Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Midday Meal Scheme

![Children being served midday meal under the scheme in Nagaland]float-right The Midday Meal Scheme, officially redesignated as Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN) in 2021, is a centrally sponsored program of the Government of India that delivers free cooked lunches containing specified caloric and protein content to over 100 million children attending government, government-aided, and local body primary and upper primary schools on working days. Launched nationally in 1995 as the National Programme of Nutritional Support to Primary Education to combat classroom hunger and promote universal elementary education, the scheme evolved from earlier state-level initiatives dating back to 1925 in regions like Madras, with the objective of boosting enrollment, attendance, retention, and nutritional outcomes among schoolchildren, particularly from disadvantaged backgrounds. Empirical evaluations indicate that the program has significantly increased school enrollment by up to 22 percentage points in beneficiary areas and enhanced learning achievements, as measured by scores, while also yielding intergenerational nutritional benefits through improved child metrics. However, implementation challenges persist, including inconsistent food quality leading to incidents such as contamination-related illnesses, infrastructural deficiencies, and administrative hurdles like funding delays, which have undermined efficacy in certain locales despite overall positive causal impacts on and academic performance.

Historical Background

Pre-Independence Roots

The origins of school meal programs in India trace back to localized initiatives in the early , primarily within British-administered provinces, aimed at mitigating child amid recurrent famines and . In the , the first documented effort began on November 16, 1920, when the Madras Corporation provided simple (snacks) to students in a corporation school in the Thousand Lights area of Madras city, spearheaded by local leaders to combat hunger and promote attendance among underprivileged children. This voluntary program, funded through municipal resources without support, represented an early response to the nutritional deficits highlighted by famines such as the 1899–1900 event and subsequent droughts, which had severely affected child health and school participation in southern . By 1925, the Madras Corporation Council formalized and expanded the scheme, approving proposals to supply midday meals to underprivileged students in select schools, marking a shift toward structured feeding as a tool for social welfare during the colonial era. Similar localized experiments emerged elsewhere: in , Keshav Academy in Calcutta introduced compulsory midday for boys to address urban poverty and low enrollment; and in 1942, the Bombay municipal administration launched free midday meals in primary schools amid wartime shortages and concerns. These efforts, often driven by philanthropists, municipal bodies, and social reformers rather than colonial policy, lacked nationwide coordination or funding, relying instead on donations and contributions to provide basic staples like or porridge. Missionary institutions also contributed sporadically, offering food alongside in colonial-era to attract poor children from marginalized communities, though such provisions were incidental to evangelistic goals rather than systematic programs. Overall, these pre-independence roots emphasized relief and voluntary aid over entitlement, yielding initial boosts in among targeted groups—such as observed increases in in Madras pilot —but without rigorous or due to fragmented implementation and resource constraints.

Post-Independence Central Initiatives

Following , state governments in initiated midday meal programs to address child and boost school enrollment, with launching a widespread scheme in 1956 under , starting as a pilot in and expanding to cover over 1.3 million children by 1960 through community and government funding. implemented similar efforts in the and , providing cooked meals in select schools via local panchayats, achieving near-universal coverage in primary schools by the mid-1980s. These state-level successes demonstrated increased attendance—up to 20% in —and nutritional improvements, influencing central policy discussions on scaling such interventions nationwide. The (NPE) of 1986 recommended integrating nutritional support, including midday meals, into to enhance enrollment and retention, particularly among disadvantaged groups, as part of broader efforts like Operation Blackboard for infrastructural improvements. This policy marked an early central endorsement of meals as a tool for , though implementation remained largely state-driven with limited federal funding until the 1990s; by the mid-1980s, only , , , and had universalized cooked meal programs using state resources. Central pilots in the late 1980s focused on dry ration distribution in drought-prone areas, covering thousands of schools but yielding modest enrollment gains due to inconsistent supply chains. In 1995, the launched the National Programme of Nutritional Support to on August 15, initially in 2,408 blocks across 21 states, providing free food grains at 100 grams per child per school day for classes I-V to encourage without mandating cooked meals. By 1997-98, the program expanded to all blocks, reaching approximately 47 million children and distributing over 1.2 million tonnes of rice annually, later increased to 300 grams per child in 2001. Early evaluations noted coverage of millions but limited nutritional benefits, as dry grains were often resold or inadequately prepared due to lacking kitchen infrastructure in over 60% of beneficiary schools, prompting gradual shifts toward cooked meals in subsequent years. In the public interest litigation People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 196 of 2001), the Supreme Court of India recognized the right to food as integral to the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution, directing the conversion of existing food security schemes into enforceable entitlements. On November 28, 2001, an interim order mandated that all state governments provide cooked mid-day meals to children in classes I to V in every government, government-aided, and local authority primary school within six months, replacing dry rations where previously supplied. This directive shifted the Midday Meal Scheme from a discretionary welfare measure to a justiciable obligation, with the Court appointing commissioners to monitor compliance and report periodically. Subsequent interim orders reinforced phased implementation, requiring states to achieve full coverage in primary schools by the 2002-2003 and addressing deficiencies through nutritional guidelines and support. By 2003, most states had transitioned to cooked meals, covering an estimated 80-90% of primary schools, with enrollment data indicating rapid uptake. The extended oversight to upper primary levels (classes VI-VIII), culminating in national directives for their inclusion by the 2006-2007 , resulting in cooked meals reaching approximately 120 million children daily across primary and upper primary grades by mid-decade. Compliance reports filed with the documented near-universal provision in government schools by 2007, though challenges like irregularities persisted in some regions. The scheme's legal framework evolved further with the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Act, 2009, which enshrined as a fundamental right under Article 21A and integrated nutritional support, including mid-day meals, to boost attendance and retention. Section 19 of the RTE Act permitted schools to organize mid-day meals, aligning with the PUCL entitlements and delegating monitoring to school management committees for community oversight. This linkage reinforced the Court's vision of as a prerequisite for effective , embedding the Midday Meal Scheme within a broader rights-based ecosystem while maintaining for enforcement.

