Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Knoop hardness test

The Knoop hardness test is a microindentation for assessing material , particularly effective for thin coatings, small specimens, and brittle materials like ceramics and glass, where it applies light loads using a indenter shaped as a rhombic-based with unequal diagonals. The number (HK) is calculated by dividing the applied test force by the projected area of the indentation, which is determined from the length of the long diagonal, enabling precise measurements with minimal surface disruption. Developed in the late 1930s at the National Bureau of Standards (now the National Institute of Standards and Technology), the test was introduced by Frederick Knoop, Chauncey C. Peters, and Walter B. Emerson to overcome limitations in prior hardness methods, such as the test, which could cause cracking in fragile samples under load. Their 1939 publication detailed the indenter's design and application, stemming from earlier exploratory work on pyramidal tools for low-force testing, and a U.S. for the device was granted to Knoop in 1937. In practice, the indenter features a base with diagonals in a 7:1 (long to short), of 172°30' longitudinally and 130° transversely, and edge of 86°15', producing an elongated indentation that penetrates deeper along its major axis for a given load. Test loads range from 1 (9.807 × 10⁻³ ) to 1 kgf (9.807 ), with the standardized in ASTM E384 for microindentation of metals and alloys, and in E92 for broader metallic applications, ensuring consistent procedures for indentation spacing, , and reporting. The test's advantages include reduced risk of subsurface cracking in brittle materials due to its shallow depth-to-width ratio, suitability for closely spaced indentations to map hardness gradients, and applicability across diverse fields like , , and in coatings and precision components. It remains a key tool in and , with reference materials like NIST SRM 1893 providing certified values for .

Principles of the test

Indenter geometry

The Knoop indenter is a highly polished, pointed, rhombic-based pyramidal , specifically designed as an elongated four-sided rhombohedral shape to produce precise, shallow indentations in materials. This geometry features a long diagonal that is approximately 7.114 times the length of the short diagonal, enabling the formation of an elongated impression suitable for micro assessment. The indenter is typically fabricated from synthetic type IIa , chosen for its exceptional , durability, and ability to maintain geometric under repeated use without wear or deformation. The precise angles defining the indenter's edges are 172° 30' for the included longitudinal angle along the long diagonal and 130° for the transverse angle along the short diagonal, ensuring a sharp and controlled . These specifications result in an asymmetrical indentation where the impression's depth is approximately 1/30 of the long diagonal length, minimizing subsurface damage and allowing for testing on thin layers or brittle samples. The rhombohedral directs primarily along the long , producing a rhombus-shaped mark that facilitates accurate measurement of the extended diagonal while reducing edge effects in heterogeneous microstructures.

Indentation process

In the Knoop hardness test, a predetermined load is applied to the rhombohedral indenter, typically ranging from 10 gf to 1 kgf (0.098 N to 9.807 N), to press it into the material surface and create a shallow, elongated impression. This load is delivered through a testing machine that ensures precise and controlled force application, resulting in minimal deformation beyond the immediate contact area. The indenter's geometry, with an included longitudinal angle of 172° 30' along the long diagonal and a transverse angle of 130° along the short diagonal, facilitates shallow penetration, with the depth of indentation being about 1/30 of the long diagonal length. This limited penetration depth, roughly half that of a comparable indenter, reduces the risk of cracking in brittle materials such as ceramics or by distributing stress over a longer surface area. The applied load is maintained for a of 10 to 15 seconds, allowing the material to respond fully and form a stable indentation without excessive creep or recovery effects. Upon removal of the load, the resulting mark appears as a rhombus-shaped impression with unequal diagonals, the long diagonal being approximately seven times the length of the short one, enabling subsequent optical evaluation.

