Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Knowledge-based authentication

Knowledge-based authentication (KBA), also referred to as knowledge-based verification (KBV), is a method of identity verification that challenges an individual with questions designed to test their knowledge of personal or private information, thereby confirming their claimed identity against stored or authoritative data.^[1]^[2] KBA encompasses two primary variants: static and dynamic. Static KBA relies on pre-established "shared secrets," such as security questions selected and answered by the user during account setup (e.g., "What is your mother's maiden name?"), which are stored for later verification.^[3] In contrast, dynamic KBA generates questions in real-time from aggregated third-party data sources, such as credit reports or public records, without requiring prior user input, allowing for multiple-choice formats that enhance resistance to guessing.^[3]^[4] This authentication approach offers simplicity in deployment, as it requires no additional hardware and leverages readily available personal data. However, KBA is vulnerable to social engineering, phishing, and data breaches that expose personal information, leading to reduced effectiveness; recent NIST guidelines (SP 800-63-4, 2025) prohibit its use for identity verification at any assurance level due to error-proneness, user frustration from forgotten answers, and security risks.^[2]^[5]^[3] Additionally, static variants are particularly susceptible to brute-force or shoulder-surfing attacks, while dynamic methods depend on the accuracy and currency of external databases.^[3] While historically applied in online banking, e-commerce password recovery, and remote notarization to supplement multi-factor authentication, NIST SP 800-63B (2020) withdrew KBA as an authenticator type, and its use is now discouraged in favor of biometrics or possession-based factors.^[3]^[6]^[7] Despite its emergence in the late 1990s and early 2000s in graphical and textual forms, evolving standards emphasize alternatives over KBA as a solution.^[3]^[8]

Introduction

Definition and Principles

Knowledge-based authentication (KBA), also known as knowledge-based verification (KBV), is a method used to confirm a user's identity by posing questions that draw upon personal information or experiences presumed to be known only to the legitimate claimant. This approach tests the user's recall or recognition of details such as biographical facts, prior interactions, or self-selected secrets, distinguishing it from other verification techniques that rely on possession or inherent traits.^[9]^[10]^[11] At its core, KBA aligns with the "something you know" factor in authentication frameworks, where security hinges on the exclusivity of the knowledge required. It differentiates between private knowledge—details not readily accessible through public records or social media—and public information, which undermines verification if exploited by adversaries. The principles emphasize the secrecy of the underlying data to resist social engineering or data breaches, alongside the uniqueness of user responses to minimize successful guessing attacks, often requiring multiple correct answers for validation.^[12]^[10]^[13] Fundamental components of KBA include the formulation of targeted questions, secure storage of anticipated answers (typically hashed or encrypted), and algorithms for response evaluation. Matching processes commonly employ fuzzy techniques to tolerate minor discrepancies, such as spelling errors or variations in phrasing, ensuring usability without compromising accuracy.^[14] KBA represents an evolution from basic password systems, which function as single shared secrets, by incorporating multi-question sets to layer additional verification and mitigate risks like credential stuffing. Variants include static and dynamic forms, where questions remain fixed or adapt based on real-time data, respectively.^[15]

Historical Background

Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) originated in the late 1990s and early 2000s amid the rapid expansion of online banking and e-commerce, serving as a supplementary verification layer to passwords in order to mitigate early forms of internet fraud and account takeovers.^[16] At this time, static KBA—relying on pre-selected security questions such as "What is your mother's maiden name?" or "What was the name of your first pet?"—gained traction among financial institutions for password recovery and identity confirmation during account setup.^[17] By the mid-2000s, dynamic KBA emerged as an advancement, drawing on external databases like credit bureaus to generate personalized, out-of-wallet questions based on non-public personal details, such as past addresses or vehicle registrations, thereby enhancing security over static methods.^[18] This development coincided with growing access to consumer data repositories, allowing for more robust verification without relying solely on user-memorized secrets. Widespread adoption of KBA accelerated after 2010, driven by high-profile data breaches that exposed the inadequacies of password-only systems and prompted institutions to implement multi-layered authentication.^[19] Major events further shaped KBA's trajectory, including the 2012 LinkedIn breach, which compromised over 117 million user credentials and illustrated how leaked personal information could undermine static KBA by enabling attackers to infer answers to common security questions.^[20] This incident, alongside others like the 2015 Experian hack affecting 15 million records, highlighted vulnerabilities in both static and dynamic approaches when underlying data sources were compromised.^[21] Regulatory developments, such as the European Union's PSD2 directive, with Strong Customer Authentication requirements effective from September 2019, reinforced KBA's role by mandating strong customer authentication that incorporates a knowledge factor—something only the user knows—alongside other elements to secure electronic payments.^[22] In the 2010s, technological advancements in big data analytics and artificial intelligence transformed KBA from manual, rule-based systems to automated platforms capable of real-time question generation and risk assessment, improving scalability for high-volume online transactions.^[23] These innovations, while initially bolstering KBA's efficacy, also amplified concerns over data privacy as reliance on aggregated consumer profiles increased.^[16] In the 2020s, evolving privacy regulations and standards, such as the 2024 NIST SP 800-63-4 guidelines, have increasingly de-emphasized standalone KBA in favor of integrated biometric and possession-based authenticators for enhanced security and user experience.^[24]

