Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lev Rebet

Lev Rebet (3 March 1912 – 12 October 1957) was a , , and who advanced the cause of Ukrainian independence through leadership in the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and prolific writings on national theory. Born in , , Rebet joined the in 1927 and rose in the OUN, heading its district executive in by 1930 and the regional executive in from 1935 to 1938, enduring multiple arrests by Polish authorities that resulted in over two years of imprisonment. During the OUN's 1940 split, he aligned with the Bandera faction and served as second vice-president of the short-lived Administration proclaimed in on 30 June 1941, assuming leadership after Yaroslav Stetsko's arrest. Arrested by the in September 1941, he was interned in until his release in 1944. Fleeing to amid advancing Soviet forces, Rebet settled in , where he earned a doctorate in from the Ukrainian Free University in 1947, taught state , and became a in 1954. In exile, he edited the journal Ukraïns’kyi samostiinyk from 1955 to 1957, led the foreign representation of the , and headed the OUN (Abroad) faction starting in 1956, authoring works such as Formation of the Ukrainian Nation that emphasized political and cultural foundations of nationhood over ethnic exclusivity while critiquing both Soviet and authoritarian . His persistent opposition to Soviet domination among Ukrainian émigrés marked him for elimination; on 12 October 1957, KGB agent assassinated him in using a gas pistol that induced , leaving no immediate traces of foul play. Stashynsky's later and in 1961 confirmed the operation, highlighting the KGB's covert tactics against anti-Soviet exiles.

Personal Background

Early Life and Education

Lev Rebet was born on 3 March 1912 in , a town in then under Austro-Hungarian rule, later part of interwar . His father, Mykhailo Rebet, worked as a postal official, providing a modest family background in . Rebet grew up in a religiously observant Greek Catholic household, which influenced his early worldview amid the ethnic and political tensions of the region. In 1930, he enrolled in the Law Faculty of Lviv University, pursuing studies in a period of Polish administration that restricted -language and . He completed a in law from Lviv University in 1938, focusing on legal principles amid rising nationalist sentiments in Ukrainian intellectual circles. This formal equipped him with analytical tools later applied to political and ideas, though his university years overlapped with increasing involvement in activities.

Political Activism Before World War II

Involvement in Ukrainian Nationalism

Rebet's engagement with began in his youth during the under rule in . He joined the (UVO), a clandestine group advocating armed resistance against occupation to achieve Ukrainian independence, around 1927 while studying at Gymnasium. The UVO, formed by veterans of the Ukrainian War of Independence, emphasized sabotage and assassinations targeting officials to undermine control over . Following the UVO's merger into the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) in 1929, Rebet became a member and assumed leadership of the OUN's district branch from 1930, coordinating local propaganda, recruitment, and anti-Polish actions such as boycotts and disruptions of elections. Under his command, the district unit expanded membership and intensified activities amid rising Polish repression, including the 1930 Pacification campaign that destroyed Ukrainian villages. By the mid-1930s, Rebet advanced to head the OUN's regional executive for , overseeing operations across from approximately 1935 to 1938, focusing on ideological training and preparations for broader insurgency. His leadership drew Polish attention, leading to multiple arrests; in 1934, following the assassination of Polish Interior Minister —attributed to OUN radicals—Rebet was detained and sentenced to imprisonment in the Bereza Karuzka concentration camp, a facility for political opponents where harsh conditions aimed to suppress nationalist agitation. Released amid international pressure, Rebet continued advocating , emphasizing ethnic Ukrainian statehood free from Polish, Soviet, or other foreign domination, as outlined in OUN directives prioritizing over negotiation. These efforts positioned him as a proponent of uncompromising , aligning with the OUN's rejection of or within .

