Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Macroevolution

Macroevolution encompasses evolutionary changes at and above the species level, including the origination of new higher taxa, substantial morphological innovations, and large-scale patterns of lineage diversification and extinction over geological timescales.^[1]^[2] It contrasts with microevolution, which involves smaller-scale genetic and phenotypic shifts within populations that can be observed directly or experimentally, whereas macroevolutionary phenomena require inference from indirect evidence such as the fossil record, phylogenetic trees, and comparative genomics.^[3]^[4] Central to macroevolution are processes like speciation—often through geographic isolation or ecological divergence—and the sorting of lineages via differential extinction and proliferation, which generate the hierarchical structure of life as depicted in phylogenetic trees.^[5] Empirical support derives from transitional forms in the fossil record, such as the Devonian origins of tetrapods from sarcopterygian fish, and molecular clock analyses revealing divergence timings consistent with geological events.^[1] Defining characteristics include adaptive radiations, where lineages rapidly diversify into vacant niches following mass extinctions, and long-term trends like increasing body size in certain clades, though punctuated patterns of stasis interspersed with rapid change challenge purely gradualistic models.^[4]^[6] Debates persist on whether macroevolution operates via the same microevolutionary mechanisms—primarily natural selection, mutation, and drift—extrapolated over time, or if emergent processes like species-level selection or developmental constraints introduce distinct causal dynamics.^[7]^[8] The prevailing scientific view holds that macroevolutionary patterns arise as cumulative outcomes of microevolutionary processes, supported by simulations and comparative studies showing no fundamental mechanistic divide, though empirical gaps in observing speciation in real time underscore reliance on historical data.^[9]^[10] These inquiries inform explanations for Earth's biodiversity, with macroevolution accounting for the proliferation of over 8.7 million species from common ancestors amid five major extinction events.^[5]

History and Conceptual Development

Origin and Etymology of the Term

The term macroevolution was first coined in 1927 by Russian geneticist and entomologist Yuri Filipchenko in his German-language book Variabilität und Variation, where he introduced "Makro-Evolution" to denote evolutionary processes producing higher taxonomic groups beyond species-level changes, often in a framework emphasizing macromutations over gradual Darwinian mechanisms.^[11] Filipchenko, working in the early Soviet era, contrasted this with "microevolution" for intraspecific variation, reflecting his saltationist leanings and doubts about natural selection's sufficiency for major innovations.^[12] The English term gained prominence through American paleontologist George Gaylord Simpson's 1944 book Tempo and Mode in Evolution, in which he defined macroevolution as "evolution above the species level" to describe patterns of adaptive radiation, extinction, and phyletic trends observed in the fossil record, thereby integrating paleontological data into the emerging modern evolutionary synthesis.^[13] Simpson's usage emphasized statistical and temporal modes of evolution, distinguishing it from microevolutionary population genetics while affirming continuity through cumulative small changes.^[14] Prior to these formulations, Charles Darwin's On the Origin of Species (1859) implicitly differentiated small, heritable variations—amenable to natural selection within populations—from larger "transmutations" yielding new species, genera, and classes, positing that the latter emerged via prolonged accumulation of the former without invoking saltational leaps.^[15] Darwin avoided coining a specific term for such higher-scale processes, focusing instead on demonstrating their mechanistic unity with ordinary variation under domestication and nature.^[16]

Evolution of the Concept in Evolutionary Biology

The concept of macroevolution initially emerged in the context of the Modern Synthesis of evolutionary biology, formalized during the 1930s and 1940s by figures such as Theodosius Dobzhansky, Ernst Mayr, and George Gaylord Simpson, which integrated Mendelian genetics, population genetics, and natural selection to explain large-scale evolutionary patterns as extrapolations of gradual, adaptive changes within populations.^[17] This framework, dominant through the 1960s, emphasized phyletic gradualism, wherein macroevolutionary divergences—such as the origin of higher taxa—were viewed as arising from the slow accumulation of small, selectable variations over geological time, without invoking distinct processes beyond those operating at the organismal level.^[18] By the 1970s, paleontological observations prompted a reevaluation, with Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould's 1972 proposal of punctuated equilibrium challenging the Synthesis's uniform gradualism by documenting long intervals of morphological stasis in fossil species, interrupted by rapid bursts of change typically linked to cladogenesis rather than anagenesis.^[19] This model reframed macroevolution as the study of emergent patterns in the fossil record—such as discontinuities and hierarchical branching—distinct from the microevolutionary processes of allele frequency shifts, thereby expanding the field's scope to include tempo and mode beyond adaptive extrapolation.^[20] Further refinements in the late 1970s and 1980s incorporated multilevel selection hierarchies, as Elisabeth Vrba articulated species selection in 1980, positing that emergent species-level properties (e.g., geographic range or developmental constraints) could bias differential origination and extinction rates, driving macroevolutionary trends independently of organismic fitness.^[21] Concurrently, Motoo Kimura's neutral theory of molecular evolution, introduced in 1968, underscored the role of genetic drift in fixing neutral mutations, suggesting that stochastic processes contribute significantly to the genetic underpinnings of macroevolutionary patterns, countering purely adaptationist interpretations.^[22] These developments collectively shifted macroevolution toward a pluralistic view, integrating paleontological empiricism with recognition of non-gradual dynamics and higher-level causal factors.^[4]

Distinction from Microevolution

Core Definitions and Scale Differences

Macroevolution encompasses evolutionary processes that generate higher-level patterns of diversity, such as the origin of new species, genera, or clades, and the emergence of novel adaptations or body plans, typically unfolding over geological timescales of millions of years.^[4] These changes involve the sorting of variation among lineages, leading to shifts in biodiversity, extinction dynamics, and phylogenetic branching observable in the fossil record and molecular phylogenies.^[23] In operational terms, macroevolution is distinguished by outcomes like species origination rates exceeding extinction or the establishment of disparate morphological forms within clades, quantified through metrics such as cladistic disparity (e.g., the occupancy of morphospace by descendant taxa relative to ancestors).^[8] Microevolution, by contrast, refers to changes in genetic composition within populations or closely related groups, primarily through shifts in allele frequencies driven by natural selection, mutation, migration, and drift, often measurable over ecological timescales of generations to decades.^[9] These processes produce adaptations suited to local environments but remain confined to existing developmental and genetic constraints of the lineage, without necessarily yielding irreducible barriers to higher taxonomic divergence.^[24] A canonical empirical example is the long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli initiated by Richard Lenski in 1988, where over 75,000 generations (as of 2022), populations exhibited increased fitness and novel traits like aerobic citrate utilization, yet remained within the species boundary without forming reproductively isolated clades.^[25]^[26] The core scale differences lie in temporal extent, hierarchical scope, and evidential access: macroevolutionary patterns require deep time—frequently 1–10 million years for speciation or clade radiation—to accumulate sufficient divergence, as evidenced by fossil turnover rates averaging around 1 million years per species lifespan.^[27] Microevolutionary shifts, however, manifest rapidly in controlled settings or natural populations tracked over years, such as allele frequency alterations in Drosophila under selection pressures.^[9] Taxonomically, microevolution operates at the infraspecific level (e.g., ecotypes or subspecies), while macroevolution addresses interspecific or supraspecific transitions, often assessed via phylogenetic divergence thresholds like genetic distance exceeding 2% in mitochondrial DNA for avian taxa or morphological gaps in principal component analyses of skeletal traits.^[28] Observability reinforces this: microevolution yields direct genetic and phenotypic data from living systems, whereas macroevolution relies on indirect proxies like stratigraphic sequences and comparative cladograms, precluding real-time replication but enabling causal inference from correlated lineage splits and environmental perturbations.^[4]^[8]

Debates on Continuity and Barriers

Proponents of continuity argue that macroevolutionary patterns emerge seamlessly from microevolutionary processes, as the underlying genetic mechanisms—such as mutation, genetic drift, and natural selection—operate without fundamental barriers across scales.^[29] In computational simulations using the Avida platform, self-replicating digital organisms evolved complex arithmetic functions, such as equality detection (EQU), through incremental mutations rewarding simpler logic operations like negation (NOT) and complement (EQU's precursors), demonstrating how selection on small changes can yield hierarchical complexity without saltational leaps. These models, incorporating realistic population dynamics and error-prone replication, support the scalability of microevolutionary rules to produce macro-like innovations, as complex traits arose in populations of up to 50 million individuals over thousands of generations. Critics of unbridled continuity highlight empirical limits observed in long-term laboratory evolution, where microevolutionary adaptations accumulate but fail to breach thresholds for major functional shifts. In Richard Lenski's E. coli long-term evolution experiment (LTEE), initiated in 1988, twelve asexual populations have undergone over 75,000 generations under controlled glucose-limited conditions, yielding fitness gains via mutations like aerobic citrate utilization (Cit+), yet remaining firmly within prokaryotic bounds without transitions to eukaryotic-like complexity such as organelles or multicellularity. This outcome, despite billions of mutations screened, underscores potential "information thresholds" where novel body plans or metabolic overhauls require non-incremental innovations not observed under intensified selection, as parallel adaptations across replicates converged on similar, bounded optima rather than divergent macroevolutionary divergence.^[30] Quantitative assessments further probe scalability through metrics like mutational robustness and genetic load. Asexual lineages in the LTEE exhibit decelerating fitness gains and increasing deleterious mutation effects over time, consistent with models of Muller's ratchet, where irreversible accumulation of harmful mutations erodes adaptability, potentially capping long-term evolvability before macroevolutionary thresholds are crossed.^[31] Empirical tracking of protein evolution rates in hypermutator LTEE lines reveals slower substitution in abundant proteins, indicating constraints on functional novelty that challenge pure extrapolation from short-term microevolution to deep-time macro patterns.^[32] Such dynamics suggest that while microchanges drive initial adaptation, barriers like diminishing returns on mutation or heritability erosion—evident in reduced evolvability under prolonged selection—may necessitate additional causal factors for observed macroevolutionary discontinuities.^[33]

