Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Data preprocessing

Data preprocessing is the process of transforming raw, real-world data into a clean, structured, and computer-readable format suitable for analysis in data mining and machine learning. It addresses common imperfections in data, such as missing values, noise, inconsistencies, redundancies, and excessive volume, through a series of preparatory steps that enhance data quality and usability.^[1] The importance of data preprocessing lies in its ability to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and reliability of subsequent analytical processes, as poor data quality can lead to misleading or suboptimal model outcomes. By mitigating issues inherent in real-world datasets, preprocessing ensures that algorithms receive high-quality input, reduces computational demands, and facilitates better model interpretability and generalization. It forms a core phase in methodologies like CRISP-DM, where data preparation is emphasized as iterative and essential.^[2] In machine learning pipelines, it is often the most time-intensive phase, consuming a significant portion of the effort in practical applications.^[1] Major tasks in data preprocessing include data cleaning, which involves imputing missing values (e.g., using methods like k-nearest neighbors or expectation-maximization) and removing or smoothing outliers and noise; data integration, which resolves conflicts when merging data from heterogeneous sources; data transformation, encompassing normalization (e.g., min-max scaling or z-score standardization) and discretization to convert continuous data into categorical forms; and data reduction, such as dimensionality reduction via principal component analysis or feature selection to eliminate irrelevant attributes while preserving essential information.^[1]^[3] These techniques collectively prepare data for effective mining by minimizing bias and enhancing stability.^[1] Recent studies highlight how specific preprocessing choices, including outlier detection via interquartile range or z-scores and imputation strategies like mode replacement, can significantly influence model fairness and performance across diverse datasets, underscoring the need for tailored approaches in modern applications.^[4]

Fundamentals

Definition

Data preprocessing is the process of preparing raw data for further analysis or modeling by transforming it into a clean, consistent, and suitable format, encompassing tasks such as cleaning, integration, transformation, and reduction.^[5] This foundational step ensures that data is accurate, complete, and structured in a way that enhances the effectiveness of subsequent analytical or machine learning processes.^[6] Basic techniques for data cleaning and integration originated in the 1960s and 1970s with the development of early database management systems to manage growing volumes of structured data in organizations.^[7] The concept of data preprocessing as a structured process evolved in the 1990s alongside the rise of data mining and machine learning, becoming a key step in Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) for handling noisy and incomplete data and extracting features.^[8] Key characteristics of data preprocessing include a blend of automated tools for scalable operations and manual interventions for nuanced decision-making, particularly in handling domain-specific anomalies.^[9] It is distinct from data collection, which precedes it as the initial gathering phase, and from modeling, which follows as the application of algorithms on the prepared data.^[10]

Objectives

Data preprocessing serves as a foundational step in data analysis and machine learning pipelines, with primary objectives centered on improving data quality, enhancing model accuracy, reducing computational costs, and ensuring compatibility across systems. By addressing inherent flaws in raw data—such as inconsistencies, noise, and redundancies—preprocessing transforms unrefined inputs into a clean, structured format suitable for effective downstream processing. This process mitigates errors that could propagate through analytical workflows, thereby enabling more reliable insights and predictions.^[11] The measurable benefits of data preprocessing are evident in its capacity to significantly boost performance metrics in machine learning applications. Studies demonstrate that appropriate preprocessing techniques can reduce forecasting errors by up to 30% in neural network models for trended time series, highlighting substantial gains in accuracy and efficiency.^[12] Similarly, preprocessing facilitates downstream tasks like algorithm training by minimizing variability and irrelevant features, which can lead to improvements in overall model performance, as observed across empirical evaluations. These enhancements not only elevate predictive precision but also streamline resource utilization, making complex datasets more manageable for scalable analysis.^[11] In end-to-end data pipelines, preprocessing acts as a critical bridge between raw data collection and actionable insights, embodying the "garbage in, garbage out" principle to prevent flawed inputs from undermining outputs. Without it, poor data quality would amplify biases and inefficiencies throughout the workflow, compromising the validity of results in fields ranging from data mining to artificial intelligence. By standardizing formats and resolving integration challenges, preprocessing ensures seamless interoperability among diverse data sources and tools, ultimately fostering robust, high-impact analytical outcomes.^[11]

Data Quality Issues

Common Problems

Data quality issues in preprocessing encompass a range of imperfections that compromise the reliability of raw data for subsequent analysis. These problems arise frequently in real-world datasets and include missing values, where certain data points are absent; noise, characterized by random errors or variations that distort true signals; outliers, which are data points significantly deviating from expected patterns; and inconsistencies, such as duplicate records or mismatches in data representation like varying formats for the same attribute (e.g., dates recorded as MM/DD/YYYY in one source and DD-MM-YYYY in another).^[13]^[14]^[15] Incomplete data overlaps with missing values but extends to broader gaps in information coverage, often resulting in partial representations that hinder comprehensive analysis. Such issues stem from diverse origins, including sensor failures in automated collection systems, which produce erroneous or absent readings; human entry errors during manual data input, leading to typographical mistakes or omissions; and challenges in integrating data from heterogeneous sources, such as disparate databases and APIs that introduce format discrepancies or conflicting entries.^[13]^[16]^[14] These problems can be categorized into structural issues, which pertain to mismatches in data schema or organization (e.g., differing attribute names or hierarchies across sources), and content-based issues, which involve invalid or implausible values within the data (e.g., negative ages or impossible measurement ranges).^[17]^[16] Structural problems often emerge during multi-source integration, while content-based ones typically trace back to collection inaccuracies. Such categorizations aid in identifying the scope of quality deficits, though they collectively undermine the validity of downstream analytical processes.^[13]

Impacts

Unaddressed data quality problems in datasets can lead to biased machine learning models, as incomplete or skewed input data propagates systematic errors into predictions, resulting in unfair or inaccurate outcomes across demographics or scenarios.^[18] For instance, missing values or erroneous labels introduce imbalances that amplify existing prejudices in the training data, compromising model fairness and reliability.^[19] Similarly, predictive performance often suffers dramatically; simulations on activity and heart rate monitoring data show that missingness levels exceeding 50% render models non-predictive, with root mean square error (RMSE) degrading substantially from baseline levels of 0.079 to unreliable thresholds.^[20] This reduction in accuracy—potentially dropping below usable levels—undermines the validity of downstream analyses. Poor data also inflates processing demands, with employees dedicating up to 27% of their time to manual corrections, thereby slowing workflows and escalating operational overhead.^[21] Ultimately, these issues yield misleading insights, where faulty analytics guide erroneous conclusions and inefficient resource allocation.^[22] In business contexts, the ramifications extend to substantial financial losses from decisions based on flawed data, such as misguided marketing campaigns or inventory mismanagement that erode revenue and market position. Organizations face average annual costs of $12.9 million due to such inefficiencies, including compliance violations and lost productivity.^[23]^[21] Across the U.S. economy, poor data quality is estimated to cost $3.1 trillion yearly as of 2016, encompassing lower productivity, system failures, and suboptimal strategies.^[24] In healthcare, the stakes are even higher, as inaccurate or incomplete patient records contribute to misdiagnoses, incorrect treatments, and medication errors, directly endangering lives and outcomes. For example, flawed data can delay critical interventions or lead to patient misidentification, amplifying risks in clinical decision-making.^[25] These broader implications highlight the urgency of addressing data quality issues to mitigate cascading harms in analysis and real-world applications.