Organizational Roles in OUN

Rebet joined the in 1927, a precursor to the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), and transitioned into the newly formed OUN following its establishment in 1929. By 1930, at age 18, he assumed leadership of the OUN branch in the district of Galicia, then under administration, where he directed local nationalist activities amid repression. From 1935 to 1938, Rebet advanced to head the OUN Home Executive (Kraiova Ekzekutyva) for , a regional body responsible for coordinating operations, , and recruitment across Polish-occupied territories. In this capacity, he managed liaison with leadership and navigated internal debates on tactics against Polish rule, though his tenure involved frequent clashes with authorities, resulting in multiple arrests and over two and a half years of in facilities in and . The OUN's internal schism in early 1940 saw Rebet align with the faction under , favoring aggressive revolutionary methods over the conciliatory diplomacy advocated by Andrii Melnyk's group, thereby positioning himself among the leadership of what became known as OUN-B. This affiliation underscored his commitment to immediate action for Ukrainian independence, influencing his subsequent roles as Nazi forces advanced into the region.

Experiences During World War II

The 1941 Proclamation and Immediate Aftermath

On June 30, 1941, as German forces advanced into following , the faction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B) proclaimed the restoration of Ukrainian statehood in through the "Act of Proclamation of the Ukrainian State." The declaration, led by as prime minister, asserted Ukrainian sovereignty, condemned Soviet and Polish rule, and pledged cooperation with against while demanding recognition of an independent government. This move aimed to capitalize on the power vacuum and German occupation to establish a provisional Ukrainian administration, including a Ukrainian National Council with ministries for internal affairs, , and security. Lev Rebet, having participated in the OUN-B's second congress in March 1941 and arrived in amid the invasion, was appointed deputy chairman of the Administration's executive board, positioning him as a key figure in the nascent government's organizational efforts. In the days following the proclamation, Rebet contributed to administrative functions, including coordination with local activists and the formation of units to maintain and counter potential Soviet remnants. German authorities, viewing the unilateral declaration as a challenge to their control over occupied territories, refused to acknowledge the and demanded its dissolution. Stetsko was arrested on July 1, 1941, prompting Rebet to temporarily assume the role of to sustain operations. , OUN-B leader, was detained on July 5 under "honorary arrest" in after rejecting revocation of the act. By mid-September 1941, escalating repression culminated in Rebet's on , alongside other OUN leaders, for persistent refusal to disavow the proclamation; he was imprisoned in Kraków's . This wave of arrests dismantled the surface-level administration, forcing OUN-B activities underground while highlighting the limits of nationalists' tactical alliance with .

Arrest, Internment, and Escape from Nazi Control

Following the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists' (OUN) declaration of Ukrainian independence on June 30, 1941, which German occupation authorities rejected, Lev Rebet was arrested by the in on September 15, 1941, along with other OUN leaders. He was transferred to , where approximately 200 Ukrainian OUN members were held as political prisoners amid the camp's broader operations targeting , Poles, and other groups deemed threats by the Nazi regime. Rebet endured internment at Auschwitz from late 1941 until 1944, surviving the camp's forced labor, starvation, and executions that claimed over one million lives, primarily , but also political dissidents like nationalists. His confinement reflected Nazi toward non-collaborating nationalists after initial tolerance of OUN activities gave way to suppression upon realizing independence aims conflicted with colonial plans for the East. In 1944, as Soviet forces advanced and Germany sought to mobilize anti-Bolshevik elements, Rebet was released from Auschwitz, enabling him to flee westward and evade recapture by either Nazi or Soviet authorities. This release aligned with the German strategy of liberating select OUN figures, such as Stepan Bandera from Sachsenhausen in September 1944, to form auxiliary units against the Red Army, though Rebet did not subsequently align with such formations and instead prioritized escape from Nazi-dominated territories.

Post-War Exile and Leadership

Settlement in Germany and Emigre Activities

Following the conclusion of in 1945, Lev Rebet relocated to in the of , a major center for political exiles and displaced persons fleeing Soviet control. This settlement aligned with the broader migration of thousands of nationalists who avoided to the USSR, establishing networks in to sustain anti-Soviet resistance from abroad. In , Rebet engaged in emigre political and journalistic endeavors, serving as an anti-communist writer and editor within the . He contributed articles and held editorial positions at publications like Suchasna Ukraïna (Contemporary Ukraine), a biweekly journal issued in from 1951 to 1960 that focused on Ukrainian independence and opposition to both Nazi and Soviet . These outlets, supported by moderate nationalist groups, disseminated analyses of and critiques of Russian imperialism, reaching emigre audiences across and beyond. Rebet's activities emphasized intellectual advocacy for statehood within a European framework, including lectures and writings that rejected authoritarian excesses in prior nationalist strategies while prioritizing empirical resistance to Soviet expansionism. His role in these circles positioned him as a key figure in sustaining organized opposition, though Soviet intelligence infiltration posed ongoing threats to such exile operations.

