Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Junagadh State

Junagadh State was a princely state in the Kathiawar region of western British India, ruled by the Muslim Babi dynasty of Nawabs from its establishment in 1730 until its merger with India in 1948. Founded by Sher Khan Babi, who expelled Mughal authorities, the state encompassed approximately 8,643 square kilometers and had a 1941 population of around 671,000, of which Muslims comprised about 19 percent. As a British protectorate from 1807, it maintained internal autonomy while paying tribute, and under Nawab Mahabat Khanji III, it advanced conservation efforts for the Asiatic lion in the Gir Forest, alongside infrastructure like dams and educational institutions. The state's defining controversy arose during the 1947 partition of India, when Nawab Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III acceded to Pakistan on August 15, despite the state's geographic isolation from Pakistan and its Hindu-majority populace, sparking widespread protests and communal violence. India declined recognition of the accession, blockaded the state, and assumed de facto control amid the Nawab's flight to Pakistan; a plebiscite in February 1948 confirmed integration, with 190,779 votes for India against 91 for Pakistan. This episode exemplified the tensions in princely state accessions, where demographic realities and contiguity prevailed over monarchical preference, leading to Junagadh's incorporation into the Indian Union as part of Saurashtra State.

Geography

Territory and Borders

Junagadh State covered an area of 3,337 square miles (8,643 km²) in the Peninsula, a region now within the state of in . The territory centered around the city of , situated at the foot of the Girnar Hills, and extended southward to encompass the Gir Forest—a dense woodland habitat known for Asiatic lions—and reached the , providing the state with approximately 100 miles of coastline and several ports. The state's land borders primarily adjoined other princely states in the Kathiawar Agency under British suzerainty, including Gondal to the north, Porbandar to the northwest, and Bhavnagar to the east, forming a patchwork of semi-autonomous entities in the Saurashtra region. This configuration placed Junagadh amid a cluster of Hindu-ruled states, despite its own Muslim Babi dynasty governance, with no direct contiguity to Pakistan following the 1947 partition. The territory also included administrative divisions such as talukas of Junagadh, Vanthali, and Manavadar, along with oversight of subsidiary petty states like Babariawad and Mangrol, which added fragmented holdings but were integrated under the Nawab's authority. Geographically isolated from by over 200 miles, Junagadh's borders highlighted its enclave-like position within Indian-dominated territory, influencing post-independence accession disputes. The state's compact yet diverse landscape featured hilly interiors, fertile plains, and coastal plains, supporting , , and as key economic pillars.

Physical Features

Junagadh State encompassed a diverse terrain within the of western , featuring predominantly level alluvial plains interspersed with hilly regions. The capital, , lay at the western base of the massif, a 15 km diameter compound of hills and valleys formed by an extinct volcanic intrusion over 60 million years old, with elevations exceeding 1,000 meters and composed of layered gabbros. To the south, the state's territory extended into the Gir Hills, characterized by undulating forested landscapes of dry deciduous vegetation, including acacia and tamarisk stands, which historically supported abundant pastures and wildlife such as Asiatic lions. The region bordered the along its southern and southwestern coasts, providing outlets through ports like and Mangrol, while lacking perennial rivers typical of Saurashtra, relying instead on seasonal streams draining westward. Key watercourses included the , originating at 380 meters elevation in the Gir Forest and flowing northwest, as well as smaller seasonal rivers like the Kalwa, Uben, Sonrakh, and Kalwo near the capital. The featured hot summers with temperatures up to 38°C and moderate winters, with annual rainfall concentrated in the season supporting the region's and forested .

Demographics

Population Statistics

The population of Junagadh State was enumerated in the , with the 1941 census recording a total of 670,719 inhabitants across an area of 8,643 square kilometers, resulting in a density of approximately 78 persons per square kilometer. This figure reflected steady growth from earlier enumerations, such as the 1921 census total of 465,493, indicating an average annual increase of about 1.8% over the two decades amid limited industrialization and reliance on . Urban centers like the capital city accounted for a modest portion, with roughly 20-25% of the populace residing in towns by the 1940s, while the majority lived in rural talukas focused on and farming livelihoods. These statistics underscored the state's sparse settlement patterns, influenced by arid terrain and historical nomadic elements in the .

Religious and Ethnic Composition

In the 1941 , Junagadh State recorded a total of 671,000, with numbering 128,000 or 19% of the inhabitants, while constituted the vast majority at approximately 80%. This religious imbalance—Muslim rulers governing a predominantly Hindu populace—fueled underlying tensions that intensified during the 1947 accession debates, as Hindu-majority areas expressed strong preferences for integration with . Smaller religious groups, including Jains and tribal animists, accounted for the remainder, though precise figures for these minorities were not prominently detailed in contemporary records. Ethnically, the state's population was overwhelmingly Gujarati-speaking, reflecting the broader Indic linguistic and cultural framework of the region, with communities divided along and occupational lines. Hindu ethnic groups dominated rural agrarian life, including pastoralists such as Ahirs and Rabaris, as well as cultivating castes like Kolis and Patidars, who formed the economic backbone through farming and herding in the fertile plains and hilly tracts. Urban centers like city hosted a more mixed profile, with Muslim ethnic enclaves comprising Pathan-origin elites tied to the , alongside mercantile groups like Memons and Bohras engaged in trade. Tribal populations, such as the Siddis (of African descent) in peripheral areas, represented marginal ethnic minorities, often practicing syncretic customs blending with or . This ethnic stratification reinforced social hierarchies, with Muslim holding disproportionate influence despite numerical inferiority.