Macroevolutionary Processes

Speciation and Phylogenetic Branching

Speciation represents the primary mechanism of cladogenesis in macroevolution, wherein a single evolutionary lineage splits into two or more descendant lineages incapable of interbreeding, thereby generating phylogenetic branching and increased biodiversity.^[34] This process hinges on the evolution of reproductive isolation, which prevents gene flow and allows independent divergence driven by mutation, genetic drift, natural selection, or their interactions.^[35] In practice, speciation underlies the hierarchical patterns observed in phylogenies, where branching events reflect historical divergences rather than gradual transformations within lineages. Allopatric speciation, involving geographic isolation as the initial barrier to gene flow, predominates as the causal driver in most documented cases, particularly in terrestrial animals and island systems.^[36] Physical separation—such as by oceans, mountains, or continental drift—reduces interbreeding opportunities, enabling populations to accumulate genetic differences through local adaptation or neutral drift, often accelerated in small founder populations where genetic drift exerts outsized influence.^[34] Empirical rates from island radiations illustrate this: in Darwin's finches of the Galápagos, a single colonizing lineage diversified into 15 species over approximately 1-2 million years, with geographic isolation across islands fostering beak morphology adaptations tied to food sources.^[37] Long-term field studies on Daphne Major by Peter and Rosemary Grant documented ongoing hybridization between species like Geospiza fortis and G. scandens, yet reproductive isolation persists via assortative mating and song divergence, underscoring how isolation maintains branching despite gene flow.^[38] Sympatric speciation, occurring without geographic barriers through mechanisms like ecological niche partitioning or polyploidy, appears rarer but viable in specific contexts such as plants and lacustrine fishes.^[39] For instance, genomic analyses have confirmed sympatric origins in cichlid fishes of crater lakes, where disruptive selection on trophic traits drives divergence within continuous habitats.^[40] In Darwin's finches, a striking 2017 observation captured hybrid speciation: offspring of G. conirostris and G. fortis formed a reproductively isolated lineage (G. magnirostris variant) in just two generations on Daphne Major, bypassing strict allopatry via novel ecological fitting and genetic incompatibilities.^[41] Such events highlight that while sympatric modes contribute to branching, they often involve hybrid intermediates rather than pure parapatric divergence. Phylogenetic analyses quantify cladogenesis through net diversification rates, derived from birth-death models fitted to branching times in molecular phylogenies.^[42] These stochastic models estimate speciation rate (λ, "births") and extinction rate (μ, "deaths"), yielding net rate r = λ - μ, which captures overall lineage proliferation; for example, constant-rate birth-death priors reveal elevated diversification in avian clades like finches, with λ exceeding μ during adaptive radiations.^[43] Variations in rates—up to 46-fold across subclades—arise from environmental shifts or biotic interactions, but geographic isolation remains the foundational causal precondition, as founder events in peripheral isolates amplify drift-induced fixation of alleles incompatible with parental gene pools.^[44] This framework integrates empirical phylogenies with process-based inference, affirming speciation's role in macroevolutionary tree-building without invoking unverified saltational leaps.

Origin of Major Innovations and Body Plans

The origin of major innovations and body plans in macroevolution primarily involves genetic mechanisms such as gene duplication and the evolution of cis-regulatory elements, which enable the co-option of existing developmental toolkit genes for novel functions. Hox genes, which specify anterior-posterior patterning along the body axis, exemplify this process through cluster duplications that increased regulatory complexity and facilitated segmentation diversity. In arthropods, a single ancestral Hox cluster patterns tagmosis (fused segments), whereas vertebrates acquired multiple clusters via two rounds of whole-genome duplication approximately 500 million years ago, allowing finer control over vertebral and appendage identity.^[45]^[46] These duplications, occurring post-Cambrian arthropod-chordate divergence around 550 million years ago, provided raw material for evolutionary novelty by permitting subfunctionalization, where paralogs diverge to regulate distinct body regions without disrupting core functions.^[47] Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) highlights how modular changes in cis-regulatory elements—non-coding DNA sequences controlling gene expression—can generate macroevolutionary shifts in morphology. In Drosophila species, comparative analyses reveal that alterations in enhancers for genes like even-skipped drive interspecific differences in embryonic segmentation stripes, demonstrating how localized regulatory tweaks propagate to affect overall body plan architecture.^[48] Such modularity reduces pleiotropic effects, enabling innovations like novel segment identities or organ primordia without wholesale rewiring of protein-coding genes. Empirical studies confirm that cis-regulatory evolution, often via point mutations or insertions in enhancer modules, underpins trait origins across insects, as seen in the integration of transcription factors into new gene regulatory networks for wing pattern diversification.^[49]^[50] Developmental constraints and historical contingency further shape the feasibility of body plan innovations, limiting pathways to those compatible with ancestral architectures. Stephen Jay Gould argued that replaying evolutionary history would yield different outcomes due to chance events, with developmental "canals" channeling variation toward constrained forms rather than arbitrary designs.^[51] Fossil and genomic evidence supports this, showing that bilaterian body plans emerged rapidly during the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition (~550 Mya), where regulatory co-option of conserved toolkit genes like Hox and Wnt likely generated disparity under physicochemical and ecological contingencies, rather than exhaustive exploration of morphological space.^[52] While these mechanisms explain observed patterns, the precise causal sequences for many phylum-level innovations remain incompletely resolved, underscoring the interplay of genetic opportunity and extrinsic filters in macroevolutionary origins.^[4]

Role of Extinction in Shaping Diversity

Extinction serves as a primary macroevolutionary filter, differentially eliminating lineages and thereby sculpting the tree of life through survivorship biases that favor clades with superior adaptability or luck. In the Phanerozoic eon, spanning approximately 541 million years, extinction has accounted for over 99% of all species that ever existed, with patterns revealing both stochastic elements and selective pressures that prune maladaptive forms while preserving those poised for expansion.^[53] This process generates turnover pulses, where clade success emerges not solely from origination but from differential persistence, as evidenced by analyses of marine fossil records showing that geographic range breadth strongly predicts genus survivorship across most intervals.^[54] Background extinction operates at a steady, low intensity of roughly 1 species per million species-years, facilitating gradual lineage replacement without profoundly disrupting diversity equilibria.^[55] In contrast, mass extinction events impose acute selective sieves, such as the end-Permian crisis around 252 million years ago, which eradicated approximately 96% of marine species through environmental stressors like volcanism-induced warming and anoxia.^[56] ^[57] These episodes amplify survivorship biases, as surviving taxa often exhibit traits like broad tolerances or dispersal capabilities, leading to cladistic imbalances where opportunistic groups dominate subsequent assemblages.^[58] The causal mechanism of extinction in diversity dynamics involves both neutral and deterministic components, with David Raup's stochastic models—treating lineage trajectories as random walks—contrasting selectionist views that emphasize fitness-based filtering.^[59] Phanerozoic data, including genus-level turnover from Sepkoski's compendia, reject pure randomness by demonstrating non-uniform extinction intensities tied to biotic traits, such as habitat specialization, which prune vulnerable branches and clear ecospace for radiations.^[60] For instance, following the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction at 66 million years ago, which eliminated non-avian dinosaurs, mammalian clades underwent accelerated diversification, with placental orders exploiting vacated niches and achieving body size expansions within millions of years.^[61] ^[62] This pruning-radiation cycle underscores extinction's role in clade success, where mass die-offs reset competitive landscapes, favoring lineages with latent evolvability over sheer proliferation rates.^[63]

Empirical Evidence

Fossil Record Patterns and Transitions

The fossil record, compiled from stratigraphic sequences worldwide, primarily reveals episodes of morphological stasis within lineages, followed by discontinuous appearances of novel forms, with intermediates between major groups being sparsely documented. Quantitative analyses of marine invertebrates, such as those in Sepkoski's compendium of over 7,000 genera spanning the Phanerozoic, indicate that preservation biases limit the record to a small fraction of past biodiversity, estimated at around 5-25% for genera but far lower for species-level details due to taphonomic filtering.^[64]^[65] Despite extensive sampling, the stratigraphic order consistently shows higher taxa emerging without dense precursor gradients, as seen in the global distribution of first occurrences. The Cambrian Explosion represents a prime example of such discontinuity, with the interval from approximately 541 to 530 million years ago marking the abrupt fossil debut of diverse bilaterian phyla—including arthropods, chordates, and echinoderms—featuring complex features like segmentation, eyes, and coelomic body cavities, but with scant Ediacaran precursors exhibiting comparable organization.^[66]^[67] Fossil assemblages from sites like the Burgess Shale and Chengjiang preserve these early representatives in exceptional detail, yet the ~10-20 million-year span yields no gradual buildup from simpler metazoans, instead documenting a proliferation of disparate body plans in marine environments.^[68] Notable transitional fossils do occur, such as Tiktaalik roseae from 375-million-year-old Devonian deposits in Ellesmere Island, Canada, which bridges sarcopterygian fish and tetrapods through traits like a flattened skull, spiracle for air breathing, and pectoral fins with radius-ulna homologs supporting weight-bearing.^[69]^[70] However, such intermediates remain exceptional; for instance, the fish-to-tetrapod sequence spans ~30 million years with few additional candidates like Panderichthys, while broader macroevolutionary shifts, such as the origin of amniotic eggs or placental mammals, lack comparably detailed stratigraphic chains despite intensive searches in formations like the Karoo Basin.^[71] The Signor-Lipps effect accounts for some apparent gaps, whereby incomplete sampling creates a "pulled-back" illusion of abruptness in first or last appearances, with the true range of a taxon extending beyond the observed fossils due to rarity near boundaries.^[72] Correcting for this via confidence intervals and sampling standardization, as in studies of end-Cretaceous ammonites, still reveals persistent shortfalls: expected transitional morphologies under continuous speciation models predict orders of magnitude more intermediates than observed, even factoring in undersampling rates exceeding 90% for soft-bodied or low-abundance forms.^[73] This empirical pattern of rarity holds across clades, from trilobites to mammals, underscoring the fossil record's documentation of discrete rather than finely graduated shifts.^[74]

