Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis

The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH) is an ecological theory that posits species diversity within a community reaches its maximum at intermediate levels of disturbance, where disturbances are frequent enough to prevent competitive exclusion by dominant species but not so intense or frequent as to eliminate less resilient species.^[1] This hypothesis explains how nonequilibrium conditions, driven by periodic disruptions such as storms, fires, or herbivory, maintain high biodiversity in otherwise stable ecosystems by creating opportunities for multiple species to coexist through varying resource availability and regeneration niches.^[1] Proposed by ecologist Joseph H. Connell in 1978, the IDH was originally developed to account for the exceptionally high species richness observed in tropical rain forests and coral reefs, where natural disturbances recurrently reset succession without allowing communities to reach a low-diversity climax state dominated by superior competitors.^[1] Under low disturbance regimes, a few highly competitive species would outcompete others, reducing diversity; conversely, extreme disturbances would favor only highly resistant or opportunistic species, also lowering overall richness.^[2] At intermediate levels, the hypothesis predicts a unimodal (hump-shaped) relationship between disturbance frequency or intensity and diversity, as moderate disruptions promote patch dynamics that allow subordinate species to persist and recolonize.^[3] The IDH has been influential across diverse ecosystems, including forests, grasslands, and marine environments, influencing models of community assembly, succession, and conservation strategies that aim to mimic natural disturbance patterns to enhance biodiversity.^[2] While empirical tests have yielded mixed results—with support in classic studies of rocky intertidal communities but weaker or non-unimodal patterns in many others—the hypothesis remains a foundational framework for understanding how disturbance regimes shape ecological diversity.^[4]^[3]

Core Concepts

Definition

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) posits that local species diversity in ecological communities is maximized under conditions of moderate disturbance frequency and/or intensity, resulting in a unimodal relationship where diversity peaks at intermediate disturbance levels and declines toward both low and high extremes. This hypothesis suggests that disturbances prevent the dominance of highly competitive species while avoiding widespread extinctions, thereby maintaining a balance that supports coexistence among multiple species. In ecology, disturbance refers to any relatively discrete event that disrupts the structure of an ecosystem, community, or population by altering resources, substrate availability, or the physical environment, such as fires, storms, or herbivory. Species diversity, the central metric in the IDH, encompasses both species richness—the number of different species present—and species evenness—the relative abundance distribution among those species—providing a comprehensive measure of community complexity.^[5] The conceptual foundation of the IDH is often illustrated by a unimodal curve, graphically depicting species diversity on the y-axis against a gradient of disturbance intensity or frequency on the x-axis, with the peak representing optimal intermediate conditions for diversity. At low disturbance levels, competitive exclusion occurs, where superior competitors outcompete and eliminate less competitive species, reducing diversity over time. Conversely, at high disturbance levels, frequent or intense events increase extinction risks by preventing species from establishing or recovering, again lowering diversity.

Key Principles

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) rests on the foundational assumption that ecological communities operate under nonequilibrium dynamics, where disturbances prevent systems from reaching a stable equilibrium that would otherwise favor competitive exclusion and reduce diversity. In this view, ecosystems are perpetually disrupted, creating transient opportunities for species recruitment and coexistence; for instance, disturbances open "recruitment windows" that allow subordinate or early-successional species to establish before superior competitors dominate, akin to lottery-like processes in patchy environments.^[1]^[7] This nonequilibrium state is essential for maintaining high local diversity, as prolonged stability would lead to monodominance by a few K-selected species adapted to low-disturbance conditions.^[1] A core principle of the IDH is the role of heterogeneity generated by intermediate disturbances, which produce spatial and temporal patchiness in habitats, thereby fostering niches for fugitive species—those that persist by rapidly colonizing disturbed patches—and rare specialists that cannot compete in uniform, mature communities. This patchiness arises from disturbances of moderate frequency and intensity, which reset succession in localized areas without homogenizing the entire habitat, allowing a mosaic of successional stages to coexist and support a broader array of species.^[1]^[7] As a result, intermediate regimes enhance beta diversity within local areas by preventing any single community structure from prevailing.^[7] The hypothesis also emphasizes trade-offs across disturbance regimes, where species exhibit varying life-history strategies that determine their success under different conditions. At low disturbance levels, K-selected species—characterized by slow growth, high competitive ability, and adaptation to stable environments—outcompete others, resulting in low diversity dominated by a few superior competitors. In contrast, high disturbance favors r-selected species, which prioritize rapid reproduction and colonization but lack competitive prowess in stable settings, often leading to communities composed solely of disturbance-tolerant opportunists. Intermediate disturbances strike a balance, permitting coexistence between r- and K-strategists by periodically clearing space for colonizers while allowing competitors time to establish, thus maximizing species richness.^[1]^[8] Finally, the IDH is scalable primarily at local levels, such as within habitat patches or small areas like a single hectare of forest, where disturbance effects on succession and recruitment are directly observable; it does not extend reliably to regional or global scales, where broader gradients like climate or dispersal may override local dynamics.^[1]^[9] This focus on patch-scale processes underscores the hypothesis's emphasis on fine-grained ecological interactions rather than landscape-wide patterns.^[9]