Procedure

Sample preparation

Proper sample preparation is essential for the Knoop hardness test to achieve accurate and repeatable results, as the micro-scale indentations are highly sensitive to surface conditions and specimen integrity. The test surface must be flat and meticulously polished to minimize irregularities that could distort the indentation or diagonal measurements. For reliable microhardness testing, the surface roughness should be less than 0.5 µm , ensuring precise formation of the elongated Knoop indent without or cracking. Thin or small specimens, common in applications like coating evaluation or brittle material analysis, require mounting in a stable medium to facilitate handling, , and secure positioning under the indenter. Thermosetting resins are widely used for this purpose, encapsulating the sample to create a uniform block that prevents movement and protects delicate edges during preparation. Contaminants such as oils, dust, or oxidation layers must be removed prior to testing, as they can alter the contact between the indenter and surface, leading to erroneous values. Standard cleaning involves ultrasonic baths with solvents like acetone or , followed by drying to yield a pristine, oxide-free surface. For thin sections, the specimen thickness must be at least one-third the of the long diagonal of the indentation (approximately 10 times the indentation depth) to avoid effects or deformation from the mounting material influencing the measured , per ISO 4545-1 and ASTM E384.

Testing steps

The Knoop hardness test procedure involves a series of precise steps to ensure accurate indentation and measurement, typically conducted using a microscope-equipped microhardness tester. The first step is the selection of an appropriate test load, which depends on the material's properties and the sample's thickness to produce a measurable indentation without influence or cracking. For bulk materials, loads around 500 (approximately 4.9 N) are common, while lower loads such as 10-50 are used for thin films or coatings to limit penetration depth to less than one-tenth (10%) of the film's thickness. The chosen load should result in an indentation with a long diagonal of at least 20 μm to ensure reliable measurement, avoiding forces below 25 that may yield qualitative results. Next, the prepared sample is positioned on the tester's stage, ensuring the test surface is flat and perpendicular to the axis of the rhombic-based indenter. Under the integrated , the operator focuses on the desired test location and aligns the indenter precisely above it, often using a filar or for accuracy. The rhombic-based indenter, with its elongated shape, is then lowered into contact without shock or vibration. The selected load is then applied gradually, reaching full force within 7-10 seconds to prevent dynamic effects. This load is maintained for a of 10-15 seconds, allowing the material to deform plastically under stable conditions, after which the load is unloaded automatically or manually. The indenter's contact velocity during loading should not exceed 0.070 mm/s to ensure controlled penetration. To achieve statistical reliability, multiple indentations—typically 5-10 per sample area—are performed across the surface. These must be spaced sufficiently to avoid stress field interactions from adjacent indentations, with a minimum distance of 2.5 times the long diagonal between centers and at least twice the diagonal from sample edges or features. For more precise control in anisotropic materials, spacing may be adjusted to 3.5 times the short diagonal for side-by-side positions. After each indentation, the surface is refocused under the before proceeding.

Calculation

Hardness formula

The Knoop hardness number, denoted as HK, is defined as the applied test force divided by the projected surface area of the indentation, expressed in units of kgf/mm². This projected area is approximated as that of a rhombus formed by the indentation's diagonals, where the long diagonal L (in mm) is measured, and the short diagonal is approximately L / 7.114 based on the indenter's geometry. The resulting primary formula is HK = 14.229 \times \frac{P}{L^2}, where P is the applied load in kgf and the constant 14.229 derives from the indenter's rhombic pyramid shape, specifically $2 \times 7.114, accounting for the fixed ratio of the diagonals. For measurements using smaller scales, an alternative form of the formula adjusts for gram-force (gf) and micrometers (µm): HK = 14229 \times \frac{P}{d^2}, where P is in gf and d is the long diagonal in µm; this is equivalent to the primary formula after unit scaling by factors of 1000. To convert HK values to SI units, multiply by the gravitational constant, yielding HK (MPa) ≈ HK (kgf/mm²) × 9.807, since 1 kgf/mm² equals approximately 9.807 N/mm².

