.^[128]

Critiques of Western Bias and Universality

Critics, particularly from non-Western perspectives, have argued that the human security paradigm embodies Western liberal individualism, prioritizing personal freedoms and interventions that undermine state sovereignty and cultural collectivism.^[129] This view posits the concept as a tool for imposing Eurocentric norms, incompatible with Asian emphases on territorial integrity and non-interference, as articulated in debates contrasting "freedom from fear" (often Western-associated) with broader developmental security needs.^[130] Such critiques often draw on relativist frameworks, suggesting universality claims mask power imbalances favoring liberal democracies.^[131] Empirical assessments, however, challenge this dismissal by demonstrating the paradigm's applicability across cultural contexts, with outcomes tied more to institutional adherence than inherent bias. Scholar Amitav Acharya refutes a strict East-West binary, highlighting Asian intellectual contributions to human security—such as Japan's "human-centered" foreign policy—and internal divergences within regions, where sovereignty absolutism correlates with persistent insecurities rather than cultural authenticity.^[129] In non-Western settings like Timor-Leste (East Timor), the framework underpinned post-1999 UN-led interventions, facilitating a transition from Indonesian occupation violence to relative stability; by 2024, the nation had achieved sustained peace, contributing to regional peacekeeping and registering improved human development metrics, including reduced conflict-related mortality from over 1,000 deaths in 1999 to near-zero in subsequent years.^[132] ^[133] These gains stemmed from addressing individual threats like displacement and militia violence, not despite local norms but by aligning with universal needs for physical safety amid state failure.^[134] Cross-national data further underscores universality: regimes incorporating human security elements—such as rights-respecting democracies—exhibit higher individual security levels, with bureaucratic democracies scoring markedly better on metrics like life expectancy, poverty reduction, and conflict avoidance compared to patronage autocracies, where centralized control exacerbates vulnerabilities.^[135] For instance, quantitative analyses of 150+ countries from 1990–2020 reveal that authoritarian hybrids with weak rule of law experience 20–30% higher rates of civil unrest and human insecurity indicators (e.g., homicide, displacement) than counterparts emphasizing individual protections, independent of cultural zone.^[135] ^[136] Failures in application, such as incomplete security sector reforms in Timor-Leste during the 2006 crisis, trace to execution gaps—like inadequate local capacity building—rather than conceptual mismatch with non-Western values.^[137] This evidence prioritizes causal links between threat mitigation and outcomes over narrative relativism, affirming human security's grounding in empirically verifiable human necessities like survival and dignity, which transcend ideological divides.^[138]

Practical Applications

Policy Instruments and Interventions

The United Nations Human Security Unit, operationalized following the 2003 Commission on Human Security report, coordinates system-wide efforts to mainstream human security through practical tools including guidance notes, cooperation frameworks, and handbooks tailored for crisis settings.^[139] These instruments emphasize integrating "freedom from fear" and "freedom from want" into policy responses, facilitating partnerships between UN agencies, states, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) for threat assessment and mitigation.^[1] A prominent global framework is the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), unanimously endorsed by UN member states at the 2005 World Summit, which structures interventions around three pillars: a state's primary duty to protect populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity; international assistance for prevention; and collective action for timely response if states fail.^[140] R2P delineates non-coercive measures such as capacity-building and early warning alongside coercive options like sanctions or military intervention as last resorts, operationalized through UN Security Council resolutions.^[141] Regional policies adapt these principles; for instance, the European Union's integrated approach to external conflicts and crises, formalized in its 2016 Global Strategy, combines diplomatic, developmental, and security instruments to address interconnected threats like instability and resource scarcity, with mechanisms for joint programming across EU institutions and member states.^[142] Humanitarian interventions prioritize non-coercive aid delivery and protection mandates, often via UN peacekeeping or NGO-led operations, while coercive variants involve targeted enforcement under frameworks like R2P to halt immediate violence.^[143] The 1997 Ottawa Process, driven by a coalition of states, NGOs such as the International Campaign to Ban Landmines, and UN entities, produced the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, banning production, stockpiling, and use of anti-personnel mines to safeguard civilians from persistent post-conflict hazards.^[144] Operationally, human security employs a prevent-react-rebuild sequence: prevention through early diplomacy and root-cause addressing; reaction via rapid protection and enforcement; and rebuilding focused on institutional recovery, with state authorities coordinating alongside NGOs for localized implementation.^[145] This cycle underscores multi-actor collaboration, where NGOs provide on-ground expertise in vulnerability mapping and states ensure sovereign alignment with international norms.^[40]

Success Cases and Verifiable Outcomes

The 1997 Mine Ban Treaty, also known as the Ottawa Treaty, represents a verifiable success in mitigating human security threats posed by antipersonnel landmines, which indiscriminately endanger civilians and impede development. Since entering into force in 1999, 164 states parties have collectively destroyed more than 55 million stockpiled antipersonnel mines, eliminating the vast majority of declared holdings under the treaty's obligations.^[146] ^[147] This destruction, verified through international monitoring by organizations like the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), has directly reduced the proliferation of these weapons, with 94 states parties completing full stockpile elimination by 2024.^[148] Empirical data from the ICBL's Landmine Monitor reports causal links between treaty compliance and decreased casualties, with global annual deaths and injuries from antipersonnel mines dropping from approximately 25,000 in the late 1990s to under 5,000 by the early 2020s, attributed to stockpile destruction, use prohibitions, and clearance efforts.^[149] Mine action programs, aligned with human security principles by prioritizing civilian protection over military utility, have released over 4,000 square kilometers of land for productive use since 1999, enhancing food security and economic stability in affected regions like Afghanistan and Cambodia.^[150] These outcomes depended on state enforcement of treaty provisions, including national legislation and cooperation with NGOs, demonstrating that human security gains require robust governmental implementation alongside advocacy.^[151] In economic dimensions of human security, microfinance initiatives have shown measurable reductions in poverty vulnerabilities, correlating with improved community stability in high-risk zones. For instance, programs like Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM) increased participant household incomes by facilitating access to credit, with empirical studies documenting sustained poverty alleviation after three years of engagement. Similar evidence from vector error correction models in other developing contexts indicates microfinance contributes to higher consumption and asset accumulation, indirectly bolstering resilience against want-induced instability, though effects are moderated by institutional stability and borrower selection.^[152] These interventions succeed when integrated with state-supported financial regulations, underscoring the necessity of complementary policy frameworks for scalable human security benefits.^[153]

Failures, Interventions, and Unintended Consequences

The 2011 NATO-led military intervention in Libya, authorized by UN Security Council Resolution 1973 and framed in part as a response to threats against civilians under Responsibility to Protect (R2P) norms aligned with human security objectives, ultimately fragmented the state apparatus after the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi on October 20, 2011.^[154] This led to a decade of degraded civil society, proliferation of militias, and territorial control by terrorist groups, including the Islamic State (IS), which seized Sirte in early 2015 and held it until U.S.-backed operations dislodged them in December 2016.^[155] Libya's descent into rival governments and ongoing civil war from 2014 onward exacerbated human insecurity, with UN reports documenting widespread arms proliferation that armed non-state actors and fueled regional instability.^[154] Post-intervention, Libya emerged as a primary transit hub for irregular migration to Europe, with over 700,000 sea arrivals recorded from North Africa between 2014 and 2017, many transiting through Libyan smuggling networks empowered by the security vacuum.^[156] Terrorism incidents surged, with groups like Ansar al-Sharia and IS affiliates conducting attacks that killed hundreds, including the 2012 Benghazi consulate assault claiming 4 American lives on September 11, 2012, and enabling cross-border threats to neighbors like Mali and Tunisia.^[157] Empirical assessments indicate that the intervention's failure to establish stabilizing governance structures contributed to a net increase in violent deaths and displacement, with Libya's Fragile States Index score deteriorating from 70.2 in 2011 to 88.6 by 2021 on a scale where higher values denote greater fragility.^[155] In Somalia, humanitarian aid efforts in the 1990s, including UN operations like UNOSOM II from March 1993 to March 1995 aimed at addressing famine and clan-based violence under human security rationales, inadvertently prolonged warlord dominance by providing resources that factions taxed and controlled.^[158] Warlords such as Mohamed Farrah Aidid diverted aid convoys, using proceeds to fund militias and sustain territorial control, with empirical analyses showing that aid inflows exceeding $1 billion annually in the early 1990s correlated with extended conflict durations rather than state reconstruction.^[159] This dynamic entrenched clan-based power structures post-1991 state collapse, delaying central authority restoration until partial gains via the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) from 2007, though warlordism persisted amid recurring aid dependencies.^[160] Broader patterns in such interventions reveal how rapid sovereignty erosions—often through external regime change or aid without robust local buy-in—generate power vacuums that empirically amplify threats. In Libya, the absence of post-conflict security sector reform allowed militias to capture state institutions, leading to a 300% rise in small arms circulation documented by UN sanctions panels from 2011 to 2015.^[154] Similarly, Somalia's aid-fueled warlordism contributed to the emergence of al-Shabaab by 2006, with the group exploiting ungoverned spaces to conduct attacks killing over 3,000 civilians annually at peak in 2017.^[159] These cases underscore causal links where interventions prioritizing short-term threat mitigation over sustainable governance foster environments conducive to terrorism, migration surges, and chronic instability, as evidenced by comparative studies of post-intervention fragility metrics.^[161]

