Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

In Time

In Time is a 2011 American dystopian science fiction action film written, directed, and produced by Andrew Niccol, starring Justin Timberlake as Will Salas, a factory worker from a time-poor ghetto, and Amanda Seyfried as Sylvia Weis, the daughter of a wealthy time lender.^[1]^[2] The story is set in the year 2169, in a world where genetic engineering halts human aging at 25, but individuals must purchase additional time as literal currency displayed on glowing forearm clocks to avoid sudden death when their allocation expires, creating stark divides between the time-affluent elite in fortified zones and the perpetually indebted masses in ghettos.^[1]^[3] After receiving a century's worth of time from a suicide victim, Salas embarks on a quest for justice against a system that enforces scarcity through timekeeper police and predatory lending, kidnapping Weis and sparking a redistribution of hoarded time among the poor.^[4]^[1] Released theatrically on October 28, 2011, the film earned $174 million worldwide on a $40 million production budget, succeeding internationally despite underperforming domestically and garnering mixed critical reception, with a 36% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes for its intriguing premise overshadowed by heavy-handed allegory, plot inconsistencies, and underdeveloped characters.^[3]^[2]^[5] While praised for visualizing time as an exploitable resource akin to money—echoing Benjamin Franklin's adage in a literal, high-stakes economy—it faced criticism for simplistic anti-capitalist messaging that some viewed as inadvertently satirizing ineffective redistribution efforts rather than systemic flaws, alongside technical flaws like inconsistent world-building rules.^[4]^[6]^[7] The film received a Teen Choice Award nomination for Timberlake but no major wins, marking Niccol's return to directing since Gattaca and highlighting his recurring interest in bioethics and inequality through speculative futures.^[8]^[9]

Synopsis

Plot Summary

In the year 2169, genetic engineering ensures that humans cease aging after 25, when a digital clock on their forearm activates, initially displaying one year of life that can be extended by acquiring more time, which functions as the sole currency for all transactions across society.^[10] ^[11] Residents of impoverished ghettos like Dayton subsist by working for minimal time wages, often facing expiration from routine expenditures such as bus fares or purchases, while affluent zones such as New Greenwich house elites who accumulate centuries or millennia of time.^[11] Will Salas, a Dayton factory worker, intervenes to save Henry Hamilton—a despondent visitor from New Greenwich possessing over a century of time—from assailants; Hamilton subsequently transfers 116 years to Will's account before deliberately allowing his timer to reach zero.^[11] Awakening to his windfall, Will discovers his mother Rachel has perished while hurrying to meet him, her time depleted mid-journey, as Timekeeper Leon begins probing Hamilton's demise and flags Will for possessing implausibly abundant time in the ghetto.^[11] Fleeing to New Greenwich, Will integrates into elite circles, encountering Sylvia Weis, daughter of Philippe Weis, the overseer of the dominant time-lending corporation; after Leon locates him, Will seizes Sylvia as a hostage to effect his escape, but she soon comprehends the ghettos' plight and joins his efforts.^[11] The duo commences a series of heists targeting time vaults and banks, siphoning hoarded reserves to disseminate among Dayton's destitute, thereby inciting widespread unrest and intensifying Leon's hunt.^[11] The narrative culminates in Will and Sylvia breaching Philippe Weis's fortified compound to plunder a million-year time repository; amid the confrontation, they initiate a broadcast from New Greenwich, unleashing torrents of time into the ghettos and eroding the elites' dominion.^[11] Leon succumbs during the pursuit, and with seconds remaining on Sylvia's clock, Will replenishes her time; the pair persists in undermining the entrenched hierarchy of time scarcity.^[11]

Cast

Principal Actors

Justin Timberlake portrays Will Salas, a 28-year-old factory worker in the impoverished Dayton zone who receives an unexpected inheritance of over a century's worth of time, leading him to infiltrate the elite New Greenwich sector. Timberlake, born January 31, 1981, rose to fame as a member of the boy band NSYNC before launching a solo music career with albums like Justified (2002), and entered acting with supporting roles in films such as Alpha Dog (2006) and The Social Network (2010); In Time represented his first starring role in a major feature, selected by director Andrew Niccol for his ability to convey underlying intensity amid a high-stakes narrative.^[1]^[12] Amanda Seyfried plays Sylvia Weis, the daughter of a powerful time-lending executive who becomes entangled with Salas after a robbery at her family's bank, eventually partnering with him to redistribute time from the wealthy. Seyfried, born December 3, 1985, gained recognition for roles in Mean Girls (2004) and Mamma Mia! (2008), bringing a blend of vulnerability and resolve to the character that underscores the film's romantic and ideological tensions.^[1]^[12] Cillian Murphy embodies Raymond Leon, the chief timekeeper tasked with enforcing the temporal economy's rules, depicted as a determined antagonist who depletes his own time reserves in pursuit of Salas. Murphy, born May 25, 1976, known for intense performances in 28 Days Later (2002) and Inception (2010), contributes a stoic, methodical presence that heightens the film's cat-and-mouse dynamics.^[1]^[12] Vincent Kartheiser appears as Philippe Weis, Sylvia's father and a tycoon whose corporation monopolizes time loans, serving as a symbol of entrenched elite power. Kartheiser, born October 5, 1979, was concurrently starring as Pete Campbell in the television series Mad Men (2007–2015), lending the role a layer of calculated ambition drawn from his established screen persona.^[1]^[13]

