Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lump sum contract

A lump sum contract, also known as a fixed-price or stipulated-sum contract, is a in and related fields where the commits to delivering a fully defined of work for a single, predetermined total price that encompasses all labor, materials, equipment, overhead, and profit, irrespective of the actual expenses incurred during execution. This contract type requires detailed project specifications and plans to be finalized upfront, minimizing ambiguity in the scope to prevent disputes, and payments are typically structured in installments tied to project milestones rather than itemized costs. For owners, lump sum contracts provide financial predictability and reduced administrative burden, as the fixed facilitates easier budgeting, financing, and transfer to the . Contractors, in turn, benefit from a clear framework that incentivizes and control to maximize margins, though they bear the full of overruns due to unforeseen conditions or errors in estimation. Common in projects with well-defined scopes, such as building construction or developments where changes are minimal, lump sum contracts are contrasted with cost-plus or unit-price models that allow for adjustable billing based on actual expenditures. Any modifications to the original scope necessitate formal change orders, which must be approved and may adjust the contract price accordingly, ensuring accountability while maintaining the core fixed-price principle. In regulatory contexts, such as tax and , lump sum contracts are defined by the absence of separate itemized charges for materials or labor, treating the total as a unified billing amount.

Fundamentals

Definition

A lump sum contract, also known as a fixed-price or stipulated-sum contract, is a type of in and where the commits to delivering the entire specified scope of work for a single, predetermined total price, irrespective of the actual costs incurred during execution. This fixed price encompasses all necessary elements to complete the project as outlined in the documents, providing a clear financial boundary from the outset. The scope of a contract typically covers the full without requiring itemized breakdowns for individual tasks or components, unless explicitly detailed in the agreement; it assumes a well-defined set of plans, specifications, and schedules provided by the owner prior to contracting. Payments under such contracts are generally structured as a single upon substantial completion or divided into installments tied to predefined milestones, ensuring the contractor receives compensation aligned with progress rather than ongoing cost reimbursements. Unlike more flexible contract types, a lump sum contract is inherently all-inclusive, incorporating labor, materials, , overhead, and margins into the fixed total, with the owner insulated from any overruns that may arise from inefficiencies, fluctuations, or unforeseen expenses within the defined . This structure shifts the primary financial risk to the contractor, who must manage and absorb variances to maintain profitability.

Key Characteristics

A lump sum contract operates as a fixed-price where the commits to delivering the specified for a predetermined total amount, providing the owner with certainty from the outset. In terms of risk allocation, the assumes primary responsibility for all overruns and schedule delays, as the fixed price does not adjust for unforeseen issues unless explicitly modified, while the owner benefits from protection against budget escalations. This structure incentivizes the to manage contingencies through higher initial markups to cover potential risks. The of performance thus falls entirely on the , requiring careful during formation. The scope definition demands comprehensive and detailed project specifications upfront, including complete plans and technical requirements, to ensure mutual understanding and minimize ambiguities that could lead to disputes. Any subsequent changes to this defined scope are managed through formal change orders, which adjust the price and timeline as needed to reflect the modifications. Payment under a lump sum contract involves a fixed total sum disbursed in structured installments, typically including an initial payment (e.g., 5-10% of the total to cover startup costs), subsequent progress payments based on verified milestones or percentage of work completed, and a final retention amount (often 5-10%) released upon substantial completion. These progress payments are usually made monthly, tied to the value of work performed, ensuring the contractor receives funds aligned with advancement while the owner retains oversight. Regarding duration and deliverables, the contract establishes a fixed for completion, with the obligated to deliver all specified outputs within this period to avoid penalties. Delays beyond the agreed schedule often trigger , which are predetermined amounts deducted per day of overrun to compensate the owner for time-related losses, provided they are reasonable and not punitive. Such provisions must balance enforceability, sometimes requiring complementary incentives for early completion.