Schisms and Leadership in Moderate Ukrainian Groups

Following , Lev Rebet emerged as a prominent figure in Ukrainian organizations, initially aligned with the Bandera faction of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN-B), but increasingly critical of its authoritarian tendencies and rigid ideological exclusivity. In 1953–1954, Rebet, alongside and Zynovii Matla, was tasked by the OUN(B) underground in with reorganizing the wing into the ZCh OUN (External Units of the OUN), aiming to align it with revised guidelines that moderated revolutionary tactics in favor of political realism and anti-totalitarian principles. However, implementation faltered due to Bandera's insistence on maintaining centralized control, leading to irreconcilable disputes over structures and strategic priorities. By 1954, these tensions culminated in a , with Rebet and Matla breaking from to lead the Foreign Representation of the (ZP UHVR), prioritizing pragmatic engagement with Western democratic institutions over OUN(B)'s insular militancy. This faction rejected Bandera's condemnation of their actions as detrimental to the liberation cause, instead advocating for a statehood model inclusive of non-ethnic as citizens, in opposition to the OUN(B)'s ethno-exclusive "Ukraine for " doctrine that had fueled internal dissent since at least 1948. Rebet's group emphasized empirical adaptation to realities, favoring diplomatic lobbying and publications over clandestine operations, which they viewed as counterproductive amid Soviet infiltration risks. The 1956 formal split solidified the moderate wing as the OUN Abroad (OUN-Z), co-led by Rebet and Matla, which distanced itself from OUN(B) dogmas by endorsing multi-party , accommodations for minorities, and renunciation of interwar fascist alliances in favor of Atlanticist integration. Under Rebet's influence, the OUN-Z operated as a collegial body, publishing outlets like Suchasna Ukrayina to propagate these views, critiquing on both Soviet and historical nationalist extremes while maintaining anti-communist resolve. This leadership positioned Rebet as a bridge between wartime radicals and post-war realists, though it marginalized the faction numerically against Bandera's loyalists, reflecting broader émigré divides over causal efficacy in achieving through ideological purity versus adaptable coalition-building.

Ideological Contributions and Publications

Key Publications and Anti-Totalitarian Writings

Rebet's early scholarly work included his 1941 doctoral dissertation, State and Nation (Der Staat und die Nation), published in , which examined the interplay between institutions and ethnic national as foundational to Ukrainian independence. This treatise argued for a nation-state model integrated into European democratic frameworks, countering imperial models that subordinated national identity to centralized totalitarian control. In postwar exile in , Rebet served as a prolific contributor and editor for émigré publications, including Suchasna Ukraina (Modern Ukraine), Ukrayins'ka Trybuna, and Chas, where he disseminated analyses denouncing Soviet as a totalitarian system that eradicated national sovereignty through mass repression and . His articles emphasized empirical evidence of Soviet atrocities, such as forced collectivization and the famine of 1932–1933, framing them as causal mechanisms for denying self-rule rather than mere ideological excesses. Rebet also critiqued Nazi based on his Auschwitz internment from 1941 to 1944, advocating rejection of any with expansionist regimes that mirrored Soviet in suppressing dissent. A pivotal anti-totalitarian text, Svitla i tini OUN (Lights and Shadows of the OUN), compiled from Rebet's notes and published posthumously in in 1964 by Ukrains'kyi Samostiinyk, offered a self-critical appraisal of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists' evolution. In it, Rebet delineated the organization's successes in mobilizing resistance against , Nazi, and Soviet occupations while exposing internal "shadows" such as authoritarian structures and tactical errors that risked alienating democratic allies. This work underscored Rebet's commitment to reforming toward pluralistic governance, rejecting totalitarian methods in favor of federalist principles aligned with Western liberal states. His broader oeuvre, including legal essays like The in the Science of Law (originally drafted pre-assassination and later translated), applied first-principles analysis to , prioritizing rule-of-law constraints on state power to prevent totalitarian overreach.