Supporting Roles

Olivia Wilde portrays Rachel Salas, the mother of Will Salas, whose role underscores the personal stakes of time scarcity in Dayton's ghetto, fostering emotional depth in family interactions amid economic desperation.^[1] Johnny Galecki plays Borel, Will's friend and fellow factory worker, who illustrates peer solidarity and the precarious social fabric of the lower zones through shared routines and risks.^[14] These portrayals contribute to ensemble dynamics by grounding the story in relatable human connections within the underclass.^[12] Matt Bomer depicts Henry Hamilton, a figure from New Greenwich whose brief but pivotal presence bridges class divides and propels plot momentum via interactions that challenge the status quo.^[15] Alex Pettyfer embodies Fortis, a gang leader enforcing territorial control through predatory tactics, which heightens conflict and reveals the lawless undercurrents exploiting systemic vulnerabilities.^[16] Together, these supporting characters populate the film's stratified world— from ghetto dwellers to elite outsiders and criminal enforcers— advancing narrative tension through collective depictions of societal friction and opportunistic behaviors.^[3]

Production

Development and Pre-Production

Andrew Niccol conceived the screenplay for In Time as an original concept exploring a dystopian society where time functions as the primary currency, reflecting themes of economic inequality and class division in which individuals cease aging at 25 but must earn or inherit additional lifespan to survive beyond a year.^[17] The script built on Niccol's prior work in speculative fiction, akin to the genetic class structures in Gattaca, emphasizing causal mechanisms of resource scarcity driving social stratification.^[18] Development advanced under New Regency Productions, with co-production from Strike Entertainment led by Marc Abraham and Eric Newman, securing a $40 million budget to realize Niccol's vision without relying on extensive visual effects for world-building.^[5]^[19] Pre-production challenges included aligning the project's modest scale with its ambitious premise, prompting Niccol to advocate for directing after initial studio acquisition of the script.^[20] 20th Century Fox committed to distribution, facilitating preparations such as casting principal roles—Justin Timberlake as protagonist Will Salas and Amanda Seyfried as Sylvia Weis—which were finalized in 2010 to leverage their rising profiles for market appeal.^[1] Location scouting centered on Los Angeles neighborhoods to proxy distinct "time zones," substituting urban decay for ghettos and affluent districts for wealthy enclaves, minimizing logistical costs while evoking the film's literal time-based segregation.^[14]

Filming and Technical Aspects

Principal photography for In Time occurred primarily in Los Angeles, leveraging the city's diverse urban landscapes to visually underscore the film's socioeconomic contrasts. Derelict neighborhoods in downtown areas, including Boyle Heights, the Arts District, and Skid Row, served as the primary locations for the impoverished "Dayton" ghettos, capturing rundown streets and industrial decay.^[21]^[22] Upscale districts like Century City represented the opulent "New Greenwich," with its modern high-rises and luxury settings providing a stark counterpoint to the gritty backdrops.^[21] The film's sci-fi elements were grounded through practical on-set effects, particularly for the glowing time displays embedded in characters' forearms. Actors periodically donned hand rigs fitted with LED lights connected to compact battery packs, which emitted a realistic luminescent effect visible during filming and illuminated the surrounding skin.^[23] These props allowed for tangible interactions in scenes depicting time transfers and depletion, enhancing the immediacy of the narrative's core mechanic without relying solely on digital augmentation at the capture stage.^[23] Action sequences, including foot and vehicle chases across these real-world locations, incorporated practical stunts to convey urgency and physical stakes, filmed directly amid the urban environments to integrate seamlessly with the setting.^[22] Director Andrew Niccol emphasized location-based shooting to maintain a grounded aesthetic, avoiding extensive green-screen work for principal environments and prioritizing authentic spatial dynamics in the film's kinetic pursuits.^[21]

Post-Production

Post-production on In Time began in March 2011 after principal photography concluded the prior November. This phase encompassed editing to amplify narrative tension via sequences depicting characters' depleting time displays, sound mixing to underscore the urgency of time as currency, and integration of effects for the film's retro-futuristic interfaces. The work wrapped by September 2011, enabling the film's theatrical debut later that month. Visual finishing involved digital intermediate processing in 2K resolution, facilitating targeted color grading that differentiated the stark, time-scarce ghettos from opulent, time-rich enclaves. Effects work prioritized practical constructions for sets and props—like forearm-embedded time gauges realized through prosthetics and lighting—supplemented by targeted CGI for elements such as vehicle modifications and chase dynamics, preserving a tangible aesthetic over extensive digital fabrication.^[24] Sound design featured synthesized alerts and rhythmic pulses mimicking digital timers, heightening immersion in the premise without overpowering the dialogue-driven plot.^[25]