Types of Knowledge-Based Authentication

Static KBA

Static knowledge-based authentication (KBA) refers to a method where users preselect and store fixed personal questions and corresponding answers during account registration or setup, which are later used to verify identity. These shared secrets function as a form of "something you know" authenticator, distinct from passwords or PINs due to their reliance on biographical or personal details. The process typically involves the user choosing from a predefined list of questions or entering custom ones, with answers stored securely (often hashed) by the system for future comparison.^[25] In operation, during authentication—such as password recovery—the system randomly selects and presents one to three questions to the user, requiring exact or near-exact matching of the stored answers to grant access. This setup occurs at account creation, where users provide responses that are expected to be memorable yet secret, and the verification step enforces case-insensitive or normalized matching to account for minor variations like capitalization. The method is straightforward, involving no real-time computation beyond retrieval and comparison, making it suitable for low-tech environments.^[25] Common examples include questions like "What is your mother's maiden name?" or "What was the name of your first pet?", which are widely used in email services and banking applications for fallback verification. These have been standard in early online systems, such as those from Microsoft, AOL, Google, and Yahoo, where users set answers to recover access without additional factors. The security model of static KBA depends entirely on the secrecy and uniqueness of the answers, positioning it as a single-factor method or a secondary layer in multi-factor authentication (MFA) frameworks. It assumes adversaries lack personal knowledge of the user, but vulnerabilities arise from guessability—studies show acquaintances guessed correctly in 27%–45% of cases, depending on the question—and entropy assessments classify 8%–57% of answers as low-strength (less than 2^34 possibilities), rendering them susceptible to targeted social engineering or data breaches exposing personal details. Unlike dynamic KBA, which adapts questions per session from external data, static KBA's fixed nature limits its resilience to repeated attacks.^[25]^[26]

Dynamic KBA

Dynamic knowledge-based authentication (KBA) is a method that generates authentication questions in real time using external, user-specific data, distinguishing it from static KBA by avoiding pre-established shared secrets that can be compromised through breaches.^[18] These questions draw on information not readily available to the public or fraudsters, such as details from an individual's credit history or proprietary records, exemplified by queries like "What color was your first car?" derived from credit reports.^[27] This approach enhances security by ensuring questions are unique to each authentication session and tailored to the user's profile.^[28] The primary data sources for dynamic KBA are out-of-wallet (OOW) information, which includes non-public details from credit bureaus such as Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax, as well as public records and transaction histories from financial institutions.^[27] These sources provide a broad pool of verifiable facts, like past addresses, loan amounts, or vehicle ownership, selected to minimize guessability from social media or other open sources.^[18] Operationally, dynamic KBA systems typically select 3-5 multiple-choice questions per authentication session, with the exact number and difficulty adjusted based on the user's risk profile and the transaction's sensitivity—escalating complexity for high-risk events like large transfers.^[28] Questions are generated algorithmically from the available data pool, often retiring frequently used ones to maintain efficacy, and legitimate users achieve pass rates of 70-90%, balancing security with usability.^[29] Common applications include verifying identity during loan applications, where questions might reference credit-derived details like mortgage history, or in high-value transactions requiring confirmation of transaction-specific data.^[18] For instance, a banking system might pose inquiries about recent deposits from internal records to authenticate a wire transfer request.^[28]