Historical Development

Origins

The roots of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) lie in early 20th-century ecological concepts that shifted focus from static climax communities to dynamic, individualistic responses of species to environmental variability. Henry Allan Gleason's 1926 individualistic concept portrayed plant communities as chance assemblages of species each responding independently to fluctuating conditions, challenging the prevailing Clementsian view of communities as integrated superorganisms progressing toward a stable climax. Similarly, Robert H. Whittaker's 1956 gradient analysis emphasized continuous variation in species composition along environmental gradients, highlighting how spatial and temporal heterogeneity, including disturbances, maintains diversity rather than equilibrium stability. These ideas laid foundational groundwork for viewing ecological systems as nonequilibrium entities influenced by ongoing perturbations.^[10] The hypothesis was formally articulated by Joseph H. Connell in his seminal 1978 paper, "Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs," published in Science.^[1] Drawing from field observations in tropical ecosystems, Connell proposed that species diversity peaks under intermediate levels of disturbance frequency and intensity, as such conditions prevent competitive exclusion while allowing opportunistic species to persist. His motivations stemmed from empirical patterns in disturbed coral reefs and rainforests, where high diversity contrasted sharply with low-diversity outcomes in either undisturbed (competitive dominance) or highly disturbed (extinction-prone) systems.^[1] Upon publication, the IDH gained rapid traction in the late 1970s and 1980s as a heuristic framework for interpreting nonequilibrium diversity patterns, amid broader debates on factors regulating community structure.^[11] Ecologists embraced it for explaining coexistence in variable environments, though initial tests focused on qualitative support rather than rigorous quantification.^[11]

Key Formulations and Influences

Following the initial proposal by Connell in 1978, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) underwent significant refinements in subsequent publications that integrated it with broader ecological frameworks. In 1979, J.P. Grime extended the concept in his book Plant Strategies and the Dynamics of Vegetation, positing that disturbance interacts with productivity gradients to influence plant community structure and diversity; at intermediate disturbance levels, conditions favor a balance between competitive, stress-tolerant, and ruderal strategies, preventing dominance by any single group and maximizing species richness.^[12] This linkage emphasized how disturbances alter resource availability, thereby modulating competition along environmental gradients. Michael A. Huston's 1994 book further formalized the IDH by incorporating temporal scales of disturbance and recovery, arguing that species diversity peaks when the time between disturbances allows partial community recovery without full competitive exclusion; this dynamic equilibrium model highlights trade-offs between colonization rates and competitive abilities across varying disturbance intervals.^[13] Huston's synthesis provided a quantitative foundation for predicting diversity patterns in changing landscapes, influencing subsequent theoretical developments.^[14] The IDH also gained interdisciplinary traction, integrating with metacommunity theory by the late 1990s and early 2000s; building on Richard Levins' 1970 metapopulation models, which described patch occupancy and extinction-colonization dynamics, researchers like Holyoak et al. (2005) incorporated intermediate disturbances as drivers of spatial heterogeneity, where moderate patch turnover promotes regional coexistence through dispersal-tradeoff mechanisms. Similarly, in landscape ecology during the 1990s, the hypothesis was applied to spatial disturbance regimes, as seen in studies testing IDH across coral reef mosaics, revealing how intermediate-scale disturbances enhance beta diversity by creating habitat patchiness.^[15] Early mathematical models bolstered these refinements; in the 1980s, Robert A. Armstrong and Richard McGehee extended Lotka-Volterra competition equations to include periodic disturbances, showing that intermediate disturbance frequencies disrupt stable equilibria, allowing transient coexistence beyond strict exclusion principles by exploiting nonlinear dynamics and temporal niches.^[16] These simulations demonstrated thresholds where low disturbances permit exclusion and high ones prevent establishment, but intermediate regimes sustain multiple species.^[17] By the 2000s, the IDH achieved global adoption in conservation biology, informing strategies for managing disturbance-prone habitats like forests and grasslands; citation analyses indicate peaks in disturbance ecology literature during this period, reflecting its role in guiding restoration practices that mimic intermediate regimes to enhance biodiversity resilience.^[18] This widespread influence underscored the hypothesis's utility in applied ecology.

