Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Job Corps


Job Corps is a federally administered residential and vocational training program targeting low-income aged 16 to 24 who face barriers to , such as lack of or skills. Launched on August 20, 1964, through the Economic Opportunity Act signed by President as a component of the , the program operates over 120 centers nationwide, offering tuition-free academic instruction, career technical training in sectors like healthcare and , health services, counseling, and job placement assistance, and has enrolled more than 2 million participants since inception.
The program's core phases include , and vocational skill-building, and transition support, with residential options providing meals, allowances, and structured living to foster ; eligibility demands U.S. or legal residency, low family , absence of disqualifying criminal records, and demonstrated motivation, prioritizing those without high school credentials. Rigorous evaluations, including the Mathematica-conducted National Job Corps Study using of over 11,000 eligible applicants in the late , reveal that participants gain higher —such as increased rates of high school equivalency diplomas—and experience short-term boosts in weekly earnings (about $17 more per week in the first post-program year) and reduced involvement compared to controls, yet long-term earnings impacts largely fade by four years out, with social benefits modestly exceeding program costs of roughly $22,000 per enrollee by an estimated $17,000 in terms, though subsequent analyses question sustained returns for younger or certain subgroups. Defining characteristics include persistent low completion rates—averaging 32% to 38% in recent Department of Labor transparency reports—and operational challenges, such as documented and violations at multiple centers leading to suspensions and scrutiny, alongside criticisms of high aggregate costs exceeding $1.7 billion annually amid debates over causal in addressing root barriers like family instability or behavioral issues, prompting recurrent proposals despite its endurance as a intervention.

Program Fundamentals

Mission and Objectives

Job Corps operates under a mission to and eligible young adults ages 16 through 24, particularly those from low-income backgrounds facing barriers to and , for successful careers in high-demand industries through residential , vocational, and support services. The program, administered by the U.S. Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration, emphasizes no-cost access to comprehensive aimed at improving participants' employability and life outcomes. Key objectives include enabling students to complete high school credentials or equivalents, develop skills for specific trades, and secure initial or placements upon graduation. Additional goals encompass providing transitional support such as job placement assistance, counseling for personal and social development, and fostering responsibility to produce more productive citizens. These objectives target economically disadvantaged youth, with the program designed as an intensive intervention to address skill gaps and barriers like undereducation or .

Eligibility Requirements

Eligibility for Job Corps enrollment is governed by criteria specified in Exhibit 1-1 of the program's Policy and Requirements Handbook, administered by the U.S. Department of Labor. These requirements ensure participants are young individuals facing barriers to education and employment who can benefit from intensive residential training. Admissions counselors verify eligibility sequentially through documentation, interviews, background checks, and assessments of readiness and behavior. Applicants must be 16 to 24 years of age on the enrollment date (arrival at the center or virtual orientation completion), with the upper age limit waived only for those with documented disabilities. Proof includes birth certificates, driver's licenses, or passports. Unemancipated minors under 18 require parental or guardian consent, except for emancipated, married, or court-declared independent youth. Legal residency requires U.S. citizenship, nationality (including naturalized), lawful permanent residency, refugee or asylee status, parole under specified immigration sections, or (DACA) with employment authorization. Residents of U.S. territories are also eligible. Documentation such as passports, green cards, or Employment Authorization Documents is mandatory. Males aged 18 or older must be registered for Selective Service. Low-income status is required, defined as receiving public assistance; family income not exceeding the higher of the poverty line or 70% of the Lower Living Standard Income Level (LLSIL); eligibility for or reduced-price meals; , homeless, or runaway status; or, for disabled applicants, meeting criteria. Victims of are exempt from this requirement. Verification uses pay stubs, tax returns, public assistance letters, or eligibility forms, assessed for the family unit (applicant plus dependents). Applicants must demonstrate at least one barrier to employment or education, such as basic skills deficiency, school dropout status, homelessness, foster care or runaway history, parenthood, need for high school credentials, or trafficking victimization. They must also express intent to obtain a high school diploma or equivalency and career technical training suited to Job Corps. Behavioral and legal criteria exclude those unable to participate in group settings, maintain discipline, or comply with drug- and alcohol-free policies; applicants sign commitments to these standards. Disqualifying convictions include , molestation, or /; background checks are required. Those on or need court or agency approval, and unpaid fines over $500 must be addressed or lead to suspension. Applicants with dependent ren must certify childcare arrangements. Health information release authorization is mandatory.

Operational Structure

Job Corps is administered by the (DOL) through its Employment and Training Administration (ETA), which provides national-level policy direction, funding allocation, and program evaluation. The DOL's Office of Job Corps Acquisition Services (JCAS) specifically handles the and administration of contracts for center operations, as well as , admissions, and transition services, ensuring competitive bidding and compliance with federal contracting standards. At the regional level, Job Corps maintains six offices—Region 1 (), Region 2 (), Region 3 (), Region 4 (), Region 5 (), and Region 6 ()—each led by a regional responsible for overseeing , monitoring performance, and enforcing through designated Contracting Officer's Representatives. These offices coordinate with local centers to address operational issues, conduct audits, and report data to national headquarters, forming a decentralized oversight model that balances with . The core of operations occurs at 123 residential training centers nationwide, where 99 are operated by private entities or nonprofits under fixed-price or cost-reimbursement contracts with the DOL, employing non-federal staff to deliver training, residential services, and support. The remaining 24 are Civilian Conservation Centers (CCCs), federally managed by the on public lands, focusing on conservation work alongside vocational training and retaining federal staffing. All centers adhere to the Policy and Requirements Handbook (PRH), a DOL-issued manual mandating uniform standards for enrollment, curriculum delivery, safety protocols, and performance metrics, with operators required to submit regular reports on enrollee outcomes and facility maintenance. Contractors at non-CCC centers must maintain qualified staff for administrative, instructional, counseling, and roles, often subcontracting specialized services while remaining accountable for overall integrity and controls. This structure supports a primarily residential model, with centers providing on-site , meals, and holistic services, though it has faced scrutiny for high operational —exceeding $1.7 billion annually in recent —and dependency on contractor performance amid reports of inefficiencies. In May 2025, the DOL announced a phased pause of all 99 contractor-operated centers citing financial unsustainability and concerns, but a federal court stay in July 2025 halted closures, preserving the operational framework under ongoing litigation.

Historical Evolution

Founding in the 1960s

Job Corps was established as Title I-B of the , signed into law by President on August 20, 1964, as a key component of his initiative. The program aimed to provide residential vocational training, basic education, and work experience to economically disadvantaged youth aged 16 to 21, targeting those from low-income families in urban and rural areas. Patterned after the of the 1930s, it sought to address youth unemployment and skill gaps through structured centers offering practical skill development and character-building activities. Administered initially by the Office of Economic Opportunity under Director R. Sargent Shriver, Job Corps rapidly expanded with federal funding allocated for center construction and operations. The first center opened on January 15, 1965, at Camp Catoctin, , accommodating 30 students and 14 staff, followed shortly by the first women's center in , . By the end of 1965, over 100 centers were operational nationwide, enrolling tens of thousands of participants in trades such as , , and clerical work, alongside and counseling services. Early implementation emphasized residential programs to remove youth from negative environments, with conservation and urban centers utilizing federal lands and facilities for training in forestry, maintenance, and community service projects. Despite logistical challenges and criticisms over costs—initial per-student expenses exceeding $10,000 annually—the program enrolled more than 80,000 youth by 1966, reflecting ambitious goals to foster self-sufficiency amid broader efforts.

