Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Manbij offensive

The Manbij offensive was a decisive conducted by the —a coalition primarily of Kurdish People's Protection Units (YPG) and Arab militias—against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), with substantial support from U.S.-led coalition airpower, to recapture the city of and its environs in northern Syria's from late May to mid-August 2016. ISIL had seized in January 2014, transforming it into a logistical hub for foreign fighter transit and supply lines linking its stronghold to the Turkish border. The campaign isolated ISIL territorially by severing these routes, enabling forces to advance through intense urban combat and clear over 100 villages en route to capturing the city center around mid-August. Coalition contributions were pivotal, including nearly 500 sorties by MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper drones that delivered reconnaissance, , and over 300 precision-guided missiles—accounting for roughly 40% of kinetic strikes—alongside more than 105 fixed-wing airstrikes that neutralized 108 ISIL fighting positions, 31 vehicles, 17 heavy weapons systems, and multiple improvised explosive devices. Ground elements of the SDF-led bore the brunt of the assault, liberating approximately 344 square kilometers while contending with ISIL's defensive tactics, such as booby-trapped buildings and human shielding. The victory marked a turning point in , degrading ISIL's operational capacity near the Valley and facilitating subsequent advances toward , though it incurred heavy costs in prolonged fighting and post-liberation hazards like uncleared mines that killed or maimed hundreds of returning .

Background

ISIS Control and Atrocities

The seized on January 23, 2014, during its rapid expansion across northern , securing control over the city and surrounding countryside previously held by other rebel factions. This positioned as a critical logistics hub, serving as the main overland corridor linking ISIS's de facto capital in to the Turkish border approximately 30 kilometers north, which facilitated the smuggling of oil for revenue generation and the transit of foreign fighters into . ISIS enforced its rule through pervasive brutality, killing civilians who attempted to escape the city and employing human shields to deter flight and potential advances by opposing forces. Eyewitness accounts from Manbij residents detail public executions, including beheadings and crucifixions, as methods to suppress dissent and instill fear among the population of approximately 150,000 prior to the takeover. The group also engaged in systematic destruction and looting of cultural heritage sites in Manbij and its environs, targeting ancient artifacts and structures to eliminate perceived idolatrous influences while profiting from illicit antiquities sales. Economic control involved heavy taxation, including the imposition of on non-Muslim residents, alongside from local businesses and agriculture, which funded operations while impoverishing the populace and contributing to widespread as families fled repression. Practices akin to were reported, with women subjected to forced "marriages" to fighters under the guise of jihad al-nikah, further entrenching the group's coercive dominance. These measures, corroborated by local testimonies and post-liberation investigations, underscored the regime's reliance on terror and exploitation to sustain territorial hold.

Geostrategic Significance

Manbij's location astride the River endowed it with pivotal military value as a hub for the Islamic State of Iraq and (ISIS), serving as the primary corridor for transporting jihadists, weapons, and funds from into its Syrian territories. Control of the city facilitated ISIS's access to border crossings near Jarablus, enabling sustained resupply operations that were indispensable for maintaining operational tempo across its self-proclaimed . Additionally, Manbij housed the largest wheat and grain depositories in northern , providing economic leverage through for ISIS fighters and administered populations, thereby reducing dependence on vulnerable external imports. From a terrain perspective, the flat plains surrounding amplified the importance of its road networks, including links to the M4 highway remnants and crossings, which formed natural chokepoints for vehicular movement in an otherwise arid landscape lacking robust rail infrastructure. Losing these routes would compel to rely on longer, more exposed detours, heightening vulnerability to interdiction. The city's position, roughly 100 kilometers west of and adjacent to Aleppo's contested zones, rendered it a connectivity nexus; its fall fragmented ISIS's territorial contiguity, isolating the core heartland in Raqqa by severing western reinforcements and supply flows, a causal dynamic evident in subsequent operational constraints on the group. Manbij's demographics further underscored its geostrategic weight, with a predominantly —comprising Sunni Arabs from province alongside smaller Kurdish, Turkmen, Circassian, and Chechen minorities—contrasting sharply with the Kurdish-majority enclaves held by the (SDF) elsewhere. This ethnic composition tested the SDF's multi-ethnic model, as securing local Arab tribal alliances was prerequisite for stabilizing control over non-Kurdish areas and preventing resurgence of insurgent networks exploiting communal divisions.

Key Actors and Alliances

The served as the primary ground component in the Manbij offensive, comprising a Kurdish-led alliance that integrated fighters from the People's Protection Units (YPG)—the dominant Kurdish militia—with Arab-majority units such as the Syrian Arab Coalition to project a multi-ethnic character and broaden local recruitment. This structure reflected the 's dual motivations: immediate territorial gains against and longer-term establishment of autonomous governance in northern , though the YPG's ideological alignment with the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK)—evident in shared leadership cadres, training methodologies, and Öcalanist ideology—fueled Turkish assertions of continuity between the groups, despite SDF denials of operational subordination. Opposing the SDF were ISIS defenders, estimated at 1,500 to 3,000 militants including Syrian locals and foreign fighters from , the , and beyond, who prioritized holding as a logistical hub linking to the Turkish border; their capabilities emphasized defensive preparations like extensive booby-trapping of , sniper positions, and deployment of vehicle-borne improvised devices (VBIEDs) to inflict on advancing forces. The US-led Global Coalition to Defeat enabled advances through indirect support, delivering over 200 precision air strikes via platforms including MQ-9 Reapers and manned aircraft, alongside embedded advisors who provided intelligence, targeting guidance, and tactical coordination without deploying conventional ground troops—a deliberate choice to minimize entanglement risks while leveraging local proxies for anti- objectives. This partnership underscored prioritization of territorial defeat over regional allies' concerns, such as Turkey's opposition to YPG empowerment due to PKK parallels. Peripheral actors included the Assad regime, which maintained artillery positions south of and occasionally fired indiscriminately into the without coordinated involvement, reflecting its strategic disinterest in contesting the area directly amid focus on other fronts. Russian forces, concentrated on pro-Assad offensives elsewhere like , exhibited no substantive engagement in Manbij operations, prioritizing regime survival over anti-ISIS efforts in Kurdish-held zones.

Prelude

SDF Mobilization and Planning

The , a Kurdish-led coalition incorporating Arab militias, mobilized several thousand fighters for the Manbij offensive, launching preliminary operations under the banner of Operation Faysal Abu Layla on May 31, 2016, to encircle the ISIS-controlled city and sever its supply lines to and the Turkish border. This buildup drew forces from secured positions near the Tishrin Dam, with units crossing the Euphrates River on rafts to position for advances west of the river, an area predominantly Arab-inhabited to mitigate perceptions of ethnic overreach. To enhance operational legitimacy and integrate local elements, the formed the Military Council in early 2016, a of non-Kurdish factions primarily composed of local Arab groups like the Northern Sun Battalion, which contributed around 3,000 Arab fighters to the effort alongside 450–500 YPG personnel, as reported by U.S. Central Command. This recruitment emphasized Arab leadership in public statements to align with the region's demographics, freeing Kurdish core units for tactical roles while addressing logistical needs through vetted local knowledge of terrain and ISIS networks. Preceding the main push, forces consolidated control over rear areas by capturing Al-Shaddadi in February 2016, securing southern Hasakah province and stabilizing supply routes to enable force reallocation northward without exposing flanks to counterattacks from the southeast. Planning incorporated assessments of fortifications, drawing on from regional sources to map defensive positions, though specific defector contributions remained operationally sensitive.

