Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Median sternotomy

Median sternotomy is a surgical incision made along the midline of the sternum (breastbone) to provide direct access to the heart, mediastinum, and adjacent thoracic structures, serving as the gold standard approach in cardiac and certain thoracic surgeries. First proposed by Herbert M. N. Milton in 1897 and reintroduced by Oscar C. Julian and colleagues in 1957, it enables precise visualization and manipulation during procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting, valve repairs, and congenital heart defect corrections. The procedure typically begins with the patient positioned under general , followed by a vertical incision from the sternal notch to the , approximately 6 to 8 inches long. The is then divided longitudinally using a specialized saw, with careful retraction to avoid injury to underlying pleura, , or vascular structures, allowing the surgeon to perform the necessary cardiac or thoracic intervention. Closure involves approximating the sternal edges and securing them with 4 to 8 wires, often supplemented by layered suturing of the soft tissues and . This technique offers advantages including rapid execution, excellent exposure of all cardiac chambers and major vessels, and low rates of intraoperative complications, contributing to its widespread adoption since the advent of open-heart surgery in the mid-20th century. Indications for median sternotomy encompass a broad range of conditions, primarily acquired and congenital heart diseases requiring open-heart procedures, as well as mediastinal tumor resections, bilateral lung surgeries, and interventions on the lower trachea or main bronchi. In the United States alone, over 700,000 sternotomies for cardiac and thoracic procedures are performed annually, underscoring its role in treating ischemic heart disease and other cardiac pathologies. While minimally invasive alternatives exist for select cases, median sternotomy remains preferred for its comprehensive access and proven long-term outcomes. Despite its efficacy, median sternotomy carries risks, including hardware-related issues such as sternal wire (incidence 2–3%) or migration, osseous complications like (0.5–3%) or (up to 13%), and soft-tissue problems including (3–6%), mediastinitis, or sternal (1–5%). Superficial wound infections occur in 3–8% of cases, while deep sternal wound infections (mediastinitis) affect 1–3%, with mortality rates up to 10–35% in severe instances. generally spans 6–8 weeks, involving sternal precautions to avoid heavy lifting (>10 pounds) or strenuous arm movements, with most patients resuming after about one month and full activities by 8–12 weeks post-surgery.

Overview

Definition and Anatomy

A median sternotomy is defined as a longitudinal incision along the midline of the sternum, dividing the bone to grant access to the mediastinum, with particular emphasis on the heart and great vessels. This approach is widely regarded as the gold standard for accessing central thoracic structures due to its established efficacy and low complication rates. The sternum, or breastbone, is a flat, elongated structure in the anterior thorax composed of three primary parts: the manubrium superiorly, the body centrally, and the xiphoid process inferiorly. The manubrium articulates with the clavicles via the sternoclavicular joints and with the costal cartilages of the first two ribs, while the body connects to the costal cartilages of ribs 2 through 7, and the xiphoid process may attach to the seventh or eighth rib's cartilage. Beneath the sternum lies the mediastinum, which encompasses vital contents including the heart encased in the pericardium, remnants of the thymus gland (often reduced to fatty tissue in adults), and major vessels such as the ascending aorta, superior and inferior vena cavae. The rationale for the midline approach stems from the sternum's central anatomical position, which facilitates broad exposure of mediastinal organs while minimizing disruption to surrounding respiratory muscles, in contrast to lateral incisions that require dividing larger muscle groups like the latissimus dorsi and serratus anterior. This positioning allows for efficient visualization and manipulation of thoracic contents without compromising chest wall integrity to the same extent as alternative approaches. Variations in incision length adapt to specific anatomical needs: a full median sternotomy extends from the sternal notch to the for comprehensive access, whereas partial variants, such as an upper hemisternotomy (approximately 8-10 cm from the sternal notch to the angle of ) or lower hemisternotomy, target superior or inferior structures respectively. It is commonly employed in to reach these mediastinal elements.

Historical Context

The median sternotomy was first proposed by Herbert Milton in 1897 as a vertical incision through the sternum to provide access to the thoracic cavity, initially demonstrated in experimental animals and applied in human cases for excising tuberculous mediastinal nodes. This approach offered superior exposure to the heart and great vessels compared to lateral thoracotomies but saw limited early adoption due to the era's technical constraints, including the absence of effective ventilators and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), which restricted safe intracardiac interventions. Prior to the , the procedure's use remained sporadic and primarily confined to non-cardiac thoracic applications, such as and resection of anterior mediastinal masses, as high postoperative risks—exacerbated by the lack of modern antibiotics—posed significant threats to patient survival. The introduction of penicillin and other antibiotics in the began to mitigate these concerns, but without CPB, median sternotomy was not viable for most cardiac surgeries, leading to its underutilization in favor of less invasive or alternative incisions. A transformative shift occurred in 1953 when John H. Gibbon, Jr., achieved the first successful open-heart surgery using extracorporeal circulation on a with an , enabling direct visualization and repair of intracardiac structures. This milestone coincided with the revival of median sternotomy for cardiac procedures, as Owen C. Julian and colleagues detailed its advantages in a 1957 publication, emphasizing its rapid access, minimal blood loss, and optimal exposure during CPB-supported operations, which propelled it to prominence in . Post-1960s advancements in , prophylactic antibiotics, and sterile techniques standardized median sternotomy as the preferred incision for the majority of open-heart procedures, dramatically reducing infection rates and improving outcomes. Mid-20th-century innovations, such as the introduction of wire cerclage for sternal closure, enhanced stability and minimized dehiscence, further solidifying its reliability. By the , it became routinely integrated into coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the era's burgeoning procedure for ischemic heart disease, with the technique's adoption accelerating alongside the procedure's widespread clinical use following René Favaloro's refinements in 1968. The 1990s marked an evolution toward minimally invasive variants, including partial sternotomies, which shortened incisions while preserving access for select cardiac interventions.