Comparative Morphology and Developmental Biology

Comparative morphology examines structural similarities among organisms to infer evolutionary relationships, distinguishing between homologies—traits derived from a common ancestor—and convergences, where similar forms arise independently due to shared selective pressures. In tetrapods, the pentadactyl limb plan, featuring a single proximal bone (humerus or femur), two distal elements (radius-ulna or tibia-fibula), and five digits, exemplifies homology at the skeletal level, with corresponding bones retaining positional and developmental correspondences across amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals despite functional divergences such as flight or locomotion.^[75]^[76] This pattern aligns with descent from a shared tetrapod ancestor, as digit reduction or modification (e.g., to three in birds) builds upon the conserved ground plan rather than independent reinvention.^[77] Convergences highlight limits to morphological plasticity, where unrelated lineages converge on similar solutions for analogous environments. Ichthyosaurs (extinct marine reptiles) and dolphins (cetacean mammals) independently evolved streamlined fusiform bodies, dorsal fins, and tail flukes optimized for aquatic propulsion, achieving comparable hydrodynamic drag coefficients despite originating from terrestrial ancestors separated by over 200 million years.^[78]^[79] Such parallels underscore functional convergence driven by physics and ecology, not shared ancestry, as underlying anatomies differ (e.g., ichthyosaur vertebral counts and scale coverage versus cetacean blubber and hairless skin).^[80] Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) reveals conserved genetic and cellular mechanisms constraining macroevolutionary change, often channeling variation along predefined pathways. Pharyngeal arches in vertebrate embryos exhibit serial homology, with the mandibular arch differentiating into jaws via dorsoventral patterning shared with posterior gill-supporting arches, suggesting jaws co-opted ancestral branchial modules rather than arising de novo.^[81]^[82] However, developmental constraints—such as modular integration and regulatory hierarchies—impose biases on phenotypic variation, limiting the production of novel structures; experimental perturbations in model organisms (e.g., Hox gene manipulations) yield modifications within existing plans but no observed origination of complex appendages like limbs from non-limb primordia.^[83]^[84] Quantitative assessments of morphological disparity, measured via multivariate analyses of shape and form, indicate that early divergences among animal phyla achieved greater overall variance than subsequent radiations within those phyla, with Cambrian assemblages spanning broader morphospace than post-Cambrian elaborations.^[85] This pattern implies that macroevolutionary novelty concentrates in basal splits, with later diversity filling narrower adaptive zones under developmental and ecological limits, rather than progressively expanding disparity.^[86] Such metrics prioritize empirical geometry over qualitative narratives, revealing stasis in higher-level form despite microevolutionary tinkering.^[87]

Molecular Phylogenetics and Genomic Data

Molecular phylogenetics reconstructs evolutionary relationships among major taxa using DNA and protein sequences, often producing trees that broadly align with fossil-based chronologies when calibrated by molecular clocks. For instance, estimates of placental mammal crown-group divergence cluster around 100 million years ago (Mya), consistent with fossil evidence of early eutherian remains from the Early Cretaceous.^[88] These clocks assume relatively constant substitution rates over time, but fossil calibrations are essential to convert relative branch lengths into absolute timescales, revealing congruence in events like the radiation of mammalian orders post-Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary at approximately 66 Mya.^[89] However, rate heterogeneity—variations in evolutionary rates across lineages, sites, or genes—complicates these inferences, often leading to artifacts such as long-branch attraction that distort deep macroevolutionary branches. Asymmetric rates between sister clades can bias topology toward incorrect groupings, particularly in ancient divergences exceeding 500 Mya, where saturation of substitutions obscures signal.^[90] ^[91] Relaxed clock models mitigate some issues by allowing rate variation, yet persistent discrepancies highlight limits in assuming uniform processes across vast timescales, as seen in mismatched avian or plant phylogenies despite extensive genomic data.^[92] Genomic data reveal hallmarks like whole-genome duplications (WGDs) that correlate with macroevolutionary innovations. The vertebrate 2R hypothesis posits two ancient WGDs around 500 Mya, near the chordate-vertebrate transition, expanding gene families involved in neural and developmental complexity, such as Hox clusters and signaling pathways.^[93] Evidence from synteny blocks in lamprey, hagfish, and amphioxus genomes supports this timing, linking duplications to bursts in morphological disparity during the Ordovician.^[94] Orphan genes, lacking detectable homologs outside specific taxa, constitute 10-30% of protein-coding genes in many animal lineages, including insects and vertebrates, posing interpretive challenges for universal common descent. These taxon-restricted novelties often arise de novo or via rapid divergence, but their prevalence—e.g., ~10-20% species-specific in mammals—suggests episodes of lineage-specific origination that strain homology-based phylogenies without invoking undetected ancestral traces or horizontal transfer.^[95] ^[96] While some resolve as fast-evolving paralogs, the systematic emergence of functional orphans in divergent clades underscores anomalies in expecting strictly nested genetic hierarchies.^[97]

Theoretical Frameworks

Gradualism versus Saltationism

Gradualism, as articulated by Charles Darwin, holds that macroevolutionary transformations result from the accumulation of numerous small, incremental genetic changes selected over long periods, extrapolating directly from observed microevolutionary processes.^[98] This view assumes that adaptive complexity, such as the development of organs like the vertebrate eye, emerges through successive minor modifications, each conferring slight fitness advantages. However, population genetics imposes strict limits on the pace of such accumulation; J.B.S. Haldane's 1957 calculation of the "cost of natural selection" demonstrated that substituting a beneficial allele in a large population incurs a genetic load equivalent to approximately 30% mortality per locus under typical selection coefficients, restricting the simultaneous fixation of multiple independent mutations.^[99] In practice, this yields a maximum evolutionary rate of roughly one adaptive substitution per 300 generations in mammalian-sized populations, rendering the coordinated assembly of thousands of mutations—estimated for functional innovations like protein complexes or sensory systems—mathematically infeasible within compressed evolutionary intervals, as the required sequential fixations would demand implausibly low costs or vast population sizes exceeding empirical bounds.^[100] Saltationism counters that macroevolution can proceed via discontinuous leaps, where single-generation events produce substantial phenotypic or genotypic discontinuities, bypassing gradual pathways. Empirical support derives primarily from polyploidy in plants, where chromosome doubling in hybrids instantly yields reproductive isolation and novel species; for instance, the allotetraploids Tragopogon mirus and T. miscellus formed in the 1920s–1940s in western North America from hybrids of introduced diploids T. dubius and T. pratensis, with field documentation confirming their sudden origin and establishment as distinct entities within decades.^[101] These cases illustrate saltational speciation, as the polyploid genome confers immediate barriers to backcrossing with parents, enabling rapid divergence without intermediate forms, though such jumps are rarer in animals due to developmental constraints on genome duplication. Theoretical feasibility assessments, including simulations of large-effect mutations, indicate that while saltation avoids Haldane's substitution bottlenecks for genome-level shifts, morphological saltations (e.g., via homeotic gene duplications) remain constrained by viability costs, occurring sporadically rather than routinely.^[102] The debate hinges on reconciling microevolutionary rates with macroevolutionary scales: gradualism's reliance on additive small changes falters under quantitative scrutiny of substitution limits and mutation supply, as neutral theory extensions mitigate but do not eliminate the load for selected traits, whereas saltation's documented instances like polyploidy affirm causal realism for barrier-crossing events, albeit niche-specific.^[103] Mainstream adherence to gradualism often overlooks these limits, potentially reflecting institutional preferences for neo-Darwinian continuity over discontinuous mechanisms, yet empirical polyploid data and genetic cost models underscore saltation's role in feasible macroevolutionary leaps.^[104]

Punctuated Equilibrium and Stasis

Punctuated equilibrium, proposed by paleontologists Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould in their 1972 paper, posits that the fossil record predominantly shows long intervals of morphological stasis in species, interrupted by brief episodes of rapid evolutionary change coinciding with speciation events.^[105] This framework challenges the expectation of uniform gradualism, arguing instead that significant phenotypic shifts occur primarily through speciation in small, isolated populations rather than slow anagenesis within widespread lineages.^[19] Under this model, established species maintain relative morphological stability for the duration of their existence due to stabilizing selection and developmental constraints, with the prediction that stasis characterizes the vast majority of a species' geological lifespan.^[106] The primary mechanism emphasized is peripatric speciation, a form of allopatric divergence where small peripheral populations—geographically isolated from the main range—experience founder effects, genetic drift, and intense selection, enabling rapid adaptation and morphological innovation in spans of thousands to tens of thousands of years, often too brief to resolve finely in stratigraphic sequences.^[106] Eldredge and Gould contended that such peripheral isolates, rather than central populations, drive macroevolutionary patterns because large, panmictic groups resist change through gene flow and density-dependent regulation, preserving stasis.^[105] This geographic emphasis predicts that fossil transitions appear abrupt at species boundaries, with little evidence of intermediate forms in ancestral ranges. Paleontological data have provided empirical tests, with studies on trilobites such as Phacops rana revealing morphological stasis across millions of years, where traits like eye structure remained stable post-speciation, with shifts confined to initial divergence events.^[107] Bryozoan lineages, analyzed over 25 million years, demonstrate prolonged stasis in colony morphology, punctuated by rapid transitions during inferred speciation, supporting the model's tempo in marine invertebrates.^[108] Multivariate analyses of bivalve shells similarly document approximate stasis over multimillion-year intervals in multiple lineages, with morphological variance remaining low despite faunal turnover.^[109] Critiques highlight that the model's reliance on spatial isolation may undervalue genetic mechanisms, as molecular phylogenetics reveals gradual accumulation of neutral substitutions and divergence in protein sequences even among morphologically static sibling species, indicating ongoing microevolutionary processes decoupled from phenotypic stasis.^[110] Some analyses question the universality of observed patterns, noting that re-evaluations of certain datasets, such as planktic foraminifera, have identified gradual components or sampling artifacts mimicking punctuation, suggesting stasis is not as pervasive as claimed.^[111] These findings imply that while stasis occurs empirically in many fossil clades, underlying genetic clocks challenge the exclusivity of punctuated tempos for all evolutionary scales.^[112]