US Coalition Support

The -led coalition provided critical tactical support to the () during the Manbij offensive, enabling advances against entrenched positions through precision airstrikes and advisory assistance. By late July 2016, coalition aircraft had conducted over 500 airstrikes in direct support of operations around Manbij, targeting command centers, fighting positions, and supply routes to disrupt defensive capabilities. These strikes, coordinated via joint targeting cells, were essential for breaking resistance in urban and rural phases, as ground forces lacked independent airpower and relied on real-time intelligence to minimize exposure to counterattacks. A limited contingent of special operations forces embedded with units served in advisory roles, focusing on intelligence sharing, targeting coordination, and tactical planning rather than direct combat engagement. These advisors operated at a distance from front lines, providing on-the-ground assessments to enhance strike accuracy and maneuver effectiveness without assuming combat risks themselves. Material aid included the provision of , , and anti-tank guided missiles such as TOW systems, which proved effective against ISIS vehicle-borne threats and improvised explosive devices during encircling maneuvers. forces also delivered indirect artillery fire support in select instances, emphasizing precision to align with advances and reduce collateral risks, as detailed in Department of Defense operational summaries. This equipment bolstered capabilities in sustained urban fighting, where ISIS employed fortified positions and foreign fighters. Strategically, the viewed Manbij's capture as a preparatory operation to isolate 's de facto capital in by severing key supply lines from , prioritizing the degradation of 's core territorial control over enduring post-conflict alliances with the . However, the heavy reliance on enablers highlighted potential vulnerabilities, as operational tempo and holding gains post-offensive depended on continued external air and logistical dominance, potentially limiting autonomous sustainment against residual threats or rival actors.

Turkish Opposition and Regional Dynamics

Turkey regarded the People's Protection Units (YPG), the primary Kurdish component of the , as an extension of the , a Marxist-Leninist militant group designated as a terrorist organization by , the , and the due to its decades-long involving attacks on Turkish and civilians. Empirical links included overlapping , with PKK commanders reportedly directing YPG operations; shared ideological texts and camps; and cross-border of PKK fighters to bolster YPG ranks, as documented in Turkish intelligence assessments and captured militant communications. Ankara's primary security concern was the potential establishment of a contiguous YPG-controlled from to the Mediterranean, which would facilitate PKK logistics, recruitment, and cross-border raids, thereby threatening 's and southeastern border stability. Prior to the Manbij offensive's launch on May 31, , Turkish officials repeatedly warned against any advance west of the River, viewing it as an expansionist move that violated prior understandings with the , which had assured that YPG forces would not cross to consolidate gains beyond ISIS-held areas east of the river. Foreign Minister stated on multiple occasions in June that such a crossing represented a "red line," potentially prompting Turkish military intervention to prevent the linking of YPG enclaves in and Afrin, which could form a proto-state hostile to Turkish interests. Despite these cautions, the proceeded with encirclement maneuvers west of the by early June, prompting heightened Turkish border deployments and artillery fire on approaching positions to signal resolve without direct escalation at that stage. In response to the SDF's consolidation around Manbij, Turkey initiated Operation Euphrates Shield on August 24, 2016, deploying tanks, artillery, and Turkish-backed Free Syrian Army proxies to seize Jarablus from ISIS and establish a buffer preventing YPG forces from bridging the Euphrates gap. The operation's dual objectives—eliminating ISIS threats along the 100-kilometer Turkish border stretch and countering YPG territorial gains—reflected Ankara's calculus that unchecked SDF expansion posed a greater long-term risk than residual ISIS cells, with Turkish forces advancing up to 10 kilometers into Syria within days to disrupt potential Kurdish corridors. Regional actors further constrained SDF momentum: the Assad regime, asserting sovereignty over all Syrian territory, rejected YPG-led advances as separatist encroachments and conducted parallel offensives nearby to reclaim influence, while air support enabled regime forces to probe SDF flanks indirectly through coordinated strikes on shared targets southeast of in June 2016. Moscow's backing of Assad complicated U.S.- coordination by prioritizing regime territorial recovery over anti- exclusivity, as evidenced by airstrikes that advanced pro-government positions into province, boxing in SDF operational space without direct confrontation. This dynamic underscored the prelude's geopolitical tensions, where SDF gains against inadvertently heightened vulnerabilities to by Turkish, regime, and pressures.

Military Operations

Initial Encircling Maneuvers (June 2016)

The (SDF), advancing primarily from positions south and east of , initiated ground maneuvers to encircle the (ISIS)-held city following the offensive's launch on May 31, 2016. These efforts focused on seizing control of rural areas and highways, capturing multiple villages in the vicinity and severing ISIS supply lines and potential escape routes toward Jarablus near the Turkish border. By June 9, SDF units had pushed to within artillery range of the final access road, setting the stage for complete isolation. On June 10, the captured the last remaining route into , finalizing the and trapping an estimated several thousand fighters within the city's perimeter. U.S.-led coalition airstrikes played a critical role, targeting convoys attempting reinforcement or withdrawal and disrupting militant movements along the lines. special operations forces provided on-ground coordination to enhance the precision of these strikes. ISIS responded with counterattacks, including vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices (VBIEDs) deployed against positions, but these were largely repelled due to timely air support that neutralized threats before they could breach the forming cordon. The maneuvers effectively isolated by mid-June, shifting the campaign toward sustained pressure on the urban core without yet engaging in direct city assaults.

Siege and Urban Assault (July 2016)

In July 2016, the (SDF) intensified their siege of , advancing into the city's outskirts and initiating house-to-house combat against entrenched positions, which slowed progress to mere blocks over weeks amid fierce resistance. fighters fortified urban structures, including mosques and minarets used for sniper nests, emplacements, and command points, while deploying improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and vehicle-borne IEDs (VBIEDs) to channel SDF movements into kill zones. ISIS tactics further included the use of tunnels for movement and ambushes, as well as preventing evacuation by executing those attempting to flee, effectively employing human shields to complicate assaults and airstrikes. Key clashes erupted in densely populated districts, where ISIS converted markets and hospitals into defensive strongholds booby-trapped with explosives, forcing fighters to clear buildings methodically under constant and small-arms fire. The U.S.-led provided , conducting multiple strikes on ISIS tactical units and fighting positions near , though coordination challenges led to incidents such as the airstrike in the nearby Tokhar area, which killed at least 56 according to monitors.

Capture of Manbij City (August 2016)

The (SDF) pressed their urban assault in during the first half of August 2016, overcoming entrenched defenses amid coalition airstrikes that targeted over 680 militant positions, vehicles, and heavy weapons. By August 10, SDF fighters had recaptured approximately 90 percent of the city, including advances into the densely held eastern districts, marking a critical erosion of 's hold after two months of siege operations. This phase saw intensified house-to-house fighting, with SDF units exploiting 's dwindling manpower and supply lines severed by prior encirclement. The climactic seizure occurred on August 12, when the remaining fighters abandoned their positions and fled northward, enabling forces to enter the city center unchallenged and declare operational control over . contingents, including local fighters integrated to reflect the city's demographic majority, spearheaded the final pushes into central areas, hoisting their flags amid resident celebrations that signaled the end of rule. This breakthrough followed the of thousands of civilians previously held as human shields, with having abducted around 2,000 residents in a desperate bid to deter advances. ISIS's collapse manifested in a disorganized retreat toward near the Turkish border, with fighters convoying in approximately 500 vehicles interspersed with coerced civilians to evade pursuit and airstrikes. U.S. surveillance captured these movements, prompting strikes that disrupted the exodus and inflicted further losses on the militants. The flight of these holdouts—estimated in the low hundreds based on scale—underscored ISIS's tactical failure to mount a cohesive , as prior attrition from urban combat and aerial interdiction had reduced their effective strength in the city.