Measurement Challenges

Development of Indices and Metrics

The concept of human security, as articulated in the United Nations Development Programme's 1994 Human Development Report, prompted subsequent efforts to quantify its dimensions through composite indices that extend beyond traditional state-centric security metrics. These initiatives aimed to integrate elements from the Human Development Index (HDI), such as life expectancy and education, with vulnerability assessments incorporating threats like economic instability and environmental degradation.^[1] Early proposals in the 2000s, including those by scholars like Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, emphasized blending quantitative indicators of chronic threats—such as hunger and disease prevalence—with sudden disruptions like natural disasters, to create actionable frameworks for policy analysis.^[51] A notable development was the Human Security Index (HSI), first released in 2008 by researchers affiliated with the Human Security Report Project. This index combined sub-indices focused on economic fabric (e.g., GDP per capita, unemployment rates), environmental fabric (e.g., access to improved water sources, deforestation rates), and social fabric (e.g., homicide rates, political imprisonment incidence), aggregating data from over 100 countries to rank human security levels. An updated version in the early 2010s refined these components by incorporating conflict-related deaths and infant mortality rates as proxies for personal and health security threats, drawing on datasets from sources like the World Bank and Uppsala Conflict Data Program.^[162] Similarly, proposals by Taylor Owen sought to balance quantitative metrics, such as annual conflict fatalities per capita, with qualitative elements like perceived vulnerabilities, though the latter proved challenging to standardize across contexts.^[163] In parallel, academic efforts like those outlined by Gary King proposed rethinking human security measurement by prioritizing outcome-based indicators over inputs, such as survival rates from preventable diseases and exposure to violence, to align with first articulated freedoms from fear and want. These indices often hybridized HDI components with insecurity scores, for instance weighting infant mortality (under 5 years) at around 5% of global datasets to capture health threats.^[164] By the late 2000s, variations emerged, including insecurity-focused indices that inverted security scores to highlight deprivations in food access and community cohesion.^[165] Discussions in United Nations forums, particularly through the Commission on Human Security established in 2001, advanced calls for standardized metrics by advocating integration of human security into broader development reporting. The 2003 final report urged aggregation of indicators like displacement due to conflict (e.g., over 35 million internally displaced persons tracked globally in early 2000s data) with economic vulnerability scores, influencing subsequent UNDP efforts to prototype composite tools.^[29] However, no universally adopted UN index materialized by the 2010s, with ongoing deliberations emphasizing cross-country comparability through harmonized data from agencies like WHO and UNHCR.^[166] Recent projects, such as the 2024 Cross-Country Metrics initiative, build on these foundations by refining components for empirical tracking.^[167]

Methodological Limitations and Data Issues

Efforts to quantify human security through composite indices often introduce subjectivity in the weighting of diverse categories such as economic stability, health, and environmental risks, as there is no consensus on relative priorities among these dimensions.^[168] This arbitrariness stems from the lack of empirically grounded criteria for assigning weights, leading to variations across methodologies that reflect analysts' assumptions rather than objective causal relationships.^[164] For instance, some approaches emphasize economic indicators like per capita income, while others prioritize political freedoms, but integrating these without validated trade-offs undermines the indices' reliability.^[164] Aggregation of heterogeneous indicators into singular scores exacerbates these issues by relying on unverifiable assumptions about how threats interact, often oversimplifying causal dynamics and masking subnational disparities.^[168] Data limitations are particularly acute in measuring threats from non-state actors, such as armed groups, where informal operations and underreporting in unstable regions result in incomplete datasets; for example, vulnerability assessments in conflict-affected areas like Cambodia highlight the challenges of obtaining representative statistics on localized violence.^[168] Reliable individual-level data across domains like health and political rights remain scarce, forcing reliance on ecological inferences or aggregates that fail to capture personal exposure to risks.^[164] Empirically, these indices frequently correlate poorly with tangible outcomes, as aggregate scores can obscure individual-level insecurities; in China as of 1997, national per capita income exceeded $3,000, yet over 200 million people lived below poverty thresholds indicative of heightened vulnerability, demonstrating how averages mask persistent threats.^[164] Such discrepancies underscore the superiority of hard metrics, like expected years of survival free from severe deprivation or life expectancy, over softer perceptual indicators, which are prone to biases in risk perception where individuals overweight minor hazards while underestimating systemic ones.^[164] Prioritizing verifiable survival rates and mortality data from sources like WHO statistics provides a more causally robust foundation, avoiding the dilution inherent in broad aggregations.^[164]

Major Criticisms and Counterarguments

Vagueness and Definitional Problems

The concept of human security, as articulated in the 1994 United Nations Development Programme report, encompasses seven interconnected dimensions—economic, food, health, environmental, personal, community, and political security—aiming to shift focus from state-centric threats to individual vulnerabilities. This expansive framework, however, has drawn criticism for its definitional ambiguity, with scholars arguing that it lacks precise boundaries, rendering the term susceptible to indefinite broadening.^[169] Roland Paris, in a 2001 analysis, contended that human security is "too broad and vague a concept to be an effective mobilizer of international action," as its inclusivity risks diluting analytical utility by equating diverse risks without hierarchical prioritization.^[169] A core problem lies in the "everything is a threat" tendency, where the framework extends to everyday hazards far removed from traditional violence. For instance, some applications frame road traffic accidents as human security threats, citing their annual global toll of approximately 1.3 million deaths—exceeding war-related fatalities—and linking them to broader vulnerabilities like inadequate infrastructure or poverty.^[170] Similarly, economic inequality is subsumed under economic security, portraying disparities in income distribution as existential risks akin to armed conflict, despite causal distinctions between structural inequities and acute perils.^[6] Such expansions, critics note, erode the concept's distinctiveness, merging it indistinguishably with general development or welfare agendas.^[171] These definitional issues contribute to policy paralysis, as the absence of clear thresholds impedes resource allocation and threat assessment. Empirical critiques highlight that overly diffuse security paradigms correlate with ineffective prioritization; for example, broad threat inventories in international policy documents often fail to translate into targeted interventions, as evidenced by stalled progress on multidimensional security agendas in post-conflict settings where competing definitions fragment consensus.^[172] Data from security policy evaluations, such as those reviewing UN human security initiatives, show that vague metrics lead to misallocated efforts, with resources spread thinly across low-impact areas rather than concentrated on verifiable high-risk factors.^[173] Proponents counter that definitional flexibility is essential for addressing interconnected, non-traditional threats in a globalized world, allowing adaptive responses to evolving risks like pandemics or climate impacts.^[138] Yet, this defense lacks robust empirical backing, as studies of human security applications reveal minimal causal links between conceptual breadth and measurable outcomes, such as reduced vulnerability indices in adopting states.^[174] Critics maintain that without tighter boundaries—potentially favoring "narrow" freedom-from-fear interpretations focused on violence—the concept risks perpetual theoretical debate over practical efficacy.^[175]

