Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Jilu


Jīlū, commonly known as , was a semi-autonomous and tribal entity of Nestorian s in the Hakkari mountains of southeastern , comprising around 14 villages and 555 families in the late . Inhabiting rugged terrain that fostered martial self-reliance, the Jilu maintained distinct customs and limited independence from central authority, often navigating alliances and conflicts with neighboring groups. During , Jilu fighters resisted and assaults amid the massacres targeting Christian minorities, resulting in heavy casualties and the flight of survivors—estimated among 40,000 Hakkari s—to Persian Urmia, marking the end of their ancestral presence and contributing to the global . Leaders like Qambar exemplified their defensive prowess, later aiding Allied efforts before exile. The 's ancient churches, such as those of St. George and St. Māri, underscore its longstanding Christian heritage amid a landscape now largely depopulated of its communities.

Geography

Location and Boundaries

Jīlū was a historical in the Hakkari region of southeastern , part of upper Mesopotamia's mountainous terrain. It formed one of the semi-autonomous tribal territories, governed by hereditary maliks under nominal suzerainty until the early . The district's core lay within what is now Hakkari Province, proximate to the borders with to the south and to the east. Geographically, Jīlū's boundaries were delineated by prominent mountain ranges forming a triangular convergence, encompassing rugged valleys and highland plateaus suitable for fortified villages. It neighbored the Assyrian districts of Baz to the north, Gawar (corresponding to Yüksekova plain) to the east, and to the southwest. These natural barriers, including branches of the Hakkari mountain chains, isolated Jīlū while facilitating connectivity via passes to adjacent tribal areas and trade routes toward the plain in Persia. The district included multiple villages along watercourses such as the Jīlū River, with settlements typically perched at elevations exceeding 1,600 meters to leverage defensive topography against incursions. Post-1915 demographic upheavals and border reconfigurations integrated former Jīlū lands into Turkey's Yüksekova subdistrict, though historical extents retained cultural significance for dispersed communities.

Terrain and Natural Features

The Jilu district, situated in the Hakkari region of southeastern , features rugged, high-altitude mountainous terrain as part of the eastern extension. This landscape is dominated by the Cilo Dağ, reaching 4,170 meters, and Sat Dağ at 3,810 meters, contributing to Hakkari's status as one of Turkey's most elevated and isolated provinces. The area encompasses steep slopes, narrow valleys, and exposed highlands that historically limited accessibility and fostered insular communities. Natural features include dramatic glacial valleys carved by ancient ice flows, jagged peaks, and high plateaus suitable for seasonal . Pristine lakes, such as those in the Sat Gölleri system, dot the upper elevations, fed by meltwater from persistent snowfields and supporting limited adapted to harsh conditions. The terrain's severity, with elevations often exceeding 2,000 meters, has shaped local , including sparse vegetation of hardy shrubs and grasses on slopes, interspersed with coniferous forests in lower valleys. These features form part of the , highlighting the region's geological dynamism from tectonic uplift and .

Demographics and Ethnic Composition

Pre-1915 Population Dynamics

Prior to 1915, the Jilu district in the Hakkari mountains of southeastern was predominantly inhabited by Assyrian Christians of the , organized into tribal structures under local maliks (chieftains). The broader Hakkari region, encompassing Jilu alongside districts like and Baz, supported an estimated 50,000 Assyrian Christians in the late , forming a significant portion of the area's Christian population amid a larger majority. These Assyrians, known as the Jilu tribe, resided primarily in highland villages sustained by , including and cultivation, and pastoral herding, which underpinned demographic stability despite the rugged terrain limiting large-scale settlement expansion. Population composition reflected ethnic and religious homogeneity among the majority, with a small minority often living in proximity or under Assyrian tribal oversight in certain locales. Early 20th-century surveys of the Hakkari sub-districts, such as Gulamarj Qada, recorded around 41,000 Assyrians across 4,855 households, indicating household sizes averaging 8-10 individuals and suggesting Jilu's share aligned with this pattern given its status as a core tribal enclave. Dynamics included minimal net , as tribal and patriarchal inheritance preserved community cohesion, though occasional conversions—such as a group of 40 Jilu youth to Catholicism around , later reversed due to external funding shortfalls—highlighted minor religious shifts influenced by missionary activities. Intermittent pressures from taxation, nest-of-tribes autonomy under Mar Shimun XIX, and sporadic incursions shaped subtle fluctuations, with some villages experiencing temporary depopulation from feuds but recovering through internal resilience rather than influxes. Overall, pre-1915 demographics evinced gradual growth tied to improved -era security post-1840s massacres, fostering a warrior-farmer that sustained numbers without or significant displacement until the onset of .