Immediate Aftermath

Clearing Operations and ISIS Retreat

Following the capture of on August 19, 2016, (SDF) launched systematic clearing operations to neutralize -planted improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and booby traps, which the group had extensively deployed in buildings, roads, and vehicles prior to retreat. SDF units, supported by a 20-member demining team trained by U.S. forces, prioritized securing main roads and such as schools and hospitals immediately after major combat ceased around August 12. These efforts uncovered 's deliberate mining of virtually every structure to hinder post-withdrawal stabilization, though limited resources and the scale of contamination left many areas uncleared, resulting in ongoing risks from undetonated devices. During sweeps, forces encountered remnants of 's repressive infrastructure, including detention sites indicative of systematic torture, alongside later discoveries of mass graves containing over 235 civilian bodies—many showing signs of execution-style killings and predating the offensive to 's 2014 rule. U.S. surveillance drones documented fighters fleeing the city in the final days, with surviving elements scattering to adjacent strongholds like , where they regrouped for subsequent defenses, and toward Jarablus ahead of Turkish-backed advances there. This dispersal underscored tactical gains in but highlighted persistent threats from embedded sleeper cells and mobile units evading full encirclement. Initial humanitarian efforts included basic distribution coordinated with partners, focusing on freed hostages and displaced residents, alongside preliminary to enable returns; however, incomplete clearance perpetuated hazards, distinguishing short-term territorial control from enduring insurgent capabilities. SDF established temporary security perimeters, but ISIS's retreat preserved operational networks for rather than total defeat in the vicinity.

Casualties and Humanitarian Toll

The Manbij offensive inflicted heavy losses on combatants, with the and allied U.S.-led ground partners suffering an estimated 300 fatalities, primarily from intense urban fighting and counterattacks. fighters faced significantly higher attrition, with and estimates placing their deaths between 1,000 and 2,000, including hundreds eliminated via airstrikes targeting command nodes and vehicle convoys. Civilian casualties totaled 200–300, largely from coalition airstrikes amid ISIS's use of human shields and booby traps, as well as post-withdrawal encounters with improvised explosive devices (IEDs) seeded by retreating ISIS elements. Notable incidents included a July 19, 2016, strike near Tokhar village that killed at least 56–73 noncombatants, per SOHR and activist reports, later partially acknowledged by the coalition as causing 24 civilian deaths. ISIS exacerbated the toll through summary executions of escapees and forced retention of residents as shields, with monitors noting dozens of such killings during the siege. The humanitarian impact extended to widespread of approximately 100,000 residents from and its environs, driven by , , and fear of reprisals, straining local resources and aid delivery in chaotic conditions. Overall figures likely undercount due to restricted access, unrecovered bodies in rubble, and ISIS's concealment tactics, as highlighted by field monitors.

Strategic Outcomes

Disruption of ISIS Networks

The capture of on August 19, 2016, disrupted ISIS's primary overland supply corridors from , which had facilitated the smuggling of , weapons, and foreign fighters into . As a key logistical hub linking the Turkish border to ISIS's core territories, including , the city's fall severed routes that enabled the group to looted for —estimated at up to $1-3 million daily across its networks—and import reinforcements, thereby straining operational sustainment. This isolation effect positioned the offensive as a direct precursor to the Raqqa campaign, where advances from encircled ISIS's capital by cutting western access points and forcing resource reallocations southward. The logistical setbacks compounded a psychological toll on , marking as the group's first major defeat in a predominantly Sunni Arab urban center in , which undermined narratives of an unassailable . Internal reports from ISIS ranks indicated plummeting morale, with fighters facing attrition from prolonged sieges and severed resupplies, leading to defections and reduced combat effectiveness in subsequent defenses. This erosion of perceived invincibility contrasted with earlier holds on mixed or non-Arab areas like , amplifying the symbolic impact on recruitment and cohesion. SDF forces secured control over approximately 1,500-2,000 square kilometers in the pocket and adjacent rural areas during the offensive, consolidating a contiguous front that enabled rapid pivots to eastern thrusts against . These gains, achieved by early September 2016, provided staging grounds for isolating and disrupting residual cells, as evidenced by follow-on operations that reclaimed over 100 additional square kilometers in immediate proximity. The territorial expansion weakened 's maneuverability in northern , forcing a contraction of defended perimeters and exposing flanks to coalition air support.

Shifts in Local Power Dynamics

Following the SDF's capture of on August 19, 2016, the group established the , initially comprising co-presidents—one male and one female—overseeing 13 committees with co-chairs drawn proportionally from local ethnic groups, including (the demographic majority in the predominantly city), , , and . The MCC adopted a governance model mirroring structures in northeast , emphasizing shared leadership to project inclusivity amid the SDF's YPG-dominated military command. This setup secured SDF control over strategic assets, including River access and the M4 junction, though local administration faced immediate resource strains from limited taxation and donor aid without broader international recognition. Ethnic power dynamics shifted as the Kurdish-led asserted authority in an Arab-majority area, fostering wariness among locals toward YPG dominance despite the MCC's nominal Arab representation. Thousands of displaced residents returned to in the days after liberation, drawn by the ouster of , but patterns of Kurdish settlement from SDF-affiliated areas exacerbated Arab concerns over demographic changes and resource allocation priorities favoring SDF networks. These tensions manifested in resistance to external alternatives perceived as corrupt, underscoring friction between local Arab preferences for autonomous control and the 's centralized, Kurdish-influenced model. The Syrian government under Assad, backed by Russian air support, probed SDF vulnerabilities through advances in western Aleppo province during the same period but desisted from direct assaults on Manbij to avert escalation with U.S.-embedded forces. This restraint preserved a tentative divide, with regime elements occasionally coordinating tacitly with elements against mutual threats while consolidating elsewhere, reflecting pragmatic avoidance of broader confrontation.

Political Repercussions

US-Turkey Tensions and the Manbij Roadmap

Following the ' (SDF) capture of in August 2016, tensions between the and intensified due to Ankara's perception of the SDF's dominant People's Protection Units (YPG) as a proxy for the (PKK), a U.S.-designated terrorist since 1997 engaged in a decades-long against . repeatedly warned of military action to dislodge YPG elements from , viewing their presence west of the River as a direct security threat that could embolden PKK operations inside . The , prioritizing the SDF's role in combating ISIS remnants, maintained advisory forces in and signaled readiness to counter any Turkish incursion, exacerbating strains within the alliance where demanded the dismantlement of YPG control. Diplomatic efforts culminated in talks between U.S. President and Turkish President , leading to the announcement of the Manbij Roadmap on June 4, 2018, after meetings between U.S. and Turkish Foreign Minister . The agreement outlined phased steps including the withdrawal of all YPG fighters from , establishment of a local civilian council with Arab-majority representation to govern the area, joint U.S.-Turkish patrols to ensure security and stability, and coordinated efforts to clear elements without empowering militias. Turkish officials described the roadmap as a to "rebuild mutual trust," with Erdoğan crediting Trump's direct involvement in phone discussions that emphasized its role in broader Syrian stabilization. Implementation proceeded unevenly, with initial joint ground and air patrols commencing in September 2018 and expanding around by November 1, 2018, involving approximately 40 U.S. and Turkish vehicles monitoring a 60-kilometer perimeter. However, the U.S. continued to embed forces alongside units inside , effectively shielding them from Turkish demands for full YPG expulsion, as American priorities remained focused on sustaining capabilities against rather than addressing 's core concerns over PKK linkages. A December 7, 2018, joint statement reaffirmed commitment to the roadmap's expansion but highlighted persistent frictions, with pushing for accelerated YPG removal and the U.S. insisting on conditions tied to anti- operations. This dynamic underscored a fundamental U.S. strategic choice—tolerating PKK-affiliated elements for tactical gains against —which strained cohesion, as perceived American arming of the YPG as enabling terrorist threats on its borders despite shared alliance obligations.