Developments Through the 20th Century

In 1969, administrative responsibility for Job Corps shifted from the Office of Economic Opportunity to the U.S. Department of Labor, enabling a greater emphasis on vocational outcomes and integration with broader labor policies. This transition coincided with operational expansions, including the opening of the first coeducational center at Tongue Point, , in 1970, which broadened access beyond gender-segregated facilities. By the late , enrollment reached approximately 22,000 students with a budget of $342 million under President Carter, reflecting steady growth amid efforts to address in urban and rural areas. The 1980s saw continued program maturation despite fiscal pressures from the Reagan administration's broader spending reductions. Appropriations rose from $560 million in 1980 to $716 million by 1988, supporting infrastructure maintenance and service enhancements. The Job Training Partnership Act of 1982 authorized pilot projects at Job Corps centers to prepare participants for in collaboration with the of , aiming to align with needs. Evaluations during this decade, including nonexperimental analyses, demonstrated positive effects for participants, justifying eligibility from primarily 16- to 21-year-olds to include those up to age 24, thereby targeting a wider cohort of disadvantaged young adults. In the late 1980s, centers began incorporating facilities and single-parent dormitories to accommodate family responsibilities, improving retention for enrollees. Entering the 1990s, Job Corps pursued modernization through the proposed "50-50 Plan," which sought congressional approval to construct 50 new centers by 2000 and expand enrollment to 50,000 students annually, emphasizing long-term capacity building. The Job Training Reform Amendments of 1992 refined federal training frameworks, indirectly bolstering Job Corps by streamlining partnerships with employers and integrating performance metrics. Increased capital investments in the decade funded renovations of aging facilities, addressing maintenance backlogs from prior eras and enhancing residential quality. These developments sustained the program's focus on comprehensive training while adapting to evolving labor market demands, with cumulative participation exceeding 2 million youth by century's end.

21st Century Operations and Reforms

In the early , Job Corps operations maintained its core residential model, serving approximately 50,000 to 60,000 enrollees annually across roughly 100 centers managed primarily by private contractors under Department of Labor oversight. Program funding averaged $1.5 billion to $1.7 billion yearly, with per-enrollee costs exceeding $25,000 due to comprehensive services including vocational training, academic remediation, and residential support. Evaluations from this period, such as the National Job Corps Study by Mathematica Policy Research, revealed modest short-term gains in weekly earnings (about 11% increase four years post-enrollment) and educational credentials, alongside reductions in arrest rates, but highlighted high costs relative to benefits, prompting internal reviews of efficiency. The 2014 enactment of the (WIOA) marked a significant reform, integrating Job Corps into a broader workforce framework with standardized performance metrics to enhance accountability. These included requirements for operators to achieve targets in employment placement (second and fourth quarters post-exit), median earnings, credential attainment, and measurable skill gains, with data-driven consequences like contract non-renewal for persistent underperformance. WIOA also expanded flexibility for centers to tailor training to regional labor demands, emphasizing high-growth sectors like healthcare and , while mandating better coordination with local workforce boards for post-program transitions. Long-term follow-up data from the Mathematica study, extending to 20 years post-enrollment, substantiated program value by demonstrating sustained earnings increases (up to 12% into adulthood) and positive net social benefits, countering earlier critiques of fade-out effects. Operational adjustments in the focused on and , including pilot programs for nonresidential and college-focused models to reduce costs and broaden access, as tested by MDRC evaluations showing improved training completion rates. The Department of Labor implemented data analytics for continuous improvement, such as aligning curricula with employer needs and enhancing behavioral interventions to lower dropout rates (historically around 50%). Despite these reforms, independent assessments noted persistent challenges in cost-effectiveness, with benefit-cost ratios hovering near 1:1 in some analyses, underscoring the need for targeted efficiencies without diluting core youth development services.

Recent Challenges and Shutdown Efforts (2020s)

In April 2025, the U.S. Department of Labor released the Job Corps Transparency Report, which highlighted persistent inefficiencies, including an average graduation rate of approximately 38.6% across centers and costs per graduate nearly three times higher than comparable programs. The report aggregated unmanipulated data on expenditures and outcomes, revealing limited despite annual funding exceeding $1.7 billion, prompting internal reviews of program viability. These fiscal and performance issues culminated in a May 29, 2025, announcement by the Department of Labor to initiate a phased pause in operations at all 99 contractor-operated Job Corps centers nationwide, with closures targeted by June 30, 2025. The decision, under the administration, aimed to address systemic underperformance and redirect resources, as contractor-managed sites accounted for the majority of enrollments but showed weaker metrics in career placement and completion rates compared to federally operated centers. Legal challenges swiftly followed, with lawsuits filed by Job Corps students and advocacy groups alleging inadequate notice and harm to vulnerable youth; a federal judge in , issued a temporary on June 9, 2025, followed by a preliminary on June 25 and additional halts in July, preserving operations pending resolution. The pauses disrupted services for over 21,000 enrollees, with program data indicating 20% faced heightened risk upon , though proponents argued the move would prevent perpetuating a low-yield system. As of mid-2025, the shutdown efforts remained stalled by litigation, but ongoing Department of Labor evaluations emphasized the need for reforms to improve accountability, with no full resumption of expansions planned amid budgetary constraints and evidence of stagnant post-training earnings gains.

Training and Services

Phases of Career Development

The Job Corps Career Development Services System (CDSS) delineates student progression across four sequential phases designed to facilitate skill acquisition, personal growth, and readiness: Outreach and Admissions, Career Preparation Period, Period, and Career Transition Period. This framework, formalized in the program's Policy and Requirements Handbook (PRH), emphasizes individualized planning via tools like the Personal Career Development Plan (PCDP), which tracks short- and long-term goals from through post-program self-sufficiency. In the Outreach and Admissions Phase, program representatives identify and screen potential enrollees aged 16 to 24 who face barriers such as low income, educational deficits, or , prioritizing those without high school diplomas or with involvement. This pre-enrollment stage includes informational sessions, eligibility verification, and initial assessments to align applicants' goals with available training, culminating in assignment to a residential center; direct referrals bypass some steps but maintain standards for participation in subsequent phases. The Career Preparation Period, typically lasting the first 60 days on center, orients new students to center operations, enforces behavioral expectations including zero-tolerance policies, and delivers foundational instruction in career success standards such as workplace skills, , and social competencies. Students undergo academic and vocational assessments, screenings, and initial PCDP development, with formal evaluations every 60 days to gauge readiness for advanced training; this phase aims to foster adjustment and mitigate separation risks, which affect approximately 20-30% of entrants based on historical retention data. During the Career Development Period, comprising the core of on-center training up to three years, students engage in vocational trade instruction, academic remediation toward high school equivalency or postsecondary credits, , and extracurricular activities tailored to their PCDP. Emphasis is placed on achieving industry-recognized credentials, with integrated support for learners and ongoing counseling to address personal barriers; performance metrics include completion rates for planned training, tracked via 60-day re-evaluations. The Career Transition Period shifts focus to post-center outcomes, providing six to twelve months of off-site placement assistance, job search support, and follow-up services to secure , apprenticeships, or . Graduates receive resume building, interview preparation, and connections to employer partners or American Job Centers, with PCDP updates monitoring sustained progress toward self-sufficiency; success is measured by metrics like 80% placement in jobs paying at least within six months.

