Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Libération


Libération is a French daily newspaper founded in 1973 by philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, journalist Serge July, and associates Philippe Gavi and others, emerging as a cooperative venture in the wake of the May 1968 student and worker protests to challenge establishment media narratives with a libertarian-left perspective.
Characterized by innovative formatting, reader involvement, and progressive stances on social issues, it gained influence despite modest circulation, peaking in the 1980s before facing chronic losses that prompted ownership changes, including investment from Édouard de Rothschild in 2005 and a pivot to non-profit endowment status in 2020 to ensure sustainability.
Its readership, around 101,000 as of 2022 with a growing digital share, has underperformed relative to competitors amid broader print declines, reflecting challenges in adapting to digital shifts while maintaining editorial independence amid accusations of left-wing bias from critics.

Origins and Founding

Establishment in 1973 and Ties to May 1968

Libération was founded as a daily newspaper in Paris, with its inaugural issue appearing on April 18, 1973. The project originated from a group of leftist intellectuals and militants, led principally by journalist Serge July and philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, who served as the initial editorial director. Sartre's participation lent symbolic weight, framing the paper as an anti-establishment alternative to mainstream French journalism, though his active involvement was limited by age and health; he had outlined its democratic ethos in interviews earlier that year, emphasizing collective decision-making and rejection of hierarchical structures. The newspaper's creation was deeply rooted in the upheavals of May 1968, a period of intense social and political unrest in France marked by student occupations, strikes involving approximately 10 million workers, and challenges to President Charles de Gaulle's authority. July, a former student radical active during those events, sought to channel the revolutionary fervor into a permanent media outlet that amplified marginalized voices and critiqued institutional power. Many founders, including July and Sartre, had ties to post-1968 Maoist circles, such as the Gauche prolétarienne, a group advocating proletarian uprising and cultural revolution inspired by Chinese communism. This ideological lineage positioned Libération as a libertarian-left venture, initially eschewing advertising and traditional editorial controls in favor of reader participation and direct action reporting. From its outset, Libération embodied the unmet aspirations of 1968 by prioritizing uncensored expression over viability, with early editions featuring unconventional layouts and drawn from contributions. Sartre described it for "true ," where workers and intellectuals could without intermediaries, reflecting the era's of established perceived as complicit in repression. However, the paper's origins also sowed internal tensions, as Maoist influences clashed with broader libertarian ideals, setting for its beyond pure militancy.

Historical Development

Radical Phase (1973–1981)

Libération was established in 1973 by , Serge July, Philippe , Lallement, and Jean-Claude Vernier, with its inaugural published on , 1973, as a response to the ideological ferment of and influenced by Maoist and gauchist currents. The newspaper adopted a non-hierarchical collective management model, rejecting traditional editorial hierarchies in favor of daily assemblies where all staff members—from journalists to maintenance workers—held equal decision-making power and received uniform salaries pegged to the Paris unskilled worker wage of approximately 2,700 francs per month. served as nominal director until May 1974, when health issues prompted his withdrawal, yielding control to July, though the structure emphasized direct democracy and reader contributions over professional journalism conventions. The paper's content embodied a libertarian , prioritizing struggle narratives, critiques of capitalist institutions, and coverage of marginalized voices over conventional objectivity, with Sartre envisioning it as a tool for workers to self-report and analyze events without mediation or influence. Early issues featured investigative pieces on labor conflicts, such as the 1973 Lip factory occupation and the Bruay-en-Artois murder case highlighting proletarian conditions, alongside taboo topics like prison abuses and industrial exploitation (e.g., Renault's role in capitalist production), often employing unconventional language and red symbolism to signal revolutionary intent. Funded primarily through subscriptions and sales to evade bourgeois press dependencies, Libération avoided ads and aimed to empower proletarian perspectives, though its rejection of balanced reporting aligned it closely with far-left activism. By the mid-1970s, internal fractures emerged as most founding Maoist militants resigned amid ideological disillusionment, leaving a smaller core to grapple with stagnant circulation—hovering at 23,000 copies in 1976 and reaching only 35,000 by 1980—and recurrent financial shortfalls exacerbated by the absence of commercial revenue streams. Heavy losses in 1978 underscored the unsustainability of the autogestion model, prompting debates over even as radical coverage persisted. The phase culminated in acute crisis on , 1981, when halted following a contentious vote (70 in favor) to lay off the entire staff and restructure under July's direction, marking the effective end of its purest radical experiment ahead of a May 1981 relaunch.

Institutionalization and Challenges (1981–2005)

In February 1981, Libération faced acute financial difficulties stemming from its experimental collective model and high operational costs, leading editor Serge July to suspend publication temporarily for restructuring amid the French presidential election campaign. The relaunched on May 13, 1981, under the banner "Libération 2," marking a shift toward with a more hierarchical editorial structure, salaried journalists replacing the open-contributor system, and abandonment of the founding principles of autogestion (self-management), equal salaries, and rejection of advertising. Paid advertisements appeared for the first time on February 16, 1982, generating initial revenue but signaling a departure from the utopian anti-commercial ethos to ensure viability. This institutionalization under July's direction transformed Libération into a structured left-leaning daily, aligning editorially with the under while maintaining investigative and culturally innovative features. Circulation grew steadily, reaching approximately 100,000 copies daily by 1982 and peaking above 170,000 in the mid-1990s, supported by expansions such as the launch of Libération Lyon in 1987 and Libération Magazine. However, the professionalized model retained high costs from extensive reporting and design, limiting profitability despite revenue from ads and subscriptions. Persistent challenges included chronic deficits, exacerbated by competition from established dailies like and , and internal tensions over July's centralized control. By the early , circulation stagnated and began declining amid a broader print downturn, with a 20% drop in French sales between 2001 and 2005, underperforming peers due to Libération's niche appeal and resistance to cost-cutting. These financial strains culminated in a 2005 crisis, forcing reliance on loans and investor pressure, though formal ownership changes occurred later.