Formation and Implementation

Bidding Process

The bidding process for a lump sum contract begins with the project owner issuing an invitation to bid, typically through a request for proposals (RFP) or similar document that includes detailed plans, , and a clear definition of the project scope. This step ensures that potential contractors have complete and adequate information to prepare accurate bids, with solicitations often requiring public advertisement to promote among qualified bidders. owners may limit the invitation to pre-qualified contractors to streamline the process, while emphasizing the need for realistic to support firm-fixed-price arrangements. In response, contractors analyze the provided documents, conduct site visits if permitted, and seek clarifications on any ambiguities through formal queries or pre-bid meetings. Bidders then develop their quotes by estimating (such as labor, materials, and equipment), adding (like overhead and administrative expenses), incorporating contingencies for potential risks, and applying a markup to arrive at the total fixed price. This preparation requires bidders to demonstrate their experience, , and ability to perform, often submitting supporting alongside the bid to affirm responsibility. Once submitted, bids are typically opened publicly at a specified time and place to ensure , particularly in procurements. Owners evaluate the submissions by comparing the prices, verifying compliance with specifications, assessing bidder qualifications, and confirming responsiveness to all requirements. The is awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, whose offer provides the best value considering factors like price, past performance, and any specified discounts or life-cycle costs, with negotiations limited to clarifications rather than substantive changes. Rejected bids must be documented and justified in writing to maintain fairness. Common pitfalls in this process include incomplete or ambiguous specifications, which can lead to unbalanced bids where contractors inflate prices for certain items to offset risks elsewhere, potentially misleading owners on true costs and increasing the likelihood of disputes. Additionally, failure to adequately address bidder queries during the solicitation phase may result in non-compliant submissions or challenges to the , underscoring the importance of thorough pre-bid communication to mitigate these issues.

Execution and Administration

Implementation details can vary depending on the standard contract form used, such as AIA A201 for general U.S. construction, for international s, or EJCDC for engineered works. During the execution phase of a lump sum contract, is essential to ensure the contractor adheres to the defined , , and standards. The owner or their representative, such as an or , conducts regular site inspections to verify progress and compliance with specifications, while the contractor submits periodic progress reports, often in the form of updated schedules like bar charts or critical path methods (), for approval. Quality control measures, including material testing and workmanship reviews, are integrated into these inspections to prevent deviations that could impact the fixed-price deliverables. Change management in lump sum contracts focuses on handling any deviations from the original through formalized procedures to protect the fixed sum. Variations, such as design modifications or unforeseen site conditions, require the issuance of a written , which must detail the adjusted work, any time extensions, and pricing impacts only if the genuinely changes; no additional compensation is allowed for inefficiencies within the agreed . The or reviews and approves these orders before work proceeds, ensuring all parties agree on the implications to avoid disputes over the price. Payment administration under lump sum contracts typically involves progress payments certified based on completed work milestones, with the total fixed price disbursed incrementally to align with advancement. The submits monthly applications detailing verified quantities and percentages of , which the owner's representative certifies after reviewing daily work reports and observations, authorizing payment within a specified timeframe, such as 30 days. Final payment occurs after acceptance, following resolution of any items—outstanding minor defects or incomplete tasks—through a final and that all contractual obligations are met. Dispute resolution mechanisms in lump sum contracts emphasize early intervention to maintain project momentum without altering the fixed price structure. Initial steps often involve direct negotiation between the contractor and the owner's representative, followed by mediation or referral to a dispute adjudication board (DAB) for a binding but interim decision; for example, under FIDIC contracts, a DAB may provide a neutral assessment within 84 days after referral. If unresolved, escalation proceeds to arbitration or litigation, but parties are required to continue work pending resolution to avoid delays.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Advantages

Lump sum contracts offer significant benefits to project owners, primarily through the provision of budget certainty. Owners receive a fixed total price upfront, allowing for precise financial planning and minimizing the risk of unexpected cost overruns. This predictability stems from the assuming responsibility for all costs within the defined , enabling owners to allocate resources more effectively without ongoing financial adjustments. Additionally, the fixed-price structure simplifies administration by reducing the need for detailed cost tracking and verification during execution, thereby lowering owner overhead associated with monitoring and auditing expenses. From the contractor's perspective, contracts provide opportunities for enhanced profitability when are managed efficiently. By locking in a fixed , contractors can retain any savings achieved through controls, innovative methods, or optimized use as additional . The clearly defined scope in these contracts also minimizes disputes over changes, reducing claims related to and allowing contractors to focus on execution rather than negotiations. Overall, lump sum contracts promote efficiency and by incentivizing s to adopt cost-saving techniques and streamline operations to maximize margins within the fixed . This risk transfer to the contractor, as outlined in key characteristics, fosters a focus on timely completion, often resulting in accelerated timelines due to the financial motivation to avoid delays. In applications, this approach has been shown to decrease owner administrative burdens compared to models, enhancing overall delivery.