Theoretical Mechanisms

Disturbance Dynamics

Disturbances in the context of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) are classified into abiotic and biotic categories, as well as discrete (pulse) and chronic (press) types. Abiotic disturbances, such as fires and floods, arise from non-living environmental forces that disrupt community structure, while biotic disturbances, including herbivory and disease, stem from interactions with living organisms that alter resource availability or population dynamics.^[19]^[20] Discrete disturbances occur as short-term events, like storms that rapidly remove biomass in localized areas, whereas chronic disturbances persist over longer periods, such as ongoing grazing that continuously suppresses dominant vegetation.^[21]^[22] This classification highlights how disturbances vary in origin and temporal pattern, influencing their role in maintaining community diversity under IDH.^[23] Key parameters defining disturbances include frequency (measured as return interval), intensity (severity of biomass or population reduction), and scale (spatial extent affected). Intermediate levels are context-dependent, often calibrated relative to species life histories; for instance, disturbances at frequencies scaled relative to species generation times allow partial recovery without full dominance by superior competitors.^[24]^[25] Frequency quantifies how often events recur, with intermediate rates preventing both stagnation and constant upheaval; intensity assesses the magnitude of impact, where moderate severity creates opportunities for subordinate species; and scale determines the patch size affected, balancing local resets against regional persistence.^[26]^[27] These parameters are measured through field monitoring of event recurrence, biomass loss metrics, and affected area delineation, ensuring applicability across ecosystems.^[28] The dynamic effects of intermediate disturbances involve the creation of successional mosaics, where heterogeneous patches at varying recovery stages arise due to asynchronous resets across the landscape. This patchiness disrupts uniform succession, preventing the full competitive exclusion of less dominant species by superior ones that would otherwise monopolize resources in undisturbed conditions.^[29]^[30] By maintaining a spatial and temporal variability in community states, these dynamics foster coexistence, aligning with the unimodal diversity-disturbance relationship central to IDH.^[31] Conceptual models integrating IDH with neutral theory, such as those building on Hubbell's 2001 unified neutral theory of biodiversity, posit that disturbances modulate dispersal from a metacommunity and elevate local extinction rates, thereby regulating species turnover without relying on niche differences.^[32] In this framework, intermediate disturbance frequencies balance extinction risk with immigration, sustaining diversity through stochastic processes rather than deterministic competition. This integration extends IDH by emphasizing demographic equivalence among species, where disturbance acts as a homogenizing force that counters local drift toward monodominance.^[33]