Indications

Cardiac Surgery Applications

Median sternotomy serves as the primary surgical access for , which is the most common indication, addressing ischemic heart disease in cases of left main stem or triple vessel . It is also essential for aortic and repairs or replacements, particularly in severe with a valve area less than 1 cm² or significant with a greater than 7 mm. Additionally, this approach is indicated for correcting congenital heart defects such as atrial septal defects, ventricular septal defects, and in older children and adults. represents another key application, enabling access for end-stage patients unresponsive to medical therapy. The rationale for employing median sternotomy in these procedures lies in its provision of unobstructed visualization and access to all four heart chambers, the great vessels, and the , which is critical for surgeries requiring . This incision facilitates the integration of circulation systems, allowing safe temporary cessation of cardiac activity during intricate repairs. In CABG specifically, it enables optimal exposure for harvesting the internal mammary artery as a graft conduit, enhancing long-term patency rates. Patient selection for median sternotomy typically includes adults and older children with stable , determined through preoperative imaging such as and computed , alongside risk stratification using tools like the Society of Thoracic Surgeons () score or EUROScore. Relative contraindications encompass severe , , prior chest , and , which may elevate complication risks and prompt consideration of alternative minimally invasive approaches.

Non-Cardiac Thoracic Applications

Median sternotomy provides central access to the and bilateral thoracic structures, making it suitable for various non-cardiac thoracic procedures where wide exposure is required without compromising pulmonary mechanics. Although primarily associated with , it is employed in select non-cardiac contexts to address pathologies involving the , , airways, and lungs. Key indications include for , where median sternotomy facilitates complete en bloc resection of the and surrounding mediastinal tissue, as demonstrated in randomized trials showing improved clinical outcomes compared to medical therapy alone. It is also used for mediastinal tumor resections, particularly anterior compartment masses such as thymomas, allowing for safe removal of large lesions through direct visualization and minimal manipulation of adjacent structures. For tracheal or bronchial surgeries, such as carinal resection or intrathoracic tracheal tumor excision, the approach offers optimal exposure while preserving integrity and blood supply. In select lung procedures, like bilateral pulmonary metastasectomy, median sternotomy enables simultaneous access to both hemithoraces for wedge resections or lobectomies, particularly in patients with multiple metastases. The advantages of median sternotomy in these non-cardiac applications include symmetrical access to bilateral structures, which reduces the need for repositioning or additional incisions during bilateral procedures. Compared to lateral , it preserves lung function by avoiding unilateral collapse and retraction, resulting in less postoperative pulmonary decline and shorter hospital stays. Specific scenarios where median sternotomy is indicated include of mediastinal hematomas, where rapid evacuation via this central incision can address life-threatening compression without delaying intervention. The role of median sternotomy in non-cardiac thoracic surgery has evolved, becoming less common with the rise of (VATS) and robotic alternatives for and tumor resections, which offer reduced morbidity.

Surgical Procedure

Preoperative Preparation

Preoperative preparation for median sternotomy begins with a thorough assessment to evaluate anatomical and physiological suitability, particularly in where this incision is most commonly employed. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) or (MRI) are utilized to delineate thoracic , identify potential adhesions from prior surgeries, and assess the proximity of cardiac structures to the , which is crucial for risk stratification in procedures like coronary artery bypass grafting or valve repair. may be indicated to map coronary anatomy and graft positions if redo surgery is anticipated, while pulmonary tests are performed to gauge respiratory reserve, especially in patients with underlying lung disease. Risk stratification tools, such as the EuroSCORE II, are applied to quantify and morbidity, incorporating factors like age, comorbidities, and surgical urgency to guide and . Optimization protocols aim to mitigate modifiable risk factors and enhance patient resilience prior to incision. is recommended at least four weeks before to reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and surgical site s, with hazardous alcohol use screening and abstinence similarly advised. involves preoperative hemoglobin A1c measurement and glycemic control to levels below 7-8% where feasible, as elevated values correlate with increased and renal risks. Antibiotic prophylaxis, typically with administered within 60 minutes of incision, is standard to prevent sternal wound infections, with added for colonization after nasal screening. For malnourished patients, identified via low preoperative levels (<3.0 g/dL), nutritional support through oral supplements or enteral feeding is implemented to correct deficiencies and improve wound healing outcomes. Prehabilitation programs, including exercise and inspiratory muscle training, are considered for frail or deconditioned individuals to optimize functional status. Anesthesia considerations emphasize hemodynamic stability and organ protection during the procedure. General endotracheal anesthesia is induced, often with a double-lumen tube to facilitate lung isolation and one-lung ventilation if non-cardiac thoracic access is required. Invasive monitoring is established pre-induction, including radial arterial lines for continuous blood pressure tracking and central venous catheters for fluid management; a Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter may be placed in high-risk cases to monitor cardiac output and pulmonary pressures. Patients are allowed clear liquids up to two hours preoperatively in low-aspiration-risk scenarios to minimize dehydration, and preoperative carbohydrate loading can be considered to attenuate insulin resistance. For those on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, discontinuation follows guideline-based protocols, with bridging if thrombotic risk is elevated. Surgical planning involves meticulous coordination to ensure procedural efficiency and safety. The midline incision line is marked along the sternum under sterile conditions, with potential saphenous vein harvest sites identified and prepared if bypass grafting is planned. A multidisciplinary team briefing reviews the cardiopulmonary bypass setup, including cannulation strategy (e.g., peripheral access for redo cases to avoid sternal injury), blood conservation measures like tranexamic acid administration, and contingency plans for massive bleeding or hemodynamic instability. Preoperative anemia is addressed through iron supplementation or erythropoietin to target hemoglobin above 13 g/dL in men and 12 g/dL in women, reducing transfusion needs. Transesophageal echocardiography is routinely employed for real-time anatomical confirmation in moderate- to high-risk patients.

