Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Launch loop

A launch loop, also known as a Lofstrom loop, is a proposed Earth-based space launch system that uses a high-speed rotating iron rotor loop, levitated and accelerated by magnetic forces within a partial vacuum sheath, to support an elevated launch track and propel vehicles into orbit without relying on chemical rockets. The system, conceptualized by engineer Keith Lofstrom in the early 1980s, features a rotor loop approximately 2,600 kilometers long, with a 2,000-kilometer horizontal section reaching altitudes of up to 80 kilometers at its apex, with the rotor segments traveling at speeds of 14 kilometers per second to generate the necessary lift and momentum transfer. The core mechanism involves two stationary end stations on the ground connected by the elevated rotor loop, which forms an inclined track rising from to 80 kilometers over approximately 312 kilometers horizontally. Vehicles are accelerated along this track using linear magnetic motors, achieving velocities of around 10.5 kilometers per second at the apex before being released into suborbital or orbital trajectories, potentially supplemented by small onboard boosters for final insertion. The , composed of thin iron bands about 5 centimeters in diameter and 2.5 millimeters thick, stores of approximately 420 gigawatt-hours and is segmented into 2-meter links to manage stresses, with the entire structure maintained in a low-pressure to minimize drag and heating. Key advantages of the launch loop include dramatically reduced launch costs, estimated at around $3 per for payloads at full scale, compared to traditional systems, due to its reusability and reliance on rather than expendable propellants. It offers high throughput capacity, potentially launching up to 600 tons per hour or 80 vehicles of 5 tons each every hour, enabling applications like space solar power satellites, orbital manufacturing, and large-scale efforts. The design leverages existing materials and technologies, such as high-strength iron alloys and superconducting magnets, avoiding the need for exotic composites required by alternatives like space elevators. Despite these benefits, significant engineering challenges remain, including maintaining against atmospheric winds, managing thermal loads on the that could exceed 900 , and mitigating risks from or micrometeorites impacting the elevated portions. Construction would require initial investment estimated at around $2 billion, and site selection in equatorial regions for optimal efficiency, such as over the . As of 2025, the concept remains theoretical, with no prototypes built, though it continues to influence discussions on advanced launch infrastructure in literature.

Background and History

Origins and Key Contributors

The launch loop concept was primarily invented by Keith Lofstrom, an American electrical engineer, who conceived the idea in the early 1980s amid broader discussions within the space advocacy community on non-rocket methods for accessing orbit. Lofstrom, holding a BSEE and MSEE from the , drew initial inspiration from , particularly Arthur C. Clarke's 1979 novel , though he diverged from its engineering and materials assumptions to develop a more practical dynamic structure. His concept evolved from a "flying cable" idea presented at Orycon 1 in 1979, inspired by Roger Arnold's short story "Spaceport" in Analog magazine (November/December 1979), which addressed stability issues in vertical launchers by proposing a horizontal, ground-anchored loop. His motivations were rooted in addressing the high costs of space access following the operational debut of the in 1981, aiming to create a reusable, ground-based system capable of dramatically lowering launch expenses compared to chemical rockets. Lofstrom's early work contributed to the family of dynamic architectures explored by engineers in the late and early 1980s, emphasizing momentum storage in high-speed streams rather than static tethers. Notably, parallel concepts included Paul Birch's proposals for systems and partial orbital ring systems (PORS) published in the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society in 1982. Birch's ideas, which envisioned rotating structures to support orbital infrastructure without full elevators, share similarities with the launch loop's linear, maglev-based that avoids full orbital closure while achieving launch efficiencies. This positioned the launch loop as a variant within these related designs. The concept's initial public disclosure occurred in November 1981 through a short article in the Reader's Forum of the American Astronautical Society Newsletter, where Lofstrom outlined the basic principles of a low-cost Earth-to-orbit system. This was followed by more detailed expositions, including a 1982 feature in L5 News and a formal technical paper presented at the 21st in , titled "The Launch Loop: A Low Cost Earth-to-High-Orbit Launch System." These early publications established Lofstrom as the key contributor, with subsequent refinements attributed to his ongoing work, though the core architecture has remained tied to his original vision.