Instrumentalization for Political Agendas

The concept of human security has been critiqued for enabling selective military and political interventions, particularly by Western powers, under the guise of protecting individuals from threats like violence or deprivation, often aligning with geopolitical interests rather than universal application. Following the 2001 report by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, which linked human security to the emerging Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, the framework was invoked to justify actions such as the 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya via UN Security Council Resolution 1973, ostensibly to avert mass atrocities but resulting in regime change against Muammar Gaddafi.^[140]^[176] Critics argue this represented co-optation for democracy promotion and Western value imposition, as subsequent instability in Libya— including over 20,000 civilian deaths by 2016 from ensuing conflict—highlighted causal disconnects between intervention rhetoric and outcomes, with human security metrics selectively emphasized to legitimize force against disfavored regimes.^[177] Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have amplified this instrumentalization by blending human security advocacy with campaigns for regime accountability, often prioritizing threats in ideologically opposed states while downplaying those in aligned ones. Groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have framed civil unrest or authoritarian practices as human security crises warranting external pressure or intervention, as seen in their post-2001 reports urging action in Syria and Myanmar but muted responses to similar abuses in Saudi Arabia or Bahrain during the 2011 Arab Spring, where Western allies intervened to suppress protests.^[178]^[179] This blurring of security analysis with activism fosters a narrative that normalizes interventions against non-Western governments, with empirical data showing NGOs' funding ties—over 80% from Western donors in 2010—correlating with focus on adversaries rather than comprehensive threat assessment.^[180] Evidence of non-neutrality appears in United Nations patterns, where human security-related resolutions exhibit selective enforcement mirroring alliance structures, such as stronger Security Council responses to crises in Africa and the Middle East (e.g., 12 interventions authorized from 1990-2010) versus inaction on comparable threats in ally-backed contexts like Yemen's Saudi-led campaign, which displaced 4 million by 2019 without R2P invocation.^[181] Voting analyses reveal systemic bias, with UN General Assembly resolutions on human rights—often invoking security framings—passing disproportionately against states like Israel (over 140 since 2006) while sparing major powers' violations, reflecting elite interests over empirical universality.^[182]^[183] Such patterns underscore causal realism: human security's vagueness permits its deployment as a rhetorical tool for advancing intervener agendas, eroding credibility when outcomes favor political elites over verifiable threat reduction.^[177]

Tension with National Sovereignty Priorities

The human security framework, by prioritizing individual vulnerabilities over state-centric stability, has fostered doctrines like the Responsibility to Protect (R2P), which permit international interventions ostensibly to avert atrocities, thereby challenging traditional non-intervention norms enshrined in the UN Charter.^[184] Such approaches erode sovereignty by enabling actions without full UN Security Council consensus, as exemplified by NATO's 1999 Kosovo intervention, where military force was deployed absent explicit authorization to address humanitarian concerns.^[185] This tension manifests when failed or weakened states, resulting from interventions or neglect of sovereignty, export transnational threats; for instance, post-2011 Libya's collapse after NATO-backed regime change facilitated arms proliferation, jihadist networks, and mass irregular migration destabilizing Europe and beyond.^[186] Similarly, ungoverned spaces in Somalia have sustained piracy and al-Shabaab terrorism, underscoring how state fragility amplifies risks to human security in neighboring and distant regions rather than mitigating them through external impositions.^[187] Empirical outcomes in sovereign states prioritizing national cohesion and control demonstrate superior human security metrics compared to interventionist or globalist models. Singapore, since independence in 1965, leveraged strict sovereignty, centralized governance, and a "Total Defence" doctrine—encompassing military, economic, social, and psychological resilience—to eradicate poverty, achieve a Human Development Index ranking among the world's top five by 2023, and maintain homicide rates below 0.3 per 100,000 inhabitants annually.^[188] ^[189] This contrasts with diffuse human security emphases, where causal primacy lies in national unity enabling individual protections; studies link high social cohesion—fostered by cultural homogeneity and shared norms—to elevated trust, reduced crime, and effective welfare delivery, preconditions absent in fragmented societies.^[190] Globalist migration policies, often aligned with human security's borderless ethos, have exacerbated insecurities by undermining sovereignty and cohesion, as evidenced in Europe's 2015-2016 crisis involving over 1.3 million asylum seekers, correlating with spikes in violent crime in high-inflow areas like Germany (e.g., 10% rise in non-German suspects for certain offenses per federal data) and fueling populist backlashes.^[191] ^[192] These dynamics reveal how prioritizing individual mobility over state controls erodes the very foundations of protection, with empirical analyses indicating that rapid demographic shifts diminish social capital and amplify perceived threats, prioritizing collective national integrity as antecedent to sustained human flourishing.^[193]^[194]

Global Impact and Prospects

Adoption in International Frameworks

The concept of human security gained initial traction within United Nations frameworks following its articulation in the 1994 United Nations Development Programme's Human Development Report, which framed it as a people-centered approach encompassing freedom from fear and want.^[1] The UN formalized this integration through the establishment of the United Nations Trust Fund for Human Security in 1999, funded primarily by Japan, to support projects addressing threats to individuals and communities.^[3] By 2004, the UN Secretariat created a dedicated Human Security Unit to coordinate inter-agency efforts, emphasizing preventive responses to cross-cutting challenges like poverty and conflict.^[73] UNESCO advanced the framework's adoption by forming the Intersectoral Group on Human Security in 2006, which produced analytical publications linking human security to education, culture, and ethical governance.^[195] In 2025, UNESCO launched initiatives applying human security to digital transformation in regions like Mexico, focusing on ethical AI and technological risks.^[196] Regional bodies have adapted the concept variably; in the Asia-Pacific, UN programs integrate human security into sustainable development efforts, such as addressing climate mobility and community resilience, often through localized partnerships.^[197] Adoption manifests in high-level rhetorical commitments, including UN General Assembly Resolution 66/290 in 2012, which recognized human security as a complementary approach to state security without creating binding obligations.^[73] Treaty analyses indicate low incorporation into enforceable international law, with human security influencing soft instruments like the 2003 Commission on Human Security report rather than core conventions.^[29] Implementation remains uneven, with Western states and organizations like NATO embedding it in policy doctrines for legitimacy and mission planning since the early 2000s.^[198] In contrast, Global South perspectives reveal selective uptake, with origins tracing to both Western and developing country inputs but tempered by emphasis on sovereignty in forums like ASEAN, prioritizing state-centric adaptations over universal application.^[131]

Empirical Assessments of Influence

Empirical assessments of human security frameworks indicate targeted achievements in specific domains, such as disarmament, but demonstrate limited causal influence on broader outcomes like poverty reduction and conflict mitigation. The Ottawa Treaty of 1997, embodying human security's focus on protecting civilians from weapons causing indiscriminate harm, correlates with a sharp decline in reported landmine casualties, dropping from approximately 25,000 annually in 1999 to under 5,000 by 2023, accompanied by the destruction of over 55 million stockpiled anti-personnel mines across signatory states.^[199]^[146]^[144] Compliance monitoring by organizations like the International Campaign to Ban Landmines has documented widespread adherence among parties, contributing to clearance of vast contaminated areas and reduced production from over 50 countries pre-treaty to fewer than 10 today.^[200] In contrast, econometric analyses of human security-oriented policies in adopter states reveal weak causality for reductions in poverty or conflict incidence, with observed correlations frequently attributable to confounding variables such as economic liberalization, foreign aid inflows, or parallel institutional reforms rather than the framework itself.^[201]^[202] Studies attempting to isolate human security's effects encounter methodological hurdles, including endogeneity and data scarcity, leading to inconclusive evidence of transformative impacts beyond rhetorical or marginal shifts in development indicators.^[203] Persistent insecurities in regions emphasizing human security rhetoric, such as parts of sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, underscore failures to address root causal drivers like governance failures and resource scarcity, despite policy adoption.^[6] Comprehensive reviews highlight that traditional national security measures—encompassing military deterrence and state capacity-building—account for substantially more variance in empirical stability metrics, such as conflict recurrence rates and human development trajectories, than diffuse human security interventions.^[204] This disparity reflects the framework's challenges in operationalizing causal realism amid complex, multi-factorial threats, yielding net influence that remains marginal relative to established security paradigms.^[51]

