Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Metatranscriptomics

Metatranscriptomics is the study of the collective RNA transcripts, or metatranscriptome, produced by all microorganisms within a complex microbial community in a specific environment, enabling the analysis of active gene expression and functional activities at a given time. This approach utilizes high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to capture messenger RNA (mRNA) alongside other RNA types, providing a dynamic snapshot of microbial responses to environmental conditions, host interactions, or perturbations, in contrast to DNA-based metagenomics which reveals only genetic potential. By focusing on expressed genes, metatranscriptomics identifies which microbial taxa are metabolically active, uncovers regulatory mechanisms, and elucidates community-level processes such as nutrient cycling or pathogenesis. Emerging in the early alongside advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, metatranscriptomics built on foundational environmental work, with initial studies like those analyzing microbial transcripts in 2005 demonstrating its feasibility for small-scale transcript . The field has since expanded rapidly, with the number of metatranscriptomic datasets in public databases like the NCBI Sequence Read Archive surging from fewer than 100 in 2010 to several thousand by 2019, driven by improvements in sequencing depth and computational tools, and continuing to grow with tens of thousands of datasets as of 2025. Metatranscriptomics has wide-ranging applications across ecosystems, including marine environments where it has revealed active during algal blooms in the , terrestrial settings like acidic soils dominated by Verrucomicrobia phyla, and human-associated microbiomes such as the gut or lung infections, where it links microbial activity to disease states like . In host-microbe studies, such as those in molluscs like mussels, it detects diverse pathogens (bacteria, viruses, fungi) and their impact on host , offering advantages over 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing by capturing functional insights beyond . Despite its power, challenges persist, including incomplete reference genomes for uncultured microbes, biases in rRNA depletion, and the need for high sequencing coverage to avoid missing lowly expressed transcripts, though ongoing developments in long-read sequencing and machine learning-based assembly promise to enhance accuracy and accessibility. Overall, metatranscriptomics complements multi-omics approaches like and to provide a holistic view of microbial community function, with growing impacts in , , and .

Overview

Definition and Principles

Metatranscriptomics is the comprehensive study of RNA transcripts produced by microbial communities within environmental samples, encompassing mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, and other non-coding RNAs to profile active and functional dynamics . This approach captures the collective of diverse microbial consortia, including , , and eukaryotes, revealing which genes are actively transcribed under specific conditions rather than merely present as genetic potential. In prokaryotic-dominated communities, metatranscriptomics targets non-polyadenylated RNAs, which predominate due to the absence of poly-A tails in bacterial and archaeal transcripts, often requiring rRNA depletion strategies to enrich for informative mRNA sequences. A core principle of metatranscriptomics is its emphasis on the functional realization of microbial genomes, contrasting with ' DNA-based assessment of static genetic composition. While delineates the potential capabilities of a community, metatranscriptomics elucidates real-time , including differential regulation influenced by environmental factors such as nutrient availability, , or , thereby highlighting temporal and spatial variations in microbial activity. The field gained prominence post-2005 with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, which enabled high-throughput, cost-effective analysis of complex transcriptomes that were previously challenging to sequence at scale. At its , metatranscriptomics examines the and of transcripts in mixed communities to uncover microbial interactions, such as syntrophic partnerships or antagonistic behaviors that drive stability. It plays a pivotal role in elucidating processes like cycling, where expressed genes involved in carbon, , or indicate active biogeochemical transformations in habitats ranging from soils to oceans. Additionally, in host-associated contexts, metatranscriptomics illuminates microbial contributions to by identifying upregulated factors or immune-modulating transcripts during disease states, such as . These insights underscore metatranscriptomics' value in linking microbial function to ecological and health outcomes.

Historical Development

The foundations of metatranscriptomics trace back to the early , when initial studies focused on extracting and analyzing environmental to detect bacterial in complex settings like , laying the groundwork for understanding active microbial processes without . These efforts highlighted the challenges of low RNA stability and yields in natural samples but established as a key molecule for probing community function beyond DNA-based . A pivotal milestone came in 2006 with the first reported metatranscriptome, generated via pyrosequencing of cDNA from soil microbial communities dominated by ammonia-oxidizing archaea, revealing high expression of key metabolic genes and demonstrating the feasibility of sequencing environmental transcripts at scale. This was followed by early marine applications, such as the 2009 analysis of ocean microbial metatranscriptomes, which uncovered novel small RNAs and light-responsive gene expression patterns in surface waters. The shift to shotgun metatranscriptomics gained traction around 2009-2011, exemplified by studies using unbiased cDNA sequencing to profile community-wide gene activity in oxygen minimum zones, enabling broader functional insights without targeted amplification. During the 2010s, metatranscriptomics integrated closely with through large-scale initiatives like the Human Microbiome Project, which incorporated metatranscriptomic sequencing to link genomic potential with active expression in human-associated communities, such as the gut microbiome. Influential developments included the refinement of rRNA depletion protocols around 2010-2012, which improved mRNA enrichment by subtracting abundant ribosomal RNAs using subtractive hybridization or enzymatic methods, reducing rRNA contamination from over 90% to less than 10% in microbial samples. Initial challenges with low RNA yields from environmental samples were addressed by 2015 through optimized enrichment techniques, including rRNA depletion using kits like Ribo-Zero and improved extraction buffers with mechanical , enhancing transcript recovery in low-biomass matrices like . In the 2020s, advances in long-read sequencing technologies, such as PacBio and Oxford Nanopore, have improved metatranscriptome assembly by capturing full-length transcripts, facilitating better isoform detection and functional annotation in complex communities. Recent reviews from 2023 onward emphasize multi-omics integration, combining metatranscriptomics with and to elucidate microbial-host interactions and dynamics. Publication output has surged since the early , reflecting the field's maturation and adoption across , , and . By 2024-2025, applications have expanded to include metatranscriptomics-guided genome-scale metabolic reconstructions and robust workflows for skin profiling.

Methodological Approaches

Sample Preparation and RNA Isolation

Sample preparation in metatranscriptomics begins with the collection of environmental samples from diverse sources, such as , water bodies, or host-associated microbiomes, where microbial communities are heterogeneous and is prone to rapid degradation. To preserve integrity, samples are immediately stabilized using preservatives like RNAlater, which permeates cells and inhibits RNase activity, allowing storage at room temperature for up to 1 week or at 4°C for up to 1 month before processing. This step is crucial in field settings, such as oceanic or sampling, to minimize transcriptional changes and loss due to environmental stressors. Following stabilization, cell is performed to release from the diverse microbial cells within the sample. Mechanical methods, particularly bead-beating, are widely used as they effectively disrupt tough cell walls of bacteria and fungi through high-speed agitation with glass or zirconia beads, outperforming enzymatic in yield for complex communities. Enzymatic approaches, involving lysozymes or , complement bead-beating for but are often combined to optimize efficiency across prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes without excessive shearing. Total RNA isolation typically employs commercial kits like the Qiagen RNeasy or RNeasy PowerSoil, which use silica-based columns to purify RNA from lysed samples while removing contaminants such as proteins, DNA, and inhibitors common in environmental matrices. These protocols separate prokaryotic and eukaryotic RNA fractions, as prokaryotes lack poly-A tails, necessitating targeted enrichment strategies downstream. For mRNA enrichment, ribosomal RNA (rRNA) depletion is essential, given that rRNA constitutes 80-90% of total RNA in prokaryotes; methods like Ribo-Zero kits use biotinylated probes for subtractive hybridization followed by magnetic bead capture, achieving up to 99% rRNA removal. In host-associated samples, such as human microbiomes, poly-A selection via oligo-dT beads subtracts abundant eukaryotic host RNA, enriching microbial transcripts while preserving non-polyadenylated prokaryotic mRNA. A major challenge in metatranscriptomics is the low RNA biomass in sparse environments, such as samples yielding less than 1 ng/μL, which limits preparation and increases risks. Advances in the , including magnetic bead-based depletion systems, have improved efficiency, routinely achieving over 90% rRNA removal even from low-input samples, enhancing mRNA sequencing depth. Quality control of isolated is assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyzer, where (RIN) values above 7 indicate sufficient integrity for downstream sequencing, as lower scores signal that could bias transcript detection. Quantification relies on fluorometric methods like the Qubit assay, which provides accurate total concentrations in the presence of contaminants, ensuring optimal input for library construction. High-quality input is vital, as propagates errors in subsequent metatranscriptomic analyses.

