Locknut
A locknut, also known as a locking nut or prevailing torque nut, is an internally threaded fastener designed to resist loosening under vibrations, torque, or dynamic loads by incorporating friction-enhancing or mechanical locking features.[1] These nuts maintain clamping force in bolted joints, ensuring joint integrity in environments where standard nuts might fail, such as in machinery, automotive components, and industrial equipment.[2] Invented in the 1930s as a cost-effective alternative to using dual nuts for vibration resistance, locknuts have become essential in applications requiring reliable fastening under stress.[3] Locknuts operate through two primary mechanisms: friction-based designs, which deform or grip the bolt threads to generate prevailing torque that opposes rotation, and positive locking types, which use mechanical elements like pins or crimps for secure fixation.[2] Common friction-based variants include nylon-insert locknuts (e.g., Nyloc nuts), where a nylon ring expands to tightly engage the threads, and metal deformation nuts like Stover or jam nuts, which rely on distorted threads or paired tightening for added resistance; serrated flange nuts also use friction by digging into mating surfaces for stability.[1] Positive locking examples encompass castle nuts, featuring slots for cotter pins to prevent rotation.[2] Materials typically include stainless steel, zinc-plated mild steel, or brass, with some designs incorporating nylon or polymer inserts limited to temperatures below 250°F (121°C) to avoid degradation.[2] In practice, locknuts are selected based on factors like load type, environmental conditions, and reusability; for instance, nylon-insert types may lose effectiveness after multiple installations, while metal options offer greater durability in high-heat or corrosive settings.[1] Their widespread adoption in engines, aerospace, and construction underscores their role in enhancing safety and operational reliability by minimizing the risk of fastener failure.[3]Fundamentals
Definition and Purpose
A locknut, also known as a self-locking nut or prevailing torque nut, is a specialized fastener designed to resist unintentional loosening caused by vibrations, shock, torque, or axial loads, distinguishing it from standard nuts that depend primarily on initial tightening preload for retention.[4][5] This resistance is achieved through an integrated locking feature that provides frictional or mechanical interference between the nut's threads and the mating bolt, independent of the applied clamp load.[4] Locknuts engage with bolts via threaded connection, where the locking mechanism creates additional torque to secure the joint without relying solely on friction from compression.[5] The primary purpose of a locknut is to maintain joint integrity in dynamic environments, preventing separation of assembled components, bolt fatigue from cyclic loading, and potential equipment failure that could arise from fastener loss.[4][5] In high-vibration settings, such as aerospace, automotive, and industrial machinery, locknuts reduce the rate of preload loss and mitigate risks like foreign object debris in critical systems.[5] Key advantages include enhanced safety for critical assemblies by ensuring reliable retention under operational stresses, as well as reusability in select designs that withstand multiple installations without significant degradation of the locking function.[4] Various locknut types, such as prevailing torque and positive locking variants, address these needs across applications.[4]Historical Development
The development of locknuts traces back to the early 20th century, when the need for fasteners resistant to vibration in emerging industries like aviation and transportation spurred innovation. One of the earliest significant designs was the Elastic Stop Nut, a Swedish invention brought to the United States by engineer Carl Arthur Swanstrom in 1927 under license, featuring a non-metallic insert to create friction and prevent loosening without damaging threads.[6] This concept addressed limitations of traditional jam nuts—thin secondary nuts tightened against primary ones—which had been used in applications such as railway track assembly to secure bolts against rotational forces from train vibrations.[7] In the 1920s and 1930s, locknut technology advanced rapidly for aviation, where high-vibration environments demanded reliable securing of aircraft components. Swanstrom established production and refined assembly methods with automated machines by the early 1930s.[6] The Elastic Stop Nut Corporation of America was founded in 1934, and by the late 1930s, these nuts proved effective in reducing maintenance on vibrating machinery, earning U.S. Air Force approval in 1943 for military aircraft use.[6] World War II accelerated adoption, with millions of Elastic Stop Nuts produced for armed services applications in planes, vehicles, and electronics, driven by the critical need for vibration-resistant fasteners to ensure operational safety amid wartime industrial demands.