Historical Development

Ancient and Medieval Foundations

The region encompassing modern , centered around the hill massif, holds evidence of human activity dating back to prehistoric times, with early settlements on the slopes prior to significant Quaternary geological events. However, the earliest documented historical significance emerges during the Mauryan Empire (circa 321–185 BCE), when served as a provincial administrative center. Emperor (r. 268–232 BCE) inscribed one of his on a large granite boulder near the city, dated to approximately 250 BCE, promoting principles of Dhamma including non-violence, tolerance, and ethical governance in using language. These inscriptions, among the fourteen major edicts, underscore the area's strategic value for imperial communication and water management, as references improvements to the Sudarshana Lake originally constructed under (r. 321–297 BCE). Post-Mauryan rule saw the incursion of (Shakas), Indo-Scythian rulers who controlled Saurashtra from around 35 BCE to 405 CE. (r. 130–150 CE), a prominent Shaka mahakshatrapa, repaired the Sudarshana Lake after flood damage, as detailed in his inscription on the same rock as Ashoka's edicts, composed shortly after 150 CE in elegant classical prose—the earliest such example. This multilingual layering of inscriptions on the rock illustrates the site's enduring administrative and hydrological importance, with Rudradaman's work involving embankments and canals to sustain agriculture in the arid region. By the 5th century CE, emperor (r. 455–467 CE) added his own inscription to the rock, claiming restoration of the dam and crediting prior rulers, reflecting Gupta oversight amid Huna pressures. In the medieval period, from the onward, the —a clan—established (then known as Junagadh or Girinagar) as their primary capital, ruling for approximately 600 years until the late 15th century. Notable rulers included Chandra Chuda (r. 875–907 CE), under whom the —a massive citadel originally dating to Mauryan times but extensively fortified with triple walls, moats, and Buddhist caves—was rebuilt and expanded to defend against invasions. The Chudasamas patronized , leveraging Girnar's sanctity as the nirvana site of (circa 22nd ), with temple constructions enhancing the hill's pilgrimage status. Their rule ended with conquest by the under in 1472 CE, shifting control to Muslim governors who maintained the fort's defenses while integrating the area into the sultanate's feudal structure until incorporation in the 16th century.

Rise of Babi Dynasty

The Babi dynasty traced its origins to the Usmankhel Yusufzai Pashtuns, who entered northern India as military retainers under the Mughal emperor Humayun in the mid-16th century, with Usman Khan Babi serving as a key follower during Humayun's campaigns. Descendants of this clan rose through the Mughal administrative hierarchy in Gujarat, leveraging martial skills amid the empire's gradual fragmentation in the early 18th century. Junagadh, previously a Rajput stronghold conquered by Muslim forces in 1472 under the Gujarat Sultanate and later incorporated into Mughal domains, became a focal point for local power struggles as central authority waned. Sher Khan Babi, a prominent leader and appointee in the region, exploited this vacuum to assert control. In 1735, he expelled the incumbent governor () of , thereby founding an independent polity centered on the city and its surrounding territories in southern . This seizure was facilitated by alliances with local chieftains distressed by Maratha raids and neglect, allowing Sher Khan to organize defense and administration without formal imperial sanction. His success stemmed from the dynasty's Pathan martial tradition, which proved effective against fragmented foes, marking the transition from vassalage to . Under Sher and his immediate successors, the Babis consolidated holdings by repelling Maratha incursions and integrating adjacent parganas, establishing a hereditary Muslim rulers' line over a predominantly Hindu agrarian base. Sher Khan, who ruled until approximately 1758, adopted the title Bahadur Khanji I and appointed Hindu dewans like (1748–1751) and Morarji to handle revenue and , fostering initial stability. This pragmatic enabled the dynasty to endure as one of Gujarat's few independent Muslim principalities, setting the stage for expansion into revenue-generating ports and estates by the late 18th century.

British Suzerainty and Internal Dynamics

Junagadh State entered British suzerainty in 1807 when Muhammad Hamid Khanji I concluded the Walker Settlement with Colonel Walker of the , acknowledging British paramountcy over external affairs and defense in exchange for protection against Maratha incursions and internal autonomy. This arrangement formalized Junagadh's status as a within the Political Agency, where the British maintained oversight through a political agent but refrained from direct interference in domestic unless prompted by lapses in administration or succession disputes. Subsequent engagements, such as the 1821 treaty with the and the 1879 cession of criminal jurisdiction over railway lands, reinforced this without eroding the Nawab's core authority. Internally, the Babi Nawabs governed a predominantly Hindu —estimated at over 80% by the late —through a blend of traditional Islamic administrative practices and incremental modernizations, fostering relative communal harmony absent major recorded uprisings during the era. The state retained elements of the mansabdari system for collection and , overseen by a (prime minister) and departmental officials. Nawab Mahabat Khanji II (r. 1851–1882) introduced a formalized Department to enhance fiscal efficiency, while his successors, including Rasul Khanji (r. 1892–1913), established the Alienation in 1895 to manage land grants and indebtedness. Economic and infrastructural reforms under included the construction of the Junagadh-Port Bandar in , connecting the state to broader networks, and later initiatives like an electric powerhouse in 1929, which supported limited industrialization while preserving agrarian foundations. These developments, funded through state revenues and occasional loans, aimed at self-sufficiency but highlighted dependencies, as the Nawabs navigated expectations for progressive rule amid a diverse populace where Hindu taluqdars held significant local influence alongside Muslim elites. The absence of systemic communal friction until the 1940s underscores the efficacy of personalized Nawabi patronage in maintaining order, though underlying demographic disparities sowed seeds for later tensions.

Key Internal Conflicts

One of the earliest recorded internal conflicts in Junagadh State occurred during the reign of the first , Sher Khan Babi (r. 1730–1748), when Koli chieftain Mansa Khant led a against the newly established Babi dynasty's authority. The Kolis, a local tribal community, resisted the imposition of Muslim rule following the decline of influence, with Mansa Khant seizing the strategic and conducting raids across the region for approximately 13 months. This uprising highlighted early ethnic and administrative frictions between the incoming Pathan rulers and indigenous groups, though the eventually suppressed it with external aid, consolidating control over the territory. During the British suzerainty period (from the early onward), internal dynamics were shaped by the Nawabs' absolute rule amid a predominantly Hindu (estimated at over 80% by the ), fostering grievances over fiscal mismanagement, favoritism toward Muslim elites in administration, and lack of representative institutions. The Nawabs' extravagance, particularly under (r. 1933–1947), who accrued significant debts through palace constructions and luxuries, exacerbated economic strains on subjects, leading to widespread discontent. The formation of the Junagadh Praja Mandal in the late 1920s marked a structured reform movement, affiliated with the All-India States People's Conference, demanding , , and curbs on autocratic excesses. Agitations intensified in and under leaders like , who later became president, targeting the repressive policies of Sir Shah Nawaz Khan (appointed 1943), including press censorship, arbitrary arrests, and suppression of public assemblies. Satyagrahas and protests, often coordinated from adjacent territories like , sought constitutional reforms and greater Hindu representation, reflecting causal tensions from dynastic absolutism clashing with emerging democratic aspirations amid colonial-era political awakening. These movements, while non-violent, faced state crackdowns, underscoring systemic imbalances in a Muslim-ruled state with Hindu-majority demographics.