Disadvantages

Lump sum contracts often result in higher initial bid prices for owners, as contractors incorporate contingencies to account for potential risks and uncertainties, leading to inflated estimates compared to other contract types. This premium can strain project budgets, particularly for owners seeking cost efficiency. Additionally, accommodating design changes becomes challenging, as modifications typically require formal change orders that escalate costs and involve extensive documentation, reducing overall project flexibility. Contractors face significant exposure to unforeseen costs under lump sum agreements, such as unexpected site conditions or material price spikes, which must be absorbed without additional compensation, potentially resulting in financial losses. For instance, in volatile markets, sudden increases in material costs—like those experienced during disruptions—can erode profit margins, as the fixed price does not adjust for such fluctuations. This risk may pressure contractors to cut corners, such as using inferior materials or shortcuts in workmanship, to maintain profitability, which compromises project quality. At the project level, contracts heighten the potential for disputes arising from differing interpretations of the fixed , especially when ambiguities in contract terms lead to disagreements over inclusions or exclusions. The inherent rigidity also limits adaptability to evolving requirements, making it difficult to incorporate mid-project adjustments without triggering conflicts or delays.

Variations and Applications

Common Variations

Common variations of the lump sum contract adapt the fixed-price model to accommodate uncertainties in project scope, quantities, or responsibilities, while maintaining a of predictability for the owner. These modifications often involve capping expenditures, adjusting for variable quantities, integrating design services, or incorporating performance incentives, allowing for tailored allocation compared to the standard lump sum's complete transfer of to the . The guaranteed maximum price (GMP) is a related contract type that establishes a on total costs, under which the owner reimburses the 's actual plus a , with any savings below the cap typically shared between the parties. This approach protects the owner from overruns while incentivizing efficiency, differing from the pure by reimbursing verifiable expenses up to the limit rather than paying a single fixed amount. It is commonly used in with evolving scopes, such as those involving early involvement. The unit price contract provides a fixed price per defined unit of work (e.g., per cubic meter of earthwork or per of ), multiplied by estimated quantities to form the base contract sum, with final payment adjusted based on measured actual quantities completed. This method offers flexibility for projects where quantities are uncertain at bidding, such as works with variable site conditions, while still providing cost certainty per unit; unlike standard , the total can vary with actual quantities. Adjustments are typically limited to predefined items to prevent . The lump sum contract extends the standard model by assigning the full responsibility for , , , and commissioning of the for a single fixed price, delivering a fully operational ready for the owner's use. This variation is prevalent in industrial or projects requiring integrated expertise, such as power plants or facilities, where the assumes risks across all phases rather than alone. It streamlines owner oversight but demands comprehensive capabilities. Hybrid lump sum models combine elements of the fixed-price structure with other contract types, often incorporating incentives for early completion (e.g., bonuses tied to schedule milestones) or penalties for delays (e.g., ), to align performance with owner priorities. For instance, a may pair a for general conditions with cost-plus for variable elements, or include shared savings in a GMP framework to motivate cost control. These adaptations are suited to complex projects balancing certainty with motivation, such as those with tight timelines or phased deliveries.

Industry Applications

Lump sum contracts are predominantly utilized in the construction industry for projects with well-defined scopes, such as office buildings, residential developments, and like bridges and roads, where the fixed price allows for predictable budgeting and streamlined . These contracts are particularly effective in scenarios where detailed plans and specifications are available upfront, enabling contractors to assume the risk of cost overruns while providing owners with cost certainty. In and sectors, contracts are commonly applied to plant projects, including oil refineries and power facilities, where they facilitate the delivery of fixed, deliverables encompassing , , and phases under a single price agreement. For instance, () contracts often operate on a basis to ensure comprehensive project execution with minimized owner involvement in day-to-day risks. Beyond traditional and , lump sum contracts find application in other sectors such as IT system implementations, where they support fixed-price agreements for deploying standardized software solutions with clearly outlined requirements, and in setups for installing production lines with predefined outputs. However, they are less common in (R&D) activities due to the inherent uncertainties in and outcomes, which favor more flexible contracting models. A notable case example is high-speed rail projects, where lump sum contracts are frequently employed for civil works to maintain strict budget controls amid complex infrastructure demands; for instance, the Taiwan High Speed Rail project utilized a fixed lump sum design-build approach to integrate design and construction interfaces efficiently.