Career Technical Training Options

Job Corps delivers career technical training through more than 100 specialized programs spanning 10 designated high-growth industry sectors, emphasizing practical, hands-on instruction aligned with labor market demands. These offerings enable students to acquire certifications, such as industry-recognized credentials, preparing them for entry-level positions or further apprenticeships. Training durations vary by program but typically range from several months to up to three years, integrated with academic components for holistic skill development. The core sectors include:
  • Advanced Manufacturing: Focuses on precision machining, , and processes for industrial production roles.
  • Automotive and Machine Repair: Covers vehicle diagnostics, engine repair, diesel mechanics, and heavy equipment operation.
  • Construction: Encompasses , electrical work, , , and site preparation, often linking to pre-apprenticeship pathways.
  • Finance and Business: Includes services, , and business fundamentals.
  • Healthcare: Provides training for certified assistants, medical administrative assistants, and technicians, with entry-level clinical skills.
  • Homeland Security: Targets security officer roles, emergency response, and protective services protocols.
  • Hospitality: Trains in , hotel operations, and food service .
  • Information Technology: Offers certifications in computer systems administration, networking, cybersecurity, and software support, such as A+ or AWS Cloud Practitioner.
  • Renewable Resources and Energy: Specializes in wildland , , and technicians, particularly at civilian conservation centers.
  • Transportation: Involves , , and operations for roles.
Program availability varies by center, with selections approved by the National Office of Job Corps to ensure relevance to regional economies. Students select trades based on aptitude assessments and , aiming for credentials that enhance in competitive fields.

Residential and Support Services

Job Corps centers operate as residential facilities where enrollees, aged 16 to 24, live on-site during their training, typically in separate male and female dormitories with assigned roommates sharing rooms that include basic furnishings such as beds, closets, and sometimes desks. Residential Advisors (RAs) provide 24-hour supervision, monitoring compliance with center rules, conducting dormitory patrols, organizing recreational activities, and assisting with daily maintenance to foster a structured promoting self-management and personal responsibility. Support services encompass comprehensive , including on-site medical, dental, optical, and provisions through walk-in clinics and 24-hour emergency response, with referrals for specialized needs beyond basic coverage. Counseling components feature intensive personal assessments and ongoing sessions within the first 60 days of , addressing planning, behavioral issues, and , supplemented by programs like the Transitional Employment Assistance Program (TEAP) for substance use prevention and treatment. Additional amenities include meals, a living allowance, recreational facilities, and student benefit funds for personal needs, all integrated to support holistic development amid reports of variable dormitory quality at some sites.

Infrastructure and Reach

Center Types and Management

Job Corps centers are categorized into two primary types: contract centers and Civilian Conservation Centers (CCCs). Contract centers, which historically comprised the majority of the program's facilities, are operated by private companies, nonprofits, or educational institutions under cost-reimbursement contracts awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). These centers focus on urban or suburban locations and deliver vocational training in sectors such as healthcare, , and , serving residential students with on-site dormitories and support services. As of May 2025, DOL initiated a phased pause in operations at all contractor-operated centers, with closures completed by June 30, 2025, citing fiscal and performance challenges; this affected approximately 99 such facilities nationwide. In contrast, CCCs consist of 24 residential facilities located on , primarily managed through interagency agreements with the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Service. These centers emphasize work, such as , trail maintenance, and environmental , alongside core Job Corps training, and are situated in rural areas to leverage public lands for hands-on . Unlike contract centers, CCCs are not subject to the same procurement processes and continued operations following the 2025 pause of facilities. Program management falls under DOL's Employment and Training Administration (), which sets policy, allocates funding, and enforces standards via the Policy and Requirements Handbook (PRH). For contract centers, DOL's Job Corps Acquisition Services handles , administration, and performance oversight, requiring operators to meet metrics on enrollment, retention, and outcomes under competitive or sole-source awards. CCC management involves between DOL and partner agencies, with the Forest Service handling day-to-day operations, facility maintenance, and integration of projects into training curricula. All centers must adhere to on , finances, and , though operators face periodic re-competition if performance falls below benchmarks, such as ranking in the lowest 10% of centers for two consecutive years.

Locations and Enrollment Patterns

Job Corps centers are distributed across the , with over 120 campuses operating in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and . These facilities are organized under six regional offices: , , , , , and , facilitating localized administration and recruitment. Of these, 24 are designated as Civilian Conservation Centers, primarily located in rural areas and managed in partnership with the U.S. Forest Service, emphasizing environmental and conservation training alongside vocational skills. The remaining centers include a mix of urban and rural residential sites, as well as limited non-residential options, with operations contracted to private or nonprofit entities under Department of Labor oversight. Enrollment in Job Corps targets disadvantaged youth aged 16 to 24 who face barriers to and , such as low or lack of credentials, with the having served more than 2 million participants since its in 1964. Historical enrollment peaked in the 1970s and 1980s but has trended downward in recent decades, reaching approximately 50,000 enrollees in program year 2017 amid broader federal workforce training shifts. Post-2020, enrollments dropped significantly due to restrictions and operational pauses, with program years 2022 and 2023 marked as transitional periods of recovery and stabilization, though specific annual figures remain below historical norms. Demographic patterns show enrollees predominantly from areas, reflecting recruitment focus on high-poverty regions, though rural centers draw from dispersed populations. Racial and ethnic minorities constitute a of participants, with data from evaluations indicating substantial representation from , , and Native groups, aligned with the program's to address inequities in outcomes. fluctuations correlate with economic cycles and policy emphases, with higher intakes during recessions but persistent challenges in retention and regional .

Fiscal Realities

Funding Sources and Appropriations

Job Corps is funded exclusively through annual discretionary federal appropriations allocated to the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) under the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. These funds support program operations, including student training, residential services, and administrative costs, with appropriations typically divided into categories such as Job Corps Operations (the largest share, covering direct services) and Construction, Rehabilitation, and Acquisition for facilities. Unlike formula-based programs, Job Corps receives no state matching funds or private contributions as core funding sources; it operates as a fully federally financed initiative authorized separately under WIOA Title I Subtitle C. Appropriations have remained relatively stable in recent years at approximately $1.7 billion annually, reflecting congressional resistance to executive branch proposals for cuts or elimination amid debates over program efficacy and costs. The following table summarizes enacted total appropriations for select fiscal years (in millions of dollars), drawn from DOL budget documents and congressional records:
Fiscal YearTotal AppropriationOperations PortionNotes
FY 20201,7441,603Enacted level amid early COVID-19 adjustments.
FY 20211,7491,603Maintained operations despite pandemic disruptions.
FY 20231,712N/ASlight reduction from prior peaks.
FY 20251,7601,606Full-year continuing resolution level.
For FY 2026, the Trump administration's budget request proposed complete elimination of Job Corps funding, citing unsustainable per-participant costs exceeding $100,000 annually and poor outcomes relative to alternatives, with reallocation to other workforce programs. However, Senate Appropriations Committee proposals maintained funding at $1.7 billion, matching FY 2025 levels, while House versions advanced deeper cuts or phase-out provisions, highlighting ongoing partisan divides in sustaining the program. Congressional appropriations ultimately determine final levels, often via continuing resolutions when full bills stall.