Mechanisms and Processes

Question Generation and Validation

In knowledge-based authentication (KBA), question generation relies on algorithms that select and formulate challenges from predefined pools or user data, prioritizing relevance to the individual's history, appropriate difficulty to balance security and usability, and sufficient availability to ensure broad applicability. For instance, attribute selection methods employ importance sampling and data preprocessing to identify suitable personal details from databases, such as past behaviors or preferences, while ensuring questions are verifiable through known facts. Criteria for selection emphasize obscurity, where questions avoid easily searchable public information like common names or events, and verifiability, requiring answers that can be cross-checked against reliable records without exposing sensitive data. In location-based variants, algorithms like DBSCAN clustering analyze user mobility patterns to generate rare-location questions, weighted by "interestingness" to enhance memorability and resistance to guessing.^[30]^[31]^[25] Validation mechanisms in KBA incorporate fuzzy logic to accommodate variations in user responses, such as matching "Jon" to "John" via phonetic algorithms or tolerating typos through Levenshtein distance calculations that measure edit similarity. Scoring systems aggregate response accuracy, often requiring a majority of correct answers across a set (e.g., 3-5 questions) for successful authentication, with configurable thresholds like 60-90% match scores for fuzzy components including fat-fingering corrections or abbreviations. Error handling addresses ambiguous inputs by implementing failure counters—typically limiting 3 attempts per question online—and lockout protocols after exhaustion, while customer service resets enable recovery without compromising security. These processes apply across static and dynamic KBA contexts, though dynamic variants may integrate real-time data for validation.^[14]^[25]^[14] Technical considerations for KBA include seamless integration with APIs from third-party data providers, such as credit bureaus or identity services, to fetch and validate question data without storing excessive personal information. Randomization algorithms shuffle question order and selection from pools (e.g., via round-robin or true random properties) to thwart pattern-based guessing attacks by adversaries. Compliance with privacy standards like GDPR involves obtaining explicit user consent for personal data use, applying data minimization principles, and securing responses to reduce breach risks, despite reliance on personally identifiable information.^[32]^[14]^[33] As of NIST SP 800-63-4 (2025), KBA mechanisms are not recommended as authenticators but may support low-level verification with compliant processes.^[34] Quality metrics for question pools involve rigorous testing to minimize false positives (legitimate users rejected, e.g., due to forgotten details) and false negatives (fraudsters accepted), with evaluations showing high generability and moderate resistance to observation-based guesses. Adaptive difficulty adjusts question complexity based on contextual risk scores—escalating to harder challenges for high-risk sessions—using Bayesian classifiers or entropy measures (e.g., Shannon's formula for answer strength, targeting at least 20 bits across questions) to optimize security without excessive user friction. Industry benchmarks prioritize questions with high correct-response rates (e.g., 90%+ for users) and low fraud success (e.g., <10% for imposters), ensuring scalable performance. Recent standards (e.g., NIST 800-63-4, 2025) limit KBA to supplemental roles, prompting mechanisms to integrate with phishing-resistant factors.^[25]^[35]^[36]^[34]