Program Framework

Entitlements and Nutritional Standards

![Children being served food under the Mid-day Meal Scheme][float-right] The Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN) scheme entitles children in government, government-aided, and local body schools, from Bal Vatika (pre-primary) to Classes I-VIII, to one hot cooked meal per school day, provided in approximately 12 beneficiaries annually. This coverage extends to special training centers under the National Child Labour Project, ensuring nutritional support aligns with the mandates. Nutritional standards require meals to deliver minimum caloric and protein intake differentiated by class level: 450 calories and 12 grams of protein for primary (Bal Vatika to Class V), and 700 calories and 20 grams for upper primary (Classes VI-VIII). These norms, derived from cooking 100 grams of food grains, specified pulses, vegetables, and oils, promote balanced diets with micronutrients supplemented through convergence with health programs. Post-2013 revisions under NFSA emphasized fortified foods, such as double-fortified salt with iron and iodine, and incorporation of nutri-rich cereals or millets to enhance nutritional quality without altering core calorie-protein benchmarks. Specific food entitlements per per school day are standardized as follows:
ComponentPrimary (Bal Vatika to Class V)Upper Primary (Classes VI-VIII)
Food grains (, , or nutri-rich cereals)100 grams150 grams
Pulses20 grams30 grams
(including leafy)50 grams75 grams
Oil and fat5 grams7.5 grams
Salt and condiments are provided as needed to prepare varied menus, with guidelines encouraging school nutrition gardens for fresh produce. These quantities ensure the prescribed energy and protein from a combination of staples and accompaniments, with states advised to adapt menus locally while adhering to central norms.

Financial Structure and Budgetary Allocations

The Midday Meal Scheme, now known as PM POSHAN, operates as a wherein the central government provides assistance for key components including the cost of food grains supplied free of charge to states, cooking costs, payments to cooks-cum-helpers, and , (MME) expenses. Cooking costs are shared between the center and states in a 60:40 for most states and union territories, with a 90:10 applicable to northeastern and certain special category states; states are responsible for infrastructure development, maintenance, and any supplementary expenditures beyond central norms. The central share for cook stands at 100% in some cases but is otherwise shared similarly to cooking costs, while MME funding is allocated at 2.7% of the combined assistance for food grains and cooking costs. This structure ensures decentralized implementation with fiscal accountability, though states must match central contributions to access funds. Budgetary allocations for the scheme have expanded significantly since its national rollout in , reflecting increased coverage and nutritional enhancements. In the early 2000s, annual central outlays hovered around Rs. 3,000 , rising to Rs. 4,813 by 2006-07 amid program scaling. By the , allocations surpassed Rs. 8,000 annually, driven by enrollment growth and adjustments, and exceeded Rs. 10,000 by the late 2010s; for instance, revised estimates reached Rs. 12,900 in 2020-21 despite disruptions. This escalation underscores sustained fiscal commitment, with cumulative central spending approaching Rs. 40,000 over the decade prior to 2020. Under the PM POSHAN extension approved for 2021-26, the scheme's total projected budget amounts to Rs. 1,30,794.90 crore, incorporating central assistance for core components alongside state shares and an additional Rs. 45,000 crore borne centrally for food grains. Annual central allocations have stabilized around Rs. 10,000-12,500 crore, with the 2024-25 budget estimate at Rs. 12,467.39 crore and the 2025-26 budget estimate at Rs. 12,500 crore. To address inflationary pressures, cooking costs (termed material costs) were revised upward by 9.5% effective May 1, 2025, increasing from Rs. 6.19 to Rs. 6.78 per child per day for primary classes and proportionately for upper primary, marking a targeted adjustment to maintain nutritional standards without broader structural overhauls.

Implementation Models and Variations

The Midday Meal Scheme utilizes two principal implementation models: decentralized preparation at individual schools and centralized production from large-scale facilities. The decentralized model, adopted widely across , involves on-site cooking by school staff, local cooks, or community self-help groups using ingredients supplied under the scheme, allowing for customization to regional tastes but posing challenges in and consistency. In the centralized model, meals are cooked in industrial kitchens and transported to schools, emphasizing standardization, , and ; this approach is implemented in select urban and high-density areas to address limitations of on-site cooking. Centralized kitchens, such as those operated by in partnership with state governments, produce up to 100,000 meals per facility daily and supply over 2.3 million children across 23,000 schools in multiple states, with distribution completed within specified time limits like 2 hours in some districts. Variations include Tithi Bhojan, a supplementary initiative encouraging voluntary contributions of full meals or add-ons like sweets, fruits, or snacks on specific dates such as festivals, birthdays, or anniversaries, to enhance nutritional diversity without replacing standard entitlements. Originating in , it has expanded to states including and , where it has facilitated over 100,000 additional meals in schools through local sponsorships. State adaptations feature extensions beyond primary and upper primary levels; for instance, implemented the scheme in 475 government junior colleges from January 1, 2025, supplying hot cooked meals to intermediate students (classes 11-12) to curb enrollment drops.

Recent Reforms and Expansions

In September 2021, the Union Cabinet approved the renaming of the Midday Meal Scheme to the Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN) scheme, with a five-year extension from the financial year 2021-22 to 2025-26, aiming to enhance nutritional support through one hot cooked meal per school day for eligible children. This reform introduced flexi-funds to states for procuring local nutritious items like fruits and vegetables, addressing gaps in dietary beyond standard entitlements. To combat deficiencies, the scheme incorporated fortified —enriched with iron, folic acid, and vitamins—starting from 2021, with nationwide rollout under programs by March 2024 and extension of the mandate until December 2028. This initiative targets reduction, particularly in school meals, by blending fortified kernels at a 1:100 ratio in supplied to PM POSHAN institutions. In April 2025, the Ministry of Education enhanced the material cost component by 9.5%, raising it from ₹6.19 to ₹6.78 per child per day for primary classes (classes I-V) and from ₹9.32 to ₹10.19 for upper primary (VI-VIII), effective from May 1, 2025, to offset in food prices as per the for Industrial Workers. The committed an additional ₹954 for FY 2025-26 to cover this hike, maintaining the shared funding model while prioritizing cost adjustments for staples, pulses, and oils without altering cooking or rates.

Operational Execution

Decentralized and Centralized Approaches

The Midday Meal Scheme primarily employs a decentralized model, wherein hot cooked meals are prepared on-site at individual schools by local cooks or community groups, a practice mandated by the in 2001 to ensure freshness and nutritional retention. This approach predominates in rural areas, where over 80% of scheme beneficiaries reside, leveraging local ingredients and immediate serving to minimize spoilage risks associated with transportation. However, it introduces variability in due to inconsistent and among cooks, potentially affecting uniformity across schools. In contrast, centralized kitchens involve large-scale industrial facilities that prepare and distribute meals to clusters of schools, often through partnerships with NGOs like , which operates such systems to supply over 1.5 million meals daily using automated cooking processes like steam and gravity-based methods for enhanced efficiency. This model is more prevalent in and semi-urban settings, where high facilitates via dedicated fleets, reducing per-meal time to under five hours for bulk and achieving savings through . benefits are evident in , as centralized operations can standardize portion sizes and protocols, though they risk delivery delays from traffic or distance, potentially cooling meals en route. Hybrid implementations, such as those in , integrate decentralized school-level cooking in rural zones with centralized kitchens for urban clusters, covering over 70% of the state's beneficiaries through Akshaya Patra's and improving coverage by adapting to geographic variances—centralized units handle dense populations while decentralized ones address remote access challenges. This flexibility enhances overall , with centralized components enabling rapid scaling during expansions, as seen in the scheme's extension to pre-primary levels in select districts by 2022, though it requires robust coordination to balance freshness with volume demands.