Ownership Shifts Under Rothschild and Beyond (2005–Present)

In January 2005, Édouard de Rothschild invested €20 million in Libération, acquiring a 37% stake amid the newspaper's mounting debts of €18 million and annual losses exceeding €2 million, driven by declining circulation. This infusion reduced the influence of the Société Civile des Publications Libération (SCPL), previously holding 36.4%, and positioned Rothschild as the largest shareholder, with commitments to preserve editorial independence despite staff resistance to external capital. The investment facilitated cost-cutting, including the dismissal of 56 employees by 2006 and the ousting of founding editor Serge July following disputes over management and a failed cost-reduction plan. Rothschild's tenure, extending into the early 2010s, involved repeated interventions to stem losses, but Libération continued accruing deficits, prompting and minority shareholder Ledoux (holding 26%) to threaten withdrawal of funding by February 2014 unless radical restructuring occurred, including potential job cuts and diversification into a hub. Later that year, control shifted to Altice, the telecom group led by , which acquired the for €14 million amid its ongoing financial distress. Under Altice's ownership from 2014 to 2020, Libération faced persistent unprofitability, with cumulative losses reaching levels necessitating . In May 2020, Altice transferred the title to Presse Indépendante S.A.S., a non-profit entity, while establishing an endowment fund and assuming €50 million in debts to stabilize operations without direct profit motives. This structure integrated Libération into a dotation fund derived from Altice Média, retaining indirect ties to Drahi until further announcements in late 2024 signaled Altice's full separation to refocus on core telecom assets.

Editorial Stance and Journalistic Style

Evolution from Libertarianism to Contemporary Leftism

Libération originated in 1973 as a radical libertarian-left organ, deeply influenced by the anti-authoritarian ethos of the May 1968 uprisings, with co-founder Jean-Paul Sartre envisioning it as a "people's paper" free from hierarchical structures and committed to Maoist-inspired egalitarianism. Staff operated collectively, receiving uniform salaries regardless of role, and the publication prioritized raw, unfiltered voices from marginalized groups over conventional reporting, embodying gauchisme—a rejection of both capitalist and Soviet-style authority in favor of spontaneous, grassroots expression. This stance began eroding by the late 1970s amid internal maturation and external political shifts, as editorial direction under Serge July trended toward a centre-left that accommodated broader readership appeal. The pivotal transformation occurred in : after suspending publication in February due to financial and organizational crises, Libération relaunched on —coinciding precisely with François Mitterrand's presidential —adopting an explicitly supportive posture toward the Socialist government's nationalizations and social reforms, marking a departure from pure radicalism toward institutional leftism. In the decades following, particularly post-2000 under directors like Laurent Joffrin, the paper's line solidified into contemporary leftism, endorsing European federalism (such as the 2005 Constitution referendum), multicultural policies, and social-liberal reforms while critiquing neoliberal economics—yet drawing fire from purist leftists for perceived elitism and proximity to power, often derided as gauche caviar for blending progressive rhetoric with affluent, urban sensibilities. By the 2010s, endorsements of figures like Emmanuel Macron in 2017 reflected further accommodation to centrist governance, alienating original gauchiste adherents who viewed it as a betrayal of its subversive origins for mainstream viability.

Signature Features and Innovations

Libération pioneered an unorthodox journalistic approach in its early years, rejecting hierarchical editorial structures in favor of collective decision-making among staff, which extended to equal salaries for all employees regardless of role and an initial refusal of paid advertising to maintain . This model emphasized reader involvement, with open submissions and a focus on reporting that blurred lines between professional journalists and contributors, fostering a vibrant, pluralist content ecosystem. A distinctive element was its irreverent tone, employing the informal "" pronoun to address readers directly, in contrast to the formal "vous" standard in print , which cultivated an intimate, egalitarian rapport aligned with its post-May 1968 libertarian origins. Complementing this were innovative paratextual features like the "note de la claviste" (NDLC), spontaneous, often acerbic comments inserted by the typesetter during production, adding layers of wit and last-minute critique that underscored the paper's anti-authoritarian spirit. Visually, Libération stood out for its experimental and , earning recognition as one of France's most graphically advanced through bold headlines, integrated cartoons—often politically incisive works by artists like Plantu—and periodic redesigns featuring custom typefaces tailored to enhance readability and aesthetic impact. These elements, evolving from the onward, prioritized visual over conventional text-heavy formats. In the digital realm, innovated by launching one of France's earliest websites in 1995, enabling real-time updates and integration ahead of peers, which laid groundwork for its shift toward print- operations amid declining circulation.