Themes and Analysis

Core Premise and Dystopian Elements

In the film In Time, humanity has undergone genetic modification to halt physical aging at 25 years of age, preserving youthful appearance indefinitely contingent on possessing adequate lifespan reserves.^[1] ^[26] ^[27] Upon turning 25, an individual's forearm displays a glowing digital timer initialized with one year of life, which counts down inexorably and triggers death upon reaching zero.^[1] ^[28] This remaining time serves as the exclusive currency, transferable via physical contact for purchases, wages, or gifts, embedding economic activity directly into biological survival.^[29] ^[30] The societal structure manifests as segregated time zones, with lower strata like the Dayton ghetto enforcing a grueling cycle of incessant labor due to engineered temporal scarcity, where earned increments depreciate swiftly against escalating costs for essentials, perpetuating subsistence-level existence.^[29] ^[31] Affluent enclaves, conversely, hoard centuries or millennia, enabling luxurious immortality insulated from such pressures.^[32] This bifurcation underscores the dystopian hierarchy, where access to time dictates not mere longevity but quality of life, rendering the underclass perpetually vulnerable to expiration from mundane expenditures or misfortune.^[33] Enforcement relies on Timekeepers, a specialized authority analogous to law enforcement, who monitor and confiscate anomalous time accumulations in impoverished zones to preserve equilibrium, ostensibly averting unrest from perceived inequities.^[32] Complementing this official apparatus, illicit networks of Minutemen operate as predatory gangs, conducting raids to siphon time from the populace through violence, exploiting the system's rigidity for personal gain.^[34] These elements collectively forge a panopticon of temporal control, where deviation invites lethal reprisal and the commodification of existence stifles organic population dynamics or innovation beyond survival imperatives.^[18]

Economic Interpretations

The film's economic framework portrays time as a finite resource commodified into a universal currency, where the wealthy accumulate vast reserves—often centuries—while the impoverished subsist on daily allotments, mirroring real-world wealth disparities in which the top 1% hold disproportionate assets. This hoarding by elites in fortified zones like New Greenwich symbolizes concentrated capital that sustains immortality for the few at the expense of mass precarity, with systemic mechanisms such as time vaults and patrols enforcing scarcity to prevent redistribution. Director Andrew Niccol framed the narrative around the literalization of "time is money," emphasizing how commodified lifespan exacerbates inequality by tying survival to economic productivity.^[35]^[36] Inheritance and lending practices in the story further entrench class divisions, as families pass down temporal fortunes akin to generational wealth transfers, while predatory loans from time banks impose interest rates that drain the poor's allotments, perpetuating cycles of debt and dependency. These elements critique the absence of progressive taxation or universal allocation, positioning time deficits as engineered outcomes of unchecked market dynamics rather than natural scarcity. Heists, such as the protagonist Will Salas's robbery of a century from industrialist Philippe Weis, represent acts of redistribution symbolizing resistance against elite monopolization, evoking Robin Hood-style interventions in unequal systems.^[37]^[38] Released amid the 2011 Occupy Wall Street protests, which highlighted the 99% versus 1% wealth chasm following the 2008 financial crisis, the film resonated with contemporary concerns over financialization and austerity, though Niccol conceived the premise earlier as a broader allegory for life's commodification under capitalism. Reviewers interpreted the ghetto zones' constant "time tax" hikes—eroding wages to inflate elite holdings—as analogous to inflationary policies favoring asset holders, framing the narrative as a left-leaning indictment of exploitation without viable alternatives.^[39]^[40]^[41]

Critiques of the Film's Economic Model

Critics have noted that the film's time-based economy lacks mechanisms for productivity growth or capital investment, resulting in a static distribution of wealth rather than the dynamic expansion observed in real-world markets driven by savings and innovation. In actual economies, accumulated capital enables technological advancements and increased output, as evidenced by historical GDP growth rates averaging 2-3% annually in developed nations over the 20th century through reinvestment. The film's system, where time functions as both currency and lifespan, discourages long-term savings or lending due to pervasive theft risks and an inverted yield curve favoring short-term security expenditures over productive assets, leading to a downward spiral of concentrated market power in protection services.^[42]^[43] The assumption that hoarding time by the wealthy inherently causes deflation or devalues the currency overlooks basic principles of supply and voluntary exchange; without mechanisms to expand the time supply—such as through innovation or population controls—hoarding would not trigger widespread devaluation absent artificial manipulation. In the film, prices inflate via alleged "manipulation" to cull the population, but this ignores how property rights and secure storage could stabilize value, as seen in commodity-backed currencies historically resisting deflationary pressures from restricted supply.^[44] Analyses highlight that natural time depletion from daily consumption (e.g., a 1-day drain per person) should induce deflationary tendencies, contradicting the depicted hyperinflation unless unexplained money creation occurs, which undermines the zero-sum premise.^[45] The narrative's emphasis on coercive redistribution through theft as a solution to inequality disregards empirical evidence of such approaches' failures, such as in historical command economies where forced equality stifled incentives and led to stagnation, with per capita income growth near zero in the Soviet Union from 1928-1989. Protagonist Will Salas achieves wealth via individual risk-taking and evasion rather than systemic reform, illustrating how entrepreneurial action in voluntary markets generates value, yet the film attributes success to luck and predation without acknowledging causal drivers like skill and opportunity exploitation.^[6] Macroeconomic stability in the depicted world is implausible due to absent incentives for technological progress or demographic adjustments; with no evident advancements in time-generation efficiency despite centuries of operation, the system fails to explain sustained population levels or why security innovations do not emerge to mitigate theft, as rational actors would prioritize such developments in a high-risk environment.^[42] Commentators question the lack of business formation amid clear shortages, such as unaddressed price spikes in basics like coffee, indicating suppressed entrepreneurship not justified by the rules.^[45] This portrayal contrasts with real economies where scarcity prompts innovation, underscoring the model's oversight of human agency in adapting to constraints.^[29]