Theoretical Development and Publications

The theoretical development of the launch loop concept began with Keith Lofstrom's initial description in a short published in the November 1981 issue of the American Astronautical Society Newsletter. In this seminal work, Lofstrom outlined the core principles of a dynamic utilizing a high-speed to support a magnetically levitated , enabling efficient of payloads to orbital velocities with minimal atmospheric loss, drawing on electromagnetic and existing materials to achieve low-cost access to space. The emphasized the system's potential for storing in a circulating iron packet traveling at approximately 14 km/s, which would generate upward magnetic forces to counteract the weight of the elevated . Subsequent publications expanded on these foundations, including Lofstrom's 1983 article in Analog magazine, which provided a broader conceptual overview, and his 1985 AIAA paper, "The Launch Loop: A Low Cost Earth-to-High-Orbit Launch System," presented at the 21st Joint Propulsion Conference. The AIAA paper refined the theoretical framework by incorporating preliminary calculations on stability and requirements, demonstrating the feasibility of scaling the to handle multiple launches while maintaining structural integrity through active magnetic control. These early documents shifted focus from basic sketches of the rotor-track interaction to more formalized models, highlighting the advantages of non-rigid, actively supported architectures over static tensile structures like space elevators. By the and early , Lofstrom continued advancing the concept through updates disseminated via the Launch Loop website (launchloop.com), including a 2002 presentation at the International Space Development Conference that explored and . The evolution progressed from conceptual sketches to detailed computational models, particularly in rotor dynamics, as detailed in Lofstrom's 2009 paper "The Launch Loop," which incorporated simulations of rotor deflection, stability, and thermal constraints using segmented rotor packets to accommodate elastic stretch under high velocities. These simulations modeled the rotor's behavior under varying loads, employing finite element-like approaches to predict wave propagation and control requirements with distributed magnet arrays, establishing a quantitative basis for the system's dynamic equilibrium.

Design Principles

Structural Components

The launch loop is a proposed dynamic structure featuring a continuous iron rotor that forms an elevated loop, extending approximately 2,000 kilometers in length and reaching a maximum height of 80 kilometers above the Earth's surface. The rotor circulates at a of km/s, storing and to facilitate transport. Conceived by Keith Lofstrom in the , this core element is designed as a lightweight, high-speed conduit within a protective sheath. The comprises millions of short segments, each approximately 2 meters long and weighing about 6 kilograms, connected via sliding joints to allow flexibility and continuous motion. These segments are fabricated from laminated iron or woven iron wire, formed into a cylindrical shape with a 5-centimeter and 2.5-millimeter-thick walls to withstand the immense tensile stresses at operational speeds. Supporting the rotor are cables engineered for high tensile strength, which help maintain the loop's and structural against gravitational and aerodynamic forces. Key components include the rotor segments themselves, tracks positioned 1 centimeter below the rotor to provide support and guidance, and large turnaround stations located at ground level on either end of the system. The tracks, constructed with permanent magnets such as 8, bear a distributed load of about 7 kilograms per meter while the rotor adds roughly 3 kilograms per meter. The ground-level stations house massive 5,000-metric-ton deflectors with a 14-kilometer radius to redirect the rotor in semicircular paths, enabling the loop's continuous circulation. Geometrically, the loop follows an inclined path rising from ground level at angles of 9 to 20 degrees to pierce the atmosphere, transitioning to a horizontal segment at the apex before descending symmetrically. Sections along the inclines are enclosed in tubes, approximately 14 centimeters in and coated with like Teflon over or carbon fiber, to minimize drag and maintain a high for efficient rotor operation. This configuration ensures the exits the dense lower atmosphere while optimizing usage for .