Ownership, Governance, and Financial Trajectory

Early Collective Model and Crises

Upon its founding on April 18, 1973, under the auspices of and a group of Maoist-influenced journalists, adopted a and management structure inspired by the self-management (autogestion) ideals of , eschewing traditional hierarchies in favor of staff assemblies for decision-making. The model emphasized equal pay for all employees, rejection of advertising revenue to maintain independence, and participatory journalism where contributors operated without fixed editorial roles, aiming to produce a " made by the with journalists’ help." This structure extended to , with no dominant ; instead, collective deliberations guided content and operations, reflecting a commitment to non-alienated labor and proximity to readers. The approach, while ideologically aligned with post-1968 radicalism, engendered operational inefficiencies from the outset, as consensus-based assemblies slowed production and complicated in a competitive daily market. Circulation remained modest, reaching only 23,000 copies daily by 1976 and climbing to 35,000 by 1980, insufficient to offset mounting debts without external funding, which the model ideologically resisted. Internal tensions arose over the balance between ideological purity and viability, exacerbating financial strain amid France's economic challenges in the late 1970s. These pressures culminated in a severe by early , when persistent losses and disagreements over led to the of on February 21, , following a layoff plan affecting staff. The halt marked the effective collapse of the pure autogestion phase, as the newspaper resumed printing on May 13, , shortly after François Mitterrand's victory, but only after conceding to hierarchical reforms and eventual introduction on February 16, 1982. By 1983, the creation of the financing entity Communication et Participation signaled a shift toward external capital, ending the early experiment amid recognition of its unsustainability for a mass-market daily.

Investor Interventions and Non-Profit Transition (2020)

In May 2020, Libération faced ongoing financial losses exceeding €8.9 million on €35 million in revenue as of 2018, prompting , its owner since 2014 under billionaire , to intervene by restructuring the into a non-profit entity. On May 14, 2020, Altice announced the creation of the Fonds de Dotation pour une Presse Indépendante, a non-profit endowment fund, which would acquire Libération through a called Presse Indépendante , enabling the to erase approximately €50 million in accumulated debts via substantial funding from Altice. The transition aimed to safeguard by prohibiting future sales or buyouts, modeling the structure after reader-funded outlets like in or in the UK, with any surplus revenues directed to journalism initiatives or charities such as . Altice committed to initial endowments to cover operational shortfalls, while opening the fund to additional donors, including personal support from Drahi, amid Libération's reliance on subsidies constituting up to 20% of . The move followed 22 consecutive years of deficits, exacerbated by print circulation declines and ideological stances limiting from certain sectors. By September 2020, the transfer was finalized, detaching Libération from Altice's commercial operations and placing governance under the endowment fund's oversight, though staff expressed reservations about potential lingering influence from major donors like Drahi, arguing the structure did not fully eliminate dependency risks. Critics, including observers, noted that while the non-profit model promised stability, it heightened vulnerability to philanthropic whims and public aid, with no guaranteed influx of diverse funding to offset Altice's initial . Despite these concerns, proponents viewed the shift as a pragmatic step to prioritize journalistic over profitability, aligning with broader trends in .

Circulation, Readership, and Market Position

Libération's print circulation has followed the broader downturn in French newspaper sales, with average daily diffusion figures dropping amid rising digital alternatives. Between 1999 and 2011, the newspaper's circulation underperformed relative to competitors, as evidenced by comparative industry data. By 2022, verified average daily diffusion stood at 97,633 copies, increasing modestly to 103,218 in 2023 due to targeted promotions and event-driven sales boosts. For the 2024-2025 period, total diffusion rose further to 116,062, reflecting a 13.3% year-over-year gain, though this includes growing non-print components. The shift to digital has accelerated, with online formats surpassing print in readership share by 2023, where digital accounted for the majority of Libération's audience. Digital subscribers expanded from approximately 50,000 in 2020 to around 73,000 by 2023, supporting revenue diversification through paywalls and premium content. This transition aligns with industry-wide adaptations, yet print remains a core but diminishing segment, comprising under 20% of recent digital-heavy metrics in some breakdowns. Despite these gains, overall paid print sales continue to lag historical levels, prompting sustained investment in multimedia and subscription models to offset advertising losses.

Comparative Influence in French Media Landscape

Libération maintains a position among France's national quality dailies, alongside Le Monde and Le Figaro, targeting educated readers with in-depth analysis. However, its influence is constrained by comparatively low circulation and audience metrics. In the 2024-2025 period, Libération's paid diffusion in France ranked fifth nationally at approximately 100,000 copies daily, trailing Le Monde's 549,758 and Le Figaro's 375,081. Digitally, Libération relies heavily on online formats, with 81% of its paid individual diffusion coming from digital versions in 2024-2025. Yet, its subscriber base lags behind competitors; reported 527,000 digital subscribers in 2024, while Libération's figures remain lower, reflecting a niche rather than mass appeal. Monthly digital audience for Libération stood at around 7.4 million users in earlier data, but recent aggregates show national dailies collectively drawing hundreds of millions of visits without Libération dominating shares. In the broader media ecosystem, Libération holds centrality in networks of outlets, appearing as a key node alongside and in analyses of media interconnections. Nonetheless, its left-leaning stance limits penetration into conservative or centrist demographics, where exerts greater sway, and its overall reach pales against television leaders like , which captured the top non-stop audience share in 2024. This positions Libération as influential in progressive intellectual discourse but secondary in shaping national consensus compared to higher-circulation peers or audiovisual media.