Preprocessing Stages

Data Cleaning

Data cleaning is a critical stage in data preprocessing that involves identifying, correcting, or removing errors and inconsistencies within a dataset to improve its accuracy, reliability, and usability for subsequent analysis. This process addresses issues such as inaccuracies introduced during data collection, storage, or transmission, ensuring the dataset reflects true underlying information without distortions that could skew results.^[14] Core activities in data cleaning include removing duplicate records, which occur when identical or near-identical entries are present, often due to repeated data entry or merging errors; this step prevents overrepresentation and redundancy in the dataset. Correcting errors encompasses fixing inaccuracies like typographical mistakes, inconsistent formatting, or invalid values through verification against known standards or domain knowledge. Handling noise, which refers to random variations or outliers in the data that do not reflect true patterns, is typically achieved through smoothing techniques such as binning—where data is sorted and grouped into equal-frequency bins, with values then replaced by bin means or boundaries—and regression-based smoothing, which fits a regression model to estimate and replace noisy points with predicted values.^[26]^[27]^[28] Methods for data cleaning vary by dataset scale: for small datasets, manual inspection allows domain experts to review and edit entries directly, identifying subtle errors that automated tools might miss. For large-scale datasets, automated scripts and tools are employed, such as SQL queries for deduplication—using operations like GROUP BY and HAVING COUNT(*) > 1 to detect and eliminate duplicates efficiently. These automated approaches leverage scripting languages like Python or R, integrated with libraries such as pandas, to scale the process across massive volumes of data.^[29]^[30]^[31] Evaluation of data cleaning effectiveness relies on metrics that quantify improvements in data quality, such as the completeness ratio, defined as the proportion of non-null or valid entries in the dataset after cleaning compared to before, which indicates how well errors and gaps have been addressed. Other metrics may include accuracy rates verified against ground truth samples, but completeness provides a straightforward measure of the dataset's readiness for integration or analysis. Post-cleaning, the refined data can be briefly referenced in integration processes from multiple sources, though detailed merging occurs in separate stages. As of 2025, AI-driven tools like Monte Carlo and Great Expectations enable automated profiling, real-time monitoring, and anomaly detection, reducing data downtime by up to 90% and improving processing efficiency by 50%.^[32]^[33]^[34]

Data Integration

Data integration is a critical phase in data preprocessing that involves combining data from multiple heterogeneous sources to form a unified, coherent dataset suitable for subsequent analysis or modeling. This process ensures that disparate datasets, often originating from different systems, formats, or organizations, are reconciled into a single view that maintains consistency and completeness. By addressing variations in structure and content across sources, data integration facilitates more accurate insights and reduces errors in downstream tasks such as machine learning or reporting.^[35] Key processes in data integration include schema matching and entity resolution. Schema matching identifies and aligns corresponding attributes or elements between different data schemas, enabling the mapping of fields like "customer_name" in one database to "client_full_name" in another. This alignment is essential for resolving structural differences and is foundational in domains like data warehousing and semantic query processing. Entity resolution, also known as record linkage, matches records across sources that refer to the same real-world entity, such as linking customer profiles from sales and CRM systems despite variations in spelling or identifiers. Surveys highlight that entity resolution often employs blocking and filtering techniques to efficiently handle large-scale data by reducing the number of comparisons needed. Data warehousing techniques further support integration by providing centralized repositories where extracted data is transformed and loaded to eliminate silos.^[36]^[35]^[37]^[38] Integration addresses several challenges, particularly redundancy and conflicts arising during merges. Redundancy occurs when duplicate records from multiple sources lead to inflated datasets and potential inconsistencies, requiring deduplication strategies within entity resolution workflows. Conflicts, such as differing data representations, can manifest in value mismatches like temperature measurements in Celsius versus Fahrenheit, necessitating reconciliation through conversion rules or mapping functions to ensure semantic consistency. For instance, semantic incompatibilities in units or formats are common in heterogeneous environments and can be resolved using predefined transformation logic. Data cleaning often serves as a prerequisite to integration, preparing individual sources by removing errors before merging.^[35]^[39]^[40] ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) pipelines provide a structured framework for implementing data integration, particularly in large-scale environments. In ETL, data is first extracted from source systems, then transformed to resolve schema and entity issues while handling redundancies and conflicts, and finally loaded into a target repository like a data warehouse. This approach is widely adopted for its ability to automate integration in big data contexts, though it requires careful design to manage scalability and quality. In recent years, particularly as of 2025, there has been a shift towards ELT pipelines, especially in cloud-based data lakes, allowing transformation after loading to better handle unstructured data with tools like AWS Glue. Recent explorations emphasize ETL's role in overcoming integration hurdles through hybrid optimizations for efficiency.^[41]^[42]^[43]

Data Transformation

Data transformation is a critical phase in data preprocessing that involves applying operations to convert raw data into formats more suitable for analysis, modeling, or mining tasks. This stage focuses on structural and representational changes to enhance data consistency and usability, without primarily aiming at volume reduction. By restructuring data, transformation addresses incompatibilities between source formats and analytical requirements, thereby improving the effectiveness of downstream processes. Key operations in data transformation include aggregation, generalization, attribute construction, and smoothing. Aggregation summarizes data at higher levels of abstraction, such as computing total sales figures from daily transactions to monthly summaries, which prepares multidimensional data for efficient querying in data cubes. This operation preserves essential patterns while facilitating trend analysis. Generalization replaces low-level, detailed data values with higher-level concepts using predefined hierarchies; for example, specific city names might be generalized to broader regions like "North America" to simplify global market segmentation. Attribute construction generates new attributes derived from existing ones, such as creating a debt-to-income ratio from separate debt and income fields, which can reveal insights not apparent in the original dataset. These operations collectively enable the creation of derived features that better align with analytical goals. Smoothing specifically targets noise reduction in data, particularly in time-series contexts, to uncover underlying trends. A common method is the moving average filter, which computes the average of a sliding window of consecutive data points—for instance, averaging three consecutive monthly temperature readings to mitigate short-term fluctuations caused by measurement errors. This technique is widely used in forecasting applications to produce cleaner signals for pattern recognition.^[44] The primary purpose of data transformation is to ensure the data is compatible with the intended models or algorithms; for example, converting non-numerical data like text descriptions into quantifiable forms supports machine learning pipelines where numerical inputs are essential for training classifiers or regressors. In supervised learning scenarios, such transformations improve model performance by reducing representational biases and enhancing feature relevance. Following transformation, data reduction may be applied briefly to control volume if the modifications introduce redundancy. As of 2025, AI-driven tools automate feature engineering and transformation tasks, such as optimizing scaling and deriving features, minimizing human intervention and enhancing model performance.^[45]^[46]

Data Reduction

Data reduction is a critical phase in data preprocessing that involves minimizing the volume of data while retaining its essential characteristics to facilitate efficient storage, processing, and analysis. This process addresses the challenges posed by large-scale datasets, where raw data volumes can overwhelm computational resources and analytical tools. By applying reduction techniques, practitioners can achieve a more manageable representation of the data without substantially compromising its utility for tasks such as machine learning or data mining. Key strategies for data reduction include numerosity reduction, dimensionality reduction, and data compression. Numerosity reduction decreases the number of data points by replacing the original dataset with a more compact representation, such as parametric models like regression, where model parameters are estimated and stored instead of individual records, or nonparametric approaches like clustering and sampling that group similar data instances; emerging methods like dataset distillation (as of 2025) leverage generative models to create compact synthetic datasets that preserve performance for training. Dimensionality reduction focuses on eliminating redundant or less informative features; for instance, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) projects high-dimensional data onto a lower-dimensional subspace that captures the principal axes of variance, effectively reducing features while preserving the majority of the data's structure. Data compression further condenses the dataset through encoding schemes, distinguishing between lossless compression—which enables exact reconstruction of the original data by exploiting redundancies, such as in run-length encoding—and lossy compression, which discards minor details to achieve higher compression ratios, suitable for applications where perfect fidelity is not required.^[47] The primary benefits of data reduction encompass accelerated processing speeds and substantial storage savings, enabling scalable analysis on voluminous datasets. For example, in high-dimensional domains like image processing or genomics, techniques such as PCA can condense thousands of features to a few hundred, reducing computational demands by orders of magnitude while maintaining analytical integrity, as demonstrated in applications where reduced datasets yield comparable predictive performance with significantly lower resource usage. These efficiencies not only lower operational costs but also enhance the feasibility of real-time or iterative data exploration. Despite these advantages, data reduction involves trade-offs, particularly the risk of information loss when techniques are over-applied, which may obscure subtle patterns or introduce biases in subsequent analyses. Lossy methods, for instance, prioritize compression efficiency over completeness, potentially degrading model accuracy if critical variance is eliminated, necessitating careful selection based on the application's tolerance for approximation. Balancing reduction intensity with fidelity preservation is essential to avoid undermining the overall preprocessing pipeline.^[48]^[49]^[50]