[6][8] Post-war innovations focused on material enhancements for broader applications. In 1947, the Nylok Corporation introduced a nylon-insert locknut at the Aviation Show in New York, utilizing plastic as the locking element to provide consistent prevailing torque while allowing reusability.[9] This design evolved from fiber inserts and gained popularity in the 1950s for its cost-effectiveness in general machinery.[10] Concurrently, all-metal prevailing torque locknuts emerged in the mid-1940s for high-temperature environments unsuitable for nylon, with further refinements in the 1960s tailored for military specifications, including deformed thread designs to meet rigorous vibration tests.[6] By the 1970s and 1980s, locknuts complied with evolving aerospace standards, such as those from the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), incorporating precision manufacturing for jet engines and space vehicles.[6] These milestones were largely propelled by the industrial imperatives of the World Wars, which highlighted the risks of fastener failure in dynamic systems like tanks, aircraft, and naval equipment.[8]Types
Prevailing Torque Locknuts
Prevailing torque locknuts are a category of self-locking fasteners that generate a consistent level of torque resistance, known as prevailing torque, during both installation and removal due to intentional modifications in their threads or the addition of frictional elements, thereby preventing loosening from vibration without requiring external locking aids.[11] This torque arises from the interaction between the nut's altered internal features and the mating bolt threads, providing a reliable clamping force that maintains joint integrity in dynamic environments.[12] The primary subtypes of prevailing torque locknuts include nylon-insert designs and all-metal deformed-thread variants, each incorporating distinct mechanisms to achieve thread resistance. Nylon-insert locknuts, such as Nyloc nuts, feature a polymer ring or collar embedded in the top of the nut that is slightly undersized relative to the bolt threads; during tightening, the nylon deforms and displaces under compression, embedding into the thread grooves to create high friction and dampen vibrations.[11][12] These are typically one-way nuts, oriented with the insert facing up, and offer additional benefits like sealing against moisture or gases, though they are not suitable for high-temperature or chemically aggressive conditions due to nylon degradation.[12] All-metal prevailing torque locknuts rely on mechanical deformation of the nut's threads or body to produce interference, eliminating the need for non-metallic components and enhancing durability in harsh environments. Examples include Stover nuts, which have a conical top section with elliptically deformed threads that crimp against the bolt for friction-based locking, and Flexlock nuts, characterized by a slotted or serrated collar that distorts the threads to grip the mating part.[12][13] In these designs, the deformation—such as indentations on the nut flats or thread serrations—creates elastic interference that resists rotation, with the conical or slotted features ensuring consistent torque application.[11][12] Another subtype involves jam nuts, also known as half-nuts, which function in a two-nut system where a thinner auxiliary nut is jammed against a primary full-thickness nut, deforming threads slightly to lock both in position through direct interference.[14][15] This method relies on frictional resistance from the thread jamming to prevent rotation. Clinch nuts, or self-clinching locknuts, combine prevailing torque features, such as nylon inserts or deformed threads, with mechanical clinching into sheet metal or panels as an installation method; the clinched base secures the nut to the panel, while the prevailing torque elements lock the mating screw against loosening.[16][17] Reusability varies by subtype, with nylon-insert locknuts generally limited to 2-5 cycles before the deformed polymer loses effectiveness and prevailing torque diminishes significantly.[12] In contrast, all-metal designs like Stover and Flexlock nuts support higher reuse counts—up to 15 installations for Flexlock—due to their elastic deformation properties, though repeated use can gradually wear the threads and reduce locking performance.[12][13] Unlike positive locking locknuts that employ mechanical interlocks such as pins, prevailing torque types depend solely on frictional thread resistance for their securing action.[11]Positive Locking Locknuts