User Interaction and Response Handling

In knowledge-based authentication (KBA), the user interaction flow involves presenting security questions through diverse interfaces to verify identity without disrupting the primary task. Questions are typically displayed sequentially via web forms or mobile applications, where users select from predefined options or enter free-text responses, often accompanied by a header indicating progress such as "Question X of X" to guide the process. In voice-based systems, such as interactive voice response (IVR) platforms used in contact centers, questions are delivered audibly using text-to-speech technology, with users responding verbally through speech recognition for natural interaction. This multi-modal approach ensures compatibility across devices and contexts, with questions drawn from user profiles during high-risk sessions like logins from unfamiliar locations. Response handling in KBA emphasizes security and efficiency by processing user inputs through validation mechanisms that sanitize data to mitigate risks like injection attacks. Systems apply rules such as regular expression matching, length restrictions, and normalization (e.g., trimming whitespace and case-insensitive comparison) to clean responses before comparison against stored values. Upon submission, real-time feedback informs users of success or failure; for instance, incorrect answers trigger immediate error messages like "Oops! One or more answers were incorrect. Please try again," allowing continuation without full session termination. If validation fails repeatedly, the process escalates to alternative methods, such as biometric verification or manual agent review, to maintain access while enhancing security. User experience design in KBA prioritizes clarity and inclusivity to minimize friction during authentication. Interfaces provide explicit instructions, such as prompts to "select all that apply" for multiple-choice questions, which are common in dynamic KBA to reduce cognitive load and typing errors. Elements like readable fonts, high-contrast colors, and adequate button sizes improve accessibility and touch interaction on mobile devices. Accessibility features accommodate diverse users, including audio delivery via IVR for visually impaired individuals and locale-specific question sets to support non-English speakers; graphical alternatives, like image-based challenges, have been shown to aid older adults by requiring fewer login attempts compared to text-only methods. Error management in KBA balances security with usability through configurable retry policies and non-intrusive logging. Users are typically allowed a limited number of attempts, such as three per question in online flows or per interaction in phone-based systems, after which the session locks to prevent brute-force attacks. Failed attempts increment counters tracked server-side for audit trails, but full answer details are not persisted in plain text to protect sensitive information; instead, hashed or tokenized representations are used. Upon lockout, administrative resets or escalations enable recovery, ensuring compliance with standards like those in enterprise identity systems.

Applications and Use Cases

Online Security and Fraud Prevention

Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) has been used as a secondary factor in multi-factor authentication (MFA) systems, particularly for user logins, account recovery processes, and alerts triggered by suspicious activity, adding a layer of verification beyond passwords or biometrics. However, NIST SP 800-63-4 guidelines, as of 2025, prohibit the use of KBA in such authentication processes.^[37] In these contexts, KBA prompts users with questions drawn from personal or account-related data to confirm identity. Studies on MFA implementations indicate that such measures can reduce the risk of unauthorized access to commercial accounts by over 99%, with specific analyses showing a 98.56% decrease in compromises involving leaked credentials.^[38] In fraud prevention, KBA has played a role in detecting account takeover (ATO) attacks by challenging logins deemed high-risk based on behavioral or contextual signals, such as unusual transaction patterns or IP locations.^[39] For instance, in e-commerce platforms, it verifies users during payment processes by posing dynamic questions about past purchases or profile details, which helps resist phishing schemes where attackers possess stolen credentials but lack deeper personal knowledge.^[40] This approach disrupts credential-stuffing bots and social engineering attempts, as KBA requires information not easily obtainable from public breaches.^[41] The 2014 Target data breach exposed millions of customer records and led to widespread identity fraud claims. Financial institutions have integrated KBA into fraud detection workflows in some cases to authenticate customers.^[42] This can erect knowledge barriers against automated bots attempting to file false claims, as the questions leverage non-public details from credit histories. Empirical metrics highlight the impact of ATO prevention implementations, including KBA, with leading solutions reducing average losses per ATO incident by approximately 52%, from $13,400 to $6,430, through proactive challenges on suspicious sessions.^[39] However, overly complex questions can elevate user abandonment rates, with research showing up to 30% of legitimate users failing KBA prompts and a 25% false rejection rate in banking scenarios, potentially increasing session drop-offs.^[29] To mitigate these drawbacks, KBA is often combined with device fingerprinting in hybrid defenses, where device attributes like browser configurations and geolocation provide passive risk scoring alongside active questioning, enhancing detection without solely burdening users.^[39] Dynamic KBA variants offer a data-driven edge by selecting questions from real-time analytics, further lowering fraud while preserving usability.^[43]