Cost Analyses and Deficits

The Job Corps program incurs substantial operational costs, with average expenditures per enrollee amounting to $49,770 in program year 2023. Annual costs per student averaged $80,285 during the same period, reflecting fixed expenses for residential facilities, staff, and training across 99 centers. Costs per graduate were markedly higher, reaching $187,653 under traditional metrics and $155,600 under definitions, with some centers exceeding $500,000 per graduate due to low completion rates averaging 32 percent. Historical evaluations have underscored these elevated costs relative to outcomes. A 1995 Government Accountability Office assessment identified high per-participant expenses amid mixed employment results, recommending scrutiny of national training contracts for cost-effectiveness. An earlier benefit-cost analysis, drawing on 1994–1996 data, estimated societal costs at approximately $14,100–$16,500 per participant (in 1995 dollars), offset by projected benefits including increased earnings and reduced crime, yielding net social gains of about $16,800 per participant over participants' working lives. However, subsequent reviews, including those citing the National Job Corps Study, have questioned whether benefits consistently exceed costs, particularly given persistent low post-separation earnings averaging $16,695 annually in recent data. Fiscal deficits have compounded these challenges, driven by declining post-COVID-19 and inflexible costs. In program year 2024, the program recorded a $140 million shortfall against its roughly $1.7 billion budget, with projections escalating to $213 million in 2025 absent reforms. These imbalances prompted the Department of Labor to initiate phased pauses of center operations in May 2025, aiming to curtail losses by $119 million through reduced staffing and halted admissions, amid broader efforts to address underutilization where fixed costs persist regardless of participation levels.

Empirical Assessments

Major Evaluation Studies

The National Job Corps Study, conducted by Mathematica Policy Research and commissioned by the U.S. Department of Labor starting in 1993, represents the program's most comprehensive evaluation to date, employing a design with over 11,000 eligible applicants assigned to treatment or control groups across 86 centers nationwide. This experimental approach measured impacts on , , earnings, and other outcomes up to 48 months post-random assignment, revealing that participation increased hourly earnings by approximately 12% (or $1,490 annually) in years 3 and 4 for completers, alongside gains in GED attainment (by 16 percentage points) and reduced arrests (by 16%), though no significant short-term earnings boosts occurred in years 1 and 2, and receipt showed minimal change. Benefit-cost analyses from the study estimated program costs at $1.7 per dollar of benefits, factoring in participant and societal returns, with critics noting that these figures hinge on sustained long-term earnings gains that faded in some subgroups. Longer-term follow-ups to the National Job Corps Study, including a 20-year analysis using administrative tax data released in 2019, examined outcomes for the original and found persistent earnings increases of about 11% for older participants (ages 20-24 at enrollment) but negligible or negative effects for younger ones (ages 16-19), alongside reductions in receipt by 40% for the older group; however, these results have faced for potential selection biases in non-experimental extensions and overreliance on tax records that may undercount informal earnings or transfers. Smaller-scale evaluations include the 2017-2019 implementation study of the Cascades Job Corps College and Career Academy pilot in Washington State, which tested an enhanced model integrating college credits and career pathways via random assignment, documenting higher educational attainment but limited employment impacts due to implementation challenges like staffing shortages. An Abt Global evaluation of another innovative pilot similarly used random assignment to assess service receipt and outcomes, finding modest gains in training completion but no robust evidence of broader labor market effects. Recent proposals, such as MDRC's 2024 framework for re-evaluating Job Corps under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, advocate for updated randomized impact studies focused on earnings and program operations, highlighting ongoing needs amid stagnant enrollment and fiscal pressures.

Measured Outcomes and Effectiveness Data

The National Job Corps Study, a conducted by Mathematica Policy Research, found that participants experienced statistically significant positive impacts on and earnings in the short to medium term. Specifically, by the 48th month after , treatment group members earned $18 more per week and worked 1.5 additional hours per week compared to the control group. These effects were accompanied by educational gains, including 3.5 additional hours per week spent on and , and a 23 higher likelihood of obtaining a vocational, technical, or trade certificate. However, longer-term follow-up data from the same study, using administrative records, indicated no sustained impacts on or beyond the fourth year post-random assignment. Benefit-cost analyses based on this estimated that while Job Corps generated some positive returns through increased and reduced , the program's overall benefits did not exceed its costs when for administrative expenses averaging over $20,000 per participant annually during the study period. In program year 2023, Job Corps reported average graduation rates of 32% under traditional metrics and 38% under definitions, with average post-separation annual earnings for graduates at $16,695. The per graduate reached $187,653 under traditional measures and $155,600 under WIOA definitions, reflecting per-enrollee costs of approximately $49,770. A U.S. Department of Labor Office of concluded that Job Corps could not demonstrate beneficial job outcomes, as 94% of sampled placements (306 out of 324) lacked evidence of contractor assistance, with many participants securing independently or returning to pre-enrollment roles. Among audited participants, median annual earnings in 2016 were $12,105, falling below the federal poverty threshold and $14,883 less than the median for comparable non-graduates without high school diplomas. These findings highlight persistent challenges in linking to sustained wage advancement despite short-term certification gains.

Comparative Efficiency

The National Job Corps Study, a conducted by Mathematica Policy Research, provides the primary empirical basis for evaluating program efficiency through benefit-cost analysis. Initial results estimated total societal benefits of $30,977 per participant, including increased earnings ($27,531), reduced ($1,240), and lower use of alternative programs ($2,186), against costs of $14,128, yielding net benefits of $16,849 and a benefit-cost of $2.02. Subsequent long-term follow-ups spanning up to 20 years, however, documented earnings gains fading after four years for most participants, with overall benefits failing to exceed costs except among older enrollees (ages 20-24), for whom net societal returns remained positive due to persistent employment and reduced . Job Corps' per-participant costs, driven by residential operations, averaged $49,770 per enrollee in 2023, escalating to $155,600 per when for duration and separation rates below 40%. This contrasts sharply with non-residential alternatives under the (WIOA), which emphasize shorter-term, community-based training at lower per-participant expenditures (typically under $5,000 annually), though WIOA youth programs similarly yield mixed or negative net benefits from modest earnings impacts. Registered apprenticeships, by comparison, generate estimated societal net benefits of $49,000 per completer through sustained wage premiums and employer contributions, at costs often shared between government and private sectors. Government Accountability Office assessments underscore Job Corps' inefficiencies relative to these benchmarks, citing high operational expenses and inconsistent outcomes that fail to justify the program's scale amid alternatives offering comparable or superior returns on investment for at-risk . Residential features, while intended to address barriers like housing instability, inflate costs without proportional long-term gains for younger cohorts, rendering the program less efficient overall than targeted, non-residential interventions.

Debates and Criticisms

Safety and Violence Incidents

Job Corps centers have documented persistent safety and violence issues, with federal audits revealing thousands of incidents annually involving assaults, , and other criminal acts among students. A 2018 (GAO) analysis of data from July 2016 to June 2017 identified 13,673 safety and security incidents at Job Corps centers, predominantly involving students as perpetrators or victims. Students were victims in 72 percent of reported violent incidents, including assaults, homicides, and sexual assaults occurring both onsite and offsite, according to preliminary GAO observations in 2017. Over the longer period from January 2007 to June 2016, GAO documented nearly 50,000 such incidents across the program. Assaults and constitute significant portions of these reports, with drug infractions often co-occurring. In program year 2023, Job Corps recorded 14,913 serious incident reports, including 1,764 , 372 cases of inappropriate sexual behavior or , and 1,167 breaches of or , contributing to the U.S. Department of Labor's decision to pause center operations in May 2025. A 2017 Department of Labor Office of Inspector General (OIG) review of 11 centers found that operators failed to contact law enforcement for 140 out of 348 potentially serious criminal incidents, representing 40 percent of cases, indicating lapses in adherence. Earlier data from program year 1999 showed 101 alleged incidents of or by students, with 38 percent occurring off-center premises. Multiple OIG and audits have highlighted systemic deficiencies in oversight, such as inadequate prevention of drug entry and inconsistent incident reporting, despite program requirements for immediate notification of significant events like weapons possession or gang-related activities. These findings underscore challenges in maintaining secure environments for the at-risk youth enrolled, who often arrive with histories of or behavioral issues, though program advocates have claimed assault and rates among students are lower than in the general youth population— a contention based on comparative but unverified internal metrics. Despite remedial policies, such as enhanced awareness training introduced in , violence incidents have remained a recurring concern prompting congressional scrutiny and operational reviews.