Diversity Generation Processes

Disturbances under the intermediate disturbance hypothesis create recruitment windows by opening patches of unoccupied space in otherwise competitive environments, enabling colonization through propagule rain from surrounding areas. These gaps favor species with high dispersal capabilities but lower competitive abilities, as they provide temporary refuges from exclusion by dominant residents. In sessile communities like coral reefs or forests, such openings allow larvae or seeds to settle without immediate suppression, thereby introducing variability in species composition and preventing monocultures.^[1] Successional trade-offs further contribute to diversity maintenance, where early-successional r-strategists, characterized by rapid growth and reproduction, initially dominate post-disturbance patches due to their colonization advantages. Over time, these yield to late-successional K-strategists, which excel in resource competition and shade tolerance but are slower to disperse. Intermediate disturbance regimes repeatedly reset succession before K-strategists fully exclude r-strategists, sustaining a mosaic of age classes and functional types that supports coexistence. This dynamic balances the inherent trade-off between dispersal and competitive prowess, ensuring neither strategy prevails indefinitely.^[1]^[34] Within Chesson's framework of coexistence mechanisms, the storage effect plays a key role in intermediate disturbance scenarios by amplifying fluctuating selection pressures that allow rare species to persist. Disturbances act as fluctuating mortality factors, creating periods of reduced competition that enable low-density species to recover through buffered life stages, such as seeds or dormant propagules. This mechanism stabilizes populations against environmental variability, as species-specific responses to disturbance timing enhance invasion growth rates for rarer taxa during favorable windows. Ongoing formulations since 1985 emphasize how such amplified fluctuations promote long-term diversity without requiring spatial patchiness alone.^[35] The patch dynamics model, influenced by Levin and Paine, formalizes these processes by describing patch age distributions under stochastic, Poisson-distributed disturbances. In this framework, the density of patches of age a follows an exponential decay modulated by disturbance rate \lambda. At intermediate \lambda, the resulting heterogeneous age mosaic maximizes species variety, as short-lived patches support colonizers while longer-lived ones accommodate competitors, aligning with empirical patterns in intertidal and terrestrial systems.

Empirical Evidence

Terrestrial Examples

Empirical evidence for the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) in terrestrial ecosystems is prominently demonstrated in forest systems, where disturbances such as treefalls and fires create opportunities for species coexistence. In tropical rainforests, Joseph H. Connell's seminal work analyzed tree diversity patterns and found that species richness peaks at intermediate rates of treefall disturbances, which generate canopy gaps that prevent competitive exclusion by dominant species while allowing recruitment of subordinate ones.^[1] These gaps, occurring at moderate frequencies, maintain high tree diversity by balancing successional processes, as observed in Queensland's rainforests where intermediate gap formation correlated with elevated species richness compared to undisturbed or highly disturbed areas.^[1] In temperate forests of North America, fire regimes provide further support for IDH, particularly during the 1990s when studies highlighted how intermediate fire frequencies enhance understory and overall plant diversity. For instance, analyses of fire history in mixed-conifer forests showed that moderate burn intervals (around 20-50 years) maximize species richness by reducing fuel loads without eliminating fire-adapted species, contrasting with low-diversity outcomes from infrequent severe fires or frequent low-intensity burns. Michael Huston's 1994 synthesis of disturbance dynamics in these ecosystems emphasized that intermediate fire disturbances promote heterogeneity, fostering coexistence among tree and herbaceous species across landscapes. Grassland and savanna ecosystems also align with IDH through grazing disturbances, where moderate herbivory levels can optimize plant diversity. In African savannas, including the Serengeti, studies have shown that moderate grazing by large herbivores suppresses dominant grasses, creating opportunities for forbs and annuals, consistent with unimodal diversity patterns under intermediate intensities. Meta-analyses of grazing studies across global grasslands confirm that moderate stocking rates often yield higher diversity compared to ungrazed or heavily grazed conditions. This pattern holds because intermediate grazing disrupts competitive hierarchies without exceeding regeneration thresholds, as evidenced in Serengeti studies where moderate herbivory supported diverse graminoid-forb assemblages. Recent validations in managed European forests extend IDH to anthropogenic influences like browsing. A 2025 study on roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) populations in production forests tested IDH and found hump-shaped responses in faunal diversity (e.g., spiders, birds) peaking at intermediate deer densities, with browsing maintaining understory structure that indirectly supports biodiversity, aligning with IDH predictions.^[36] This supports broader application of IDH in human-modified landscapes, where managed browsing mimics natural disturbances to sustain biodiversity, though results vary across taxa. Quantitative meta-analyses underscore the prevalence of unimodal patterns in terrestrial IDH tests, though with mixed support in some systems. A 2012 review of 160 studies across ecosystems reported that species richness exhibited hump-shaped responses to disturbance in the majority of cases, providing empirical backing for IDH's core prediction in forests, grasslands, and other land-based habitats.^[37]