Controversies and Criticisms

Internal Disputes and Staff Resistance

In February 2014, Libération faced a significant internal triggered by shareholders' proposals for a major , including a pivot and a request for a state loan to address mounting debts of approximately 6 million euros. Journalists staged a strike on February 7, halting print publication and website updates, in protest against the plan presented by principal shareholder Bruno Ledoux, which they viewed as undermining the newspaper's editorial independence and collective ethos. The strike, supported by 65% of staff, escalated tensions with then-president of the directoire Nicolas Demorand, whose editorial text for the following day was rejected by the newsroom, culminating in his resignation on February 13 after six days of acrimony. This episode highlighted longstanding frictions between management pushes for financial viability amid a 14.9% circulation drop in 2013 and staff resistance to perceived top-down interventions that risked diluting Libération's left-libertarian identity. Earlier precedents of staff pushback date to the mid-2000s, when acquired a 37% stake in following prolonged financial strain, prompting debates over the intrusion of private capital into the paper's historically collective model; while ultimately approved via staff vote, it fueled perceptions of eroding autonomy and set the stage for recurring clashes. Such disputes echoed foundational tensions from Libération's origins as a non-hierarchical outlet, where transitions to professionalized under figures like in the provoked resistance from purist factions wary of institutionalization. More recently, in December 2024, editorial director Dov Alfon, appointed in 2020 with strong staff backing (90% approval), drew internal criticism for a "vertical" management style and alleged interventionism, including suspected misrepresentations in handling a journalist's disciplinary case. Personnel representatives compiled a letter detailing widespread "malaise" from over 20 contributors, citing opaque decision-making and editorial overreach, though Alfon defended his approach as necessary for adapting to digital challenges and achieving subscriber growth targets. These episodes underscore a pattern of staff resistance rooted in defending journalistic autonomy against financial imperatives, often manifesting in strikes or public frondes rather than outright schisms, amid the paper's shift to a non-profit structure in 2020.

Allegations of Bias and Loss of Independence

Libération has faced persistent allegations of eroding through successive ownership changes that prioritized financial survival over its founding libertarian ethos. In 1983, the newspaper opened its to external investors such as Jean Riboud and Gilbert Trigano, who acquired stakes totaling 9.09%, marking an initial departure from Jean-Paul Sartre's vision of autonomy from private to address deficits. This accelerated, with external shareholders controlling % of the by , when Jérôme Seydoux purchased a 66% stake, reducing staff ownership to under 20% and prompting claims that financial imperatives began dictating content moderation. The 2005 intervention by , who became the majority shareholder amid mounting losses projected at 7 million euros that year, intensified these concerns. Staff unions, including SUD and CGT, warned of inevitable loss, as Rothschild's —initially 20 million euros with potential for more—linked decisions to banking interests, leading to the 2006 resignation of founding director Serge July after disputes over restructuring. Critics, including media watchdog Acrimed, argued this shift reframed capitalist dependence as liberation, evidenced by July's earlier defenses of profit as a path to and a perceived rightward tilt in coverage since the Mitterrand era, diluting anti-capitalist critiques. Rothschild himself rejected strict separations between ownership and content, fueling accusations that the newspaper's adversarial stance softened toward market-friendly policies. In 2020, Libération's transfer to a non-profit endowment fund (fonds de dotation) was touted as a safeguard for independence from Patrick Drahi's Altice Group, which had held ownership since 2014. However, Mediapart described the maneuver as a "ruse masquerading as independence," highlighting a financially unrealistic plan reliant on unproven donations and tax advantages for Drahi, potentially allowing lingering influence over editorial control despite the foundation's structure. Editorial staff expressed unease over the opacity, viewing it as perpetuating vulnerability to powerful stakeholders rather than restoring autonomy. Allegations of often intersect with these critiques, with observers from both ideological flanks charging Libération with left-centrist partisanship that aligns too closely with figures post-ownership shifts. rates it as left-center biased in story selection, favoring positions while maintaining factual reporting, though detractors on the further left decry a post-1980s complacency toward socialist and capitalist integration. Right-leaning voices and internal fractures, such as debates over versus , highlight perceived cultural biases favoring over empirical scrutiny. Specific incidents, like the 2021 suppression of an interview critical of Israel's operations, have been cited as evidence of selective to avoid alienating allies, underscoring risks when financial dependencies compromise journalistic skepticism.

