Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Insertion loss

Insertion loss refers to the reduction in signal power that occurs when a device, component, or network is inserted into a path, such as a , , or , and is typically expressed in decibels (). This loss arises from factors including due to material , , imperfect connections, and reflections at interfaces, and it is a fundamental parameter in evaluating the performance of systems. In and networking, insertion loss is critical for both and optic cabling, where it accumulates over distance and at each connection point, directly impacting and data transmission rates. For cables, such as those in Ethernet standards, maximum allowable insertion loss is specified by bodies like TIA and ISO—for instance, up to 32 for Category 6 at 250 MHz—while in optics, it is often limited to values like 2.9 for 10GBASE-SR links over 400 meters. In (RF) and , insertion loss quantifies power reduction in components like filters, antennas, and transmission lines, where even small losses (e.g., 0.5 in connectors) can degrade system efficiency in high-frequency applications. The magnitude of insertion loss is calculated using the formula IL (dB) = 10 × log₁₀(P_in / P_out), where P_in is the input power and P_out is the output power after insertion, allowing for precise characterization through methods like S-parameter analysis (e.g., |S₂₁| for forward transmission) or direct power measurements. In practice, minimizing insertion loss is essential for optimizing power budgets in systems, as excessive loss can lead to signal degradation, requiring amplification or redesign, and it is often distinguished from , which measures reflected power.

Fundamentals

Definition

Insertion loss is a fundamental measure in telecommunications and signal transmission systems, defined as the reduction in signal power that occurs when a device or component, such as a filter, connector, or attenuator, is inserted into a transmission line or path. It quantifies the difference between the power incident on the device and the power transmitted through it to the load, typically expressed in decibels (dB) using the formula IL = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{P_{in}}{P_{out}} \right), where P_{in} is the input power and P_{out} is the output power. This metric captures the overall degradation introduced by the insertion, encompassing both dissipative effects and any impedance mismatches that affect power transfer. Unlike measures of passive loss that might assume ideal matching conditions and focus solely on inherent energy dissipation within a component, insertion loss provides a practical of the net impact on performance when the device is added, without presupposing perfect termination or coupling. It is conventionally reported as a positive value, indicating , and is inherently frequency-dependent in applications, where the loss can vary across the signal due to properties and design factors. The concept of insertion loss originated in the early within , where it was developed to evaluate impairments in long-distance transmission lines and emerged from parallel efforts in the United States and before . Pioneered amid challenges like limited access to quartz crystals for filtering in , it was advanced at Bell Laboratories in the U.S., becoming a standard for assessing line efficiency and component integration in analog communication systems.

Causes

Insertion loss in transmission systems arises primarily from four mechanisms: , , , and transmission inefficiencies. Reflection occurs when there is an impedance mismatch between the source, the inserted device, and the load, causing a portion of the signal to be reflected back rather than transmitted forward. Absorption involves the dissipation of signal energy as heat within the materials of the device or , reducing the available for transmission. Scattering results from imperfections or discontinuities that redirect signal energy in unintended directions, such as through or . Transmission inefficiencies encompass other losses, including those from imperfect or mode conversion at interfaces, which prevent full transfer. Material contributions significantly influence these losses. Dielectric losses stem from energy dissipation in insulating materials due to molecular under alternating . Conductor , particularly ohmic losses in metallic paths, converts signal into through resistive heating. Geometric factors, such as bends, junctions, or abrupt changes in line dimensions, introduce additional and losses by disrupting wave uniformity. The impact of these causes varies with . At higher frequencies, can increase due to the skin effect, which confines current to the conductor's surface, raising effective resistance and exacerbating mismatch losses. losses also rise linearly with , as mechanisms in the material become less efficient at following rapid field changes. from or defects becomes more pronounced relative to at shorter wavelengths, further contributing to overall loss. Basic mitigation strategies target these root causes without relying on specific measurement or calculation methods. techniques, such as using matching networks or selecting components with characteristic impedances aligned to the system (e.g., 50 Ω in RF applications), minimize reflection-based losses by maximizing power transfer. Selecting low-loss materials with minimal dissipation and smooth conductors can reduce and , while optimizing geometries to avoid sharp bends or junctions helps preserve .