Integration of Neutral and Selectionist Processes

The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution, introduced by Tomoko Ohta in 1973, posits that many mutations are slightly deleterious and can fix in populations through genetic drift when their selective effects are comparable to 1/(2N_e), where N_e is the effective population size.^[113] In macroevolutionary contexts, this mechanism contributes to long-term stasis by allowing the accumulation of weakly deleterious substitutions over extended periods, particularly in lineages with fluctuating or reduced effective population sizes, where purifying selection becomes less efficient.^[114] Such drift-dominated processes explain heterogeneous substitution rates observed in fossil-calibrated phylogenies, where molecular clocks deviate from strict neutrality without corresponding adaptive shifts, thereby underpinning patterns of relative morphological stability across geological epochs.^[115] Selectionist approaches to macroevolution incorporate hierarchical structures, including multi-level selection acting on species or clade-level traits via differential speciation and extinction. Steven M. Stanley formalized this in 1975 as species selection (or sorting), where clade success emerges from varying rates of lineage proliferation and persistence, independent of individual-level adaptation, thus generating macroevolutionary trends like differential diversification among higher taxa.^[116] This framework posits that emergent properties, such as developmental constraints or reproductive isolation, are "selected" through clade-level fitness differentials, complementing genic selection by addressing patterns beyond microevolutionary scales. Integration of neutral and selectionist processes occurs within hierarchical models of variation origin and sorting, where neutral drift governs much molecular rate heterogeneity and demographic stochasticity, while selection filters clade-level outcomes.^[4] Phylogenomic analyses of rate shifts across lineages often reveal inconsistencies with ecological niche evolution; for instance, substitution rate variations in certain clades show weak correlations with habitat or dietary shifts, implicating neutral factors like ancestral population bottlenecks over adaptive divergence.^[117]^[118] In birds and mammals, lineage-specific rate accelerations frequently align more with generation time or metabolic proxies for N_e than with niche occupancy, supporting a synthesis where drift modulates evolvability, enabling selection to act on sorted variation at higher levels.^[119] This interplay accounts for macroevolutionary rate heterogeneity without invoking uniform adaptive causation, as evidenced by simulations and empirical trees where neutral-inclusive models better fit observed diversification disparities.^[120]

Controversies and Criticisms

Extrapolation from Micro to Macro Mechanisms

The assumption that microevolutionary processes—such as point mutations, genetic drift, and natural selection observed in laboratory populations—can extrapolate to macroevolutionary outcomes like novel body plans relies on the indefinite accumulation of adaptive changes without emergent barriers. However, empirical data from controlled experiments highlight limitations in generating qualitative innovations. In the Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE) started by Richard Lenski in 1988, Escherichia coli populations transferred daily have reached approximately 75,000 generations by 2023, equivalent to billions of individual mutations under constant selection pressure in a glucose-limited environment. Despite innovations like aerobic citrate metabolism in one lineage, no evolution of novel cell types, multicellularity, or eukaryotic-like structures occurred, with lineages remaining unicellular prokaryotes.^[121]^[122] Fitness trajectories in the LTEE further indicate plateaus, as relative fitness gains decelerate exponentially rather than linearly, suggesting diminishing marginal returns from further mutations under sustained selection. This pattern aligns with broader observations in microbial evolution experiments, where adaptive peaks constrain further divergence without environmental shifts.^[123]^[124] Quantifying biological information underscores additional scalability issues. Durston et al. (2007) measured functional sequence complexity (FSC) across 35 protein families using Shannon entropy applied to aligned sequences, finding average FSC values of 2.3–10.9 bits per amino acid site; for a 300-amino-acid protein, this equates to 690–3,270 bits of specified information, a rarity (e.g., 1 in 10^{208} sequences for high-FSC cases) unattainable via unguided random variation alone. Such metrics imply that mutations typically degrade rather than construct the precise configurations needed for novel functions, challenging extrapolation to macro-scale innovations requiring coordinated informational increases.^[125] Probabilistic analyses of mutation waiting times reveal temporal constraints for multi-mutation events central to macroevolution. For two specific beneficial mutations in a bacterial population of 10^9 individuals with mutation rate 10^{-8} per site per generation, expected waiting times approximate 10^4–10^5 generations under favorable conditions, but scale quadratically or worse for additional independent sites without synergistic benefits. In smaller eukaryotic populations (effective size ~10^4–10^6), waiting for even two coordinated mutations for complex traits like regulatory networks can exceed 10^6–10^8 generations, surpassing Earth's 3.5 billion-year timeline for multi-gene innovations. Behe (2009) calculates that for human-scale evolution, such paired mutations yield waits of ~100 million years per site pair, rendering simultaneous coordination for macroevolutionary leaps implausible without non-random mechanisms.^[126]^[127] While microbial models permit rare dual events, extensions to polygenic traits amplify these barriers, as back-mutations and deleterious interactions further extend timelines.^[128]

Fossil Gaps and the Cambrian Explosion

The fossil record exhibits significant stratigraphic discontinuities prior to and during the early Cambrian period, beginning approximately 541 million years ago (Mya), where the sudden appearance of diverse bilaterian body plans challenges expectations of uniformitarian gradualism in macroevolutionary change.^[129] In contrast to the sparse and enigmatic Precambrian assemblages, the Cambrian strata reveal the rapid origination of most major animal phyla, with little evidence of sequential precursor forms spanning the preceding tens of millions of years.^[130] This pattern underscores an empirical gap, as uniformitarian models predict a dense continuum of morphological intermediates accumulating over extended geological time, yet such forms remain largely undocumented. The late Ediacaran biota, dating from roughly 575 to 541 Mya, primarily consists of soft-bodied organisms preserved in exceptional conditions, but lacks unambiguous bilaterian ancestors for the Cambrian radiation.^[131] While some Ediacaran fossils exhibit trace mobility or quilted structures, they do not demonstrably link to the complex, motile bilaterians that dominate early Cambrian deposits, with most Ediacaran taxa failing to persist into the Cambrian or showing morphological discontinuities.^[132] This absence persists despite taphonomic windows—such as anoxic seafloors favorable for soft-tissue preservation—comparable to those enabling Cambrian lagerstätten, suggesting the gap reflects biological reality rather than mere preservational bias.^[133] Early Cambrian sites like the Chengjiang (Maotianshan Shales) biota, dated to about 518 Mya, document over 20 metazoan phyla in a single assemblage, including arthropods, priapulids, chordates, and echinoderms, representing a profound diversification absent in immediately preceding strata.^[134] Arthropods alone comprise a significant portion of this diversity, with genera exhibiting advanced features like segmented appendages and compound eyes, marking the inaugural fossil evidence for such structures across multiple lineages.^[135] No verified Precambrian equivalents of these complex eyes or metameric segments exist, despite the demonstrated taphonomic potential for their preservation in Ediacaran settings, further highlighting the abruptness of phyla-level innovation.^[136] Quantitative assessments of these gaps, based on actualistic simulations of sedimentation and fossilization rates, indicate that millions of transitional morphologies should populate the Precambrian-Cambrian interval under gradualist assumptions, yet the record yields fewer than expected by orders of magnitude. This discrepancy poses a causal challenge to extrapolative models relying on continuous microevolutionary processes, as the empirical pattern favors discrete origination events over smoothed transitions. Attributing the voids solely to incomplete sampling strains credulity given the volume of explored strata and the fidelity of Cambrian preservation.