Intraoperative Technique

The median sternotomy begins with the patient positioned supine and the surgical field prepared under sterile conditions. A vertical midline incision is made using a scalpel, extending from the sternal notch to the xiphoid process, typically 20-25 cm in length to provide adequate access to the mediastinum. This incision is deepened through the subcutaneous tissue and pectoralis major fascia using electrocautery at low power to achieve hemostasis and minimize tissue trauma. The midline is identified by the decussation of the pectoral muscle fibers and palpation of the sternal edges to ensure precise alignment. Once the periosteum is exposed, it is incised longitudinally along the sternum's midline using a scalpel or electrocautery, followed by elevation with a on both sides to protect the underlying pleura, pericardium, and internal mammary arteries. The sternum is then divided using an or pneumatic sternal saw, starting from the manubrium downward or in the reverse direction based on surgeon preference, with the patient's ventilation paused to reduce the risk of pleural injury. The saw blade is directed medially, pulling upward to avoid damaging adjacent structures such as the innominate vein, brachiocephalic artery, or ectatic aorta; in redo procedures or pediatric cases, a finer is preferred to minimize bone loss. At the xiphoid, the linea alba is incised, and any attachments to the diaphragm are divided digitally or with scissors, while clipping or cauterizing the transverse thoracic vein to control bleeding. Following division, a Finochietto retractor is inserted into the sternal edges and gradually opened to expose the mediastinum, starting inferiorly to prevent brachial plexus strain or sternal fracture, particularly in osteoporotic patients. Thymic remnants are excised or divided with electrocautery if they obstruct access, and the pericardium is opened longitudinally if needed for initial exposure, though it may be left intact initially in some procedures. Hemostasis is secured using pinpoint electrocautery for soft tissue bleeding and bone wax sparingly on sternal marrow to avoid infection risk, with towels placed along the edges for additional control. This exposure facilitates immediate integration with the core procedure, such as cannulation of the ascending aorta and right atrial appendage for cardiopulmonary bypass, which is performed under direct visualization once the mediastinum is fully retracted. Variations include partial sternotomies, such as a J-shaped lower sternotomy for isolated mitral valve procedures, where the incision curves laterally at the fourth intercostal space using the same saw technique to limit access while preserving cosmesis.

Closure and Immediate Postoperative Steps

Following the completion of the surgical procedure, closure of the median sternotomy begins with the approximation of the sternal edges using stainless steel wires, typically 4 to 8 in total arranged in a figure-of-eight pattern to ensure stable fixation and minimize movement during healing. Layered closure of the soft tissues follows, employing absorbable sutures for the periosteum, muscle layers, and subcutaneous tissue, with the skin closed using subcuticular sutures or staples to promote optimal wound healing. Hemodynamic stabilization is achieved by gradually weaning the patient from cardiopulmonary bypass, administering protamine to reverse the effects of heparin anticoagulation, and placing temporary epicardial pacing wires if atrial or ventricular pacing is required postoperatively. These steps help restore normal cardiac rhythm and circulation prior to leaving the operating room. Immediate postoperative checks include the insertion of chest tubes into the mediastinum and pleural spaces for drainage of potential blood or fluid accumulations, as well as verification of hemostasis through to detect any residual bleeding or valve dysfunction. In high-risk patients, such as those with , variations like rigid plate fixation may be employed instead of wires to enhance sternal stability and reduce dehiscence risk.