Core Political Views on Ukrainian Independence

Lev Rebet consistently advocated for the establishment of a Ukrainian state as a fundamental goal of , viewing not merely as territorial but as the realization of a distinct rooted in historical continuity from the Kyivan Rus' era. In his writings, he traced the Ukrainian nation's formation to the , with its political consolidation achieved in the Kyivan state by the , arguing that this predated and diverged from the ethnogenesis claimed for Russians and Belarusians in Soviet . He critiqued Soviet theories positing a shared "triune" origin for , demonstrating through historical evidence and even Soviet sources that Ukrainian development followed an independent trajectory, thereby undermining Moscow's claims to historical primacy over Ukrainian lands. Rebet emphasized that Ukrainian nationhood transcended purely ethnic criteria, forming instead on political, cultural, and psychological foundations, which he detailed in works such as Formation of the Ukrainian Nation and Theory of the Nation. This conceptualization supported his vision of sovereignty as requiring a consolidated society bound by national ideas and individual rights, rejecting totalitarian impositions in favor of democratic governance. As a cabinet member in the Ukrainian National Government formed by the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) on June 30, 1941, he helped proclaim the Act of Restoration of the Ukrainian State, asserting independence from both Soviet and Nazi domination while seeking alliances only on terms recognizing full Ukrainian sovereignty. In exile after , Rebet's anti-totalitarian writings, including his doctoral dissertation State and Nation, reinforced independence as essential to countering both communist expansionism and Russian chauvinism, aligning with the OUN's 1943 slogan of "Freedom to the peoples, freedom to man." He positioned an independent within the family of nations, capable of serving as a model of political culture in through advanced democratic principles rather than authoritarian . This outlook informed his leadership in moderate émigré factions, prioritizing pragmatic anti-Soviet resistance over ideological extremism to achieve verifiable national .

Assassination and Soviet Operations

The 1957 Killing in Munich

On October 12, 1957, Lev Rebet was assassinated in , , by , a operative dispatched from the . Stashynsky approached Rebet in the stairwell of his apartment building at 8, where Rebet maintained his office for Ukrainian publications, and discharged a concealed spray loaded with gas directly into Rebet's face. The weapon, a single-barrel atomizer developed by technicians, released the cyanide in form to mimic a natural without leaving detectable traces, causing Rebet to collapse and die almost immediately. Rebet's body was discovered around 10:40 a.m. by a cleaning woman in the stairwell, with no visible wounds or signs of violence, leading Bavarian authorities to initially rule the death as resulting from a heart attack. An autopsy conducted by German pathologist Gerhard Laves confirmed cyanide poisoning only after Stashynsky's later confession and defection to West Germany in 1961, during which he detailed the operation under interrogation and at his 1962 trial in Karlsruhe. Stashynsky, recruited by the KGB in 1952 and trained in assassination techniques, had been instructed by superiors including Nikolai Mikhaylov and Aleksandr Korotkov to target prominent Ukrainian nationalists abroad as part of a broader Soviet campaign against anti-communist exiles. The killing remained unsuspected as foul play for nearly four years, allowing the KGB to evade immediate international scrutiny, though émigré communities expressed private doubts about the sudden death of a relatively healthy 49-year-old. Stashynsky disposed of the weapon in a Munich canal post-assassination and reported success to his handlers, who viewed Rebet's elimination—due to his leadership in moderate Ukrainian nationalist groups and anti-Soviet writings—as a strategic blow against organized opposition in the West. The method's success in simulating natural causes informed subsequent KGB operations, including Stashynsky's 1959 killing of Stepan Bandera using an improved dual-barrel variant of the device.