Measurement considerations

In Knoop hardness testing, the indentation is measured using optical microscopy to determine the of the long diagonal, as this dimension alone is used in the . High-resolution microscopes with a calibrated stage are employed, typically at magnifications ranging from 400x to 1000x, to ensure precise visualization of the elongated indentation for loads under 1 kgf. According to ASTM E384-17, the diagonal should span 25% to 75% of the field of view to minimize measurement errors, with higher magnifications recommended for indentations smaller than 20 μm. For a valid measurement, the two halves of the long diagonal must not differ by more than 10%, indicating proper indenter and load application; greater invalidates the result. Additionally, the indentation must be clear, symmetrical, and free from cracks or other defects, as any cracking—common in brittle materials—compromises accuracy by altering the effective and . Several factors can introduce errors in diagonal measurement. Surface tilt exceeding 2° leads to non-uniform distribution, causing distortions in the indentation that affect diagonal length accuracy. In thin samples, near the specimen boundary can similarly distort the indentation due to unconstrained deformation or influence. Vibrations during loading or inadequate stabilization also contribute to variability. Modern Knoop testers incorporate through systems, which capture and analyze the indentation via software for automated diagonal length determination, improving precision and reducing operator variability compared to manual methods. These systems, compliant with ASTM E384, exhibit slightly larger but consistent intervals, making them suitable for high-throughput testing.

Applications

Material types

The Knoop hardness test is particularly well-suited for brittle materials such as ceramics, , and minerals, where the shallow and elongated indentation minimizes the risk of cracking or subsurface damage that could occur with deeper-penetrating indenters. This method allows for reliable hardness measurements on these materials without compromising the sample integrity, as the indenter's geometry produces a approximately half that of a Vickers indenter under similar loads. Thin coatings and films, including metallurgical coatings like layers and metal platings, as well as layers, are effectively evaluated using the Knoop test due to its ability to produce indentations with depths on the order of microns, preventing substrate influence in layers as thin as a few micrometers. The test's microhardness range, typically involving loads up to 1 kgf, ensures precise assessment of surface properties without or excessive deformation. For anisotropic materials, such as single crystals like (alumina) or minerals including , the Knoop indenter's elongated rhomboidal shape enables directional hardness assessment by aligning the long axis of the indentation with specific crystallographic orientations, revealing variations in hardness due to . This capability is valuable for studying slip systems and mechanical in these materials. The test is also ideal for small or delicate parts, such as components and dental materials like composites or ceramics, where the minimal indentation size and low applied forces avoid structural damage to fragile or miniature specimens.

Industrial uses

In manufacturing, the Knoop hardness test is widely employed for , particularly in assessing depth on components such as and cutting tools, where precise of surface gradients is essential to ensure and under load. This allows for of thin hardened layers, typically ranging from 0.05 to 1 mm in depth, by creating shallow indentations that minimize subsurface damage while mapping hardness variations across the material cross-section. In materials research within , the Knoop test facilitates the evaluation of transformations and by providing microscale hardness profiles that reveal differences in microstructural , such as or in heat-treated steels. Researchers use it to quantify hardness anisotropy in polycrystalline , enabling correlation between , processing conditions, and mechanical properties without compromising sample integrity. For failure analysis in aerospace components, the Knoop hardness test is applied to investigate surface treatments and mechanisms, such as in turbine blades or parts, where it detects localized hardness changes indicative of , , or inadequate coating . This approach supports root-cause determination by traversing indentations along wear tracks or treated surfaces, often under loads as low as 10 gf to preserve evidence for further metallographic examination. In biomedical applications, the Knoop test is utilized to assess the hardness of implants and restorative dental materials, including for orthopedic devices and composite resins for fillings, ensuring and resistance to masticatory forces. It is particularly valuable for brittle ceramics like zirconia used in dental crowns, where the elongated indenter produces indentations with minimal cracking, allowing accurate measurement of surface values typically between 1200 and 1600 HK.