Inter-Ethnic Relations and Conflicts

The , inhabiting the Hakkari mountains, maintained predominantly adversarial relations with neighboring , marked by recurrent feuds over livestock theft, territorial disputes, and religious tensions between Christian Nestorians and Muslim . This tense coexistence persisted under rule, where Assyrians enjoyed limited patriarchal autonomy but faced periodic raids and subjugation attempts by Kurdish emirs seeking dominance in the region. In the mid-19th century, broader -Kurdish conflicts escalated with the campaigns of Bedr Khan Beg of , who in 1843–1846 orchestrated massacres against communities in Hakkari, including areas adjacent to Jilu, resulting in thousands of deaths and enslavements as asserted control over Christian populations. Although Jilu's semi-independent status and migratory practices—such as seasonal labor in the and —afforded some buffer, the tribe remained vulnerable to spillover violence and economic predation from groups. During , inter-ethnic hostilities culminated in the of 1915, when forces, bolstered by militias like the Barzan tribe, systematically targeted Jilu settlements for plunder and extermination. Jilu tribesmen mounted fierce resistance, with leaders organizing defenses against Turkish troops and raiders, destroying the ancient Mar Zaya in the process. Survivors fled as refugees, receiving aid from forces amid the collapse of their homeland. These events underscored the causal role of policies in exacerbating tribal animosities, prioritizing ethnic homogenization over prior fragile equilibria.

Religion

Adherence to the Church of the East

The Jilu tribe, inhabiting the mountainous district of Jīlū in Hakkari, adhered exclusively to the , following its East Syriac liturgical tradition and dyophysite Christology as defined against the in 431. This adherence positioned them within the broader community of mountain Nestorians, who preserved the church's autonomy under patriarchal authority amid regional isolation and Kurdish dominance. The Jilu recognized the Catholicos-Patriarch of the , with the patriarchate relocating to the Hakkari highlands by the late 17th century, fostering close ecclesiastical ties. Religious life in Jīlū integrated tribal structures with governance, where maliks (tribal leaders) often coordinated with metropolitan bishops to enforce doctrinal purity and resist external missionary pressures from Protestant and Catholic groups in the . Practices emphasized liturgy, fasting cycles, and veneration of saints like Mar Zaia, whose namesake symbolized enduring fidelity to apostolic traditions originating in . This fidelity persisted despite geopolitical upheavals, with Jīlū villages supporting over a dozen parishes that maintained icons, manuscripts, and rituals distinct from neighboring or communities. The Church of the East's influence reinforced Jilu and cultural insularity, limiting conversions and intermarriages with non-adherents, thereby sustaining a homogeneous until the early 20th-century genocidal events disrupted communal . Historical records note the destruction of Jīlū churches during conflicts, yet survivors upheld portable altars and oral transmissions of hymns, evidencing resilient doctrinal commitment.

Key Religious Sites and Practices

The Church of St. George in Be-Biyya functioned as a principal religious site for Jilu's population, hosting communal worship and veneration of St. George, a saint prominent in East traditions. Similarly, the ruins of the ancient church of St. Māri in Sāt village preserve evidence of early Christian in the district, likely used for liturgies and baptisms prior to the 20th century. These structures underscore the integration of religious centers within Jilu's tribal villages, where churches often doubled as community fortresses amid regional conflicts. Religious practices in Jilu followed the of the , featuring the Qurbana Qadisha (Holy Offering or ) as the core weekly observance, conducted exclusively in Classical with the Anaphora of Addai and , dating to at least the . The seven sacraments—or "mysteries"—formed the sacramental framework: by immersion for infants, immediately following, reserved for baptized members, through auricular confession to priests, restricted to ethnic Assyrians, monastic consecration, and . The diocese of Jilu, under metropolitans such as Mar Zaya Sargis in the early 20th century, administered these rites and enforced doctrinal adherence to , rejecting Ephesine and Chalcedonian formulas while upholding the decisions of the Synod of Beth Lapat (484 CE). Annual feasts, including those for Mar Shimun bar Sabbae (commemorated September 14) and local saints, involved processions, fasting, and almsgiving, often coordinated with tribal maliks to maintain communal cohesion. , though diminished by the 19th century, persisted in hermitages near key sites, emphasizing ascetic prayer and scriptural exegesis in .