Aquatic and Marine Examples

In coral reefs, empirical support for the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) stems from foundational observations in tropical systems, where disturbances such as cyclones and predation prevent competitive exclusion and sustain high species diversity at intermediate frequencies. Joseph Connell's 1978 analysis of Great Barrier Reef corals demonstrated that infrequent severe cyclones, occurring roughly every 10–50 years, create space for recruitment while allowing partial recovery, resulting in peak coral diversity compared to areas with either too-frequent disruptions (favoring early successional species) or prolonged stability (dominated by competitive exclusions). Predation by crown-of-thorns starfish further acts as a pulsed disturbance, selectively removing dominant corals and maintaining coexistence among diverse taxa, including over 300 scleractinian species in non-equilibrium states.^[1] In rocky intertidal zones, IDH has been tested through studies of physical and biological disturbances, showing that moderate wave action and predation intensities maximize algal and invertebrate diversity. Robert Paine's pioneering work on keystone predation by the sea star Pisaster ochraceus in Washington State intertidal communities revealed that selective predation on mussels (Mytilus californianus) prevents monocultures, sustaining higher diversity of understory species like algae, barnacles, and chitons at intermediate predator densities. This biological disturbance complements physical wave impacts, which at moderate levels dislodge dominant space occupiers without fully resetting communities, leading to peak species richness in mid-zonation bands; experimental removals confirmed diversity drops under low or high disturbance regimes. Freshwater systems, particularly riverine floodplains, provide evidence for IDH through seasonal hydrological pulses that enhance fish and plant richness at moderate scales. In the Amazon Basin, the flood pulse concept, articulated by Junk, Bayley, and Sparks in 1989, describes how intermediate flooding durations (typically 4–7 months annually) inundate floodplains, creating heterogeneous habitats that boost connectivity and resource availability without excessive scour; this supports over 2,000 fish species and diverse aquatic plants by favoring generalist and specialist taxa during moderate events, as opposed to rare extreme floods or stable low-water periods that reduce richness. 1990s field studies in central Amazon varzea forests extended this, quantifying how moderate flood extents correlate with peak alpha diversity in fish assemblages, including migratory characins and cichlids, through enhanced spawning and foraging opportunities.^[38] Recent evidence from 2020s marine studies reinforces IDH amid climate stressors, linking intermediate bleaching and storm events to resilient diversity recovery in Pacific coral reefs. A 2023 modeling and field-calibrated study on Pacific reefs found that moderate-frequency bleaching disturbances, combined with wave fluctuations, promote coral biodiversity by altering population size structures and enabling coexistence of morphologies like branching and massive forms; intermediate events (e.g., every 5–10 years) allow recovery to higher diversity states, contrasting with frequent acidification-driven bleaching that erodes resilience or rare events that permit dominance by stress-tolerant species.^[39] Global coral reef status reports indicate variable recovery post-storms, with some reefs rebounding through enhanced recruitment after moderate disturbances, though overall trends show declines under intensifying climate pressures. Empirical tests of IDH in aquatic systems yield mixed results, with strong support in intertidal and reef contexts but context-dependent outcomes in freshwater under changing regimes.