Governance and Rulers

List of Nawabs

The Babi Nawabs ruled Junagadh State from its as an independent entity in until the accession crisis of 1947. The originated from Pashtun Babi tribesmen who gained control over the region following the decline of authority. There were nine recognized Nawabs, each bearing titles such as Diwan Nawab and later receiving British honors including gun salutes and knighthoods. The following table enumerates the Nawabs with their reign periods:
No.NameReign Period
1Muhammad Bahadur Khanji I (also known as Muhammad Sher Khan Babi)1748–1758
2Muhammad Mahabat Khanji I1758–1774
3Muhammad Hamid Khanji I1774–1811
4Muhammad Bahadur Khanji II1811–1840
5Muhammad Hamid Khanji II1840–1851
6Muhammad Mahabat Khanji II1851–1882
7Muhammad Bahadur Khanji III1882–1892
8Muhammad Rasul Khanji1892–1911
9Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III1911–1947
During the reigns of the later Nawabs, the state entered into subsidiary alliances with the East India Company in 1807, transitioning to direct after 1818, which preserved internal while external affairs were managed by British paramountcy. The final Nawab, Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III, acceded to on 15 August 1947, leading to the state's integration into following a plebiscite in 1948.

Administrative Framework

Junagadh State operated under a monarchical administrative system where the held absolute sovereignty, encompassing executive, legislative, and judicial authority over internal affairs. The was assisted by a , serving as the chief administrator or prime minister, responsible for overseeing the civil bureaucracy, revenue collection, and policy implementation. Notable Diwans included in 1947, who influenced key decisions such as the attempted accession to . The state's territory was organized into prants (sub-divisions) and talukas for local governance, revenue administration, and . Prant officers, appointed by the , managed these units, supervising talukadars who handled village-level affairs including land revenue assessment under a system akin to the or jagirdari variants prevalent in . This structure facilitated efficient collection of land revenue, which formed the backbone of state finances, while maintaining the Nawab's oversight through appointed officials. Under paramountcy established by in 1807, the retained autonomy in domestic administration but ceded control over foreign relations, defense, and certain fiscal policies to the Political attached to the Baroda . The state maintained a small and force for , with judicial matters resolved through a of courts culminating in the 's . Reforms in the early introduced limited advisory councils, though real power remained concentrated with the ruler.

The 1947 Accession Crisis

Nawab's Accession to Pakistan

Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III, the Nawab of Junagadh, formally acceded the state to the Dominion of Pakistan by signing the instrument of accession on 15 September 1947, which was subsequently countersigned and accepted by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Governor-General of Pakistan. This decision followed the partition of British India on 15 August 1947, during which princely states were granted the option to accede to either India or Pakistan, or remain independent, based on the sovereign authority of their rulers. The Nawab, a Muslim ruler presiding over a state with a predominantly Hindu population of approximately 670,000 Hindus and 80,000 Muslims as per the 1941 census, exercised this prerogative despite the state's geographic enclaves within Indian territory and lack of land contiguity with Pakistan. The Nawab's choice was influenced by religious solidarity with the newly formed Muslim-majority , as well as the historical Muslim governance of under the since the 18th century. He rejected arguments emphasizing demographic majorities or geographic viability, asserting that such factors did not override the ruler's absolute right to determine accession, a position paralleled in discussions around other non-contiguous states like . promptly recognized the accession, hoisting its flag over on 17 September 1947 and appointing a administrator to affirm control. This move was announced publicly in August 1947, prior to the formal instrument, signaling the Nawab's intent amid the rapid dissolution of British paramountcy. Lord Mountbatten, as , had advised against the accession, citing potential communal tensions given the Hindu majority and the state's isolation from , but the proceeded independently. The decision also extended to Junagadh's feudatory states, including Mangrol and Babariawad, which similarly acceded to , though these faced immediate local challenges. 's acceptance underscored its broader to incorporate Muslim-ruled territories, irrespective of composition, consistent with the two-nation theory's emphasis on over demographics.

Local Resistance and Demographic Pressures

Junagadh State's population, as recorded in the 1941 , totaled approximately 671,000, with comprising 19% (128,000 individuals) and Hindus the remaining 81%. This stark demographic imbalance—coupled with the state's encirclement by Indian territory and lack of contiguity with —intensified opposition when Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III signed an to on August 15, 1947. The decision, advised by Dewan Shah Nawaz Bhutto, disregarded the Hindu majority's preferences, prompting immediate agitation among local residents who favored integration with due to cultural, geographic, and economic ties. Protests erupted across key towns including , Mangrol, and Babariawad, where communities organized demonstrations, hartals, and non-payment of taxes to undermine the administration. Clashes occurred between Muslim League supporters enforcing the accession and protesters, escalating tensions and leading to an exodus of to neighboring provinces; reports indicated significant flows, with thousands seeking safety amid fears of . In Bombay, a Junagadh Samiti formed on September 15, 1947, evolving into the Aarzi Hukumat (Provisional Government) on September 25 under , which coordinated economic boycotts, supply embargoes on essentials like food and fuel, and campaigns from exile in to amplify local pressures. These grassroots efforts, rooted in the majority's rejection of separation from , eroded the Nawab's authority; volunteers seized peripheral villages by late , and the Dewan's resignation on 24 precipitated the ruler's flight to with his family and treasury on 25. Pakistan's failure to provide or logistical support despite accepting the accession further isolated the regime, highlighting how demographic realities and sustained local non-cooperation rendered the decision untenable.