History

Early Origins and Church of the East Establishment (5th-14th Centuries)

Historical records concerning the early origins of in the Jilu district of Hakkari remain limited due to the area's rugged terrain and historical instability, which hindered systematic documentation and archaeological exploration. The broader Hakkari region, however, functioned as a longstanding refuge and cradle for Christian communities affiliated with the , spanning nearly fifteen centuries from the early Christian era. The emerged in the as the East Syriac branch of Christianity, organizing under the of Seleucia-Ctesiphon following the in 431, where it upheld a dyophysite emphasizing the distinct human and divine natures of Christ, leading to its separation from the imperial churches of the . This ecclesiastical body expanded within the , establishing dioceses across and Persia, with missionary activities reaching as far as by the 6th century. In the Hakkari mountains, including areas later known as Jilu, such communities likely formed early outposts amid periodic persecutions, though specific episcopal presence in Jilu itself is not attested until later medieval periods. By the 7th to 14th centuries, under Arab caliphates and subsequent Mongol rule, the Church of the East maintained hierarchical structures with metropolitans overseeing regions encompassing northern Mesopotamia and adjacent highlands. Traditions among Hakkari Assyrians trace significant settlements to migrations from the Mosul plain around 1400, fleeing the invasions of Timur (Tamerlane), who devastated Christian centers in the late 14th century; these refugees bolstered existing Nestorian enclaves in districts like Jilu, solidifying the Church's foothold amid Kurdish tribal dominions. Archaeological remnants, such as ancient church ruins in Jilu villages, suggest continuity of religious sites potentially dating to this formative era, though precise dating remains challenging without extensive excavation. The isolation of Jilu preserved these communities' adherence to East Syriac liturgy and autonomy under tribal maliks aligned with patriarchal authority, resisting assimilation until later Ottoman influences.

15th-Century Destruction and Partial Revival

In the late 14th and early 15th centuries, (Tamerlane), the Turco-Mongol conqueror, conducted devastating campaigns across and Persia, targeting Christian communities affiliated with the , including populations in regions ancestral to the Jilu district. His forces massacred tens of thousands of Christians, with estimates suggesting up to 20 million deaths across his conquests, though specific figures for Assyrian victims remain imprecise due to limited contemporary records. These invasions, peaking around 1393–1404, razed monasteries, churches, and settlements, effectively dismantling the Church of the East's extensive dioceses in urban and lowland areas like the plain, reducing its presence from a major Nestorian branch to scattered remnants confined to remote highlands. The destruction precipitated a mass exodus of surviving Assyrians northward into the Hakkari mountains, where the rugged terrain of districts such as Jilu offered defensive isolation from further raids. Tradition holds that around 1400, Christian refugees from "Assyria" (the Mosul region) repopulated Hakkari, including Jilu, fleeing Timur's scorched-earth tactics that combined military conquest with religious zeal against non-Muslims. This migration bolstered highland enclaves, with the Church's patriarchal seat relocating to these valleys, as documented in Syriac chronicles describing the retreat of leaders like amid the chaos. Partial revival in Jilu and adjacent Hakkari areas occurred through the establishment of fortified villages and centers in the , enabling , , and maintenance of Syriac liturgy despite ongoing threats. By mid-century, these communities had stabilized sufficiently to sustain tribal structures under maliks (local princes), though population recovery was limited, with dioceses shrinking to a handful of bishoprics focused on mountain survival rather than expansion. Archaeological remnants, such as ancient foundations in Jilu, attest to this , though many sites were repurposed or abandoned post-invasion, reflecting a shift from lowland prosperity to highland resilience. This era marked the transition of society in the region toward semi-autonomous , setting the stage for later consolidations amid persistent nomadic incursions.