Sequencing Technologies

Metatranscriptomics primarily relies on next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms to capture the active transcriptome of microbial communities. Short-read technologies, such as Illumina's HiSeq and NovaSeq systems, dominate due to their high throughput and accuracy, generating paired-end reads typically ranging from 50 to 300 base pairs (bp). These platforms enable the production of over 10 gigabases (Gb) of data per run, making them ideal for shotgun metatranscriptomics, an untargeted approach that sequences the entire RNA pool to profile community-wide gene expression without prior amplification bias. Directional (strand-specific) library preparation is commonly employed to preserve information on transcription direction, distinguishing sense from antisense strands and aiding in the identification of overlapping genes in microbial operons. In contrast, long-read sequencing technologies offer advantages for resolving complex transcript structures, such as full-length isoforms and polycistronic mRNAs prevalent in prokaryotes. ' Single Molecule (SMRT) sequencing produces reads up to 20 kilobases (kb), facilitating isoform detection and mapping by capturing entire transcripts in a single read. (ONT) provides complementary long-read capabilities, with average read lengths exceeding 10 kb and the potential for ultra-long reads beyond 100 kb, supporting sequencing that allows adaptive sampling during runs—particularly useful for field-based, portable applications in diverse environments. These long-read methods, however, come with higher per-base costs and lower throughput compared to short-read platforms. Error rates vary significantly across platforms, influencing and downstream analysis. Illumina sequencing achieves per-base error rates below 0.1%, ensuring reliable of short fragments into contigs. PacBio SMRT reads initially exhibit error rates around 10-15%, mitigated to under 1% through circular consensus sequencing () modes like HiFi, while ONT's raw error rates hover at 5-10% but have further improved to under 1% with the 2024-2025 R10.4.1 chemistry and advanced basecalling models, enhancing accuracy for direct RNA sequencing without reverse transcription biases. Sequencing costs have plummeted since 2010, when a typical NGS run exceeded $10,000, to around $1,500-$2,000 per lane by 2025, driven by and instrumentation advances, enabling broader adoption in metatranscriptomics. Typical metatranscriptomic datasets from Illumina platforms yield 10-100 million reads per sample, providing sufficient depth for detecting low-abundance transcripts in complex communities, with data sizes often ranging from 2-10 Gb after quality filtering. Multiplexing via barcoding allows simultaneous processing of multiple samples in a single run, reducing costs and experimental variability—up to 96 or more libraries on NovaSeq flows. Recent advancements as of 2025 in ultra-long read technologies, such as enhanced ONT and PacBio protocols integrated with tools like Fungen for clustering and correction of long-read metatranscriptomic data, have improved operon mapping by resolving co-transcribed gene clusters without fragmentation, offering deeper insights into microbial regulation. These require high-quality RNA input from upstream preparation to minimize biases during library construction.

Data Analysis

Computational Pipelines

Computational pipelines in metatranscriptomics process raw sequencing data from microbial communities through a series of standardized steps to generate interpretable functional insights, such as active profiles. These workflows typically begin with preprocessing to ensure , followed by or , quantification, and to account for compositional biases in diverse microbiomes. Widely adopted pipelines like SAMSA, metaTP, and MT-Enviro integrate these stages for and , often leveraging resources. The initial core stage involves quality trimming and read filtering to remove adapters, low-quality bases, and contaminants such as rRNA or host sequences. Tools like Trimmomatic are commonly used for trimming, effectively removing poor-quality reads and adapters while preserving over 90% of usable data in environmental samples; for instance, 2025 benchmarks on mixed microbial datasets reported 91-98% read recovery post-trimming with Trimmomatic, outperforming alternatives like fastp in base quality improvement (from 28.82% to 45.83% normal bases). Filtering for contaminants follows, often using Bowtie2 to align and remove rRNA reads, reducing non-informative content by up to 80% in complex communities. These steps typically take minutes to hours on standard servers but scale to GPU-accelerated clusters for large datasets. assembly then reconstructs transcripts from trimmed reads, employing tools such as for eukaryotic-dominated communities or MEGAHIT for prokaryotic ones, producing contigs that capture full-length transcripts despite the challenges of uneven coverage in metagenomes. Subsequent quantification and normalization estimate transcript abundances, addressing multi-mapping reads prevalent in microbial communities with shared genes. Reads are mapped to reference genomes or assembled contigs using Bowtie2, which handles alignments efficiently even with repetitive sequences, followed by abundance estimation via tools like for transcript-level counts or DESeq2 for differential expression analysis across conditions. Normalization in DESeq2 accounts for library size and compositional variance, enabling detection of condition-specific expression with low false positives in microbiome data. For long-read technologies like Oxford Nanopore, machine learning-integrated error correction, as in the 2025 Fungen tool, clusters and corrects reads to achieve sub-1% error rates, improving assembly contiguity by 20-30% over uncorrected data. Overall workflows, from raw reads to quantified profiles, require hours to days on GPU clusters for terabyte-scale datasets, depending on community complexity. To ensure reproducibility and scalability, batch processing frameworks like or orchestrate these pipelines, automating dependencies and parallelization across clusters; for example, metaTP implements for end-to-end execution, while -based workflows like those for metagenome-transcriptome integration handle multi-omic data fusion efficiently. These systems mitigate variability in results, supporting analyses of diverse applications from soil microbiomes to clinical samples.