Policy and Ideological Disputes

The Job Corps program has faced persistent policy disputes in Congress over its funding levels and operational viability, with Republican-led administrations and fiscal conservatives repeatedly proposing cuts or elimination due to documented inefficiencies and high per-participant costs exceeding $100,000 annually without commensurate earnings gains. For instance, the Reagan administration in 1985 sought to terminate the program in its budget, arguing it underperformed compared to private-sector partnership models for job training. Similarly, George W. Bush's budgets in 2002 and 2008 proposed substantial reductions to Job Corps and related training initiatives, prioritizing reallocations to programs deemed more responsive to labor market needs. Ideologically, conservatives, including analysts at , contend that Job Corps exemplifies government overreach in workforce development, crowding out private apprenticeships and market-driven solutions while failing to deliver net economic benefits, as evidenced by randomized evaluations showing minimal long-term employment or income improvements. This perspective aligns with broader skepticism toward federal interventions inherited from Great Society-era initiatives, viewing them as perpetuating dependency rather than fostering self-reliance through incentives for hard work among low-income youth. In contrast, program proponents, often aligned with Democratic priorities, defend Job Corps as a vital mechanism for at-risk populations—particularly and low-income youth comprising nearly half of enrollees—arguing that abrupt defunding ignores long-term societal returns like reduced and , and that criticisms rely on misleading metrics. These tensions culminated in 2025 when the administration's of Labor initiated a phased suspension of contractor-operated centers, citing persistently low graduation rates below 50 percent, escalating violence, and fiscal unsustainability amid a $1.7 billion annual budget. The move drew bipartisan congressional resistance, including from 38 senators led by figures like and , who invoked appropriations laws maintaining $1.76 billion in funding, while civil rights groups filed successful lawsuits halting closures as unconstitutional overreaches. Proponents framed the effort as ideologically driven austerity undermining opportunities for the 16-24 demographic disconnected from and , whereas critics maintained it redirected resources toward proven alternatives like expanded trade schools.

Counterarguments from Proponents

Proponents of Job Corps maintain that the program's rigorous, residential model delivers tangible benefits for its target population of economically disadvantaged youth, many of whom face barriers unmet by standard workforce programs. They cite the National Job Corps Study, a randomized commissioned by the Department of Labor, which documented significant increases in equivalent to an additional year of schooling, including over 20 percentage point gains in GED equivalency and vocational credentials. These outcomes, advocates argue, equip participants with skills that enhance employability and self-sufficiency, countering claims of ineffectiveness by emphasizing the challenges of serving high-risk dropouts. In addressing critiques of limited earnings impacts, supporters highlight subgroup-specific evidence from the same , particularly for older enrollees aged 20-24, who showed sustained annual gains of about $750 in years 5-10 after enrollment and reduced public assistance use by roughly $640 per participant. For this cohort, program benefits exceeded costs by $16,853 per person from a societal viewpoint, including reductions in involvement such as a 16% drop in rates. The National Job Corps Association asserts that such non-wage benefits, like decreased reliance on and incarceration, generate long-term fiscal returns, with estimates of up to $23 saved per dollar invested when compared to the $258,000 lifetime taxpayer cost of an unserved "." Defending against fiscal inefficiency charges, proponents point to performance-based contracting that drives continuous improvement, positioning Job Corps as the most effective dropout recovery initiative. Recent data indicate 75% of nearly 50,000 enrollees transitioned to or , yielding potential net societal benefits of nearly $1 million per program slot over lifetimes, per analyses of opportunity youth costs. On and ideological concerns, advocates argue the structured instills , as reflected in the study's crime reductions, and aligns with merit-based skill development rather than unsubstantiated equity mandates.

Individual Impacts

Notable Alumni

George Foreman, a two-time world heavyweight champion and 1968 Olympic gold medalist, enrolled in Job Corps at age 16 after dropping out of high school, crediting the program with instilling discipline, teaching him to read and write, and redirecting him from a life of in . He graduated from a Job Corps center in in 1967 before pursuing , later building a business empire including the . Charles Bradley (1948–2017), the soul singer dubbed the "Screaming Eagle of Soul" for his raw, James Brown-influenced performances, joined Job Corps as a homeless teenager in , where he trained as a cook and first encountered live music, sparking his lifelong passion that led to albums like (2011). Sergio Gutierrez, Idaho's first judge who served on the Court of Appeals until his retirement, graduated from Job Corps in 1970 after arriving as an undocumented farmworker teen; the program provided his GED and foundational stability, enabling him to earn degrees from and later advocate for at-risk youth as a "Job Corps Hero." MaryAnn Gamble, a specializing in medicine, graduated from Gary Job Corps Center in in 1992 after living in her car; she obtained initial certifications there that supported her path to and a professional career, later returning to inspire students as a program ambassador.

Documented Success Cases

Oballa Oballa, originally from , where he witnessed on December 13, 2003, spent eight years in a Kenyan before arriving in the United States in December 2013 at age 20. Enrolling in the Boxelder Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center, he completed training and earned a Certified Assistant , while serving as Dorm President and leading his dorm to win "Cleanest Dorm of the Month" for three consecutive months. After graduating, Oballa pursued , obtaining an associate's degree in from Riverland and a in Social Work and Psychology from the in March 2021; he also worked 50 hours per week as a nursing assistant and health unit coordinator at the . In November 2020, he was elected to the City Council as the first , immigrant, and of color in that role, and he advocated successfully for the Hunger Free Campus Act, which passed with bipartisan support in May 2019, leading to the establishment of multiple campus food banks. Justin Speight joined the Schenck Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center in May 2019 seeking personal change after youthful challenges, enrolling in the automotive trade program. He graduated in 2020, having participated in classes, served as residential living officer, played on the men's team, and held a , which built his confidence and self-discipline. Post-graduation, Speight was hired as a lube apprentice at Hubert Vester and was promoted to maintenance within his first year, receiving a $3 per hour raise for his dedication. His supervisors noted his strong and rapid skill acquisition, positioning him for further advancement toward owning an automotive business. Maite Olsen enrolled at the Centennial Job Corps center in 2018 at age 17 for facilities maintenance but shifted to wildland training with 8 Hand . She transferred to Trapper Creek Job Corps in January 2022 for advanced Wildland and training, earning qualifications as a sawyer and the for most physically improved by season's end, along with completing an eight-week assignment at the Darby Ranger Station. In March 2023, Olsen was hired by the U.S. Forest Service as a on the Wise River Ranger District of the Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, leveraging Public Lands Corps and Schedule A hiring authorities facilitated by Job Corps staff. She credited the program with providing purpose after feeling lost, enabling her entry into federal wildland fire management.