Complications

Intraoperative and Early Postoperative Risks

During median sternotomy, intraoperative risks include significant bleeding, often from injury to the internal mammary artery, which can arise during dissection or mobilization of the vessel for grafting. This complication occurs in approximately 5% of cardiac surgery cases, potentially necessitating emergent re-exploration if blood loss exceeds 500 mL in 30 minutes or 7 mL/kg in 1 hour. Sternal fracture may also develop during the sawing phase, particularly in patients with underlying osteoporosis, leading to instability and requiring immediate wire fixation to ensure proper approximation. Air embolism represents another acute hazard during exposure of the mediastinum, where negative pressure gradients allow air entry into venous structures, with risks heightened in off-pump procedures or during cardiopulmonary bypass initiation. In the early postoperative period (0-48 hours), complications such as mediastinitis from intraoperative contamination can emerge, with deep sternal wound infection rates ranging from 1-2% in standard cases, though overall sternotomy complications affect 0.5-5% of patients. Cardiac tamponade due to retrosternal hematoma formation compresses the heart, occurring in about 5% of initial operations and demanding prompt surgical evacuation via re-sternotomy. Arrhythmias, including and ventricular tachycardia, frequently arise post-bypass, with incidences up to 40% for , often triggered by inflammatory responses or electrolyte shifts. Prevention of these risks emphasizes meticulous intraoperative techniques, such as atraumatic dissection to avoid vascular injury and careful saw use with preoperative bone density assessment. Strict sterile protocols, including chlorhexidine showers and intranasal mupirocin, reduce contamination risks, while prophylactic topical vancomycin applied to sternal edges lowers deep infection rates by up to fivefold in high-risk patients. Hemodynamic monitoring with a Swan-Ganz catheter aids in detecting early tamponade or arrhythmia precursors by tracking pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac output during and immediately after surgery.

Late Complications and Management

Late complications of median sternotomy, occurring weeks to years after surgery, primarily involve sternal healing failures and hardware-related issues, with an overall incidence of sternal wound complications ranging from 0.5% to 5%. Sternal nonunion, defined as failure of bony fusion more than one year postoperatively, affects approximately 0.5% to 3% of patients and manifests as persistent instability, often presenting with chronic pain or a palpable sternal click during movement. Sternal dehiscence, the partial or complete separation of the sternal edges, occurs in 1% to 3% of cases and may lead to wound drainage or exposed hardware if associated with late infection. Chronic pain from nerve entrapment or musculoskeletal strain is a common sequela of nonunion, while wire migration or fracture, seen in 2% to 3% of patients, can cause tissue erosion or, rarely, penetration into adjacent structures like the aorta. Diagnosis of these late complications relies on a combination of clinical evaluation and imaging. Patients often report anterior chest pain exacerbated by activity or a clicking sensation, with physical examination revealing sternal instability or tenderness. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is the primary imaging modality, demonstrating sternal gapping greater than 4 mm in nonunion (with well-corticated edges) or focal discontinuities in fractured wires, while also assessing for soft-tissue involvement or erosion. For suspected late infection or osteomyelitis, bone scintigraphy with technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can identify increased uptake indicative of active inflammation. Management strategies prioritize conservative approaches for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic cases, escalating to surgical intervention based on severity. For minor sternal instability or nonunion without infection, bracing and pain management with analgesics or physical therapy may suffice, though evidence for long-term efficacy is limited. Symptomatic nonunion, particularly with chronic pain, typically requires surgical revision involving thorough debridement of nonviable bone and fibrous tissue, followed by rigid fixation using plates (e.g., titanium sternal plating systems like or KLS Martin), wires in a Robicsek weave configuration, or cables, which achieve union rates exceeding 90% in reported series. Muscle flap coverage, such as pectoralis major advancement, is often incorporated to enhance stability and soft-tissue healing. For dehiscence with drainage or infection, initial debridement and vacuum-assisted closure () therapy promote granulation and control contamination, bridging to definitive rewiring or plating, with studies showing reduced mortality and complication rates compared to primary closure alone. Wire migration or fracture is managed conservatively with monitoring if asymptomatic, but erosion necessitates prompt surgical removal and repair to prevent vascular or cardiac injury. Key risk factors for these late complications include patient-related elements such as diabetes mellitus, obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m²), , and , which impair and increase mechanical stress on the . Surgical factors, notably bilateral internal mammary harvesting during coronary , elevate risk by disrupting sternal blood supply, with odds ratios for up to 2.5 times higher in such cases. Advanced age (>60 years) and technical errors like paramedian incision or inadequate initial closure further contribute to instability and delayed healing. Early recognition of these risks allows for preventive measures, such as optimized glycemic control and selective use of bilateral in high-risk patients.

Recovery and Outcomes

Postoperative Care Protocols

Following median sternotomy, patients typically require intensive monitoring in the (ICU) for 24-48 hours to assess hemodynamic stability and detect early complications, though Enhanced Recovery After Surgery () protocols may facilitate shorter stays in select cases. , including , , and , are continuously monitored, alongside chest tube output to evaluate for excessive (generally <100-200 mL/hour initially). Transthoracic or transesophageal is routinely performed to assess cardiac function, valve integrity, and ventricular performance, particularly in cases of suspected low . Pain management employs a multimodal approach to minimize opioid use and facilitate recovery, as emphasized in ERAS guidelines. Intravenous paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen, are administered intraoperatively and continued postoperatively unless contraindicated by renal impairment or bleeding risk. Opioids like morphine are reserved for breakthrough pain, often delivered via patient-controlled analgesia pumps during the initial ICU phase. Adjuncts such as intravenous magnesium or dexmedetomidine may be considered for enhanced analgesia, while regional techniques like parasternal blocks provide targeted relief to the sternal incision site. Mobility protocols emphasize progressive sternal precautions to promote while preventing respiratory complications, with current guidelines (as of 2024) favoring individualized approaches over traditional strict restrictions. Starting on postoperative day 1, patients are encouraged to sit upright and dangle legs at the bedside, progressing to assisted ambulation by day 2, using strategies like "Keep Your Move in the Tube" (arms close to body for load-bearing activities, unrestricted non-load-bearing motion). Lifting is limited to 5 kg (11 pounds) bilaterally initially, with early upper extremity exercises encouraged to avoid . Incentive is initiated immediately to encourage deep breathing and prevent , with patients performing 10 breaths hourly while awake. Wound care involves daily inspections of the sternal incision for signs of , such as or , with sterile dressing changes as needed. Prophylactic antibiotics, typically or for methicillin-resistant coverage, are continued until chest tubes are removed, usually within 1-2 days if output is minimal and no signs of are present. Discharge criteria generally include stable without inotropic support, adequate control on oral medications, independent ambulation for short distances, and removal of chest tubes, typically achieved by postoperative day 4-7 for uncomplicated cases, potentially earlier with implementation. Patients are educated on sternal protection and follow-up appointments before leaving the hospital.