Advantages and disadvantages

Benefits over other methods

The Knoop hardness test produces shallower indentations compared to macrohardness methods like Brinell and Rockwell, minimizing effects when evaluating thin coatings or layers. This shallower penetration—approximately half the depth of a indentation at the same load—allows accurate measurement of surface properties without significant influence from underlying softer s, which is particularly beneficial for films thinner than 10 micrometers. In brittle materials such as ceramics and , the elongated rhombic shape of the Knoop indenter distributes stress more evenly, reducing the risk of cracking compared to the square-based indenter, which can propagate cracks more readily under similar loads. This design enables reliable testing of fragile components where other microhardness methods might cause damage. The Knoop test exhibits high sensitivity to material anisotropy, with hardness values varying based on the orientation of the indenter's long axis relative to the , making it valuable for studying directional properties in single crystals or textured materials. For instance, in calcium oxyborate crystals, anisotropy shows distinct maxima and minima over a 180° , linked to active slip systems. Additionally, the Knoop method supports a wide load range from 1 gf to 1 kgf, facilitating seamless transitions between micro- and macro-scale testing on the same equipment without modifications. In microhardness applications, this versatility provides greater precision than the due to the longer measurement diagonal at equivalent depths.

Limitations

The Knoop hardness test exhibits higher sensitivity to compared to methods like , as rough surfaces can distort the elongated indentation, particularly affecting the measurement of the long diagonal due to its greater length and shallower depth. This requires meticulous polishing of the specimen to ensure optical clarity, as imperfections can lead to inaccurate diagonal readings. The asymmetrical rhombohedral shape of the Knoop indenter introduces measurement variability, where imprecise alignment can result in distorted indent shapes, such as kite-like forms instead of rhombuses, potentially causing errors in diagonal assessment. Standards like require the measured short-to-long diagonal ratio (y/x) to not exceed 1.1; indentations exceeding this are invalid due to misalignment, beyond which results are deemed unreliable. The test is time-intensive, with each cycle typically requiring 30 to 60 seconds for indentation and , plus additional for measuring the long diagonal, making it less automated and slower than Rockwell testing. For very soft materials, the Knoop test is not ideal, as the shallow under low loads may produce unreliable indentations that are prone to elastic recovery or insufficient definition, limiting accurate determination below certain load thresholds.

Standards and equipment

International standards

The Knoop hardness test is standardized internationally to promote uniformity in methodology, equipment verification, and result reporting across laboratories. The primary standards are ASTM E384 from the and ISO 4545-1 from the , which outline procedures for microindentation hardness testing using the Knoop indenter. ASTM E384, designated as the "Standard Test Method for Microindentation of Materials," encompasses Knoop hardness measurements for a broad range of materials, specifying test forces from 0.0098 N to 9.8 N (1 gf to 1000 gf). It details Knoop-specific requirements, including load application durations, acceptance criteria for indentation quality (such as limits on cracking or irregularity), and verification protocols for indenter geometry and machine performance to ensure measurement accuracy. ISO 4545-1, titled "Metallic materials — Knoop hardness test — Part 1: Test method," focuses on metallic materials and prescribes test forces from 0.009807 N to 19.613 N, with indentations requiring a long diagonal length of at least 0.020 mm for reliable readings. The standard emphasizes indenter verification through profilometry or optical comparison, along with controlled test conditions like surface preparation and environmental factors to minimize variability. These standards differ in unit conventions for expressing Knoop hardness values: ASTM E384 employs the traditional kgf/mm², whereas ISO 4545-1 permits SI units such as N/mm² (equivalent to ) or GPa for consistency with international metric practices. Standardization efforts for the Knoop test, invented in 1939 at the U.S. National Bureau of Standards, emerged in the mid-20th century to formalize its application beyond initial research. ASTM first codified Knoop hardness testing under E92 in 1957 for broader metallic applications, with microindentation aspects detailed in E384 (first published in 1975 and revised periodically), while ISO 4545 was introduced in 2005 and revised in 2017 and 2023 to accommodate modern optical imaging and automated systems for enhanced precision.