References

  1. [1]
    Job Corps
    ### Overview of Job Corps
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Job Corps: A Primer | Congress.gov
    Aug 3, 2022 · Job Corps is a comprehensive and primarily residential federal job training program for youth ages 16 to 24 who are low-income and have a barrier to education ...Job Corps Operations · Job Corps Scholars · Findings from the National Job...
  4. [4]
    About | Job Corps
    ### Summary of Job Corps (https://www.jobcorps.gov/about)
  5. [5]
    [PDF] National Job Corps Study and Longer-Term Follow
    How effective is Job Corps overall at improving the outcomes of its participants? Does the program increase educational attainment and literacy?
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The Benefits and Costs of Job Corps - U.S. Department of Labor
    The benefit-cost analysis drew extensively on the impact analysis, and we would like to thank everyone whose efforts made that part of the study successful. We ...
  7. [7]
    National Job Corps Study: The Benefits and Costs of Job Corps
    Jan 1, 2001 · Our findings suggest that Job Corps is a good investment: the benefits to society exceed the costs of the program by nearly $17,000 per ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  8. [8]
    US Department of Labor releases new Job Corps Transparency Report
    ### Summary of Job Corps Transparency Report (PY2023)
  9. [9]
    Job Corps Still Failing Vulnerable Youth on Health and Safety
    May 9, 2017 · Multiple centers failed to ensure compliance with safety and health standards. Another center failed to take the proper steps to address student ...Missing: controversies criticisms
  10. [10]
    Job Corps program that puts students in danger, cost taxpayers $1.7 ...
    May 29, 2025 · Labor Dept to suspend Job Corps centers it says put students in danger, cost taxpayers $1.7B · The graduation rate of the program is just 38.6% ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Job Corps | U.S. Department of Labor
    Job Corps is a no-cost education and vocational training program administered by the U.S. Department of Labor that helps young people ages 16-24 improve the ...
  12. [12]
    Summary of the National Job Corps Study - U.S. Department of Labor
    Jan 1, 2001 · ... program without a high school diploma. The program's goal is to help youths become more responsible, employable, and productive citizens.It ...
  13. [13]
    None
    ### Job Corps Eligibility Requirements Summary
  14. [14]
    Job Corps Acquisition Services - U.S. Department of Labor
    The primary focus of JCAS is to procure and administer complex contracts for Job Corps center operations; outreach, admissions, and career transition services; ...
  15. [15]
    Center Locations - U.S. Department of Labor
    Region 1 - Boston, Region 2 - Philadelphia, Region 3 - Atlanta, Region 4 - Dallas, Region 5 - Chicago, Region 6 - San FranciscoRegion 4 - Dallas · Region 3 - Atlanta · Region 6 - San Francisco · Region 1 - BostonMissing: structure | Show results with:structure
  16. [16]
    [PDF] FY 2025 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION ...
    The language change provides that the funds appropriated for Federal administration of the. Job Corps program shall be available for. Federal obligation through ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Job Corps - U.S. Department of Labor
    The six Regional Offices perform contract oversight and monitoring and each is led by a regional director. Each region has designated staff to serve as ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Federal district court stays DOL's shuttering of 99 private Job Corps ...
    Jul 30, 2025 · There are currently 123 Job Corps centers nationwide. Ninety-nine of them are operated by private entities under contracts with DOL, and 24 ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] JOB CORPS PAUSEFAQs - U.S. Department of Labor
    May 29, 2025 · The Department will provide staff with targeted information and eligibility determination for employment services, access to apprenticeship ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Pages - Welcome to the Job Corps Policy and Requirements ...
    The PRH was developed to provide all mandatory program operation and reporting requirements for contractors operating Job Corps centers and providing enrollment ...The Job Corps ePolicy System · Exhibits - All Documents · PRH Chapter 5 · FormsMissing: operators | Show results with:operators
  21. [21]
    US Department of Labor pauses Job Corps center operations
    May 29, 2025 · “Job Corps was created to help young adults build a pathway to a better life through education, training, and community,” said Secretary Lori ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Connecting Potential With Opportunity: 60 Years of Job Corps
    Aug 14, 2024 · Job Corps makes education and training available to everyone and offers the opportunity to work, promoting and facilitating access to good jobs ...Missing: effectiveness | Show results with:effectiveness
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 508 PUBLIC LAW 88-452-AUG. 20, 1964 Public Law 88-452 - GovInfo
    The Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, also known as Public Law 88-452, aimed to combat poverty by providing opportunities for education, training, and work.Missing: founding | Show results with:founding<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Job Corps - Catoctin Mountain Park (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jul 14, 2025 · President Lyndon B. Johnson proposed the Job Corps as a partial solution to this problem and his War on Poverty. This program, patterned after ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  25. [25]
    [PDF] ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY ACT OF 1964, AS AMENDED ... - GovInfo
    ESTABLISHMENT OF THE JOB CORPS. Sec. 102. There is hereby established within the Office of Economic. Opportunity a “Job Corps”. INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE FOR THE JOB ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Guide to the NPS Job Corps Collection (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jul 12, 2025 · The Job Corps was established on August 20, 1964, as part of ... Although President Johnson wasn't at the dedication, he visited the ...
  27. [27]
    CLEVELAND JOB CORPS | Encyclopedia of Cleveland History
    The Cleveland Job Corps, founded in 1965, was one of over 100 job-training programs created by the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE CREATION OF THE JOB CORPS ...
    Sargent Shriver immediately saw the Job Corps program as a critical part of the War on Poverty and took great interest in its development and implementation.
  29. [29]
    Job Corps - Texas State Historical Association
    Jun 11, 2020 · Following the passage of the Federal Economic Opportunity Act into law on August 20, 1964, the United States Office of Economic Opportunity ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Job Corps - Amazon S3
    Throughout its rich history, Job Corps has removed barriers to employment for young people and helped them to realize their full career goals and personal ...
  31. [31]
    Job Corps Historical Timeline
    1965 The first Job Corps center is inaugurated at Camp Catoctin, Md., with 30 students and 14 staff members. The first women's center opens in Cleveland, Ohio.
  32. [32]
    H.R.5320 - 97th Congress (1981-1982): Job Training Partnership Act
    Authorizes the Secretary to arrange with the Secretary of Defense for pilot projects at Job Corps centers to prepare youth to qualify for military service.
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Employment and Training Programs
    These results support policymakers' decision during the 1980s to expand eligibility for Job Corps to young adults. Nonexperimental Evaluations. Despite the ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
  34. [34]
    Great Society-Era Jobs Program Gets a Boost in 1993
    May 5, 1993 · In the late 1980's, the Job Corps initiated a number of programs, such as child-care centers and single-parent dormitories at some facilities, ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
  35. [35]
    ED338811 - Hearing on the Job Corps 50-50 Plan. Hearing ... - ERIC
    This document reports on a proposal from the Job Corps community that would create 50 new centers around the country by the year 2000 and increase ...
  36. [36]
    H.R.3033 - Job Training Reform Amendments of 1992 - Congress.gov
    Amends the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA) to revise and extend employment and training assistance programs.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] JOB - ERIC
    Over the years, Job Corps has helped to guide more than. 2 million young people to opportunity and success. As a result of its.
  38. [38]