16th-17th Century Tribal Consolidation

Following the destructions of the , the Jīlū community underwent significant tribal consolidation in the 16th and 17th centuries, marked by the revival of structures and the solidification of ashiret (tribal) around key religious centers. By , residents who had fled to in the wake of 1448 raids by Shiʿite Turkic clans under rule returned to rebuild villages, homes, and churches, restoring the Jīlū diocese to functionality under the . The Monastery of Mar Zaia, established circa 427 CE and legendarily protected by a attributed to the Prophet Muhammad, emerged as the focal point of this resurgence, fostering communal cohesion and cultural continuity in the face of prior depopulation. Tribal structures coalesced around the Jәlwé (Jīlū) , with local increasingly vested in maliks (hereditary leaders) who mediated internal disputes and external relations, laying foundations for semi-autonomy that persisted into later centuries. In the early 1600s, a resident oversaw the , while nominal Ottoman was established, evidenced by Jīlū's contribution of 4,000 men to the in —a that underscored military obligations in exchange for tribal self-rule amid the empire's peripheral administration. Tribute payments to the of Hakkari were routine, accompanied by intermittent raids but offset by pragmatic alliances across ethnic lines, enabling demographic recovery and territorial stability. Ecclesiastical realignments further reinforced consolidation, as ' mid-17th-century overtures for union were rebuffed, leading to reaffirmed loyalty to the Nestorian Patriarchate by 1700 under the Shimun line at Qudshanis (Kochanes) in nearby Tkhuma district. This patriarchal seat, relocated to the Hakkari mountains during the –1553, provided spiritual oversight and temporal arbitration for mountain tribes including Jīlū, integrating them into a broader confederative framework while preserving distinct tribal identities against centralization pressures.

19th-Century Challenges and Autonomy

In the 19th century, the Jīlū tribe functioned as one of several semi-autonomous ashirat (tribal confederations) among the mountain-dwelling Assyrians of Hakkari, enabling self-governance through hereditary maliks who oversaw local villages, dispute resolution, and defense. This structure operated under the broader temporal and spiritual authority of the Church of the East patriarch, based in Qudshanis (modern Çölemerik), who coordinated inter-tribal alliances and mediated with external powers, preserving Jīlū's independence from direct Ottoman interference in daily affairs despite nominal imperial suzerainty. Such autonomy facilitated the maintenance of Syriac liturgy, tribal militias armed with matchlock rifles, and customary laws derived from ecclesiastical canons, allowing Jīlū to field several hundred fighters in regional conflicts. Challenges arose primarily from Kurdish tribal encroachments and Ottoman centralization drives, as Jīlū villages paid tribute to dominant aghas until the empire's military campaigns in the 1840s subdued local emirs like of , who had raided settlements across Hakkari, including areas bordering Jīlū. These incursions, peaking in 1843–1846, displaced communities and strained resources, though Jīlū's rugged terrain and fortified positions limited total subjugation, with the tribe retaliating through guerrilla tactics. Post-intervention, valis imposed direct taxation—often 10–20% of harvests—and conscription demands, eroding fiscal independence while introducing administrative oversight via kaymakams, yet the patriarch's influence ensured maliks retained de facto control over internal matters until . European missionary efforts, particularly by the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions from 1833 onward, further complicated cohesion by proselytizing among Nestorians and fostering Protestant converts, though Jīlū largely resisted schism, viewing such influences as threats to patriarchal unity. Inter-tribal skirmishes with neighboring groups like Tiyari over grazing lands and Ottoman-favoritism exacerbated vulnerabilities, prompting occasional alliances under Mar Shimun XIX (r. 1853–1903) to petition for protections, which yielded sporadic exemptions from the reforms but heightened exposure to imperial intrigue. Despite these pressures, Jīlū's estimated 4,000–5,000 inhabitants in the late 1800s sustained agricultural self-sufficiency via terrace farming and , underscoring amid encroaching state authority.