Long-Term Prognosis and Rehabilitation

The long-term prognosis following median sternotomy, particularly in elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), is generally favorable, with 1-year survival rates exceeding 95% in low-risk cohorts (as of studies through 2024). Five-year survival typically ranges from 80% to 95%, influenced by patient-specific factors such as advanced age, , renal insufficiency, and other comorbidities, which independently elevate mortality risk. Approximately 80-90% of patients return to baseline functional status within 3 months postoperatively, as measured by improvements in health-related quality-of-life scores like the , where most subscales show significant recovery from preoperative deficits. Rehabilitation after median sternotomy is structured in phases to promote sternal healing while minimizing complications, incorporating principles for early and progressive activity. Phase 1 (inpatient to early outpatient, starting within 1-2 weeks post-discharge) emphasizes gentle exercises such as walking and progressive upper-body movements with individualized sternal precautions, with supervised (CR) initiation as early as 2 weeks post-surgery to enhance cardiovascular endurance and prevent deconditioning. Phase 2 (up to 3-6 months) involves strengthening exercises, including resistance training at moderate intensity (e.g., 8-10 whole-body movements), while monitoring sternal stability and avoiding high-risk activities until cleared. Ongoing monitoring includes follow-up imaging, such as chest or computed at 6-8 weeks, to assess sternal union, with significant progress toward in most uncomplicated cases by this time and full union typically by 12 weeks ( rates <2%). Psychological support is integral, addressing sternal pain and potential posttraumatic stress through interventions like cognitive-behavioral therapy, as elevated distress predicts poorer adherence to . Quality-of-life outcomes demonstrate minimal long-term respiratory impairment, with 1-year pulmonary function tests showing only slight declines in static and dynamic despite the surgical incision's impact on chest wall . Return-to-work rates reach approximately 70% by 3 months, varying by occupation and preoperative status, with higher rates among those without heavy manual labor demands.

Alternatives and Variations

Minimally Invasive Alternatives

Partial sternotomy variants, such as upper mini-sternotomy, offer a less invasive option for surgery, involving a smaller incision of 4-8 from the sternal notch to the second, third, or fourth . This approach preserves chest wall stability, leading to reduced postoperative pain and faster recovery compared to full median sternotomy. Patients undergoing upper mini-sternotomy typically experience shorter stays (1.8 days versus 2.4 days) and overall hospital stays (median 6 days versus 8 days). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) serves as a minimally invasive alternative to median sternotomy for select thymectomies, particularly in early-stage and cases, using bilateral or unilateral approaches with endoscopic visualization to minimize tissue trauma. VATS reduces intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and respiratory complications while providing better and shorter hospital stays than sternotomy. It achieves comparable oncological outcomes and survival rates, making it suitable for patients where extensive exposure is not required. Robotic-assisted mitral valve repair via mini-thoracotomy employs systems like the da Vinci to perform repairs through a small right chest incision, avoiding full sternal division and enabling precise endoscopic manipulation. This technique demonstrates advantages over conventional sternotomy, including lower rates of and reduced time to return to normal activities (35 days versus 56 days). It is particularly effective for degenerative in low-risk patients, with comparable long-term durability. Endoscopic approaches eliminate sternotomy entirely in suitable candidates. (TAVR) delivers a prosthetic via femoral or alternative vascular access for severe , reducing respiratory complications and avoiding open surgery; as of 2020, it is approved for low surgical risk patients. Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) treat stable through catheter-based stenting, offering lower stroke risk and suitability for higher-risk patients compared to bypass grafting via sternotomy. These alternatives generally result in shorter stays (3-7 days versus 5-11 days for sternotomy) and lower risks (e.g., 1.0% infections versus 6.6%), though they are limited to simpler anatomical cases without multivessel or complex .