Measurement

Techniques

Insertion loss is commonly measured using vector network analyzers (VNAs) in (RF) systems, where the S21 parameter represents the forward , directly corresponding to the insertion loss when the device under test (DUT) is inserted between the ports. In optical systems, insertion loss is assessed with optical power meters paired with a light source, which measure the difference in before and after inserting the DUT into the fiber path. For RF measurements with a VNA, the setup involves connecting the input of the DUT to port 1 and the output to port 2 of the VNA, followed by a full two-port using standards such as short, open, load, and through (SOLT) to establish the reference plane at the DUT interface. with a through-line reference, often part of TRL (through-reflect-line) methods, ensures accurate removal of cable and connector contributions, while swept- analysis across the of interest characterizes variation with . Connector are accounted for by including them in the process or using de-embedding techniques to isolate the DUT response. In optical setups, the procedure starts with a reference measurement using a test connected directly between the light source and power meter to set a zero-loss , followed by inserting the DUT and recording the power drop. Common configurations include the one-cable , which incorporates connector losses at both ends, or the three-cable to exclude them for more precise component . Wavelength-specific sources, such as lasers at 1310 nm or 1550 nm, are used to match the system's operating conditions. Key error sources in these measurements include inaccuracies from fixture effects, which require de-embedding algorithms to mathematically remove parasitic influences from test fixtures or adapters. Repeatability issues arise from variations in connector or cable flexing, necessitating multiple measurements and averaging to achieve consistent results. Environmental factors, particularly temperature fluctuations, can alter material properties like constants or resistance, leading to variations in measured loss that must be controlled or compensated for during testing. Industry standards ensure consistent protocols; for RF applications, IEEE Std 1560 provides guidelines for insertion loss measurements of power-line filters in the 100 Hz to 10 GHz range, emphasizing matched-impedance conditions. In , IEC 61300-3-4 outlines methods for measurements, including insertion loss, using power meters for passive components, with specifications for reference setups and .

Calculations

Insertion loss is fundamentally quantified using the power ratio between input and output signals. The basic equation for insertion loss in decibels () is given by \text{IL (dB)} = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{P_{\text{in}}}{P_{\text{out}}} \right), where P_{\text{in}} is the input power and P_{\text{out}} is the output power after passing through the device or system. This formula derives directly from the definition of decibels as a logarithmic measure of power ratios, where the insertion of a component reduces the transmitted power, resulting in a positive value for IL that represents the attenuation. For cascaded systems, where multiple components or stages are connected in series, the total insertion loss is the arithmetic sum of the individual insertion losses when expressed in . This additive property arises because power ratios multiply in the linear domain, but their logarithms add in the scale; thus, \text{IL}_{\text{total}} = \sum \text{IL}_i. For average insertion loss over a , an integration in the is used, such as \text{IL}_{\text{avg}} = 10 \log_{10} \left( \frac{1}{\Delta f} \int_{f_1}^{f_2} \frac{P_{\text{in}}(f)}{P_{\text{out}}(f)} \, df \right), where \Delta f = f_2 - f_1 is the , providing a loss value for assessments. Insertion loss can also be related to the T, often represented by the S-parameter S_{21} in network analysis, via \text{IL (dB)} = -20 \log_{10} |T|, where T is the voltage transmission coefficient and the factor of 20 accounts for the relationship between voltage and power. This form is particularly useful in frequency-domain simulations, as |S_{21}| directly measures the transmitted signal relative to the incident wave. Predictive calculations of insertion loss are commonly performed using simulation tools like for circuit-level analysis, where S-parameters or power transfer functions are derived from component models to compute IL across frequencies, and HFSS for full-wave electromagnetic simulations, enabling detailed modeling of field distributions and losses in complex structures such as antennas or interconnects. These tools allow validation against theoretical equations by solving numerically or through lumped-element approximations.