Indian Military and Diplomatic Response

India's diplomatic response to the Nawab's accession to Pakistan on August 15, 1947, emphasized the state's geographical encirclement by Indian territory and its demographic composition, with Hindus comprising approximately 80-90% of the population, rendering the accession impractical and contrary to the wishes of the majority. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, as Minister of States, urged the Nawab to reconsider accession to or permit a plebiscite, while rejecting Pakistan's acceptance on grounds of non-contiguity and lack of popular support; these overtures were conveyed through intermediaries including , who had advised against the move. When diplomatic persuasion failed, implemented an economic in 1947, severing supplies of essentials like salt, grain, and revenue flows from , which crippled Junagadh's finances and prompted internal unrest, including the formation of the Arzi Hukumat (provisional government) by local Hindu leaders aligned with the All India States People's Conference. Military dimensions escalated after Junagadh forces occupied the neighboring principalities of Mangrol and Babariawad—both of which had acceded to —prompting to authorize limited troop deployments to those areas starting October 22, 1947, to safeguard their without advancing into Junagadh proper. By early November, amid reports of , administrative collapse, and the Nawab's prolonged absence in , Dewan Shah Nawaz Bhutto resigned on November 8, 1947, and formally requested Indian to avert total , citing the state's inability to maintain order or pay salaries. On November 9, 1947, units under T. B. Henderson Brooks entered unopposed, as state forces offered no resistance, enabling rapid assumption of control by n civil administrators; this action was framed by as a temporary measure to stabilize the region pending a plebiscite, though protested it as an . The involved fewer than 1,000 troops initially, focused on securing key sites like the Girnar Hills and ports, with no significant combat reported, reflecting the state's depleted military capacity after the blockade and desertions. This sequence underscored 's strategy of combining coercive diplomacy with minimal force to enforce integration, prioritizing contiguity and demographic realities over the Nawab's unilateral decision.

Resolution Through Plebiscite

Organization and Conduct of the Vote

Following the provisional takeover of Junagadh's administration by forces on , 1947, after the Dewan fled and local authorities invited intervention amid collapsing governance, the established a under T.L. Savage to maintain order and prepare for a democratic resolution of the accession dispute. This setup transitioned into a civilian by early 1948, tasked with organizing a plebiscite to ascertain the populace's preference between joining or , reflecting the demographic reality of a Hindu-majority (approximately 80-90% of residents) in a geographically contiguous . was excluded from participation in the plebiscite's planning or supervision, as the administration deemed the Nawab's prior accession invalid due to lack of popular support and failure to maintain effective control. The vote was scheduled for February 20, 1948, across the state including its talukas, with polling stations managed by Indian-appointed officials under the provisional government's oversight to ensure orderly conduct. Eligible voters, drawn from an electorate of roughly 200,000 adult residents, were presented with a straightforward via ballot: accession to or to , without the Nawab's personal option as he had absconded to Pakistan. The process emphasized secrecy and accessibility, with no reported widespread disruptions, though pro-Pakistan elements largely abstained or were marginalized by the prevailing local sentiment favoring with due to cultural, economic, and geographic ties. Turnout exceeded 95%, reflecting broad participation under the administered framework. Results were tallied promptly, showing 190,779 votes (99.95%) for India and only 91 for Pakistan out of 190,870 valid ballots cast, validating the provisional administration's actions and formalizing Junagadh's merger into the Indian Union via the Saurashtra State. While Indian sources describe the conduct as fair and reflective of ground realities, Pakistani accounts have contested it as predetermined under military occupation, excluding neutral oversight and splitting results by district to obscure minority preferences—claims unsubstantiated by contemporaneous independent verification but highlighting ongoing sovereignty disputes.

Results and International Reactions

The plebiscite in Junagadh State was conducted on February 20, 1948, following Indian administration's takeover in November 1947. Out of 201,457 registered voters, 190,870 participated, with 190,779 votes cast in favor of accession to and only 91 in favor of . The overwhelming margin reflected the state's demographic reality, where comprised approximately 80-90% of the population, contrasting with the Muslim Nawab's decision to accede to despite geographic contiguity with and lack of prompting . Pakistan immediately rejected the plebiscite results, denouncing them as invalid due to the absence of its consent and alleging the vote occurred under duress from Indian military presence, which they claimed constituted an illegal occupation. Pakistani officials argued that legal advisors, including British barrister , had indicated Pakistan's approval was required for any such referendum, framing India's actions as a violation of the standstill agreement and sovereignty principles under the Act of 1947. In response, maintained its non-recognition of Junagadh's into and periodically referenced the territory in diplomatic maps and claims, though without pursuing military reclamation. Internationally, the plebiscite elicited limited reaction beyond bilateral tensions, overshadowed by the concurrent Kashmir conflict, where Pakistan's UN Security Council complaint on January 22, 1948, shifted focus to demands for a plebiscite there under Resolution 47. The United Kingdom, via Governor-General Lord Mountbatten, had earlier urged Pakistan to release Junagadh but accepted the de facto Indian control post-vote without formal protest. Major powers like the United States showed no significant intervention, implicitly recognizing India's administrative integration by 1949, as Junagadh was incorporated into the Saurashtra State and later Gujarat without broader diplomatic repercussions or sanctions. The lack of international enforcement for Pakistan's claims stemmed from the plebiscite's empirical alignment with local majoritarian preferences and the Nawab's flight to Pakistan, which undermined his representational legitimacy.