Other Surgical Approaches

Lateral serves as a primary alternative open incision for accessing specific thoracic structures when median sternotomy is not ideal. The posterolateral thoracotomy, involving an incision along the posterior axillary line between the fourth and sixth intercostal spaces, provides excellent exposure for unilateral resections, such as lobectomies or pneumonectomies, and is considered the gold standard for many general thoracic procedures due to its versatility in reaching posterior mediastinal and hilar regions. In contrast, the anterior thoracotomy, typically performed through the second or third along the anterior axillary line, is utilized for surgeries involving the , including root replacements in cases complicated by prior midline scarring, offering direct access while avoiding dense adhesions. The clamshell incision, also known as bilateral anterior , combines two anterior connected by a transverse sternotomy across the fourth intercostal spaces, creating a "clamshell" effect upon retraction. This approach is particularly suited for extensive bilateral thoracic access, such as in bilateral pulmonary metastasectomies or double , where wide exposure of both hemithoraces and the anterior is required without relying on midline division. The incision, or L-shaped thoracotomy, involves an incision from the midclavicular line to the sternal notch, along the midline to the fourth , and laterally to the midaxillary line, incorporating a partial upper median sternotomy to form a flap for superior retraction. It is indicated for aneurysms of the descending or , particularly those extending to the cervicothoracic junction, allowing comprehensive visualization and manipulation of arch branches and proximal descending segments in a single field. Selection of these approaches over median sternotomy typically occurs in reoperations where midline adhesions or scarring increase risks of during resternotomy, in pediatric cases involving cervicothoracic tumors requiring broad , or when anatomical constraints limit central access. However, these incisions generally result in greater postoperative and functional compared to median sternotomy, often leading to extended periods due to intercostal muscle disruption and higher rates of chronic discomfort.