Future Relevance in Geopolitical Shifts

The intensifying U.S.-China rivalry and structural multipolarity of the 2020s have elevated state-centric threats—such as territorial incursions, military buildups, and economic coercion—above individual vulnerabilities emphasized in human security frameworks.^[205] Realist perspectives contend that great powers, operating in an anarchic system, rationally prioritize survival and relative power gains, viewing human security initiatives as resource diversions that suboptimalize national interests unless directly serving egoistic goals like regime stability or alliance leverage.^[53]^[206] For instance, U.S. national security strategies since 2018 have framed competition with China and Russia as existential challenges to sovereignty, sidelining broader human-centric concerns in favor of containment and deterrence measures.^[206] Amid rising nationalism—manifest in policies under leaders like Donald Trump (U.S., 2017–2021 and post-2024) and Giorgia Meloni (Italy, since 2022)—human security's prospects appear confined to niche roles in development aid, where it bolsters soft power through targeted interventions in health and infrastructure without imposing universal norms.^[207] U.S. aid, totaling over $50 billion annually in recent fiscal years, contrasts China's $462 billion in official development finance from 2008–2019 by emphasizing transparency and private-sector growth to counter influence operations, yet this integration remains secondary to hard-power priorities.^[207] Persistent definitional ambiguities, however, heighten risks of irrelevance, as states revert to sovereignty-focused agendas that marginalize supranational human security paradigms during crises like the 2022 Ukraine conflict or South China Sea tensions.^[53] To enhance viability, human security must adapt via subordination to realist national priorities, incorporating measurable indicators like social cohesion metrics to yield empirical gains in stability and deterrence resilience, as seen in Australia's evolving strategies addressing disinformation and youth disengagement since 2020.^[208] Over-reliance on global institutions, critiqued by realists for failing to mitigate inherent security dilemmas among competitors, should yield to bilateral or domestically aligned applications that align altruistic ends with power-political imperatives, avoiding the opportunity costs of idealistic overreach.^[53]^[206]