Specific Techniques

Handling Missing Values

Handling missing values is a critical step in data preprocessing to ensure the integrity and usability of datasets for subsequent analysis. Missing data can arise due to various reasons, such as non-response in surveys, sensor failures in sensor networks, or errors in data collection. The approach to handling these absences depends on the underlying missingness mechanism, which influences the validity of the chosen method. The three primary mechanisms are missing completely at random (MCAR), where the probability of missingness is unrelated to any observed or unobserved data; missing at random (MAR), where missingness depends only on observed data; and missing not at random (MNAR), where missingness relates to the unobserved values themselves.^[51] Understanding these mechanisms guides the selection of techniques, as methods valid under MCAR may introduce bias under MAR or MNAR.^[52] Deletion techniques remove incomplete observations or entries to work with complete cases only. Listwise deletion, also known as complete case analysis, excludes any row with at least one missing value, simplifying analysis but potentially reducing sample size significantly and introducing bias if data are not MCAR.^[53] Pairwise deletion, in contrast, uses all available pairs of observations for each analysis, retaining more data but possibly leading to inconsistent sample sizes across computations and inflated correlations.^[53] These methods are computationally efficient and suitable for large datasets with low missingness rates under MCAR assumptions, though they discard valuable information.^[54] Imputation replaces missing values with estimated substitutes to preserve dataset size. Simple imputation methods include replacing numerical missing values with the mean or median of observed values in the feature, which is straightforward and preserves the mean but underestimates variance by treating imputed values as known.^[55] For categorical data, mode imputation uses the most frequent category. More advanced techniques leverage relationships in the data; k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) imputation identifies the k most similar complete observations based on distance metrics (e.g., Euclidean) and imputes the average or weighted average of their values.^[56] This method performs well under MAR when local patterns exist but can be sensitive to the choice of k and distance measure.^[57] Regression-based imputation models the missing variable as a function of other observed variables using linear or logistic regression, predicting values for the missing entries. This approach accounts for dependencies and is effective under MAR, though it assumes linearity and can propagate errors if the model is misspecified.^[55] Prediction models, such as decision trees, extend this by using tree-based algorithms to impute values, handling non-linear relationships and interactions without assuming a specific distribution; for instance, classification and regression trees (CART) incorporate surrogate splits to manage missingness during tree construction.^[58] Multiple imputation, a sophisticated variant, generates several plausible datasets by drawing from posterior distributions and analyzes them separately before pooling results, providing valid inferences under MAR while properly accounting for uncertainty.^[59] Evaluating imputation effectiveness involves comparing pre- and post-imputation dataset statistics to assess preservation of original properties. Key metrics include mean, variance, and correlations; for example, mean imputation often reduces variance compared to the original data, while k-NN or regression methods better maintain it by capturing variability.^[60] Under MCAR, deletion methods yield unbiased estimates but lower power due to reduced sample size, whereas imputation generally preserves power better. Cross-validation or simulation studies can quantify bias and efficiency by artificially introducing missingness and measuring recovery accuracy.^[61] These evaluations ensure the chosen method aligns with the missingness mechanism and analysis goals, forming a key part of the broader data cleaning stage.^[55]

Outlier Detection and Treatment

Outliers are data points that significantly deviate from the overall pattern of the dataset, potentially arising from measurement errors, rare events, or genuine anomalies that can distort statistical analyses and machine learning models during preprocessing. In data preprocessing, detecting and treating these outliers is essential to enhance data quality and ensure robust downstream applications, as untreated outliers can lead to biased estimates and reduced model performance.^[62] Detection methods for outliers vary by approach and data characteristics. Statistical methods are foundational and often applied in univariate settings, where outliers are identified in single variables. The Z-score method computes the standardized distance of a point from the mean, defined as z = \frac{x - \mu}{\sigma}, where \mu is the mean and \sigma is the standard deviation; points with |z| > 3 are typically flagged as outliers under the assumption of approximate normality.^[63] Similarly, the interquartile range (IQR) method, introduced by Tukey, identifies outliers as values below Q1 - 1.5 \times IQR or above Q3 + 1.5 \times IQR, where Q1 and Q3 are the first and third quartiles, and IQR = Q3 - Q1; this non-parametric approach is robust to non-normal distributions and skewness.^[64] Model-based methods leverage algorithms to uncover outliers in more complex structures, particularly multivariate data where anomalies may not be extreme in individual dimensions but deviate jointly. Density-based clustering, such as DBSCAN (Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise), designates points as outliers if they fall outside dense clusters, defined by a minimum number of neighbors within a radius \epsilon; this enables detection of arbitrary-shaped clusters and noise without assuming data distribution.^[65] Univariate methods suffice for isolated variables but miss multivariate outliers, which involve interactions across features—for instance, a combination of moderate values that collectively appear anomalous—necessitating techniques like principal component analysis or distance-based measures for higher dimensions.^[66] Domain-specific rules provide tailored detection in application contexts, incorporating expert knowledge such as predefined thresholds or logical conditions. In fraud detection, for example, outliers might be flagged by rules combining unusual transaction amounts exceeding historical norms with atypical locations or times, enhancing precision in financial datasets where statistical methods alone may overlook contextual anomalies.^[67] Once detected, outliers require careful treatment to mitigate their impact without introducing bias. Removal, or trimming, involves deleting identified points, which is straightforward but risks data loss if outliers represent valid rare events; it is commonly applied when the dataset is large and anomalies are deemed erroneous.^[62] Capping, known as winsorizing, replaces extreme values with the nearest non-outlier boundary (e.g., the 95th percentile), preserving sample size while reducing influence, as this method bounds the data without elimination. Transformation techniques, such as logarithmic scaling (y = \log(x)), compress skewed distributions to lessen outlier extremity, particularly effective for positive-valued data like incomes or counts in preprocessing pipelines. The choice of treatment depends on the context, with integration of treated data proceeding to subsequent preprocessing stages for analysis.