Applications

Electronics

In electronic systems, particularly those operating in the (RF) and regimes, insertion loss represents a critical performance metric that quantifies the power dissipation introduced by passive components in signal paths. This loss arises from resistive, , and radiative mechanisms within devices such as filters, which attenuate signals to achieve selectivity; amplifiers, where passive matching networks contribute to overall degradation; cables, which suffer from and losses; and connectors, which introduce mismatches and contact resistances. For instance, high-quality RF connectors typically exhibit insertion losses of 0.1 to 0.3 , while coaxial cables commonly show 0.5 to 2 over typical short lengths (e.g., 1-10 meters) at frequencies up to several GHz, depending on type and environment. Bandpass filters, essential for rejecting , often incur 1 to 5 of loss to balance selectivity and . Design considerations for minimizing insertion loss in electronic circuits emphasize its direct impact on system efficiency, particularly in receivers where pre-amplifier losses degrade the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Each decibel of insertion loss before the low-noise amplifier (LNA) increases the overall noise figure by an equivalent amount, as the attenuated signal encounters the full thermal noise floor of subsequent stages, effectively reducing SNR without amplifying noise contributions proportionally. In filter design, achieving sharper roll-off for improved selectivity—such as in Chebyshev or elliptical configurations—requires higher-order poles or ripples, which inherently elevate insertion loss compared to flatter Butterworth responses; for example, a high-Q cavity filter might trade 1-2 dB additional loss for 20-30 dB better adjacent-channel rejection. A practical illustrates these effects in networks, where insertion loss accumulates across lines, dividers, and shifters to distribute signals to elements. In a typical phased-array radar feed, or segments might contribute 0.5-1 per meter, compounded by 0.5-2 from dividers, leading to total losses of 3-6 that necessitate compensatory gain stages to maintain accuracy and sensitivity. Similarly, in multi-stage —common in transceivers—passive interstage matching networks add cumulative losses; a three-stage with 0.5 per matching section results in 1.5 total degradation, which can be mitigated by integrating low-loss GaAs-based components to preserve overall gain flatness. The evolution of insertion loss management in has progressed from the era, where bulky interstage transformers and tube grids imposed losses exceeding 3-5 per stage due to mismatches and parasitic capacitances, to modern integrated circuits (). The advent of (GaAs) monolithic microwave integrated circuits (MMICs) in the 1970s-1980s enabled sub-1 losses in compact amplifiers and switches by leveraging higher and reduced parasitics compared to , facilitating low-noise front-ends with overall chain losses under 2 . This shift has been pivotal in applications like satellite communications, where GaAs MMICs significantly reduced system losses relative to tube-based designs.

Optics

In optical systems, insertion loss refers to the reduction in when a device or component is inserted into the signal path, primarily arising from imperfections in connections and material properties. In optic links, significant contributions come from splices, connectors, and couplers. splices between single-mode fibers typically exhibit insertion losses of less than 0.1 when performed with high-precision fusion splicers, minimizing misalignment and core-cladding . For connectors, such as the /PC type commonly used in , typical insertion losses range from 0.1 to 0.3 per connection due to factors like air gaps and polishing imperfections, with standards aiming for a maximum of 0.3 to ensure reliable performance. Optical couplers, used for power splitting in networks, introduce higher losses; for instance, a 50:50 2x2 fused biconic taper coupler has a theoretical splitting loss of 3 plus excess loss of 0.2-0.5 , resulting in total insertion losses around 3.5-4 . Additionally, the inherent , quantified by the coefficient α in /km, represents distributed insertion loss over length; for standard single-mode (ITU-T ), α is approximately 0.35 /km at 1310 and 0.25 /km at 1550 , dominated by and residual OH absorption. In photonic integrated devices, insertion loss is a critical parameter affecting overall system efficiency, particularly in modulators, switches, and multiplexers. Electro-optic modulators, such as those based on , typically suffer 3-6 of insertion loss from waveguide propagation, electrode-induced absorption, and inefficiencies, with advanced thin-film designs reducing this to around 5 while maintaining high-speed . Photonic switches, including silicon-based Mach-Zehnder interferometer types, exhibit insertion losses of 1-4 depending on the switching and level, where losses stem from phase shifter bending and mode mismatch. For multiplexers, such as arrayed gratings (AWGs) in (WDM) systems, insertion losses range from 3-7 , influenced by star coupler inefficiencies and channel , though cascaded designs can achieve sub-1 losses in optimized platforms. As of 2024, engineering of () waveguides has reduced propagation losses to 0.5 /m, enabling further minimization of insertion loss in photonic integrated circuits. The wavelength dependence of insertion loss in optical systems arises from both scattering and absorption mechanisms, with silica-based components showing lower overall losses in the near-infrared compared to the . , proportional to 1/λ⁴, causes higher in visible wavelengths (e.g., ~10-50 dB/km at 650 for multimode fibers), while near-IR operation at 1550 benefits from reduced scattering alongside low material , enabling long-haul transmission with α < 0.2 dB/km. However, in the mid-infrared beyond 2 μm, intrinsic from Si-O vibrations increases losses significantly, exceeding 1 dB/km, limiting applications to specialized or chalcogenide fibers. Measurement of insertion loss in links often employs adaptations of general techniques, with optical time-domain reflectometry (OTDR) providing distributed profiling along the fiber length. OTDR launches short pulses and analyzes backscattered light to identify and quantify discrete loss events, such as splices (typically resolving <0.1 changes) or connectors (0.2-0.5 jumps), offering a of meters over tens of kilometers without disrupting the link. This method complements end-to-end power meter testing by localizing faults, though it requires bidirectional measurements to correct for gain/loss asymmetries in long spans.