Contractual Clauses

Lump sum contracts, being fixed-price agreements, incorporate specific contractual clauses to delineate responsibilities, allocate risks, and provide mechanisms for handling unforeseen circumstances, ensuring clarity and protection for both owner and contractor. These clauses are essential to mitigate disputes arising from the contractor's assumption of most performance risks in exchange for a predetermined sum. The and clause forms the cornerstone of a lump sum contract, providing a detailed description of the work to be performed, including all labor, materials, , and services necessary for completion as outlined in the contract documents such as drawings, plans, and technical . This clause aims to prevent ambiguity by specifying that the must adhere strictly to these documents, with any deviations requiring written approval through change orders; for instance, the work comprises "the completed or partially completed required by the Documents and includes all labor and necessary to produce such ." In lump sum arrangements, this detailed delineation is critical because the fixed price is based on the defined , shielding the owner from additional costs while obligating the to cover any underestimations. Failure to comply with may result in the bearing the of corrections, such as uncovering and replacing non-conforming work at their expense. Indemnity and insurance clauses in lump sum contracts protect the owner from liabilities stemming from the 's operations, requiring the to assume responsibility for claims related to bodily , property , or other losses arising from their work, except those solely caused by the owner's . Typically, the must "defend, and hold harmless Owner... from loss on account thereof," covering costs and judgments, with obligations independent of limits. Insurance requirements mandate comprehensive coverage, including commercial general (often $1-5 million per occurrence), (statutory limits with $1 million employer's ), automobile ($1-5 million), and sometimes builder's for the duration, naming the owner as an additional insured on a primary and non-contributory basis. In lump sum contexts, these provisions align with the allocation, ensuring financial safeguards without altering the fixed price, and subcontractors must maintain equivalent coverage. Waivers of and 30-day notice of policy changes are standard to maintain uninterrupted protection. Termination provisions outline conditions under which the may end, distinguishing between by the and termination for the owner's , with processes to equitably resolve payments in scenarios. For , the owner may terminate upon the 's material failure to perform, such as non-payment of subcontractors or , after providing and a cure period (often 10 days); the owner can then complete the work and deduct excess costs from any unpaid balance, holding the liable for including repurchase expenses. termination allows the owner to end the at any time with written , compensating the for work performed, reasonable costs incurred (including subcontractor settlements), and a portion of anticipated on completed portions, but excluding unabsorbed overhead or lost profits on unperformed work. Settlements are negotiated within one year of termination, using methods like inventory basis or basis, with partial payments up to 90-100% of verified costs, formalized via standard forms such as 30. These mechanisms preserve the fixed-price integrity while providing fair exit strategies. Force majeure clauses excuse non-performance or delays due to uncontrollable events beyond the parties' control, such as , acts of , , riots, or government actions, without fault or by the affected party, thereby preventing claims in lump sum contracts where timing and completion are fixed. In contexts, these events typically grant time extensions to avoid liquidated damages but rarely cost compensation unless specified; examples include floods, earthquakes, or labor strikes not attributable to the contractor's procurement failures. The clause often requires prompt notice (e.g., within 7 days) of such events and may allow termination if delays persist for 60 days due to governmental orders, with recovery limited to costs for work done excluding profits. For subcontractor delays to qualify, they must be unforeseeable and external to both the prime contractor and subcontractor. This provision balances in lump sum agreements by recognizing external disruptions without shifting the core financial burden.