Intelligent Design Challenges and Irreducible Complexity

A core challenge to macroevolutionary theory from intelligent design (ID) proponents centers on irreducible complexity (IC), defined as a system of multiple interdependent parts where the removal of any single part renders the system non-functional, precluding gradual assembly via natural selection acting on stepwise functional intermediates. Biochemist Michael Behe introduced IC in his 1996 book Darwin's Black Box, arguing it applies to molecular machines whose coordinated complexity defies undirected evolutionary processes, thereby questioning the sufficiency of microevolutionary mechanisms for generating macroevolutionary novelty.^[137] Empirical tests of IC involve disassembly: for instance, genetic knockouts or structural analyses show that eliminating key components abolishes function without viable reduced forms, as Behe demonstrated through biochemical reviews rather than ad hoc speculation.^[138] The bacterial flagellum exemplifies IC in a system relevant to macroevolutionary origins, comprising a rotary motor with over 30-40 proteins forming a whip-like propulsor powered by proton gradients, where phylogenetic reconstructions reveal no credible stepwise precursors with selectable intermediate functions.^[138] Proponents assert that the flagellum's type III export apparatus integrates precisely with basal body rings and filament hooks, such that partial assemblies lack motility or export utility, challenging co-evolutionary recruitment from simpler secretory systems.^[139] ID extends IC critiques via specified complexity, formalized by mathematician William Dembski, which infers design when a pattern exhibits both improbability (probability below the universal bound of 10^{-150}, accounting for cosmic resources like particle interactions) and specification (conforming to an independent functional description, such as propulsion).^[140] For the flagellum, combinatorial protein-folding constraints yield probabilities far exceeding this threshold under chance and selection, favoring intelligent causation over macroevolutionary contingency, as random searches cannot traverse such configurational spaces without guidance.^[141] Darwinian responses, notably from biologist Kenneth Miller, invoke co-option—repurposing pre-existing components like the type III secretion system (TTSS)—as a pathway, claiming homology between ~10-20 flagellar proteins and TTSS injectors suffices for gradual evolution.^[142] However, ID analyses counter that TTSS derives from flagellar subsets (not vice versa), omits rotary elements, and requires its own irreducible core, with no laboratory reconstructions or fossil intermediates verifying selectable transitions; phylogenetic parsimony maps instead embed the flagellum as basal.^[143] Exchanges like Behe-Miller debates highlight this impasse, where mainstream critiques often prioritize theoretical narratives over empirical validation, amid institutional resistance to ID evidenced by publication barriers despite peer-reviewed ID contributions.^[139]^[144]

Current Research and Applications

Advances in Phylogenetic and Trait Modeling (2020s)

In the 2020s, phylogenetic comparative methods advanced to incorporate environmental covariates into trait macroevolution models, enabling researchers to detect regime shifts and episodic bursts in evolutionary rates while accounting for extrinsic factors like climate or habitat. For instance, a 2025 model framework allows fitting of trait evolution histories that disentangle endogenous phylogenetic signals from correlated covariates, revealing instances where environmental pressures trigger accelerated phenotypic change across clades.^[145] These approaches, implemented in tools like those extending Bayesian phylogenetic software, improve inference of macroevolutionary dynamics by modeling variance components free from multicollinearity among predictors, thus providing more robust estimates of selective regimes over deep time.^[146] Phylogenomic analyses leveraging whole-genome sequencing have similarly progressed, uncovering convergent genetic underpinnings of macroevolutionary traits through comparative genomics across independent lineages. A 2025 study of cavefish (Astyanax mexicanus) populations demonstrated that eye loss evolved convergently via distinct mutations in vision-related genes, such as disruptions in optic vasculature pathways, highlighting parallel genomic erosion despite varied selective histories in isolated cave environments.^[147] This work utilized high-coverage genome assemblies to quantify pseudogenization rates and loss-of-function variants, refining phylogenetic models to predict trait degeneration probabilities under relaxed selection.^[148] Integration of long-term field datasets into these models has further bridged microevolutionary observations with macro patterns, demonstrating persistent directional selection over decades that accumulates into clade-level shifts. Analyses from multi-decade studies, such as those tracking morph frequencies in wild populations, reveal repeatable evolutionary trajectories under consistent pressures, informing phylogenetic simulations of trait variance and stasis.^[149] For example, 2025 reviews of longitudinal data emphasize how fluctuating selection gradients, captured in real-time, validate model assumptions of rate heterogeneity, enhancing predictions of macroevolutionary stasis or divergence without relying solely on fossil proxies.^[150]

Implications for Conservation, Invasions, and Human Evolution

Macroevolutionary patterns, such as phylogenetic diversity (PD), inform conservation prioritization by quantifying the evolutionary history represented in species assemblages, enabling the identification of lineages with unique or irreplaceable branches that warrant protection to safeguard future adaptive potential.^[151] Metrics like PD have been shown to capture functional diversity, with prioritization of phylogenetically diverse taxa yielding an average 18% gain in functional trait representation compared to random selection.^[151] In practice, this approach guides resource allocation toward species or areas preserving deep phylogenetic branches, as demonstrated in analyses of global biodiversity hotspots where PD-based strategies outperform species richness alone in maintaining long-term ecosystem resilience.^[152] Historical macroevolutionary rates, including past extinction and diversification dynamics, further predict contemporary extinction risks, with lineages exhibiting stasis or low adaptive turnover facing heightened vulnerability under anthropogenic pressures.^[153] In invasion biology, macroevolutionary indicators like net diversification rates serve as proxies for traits associated with invasion success, such as broad ecological tolerances or rapid range expansions derived from historical biogeography.^[154] A 2025 analysis of plant and animal clades found that species from lineages with elevated macroevolutionary rates—reflecting greater niche breadth or dispersal capacity—exhibit higher probabilities of establishing invasive populations in novel environments, outperforming microevolutionary predictors like individual plasticity.^[154] These patterns underscore how deep-time evolutionary legacies, including biogeographic origins, can forecast invasion risks; for instance, taxa with ancestral generalist strategies from unstable habitats demonstrate enhanced establishment rates in disturbed ecosystems.^[154] Such insights aid preemptive management, though they require integration with local abiotic filters to avoid overgeneralization. Applications to human macroevolution highlight recent genetic adaptations shaped by environmental pressures over millennia, including selection for lactase persistence in pastoralist populations around 7,000–10,000 years ago, enabling adult dairy consumption and conferring nutritional advantages in calcium-scarce regions.^[155] Similarly, variations in skin pigmentation genes, such as SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, underwent strong selection post-migration from Africa, with lighter alleles fixing in northern latitudes to optimize vitamin D synthesis under low UV exposure, as evidenced by haplotype scans showing rapid allele frequency shifts within the last 10,000 years.^[156] Genome-wide studies from 2025 reveal ongoing macroevolutionary dynamics, with signals of adaptation in immune response and metabolic traits persisting into recent millennia, challenging notions of halted human evolution and indicating persistent natural selection amid cultural buffers.^[157] Debates persist on directionality, with some evidence suggesting neutral drift amplifies stochastic shifts rather than unidirectional progress, necessitating caution in inferring adaptive inevitability from phylogenetic patterns.^[157]