Positive locking locknuts are specialized fasteners that secure threaded connections through mechanical interference or auxiliary locking elements, such as pins, wires, or set screws, which physically engage to prevent rotational loosening without reliance on frictional forces alone. These nuts offer enhanced security in environments subjected to severe vibration, shock, or dynamic loads, where friction-dependent mechanisms may fail. Unlike prevailing torque types, positive locking designs provide a definitive stop against rotation, making them suitable for critical applications requiring irreversible or highly reliable fastening.[14][18] Key subtypes include castle nuts, which have a slotted or castellated top that aligns with a drilled hole in the mating bolt or stud for insertion of a cotter pin, creating a mechanical barrier to rotation.[14] Specialized positive locking locknuts, like those equipped with tangential set screws, employ small screws oriented perpendicular to the main thread axis, which are tightened to bear directly on the bolt shank or threads for precise, adjustable interference.[19] Design specifics of positive locking locknuts often necessitate additional hardware and precise installation procedures to achieve full effectiveness; for instance, castle nuts require pre-drilled holes and cotter pin insertion after torquing, while set screw systems demand controlled tightening to avoid thread damage. These nuts are particularly advantageous in one-time or high-load scenarios, such as aircraft control linkages and structural joints, where they maintain preload under extreme conditions like high torque or thermal cycling, outperforming friction-based options in reliability.[14][18]Locking Mechanisms
Friction-Based Methods
Friction-based methods in locknuts rely on engineered enhancements to the frictional resistance between the nut's threads and the mating bolt, as well as between the nut's bearing surface and the workpiece, to counteract rotational loosening caused by dynamic loads such as vibration.[20] This approach increases the prevailing torque required for rotation without relying on mechanical deformation or positive interlocks, thereby maintaining clamp load over time.[20] The core principle involves elevating the coefficient of friction (μ) in the threaded interface or bearing face, which opposes slip under transverse or axial forces; typical μ values for effective locking in such systems range from 0.11 to 0.16, ensuring resistance to vibration-induced rotation while allowing controlled installation.[21] One common implementation uses polymer inserts, such as nylon or fluoropolymer rings embedded in the nut's top, which deform slightly under torque to create a viscoelastic grip on the bolt threads.[11] The nylon insert, for instance, expands radially to fill thread gaps, generating radial pressure and frictional drag that minimizes backlash and slip, particularly effective against low-amplitude vibrations.[22] Fluoropolymer variants offer similar benefits with added chemical resistance, though both types leverage the polymer's elastic recovery to sustain friction after repeated use, albeit with a gradual decline in performance.[11] Thread coatings represent another friction-enhancing technique, where anaerobic adhesives are applied to the nut or bolt threads prior to assembly, curing in the oxygen-deprived gap to form a thin, resilient film.[23] This cured layer boosts the thread interface friction coefficient, distributing shear forces evenly and preventing relative motion without permanent bonding, thus allowing disassembly if needed.[20] Such coatings are particularly suited for applications requiring reusability, as removable formulations allow disassembly without damage, though the threads must be cleaned and adhesive reapplied to restore the locking effect.[24] Serrated flanges on locknuts provide base-surface friction by incorporating radial teeth or serrations on the bearing face, which embed lightly into the workpiece during installation to resist rotation.[25] This method augments overall frictional locking by increasing the torque needed to overcome both thread and surface resistance, complementing thread-based friction without altering the nut's core geometry.[20] The serrations enhance grip on softer materials like sheet metal, minimizing loosening from torsional vibrations while distributing load to reduce wear.[25]Deformation and Interference Methods
Deformation and interference methods in locknuts rely on the intentional alteration of the nut's threads or body to produce a mechanical interlock or frictional resistance that prevents loosening under vibrational or dynamic loads. This approach creates an interference fit by generating radial pressure between the nut and bolt threads, which binds them together and minimizes relative motion. The deformation can be permanent (plastic) or elastic, depending on the design and material, and is particularly effective in all-metal locknuts where no additional locking elements are used.[14] Common techniques include thread swaging and crimping, where sections of the nut's threads are compressed or squeezed to reduce their effective diameter and create a tighter grip on the mating bolt. For instance, in swaging, the threads are deformed elliptically or through slitting and squeezing, which distorts the thread profile to enhance thread-to-thread contact and radial clamping force. Crimping typically involves localized deformation at the top or last few threads, such as pinching or indenting to form locking indents that wedge against the bolt flanks. These methods ensure the locking action persists even after initial installation by maintaining interference throughout the engagement.