Societal and Political Impact

Contributions to Discourse and Key Campaigns

Libération has shaped public through its emphasis on libertarian-left perspectives, prioritizing coverage of social movements, cultural critiques, and challenges to institutional power. Founded in the aftermath of the protests, the newspaper positioned itself as a to , fostering debates on individual liberties, minority protections, and anti-authoritarian stances that resonated with post-May currents. Its editorial compass, centered on defending freedoms against and societal constraints, influenced subsequent left-leaning by normalizing irreverent, reader-engaged formats that blurred lines between and . A notable contribution came via early warnings on political figures' personal conduct, as in journalist Jean Quatremer's 2007-2011 columns in Libération highlighting Dominique Strauss-Kahn's patterns of behavior with women—issues downplayed by much of the French press due to cultural norms of privacy for elites. This prefigured broader media reckonings post-Strauss-Kahn's 2011 arrest, prompting discourse on accountability for public officials and eroding the "omertà" shielding politicians from scrutiny. Libération's decision to publish arrest images from the case further catalyzed debates on journalistic ethics, public interest versus privacy, and the limits of deference in reporting scandals. In the digital era, Libération advanced factual discourse with the 2017 launch of CheckNews, France's inaugural on-demand service, where journalists directly address reader-submitted queries on claims, succeeding the newspaper's earlier Désintox rubric. Timed ahead of the 2017 presidential election, it processed thousands of verifications, countering proliferation and modeling hybrid reader-journalist verification over algorithmic tools. This initiative, staffed by nine dedicated reporters, has handled diverse topics from policy assertions to viral hoaxes, bolstering empirical standards in an era of fragmented information. Key campaigns include sustained advocacy for press freedoms and , such as amplifying voices from environmental and mobilizations through dedicated rubrics like Fil Vert for ecological reporting. However, these efforts often aligned with progressive priors, drawing critiques for selective outrage amid left-wing institutional biases in media ecosystems. Libération's coverage of events like the 2005 suburban riots and AIDS crisis in the exemplified its role in elevating marginalized narratives, though empirical analyses question the causal depth of its influence versus with broader activist waves.

Critiques of Ideological Influence and Empirical Shortcomings

Critics of Libération have argued that its foundational left-libertarian orientation, rooted in the post-1968 intellectual milieu, exerts undue influence on news selection and framing, often subordinating empirical to ideological . This perspective holds that the newspaper's self-described as a for diverse left-wing tendencies fosters a systemic preference for narratives aligning with progressive causes, such as expansive policies or critiques of national sovereignty, at the expense of balanced scrutiny of countervailing data. For example, coverage of social movements like the Yellow Vests has been faulted for emphasizing elite disconnect over grassroots economic grievances, reflecting a broader media tendency to delegitimize populist dissent through pejorative framing rather than dissecting underlying causal factors like fuel tax hikes and rural marginalization. Empirical shortcomings in Libération's reporting have drawn particular scrutiny, with specific incidents illustrating lapses in verification amid ideologically charged contexts. In June 2024, journalists Pierre Plottu and Maxime Macé published an article erroneously claiming that , a Rassemblement National () candidate in for the legislative elections, had shared antisemitic content on ; the unverified allegation, amplified by outlets like , prompted the RN to disavow and exclude Martin, yet Libération issued no retraction or apology, leading to defamation indictments against the reporters, director , and associated figures. This case exemplifies how partisan incentives may accelerate publication without rigorous sourcing, eroding trust in empirical claims against right-leaning actors. A parallel lapse occurred in October 2023 during the Israel-Hamas war, when Libération's front-page story on Middle East escalation featured an Associated Press photograph of a Cairo protester holding an AI-generated image of a crying infant in rubble—sourced from the February 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquakes, not Gaza—without sufficient captioning to clarify its symbolic intent, prompting widespread accusations of visual misinformation to heighten emotional impact. Director Dov Alfon justified the image as evoking the "specter of embrasement" but acknowledged the caption omission as regrettable, underscoring tensions between editorial symbolism and factual precision. These episodes align with broader evaluations rating Libération as left-center biased, with factual reporting deemed high overall but vulnerable to loaded wording and selective emphasis in politically sensitive domains, potentially amplifying ideological priors over of events. Commentators contend that such patterns, prevalent in left-leaning ecosystems, contribute to by prioritizing with institutional biases—evident in and —over unvarnished data on issues like impacts or electoral shifts. Independent critiques further highlight how ownership transitions, including Édouard de Rothschild's intervention, have not neutralized but arguably entrenched these tendencies by aligning with elite progressive .