Case Law

One of the foundational principles in lump sum contract disputes arises from EWHC J70, where the English court established the rule on foreseeability of , limiting recovery to those arising naturally from the or within the parties' reasonable contemplation at the time of contracting. This doctrine has been applied in fixed-price contexts, including lump sum agreements, to assess consequential losses such as delays or cost overruns, emphasizing that contractors cannot claim unforeseeable beyond the agreed sum unless explicitly contemplated. In construction-specific rulings, courts have stressed the importance of clear specifications to enforce terms. For instance, in Hoenig v. Isaacs EWCA Civ 6, the English Court of Appeal held that under a for redecorating a flat, the contractor was entitled to the full agreed payment of £750 minus deductions for defective work, as substantial performance had been achieved despite minor defects. This decision underscores the theme of substantial performance, allowing recovery on the contract price while offsetting owner , but only where the work is essentially complete and deviations are not fundamental. Modern disputes often involve scope changes, where examine whether alterations justify deviations from the fixed sum. In A. Arenson Ltd. v. T.A.N. Earthmoving Works Ltd. ( , 2023), a performed additional repair work using an unapproved method under a project valued at ILS 11.5 million; the ruled the was not required to refund excess payments of ILS 1.5 million, citing contractual provisions allowing plan modifications and tacit approval by the contractor's site representative. Similarly, the in Mascareignes Sterling Co Ltd v. Chang Cheng Esquares Co Ltd UKPC 21 addressed variations in a JCT for a in , holding that additional work could be valued using rates from the contract bills of quantities, without transforming the into a remeasurable , provided the variations were properly instructed. These cases highlight judicial emphasis on contractual mechanisms for changes, protecting the 's integrity while permitting equitable adjustments for owner-directed alterations. Rulings on liability for underbidding reinforce the fixed-price allocation. In Satluj Jal Vidyut v. Jaiprakash Hyundai Consortium (2023 SCC OnLine Del 4039), the set aside an arbitral award granting a 30% labor beyond the 10% bid allowance in a hydropower contract, ruling that claims must be evidence-based and strictly tied to contract terms, holding the accountable for its bid assumptions. Internationally, jurisdictions like the prioritize contractual intent and substantial performance, as seen in Hoenig, while systems impose stricter adherence to the fixed sum. In , under Article 1195 of the , courts rarely adjust construction contracts for unforeseen circumstances if the price is explicitly fixed, viewing it as a of rebalancing claims unless impossibility is proven. German courts, applying §§ 631-632 BGB, similarly enforce terms without automatic adjustments for cost increases, requiring proof of material for deviations, as in general termination disputes where fixed prices limit claims for economic hardship. Recent developments post-2020 have tested in agreements amid the . In a Singapore Court of Appeal decision, Ser Kim Koi v. GTMS Construction Pte Ltd and others SGHC(A) 34, the court upheld a clause in a under SIA conditions, ruling that pandemic-related government restrictions qualified as force majeure, excusing delays with time extensions provided notice was given and mitigation efforts were made. This contrasts with stricter interpretations, where courts have denied force majeure relief in fixed-price contexts unless pandemics are explicitly listed in the clause, emphasizing precise drafting to avoid underbidding liabilities during disruptions.