Normalization and Scaling

Normalization and scaling are essential preprocessing techniques in data analysis that adjust the range and distribution of numerical features to ensure comparability across variables with differing units or scales, thereby preventing bias in algorithms sensitive to magnitude differences. These methods transform data without altering its underlying relationships, making them particularly useful in machine learning pipelines where feature scales can dominate model performance. For instance, in datasets involving measurements like height in centimeters and weight in kilograms, unscaled features may lead to disproportionate influence from larger-scale variables. One common technique is min-max scaling, also known as feature rescaling, which linearly transforms each feature to a fixed range, typically [0, 1], using the formula:

X_{\text{scaled}} = \frac{X - X_{\min}}{X_{\max} - X_{\min}}

where X is the original value, and X_{\min} and X_{\max} are the minimum and maximum values of the feature, respectively. This method preserves the relative relationships between data points but is sensitive to outliers, as extreme values can compress the scaled range for other points. Min-max scaling is often applied in scenarios requiring bounded outputs, such as image processing or when using neural networks with activation functions like sigmoid.^[68] Z-score standardization, or standardization, centers the data around a mean of zero and a standard deviation of one, following the formula:

X_{\text{standardized}} = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}

where \mu is the mean and \sigma is the standard deviation of the feature. This approach assumes a roughly Gaussian distribution and is robust to varying scales but can be affected by outliers that inflate \sigma. It is widely used for algorithms like support vector machines (SVM) and principal component analysis (PCA), where assumptions of normality or equal variance enhance convergence and interpretability. Robust scaling addresses the limitations of the previous methods by using statistics less sensitive to outliers, specifically the median and interquartile range (IQR). The transformation subtracts the median and divides by the IQR (the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles):

X_{\text{robust}} = \frac{X - \text{median}(X)}{\text{IQR}(X)}

This technique maintains the central tendency while mitigating outlier influence, making it suitable for real-world datasets with noise or anomalies. Robust scaling is particularly beneficial for distance-based models like k-nearest neighbors (KNN), where outliers could otherwise skew neighbor selection. A variation, decimal scaling, normalizes by shifting the decimal point to ensure the maximum absolute value falls within [-1, 1], determined by the number of decimal places equal to the largest power of 10 needed to divide the maximum value by 1. For example, values ranging from 0 to 999 are divided by 1000 to yield [0, 0.999]. This method preserves integer properties and is useful in numerical computations where exact decimal representation matters, such as in certain database systems. Normalization and scaling are typically applied to numerical features in conjunction with encoding techniques for non-numeric data to prepare heterogeneous datasets for modeling. They are especially critical for distance-based algorithms like KNN and SVM, as well as when features have disparate units (e.g., temperature in Celsius versus income in dollars), ensuring equitable contributions to model training.

Categorical Data Encoding

Categorical data encoding transforms non-numeric qualitative variables, such as labels or categories, into numerical representations suitable for machine learning algorithms that require quantitative inputs.^[69] This process is essential in data preprocessing pipelines, as most models, including linear regression, decision trees, and neural networks, cannot directly process textual or unordered categorical features.^[70] Common encoding methods balance interpretability, computational efficiency, and preservation of relationships between categories, with choices depending on whether the data is nominal (no inherent order, e.g., colors) or ordinal (with natural ranking, e.g., education levels).^[69] One-hot encoding, also known as dummy encoding, converts each category into a binary vector where a single element is 1 to indicate presence and others are 0, creating a sparse matrix of dimensions equal to the number of categories.^[71] This method avoids implying false ordinal relationships, making it ideal for nominal data in algorithms like logistic regression or support vector machines, though it can lead to the curse of dimensionality for features with many categories.^[69] For instance, encoding a "color" feature with values {red, blue, green} results in three binary columns, enabling models to treat categories independently without assuming numerical proximity implies similarity.^[71] Label encoding, often used interchangeably with ordinal encoding, assigns unique integers to categories based on an arbitrary or natural order, mapping them to a single numerical column.^[70] It is particularly suitable for ordinal data where the ranking matters, such as low/medium/high ratings, but can mislead tree-based models by implying unintended hierarchies in nominal data.^[69] In practice, for a "city" feature like {New York, London, Tokyo}, label encoding might assign 0, 1, 2 respectively, preserving compactness but requiring careful application to avoid biasing distance-based algorithms.^[70] Target encoding replaces each category with the mean (or another statistic) of the target variable for that category in the training data, providing a supervised numerical summary that captures predictive relationships.^[72] Regularized variants, such as those using generalized linear mixed models with cross-validation, mitigate overfitting by shrinking estimates toward a global mean, especially beneficial in high-cardinality settings.^[73] This approach has demonstrated superior performance over one-hot and label encoding in benchmarks across regression and classification tasks, improving accuracy by up to 5-10% on datasets with sparse categories.^[73] For example, in a housing price prediction dataset, cities could be encoded by their average sale price, directly informing the model's target correlation.^[72] Distinguishing between ordinal and nominal data is crucial, as ordinal encoding preserves meaningful hierarchies (e.g., poor/fair/good ratings mapped to 1/2/3) while nominal encoding like one-hot prevents erroneous assumptions of order.^[74] Misapplying ordinal methods to nominal data can introduce bias, reducing model interpretability and performance in downstream tasks.^[69] High-cardinality features, with hundreds or thousands of categories, pose challenges for standard encodings due to increased dimensionality or loss of information; solutions include feature hashing, which maps categories to fixed-size bins via hash functions to approximate one-hot without expansion, and entity embeddings, learned dense vectors that capture semantic similarities.^[75] Feature hashing reduces memory usage for large-scale text or categorical inputs, though it risks collisions in sparse spaces.^[76] Embeddings, trained via neural networks, excel in deep learning by embedding categories into low-dimensional spaces where similar ones (e.g., cities like "Paris" and "London") cluster closely, enhancing generalization on sparse data.^[77] Scaling may be applied post-encoding for mixed numeric-categorical datasets to ensure feature comparability.^[69]

Applications

Machine Learning Pipelines

Data preprocessing is a foundational step in machine learning pipelines, particularly in supervised learning workflows, where it prepares raw data for subsequent stages such as feature selection and model training. By transforming unstructured or inconsistent data into a suitable format, preprocessing ensures that algorithms can learn meaningful patterns without being hindered by noise, missing values, or scale discrepancies. In practice, this integration is facilitated through sequential workflows that apply multiple transformation steps atomically, preventing errors from manual chaining of operations. For instance, the scikit-learn library's Pipeline class enables the construction of such end-to-end pipelines, where preprocessing transformers (e.g., scalers or imputers) are followed by an estimator for training, allowing seamless fitting and prediction on new data.^[78]^[79] A key consideration in machine learning pipelines is the handling of train-test splits to mitigate data leakage, a common pitfall where test set information inadvertently influences the training process, leading to overly optimistic performance estimates. Preprocessing operations, such as normalization or imputation, must be fitted exclusively on the training data and then applied to the test set, ensuring that no future or unseen data contaminates the model. This principle extends to cross-validation, where preprocessing is performed independently within each fold to maintain the integrity of the validation process and simulate real-world deployment scenarios. Failure to adhere to these practices can result in models that generalize poorly, as the pipeline effectively "cheats" by using global statistics from the entire dataset.^[80] In supervised image classification tasks, preprocessing pipelines often include resizing images to uniform dimensions and pixel value normalization to align with convolutional neural network (CNN) expectations, enhancing convergence and accuracy. For example, in the development of deep CNNs for large-scale image recognition, inputs are typically resized to 224×224 pixels and normalized by subtracting the dataset mean and dividing by the standard deviation, which stabilizes training on diverse image datasets. Similarly, in natural language processing pipelines for supervised tasks like text classification, tokenization segments raw text into tokens (e.g., words or subwords via methods like WordPiece), converting it into numerical embeddings that feed into models such as transformers. Techniques like categorical encoding may be briefly incorporated here to handle labels or features, but the focus remains on sequence preparation before training.