References

  1. [1]
    After two decades of losses, French left-wing daily Liberation's pivots ...
    May 18, 2020 · French newspaper Libération, founded by Jean-Paul Sartre in 1973, is transferring into a non-profit company in a bid to secure a more prosperous future.
  2. [2]
    Libération | eurotopics.net
    Libération was founded under the aegis of philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre in 1973 and is considered France's leading leftwing daily.Missing: history ownership
  3. [3]
    Libération newspaper • Paris • Abbas - Magnum Photos
    May 9, 2018 · Founded by Sartre and Serge July in Paris in 1973, the paper was extraordinarily influential in its early years, despite its circulation never ...
  4. [4]
    Libération journalists fight investors' vision for future of French ...
    Feb 9, 2014 · The philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre co-founded Libération – affectionately known to its readers by the diminutive Libé – with four others in 1973, ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  5. [5]
    Liberation (Paris) – Bias and Credibility
    Oct 7, 2022 · In recent years' shrinking readership has plunged the newspaper into significant financial difficulties. In 2014, its two owners ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Libération, 18th April 1973: The Dawning of a New Journalism
    Dec 12, 2017 · The first edition of the newspaper Libération, the brainchild of journalist Serge July and philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, was published on 18 th April 1973.
  7. [7]
    Jean-Paul Sartre talks about the launch of Libération – archive, 1973
    Mar 10, 2014 · Originally published in the Guardian on 10 March 1973: Jean-Paul Sartre talks about his plans for starting a new daily paper called ...
  8. [8]
    Lib?ration: From Sartre to Rothschild - CounterPunch.org
    Mar 13, 2007 · When Serge July burst into the circles of power, it aroused interest in Libération on the part of those who inhabit these circles. Shortly after ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  9. [9]
    Has Liberation lost its fight for freedom? | Media - The Guardian
    Sep 16, 2006 · Yet it is true that Liberation, founded in 1973 by a group of hard left militants in the wake of the seismic shock of the 1968 student revolts, ...
  10. [10]
    LIBERATION OF PARIS SETS TRADITION FREE – Chicago Tribune
    Paradoxically, Liberation was born out of politics, founded in 1973 by a student radical named Serge July (who is still editor) and a group of fellow ...
  11. [11]
    Libération : discours sur les crises d'un quotidien | Cairn.info
    En 1974, Jean-Paul Sartre, malade, laisse sa place de directeur à Serge July. La plupart des militants gauchistes fondateurs du journal ont déjà démissionné [14] ...Missing: phase radicale
  12. [12]
    Génération "Libération" - Le Nouvel Obs
    Jul 30, 2016 · En 1981, le quotidien fondé par Jean-Paul Sartre se coupe définitivement de ses origines gauchistes. Avec Serge July à la manœuvre, ce nouveau ...Missing: radicale | Show results with:radicale
  13. [13]
    De ses débuts chaotiques au fonds de dotation, faire vivre «Libé
    Oct 26, 2023 · Après une augmentation rapide des ventes en 1976 et 1977, c'est de nouveau la douche froide en 1978 : le journal essuie de lourdes pertes et la ...
  14. [14]
    Les grandes dates de la vie de Libération - Le Nouvel Obs
    Jan 21, 2005 · - 13 mai 1981 : reparution du journal, lancement de Libération 2. - 16 février 1982 : parution des premières publicités. Les ventes en 1982 s' ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Libération staff in a dilemma over offer | Media | The Guardian
    Jan 21, 2005 · Libération's board has already approved the bid by Edouard de Rothschild to take on a 37% share in the newspaper, justifying it as an essential ...
  16. [16]
    Capturing Libération | Institutional Investor
    Libération, which has a total debt of E18 million, lost an estimated E2 million in 2004 as average daily sales declined. Rothschild's millions will be used to ...
  17. [17]
    Journalists to strike at Liberation | libcom.org
    ... Edouard de Rothschild in January 2005. In exchange for an investment of 20M euros he was given a 37% stake in the company. This reduced the 36.4% SCPL ...
  18. [18]
    Europe | French paper in last-ditch rescue - BBC NEWS
    Sep 28, 2006 · Mr de Rothschild invested 20m euros (£13.5m) in the paper and later dismissed some 56 employees in a drive to reduce costs. It has also revamped ...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
  19. [19]
    French Newspaper of the Far Left Faces Financial Ruin - The New ...
    Mr. Rothschild invested in Libération in early 2005 to build a group in the media sector. In July, he reacted angrily to an opinion piece in Le Monde by a staff ...
  20. [20]
    Iconic French newspaper Libération in crisis as editor-in-chief steps ...
    Feb 13, 2014 · Its two main owners, businessman Edouard de Rothschild and real estate developer Bruno Ledoux, have warned they will no longer finance the paper ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Libération shareholder warns job cuts inevitable - Mediapart
    Mar 7, 2014 · Bruno Ledoux, who holds a 26% stake in the troubled daily, said a future "major restructuring" of the paper is certain.Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
  22. [22]
    Altice dit « au revoir » à Libé - La Tribune
    May 14, 2020 · Patrick Drahi avait acquis Libération en 2014, pour 14 millions d'euros. Reuters.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  23. [23]
    Altice se désengage de Libération via un Fonds de Dotation pour ...
    May 14, 2020 · Le groupe Altice (BFMTV, RMC, SFR…) a joué la surprise en annonçant jeudi se séparer de Libération qu'il avait racheté en 2014, alors en dépôt ...
  24. [24]