Levitation and Stability Mechanisms

The of the Launch Loop structure relies on magnetic forces to counteract , primarily through attractive ferromagnetic between an iron and stationary permanent magnets along the . The , consisting of segmented iron packets traveling at high speeds, is pulled upward by these magnets, achieving a lift-to-weight ratio of at least 3 with minimal spacing of about 1 between components. This mechanism stores energy in the volume, and reducing the gap between the and enhances the supporting via magnetic given by B^2 / 2\mu_0, where B is the magnetic field strength and \mu_0 is the permeability of free space. The overall elevation of the loop is maintained by balancing the generated by the 's velocity against gravitational pull, enabling the structure to arch up to approximately 80 km altitude. The speed of 14 km/s creates an outward tension in the 2000 km long loop, with the per unit approximated as v^2 / r, where v is the velocity and r is the (on the order of hundreds of kilometers for the arch). For deflector sections, the force supporting the is derived from F \approx m_r v_r^2 \theta, where m_r is the (about 3 kg/m), v_r is the speed, and \theta is the deflection angle, sufficient to hold 7.1 kg/m of weight. This dynamic tension from the segments distributes the load across the sheath, preventing collapse under Earth's gravity. Stability is achieved through active feedback control systems that address the inherent instability of attractive , as predicted by . Sensors monitor and at high sampling rates (up to 340 kHz in 40 control sections), while digital controllers adjust currents in electromagnets to perturbations such as or seismic activity, correcting deviations that could double in amplitude every 180 µs. These systems use millions of integrated circuits for electronic , ensuring lateral stiffness and preventing resonant oscillations across the structure. Maintaining requires continuous electrical input to power the windings and overcome losses from atmospheric drag on the . The system consumes approximately 100 MW for the copper and iron-based , with additional dissipation of about 35 MW in the track and 90 MW in deflectors, cooled primarily by . This power sustains the 's and without significant net loss, as exceeds 99% in linear motors driving the system.

Operational Mechanics

Payload Acceleration and Launch Process

Payloads in the Launch Loop system are accelerated along a dedicated 2000-kilometer launch positioned at an altitude of approximately 80 kilometers, where the structure benefits from the levitated 's . This consists of a thin-walled cylindrical iron approximately 5 cm in diameter with 2.5 mm wall thickness, moving at 14 km/s within a that maintains a near-vacuum to minimize . Vehicles, typically weighing 5 tons, are propelled forward by electromagnetic coils in the that interact with onboard magnets, transferring from the decelerating to achieve velocities of 10.5 to 11.1 km/s relative to the ground. The launch sequence begins at the western , where payloads are loaded onto sleds and elevated via high-speed elevators or initial to the track's starting point. Once on the track, the sleds—each around 2000 and carrying the aerodynamic —undergo tangential at 3 (approximately 30 m/s²) for about 370 seconds, following the curved path that rises and falls with the rotor's geometry. At the trajectory's apex over the eastern station, the is released from the , which then decelerates rapidly (up to 15 ) for reuse, allowing the to follow a ballistic transfer toward or beyond. This process exploits the rotor's forward motion to add efficiently, with the entire occurring in a controlled to ensure precise trajectory alignment. Launches are oriented eastward from an equatorial site, such as over the at around 8°S latitude, to maximize the addition of Earth's rotational velocity (about 0.465 km/s at the ) to the payload's speed, thereby reducing the required for orbital insertion. The track's slope descends at angles up to 20° toward the ocean surface at the endpoints, ensuring the release point at 80 km altitude provides optimal conditions for suborbital or orbital trajectories with minimal atmospheric interference. Safety mechanisms are integrated throughout the process to handle anomalies. The magnetic levitation system features 10-fold redundancy, requiring multiple simultaneous failures for derailment, while payloads can be aborted by decoupling from the track and deploying parachutes for controlled descent or following off-nominal release paths into the ocean. Track sections are equipped with parachutes for recovery in case of structural issues, and the remote oceanic location minimizes risks to populations, with rotor fragments designed to disintegrate harmlessly upon failure.