References

[1]
[PDF] human security GN
Human security, defined by the 1994 HDR, includes safety from chronic threats like hunger, disease, and repression, and protection from disruptions in daily ...
[2]
[PDF] HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 1994
The 1994 report defines sustainable human development, explores human security, and outlines a new design for development cooperation.
[3]
Human security milestones and history - UN.org.
Apr 10, 2018 · The term 'human security' was coined in 1994 by the UNDP report, which highlighted four characteristics and seven interconnected elements.
[4]
Human Security: An Overview - Walter Dorn
" Seven types of security were listed as components of human security: economic security; food security; health security; environmental security; personal ...Missing: categories | Show results with:categories
[5]
Publications on Human Security - the United Nations
Aug 9, 2024 · PUBLICATIONS ON HUMAN SECURITY. ACADEMIC LITERATURE. Center for Migration Studies, Journal on Migration and Human Security.Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
[6]
A Critical Evaluation of the Concept of Human Security
Jul 5, 2014 · The aim of this essay is to critically evaluate the concept of human security: Is it simply “hot air”, as Roland Paris (2001) has suggested?Missing: empirical evidence
[7]
Do INGOs Work? An Empirical Investigation of Human Security Effects
May 31, 2016 · Do International NGOs (INGOs) really improve human security from fear and want for populations around the world?
[8]
[PDF] THE INSECURITY OF HUMAN SECURITY
Nov 6, 2014 · This article presents a conceptual analysis of human security. It clarifies the distinctions between national security and human security,.
[9]
Human Development Report 1994
The 1994 Report introduces a new concept of human security, which equates security with people rather than territories, with development rather than arms.
[10]
Human Security: People, Wants, and Fears - Wavell Room
May 5, 2021 · The report stressed that “there have always been two major components of human security: freedom from fear and freedom from want.” These 'two ...Missing: debate | Show results with:debate
[11]
[PDF] Human Security: From Idea to Practice - La Trobe University
And what about the role of the individual in securing 'freedom from want' and 'freedom from fear'? Durodie discussed his criticisms of Human Security theory.
[12]
Poverty and conflict - GSDRC
Group-level inequalities can generate social and economic polarisation that increases the risk of violent conflict (Østby 2008; Stewart 2009). Of course, these ...Missing: interconnections threats
[13]
[PDF] Understanding the Complex Nexus of Security, Conflict, Poverty ...
interconnections and overlapping patterns between these issues. Poverty ... governance structures, contribute to conflicts and security threats, perpetuate ...
[14]
[PDF] IIHS Human Security Outlook 2025
Mar 5, 2025 · Human security demands a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to conflict. Traditional security frameworks focus on managing crises ...
[15]
[PDF] The role of non-state actors in building human security
During internal conflicts, non-state actors benefit from close involvement with local communities and they are better able than traditional actors to build ...
[16]
History of, and Rationale for the Concept of Human Security (HS)
National security policy focuses on the territorial integrity of a state and its sovereignty, while human security puts particular emphasis on individuals and ...
[17]
Analysing the Trajectory of Mahbub ul Haq - ResearchGate
Aug 8, 2025 · Mahbub ul Haq's work to coordinate, establish and propagate the human development approach offers an example of effective leadership.
[18]
[PDF] The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent ...
Over the last decade Amartya Sen's Capability Approach (CA) has emerged as the leading alternative to standard economic frameworks for thinking about ...
[19]
International Organizations and Ethnic Conflict on JSTOR
From Rwanda to Somalia to the former Yugoslavia, one feature of the post-Cold War world has become dreadfully clear. Ethnic conflicts are escalating, and ...
[20]
[PDF] Approaches to the Control of Ethnic Conflict in the post-Cold War ...
The most striking examples in this context were the states of Burundi and Rwanda in which mass killing occurred if not quite at regular intervals, often ...
[21]
[PDF] THE BANALITY OF "ETHNIC WAR": YUGOSLAVIA AND RWANDA
Jul 26, 2000 · The concept of "ethnic war" tends to suggest a Hobbesian war of all against all and neighbor against neighbor.
[22]
Canada and the Human Security Network (1998â
Launched as a bilateral Canadian–Norwegian initiative in 1998, the HSN now encompasses twelve like-minded middle and smaller powers from across the globe. While ...
[23]
Canada's Human Security Agenda - Humanitarian Practice Network
Dec 5, 2012 · The agenda seeks to address a range of threats – particularly those which stem from violent conflict – to the safety and security of individuals ...
[24]
[PDF] HUMAN - security - à www.publications.gc.ca
To meet this crucial challenge, Canada has made human security a leading foreign policy theme. This initiative means taking the security of ordinary people as a ...
[25]
Human Security in the United Nations - JCIE
The Trust Fund for Human Security (TFHS) was established in the United Nations in March 1999 to support UN projects addressing various threats to human lives.
[26]
UNITED NATIONS TRUST FUND FOR HUMAN SECURITY
Aug 2, 2024 · The UNTFHS finances programmes that translate the human security approach into practical actions and provide concrete and sustainable benefits.Documents and FAQsUNTFHS2022 Call for ProposalsUnited Nations Trust Fund for ...General Information
[27]
Promotion and implementation of human security policies at various ...
A year after launching UNTFHS, the Millennium Development Goals were adopted in 2000, setting guidelines for development policies at the global level.[1] ...
[28]
Commission on Human Security
The Commission on Human Security was established in January 2001 in response to the UN Secretary-General's call at the 2000 Millennium Summit.
[29]
[PDF] Human security now - United Nations Digital Library
Town, statement made at the Commission on Human. Security Africa-wide civil society consultative meeting on human security held in Pretoria, 15–16 October.
[30]
Human Security ｜ About JICA
Human Security Now, the final report by the 2023 Commission on Human Security (Note 1), co-chaired by Ogata Sadako (former JICA President) and Professor Amartya ...
[31]
2022 Special Report on Human Security
Feb 8, 2022 · The report examines a cluster of threats that have shifted to become more prominent in recent years including those from digital technologies, inequalities, ...Missing: 2020-2022 | Show results with:2020-2022
[32]
[PDF] New threats to human security in the Anthropocene
Multiple threats from COVID-19, digital technology, climate change, and biodiversity loss, have become more prominent or taken new forms in recent years. In ...
[33]
the impact of hybrid war and hybrid interference on civilians | isij.eu
Hybrid threats and human security: the impact of hybrid war and hybrid interference on civilians. Myriam Denov. How to cite: Myriam Denov.
[34]
How the new National Security Strategy transforms US China policy
The United States has transformed its policy toward China. This shift is not plain from the language of the National Security Strategy, released this week.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[35]
White Paper “China's National Security in the New Era”
Jul 15, 2025 · The paper analyzes China's holistic national security strategy—spanning political, economic, technological, and social spheres—and its global ...
[36]
[PDF] Military and Security Developments Involving the People's Republic ...
Dec 18, 2024 · The report shall also address United States-China engagement and cooperation on security matters during the period covered by the report, ...<|separator|>
[37]
Traditional Security Vs Human Security: Contrasting Approaches to ...
Apr 10, 2024 · Traditional security focuses on external military threats, whereas human security considers both external and internal threats, including ...
[38]
Strategies of Containment, Past and Future - Hoover Institution
Our policy of containment helped win the Cold War. Does the policy have any relevance today? By Hoover fellow John Lewis Gaddis.
[39]
[PDF] 1 Linkages between traditional security and human security
The traditionalists' operative paradigm secures legitimacy on the basis of realist principles that are declared to be im- mutable to collective human behaviour.
[40]
[PDF] HUMAN SECURITY IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
1.2 How does Human Security differ from Traditional Security, Human. Development and Human Rights Approaches? “Human Security complements state security ...
[41]
Kennan and Containment, 1947 - Office of the Historian
George F. Kennan, a career Foreign Service Officer, formulated the policy of “containment,” the basic United States strategy for fighting the cold war.
[42]
Haiti's human rights crisis deepens as elites, gangs and foreign ...
Jul 23, 2025 · ... Haiti's worsening collapse to elite corruption, gang alliances, and global failures. Haiti's human rights situation is worsening under a ...
[43]
The Challenge of Balancing State Security with Human ... - ASEAN.org
National security enables nation states to pursue long-term national development agenda without fear of being interrupted by conflict and unwanted surprises ...
[44]
(PDF) State Security Vs Human Security: Which Should Prioritize ...
The concept of human security shifts the focus point of security which previously focused on the state to become towards individuals.
[45]
Amid Global Instability, Upholding the Mine Ban Treaty is More ...
Mar 28, 2025 · The 1997 Ottawa Treaty has been instrumental in reducing landmine casualties from approximately 25,000 per year in 1999 to fewer than 5,000 in ...Missing: empirical data
[46]
Why the Mine Ban Convention was worth fighting for and still is - ICRC
Apr 4, 2016 · The treaty has saved lives. Twenty years ago the ICRC estimated approximately 20,000 individuals, mainly civilians, were maimed or killed each ...
[47]
[PDF] REPORT 2023/2024 | Human Development Reports
The signed contributions in boxes and spotlights represent the opinions of the authors and are the product of independent research of their responsibility. They.
[48]
[PDF] Relationships between the economy and national security - RAND
The Research and Documentation Centre (WODC) in the Netherlands commissioned RAND Europe to explore the relationship between the economy and national ...
[49]
Full article: Economic Development and Military Effectiveness
Feb 19, 2010 · In other words, a state with a high level of defense spending but a low level of economic development will not be as militarily effective as a ...
[50]
The inferential limits of randomized controlled trials - PMC - NIH
However, the inferences that can reliably be drawn from RCT methodology are limited to group effects.
[51]
[PDF] Human Security: Concepts and Implications - Sciences Po
Sep 11, 2025 · Human security goes beyond traditional security, focusing on development and human rights, and is defined as freedom from both fear and want.<|separator|>
[52]
NATIONAL SECURITY AND HUMAN SECURITY: THE INTER ... - jstor
Today, in an increasingly globalised world, the most pernicious threats to human security emanate from the conditions that give rise to genocide, civil war, ...
[53]
[PDF] Human Security: a paradigm contradicting the national interest?
and realist theory. Realist critics of Human Security object that States are principally interested in their own security and do not in general care about ...