References

[1]
Evolution Is Change in the Inherited Traits of a Population through ...
One can distinguish between two general classes of evolutionary change: microevolution (change below the level of the species) and macroevolution (change above ...
[2]
Biological design in science classrooms - PNAS
May 15, 2007 · Although scientists sometimes colloquially refer to macroevolution as “evolution above the species level,” this definition does not do justice ...<|separator|>
[3]
Evolution at different scales: micro to macro
Microevolution happens on a small scale (within a single population), while macroevolution happens on a scale that transcends the boundaries of a single species ...What is microevolution? · What is macroevolution? · Examples of microevolution
[4]
Approaches to Macroevolution: 1. General Concepts and Origin of ...
Jun 3, 2017 · Approaches to macroevolution require integration of its two fundamental components, ie the origin and the sorting of variation, in a hierarchical framework.
[5]
Clade diversification dynamics and the biotic and abiotic controls of ...
Aug 1, 2018 · Macroevolution is the long-term process that shapes large-scale patterns of species diversity. Since the Modern Synthesis, a debated ...
[6]
Model for macroevolutionary dynamics - PNAS
Jun 18, 2013 · a stochastic model that includes three events with constant rates—species formation, extinction of species, and origination of new genera—can ...
[7]
Micro- and Macroevolution: A Continuum or Two Distinct Types of ...
Apr 15, 2024 · The most prevalent view is that macroevolution is the cumulative result of microevolution, shaped by natural selection and genetic drift, ...<|separator|>
[8]
Variable success in linking micro- and macroevolution | Oxford
Macroevolution is the rise and fall of lineages of species (rates of species origination, species extinction, and diversification—the difference between ...Missing: peer- | Show results with:peer-
[9]
[PDF] Microevolution and Macroevolution Are Governed by the Same ...
Nov 1, 2009 · Patterns of variation within a species are classic examples of microevolutionary phenomena, while patterns of phyletic change associated with ...
[10]
General statistical model shows that macroevolutionary patterns and ...
Mar 2, 2022 · Statistical models of macroevolution attempt to describe the historical phenotypic changes that gave rise to the major differences observed ...
[11]
History and Philosophy of Science and the Teaching of ...
The term macroevolution is a relatively recent addition to the lexicon of evolution, first coined (in German) by Filipchenko in 1927 and subsequently ...<|separator|>
[12]
[PDF] Why Building Animals Is Hard: The Logic of Development, Common ...
May 7, 2020 · 1920s, with leading geneticist Yuri. Filipchenko (1882-1930), who coined the terms microevolution and macroevolution. It is unlikely that.<|separator|>
[13]
Macroevolution: Its definition, Philosophy and History - Talk Origins
Sep 23, 2006 · The terms macroevolution and microevolution were first coined in ... Simpson, George Gaylord. 1944. Tempo and mode in evolution . New ...
[14]
Macroevolution | Tempo and Mode in Evolution: Genetics and ...
Since George Gaylord Simpson published Tempo and Mode in Evolution in 1944, discoveries in paleontology and genetics have abounded. This volume brings ...
[15]
Darwin, C. R. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural ...
Aug 10, 2025 · This is the first edition of Darwin's most famous work and one of the most influential books in history. It was published on 24 November 1859.
[16]
Variation under domestication in plants: 1859 and today - PMC
Darwin's thesis was that domesticated diversity displays the essential elements in the origin and evolution of species by natural selection.Missing: transmutations | Show results with:transmutations
[17]
Philosophy of Macroevolution
Jun 3, 2019 · George Gaylord Simpson (1963) foreshadowed that claim when he suggested that paleontology is a distinctively historical science that seeks ...
[18]
Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary? - Science
Macroevolutionary processes are underlain by microevolutionary phenomena and are compatible with the synthetic theory of evolution. But microevolutionary ...
[19]
Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution ... - jstor
115-151. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Stephen Jay Gould and Niles Eldredge.
[20]
Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism
Punctuated equilibria apply to sexually reproducing organisms and that morphological evolutionary change is regarded as largely (if not exclusively) correlated ...
[21]
What is Species Selection? - jstor
Eldredge (1979) and Vrba (1980) have advanced the idea that stenotopes are more susceptible to geographic isolation than are more widely distrib- uted eurytopes ...
[22]
https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/neutral-theory-the-null-hypothesis-of-molecular-839
[23]
Approaches to Macroevolution: 2. Sorting of Variation, Some ...
Oct 24, 2017 · Macroevolution, defined broadly as evolution above the species level, has two primary components: the origin of variation and the sorting of ...
[24]
The relationship between micro‐ and macroevolution - Novick - 2014
Jul 7, 2014 · Evolutionary biologists distinguish macroevolution, which includes tree thinking, from microevolution, which includes natural selection.Microevolution Versus... · The Instructional Booklet · Method · Results
[25]
E. coli Long-term Experimental Evolution Project Site - Richard Lenski
Summary data from the long-term evolution experiment including relative fitness, cell size, colony morphology (photographic), and molecular genetics. Genomics ...Missing: microevolution | Show results with:microevolution
[26]
New Era at UT Austin Begins for Famous Long-Term Evolution ...
Aug 25, 2022 · After 34 years and 75000 generations of bacterial evolution, the Long-Term Evolution Experiment moved to the University of Texas at Austin ...Missing: microevolution | Show results with:microevolution
[27]
7 Geologic Time - OpenGeology
The average lifespan of a species in the fossil record is around a million years. That life still exists on Earth shows the role and importance of evolution as ...
[28]
Quantifying macro‐evolutionary patterns of trait mean and variance ...
Oct 1, 2025 · Species divergence in sexually selected traits: Increase in song elaboration is related to decrease in plumage ornamentation in finches.
[29]
The paradox of predictability provides a bridge between micro
This apparent consistency between micro- and macroevolution is paradoxical because it contradicts our previous understanding of phenotypic evolution and is so ...
[30]
Innovation in an E. coli evolution experiment is contingent on ...
The Lenski long-term evolution experiment (LTEE) consists of twelve E. coli B populations that have been propagated daily in glucose-limited DM medium for over ...
[31]
Changing fitness effects of mutations through long-term bacterial ...
Jan 26, 2024 · The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations shapes evolution, but it is challenging to observe how it changes as organisms adapt.
[32]
Universal Constraints on Protein Evolution in the Long-Term ...
Here, I report that abundant proteins evolve slowly in the hypermutator populations of Lenski's long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli (LTEE).Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[33]
Temporal Variation in Selection Accelerates Mutational Decay by ...
Asexual species accumulate deleterious mutations through an irreversible process known as Muller's ratchet. Attempts to quantify the rate of the ratchet ...
[34]
Speciation: The Origin of New Species | Learn Science at Scitable
The central idea here is that when populations are geographically separated, they will diverge from one another, both in the way they look and genetically.
[35]
Causes of speciation - Understanding Evolution - UC Berkeley
Speciation can occur through geographic isolation, even without physical barriers, and by reduced gene flow within a population, even without extrinsic ...Missing: founder | Show results with:founder
[36]
First passage time to allopatric speciation - PMC - PubMed Central
Allopatric speciation is a mechanism to evolve reproductive isolation; it is caused by the accumulation of genetic differences between populations while they ...
[37]
Every inch a finch: a commentary on Grant (1993) 'Hybridization of ...
Apr 19, 2015 · ... hybridization. The 1993 paper makes it clear that Darwin's finches are an instance of ecological speciation in the presence of hybridization.
[38]
Songs of Darwin's finches diverge when a new species enters the ...
The fortiscandens lineage on Daphne, a new incipient species, provides an example of reproductive isolation and shows that speciation involving hybridization ...
[39]
Sympatric Speciation: Models and Empirical Evidence
Dec 1, 2007 · As a result of new empirical examples and theory, it is now generally accepted that sympatric speciation has occurred in at least a few ...
[40]
Searching for sympatric speciation in the genomic era - PMC - NIH
Sympatric speciation illustrates how natural and sexual selection may create new species in isolation without geographic barriers.
[41]
Rapid hybrid speciation in Darwin's finches - Science
Nov 23, 2017 · Here we report the results of a combined ecological and genomic study of Darwin's finches that documents hybrid speciation in the wild from its ...
[42]
ClaDS rate-heterogeneous birth–death prior for full phylogenetic ...
May 10, 2023 · ClaDS is a birth–death diversification model designed to capture small progressive variations in birth and death rates along a phylogeny.
[43]
Chapter 10: Introduction to birth-death models
In this chapter, I will introduce birth-death models, by far the most common model for understanding diversification in a comparative framework.
[44]
No link between population isolation and speciation rate in ... - PNAS
Within each group, the slowest and fastest 2.5% of speciation rates differ anywhere from 14-fold to 46-fold. The sources of this variation remain largely ...
[45]
Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties
Recent evidence shows that vertebrate Hox clusters are structurally more constrained than invertebrate Hox clusters; they exclude transposable elements, do not ...
[46]
Duplications of Hox Gene Clusters and the Emergence of Vertebrates
Jun 15, 2013 · We use compound full Hox clusters deletions to investigate how Hox genes duplications may have contributed to the emergence of vertebrate-specific innovations.Missing: enabling segmentation diversity arthropod ~550 Mya
[47]
Composition and genomic organization of arthropod Hox clusters
May 10, 2016 · Differences in Hox cluster size arise from variation in the number of intervening genes, intergenic spacing, and the size of introns and UTRs.Missing: enabling | Show results with:enabling
[48]
Changes in Cis-regulatory Elements during Morphological Evolution
Regulation is therefore modular, and mutational changes within any individual CRE can affect expression in one, or a subset of, tissue(s) without affecting ...Missing: fruit | Show results with:fruit
[49]
Cis-regulatory evolution integrated the Bric-à-brac transcription ...
Jan 3, 2018 · This work demonstrates how a new trait can evolve by incorporating existing transcription factors into a GRN through CRE evolution.Missing: macroevolution | Show results with:macroevolution
[50]
Full article: Enhancer modularity and the evolution of new traits
Cis-regulatory regions have modular structures. A cis-regulatory region consists of non-coding DNA that resides in the vicinity of a gene and regulates the ...
[51]
Contingency and determinism in evolution: Replaying life's tape
Nov 9, 2018 · The evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould once dreamed about replaying the tape of life in order to identify whether evolution is more subject to ...
[52]
Evo-Devo: Variations on Ancestral Themes - ScienceDirect.com
Jan 25, 2008 · The Hox complex has been duplicated twice in mammalian genomes and comprises 39 genes. Note that microRNA genes, which inhibit translation of ...
[53]
Decreasing Phanerozoic extinction intensity as a consequence of ...
Changes in the latitudinal focus of fossil sampling through the Phanerozoic may also bias extinction rate estimates slightly toward environments with warmer ...