Ongoing Controversies

Pakistan's Territorial Claims

accepted the signed by Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III on August 15, 1947, formally incorporating into its territory on September 13, 1947, despite the state's geographical discontinuity with and its Hindu-majority population of approximately 80-90%. This decision aligned with the provisions of the Indian Independence Act of 1947, which granted princely rulers sovereign authority to accede to either dominion irrespective of demographic or locational factors, a principle invoked to parallel its acceptance of other non-contiguous accessions like those attempted in . Pakistani authorities justified the claim by emphasizing the Nawab's Muslim identity and the state's coastal access via the port of , which they argued provided viable linkage to , countering Indian objections on geographic impracticability. Following 's military intervention in November 1947 and the February 1948 plebiscite—where over 190,000 votes favored integration with against fewer than 100 for rejected the results as invalid, asserting they occurred under coercive occupation that invalidated any democratic expression of will. has since maintained that the original accession document constitutes the sole legal basis for sovereignty, viewing control as an unlawful annexation akin to violations of on for princely states. Official Pakistani maps, including those from the Survey of , have persistently depicted —along with subsidiary territories like and Babariawad—as integral Pakistani land, reinforcing this stance without active territorial enforcement. In August 2020, Prime Minister publicly unveiled an updated political map explicitly incorporating into Pakistan's boundaries, framing it as a reclamation of historically rightful territory amid broader disputes like . This move echoed earlier diplomatic assertions, such as those during the 1947-48 crisis, where Pakistani leadership, including , insisted on the Nawab's prerogative over popular sentiment. Pakistani narratives, often articulated through state-affiliated institutions, portray the unresolved status as a deliberate oversight in post-partition agreements, arguing that India's integration bypassed requisite ratification by the dominion to which accession was offered. Despite lacking or practical has remained administered as part of under Indian sovereignty since 1948—the claim persists in official cartography and rhetoric, occasionally invoked to critique perceived inconsistencies in India's adherence to accession principles elsewhere.

Critiques of the Annexation Process

Critics, primarily from Pakistani perspectives, have argued that India's military on November 9, 1947, constituted an illegal that preempted any neutral resolution of the accession dispute, as the Nawab's to , signed on August 15, 1947, remained legally valid under the terms of the Indian Independence Act. This action followed a period of local unrest and an economic by , but occurred before could provide logistical support to enforce its acceptance, rendering the process coercive rather than consensual. The subsequent plebiscite held on February 20, 1948, under administrative control, has been contested for lacking impartiality and oversight, with a reported 99.95% vote in favor of into from approximately 190,779 valid votes out of a exceeding 800,000, as many reportedly boycotted it or had fled amid fears of reprisals. Pakistani sources contend this outcome reflected demographic engineering rather than genuine popular will, contrasting it with the proposed but unheld plebiscite mechanisms for other disputed princely states like , and highlighting the absence of neutral observers to verify voter participation or coercion. Accounts from the period describe widespread violence against the Muslim minority following forces' entry, including murders, rapes, and looting of properties, which critics attribute to communal reprisals encouraged by the annexation's chaotic execution and India's failure to protect pro- elements. Such events, documented in contemporary reports and later analyses from Pakistani viewpoints, fueled claims of and undermined assertions of a peaceful , with Pakistan maintaining that the Nawab's sovereign decision—irrespective of the state's Hindu majority—should have prevailed absent armed intervention. These critiques, often voiced in Pakistani diplomatic rhetoric, portray the process as a precedent for India's expansionist policies toward non-contiguous territories, though they are typically dismissed in Indian narratives as justifications for reversing an impractical accession.

Comparative Analysis with Other Princely States

Junagadh's 1947 accession to , despite its 80% Hindu population and lack of to , exemplified a rare conflict between a ruler's and demographic realities, akin to the crises in and , where princely autonomy clashed with emerging national imperatives. In all three cases, the —signed under the Indian Independence Act of 1947—granted rulers theoretical choice over joining , , or remaining independent, yet implementation varied based on strategic, communal, and popular pressures. Unlike the majority of over 560 princely states that acceded peacefully to by , influenced by Vallabhbhai Patel's diplomatic campaigns, these outliers triggered interventions reflecting inconsistencies in applying Mountbatten's lapse-of-paramountcy principle. Hyderabad, the largest with a 85% Hindu majority under Muslim Nizam Osman Ali , mirrored in featuring a Muslim sovereign resisting integration into Hindu-majority ; the Nizam sought independence or alignment with , delaying accession until India's military Operation Polo on September 13, 1948, forcibly integrated it without a plebiscite. This contrasted sharply with , where imposed an economic from August 1947, established a provisional government by November 7, and followed military on November 9 with a plebiscite on February 20, 1948, yielding 99% approval for amid 190,779 votes cast. Hyderabad's Razakar violence against integration advocates escalated the crisis, justifying India's "police action" under Article 8 of the standstill agreement, whereas Junagadh's unrest was more localized, with Hindu-led Praja Mandal protests prompting the plebiscite as a democratic resolution—though critics note 's non-participation undermined its fairness. Jammu and Kashmir presented an inverted demographic dynamic: a 77% Muslim-majority state under Hindu Maharaja Hari Singh, who acceded to India on October 26, 1947, amid Pashtun tribal invasion backed by Pakistan, leading to the first Indo-Pakistani War and UN-mediated ceasefire on January 1, 1949, without a conclusive plebiscite. India's acceptance of Kashmir's accession, citing the ruler's instrument and security needs, paralleled its initial rejection of Junagadh's on geographic and communal grounds, yet diverged in outcomes—Kashmir's partial integration persists as disputed, with Pakistan controlling 35% of territory, while Junagadh's swift plebiscite affirmed full incorporation into Saurashtra State by 1948. This asymmetry fueled Pakistani arguments for reciprocal logic, positing Junagadh's validity if Kashmir's was upheld, though India's emphasis on popular sovereignty in Junagadh (via vote) contrasted its military approach in Hyderabad and deferral in Kashmir. Other states like (Muslim ruler, Muslim-majority pockets but acceded to on August 30, 1947, after negotiations) and (initial independence declaration withdrawn by October 1947 under economic pressure) resolved without prolonged conflict, highlighting how Junagadh's non-contiguity to —unlike potential Pakistan-aligned enclaves—amplified its anomaly, prompting India's proactive stance to prevent communal fragmentation in . Collectively, these cases underscore the nature of integration, where legal formalism yielded to , with Junagadh's plebiscite serving as a rare concession to plebiscitary ideals amid broader coercive consolidations.