Assyrian Genocide (Seyfo) and Immediate Collapse (Early 20th Century)

In mid-1915, amid the broader known as Seyfo, forces under Governor Haydar Bey, supported by tribal allies, launched coordinated attacks against the Assyrian tribes of the Hakkari mountains, including the Jīlū. A three-pronged commenced in June 1915, targeting Nestorian communities with heavy weaponry to enforce and . The Jīlū tribe, already weakened by the assassination of its ruler—a cousin of Mar Shimun—on the patriarch's orders, abstained from joining the unified resistance mounted by other Hakkari tribes such as and Baz, despite the patriarch's declaration of war against the Ottomans on May 10, 1915. The Jīlū faced encirclement and assaults by Turkish troops and neighboring forces in the summer of 1915, employing outdated rifles in bitter but ultimately futile defense against superior arms. policy, directed by Interior Minister , aimed at permanent expulsion, leading to of villages, churches, and crops, as well as mass tactics that decimated populations; in one Hakkari district, only 17 survivors remained from 40 villages. By September 1915, despite coordinated tribal resistance elsewhere in Hakkari, the Jīlū and surviving Assyrians were driven out, with 20,000 to 35,000 fleeing to Russian-occupied territories in by October. The precipitated the immediate collapse of Jīlū society and in their ancestral highlands. Hakkari was ethnically cleansed of its inhabitants, who became refugees scattered across Persia, the , , and later under protection; promised Russian reinforcements never materialized, exacerbating the rout. Post-war, Turkish forces under Kemal prevented any return, ensuring the irreversible disintegration of tribal structures and the end of Jīlū by the early 1920s, with overall death tolls estimated at 200,000 to 250,000 from massacres, , and . Survivors, including Jīlū fighters documented in 1918 training with forces in , , faced ongoing displacement without homeland restoration.

Post-Genocide Diaspora and Remnants (1920s-Present)

Following the Assyrian Genocide of 1915, survivors from the Jīlū district, numbering in the thousands prior to the massacres, fled en masse across the border into (modern ) to evade and tribal forces. The men of Jīlū had withdrawn to Persian territory earlier in the campaign, joining an estimated 25,000 Hakkari Assyrians who reached by late September 1915, including elements of the patriarchal household. By 1918, Jīlū refugees were documented crossing the Asadabad Pass toward the British-administered refugee camp in , where they received aid amid ongoing hostilities. British forces assisted Jīlū refugees during their displacement, providing logistical support and protection against pursuers, as evidenced by contemporaneous accounts of military escorts for Hakkari evacuees. Post-armistice, attempts by some Hakkari groups, including Jīlū survivors, to resettle in their ancestral were thwarted; Turkish authorities enforced a policy of exclusion, culminating in the 1924–1925 Hakkari expulsion, which displaced remaining Christians from the region into and as unwanted minorities. No viable Jīlū communities persisted in after this, with lands repopulated by Kurdish settlers, rendering the area ethnically cleansed of its indigenous population. In Iraq, Jīlū survivors integrated into northern settlements, such as those in the Barwar and Sapna valleys, under the British Mandate, though exact tribal distinctions blurred amid broader and affiliations. Further upheavals, including the 1933 Simele massacres—which targeted militias and civilians—prompted additional flight, with many relocating to urban centers like or emigrating westward via schemes. By the mid-20th century, Jīlū descendants formed part of the global , settling in Syria's Khabur River villages (established 1933–1934 for Hakkari refugees), , and eventually Western countries including the , , , and Europe, driven by Iraqi Ba'athist persecutions, the 1980–1988 -Iraq War, and the 2014 campaigns. ![British soldier helping Jilu Assyrian refugees][float-right] Today, negligible remnants of Jīlū identity endure in the original Hakkari homeland, with descendants preserving tribal lore primarily through communities; genetic and oral historical continuity links them to pre-genocide villages like Nahra, whose survivors scattered to , , and abroad post-1915. Cultural revival efforts, including documentation of Jīlū fighters' resistance in , underscore resilience amid fragmentation, though no formal autonomous structures have reemerged.