References

  1. [1]
    Sternotomy: Procedure Details & Recovery - Cleveland Clinic
    A sternotomy, or median sternotomy, is a procedure to create access to your heart or other body parts your breastbone protects.
  2. [2]
    Median sternotomy - MMCTS
    Aug 23, 2015 · Sternotomy is considered to be the gold standard incision in cardiac surgery, resulting in low failure rates and excellent proven long-term outcomes.
  3. [3]
    Julian's reintroduction of Milton's operation - PubMed
    Although median sternotomy was described by Milton in 1897, it was a seldom-used procedure at the time of Julian and associates' publication in 1957. The ...
  4. [4]
    Poststernotomy Complications: A Multimodal Review of Normal and ...
    Reported complication of median sternotomy include hardware complications (sternal wire fracture, wire migration, wire rotation), osseous complications ( ...
  5. [5]
    Sternotomy: Overview, Preparation, Technique - Medscape Reference
    Oct 18, 2024 · Median sternotomy is one of many incisions that can be made in the thorax and gives a wide view of the thoracic cavity.Overview · Technique · Complications
  6. [6]
    The Sternum - Body - Manubrium - Xiphoid - TeachMeAnatomy
    ### Summary of Sternum Structure and Attachments
  7. [7]
    Sternum: Anatomy, parts, pain and diagram - Kenhub
    The sternum is also known as the breastbone. It is a flat bone that articulates with the clavicle and the costal cartilages of the upper 7 ribs (true ribs), ...Anatomy · Manubrium · Clinical Points
  8. [8]
    Anatomy, Thorax, Mediastinum - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    The mediastinum houses many vital structures including the heart, great vessels, trachea, and essential nerves. It also functions as a protected pathway for ...Anatomy, Thorax, Mediastinum · Structure And Function · Blood Supply And Lymphatics
  9. [9]
    Cardiothoracic Incisions - Sternotomy - Thoracotomy
    Sep 8, 2021 · The median sternotomy ① is the most common thoracic incision. It is predominately used for open heart surgery, such as valve replacements, CABG, ...Missing: disruption | Show results with:disruption
  10. [10]
    H. Milton: visionary surgeon - PubMed
    H. Milton designed a vertical sternal-splitting approach for the excision of tuberculous mediastinal nodes and employed it successfully in a patient.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Access to the Heart – Evolution of surgical techniques - OAText
    Sep 4, 2015 · The midline or median sternal osteotomy or sternotomy was first described in experimental animals, by Milton, in 1897. Since ventilators.
  12. [12]
    Median Sternotomy - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Median sternotomy is a type of surgery in which a vertical inline incision is performed along the sternum providing access for surgical procedures.
  13. [13]
    The history of the management of sternal osteomyelitis and ... - NIH
    Jun 16, 2014 · Midline sternotomy was first described by Milton in 1887. It was reintroduced by Julian and colleagues in the mid-1950s. It offers a more ...
  14. [14]
    John H. Gibbon, Jr. Part I. The development of the first ... - PubMed
    Finally, on May 6, 1953, Dr. Gibbon performed his first successful operation using an extracorporeal circuit on an 18-year-old woman with a large atrial septal ...
  15. [15]
    a general evaluation of its use in heart surgery - PubMed
    The median sternal incision in intracardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation; a general evaluation of its use in heart surgery. Surgery. 1957 Oct ...Missing: sternotomy | Show results with:sternotomy
  16. [16]
    Cardiac Surgery - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Sep 3, 2024 · ... median sternotomy approach remaining the gold standard for most open-heart procedures. Since the 19th century, the field has seen ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] The Median Sternotomy: The Unkindest Cut of All?
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE MEDIAN STERNOTOMY. The median sternotomy is thought to have been first pro- posed by Milton in 1897, but this approach to the chest ...
  18. [18]
    Median sternotomy - PubMed
    Although median sternotomy was succinctly described in 1897, "Milton's procedure" was essentially unused until it was recommended in 1957.
  19. [19]
    Minimally-Invasive Valve Surgery - JACC
    Jul 27, 2010 · In the 1990s, the success of laparoscopic operations in general surgery renewed an interest in minimally-invasive approaches for cardiac surgery ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Incisions and Approaches in Cardiac Surgery | Adult and Pediatric ...
    May 10, 2020 · Traditionally, median sternotomy has been the most commonly used incision to access the heart and major vasculature given its excellent ...Missing: rationale | Show results with:rationale
  21. [21]
    Sternotomy - MMCTS
    Median sternotomy is one of the most frequently used accesses in cardio-thoracic surgery. We demonstrate it in this video tutorial.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  22. [22]
    Randomized Trial of Thymectomy in Myasthenia Gravis
    Aug 11, 2016 · Thymectomy was performed by means of a median sternotomy with the goal of an en bloc resection of all mediastinal tissue that could anatomically ...
  23. [23]
    Median Sternotomy for Mediastinal Mass Removal: Thymoma ... - NIH
    Jul 20, 2025 · The patient underwent his scheduled median sternotomy, allowing for complete resection of the 10.5 x 9.2 x 3.5 cm mediastinal mass (Figure 2), ...
  24. [24]
    Carinal Resection via Median Sternotomy - CTSNet
    Mar 24, 2009 · Surgical resection of carinal tumors can be safely accomplished via median sternotomy. Resection effectively alleviates airway obstruction.
  25. [25]
    Median sternotomy for resection of pulmonary metastases - PubMed
    Most median sternotomies involved wedge resections (mean 8.9 range one to 52). Two segmentectomies, six lobectomies, and one pneumonectomy were also performed.
  26. [26]
    Median sternotomy for bilateral pulmonary metastasectomy in ...
    Median sternotomy allows excellent exposure of both lungs. In our series, there were no lesions that could not be resected because of inadequate exposure, ...
  27. [27]
    Emergent Median Sternotomy for Mediastinal Hematoma: A Rare ...
    Mediastinal hematoma is a rare complication following insertion of a central venous catheter with only few cases reported in the English literature.
  28. [28]
    Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Repair - Cleveland Clinic
    What happens during ascending aortic aneurysm repair? · Incision. Your surgeon will make an incision in the front of your chest (median sternotomy). · Clamping.
  29. [29]
    Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus sternotomy in ...
    Oct 1, 2015 · VATS thymectomy was introduced in 1992 as a minimally invasive alternative to sternotomy for patients with myasthenia gravis requiring ...
  30. [30]
    Three different surgical methods for large-sized anterior mediastinal ...
    Nov 29, 2024 · To date, surgical approaches for the resection of anterior mediastinal tumors include traditional sternotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic ...
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    CTSNet Step-by-Step Series: Midline Sternotomy
    Sep 5, 2017 · The authors detail the procedure in a step-by-step fashion, using diagrams and surgical video to illustrate key technical elements.
  35. [35]
    Overview and Management of Sternal Wound Infection - PMC
    Deep sternal wound infection (DSWI), also termed mediastinitis, is a life-threatening complication after median sternotomy with an incidence of 1 to 5%.
  36. [36]
    Fatal air embolism during cardiopulmonary bypass - Oxford Academic
    We present a case of a patient who suffered an air embolism during coronary bypass surgery, despite standard safety features and procedures.
  37. [37]
    Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) - Cardiovascular Disorders
    Atrial fibrillation occurs in 15 to 40% of patients, typically 2 to 4 days after surgery. Beta-blockers (including sotalol) and amiodarone appear to reduce the ...<|separator|>
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
    Surgical management of sternal wound complications - UpToDate