Legacy and Modern Context

Integration into India

Following the plebiscite conducted from 15 to 20 February 1948, in which 190,779 votes supported accession to out of 190,870 cast, with only 91 favoring , the state was formally integrated into the Union in March 1948. This outcome reflected the demographic reality of a predominantly Hindu exceeding 80% as per the 1941 , overriding the Nawab's earlier accession to on 15 August 1947. administration had assumed control on 9 November 1947 at the invitation of the state's amid widespread unrest and the Nawab's flight to , ensuring stability prior to the vote. Junagadh was merged into the United State of Saurashtra, a federation of princely states formed on 15 , which encompassed the peninsula. This integration preserved local governance structures initially while aligning the territory administratively with , including the incorporation of its 3,337 square miles and approximately 670,000 residents into Saurashtra's framework. By 1949, full merger was complete, with the region transitioning from princely rule to representative institutions under Indian sovereignty. In subsequent reorganizations, Saurashtra acceded to on 1 November 1956, and following the linguistic reorganization of states, Junagadh's territories formed part of upon its creation on 1 May 1960. Today, the former state's core areas constitute and Gir Somnath districts, contributing to 's economy through agriculture, fisheries, and tourism centered on sites like the Gir Forest. The underscored the principle that accession decisions in princely states should align with , particularly in cases of geographic and demographic incongruence with the acceding . Pakistan's persistent claims, formalized in its 2019 map revision, lack empirical support given the plebiscite's decisive results and the absence of subsequent reversals.

Persistent Geopolitical Echoes

Pakistan maintains an official territorial claim over , including it in its national maps despite the 1948 plebiscite results favoring integration with by a margin of 99.95% with 190,779 votes for against 91 for . This claim was reaffirmed in 's revised political map released on August 5, 2020, which explicitly incorporated and as Pakistani territory, prompting Indian diplomatic protests. The persistence of this claim serves symbolic purposes in Indo-Pakistani rhetoric, often invoked by Pakistani analysts to highlight perceived inconsistencies in India's stance on plebiscites, contrasting Junagadh's with the dispute. Pakistani state-affiliated sources, such as the Institute of Strategic Studies Research and Analysis, describe the 1947 accession to and subsequent control as an "illegal occupation," rejecting the plebiscite's validity due to the absence of their government's consent or observers. However, the claim lacks substantive backing or enforcement mechanisms, remaining confined to Pakistani domestic narratives and rather than active diplomatic or military pursuits. In , Junagadh's integration as a district of has elicited no domestic geopolitical friction, with the episode largely consigned to historical education emphasizing the plebiscite's democratic . Occasional echoes arise in bilateral tensions, such as Pakistan's map update interpreted as retaliation to India's revocation of and Kashmir's special status, underscoring how the Nawab's 1947 decision continues to fuel mutual accusations of without altering on-ground realities.