Bioinformatics Tools and Software

Metatranscriptomic analysis relies on a suite of specialized bioinformatics tools and software to process raw sequencing data, perform taxonomic and , and enable downstream interpretations. These tools address challenges such as high data volumes, rRNA contamination, and the need for accurate quantification in complex microbial communities. Major pipelines integrate , , , and statistical modules, often leveraging reference databases for and . Open-source implementations predominate, allowing customization and community contributions to adapt to evolving sequencing technologies. HUMAnN2 (HUMAn MicrobiomeN's) is a widely adopted for functional profiling of metatranscriptomic data, estimating and pathway abundances at species-level . It employs a tiered search strategy, starting with translated nucleotide searches against UniRef90 protein clusters to reduce computational demands by mapping reads to smaller, pre-clustered reference sets, followed by nucleotide-level refinement for precision. This approach enables efficient processing of large datasets, with applications in host-associated microbiomes like the human gut, where it reconstructs metabolic pathways from reads. HUMAnN2's strength lies in its integration with taxonomic profilers like MetaPhlAn, providing strain-resolved insights, and it has been benchmarked to achieve high accuracy in functional abundance estimation across diverse environments. MetaTrans is an open-source pipeline tailored for metatranscriptomic workflows, handling rRNA removal, assembly, taxonomic binning, and functional in a single . It uses tools like SortMeRNA for ribosomal RNA filtering and for downstream classification, supporting both short- and long-read inputs. Designed for environmental and clinical samples, MetaTrans excels in scenarios requiring comprehensive analysis, such as microbial responses to stressors, and its facilitates on clusters. Benchmarks from metagenomic challenges, adapted to transcriptomic data, demonstrate its detection accuracy exceeding 80% in simulated communities, highlighting its robustness for low-abundance taxa. SAMSA (Simple Annotation of Metatranscriptomes by ) provides an OTU-based approach for metatranscriptomic expression profiling, clustering transcripts into operational taxonomic units and quantifying their activity levels. It integrates alignments against reference genomes and functional databases, offering breakdowns of transcription by or pathway, which is particularly useful for comparative studies across samples. SAMSA's standalone nature and compatibility with supercomputing environments make it suitable for large-scale datasets, with strengths in handling uneven sequencing depths common in metatranscriptomes. Its open-source availability supports extensions for custom annotations, enhancing its use in microbiome research. mOTUs2 (metagenomic Operational Taxonomic Units) is a marker gene-based tool for taxonomic profiling directly from metatranscriptomic reads, estimating relative abundances and transcriptional activities of bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes without full assembly. By aligning reads to universal single-copy genes, it achieves species-level resolution and correlates metagenomic DNA with metatranscriptomic RNA profiles, revealing active community members. This tool is advantageous for gut and soil microbiomes, where it outperforms 16S rRNA methods in sensitivity, and recent updates have improved its handling of long-read data for enhanced resolution in complex samples. mOTUs2's lightweight design and integration with pipelines like QIIME enable rapid analysis, with validations showing strong Spearman correlations (>0.8) between predicted and observed abundances. The Leimena-2013 pipeline, developed for gut metatranscriptomic studies, focuses on and expression tailored to samples, incorporating for rRNA depletion and host RNA removal. It uses reference-based mapping to pathways for functional insights, making it ideal for clinical applications like research. Its specialized workflow emphasizes gut-specific microbial dynamics, providing quantitative metrics on gene activity that inform host-microbe interactions. Key database resources underpin these tools, facilitating standardized annotations. MG-RAST serves as a central repository for metatranscriptome submission, offering automated phylogenetic and functional analysis via integrated searches against multiple references, including non-redundant protein sets. and Greengenes provide curated rRNA databases essential for taxonomic sorting and contamination removal in metatranscriptomic pipelines. supports functional annotation by mapping transcripts to metabolic pathways and orthologs, enabling pathway-level expression summaries across tools like HUMAnN2 and SAMSA. These resources are openly accessible, promoting and in metatranscriptomic studies.
ToolPrimary FunctionKey StrengthUse Case Example
HUMAnN2Functional pathway abundanceSpecies-resolved efficiencyHuman gut metabolism
MetaTrans and Modular rRNA handlingEnvironmental responses
SAMSAOTU-based expressionSupercomputing scalabilityComparative microbiome transcription
mOTUs2Taxonomic activity profiling sensitivityActive species in soils
Leimena-2013Gut-specific differential expressionHost normalizationClinical IBD studies
These tools collectively advance metatranscriptomic research by providing customizable, high-throughput solutions, often integrated into broader workflows for holistic characterization.

Specialized Techniques

Microarray Methods

methods represent an early approach to metatranscriptomics, utilizing high-density DNA with probes designed for known microbial genes to assess community-wide profiles. These , including custom designs or commercial platforms like GeneChips, enable targeted hybridization-based detection of transcripts from environmental samples, providing insights into active microbial functions without the need for . Community is extracted, reverse-transcribed into labeled cDNA, and hybridized to the array surface, where probes—typically 25-60 —bind complementary sequences, allowing quantification of expression levels through scanning. The workflow begins with probe design, often derived from metagenomic surveys or reference microbial genomes to target functional genes involved in processes like nutrient cycling. Labeled cDNA is then applied to the under controlled hybridization conditions, followed by washing to remove unbound material and to measure signal intensities. Data preprocessing includes background correction, —commonly using the Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) for arrays, which applies and median polishing for robust summarization—and quality control to ensure reproducibility across replicates. Pioneered in the mid-2000s, microarray-based metatranscriptomics was first applied to environmental samples such as bacterioplankton and communities. A seminal study in used functional gene microarrays to profile and carbon cycling transcripts across transects, revealing latitudinal patterns in microbial activity and validating the technique's utility for hypothesis-driven . Advantages include low cost, often under $100 per sample in early implementations, and high reproducibility due to standardized probe sets, making it suitable for large-scale comparative studies. However, these methods are inherently limited to predefined probes, restricting detection to known genes and often providing incomplete coverage for diverse, uncultured microbial communities where novel transcripts predominate. By the , microarrays were largely phased out in favor of next-generation sequencing for its broader and discovery potential, though approaches persist, using arrays to validate targeted genes identified via sequencing in hypothesis-driven research.

Amplicon-Based Approaches

Amplicon-based approaches in metatranscriptomics target the amplification of (rRNA) molecules, such as the V4 of the bacterial 16S rRNA, to profile transcriptionally active microbial communities. Unlike DNA-based 16S rRNA gene sequencing, which captures total microbial abundance including dormant cells, this RNA-focused method emphasizes rRNA transcripts as for metabolic activity, enabling the identification of potentially "active" taxa engaged in protein synthesis. However, the use of rRNA as a reliable for activity remains debated, with some studies supporting its utility in specific contexts like soils, while a 2023 analysis found it ineffective in complex environmental communities due to lack of significant differentiation from DNA profiles (Bray-Curtis dissimilarities median 0.28-0.33). (RT-PCR) is central, converting to (cDNA) for subsequent amplification and sequencing. The workflow begins with RNA extraction from environmental or host-associated samples, followed by cDNA synthesis using reverse transcriptase kits, such as QuantiTect or SuperScript III with random hexamers to ensure comprehensive coverage. Barcoded primers, like the Earth Microbiome Project's 515F/806R pair, are then used for PCR amplification of the target rRNA region, incorporating adapters for next-generation sequencing. Libraries are sequenced on platforms like Illumina MiSeq, yielding paired-end reads (e.g., 150 bp), after which taxonomic assignment occurs through pipelines such as QIIME2 or DADA2, which denoise sequences into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and classify them against databases like or Greengenes. These methods have been proposed to distinguish active from dormant microbes, as rRNA levels may correlate with ribosomal content and growth rates in certain systems, revealing discrepancies such as "phantom taxa" present in RNA but absent in DNA profiles, which can comprise 6-62% of communities depending on sample type and sequencing depth. For instance, RNA profiles can show moderate overlap with DNA-based assessments (e.g., Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of 0.28-0.33 in complex environmental samples), though recent evidence indicates these differences may not reliably reflect activity shifts. In low-biomass contexts like human skin, a 2025 study adapted these techniques for non-invasive sampling, achieving high reproducibility (Pearson's r > 0.95) to profile active species such as Staphylococcus and Malassezia despite host RNA contamination challenges. Error sources, including primer bias that can skew amplification of certain taxa, are mitigated through multi-primer sets targeting multiple hypervariable regions, reducing underrepresentation and improving coverage across diverse phyla. Advantages include enhanced for detecting rare, transcriptionally active transcripts in low-abundance populations and cost-effectiveness for scaling to large cohorts, as targeted requires fewer sequencing reads than untargeted methods. These approaches can integrate briefly with metatranscriptomics for functional insights, using tools like mOTUs2 for refined of rRNA .