References

  1. [1]
    Lump Sum Contracts in Construction - Procore
    Jul 29, 2025 · A lump sum contract is an agreement that sets a predetermined cost for construction work. In other words, the contractor performing the work ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  2. [2]
    Lump Sum Contracts: Advantages, Disadvantages & When to Use
    Apr 11, 2021 · Under a lump sum contract, also known as a stipulated sum contract, the project owner provides explicit specifications for the work, and the contractor ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  3. [3]
    Homebuilders and Real Property Services - Texas Comptroller
    Lump-sum Contracts - A lump-sum contract is a contract through which the price is billed as one lump-sum amount. The contract does not state a separate ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] 140 Lump Sum Projects - FDOT
    Jan 1, 2018 · The purpose of Lump Sum projects is to reduce the costs of contract administration associated with quantity, verification and measurement.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Lump Sum Project Guidelines
    Definition. A lump sum project is a fixed-price contract that. requires a bidder to submit a price for completing an. entire project as opposed to bidding on ...
  6. [6]
    Regulation 1521 - CDTFA - CA.gov
    (8) Lump Sum Contract. "Lump sum contract" means a contract under which the contractor for a stated lump sum agrees to furnish and install materials or fixtures ...
  7. [7]
    Lump Sum Contracts: Key Benefits for Contractors and Owners
    Jan 13, 2023 · A lump sum contract is an agreement where a contractor agrees to complete construction services for a fixed price, focusing on the total cost.Missing: FIDIC | Show results with:FIDIC
  8. [8]
    8. Construction Pricing and Contracting
    However, all pricing arrangements have some common features in the form ... In a lump sum contract, the owner has essentially assigned all the risk to ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  9. [9]
    3. The Prime Contract—An Overview – Construction Contracting
    Fixed-price contracts in construction take one of two different forms. The first is a true lump sum contract, where payment is made in a total fixed monetary ...
  10. [10]
    Chapter 5: Contract Administration, Section 3: Change Orders
    A change order is a legally binding document used to make changes to the contract. Form DOT CEM-4900, “Change Order,” is used for change orders.
  11. [11]
    City of San Diego
    Jul 28, 2017 · ... Mobilization", payment for mobilization Work shall not exceed 6% of ... progress payments up to the bid amount of "Mobilization" Bid ...
  12. [12]
    Subpart 11.5 - Liquidated Damages | Acquisition.GOV
    Jul 31, 2024 · This subpart prescribes policies and procedures for using liquidated damages clauses in solicitations and contracts for supplies, services, research and ...Missing: penalties | Show results with:penalties
  13. [13]
    2 CFR 200.320 -- Procurement methods. - eCFR
    This is a procurement method in which bids are publicly solicited through an invitation and a firm fixed-price contract (lump sum or unit price) is awarded to ...
  14. [14]
    Part 16 - Types of Contracts | Acquisition.GOV
    Apr 24, 2023 · A cost-plus-award-fee contract is a cost-reimbursement contract that provides for a fee consisting of (a)a base amount (which may be zero) ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
    • If the contract time dispute is resolved at the project or District level ... The specifications allow progress payments on certain specific lump sum items when ...
  16. [16]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  17. [17]
    The New FIDIC 2017 Yellow Book – what you need to know
    Oct 19, 2017 · This new edition moves more towards the Silver Book in terms of putting further risk onto the Contractor. The basic nature is the same – a lump sum contract.
  18. [18]
    Contractor Compensation Basics - AIA Contract Documents
    Mar 8, 2024 · The terms of the contract should specify the conditions upon which the contract sum might be changed, in which case a change order is executed.
  19. [19]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  20. [20]
    Lump Sum Contracts in Construction: Benefits, Challenges, and ...
    Jan 9, 2024 · Lump sum contracts are specific contracts used in the construction industry to give owners financial certainty and decrease risk.
  21. [21]
    A Guide to Lump Sum (Fixed Price) Construction Contracts - Autodesk
    Sep 2, 2025 · Lump sum contracts, also referred to as fixed-price contracts, establish a predetermined price for the entire project.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Identifying Red Flags in Construction Contracts - KSGFOA
    LUMP SUM CONTRACT. • Benefits. • Known financial commitment. • Less administrative burden for owner. • Less risk of scope creep and budget overage.<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Lump Sum Contracts (With Pros, Cons and Writing Tips) | Indeed.com
    Jul 25, 2025 · Disadvantages of lump sum contracts · Increased contractor risk: In this kind of contract, the contractor takes full responsibility for the ...
  24. [24]
    All About Lump Sum Agreements: Variations, Pros, and Cons
    Jun 25, 2024 · A lump sum contract is a type of agreement where the contractor agrees to complete the project for a fixed, stipulated sum.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Construction Industry Audit Technique Guide - IRS