Release

Theatrical Release and Marketing

The film premiered at the Regency Village Theater in Westwood, Los Angeles, on October 20, 2011.^[46] It received a wide theatrical release in the United States on October 28, 2011, distributed by 20th Century Fox.^[1] The international rollout commenced earlier in select markets, including Singapore and Egypt on October 26, 2011, and Australia on October 27, 2011, as part of a coordinated global strategy by Fox to build momentum ahead of the North American debut.^[47] Marketing efforts centered on the film's innovative premise of time as a literal currency, showcased through trailers that highlighted the distinctive visual motif of glowing digital timers embedded in characters' forearms, high-stakes chase sequences, and the pairing of Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried to draw in younger audiences. Promotional materials, including spots aired during major events and online campaigns, emphasized the sci-fi action-thriller genre and Timberlake's crossover appeal from music to film, positioning the movie as a test of his leading-man potential.^[48] The campaign included appearances at San Diego Comic-Con 2011 as part of 20th Century Fox's panel lineup, targeting genre enthusiasts without delving into the story's socioeconomic undertones, despite the post-2008 recession context lending inherent timeliness to its themes of inequality and survival.^[49]

Home Media and Distribution

The film became available for home video purchase in the United States on January 31, 2012, through DVD and Blu-ray formats distributed by 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment.^[50]^[51] The standard Blu-ray edition featured 1080p high-definition video, Dolby TrueHD 5.1 audio, and supplementary materials including an audio commentary track by director Andrew Niccol, who discussed the construction of the film's time-based economy and dystopian societal framework.^[52] Combo packs bundling Blu-ray, DVD, and a digital copy were also offered, facilitating multi-format accessibility for consumers.^[53] Digital download and rental options followed shortly after, enabling purchase via platforms such as iTunes and Amazon Video, with rights managed under 20th Century Fox's licensing portfolio.^[5] Over time, streaming availability proliferated across video-on-demand services; by the mid-2010s, it appeared on subscription platforms including Netflix in various territories before shifting due to content rotation.^[54] As of 2025, the film streams on Hulu, Amazon Prime Video, and Disney+ in regions like North America and parts of Europe, reflecting Disney's acquisition of Fox assets and subsequent catalog integration.^[55]^[56]^[57] International home media distribution mirrored the U.S. timeline with region-specific adaptations, such as Region 2 DVD releases in Europe compatible with PAL standards and localized packaging.^[58] Exclusive editions, including a Media Markt SteelBook Blu-ray in Germany, catered to collector markets and emphasized the film's appeal in regions receptive to its socioeconomic critiques.^[59] Licensing variations prolonged physical media dominance in some non-U.S. markets, where streaming penetration lagged, ensuring sustained ancillary revenue through dubbed audio tracks and subtitles in languages like French, Spanish, and German.^[53]

Reception

Critical Response

In Time garnered mixed reviews from critics upon its release, with a 36% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 173 reviews and an average score of 5.2/10.^[2] The consensus highlighted the film's innovative premise—where time serves as literal currency in a stratified society—as a strength, but faulted its execution for a predictable plot, underdeveloped characters, and superficial exploration of socioeconomic themes.^[60] On Metacritic, it scored 53 out of 100 from 36 critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews," with praise for its stylish action sequences offset by critiques of logical inconsistencies in the economic model, such as the absence of productivity incentives beyond time allocation.^[61] Roger Ebert awarded the film three out of four stars, commending its engaging blend of thriller elements and social commentary, describing the concept as "fascinating" and the narrative as a "slick, hyper-stylized conspiracy yarn" that entertains despite not delving deeply into philosophical implications.^[4] In contrast, The Hollywood Reporter noted that while the provocative setup and attractive cast provided initial appeal, the film's reliance on conventional lovers-on-the-run tropes failed to sustain intellectual depth, rendering its dystopian critique underdeveloped.^[9] Similarly, Deep Focus Review criticized the script for prioritizing market-friendly pacing over substantive world-building, observing that the low-tech visuals and lack of elaborate effects underscored a modest production that did not fully capitalize on its high-concept foundation.^[62] Some reviewers appreciated the film's visual style and brisk tempo, with The Independent Critic acknowledging its thought-provoking potential amid fast-paced chases, though lamenting deviations toward commercial accessibility that diluted the premise's edge.^[63] Critiques of economic illogic were recurrent, as outlets like The Critical Movie Critics pointed to implausible societal mechanics, such as uniform aging at 25 regardless of lifespan, which undermined causal realism in the time-based currency system without rigorous justification.^[64] No major awards for visual effects materialized, though the film's practical aesthetic and kinetic editing received incidental nods in genre discussions for maintaining viewer immersion.^[8] Overall, professional consensus positioned In Time as conceptually ambitious yet narratively conventional, appealing more as escapist fare than profound allegory.