System Capacity and Performance Metrics

The Launch loop system demonstrates substantial capacity for high-volume space access, with designs enabling the delivery of up to 175 metric tons of payload to per day using 5-ton vehicles launched at rates of approximately 35 per day for a small system. This throughput equates to roughly 64,000 tons annually, far surpassing global launch capabilities as of , which totaled around 1,900 tons per year (with 2025 expected to be higher). Such performance stems from the system's continuous operation along an extended track, allowing frequent vehicle releases without the downtime associated with chemical refueling. In terms of velocity provision, the launch loop imparts a delta-v of 9 to 11 km/s to payloads, sufficient to reach trajectories for small vehicles without requiring additional upper stages in many cases. This delivery occurs via electric linear accelerating vehicles along the rotor at up to 14 km/s, providing an effective equivalent exceeding 1,000 seconds—calculated as the imparted velocity divided by (approximately 9.8 m/s²)—which dramatically outperforms chemical rockets' typical 300 to 450 seconds. The high of these , rated above 99%, minimizes energy losses during acceleration, contributing to overall system performance that prioritizes reusable infrastructure over expendable propellants. Scalability is a core feature of the design, achieved through modular extensions of the rotor track to support higher altitudes or increased launch frequencies, as well as the deployment of multiple parallel loops to handle greater demand. For instance, extending the track to 5,000 km or operating several units in tandem could elevate daily throughput to thousands of tons, adapting to evolving space transportation needs while maintaining structural integrity with commercially available materials.

Economic and Feasibility Analysis

Cost Projections and Scalability

Estimates for the construction cost of a full-scale 2,000 km Launch Loop system vary from approximately $2 billion to $10 billion, based on different assumptions about materials like and for the rotor and structural components, power infrastructure, and contingencies. Early breakdowns identify around $572 million in direct materials and equipment costs. Operational costs are projected at $10-50 per kg to orbit, dominated by electricity at approximately $0.05/kWh and routine maintenance, with full-capacity utilization enabling costs as low as $3 per kg including amortization. At peak performance, the system could achieve payback within 5-10 years through high-volume launches, assuming 85% capacity and throughput of approximately 4.5 million tons per year. Capacity estimates vary by design scale, from 750,000 tons per year with a 4 system to up to 5.3 million tons per year with 17 . Scalability is envisioned through phased , beginning with smaller loops around 10 in to validate and before expanding to operational segments and the full 2,000 . ROI models indicate at modest utilization levels of about 100 tons per year, with exponential returns as capacity scales to millions of tons annually via additional parallel loops or extended infrastructure. Funding could involve public-private partnerships, similar to major infrastructure projects like the Channel Tunnel, which incurred a final cost of $14.7 billion through joint ventures between governments and private consortia.