Criticisms and Alternatives

Major Critiques

One major critique of the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) is its lack of universality, as empirical evidence frequently reveals linear, negative, or no relationships between disturbance and species diversity rather than the predicted unimodal pattern. A comprehensive review of over 100 published studies found that fewer than 20% supported the humped relationship central to IDH, with many instead showing context-dependent outcomes where factors like productivity gradients dominate diversity patterns.^[40] For instance, in systems with high productivity, competitive exclusion may suppress diversity regardless of disturbance level, overriding the hypothesized intermediate peak.^[37] This variability underscores IDH's failure to hold across diverse ecosystems, challenging its status as a general principle.^[40] Another significant issue is definitional ambiguity, which hampers rigorous testing and leads to post-hoc rationalizations of data. The concepts of "intermediate" disturbance frequency, intensity, and scale remain vaguely defined, allowing researchers to retroactively classify disturbances as intermediate to fit observed diversity peaks, thus undermining falsifiability.^[40] Critics have highlighted how IDH often conflates disturbance with environmental stress, blurring distinctions between discrete events (e.g., fires) and chronic pressures (e.g., nutrient limitation), which logically contradicts the hypothesis's mechanisms of coexistence.^[40] Such inconsistencies make it difficult to standardize metrics across studies, contributing to inconsistent empirical support.^[37] Scale dependency further weakens IDH, as patterns observed at local scales often fail to scale up to regional or landscape levels, particularly in beta-diversity metrics. While local alpha-diversity may exhibit unimodal responses in some cases, regional analyses reveal that disturbance regimes influence turnover and nestedness differently, diluting the predicted peak.^[41] A 2021 review of disturbance ecology emphasized that many studies suffer from the "n=1 problem," where single disturbance events (e.g., one wildfire or flood) limit replication and generalization, exacerbating scale mismatches between local observations and broader predictions.^[41] Finally, experimental limitations plague IDH validation, with most evidence derived from observational data prone to biases like legacy effects from prior disturbances that confound causality. Few manipulative experiments exist to isolate disturbance intensity, as natural systems rarely allow controlled replication, and artificial disturbances (e.g., simulated grazing) often fail to mimic ecological complexity.^[41] These constraints result in correlative rather than causal inferences, leaving IDH vulnerable to alternative explanations for diversity patterns.^[40] The Dynamic Equilibrium Model (DEM), originally formulated by Huston, predicts that species diversity peaks at intermediate combinations of disturbance frequency and resource productivity, where moderate disturbance rates slow competitive exclusion while allowing sufficient colonization to maintain coexistence.^[42] This model integrates productivity gradients with disturbance, contrasting with the Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH) by emphasizing equilibrium dynamics driven by resource availability rather than disturbance alone. Sheil and Burslem extended these ideas in defense of Connell's original IDH, arguing that continuous small-scale disturbances, such as treefalls in forests, sustain diversity through ongoing recruitment opportunities, differing from IDH's focus on episodic, large-scale perturbations that reset community succession.^[43] The Stress-Gradient Hypothesis (SGH), proposed by Bertness and Callaway, posits that interactions among plants shift from predominantly competitive to facilitative as abiotic stress intensifies, with disturbances often amplifying stress to favor mutualistic outcomes over rivalry.^[44] Unlike IDH, which centers on disturbance frequency modulating diversity via coexistence trade-offs, SGH highlights how stress-disturbance synergies alter interaction strengths, promoting diversity in harsh environments through positive feedbacks like neighbor amelioration of extremes. This framework has been applied to predict shifts in community assembly, where facilitation dominates under combined disturbance and stress, such as in arid or saline habitats. The Janzen-Connell Hypothesis attributes high tropical plant diversity to host-specific natural enemies, including predators and pathogens, that impose density- and distance-dependent mortality on seeds and seedlings near parent trees, thereby regulating population densities and preventing monopoly by common species. Originally articulated by Janzen and independently by Connell, this mechanism functions as a biological disturbance that overlaps with IDH in fostering diversity through negative density dependence but diverges by stressing species-specific enemy effects rather than uniform disturbance impacts across communities. Empirical support includes elevated seedling survival with distance from conspecific adults, underscoring its role in spatial patterning of recruitment.^[45] Modern metacommunity frameworks integrate IDH with dispersal processes, demonstrating how connectivity among habitat patches can rescue local populations from disturbance-induced extinctions, thereby stabilizing regional diversity beyond isolated patch dynamics. For instance, recent models show that intermediate dispersal rates, combined with niche differentiation, amplify diversity peaks under varying disturbance regimes by countering local extirpations and promoting source-sink dynamics.^[46]