Box Office and Financial Performance

In Time was produced on a budget of $40 million.^[65] The film premiered in theaters on October 28, 2011, opening in second place at the North American box office behind Paranormal Activity 3, with a debut weekend gross of $12.05 million from 3,008 screens.^[65] Its domestic run totaled $37.52 million, representing approximately 32% of the opening weekend relative to the full U.S. and Canada earnings, reflecting sustained audience interest over 24 weeks.^[1]^[5] Internationally, the film earned $136.41 million across 45 markets, with notable performances in France ($16.8 million) and Germany ($9.5 million), debuting strongly in several territories post-domestic release.^[65] The cumulative worldwide gross reached $173.93 million.^[65] This result exceeded the production budget by a factor of over four, marking a profitable return for 20th Century Fox given typical distributor shares and ancillary revenue streams, though exact net figures account for marketing expenditures estimated at $20–30 million.^[5]

Audience Perspectives and Cultural Impact

The audience reception to In Time has been mixed, with viewers appreciating its high-concept premise and action sequences despite acknowledging flaws in execution. On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds an audience score of 51% based on over 50,000 ratings, averaging 3.3 out of 5, where many praised its entertaining dystopian setup and visual style over its heavier messaging.^[2] Forum discussions, particularly on Reddit, highlight entertainment value in the time-as-currency gimmick but criticize underdeveloped world-building, such as how the system avoids demographic collapse from widespread early deaths in lower zones.^[66] Users have noted logical inconsistencies, like the sustainability of ghettos where residents expire at 25-30 years old, questioning population replenishment without addressing infant mortality or birth incentives tied to time scarcity.^[24] Culturally, In Time has achieved modest enduring influence, occasionally resurfacing in online conversations about economic inequality due to its stark portrayal of time hoarding by elites.^[67] Some interpretations frame it as a critique of capitalism's excesses, yet counterviews emphasize the protagonist's self-reliant heists and disruption of entrenched lenders as validating entrepreneurial risk-taking rather than pure systemic indictment.^[6] It lacks widespread cult status, with limited mainstream revival beyond niche sci-fi retrospectives, though its premise continues to spark debates on resource allocation without achieving the iconic resonance of similar dystopias.^[68]

Legal Controversies

Copyright Infringement Lawsuit

In September 2011, science fiction author Harlan Ellison filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in California federal court against director Andrew Niccol, New Regency Productions, and 20th Century Fox, alleging that In Time plagiarized key elements from his 1965 Hugo Award-winning short story "'Repent, Harlequin!' Said the Ticktockman". Ellison contended that the film's dystopian premise of a society rigidly enforcing temporal discipline, featuring an authoritarian time overseer (the Ticktockman in the story versus Timekeepers in the film) and a rebellious protagonist defying the system, constituted unauthorized copying of protectable expression.^[69] The complaint sought a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction to block the film's October 28, 2011, theatrical release, along with destruction of all copies and unspecified damages. Ellison's claims highlighted superficial plot parallels, such as the enforcement of time scarcity leading to execution for lateness and the central conflict over subverting chronological control. However, legal experts noted that copyright law protects specific expressions rather than abstract ideas or sci-fi tropes like time manipulation, which predate Ellison's work in various literary forms.^[70] On November 30, 2011, Ellison voluntarily dismissed the suit without prejudice after screening the film, informing his attorneys that he declined any association with it despite initial similarities in concept. The withdrawal avoided a judicial ruling on substantial similarity, but underscored the doctrinal barrier in idea-submission cases: courts routinely dismiss claims where high-level premises (e.g., time as a regulated resource) lack detailed, original expressive overlap beyond unprotected genre elements like dystopian enforcement mechanisms.^[71] This episode exemplifies broader intellectual property challenges in speculative fiction, where unprotected "ideas" such as commodified time or surveillance states—common since H.G. Wells and earlier analogs—cannot sustain infringement absent verbatim or closely derived plot, character, or dialogue appropriation, as affirmed in precedents emphasizing filtration of scènes à faire (standard tropes inevitable to the genre).^[69]