Challenges and Limitations

Technical Constraints

Metatranscriptomics faces significant challenges due to the inherent instability of molecules, particularly in microbial communities. Microbial is highly prone to , with half-lives often in the range of minutes under environmental stresses, necessitating immediate stabilization techniques such as or chemical preservatives to preserve transcript integrity during sample collection. Additionally, the total pool in microbial samples is overwhelmingly dominated by (rRNA) and (tRNA), comprising 95-99% of the content, while (mRNA)—the primary target for functional analysis—constitutes only 1-5%. This low mRNA fraction complicates downstream sequencing and requires efficient rRNA depletion strategies, though residual rRNA can still consume a substantial portion of sequencing reads. Contamination from non-target nucleic acids further exacerbates technical limitations in metatranscriptomic workflows, especially in host-associated or complex environmental samples. In meta-samples derived from host tissues, such as gut biopsies, host RNA can dominate the pool in low microbial biomass scenarios, often comprising the majority of total RNA and thereby diluting microbial signals and reducing the efficiency of sequencing depth allocation. Environmental inhibitors, including in or samples, can interfere with extraction and purification by binding to nucleic acids or inhibiting enzymatic steps, leading to inconsistent yields and quality. These contamination issues are particularly pronounced in clinical or ecological contexts where separating microbial from host or abiotic components remains challenging. Variability in microbial across environments imposes additional constraints on recovery and quantification. For instance, water samples typically yield up to 10 times less than samples due to sparse microbial densities, often resulting in insufficient material for high-throughput sequencing without extensive concentration efforts. Recent 2025 studies on skin metatranscriptomics highlight persistent challenges in low- environments, including and stability, despite protocol optimizations achieving up to 75% success rates. rRNA depletion methods, while essential, can introduce taxonomic biases by unevenly removing rRNA across different taxa, skewing community composition estimates. Quantification in metatranscriptomics is further undermined by stoichiometric imbalances within community RNA pools, where RNA content varies non-uniformly across taxa due to differences in cell size, growth rates, and metabolic states. This allometric scaling effect—where larger cells produce disproportionately more RNA—leads to overestimation of expression from dominant, high-RNA producers and underrepresentation of smaller or dormant microbes, complicating absolute abundance interpretations. Such imbalances highlight the need for strategies, though they cannot fully resolve the underlying experimental variability in diverse microbial consortia. Stabilization and depletion techniques can mitigate some and effects, but persistent low recovery in sparse environments limits applicability to high-biomass studies like the gut .

Analytical and Interpretive Challenges

One major challenge in metatranscriptomics lies in the assembly of short sequencing reads into coherent transcripts, particularly in diverse microbial communities where similar transcripts from different species can lead to chimeric contigs. De novo assembly tools, often adapted from metagenomics, struggle with these issues due to conserved genomic regions, organism variability, and gene shifts, resulting in ambiguities and erroneous merges of sequences. Additionally, uneven sequencing coverage exacerbates low completeness, with assemblies for rare species frequently achieving less than 70% completeness, as low-abundance transcripts receive insufficient reads for reliable reconstruction, limiting the recovery of full gene sets. Annotation of assembled contigs or raw reads presents further gaps, with up to 40% of reads often remaining unmatched to databases due to the underrepresentation of microbial transcripts. This is particularly acute for uncultured or microbes, where functional errors arise from incomplete genomes, leading to inaccurate assignments of metabolic roles or pathways. Tools like HUMAnN2 partially address these gaps through gap-filling strategies in pathway abundance estimation, but reliance on existing databases still hampers comprehensive functional inference. Processing large metatranscriptomic datasets imposes significant computational demands, often requiring over 100 GB of for and steps in tools like or CLARK-S, especially for high-depth samples exceeding millions of reads. Benchmarks, such as those from comparative evaluations, reveal accuracies below 60% for pathway reconstruction, highlighting errors in inferring complete metabolic networks from fragmented . Read further introduces biases that favor abundant taxa, as algorithms prioritize high-coverage references, underrepresenting low-abundance and skewing community-wide expression profiles. Interpretive challenges compound these issues, including the difficulty in distinguishing technical noise—such as sequencing artifacts or rRNA contamination—from genuine biological variation in gene expression across dynamic communities. The lack of standardization across pipelines, from read preprocessing to normalization, further impedes reproducibility and meta-analysis, as varying tool choices and parameters yield inconsistent results. Addressing these requires integrated multi-omics approaches to contextualize transcriptomic signals, though current methods still fall short in robust validation.

Applications

Human Microbiome Studies

Metatranscriptomics has provided critical insights into the functional activity of microbial communities associated with the human body, revealing how gene expression responds to health, disease, and environmental factors in sites such as the gut, oral cavity, and skin. In the gut microbiome, studies have highlighted dysbiosis-linked transcriptional changes, such as the increased RNA abundance of Ruminococcus gnavus (up to three orders of magnitude higher in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients compared to controls). This approach has uncovered species-specific activity, including reduced expression of beneficial pathways in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, offering a deeper understanding of how microbial functionality contributes to disease progression beyond mere compositional shifts. Early efforts tied to the Human Microbiome Project, such as analyses of self-collected fecal samples, demonstrated strong correlations between metagenomic potential and metatranscriptomic expression (Spearman's r = 0.76), with diet-responsive pathways like varying by individual dietary patterns. In the oral microbiome, metatranscriptomics has identified conserved metabolic shifts during periodontitis, including upregulated to butyrate and in keystone pathogens like and , with approximately 18% of enzyme-encoding gene families differentially expressed in diseased sites. Similarly, a 2025 study across skin sites (e.g., , , ) revealed site-specific microbial activity, where and species showed disproportionately high transcript contributions despite low genomic abundance, alongside active antimicrobial genes like that modulate interactions and . Case studies have further illustrated metatranscriptomics' utility in clinical contexts, such as monitoring antibiotic resistance through targeted increases in resistance gene transcripts (e.g., genes upregulated by log₂ fold-change >4 after amoxicillin exposure in the gut), emphasizing the need to assess expression rather than presence alone for effective resistance surveillance. Detection of transient expression patterns, such as post-meal upregulation of sugar transport and central genes in oral biofilms, highlights dynamic responses to stress, with person-specific shifts in active microbial communities. Integrating metatranscriptomics with has linked these expression profiles to metabolite production, revealing impaired short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) cross-feeding networks in , where fewer producers and consumers of butyrate and propionate correlate with reduced fecal SCFA levels and heightened inflammation. These applications extend to , where metatranscriptomic profiling predicts efficacy by identifying responsive microbial functions and assesses antimicrobial treatment outcomes by tracking shifts in microbial expression. Overall, such studies underscore metatranscriptomics' role in tailoring interventions based on active microbial states, potentially improving outcomes in microbiome-mediated diseases.