[54]
The effect of geographic range on extinction risk during background ...
Our results show that wide geographic range has been significantly and positively associated with survivorship for the great majority of Phanerozoic time.
[55]
Extinction Over Time | Smithsonian National Museum of Natural ...
Judging from the fossil record, the baseline extinction rate is about one species per every one million species per year.
[56]
How Did the 'Great Dying' Kill 96 Percent of Earth's Ocean-Dwelling ...
Dec 11, 2018 · Known colloquially as “The Great Dying,” the Permian-Triassic extinction wiped out nearly 90 percent of the planet's species, including about 96 ...
[57]
What caused Earth's biggest mass extinction?
Dec 6, 2018 · ... 96 percent of marine species died off at the end of the Permian period. New research shows the "Great Dying" was caused by global warming ...
[58]
Review Life in the Aftermath of Mass Extinctions - ScienceDirect.com
Oct 5, 2015 · Mass extinctions effect macroevolution through extinction and through the evolution of life in the aftermath. Mass extinctions coincide with the ...
[59]
The Role of Extinction in Evolution - Tempo And Mode In ... - NCBI
The extinction of species (and larger groups) is closely tied to the process of natural selection and is thus a major component of progressive evolution.Missing: walk | Show results with:walk
[60]
Extinction or survival: Selectivity and causes of Phanerozoic crises
Jan 1, 1982 · Major Phanerozoic crises, resulting in extinction of marine organisms, are suggested to be the culmination of a gradual process of selection.
[61]
Diversification dynamics of mammalian clades during the K–Pg ...
Sep 26, 2018 · The Cretaceous/Palaeogene (K–Pg) episode is an iconic mass extinction, in which the diversity of numerous clades abruptly declined.
[62]
Study: Mammals Bulked Up After Dinosaurs | AMNH
Mar 31, 2022 · Research indicates that mammals experienced significant size increases following the extinction of dinosaurs, adapting to new ecological ...
[63]
The role of mass extinction in evolution
Mass extinctions reduce diversity by killing off specific lineages, and with them, any descendent species they might have given rise to.
[64]
[PDF] Absolute measures of the completeness of the fossil record
We provide an estimate of the probability of genus preservation per stratigraphic interval6,7, and determine the proportion of living families with some fossil ...
[65]
Sepkoski Online - Shanan Peters - University of Wisconsin–Madison
This database is to allow users to easily search and summarize Sepkoski's global genus compendium on the basis of Evolutionary Fauna, Phylum, or Class.<|separator|>
[66]
Cambrian Explosion Occurred Millions of Years Earlier ... - Sci.News
Jun 26, 2025 · Most studies suggest that this event occurred between 541 million and 530 million years ago at the beginning of the Cambrian period.Missing: sudden Mya
[67]
Cambrian Period—541 to 485.4 MYA (U.S. National Park Service)
Jan 22, 2025 · The Cambrian Period (541-485.4 MYA) saw the appearance of many invertebrates and first vertebrates, and the 'Cambrian explosion' of life.Missing: sudden phyla 541-530<|separator|>
[68]
The Cambrian explosion's spark - Stanford Report
Jul 2, 2024 · Scientists have found evidence for the sudden appearance of most animal body plans in the fossil record in rocks formed during the Cambrian ...Missing: phyla 541-530
[69]
What has the head of a crocodile and the gills of a fish?
Tiktaalik represents a close relative of the ancestor of tetrapods, and its fossils date to 375 million years ago. The first unambiguous fossils of tetrapod ...Missing: Mya | Show results with:Mya
[70]
Newly found species fills evolutionary gap between fish and land ...
Apr 6, 2006 · The newly found species, Tiktaalik roseae, has a skull, a neck, ribs and parts of the limbs that are similar to four-legged animals known as ...Missing: Mya | Show results with:Mya
[71]
The feeding system of Tiktaalik roseae: an intermediate between ...
Feb 1, 2021 · The water-to-land transition is a major event in vertebrate history, involving significant changes to feeding structures and mechanics.<|separator|>
[72]
Estimating times of extinction in the fossil record - PMC
Apr 4, 2016 · According to Signor and Lipps, the size of the gap between the youngest fossil found and the true time of extinction will vary across taxa, ...
[73]
Fossils on the move can distort patterns of mass extinctions
Sep 13, 2018 · Applied on a larger scale, the Signor-Lipps effect can make abrupt mass extinctions appear gradual. A common approach to correct for this effect ...Missing: gaps | Show results with:gaps<|separator|>
[74]
On the probabilities of branch durations and stratigraphic gaps in ...
Feb 19, 2019 · In the case of total extinction, a Signor-Lipps will reduce expected sister taxa leading up to the extinction, with the possible effect ...
[75]
Reviewing the Evidence for Evolution (Chapter 2)
Nov 6, 2020 · But the individual bones of the pentadactyl limb are homologous with one another (resemblance indicating common ancestry). The humerus of a ...
[76]
Evidence against tetrapod-wide digit identities and for a limited ...
Jul 19, 2019 · In crown group tetrapods, individual digits are homologized in relation to a pentadactyl ground plan. However, testing hypotheses of digit ...
[77]
Evolution of Hoxa11 regulation in vertebrates is linked to the ... - NIH
Oct 5, 2016 · We propose that the evolution of Hoxa11 regulation contributed to the transition from polydactyl limbs in stem-group tetrapods to pentadactyl limbs in extant ...
[78]
Effects of body plan evolution on the hydrodynamic drag and energy ...
We show that even the early ichthyosaurs produced low levels of drag for a given volume, comparable to those of a modern dolphin, and that deep 'torpedo-shaped' ...
[79]
Like Whales and Dolphins, Prehistoric 'Fish Lizards' Kept Warm With ...
Dec 5, 2018 · Ichthyosaurs are a classic case of convergent evolution. From their body shapes to their fish-snatching lifestyles, they pioneered a way of ...
[80]
Why an Ichthyosaur Looks Like a Dolphin - National Geographic
Feb 6, 2015 · They're a striking example of convergent evolution – two lineages independently evolving extremely similar anatomy from different starting ...
[81]
Developmental evidence for serial homology of the vertebrate jaw ...
Feb 5, 2013 · Our data suggest that vertebrate jaw, hyoid and gill arch cartilages are serially homologous, and were primitively patterned dorsoventrally by a common Dlx ...
[82]
Evolution of the vertebrate jaw: comparative embryology and ...
It is generally believed that the jaw arose through the simple transformation of an ancestral rostral gill arch. The gnathostome jaw differentiates from ...
[83]
Developmental Constraints and Evolution: A Perspective from the ...
Developmental constraints are biases on variant phenotypes or limitations on variability caused by the developmental system. They play a significant role in ...
[84]
The Generation of Variation and The Developmental Basis for ...
Evolutionary novelty involves both a transition from one adaptive peak to another and a transition from one canalized state to another. A shows three ...
[85]
Clades reach highest morphological disparity early in their evolution
Jul 24, 2013 · We test and verify the purported tendency for animal clades to reach their maximum morphological variety relatively early in their evolutionary histories ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[86]
Cambrian and Recent Morphological Disparity - Science
number of extinct "phyla" or problematica, but on the perceived magnitude of differ- ences among Cambrian animals. The fact that morphological disparity has not ...
[87]
How important are functional and developmental constraints on ...
Sep 14, 2022 · Functional and developmental constraints on phenotypic variation may cause traits to covary over millions of years and slow populations from ...
[88]
Genomic evidence reveals a radiation of placental mammals ... - PNAS
Aug 14, 2017 · Successful molecular dating of divergence events depends on various factors, the most critical of which are a rigorous set of fossil calibration ...<|separator|>
[89]
Assessing the quality of molecular divergence time estimates by ...
Case studies with multiple fossil calibration points provide important opportunities to examine the divergence time estimation problem in new ways. We discuss ...
[90]
The impact of rate heterogeneity on inference of phylogenetic ...
Our results show that rate heterogeneity is present across small-scaled avian clades, and consequently applying only standard single-process models prompts ...Missing: macroevolution | Show results with:macroevolution
[91]
Heterogeneity in the rate of molecular sequence evolution ...
In this study, we show that asymmetric rates of sequence evolution lead to systematic biases in the inferred phylogeny, which in turn lead to erroneous ...
[92]
The Influence of Rate Heterogeneity among Sites on the Time ...
Abstract. Molecular evolutionary rate estimates have been shown to depend on the time period over which they are estimated. Factors such as demographic pro.
[93]
New Evidence for Genome-Wide Duplications at the Origin of ...
As common estimates of the evolutionary time that has elapsed since the speculated whole-genome duplications range from 400 to 500 Myr (Skrabanek and Wolfe 1998) ...
[94]
Hagfish genome elucidates vertebrate whole-genome duplication ...
Jan 12, 2024 · The 2R hypothesis suggests that two WGD events (1R and 2R) occurred during early vertebrate evolution. However, the timing of the 2R event ...Missing: Mya | Show results with:Mya
[95]
Mechanisms and Dynamics of Orphan Gene Emergence in Insect ...
Orphans are an enigmatic portion of the genome because their origin and function are mostly unknown and they typically make up 10% to 30% of all genes in a ...Thirty Arthropod Genome Data... · Results · Literature Cited
[96]
Orphan genes are not a distinct biological entity - PMC
Nov 3, 2024 · Orphan genes represent genes with no homologs in other species and are widely assumed to represent genuine species‐specific loci.
[97]
The Lost and Found: Unraveling the Functions of Orphan Genes
Jun 13, 2023 · OGs tend to be more prevalent in species with larger genomes, such as plants and animals, and their evolutionary origins remain unclear but ...1. Introduction · Table 1 · 3.2. Orphan Genes Databases
[98]
Darwin's gradualism and empiricism - Nature
However, gradual- ism and any form of saltation differ funda- mentally in theory, and this difference deserves discussion. A gradual process advances by steps,.
[99]
Haldane's Dilemma | Chase Nelson - Inference Review
The short answer is that reproduction is finite. Evolution involves the genetic change of whole populations of organisms, and this change occurs because some ...
[100]
Haldane's cost of selection imposes a mild constraint on adaptation ...
Nov 3, 2021 · Haldane's Dilemma refers to the concern that the need for many “selective deaths” to complete a substitution creates a speed limit to ...
[101]
Polyploidy and novelty: Gottlieb's legacy - PMC - NIH
Nearly four decades ago, genetic and biochemical additivity in polyploid genomes was demonstrated in recent allotetraploids of Tragopogon (Asteraceae). Using ...
[102]
On the feasibility of saltational evolution - PNAS
In evolutionary biology, the rejection of saltation takes the form of gradualism, that is, the notion that evolution proceeds gradually, via accumulation of “ ...Missing: macroevolution evidence
[103]
Sex solves Haldane's dilemma - Canadian Science Publishing
The cumulative reproductive cost of multi-locus selection has been considered to be a potentially limiting factor on the rate of adaptive evolution.
[104]
[PDF] Saltational evolution: hopeful monsters are here to stay
And indeed, up to now the empirical basis of strict gradualism is weak at best. For instance, with its abrupt transitions, the fossil record provides little ...
[105]
[PDF] AN ALTERNATIVE TO PHYLETIC GRADUALISM
Eldredge (1972) concludes that 18 is the primitive number of d.-v. files for all North American Phacops rana. Figure 5-7 summarizes relationships among the ...
[106]
Punctuated equilibria - Scholarpedia
Jan 10, 2008 · Punctuated equilibria explains that most species change little after appearing in the fossil record, with speciation being the main ...