    Does Job Corps Work? Impact Findings from the National Job Corps ...
    This paper presents findings from an experimental evaluation of Job Corps, the nation's largest training program for disadvantaged youths.Missing: MDRC | Show results with:MDRC
  39. [39]
    Evaluation of the Job Corps Program - Mathematica
    Through the Economic Opportunity Act of 1964, Congress established Job Corps, a national vocational and academic training program for disadvantaged youth ages ...Missing: history | Show results with:history<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act - U.S. Department of Labor
    WIOA is designed to help job seekers access employment, education, training, and support services to succeed in the labor market.
  41. [41]
    Topics (CFR Indexing Terms) - Job Corps - Federal Register
    The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) establishes six primary indicators of performance for certain WIOA- authorized programs.
  42. [42]
    Long‐Run Labor Market Effects of the Job Corps Program: Evidence ...
    Jun 10, 2020 · This study is the first to establish that a national program for disconnected youth can produce long-term labor market gains, and can be a positive investment ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] NONRESIDENTIAL COLLEGE-FOCUSED JOB CORPS - MDRC
    The evaluation of that demonstration project showed not only that this model was effective at increasing the amount of education and training students received, ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A Proposed Research and Evaluation Framework for the Job Corps ...
    Sep 28, 2024 · The findings from that impact study could be used to suggest areas for improvement and possible practices that could be scaled. The report notes ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Federal Job Corps Program Winding Down As Report Reveals High ...
    May 30, 2025 · ... Job Corps program's performance and return on investment. The average graduation rate is about 38.6%, according to the report, as cited by ...
  46. [46]
    NJCA's Statement on the Job Corps Transparency Report
    Apr 26, 2025 · The report shows Job Corps cost per graduate is nearly three times higher, but students still find success, and NJCA is committed to reforms.Missing: performance reviews 2020-2025
  47. [47]
    Department of Labor announces shutdown of contractor-operated ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · Department of Labor announces shutdown of contractor-operated Job Corps centers. Agencies June 26, 2025. Update: On June 25, ...
  48. [48]
    Lawsuit aims to stop closure of almost 100 Job Corps sites - NPR
    Jun 16, 2025 · A federal judge has temporarily halted the Trump administration's order to close America's 99 Job Corps centers, which provide residential ...
  49. [49]
    Another Court Halts Trump Plan to Close Job Corps Centers (1)
    Jul 25, 2025 · A second federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from winding down the Job Corps training program for low-income young adults, ...
  50. [50]
    Thousands of young Americans at risk of homelessness if Job Corps ...
    Jun 18, 2025 · The vocational training program has trained over two million Americans since its inception, but now faces closure.
  51. [51]
    Court Orders 99 Job Corps Centers Must Remain Open
    Jul 25, 2025 · The court granted a motion filed on behalf of seven Job Corps students and a nationwide class seeking to stop the planned closures pending final ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] PROGRAM YEAR (PY) 2024
    Oct 31, 2024 · The Office of Job Corps annually reviews and revises its performance management system to ensure it continues to support program goals and ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Job Corps Policy and Requirements Handbook - Amazon S3
    Include center-specific information including available career technical training, certification, credentialing, and licensure opportunities;. 2. Be designed ...
  54. [54]
    Explore Possibilities | Job Corps
    ### Career Technical Training Options and Fields
  55. [55]
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
    Your future community begins here. - Job Corps
    Job Corps offers on-campus living with dorms, or non-residential options. Some centers are in nature, and commuter students can live at home. It provides a ...Missing: support | Show results with:support
  59. [59]
    Residential Advisor - Career Center | Recruitment
    Feb 28, 2025 · Ensures the dormitories are under supervision 24 hours a day and ensures all rules, policies and procedures are followed by residents. Maintains ...
  60. [60]
    Management & Training Residential Advisor Job in Edison, NJ
    The Residential Advisor monitors students, ensures compliance, assists with activities, patrols dormitories, and helps with maintenance. Benefits include ...
  61. [61]
    Clearfield Job Corps students concerned with conditions at dormitory
    Aug 7, 2024 · A Clearfield Job Corps student is speaking out about the allegedly filthy conditions she and other students are currently living in at one of the dorms.
  62. [62]
    20 CFR Part 686 -- The Job Corps Under Title I of the Workforce ...
    The objective of Job Corps is to support responsible citizenship and provide young people with the skills they need to lead to successful careers.<|separator|>
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
    Why are they shutting down contract Job Corps centers but ... - Reddit
    Jun 1, 2025 · The law remains unchanged, there's supposed to be the Job Corps program, so the Civilian Conservation Centers remain for now.
  65. [65]
    | Job Corps
    No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    ICYMI: The Job Corps Failure
    Apr 23, 2018 · Nearly 50,000 people enrolled in 2017, and 87% lived in Job Corps dorms. In addition to ['the t-word'] and housing, the Job Corps provides ...Missing: historical trends
  67. [67]
    Context for the Job Corps Transparency Report
    May 28, 2025 · The U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) Employment and Training Administration released a “Job Corps Transparency Report” in April 2025.Missing: performance reviews 2020-2025
  68. [68]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  69. [69]
    [PDF] US Department of Labor Job Corps Process Study Final Report
    organized the research activities into four phases: ▫. Phase 1 – Conducted background research to inform the overall evaluation design. ▫. Phase 2 ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] FY 2026 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION ...
    Job Corps' final year will also prioritize the dignified transition of all students, ensuring that each young person exits the program with not only the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    “Immediately Reverse” Damaging, Unconstitutional Cuts to Job Corps
    Jun 9, 2025 · Congress passed the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act of 2025, which includes $1,760,155,000 for Job Corps and ensures that ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] FY 2026 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
    As part of this effort, the FY 2026 Budget eliminates Job Corps and requests ... Annual Appropriation. $13.3. $13.2. $8.6. -$4.6. Budgetary Adjustments. $0.3.Missing: history | Show results with:history<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    Senate Committee Advances 2026 Funding Bill - Goodwill Industries
    $$1.7 billion for Job Corps, equal to the current FY25 level. $285 million for Registered Apprenticeships, equal to the FY25 level. $105 million for ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Senate Appropriations Bill for FY26 Maintains Workforce Funding ...
    Aug 13, 2025 · Senate Appropriations Bill for FY26 Maintains Workforce Funding, But Falls Short of Needed Investments ; JobCorps, $1,760,155,000, $1,760,155,000 ...
  75. [75]
    Bill to Fund Key Health, Workforce, and Education Programs in ...
    Jul 31, 2025 · Job Corps: $1.8 billion for Job Corps. Senator Collins has strongly opposed the Administration's proposed elimination of Job Corps. At a ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  76. [76]
    Job Corps: High Costs and Mixed Results Raise Questions About ...
    Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on Job Corps program operations, focusing on: (1) who is being served and the services...
  77. [77]
    Eliminate the Job Corps - The Heritage Foundation
    A cost-benefit analysis based on the National Job Corps Study found that the benefits of Job Corps do not outweigh its costs.2. Further Reading & Additional ...
  78. [78]
    The impacts of Job Corps on participants' employment and ... - CLEAR
    It offers individualized academic education, vocational training, counseling, and job placement assistance to economically disadvantaged youth ages 16 to 24.Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