Data Mining Processes

Data preprocessing serves as a foundational step in the knowledge discovery in databases (KDD) process, where it acts as the second major phase following data selection, aimed at cleaning, integrating, and preparing raw data to make it suitable for transformation, pattern mining, and evaluation. As outlined by Fayyad et al. (1996), this phase addresses issues like noise, missing values, and inconsistencies to ensure high-quality input for subsequent knowledge extraction, thereby enhancing the reliability of discovered patterns.^[81] In the CRISP-DM framework, data preparation—encompassing preprocessing—follows business and data understanding phases, involving tasks such as data cleaning, construction, integration, and formatting to create a refined dataset ready for modeling and evaluation.^[82] Within data mining processes, preprocessing incorporates specialized techniques tailored to pattern discovery objectives, such as discretization for association rule mining and sampling for efficient pattern identification. Discretization transforms continuous numerical attributes into discrete intervals, enabling the application of algorithms like Apriori to uncover relational patterns; for example, unsupervised methods partition data based on statistical properties to preserve meaningful associations without prior class labels.^[83] Sampling, meanwhile, selects representative subsets from large datasets to mitigate computational demands during pattern mining, with approaches like random or constraint-based sampling ensuring that discovered patterns, such as frequent itemsets, remain statistically sound and generalizable.^[84] A prominent example of preprocessing in data mining is the preparation of transactional data for market basket analysis, where raw purchase records are cleaned by removing invalid entries, aggregating items per transaction into binary matrices, and applying discretization to quantitative attributes like quantities or prices to facilitate association rule extraction. This step ensures that algorithms can identify co-occurrence patterns, such as product affinities, while data reduction techniques like dimensionality reduction may be briefly applied to streamline the process for efficiency.^[85]

Big Data Analytics

In big data analytics, data preprocessing must be adapted to handle the immense scale and complexity of datasets, often distributed across clusters of machines. Traditional preprocessing techniques, such as cleaning and transformation, are scaled up using distributed computing frameworks to manage the core challenges posed by the three Vs of big data: volume, referring to the sheer magnitude of data (often in petabytes or exabytes); velocity, the high speed at which data is generated and must be processed; and variety, the diverse formats and structures including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. These challenges necessitate parallel processing to avoid bottlenecks, ensuring that operations like noise removal and feature extraction can be performed efficiently without centralized storage limitations.^[86]^[87] Apache Spark emerges as a pivotal tool for distributed data cleaning and transformation in big data environments, enabling in-memory processing that significantly outperforms disk-based alternatives for iterative tasks common in preprocessing. Spark's Resilient Distributed Datasets (RDDs) and DataFrame APIs facilitate scalable operations such as filtering missing values, normalizing features across partitions, and joining heterogeneous datasets, all while maintaining fault tolerance through lineage tracking. This framework supports the integration of standard preprocessing steps in a unified pipeline, reducing latency for large-scale analytics workflows.^[88]^[89] MapReduce provides a foundational technique for integrating and preprocessing big data by decomposing tasks into map phases for parallel data extraction and transformation, followed by reduce phases for aggregation and cleaning. Originating from Google's implementation, this model excels in handling volume and variety by distributing workloads across commodity hardware, allowing for efficient sorting, deduplication, and format conversion on terabyte-scale inputs without requiring complex programming. In big data analytics, MapReduce is often used to preprocess raw logs or sensor data before feeding into analytical models, ensuring consistency in distributed environments.^[90] For velocity-driven scenarios, streaming preprocessing techniques process real-time data inflows incrementally, applying transformations like windowed aggregations and outlier filtering as data arrives. Apache Spark Streaming, an extension of Spark, discretizes continuous streams into micro-batches for near-real-time handling, supporting sources like Kafka for velocity up to millions of events per second while incorporating preprocessing to maintain data quality. This approach is essential for applications requiring immediate insights, such as fraud detection in financial transactions.^[91] A representative example is the preprocessing of server logs within the Hadoop ecosystem for anomaly detection, where MapReduce jobs parse and clean terabytes of semi-structured log files—extracting timestamps, IP addresses, and error codes—before applying distributed statistical models to identify deviations. In one implementation, Hadoop's HDFS stores raw logs, while MapReduce handles parallel parsing and normalization, correctly detecting abnormal intervals by mitigating noise from incomplete entries. This pipeline demonstrates how big data preprocessing enhances downstream analytics in cybersecurity contexts.^[92]

Challenges and Considerations

Computational Challenges

Data preprocessing often encounters significant computational hurdles when handling large-scale or high-dimensional datasets, primarily due to the inherent time complexities of certain algorithms. For instance, methods like k-nearest neighbors (kNN) imputation for missing values require computing pairwise distances across all data points, resulting in an O(n²) time complexity that becomes prohibitive for datasets with millions of records.^[93] Similarly, pairwise approaches in data integration, such as entity resolution for deduplication, exhibit quadratic scaling, exacerbating runtime as dataset size grows. Memory constraints further compound these issues, as loading and manipulating voluminous datasets can exceed available RAM, leading to frequent disk I/O operations that slow down processing.^[94] Parallelization is thus essential to distribute workloads across multiple cores or nodes, yet achieving effective load balancing and minimizing inter-process communication overhead remains challenging in distributed environments.^[95] To address these challenges, techniques such as sampling reduce dataset size by selecting representative subsets, thereby lowering computational demands while preserving statistical properties.^[96] Incremental processing enables handling data in streams or batches, updating models without reprocessing the entire dataset from scratch. Hardware accelerations, including GPU utilization, parallelize matrix operations common in scaling and encoding tasks, achieving significant speedups for compatible algorithms.^[97] In practice, these computational demands mean that preprocessing can consume up to 80% of the total time in a machine learning pipeline, underscoring the need for optimized implementations to maintain overall efficiency.^[98] Tools like Apache Spark facilitate mitigation through distributed parallelization for large-scale preprocessing.^[99]

Ethical and Bias Issues

Data preprocessing can inadvertently amplify biases present in raw datasets, particularly through techniques like imputation and sampling that fail to account for group disparities. For instance, mean aggregation imputation for missing values may exacerbate discrimination by propagating differences in feature expectations between marginalized and dominant groups, as demonstrated in analyses of graph-based propagation methods where low inter-group connectivity leads to higher discrimination risk. Similarly, non-representative sampling often underrepresents minorities, such as women of color in facial recognition datasets, resulting in skewed distributions that perpetuate historical inequities when processed further. This amplification occurs because preprocessing assumes uniform data patterns, ignoring systemic underrepresentation rooted in biased collection practices.^[100]^[101]^[102] A prominent historical example is the COMPAS recidivism prediction tool, where preprocessing of historical criminal records—drawn from biased arrest data—embedded racial disparities, leading to African American defendants being nearly twice as likely to receive false positive high-risk scores compared to white defendants. Such issues stem from sampling biases in source data, where over-policing of minority communities creates unrepresentative inputs that imputation or scaling cannot fully correct without explicit intervention. These preprocessing flaws not only reinforce societal biases but can also distort downstream analyses, yielding unfair outcomes in decision-making systems.^[103]^[103] Privacy risks emerge prominently during data integration and anonymization in preprocessing, where failures to adequately de-identify can enable re-identification attacks. For example, linkage of partially anonymized datasets using quasi-identifiers like location or demographics has re-identified up to 95% of individuals in mobility data with just four spatio-temporal points, undermining the utility-privacy trade-off. Such vulnerabilities are heightened in high-dimensional preprocessing pipelines, where techniques like k-anonymity falter against robust inference attacks. Compliance with regulations such as GDPR and CCPA mandates robust anonymization to qualify data as non-personal, yet imperfect methods often leave residual identifiability risks, requiring contextual assessments to avoid breaches.^[104]^[104] To address these ethical concerns, mitigation strategies focus on fairness audits and diverse sampling during preprocessing. Fairness audits involve evaluating datasets with metrics like demographic parity or equalized odds before and after processing to detect amplification, enabling targeted adjustments such as reweighing instances by sensitive attribute frequencies. Diverse sampling techniques, including preferential over-sampling of underrepresented groups, help balance representations without altering original data integrity, as shown in surveys of bias-removal methods that improve group fairness in subsequent modeling. These approaches emphasize proactive ethical scrutiny to prevent bias propagation and privacy leaks.^[105]^[101]