[16][14] Another prevalent method employs elliptical or oval thread shapes, where the nut's thread barrel is purposefully deformed into a non-circular cross-section, such as in designs like UL™ or FEO™ locknuts. This out-of-round geometry produces uneven thread engagement, generating continuous radial interference that increases prevailing torque and resists rotation. Tangential distortion, often applied at the terminal threads, involves lateral squeezing or offsetting of thread segments to create asymmetrical pressure points, further amplifying the locking effect by disrupting smooth helical motion. These geometric alterations collectively reduce backlash by filling thread voids and limiting axial play under load, thereby enhancing joint stability without relying solely on surface friction.[26][14] Material selection is critical for these methods, as the nut must withstand deformation without fracturing or losing integrity. Ductile metals, such as carbon steel, alloy steel, or brass, are preferred due to their ability to undergo plastic deformation elastically recovering where needed, while avoiding brittle failure during manufacturing or use. Aluminum alloys may also be used in lower-load applications for similar ductility. The interference generated by deformation not only counters vibrational loosening but also accommodates minor thermal expansions, maintaining preload in assemblies exposed to temperature variations up to the material's limits, typically around 250–400°F for plated steels.[14][27]Performance and Testing
Prevailing Torque Measurement
Prevailing torque refers to the rotational force required to turn a self-locking nut onto a mating bolt or screw without applying any axial clamping load, serving as a key indicator of the nut's resistance to loosening during installation and initial engagement. This torque is measured independently from the tightening torque, which generates the desired preload in the joint, allowing for the quantification of the locking mechanism's effectiveness before full assembly.[28] Standardized measurement of prevailing torque employs torque-tension testing equipment to assess both prevailing-on torque (during advancement toward seating with no clamp load) and prevailing-off torque (during removal after clamp load release). According to ISO 2320:2015, tests are conducted at ambient temperatures between +10 °C and +35 °C using an ISO 16047 calibration device, where the nut is assembled onto a test bolt to a specified clamp force (typically 65-75% of proof load), and torque values are recorded continuously during rotation at a controlled speed to avoid temperature rise exceeding 42 °C above ambient. For aerospace applications, NASM 25027 specifies run-down torque testing on a gauging bolt or hardened plate, measuring the maximum torque during the third complete turn of the nut after the locking feature engages, followed by a 15-cycle reusability test to verify minimum breakaway torque on the final removal without additional lubrication beyond any factory-applied dry film.[29][28][30] Prevailing torque locknuts are classified into categories based on performance levels, such as low (e.g., suitable for general applications with minimal torque requirements) and high (e.g., for demanding environments requiring sustained resistance). Under ISO 2320, nuts are grouped by property classes (e.g., 04, 05, 5 through 12), which dictate minimum prevailing-off torque after first and fifth removals alongside maximum prevailing-on torque, ensuring compliance with mechanical properties in ISO 898-2. These classifications help select nuts for applications balancing ease of installation against locking reliability.[29][30][28] Several factors influence prevailing torque values, including thread size (larger diameters generally yield higher torques due to increased contact area), lubrication (factory-applied or added oils reduce friction and can lower measured values by up to 50%), and the locking feature type (nylon-insert nuts exhibit maximum on-torques at 50% of all-metal equivalents, while deformation-based metal features provide consistent higher resistance across cycles). For non-metallic inserts, performance is limited to -50 °C to +120 °C, beyond which torque may degrade, whereas all-metal types extend to higher temperatures per NASM 25027.[28][31][30] Typical prevailing torque ranges for an M8 nut, as defined in ISO 2320, vary by property class and insertion type, with metal nuts showing higher maxima than non-metallic. The following table summarizes key values (in N·m) for first assembly and reuse, based on laboratory conditions without additional lubrication:| Property Class | Max Prevailing-On Torque (N·m) | Min Prevailing-Off Torque, 1st Removal (N·m) | Min Prevailing-Off Torque, 5th Removal (N·m) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04 (Metal) | 6 | 0.85 | 0.6 |
| 05 (Metal) | 8 | 1.15 | 0.8 |
| 10 (Metal) | 13.5 | 10 | 10 |
| 04 (Non-Metallic) | 3 | 0.85 | 0.6 |
| 05 (Non-Metallic) | 4 | 1.15 | 0.8 |