Monitoring Mechanisms and Oversight

The PM POSHAN scheme (formerly the Midday Meal Scheme) establishes a multi-tiered oversight framework, including a National Steering-cum-Monitoring Committee (NSMC) tasked with reviewing scheme-wide implementation, evaluating progress, and providing policy recommendations to central authorities. Complementary state-level steering-cum-monitoring committees, often chaired by the chief secretary, coordinate with and block-level panels that convene at least monthly to scrutinize local , resource allocation, and operational hurdles. These bodies mandate regular field visits by education officers and headmasters to verify , nutritional adherence, and protocols using standardized checklists. Social audits form a core built-in check, conducted through community-led processes where trained local participants, including parents and School Management Committee members, verify records on meal regularity, finances, and inclusion at selected schools, culminating in public hearings for and corrective mandates. States are required to perform these audits at least twice annually in underperforming districts, covering at least 20 schools per such area, with findings reported to district authorities for enforcement, including potential disciplinary actions against irregularities. The facilitates real-time oversight by aggregating data on student attendance, meal servings, and inventory via web and mobile platforms, enabling comprehensive reports for administrators to detect discrepancies promptly. operates through state-specific toll-free helplines, such as 1967 for reporting missed meals exceeding three days, with districts obligated to investigate and resolve complaints within defined timelines while submitting periodic compliance updates to higher levels. States furnish annual implementation reports to the central Ministry of Education, detailing monitoring outcomes, audit results, and adherence rates to nutritional and procedural norms.

International and NGO Involvement

Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have supplemented the Midday Meal Scheme through partnerships with state governments, primarily by operating centralized kitchens to supply hot cooked meals in urban and high-density areas. The , the largest such NGO, delivers mid-day meals to approximately 2.35 million children daily across 23,113 schools via 78 facilities in multiple states, focusing on scalability through industrial-scale preparation while adhering to government nutritional norms. These efforts, initiated in before formal government expansion, cover select regions without replacing decentralized school-level cooking. International organizations provide technical support and capacity-building rather than direct funding or meal provision. The World Food Programme (WFP) collaborates on enhancing meal quality, including pilots and training for cooks on and , as seen in a 2021 Odisha app for mid-day meal helpers and a 2022 partnership with for broader program strengthening. WFP's involvement dates to early scheme phases, aiding and nutritional standards amid 's program serving over 120 million children overall. NGO contributions remain supplementary and limited, accounting for under 10% of total meals due to the scheme's vast scale and government dominance in rural areas. Such partnerships target implementation gaps in densely populated zones, emphasizing efficiency without supplanting public funding.

Empirical Impacts

Enrollment and Attendance Effects

The nationwide expansion of the Midday Meal Scheme following the Court's 2001 directive led to significant increases in . Empirical analyses indicate that the program raised by 16-19 percentage points, with disproportionately larger effects observed among girls and children from disadvantaged socioeconomic groups, such as scheduled castes and tribes. These gains stem from the scheme's role as a tangible , whereby families in resource-constrained environments prioritize to secure the daily , thereby offsetting opportunity costs associated with labor or duties. Attendance rates in primary also improved following , with evaluations reporting gains of approximately 5-10% based on household survey data, particularly benefiting marginalized communities where previously contributed to irregular participation. The causal mechanism aligns with basic economic incentives: by alleviating short-term , the midday reduces driven by nutritional deficits or the need to seek elsewhere, encouraging consistent presence without relying on indirect pathways like improved . Quasi-experimental studies exploiting staggered rollout across districts confirm these attendance effects, attributing them to the program's universal provision rather than selection biases in .

Nutritional and Health Outcomes

The Midday Meal Scheme has demonstrated measurable reductions in rates among participating school children, with a 2024 using data from India's National Family Health Surveys finding that sustained exposure to the program lowered prevalence by improving physical growth trajectories from childhood through . from randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental analyses further supports this, showing that regular meal consumption decreases the likelihood of status by enhancing caloric intake and nutritional consistency, particularly in rural and low-income cohorts. However, impacts on height-for-age (stunting) remain inconsistent, with some evaluations attributing only marginal gains to program adherence rather than transformative effects. Recent systematic reviews, including a 2024 assessment, confirm modest improvements in (BMI) and related anthropometric measures among beneficiaries, though these gains are often limited to 1-2 percentage points in undernutrition indicators over multi-year periods. Longitudinal data from 2006-2016 indicate a 13-32% relative reduction in stunting linked to scheme expansion, driven by increased protein and energy provision, yet absolute declines vary by region due to baseline severity. Sustained exposure in randomized settings yields stronger correlations, with children receiving meals for over two years exhibiting better weight stabilization compared to intermittent participants. Outcomes for deficiencies present mixed evidence, with initiatives—such as iron-enriched or double-fortified —showing efficacy in randomized trials by elevating levels and curbing among recipients. A across 150 rural schools demonstrated high uptake of mixes, increasing nutrient density in meals and modestly alleviating deficiencies in iron and , though challenges persist. Limitations arise from inconsistent menu compliance and issues, resulting in uneven deficiency reductions; for instance, while addresses targeted gaps, broader adherence to fortified staples is required for population-level impacts beyond . Overall, these interventions yield incremental health benefits but fall short of eradicating shortfalls without complementary strategies like diverse sourcing.