Best Practices

Effective data preprocessing requires adherence to core principles that ensure reliability and repeatability across projects. Documentation of all preprocessing steps is essential for reproducibility, allowing teams to retrace transformations and maintain consistency in subsequent analyses.^[10] This involves recording decisions such as handling missing values or feature selections in a structured format, often using notebooks or dedicated logging tools, to facilitate collaboration and auditing.^[106] Validation of preprocessing outputs further strengthens this process; practitioners should employ statistical tests, such as Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests for distribution similarity or t-tests for mean comparisons between pre- and post-processed data, to confirm that transformations preserve data integrity without introducing artifacts.^[107] Automation through pipelines is a key principle, where tools like scikit-learn's Pipeline class sequence operations to minimize manual intervention and reduce errors in repetitive tasks.^[10] In workflow design, adopting an iterative approach to preprocessing enhances adaptability, particularly in machine learning where initial transformations may need refinement based on model performance feedback.^[108] This involves cycling through data exploration, transformation, and evaluation stages, adjusting steps as new insights emerge from model iterations.^[109] Version control for datasets complements this by tracking changes to data artifacts, enabling rollback to previous states and supporting collaborative environments. Tools like Data Version Control (DVC) integrate with Git to version large datasets and pipelines without storing raw files in repositories, promoting efficient management in data science projects.^[110] As of 2025, emerging trends in data preprocessing emphasize automation via AutoML frameworks, which streamline feature engineering and cleaning to accelerate workflows. AutoGluon, for instance, automates preprocessing tasks such as handling missing values and encoding categoricals directly on raw data, integrating seamlessly into broader machine learning pipelines for rapid experimentation.^[111] These advancements not only reduce manual effort but also incorporate best practices for addressing potential biases during automation, ensuring fairer outcomes.^[112]