References

[1]
In Time (2011) - IMDb
Rating 6.7/10 (474,970) Box office ; Budget. $40,000,000 (estimated) ; Gross US & Canada. $37,520,095 ; Opening weekend US & Canada. $12,050,368; Oct 30, 2011 ; Gross worldwide.Full cast & crew · Plot · Parents guide · Trailer #1
[2]
In Time - Rotten Tomatoes
Rating 36% (173) Original Language: English. Release Date (Theaters): Oct 28, 2011, Wide. Release Date (Streaming): Jan 1, 2014. Box Office (Gross USA): $37.6M. Runtime: 1h 49m.173 Reviews · Cast and Crew · Audience Reviews
[3]
In Time | Moviepedia - Fandom
The film was released on October 28, 2011, and grossed $174 million against a $40 million budget. It received mixed reviews from critics, who praised the ...Plot · Cast · ProductionMissing: summary | Show results with:summary
[4]
“Time is Money.” — Ben Franklin movie review (2011) | Roger Ebert
Rating 3/4 · Review by Roger EbertOct 26, 2011 · The movie I suppose is an allegory in which time is money in a brutally direct way. For some of these people, time burns a hole in their pockets ...
[5]
In Time (2011) - Box Office and Financial Information - The Numbers
In Time is a movie that can be seen as a box office bomb when you look at the film's domestic numbers, as it only made $37 million on a $35 million budget. If ...
[6]
'In Time': A Hollywood Get-Rich-Quick Tale Disguised as Capitalist ...
Oct 28, 2011 · In Time wants to be a critique of capitalism. Instead, it ends up an unintentionally searing satire of America's utter inability to critique capitalism.
[7]
In Time – A Lesson in Plot Holes - Elena's Grace
Jul 1, 2022 · In 'In Time', time is money, and at 25, everyone has a year to live. The movie has a plot hole where the origin of the time system is not ...
[8]
In Time (2011) - Awards - IMDb
2012 Nominee Teen Choice Award. Choice Movie Actor: Drama. Justin Timberlake · Golden Trailer Awards. Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried in In Time (2011).Missing: budget | Show results with:budget
[9]
In Time: Film Review - The Hollywood Reporter
Oct 26, 2011 · Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried star in Andrew Niccol's dystopian film, giving new currency to Benjamin Franklin's infamous quote, "Time is Money."
[10]
Cillian Murphy and Justin Timberlake's 'In Time' Shouldn't Be Lost to ...
In Time is set in the year 2169, where all of human life has been engineered to stop aging after the age of 25, and only given a year to live thereafter.Missing: plot | Show results with:plot<|separator|>
[11]
In Time Summary - GradeSaver
Nov 13, 2022 · The story focuses on Will whose mother, Rachel, passes away after her time runs out. Will learns that the elites of the world hoard the time ...
[12]
In Time | Cast and Crew - Rotten Tomatoes
Credit(s) Director, Screenwriter, Producer. Justin Timberlake. Character(s) Will Salas. Credit(s) Actor. Amanda Seyfried. Character(s) Sylvia Weis. Credit(s) ...
[13]
'In Time' Premiere: 'Mad Men's' Vincent Kartheiser on his Fear of ...
Oct 20, 2011 · Mad Men star Vincent Kartheiser plays Philippe Weis, a wealthy man with lots of time whose daughter (Seyfried) is taken hostage by Will.
[14]
In Time (2011) - Full cast & crew - IMDb
Directed and written by Andrew Niccol, starring Justin Timberlake, Olivia Wilde, Shyloh Oostwald, and Johnny Galecki.
[15]
In Time (2011) - Matt Bomer as Henry Hamilton - IMDb
In Time (2011) - Matt Bomer as Henry Hamilton.
[16]
In Time (2011) - Cast & Crew — The Movie Database (TMDB)
Justin Timberlake. Will Salas · Amanda Seyfried. Sylvia Weis · Cillian Murphy. Raymond Leon · Olivia Wilde. Rachel Salas · Alex Pettyfer. Fortis · Johnny Galecki.
[17]
In Time - Variety
Oct 26, 2011 · A tightrope walk between inspired high-concept storytelling and near-agonizing obviousness, Andrew Niccol's “In Time” takes place in a retro ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
In Time: Andrew Niccol on His Gattaca-Inspired New Film
Oct 28, 2011 · Niccol sat down with Popular Mechanics to talk about how Gattaca influenced the film, and why people in the future drive classic cars.
[19]
In Time (2011) - Company credits - IMDb
Production Companies · New Regency Productions. (presents, A Film by Andrew Niccol) ; Distributors · Twentieth Century Fox. (United States, 2011) ; Special Effects.
[20]
David Thomson: 'In Time,' a Film That Can't Deliver on Its Own ...
Oct 31, 2011 · It was bought, it was developed, and Andrew Niccol offered the humble plea that he might be allowed to direct his baby. But as the project grew, ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[21]
In Time (2011) - Film City L.A.--- Los Angeles and the Movies
Jul 12, 2016 · In Time uses LA locations that are for the most part off the beaten track: Boyle Heights and the downtown Arts District for derelict Dayton; and Century City ...
[22]
In Time: Filming Locations - Seeing Stars
This opening "Dayton" sequence was shot on the 600 block of Anderson Street, on the east side of downtown Los Angeles, just east of the L.A. River. That ...
[23]
Minute by minute: the vfx of In Time - fxguide
Nov 5, 2011 · On set, actors occasionally wore a hand rig with LED lights that had a small battery back, which would illuminate the surrounding area the arm.
[24]
In Time (2011) is a hilarious waste of great sci fi ideas. - Reddit
Feb 27, 2020 · This movie is an example of a compelling science fiction setting being wasted and/or botched. The plot is essentially that people have digital clocks on their ...What do people think of "In Time" with Justin Timberlake? : r/moviesThe movie “In Time”s economy is built on killing babies - RedditMore results from www.reddit.comMissing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[25]
