Hutaree
Hutaree (/huːˈtɑːriː/) was a small, millenarian Christian militia organization founded in rural Michigan by David Stone Sr. in the late 2000s, whose members described themselves as training "for the end time battles to keep the testimony of Jesus Christ alive," drawing on biblical exhortations to lay down one's life for brethren.[1] The group's name, derived from an invented term meaning "Christian warrior," reflected its apocalyptic ideology, which portrayed the federal government, law enforcement, and entities like the United Nations as agents of the Antichrist in a coming spiritual war.[2] Unlike broader constitutionalist militias, Hutaree emphasized religious exclusivity, rejecting non-Christians and imposing strict hierarchies under Stone's leadership, while conducting paramilitary exercises marked by unsafe weapons handling and violent rhetoric aimed at sparking confrontation to hasten Christ's return.[2][3] The group attracted federal scrutiny after an informant and undercover agent infiltrated its ranks, revealing discussions of ambushing police officers—potentially at traffic stops or funerals—and using improvised explosives to ignite a broader uprising against the government.[4] In March 2010, the FBI raided Hutaree properties across Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana, arresting nine members on charges including seditious conspiracy, attempting to kill federal officers, and possession of weapons of mass destruction.[4] Defendants amassed over 100 firearms, including illegal automatic weapons, but prosecutors alleged no imminent plot beyond preparatory talk.[2] During the 2012 trial in U.S. District Court, Judge Victoria Roberts acquitted seven members of sedition and conspiracy charges, ruling that the government had established strong anti-government sentiments and poor firearm safety but failed to demonstrate a mutual agreement or specific overt acts requisite for seditious conspiracy.[3][5] Two defendants pleaded guilty to weapons violations, receiving sentences up to several years, while the acquittals highlighted evidentiary thresholds distinguishing protected ideological expression from prosecutable plots.[6][7] The outcome, amid infiltration tactics, fueled debates on federal overreach in monitoring dissident groups expressing end-times preparedness rather than immediate violence.[3]