Scattering Parameters

Scattering parameters, or , provide a framework for characterizing the behavior of linear electrical networks at high frequencies by relating incident and reflected voltage waves at the . In a , the forward S_{21} is defined as the ratio of the outgoing wave at port 2 (b_2) to the incident wave at port 1 (a_1), with port 2 terminated in the impedance such that the incident wave at port 2 (a_2) is zero: S_{21} = b_2 / a_1. This coefficient quantifies the transmitted signal, encompassing both magnitude (indicating or ) and shift. The insertion loss (IL) in decibels is directly derived from S_{21} as IL = -20 \log_{10} |S_{21}|, assuming matched terminations at both ports. This relation stems from the power-normalized definition of the waves, where the incident power is proportional to |a_1|^2 and the transmitted power to |b_2|^2; thus, the power transmission ratio is |S_{21}|^2, and the insertion loss, defined as the negative logarithm of the power ratio P_{\text{out}} / P_{\text{in}}, simplifies to IL = -10 \log_{10} |S_{21}|^2 = -20 \log_{10} |S_{21}|. The phase of S_{21}, denoted \arg(S_{21}), represents the insertion , which accounts for delays and is crucial for analyzing in systems. In theory, S-parameters model insertion loss through the scattering matrix \mathbf{S} = \begin{bmatrix} S_{11} & S_{12} \\ S_{21} & S_{22} \end{bmatrix}, where the full response is \begin{bmatrix} b_1 \\ b_2 \end{bmatrix} = \mathbf{S} \begin{bmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \end{bmatrix}. For reciprocal networks, which satisfy the Lorentz reciprocity theorem (common in passive, linear, isotropic media without magnetic fields or gyrotropic elements), the matrix is symmetric such that S_{12} = S_{21}, ensuring symmetric and enabling bidirectional of loss. This reciprocity simplifies modeling, as the forward insertion loss equals the reverse. S-parameters offer advantages in analyzing insertion loss, particularly in systems deviating from the standard 50 Ω reference impedance, as they can be generalized to arbitrary characteristic impedances Z_0 by redefining the wave normalizations, facilitating characterization of mismatched or multi-impedance environments. Additionally, the reflection coefficients (e.g., S_{11}) derived from S-parameters enable visualization for , which indirectly minimizes insertion loss by reducing reflections that contribute to overall power dissipation. S-parameters are typically obtained using vector network analyzers as part of calibration-corrected measurements.

Comparisons

Insertion loss is distinct from , as the former quantifies the reduction in signal power transmitted through a device or component (typically expressed via the magnitude of the S21 scattering parameter), while measures the power reflected back due to impedance mismatches (defined as RL = -20 log₁₀ |S₁₁|). In RF and systems, insertion loss focuses on forward efficiency, whereas assesses reflection at the input port, helping to evaluate how well a component matches the system's . Unlike , which represents the inherent power loss due to material , , or other fundamental properties of a under matched conditions, insertion loss encompasses both these intrinsic losses and additional effects introduced by the device itself, such as connector mismatches or structural discontinuities. For instance, in a , might be 0.5 /m from and losses alone, but inserting a could add 2 of insertion loss due to its internal design. In optical contexts, excess loss refers to the additional power loss in a component beyond expected from ideal or splitting ratios, whereas insertion loss includes this excess along with all other reductions. For example, in a optic coupler designed for a 50:50 split, the minimum insertion loss might be 3 per output, but excess loss from misalignment could add 0.5 or more. Insertion loss is primarily used for the overall performance of active or passive devices in a system, such as filters or amplifiers, while is employed to characterize the properties of the medium itself, like waveguides or , independent of added components. guides to minimize reflections, and excess loss in aids in optimizing component fabrication for minimal unintended losses.