In Time (2011) | Soundeffects Wiki - Fandom
In Time is a 2011 American science fiction action film. Storyline, Sound Effects Used, Image Gallery, Audio Samples, External Links, More Information
[26]
Director Calls In Time 'Bastard Child of Gattaca' - WIRED
Oct 6, 2011 · ... gene-themed mind-melter, In Time. “I think of it as the bastard ... genetically programmed to die at age 25. Individuals' lifespans are ...
[27]
"In Time" Wastes Time - Ms. Magazine
Nov 2, 2011 · As we quickly learn, “time is now the currency.” People are genetically engineered to stop aging at 25 and then given a year on their “clock”–a ...
[28]
Where does time come from in the movie "In Time"?
Nov 12, 2011 · In Time shows a world where time is currency. The film explains that on a person's 25th birthday, their clock starts ticking, with one year on it.Missing: premise | Show results with:premise
[29]
The Economics of Andrew Niccol's In Time - Bigger on the Inside
Nov 5, 2011 · The premise of the movie is as such: time is now a currency, and intrinsically linked to their lives, and the lower class of society has to fight for their ...
[30]
In Time (2011) | Science Fiction & Fantasy forum - SFF Chronicles
Feb 8, 2013 · The catch is that the universal currency is not money but the minutes and hours of people's lives, known as "living time". Everyone has a clock/ ...
[31]
Reflection Guide to the Movie: "In Time"
Jan 19, 2012 · In Time is set in a future dystopia where living zones separate the rich from the poor. A dystopia (from Ancient Greek) anti-utopia is the idea ...<|separator|>
[32]
In Time: a closer look at an unusual sci-fi dystopia | Den of Geek
Feb 24, 2012 · Andrew Niccol's film, In Time, presents a sci-fi dystopia that is both Orwellian and uniquely its own.Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
[33]
Movie Review: 'In Time' - CBS Philadelphia
Oct 28, 2011 · In Time is a serviceable science fiction thriller, set in Dayton in the not-too-distant future, about an imagined dystopian society in which ...
[34]
In Time (Film) - TV Tropes
The poor also live in fear of the Minute Men, a ruthless gang that robs people of all their time, killing them. It shares quite a few elements from "Time is ...
[35]
In a world where time is literally money - Marketplace.org
Oct 28, 2011 · Director Andrew Niccol discusses the premise of his new film, “In Time,” where time becomes a literal commodity: the currency of life.
[36]
Eight Hours of Writing about Two Hours of Film: A Review of In Time
Oct 29, 2011 · The film offers two explicit arguments against human immortality: first, that it may, as in this society, unfairly require that other people die ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[37]
In Time by Andrew Niccol Film Analysis Essay (Critical Writing)
May 13, 2020 · The film “In Time” delves into the concept of “time” as it has replaced currency as the way to signify wealth and social prestige in the world.
[38]
In Time: story of exploitation and class struggle - New Age
Sep 2, 2018 · Directed by Andrew Niccol, this film criticises capitalism's exploitation of labour. Nasir Uz Zaman presents a Marxist interpretation of the ...
[39]
In Time really is Occupy Wall Street: The Movie - Gizmodo
Oct 28, 2011 · In Time both is and isn't an allegory for our own widening gap between rich and poor. On the one hand, the actual situation is very ...
[40]
"In Time": Justin Timberlake's OWS sci-fi thriller - Salon.com
Oct 27, 2011 · Niccol hasn't just made a Marxist B-movie (see also: John Carpenter's “They Live”), he's made one in which 27-year-old Olivia Wilde plays the ...
[41]
'In Time' Is a Bad Action Movie, But a Radical Statement On Income ...
Oct 28, 2011 · 'In Time' Is a Bad Action Movie, But a Radical Statement On Income Inequality ... In Time, a mediocre action movie in which Justin Timberlake ...
[42]
*In Time* (spoilers about the macroeconomic model) - Marginal ...
Oct 31, 2011 · So, people are paid in time, and time is a currency. All of this is explained in the first 10 minutes of the film. (Why are people only given 1 ...
[43]
Economics of the movie In Time - Savvy Buck
Nov 7, 2015 · To quickly summarize the movie, everything is paid by and for in time. You work to gain hours and minutes and you pay for things in hours and minutes.<|separator|>
[44]
In Time Economics - by Robin Hanson - Overcoming Bias
Oct 31, 2011 · In the movie, commodity prices are raised via “manipulation,” but that can't work reliably unless authorities in effect raise taxes on those ...
[45]
'In Time' is bad economics : r/badeconomics - Reddit
May 13, 2015 · The film 'In Time' tries to demonstrate how cruel of a system capitalism is by taking the phrase 'time is money' in a literal sense.What do people think of "In Time" with Justin Timberlake? : r/moviesThe movie “In Time”s economy is built on killing babies - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
[46]
'In Time' Premiere Red Carpet Arrivals: Justin Timberlake, Amanda ...
Oct 20, 2011 · ... In Time premiere, held in Westwood, Calif. She plays Justin Timberlake's mother in the film, opening in theaters Friday, Oct. 28. Matt Bomer.
[47]
In Time (2011) - Release info - IMDb
In Time premiered in the US on October 20, 2011, and was released in Egypt and Singapore on October 26, 2011, and in Australia on October 27, 2011.
[48]
In Time | Reviews - Screen Daily