References

[1]
[PDF] Salvador García Julián Luengo Francisco Herrera
Data preprocessing includes data preparation, compounded by integration, cleaning, normalization and transformation of data; and data reduction tasks; such as ...
[2]
Module 4: Data Preprocessing
Data preprocessing consists of a broad set of techniques for cleaning, selecting, and transforming data to improve data mining analysis. Read the step-by-step ...
[3]
[PDF] A STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF PREPROCESSING ... - Amazon S3
Nov 2, 2025 · Our study evaluates several preprocessing techniques for several machine learning models trained over datasets with different charac- teristics ...
[4]
What is Data Preprocessing? Key Steps and Techniques - TechTarget
Mar 12, 2025 · Data preprocessing, a component of data preparation, describes any type of processing performed on raw data to prepare it for another data processing procedure.
[5]
Data preprocessing - Machine Learning Lens - AWS Documentation
Data preprocessing includes cleaning, balancing, replacing, imputing, partitioning, scaling, augmenting, and unbiasing to prepare data for training.
[6]
The origins of data preprocessing: A historical journey - BytePlus
The roots of data preprocessing can be traced back to the mid-20th century, when organizations first began to grapple with the complexities of managing large ...
[7]
Data mining: past, present and future | The Knowledge Engineering ...
Feb 7, 2011 · By the early 1990s, data mining was commonly recognized as a sub-process within a larger process called knowledge discovery in databases or KDD ...
[8]
Data Preprocessing: Definition, Importance, and Key Techniques
Data preprocessing is the process of cleaning, transforming, and organizing raw data into a structured format for analysis, machine learning (ML), and ...
[9]
Data Preprocessing: A Complete Guide with Python Examples
Jan 15, 2025 · Data preprocessing transforms raw data into a clean, structured format, preparing it for analysis or processing tasks.What is Data Preprocessing? · Step 3: Data transformation · Data encoding
[10]
[PDF] Introduction to Data Mining
The purpose of preprocessing is to transform the raw input data into an appropriate format for subsequent analysis. The steps involved in data preprocessing ...
[11]
Data preprocessing techniques and neural networks for trended ...
The results demonstrate that differentiation significantly enhances forecasting accuracy across all tested models, reducing errors by up to 30 % compared to ...
[12]
Normal Workflow and Key Strategies for Data Cleaning Toward Real ...
Sep 21, 2023 · Classification of data quality issues. Causes of Data Quality Issues. Pattern-layer issues originate from deficiencies in the system design.
[13]
A review: Data pre-processing and data augmentation techniques
This review paper provides an overview of data pre-processing in Machine learning, focusing on all types of problems while building the machine learning ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[14]
Statistical data preparation: management of missing values and ...
Outliers result from various factors including participant response errors and data entry errors. In a distribution of variables, outliers lie far from the ...
[15]
The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the ...
May 22, 2015 · They discussed basic problems with data quality such as definition, error sources, improving approaches, etc. ... (2010) Research on Some Basic ...
[16]
[PDF] Quality Assessment for Linked Data: A Survey - Semantic Web Journal
Syntactic validity. Fürber et al. [19] classified accuracy into syntactic and semantic accuracy. They explained that a “value is syntactically accurate ...
[17]
Top 3 Examples of How Poor Data Quality Impacts ML - Sama
Here are three examples of poor data quality resulting in bad ML algorithms. 1. Inaccurate or missing data leads to incorrect predictions,. utm_source.
[18]
Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care - NIH
Data limitations are a critical issue that can result in bias (Figure 1), but the lack of diversity in clinical datasets is not the only source of bias.
[19]
Data Quality Degradation on Prediction Models Generated ... - NIH
May 3, 2023 · The aim of this study is to simulate the effect of data degradation on the reliability of prediction models generated from those data.
[20]
The Costly Consequences of Poor Data Quality - Actian Corporation
Jun 23, 2024 · This can lead to delayed decision-making, missed deadlines, and increased operational costs. Flawed Analytics and Decision-Making Data analysis ...
[21]
The Impact of Poor Data Quality (and How to Fix It) - Dataversity
Mar 1, 2024 · Poor data quality can lead to poor customer relations, inaccurate analytics, and bad decisions, harming business performance.
[22]
Bad Data Costs the U.S. $3 Trillion Per Year
Sep 22, 2016 · Bad Data Costs the U.S. $3 Trillion Per Year ... Consider this figure: $136 billion per year. That's the research firm IDC's estimate of the size ...
[23]
The Consequences of Bad Healthcare Data | Infinit-O Global
Bad healthcare data can cause delays in diagnosis, misdiagnosis, patient misidentification, lost revenue, and put patient health at risk.
[24]
[PDF] Data Preprocessing - LIACS
How to Handle Noisy Data? ▫. Binning. ▫ first sort data and partition into (equal-frequency) bins. ▫ ...
[25]
[PDF] 03.pdf
Figure 3.1 summarizes the data preprocessing steps described here. Note that ... This acts as a form of data reduction for logic-based data mining methods, such.
[26]
A comprehensive review on data preprocessing techniques in data ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Data cleaning, including handling missing values and noise reduction, is ubiquitously applied across domains such as behavioral sciences and ...
[27]
[PDF] Towards Reliable Interactive Data Cleaning: A User Survey and ...
Almost all data cleaning software requires some level of analyst supervision, on a spectrum from defining data quality rules to actually manually identifying ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[28]
[PDF] A Framework for Fast Analysis-Aware Deduplication over Dirty Data
Feb 3, 2022 · ABSTRACT. In this work, we explore the problem of correctly and efficiently answering complex SPJ queries issued directly on top of dirty ...
[29]
(PDF) Automated Data Cleaning in Large Databases Using Machine ...
Sep 15, 2025 · The paper discusses the need for effective data cleaning processes to ensure the accuracy and reliability of datasets in machine learning ...
[30]
A Survey of Data Quality Measurement and Monitoring Tools - PMC
Consequently, fully automated DQ monitoring is restricted to syntactic and semantic DQ aspects. 2.2. Data Quality Dimensions and Metrics. Data quality is ...
[31]
A Metric and Visualization of Completeness in Multi-Dimensional ...
In order to reveal the structure of such multi-dimensional data sets and detect deficiencies, this paper derives a data quality metric and visualization. The ...
[32]
[1905.06397] End-to-End Entity Resolution for Big Data: A Survey
May 15, 2019 · In this survey, we provide for the first time an end-to-end view of modern ER workflows, and of the novel aspects of entity indexing and matching methods.
[33]
A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching
Schema matching is a basic problem in many database application domains, such as data integration, E-business, data warehousing, and semantic query processing.
[34]
A Survey of Blocking and Filtering Techniques for Entity Resolution
May 15, 2019 · In this survey, we organized the bulk of works in the field into Blocking, Filtering and hybrid techniques, facilitating their understanding and use.
[35]
Data Warehousing Concepts: Common Processes - Databricks
Data integration and ingestion is the process of gathering data from multiple sources and depositing it into a data warehouse. Within the integration and ...
[36]
[PDF] DIRECT: Disovering and Reconciling Conflicts for Data Integration
Typical examples include type mismatch, different formats, units, and granularity. Semantic incompatibility occurs when similarly defined attributes take on ...
[37]
[PDF] Discovering and reconciling value conflicts for data integration
For example, a simple unit conversion function can be used to resolve scaling conflicts, and synonyms can be resolved using mapping tables. 4. Page 6. 2.2 Data ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[38]
Data integration from traditional to big data: main features and ...
Sep 16, 2024 · This paper aims to explore ETL approaches to help researchers and organizational stakeholders overcome challenges, especially in Big Data integration.
[39]
Overview of ETL Tools and Talend-Data Integration - IEEE Xplore
This paper explains the different steps involved in integration of data from different sources and making the data more useful and organized using Talend Open ...
[40]
6.4.2. What are Moving Average or Smoothing Techniques?
Smoothing data removes random variation and shows trends and cyclic components, Inherent in the collection of data taken over time is some form of random ...
[41]
(PDF) Data Preprocessing for Supervised Learning - ResearchGate
Proper data preprocessing is vital for ensuring dataset quality and improving model performance by reducing bias and addressing inconsistencies (Kotsiantis, ...
[42]
Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments
Apr 13, 2016 · Principal component analysis (PCA) is a technique for reducing the dimensionality of such datasets, increasing interpretability but at the same time minimizing ...
[43]
Data Reduction - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
7. Data preprocessing methods, including data reduction, are essential for converting raw data ... data type and algorithm, with trade-offs between quality ...
[44]
Analyzing Data Reduction Techniques: An Experimental Perspective
Apr 18, 2024 · The choice between lossy compression and numerosity data reduction techniques depends on the desired trade-off between data size reduction and ...
[45]
[PDF] Inference and Missing Data - Donald B. Rubin
Feb 18, 2003 · Biometrika (1976), 63, 3, pp. 581-92. Printed in Great Britain. 581. Inference and missing data. BY DONALD B. RUBIN. Educational Testing Service ...
[46]
Missing data mechanisms - Iris Eekhout
Jun 28, 2022 · Rubin distinguished three missing data mechanisms: missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR), and missing not at random (MNAR).
[47]
The prevention and handling of the missing data - PMC - NIH
Listwise deletion is the most frequently used method in handling missing data, and thus has become the default option for analysis in most statistical software ...
[48]
Listwise Deletion in High Dimensions | Political Analysis
Mar 2, 2022 · Listwise deletion is a commonly used approach for addressing missing data that entail excluding any observations that have missing data for any variable used ...Listwise Deletion In High... · 2 Theory · 3 Application
[49]
Missing Data in Clinical Research: A Tutorial on Multiple Imputation
An alternative to mean value imputation is “conditional-mean imputation,” in which a regression model is used to impute a single value for each missing value.
[50]
Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays
Feb 22, 2001 · Three methods for estimating missing values in DNA microarrays are: SVDimpute, weighted K-nearest neighbors (KN-Nimpute), and row average. ...
[51]
Comparison of the effects of imputation methods for missing data in ...
Feb 16, 2024 · Therefore, KNN is an excellent method for dealing with missing data in cohort studies. In recent years, ML has been widely studied for its ...
[52]
[PDF] INFERENCE AND MISSING DATA - Semantic Scholar
Jun 1, 1975 · Two results are presented concerning inference when data may be missing. First, ignoring the process that causes missing data when making ...
[53]
[PDF] Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years - Donald B. Rubin
Jun 6, 2005 · Multiple imputation handles missing data in public-use data where the data constructor and user are distinct, aiming for valid inference for ...
[54]