Identity Verification and Onboarding

Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) plays a role in user onboarding by verifying the identity of new registrants during account signup processes, particularly in regulated sectors where establishing trust is paramount. In financial services, for instance, KBA is often integrated alongside the upload of identification documents, such as driver's licenses or passports, to confirm the user's provided information against personal knowledge. This approach not only streamlines the initial setup but also ensures compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations, which mandate robust identity checks to prevent illicit activities like money laundering. However, NIST SP 800-63-4 guidelines, as of 2025, prohibit KBA for higher-assurance identity proofing.^[5]^[44]^[45] For identity verification, dynamic KBA is employed in scenarios requiring security, such as remote notarization and loan approvals, where questions are generated in real-time from non-public data sources like credit histories or public records. This method cross-checks the user's responses against verified personal data, reducing the risk of synthetic identity fraud—where criminals blend real and fabricated information to create false personas—by ensuring only legitimate individuals can provide accurate answers to tailored queries. In remote notarization, dynamic KBA serves as a layer in multi-factor processes, enhancing the reliability of digital signatures and transactions without physical presence.^[46] Across industries, KBA facilitates onboarding in diverse applications. In telecommunications, it is used during SIM card activation to authenticate customers remotely, verifying details like prior addresses or account history to prevent unauthorized activations and associated fraud. In healthcare, KBA enables enrollment in patient portals, such as Epic's MyChart, by posing personalized questions that confirm the patient's identity before granting access to sensitive medical records. Pass rates for KBA in these onboarding flows often fall below 70%, varying based on question complexity and user familiarity with their data, influencing overall conversion rates.^[47]^[48]^[29] KBA is typically integrated sequentially into onboarding workflows, following initial document submission and preceding full account activation, to layer defenses against potential mismatches. If KBA fails—due to forgotten details or suspicious patterns—the process often escalates to manual review by human agents, who may request additional proofs like video calls or secondary documents, ensuring continuity while maintaining security standards. This hybrid model balances automation with oversight, minimizing drop-offs in high-stakes environments like finance and healthcare.^[44]^[45]

Strengths and Limitations

Advantages

Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) offers significant accessibility benefits by not requiring specialized hardware, biometrics, or additional devices, making it inclusive for users with low technological resources or in environments without advanced equipment.^[49] This approach can be deployed universally on any device equipped with a web browser, enabling seamless integration across diverse platforms without compatibility issues.^[50] In terms of cost-effectiveness, KBA involves low implementation expenses compared to biometric or token-based systems, as it eliminates the need for physical infrastructure or ongoing hardware maintenance.^[49] It scales efficiently for large user bases through software-only solutions, often leveraging APIs with per-verification fees ranging from $0.95 to $3, depending on the provider and volume.^[51]^[52] Unlike token-based methods that demand device issuance and management, KBA reduces operational overhead while maintaining broad applicability.^[53] KBA enhances effectiveness as an authentication layer by incorporating personal knowledge verification, which helps mitigate risks from credential-stuffing attacks where stolen passwords alone are insufficient for access.^[54] User familiarity with common security questions, such as those based on personal history, facilitates higher adoption rates and reduces training needs, as individuals are already accustomed to this format from everyday online interactions.^[53]^[55] Additionally, KBA supports quick user enrollment and verification processes, often completing in moments without complex setup. When implemented securely, it preserves privacy by hashing answers rather than storing them in plain text, minimizing exposure of sensitive information in case of data breaches.^[56]^[57]

Disadvantages

Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) is highly susceptible to security risks, including social engineering attacks where fraudsters manipulate users into revealing answers and public information scraping from social media or online profiles.^[58] Data breaches further exacerbate these vulnerabilities, as leaked personal details—such as those from major incidents—enable attackers to obtain or infer KBA responses, rendering the method ineffective against credential stuffing.^[19] For dynamic KBA, which draws from third-party databases, any compromise of these sources can expose the underlying question-answer pools, allowing adversaries to preemptively gather intelligence.^[55] Usability issues significantly undermine KBA's reliability, with legitimate users facing high failure rates of 20-30% due to forgotten answers or inconsistencies in response formatting.^[29]^[59] Fuzzy matching algorithms intended to accommodate variations often introduce errors, leading to false negatives that lock out valid users. Additionally, questions may exhibit cultural biases, such as those assuming widespread pet ownership or familiarity with certain life events, which disproportionately affect diverse populations and increase rejection rates in non-Western or underrepresented groups.^[58] KBA's efficacy has declined amid the proliferation of online personal data, making once-private information readily accessible and reducing the uniqueness of answers.^[19] It is not suitable as a standalone method for high-security environments, as guidelines explicitly prohibit its use for robust identity verification due to these inherent weaknesses.^[5] Privacy concerns arise from the need to query and store sensitive personal details, potentially conflicting with data protection regulations that scrutinize such practices.^[60] Mitigating these challenges proves difficult, particularly in diverse populations where false negatives rise from mismatched question relevance, complicating equitable access. Regulatory frameworks like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) impose heightened scrutiny on KBA's data handling, requiring organizations to justify personal information use and ensure compliance amid growing privacy expectations.^[61]