References

[1]
Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs - Science
Diversity in Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs: High diversity of trees ... ConnellAuthors Info & Affiliations. Science. 24 Mar 1978. Vol 199, Issue ...
[2]
THE INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS: PATCH ...
Feb 1, 2004 · The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) has been used for several decades as an explanation for the coexistence of species in ecological communities.
[3]
Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis in Ecology: A Literature Review
May 14, 2020 · The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) suggests that the peak of species diversity occurs at intermediate-scale disturbances.
[4]
Characterizing Communities | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
Species richness is simply the number of species in a community. Species diversity is more complex, and includes a measure of the number of species in a ...
[5]
https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/characterizing-communities-13241173/
[6]
https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5B2378:DIOCRI%5D2.0.CO;2
[7]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2013.07.006
[8]
[PDF] Chapter 2 - Space and Time in Ecology: Noise or Fundamental Driver?
These results are explained by the “intermediate disturbance hypothesis”. (Connell 1978). ... Gleason H (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant ...
[9]
Figure Set 1: Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis
In this study, Wayne Sousa tested the intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposed by Connell (1978). In the 70's and 80's ecologists hotly debated factors ...
[10]
Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species - Michael A. Huston
Sep 15, 1994 · In this book, existing theories on diversity are synthesised into a logical framework. Global and landscape-scale patterns of biodiversity are described in the ...Missing: DOI | Show results with:DOI
[11]
M.A. Huston Biological diversity. The coexistence of species on ...
M.A. Huston Biological diversity. The coexistence of species on changing landscapes, xix, 681 p. Cambridge University Press, 1994. Price £60.00.
[12]
Landscape patterns of reef coral diversity: a test of the intermediate ...
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis predicts that species diversity within habitats will be maximal at intermediate levels of disturbance, ...
[13]
Competitive Exclusion | The American Naturalist: Vol 115, No 2
We conclude that the competitive exclusion principle applies in general only to coexistence at fixed densities.
[14]
[PDF] Competitive Exclusion - Robert A. Armstrong, Richard McGehee
Aug 19, 2002 · STOR. Competitive Exclusion. Robert A. Armstrong, Richard McGehee. American Naturalist, Volume 115, Issue 2 (Feb., 1980), 151-170. Stable URL ...
[15]
Trends in ecology and conservation over eight decades - Anderson
Apr 1, 2021 · Yet the intermediate disturbance hypothesis itself peaked in the early 2000s, perhaps due to later critiques (Figure 3e; Fox 2013). Population ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[16]
Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis - an overview
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis is defined as the idea that disturbances can enhance biodiversity by creating varied habitats, where moderate levels ...
[17]
Disturbance theory for ecosystem ecologists: A primer - PMC
May 30, 2024 · Intermediate disturbance hypothesis, Community ecology, Moderate intensity disturbances may increase species diversity by augmenting or ...
[18]
A theory of pulse dynamics and disturbance in ecology - ESA Journals
Apr 24, 2019 · We propose four postulates as the minimum set of logical propositions necessary for a theory of pulse dynamics and disturbance in ecosystems.
[19]
Ecology of Disturbance Interactions | BioScience - Oxford Academic
Sep 16, 2020 · Disturbance denotes a discrete event (Pickett and White 1985) relative to the lifespan of the dominant organisms (Peters et al. 2011), which ...
[20]
Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology ...
Disturbances are often inferred to be synonymous with pulse events, perturbations, threats, and/or stressors, and thus, the concept of disturbance encapsulates ...
[21]
[PDF] The intermediate disturbance hypothesis and plant invasions
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) predicts a hump-shaped pattern between community diversity and disturbance, central to understanding species ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
[PDF] Coexistence Mechanisms Under Intermediate Disturbance Regimes
One famous hypothesis of diversity maintenance under disturbance is the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH). ... non- equilibrium community dynamics ...
[23]
How frequency and intensity shape diversity–disturbance relationships
For example, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis proposes that diversity will be highest at intermediate levels of disturbance. Although peaked (hump-shaped) ...
[24]
Diversity–disturbance relationships: frequency and intensity interact