SDF Governance and Internal Challenges

The implemented a decentralized model in through the establishment of the Manbij Civil Council, which aimed to foster local stability by integrating diverse ethnic representatives and promoting inclusive administration following the city's capture from in August 2016. Women's councils were formed as part of this structure to address gender-based security issues, with over 50 women joining the local Asayish internal security force by late 2017 and initiatives expanding to include training for women amid post-conflict vulnerabilities. These efforts contributed to relative stability by reducing immediate ISIS threats and enabling basic service provision, though empirical data on long-term outcomes remains limited to broader SDF programs rather than Manbij-specific metrics. Internal challenges emerged prominently from the SDF's mandatory policy, enforced to bolster defenses against remnants and regional threats, which sparked widespread protests in . In June 2021, thousands defied a to demonstrate against forced of young men and women, leading to clashes with SDF forces that resulted in at least eight deaths and a across the city and surrounding villages. Demonstrators demanded suspension of the draft, increased fuel allocations, and greater local autonomy, prompting the SDF to temporarily halt conscription and form negotiation committees, though underlying resistance persisted due to economic hardships and perceived overreach. Ethnic frictions intensified under Kurdish-led oversight, with Arab-majority residents in voicing resentment over YPG/SDF dominance in administrative and security roles, viewing it as marginalization of local Arab leadership despite nominal inclusion in councils. Protests in 2018 highlighted these tensions, fueled by tribal dynamics and fears of cultural imposition, eroding legitimacy in a region where comprise the demographic majority. Allegations of corruption in aid distribution further strained relations, with local perceptions of favoritism toward elements undermining trust, though specific verifiable instances in are scarce amid broader reports of graft in SDF-controlled areas. The sustained U.S. troop presence in , numbering several hundred as part of counter-ISIS operations since , effectively deterred jihadist resurgence by providing air support and intelligence, stabilizing the area against immediate threats. However, this partnership facilitated the entrenchment of PKK-affiliated structures within the , as the YPG—its core component—maintains operational and ideological ties to the designated terrorist group, enabling recruitment and command integration that cites as a . U.S. policy differentiated the from the PKK for tactical reasons, prioritizing anti-ISIS efficacy over delinking efforts, which prolonged leverage but exacerbated regional alliances against perceived PKK expansion.

Long-Term Developments

Ongoing Security Threats and Mine Hazards

Following the liberation of Manbij in August 2016, improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and landmines emplaced by persisted as a major hazard, causing numerous civilian casualties in the ensuing years. documented that had extensively mined homes, roads, and public spaces during its control, resulting in hundreds of civilian deaths and injuries, including dozens of children, in the immediate aftermath. These devices, often pressure-plate IEDs or victim-activated explosives, continued detonating sporadically through 2017-2020 as civilians returned to booby-trapped structures and farmland. Demining efforts by the , supported by limited U.S.-led explosive ordnance disposal teams, faced significant constraints, including insufficient funding, equipment shortages, and the vast scale of across and rural areas. By 2019, only a fraction of contaminated sites had been cleared, leaving residents vulnerable to ongoing risks during and agriculture. The recorded multiple mine-related incidents in Manbij and surrounding areas post-2016, underscoring the protracted nature of the threat amid resource limitations. Remnant ISIS cells exploited this instability, conducting sporadic attacks to reassert presence. On January 16, 2019, an ISIS-claimed suicide bombing targeting a U.S. patrol in killed four Americans—including three service members and one Department of Defense civilian—and wounded several others, highlighting the group's enduring operational capacity in the region. subsequently claimed responsibility for facilitating the attack through sleeper cells, with U.S. forces capturing five suspects linked to the plot later that year. SDF security operations against suspected ISIS affiliates and local dissenters further strained stability in Manbij, a predominantly Arab area under Kurdish-led administration. Reports of arbitrary arrests and suppression of protests against SDF governance fueled resentment among tribes and civilians, creating fertile ground for low-level unrest and potential insurgent recruitment. Such measures, while aimed at preventing ISIS resurgence, exacerbated ethnic tensions and undermined community trust, contributing to a cycle of insecurity independent of mine hazards.

Turkish-Backed Pressures and 2024 Loss of Control

Turkish forces and allied groups, through from August 2016 to March 2017, advanced to capture and disrupted potential territorial contiguity between and areas west of the River, effectively encircling Manbij from the west and preventing Kurdish-led expansion toward the Turkish border. This operation positioned Turkish-backed forces adjacent to Manbij's western and northern peripheries, establishing a persistent security buffer that constrained maneuvers. By 2019, amid Operation Peace Spring east of the , Turkish officials reiterated demands for withdrawal from as part of a proposed 30-kilometer border security zone, viewing the presence of YPG-linked forces there as an extension of PKK threats to Turkish . insisted on disarmament and relocation of heavy weapons, framing non-compliance as justification for further incursions to neutralize perceived terrorist infrastructure. These pressures persisted through joint US-Turkish patrols in under the 2018 , which aimed to stabilize the area but failed to resolve underlying Turkish grievances over autonomy. The fall of the Assad regime in early December 2024 triggered a rapid escalation, as Turkish-backed Syrian National Army (SNA) factions launched Operation Dawn of Freedom targeting Manbij on December 6, exploiting the power vacuum and SDF overextension. SNA forces, supported by Turkish artillery and drones, overran SDF positions, capturing the city center by December 9 amid reports of SDF retreats to avoid urban attrition. A US-brokered ceasefire on December 11 facilitated SDF withdrawal from Manbij proper, ceding control to SNA groups and marking the collapse of US-supported Kurdish administration in the area. Into 2025, residual elements clashed with the emerging Syrian transitional government forces near , including artillery exchanges and small-arms fire in August that injured Syrian personnel and civilians, as accused of provocations while demanding or . These sporadic engagements, coupled with ongoing Turkish-SNA operations, compelled further retreats eastward toward the , underscoring the fragility of US-backed enclaves amid converging pressures from and a reasserting central authority in . The sequence of events demonstrated the causal limits of sustainability without broader accommodation of Turkish security imperatives, as regional realignments post-Assad eroded isolated autonomies reliant on diminishing external patronage.

Controversies

Civilian Casualties from Coalition Actions

During the Manbij offensive from to 2016, US-led airstrikes in support of advances resulted in an estimated 167 civilian deaths across the Manbij pocket in the preceding two months, according to the , amid over 200 reported strikes targeting positions in densely populated areas. monitors like Airwars documented at least 47 separate events linked to actions in the Manbij area since May 2016, with estimating more than 200 civilian fatalities overall during the campaign to dislodge from the city. These figures exceeded coalition self-assessments, which deemed many reports non-credible after review, acknowledging only a fraction of the claimed deaths despite procedural reviews. The most significant incident occurred on July 19, 2016, when coalition airstrikes hit fighting positions in Tokhar village north of Manbij, killing at least 56 civilians—including 11 children—per the , with local activists and other monitors reporting up to 73 deaths, mostly women and children sheltering in homes. The Central Command launched a formal into the strike as a credible claim, later admitting deaths in Manbij-area operations and attributing errors to tactics of massing fighters with coerced civilians as human shields to complicate targeting and generate from resultant casualties. No investigations uncovered evidence of deliberate civilian targeting by the ; casualties stemmed from fog-of-war challenges in urban combat, including misidentification of groups as combatants and intelligence gaps exacerbated by embedding among non-combatants, though procedural lapses in target verification were noted in post-strike analyses. These unintended losses, while tragic, occurred against 's routine use of shielding—contrasting sharply with the group's intentional massacres of thousands of non-combatants elsewhere in —highlighting the asymmetric risks of precision strikes in contested environments where militants exploited populated zones to evade defeat.