Educational Performance and Long-Term Benefits

Studies utilizing quasi-experimental designs have identified positive causal impacts of prolonged exposure to the Midday Meal Scheme (MDMS) on learning outcomes, particularly in and reading. Children with up to five years of primary school exposure to the program demonstrated test score improvements of approximately 18% in reading and 9% in compared to those with shorter exposure, based on data from India's National Achievement Survey and household learning assessments. These gains arise primarily from enhanced nutritional intake reducing classroom hunger and improving cognitive function, enabling greater attention and sustained effort during instruction, though effects exhibit beyond initial years without concurrent improvements in teaching quality or delivery. Long-term cohort analyses indicate sustained educational benefits, including reduced dropout rates and higher retention through upper primary levels among MDMS beneficiaries. Regular program access correlates with lower dropout probabilities, attributed to compounded effects of improved , attendance stability, and familial incentives for continued schooling, with some evaluations estimating 10-15% reductions in dropout incidence in rural cohorts exposed since early primary grades. While on adult wage premiums remains limited, intergenerational studies link early MDMS participation to better height-for-age metrics and reduced stunting, which proxy for enhanced formation potentially translating to higher lifetime earnings via improved and persistence. Empirical evaluations, including those drawing on Annual Status of Education Report (ASER) data, underscore that MDMS effects on achievement are most pronounced after 3-5 years of exposure but plateau thereafter, highlighting the necessity of complementary interventions like teacher training to amplify and sustain gains. International benchmarks, such as those from the World Bank's assessments of school feeding programs, affirm these patterns in , where nutritional supplementation alone yields modest learning uplifts absent systemic educational reforms.

Economic Evaluation

Program Costs and Fiscal Burden

The PM POSHAN scheme, formerly known as the Midday Meal Scheme, entails an annual allocation of approximately ₹12,500 for the financial year 2025-26, covering foodgrains, transportation, and partial cooking costs, with s required to match contributions for cooking expenses and management overheads. This central outlay represents a portion of the scheme's total five-year budget of ₹1,30,794.90 from 2021-22 to 2025-26, supplemented by funds that vary by but typically add 10-40% to cooking costs depending on central ratios (e.g., 90% central assistance in northeastern s versus 60% elsewhere). Per-child daily material costs, which fund ingredients excluding grains, were revised upward to ₹6.78 for Bal Vatika and primary classes and ₹10.17 for upper primary classes effective May 1, 2025, reflecting adjustments but still constituting only the core food component amid broader expenditure categories. Additional fiscal burdens arise from infrastructure investments, such as kitchen construction and maintenance, and labor payments for cooks and helpers, which collectively account for 20-30% of total outlays in audited implementations, often leading to underutilized facilities due to poor planning. performance audits have repeatedly documented inefficiencies, including leakages through inflated enrollments and diversion of funds, with instances of "institutionalised " resulting in equivalent to 10-20% of allocated resources in sampled states like and during earlier fiscal years. These systemic issues persist despite monitoring enhancements, imposing an unquantified but substantial on taxpayers by eroding effective expenditure rates. The scheme's funding competes within constrained education budgets, diverting resources from alternatives like training or classroom , where non-utilization of mid-day meal-specific grants has been noted alongside broader shortfalls in school facilities. For instance, reports highlight cases where funds earmarked for meal-related infrastructure remained unspent, indirectly straining allocations for core educational inputs and exacerbating burdens without proportional gains in instructional . This fiscal prioritization, amid India's total central education spending exceeding ₹1 crore annually, underscores trade-offs where meal program overheads—estimated at 15-25% for administration and monitoring—reduce fiscal space for investments with potentially higher direct returns on learning outcomes.

Cost-Benefit Analyses and Efficiency Metrics

Independent evaluations of the Midday Meal Scheme have estimated benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) ranging from 4.8 to as high as 31 for school feeding programs, driven primarily by enrollment increases that enhance future labor market earnings through improved accumulation. These returns stem from causal links between higher school participation and long-term income gains, though scheme-specific BCRs for remain moderated by implementation variances. However, efficiency in nutrition delivery lags, with the program's per-child costs approximately three times higher than targeted teaching interventions, yielding inferior learning gains per dollar expended. Decentralized cooking models exacerbate unit costs through inconsistent ingredient sourcing and preparation, reducing nutritional potency—such as calcium and zinc meeting less than 30% of recommended dietary allowances in sampled Odisha implementations—while administrative overheads dilute overall returns. Audits highlight systemic inefficiencies, including institutionalized exaggeration of beneficiary numbers and irregular fund diversions, with and reports documenting widespread mismanagement that implies 10-20% or more of allocations unaccounted for in various states due to leakages and over-reporting. Such findings underscore administrative waste offsetting enrollment-driven benefits, particularly in rural decentralized setups prone to local-level irregularities. Comparisons to private alternatives, such as school vouchers, suggest potential for superior cost-effectiveness; voucher programs have demonstrated comparable or greater boosts in participation and learning outcomes at lower per-child expenses by enabling choice among providers and reducing public sector overheads. These alternatives could yield higher net returns by minimizing leakages inherent in centralized and decentralized execution, though direct head-to-head trials for the Midday Meal context remain limited.

Criticisms and Challenges

Quality Control and Safety Incidents

In July 2013, 23 children died and over 50 others fell ill in Dharmasati Gandaman village, , , after consuming a midday meal contaminated with , a toxic , due to cooking oil stored in a repurposed pesticide container by the school's cook. This incident highlighted lapses in storage practices and oversight under the scheme. Food poisoning cases linked to midday meals have persisted, with 979 victims reported across schools in the first nine months of 2022 alone, marking the highest figure in six years according to cited in a and review. In June 2023, over 100 students in were hospitalized following consumption of a "sour" midday meal suspected of spoilage, representing the third such incident in that region within a week. Hygiene deficiencies contribute to these failures, as evidenced by a 2019 study of 52 upper primary schools in , where personal among cook-cum-helpers was satisfactory in only 32.1% of government-aided schools, compared to 91.7% in government schools, despite national guidelines mandating protective gear and sanitation protocols. Violations of these standards, including absent head caps, aprons, gloves, and inadequate cleaning, have been documented in inspections, often linked to insufficient for cooks despite directives requiring periodic . Such lapses exacerbate risks of in school kitchens lacking basic like clean water access.

Implementation Shortcomings and Corruption

The implementation of the Midday Meal Scheme has faced persistent bureaucratic delays in fund releases and procurement, leading to irregular supplies of ingredients and missed meal servings in numerous schools across states. A 2015 performance audit highlighted that states often failed to conduct prescribed inspections for grain quality, resulting in procurement flaws that allowed substandard materials to enter the without adequate verification. These delays, compounded by inadequate monitoring mechanisms, have caused uneven distribution, with reports of meals not reaching students for extended periods in regions like , where distribution halted in over 100 schools for months due to supply chain breakdowns. Corruption has undermined the scheme through widespread misappropriation of funds and diversion of resources, as evidenced in multiple audits and enforcement actions. In , a principal was arrested in September 2025 for embezzling over ₹55 from Midday Meal allocations, redirecting the funds to rather than procurement or operations. Systemic issues include unauthorized retention of commodities and fund diversions, noted in state-specific reviews such as 's 2007 audit, which identified unspent budgets alongside evidence of . Across , complaints of corruption and irregularities in fund handling have persisted, with states like and others exhibiting patterns of mismanagement that prioritize siphoning over delivery. Empirical evidence of ghost beneficiaries has further exposed governance failures, inflating reported coverage to mask fund leakages without corresponding benefits to children. The 2017 linkage of the scheme to biometrics revealed 4.4 lakh fictitious students in , , and , whose non-existent enrollments had enabled unwarranted disbursements of grains and cooking costs. In alone, audits identified approximately 2 lakh such ghost entries, leading to fines on 251 headmasters and underscoring how exaggerated enrollment figures—described by as "institutionalised"—facilitated resource pilferage. These discrepancies, persisting despite central guidelines, indicate deep-rooted incentives for local officials to overstate numbers to secure higher allocations while actual reach diminishes.