Material and Construction Challenges

The primary material challenge in constructing a launch loop lies in selecting components that can endure extreme velocities and dynamic loads without failure, particularly for the rotor and supporting cables. The rotor, consisting of a thin iron ribbon traveling at 14 km/s, requires coatings such as pyrolytic carbon to mitigate erosion and potential spalling, as the partial vacuum sheath minimizes atmospheric friction but impacts remain a concern. Kevlar cables, with a tensile strength of 2.7 GPa and density of 1,440 kg/m³, are proposed for suspending the sheath at altitudes up to 80 km, providing the necessary axial strength during rotor startup and operation while incorporating safety factors for wind and thermal stresses. Although current high-strength steels reach up to approximately 1.5 GPa, the design leverages Kevlar and epoxy-impregnated carbon fiber for the sheath to meet overall requirements using existing materials, though integration at scale remains untested. Future advancements in carbon composites could further enhance durability against hypervelocity impacts and temperature excursions up to 1,000 K. Construction logistics present significant hurdles due to the system's immense —spanning 2,000 km—and the need for precise alignment over vast distances. is envisioned over the equatorial , such as in the southern Pacific, using barges to deploy the and segments over approximately 10 days, with stabilization via temporary cables to counter ocean waves and deployment stresses. Automated fabrication of 2-meter segments and magnetic insertion into the would be essential, guided by laser interferometers to achieve submillimeter accuracy across the entire structure, as even minor misalignments could propagate instabilities. The process draws from 1970s-era technologies like and , but scaling to full size demands unprecedented precision in segment joining and setup, potentially funded initially through smaller power loop variants for testing. Environmental factors exacerbate construction and operational vulnerabilities, particularly in seismically active or corrosive settings. The structure's deep-sea anchors must accommodate ground movements up to 1 g from earthquakes or "mushiness," using active adjustments via a grid of interferometers spaced 100 km apart to maintain stability without rigid foundations. Atmospheric poses risks to the iron rotor and aluminum deflection switches, mitigated by cooling for magnets and for the rotor at 900 , though exposure to 100-knot winds (exerting 50 N/m loads) and strikes (up to 100,000 A) requires robust Teflon-coated sheaths and redundant shielding. Site selection avoids direct equatorial placement to sidestep future conflicts, favoring oceanic locations for natural but complicating logistics compared to land-based alternatives. Testing gaps highlight the conceptual nature of the launch loop, with no full-scale prototypes constructed to date and reliance on theoretical simulations for predictions, as of 2025. Small-scale models, such as lower-speed circular loops at 260 m/s, have been proposed for experimentation to assess bending forces and , but none have advanced beyond discussions. Magnetic demonstrations from the 1990s, while informative for related technologies, did not specifically validate launch loop dynamics, underscoring the need for incremental prototypes like 300 km power loops to test erosion, control systems, and environmental resilience before committing to a major validation effort. These gaps emphasize the risks of unproven scale-up, where instabilities from perturbations or launches could cascade without empirical data.

Advantages and Limitations

Comparative Benefits

The launch loop offers significant reusability compared to traditional expendable , as its core —a magnetically levitated rotor stream spanning approximately 2,000 kilometers—remains in continuous operation without the need for replacement after each launch, enabling indefinite use following initial construction. This contrasts with chemical , which often discard stages or require extensive refurbishment, resulting in high recurring costs; the launch loop minimizes needs to small onboard rocket motors for final orbit insertion, potentially reducing per-kilogram launch costs to around $3 at high utilization rates. High launch cadence represents another key advantage, allowing for up to 80 vehicles per hour in a baseline system, far exceeding the sporadic schedules of vertical-launch rockets that are frequently delayed by weather or maintenance. Operating along a fixed, elevated track immune to ground-level atmospheric conditions, the system supports near-daily or continuous operations, facilitating rapid payload deployment without the logistical bottlenecks of rocket assembly and fueling. Environmentally, the launch loop is electric-powered during , producing zero direct emissions from the launch process itself, unlike the byproducts of chemical rockets such as and particulates. Additionally, it avoids generating orbital from discarded stages, as any rotor material losses are designed to deorbit and burn up harmlessly in the atmosphere, contributing to a cleaner over time. Strategically, the system's high throughput—capable of delivering over 750,000 tons to annually in a single installation—enables the swift assembly of large constellations or shipments to destinations like Mars, surpassing the limits of current chemical methods that constrain frequencies and masses. This capacity supports transformative applications, such as orbital or interplanetary , by providing a reliable, high-volume pathway to that accelerates expansion beyond .

Engineering and Practical Difficulties

One of the primary operational risks associated with the launch loop is the potential of the due to impacts from micrometeorites or deliberate . The , traveling at 14 km/s, faces a low but non-zero hazard from , with an estimated mean mass to of 20,000 tonnes before a significant impact compromises the structure. Such a could initiate a , where a single segment rupture propagates along the 2,000 km loop, releasing stored equivalent to 1.5 × 10^15 joules—comparable to the energy of 150,000 freight trains—potentially fragmenting the rotor into that either burns up in the atmosphere or enters orbits. To mitigate this, the design incorporates segmented iron rotor pieces with sliding joints and diverter traps, aiming to contain damage and prevent total system collapse, though across multiple loops anchored far apart is recommended to isolate failures. Safety concerns further complicate operations, particularly regarding payload limitations from high acceleration and potential ground hazards. Payloads experience up to 3 g's of acceleration over the 2,000 km track, restricting launches to durable cargo such as satellites or supplies, while human transport would require advanced g-suits or other protective measures not yet standard. In the event of a failed release, errant vehicles or rotor fragments could pose risks to ground infrastructure, though the system's proposed oceanic location in the uninhabited southern equatorial Pacific minimizes populated area threats; a full rotor disintegration might boil 400,000 m³ of seawater but is designed to produce fragments small enough to dissipate harmlessly. Emergency rocket motors on vehicles provide an additional safeguard against mid-launch mishaps, such as magnetic failures slicing capsules. Regulatory hurdles present significant barriers, including airspace conflicts and adherence to international treaties. The loop's 80 km elevation and high-speed operations could interfere with aviation routes, generating sonic booms from elevator ascents at 343 m/s that affect nearby regions, necessitating coordinated airspace management. Placement near but not directly on the equator avoids conflicts with existing launch sites like Kourou (at 5°N) and potential treaties restricting equatorial structures, such as those related to space elevators, while also considering ecological preserves and space traffic protocols. Maintenance demands add to practical difficulties, requiring continuous oversight of the extensive structure to ensure reliability. The 2,000 km and necessitate 24/7 monitoring via high-accuracy laser interferometry for precise track positioning at 80 km altitude, with provisions for rapid segment replacements using spares to minimize . constraints from accelerations limit launch rates to about 80 five-ton payloads per hour, followed by 45-second cooling cycles to prevent rotor overheating beyond 900 , potentially extending intervals to half an hour and interrupting operations. Earthquake-prone sites demand compliant attachments allowing meter-scale displacements without structural failure.

Related and Competing Concepts

Similar Historical Proposals

One of the earliest conceptual precursors to kinetic space launch systems appeared in Jules Verne's 1865 novel From the Earth to the Moon, where a massive cannon known as the Columbiad accelerates a crewed projectile from Florida toward the Moon, achieving escape velocity through explosive propulsion in a barrel over 274 meters long. This fictional proposal highlighted the potential of ground-based acceleration for space access but faced practical limits in human tolerance to g-forces, inspiring subsequent 19th- and 20th-century ideas that shifted toward centrifugal mechanisms to distribute acceleration more gradually, eventually evolving into electromagnetic rail and loop designs. In the 1970s, physicist advanced kinetic launch concepts with the , an electromagnetic accelerator proposed for flinging payloads from the Moon's surface using a series of linear synchronous motors to impart momentum via coiled magnetic fields, serving as a foundational idea for non-rocket orbital insertion through dynamic energy transfer. O'Neill's design, detailed in his 1974 Physics Today article and 1976 book The High Frontier, envisioned rotating elements to manage recoil and stability, prefiguring the circulating rotor mechanics central to later loop-based systems by enabling efficient, propellant-free payload boosting. Paul Birch's 1982 orbital ring concept, outlined in a series of papers in the Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, proposed a fully orbital structure comprising a magnetically levitated ring rotating at near-orbital speeds in , with stationary platforms for payload attachment and release, contrasting with ground-tethered loops by eliminating surface while relying on similar principles of centrifugal support and electromagnetic . Birch's model emphasized a global-encircling ring held aloft by active magnetic bearings and , allowing continuous launch opportunities without atmospheric interference, though it required initial construction entirely in . A related proposal is the system, developed by James R. Powell and George Maise in the early 2000s, which employs an evacuated track elevated on a mountain to accelerate cargo at lower g-forces before atmospheric exit. This design integrates rails with linear acceleration paths to optimize for varied payload sizes and launch cadences, sharing conceptual similarities with loop-based systems in providing propellant-free momentum transfer.

Modern Alternatives in Space Launch

Reusable rockets represent a dominant modern approach to , exemplified by SpaceX's system, which employs vertical takeoff powered by chemical propellants to achieve orbital insertion. is designed to deliver up to 150 metric tons of to () in its fully reusable configuration, enabling high-volume missions such as satellite constellations or interplanetary transport. However, this method incurs significant per-launch costs, with projections aiming for approximately $100 per kilogram to orbit through rapid reusability and , though current estimates range higher at $100–$200 per kg depending on operational maturity. In contrast to the launch loop's horizontal magnetic acceleration along an elevated track, reusable rockets rely on combustion-based propulsion, which demands substantial fuel mass and limits launch frequency to discrete events rather than continuous operations. Space elevators offer a passive, continuous ascent as an alternative, utilizing a —potentially composed of (CNT) cables—anchored to Earth's surface and extending to , allowing payloads to climb via mechanical or electromagnetic means. Theoretical models indicate that CNT-based tethers could enable launch costs below $100 per kg by eliminating propellants, providing a reusable for frequent, low-energy payload delivery. Yet, the technology remains infeasible in the near term, as current CNT production yields fibers only centimeters long with strengths far below the required 50–100 GPa for a stable cable, and scaling to kilometer-scale tethers is projected to take decades due to and defect challenges. Unlike the launch loop's dynamic rotor-based , space elevators demand unprecedented material purity and uniformity, shifting the engineering focus from kinetic systems to static structural integrity. Gun-based launchers, such as SpinLaunch's kinetic system, accelerate payloads centrifugally within a vacuum-sealed chamber to impart initial velocity before atmospheric exit and upper-stage ignition. The system targets speeds up to 8,000 km/h (approximately 2.2 km/s), providing a fraction of orbital velocity while subjecting payloads to extreme g-forces of 10,000–20,000 g during spin-up, which restricts applications to rugged, non-living cargoes like small satellites. Limitations include the need for a supplemental rocket stage to reach full orbital speed (around 7.8 km/s) and challenges in achieving consistent release at high altitudes to minimize drag, resulting in payloads typically under 200 kg per shot. This contrasts with the launch loop's gentler acceleration profile (up to 10 g) over a longer path, allowing broader payload compatibility without hybrid propulsion. Hypersonic air-launch systems, like the former Virgin Orbit's deployed from a modified , provide an initial altitude and velocity boost by releasing rockets mid-flight at 0.8 and 35,000 feet. could deliver up to 500 kg to or 300 kg to , benefiting from reduced atmospheric drag and flexible launch sites but constrained by the carrier aircraft's size and operational costs. Unlike the ground-based, high-throughput design of the launch loop, air-launch caps scale at small satellites and requires infrastructure, limiting it to niche, responsive missions rather than mass transport.