KGB Methods and Broader Context of Targeted Assassinations

The assassination of Lev Rebet on October 12, 1957, exemplified the KGB's emphasis on covert, deniable killing methods designed to simulate natural causes and evade forensic detection. KGB operative Bohdan Stashynsky, acting under direct orders from Moscow, ambushed Rebet in the stairwell of his Munich apartment building and discharged a concealed spray device containing liquid hydrogen cyanide directly into his face from close range. The weapon, a compact aluminum pistol-like apparatus developed by KGB laboratories, propelled cyanide through a fine mesh to aerosolize it into a fine mist, triggering immediate respiratory failure and cardiac arrest within seconds while leaving no external wounds or readily identifiable toxins. This technique, refined through animal testing—including fatal trials on dogs—allowed Stashynsky to disguise the device as innocuous objects like rolled newspapers or briefcases, enabling rapid execution and escape without witnesses. Autopsy reports initially attributed Rebet's death to a heart attack, delaying attribution to Soviet involvement until Stashynsky's 1961 defection and trial testimony exposed the method. Rebet's killing formed part of the KGB's systematic "wet affairs" operations, primarily executed by Department Thirteen (later the 10th Department of the ), which specialized in extraterritorial eliminations of perceived threats to Soviet control. These units prioritized poisons and exotic delivery systems—such as prussic acid derivatives or bacterial agents—over conventional firearms to minimize diplomatic fallout and sustain , a doctrine codified in training manuals emphasizing operations that mimicked accidents, suicides, or illnesses. Stashynsky underwent specialized preparation in , including linguistic immersion in and drills, before deployment to , where the maintained extensive agent networks among Eastern European émigré communities. High-level approval, reportedly from himself, underscored the strategic value placed on neutralizing vocal anti-communist figures, with Stashynsky executing a parallel of Ukrainian nationalist leader on October 15, 1959, using an identical sprayer. In the broader context, the KGB's targeted killings against Ukrainian émigrés in the 1950s targeted a concentrated hub of anti-Soviet activism in , home to displaced persons camps and organizations like the Ukrainian National Alliance that coordinated and intelligence against Moscow. Soviet doctrine viewed these exiles—many former OUN members—as existential threats capable of sustaining nationalist insurgencies or influencing Western policy, prompting over a dozen documented attempts in between 1954 and 1961, including the foiled poisoning of Georgiy Okolovich in . Operations extended beyond to dissidents in the Baltics and elsewhere, employing recruited locals like Stashynsky to exploit ethnic ties and reduce blowback, while leveraging diplomatic cover for logistics. Stashynsky's confessions revealed the psychological toll on perpetrators, with coerced participation blending ideological indoctrination and personal leverage, yet the program's efficacy lay in its terror effect: demoralizing émigré networks and deterring or agitation, even as defections like Stashynsky's eventually compromised the tactic's secrecy.

Legacy and Historical Assessment

Recognition in Post-Soviet Ukraine

In the years following 's declaration of on August 24, 1991, Lev Rebet emerged in official as a key ideologue of sovereignty and anti-Soviet resistance, with state-affiliated institutions emphasizing his role in advocating for an independent integrated into structures. The Service for Special Communications and Information Protection of has published accounts framing Rebet as a dedicated to combating Russian and through his émigré publications, portraying his intellectual contributions as prescient for contemporary efforts. These narratives highlight his pre-war leadership in the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and post-war writings critiquing Soviet , positioning him as a moderate voice within nationalist circles. Local-level recognition materialized through decommunization laws enacted in 2015, which facilitated renaming streets after figures like Rebet associated with the independence struggle. In , a street was designated in his honor as one of several commemorating OUN activists, reflecting efforts to reclaim from Soviet-era nomenclature and honor anti-communist leaders. However, such commemorations have proven contested; by February 2025, local authorities proposed reverting these names to neutral designations, citing a perceived "rollback" of amid shifting political priorities and resource constraints. Rebet's legacy has also been integrated into educational and memorial discourse by bodies like the Ukrainian Institute of National Remembrance, which on March 3, 2020—his birth anniversary—publicized his OUN leadership and scholarly work on Ukrainian legal theory as foundational to anti-Soviet activism. Despite the absence of national-level awards or major monuments dedicated solely to him, his assassination by agent in 1957 has been invoked in broader reckonings with Soviet repression, underscoring his status as an early victim of targeted eliminations. This recognition remains niche compared to more prominent OUN figures like , reflecting Rebet's emphasis on ideological over .