References

[1]
Knowledge-Based Verification (KBV) - Glossary | CSRC
A process of validating the knowledge of personal or private information associated with an individual for the purpose of verifying the claimed identity of ...
[2]
NIST Special Publication 800-63A
KBV (sometimes referred to as knowledge-based authentication) has historically been used to verify a claimed identity by testing the knowledge of the ...
[3]
[PDF] A Survey on Knowledge-Based Authentication - JETIR.org
Knowledge based authentication requires the knowledge of users on something they know. These types of passwords are currently having widespread uses. KNOWLEDGE ...
[4]
[PDF] Identity Proofing Guide - Wisconsin.gov
Nov 4, 2020 · Dynamic Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA) is an identity assessment that is based on a set of questions formulated from public or private ...
[5]
Authenticators - NIST Pages
There are nine recognized authenticator types. Pre-registered knowledge tokens—sometimes referred to as security questions or knowledge-based authentication ( ...
[6]
Knowledge Based Authentication: Is It Quantifiable? | CSRC
Feb 26, 2021 · KBA is a particularly useful tool to remotely authenticate individuals who conduct business electronically with Federal agencies or businesses ...
[7]
What is knowledge-based authentication? | Definition from TechTarget
Jul 5, 2023 · Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) is an authentication method in which users are asked to answer at least one secret question.
[8]
[PDF] nist.sp.800-63a.pdf
Jul 24, 2025 · KBV (sometimes referred to as knowledge-based authentication) has historically been used to verify a claimed identity by testing the ...
[9]
Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA) Explained - 1Kosmos
May 16, 2023 · KBA is a security measure used to verify a person's identity by asking them to provide specific information that only they should know.
[10]
What is Knowledge-based Authentication (KBA)? - Ping Identity
Jan 20, 2022 · Static Knowledge-based Authentication (SKBA). Most people are ... Dynamic Knowledge-based Authentication (DKBA). While dynamic KBA ...
[11]
Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) [explanation and examples]
Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) is a method used for identity verification by asking personal questions about the account owner.
[12]
The Three Types of Multi-Factor Authentication(MFA)
What are the types of multi-factor authentication? · Type 1 – Something You Know – includes passwords, PINs, combinations, code words, or secret handshakes.
[13]
What KBA Is and Whether There Is an Alternative - Sumsub
Dec 7, 2021 · ... based on the knowledge of the individual's private information. KBA ... Static KBA (Shared Secret Questions). Static KBA is one of the ...
[14]
Why knowledge-based authentication (KBA) is not effective - Alloy
Mar 7, 2023 · KBA: an origin story. This practice began where many of our stories start, at the dawn of an untrustworthy internet. Websites wanted an extra ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
[15]
Everybody Knows: How Knowledge-Based Authentication Died
Jan 22, 2018 · Knowledge-based authentication is one of the most common means of identity verification, used online today by an array of institutions.
[16]
Good news if you're thinking about using knowledge-based ...
Sep 12, 2013 · There are two types of KBA: "static KBA", which is based on a pre-agreed set of "shared secrets"; and "dynamic KBA", which is based on questions ...Missing: development mid- 2000s
[17]
[PDF] FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION December 23, 2013 Imperium ...
Dec 23, 2013 · including financial institutions and credit bureaus, have used KBA to authenticate users for many years. 6. Moreover, government agencies ...
[18]
It's Time to Replace Knowledge-Based Authentication - Socure
Jun 25, 2024 · Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) has been used for over 20 years as a method of proving identity online. It's time to move on.Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[19]
As Scope of 2012 Breach Expands, LinkedIn to Again Reset ...
May 18, 2016 · This was not a new security breach or hack. We took immediate steps to invalidate the passwords of all LinkedIn accounts that we believed might ...Missing: KBA | Show results with:KBA<|separator|>
[20]
https://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/05/as-scope-of-2012-breach-expands-linkedin-to-again-reset-passwords-for-some-users/
[21]
The revised Payment Services Directive (PSD2)
Mar 13, 2018 · Customer authentication is considered to be strong if it is based on the use of two or more of the following elements: (i) knowledge (something ...
[22]