Unintended Consequences and Systemic Inefficiencies

The provision of free midday meals has been associated with a displacement of parental responsibilities in meal preparation, as evidenced by qualitative reports from parents indicating a reduced household burden for providing one daily meal to children. This shift may foster greater reliance on institutional provisioning, potentially eroding incentives for families to prioritize diverse home-cooked nutrition or impart cooking skills, thereby hindering long-term self-sufficiency in dietary habits. Such dynamics align with opportunity cost considerations, where subsidized school meals lower the perceived need for family labor in child nutrition, possibly crowding out private initiatives like community or household-led feeding programs. Systemic inefficiencies arise from resource competition within schools, where the midday meal program's implementation has crowded out complementary interventions, such as the government's iron and folic acid supplementation effort. A study examining school-level interactions found that adding nutrition-focused activities displaced IFA distribution, yielding no net reduction in child despite heightened in some cases. This causal linkage—stemming from finite school staff and time—highlights how layered mandates in large-scale public programs can neutralize additive benefits, exacerbating inefficiencies at the operational level. The scheme's vast scale, serving over 120 million children daily as of recent evaluations, has inadvertently strained school environments, leading to reported declines in teacher-student interactions and parental confidence in government institutions following surges. Households responded by reallocating expenditures toward private tutoring, increasing such outlays by 0.234 standard deviations without a net change in total spending, indicating a compensatory shift rather than overall growth. These patterns underscore broader rigidities in a centralized model, where provisioning limits adaptive responses to local nutritional needs or innovations that decentralized alternatives might enable.