May 23, 2012 · An influential ecological theory, the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH), predicts that intermediate levels of disturbance will maximize ...Missing: key parameters
[25]
Introduction: Defining and interpreting ecological disturbances
Within the field of ecology, disturbance can be defined as a physical force, agent, or process, either abiotic or biotic, causing a perturbation or stress, to ...
[26]
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis and plant invasions
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) predicts a hump-shaped pattern between community diversity and disturbance, and is central to understanding ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
THE INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS: PATCH ...
Feb 1, 2004 · The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) has been used for several decades as an explanation for the coexistence of species in ecological communities.
[28]
[PDF] THE 'INTERMEDIATE DISTURBANCE HYPOTHESIS' OF SPECIES ...
- disturbance must be frequent enough so that competitive exclusion does not occur over the whole area, yet not so frequent that most species are eliminated ...
[29]
Disturbance and change in biodiversity - PMC - NIH
The word disturbance is often used to refer to causes of disturbances. In contrast, here I focus on the actual changes that occur regardless of their source, as ...
[30]
Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of ...
Mar 15, 2005 · Much has been written about the unified neutral theory (UNT) since my book appeared (Hubbell 2001), some of it critical, and there have been ...Introduction · Competition and the classical... · The hypothesis of functional...
[31]
The Strengths of r- and K-Selection Shape Diversity-Disturbance ...
Apr 24, 2014 · The level of disturbance is one of many factors that shape patterns of plant species diversity [1]. The Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis (IDH) ...
[32]
Coexistence in Disturbance‐Prone Communities: How a Resistance ...
Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) is multifaceted, and different mechanisms can provide for coexistence under this conceptual rubric (Roxburgh ...The Spatial Storage Effect · Model Formulation · Model Analysis
[33]
Grazing effects on vegetation dynamics in the savannah ecosystems ...
Nov 17, 2023 · The intermediate disturbance hypothesis suggests that species diversity is expected to be highest at intermediate levels of disturbance and ...
[34]
Testing the intermediate-disturbance hypothesis – managed roe ...
Oct 2, 2025 · The effects of deer on ecosystems can be expected to follow the intermediate-disturbance hypothesis (IDH), whereby there is a positive influence ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[35]
Disturbance–diversity models: what do they really predict and how ...
Feb 1, 2012 · The intermediate disturbance hypothesis (IDH) and the dynamic equilibrium model (DEM) are influential theories in ecology.
[36]
Biotic Indicators for Ecological State Change in Amazonian ...
Jun 22, 2022 · This occurs because flood-generated disturbance keeps floodplain ecosystems at an intermediate point between early and late successional stages.
[37]
Disturbance-Induced Changes in Population Size Structure Promote ...
Aug 6, 2025 · ... intermediate disturbance hypothesis ... Coral reefs are increasingly subjected to major disturbances threatening the health of marine ecosystems.
[38]
[PDF] Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2020
Increases in the frequency of disturbances to Pacific coral reefs may have changed long-term disturbance-recovery patterns to a point that many reefs are not ...
[39]
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned
I argue that the IDH has been refuted on both empirical and theoretical grounds, and so should be abandoned. Empirical studies only rarely find the predicted ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[40]
Disturbance ecology and the problem of n = 1: A proposed ...
Aug 12, 2021 · Essentially, f is the frequency of disturbances per unit time, where units of time are set to a generation time or time to reproductive maturity ...
[41]
[PDF] A GENERAL HYPOTHESIS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY
The dynamic equilibrium model may explain at least part of the temperate- tropical increase in tree diversity, since reduced soil nutrients and increased ...<|separator|>
[42]
Defining and defending Connell's intermediate disturbance hypothesis
This outcome of diversity can be explained by the intermediate disturbance hypothesis of Connell (1978) predicts higher diversity in areas with an intermediate ...
[43]
(PDF) Positive Interactions in Communities - ResearchGate
Aug 5, 2025 · Consistent with the stress gradient hypothesis (Bertness & Callaway, 1994; Callaway et al., 2002), positive interspecific interactions are ...
[44]
Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta ...
Jun 23, 2014 · The Janzen–Connell hypothesis proposes that specialist natural enemies, such as herbivores and pathogens, maintain diversity in plant ...Summary · Introduction · Materials and methods · Discussion