Debates and Controversies in Ukrainian Nationalism

Rebet's leadership in the post-1956 schism within the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) exemplified tensions between radical ethno-nationalism and more democratic orientations. Initially aligned with Stepan Bandera's OUN-B faction, Rebet co-led a splinter group known as the OUN (Abroad) or OUN(z), alongside Zinoviy Matla, after withdrawing amid internal party conflicts over leadership and ideology. This faction advocated reconciling with democratic principles, emphasizing individual rights, human dignity, and a civic rather than purely ethnic conception of the nation—defined through political, cultural, and psychological consolidation rather than biological exclusivity. Critics within Bandera's camp viewed this moderation as a dilution of revolutionary zeal, accusing Rebet of compromising the movement's integral nationalist core in favor of Western liberal influences to secure émigré support during the . A central controversy revolved around Rebet's rejection of authoritarian tendencies in , including his critique of 's post-war persistence with fascist-leaning elements and support for an ethnically homogeneous state pursued through extreme measures. Rebet promoted an anti-totalitarian framework, opposing both Soviet and Nazi-style —drawing from his own in Auschwitz—and endorsed the OUN's shift toward "freedom for peoples, freedom for man," aligned with Allied principles like the Atlantic Charter. This positioned his views against radicals who prioritized uncompromising anti-Soviet insurgency, even at the cost of democratic norms, sparking debates on whether moderation weakened resolve or enabled sustainable independence advocacy in exile. Soviet sources amplified these divisions, portraying Rebet as a greater ideological threat than due to his appeal to broader anti-communist coalitions. Rebet also challenged the emerging around , arguing in the late that identifying the movement solely with one leader was disproportionate, given Bandera's limited direct involvement in after —confined largely to arrests, camps, and . He contended that Bandera had not returned meaningfully to Ukrainian soil post-arrest, except briefly in 1940–1941, questioning the personalization of that overshadowed collective efforts. Loyalists dismissed this as disloyalty, fueling factional recriminations that fragmented émigré resources and propaganda efforts. These debates persisted into assessments of Ukrainian statehood, with Rebet's emphasis on a European-oriented, rights-based contrasting ethnocentric visions and influencing later discussions on 's compatibility with .