Calibration and apparatus

The apparatus for the Knoop hardness test consists of a microhardness tester featuring a rhombohedral indenter designed to produce elongated indentations, an integrated with magnifications typically ranging from 100x to 1000x for accurate diagonal measurements, and a load application system capable of applying controlled forces between 1 gf and 1 kgf using either dead-weight mechanisms or electromagnetic load cells to ensure precise and repeatable indentation. Indenter calibration involves verifying the using certified blocks, where indentations are made and measured to confirm the long-to-short diagonal adheres to the ideal 7.114:1, with acceptable deviations limited to ensure measurement precision, as deviations can affect calculations. This process, detailed in standards like ASTM E92 for block preparation, helps detect or misalignment in the indenter tip. ISO 4545-2 provides methods for and of Knoop testing machines, including periodic checks of indenter and load application. The complete testing system requires periodic calibration according to ASTM E384, encompassing checks for load accuracy within ±1% of the applied force to maintain reliable indentation depth and verification of stage flatness to prevent positional errors during sample mounting and testing, using control charts to monitor consistency and detect changes. In the 2020s, modern automated Knoop hardness testers have incorporated high-resolution cameras for , enabling software-assisted diagonal measurement and reducing operator variability while supporting high-throughput testing in environments.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] A sensitive pyramidal-diamond tool for indentation measurements
    Iron and Steel lnst. 61, 285' (1925). 'Hardness testing device. U. S. Patent 2091995 issued to Frederick Knoop and assigned by him to the U. S. Government.Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
  2. [2]
    Standard Test Methods for Vickers Hardness and Knoop ... - ASTM
    Aug 3, 2023 · Vickers and Knoop hardness tests are used for materials evaluation, quality control, and research. They use indentation principles, with ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] hardness testing retrospective: a century of wilson - Buehler
    In 1939, an alternative to Vickers— the Knoop hardness test—was intro- duced by the U.S. National Bureau of. Standards, now NIST. The Knoop test used a ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Standard Reference Material 1893
    This Standard Reference Material (SRM) is intended for use as a primary standard in calibrating Knoop-type microhardness testers and is certified for mean ...
  5. [5]
    The Vickers And Knoop Hardness Test Theory
    The ideal Knoop indenter is a highly polished, pointed, rhombic-based, pyramidal diamond. The included longitudinal edge angles are 172° 30' and 130° 0'.
  6. [6]
    Super-hard diamond indenter prepared from high-purity synthetic ...
    Jan 11, 2005 · Knoop indenters were prepared from the synthetic type IIa diamonds by taking the tip orientation to the hard crystal orientation of the diamonds ...
  7. [7]
    Analysis of Knoop indentation - ScienceDirect.com
    The geometric characteristics of the Knoop pyramid are described by the normal rhomboidal base with ratio of diameter 1:7.11, included longitudinal angle 172.5° ...
  8. [8]
    Knoop microhardness tester - Mineralogical Society of America
    Knoop indenter, showing angles between the edges of the flat pyramidal diamond point. Approximate ratios are: length : width=7.1:1, and length : depth= 30:1.
  9. [9]
    Use Knoop hardness testing (HK) for micro hardness tests
    As in the Vickers hardness test, the indenter used in the Knoop hardness test is a pyramidal diamond. However, instead of being symmetrical, the pyramid is ...
  10. [10]
    Standard Test Method for Microindentation Hardness of Materials
    Nov 8, 2022 · This test method covers microindentation tests made with Knoop and Vickers indenters under test forces in the range from 9.8 × 10 -3 to 9.8 N (1 to 1000 gf).
  11. [11]
    [PDF] An Introduction to Microindentation Methods - Buehler
    The depth of indentation is about oneseventh of the average diagonal length. Knoop. The methodology of the Knoop hardness test is similar to the. Vickers test ...
  12. [12]
    Knoop testing procedure - EMCO-Test
    The Knoop indenter only enters the material with approx. 1/30 of its longer diagonal (d), i.e. the indentation depth is minimal.Missing: ratio | Show results with:ratio