The Evolution of Knowledge-Based Authentication - Footprint
KBA is an authentication method that uses personal information to verify a user's identity. It is based on the idea that only the true owner of an account would ...Missing: history origins
[23]
https://onefootprint.com/blog/kba
[24]
https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-4/
[25]
What is Knowledge Based Verification (KBV)? - ID.me Network
Mar 29, 2020 · KBV is sometimes referred to as “out of wallet” questions, because the user must possess knowledge that could not be obtained from a stolen ...Missing: KBA | Show results with:KBA
[26]
Dynamic knowledge based authentication model for enhancing ...
Dynamic knowledge based authentication model for enhancing security of USSD banking transactions · Journal Title · Journal ISSN · Volume Title · Publisher.
[27]
https://network.id.me/article/what-is-knowledge-based-verification-kbv/
[28]
True Costs of Knowledge Based Authentication Questions | Pindrop
Oct 12, 2021 · Pindrop research shows that up to 30% of customers struggle with KBA based identity questions, while more than half of criminals pass them.Missing: legitimate users<|separator|>
[29]
Attribute Selection and Intrusion Detection for Knowledge-Based ...
PDF | This paper proposes new methods for attribute selection and intrusion detection for knowledge-based authentication (KBA) systems ... question generation ...
[30]
Designing challenge questions for location‐based authentication ...
Jun 24, 2015 · ... question generation schemes where different types of questions are ... Several variants of this dynamic form of knowledge based authentication ...
[31]
7 Managing Knowledge-Based Authentication - Oracle Help Center
Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) is a method of authentication which is used to challenge the user to prove identity before allowing them to proceed ...
[32]
Knowledge Based Authentication | Veratad
Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) is an identity verification method that empowers you to verify a customer's identity using highly personalized “out of ...
[33]
GDPR Compliance Solution - Veratad
Knowledge-Based Authentication. Verify customers with knowledge-based authentication (KBA) multiple choice “out of wallet” question sets. Learn More.Fast, Secure Identity... · Automate Your Anti-Money... · Tons Of Verification Methods...
[34]
Knoweldge Based Authentication (KBA) best practices, Part 1
Nov 23, 2009 · Using too many of these questions will contribute to false positives in your authentication process (i.e., failing a good consumer). False ...Missing: pools | Show results with:pools
[35]
[PDF] Challenges and Best Practices in KBA SCHEMES | Dell Learning
Depending upon the risk score, it classifies the activity and challenges the end user with the corresponding level of authentication. As the level of risk score ...
[36]
NIST Special Publication 800-63-4
Aug 26, 2025 · [SP800-63B] provides requirements for authentication processes that can be used at each of the three AALs, including choices of authenticators.
[37]
[PDF] Authentication and Access to Financial Institution Services ... - FFIEC
This Guidance sets forth risk management principles and practices that can support a financial institution's authentication of (a) users accessing financial ...
[38]
[PDF] how effective is multifactor authentication at - arXiv
May 1, 2023 · ABSTRACT. This study investigates the effectiveness of multifactor authentication (MFA) in protecting commercial accounts from unauthorized ...
[39]
None
Below is a merged summary of all the provided segments on Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA) for Account Takeover (ATO) Prevention, Fraud Rates, Abandonment, and Hybrid with Device Fingerprinting. To retain all details in a dense and organized manner, I’ve used tables in CSV format where applicable, followed by a narrative summary for additional context and URLs. This ensures comprehensive coverage while maintaining clarity.
[40]
Device Authentication and Consumer Verification Techniques for ...
2.2 Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA) – A means of authenticating end users by asking “shared secret” questions only the actual person should know. KBA ...
[41]
[PDF] identity verification in a post-breach world hearing - Congress.gov
Nov 30, 2017 · The data broker Transunion:22 "Trans Union offers more complete and multidimensional ... 'Knowledge Based Authentication (KBA) ~Out-of Wallet ...
[42]
6 Things Banks Can Do To Avoid Losing Big Due To Identity Fraud
Jul 12, 2016 · The so-called 'Knowledge-Based Authentication' measures, AKA passwords and questions such as “What is your mother's maiden name?” or “Where ...
[43]
What is Knowledge-Based Authentication? A 2025 Guide - AU10TIX