[54]
[PDF] Failed States, Collapsed States, Weak States: Causes and Indicators
This book examines contemporary cases of nation-state collapse and fail- ure.1 It establishes clear criteria for distinguishing collapse and failure from.
[55]
State Capacity, State Failure, and Human Rights - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Normatively, most people agree that states ought to prevent human rights abuses. Empirically, however, states may not always be able to do so.
[56]
Realism and Security - Oxford Research Encyclopedias
Dec 22, 2017 · Central to the realist tradition is the concept of “security.” Realism sees the insecurity of states as the main problem in international ...
[57]
Operationalizing Human Security in NATO: The Blurring of Police ...
Jul 4, 2025 · This paper examines the operationalization of human security within NATO, addressing the concept's ambiguous definition and focusing on its ...
[58]
Problematizing Human Security: A General/Contextual Conceptual ...
Aug 7, 2025 · On the other hand, human security's wide appeal has as a side-effect an extended conceptual polysemy inhibiting the cumulation of knowledge and ...
[59]
The National Security Strategy of the United States of America
Governments must fight corruption, respect basic human rights, embrace the rule of law, invest in health care and education, follow responsible economic ...
[60]
[PDF] U.S. National Security Policy Post-9/11: Perils and Prospects
On September 11, 2001, our homeland was attacked in a massive and shock- ing way, and it became evident to all Americans that we must wage a long-term war on ...
[61]
[PDF] Poverty as a Threat to Human Security in Nigeria - RSIS International
Feb 1, 2020 · This paper shall clarify the concept of poverty, threat, human security and establish a solid link between poverty and human security from ...
[62]
[PDF] Conflict and Poverty - World Bank Documents & Reports
Conflict creates a "conflict debt" that slowly recovers, and the poorest countries suffer most from armed conflict. Repeated violence prevents poverty recovery.
[63]
The National Security Implications of Global Poverty | Brookings
Global poverty is neither just hip nor solely a humanitarian concern. In real ways, it can threaten US national security.
[64]
Which countries reduced poverty rates the most? - World Bank Blogs
Nov 12, 2019 · Some of the 15 countries (China, Kyrgyz Republic, Moldova, Vietnam) effectively eliminated extreme poverty by 2015. In others (e.g. India), low ...
[65]
Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report 2024 - World Bank
This means, about 69 million people are projected escape extreme poverty between 2024 and 2030 compared to about 150 million who did so between 2013 and 2019.Overview Figures · Publication · Background Papers
[66]
The economies that are home to the poorest billions of people need ...
Feb 22, 2021 · One possibility to reduce poverty is to redistribute income within that country so that the income of the poor rises. There are a number of ways ...
[67]
Economic development and the effectiveness of foreign aid - CEPR
Nov 28, 2014 · This views official aid as creating dependency, fostering corruption, and encouraging currency overvaluation (Easterly 2014 and Moyo 2010).
[68]
Corruption and its impact on foreign aid effectiveness DevelopmentAid
Feb 12, 2024 · Corruption can seriously distort how resources are allocated, particularly when it comes to development assistance. Corrupt activities have the ...
[69]
[PDF] How International Aid Can Do More Harm than Good - LSE
The tendering system in Lebanon leaves multiple opportunities for corruption as it lacks transparency and independent audits. Contractors inflate costs and ...
[70]
The Impact of Property Rights on Development - Ramapo College
Just like with other types of legal reform, the strengthening of property rights is believed to encourage individuals to take economic risks and pursue business ...
[71]
Property Rights and Economic Development* - ScienceDirect
The core welfare results of economics concerning the role of competitive markets assume that property rights are well defined and costlessly enforced. The ...
[72]
Property Rights: The Key to Economic Development
Aug 7, 2003 · We argue that the difference between prosperity and poverty is property. Nations prosper when private property rights are well defined and ...
[73]
What is Human Security? - UN.org.
Apr 10, 2018 · Human security draws together the expertise and resources of a wide range of actors from the United Nations system, Governments, private sector ...
[74]
About the Responsibility to Protect | United Nations
The responsibility to protect embodies a political commitment to end the worst forms of violence and persecution.
[75]
Operationalizing Human Security: What Role for the Responsibility ...
Feb 22, 2023 · This article argues that R2P plays an important role in clarifying the scope and sharpening the focus of human security.
[76]
Human security and human rights (Chapter 3) - The United Nations ...
Nevertheless, because only the Council can determine the points of overlap between human rights abuses and international security, and as it is a political ...
[77]
[PDF] SECURITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS While recent events have fanned ...
Human rights violations weaken long-term security. Security is essential to human rights, and the breakdown of state security can lead to human rights ...
[78]
Ten years ago, Libyans staged a revolution. Here's why it has failed.
Feb 17, 2021 · By almost any measure, Libya's experience following the NATO-backed armed uprising has been a failure. Longtime dictator Muammar Gaddafi and his ...
[79]
Moral Failure in Libya | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
May 22, 2018 · Moral Failure in Libya. Europe remains at fault for both failing to rebuild Libya following its 2011 intervention, and for increasingly relying ...
[80]
The Rise and Fall of the Responsibility to Protect | CFR Education
Apr 20, 2023 · The UN repeatedly failed or refused to intervene in widespread human ... failure in Libya the worst mistake of his presidency. Jan 31, 2012.
[81]
(PDF) Human Security: Undermining Human Rights? - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · This article warns that the human security discourse and agenda could inadvertently undermine the international human rights regime.
[82]
[PDF] Human Rights, Human Security and Disarmament - UNIDIR
By making the links between human rights and human security, we bring into sharper focus the most immediate threats that are present in people's daily lives.
[83]
[PDF] 12 — Human Security - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
Empirical evidence suggests that the efficacy of traditional practices can be eroded when governments relocate communities (Hitchcock, 2009; McNeeley, 2012 ...
[84]
Water scarcity and social conflict - ScienceDirect.com
We provide empirical evidence for a link between the likelihood of local conflict and water mass declines.
[85]
Mobility or traps? Unpacking the heterogeneity of climate-induced ...
Oct 31, 2024 · We find that, on average, households exposed to rainfall shocks are about 6 percentage points more likely to have a family member who migrates.
[86]
Understanding Links Between Water Scarcity and Violent Conflicts ...
Feb 1, 2024 · This study shows that water conflicts in the Sahel and Lake Chad Basin are closely related to soil moisture deficit and population-driven water scarcity.
[87]
[PDF] The Effects of Climate Change on Armed Conflict and International ...
Apr 28, 2023 · In Sudan, desertification and drought led to resource scarcity and competition between ethnic groups for basic necessities. While the Darfur ...
[88]
[PDF] Climate Change and Conflict: the Darfur Conflict and Syrian Civil War
What is apparent, however, is that environmental degradation and resource scarcity has had a significant effect on the displacement of the Darfurian population, ...
[89]
Conflict, securitisation and human agency | PLOS Climate
Mar 2, 2023 · Climate change has increasingly been understood as a security problem by researchers, policymakers and media commentators.
[90]
Global Climate Agreements: Successes and Failures
International efforts, such as the Paris Agreement, aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. But experts say countries aren't doing enough to limit dangerous ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[91]
Resilience and persistence of ancient societies in the face of climate ...
Oct 16, 2018 · The authors offer an evaluation of societal trajectories during the Late Bronze Age (LBA) in the Peloponnese against the backdrop of recently available local ...Missing: scarcity non-
[92]
Human security as biosecurity - PubMed Central - NIH
On January 10 of that year, the United Nations (UN) Security Council officially declared HIV/AIDS a threat to international peace and security in Africa. This ...
[93]
[PDF] HIV/AIDS: A Human Security Challenge for the 21st Century
contemporary human security threats. HIV/AIDS AS AN INDIRECT THREAT TO HUMAN SECURITY. The human security implications of the AIDS pandemic will not, however, ...
[94]
Supply chain failures amid Covid‐19 signal a new pillar for global ...
The pandemic has exposed the otherwise uninitiated to the global healthcare supply chain that is vulnerable to geopolitical instability (Artenstein, 2020). A ...
[95]
Were COVID-19 lockdowns worth it? A meta-analysis | Public Choice
Nov 28, 2024 · Our meta-analysis finds that lockdowns in the spring of 2020 had a relatively small effect on COVID-19 mortality.
[96]
[PDF] Covid Lockdown Cost/Benefits: A Critical Assessment of the Literature
Research done over the past six months has shown that lockdowns have had, at best, a marginal effect on the number of Covid-19 deaths.
[97]
The Strategic National Stockpile Was Not Positioned To Respond ...
Oct 16, 2023 · The Stockpile was operationally effective in distributing its limited inventory in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, based on established policies and ...
[98]
Assessing the effectiveness of quarantine measures during the ...
The main objective of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of national- and region-level quarantines in Chile during the pandemic
[99]
At the Epicenter of COVID-19–the Tragic Failure of the Global ...
Regardless of the supply-chain model, the current global stockpile has been insufficient to support the health system of any country during the pandemic. As of ...
[100]
Health Security and the COVID-19 Pandemic
Aug 19, 2021 · The pandemic proves that "health security" should no longer drive global health policy.
[101]
[PDF] RETHINKING HEALTH SECURITY AFTER COVID-19
Nov 19, 2021 · Move away from securitised responses to health in favour of a traditional public health approach that prioritises human health and well-being as ...
[102]
[PDF] Emerging technologies transforming the future of global biosecurity
Jun 4, 2025 · Emerging technologies like AI and synthetic biology enhance biosecurity through rapid detection, containment, and vaccine development, but also ...
[103]
The Bioeconomy Revolution Can End the Panic-and-Neglect Cycle ...
Jan 26, 2022 · Progress in biotechnology will advance pandemic defenses even more in coming decades.Missing: sovereignty | Show results with:sovereignty
[104]
A New Era in Health Security - CSIS
Jul 11, 2025 · It prioritizes preparedness for detecting and responding to emerging outbreaks, analysis of the risks and opportunities of biotechnology ...Missing: sovereignty | Show results with:sovereignty
[105]
Women and girls on the move - Migration Data Portal
At the end of 2023, women and girls accounted for an estimated 49 per cent of all refugees and asylum seekers globally(UNHCR, 2024). The five top countries of ...
[106]