    The amount of progress payments that is currently available to a contractor under a contract with a fixed payment schedule. Dwelling Unit. A house or ...
  26. [26]
    Cost reimbursable vs. lump sum turnkey construction contracts
    Aug 11, 2025 · The shift toward cost reimbursable contracts does not necessarily make projects less financeable, although they will likely affect the terms ...Risk Allocation · Cost Certainty · Project Control And...
  27. [27]
    Lump Sum Turn Key Contract - 2B1st Consulting
    A “Lump Sum Turn Key (LSTK) Contract” refers to bidding terms and conditions between the End User and an EPC which don't allow any financial change.
  28. [28]
    Hybrid Cost-Plus Contracting With Lump-Sum General Conditions ...
    Jun 19, 2018 · Hybrid cost-plus contracting with a lump-sum general conditions component can have administrative advantages for both contractors and owners.
  29. [29]
    Incentive Contracts in Construction: Types, Pros, Cons, and Best ...
    Feb 20, 2025 · An incentive contract rewards contractors for meeting cost, schedule, or quality goals. Learn how they work, key types, and when to use them ...5 Types Of Incentive... · Incentive Payment Clause · Penalty Clause
  30. [30]
    How Does an EPC Contract Work? - H+M Industrial EPC
    Jun 30, 2022 · An EPC contractor works under a single contract with a project owner, planning and executing all design, procurement, and construction activities.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Taiwan High Speed Rail & Its Impact to Regional Development
    To avoid complicating interfaces between the design and construction, THSR adopts the contract form of design-build at a fixed lump sum price by which ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    [PDF] University of Rochester, General Conditions of the Lump-Sum ...
    Jan 10, 2017 · 7. THE SPECIFICATIONS: The Specifications are that portion of the Contract Documents consisting of the written requirements for materials ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS IN CONTRACTS
    Please see Appendix C for a more robust discussion on the scope of indemnity clauses within construction contracts. What is a “Construction Contract”? The ...Missing: lump | Show results with:lump
  34. [34]
    Part 49 - Termination of Contracts | Acquisition.GOV
    Part 49 establishes policies and procedures for complete or partial contract termination for the Government's convenience or for default.
  35. [35]
    17. Liquidated Damages, Force Majeure, and Time Extensions
    This chapter discussed the general concepts of liquidated damages, force majeure, and contract time extensions.Missing: lump sum
  36. [36]
    Contracts : Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) | H2O - Open Casebooks
    On the following day the shaft was taken by the defendants, before noon, for the purpose of being conveyed to Greenwich, and the sum of 2l. 4s. was paid for ...Missing: lump | Show results with:lump
  37. [37]
    8.3: Remedies - Business LibreTexts
    Mar 28, 2025 · The leading case, perhaps the most studied case in all the common law, is Hadley v. Baxendale, decided in England in 1854. Joseph and Jonah ...
  38. [38]
    Hoenig v Isaacs - 1952 - LawTeacher.net
    A contract was concluded for the redecoration of a one-room flat for the lump sum of £750. Upon completion, there remained an outstanding of balance of £350 for ...
  39. [39]
    Court Ruling Could Change the Status of Lump-Sum Contracts
    May 19, 2024 · The court analyzed the facts of the case and customary practices in lump-sum contracts. It mentioned that the contract stipulated works must ...
  40. [40]
    In brief: Privy Council considers nature of lump sum contract ...
    Jul 20, 2016 · ... lump sum contract, based on the JCT Standard Form of Contract 1980, had been varied by the parties as a result of significant additional and ...
  41. [41]
    Mascareignes Sterling Co Ltd v Chang Cheng Esquares Co Ltd
    Aug 31, 2016 · Before the PC, CCE conceded that the contract had been a lump sum contract but submitted that the parties had altered it by their conduct into a ...
  42. [42]
    The Polyphonics in the Interpretation of Lump Sum Contracts
    Jun 18, 2024 · A lump sum contract encompasses the full outstanding amount, the contractor's entitlement to payment under common law is contingent upon completion of all work.
  43. [43]
    Unforeseen circumstances and contract rebalancing – August 2025
    Aug 29, 2025 · In this respect, French Courts hold that if a contract has a lump-sum fixed price, the parties are considered to have waived the benefit of ...
  44. [44]
    Deconstructing the termination of construction contracts under ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · A summary of the key considerations encountered when terminating construction contracts under German Law.
  45. [45]
    Force majeure clause ruled to cover Covid-19 pandemic and its effects
    Oct 10, 2022 · An appeals court in Singapore has ruled that the meaning of 'force majeure' in a construction contract included the Covid-19 pandemic and its consequential ...<|separator|>
  46. [46]
    COVID-related force majeure litigation in U.S. courts - Hogan Lovells
    Survey of U.S. court decisions on the application of force majeure provisions based on COVID-19 and related government actions.