Environmental and Clinical Applications

Metatranscriptomics has been instrumental in elucidating active microbial functions in oceanic environments, particularly through large-scale expeditions like the Tara Oceans project (2009–2013), which generated metatranscriptomic data revealing widespread viral involved in nutrient cycling and host interactions across communities. In microbial communities, metatranscriptomics has uncovered shifts in related to carbon cycling, such as increased transcripts for uptake and degradation under elevated CO2 conditions, demonstrating how environmental changes alter active metabolic pathways in unculturable and fungi. For instance, studies on soils have identified substantial novel enzyme-coding transcripts, including glycoside hydrolases without close homologs, comprising up to 40% of expressed sequences in some datasets, which reveal functions in lignocellulose breakdown inaccessible through culturing. In plant rhizospheres, metatranscriptomics provides insights into symbiotic interactions by profiling active microbial during root colonization, as seen in comparative studies of and Brassica napus, where conserved transcripts for nutrient acquisition and stress response genes underscore microbiota-driven enhancing plant resilience. This approach has revealed kingdom-level shifts in microbiomes, with upregulated fungal and bacterial genes facilitating and pathogen defense in agricultural settings. Beyond terrestrial ecosystems, metatranscriptomics enables real-time monitoring in bioreactors for production, where genome-centric analyses of methanogenic communities track dynamic expression of lignocellulolytic enzymes, optimizing carbon conversion efficiency in systems. Clinically, metatranscriptomics extends to wastewater surveillance for emerging pathogens, with recent applications during the (up to 2025) detecting active viral transcripts alongside bacterial resistance genes, enabling community-level tracking of outbreaks and spread in systems. In veterinary contexts, such as bovine microbiomes in , metatranscriptomic profiling links feed to active microbial functions, identifying upregulated genes for that inform strategies to enhance . For polymicrobial infections, metatranscriptomics aids diagnostics by capturing dynamic community responses, as demonstrated in analyses revealing pathogen-host interactions and novel therapeutic targets through expressed virulence factors. Broader impacts include studies, where thaw metatranscriptomes show upregulated and carbon genes, signaling accelerated release from thawing soils.

Future Directions

Emerging Technologies

Advancements in platforms are enhancing metatranscriptomic capabilities through improved long-read technologies. The PacBio Revio system, originally launched in 2022 with chemistry updates announced in 2025, enables up to 8 million high-fidelity reads per SMRT Cell using SPRQ chemistry, providing up to 15-fold increases in throughput compared to prior systems like the Sequel IIe for full-length transcript sequencing in complex microbial communities. This supports more accurate assembly of prokaryotic metatranscriptomes by capturing complete isoforms without fragmentation biases inherent in short-read methods. Complementing this, ' portable devices, such as , allow metatranscriptomic analysis directly from environmental samples, enabling real-time sequencing in field settings with minimal . These devices have demonstrated feasibility for rapid microbial community profiling, including direct sequencing of low-input samples from sediments and biofilms. Innovative and computational tools are addressing spatial and preprocessing challenges in metatranscriptomics. The NanoString GeoMx Digital Spatial Profiler integrates single-molecule to map microbial transcript expression within tissue microenvironments, revealing intratumoral dynamics at subcellular resolution. This approach has been applied to and gut microbiomes, providing spatial context for activity that traditional bulk sequencing overlooks. Additionally, AI-driven methods for rRNA identification and depletion are emerging as chemical-free alternatives, using bidirectional neural networks to accurately filter ribosomal sequences from metatranscriptomic datasets post-sequencing. Such computational tools reduce reliance on enzymatic depletion kits, improving efficiency for low-biomass samples like those from host-associated microbiomes. Targeted enrichment techniques are boosting detection of low-abundance transcripts. Meanwhile, early explorations of for genomic and transcriptomic assembly are conceptual, with scalability projections like a 96-qubit system targeted for 2027 potentially enabling optimized reconstruction of complex microbial networks in the future. These technologies hold potential to transform metatranscriptomics by improving mRNA recovery rates and reducing per-sample costs through scaled long-read platforms and automated workflows. Such improvements are expected to overcome current limitations in RNA stability and requirements, enabling broader application in by 2030. Recent advancements also include single-cell metatranscriptomics combined with spatial profiling to resolve microbial interactions at cellular resolution, and AI models for predicting community-level dynamics from sparse data, as demonstrated in 2025 studies of host-microbe interfaces.

Integration with Other

Metatranscriptomics is frequently integrated with to link genomic potential to active in microbial communities, enabling a more nuanced understanding of functional dynamics. Multi- pipelines, such as those outlined in recent reviews, utilize metagenome-guided to improve transcript and functional by RNA reads against reference genomes derived from . For instance, networks connect DNA abundance (from metagenomics) to RNA expression levels (from metatranscriptomics) and extend to protein abundances (from metaproteomics), revealing regulatory patterns that single- approaches miss. In human gut studies, this has demonstrated a Spearman of approximately 0.76 between metagenomic and metatranscriptomic abundances, indicating substantial but incomplete concordance where about 41% of transcripts align closely with genomic s without . Statistical tools like MixOmics facilitate the integration of metatranscriptomic data with , metaproteomics, and through supervised methods such as DIABLO, which identify correlated features across datasets to uncover shared microbial pathways. Graph-based models further support pathway reconstruction by representing multi-omics data as networks, where nodes denote genes, proteins, or metabolites, and edges capture co-expression or interaction relationships, as applied in analyses to model metabolic fluxes. These approaches address challenges in data heterogeneity, such as varying sequencing depths, by normalizing inputs and employing to highlight biologically relevant associations. In clinical contexts, integrating metatranscriptomics with other has illuminated roles in disease, particularly cancer, where tumor-associated microbial genes expressed in metatranscriptomic profiles correlate with oncogenic pathways and patient outcomes. For example, multi-omics studies of have used metatranscriptomics alongside to detect microbial transcripts linked to and , enhancing discovery. Metaproteomics complements this by validating active functions, confirming the presence of proteins from roughly 20-30% of predicted transcripts in microbial communities, thereby filling gaps in expression inference from data alone. Such integrations mitigate functional annotation ambiguities in metatranscriptomics, where provides contextual genomes and traces downstream products, as seen in holistic analyses of gut . Future advancements, including AI-driven automated fusion models, promise to streamline these pipelines by predicting cross-omics interactions from sparse datasets, accelerating discoveries in microbial and health.