References

  1. [1]
    Culture & Heritage | District Junagadh, Government of Gujarat | India
    The Nawabs took over in 1730, and their descendants continued to rule till 1949. In 1807, Junagadh, under the Nawabs, became a tributary state of the British ...
  2. [2]
    junagadh - Royal Ark
    JUNAGADH. BRIEF HISTORY. The Junagadh family shares joint descent with the princely houses of Radhanpur and Balasinor, and the small states of Bantva, ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  3. [3]
    131. The Disputed States III: Junagadh - Pakistan Geotagging
    Jul 20, 2020 · It occupied an area of 8,643 km², and according to the census of 1941 had a population of 671,000, of which 128,000 were Muslims, i.e., 19% of ...
  4. [4]
    Explained: When Junagadh voted to join India, and Pakistan got just ...
    Aug 5, 2020 · Pakistan unveiled a new political map that includes Junagadh, in coastal Gujarat, whose decision to join India in 1947, formalised through a Plebiscite in 1948 ...
  5. [5]
    Integration of Junagadh (1948) - GKToday
    Oct 16, 2025 · The results were overwhelmingly in favour of joining India: Out of approximately 201,000 votes cast, 199,563 were in favour of accession to ...
  6. [6]
    PLEBISCITE REPEAT OFFERED BY INDIA; Proposal on Junagadh ...
    A ballot taken late in February resulted in 190,779 votes in favor of accession the Dominion of India, and only 91 votes for Pakistan. Sir Mohammed Zafrullah ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Junagadh Pursuit of Untold History and Facts - MUSLIM Institute
    Junagadh State was a princely state among the 562 states which were indirectly controlled by British India. The state was located at the south-west of the ...
  8. [8]
    Indian Princely State Junagadh Fiscal Court fee and Revenue Stamps
    Nov 29, 2011 · Junagadh State formerly Western India States Agency ... Area of State was 3,337 square miles, and population of State was 5,45,152 in 1931.
  9. [9]
    Facts about Junagadh | IPCS - Institute Of Peace & Conflict Studies
    On 9 November 1948 , with the unanimous approval of the state council and leaders of public opinion, the administration of the state was handed over to India .Missing: results | Show results with:results
  10. [10]
    Taluka | District Junagadh, Government of Gujarat | India
    Taluka ; 1, Junagadh City, Junagadh ; 2, Junagadh Rural, Junagadh ; 3, Vanthali, Vanthali ; 4, Manavadar, Manavadar ...
  11. [11]
    Pakistan, India and mapping the contested accession of South ...
    Oct 3, 2019 · These former princely states were situated on the Kathiawar peninsula of Gujarat, over two hundred miles south east of the Pakistan border.
  12. [12]
    Map of the Junagadh State Kathiawar . . . 1938-39
    7-day returnsScarce map of the Junagadh State (now a part of Gjurat State), 8 years prior to Indian Independence.
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    CHAPTER 4 – History of Junagadh
    May 12, 2015 · Saurashtra was more forested, but with small acacias and tamarisks, and also graced with abundant pasture lands. …there seems to be an emerging ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Junagadh State and its Lions - Conservation and Society
    The Junagadh State's efforts at conservation were arguably the earliest in the Indian Empire for protecting a species for its own sake. State control of hunting ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  16. [16]
    shetrunji - INDIA WRIS WIKI
    The Shetrunji is one of the major rivers of Saurashtra. It rises at Chachai hills in Gir Forest of Junagadh district of Gujarat at an elevation of 380 m ...
  17. [17]
    Uben River Resource | Dams and Canals | Data Bank
    Location, Vill: Bhatgam Ta: Bhesan Dist: Junagadh ; Purpose, Irrigation ; River, Uben ; Area of catchment, 104 km ; Mean annual runoff in the catchment, 13.89 Mm ...
  18. [18]
    Junagadh
    Junagadh faces adverse climatic conditions in the summer months with the temperature ranging from 28° Celsius to 38° Celsius. In the winter months, the ...
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Census Of India 1941 Vol Iii
    AND POPULATION-contd. 3. Population. 人. Persons. Males. Females. 人. A ... division and distrios. Percentage of total area total area. Demity ago of Rain. LAI.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] 21325_1941_TAB.pdf - Census of India
    ... 1941. 1 .... 1 .. 18D4. 1,6)6,ft03. 1,200 L. 19~. - 8eutb .Ahloal . 11,914,321 ... INDIAlf POPULATION (CO.ftD.) 48Bot.. 1... ~n 1. per oeD~. •. 1,300 IDd1ana ...
  22. [22]
    princely states Archives - GeoCurrents
    The area in question is the former princely state of Junagadh. In the imagination of the cartographer, “Junagadh and Manavadar” retains its former complex ...Missing: extent | Show results with:extent
  23. [23]
    [PDF] 31_1941_IMP.pdf - Census of India
    TOWNS ARRANGED TERRITORIALLY WITH POPULATION. BY r~ELIGION. This table deals with religious distribution of the population of each town. The figures for ...
  24. [24]
    Gujarat - Ethnic Groups, Languages, Religions - Britannica
    The diverse peoples constituting the Gujarati population may be categorized broadly as either Indic (northern-derived) or Dravidian (southern-derived).Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  25. [25]
    India, Gujarat state, Junagadh district people groups | Joshua Project
    Other Religions ; Brahmin unspecified, 63,000 ; Chamar (Hindu traditions), 33,000 ; Charan (Hindu traditions), 1,000 ; Dahur (Hindu traditions), 300 ...
  26. [26]
    Junagadh - Ashok Edicts - Gujarat Tourism
    Ashoka's Rock Edicts belong to 250 BC where around 14 edicts of Ashoka are located on the route to the Mount Girnar Hills.
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Junagadh History - Ancient Heritage & Historical Monuments
    Junagadh came under the Mauryan Empire. Emperor Ashoka inscribed the famous Rock Edicts here, making it one of the most important historical sites in India. 185 ...
  29. [29]
    History of Junagadh, Rulers in Junagadh, British Rule in Junagadh
    Mohammad Bahadur Khanji I expelled the Mughal governor in 1748 and declared independence. He assumed the name of Zaid Khan and founded the Babi dynasty. The ...
  30. [30]
    Jaw-dropping Junagadh - India Heritage
    Apr 3, 2023 · Following the Mauryans were the Rajput Chudasma kings who reigned from the citadel-like Uparkot fort for a long 500 years. And in the 13th ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] History of Junagadh State - Islamabad - MUSLIM Institute
    Administration of Junagadh State under the Babi Dynasty. Junagadh remained under the rule of the Babi Dynasty from. 1730 to 1947 until the occupation of India.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] History Of Freedom Struggle In Princely States
    The first few chapters of the book will serve to give a good idea of the conditions prevailing in most of the states and the general background which led to ...
  33. [33]
    Junagadh: Between the sea and a hard place - Manchester Hive
    Aug 13, 2023 · In 1821, the Nawab of Junagadh signed a treaty with the East India ... Junagadh state territory, with all state servants and policemen taken pris-.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] A Collection Of Treaties, Engagements, And Sanads Vol-vi Relating ...
    ... Junagadh State ceding to the. British Government full crimmal jurisdiction over the lands m the State occupied by the Kathiawar. State Railway, dated 1879.
  35. [35]
    Junagadh & Manavadar: A Story of India's Illegal Occupation - ISSRA
    Sep 15, 2023 · On September 14, 1947, Nawab Mahabat Khan of Junagadh signed an Instrument of Accession (IoA) declaring that Junagadh would be part of the ...
  36. [36]
    The accession of Junagadh, 1947-48: Colonial sovereignty, state ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · ... state, it had to find ways to manage relations between Hindus and Muslims, even as the social order was being transformed. It also had to ...