References

  1. [1]
    Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman - PM POSHAN
    In September 2004 the scheme was revised to provide cooked mid day meal with 300 calories and 8-12 grams of protein to all children studying in classes I – V in ...
  2. [2]
    Midday meals in India improve children's learning outcomes - VoxDev
    Sep 27, 2022 · Firstly, midday meals feed over 100 million children each school day (WFP 2020), making it the world's largest school nutrition programme.
  3. [3]
    ::Welcome to PM POSHAN
    Mid Day Meal (now PM POSHAN Scheme) in schools has had a long history in India. In 1925, a Mid Day Meal Programme was introduced for disadvantaged children in ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Food for Thought: Evaluating the Impact of India's Mid-Day Meal ...
    In an effort to motivate further policy action, this paper evaluates the impact of India's. Mid-Day Meal Program on the educational enrollment of primary school ...
  5. [5]
    School feeding and learning achievement: Evidence from India's ...
    The analysis in the previous section shows that midday meals have a positive and statistically significant impact on learning achievement. The literature ...
  6. [6]
    Intergenerational nutrition benefits of India's national school feeding ...
    Jul 12, 2021 · In 2016–2017, 97.8 million children received a free cooked meal through the scheme every day, making the MDM scheme the largest school feeding ...
  7. [7]
    Impact of free school lunch program on nutritional status and ...
    Jul 17, 2024 · The MDM programme in India was effective in improving the academic achievement and a few nutritional outcomes of school children.
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    How Tamil Nadu created history through mid-day meal scheme
    Aug 29, 2023 · The mid-day meal scheme in Tamil Nadu has a history of at least 100 years. On November 16, 1920, the first step was taken to provide tiffin to students.Missing: colonial Bombay
  10. [10]
    Achievements of “Mid Day Meal Scheme” - Yojana
    ... Mid-day Meal Scheme was launched by the Government of India in 1995. NP-NSPE states that it aims to address “classroom hunger” and encourage poor children ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Mid-Day meal scheme: An analysis before and after
    May 4, 2016 · This flagship programme has a long history to go. It was originally introduced by the British government in India in. 1925 in Madras Corporation ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] The case of Dalit's in colonial Tamil Nadu
    In colonial times, these Christian missionaries were the first to implement the system of providing people with free food and clothing, displacing the previous.
  13. [13]
    How 'Local' is the Mid Day Meal? - The Locavore
    Jun 12, 2024 · The history of the school lunch initiative in India can be traced back to 1925 when the Madras Corporation Council approved a proposal for ...Missing: Bombay | Show results with:Bombay
  14. [14]
    How Kamaraj Pioneered The Mid-Day Meal Scheme - Madras Courier
    Oct 3, 2023 · The Director of Public Instruction launched the mid-day meals programme at Ettayapuram, Tirunelveli District, on July 17, 1956. From November 1, ...Missing: colonial | Show results with:colonial
  15. [15]
    India's midday meals in schools - Centre for Public Impact
    Apr 11, 2016 · Providing midday meals in Indian schools has a long history, going back to 1923 in Madras. By the mid-1980s, three states had a universal cooked ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Mid Day Meal Scheme in India: The Road Ahead - IISTE.org
    By the mid 1980s three States viz. Gujarat, Kerala and Tamil Nadu and the UT of. Pondicherry had universalized a cooked Mid Day Meal Programme with their own ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  17. [17]
    [PDF] NATIONAL POLICY ON EDUCATION 1986
    Programmes of social forestry, drinking water supply, mid-day meals, and other nutrition programmes, smokeless chullahs and other devices aimed at.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] 1. INTRODUCTION: Mid Day Meal Programme was introduced in ...
    ... India, in its wisdom, launched the Mid Day. Meal scheme, It was designed to provide nutritiously cooked afternoon meal every day to every child ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Performance Evaluation Of COOKED MID-DAY MEAL (CMDM)
    (NP-NSPE) was launched as a Centrally Sponsored Scheme on 15th August. 1995, initially in 2408 blocks in the country. By 1997-98 it was introduced in all blocks ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] World Bank Document
    The National Program of Nutri- tional Support to Primary Education, commonly known as the. Mid-Day Meal Scheme (MDMS), was launched in India in. August 1995.
  21. [21]
    People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & Ors, In the ...
    In 2001, the People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) petitioned the court for enforcement of both the food schemes and the Famine Code, a code permitting the ...
  22. [22]
    School Mid-day Meals - Right to Food Campaign
    On 28 November 2001, the Supreme Court directed state governments to introduce cooked mid-day meals in all government and government-assisted primary schools ...Missing: interim | Show results with:interim
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Evidence from India's Midday Meal Program - ifo Institut
    Briefly, and in more detail later, a 2001 Indian Supreme Court directive ordered Indian states to institute free midday meals in government primary schools.
  24. [24]
    The effect of the Mid-Day Meal programme on the longitudinal ...
    Jan 11, 2024 · The fundamental aim of this programme is to increase school enrolment, retention, and attendance of children in India by providing free cooked ...
  25. [25]
    An Evaluation of the Midday Meal Scheme in India
    Covering an estimated 120 million schoolchildren by 2006 (Khera 2006), the Midday Meal Scheme (MDMS) now is the largest school feeding program in the world. The ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Evidence from India's midday meal scheme - EconStor
    Using a panel data set of almost 500,000 schools observed annually from 2002 to 2004, we find that midday meals result in substantial increases in primary ...Missing: Nationwide | Show results with:Nationwide
  27. [27]
    Government Policies for Promotion of Education: RTE Act, Sarva ...
    Sep 25, 2017 · In 2001, MDMS became a cooked Mid-Day Meal Scheme under which every child in every Government and Government aided primary school was to be ...Missing: evolution connection
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Efficacy of Mid-Day Meal Scheme in India: Challenges and Policy ...
    implementation of the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009, has endorsed all the states to involve the local community in monitoring the scheme. Particularly ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Study on Mid-Day Meal Scheme - Ignited Minds Journals
    The Mid-Day Meal Scheme was introduced specifically with a view to ensuring the nutritional needs of increasing children and the right to education of children ...Missing: RTE | Show results with:RTE
  30. [30]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    National Scheme for PM POSHAN in School - Education - Vikaspedia
    This topic provides information about the National Scheme for PM POSHAN in School (earlier mid day meal scheme) of Ministry of Education.
  33. [33]
    pm poshan - Khramgram BDO
    PM POSHAN ; Food Intake, Primary, Upper Primary ; Food Grains, 100 grams, 150 grams ; Pulses, 20 grams, 30 grams ; Vegetable, 50 grams, 75 grams ; Oil and Fats, 5 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Mid-Day Meal Scheme (PM POSHAN) - IBEF
    The PM POSHAN scheme is being implemented by the Ministry of Education across all the government and government-aided schools in India. It provides nutritional ...
  35. [35]
    PM-POSHAN, WB || ABOUT
    The cooking cost would include the cost of pulses, vegetables, oil, fats, salt & condiments and fuel. Food-grains (Rice):. Rice is allowed by the Govt. of ...Missing: entitlement | Show results with:entitlement
  36. [36]
    [PDF] state survey of - school meal programs: india 2020
    As of 2019, the NFSA has ensured food access to 70.37 million children from 6 months to 6 years of age and 17.18 million pregnant and lactating mothers through.Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  37. [37]
    Mid-day Meal: Noon-Meal Scheme | Education for All in India
    100 grams per child/school day, 150 grams per child/school day ... This landmark direction converted the mid-day meal scheme into a legal entitlement ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    [PDF] BUDGET BRIEFS - Mid-Day Meal Scheme (MDM)
    Revised Estimates (REs) for the year, however, stood at `12,900 crore or 4 per cent less than the announcement. □ For FY 2021-22, GoI has allocated `11,500 ...