References

  1. [1]
    Insertion Loss - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Insertion loss is defined as the ratio of power delivered to a load with an inserted network compared to the power delivered without the network, ...
  2. [2]
    Insertion Loss - Microwave Encyclopedia
    The definition of insertion loss allows a passive network to have negative loss. Think about a matching network: if you had a transistor connected to 50 ohms, ...
  3. [3]
    Insertion Loss – optical power, fiber connector, splice - RP Photonics
    Insertion losses are power losses due to insertion of a device. They often need to be minimized for achieving high performance and high power efficiency.<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Insertion Loss Definition, Formula, Causes, Troubleshooting | Fluke
    Aug 25, 2021 · Insertion loss is the amount of energy that a signal loses as it travels along a cable link. It is a natural phenomenon that occurs for any type ...
  5. [5]
    What is Insertion Loss? - everything RF
    Feb 19, 2019 · This loss that occurs while a signal is traveling through a component or system is called as Insertion Loss. It is measured in decibels (dB).
  6. [6]
    Oral-History:Alfred Fettweis
    Jan 26, 2021 · Fettweis used insertion loss method five years before its perfection at Bell Labs and argues that Germany pioneered insertion loss technique ...
  7. [7]
    Two-Port vs. One-Port Handheld Insertion Loss Measurements
    Jul 24, 2025 · This loss, also known as attenuation, is a natural effect caused by resistance, dielectric absorption, and imperfections in the cable or ...
  8. [8]
    Insertion Loss vs. Return Loss: Signal Transmission and Reflection
    Mar 17, 2022 · The loss of signal, which occurs along the length of a fiber optic link, is called insertion loss. This particular measurement parameter is ...
  9. [9]
    S-Parameter Insertion Loss in the Development of Microwave Circuits
    Insertion loss describes the ratio between input power and transmitted power. In this article, we will take a closer look at insertion loss and its role in ...
  10. [10]
    Dielectric Loss - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Conductor losses increase at a square root of frequency, while dielectric losses increase linearly, making dielectric loss the primary concern.
  11. [11]
    Lossy Transmission Lines: Introduction to the Skin Effect
    Jul 19, 2023 · This article introduces high-frequency conductor losses in transmission lines caused by a phenomenon known as the skin effect.
  12. [12]
    Losses in PCB Transmission Lines - Sierra Circuits
    If the roughness hz is larger than the skin depth (which will be the case at very high frequencies), this will cause additional conductor losses. We ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Minimizing Signal Transmission Loss in High-Frequency Circuits
    Aug 21, 2020 · Two phenomena that directly impact insertion loss due to the “skin effect” are the degree of copper roughness (Figure 1) and the nature of ...
  14. [14]
    How to measure cable loss | Rohde & Schwarz
    Learn about RF cable loss measurement. Understand S11 measurement, S21 measurement and the steps of measuring cable loss with VNA.
  15. [15]
    Guidelines On What Loss To Expect When Testing Fiber Optic Cables
    To be able to judge whether a fiber optic cable plant is good, one does a insertion loss test with a light source and power meter and compares that to an ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Understanding VNA Calibration - anlage 'at' .umd.edu
    The process involves performance of a calibration check after the VNA is calibrated and requires the use of Anritsu airlines and 20-dB return loss terminations ...
  17. [17]
    Test-Fixture De-Embedding 101 | 2017-06-16 | Signal Integrity Journal
    Jun 28, 2017 · Two primary sources of error in de-embedding are poor measurements, and standards that are different from the DUT fixture.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] A Method for Improving High-Insertion-Loss Measurements with a ...
    We present a method for improving high-insertion- loss measurements with a calibrated vector network analyzer.
  19. [19]
    Temperature impacts your Insertion Loss measurement
    As temperature increases, you can expect the Insertion Loss of your link to increase too. Failing to take this into account in your design may result in ...
  20. [20]
    Cascade Analysis Calculator (Active / Passive) - Qorvo
    Cascade Analysis Calculator (Active / Passive). Enter gain, noise figure, P1dB, and IP3 to calculate cascaded system performance.
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Insertion Loss Calculator - ToolDone
    Insertion loss in decibels is calculated as: IL(dB) = 10 × log₁₀(Pin/Pout) ... The total system insertion loss is the sum of individual component losses.