[107]
The Early “Evolution” of “Punctuated Equilibria”
Jan 30, 2008 · Once the eyes had changed, they remained stable—as did every other part of the anatomy of these trilobites that was preserved. Once evolution ...
[108]
[PDF] Jeremy Jackson, Bryozoa, and the Punctuated Equilibrium Debate
In concluding the 1999 paper, Jeremy wrote, “Most cases of speciation in the sea over the past 25 My show prolonged morphological stasis punctuated by ...Missing: empirical trilobites bivalves
[109]
punctuated equilibrium at twenty: a paleontological perspective
Ultimately, this random walk of mutation (or "genetic drift") can produce something which may have a selective advantage--or may be deleterious. Either way, it ...Missing: selectionist | Show results with:selectionist<|separator|>
[110]
Punctuated equilibrium: state of the evidence | Paleobiology
May 21, 2025 · A long-standing criticism of punctuated equilibrium concerned its potential circularity: if species are defined on the basis of morphology, ...
[111]
The Most Popular Textbook Example of Punctuated Evolution Has ...
Jun 27, 2020 · Researchers at the University of Oslo have debunked a textbook example about how evolution proceeds during speciation.
[112]
Model-Based Inference of Punctuated Molecular Evolution
The punctuated equilibrium theory proposes periods of stasis interspersed by large-effect transformations, preferentially occurring at speciation events ( ...
[113]
Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution - Nature
Nov 9, 1973 · OHTA, T. Slightly Deleterious Mutant Substitutions in Evolution. Nature 246, 96–98 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/246096a0. Download ...Missing: URL | Show results with:URL
[114]
The Nearly Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution - Annual Reviews
Nov 1, 1992 · The Nearly Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Tomoko Ohta; Vol. 23:263-286 (Volume publication date November 1992) ...Missing: macroevolution | Show results with:macroevolution<|separator|>
[115]
Reconstructing the Phylogenetic History of Long-Term Effective ...
May 27, 2013 · The nearly neutral theory, which proposes that most mutations are deleterious or close to neutral, predicts that the ratio of nonsynonymous over ...
[116]
A theory of evolution above the species level. - PNAS
Feb 15, 1975 · The direction of transpecific evolution is determined by the process of species selection, which is analogous to natural selection but acts upon ...Missing: URL | Show results with:URL
[117]
Why phylogenies do not always predict ecological differences
May 8, 2017 · A number of studies have failed to find strong support for this assumption, thus challenging the utility of phylogenetic approaches.Missing: uncorrelated | Show results with:uncorrelated
[118]
Ecology has contrasting effects on genetic variation within species ...
Phylogenetic dating methods using molecular clocks have found considerable rate variation among taxa, which led to interest in the causes of that variation [6,7] ...
[119]
Studying variation in rates of molecular evolution between species
Evidence is accumulating that rates of molecular evolution vary substantially between species, and that this rate variation is partly determined by species ...
[120]
Tip rates, phylogenies and diversification: What are we estimating ...
Jan 21, 2019 · Species-specific diversification rates, or 'tip rates', can be computed quickly from phylogenies and are widely used to study ...
[121]
Introduction to the Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE)
The LTEE is a pretty simple experiment, both conceptually and methodologically. The core idea is to observe and quantify the process of evolution in action.
[122]
Long-Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. XII. DNA ...
The longest-running evolution experiment involves 12 populations of Escherichia coli founded from the same ancestral strain, which have been serially propagated ...Missing: microevolution | Show results with:microevolution
[123]
'Evolutionary poker': an agent‐based model of interactome ...
Sep 14, 2023 · Another striking result of the LTEE is that the rate of adaptation to continuous selection is not linear but rather decays exponentially. This ...<|separator|>
[124]
Modelling and simulating Lenski's long-term evolution experiment
The goal of the experiment is to observe evolution in real time. Indeed, the bacteria evolve via beneficial mutations, which allow them to adapt to the ...Missing: limitations macroevolution<|separator|>
[125]
Measuring the functional sequence complexity of proteins - PMC
A method to measure functional sequence complexity was developed and applied to 35 protein families.Missing: specificity | Show results with:specificity
[126]
Waiting Longer for Two Mutations - PMC - NIH
I then wrote that “for humans to achieve a mutation like this by chance, we would have to wait 100 million times 10 million years” (Behe 2007) (because that is ...Missing: coordinated | Show results with:coordinated
[127]
Waiting for Two Mutations: With Applications to Regulatory ...
CONCLUSIONS. For population sizes and mutation rates appropriate for Drosophila, a pair of mutations can switch off one transcription factor binding site and ...Missing: macroevolution | Show results with:macroevolution
[128]
(PDF) Waiting Longer for Two Mutations - ResearchGate
Behe (2009) also stressed the importance of including back mutations in models for the waiting time of coordinated mutations. This has been confirmed, in ...Missing: macroevolution | Show results with:macroevolution
[129]
The two phases of the Cambrian Explosion - PMC - PubMed Central
Nov 9, 2018 · We therefore propose two phases of the Cambrian Explosion separated by the Sinsk extinction event, the first dominated by stem groups of phyla.Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[130]
Molecular Dates for the “Cambrian Explosion”: The Influence of Prior ...
However, a wide range of molecular dating studies have suggested that the major lineages of animals arose long before the Cambrian, at over 630 Mya (e.g., Wray ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
[131]
The advent of animals: The view from the Ediacaran | PNAS
Apr 20, 2015 · With rare exceptions (3–6), fossils of the Ediacara biota are not found in Cambrian strata, and those that are reported are not typical Ediacara ...
[132]
Late Ediacaran trackways produced by bilaterian animals ... - Science
Jun 6, 2018 · Ediacaran trace fossils provide key paleontological evidence for the evolution of early animals and their behaviors.
[133]
The two phases of the Cambrian Explosion | Scientific Reports
Nov 9, 2018 · Cambrian petalonamid Stromatoveris phylogenetically links Ediacaran biota to later animals. Palaeontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala ...Introduction · Results · Discussion
[134]
The Chengjiang Biota inhabited a deltaic environment - PMC
Mar 23, 2022 · The Chengjiang Biota is the earliest most diverse animal community from the Cambrian Explosion (~518 million years ago). This biota is shown to ...
[135]
Community palaeoecology of the early Cambrian Maotianshan ...
The arthropods are the most diverse phylum (37% of genera) and rank second in relative abundance of specimens (26.3%). The priapulids, however, with only 17.5% ...
[136]
Disparate compound eyes of Cambrian radiodonts reveal their ...
Dec 2, 2020 · However, it must be acknowledged that there could be taphonomic inconsistencies in the ratios of preserved frontal appendages and eye types, so ...Missing: Precambrian | Show results with:Precambrian
[137]
Intelligent Design versus Evolution - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
The concept of Intelligent Design (ID) was proposed in 1996 by biochemist Michael Behe in his book, Darwin's Black Box, the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution.
[138]
Part 6 Dr. Michael Behe | National Center for Science Education
Sep 25, 2008 · Thorough studies show it requires 30-40 protein parts, and in the absence of virtually any of those parts, the flagellum doesn't work, or doesn' ...
[139]
Still Spinning Just Fine | Discovery Institute
Feb 17, 2003 · According to Miller, Behe's claim that the bacterial flagellum is irreducibly complex is false. If Miller is right, then Behe and the ...
[140]
Divining design - Creation Ministries International
If we take half this number, then we can state confidently that we should never expect a specified event whose probability is less than 0.5x10–150 to happen, ...<|separator|>
[141]
[PDF] Irreducible Complexity Revisited - Bill Dembski
Feb 23, 2004 · The complexities quickly mount, and a conceptual analysis reveals that the bacterial flagellum possesses an extremely complicated irreducible ...
[142]
The Flagellum Unspun - BIOLOGY by Miller & Levine
The intelligent design movement regard the flagellum as unevolvable because it is said to possesses a quality known as irreducible complexity.
[143]
These Don't Explain Evolution of the Flagellum
Dec 22, 2023 · The assembly process and the flagellum together constitute irreducible complexity piled on irreducible complexity” (Behe 2019, p. 286). Yet in ...<|separator|>
[144]
[PDF] LIST OF PEER-REVIEWED AND MAINSTREAM SCIENTIFIC ...
and is ...
[145]
Trait macroevolution in the presence of covariates - Nature
May 16, 2025 · The Fabric-regression model identifies a unique component of variance in the trait that is free of influences from correlated traits.
[146]
Trait macroevolution in the presence of covariates - PMC
May 16, 2025 · Phylogenetic comparative methods allow researchers to characterise the macroevolution of species' traits over the historical timeframe of a ...
[147]
Dark ages: Genomic analysis shows how cavefish lost their eyes
Aug 27, 2025 · The analysis revealed that the various cavefish lineages had completely different sets of genetic mutations involved in the loss of vision. This ...
[148]
Genomic Insights Reveal How Cavefish Evolved to Lose Their Eyes
Aug 27, 2025 · By scrutinizing 88 vision-related genes across the studied lineages, researchers identified mutations that effectively “turned off” the fishes' ...
[149]
Evolution repeats itself in replicate long-term studies in the wild
Here, we study changes over time in the frequency of cryptic color-pattern morphs in 10 replicate long-term field studies of a stick insect, each spanning at ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[150]
Long-term studies provide unique insights into evolution - PMC
Mar 19, 2025 · Long-term studies are required to both capture these oscillations in the direction of selection and understand their proximal causes.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[151]
Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional ... - Nature
Jul 23, 2018 · We found that prioritizing the most phylogenetically diverse set of taxa in a region or clade will result in an average gain of 18% functional ...
[152]
Phylogenetic diversity efficiently and accurately prioritizes ...
Mar 3, 2021 · Phylogenetic diversity detected degradation of assemblages and was sensitive enough to parse impacts to inform management actions.
[153]
Can Macroevolution Inform Contemporary Extinction Risk? - PMC
First, past dispersal capacities estimated with historical biogeography models have been linked to invasion success (Gallien et al. ... Invasion, and Infection ...
[154]
Can macroevolution inform contemporary invasion potential?
Sep 2, 2025 · Here, we investigate whether macroevolutionary and historical biogeographic studies can help predict species' probability of invasion, and if so ...
[155]
Evolution of Lactase Persistence: Turbo-Charging Adaptation in ...
We propose that the combination of consuming milk and lactase persistence could have reduced maternal mortality by promoting growth of the pelvis after weaning.
[156]
The Genetics and Evolution of Human Pigmentation - PMC
Aug 10, 2025 · To adapt, lighter skin pigmentation evolved to increase UV penetration and enable more efficient endogenous vitamin-D production, which is ...Missing: lactose tolerance
[157]
Surprising Genetic Evidence Shows Human Evolution in Recent ...
May 20, 2025 · Mounting evidence from genome studies indicates that, contrary to received wisdom, our species has undergone profound biological adaptation in its recent ...Missing: lactose tolerance