  39. [39]
    MID DAY MEAL (MDM) SCHEME BRIEF
    The Union budget has allocated approximately Rs.40,000 crore to MDM in the last. 10 years. The most notable feature in the budget outlays is the exponential ...Missing: growth | Show results with:growth<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Outlay on Major Schemes - India Budget
    Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti. Nirman (PM POSHAN). 8458. 12467. 10000. 12500. 7. (. ) 7. Strengthening Teaching-Learning and Results for States (STARS). 699.<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Govt: 9.5% hike in PM Poshan material costs - Hindustan Times
    Apr 11, 2025 · The Union government on Thursday increased the material cost for midday meals from ₹6.19 to ₹6.78 per student per day for those enrolled in kindergarten and ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Best practices for the implementation of urban school nutrition ...
    In this study, the researchers investigate the differences between two major Mid Day. Meal implementation models: the decentralized model where food is ...
  43. [43]
    Mid-day Meal Scheme And Its Challenges - GeeksforGeeks
    Aug 24, 2023 · The quality of food is frequently contested, with many media reports mentioning children's health decreasing due to the food served at midday ...
  44. [44]
    Automated Mega Kitchens of The Akshaya Patra Foundation
    Akshaya Patra's each automated mega kitchens are able to produce 100000 mid-day meals a day and ensures hygiene and quality food for the children.Missing: centralized | Show results with:centralized
  45. [45]
    Akshaya Patra's Reach | Feeding 2.33 Million Children Everyday
    Akshaya Patra provides nutritious mid-day meal to 23,36838 children from 23111 government and government-aided schools through 78 kitchens across in India.
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Guidelines on Tithi Bhojan Mid Day Meal Scheme - PM Poshan
    This is completely voluntary, and the people in the community contribute either a complete full meal or contribute food items in the form of sweets, namkeens, ...Missing: variation | Show results with:variation
  47. [47]
    Now, 'Tithi Bhojan' as part of midday meal in Uttar Pradesh
    Dec 20, 2022 · People may contribute either full meal or separate food items in the form of sweets, namkeens, fruits or sprouts,. Tithi Bhojan is not a ...Missing: variation | Show results with:variation
  48. [48]
    Goa schools' Tithi Bhojan serves 1L meals supplemented by ...
    Jul 16, 2025 · It also helps supplement the regular midday meal offered to children and makes the menu diverse and interesting. While reviewing the midday meal ...Missing: variation | Show results with:variation
  49. [49]
    Mid-day meal scheme returns to government junior colleges in ...
    Jan 1, 2025 · The Government of Andhra Pradesh has accorded administrative approval for implementation of the mid-day meal scheme in 475 government junior colleges from ...
  50. [50]
    AP Implementation of MDM in All Govt Junior Colleges GO No 40
    Dec 31, 2024 · a) The Mid-Day Meal Programme shall be implemented in 475 Government Junior Colleges from 1st January, 2025 by providing hot cooked food as per ...
  51. [51]
    PM Poshan - PIB
    Sep 29, 2021 · The CCEA cleared the PM POSHAN Scheme for providing one hot cooked meal in Government and Government-aided schools from 2021-22 to 2025-26.Missing: renamed | Show results with:renamed
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    Nutritious Boost: Free Fortified Rice for a Healthier India - PIB
    Oct 11, 2024 · The Hon'ble Prime Minister has approved the continuation of the national PM POSHAN scheme in schools for a five-year period, from 2021-22 to ...
  54. [54]
    Cabinet clears extension of fortified rice scheme until December ...
    Oct 9, 2024 · All three phases have been completed, with fortified rice available through all its schemes as of March 2024, the government said. According to ...
  55. [55]
    PM POSHAN Scheme: Centre raises material cost by 9.5%, will pay ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · The Union government will bear an additional cost of Rs 954 crore in financial year 2025-26 due to an increase in the food material cost by 9.50%.
  56. [56]
    Improving the nutrition quality of the school feeding program (Mid ...
    India's Supreme Court has directed that only hot, cooked meals be provided in MDM, through a decentralised model. However, in urban areas, big centralised ...Missing: implementation | Show results with:implementation<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Centralised Kitchens of The Akshaya Patra Foundation
    Their scale and operational efficiency help us play a crucial role in maximising the impact of PM POSHAN and other feeding endeavours. Centralised kitchens use ...
  58. [58]
    TBI Photo Essay: Akshaya Patra - How To Make 1.5 Million Meals In ...
    An example of a successful public-private partnership, the Akshaya Patra mid-day meal program has been able to achieve outstanding cost and delivery efficiency ...
  59. [59]
    Evaluating the impact of Mid Day Meal Scheme among Tribal Children
    Additionally, Tamil Nadu has introduced a centralized kitchen model in urban and semi-urban areas, improving food quality and efficiency while maintaining ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Akshaya Patra mid-day meal programme
    It serves cooked lunches from 19 kitch aily, forming the largest NGO-run mid-day meal programme in t. , Akshaya Patra kitchens have enhanced the effectiveness ...
  61. [61]
    Pradhan Mantri Poshan Shakti Nirman (PM POSHAN) erstwhile Mid ...
    ii) National level Steering cum Monitoring Committee (NSMC): The Department ... monitoring of PM POSHAN Scheme. Such data (on number of meals served on ...
  62. [62]
    [PDF] l-3/2022-Desk(PM POSHAN) Dated, the 21st D - Ministry of Education
    Dec 21, 2022 · Schedule II of the NFSA, 2013 mandates provision of hot cooked meal containing 450 calories and 12 gms protein for primary and 700 calories.
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Information to be provided under RTI Act - PM Poshan
    c Block level Committee: A broad based Steering-cum-Monitoring Committee would also monitor the implementation of the Mid Day Meal Scheme at the block level. d ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Guidelines for Social Audit of Mid Day Meal Scheme - PM Poshan
    In a social audit, the people and the government jointly monitor the scheme. It brings on board the perceptions and knowledge of the people, involves them in ...Missing: mechanisms | Show results with:mechanisms<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Mid Day Meal – Automated Monitoring System (AMS) - PM Poshan
    Mid Day Meal – Automated Monitoring System (AMS). Page 2. Objectives of AMS. Availability of near real time data. Comprehensive, accurate, level-wise reports ...
  66. [66]
    Public Grievance Redressal | Basic page - Mid Day Meal
    Grievances can be filed at district level, online at http://megpgrams.gov.in/, or by calling 1967 if meals are missed for 3 days.Missing: annual reports
  67. [67]
    Mid Day Meal in India (MDM) | Midday Meals Programme
    Mid day Meal Programme implemented by Akshaya Patra provides meals to 2.35 million children across India.It provides regular meals to Government school ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Akshaya Patra: A Leader in Battling Classroom Hunger - ValpoScholar
    Jan 6, 2022 · Akshaya Patra's school lunch programme started in Bengaluru two years before the Government of Karnataka started the mid-day meal scheme in the ...
  69. [69]
    India | World Food Programme
    To boost the nutritional value of the Government's Mid-Day Meal school meals programme, WFP is pioneering the multi-micronutrient fortification of school meals.
  70. [70]
    WFP and Odisha Govt. launch training app to make school meals safe
    Aug 26, 2021 · ... Helpers who play a critical role in preparing and providing hot-cooked meals to millions of school children under India's Mid-day Meal scheme.
  71. [71]
    WFP, Akshaya Patra Foundation join hands to strengthen India's ...
    Jan 3, 2022 · The United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) and the Akshaya Patra Foundation (TAPF) will work together to enhance school meals programmes in India.
  72. [72]
    Midday Meal Scheme - Wikipedia
    The programme supplies free lunches on working days for children in government primary and upper primary schools, government-aided anganwadis (pre-school), ...History · Roots of the programme · Initiatives by the central... · Supreme court order
  73. [73]
    NGO in India | Role of NGOs in Mid-Day Meal Scheme | Akshaya Patra
    NGOs play an important role in the expansion of the Mid-Day Meal Scheme. The State Governments partner with NGOs like The Akshaya Patra Foundation to implement ...Missing: international | Show results with:international
  74. [74]
    Evidence from mid day meal scheme of India - ScienceDirect