    « Libération » transféré par Altice à une fondation | Les Echos
    May 14, 2020 · Propriétaire du titre depuis 2014, Altice va transférer « Libération » à une société à but non lucratif. Depuis que la presse est bousculée ...Missing: rachetée | Show results with:rachetée
  25. [25]
    Pourquoi Altice se sépare de Libération - Challenges
    Dec 11, 2024 · Acte de générosité pure pour pérenniser Libération, porte-voix de la gauche en France depuis les années 1970, ou manière élégante de se ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  26. [26]
    Crisis at Libération | The Nation
    Nov 16, 2006 · Libération, the French newspaper that emerged from the legendary 1968 student protests, is on the brink of extinction.Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
  27. [27]
    La gauche caviar par l'un de ses servants - Libération
    May 17, 2006 · Il y a toujours eu, chez Laurent Joffrin, un art de la synthèse doublé d'un besoin de réconcilier les familles de gauche désunies.Missing: gauchiste | Show results with:gauchiste
  28. [28]
    Libération, French Newspaper, Bob Dylan front cover
    LIBÉRATION, popularly known as Libé, is a daily newspaper in France, founded ... 1973 in the wake of the protest movements of May 1968. Initially positioned ...Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
  29. [29]
    Révo' cul' à «Libération» (épisode 6) – Libération
    ... NDLC» (note de la claviste). Le paratexte alors n'était pas là pour faire joli, ou prudemment spirituel ; il était tout à la fois, de cette fanfare, le ...Missing: newspaper | Show results with:newspaper
  30. [30]
    Libération | Production Type
    Widely considered as the most graphically sophisticated French newspaper, Libération commissioned an exclusive typeface for its redesign.Missing: signature innovations
  31. [31]
    Libération - Rates Adwanted.com
    Founded in 1973, Libération was initially a committed press agency. Gradually, it became the most innovative French daily with its layout, the place of ...
  32. [32]
    Le quotidien « Libération » va sortir du groupe Altice pour intégrer ...
    May 14, 2020 · Le groupe Altice s'engage à « doter substantiellement ce fonds de dotation pour permettre à Libération de rembourser l'intégralité de ses dettes ...
  33. [33]
    Le journal Libération va quitter Altice France pour devenir une ...
    May 14, 2020 · Le groupe Altice France va créer un "Fonds de Dotation pour une presse indépendante", qui acquerra le journal via une filiale.
  34. [34]
    Le transfert du quotidien « Libération » à une fondation suscite des ...
    May 15, 2020 · Le groupe du milliardaire Patrick Drahi a annoncé, jeudi 14 mai, que Libération, dont il est propriétaire depuis 2014, allait être placé dans un ...
  35. [35]
    Inquiétudes et débats de fonds à - Libération
    Sep 2, 2020 · Et nous appelions le groupe de Patrick Drahi, qui a soutenu financièrement Libé depuis 2014, à augmenter le montant de son abondement pour ...
  36. [36]
    Transfert de Libération : « Le fonds de dotation ne garantit pas l ...
    May 15, 2020 · D'ici quelques mois, le journal Libération devrait quitter le giron d'Altice, groupe de télécoms dirigé par Patrick Drahi et qui a racheté ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Le transfert de Libération à un fonds de dotation inquiète ses salariés
    Dec 16, 2024 · Ce portefeuille est en effet passé de 9.000 en janvier 2018, à plus de 20.000 en février 2020, avant de flirter aujourd'hui avec "la barre des ...
  38. [38]
    Libération - ACPM
    Marque Libération; Type de support : Titre; Périodicité : Quotidien; Site web : www.liberation.com. Adresse. 113 avenue de Choisy 75013 PARIS FRANCE. Libération ...Missing: 1981-2005 | Show results with:1981-2005
  39. [39]
    Classement Diffusion Presse Quotidienne Nationale 2024-2025
    Libération, Quotidien, 2024-2025, PV, 116 062, 13,30%. 6, La Croix, Quotidien, 2024-2025, PV, 78 087, -4,77%. 7, L'Humanité, Quotidien, 2024-2025, DSH, 39 641 ...Missing: historique | Show results with:historique
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Fort de l'augmentation continue de sa diffusion, « Libération
    Feb 18, 2021 · Cependant, ajoute-t-il, « nous sommes passés de 20 000 à 50 000 abonnés numériques en 2020, et nous continuons de viser les 110 000 pour 2023, ...
  42. [42]
    Diffusion de la presse écrite en 2023 : «Libé» en forme, «le JDD»
    Feb 16, 2024 · Parmi les neuf titres de PQN comptabilisés par l'ACPM, Libé est le journal qui profite de la plus forte évolution entre 2022 et 2023, avec une ...Missing: historique | Show results with:historique
  43. [43]
    The French press - daily and weekly news media - About-France.com
    France has three major national quality dailies, Le Monde, Le Figaro, and Libération; between them, they target the same kind of educated reader market as ...Missing: influence landscape
  44. [44]
    France: crash-test for press freedom as threats of media capture rise
    Sep 12, 2024 · Cnews : 1st non-stop news TV in terms of audience share since 2024 ... Newspapers: Libération, daily circulation 100,000 (5th national).
  45. [45]
    France | Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
    Jun 17, 2024 · In France, it has been a year of billionaires buying media assets. Amidst increased concerns about media independence, debates about how regulation can support ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Uncovering the structure of the French media ecosystem - HAL-SHS
    Among the most central nodes when ranked by PageRank are prominent national broadsheet newspapers. (Libération, Le Monde, Le Figaro), reference magazines ( ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Le Figaro, Le Monde, and Public Opinion in France during the ...
    However, Le Figaro was more conservative, pro-war and popular, whereas Le Monde was more liberal and even somewhat scholarly.