Culture and Traditions

Tribal Structure and Social Organization

The Jīlū tribe constituted one of the principal ashiret (tribal confederations) among the Assyrian communities of the Hakkāri mountains, characterized by semi-autonomous under hereditary maliks (chiefs). These maliks held authority over military defense, , and administrative affairs within their districts, while owing nominal allegiance to the temporal authority of the Patriarch resident at Qudshanis. The tribal structure emphasized martial readiness, with able-bodied men serving as armed retainers to counter raids from neighboring aghas, fostering a society where and village loyalties reinforced the malik's leadership. Social organization within Jīlū revolved around village-based clans, each often led by local headmen or priest-chiefs (malëks) who managed communal resources and religious observances. Tribute in kind—primarily from pastoral herding of sheep and goats, supplemented by limited agriculture—was collected hierarchically and forwarded to the Patriarch, underscoring the intertwined ecclesiastical and secular hierarchies. This system maintained internal cohesion amid external pressures, with the malik coordinating inter-village alliances during conflicts, as evidenced by Jīlū's participation in regional defenses prior to the 20th century. Family units formed the basic social nucleus, with patriarchal inheritance patterns dictating and ownership, while women primarily handled domestic and tasks. Priests wielded significant influence beyond , advising on and mediating feuds, reflecting the Church's pervasive role in daily governance. By the late , Jīlū's estimated population of several thousand sustained this structure through transhumant and trade in animal products, though vulnerability to incursions periodically disrupted stability.

Legends, Oral Histories, and Folklore

Oral histories among the Jīlū Assyrians emphasized the genealogies and exploits of their maliks, or tribal princes, who governed semi-autonomously in the Hakkari mountains. A 1914 ethnographic account documents an oral tracing the origins of the maliks of Greater Jīlū to ancient Christian patriarchs who migrated to the region, establishing fortified strongholds and repelling nomadic incursions through strategic alliances and martial prowess. Similar transmitted narratives for Lesser Jīlū highlight inter-tribal feuds and reconciliations, portraying the maliks as divinely ordained guardians of Nestorian orthodoxy against external threats. These legends, passed down through generations via during communal gatherings and religious feasts, reinforced social cohesion and claims to ancestral lands. They often intertwined historical events, such as 16th-century consolidations under , with hagiographic elements crediting like Mar Shimun for miraculous victories over rivals. also included cautionary tales of , such as oral traditions from villages like Nahra, where locals purportedly incurred a for disrespecting passing by demanding they dismount their horses, leading to the settlement's abandonment. Such stories underscored the perils of in a rugged, contested terrain. Limited written records preserve these traditions, many of which were disrupted by the 1915 Assyrian Genocide and subsequent .

Linguistic and Customary Practices

The Jilu historically spoke the Jilu dialect of Neo-Aramaic, a (NENA) variety indigenous to the Hakkari region's Jilu district in southeastern . This dialect exhibits characteristic NENA features, including —where the subject of transitive verbs in past tenses is marked differently from intransitive subjects—and phonological developments such as the merger of certain Proto-Semitic consonants, as systematically analyzed in Samuel Fox's 1997 grammatical study. The Jilu dialect retained archaic elements, including a rich system of verbal morphology with prefixed preterites and suffixed presents, distinguishing it from surrounding dialects like those of the neighboring Tiyari or Baz tribes. Liturgical (Classical Syriac) supplemented vernacular use in services, fostering bilingualism in religious contexts, while everyday communication emphasized the dialect's oral traditions, including and proverbs. Customary practices among Jilu integrated Christian rituals with tribal social norms, emphasizing community cohesion in their mountainous, semi-autonomous environment. Life-cycle events followed traditions: baptisms involved and shortly after birth, marriages featured communal feasts with ring exchanges and veiling ceremonies to symbolize , and funerals included wakes with lamentations and burials facing eastward in of . Tribal customs reinforced within the Jilu patrilineages to maintain genetic and cultural , often arranged by family elders, alongside practices like ritual hospitality (pahnā)—offering , , and protection to guests—and blood feuds resolved through mediation by patriarchs or bishops. These norms, adapted to pastoral and agrarian life, included seasonal migrations (sayyāra) for , during which portable altars facilitated , and adherence to Church fasts like the Nineveh Fast, observed collectively from 1–3 March (). Post-1915 disrupted some practices, though emigrants preserved dialectal songs and wedding dances in exile communities.