  13. [13]
    Which surface roughness value is required to do micro Vickers ...
    Jun 9, 2015 · Which surface roughness value is required to do micro Vickers hardness test? ... surface roughness had not to be bigger than Ra=0.32 micrometres.
  14. [14]
    Metallographic cold mounting insight | Struers.com
    Use acetone or at least alcohol. Cleaning in an ultrasonic bath may be necessary. Remember to dry the specimen well. Clean specimens should be handled with ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Vickers hardness testing (HV) for micro hardness tests - Struers.com
    Indentation time: 10-15 seconds · Sample thickness ASTM: At least 10 times the indentation depth · Sample thickness ISO: At least 1.5 times the diagonal length.
  17. [17]
    Applications & Tips - EMCO-TEST
    This minimum specimen thickness (in mm) must be 1.5 times the average diagonal length of the indentation and can be taken from the graph.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] ASTM-E384-17-Standard-Test-Method-for-Microindentation ...
    4.1 In this test method, a hardness number is determined based on the formation of a very small indentation by appli- cation of a relatively low force, in ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 4545-1
    Test method. 1 Scope. This document specifies the Knoop hardness test method for metallic materials for test forces from. 0,009 807 N to 19,613 N. The Knoop ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Knoop Hardness Testing - Buehler - Buehler
    Nov 16, 2021 · The Knoop hardness test uses a rhombohedral-shaped diamond indenter. The long diagonal is seven times (7.114 actually) as long as the short diagonal.Missing: synthetic | Show results with:synthetic
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Vickers and Knoop Reference Guide - NDT Supply
    For the Knoop hardness test, the length of the long diagonal is measured, which is used to derive the Knoop hardness value. For micro indentation testing, the ...
  23. [23]
    Knoop hardness testing | GNEHM Hardness Testers
    The indenter features a rhomboid-based geometry with a longitudinal edge ... Compliance with international standards: ISO 4545, ASTM E384 and ASTM E92.Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  24. [24]
    Indentation Hardness Testing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Hardness results from cracked impressions must be considered questionable. The occurrence of cracking increases the compliance of the test specimen and usually ...
  25. [25]
    Knoop Hardness Test - Powder Metallurgy
    May 22, 2025 · Knoop Hardness Test is a microhardness testing method used to measure the hardness of brittle materials or thin materials, such as ceramic, ...
  26. [26]
    Advantages and disadvantages of the Knoop method - EMCO-Test
    It is particularly suitable for testing small, longish components and very thin layers as well as brittle materials (glass and ceramics) for which no other ...
  27. [27]
    Knoop Hardness Test | Reference Blocks | ZwickRoell Indentec
    Sep 29, 2025 · Indenter Application: A narrow, rhombic-based diamond indenter is pressed into the sample surface under a low test force (typically 10–1000 gf) ...
  28. [28]
    Hardness Testing of Ceramic Coatings - AZoM
    Apr 3, 2015 · The Knoop hardness test is most practical for the purpose of ceramic coating tests, as only a small indentation is required to evaluate and ...
  29. [29]
    Knoop Microhardness Anisotropy and the Indentation Size Effect on ...
    Dec 20, 2004 · The Knoop microhardness anisotropy profile was determined for the basal plane of a Czochralski grown alumina single crystal for indentation ...Missing: minerals | Show results with:minerals
  30. [30]
    Microhardness anisotropy and the indentation size effect on the ...
    The Knoop microhardness anisotropy of single crystal hematite, Fe2O3, was investigated on the basal plane (0001) at indentation test loads from 50 to 1000 g.Missing: minerals directional
  31. [31]
    (PDF) Knoop Hardness Anisotropy and Predicted and Observed Slip ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · 'Hardness anisotropy' is the variation of measured hardness with orientation of a low-symmetry indenter on a particular crystallographic plane.Missing: minerals directional
  32. [32]
    Hardness testing of dental materials and tooth substance - NIOM