  48. [48]
    Media, Publishing, Culture - France - Britannica
    Other influential and widely circulating Paris dailies include Le Figaro, Libération, and France-Soir. Among the smaller dailies are the Roman Catholic La Croix ...
  49. [49]
    La rédaction de « Libération » en grève - Le Monde
    Feb 6, 2014 · Les ventes du quotidien ont chuté de 14,9 % en 2013. Grevé de 6 millions d'euros de dettes, le journal, qui compte 290 salariés, devrait perdre ...
  50. [50]
    La grève est votée à Libération - La Croix
    Feb 7, 2014 · Les salariés ont décidé jeudi 6 février à 65 % de faire grève. Le quotidien ne paraîtra pas le vendredi 7 février 2014, et le site ne sera ...
  51. [51]
    Libération : six jours de crise et une démission - Le Monde
    Feb 13, 2014 · Après des années de tensions, Nicolas Demorand a démissionné de la présidence du directoire du quotidien. Récit de six jours de grande nervosit ...
  52. [52]
    Libération editor resigns after journalists go on strike - The Guardian
    Feb 13, 2014 · Nicolas Demorand was embroiled in row with newsroom staff over shareholders' vision for future of French leftwing paper.Missing: internal resistance
  53. [53]
    2014, la fronde populaire de «Nous sommes un journal - Libération
    Apr 16, 2023 · Hiver 2014. Le journal traverse une énième crise, costaude. Depuis des mois, les élus du personnel alertent sur l'état des finances du journal.
  54. [54]
    Libération tombe sous le charme d'Edouard de Rothschild - Acrimed
    Plusieurs fois reporté [1], le vote du personnel de Libération sur l'entrée d'Edouard de Rothschild dans le capital du quotidien, est intervenu le 20 ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    La direction de « Libération » critiquée en interne pour son ...
    Dec 13, 2024 · Des journalistes de la rédaction suspectent Dov Alfon, qui est aussi directeur de la publication, de plusieurs « mensonges ». Et notamment, d' ...Missing: conflits | Show results with:conflits
  56. [56]
    Dov Alfon actualise son plan stratégique pour Libération - 04/10/2024
    Oct 4, 2024 · Quatre ans après son arrivée à la tête de la rédaction du journal de gauche, Dov Alfon a présenté sa stratégie pour atteindre 200 000 ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  57. [57]
    « Libération, de Sartre à Rothschild » (extrait de) : L'engrenage
    Nov 24, 2005 · Présenter la perte d'indépendance capitalistique comme un gain d'indépendance rédactionnelle imposait d'infléchir la définition même de l' ...
  58. [58]
    Rothschild à Libération, l'aberration ? - L'Humanité
    Pour SUD et la CGT : la perte d'indépendance. « La direction promet à Rothschild une montée supplémentaire et gratuite au capital jusqu'à 49 %, en avalisant des ...
  59. [59]
    "Libération" : Edouard de Rothschild veut le départ de Serge July
    Jun 13, 2006 · Alors que la situation financière du journal s'aggrave, le fondateur serait prêt à partir si l'actionnaire réinvestit 15 millions d'euros.
  60. [60]
    «Libération»: une entourloupe aux allures d'indépendance | Mediapart
    Sep 4, 2020 · Le projet de cession du journal à un fonds de dotation inquiète la rédaction. Parce que le volet financier apparaît fantaisiste.
  61. [61]
    Multiculturalistes contre universalistes : de "Libé" au "Monde ...
    Nov 1, 2020 · Féminisme, minorités, islam : ces questions sèment la discorde dans la presse de gauche. Au "Monde" comme à "Libération" ou à "L'Obs", ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Did France's Libération silence author Sarah Schulman over Gaza?
    Apr 6, 2021 · Yet the interview has been killed by Libération, and Schulman was told that it was in part because of her criticism of Israel's attacks on Gaza.
  63. [63]
    Dominique Strauss-Kahn: the charismatic charmer brought low
    May 16, 2011 · Strauss-Kahn has never before been accused of a violent sexual crime. But his "only real problem", Jean Quatremer of the left-leaning newspaper ...
  64. [64]
    Comment ça marche, CheckNews ? - Libération
    CheckNews a été créé en septembre 2017, succédant au service Désintox de Libération, la première rubrique de fact-checking de la presse française.
  65. [65]
    Libération launches fact-checking search engine ahead of France's ...
    May 5, 2017 · ... Libération has launched CheckNews, an election search engine. The tool was released on Wednesday, just days before the vote to decide ...
  66. [66]
    Libération - CheckNews - IFCN Code of Principles - Poynter
    Checknews, the new fact-checking team of Liberation started in 2017, with a special goal: respond to readers questions. 9 journalists work on fact-checking ...
  67. [67]
    Fil vert, les chroniques : actualités, enquêtes et infos en direct
    Le fil vert, c'est le rendez-vous environnement quotidien de l'équipe de Libération. En Ariège, l'effarouchement des ours remis en cause par la ...Missing: racisme | Show results with:racisme<|control11|><|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Success Story : Libération - Actito
    Find out how Libération is harnessing the full power of Actito to improve subscriber engagement and increase Customer Lifetime Value, with concrete ...
  69. [69]
    A year of insurgency: How Yellow Vests left 'indelible mark' on ...
    Nov 16, 2019 · Loosely linked by a network of dozens of Facebook pages, the movement appeared largely shapeless, leaderless and with no clear ideological bent.
  70. [70]
    INFO JDD. Des journalistes de Libération mis en examen après une fake news contre un candidat RN
    ### Summary of Fake News Incident Involving Libération Journalists and RN Candidate
  71. [71]
    "Libération" accusé de "fake news" : La direction s'explique après la ...
    Oct 20, 2023 · En plein conflit entre Israël et le Hamas, le quotidien "Libération" a été accusé d'avoir relayé une fausse information à la Une de son édition ...