SDF's Kurdish Dominance and Terrorism Links

The (SDF) are predominantly led by the People's Protection Units (YPG), the Syrian branch of the (PKK), which shares ideological, organizational, and personnel ties with the PKK—a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization since 1997. Numerous YPG commanders have documented histories of involvement with the PKK, including training in PKK camps and prior combat operations in , facilitating cross-border operational continuity despite the SDF's framing as a multi-ethnic . This overlap extends to command structures, where PKK veterans hold key positions, enabling the transfer of tactics and resources that undermine claims of the SDF as a localized, non-irredentist force. U.S. support for the against prioritized tactical utility over PKK affiliations, with American-supplied weapons—such as AT-4 anti-tank systems delivered to units—subsequently recovered from PKK fighters in Turkish border operations as early as . This divergence from strict enforcement of PKK terrorist designations allowed indirect arming of linked groups, as acknowledged in analyses of U.S. policy trade-offs during the 2014-2019 campaign. Turkish officials have cited such transfers as evidence of complicity in PKK attacks, justifying cross-border interventions to neutralize perceived threats. Post-ISIS territorial gains, including in after August 2016, revealed the marginalization of components within the , with Kurdish YPG elements consolidating control over administration and security, sidelining local tribal leaders who had allied against . fighters, initially recruited for , faced coerced into YPG-dominated units, prompting tribal defections and accusations of demographic favoring Kurdish interests. This dynamic reinforced Turkish narratives portraying the as a PKK pursuing separatist aims, rather than a sustainable multi-ethnic governance model, thereby legitimizing Ankara's military responses. SDF proponents emphasize its role in defeating holdings by 2019, arguing operational necessities warranted alliances despite PKK ties. Critics, including authorities and independent analysts, counter that unchecked YPG expansion poses long-term risks of PKK-style insurgency spilling into , with irredentist ideologies prioritizing over local Arab-Syrian stability. Empirical patterns of resource diversion and command centralization support the latter assessment, highlighting causal links between SDF structure and regional insecurity beyond anti- efforts.

Effectiveness vs. Ethical Critiques of Interventions

The Manbij offensive delivered a decisive against , with the (SDF), backed by U.S. forces and coalition airstrikes, capturing the city on August 12, 2016, after a two-month that severed critical ISIS supply lines from to its Raqqa stronghold and expelled the group from a key urban hub it had controlled since 2014. This operation exemplified principles, integrating indigenous ground maneuvers with and advisory support to achieve rapid territorial gains against a dug-in adversary employing guerrilla tactics and improvised explosives. Proponents of U.S. intervention, including military analysts, hailed it as a pragmatic model for defeating ISIS without committing large conventional forces, prioritizing empirical disruption of the group's apparatus over indefinite occupation. Yet this success empowered the YPG-led as a U.S. proxy, a force designates as an extension of the PKK—a group listed as terrorist by the U.S., EU, and —straining alliances and incurring opportunity costs in regional stability by alienating a key partner whose cooperation was vital for broader and migration containment efforts. Anti-intervention perspectives argue this alliance trade-off fostered long-term blowback, as control invited Turkish cross-border responses and perpetuated Syria's factional chaos, diverting U.S. resources from more aligned partners and enabling PKK-linked entrenchment along 's southern flank. Ethical critiques center on the offensive's human costs, including documented coalition airstrikes that killed at least 56 civilians in a single July 2016 incident near Manbij—part of broader estimates exceeding 100 non-combatant deaths in the area—often in densely populated zones where ISIS deliberately positioned fighters amid civilians to inflate collateral damage accusations. Reports from NGOs like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, while providing casualty data, have faced scrutiny for emphasizing coalition errors over ISIS's systematic use of human shields and booby-traps, potentially reflecting institutional biases that understate jihadist agency in causal chains of harm. The post-offensive legacy compounded these issues, with ISIS-planted improvised mines—numbering in the thousands and rigged in homes, roads, and fields—killing or maiming hundreds of civilians, including children, in the ensuing months, underscoring the enduring hazards of hasty advances against an enemy prioritizing denial over retreat. SDF administration in Manbij drew further causal realism-based rebukes for fostering authoritarian governance structures, where Kurdish-dominated civil councils imposed centralized control amid reports of Arab marginalization, resource extraction, and suppression of , prioritizing ethnic consolidation over inclusive and eroding local legitimacy essential for post-conflict . These dynamics highlight a core tension: short-term efficacy in degrading territorial control versus ethical lapses in alliance management, civilian protection, and proxy accountability, with some analyses contending that left-leaning outlets amplified interventionist faults while muting 's internal coercions and 's premeditated endangerment of locals.

References

  1. [1]
    MQ-1, MQ-9 aircrews help liberate Manbij
    Apr 6, 2017 · In January 2014, ISIS took control of Manbij, a northern Syrian city, and for more than two years used the city as a central coordination hub ...
  2. [2]
    Manbij Offensive - Operation Inherent Resolve
    The Syrian Arab Coalition supported by Coalition air power have destroyed 108 Da'esh fighting positions, 31 Da'esh vehicles, 17 Da'esh heavy-weapons, two Da'esh ...Missing: casualties sources<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Syria: Improvised mines kill, injure hundreds in Manbij [EN/AR]
    Oct 26, 2016 · At least 48 were killed as they returned home after fighting ended. The actual number of deaths is probably significantly higher. Due to time ...
  4. [4]
    The destruction and looting of cultural heritage sites by ISIS in Syria
    Nov 26, 2021 · The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) occupied the city of Manbij and its countryside from 23 January 2014 until 12 August 2016.
  5. [5]
    Syria war: Manbij celebrates liberation from ISIL - Al Jazeera
    Aug 14, 2016 · ... Manbij, which had been held by ISIL, also known as ISIS, since 2014. Nasser Haj Mansour, an adviser to the SDF, said that Manbij was “under ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  6. [6]
    Manbij | EIP - European Institute of Peace
    ISIS killed civilians who attempted to escape and repeatedly used car bombs. The last remaining ISIS fighters, according to the SDF, used civilians as human ...
  7. [7]
    More than 2000 Isis hostages freed from Syrian city of Manbij
    Aug 12, 2016 · A spokesman for the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces said they had taken over the city after the last Isis militants fled on Friday.Missing: date exact
  8. [8]
    Syrians celebrate defeat of ISIS in Manbij, recount horrors of ... - CBC
    Aug 13, 2016 · Residents of the Syrian city of Manbij were celebrating today after rebel fighters freed about 2000 hostages and drove out the last ISIS ...
  9. [9]
    About the report | EIP - European Institute of Peace
    ... slavery, and the presence of Yazidi slave markets in the city. Kurds, a ... tax, which targeted non-Muslim residents who fell under ISIS' rule. ISIS ...
  10. [10]
    Syria's Manbij under constant threat of Turkey - North press agency
    Jun 4, 2022 · During the ISIS control, Manbij became the main corridor through which ISIS transported jihadists, weapon and money from Turkey to its held ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Offensive against the Syrian City of Manbij May Be the Beginning of ...
    Jun 22, 2016 · The SDF, the alliance of forces carrying out the ground offensive, was established around October 2015 with American support. The dominant group ...
  12. [12]
    For Assad, Manbij Is the Key to East Syria | The Washington Institute
    Feb 5, 2019 · ... most of them Sunni Arabs from Aleppo province. The Kurds in Manbij city are generally mixed with the Arab population. In the countryside ...
  13. [13]
    Syria conflict: On the frontline in battle for IS-held Manbij - BBC News
    Jun 15, 2016 · We travelled along the road to Manbij, a small town in northern Syria that has become the new frontline in the battle against the jihadist group Islamic State ...
  14. [14]
    Holding Territory Taken From ISIS in the Manbij Pocket
    Jun 1, 2016 · The United States and its closest partner in the Syrian conflict, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), have begun an offensive to take the northern city of ...
  15. [15]
    Turkish Military Offensive in Syria: Consequences for Counter ...
    Jun 28, 2022 · ... (SDF) with support from the US-led Operation Inherent Resolve mission, the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) continues to.Missing: 2016 details
  16. [16]
    U.S.-Turkish Tensions in Syria: The Manbij Conundrum - CSIS
    Apr 5, 2018 · The intensifying dispute over Manbij and the ongoing US relationship with the YPG confirms that the long-standing alliance is going through a particularly ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    MQ-1, MQ-9 aircrews help liberate Manbij > Air Force > Article Display
    Apr 6, 2017 · In 2016, U.S. Air Force MQ-1 Predator and MQ-9 Reaper aircrews assisted coalition partners in the reclamation of Manbij, Syria, from Islamic ...Missing: special | Show results with:special
  18. [18]
    Syria war: Dozens killed in 'US-led strikes' on Manbij - Al Jazeera
    Jul 20, 2016 · Coalition strikes on northern Manbij kill 56 civilians, bringing death toll to 167 in past two months, monitor says.
  19. [19]
    Civil Authority in Manbij, Syria Using Civil Affairs to Implement ...
    The MCC handed over five villages to Assad regime control to create a buffer between approaching Turkish forces and Manbij, and the regime and Russians were ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] RUSSIA'S INTERVENTION IN SYRIA:
    Syrian Democratic Forces liberated Manbij from ISIS in northern Syria which kickstarted a year and half long campaign with help from the U.S. that resulted in ...
  21. [21]
    Civil Authority in Manbij, Syria - Army University Press
    On 16 January 2018, four Americans including two service members, a DOD civilian, and a contractor were killed in a suicide bombing in Manbij. Islamic State ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  22. [22]
    Why the Pentagon sees recapture of Syrian city as template for ...
    Aug 16, 2016 · Since late last year, U.S.-backed forces also have captured the town of Shadadi and a strategic dam from the militants, but neither of those ...
  23. [23]
    US military opens formal investigation into deadly July airstrike in Syria
    Jul 27, 2016 · Thus far, according to Garver, the US has conducted 520 strikes in support of the Manbij offensive. The US has rejected calls from Syrian ...<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Exclusive: U.S.-backed Syria forces launch offensive for Manbij pocket
    May 31, 2016 · A small number of U.S. special operations forces will support the offensive on the ground, acting as advisors and staying some distance back ...
  25. [25]
    US-backed fighters close in on IS Syria bastion Manbij
    Jun 6, 2016 · Washington has said US forces are advising the SDF on the ground but not taking direct part in combat. In Halula, the AFP reporter saw ...
  26. [26]
    US Supplies First Armored Vehicles to Syrian Fighters - VOA
    Feb 1, 2017 · Washington has supplied the SDF with light weapons and special-forces advisers in the past and has provided air support against Islamic State ...
  27. [27]
    Manbij: A Dress Rehearsal for Raqqa?
    Aug 10, 2016 · The current push on the city began on May 31, when the Syrian Democratic Forces expanded from a small foothold west of the October Dam on the ...
  28. [28]
    US-backed fighters take town of Manbij from Isis | Syria - The Guardian
    Aug 6, 2016 · Located close the Turkish border, Manbij has served as a key transit point along Isis's supply route to Raqqa, allowing them to transport ...
  29. [29]
    The Manbij Saga: An End-Game in Syria? - Atlantic Council
    Mar 9, 2017 · The two sides remained at odds over how best to pursue shared goals: using military force to defeat the Islamic State (ISIS, ISIL, or Daesh), ...
  30. [30]
    PKK - Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs
    PKK is a terrorist organization. The PKK is listed as a terrorist organization internationally by numerous countries, including the members of the European ...Missing: evidence perspective
  31. [31]
    Turkey's Operation Euphrates Shield is a message to the Kurds
    Aug 24, 2016 · But Ankara also declared a red line: it would not allow the YPG to cross to the west of the Euphrates River.Missing: warnings | Show results with:warnings
  32. [32]
    YPG-dominated SDF crosses west of Euphrates, raises Turkey's ...
    Jun 2, 2016 · Ankara has reiterated that the YPG crossing west of the Euphrates is a red line, calling it the PYD expansionist policies under the guise of ...Missing: warnings | Show results with:warnings
  33. [33]
    Turkey's anti-YPG offensive – DW – 08/24/2016
    Aug 24, 2016 · "If YPG doesn't retreat back to the east of the Euphrates, Turkey will do what is necessary," Cavusoglu said. The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) ...
  34. [34]
    Turkey deploys more tanks in Syria, warns Kurdish YPG - Al Jazeera
    Aug 25, 2016 · Turkey demanded that the YPG retreat to the east side of the Euphrates within a week. The Kurdish fighters had moved west of the river earlier ...Missing: warnings | Show results with:warnings
  35. [35]
    Turkish military launches Operation Euphrates Shield to clear Daesh ...
    Aug 24, 2016 · The operation, which began at around 4 a.m. local time, is aimed at clearing the Turkish borders of terrorist groups, helping to enhance border ...
  36. [36]
    Operation Euphrates Shield: Aims and Gains
    Jan 19, 2017 · On Aug. 24, 2016, Turkey declared that is was exercising its rights of self-defense codified under the UN Charter Article 51, and launched ...
  37. [37]
    'IS' under pressure in Syria – DW – 06/05/2016
    Jun 5, 2016 · To the southeast of Manbij, Russian airstrikes pounded IS positions as Syrian regime forces and allied militia moved into Raqqa province on ...
  38. [38]
    U.S.-backed forces cut off all routes into IS-held Manbij - Reuters
    Jun 10, 2016 · U.S.-backed forces seized control of the last route into Islamic State-held city of Manbij in northern Syria on Friday, completing their ...<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Syria: Kurdish-led forces enter ISIL-held Manbij city - Al Jazeera
    Jun 23, 2016 · Syrian Democratic Forces enter the ISIL stronghold backed by US-led air strikes in the northern Syrian city.
  40. [40]
    https://understandingwar.org/research/middle-east/isis-sanctuary-map-august-19-2016
  41. [41]
    https://community.apan.org/cfs-file/__key/telligent-evolution-components-attachments/13-14863-00-00-00-19-51-02/20170418-Gunduz-_2D00_-The-Islamic-State-of-Iraq-and-al_2D00_Sham-and-Its-Urban-Warfare-Tactics.pdf
  42. [42]
    Syria Situation Report: July 1 - July 8, 2016 - Syria Direct
    Jul 8, 2016 · July 5: Opposition dismantles IEDs targeting mosques in Southern Syria. ... July 2 – 5: Islamic State repels initial advance on Manbij City Center ...
  43. [43]
    June 7: Manbij offensive - Centcom
    Press Release | June 7, 2016. June 7: Manbij offensive. June 7, 2016 ... The Combined Joint Task Force - Operation Inherent Resolve has conducted more than 105 strikes in support of the battle to liberate Manbij. The Syrian Arab Coalition is leading ...Missing: urban | Show results with:urban
  44. [44]
    Syria conflict: 'Dozens of civilians killed' in US-led strikes near Manbij
    Jul 19, 2016 · At least 56 civilians have died in US-led coalition air strikes near the Islamic State stronghold of Manbij in north Syria, opposition monitors say.
  45. [45]
    Civilian Death Toll From Coalition Airstrikes in Syria Could Be ...
    Jul 19, 2016 · U.S. Central Command says that coalition forces have launched at least 11 strikes in Manbij over the last 48 hours. In a press release ...
  46. [46]
    Syria: SDF retakes almost all of Manbij from ISIL - Al Jazeera
    Aug 10, 2016 · US-backed opposition fighters have almost recaptured all of Manbij, a Syrian city northeast of Aleppo, from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).<|control11|><|separator|>
  47. [47]
    IS conflict: Manbij residents celebrate liberation - BBC News
    Aug 13, 2016 · Residents in the northern Syrian city of Manbij celebrate new freedoms after it was liberated from so-called Islamic State (IS).
  48. [48]
    U.S. Drones Record ISIS Fighters Fleeing Manbij in Northern Syria
    Aug 13, 2016 · The two new victories against the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL, could have a significant effect on the group's efforts to penetrate ...
  49. [49]
    Photos show IS militants fleeing Manbij with 'human shields' - BBC
    Aug 19, 2016 · Aerial photos have been released showing Islamic State (IS) militants using civilians as shields to escape the northern Syrian town of Manbij.Missing: center | Show results with:center
  50. [50]
    Syria: Improvised Mines Kill, Injure Hundreds in Manbij
    Oct 26, 2016 · Homemade landmines have killed and injured hundreds of civilians, including dozens of children in northern Syria. ISIS mined virtually ...Missing: seizure | Show results with:seizure
  51. [51]
    USA must come clean about civilian deaths caused by Coalition air ...
    Oct 26, 2016 · US-led Coalition forces carrying out air strikes in Syria must conduct thorough investigations into reports of civilian casualties from its ...Missing: special | Show results with:special<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    Coalition says civilians killed in strikes in Syria, Iraq | AP News
    Dec 1, 2016 · The U.S.-led coalition is confirming that July airstrikes in northern Syria near Manbij killed 24 civilians who were mixed in with Islamic ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    ISIS Appears to Lose Ground in Fight for Its Raqqa Base
    Mar 6, 2017 · An assault on Raqqa to expel the Islamic State, also known as ISIS ... siege, have been rapidly advancing east toward Raqqa in the past few ...
  54. [54]
    Losing ground, fighters and morale – is it all over for Isis?
    Sep 7, 2016 · By crossing the border, Turkey has changed the face of the war against Isis. ... “Morale is desperate,” one Isis official tells the Guardian.Missing: psychological impact
  55. [55]
    Thousands Return To Manbij After Islamic State Militants Flee City
    Aug 15, 2016 · Thousands of displaced residents streamed back into the northern Syrian town of Manbij on Saturday after U.S.-backed fighters ousted the ...Missing: tensions | Show results with:tensions
  56. [56]
    Aleppo siege: Fighters try to break through in divided city | CNN
    Aug 6, 2016 · Clashes between the militias and ISIS left hundreds of combatants dead. That includes 269 militia forces – among them a commander and three ...Missing: hospitals | Show results with:hospitals
  57. [57]
    Conflict Between Turkey and Armed Kurdish Groups
    May 27, 2025 · Due to the YPG's ties to the PKK, Turkey views both the YPG and the SDF as terrorist organizations. Since 2016, the United States has ...Missing: Manbij 2017-2018
  58. [58]
    The Roadmap to Nowhere: Manbij, Turkey, and America's Dilemma ...
    Jun 29, 2018 · After trading indirect threats for months, the United States and Turkey reached agreement in early June on a roadmap to resolve tensions over ...
  59. [59]
    U.S.-Kurdish Relations in Syria after the Manbij Roadmap
    Jul 5, 2018 · In June, Turkey and the United States announced that they had agreed to implement a roadmap to promote peace in the Syrian city of Manbij, ...
  60. [60]
    US, Turkey on collision course in Syria's Manbij – DW – 03/31/2018
    Mar 31, 2018 · US special forces in Manbij, Syria. US special forces act as a deterrent against attacks on SDF-controlled areasImage: picture-alliance/AP/H.Missing: combat | Show results with:combat<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    US, Turkey Agree on Roadmap to Resolve Dispute Over Syria Town
    Jun 4, 2018 · The United States and Turkey have agreed on a roadmap to resolve the future of the northern Syrian city of Manbij, an issue that has become a major source of ...
  62. [62]
    Turkish officials credit Trump for Manbij road map - Daily Sabah
    Jun 7, 2018 · After months of delay and ambiguity, Turkish and American officials finally declared on Monday that both sides have "endorsed" a road map to ...
  63. [63]
    Turkey and US agree on plan to remove YPG from Syria's Manbij
    Jun 4, 2018 · The two sides agreed on a joint work to end a bilateral dispute over the presence of the People's Protection Units (YPG) troops in Manbij.
  64. [64]
    Turkey, U.S. agree roadmap to avert crisis in Syria's Manbij, few details
    Jun 4, 2018 · Cavusoglu said Turkish and U.S. units would together implement security and stability in Manbij, and the removal of all YPG organisations from ...
  65. [65]
    Erdogan, Trump emphasise importance of Manbij roadmap - Reuters
    Jul 16, 2018 · During Monday's phone call, the two leaders said the implementation of the Manbij deal would 'significantly contribute' to the solution of Syria ...Missing: June | Show results with:June
  66. [66]
    https://arabnews.com/node/1317206/amp
  67. [67]
    US, Turkey begin joint patrols around northern Syrian town of Manbij
    Nov 1, 2018 · Turkish and US troops on Thursday began jointly patrolling areas around the northern Syrian town of Manbij, part of a roadmap for easing tensions between the ...
  68. [68]
    Turkish forces begin patrols in Syria's Manbij - Al Jazeera
    Jun 18, 2018 · Ankara says 'independent patrol' missions by Turkish and US forces under way, part of roadmap agreed by both countries.
  69. [69]
    No: 330, 7 December 2018, Turkey-U.S. Joint Statement on Syria
    Dec 7, 2018 · They agreed to continue to work on joint planning with regard to other areas as mentioned in the Manbij Roadmap. Turkey and the United States ...
  70. [70]
    The SDF takes Manbij but Life is Slow to Return - Atlantic Council
    Aug 24, 2016 · Local factions in Manbij, in cooperation with Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a coalition of local forces dominated by Kurdish forces, ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] WOMEN IN LOCAL SECURITY FORCES November 7, 2017
    Nov 7, 2017 · In Manbij, more than 50 women have joined the. Asayish Police Force, while the city's civilian council is now expanding to better represent ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Eight killed in protests against Kurdish-led forces in northern Syrian ...
    Jun 1, 2021 · SDF officials imposed a curfew on the city and beefed up checkpoints around its main routes after many shops heeded a call for a general strike.Missing: governance challenges
  73. [73]
    Beyond conscription: What does Manbij's unrest reveal about SDF ...
    Jun 8, 2021 · Residents of Manbij and surrounding villages organized protests, accompanied by a general strike, on May 31 in refusal of the conscription ...Missing: governance challenges
  74. [74]
    The Looming Threat of Kurdish-Arab Strife in Northern Syria
    Apr 9, 2018 · In the past few months, the Manbij region has witnessed mass protests of local Arabs against YPG rule, and not surprisingly, Turkey has ...Missing: oversight | Show results with:oversight
  75. [75]
    The End of a Forced Coexistence: Arab Tribes Turn Against the ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · By 2018 and 2019, large protests against mandatory conscription and perceived ethnic bias erupted across the region. Still, the SDF retained ...
  76. [76]
    Syria: Shoring Up Raqqa's Shaky Recovery
    Nov 18, 2021 · Perceptions of corruption are widespread. While specific allegations may be difficult to substantiate, the perception itself can be almost as ...
  77. [77]
    Supporting the SDF in Post-Assad Syria | The Washington Institute
    Dec 13, 2024 · To preserve its only reliable and capable partner in the fight against the Islamic State, the United States must help the SDF deter HTS and fend off Turkey- ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Can northeast Syria delink from the PKK? - Atlantic Council
    Aug 6, 2024 · A perennial idea for solving the impasse calls for the United States to facilitate delinking of the DAANES/SDF and the PKK.
  79. [79]
    To Walk the Earth in Safety (2019) - United States Department of State
    Since late 2015, the United States and our partners in the Global Coalition to Defeat ISIS have cleared IEDs from critical infrastructure in Iraq and ...Missing: shortage | Show results with:shortage
  80. [80]
    SOHR: IS land mine kills at least 6 civilians in Syria
    Apr 10, 2023 · Victims of explosions · IEDs and landmines · Grenades · Old ordnance ... SOHR: ISIS landmine kills at least six civilians in Syria. Next Post.
  81. [81]
    ISIS Attack in Syria Kills 4 Americans, Raising New Worries About ...
    Jan 16, 2019 · “Thanks to the courage of our armed forces, we have crushed the ISIS caliphate and devastated its capabilities,” Mr. Pence said. “As we begin to ...
  82. [82]
    Americans slain in Syria attack: A Green Beret, a former SEAL and ...
    Jan 18, 2019 · Charles Summers Jr., a Pentagon spokesman, said the bombing demonstrated that the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, “remains a threat” in Syria ...
  83. [83]
    Defense Department Releases Names Of Three U.S. Casualties In ...
    Jan 18, 2019 · We were in Manbij few days ago right near blast site. It was tense. 2 local sec officers had been killed in bombing the day before. ISIS sleeper ...Missing: 1650 | Show results with:1650
  84. [84]
    5 ISIS fighters captured for alleged role in Syria blast that killed 4 ...
    Mar 19, 2019 · Five ISIS fighters allegedly linked to the deadly blast in Manbij, Syria, last January that killed four Americans have been captured by ...Missing: date exact
  85. [85]
    SDF Crackdowns in Northeast Syria Spark Local Backlash - levant24
    Sep 2, 2025 · SDF Crackdowns in Northeast Syria Spark Local Backlash ... The Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) tightened their grip across areas under their ...
  86. [86]
    Residents of SDF-held areas of Syria fear regime crackdown
    Oct 18, 2019 · Protests continue in SDF-held areas of Syria as residents fear regime crackdown. Protests took place in several towns in northern and eastern ...<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Opposition Syrian National Army liberates Manbij from US-backed ...
    Dec 9, 2024 · Türkiye disrupted these plans during 2016 Operation Euphrates Shield by blocking a direct connection between Afrin, Tel Rifaat, and Manbij.
  88. [88]
    Syria - Operation Euphrates Shield - GlobalSecurity.org
    The major goal of the operation was to capture Manbij and to prevent the Syrian Kurds from maintaining control over the Syrian-Turkish border. But Ankara failed ...Missing: encirclement | Show results with:encirclement
  89. [89]
    New front in Syria's war: Why Manbij matters - Al Jazeera
    Oct 16, 2019 · As Turkey presses ahead, strategic city becomes a potential flashpoint between its allied forces and the Syrian army.
  90. [90]
    The State of the Turkish-Kurdish Conflict
    Aug 12, 2019 · Turkey has repeatedly threatened invasion if the YPG is not disarmed and removed from within 30 kilometers of the border, a buffer zone that ...
  91. [91]
    Turkish-Backed Syrian National Army Seizes Manbij from U.S. Allied ...
    Dec 10, 2024 · Manbij is Key to Turkey's Ambitions in Syria: Manbij, the last ... ISIS. Erdogan frames this within the parameters of counterterrorism ...Missing: roads M4 highway Balikh<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    Rebels take Syrian city from U.S.-backed group after U.S.-Turkey ...
    Dec 9, 2024 · The United States and Turkey reached an agreement to ensure the safe withdrawal of US-backed Kurdish Syrian forces (SDF) from the northern city of Manbij.<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Syrian government, Kurdish-led SDF trade blame over northern ...
    Aug 2, 2025 · Defence Ministry accuses Kurdish-led SDF of injuring four army personnel and three civilians in rocket attack near Manbij.Missing: Shadadi | Show results with:Shadadi
  94. [94]
    Clashes between Syrian army and SDF in northern Syria
    Aug 12, 2025 · The Defense Ministry reaffirmed its call on the SDF to immediately cease attacks, shelling and “provocations” against the Army and the civilian ...
  95. [95]
    International airstrikes and civilian casualty claims in Iraq and Syria
    Aug 22, 2016 · Manbij Mother of the World was the first to report the event. It initially put the death toll at 25, which swiftly rose to 56 then 59 civilians, ...
  96. [96]
    Operation Inherent Resolve Monthly Civilian Casualty Report
    Jul 7, 2017 · During this period, the total number of reports of possible civilian casualties was 727. ... 28, 2014, near Manbij, Syria, via Airwars ...
  97. [97]
    US airstrikes allegedly kill at least 73 civilians in northern Syria
    Jul 20, 2016 · US airstrikes on a Syrian village have killed at least 73 civilians, a majority of them women and children, activists say, in the deadliest coalition attack on ...
  98. [98]
    US investigating whether airstrike killed civilians in Syria - The Hill
    He also said that ISIS has been using civilians as human shields and trying to get the coalition to shoot civilians as a propaganda tool. Tags. Copyright ...
  99. [99]
    Syria conflict: US coalition admits killing civilians in Manbij - BBC
    Dec 1, 2016 · The US-led coalition has admitted to killing 54 civilians in air strikes on Syria in recent months.
  100. [100]
    500-pound bombs struck their targets in a Syrian village. But who ...
    Aug 26, 2016 · Centcom has already launched an investigation into the Tokhar strike. ... An airstrike in Syria killed entire families instead of ISIS fighters ...
  101. [101]
    https://www.wsj.com/articles/airstrikes-on-islamic-state-held-villages-kill-over-50-civilians-say-syrian-activists-1468928280
  102. [102]
    Foreign Terrorist Organizations - United States Department of State
    FTO designations play a critical role in our fight against terrorism and ... ISIS in the Greater Sahara (ISIS-GS). February 28, 2018, ISIS-West Africa.
  103. [103]
    Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) | Examining Extremism - CSIS
    Jul 13, 2023 · The Transnational Threats Project's Examining Extremism series provides an overview and assessment of the Kurdistan Workers' Party, ...
  104. [104]
    The People's Protection Units' Branding Problem
    The common philosophical underpinnings of the PKK and YPG as well as Turkish Kurds fighting alongside Syrian Kurds (albeit against the IS) make the YPG and the ...Missing: perspective | Show results with:perspective
  105. [105]
    Evidence on Kurdish aspirations and the interests of the UK
    PYD and YPG are the names used by the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) when operating on Syrian soil. The PKK is recognised as a terrorist organisation by most ...Missing: perspective | Show results with:perspective
  106. [106]
    Anti-tank weapons delivered by US in Iraq, Syria nabbed from PKK ...
    Mar 22, 2018 · AT-4s are among the weapons delivered by the U.S. to the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), which is dominated by the PKK's Syrian offshoot the ...Missing: traced | Show results with:traced
  107. [107]
    Ignoring Turkey, U.S. backs Kurds in drive against ISIS in Syria
    Jun 1, 2016 · Ignoring Turkey, U.S. backs Kurds in drive against ISIS in Syria ... The PKK is designated a terrorist organization by both the United States ...
  108. [108]
    Every weapon obtained by YPG represents threat to Turkey, foreign ...
    May 10, 2017 · "Both the PKK and the YPG are terrorist organizations and they are no different, apart from their names. Every weapon seized by them is a threat ...<|separator|>
  109. [109]
    Kurdish-Arab Power Struggle in Northeastern Syria
    Jul 24, 2019 · The Kurdish leadership attempts to hold on to their stronghold in Northeastern Syria, but balancing Kurdish interests and Arab demands has become a challenge.
  110. [110]
    The impact of Turkish-Syrian normalization on the SDF
    Aug 2, 2024 · Through normalization with the Syrian regime, Turkey seeks to achieve two main goals: The first is the return of 3.6 million Syrian refugees.
  111. [111]
    Syria's U.S.-backed Kurdish coalition faces uncertain future - NPR
    Dec 27, 2024 · After the territorial defeat of ISIS in Syria in the spring of 2019, the SDF continued to guard the prisons and camps holding thousands of ISIS ...Missing: marginalized post-
  112. [112]
    The PKK's Fateful Choice in Northern Syria - International Crisis Group
    May 4, 2017 · Since mid-2015, after a Turkey-PKK ceasefire broke down, Ankara has worked to strangle the YPG-PYD-run region. Its rapprochement with Moscow ...<|separator|>
  113. [113]
    [PDF] Superpower Hybrid Warfare in Syria - DTIC
    Abstract: This article examines superpower hybrid warfare in four parts. First, it provides an overview of hybrid warfare and its tactical, if controversial ...
  114. [114]
    Suspected U.S. coalition strikes kill 56 civilians in IS-held Syrian city
    Jul 19, 2016 · At least 56 civilians were killed on Tuesday in air strikes north of the besieged Islamic State-held city of Manbij in northern Syria, ...
  115. [115]
    Strategies of dominance and governance - Clingendael Institute
    Simpler 'fighting only' rebel groups are more likely to be inclined towards authoritarian governance. ... SDF has a tribal council and the regime has a ...