  37. [37]
    The Swaminarayan Ideology and Kolis in Gujarat
    In the latter part of the eighteenth century, reference is made to a rebel leader in these parts who is named Mansa Khant (Bombay Gazetteer, 26). ... Khan of ...
  38. [38]
    PRAJA MANDAL MOVEMENTS IN PRINCELY STATES
    Feb 13, 2015 · ... Junagadh, popular movements for responsible governance came into play against independence. ... The death of Seva Singh Thikrivala marked the end ...Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  39. [39]
    junagad3 - Royal Ark
    1748 - 1758 H.E. Shri Diwan Nawab Muhammad Bahadur Khan Bahadur Babi, Nawab of Junagadh. b. as Khan Shri Muhammad Sher Khanji Salabatkhanji Babi, eldest son of ...
  40. [40]
    junagad4 - Royal Ark
    1) H.H. Shri Diwan Nawab Sir Muhammad Bahadur Khanji III Mahabat Khanji, Nawab Sahib of Junagadh (s/o Ladli Bibi) - see below. · 2) H.H. Shri Diwan Nawab Sir ...
  41. [41]
    junagad5 - Junagadh - Royal Ark
    1911 - 1959 Colonel H.H. Shri Diwan Nawab Sir Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III Rasul Khanji, Nawab Sahib of Junagadh, GCIE (1.1.1931), KCSI (1.1.1926). b. at ...
  42. [42]
    The tragedy of Junagarh remained unresolved for 73 years
    Nov 9, 2020 · The ruler of Junagadh (the Nawab, Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III) was convinced to join Pakistan by his Dewan (prime minister), Shah Nawaz Bhutto.
  43. [43]
    About Us | Collectorate - District Junagadh
    Junagadh district is located in western Gujarat and is surrounded by Arabian sea and forest area. It is located at a longitude of 20.47 N to 21.45 N and a ...Missing: territory | Show results with:territory
  44. [44]
    The case of Junagardh - The Nation
    Feb 15, 2017 · The Nawab of Junagardh Muhammad Mahabat Khanji III, signed the instrument of accession with Pakistan on 15 September 1947 and Pakistani flag ...
  45. [45]
    Junagadh annexation (November 9, 1947) and the myth of the ...
    Nov 7, 2021 · On November 9, India invaded and annexed Junagadh. The annexation of the princely state shows that India was bent upon annexing all the 565 princely states by ...
  46. [46]
    The accession by Junagadh | Pakistan Today
    Sep 16, 2021 · The underlying reason was that India then could have pleaded that Pakistan's stand on Kashmir was contradictory. It owned the Junagadh accession ...
  47. [47]
    Accession of Junagadh - Historic India | Encyclopedia of Indian History
    A plebiscite was eventually held to decide what the people wanted. The result was 1,90,870 for India, 91 for Pakistan. And this is how Junagadh merged into the ...
  48. [48]
    Arzi hukumat- Economic boycott that stifled Nawab's Junagadh
    Nov 7, 2016 · The campaign against Junagadh Nawab`s decision to merge with Pakistan, was economic boycott of the state.
  49. [49]
    Memories & anti-memories - The Tribune
    Sep 26, 2021 · Samaldas Gandhi, nephew of the Mahatma, formed a unit called the Arzi Hukumat to rule Junagadh. Rich Gujarati traders fled. Cinema halls ...
  50. [50]
    War and Peace in Modern India
    [on] October 24, 1947 the volunteers of the Provisional Government began their operations. People rose against the Nawab's rule in several parts of Junagadh.
  51. [51]
    Sardar Patel & Integration of States - Indian National Congress
    He integrated 562 princely states within the Indian Union with tact, vision and statesmanship. According to former Prime Minister Morarji Desai, “The ...
  52. [52]
    Today in History: 8 November, 1947: When Sardar Patel's diplomatic ...
    Nov 8, 2023 · After holding out for over a week, on November 8, 1947, Bhutto offered India to take over the reins of Junagadh. Indian government ...
  53. [53]
    INTEGRATION OF JUNAGADH INTO INDIA - SRIRAM's IAS
    Jul 25, 2024 · Despite having a majority Hindu population, the Muslim ruler of Junagadh decided to accede to Pakistan. Key Events Leading to Integration<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Kashmir Dispute: The Issues - jstor
    A 'Provisional Government' of Junagadh was set up in Bombay; later it moved to Rajkot, a town outside Junagadh State, which was the headquarters of the ...
  55. [55]
    Annexation of Junagadh Facts for Kids
    Oct 17, 2025 · The Nawab officially joined Pakistan on August 15, 1947. This was against the advice of Lord Mountbatten, who was a top British official in ...
  56. [56]
    Pakistan Still Shows Junagadh On Its Map Despite Losing 1948 Vote
    Jun 3, 2025 · On February 20, 1948, a referendum was held in Junagadh. Of 201,457 voters, 190,870 cast ballots—only 91 voted for Pakistan, reaffirming the ...
  57. [57]
    Pakistan Still Shows Junagadh On Its Map Despite Losing 1948 Vote
    The Pakistan government strongly opposed India's presence in Junagadh. ... According to H.V. Hodson's book The Great Divide, Governor-General Mountbatten sent a ...
  58. [58]
    View: Why Pakistan's recurring claim to Junagadh is futile
    Nov 30, 2020 · While the threat of a clash between Junagadh and India's units loomed large, on 22 October a much profound military conflict was ignited ...Missing: internal dynamics
  59. [59]
    [PDF] ISSUE OF JUNAGADH STATE AND LEGAL PERSPECTIVE
    Pakistan's approach is that Nawab Mahabat Khanji, the then ruler of Junagadh signed the instrument of accession with Pakistan. Nawab decided to accede to ...
  60. [60]
    Why Pakistan has claimed Junagadh in its new political map
    Aug 6, 2020 · While the new map reiterated their earlier claims over regions of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh as Pakistani territories, a new and somewhat ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Pakistan includes J-K, Junagadh in its new map - Deccan Chronicle
    Aug 5, 2020 · The Pakistan government on Tuesday unveiled its new official political map that included the whole of Jammu and Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek in Kutch, and ...
  62. [62]
    India-Pakistan Dispute Archives - GeoCurrents
    The Junagadh controversy goes back to 1947-1948 and the emergence of India and Pakistan as independent states. ... Junagadh's state government, facing financial ...
  63. [63]
    Why Did Pakistan Lay Claim to the Indian Territory of Junagadh?
    Aug 10, 2020 · The Junagadh issue had once been used to raise points in the Kashmir dispute. But this is no longer of significance.
  64. [64]
    Looking back at India's illegal annexation of Junagadh
    Sep 14, 2021 · ... Junagadh & Manavadar to annex them. Pakistan could not send its forces to Junagadh because of logistic problems. Pakistan has recently ...
  65. [65]
    November 9 will always be remembered as “Black Day ... - Newslark
    Nov 11, 2024 · India severely but unjustifiably opposed this decision and took illegal, barbaric military action against the State of Junagadh resulting in its ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] A HISTORICAL REVIEW OF THE INTEGRATION OF PRINCELY ...
    It was on September 15, 1947 that Nawab Mahabat Khanji of Junagadh decided to merge his princely state with Pakistan. By utterly disregarding Mountbatten's ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Reconciliation of princely states with independent India
    Aug 30, 2024 · Then on 9th November 1947 Patel also reached Junagadh, there in his presence Sardar Patel asked the people which country they wanted to go with, ...
  68. [68]
    Integration of Princely States After Independence - Drishti IAS
    Aug 21, 2019 · On November 7,1947 Junagadh's court, facing collapse, invited the Government of India to take over the State's administration. The Dewan of ...
  69. [69]
    'Junagadh is Pakistan': A dream dies with Nawab Jahangir Khan but ...
    Jul 24, 2023 · Pakistan released a political map that laid claim to erstwhile Junagadh, now in Gujarat, and listed Jammu and Kashmir as disputed territory.