Global Report 2024 - UNHCR
Jun 17, 2025 · Conflict and displacement dramatically increase the risk of gender-based violence, particularly for women and girls, making it a critical ...
[107]
Millions of women and girls forced to flee face high risk of gender ...
Nov 29, 2024 · More than 60 million women and girls worldwide who are forcibly displaced or stateless face high risks of gender-based violence (GBV).
[108]
https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/facts-and-figures/facts-and-figures-women-peace-and-security
[109]
Conflicts to Watch in 2024: Implications for Women, Peace and ...
Jan 22, 2024 · Recent data shows that approximately 600 million women—15 percent of women in the world—lived within 50 kilometers of armed conflict in 2022, ...
[110]
Women's human rights and gender-related concerns in situations of ...
Conflict can result in higher levels of gender-based violence against women and girls, including arbitrary killings, torture, sexual violence and forced ...
[111]
UNSCR 1325 turns 20 - Berghof Foundation
Oct 29, 2020 · The UN Security Council launched its landmark Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace and Security (WPS), with the aim of protecting women during conflict.<|separator|>
[112]
Women's Participation and a Better Understanding of the Political
Women's participation increases the probability of a peace agreement lasting at least two years by 20 percent, and by 35 percent the probability of a peace ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[113]
Women's Participation in Peace Negotiations and the Durability of ...
Aug 10, 2018 · Our statistical analysis demonstrates a robust correlation between peace agreements signed by female delegates and durable peace.
[114]
[PDF] A Global Study on the Implementation of United Nations Security ...
It shows that women's participation and inclusion makes humanitarian assistance more effective, strengthens the protection efforts of our peacekeepers, ...
[115]
Backlash after Quotas: Moral Panic as a Soft Repression Tactic ...
Feb 12, 2024 · The findings indicate that quota-induced gains in women's representation are followed by significant increases in conservative ethical language ...
[116]
Social Hierarchy and Men's Rejection of Women's Rights Reforms
Nov 8, 2022 · Backlash among men is more common for sensitive private rights (land reform) than public rights (quotas) and Western donors than women's organizations.
[117]
[PDF] How Quotas Mitigate Backlash to Women in Politics - Tanushree Goyal
This paper argues that quotas can also play a reconciliatory role, mitigating backlash by reinforcing negative gendered priors, especially in gender- ...
[118]
Gender, Violence, and Human Security: Critical Feminist Perspectives
Nov 15, 2013 · This book takes a critical look at notions of human security and violence through a feminist lens, drawing on both theoretical perspectives ...
[119]
[PDF] Reconceptualizing Human Security: A Feminist Perspective
Domestic violence has long term ramifications on a woman and her family structure. Victims of domestic abuse tend to have higher numbers of children and a ...Missing: securitizing | Show results with:securitizing
[120]
Landmark Cases | Меѓународниот кривичен суд за поранешна ...
As of early 2011, almost thirty have been convicted. ” Since its inception the ICTY has carried out extensive investigations and prosecution of wartime sexual ...
[121]
Bosnia and Herzegovina: Last chance for justice for over 20,000 ...
Sep 12, 2017 · “We need support, not pity:” Last chance for justice for Bosnia's wartime rape ... Bosnia and Herzegovina: War crimes convictions a historic ...
[122]
Justice on Trial: Lessons from the Minova Rape Case in the ...
Oct 1, 2015 · A number of soldiers were convicted of the war crime of pillage, despite an obvious lack of evidence against them. Based on more than 65 ...
[123]
DR Congo rape trial: Many soldiers cleared, two guilty - BBC News
May 5, 2014 · A trial of 39 soldiers in the Democratic Republic of Congo ends with two convicted of rape and 13 others cleared.
[124]
Troubling the 'human' in human security from a critical feminist ...
Feb 11, 2013 · The article argues that the 'human' in human security is exclusionary and gendered, reproducing dominant norms and obscuring power dynamics.
[125]
Gender and Human Security: A Theoretical Discourse on Feminist ...
Jun 26, 2025 · The politics of numerous overlapping identities are, therefore, a focus of a critical feminist approach to the discourse of human security.
[126]
Imperfect Victims? Civilian Men, Vulnerability, and Policy Preferences
Apr 19, 2023 · Estimates across conflicts classify men as between 1.3 and 8.9 times as likely to be killed in war as women (Ormhaug, Meier, and Hernes ...
[127]
Armed Conflict Deaths Disaggregated by Gender
Men are more likely to die during conflicts, whereas women die more often of indirect causes after the conflict is over.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[128]
Male Victimhood in Armed Conflict - Political Violence at a Glance
Jul 11, 2013 · A widely accepted claim is that women make up the majority of casualties in contemporary wars, but no academic or policy source offers the sort ...Missing: disparities | Show results with:disparities
[129]
[PDF] Human Security: East Versus West? Amitav Acharya
The paper argues that human security debates don't fall along an East-West line, but that there are differences within each camp, and that the concept has ...Missing: universality | Show results with:universality
[130]
(PDF) Human Security: East Versus West - ResearchGate
It refutes the view that human security is a "Western" concept, and identifies the Asian contributions to the development of the idea in other its respects. At ...Missing: critiques universality
[131]
Investigating the Western/Global South Identity of Human Security
Human security was intended to counter Western biases in IR and security studies. However, by not considering how Global South security concerns operate ...Missing: universality | Show results with:universality
[132]
Over 20 years since independence, how can Timor-Leste's fragile ...
Feb 20, 2024 · The current stability and development in Timor-Leste are also a valuable and successful model of international engagement and support for Japan.
[133]
After years of conflict, Timor-Leste turns peacemaker - UN News
Feb 8, 2025 · Twenty-four years on, the country has made the successful transition from a host nation for UN peacekeeping operations, to one that contributes to supporting ...
[134]
Peacebuilding Practices in Timor-Leste - Taylor & Francis Online
Timor-Leste occupies a paradoxical position in the contemporary peacebuilding landscape. Frequently celebrated as a liberal peacebuilding success storyFootnote, ...
[135]
Democracy and human security | Brookings
Bureaucratic democracies are strongly associated with high levels of human security while patronage autocracies are associated with low levels. Human security ...Missing: authoritarian | Show results with:authoritarian
[136]
[PDF] Democracy, Conflict and Human Security: - International IDEA
Box 3.9: Human Security and Political Participation: Perspectives on ... the Office of National Security in order to carry out a security sector review.
[137]
[PDF] Security Sector Reform in Timor-Leste: Missed Opportunities and ...
In 1999, the people of East Timor voted, overwhelm- ingly, against a proposal that would make their island an autonomous province of the Republic of Indonesia.
[138]
Human Security: Concepts and Measurement | Cadmus Journal
Feb 28, 2023 · Dire living conditions and material deprivations are undisputed threats to Human Security and are at the epicenter of any research or policy ...
[139]
[PDF] HUMAN SECURITY HANDBOOK - UN.org.
Human security is an integrated approach to address challenges to survival, livelihood, and dignity, and a multi-dimensional framework for the UN to respond to ...
[140]
What is R2P? - Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect
R2P is an international norm that seeks to ensure that the international community never again fails to halt the mass atrocity crimes of genocide, war crimes, ...
[141]
The Responsibility to Protect: A Background Briefing
Jan 14, 2021 · R2P seeks to ensure that the international community never again fails to act in the face of genocide, ethnic cleansing, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
[142]
Integrated Approach to External Conflicts and Crises - EEAS
May 3, 2024 · The EU HRDDP serves as a comprehensive risk management framework. It spells out key principles and defines concrete actions to manage potential ...Security Sector Reform · Climate, Peace & Security · Human Rights and...
[143]
[PDF] The EU's Comprehensive Approach to Security - Clingendael Institute
Key to comprehensive approaches to security is the shared understanding of the why (human security), but also of the how (with integrated policies). In the.
[144]
FAQ: Anti-personnel mine ban convention - ICRC
Apr 3, 2025 · The APMBC is an international agreement that bans the use, production, stockpiling, and transfer of anti-personnel landmines.
[145]
[PDF] Actualizing the Responsibility to Protect
included a responsibility to prevent, a responsibility to react, and a responsibility to rebuild, seeing a continuum of graduated policy instruments across ...
[146]
25 Years Later: The Mine Ban Treaty - APOPO
Progress of the Treaty States Parties have destroyed more than 55 million stockpiled landmines since 1997. In 2021, Sri Lanka was the last State Party to ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[147]
ICBL Statement on Stockpile Destruction, Mine Ban Treaty 20th ...
Nov 28, 2022 · The destruction of 55 million stockpiled antipersonnel landmines under the Mine Ban Treaty is one of its most lasting and life-saving ...Missing: percentage data
[148]
[PDF] Major Findings - ICBLCMC
Of the 164 States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty, 94 states have officially completed destruction of their stocks of antipersonnel mines, destroying a combined ...Missing: Ottawa percentage
[149]
[PDF] Landmine Monitor 2024 - ICBLCMC
Nov 25, 2024 · STOCKPILE DESTRUCTION BY STATES PARTIES. Of the 164 States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty, 161 do not stockpile antipersonnel mines.143. This ...
[150]
(PDF) Landmines and Livelihoods in Afghanistan: Evaluating the ...
Sep 19, 2013 · This article outlines how the Sustainable Livelihoods approach has been used to provide a better understanding of the benefits of mine action, ...
[151]
[PDF] BANNING ANTI-PERSONNEL MINES - THE OTTAWA TREATY ...
The transfer of anti-personnel mines for the purpose of destruction is permitted. Article 4. Destruction of stockpiled anti-personnel mines. Except as ...
[152]
The Impact of Microfinance Institutions on Poverty Alleviation
Sep 5, 2022 · This study examined the role of microfinancing in poverty alleviation by employing a Vector Error Correction Model on quarterly time-series data.
[153]
Effects of microfinance and small loans centre on poverty reduction ...
It was found that MASLOC played a pivotal role in poverty reduction by bolstering income levels, amplifying consumption patterns, facilitating access to ...
[154]
Nato bombing of Libya 'exceeded UN mandate' - Declassified UK
May 19, 2022 · ... Libya quickly descended into a bloody civil war and safe haven for international terrorism. Nato-backed regime change may well have caused ...
[155]
Libya: State Fragility 10 Years After Intervention - The Fund for Peace
Nov 2, 2021 · This year marks the 10th anniversary of the 2011 NATO-led intervention in Libya—a decade that has included terrorist control, degraded civil ...
[156]
[PDF] Migration Beyond the Crisis: Libyan Policy and Practice
way of African migration to Europe and in the way of al-Qaeda terrorists. ... “OHCHR | UN Report Urges Accountability for Libya Airstrike Deaths.” 2019.