References

  1. [1]
    Rebet, Lev
    ### Summary of Lev Rebet's Life
  2. [2]
    Lev Rebet. The Ideologue of the Existence of an Independent ...
    Jun 24, 2022 · ... Lev Rebet was born on March 3, 1912 in the town of Stryi. In his youth, he became a member of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and ...
  3. [3]
    Bohdan Stashynsky: The Internally Torn Assassin of Stepan ...
    Oct 16, 2024 · Stashynsky's first victim, Lev Rebet, was well-known among Ukrainian nationalists and among opponents of the Soviet Union. Rebet had long been ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  4. [4]
    The Herald of Ukrainian Statehood | Газета «День»
    Lev Rebet was born in 1912 into the family of a postal official in the town ... Recalling those years, Rebet wrote: “The main base of the OUN was youth ...Missing: early education
  5. [5]
    Lev Rebet: Pioneering Ukrainian Comparatist - HeinOnline
    Lev Roman Rebet, the son of Mykhailo Rebet and Kateryna Nedokys, was born on 3 March. 1912 in the city of Stryi (now a district center in Lviv region).Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  6. [6]
    Lev Rebet | Military Wiki - Fandom
    Arrest and Internment by the Nazis​​ In August 1941, Rebet was arrested by the Gestapo. He spent the next 3 years in the Auschwitz concentration camp. He was ...Missing: imprisonment | Show results with:imprisonment
  7. [7]
    [PDF] CIA-RDP83-00415R010100150006-6.pdf
    Be enlisted the following secret revolu- tionary organizations: The Ukrainian National Center, the Ukrainian Military. Organization (UVO), the the Organization ...
  8. [8]
    June 30, 1941 in the History of Ukraine and in Yaroslav Stetsko's ...
    Jun 29, 2021 · At one time, he was a member of this structure and was a Deputy of Lev Rebet, a Permanent Representative of the OUN. Here is what he ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] UKRAINE'S INDEPENDENCE - Diasporiana
    Lev Rebet (O.U.N). 1. Klymiv-Legenda (O.U.N.) Minister of Political Co ... The Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, which under the direction of its ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    https://old.day.kyiv.ua/en/article/culture/herald-ukrainian-statehood
  11. [11]
    A tour of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp | Газета «День»
    ... Lev Rebet and Stepan Lenkavsky, were sent here. About 200 “political” Ukrainian prisoners, that is, members of the OUN, spent some time in Auschwitz, and ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    The Man with the Poison Gun: Q&A with Serhii Plokhii
    Feb 7, 2017 · , a KGB assassin who eventually defected to the West. The product of ... The plan was that by killing Rebet, the suspicion would fall ...
  13. [13]
    The 13th Department: The KGB's Top-Secret Assassination Unit
    ... KGB's Top-Secret Assassination Unit. Lev Rebet. Lev Rebet. When KGB assassin Bogdan Stashinsky defected to the West he confessed to two sensational murders ...
  14. [14]
    Repatriating An Edifying Past: The Diaspora Ukrainian Authoritarian ...
    Dec 27, 2024 · The MVD/MGB/KGB penetrated the organization and brutally assassinated the leaders of the OUN(z) – Lev Rebet (1912–1957) – and of the OUN(b) ...
  15. [15]
    RABYNOVYCH, VADYM (b. 4 AUGUST 1953). Oligarch , media ...
    REBET, LEV (3 MARCH 1912–12 OCTOBER 1957). ... Munich, 1946–49) and the biweekly Suchasna Ukraïna (Contemporary. Ukraine, Munich, 1951–60). In 1955–57, he was ...
  16. [16]
    Checklist of the Ukrainian DP Publications at the New York Public ...
    Dec 29, 2024 · Miunkhen: Suchasna Ukraïna, 1953. 97 p. 17 cm. Vidbytka stattei z ... Rebet, Lev. Formuvannia ukrainsʹkoi natsii. Miunkhen: Suchasna ...
  17. [17]
    The Debate on Ukrainian Statehood in the Journal Suchasnist ...
    Jun 18, 2019 · The first issue of Suchasnist' appeared in January 1961 as the fusion of the two previous publications Suchasna Ukraïna and Ukraïns'ka ...
  18. [18]
    https://www.encyclopediaofukraine.com/display.asp?linkpath=pages%5CO%5CR%5COrganizationofUkrainianNationalists.htm
  19. [19]
    [PDF] CIA-RDP80S01540R006000090003-9
    The OUN Provid authorizes Lev Rebet, Zinoviy Matla, and Stefan Bandera to assume temporary leadership of the ZCh/OUN and to reorganize this organization after.Missing: involvement | Show results with:involvement
  20. [20]
    [PDF] STUDY} EXPELLEES AND EMIGRES_ 19 March 19.58 - CIA
    Mar 19, 2025 · 1954 a definte schism between Bandera and the ZP UHVR (Rebet-Matla group) divided the emigration. OUNR, at least in Munich, appears to con ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] BANDERA, STEFAN_0016.pdf - CIA