    Aug 28, 2017 · Knoop has been used for a wider range of materials, from amalgam and ceramics to resin-based composites, but is also useful for materials that ...
  33. [33]
    Evaluation of depth of cure and knoop hardness in a dental ...
    The study aimed at evaluating the depth of cure and knoop hardness of a microfine-hybrid composite resin that was photo-activated using different methods.
  34. [34]
    Knoop Hardness Testing
    In a Knoop test, a predetermined test force is applied with a pyramid-shaped diamond indenter for a specified dwell time period. The indenter used on a Knoop ...Missing: process | Show results with:process
  35. [35]
    Back to basics: Hardness testing, Part 1 - Gear Solutions Magazine
    Mar 15, 2020 · Finally, the Knoop hardness test is used for very fine hardness measurements of case depth or microstructural phase fields.Missing: manufacturing | Show results with:manufacturing
  36. [36]
    [PDF] A Guide to Selecting the Right Hardness Testing Method - ZwickRoell
    It is commonly used for measuring the hardness of thin coatings or materials with a small indentation requirement. Knoop belongs to the optical methods.
  37. [37]
    The Right Hardness Testing Method for Your Metals Application
    Jan 1, 2024 · Knoop hardness testing is used primarily when the material being tested is thin, small, or has anisotropic properties. It is especially suitable ...
  38. [38]
    Hardness Testing: Elevating Aerospace And Defense Capabilities
    Knoop Hardness Testing: Knoop hardness testing, with its elongated diamond indenter, is particularly effective for brittle materials or thin layers. It's an ...
  39. [39]
    Knoop Indenters - UPI Laboratories
    Knoop hardness testing is commonly used in industries such as electronics, aerospace, and materials research, where small-scale hardness evaluation is ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Hardness of Dental Materials is an Essential Property that ...
    Nov 24, 2022 · Knoop hardness testing was developed specifically for fragile materials like ceramics, plastics, thin metal sheets or surface coatings. In ...
  41. [41]
    (PDF) Substrate and elastic recovery effects in hardness measurement of CVD WC-based coatings
    ### Summary of Knoop Shallower Indentations and Substrate Effects
  42. [42]
    Study of Knoop microhardness anisotropy on the (001), (100) and ...
    Dec 15, 2014 · Moreover, due to the sensitivity of Knoop hardness to the indenter orientation, it is useful to evaluate the anisotropy of materials [2]. The ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] a stereographic representation of knoop hardness anisotropy
    Because the only signifi- cant measurement is in a single direction, this hardness test is well suited to a hardness anisotropy study. alined with ...Missing: sapphire | Show results with:sapphire
  44. [44]
    None
    ### Summary of Knoop Advantages, Thin Layers, Brittle, vs Other Methods, Indentation Depth, Load Range
  45. [45]
    Misalignment in Knoop Microhardness Testing - Deringer Ney
    May 13, 2021 · Misalignment in Knoop testing causes kite-shaped indents. Misalignments over 0.5° are unacceptable, and minor offsets under 0.1° are likely ...
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    ISO 4545-1:2023 - Metallic materials — Knoop hardness test — Part 1
    In stockISO 4545-1:2023 specifies the Knoop hardness test for metallic materials with test forces from 0.009807 N to 19,613 N, and a long diagonal ≥0.020 mm. It also ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 4545-1
    Test method. 1 Scope. This document specifies the Knoop hardness test method for metallic materials for test forces from. 0,009 807 N to 19,613 N. This ...
  50. [50]
    Knoop Hardness Tester - Qness Series - by QATM
    The Knoop test involves pressing a rhombic-shaped diamond indenter into the material's surface under a specific load. The length of the long diagonal of the ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Knoop Indentation Hardness of Advanced Ceramics1
    1 The indenter shall meet the specifications for Knoop indenters. See Test Method E 384. 7.2.2 Fig. 1 shows the indenter and its maximum usable dimensions. The ...
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    [PDF] DUROLINE LV SERIES - Metkon
    Integrated High Resolution CCD Camera. A high resolution CCD camera is hidden inside the hardness tester. It has 5.0 MP resolution which provides to capture ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements