The mecA gene encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), a low-affinity transpeptidase that enables staphylococcal bacteria to maintain cell wall synthesis in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics, thereby conferring resistance to drugs such as methicillin, oxacillin, and cephalosporins.[1] Located on the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), a mobile genetic element ranging from 21 to 60 kilobases in size, mecA is acquired through horizontal gene transfer and integrates into the chromosome at a specific ccr site, allowing its dissemination across Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS).[2] The gene's expression is tightly regulated by the MecRI-MecI system, where MecRI acts as a transmembrane sensor that detects β-lactams and induces the proteolytic degradation of the repressor MecI, thereby derepressing mecA transcription.[3] Structurally, mecA spans approximately 2 kilobases and produces a 78-kDa PBP2a protein with an altered active site that exhibits over 1,000-fold reduced affinity for β-lactams compared to native PBPs.[4] First identified in the 1980s as the primary mediator of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), mecA has become ubiquitous in hospital- and community-acquired infections, contributing to the global rise of multidrug-resistant staphylococci and complicating treatment of skin, soft tissue, and bloodstream infections.[5] Variants of SCCmec carrying mecA are classified into multiple types (I–XIV) based on ccr and mec complex compositions, influencing the pathogen's virulence, host adaptation, and epidemic potential.[1] A homolog, mecC, shares about 70% identity with mecA and similarly imparts β-lactam resistance, though it is less common and often associated with livestock origins.[6]
Discovery and History
Emergence of methicillin resistance
Methicillin, a beta-lactamantibiotic, was introduced in 1959 specifically to address infections caused by penicillin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus.[7] This development aimed to restore efficacy against staphylococcal infections that had become a significant clinical challenge following the widespread emergence of penicillin resistance in the 1950s.[8] Genomic analyses of historical isolates have since revealed that the genetic basis for methicillin resistance, including mecA homologs, predates the clinical use of methicillin, with evidence from pre-antibiotic era strains dating back to the 1940s.[9]The first clinical reports of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) emerged in 1961 from hospitals in the United Kingdom, where resistant strains were isolated from patients, including those recovering from surgical procedures.[7] These initial cases, identified by Patricia Jevons and colleagues, marked the onset of resistance to this new antibiotic, with the single isolate among thousands tested highlighting its rarity at the time.[10] In the UK, MRSA remained uncommon through much of the 1960s, but its prevalence began to rise gradually in the late 1960s, reaching about 5% of S. aureus isolates by 1971.[10]By the 1970s and 1980s, MRSA had spread globally through nosocomial transmission in healthcare settings, becoming endemic in many hospitals.[11]In the United States, hospital epidemics intensified during the 1980s, with MRSA prevalence among S. aureus isolates increasing from 2.4% in 1975 to nearly 30% by 1991 across various hospital sizes.[12] This era saw the dominance of healthcare-associated MRSA strains, primarily transmitted within hospitals via patient contact, contaminated surfaces, and healthcare workers. Community-associated MRSA strains began emerging in the 1990s, particularly in the US, representing a shift from hospital-centric outbreaks.[13]In recognition of its ongoing threat and the scarcity of effective treatment options, the World Health Organization classified MRSA as a high-priority pathogen in its 2017 list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria requiring urgent research and development for new therapies.[14] This resistance is primarily mediated by the mecA gene, which encodes a penicillin-binding protein altered to evade beta-lactam antibiotics.[11]
Identification and characterization of mecA
The mecA gene, responsible for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, was first cloned in 1985 by Japanese researchers from a clinical MRSA isolate (strain TK784) using a closely linked tobramycin resistance gene as a selectable marker to identify and isolate the resistance determinant.[15] This cloning effort built on prior observations of heterogeneous resistance expression and aimed to pinpoint the genetic element conferring high-level β-lactam resistance. The cloned DNA fragment was introduced into methicillin-susceptible S. aureus strains, demonstrating that it could confer resistance, thus establishing its role as the primary mediator.Initial characterization revealed that mecA encodes a novel penicillin-binding protein (PBP), designated PBP2a or PBP2', with an apparent molecular mass of 76 kDa, distinct from native PBPs in susceptible strains due to its low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics. The nucleotide sequence of mecA was determined in 1987, confirming an open reading frame of 1,644 base pairs that predicts a protein with conserved motifs typical of PBPs but with key substitutions in the active site explaining its resistance properties.[16] Further studies in 1989 elucidated the gene's expression, showing that mecA transcription is inducible by β-lactams and regulated by a promoter region, with the protein detectable via immunoblotting in resistant cells.Confirmation of mecA's essential role came from early genetic disruption experiments in the early 1990s, where insertional inactivation using transposons or targeted mutagenesis in MRSA strains resulted in a significant loss of methicillin resistance, reducing minimum inhibitory concentrations by orders of magnitude and restoring susceptibility.[17] These knockouts also highlighted mecA's dependence on auxiliary factors for full resistance expression, as disrupted strains exhibited heterogeneous phenotypes under certain conditions.[17] In parallel, 1990s research solidified the link between mecA and PBPs by purifying and biochemically analyzing PBP2a, demonstrating its transpeptidase activity in peptidoglycan cross-linking even in the presence of high β-lactam concentrations.Key publications include the 1985 cloning report in the Journal of Bacteriology and the 1987 sequence analysis in FEBS Letters, which laid the foundational molecular description.[15][16] Subsequent 1990s work, such as the 1990 insertional inactivation study, provided causal evidence for mecA's function.[17] By the late 1990s, full annotation of the mecA-containing region was achieved through cloning of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), a mobile element integrating mecA with regulatory genes like mecI and mecR1, completing the initial genetic framework.[18]
Genetic Structure and Organization
Location within bacterial genome
The mecA gene is primarily located on the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), a mobile genetic element ranging from 20 to 60 kb in size that integrates into the Staphylococcus aureus chromosome at the orfX site, positioned near the origin of replication.[19][20] This integration site, known as attBSCC, ensures stable incorporation into the bacterial genome, facilitating the horizontal transfer of methicillin resistance across staphylococcal species.[21]SCCmec elements are classified into 15 major types (I–XV) by the International Working Group on the Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Elements, based on variations in their size, the cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) gene allotypes, and the mec gene complex structure.[22][23] For instance, SCCmec type II, characterized by a class A mec complex and ccrAB type 2, is prevalent in hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (HA-MRSA) strains, contributing to their multidrug resistance profiles in clinical settings.[24] The integration and mobility of SCCmec are mediated by site-specific recombination, where the element is flanked by 15-bp direct repeats (DR) at both ends; excision and reintegration are catalyzed by the recombinases encoded by ccrAB (for most types) or ccrC (for specific types like V and VIII).[25][19]The presence of mecA within SCCmec distinguishes methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), where mecA is absent, rendering MSSA strains fully susceptible to beta-lactam antibiotics.[26] Recent genomic analyses from 2025 have revealed co-adaptation between SCCmec and the host bacterial genome, involving gene-gene associations that enhance stable vertical inheritance of mecA across diverse staphylococcal lineages, beyond simple cassette mobility.[27]
Regulatory and associated elements
The mec complex, a key regulatory component of the methicillin resistance cassette in Staphylococcus aureus, comprises the mecA gene along with its repressor mecI and sensor mecR1, which are divergently transcribed from mecA.[28] MecI functions as a DNA-binding repressor that dimerizes and attaches to the operator sequence upstream of the mecA promoter, thereby inhibiting basal transcription of mecA under non-inducing conditions.[29] MecR1, a transmembrane protein with a metalloprotease-like domain, acts as a signal transducer that remains inactive in the absence of beta-lactam antibiotics.[30]The induction of mecA expression occurs through a beta-lactam-mediated signaling cascade involving MecR1. Beta-lactam antibiotics bind to the extracellular penicillin-binding domain of MecR1, triggering a conformational change that leads to its autocleavage and activation of its intracellular protease activity.[31] This activated MecR1 then facilitates the proteolytic degradation of MecI by host proteases, such as V8, relieving repression and allowing robust transcription of mecA.[32] The process ensures inducible resistance, with mecA expression levels increasing up to 100-fold upon exposure to subinhibitory beta-lactam concentrations.[33]The regulatory elements exhibit variability across mec classes (A–D), defined by differences in mecI and mecR1 structures within the mec complex. Class A, the predominant form in clinical S. aureus isolates, features full-length, functional mecI and mecR1 genes, enabling tight inducible control.[22] In contrast, class B contains a truncated mecR1 and a mecI derived from plasmid elements, class C lacks mecR1 but retains mecI, and class D has a partial deletion in mecR1, leading to constitutive or altered regulation of mecA.[34]Recent research as of 2025 has focused on developing inhibitors that target MecR1 to disrupt this induction pathway, potentially resensitizing MRSA to beta-lactams. For instance, propolis nanoparticles have shown synergistic effects with antibiotics by downregulating mecR1 expression, while DNAzyme-based approaches specifically cleave mecR1 mRNA to inhibit resistance gene activation.[35][36]
Protein Encoded by mecA
Structure of PBP2a
The penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), encoded by the mecA gene, is a 668-amino acid protein with a molecular weight of approximately 76 kDa. It exhibits a modular architecture, comprising an N-terminal domain that structurally resembles a transglycosylase but lacks the conserved catalytic motifs required for activity, rendering it inactive, and a C-terminal transpeptidase domain responsible for peptidoglycan cross-linking. This domain organization allows PBP2a to complement the essential functions of native PBPs in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).[37]The transpeptidase domain harbors the active site, characterized by conserved motifs including the catalytic serine (S403) of the SXXK triad (Ser403-Lys406), the SXN motif involving Ser462, and adjacent residues that form the penicillin-binding pocket. These elements confer low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics through a distinctive open conformation of the active site in the apo form, where the catalytic serine is displaced from its reactive position due to allosteric influences and structural distortions.[38] This conformational rigidity hinders efficient acylation by β-lactams while permitting substrate access for transpeptidation.[38]The three-dimensional structure of PBP2a was first elucidated in 2002 through X-ray crystallography at 1.8 Å resolution (PDB ID: 1VQQ), revealing the overall fold with the inactive N-terminal extension, a non-penicillin-binding subdomain, and the core transpeptidase domain featuring α-helices and β-sheets that enclose the active site.[39] This structure highlighted the open active site geometry in the ligand-free state and provided insights into resistance mechanisms. More recent room-temperature structural studies in 2025, employing serial femtosecond crystallography with X-ray free-electron lasers, have captured dynamic snapshots of PBP2a, confirming the open active site in the apo form and demonstrating enhanced flexibility in the allosteric and transpeptidase domains compared to cryogenic structures.[40]Naturally occurring variants of PBP2a, such as the E447K substitution in the transpeptidase domain, modify interactions within the active site vicinity, potentially altering substrate specificity for peptidoglycan precursors while sustaining β-lactam resistance levels.[41] PBP2a shares significant sequence and structural homology with the native PBP2 of S. aureus, particularly in the transpeptidase core, but is distinguished by an extended N-terminal region and a unique allosteric site approximately 60 Å from the active site that modulates conformational transitions essential for catalysis. Recent studies as of 2025 explore allosteric inhibitors targeting this remote site to overcome β-lactam resistance.[38][42]
Biochemical and functional properties
PBP2a, the protein encoded by the mecA gene, primarily functions as a transpeptidase enzyme that catalyzes the cross-linking of peptidoglycan strands in the bacterial cell wall. This activity involves the formation of amide bonds between the carboxyl group of a D-alanine residue in one pentapeptide and the amino group of another, utilizing D-Ala-D-Ala termini as the natural substrate.A defining biochemical property of PBP2a is its low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics, with IC50 values exceeding 1000 μM for methicillin, compared to less than 1 μM for native penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). This resistance arises from the enzyme's active site configuration, which hinders efficient acylation of the conserved serine residue. Additionally, PBP2a lacks intrinsic transglycosylase activity and thus depends on the native PBP2 for glycan chain elongation during peptidoglycan biosynthesis, ensuring coordinated cell wall assembly.[43][44]Recent 2025 profiling studies have identified PBP2a-positive particles in environmental staphylococci, including methicillin-resistant strains, primarily derived from vesicular structures exhibiting enhanced structural stability, which may contribute to persistence in non-clinical settings.[45]
The penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), encoded by mecA, confers resistance to β-lactam antibiotics by exhibiting low affinity for these drugs at its active site. β-Lactams mimic the natural D-Ala-D-Ala substrate of transpeptidases, forming a covalent acyl-enzyme intermediate through nucleophilic attack by the active site serine (Ser403); however, in PBP2a, the active site's closed conformation and structural features, including a narrow cleft and repositioned loops, distort this acylation, leading to rapid ejection or slow deacylation of the intermediate and preventing stable inhibition.[39][38]This evasion is facilitated by an allosteric regulatory site located approximately 60 Å from the active site, near Ser462 in the α2-α3 helix, which controls access to Ser403. Upon binding of certain ligands to this distal site, conformational changes propagate through the protein, opening the active site by repositioning the β3-β4 loop and increasing its volume, but for most β-lactams, this mechanism remains inaccessible or ineffective, maintaining resistance.[38][46]PBP2a demonstrates broad resistance to all classes of β-lactams, including penicillins (e.g., methicillin) and cephalosporins, with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for methicillin exceeding 256 μg/mL in mecA-positive strains compared to less than 4 μg/mL in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA).[47] However, it shows sensitivity to specific β-lactams like ceftaroline, a fifth-generation cephalosporin that binds both the allosteric site (interacting with Ser462) and active site, inducing the open conformation and facilitating effective acylation.[46]Experimental evidence from X-ray crystallography of the PBP2a-methicillin complex highlights the distorted geometry of the acyl-intermediate, with the β-lactam ring strained and the carbonyl oxygen mispositioned, underscoring the molecular basis for poor binding affinity.[39]Recent studies in 2025 have explored non-β-lactam inhibitors and adjuvants targeting the allosteric site to disrupt PBP2a's regulation, such as nucleoside derivatives and flavonoids that induce conformational changes to enhance β-lactam efficacy against resistant strains.[42][48]
Role in peptidoglycan synthesis
In the presence of β-lactam antibiotics, which inhibit the native penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) in Staphylococcus aureus, PBP2a encoded by mecA assumes the critical role of transpeptidase to maintain peptidoglycan synthesis and ensure cell wall integrity.[1] This acquired PBP enables the continuation of cell wall assembly by performing cross-linking reactions that are otherwise disrupted, allowing methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains to survive antibiotic exposure.[46]PBP2a specifically facilitates the transpeptidation step in the peptidoglycan biosynthesis pathway, where it cross-links pentapeptide stems featuring a pentaglycine (Gly5) interbridge characteristic of S. aureus muropeptides.[49] However, PBP2a does not operate in isolation; it cooperates with the native PBP2, which provides essential glycosyltransferase activity, to achieve complete peptidoglycan maturation during β-lactam challenge.[37] This partnership ensures efficient glycan chain elongation and cross-linking, albeit with reduced overall efficiency compared to native PBPs.Expression of mecA and PBP2a imposes a modest fitness cost on MRSA, manifesting as a 5-10% reduction in growth rate attributable to the enzyme's less efficient catalytic properties.[50] Heterologous expression of mecA in Escherichia coli has demonstrated that PBP2a retains transpeptidase functionality independently, underscoring its sufficiency for cross-linking in a simplified system.[51]Recent genomic analyses as of 2025 reveal that evolved MRSA strains exhibit co-adaptive mutations across the genome that mitigate these fitness costs, enhancing overall viability without compromising resistance.[52]
Detection Methods
Molecular techniques
Standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a cornerstone method for detecting the mecA gene, typically employing primers that target a conserved 310-base pair (bp) amplicon within the gene sequence to confirm methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates.[53] This approach allows for straightforward amplification and visualization via agarose gel electrophoresis, enabling rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) directly from bacterial colonies or clinical samples.[54]Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) extends this by providing not only qualitative detection but also quantification of mecA copy numbers, which is particularly useful in assessing bacterial load in complex samples such as blood or environmental wastewater.[55]Multiplex PCR assays enhance efficiency by simultaneously detecting mecA alongside markers for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) types or other resistance genes, such as vanA in enterococci, facilitating comprehensive genotyping in a single reaction.[56] For instance, these assays can amplify mecA together with ccrAB recombinase genes to distinguish SCCmec subtypes I through V, aiding in epidemiological tracking of MRSA strains.[57] Similarly, multiplex formats targeting mecA and vanA enable co-detection of beta-lactam and vancomycin resistance, critical for mixed infections or surveillance in healthcare settings.[58]Next-generation sequencing (NGS), including whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and targeted amplicon sequencing, offers high-resolution analysis of mecA variants and associated SCCmec cassettes, revealing polymorphisms and integration sites that standard PCR might overlook.[59] WGS, in particular, has been instrumental in identifying novel SCCmec types and subtypes, such as type XIII, by mapping the full genetic context of mecA within the bacterial chromosome.[60]As of 2025, advanced nucleic acid amplification techniques have emerged for rapid, point-of-care detection of mecA. CRISPR-Cas12a-based systems, often coupled with recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), enable isothermal, sequence-specific cleavage and fluorescence reporting for mecA in under 1.5 hours, suitable for resource-limited settings.[61]Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) provides another field-deployable option, using multiple primers to amplify mecA at a constant temperature without thermal cycling, achieving results comparable to PCR in sensitivity for MRSA screening.[62]These molecular techniques generally exhibit high analytical performance, with PCR-based mecA detection demonstrating sensitivity and specificity exceeding 95% for MRSA confirmation in clinical isolates.[63] False negatives are infrequent but can occur in strains with low mecA expression or sequence variations, underscoring the value of confirmatory sequencing in ambiguous cases.[64]
Phenotypic and biochemical assays
Phenotypic and biochemical assays provide indirect evidence of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by assessing bacterial growth inhibition or protein expression in response to beta-lactam antibiotics, without targeting the gene directly. These methods are essential for routine laboratory identification of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), particularly in clinical settings where molecular techniques may not be immediately available. They rely on standardized protocols from organizations like the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) to ensure reproducibility and accuracy.The cefoxitindisk diffusion test is a widely used phenotypic method for detecting mecA-mediated resistance, employing a 30 μg cefoxitin disk on Mueller-Hinton agar inoculated with S. aureus. A zone of inhibition ≤21 mm indicates resistance, as cefoxitin effectively induces mecA expression and PBP2a production, outperforming oxacillin disks in sensitivity. This breakpoint aligns with CLSI guidelines, while EUCAST specifies ≤22 mm for resistance, both confirming MRSA with high specificity (>99%) in routine testing.Broth microdilution remains the reference phenotypic method for determining minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of oxacillin or methicillin, performed in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 2% NaCl to mimic physiological conditions. An oxacillin MIC ≥4 μg/mL classifies the isolate as resistant, reflecting mecA-driven beta-lactam tolerance, though this test may miss heterogeneous populations with subpopulations below the breakpoint. CLSI endorses this as the gold standard for MIC-based susceptibility, with results typically available within 24 hours.[65]Biochemical confirmation via latex agglutination targets the PBP2a protein encoded by mecA, using monoclonal antibodies bound to latex particles that aggregate upon binding to cell wall extracts from S. aureus colonies. Commercial kits, such as the Oxoid PBP2' test or Slidex MRSA Detection, yield results in 5-10 minutes with sensitivity and specificity exceeding 97%, serving as a rapid adjunct to phenotypic tests. This assay directly detects the altered penicillin-binding protein responsible for resistance, enhancing diagnostic confidence when integrated with disk diffusion or MIC results.Etest strips offer a quantitative gradientdiffusion alternative for precise MIC determination, applying plastic strips with exponential antibiotic concentrations (e.g., oxacillin 0.016-256 μg/mL) to agar plates. They are particularly valuable for identifying heterogeneous resistance in mecA-positive strains, where subpopulations may exhibit variable expression, providing MIC readings via ellipse intersection with >95% essential agreement to broth microdilution. This method facilitates tailored therapy decisions, especially in complex cases.Despite their utility, these assays have limitations, including false negatives in low-level mecA expressers or "stealth" MRSA variants with oxacillin MICs ≤4 μg/mL but confirmed mecA presence. Population analysis profiles (PAP) address this by plating serial dilutions on agar with increasing oxacillin concentrations to reveal subpopulation growth curves, distinguishing heterogeneous resistance via area under the curve calculations, though it is labor-intensive and not routine. As of 2025, updated CLSI and EUCAST guidelines incorporate assays for ceftaroline susceptibility in mecA-positive strains, recommending broth microdilution or Etest for MIC determination (susceptible ≤1 μg/mL), as ceftaroline retains activity against most MRSA despite PBP2a, aiding in monitoring emerging resistance patterns.
Evolutionary Aspects
Ancestral origins
The mecA gene, responsible for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, traces its evolutionary roots to homologues in non-pathogenic, coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), particularly Staphylococcus sciuri, a commensal species commonly associated with wild animals and environmental niches. This proposed ancestor shares approximately 80% nucleotide sequence identity with the mecA gene found in clinical MRSA isolates, indicating a close genetic relationship that predates the emergence of resistance in pathogenic strains. The acquisition of this homologue by S. aureus occurred through horizontal gene transfer, transforming a native chromosomal element into a potent resistance determinant.[66]Genetic and phylogenetic evidence suggests that mecA emerged in the mid-20th century, potentially in the pre-antibiotic era, prior to the first reported MRSA cases in 1961. Recent studies indicate that the resistance mechanism evolved as a co-adaptation of S. aureus to colonization of dermatophyte-infected hedgehogs, involving responses to host antimicrobial peptides rather than beta-lactam exposure.[9] Studies from the 1990s identified mecA-like genes in additional CoNS species, including Staphylococcus fleurettii and Staphylococcus vitulinus, which harbor nearly identical sequences integrated into their core genomes rather than mobile elements. Phylogenetic tree reconstructions based on these homologues consistently position the mecA origin within the CoNS clade, emphasizing its deep evolutionary history in non-pathogenic staphylococci before adaptation to S. aureus.[67][68][69]The mecA homologue was mobilized from CoNS to S. aureus via the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), a genomic island that facilitates interspecies transfer through bacteriophages or plasmids, enabling the cassette's integration near the orfX site in the S. aureus chromosome. Evidence from genomic analyses reinforces S. sciuri as a close progenitor through conserved flanking regions. This transfer mechanism underscores how environmental CoNS served as a reservoir for resistance genes, setting the stage for mecA's role in clinical pathogens.[70]
Spread and genetic diversity
The mecA gene, responsible for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus, primarily spreads through horizontal gene transfer mediated by the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec), a mobile genetic element that integrates into the bacterial chromosome at the orfX site near the origin of replication. This integration is facilitated by cassette chromosome recombinase (ccr) genes, such as ccrAB or ccrC, enabling efficient dissemination among staphylococcal species. Bacteriophage-mediated transduction and natural transformation in biofilms have been demonstrated as key mechanisms, with transformation efficiencies up to 10^{-7} in certain conditions, allowing inter- and intraspecies transfer of SCCmec elements. Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), particularly S. epidermidis, serve as major reservoirs, transferring SCCmec to S. aureus in hospital and community settings, contributing to the emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains globally since the 1960s.[71][19][2]The spread of mecA has transitioned from predominantly hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) in the 1970s–1990s to community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) since the late 1990s, driven by smaller, more mobile SCCmec types that enhance bacterial fitness and virulence without excessive metabolic burden. For instance, SCCmec type IV, associated with CA-MRSA, has been detected in up to 30% of community isolates in low-prevalence regions, reflecting antibiotic selection pressure and clonal expansion within major lineages like clonal complex 8 (CC8) and CC30. Global surveillance indicates mecA dissemination across continents, with rising prevalence in livestock-associated MRSA via zoonotic transmission, underscoring the role of environmental and animal reservoirs in amplifying resistance.[2][71][23]Genetic diversity of mecA is largely embodied in the structural variations of SCCmec elements, with 15 officially recognized types (I–XV) as of 2025, classified by combinations of the mec complex (classes A–E, where class A contains mecA with regulators mecR1 and mecI) and ccr complex (e.g., ccrAB1–4, ccrC1–2). Type I–III predominate in HA-MRSA, carrying additional resistance genes like those for aminoglycosides, while types IV–V are common in CA-MRSA and exhibit higher mobility due to their compact size (20–24 kb). Variants include mecC (61–63% amino acid identity to mecA), prevalent in ~3% of European MRSA and associated with bovine sources, and rare mecB in Macrococcus species, highlighting evolutionary divergence from ancestral genes in S. sciuri or S. fleurettii. In CoNS, diversity is greater, with over 20 subtypes reported, including novel B4 in S. epidermidis, facilitating ongoing HGT to S. aureus and increasing multidrug resistance profiles. Regional studies reveal clonal specificity, such as SCCmec III dominance (up to 60%) in Asian hospital isolates, reflecting local adaptation and multiple independent acquisitions (over 20 documented in S. aureus).[23][72][73]