    ... Lev Rebet and. Zynoviy Matla--who last February 12th, by exercising authority al- legedly granted by the . OUN underground in the Ukraine, declared that they ...
  22. [22]
    OUN Abroad - Ukrainians in the UK
    Mar 12, 2020 · In February 1954 the group led by Lev Rebet and Zynovii Matla formed ... In 1956 the Rebet and Matla group adopted a new name, the OUN Abroad (OUN ...
  23. [23]
    Emigre strategies face Soviet and Ukrainian realities - Nov. 17, 2011
    Nov 17, 2011 · ... Lev Rebet and OUNb leader Stepan Bandera in 1957 and 1959 respectively in Munich. OUNz (OUN abroad) professed allegiance to the ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Volodymyr Stakhiv. “Do Not Look for Allies at Any Cost, Even the ...
    Feb 20, 2025 · ... Lev Rebet, Mykola Lebed, and other OUN leading figures who in 1948 opposed Stepan Bandera's authoritarian ideas. Even before the split in the ...
  25. [25]
    Svitla i tini OUN - Lev Rebet - Google Books
    Bibliographic information ; Title, Svitla i tini OUN ; Author, Lev Rebet ; Publisher, Ukrains'kij Samostijnik, 1964 ; Length, 131 pages.Missing: publications | Show results with:publications
  26. [26]
    The Rural Origins of the Communist and Nationalist Movements in ...
    Jan 27, 2017 · ... Lev, Rebet, Svitla i tini OUN (Munich, 1964)Google Scholar ; Petro, Mirchuk, Narys istorii Orhanizatsii Ukrains'kykh Natsionalistiv 1920 ...
  27. [27]
    Ukrainian Nationalists Playing in the Inter-War Poland - Academia.edu
    Lev Rebet, Svitla i tini OUN [Lights and Shadows of Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists] (Munich: Vydavnytstvo 'Ukrainsky samostiinyk', 1964), 14-16.<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    https://www.lawbookexchange.com/pages/books/74226/lev-rebet-william-e-butler-ed-and-trans/the-comparative-method-in-the-science-of-law
  29. [29]
    About Ukrainian Statehood. Lev Rebet
    Aug 14, 2022 · Lev Rebet, Ukrainian politician, political writer, researcher of the history and theory of the Ukrainian nation, one of the leaders of the ...Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  30. [30]
    Bohdan Stashynskyi. Assassinations. Post Scriptum
    Oct 12, 2023 · From other sources it is known that for the murder of Lev Rebet on October 12, 1957, B. Stashynskyi was awarded only a camera. And at the trial, ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Soviet Use of Assassination and Kidnapping - CIA
    May 8, 2007 · In 1957 he killed Ukrainian emigré writer Lev Rebet in Munich with a poison vapor gun which left the victim dead of an apparent heart attack. ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] BANDERA, STEFAN_0081.pdf - CIA
    Apr 22, 1976 · In early 1959, after he had successfully assassi- nated Lev Rebet (121 October 1957) by firing a poisonous liquid into his face as Rebet ...Missing: biography internment
  33. [33]
    How a KGB Assassin Used the Death of His Child to Defect - Politico
    Jan 5, 2017 · How a KGB Assassin Used the Death of His Child to Defect. Bogdan ... Lev Rebet. Besides, no one thought that Rebet had been assassinated ...
  34. [34]
    The history of the KGB and its legendary methods - Big Think
    Jul 26, 2018 · Lethal measures. As outlined in the CIA report on the “Soviet Use of Assassination and Kidnapping,” the KGB resorted to “abduction and murder to ...
  35. [35]
    A Russian assassin at work - The Virginian-Pilot
    Aug 20, 2017 · After Stashinsky defected to the West, his 1962 trial for murder ... Lev Rebet, an assassination approved by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    A global kill list: Inside the KGB's secret retribution operations ...
    May 24, 2025 · Stepan Bandera, dissident writers, and defectors: confirmed liquidations and assassination attempts. Confirmed assassinations of Soviet ...
  37. [37]
    Вулицям, перейменованим у Бориславі на честь діячів ОУН ...
    Feb 22, 2025 · Лев Ребет – один із крайових провідників ОУН, український політик, пластун, науковець, адвокат, член уряду Ярослава Стецька у Львові у 1941 році ...
  38. [38]
    У Бориславі вулиці на честь українських діячів хочуть ...
    один із крайових провідників ОУН, справді український ... Серед претендентів на перейменування вулиця Соборності України уже не ...
  39. [39]
    Who was Stepan Bandera, Ukraine's controversial nationalist figure?
    Jun 27, 2022 · One of Bandera's rivals at the OUN, Lev Rebet, wrote the following about naming the movement after him: "Bandera never returned to Ukraine ...