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Noise Figure and Receiver Sensitivity Explained: Practical RF ...
    Sep 4, 2025 · Passive components like mixers and switches do not generally generate significant additive noise, but they degrade SNR due to insertion loss. In ...
  25. [25]
    Noise Figure Concepts—Power Gain, Lossy Components, and ...
    May 15, 2023 · Learn about the RF noise figure (NF), its power gain, lossy components, and cascaded systems. The concept of noise factor is reasonably intuitive.
  26. [26]
    [PDF] CHAPTER 8 ANALOG FILTERS
    Analog filters are networks that process signals frequency-dependently. Types include low-pass, high-pass, band-pass, and band-reject (notch) filters.
  27. [27]
    Understanding the Key Trade-Offs in RF Filters - Q Microwave
    Jan 9, 2025 · In this article, we look at how filter engineers work around your constraints and what the parameters are for the best trade-off.
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    Antenna Feed System Design | 6 Components Guide
    Jun 16, 2025 · Above 18 GHz, semirigid coax suffers insertion loss exceeding 1 dB/m—making rectangular or elliptical waveguide mandatory for anything beyond 3- ...
  30. [30]
    History of MMICs - Microwave Encyclopedia
    Click here to go to our main microwaves history page. On this page we will collect information on the evolution of MMICs. Why? Because we love this stuff!
  31. [31]
    [PDF] GaAs MMIC Reliability Assurance Guideline forSpace Applications
    Dec 15, 1996 · The guide begins with an introduction of GaAs usage and brief summary of MMIC development history. This is followed by a reliability overview ...
  32. [32]
    Recalling Early GaAs MMIC Developments | Microwaves & RF
    Mar 18, 2009 · Insertion loss was less than 0.7 dB while isolation was 18 dB. The LNA subassembly was made from two cascaded GaAs MMIC LNAs. These LNAs had an ...Missing: historical tubes
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Single Fiber Fusion Splicing - Corning
    Insertion loss, defined as the loss in optical power at a joint between identical fibers, typically is 0.2 dB for mechanical multimode splices. Since single- ...
  34. [34]
    Single Mode FC/PC Fiber Optic Patch Cables - Thorlabs
    Please note a 1 dB loss is expected when coupling an SM1950 fiber patch cable to an SM2000 cable, compared to the typical connector to connector loss of 0.3 dB.<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    F-CPL-B12355-FCUPC Optical Fiber Coupler - Newport
    Free delivery 30-day returnsTechnical Specs ; Coupling Ratio. 50%/50% ; Fiber Connector. FC/UPC ; Operating Wavelength. 1310/1550 nm ; Maximum Insertion Loss. 3.6 dB ; Return Loss. 55 dB.
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    Low Vpp, ultralow-energy, compact, high-speed silicon electro-optic ...
    Nov 24, 2009 · At a wavelength of 1551.84 nm, we achieve a modulation depth of 6.5 dB and an insertion loss of 2 dB, which are values comparable to typical ...
  38. [38]
    Silicon photonic flat-top WDM (de)multiplexer based on cascaded ...
    The measurement results show insertion loss lower than 0.9 dB, channel crosstalk lower than -20.6 dB, and 1-dB bandwidth of 2.3 nm. It is believed that the ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  39. [39]
    Optical Fiber Loss and Attenuation - Fosco Connect
    For a given fiber, these losses are wavelength-dependent which is shown in the figure below. The value of the attenuation factor depends greatly on the fiber ...
  40. [40]
    The FOA Reference For Fiber Optics - OTDRs
    OTDRs should not be used for measuring insertion loss in the fiber optic cable - that task is better left to a fiber optic test source and power meter. OTDRs ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] measure-otdr-return-and-insertion-loss-single-port-characterize ...
    The reference step enables the power meters for both units to measure the optical power PTx emitted by the laser of the other unit minored by the IL of the two ...
  42. [42]
    None
    ### Summary of S-Parameters (S21 as Transmission Coefficient) for Two-Port Reciprocal Networks
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Introduction to Network Analyzer Measurements - ni
    Scalar analyzers make transmission or insertion loss measurements by using a signal source that sweeps repetitively over the frequency range of interest. If ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] S-parameters
    S-parameters are four parameters for a two-port device. S1 and S2 are forward/reverse reflection coefficients, and S3 and S4 are forward/reverse gains.
  45. [45]
    None
    ### Summary of Insertion Loss, Attenuation, and Return Loss from the Document