2.5 How to evaluate imputation methods - Stef van Buuren
The goal of multiple imputation is to obtain statistically valid inferences from incomplete data. The quality of the imputation method should thus be evaluated ...
[55]
Comparison of the effects of imputation methods for missing data in ...
Feb 16, 2024 · We assess the effectiveness of eight frequently utilized statistical and machine learning (ML) imputation methods for dealing with missing data in predictive ...
[56]
Big Data—Supply Chain Management Framework for Forecasting
Mar 24, 2024 · Outlier Treatment: Various techniques can be employed to address outliers within a dataset. Trimming, the first method, involves the removal ...
[57]
Incremental Outlier Detection in Air Quality Data Using Statistical ...
We have presented a comparative analysis of five statistical methods viz. Z-score, InterQuartile Range, Grubb's Test, Hampel's test, Tietjen-Moore Testfor ...
[58]
Outlier Detection | SpringerLink
We present several methods for outlier detection, while distinguishing between univariate vs. multivariate techniques and parametric vs. nonparametric ...
[59]
A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial ...
In this paper, we present the new clustering algorithm DBSCAN relying on a density-based notion of clusters which is designed to discover clusters of arbitrary ...
[60]
Multivariate Outlier Detection in Applied Data Analysis: Global, Local ...
Apr 2, 2020 · In the univariate domain, these observations are typically associated with extreme values; this may be different in the multivariate case, where ...
[61]
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-024-02173-x
[62]
[PDF] Normalization: A Preprocessing Stage - arXiv
Normalization is a preprocessing stage that scales data, mapping it to a new range, often to make data well structured for further use.
[63]
Survey on categorical data for neural networks | Journal of Big Data
Apr 10, 2020 · This work appears to be a report on an exercise where the authors applied various encoding techniques available in a popular machine learning ...
[64]
A Comparative Study of Categorical Variable Encoding Techniques ...
Aug 7, 2025 · This paper presents a comparative study of seven categorical variable encoding techniques to be used for classification using Artificial Neural Networks on a ...
[65]
[PDF] An investigation of categorical variable encoding techniques ...
An investigation of categorical variable encoding techniques in machine learning: binary versus one-hot and feature hashing · 142 Citations · 32 References.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[66]
[2104.00629] Regularized target encoding outperforms traditional ...
Apr 1, 2021 · We study techniques that yield numeric representations of categorical variables which can then be used in subsequent ML applications.
[67]
Regularized target encoding outperforms traditional methods in ...
Mar 4, 2022 · We study techniques that yield numeric representations of categorical variables which can then be used in subsequent ML applications.
[68]
[PDF] Impact of Categorical Variable Encoding on Performance and Bias
Experiments were carried out on synthetic and real data, described in details in Appendix B. Briefly, the synthetic datasets consist of two-dimensional binary.
[69]
[PDF] binary versus one-hot and feature hashing - DiVA portal
Oct 26, 2018 · The application of hashing in a machine learning context becomes clear by noting that raw categorical data is usually stored in string format.
[70]
[2102.03943] Additive Feature Hashing - arXiv
Feb 7, 2021 · The hashing trick is a machine learning technique used to encode categorical features into a numerical vector representation of pre-defined ...
[71]
[1604.06737] Entity Embeddings of Categorical Variables - arXiv
Apr 22, 2016 · We map categorical variables in a function approximation problem into Euclidean spaces, which are the entity embeddings of the categorical variables.
[72]
Pipeline — scikit-learn 1.7.2 documentation
Pipeline allows you to sequentially apply a list of transformers to preprocess the data and, if desired, conclude the sequence with a final predictor for ...Make_pipeline · Sklearn.pipeline · Selecting dimensionality...
[73]
7.3. Preprocessing data — scikit-learn 1.7.2 documentation
In practice we often ignore the shape of the distribution and just transform the data to center it by removing the mean value of each feature, then scale it by ...
[74]
11. Common pitfalls and recommended practices - Scikit-learn
Below are some tips on avoiding data leakage: Always split the data into train and test subsets first, particularly before any preprocessing steps. Never ...
[75]
[PDF] From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases - KDnuggets
The basic problem addressed by the KDD process is one of mapping low-level data into other forms that might be more compact, more abstract, or more useful.
[76]
[PDF] CRISP-DM 1.0
CRISP-DM was conceived in late 1996 by three “veterans” of the young and immature data mining market. DaimlerChrysler (then Daimler-Benz) was already ...
[77]
Relative Unsupervised Discretization for Association Rule Mining
The paper describes a context-sensitive discretization algorithm that can be used to completely discretize a numeric or mixed numeric-categorical dataset.
[78]
A tutorial on statistically sound pattern discovery | Data Mining and ...
Dec 20, 2018 · This tutorial introduces the key statistical and data mining theory and techniques that underpin this fast developing field.
[79]
Numerical Association Rule Mining: A Systematic Literature Review
Jul 2, 2023 · Initially, researchers and scientists integrated numerical attributes in association rule mining using various discretization approaches; ...
[80]
[PDF] Big Data: Challenges, Opportunities and Realities - arXiv
3Vs, also known as the dimensions of big data, represent the increasing Volume, Variety, and Velocity of data (Assunção et al., 2015). The model was not ...
[81]
[PDF] Big Data Analytics in Data Mining – A Review
Nov 16, 2018 · (also called 3Vs) to explain what the “big” data is: volume, velocity, and variety. The definition of 3Vs implies that the data size is ...<|separator|>
[82]
[PDF] Spark: Cluster Computing with Working Sets - USENIX
This paper presents a new cluster computing frame- work called Spark, which supports applications with working sets while providing similar scalability and ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[83]
Apache Spark™ - Unified Engine for large-scale data analytics
Apache Spark is a multi-language engine for executing data engineering, data science, and machine learning on single-node machines or clusters.Documentation · Downloads · MLlib (machine learning) · Examples
[84]
[PDF] MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing on Large Clusters
MapReduce is a programming model and an associ- ated implementation for processing and generating large data sets. Users specify a map function that ...
[85]
Spark Streaming Programming Guide
Spark Streaming is an extension of the core Spark API that enables scalable, high-throughput, fault-tolerant stream processing of live data streams.
[86]
Anomaly Detection Technique of Log Data Using Hadoop Ecosystem
Aug 9, 2025 · These results show an excellent approach for the detection of log-data anomalies with the use of simple techniques in the Hadoop ecosystem.
[87]
[PDF] Data Preprocessing for Supervised Leaning
Thus, data pre-processing is an important step in the machine learning process. The pre-processing step is necessary to resolve several types of problems ...
[88]
Computational Constraints: Limited processing power and memory
Sep 15, 2024 · This paper examines the implications of limited computational resources on algorithm design, optimization strategies, and system architecture.
[89]
Minimization of high computational cost in data preprocessing and ...
Sep 15, 2023 · However, data preprocessing can be challenging due to the relatively poor quality of the data and the complexity associated with building ...Missing: constraints | Show results with:constraints
[90]
CDFRS: A scalable sampling approach for efficient big data analysis
In this paper, we introduce a scalable sampling approach named CDFRS, which can generate samples with a distribution-preserving guarantee from extensive ...2.1. Sampling Techniques · Random Sample Partition... · 5. Empirical Studies
[91]
The Role of GPUs in Accelerating Machine Learning Workloads
Mar 28, 2025 · Beyond training, the article examines GPU acceleration in inference, scientific computing, data preprocessing, and emerging application domains.
[92]
Evaluation of Dataframe Libraries for Data Preparation on a Single ...
Nov 21, 2024 · It is said that data scientists spend up to 80% of their time on data preparation (Hellerstein et al., ... data preparation tasks on a single ...
[93]
Challenges of Big Data analysis | National Science Review
This paper overviews the opportunities and challenges brought by Big Data, with emphasis on the distinguished features of Big Data and statistical and ...
[94]
[PDF] On the Discrimination Risk of Mean Aggregation Feature Imputation ...
These works consistently find that missing data can amplify biases, and some show that in practice, feature imputation can yield less unfair (relative to ...
[95]
Make your data fair: A survey of data preprocessing techniques that ...
In this paper, we focus on addressing bias in the data (e.g., training data), which is the root cause of unfairness and discrimination in the output of AI ...
[96]
Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and ... - arXiv
Mar 22, 2022 · This paper reviews the literature on identifying and resolving representation bias as a feature of a data set, independent of how consumed later.
[97]
Machine Bias
### Summary of COMPAS Bias Related to Historical Data and Preprocessing Issues
[98]
Anonymization: The imperfect science of using data while ...
Jul 17, 2024 · Anonymization is considered by scientists and policy-makers as one of the main ways to share data while minimizing privacy risks.Missing: preprocessing | Show results with:preprocessing
[99]
Fairness Audits and Debiasing Using mlr3fairness - The R Journal
Aug 25, 2023 · We present the package mlr3fairness, a collection of metrics and methods that allow for the assessment of bias in machine learning models.
[100]
Reproducibility in research - Data Science Workbook
Oct 14, 2025 · Document any data transformations or cleaning steps in a reproducible manner. Software & Tools, Publishing the exact versions of software and ...
[101]
2.4 Data Cleaning and Preprocessing - Principles of Data Science
Jan 24, 2025 · It involves extracting irrelevant or duplicate data, handling missing values, and correcting errors or inconsistencies. This ensures that ...
[102]
[PDF] How Developers Iterate on Machine Learning Workflows - arXiv
ABSTRACT. Machine learning workflow development is anecdotally regarded to be an iterative process of trial-and-error with humans-in-the-loop.Missing: preprocessing | Show results with:preprocessing
[103]
The 5 Levels of Machine Learning Iteration - EliteDataScience
Jul 8, 2022 · You see, most books focus on the sequential process for machine learning: load data, then preprocess it, then fit models, then make predictions ...The Model Level: Fitting... · The Macro Level: Solving... · The Meta Level: Improving...
[104]
Data Version Control · DVC
Open-source version control system for Data Science and Machine Learning projects. Git-like experience to organize your data, models, and experiments.Get Started · Use Cases · DVC Tools for Data Scientists... · DVC Documentation
[105]
AutoGluon Tabular - Essential Functionality
AutoGluon works with raw data, meaning you don't need to perform any data preprocessing before fitting AutoGluon. We actively recommend that you avoid ...Tabularpredictor · Description Of Fit() · Presets
[106]
AutoGluon Tabular - In Depth
We first demonstrate hyperparameter-tuning and how you can provide your own validation dataset that AutoGluon internally relies on to: tune hyperparameters, ...Model Ensembling With... · Accelerating Inference · Inference Speed As A Fit...