Notable Jīlū Assyrians

Qambar (died after 1933) was the , or tribal chieftain, of the Jīlū s in the early 20th century. As a descendant of prior Jīlū chiefs, he led the tribe during , conducting effective resistance against and forces in the Hakkari . Following the , Qambar participated in Assyrian military formations, including the Assyro-Chaldean established in 1920 under auspices in , where he served as a general and administrator. He was deported alongside Catholicos-Patriarch Shimun XXI Eshai to in 1933 after the .

References

  1. [1]
    The Syrians of Persia and Eastern Turkey - jstor
    Nestorian missionaries were very active in Dailam, Ghilan, and. Moghan ... Jilu .................. I4 villages. 555 families. Baz ................. 7 ...
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Hakkari - Gorgias Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Syriac Heritage
    The men of Jilu had withdrawn to Persia earlier in the year, and in all an estimated 40,000 Assyrians from Hakkari eventually found their way to Urmia. There ...
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    The Assyrians of The Van District
    ... Nestorian. In this church ... During the time of Malik Khalil who followed Malik Mirza, Kurdish tribes attacked Jilu tribes and took 2000 heads of sheep.
  6. [6]
    List of Assyrian Tribes - Encyclopedia.pub
    Dec 2, 2022 · This page features a list of Assyrian clans or tribes historically centered in the Hakkari, Sirnak and Mardin provinces in Turkey and West Azerbaijan Province ...
  7. [7]
    Pictures of Assyrian Villages in Turkey in 1912
    Jan 4, 2025 · The pictures below were originally published on the Assyrian Hakkari and Bohtan Facebook page by Nicholas al-Jeelo, who also identified and ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  8. [8]
    Hakkâri - Turkey: Must-Visit Destinations 2025
    Aug 4, 2024 · Rugged Terrain and Scenic Beauty Hakkâri is characterized by its dramatic mountainous landscape, with peaks such as Cilo and Sat Mountains ...
  9. [9]
    Hakkâri Cilo-Sat Mountains National Park
    The terrain is defined by dramatic glacial valleys, jagged granite spires, highland plateaus, and pristine alpine lakes such as Sat Gölleri, formed by ancient ...
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Assyrians Of The Van District
    The lands of the Assyrians where the tribes live are the tribes of Tyari, Baznayi, Jilwayi,. Diznayi. It is a very mountainous area. The mountains have various ...Missing: boundaries | Show results with:boundaries
  12. [12]
    [PDF] INtRoduCtIoN - Berghahn Books
    late the percentage population loss. Most estimates from the immediate prewar years indicate a total Assyrian population ranging from 500,000 to 600,000 ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ASSYRIANS" KURDS,Al'{O OTTOMANS
    ASSYRIANS, KURDS, AND OTTOMANS and early nineteenth centuries, due largely to its conflicts with several. European empires, Persia, and Arab, Kurdish, and ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The Ottoman Genocide of the Assyrians during World War I
    The Ottoman Empire's widespread persecution of Assyrian civilians during. World War I constituted a form of genocide, the present-day term for an attempt.Missing: Jilu | Show results with:Jilu
  16. [16]
    [PDF] the assyrian church of the east in the twentieth century
    It is a historical fact that after the death of. W.H. Browne in 1910, the ... history and faith of the Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East.<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Jilu | Religion Wiki | Fandom
    All Jilu are of one Jilu tribe, a tribe of the Assyrians within the Ottoman Empire. Famous Jilwayeh. Albert Quryaqus - A founding member of the "Concerned ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Oldest Christian People
    Tribe of Jilu, is one of the lost tribes of Israel. This tribe inhabits the ... The problem will be simplified by the predicted immi¬ gration of the Nestorian ...
  19. [19]
    The Assyrian Church of the East - CNEWA
    Oct 26, 2021 · The Assyrians are not in full communion with any other church. The East Syrian rite of the Assyrian Church appears to have been an independent ...