Oct 29, 2011 · Providing a test of Justin Timberlake's star power, In Time should benefit from gangbusters word-of-mouth amongst its youth-trending target demo ...
[49]
San Diego Comic Con 2011 Film Panel Schedule - FilmBuffOnline
Jul 18, 2011 · 20th Century Fox Panel: The content is TBA, but you can probably assume that The Rise of the Planet of the Apes, In Time, the Star Wars 3-D ...
[50]
In Time DVD Release Date January 31, 2012
In Time DVD and Blu-ray release date was set for January 31, 2012. ; Actor(s) Justin Timberlake ; Director(s) Andrew Niccol ; imdb: 5.4, PG-13 ; imdb: 8.2, R ; imdb: ...
[51]
In Time Blu-ray (Blu-ray + DVD + Digital)
Rating 6/10 Feb 1, 2012 · In Time Blu-ray Release Date January 31, 2012. Blu-ray reviews, news, specs, ratings, screenshots. Cheap Blu-ray movies and deals.
[52]
In Time - Blu-ray News and Reviews | High Def Digest
Release Date: January 31st, 2012 Movie Release Year: 2011. Home > Blu-Ray > In Time. In Time. Review Date February 6th, 2012 by M. Enois Duarte. Overview -.
[53]
Amazon.com: In Time [Blu-ray + DVD + Digital copy]
Actors, ‎Amanda Seyfried, Justin Timberlake ; Dubbed: ‎French, Spanish ; Studio, ‎20th Century Fox ; Release date, ‎September 23, 2014.
[54]
In Time - Where to Watch and Stream - TV Guide
Rating 53% (36) Find out how to watch In Time. Stream In Time, watch trailers, see the cast, and more at TV Guide.
[55]
Watch In Time Streaming Online | Hulu
Watch In Time and other popular TV shows and movies including new releases, classics, Hulu Originals, and more. It's all on Hulu.
[56]
Watch In Time | Prime Video - Amazon.com
Rating 4.6 (14,076) Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried co-star in this sci-fi thriller set in a future world where aging stops at 25, and the only way for one man to stay alive ...
[57]
Watch In Time | Disney+
Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried co-star in this sci-fi thriller set in a future world where aging stops at 25, and the only way for one man to stay ...
[58]
IN TIME - TIMERLAKE JUSTIN [DVD] [2011] - Amazon.com
30-day returnsPlayback Region 2 : This will not play on most DVD players sold in the U.S., U.S. Territories, Canada, and Bermuda. See other DVD options under “Other ...
[59]
In Time Blu-ray (Media Markt Exclusive SteelBook) (Germany)
Next year, Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment will bring In Time to Blu-ray. The futuristic thriller imagines both a world where units of time act as the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[60]
In Time | Reviews - Rotten Tomatoes
Rotten score. Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried lurch from car chases to shoot-outs, to a bloodless romantic interlude, while the script runs out of ideas around ...
[61]
In Time critic reviews - Metacritic
If you can overlook the lack of logic inherent in its central conceit, In Time makes for a fun, stylish piece of speculative sci-fi. By Rene Rodriguez FULL ...Missing: currency | Show results with:currency
[62]
In Time (2011) | Movie Review
Rating 2/4 · Review by Brian EggertOct 28, 2011 · Niccol's film is modestly stylish in a low-tech way, with no fancy CGI backdrops or elaborate visuals to speak of. Cinematographer Roger Deakins ...Missing: consensus | Show results with:consensus<|separator|>
[63]
"In Time" Review - The Independent Critic
In Time is a mediocre sci-fi thriller with a muddled message, where time is currency, and the reviewer advises to avoid it.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[64]
Movie Review: In Time (2011) - The Critical Movie Critics
Nov 15, 2011 · Set in a sort of alternate reality (or retro-ized future) where time is the new currency, In Time imaginatively and impressively explores the conflict between ...Missing: consensus | Show results with:consensus
[65]
In Time (2011) - Box Office Mojo
In Time (2011) ... In a future where people stop aging at 25, but are engineered to live only one more year, having the means to buy your way out of the situation ...
[66]
The movie “In Time”s economy is built on killing babies - Reddit
Nov 5, 2022 · I understand everyone stops aging in the movie In Time but they don't explain why all the woman look like models. Not everyone is pretty ...in the movie In Time. flaws of the system set up in the movie - RedditIn Time (2011) : r/iwatchedanoldmovie - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
[67]
An underrated 2011 movie, *In Time*, has been gaining attention for ...
May 10, 2025 · Set in a future where time is currency, the film shows how the rich can live forever while the poor struggle to survive.
[68]
This 14-Year-Old Cyberpunk Thriller Is Much Better than Its 36 ...
Mar 15, 2025 · The 2011 cyberpunk thriller In Time, which received a criminally low 36% score on Rotten Tomatoes. In Time is a dystopian sci-fi film set in a future where ...
[69]
Harlan Ellison Sues Claiming Fox's 'In Time' Rips Off Sci-Fi Story ...
Sep 15, 2011 · Harlan Ellison Sues Claiming Fox's 'In Time' Rips Off Sci-Fi Story (Exclusive). Legendary sci-fi author files copyright infringement lawsuit to ...
[70]
Copyright Curmudgeon Harlan Ellison Sues To Halt Release Of ...
Sep 15, 2011 · If director Andrew Niccol and New Regency's Justin Timberlake thriller In Time is based on a pilfered idea, as is claimed in a copyright ...
[71]
Harlan Ellison Drops Lawsuit Claiming 'In Time' Ripped Off His Story ...
Nov 30, 2011 · Harlan Ellison has decided that he doesn't want to take credit for In Time, the recent sci-fi film starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried.Missing: 2013 | Show results with:2013