May 12, 2025 · Static Knowledge-Based Authentication. This is the OG version. Sign ... Dynamic Knowledge-Based Authentication. Dynamic KBA ditches your ...
[44]
Understanding Knowledge Based Authentication - Jumio
Feb 5, 2024 · Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) uses personal questions to verify a customer's identity. Users are prompted to answer a series of security questions ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[45]
The Ins and Outs of Knowledge-Based Authentication for Verifying ...
Customer Onboarding With Knowledge-Based Authentication ... The global identity verification industry had a value of $7.66 Billion in 2020. ... KYC and AML ...
[46]
Knowledge-Based Authentication (KBA): Static vs. Dynamic - Notarize
Mar 29, 2022 · Knowledge-based authentication (KBA), both static and dynamic, is another way to authenticate personal information that offers distinct security benefits.
[47]
SIM Swapping: Why Telcoms Need To Adopt Stronger Identity ...
Aug 3, 2020 · Mobile SIM card registration is an alternative to in-person SIM card activation ... knowledge-based authentication (using security questions to ...
[48]
Knowledge Based Authentication in Healthcare
Knowledge-Based Authentication Simplifies MyChart Patient Portal Enrollment. Improve patient engagement while providing identity authentication and security ...
[49]
None
### Advantages of Knowledge-Based Authentication
[50]
[PDF] Knowledge based Authentication Techniques and Challenges
This survey concludes that there is a good criterion for knowledge-based authentication based on a textual methodology based on the types of KBA whether ...
[51]
Identity Verification Pricing and Plans - FACEKI
With the Flexy plan for KYC, you pay $0.95 per verification, and charges are applied at the end of each month. But you will have a monthly commitment of $50, ...
[52]
Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) | Help Center
Cost: $2 per each knowledge-based authentication (KBA) attempt. You can purchase a volume package with a minimum of 10 KBA attempts.<|control11|><|separator|>
[53]
Knowledge Based Authentication vs Other Methods - Avatier
Aug 26, 2025 · Cost-Effective: With no specialized equipment required, KBA is a budget-friendly authentication method. Despite these advantages, KBA has faced ...
[54]
What is Knowledge Based Authentication? Verifying Identity in a ...
Oct 24, 2024 · Two-Factor Authentication: Something you know combined with something you have. Increased security through multiple verification layers; Often ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[55]
KBA is Outdated, but Still Remains Useful - Pindrop
Aug 24, 2021 · The difficulty of KBA-challenges should match the value of the credentials they protect. Individuals and organizations providing higher-value ...
[56]
Configuring a Knowledge Questions authentication mechanism - IBM
The mechanism uses a hashing algorithm to store hash values of the answers to the knowledge questions provided by the user instead of storing the actual answers ...Missing: based | Show results with:based
[57]
Security Questions: Best Practices, Examples, and Ideas - Okta
Use encrypted storage: Answers may contain personal information about users and may be reused across different accounts. Consider using secure hashing ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[58]
The pitfalls of knowledge-based authentication - OneLogin Blog
Aug 8, 2024 · The key disadvantages of knowledge-based authentication · Potentially easy-to-access information · Poor user experience · Data privacy and ...Alternative Authentication... · Biometric Authentication · Advanced AuthenticationMissing: principles | Show results with:principles
[59]
Why the Industry is Moving Away from Knowledge Based ... - ID.me
Sep 6, 2020 · Knowledge-based verification (KBV), also sometimes referred to as knowledge-based authentication (KBA), is a method of verifying someone is ...
[60]
NIST Special Publication 800-63A
Aug 26, 2025 · Knowledge-based verification (KBV) or knowledge-based authentication SHALL NOT be used for identity verification. A government identifier is ...
[61]
Top Things Your Organization Needs to Know About Knowledge ...
May 16, 2025 · KBA operates on the principle of “something you know”, one of the three classic authentication factors, alongside “something you have” (like a ...
[62]
Identity Verification: Flows We've Seen in CCPA Data Requests (2 of ...
Jul 7, 2022 · Also called “Knowledge-based Authentication” or dynamic security questions, some companies use short questionnaires to ask questions about a ...Common Verification Flows · Email Or Phone Verification · Photo Of Id Or FaceMissing: concerns | Show results with:concerns