  20. [20]
    Sacraments - Assyrian Church of the East Diocese of Western Europe
    The Priesthood serves as a vital intermediary between God and humanity, focusing on granting forgiveness, bestowing blessings, and alleviating divine wrath.<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Jilu - Syriaca.org
    Jilu - [ Syriac Not Available ]. URI http://syriaca.org/place/759. Names. Jilu1, 3, 4; Galu2; Jīlū2 ... The Ecclesiastical Organisation of the Church of the East, ...
  22. [22]
    (PDF) Bewildering Beleaguerment: The Problem of Hakkari's ...
    For nearly fifteen centuries, the rugged highlands of Hakkari served as a cradle of Syriac Christianity and a refuge for adherents of the Church of the East ...
  23. [23]
    Church of the East - Jelle Verheij
    In the early Middle ages the Assyrian Church of the East was responsible for spreading Christianity as far as India, China and Mongolia. Around 1400, in the ...Missing: Jilu | Show results with:Jilu
  24. [24]
    † 1369-1400: The Massacres of Timurlane & The Escape to Hakkari
    Aug 17, 2000 · Timur continued to march north and plundered and murdered thousands of Christians on the way. When all was done, the Assyrian Christian empire ...
  25. [25]
    The Church of the East: Two Thousand Years of Martyrdom
    Jan 27, 2016 · During the fifteenth century, the Church of the East's eparchies decreased, becoming limited to Northern Mesopotamia and the Hakkari mountains ...Missing: Jilu 15th
  26. [26]
    Uncovering the Assyrian Genocide: Tragedy and Resilience - acsya
    Aug 6, 2025 · It is estimated that 250,000 - 400,000 Assyrians were killed, estimating at almost half of the Assyrian population were affected. (16). Jean ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The Beggar Chiefs of St. Zaia Nestorian 'Great Deceivers' in South ...
    750 CE -1258 CE), the Church of the East was able to carve out a productive niche in northern Iraq. During this period, Jīlū and immediate surrounds supported ...
  28. [28]
    The Assyrian Genocide of 1915 - seyfo center
    Apr 18, 2009 · ... Jilu tribe, thus alienating them. In Urmia, probably the region's most economically advanced city, the Assyrians insisted on selecting four ...
  29. [29]
    Eastern Syriacs and the 1924 Hakkari Exile - SyriacPress
    Nov 14, 2020 · In the 16th century, a group of Nestorians separated after the group adopted the Catholic belief and started calling their Church “Chaldean”.
  30. [30]
    The Origins and Development of Assyrian Nationalism
    A modest number had marketable trades, such as weaving and bricklaying, and some, in particular members of the Jilu tribe, were world travelers who returned ...
  31. [31]
    North-Eastern Neo-Aramaic - Glottolog 5.2
    ▻Northern Assyrian Neo-Aramaic · Baz · Dez · Gavar (Aramaic) · Jilu · Qudshanis ... Some Features of the Gaznax Dialect (South-East Turkey), 2015, 17 ...
  32. [32]
    PBase Language Viewer
    Assyrian Neo-Aramaic (Jilu dialect) ; Location, Iraq ; Family, AFRO-ASIATIC (Semitic) ; Reference, Fox, Samuel Ethan (1997) The Neo-Aramaic Dialect of Jilu.
  33. [33]
    Assyrian Rituals of Life-Cycle Events
    The rituals and religious rites that accompany life's milestones -- primarily birth, marriage or death -represent what it means to be Assyrian.
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
    TIL the Assyrian tribal leader Malik Qambar was so effective in war ...
    Mar 14, 2023 · Malik Qambar led the Jilu tribe in Hakkari, Turkey. He was so effective in battle against Ottomans and Kurds that the French invited him to lead their proposed ...
  36. [36]
    Iraq: Building a 'Nation'-State | Edinburgh Scholarship Online - DOI
    Malik Qambar, Jilu. Rayis Yawp Sawkho, Chamba, Upper Tiyari. Rayis Younan, Halmon. Rayis Warda Oshana of Rarwa, Upper Tiyari. Shlimun Zomaya, Gundiktha, Tkhuma.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Malik Qambar | EPFL Graph Search
    Malik Qambar was a descendant of former chiefs of the Assyrian Jilu tribe and he would justify his title as well as his immediate predecessors. In 1769, Malik ...