References

  1. [1]
    Advances and Challenges in Metatranscriptomic Analysis - PMC - NIH
    Sep 25, 2019 · Here, we present a comprehensive review on computational metatranscriptomics approaches to study microbial community transcriptomes.
  2. [2]
    Metagenomics, Metatranscriptomics, and Metabolomics Approaches ...
    May 12, 2016 · Metagenomics produces a taxonomical profile of the sample, metatranscriptomics helps us to obtain a functional profile, and metabolomics completes the picture.
  3. [3]
    Exploring the Potential of Metatranscriptomics to Describe Microbial ...
    Dec 16, 2022 · Metatranscriptomics has emerged as a very useful technology for the study of microbiomes from RNA-seq reads. This method provides additional ...
  4. [4]
    Metatranscriptomics for the Human Microbiome and Microbial ...
    Jul 20, 2021 · This review begins by summarizing the motivations for community transcriptomics and the history of the field. We then explore the principles ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  5. [5]
    Advances and Challenges in Metatranscriptomic Analysis - Frontiers
    Here, we present a comprehensive review on computational metatranscriptomics approaches to study microbial community transcriptomes.
  6. [6]
    Extraction of Bacterial RNA from Soil: Challenges and Solutions
    Detection of bacterial gene expression in soil emerged in the early 1990s and provided information on bacterial responses in their original soil ...
  7. [7]
    Integrated metatranscriptomic and metagenomic analyses ... - Nature
    Dec 9, 2010 · Metatranscriptomics involve the direct sampling and sequencing of gene transcripts from natural microbial assemblages, allowing assessment of ...Complementary Dna (cdna)... · Gos Protein Families · Nitrogen Metabolism Protein...
  8. [8]
    Metatranscriptomics of the human gut microbiome - Genome Biology
    Sep 19, 2011 · In the European-funded Metagenomics of the Human Intestinal Tract (MetaHIT) project [1], we combined next-generation sequencing with high- ...Metatranscriptomics Of The... · Author Information · Authors And AffiliationsMissing: integration | Show results with:integration
  9. [9]
    Development and quantitative analyses of a universal rRNA ... - Nature
    Mar 11, 2010 · In the first study of a marine microbial metatranscriptome sequenced using pyrosequencing (Roche GS 20 system), rRNA reads represented 53% of ...Rna Amplification And Cdna... · Pyrosequencing And Technical... · Pyrosequencing Read...
  10. [10]
    Stool metatranscriptomics: A technical guideline for mRNA ...
    Jul 4, 2015 · First metatranscriptome studies of the human gut suffered e.g. from ineffective mRNA enrichment and thus a potential loss of low abundant ...
  11. [11]
    Metatranscriptomics-guided genome-scale metabolic reconstruction ...
    Jul 5, 2024 · In this study, we combined long-read sequencing and metatranscriptomics-guided metabolic reconstruction to provide a genome-wide perspective of carbon ...
  12. [12]
    Integrated multi-omics analyses of microbial communities: a review ...
    Jul 3, 2023 · In this review, we first provide a general overview of each omics analysis type, including a brief history, typical workflow, primary applications, strengths, ...
  13. [13]
    Comparison of Metagenomics and Metatranscriptomics Tools - MDPI
    In the last 5 years, according to PubMed, more than 4300 ... This remarkable number represents a high percentage of the global publications in the field.
  14. [14]
    Metatranscriptomic analysis of autonomously collected and ... - Nature
    Jun 30, 2011 · We developed a protocol for automated collection and fixation of marine microbes using the Environmental Sample Processor (ESP) platform.
  15. [15]
    Metatranscriptomics reveals temperature-driven functional changes ...
    Feb 25, 2016 · Samples preparation and RNA extraction. Samples stored in RNA later were homogenized and 10 ml of the mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 4 °C ...Results · Methods · 16s Rrna Library Preparation...Missing: stabilization | Show results with:stabilization<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Impact of RNA extraction on respiratory microbiome analysis using ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · Mechanical lysis, often involving bead beating or sonication, is effective for microorganisms with thick or rigid cell walls but can lead to RNA ...
  17. [17]
    Evaluation of commercial RNA extraction kits for long-read ...
    Sep 19, 2024 · Volume 10, Issue 9 Evaluation of commercial RNA extraction kits for long-read metatranscriptomics in soil Open Access
  18. [18]
    Comparative Analysis of rRNA Removal Methods for RNA-Seq ...
    We used three enzymatic digestion-based rRNA depletion approaches from the following commercial kits (details in Table S1 and Methods): (a) NEBNext Bacterial ...2. Material And Methods · 2.2. Rna-Seq Experimental... · 3. Results
  19. [19]
    Efficient and robust RNA-seq process for cultured bacteria and ...
    Mar 28, 2012 · To this end, we evaluated rRNA depletion methods and chose a protocol that eliminates rRNA reads efficiently and robustly, largely irrespective ...
  20. [20]
    Efficient Enrichment of Bacterial mRNA from Host-Bacteria Total ...
    Oct 7, 2016 · A method is described to concurrently remove polyadenylated transcripts, prokaryotic rRNA, and eukaryotic rRNA, including those with low amounts of starting ...
  21. [21]
    Oceanic Crustal Fluid Single Cell Genomics Complements ... - NIH
    A testament to these challenges is the low RNA yields (0.8–3.9 ng μl–1) from the North Pond aquifer that were too low for standard RNA-seq library preparation ...
  22. [22]
    Scalable and cost-effective ribonuclease-based rRNA depletion for ...
    We describe a probe and ribonuclease based strategy for bacterial rRNA removal. We implemented the method using either chemically synthesized oligonucleotides ...
  23. [23]
    Impact of RNA degradation on next-generation sequencing ...
    The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer is generally recommended for the detection of RNA integrity; samples with RNA integrity values (RIN) ≥ 8 can be used for subsequent ...
  24. [24]
    Marine Microeukaryote Metatranscriptomics: Sample Processing ...
    Notably, filters may clog as biomass accumulates, especially for small filter size fractions, impacting filter effectiveness and sample quality. The filtration ...
  25. [25]
    Quantifying Soil Microbiome Abundance by Metatranscriptomics and ...
    The quality of the RNA of both the NAEstd and environmental RNA was high (not degraded) as seen from the Bioanalyzer RNA integrity number (a unite‐less scale ...
  26. [26]
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Full-length cDNA sequencing of prokaryotic transcriptome ... - PacBio
    In conjunction with SMRT Sequencing, which has average read lengths of 10-18 kb, we are able to sequence entire transcripts, including polycistronic RNAs ...
  28. [28]
    Error Rate of PacBio vs Nanopore: How Accurate Are Long-Read ...
    Mar 22, 2025 · Discover the error rate management of PacBio and Nanopore in genomics. Learn their strengths, correction strategies, and applications.
  29. [29]
    Primed and ready: nanopore metabarcoding can now recover highly ...
    Sep 9, 2024 · Nanopore R10.3 sequencing chemistry and super accurate (SUP) basecalling model reduced raw read error rates to ~ 4%, and consensus calling with ...
  30. [30]
    How much data should I generate for metagenomics ... - SEQanswers
    Jul 20, 2015 · Sequencing companies suggest 3 GB clean data for metagenomics and 2-4 GB for metatranscriptomics. Some papers use 2-30 GB, and one service uses ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    SAMSA: a comprehensive metatranscriptome analysis pipeline - PMC
    During preprocessing, raw sequences are trimmed to remove reads containing low-quality bases and eliminate adaptor contamination using Trimmomatic, a flexible ...
  32. [32]