[157]
LIB0012 - Evidence on Libya: examination of intervention and ...
Counter Terrorism. 28. Terrorist groups operating in Libya pose a threat to regional neighbours and – by extension – to ...
[158]
[PDF] Blood Aid How Humanitarian Aid Empowers Warlords and Prolongs ...
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the intersection of humanitarian aid and warlords. Through anecdotal evidence and several empirical reports analyzing ...
[159]
[PDF] The Effects of Aid in Somalia: Unintended Consequences and ...
After the collapse of the central government in 1991, Somalia experienced a prolonged period of political instability, armed conflict, and humanitarian crisis.
[160]
Warlords, Intervention, and State Consolidation: A Typology of ...
Feb 25, 2016 · This article, based on extensive field research in Afghanistan, shows why failed states are unlikely to consolidate and exhibit Western-style state building.
[161]
[PDF] Power Vacuums and the Rise of Extremist Groups
Iraq and Syria and the subsequent power vacuums that are created, this framework fails to ... The Iraqi National Security Strategy recognized this failure in ...
[162]
Development, Security and the Contested Usefulness of Human ...
Aug 25, 2015 · A Human (In-)Security Index. For more than a decade human security conceptualisations have been presented and. discussed in international ...
[163]
Research Methodologies of Different Approaches to HS
This phenomenon in researching human security is what Owen Taylor called measurement contradiction. Analysis of two aspects – real and perceived threats ...<|separator|>
[164]
[PDF] Rethinking Human Security - Gary King
Health factors are included in the definition of human security in two dis- tinct ways. First, survival is a critical component of human security.
[165]
[PDF] Assessing Human Insecurity Worldwide
We demonstrate how a Human (In)Security Index can be used in the political realm and bring to the fore the potential core threats to human security. This ...
[166]
[PDF] A/78/665 General Assembly - the United Nations
Jan 2, 2024 · Summary. The present report provides an update on developments related to the advancement of human security since the last report on the ...
[167]
Methods and Tools For Human Security
The “Cross-Country Metrics for Comprehensive Human Security Assessment” project, from March to October 2024, aims to develop a standardized set of metrics to ...
[168]
Measuring Human Security
### Summary of Key Methodological Challenges in Creating Human Security Indices
[169]
Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? - Belfer Center
In considering recent efforts to redefine international security in terms of human security, the author argues that the term is still "so vague that it ...
[170]
road traffic accident: human security perspective - Academic Journals
However, the human security threat of road traffic accidents have not been fully recognized, and has not yet well studied as compared to other threats of human ...Missing: everyday inequality
[171]
Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? - jstor
UNDP definition of human security includes safety from violence as a central ... approaches relate to more traditional approaches to security studies, and ...
[172]
[PDF] Human Security as a policy framework: Critics and Challenges
It was questioned for being unidirectional and state-centric and not taking in consid- eration the evolution of international society and the changes in world ...
[173]
Challenges and opportunities for defining and measuring human ...
As a concept that challenges the very core of the traditional security paradigm, human security has attracted strong critique. Prevalent among these many and ...
[174]
(PDF) Critics and Prospects of « Human Security - ResearchGate
The present paper explores how the concept of Human Security can be approached through phenomenology. First, two phenomenological studies dealing with ...
[175]
Human Security – Conflict, Critique and Consensus - jstor
'Concepts of Human Security', in Lincol. Parr & Ellen Seidensticker, eds, Human Security in a Global. Harvard University Press (15-40). Axworthy, Lloyd, 1997. ' ...
[176]
[PDF] Human Security, Humanitarian Intervention, and Third World Concerns
UNDP Reports and the subsequent Human Security Now both admit that the threats to human security at the societal level are often the root causes of protracted.
[177]
Human Security (Chapter 8) - Understanding International Security
Oct 13, 2025 · ... too broad and open-ended. One critic likened ... The concept of human security has often faced criticism for being overly broad and vague.
[178]
The Role of NGOs in Human Security - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · NGOs are especially well suited to action for human security because of their size and reach, closeness to local populations, willingness to confront the ...Missing: blurring | Show results with:blurring
[179]
[PDF] global governance and the role of ngos in international peace and ...
It is such advocacy organizations that helped shape the new international focus on human security, and they have been instru- mental in broadening the peace and ...
[180]
[PDF] The role of NGOs in Human Security - Issue Lab
In these countries, the valuable lobbying and advocacy efforts of NGOs around threats to human security, whether arising out of government funding priorities, ...Missing: blurring | Show results with:blurring
[181]
[PDF] What explains the UN's selective response to humanitarian crises?
Abstract. Over the past two decades, the United Nations Security Council has responded more strongly to some humanitarian crises than to others.<|separator|>
[182]
The biases of the Human Rights Council - GIS Reports
Jul 26, 2023 · The Human Rights Council of the United Nations is unable to confront serious human rights situations evenhandedly.Missing: patterns | Show results with:patterns
[183]
[PDF] Report to Congress on Voting Practices of UN Members for 2022
This report reviews voting practices in the UNSC and the UNGA in calendar year 2022, covering parts of Session 76, Session 77, and Emergency. Special Session 11 ...
[184]
The United Nations, national sovereignty and the “responsibility to ...
The fundamental challenge of global governance is the tension between spreading global norms and an international system, whose roots date back to the ...
[185]
State Sovereignty and the Protection of Human Rights. How Military ...
Apr 20, 2024 · An example of this is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) intervention in Kosovo in 1999, after the Security Council failed to act ...
[186]
U.S. Foreign Assistance and Failed States - Brookings Institution
... threats to our national security posed by failed and failing states. Such ... foreign assistance strategy to mitigate the risks attendant to failed and failing ...
[187]
Excerpt: Weak Links | Council on Foreign Relations
It has become commonplace to claim that the gravest dangers to U.S. and world security are no longer military threats from rival great powers but rather cross- ...
[188]
Human Security and Health in Singapore: Going beyond a fortress ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Singapore has achieved high levels of human security, overcoming the socio-economic instability and poverty of its early days of independence in the mid 1960s.
[189]
Full article: Singapore's 'Total Defence' Strategy
Singapore represents a remarkable case study of defence economic transformation. In less than three decades, it has progressed from strategic dependence on ...
[190]
[PDF] Security and social cohesion - The Council of Europe
According to research by Butterwegge on the portrayal of migrants, the media have a more significant role as vectors, or even amplifiers, of eth- nicisation.
[191]
Europe's Migration Crisis | Council on Foreign Relations
An escalating migration crisis is testing the European Union's commitment to human rights and open borders.
[192]
The 'migrant other' as a security threat: the 'migration crisis' and the ...
Nov 13, 2022 · The so-called 'migration crisis' facing the EU between 2015 and 2017 divided EU Member States and caused a rise in populist and racist ...
[193]
Understanding Europe's turn on migration - Brookings Institution
Oct 24, 2024 · Europe's tone on migration has notably shifted toward a more securitized, hardline approach, even among mainstream parties.
[194]
[PDF] Social Cohesion, Economic Security, and Forced Displacement in ...
By contrast, studies that find victimization increases social cohesion and other pro-social behaviors often point to “post-traumatic growth” as a po- tential ...
[195]
Human security: approaches and challenges
This publication is the outcome of the concerted efforts of UNESCO's Intersectoral Group on Human Security (IGHS), established in March 2006.
[196]
Human-security approach to digital transformation kicks off in
Sep 15, 2025 · UNESCO and UN agencies in Mexico launch a human-security project to foster responsible technological development and ethical Artificial ...
[197]
Regional Programmes – The Human Security Unit - UN.org.
Regional programs include strengthening sustainable solutions in the Sahel, integrating human security in Asia-Pacific, addressing climate mobility, and ...
[198]
Providing a Framework for NATO's Human Security Approach
Dec 17, 2024 · This post explains why NATO sees Human Security as a useful tool and how the concept can be an enabler, improving NATO's legitimacy and effectiveness.Missing: react- | Show results with:react-
[199]
Stay in the Mine Ban Treaty! - Broken Chair Demands - ICBLCMC
Jun 10, 2025 · Shatter 25 years of progress that reduced annual landmine casualties from approximately 25,000 in 1999 to under 5,000 in 2023; Undermine the ...Missing: decline statistics
[200]
[PDF] THE CAMPAIGN TO BAN LANDMINES AND THE
While empirical data on the effects of the Landmine Ban Treaty is difficult to acquire, the Landmine Monitor reports suggest widespread compliance with treaty.
[201]
[PDF] Rethinking Human Security - Harvard DASH
Many efforts at prevention require knowl- edge of risks; for example, effective response to human security risks is en- hanced by early warning systems and ...
[202]
Assessing peace and social impacts through local human security ...
In this article, we outline an approach using forward-looking human security partnerships between business and local stakeholders to identify and assess the ...
[203]
[PDF] Measuring Human Security - SSRN
Mar 1, 2012 · Figure 1 outlines a human security based model of causality which proposes in simple ... The mechanics of the relationship between human security ...
[204]
Enduring Disorder and Persistent Poverty: A Review of the Linkages ...
This paper examines the relationship between chronic poverty and violent conflict. Three types of potential linkage are examined.
[205]
Back to Bipolarity: How China's Rise Transformed the Balance of ...
Oct 1, 2024 · China's rise, Russia's military resurgence, and India's economic growth have prompted debates about the end of unipolarity and the future balance of power.
[206]
National Security Policy for Great Power Competition - Law & Liberty
Jul 3, 2024 · The coming era of great power competition is with adversaries who intend to achieve their goals through threats, armed force, and fear.<|separator|>
[207]
Global Development in an Era of Great Power Competition - CSIS
Mar 24, 2022 · The United States faces renewed great power competition with a rising PRC and a revisionist Russia. This competition will rely on foreign ...
[208]
Rethinking human security in a new era of threats | The Strategist
Sep 23, 2025 · Human security was framed initially around seven pillars: economic, food, health, environmental, personal, community and political security.