    ### Summary of Late Complications of Median Sternotomy (UpToDate)
  40. [40]
    Poststernotomy Imaging: Pictorial Review of Expected Postsurgical ...
    Apr 24, 2025 · Acute complications primarily involve hemorrhage and dehiscence, while subacute complications include superficial or deep sternal wound ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
    Vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the management of deep ...
    The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the use of VAC therapy as a bridge before the definitive treatment for the management of deep sternal wound ...
  43. [43]
    Factors Predisposing to Median Sternotomy Complications - CHEST
    The present study confirms previous findings that obesity, insulin-dependent diabetes, and internal mammary artery grafting (especially bilaterally) increase ...
  44. [44]
    Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting
    We conclude that bilateral IMA grafting is an important predictor of sternal infection. It should be used selectively in obese or diabetic patients.Missing: nonunion | Show results with:nonunion
  45. [45]
    Postoperative Care of the Cardiac Surgical Patient - PMC
    Echocardiography has become a first-line tool in evaluating the postoperative patient suspected of having LCO. It can either be a transthoracic examination or a ...
  46. [46]
    Considerations on the Management of Acute Postoperative ...
    Jun 22, 2023 · Echocardiography. Echocardiography provides simultaneous cardiac structure and function assessment and is the most readily available imaging ...
  47. [47]
    Pain management after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy
    Oct 1, 2023 · The analgesic regimen for cardiac surgery via sternotomy should include paracetamol and NSAIDs, unless contraindicated, administered intra-operatively and ...Missing: monitoring | Show results with:monitoring
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    Sternal Precautions: Is It Time for Change? Precautions versus ... - NIH
    Sternal wound healing complications can range from superficial skin infections and integumentary dehiscence to sternal instability and mediastinitis. 24.
  50. [50]
    Sternal Precautions - Physiopedia
    During open heart surgery, a median sternotomy (division of the sternum from top to bottom) is performed to allow surgeons to gain access to the heart.
  51. [51]
    Sternal Wound Care Protocol | Download Table - ResearchGate
    Problems with wound healing after cardiac surgery via median sternotomy persist in a small but consistent percentage of patients [22,38,57]. There is evidence ...
  52. [52]
    Successful Reduction of Postoperative Chest Tube Duration and ...
    Oct 29, 2021 · We successfully lowered postoperative CT duration and observed an associated reduction in LOS across 9 centers using collaborative learning methodology.
  53. [53]
    Modifiable risk factors remain significant causes of medium term ...
    Mean follow up was 5.3 years(0–9.4 years) and was complete for all patients. 30-day survival was 98.4%, 1-year survival 95% and 8-year survival 79%. Cox- ...
  54. [54]
    Short-term clinical outcomes and long-term survival of minimally ...
    Five-year survival ranges between 80% and 95% in different publications including high risk and elderly patients (19-21). The 5-year survival of our patients ...
  55. [55]
    Functional status outcomes of patients with a coronary artery bypass ...
    Results: Baseline scores on 7 of the 8 subscales of the MOS SF-36 were significantly lower than at 3 months, 6 months, or 12 months after surgery. Role- ...
  56. [56]
    Early initiation of post-sternotomy cardiac rehabilitation exercise ...
    Mar 23, 2018 · Current guidelines recommend abstinence from supervised cardiac rehabilitation (CR) exercise training for 6 weeks post-sternotomy.
  57. [57]
    Exercise Following Cardiac Interventions and Surgery | Heart Online
    “Keep Your Move in the Tube” is a simple framework that guides patients to move safely following median sternotomy surgery. The concept encourages short ...
  58. [58]
    Sternal Healing after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using ... - NIH
    Feb 5, 2015 · In later CT images, the average sternal healing score improved to 5.88±0.38 and complete healing was observed in 98.2% of patients. Conclusion.Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
  59. [59]
    Psychological interventions for acute pain after open heart surgery
    Several trials investigated the effects of psychological interventions to reduce acute postoperative pain and improve the course of physical and psychological ...
  60. [60]
    Pulmonary function and health-related quality of life 1-year follow up ...
    Jul 8, 2016 · One year after cardiac surgery static and dynamic lung function measurements were slightly decreased, while health-related quality of life was improved.
  61. [61]
    Predictors of early return to work after coronary artery bypass graft...
    At 3-month follow-up, 81% (n = 179) of patients returned to work, with 19% (n = 42) remaining unemployed. Among patients returning to work, including high- ...
  62. [62]
    Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement – pros and cons of ...
    It has been shown to reduce postoperative morbidity, providing faster recovery and rehabilitation, shorter hospital stay and better cosmetic results compared ...
  63. [63]
    Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus sternotomy in ... - NIH
    In spite of controversies, VATS thymectomy is gaining popularity and several studies have demonstrated the superiority of the VATS approach over sternotomy.
  64. [64]
    A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robot-Assisted Mitral ...
    Robot-assisted mitral valve repair was superior to conventional sternotomy with reduced atrial fibrillation, intensive care unit and hospital stay, pain, time ...
  65. [65]
    Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Better Than Surgical ...
    Apr 1, 2018 · TAVR portended significantly fewer respiratory‐related complications compared with SAVR in COPD patients. TAVR may be a preferable mode of aortic valve ...
  66. [66]
    Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting with Percutaneous ...
    Despite the fact that patients treated with PCI were at higher operative risk, PCI with DES was shown to be comparable to CABG in terms of mortality, stroke and ...
  67. [67]
    The Opportunities and Limitations of Minimally Invasive Cardiac ...
    All studies compared procedures using minimally invasive access versus those using median sternotomy.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  68. [68]
    Posterolateral thoracotomy - MMCTS
    Posterolateral thoracotomy is the historic gold standard of thoracic incisions, offering an excellent exposure for most general thoracic procedures.Missing: ascending | Show results with:ascending
  69. [69]
    Aortic root replacement through right anterolateral thoracotomy
    We first report a successful case of the aortic root replacement through the right-side anterolateral thoracotomy in a patient with previous wound complication ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Clamshell and hemiclamshell incisions - MMCTS
    As an excellent alternative to median sternotomy for bilateral general thoracic surgical procedures, this incision is used for surgery of bilateral metastases, ...
  71. [71]
    Trapdoor thoracotomy as a surgical approach for aortic arch aneurysm
    Conclusion. The trapdoor incision offered a good surgical view to manipulate the aortic arch, and we have experienced no paresis of vagal nerve, recurrent ...
  72. [72]
    Right anterolateral thoracotomy: an attractive alternative to repeat ...
    Sep 21, 2017 · Reoperative cardiac valve surgery can be performed safely using the right anterolateral thoracotomy in high-risk patients.
  73. [73]
    “Trap-door” and “clamshell” surgical approaches for the ...
    We searched our database for pediatric patients with cervicothoracic tumors who underwent clamshell or trap-door thoracotomy between 1991 and 2013, reviewing ...
  74. [74]
    Clamshell or sternotomy for double lung or heart ... - Oxford Academic
    The clamshell incision results in more postoperative deformity, chronic pain, and impaired function as compared with median sternotomy.<|control11|><|separator|>