    metaTP: a meta-transcriptome data analysis pipeline with integrated ...
    Apr 26, 2025 · Analyzing the meta-transcriptome can reveal variations in gene expression that are associated with specific phenotypes and provide insights into ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    Benchmarking and optimizing qualitative and quantitative pipelines in environmental metatranscriptomics using mixture controlling experiments
    ### Summary of Metatranscriptomics Pipelines from https://academic.oup.com/ismecommun/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ismeco/ycaf090/8152718
  34. [34]
    Metatranscriptomics as a tool to identify fungal species ... - IMA Fungus
    Aug 8, 2019 · For read-level abundances, sequence reads were mapped to transcripts using Bowtie2 v.2.3.3.1 (Langmead and Salzberg 2012) and quantified in ...
  35. [35]
    Genome-resolved metatranscriptomics reveals conserved root ...
    Dec 13, 2023 · Our results indicate that microbiota members activate strain-specific processes but also common gene sets to colonize plant roots.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Novel workflow for Metagenomics and transcriptomics analysis of ...
    The pipeline is written by using Nextflow to achieve high reproducibility and fast and straightforward use of the pipeline. This pipeline also produces the ...
  37. [37]
    Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and ...
    Oct 30, 2018 · HUMAnN2 is a system for accelerated functional profiling of shotgun metagenomic and metatranscriptomic (“meta'omic”) sequencing from host- and ...
  38. [38]
    MetaTrans: an open-source pipeline for metatranscriptomics - Nature
    May 23, 2016 · Here we present MetaTrans, an efficient open-source pipeline to analyze the structure and functions of active microbial communities using the power of multi- ...Missing: history key milestones
  39. [39]
    Bioinformatics tools for quantitative and functional metagenome and ...
    Here, we summarize existing bioinformatics tools of metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data analysis, the purpose of which is to assist researchers.
  40. [40]
    SAMSA: a comprehensive metatranscriptome analysis pipeline
    Sep 29, 2016 · ... data set averaged only 1–2 million annotated mRNA reads per sample. While total mRNA may not be a perfect proxy of organism population size ...Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
  41. [41]
    Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with ...
    Mar 4, 2019 · The mOTUs2 workflow for taxonomic profiling consists of three steps: alignment of metagenomic sequencing reads to MGs, estimation of read ...
  42. [42]
    MG-RAST
    MG-RAST is an open source, open submission web application server that suggests automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes.MG-RAST user manual · Data Access · Analysis
  43. [43]
    Functional microarray analysis of nitrogen and carbon cycling genes ...
    May 24, 2007 · The main goal of the present study was to describe the functional aspects of microbial communities involved in soil-borne nutrient cycling ...
  44. [44]
    Functional microarray analysis of nitrogen and carbon cycling genes ...
    Soil-borne microbial communities were examined via a functional gene microarray ... Epub 2007 May 24. Authors. Etienne Yergeau , Sanghoon Kang, Zhili He, Jizhong ...
  45. [45]
    DNA Microarrays: A Trusted Tool Keeps Evolving | Biocompare
    Mar 6, 2015 · But rough estimates put microarrays at about $100 (or less) per sample for basic genomic studies, and up to $300 per sample for more complex ...Missing: 2000s | Show results with:2000s
  46. [46]
    RNA-based amplicon sequencing is ineffective in measuring ...
    Jun 13, 2023 · This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of 16S-RNA-seq for viability assessment in synthetic and complex microbial communities.
  47. [47]
    16S rRNA/rRNA Gene Ratios and Cell Activity Staining Reveal ... - NIH
    Apr 2, 2019 · Our results suggest that 16S ratios and active cell staining provide complementary information for measuring and interpreting microbial activity-dormancy ...
  48. [48]
    Skin metatranscriptomics reveals a landscape of variation ... - Nature
    Aug 28, 2025 · Metatranscriptomics methods for the skin are hampered by low microbial biomass, contamination with host cells and low RNA stability.
  49. [49]
    Multi-amplicon microbiome data analysis pipelines for mixed ...
    Jan 13, 2023 · Multi-amplicon amplification and sequencing overcomes limitations of single primer set bias and limited speciation capacity for single amplicons ...
  50. [50]
    Review Understanding human health through metatranscriptomics
    We review the advantages and disadvantages of metatranscriptomics analyses in understanding human health and disease.Missing: poly- | Show results with:poly-
  51. [51]
    Reconstructing ribosomal genes from large scale total RNA meta ...
    Mar 13, 2020 · The whole microbial RNA pool is dominated by rRNA and tRNA (95–99%), while only small fractions are mRNA (1–5%) (Carvalhais et al., 2012).
  52. [52]
    Metatranscriptomic reconstruction reveals RNA viruses with ... - PNAS
    Nov 26, 2019 · We tracked RNA viral and host communities for 22 d in 2 soil environments central to carbon cycling, the rhizosphere and detritosphere.Missing: variability yield
  53. [53]
    Rational probe design for efficient rRNA depletion and improved ...
    Oct 20, 2023 · Here we describe a probe set that achieves efficient enzymatic rRNA removal of complex human-associated microbial communities.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  54. [54]
    Allometric scaling of RNA abundance from genes to communities
    Oct 4, 2021 · This study provides a robust empirical framework explaining the relationship between RNA abundance through metatranscriptomic reads and the size ...
  55. [55]
    Mining metagenomic and metatranscriptomic data for clues about ...
    It is noticeable that due to conserved genome regions, organism variability, and gene shifts, de novo assembly may bring chimeras and ambiguities into contigs, ...
  56. [56]
    Computational Metagenomics: State of the Art - MDPI
    PacBio's HiFi technology demonstrates very high accuracy, while ONT platforms generate ultra-long reads but with moderate base-calling accuracy in homopolymeric ...
  57. [57]
    Ten common issues with reference sequence databases and how to ...
    Mar 15, 2024 · For example, more than 40% and 60% of metagenomic reads from skin and stool, respectively, remained unmapped to any genomic positions when ...
  58. [58]
    MetaMap: an atlas of metatranscriptomic reads in human disease ...
    Total reads column depicts the average read depth per sample for each study. Average metafeature abundance for alphapapillomavirus 9, Salmonella enterica ...Missing: metatranscriptomics | Show results with:metatranscriptomics
  59. [59]
    Comprehensive evaluation of methods for differential expression ...
    Aug 9, 2023 · Total RPKs per sample are on average 13 053 428 in ZOE2.0 and 2815 749 in ZOE-pilot. The third dataset (namely, the IBD data) is in a ...
  60. [60]
    Controlling taxa abundance improves metatranscriptomics ...
    Mar 7, 2023 · We demonstrated that controlling for both DNA and taxa abundances leads to superior performance compared to only controlling for one factor.
  61. [61]
    Metatranscriptomics: A Tool for Clinical Metagenomics | OMICS
    This expert review article offers a critical examination of the computational metatranscriptomics tools for studying the transcriptomes of microbial ...
  62. [62]
    Bridging the Gaps in Meta-Omic Analysis: Workflows and ... - PubMed
    Nov 29, 2023 · First, there is a widespread lack of standardization in data processing, including software choices and the ease of installing and running ...
  63. [63]
    Dynamics of metatranscription in the inflammatory bowel disease ...