References

  1. [1]
    The Launch Loop - A low cost earth-to-high-orbit launch system
    The Launch Loop is an Earth surface based launching utility that stores energy and momentum in a very long, small cross-section iron ribbon loop moving at.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] THE LAUNCH LOOP
    The Launch Loop is an Earthsurfacebased launching utility that stores energy and momentum in a very long, small crosssection iron rotor loop ...
  3. [3]
    DynamicStructures - Launch Loop
    May 7, 2018 · Keith Lofstrom here, inventor of the launch loop. Seeing this ... That was followed by a short paper in the November 1981 American Astronautical ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Issue 16: Contributors - OHIO Open Library
    engineering or materials science), Keith invented the Launch Loop in 1981. This speculative space launch system can be built with existing technologies and.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] A LOW COST EARTH-TO-HIGH-ORBIT LAUNCH SYSTEM
    Mar 17, 2002 · The Launch Loop is an Earth-surface-based launching utility that stores energy and momentum in a very long, small cross-section iron ribbon ...Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
  6. [6]
    [PDF] N91-22162
    N91-22162 proposes using magnetic grain streams for space elevators, overcoming material strength issues and enabling low-cost space launches.
  7. [7]
    Stability of the space cable - ScienceDirect
    Earthbreak: a review of earth-to-space transportation. K. Lofstrom, The Launch Loop, in: AIAA Paper 85-1368, July... There are ...
  8. [8]
    Launch Loop - National Space Society
    LAUNCH LOOP. A closed loop made of laminated iron ribbon is continuously launched to space by an asynchronous linear motor.
  9. [9]
    LaunchLoop - Launch Loop
    Jan 24, 2022 · What do we need Launch Loops for? To cheaply launch Server Sky, data centers and space-sourced energy in orbit!
  10. [10]
    LaunchLoopFAQ - Launch Loop
    Jun 29, 2025 · The cables are tapered, fatter at the top, so more top means more fat. This greatly increases the mass of the structure, thus scaling it up ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    ShortIntro - Launch Loop
    Jan 24, 2022 · The launch loop track and stabilization cables mass 6.5 kg/m. the track contains velocity transformer coils, which couple sled magnets to the ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  12. [12]
    surface to orbit boost - Atomic Rockets
    Aug 24, 2022 · Launch loops were described by Keith Lofstrom in November 1981 Reader's Forum of the American Astronautical Society News Letter, and in the ...
  13. [13]
    (PDF) The launch loop-a low cost earth-to-high orbit launch system
    ### Summary of Launch Loop Performance Metrics
  14. [14]
    Lofstom Loop - E-Mobility Engineering
    It is powered and deployed from the ground, it can be built with available engineering materials and it can launch thousands of tons per day to high orbit. In ...
  15. [15]
    Stats - Launch Loop
    estimated cost of electrical steel. $100M. cost of rotor electrical ... Apogee insertion motors and surface operations will cost more than the ...
  16. [16]
    Channel Tunnel (Chunnel) - Bechtel
    The privately financed project, which ultimately cost $14.7 billion, has made possible 500 undersea train trips a day at speeds reaching nearly 100 miles (160 ...
  17. [17]
    Far-out Pathways to Space: Great Guns? - PWG Home - NASA
    When Jules Verne wrote in 1865 "From Earth to the Moon" he envisioned a giant vertical cannon, sunk in the ground not too far from today's Cape Canaveral.Missing: centrifugal proposal
  18. [18]
    From Verne's Cannon to…SpinLaunch? | by Jennifer R. Povey
    Nov 12, 2021 · Our space gun would need to have a very long muzzle. Quicklaunch's proposed space gun has a barrel that is 1100 meters long. The projectile ...
  19. [19]
    The Colonization of Space – Gerard K. O'Neill, Physics Today, 1974
    The late Gerard K. O'Neill was professor of physics at Princeton University. Careful engineering and cost analysis shows we can build pleasant, ...Missing: tethers | Show results with:tethers
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Orbital-Rings.pdf - National Space Society
    Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, Vol. 35, pp. 475-497, 1982. ORBITAL RING SYSTEMS AND JACOB'S LADDERS - I. PAUL BIRCH. 45 Brownsville Road ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] orbital ring systems and jacob's ladders - paul birch
    A method for transferring payloads into space without using rockets has been presented in Part I, in which massive rings encircle the globe in a low orbit ...
  22. [22]
    https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/starship
  23. [23]
    Starship - SpaceX
    Payload capacity. 100 - 150 t (fully reusable). Starship. Starship is the fully reusable spacecraft and second stage of the Starship system. The vehicle comes ...
  24. [24]
    The Starship revolution in space - ASPI Strategist
    Oct 17, 2024 · That suggests a launch cost of US$100 to US$200 per kg. Compare this ... Low-cost launches by Starship could also support a permanent ...
  25. [25]
    Space elevator tether materials: An overview of the current candidates
    NASA's feasibility study in 2003 stated that carbon nanotubes were the most likely material from which a space elevator could be made. One year later, in 2004, ...
  26. [26]
    SpinLaunch
    ### SpinLaunch System Summary
  27. [27]
    LauncherOne Service System of Virgin Orbit - eoPortal
    - According to FAA's report, Virgin Orbit proposes to conduct a maximum of 25 launches over the next five years to place small satellites into a variety of low ...