  79. [79]
    National Job Corps Study: 20-Year Follow-Up Study Using Tax Data ...
    The report describes findings from a follow-up study to examine employment-related impacts using tax records through 2015, about 20 years after random ...
  80. [80]
    Newly-published study of federal Job Corps program inaccurately ...
    Jul 21, 2020 · But the abstract's inaccurate portrayal of the study results could undercut efforts to reform Job Corps so that it actually does produce ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Evaluation of the Cascades Job Corps College and Career ...
    This is the Detailed Report of the Implementation Analysis, prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor. (DOL)'s Chief Evaluation Office and Employment and ...
  82. [82]
    Evaluating an Innovative Job Corps Pilot Program | Abt Global
    The evaluation used a rigorous random assignment design to test the effects of the new pilot program on service receipt as well as on participant outcomes, ...
  83. [83]
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Job Corps Could Not Demonstrate Beneficial Job Training Outcomes
    Mar 30, 2018 · Job Corps couldn't show training helped participants get meaningful jobs due to poor record keeping and ineffective transition services. Many ...
  85. [85]
  86. [86]
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Government Employment and Training Programs: Assessing the ...
    It was replaced by the Workforce Investment Act of. 1998 (WIA), which integrated services (one-stop delivery system), increased individual choice through ...
  88. [88]
    Job Corps: Comparison of Federal Program With State Youth ...
    One feature that makes Job Corps different from other youth training programs is its residential component. About 90 percent of the approximately 63,000 ...
  89. [89]
    Job Corps: DOL Could Enhance Safety and Security at Centers with ...
    Jun 15, 2018 · Job Corps centers reported 13,673 safety and security incidents involving students from July 2016 to June 2017, according to GAO's analysis ...
  90. [90]
    Job Corps: Preliminary Observations on Student Safety and Security ...
    Jun 22, 2017 · Most reported violent incidents—specifically assaults, homicides, and sexual assaults that occurred onsite and offsite—involved Job Corps ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] review of job corps center safety and security - DOL-OIG
    Mar 31, 2017 · Eleven centers we reviewed did not contact law enforcement for 140 (40 percent) of the 348 potentially serious criminal misconduct incidents ...<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Job Corps: A Consistent Record of Failure - The Heritage Foundation
    Feb 28, 2007 · The best available evidence, however, strongly suggests that Job Corps is ineffective. While some evaluations of Job Corps support the program.
  93. [93]
    Job Corps: An Unfailing Record of Failure | The Heritage Foundation
    Given the program's poor performance and President Obama's call for"the elimination of dozens of government programs shown to bewasteful or ineffective," ...
  94. [94]
    AFTER 20 YEARS, IS IT TIME TO RETIRE THE JOB CORPS?
    Apr 21, 1985 · The White House in its budget sought to kill the 20-year-old corps, comparing it unfavorably with its own ''partnership'' training program.
  95. [95]
    Bush Budget to Seek Job Training Cut - The New York Times
    Jan 31, 2002 · Pres Bush's budget will seek cuts in several job-training programs for laid-off workers and young adults most affected by sharp rise in ...Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  96. [96]
    Job Retraining Impacted by Bush's Misguided Budget - IAM Union
    Feb 13, 2008 · The Bush administration is proposing more than $760 million in cuts to job training and employment programs. Roughly $270 million in cuts ...
  97. [97]
    Employment and Training Programs: Ineffective and Unneeded
    Jun 1, 2011 · More fundamentally, federal employment and training programs don't fill any critical economic need that private markets don't already fill.Missing: ideological | Show results with:ideological<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    $$1.7 Billion Federal Job Training Program Is 'Failing the Students'
    Aug 26, 2018 · Kennedy's brother-in-law, as a ladder out of hopelessness, Job Corps today has become a 20th-century holdover incapable of meeting the demands ...Missing: eligibility | Show results with:eligibility
  99. [99]
    MARSHALL: Killing Jobs Corps is Killing Equity
    Jun 11, 2025 · The elimination of Job Corps may have been a long-held desire of hard-core conservatives who are unwilling to invest in the people and refuse to ...Missing: disputes | Show results with:disputes
  100. [100]
    Trump Says He Wants to Fund More Trade Schools. Just Not These.
    Jun 21, 2025 · In 2018, the Labor Department's inspector general released a report titled “Job Corps Could Not Demonstrate Beneficial Job Training Outcomes.
  101. [101]
    Merkley, Wyden, 38 Senators Fight Trump's Cuts to the Job Corps ...
    Jun 9, 2025 · Merkley, Wyden, 38 Senators Fight Trump's Cuts to the Job Corps Program. In Oregon, Tongue Point, PIVOT, and Springdale Centers at Risk.
  102. [102]
    Trump Kills Youth Jobs - The American Prospect
    Jun 25, 2025 · President Lyndon B. Johnson created the Job Corps sixty years ago. Trump wants to cut off funding for this vital workforce development program.Missing: disputes criticisms
  103. [103]
    NAHB Scores Job Corps Victories Amid House Funding Cuts
    Sep 10, 2025 · The Senate Appropriations Committee previously voted to fund Job Corps at its currently enacted level of $1.7 billion for fiscal year 2026 ...Missing: annual amounts
  104. [104]
    Job Corps Works for Taxpayers
    Studies consistently find Job Corps to be the most effective national dropout recovery program, in part because it is the only program of its kind that relies ...Missing: proponents arguments
  105. [105]
    George Foreman - Horatio Alger Association
    Born in Marshall, Texas, in 1949, George Foreman was one of seven children in his family. ... Foreman's time in the Job Corps transformed his life. He met Nick ...
  106. [106]
    1960 Archives - National Job Corps Association
    1969. by NJCA | Jul 10, 1969 | 1960. Job Corps is transferred from the Office of Economic Opportunity to the U.S. Department of Labor.Missing: EURO DOLLAR
  107. [107]
    George Foreman | U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Hall of Fame
    A high school dropout, George Foreman entered the Job Corps program, a decision that led him to a successful boxing career and a gold medal at the Mexico City ...
  108. [108]
    How a famous soul singer got his start in Maine - Bangor Daily News
    Sep 27, 2017 · It was likely that Bradley was a cook at the Job Corps building that is now the headquarters for Acadia National Park, according to Bar Harbor ...
  109. [109]
    Charles Bradley, a Late-in-Life Soul Music Star, Dies at 68
    Sep 24, 2017 · Charles Bradley, the journeyman soul singer whose beleaguered rasp ... Bradley went on to find work through the Job Corps program ...
  110. [110]
    Job Corps names Idaho judge Sergio Gutierrez one of its 'Graduate ...
    Apr 21, 2015 · Job Corps names Idaho judge Sergio Gutierrez one of its 'Graduate Heroes' ... A bus dropped off Sergio Gutierrez on aptly named Opportunity Lane ...
  111. [111]
    Alumni & Graduate Success Stories - National Job Corps Association
    Recent Graduate Spotlight & Stories · Emmanuel Tolentino · Deon McAdams · Jeaneatte McAdams · Lachan Russell · Mark Berry · James David.
  112. [112]
    Judge Sergio Gutierrez to Receive Honorary Doctorate During ...
    Apr 24, 2019 · The Honorable Judge Sergio Gutierrez, Idaho's first Latino judge ... Job Corps Association; and a past board member of the Idaho Latino ...
  113. [113]
    [PDF] A Proud Legacy, a Promising Future - First Story Strategies
    Years later, we meet people like. MaryAnn Gamble, now a physician but who was living in her car when she discovered Job Corps, and. Angel Ramon, an Army ...
  114. [114]
    Job Corps alumni: Oballa Oballa | US Forest Service
    Mar 16, 2021 · Oballa has graduated from Boxelder Job Corps with a certified nursing assistant certificate, earned an associate's degree in Human Services from Riverland ...
  115. [115]
    Schenk Job Corps grad finds success in chosen career
    Apr 6, 2022 · COLORADO—“Schenck Job Corps transformed me,” says 2020 Job Corps Civilian Conservation Center automotive graduate Justin Speight.
  116. [116]
    Job Corps Alumna: Maite Olsen's path to a Forest Service career
    Feb 24, 2023 · “Job Corps saved me,” Olsen said. “I had no passion. I was lost and felt that I didn't have a purpose until I discovered fire and caught, as ...