    Our findings highlight that directly measuring functional activity of the gut microbiome through metatranscriptomics reveals important insights that are ...
  64. [64]
    Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut
    May 19, 2014 · The results thus detail relationships between community genomic potential and gene expression in the gut, and establish the feasibility of metatranscriptomic ...
  65. [65]
    Metatranscriptomics of the Human Oral Microbiome during Health ...
    Apr 1, 2014 · In this study, we used massively parallel RNA sequencing to profile changes in both the composition and gene expression of the human oral ...
  66. [66]
    Metatranscriptomics Reveals Antibiotic-Induced Resistance Gene ...
    Mar 5, 2020 · We utilized a dual sequencing approach combining shotgun metagenomics and metatranscriptomics to profile how three antibiotics, amoxicillin, doxycycline, and ...
  67. [67]
    Microbiota diversity and gene expression dynamics in human oral ...
    Apr 27, 2014 · ... metatranscriptome, suggesting they could correspond to transient or inactive bacteria. This shows the importance of obtaining both kind of ...
  68. [68]
  69. [69]
  70. [70]
    Viral to metazoan marine plankton nucleotide sequences from the ...
    Aug 1, 2017 · A unique collection of oceanic samples was gathered by the Tara Oceans expeditions (2009–2013), targeting plankton organisms ranging from viruses to metazoans.
  71. [71]
    Soil metatranscriptome demonstrates a shift in C, N, and S ... - NIH
    Results showed changes in the expression of C cycle genes under eCO 2 with an increase in the transcript abundance for carbohydrate and amino acid uptake, and ...
  72. [72]
    Metatranscriptomics Reveals the Diversity of Genes Expressed by ...
    Specific annotation of plant cell wall degrading enzymes identified enzymes active on major polymers (cellulose, hemicelluloses, pectin, lignin) and glycoside ...
  73. [73]
    Comparative metatranscriptomics reveals kingdom level changes in ...
    Jul 18, 2013 · Plant–microbe interactions in the rhizosphere have important roles in biogeochemical cycling, and maintenance of plant health and productivity, ...
  74. [74]
    Genome-centric metatranscriptomes and ecological roles of the ...
    Apr 23, 2018 · Profiling of the metabolically active community from a production-scale biogas plant by means of high-throughput metatranscriptome sequencing.
  75. [75]
    Metatranscriptomic Profiling Reveals Linkages between the Active ...
    In this study, we applied metatranscriptomics to characterize the active rumen microbiomes of beef cattle with different feed efficiencies (efficient, n ...
  76. [76]
    The transcriptional response of microbial communities in thawing ...
    Mar 16, 2015 · Metatranscriptomics is shown here to be a useful approach for inferring the activity of permafrost microbes that has potential to improve our ...
  77. [77]
    PacBio Announces Major Advances for Revio and Vega to Lower ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · “With Revio's multi-use SMRT Cells driving down sequencing costs, long-read data will be foundational to the next generation of population ...
  78. [78]
    Full-length cDNA sequencing of prokaryotic transcriptome ... - PacBio
    Jun 1, 2021 · In conjunction with SMRT Sequencing, which has average readlengths of 10-15 kb, we are able to sequence entire transcripts, including ...
  79. [79]
    MinION portable nanopore sequencing device
    Sequence anywhere, palm-sized device for use in the lab or field. From $990 per flow cell. Cost-effective access to in-house sequencing for every lab and ...MinION Mk1D · View product · MinION 10 yearsMissing: situ | Show results with:situ
  80. [80]
    In-situ sequencing reveals the effect of storage on lacustrine ...
    Jan 31, 2022 · The Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing device is suitable for in-situ sequencing and enables accurate and robust analysis of the sediment ...
  81. [81]
    Effect of the intratumoral microbiota on spatial and cellular ... - Nature
    Nov 16, 2022 · We adapted 10x Visium spatial transcriptomics to determine the identity and in situ location of intratumoral microbial communities within ...
  82. [82]
    GeoMx DSP Spatial Genomics Overview - NanoString
    The GeoMx® Digital Spatial Profiler provides context in spatial transcriptomics and help researchers obtain spatial genomics data quickly.The Geomx Dsp Advantage · The Geomx Dsp Workflow · Related ResourcesMissing: microbiome | Show results with:microbiome
  83. [83]
    Rapid and accurate identification of ribosomal RNA sequences via ...
    Feb 21, 2022 · A metatranscriptome data processing workflow ... rRNA read removal can be the most time-consuming step in the entire data processing pipeline.Materials And Methods · Results · Rrna Reads May Be Mapped To...
  84. [84]
    Portable nanopore-sequencing technology: Trends in development ...
    Jan 31, 2023 · This paper reviews the research and development process of nanopore sequencing technology (NST) from the laboratory to commercially viable tools.Missing: metatranscriptomics | Show results with:metatranscriptomics
  85. [85]
    A CRISPR/Cas9-based enhancement of high-throughput single-cell ...
    May 19, 2025 · Here the authors present an approach called scCLEAN, which uses CRISPR/Cas9 to target and remove certain ubiquitous transcripts, thereby ...
  86. [86]
    Quantum computing for genomics: conceptual challenges and ...
    Jul 5, 2025 · We assess the potential of quantum computing to accelerate computation of central tasks in genomics, focusing on often-neglected theoretical limitations.Missing: 2027 | Show results with:2027
  87. [87]
    Scaling Up: Building a 96-Qubit Quantum Computer by 2027
    Oct 2, 2025 · New $2.66 million grant from the National Science Foundation will support the construction of a 96-qubit quantum computer to enable future ...Missing: transcriptome assembly
  88. [88]
    Efficient and cost-effective bacterial mRNA sequencing from low ...
    Oct 16, 2020 · Due to its simplicity, the cost per rRNA depletion reaction in EMBR-seq is ~$0.40, which is at least an order of magnitude lower than other ...
  89. [89]
    A Focus on Metagenomics, Metatranscriptomics, and Metaproteomics
    Jul 29, 2025 · Metatranscriptomic analysis involves the characterization of the transcriptomic profile of microbial communities through the study of RNA ...
  90. [90]
    Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut
    The Metatranscriptome Varies Significantly Among Subjects Despite Metagenomic Concordance. Recent large-scale studies of the human microbiome have shown ...
  91. [91]
    mixOmics – From Single to Multi-Omics Data Integration
    mixOmics is an R package for exploring and integrating omics data, including transcriptomics, proteomics, lipidomics, microbiome, metagenomics and beyond.The mixOmics package · mixOmics Publications · The mixOmics team · NewsMissing: metatranscriptomics | Show results with:metatranscriptomics
  92. [92]
    Consistency across multi‐omics layers in a drug‐perturbed gut ...
    Jul 24, 2023 · Using the synthetic community, we could show a high correlation between metagenomics and metatranscriptomics (ρ = 0.92), similar to a ...
  93. [93]
    Microbiomes, Their Function, and Cancer: How Metatranscriptomics ...
    Sep 7, 2023 · This review summarises the contributions of metagenomics and metatranscriptomics to the knowledge of the microbial environment associated with several cancers.3. Breast Cancer · 5. Colorectal Cancer · 6. Gastric Cancer
  94. [94]
    Advancing functional and translational microbiome research using ...
    Dec 6, 2019 · Metaproteomics should in principle provide superior insight into gut microbial functionality as compared with metatranscriptomics, since not all ...
  95. [95]
    Integration of metatranscriptomics data improves the predictive ...
    May 31, 2025 · Microbial consortia play pivotal roles in nutrient cycling across diverse ecosystems, where the functionality and composition of microbial ...