    MDMS is a rights-based program which entitles all children between the ages of 6-10 to free meals in public schools in India. MDMS is aimed at incentivizing ...<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    [PDF] EVIDENCE FROM INDIA'S MIDDAY MEALS PROGRAM
    Aug 1, 2020 · We examine interactions between school-implemented programs in the context of India's school meals scheme and a new government-implemented iron ...
  76. [76]
    Effectiveness of Fortified Mid-Day Meal in Reducing Anemia Among ...
    May 10, 2023 · The efficacy of micronutrient and iron fortified school-served meals in reducing iron deficiency anemia has been demonstrated in randomized ...Missing: Scheme | Show results with:Scheme
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Improving midday meal delivery and encouraging micronutrient ... - 3ie
    We conducted a field experiment across 150 schools in rural India to investigate the effects of a micronutrient fortification intervention introduced in the ...
  78. [78]
    Micronutrient fortification strategies in India's midday meals ...
    We found that distributing the MNM increased the presence of micronutrients in meals. There was a high level of take-up of the programme by schools, who added ...
  79. [79]
    The correlation between midday meals and learning outcomes
    Mar 19, 2019 · A study examined the effects of midday meal schemes on learning outcomes to find a steady increase in test scores initially, after which the effects 'taper off ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] school feeding and learning achievement: evidence from india's ...
    An ASER (2005) report, for example, revealed that 44% of children between the ages of 7 and 12 who were actually enrolled in school could not read a basic ...
  81. [81]
    Do School Meals Boost Education in Low- and Middle-Income ...
    Dec 13, 2024 · Earlier reviews demonstrate that school meals have a positive impact on some educational outcomes. A study by Snilstveit et al. in 2015 reviewed ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  82. [82]
    Press Note Details: Press Information Bureau - PIB
    Sep 18, 2025 · ... Poshan Tracker App. The PM POSHAN Scheme received a total financial outlay of ₹1,30,794.90 crore for the period 2021-22 to 2025-26. The ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Executive Summary - Comptroller and Auditor General of India
    There was leakage of funds, financial irregularity, loopholes in execution of works with monetary value to the extent of ` 80.70 crore due to non-adherence to ...
  84. [84]
    CAG Finds Mid-day Meal Scheme Stats Cooked Up
    Dec 19, 2015 · NEW DELHI: The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has unearthed widespread 'leaks' in the mid-day meal scheme and slammed the programme
  85. [85]
    CAG finds financial irregularity, poor quality blight mid-day meal ...
    Jul 19, 2015 · CAG's performance audit report of Mid-Day Meal has not only found financial mismanagement by the HRD ministry but it has also discovered states ...Missing: leakages | Show results with:leakages
  86. [86]
    CAG points out flaws in mid-day meal implementation in Chhattisgarh
    Apr 1, 2016 · The CAG report underlined ineffective monitoring, non-utilisation of funds and lack of infrastructural facilities as deficiencies under the ...Missing: leakages | Show results with:leakages<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    [PDF] EXPENDITURE PROFILE 2024-2025 - Union Budget
    The Expenditure Profile 2024-2025 compiles data across all Ministries/Departments to show the Government of India's financial performance and aids economic ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] cost-benefit analysis of interventions to
    This cost-benefit analysis envisages a large-scale rollout of ... S Dercon, 2014, School meals as a safety net: An evaluation of the Midday Meal Scheme in.
  89. [89]
    The Broader Economic Value of School Feeding Programs in Low
    Dec 3, 2020 · Finally, we computed aggregate benefit-cost ratios (BCR, i.e. ... midday meal scheme in India. Econ Dev Cult Change. (2014) 62:275–306 ...
  90. [90]
    A Case Study of Mid-Day Meal Scheme in Odisha, India
    Nov 22, 2021 · ... Mid-Day Meal scheme in Odisha vis-à-vis provides a cost-benefit analysis for restructuring the programme. The nutritional values in terms of ...
  91. [91]
    Midday meal scheme of UPA government has been ineffective: CAG
    Dec 19, 2015 · The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) has concluded that the two-decade-old midday meal (MDM) scheme, pushed strongly during the UPA ...Missing: fiscal | Show results with:fiscal
  92. [92]
    CAG points to 'institutionalised exaggeration' in take-up of UPA's ...
    Dec 18, 2015 · This was apart from several other irregularities, “pointing to widespread leakages” leading to “losses and misappropriations” in the MDM ...Missing: fiscal burden inefficiencies
  93. [93]
    The impact of scholarships on school attendance in India
    Specifically, the analysis found the effect of the mid-day meal ... School vouchers can cost-effectively increase both school participation and learning.
  94. [94]
    progress of school education in India - Oxford Academic
    ... mid-day meal with a minimum content of 300 calories and 8–12 grams of ... school vouchers. The recommendations for decentralizing reform in India ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] 1 - World Bank Documents
    Also in India, the introduction of a mid-day meal program instead of the ... program featuring a lottery-based allocation of school vouchers. It found ...
  96. [96]
    School meal kills 22 in India's Bihar state - BBC News
    Jul 17, 2013 · The poisoning occurred in the village of Dharmasati Gandaman, 80km (50 miles) north of the state capital, Patna. The free Mid-Day Meal Scheme ...
  97. [97]
    In India, At Least 22 Children Die After Eating Poisoned School Lunch
    Jul 17, 2013 · At least 22 children are dead in India after they ate a poisoned school lunch Tuesday at a school in the eastern state of Bihar.
  98. [98]
    Poor quality and bad management: India ignored warnings in free ...
    Jul 20, 2013 · The village school in Bihar where 23 children died by poisoning last week had been providing lunch under the government-sponsored Mid-Day ...
  99. [99]
    Data | Mid-day meal-related food poisoning cases in India at six ...
    Sep 27, 2022 · In 2022, 979 victims of food poisoning were reported in schools across India, the highest in the last six years. The number declined during the ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  100. [100]
    Steep rise in food poisoning cases after eating mid-day meals this year
    Sep 28, 2022 · Some 979 school students have suffered food poisoning after eating mid-day meals in the first nine months of 2022, according to government data.
  101. [101]
    Over 100 school children in Bihar hospitalised after eating 'sour ...
    Jun 1, 2023 · The hospital's doctors who treated sick children said it appears to be a case of food poisoning. ... The midday meal scheme is running in ...Missing: outbreaks | Show results with:outbreaks<|control11|><|separator|>
  102. [102]
    Safety of food served in Mid-Day Meal program - PubMed Central
    More emphasis on food safety was given after an incident took place in Bihar in 2013 where almost 23 children had died by poison in the food provided to them ...
  103. [103]
    Mohali: Commission directs mid-day meal cooks to follow sanitation ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · The cooking staff were found violating basic hygiene protocols—head caps, aprons, and gloves were missing, and sanitation standards were ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Guidelines to ensure, safety and hygiene - Mid Day Meal
    Jul 22, 2013 · In some cases, the foodgrains are stored at residence of the Head. Teacher or Gram Pradhans, which is in violation of the MDM Guidelines.
  105. [105]
    India ignored warnings in midday meal programme
    Jul 22, 2013 · Hygiene problems are exacerbated by a lack of fresh water and basic sanitation in some rural areas. "We struggle to get basic clean water," said ...
  106. [106]
    Exaggeration of figures in Mid Day Meal scheme: CAG
    Dec 18, 2015 · The audit also revealed that prescribed inspections to ensure quality of grains and meals were not been carried out and often food was being ...
  107. [107]
    Mid-Day Meal Scheme: Corruption and Controversies - The Probe
    Nov 27, 2022 · The Mid-Day Meal scheme has been in the thick of controversy over the substandard quality of food served to children and the scheme's poor implementation.
  108. [108]
    Former Odisha Principal Arrested for Misusing ₹55 Lakh Mid-Day ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · The ₹55 lakh misappropriated included monies from the Mid-Day Meal scheme ... schemes, showcasing a broader crackdown on corruption in ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] CHAPTER-III PERFORMANCE AUDITS This Chapter contains four ...
    Review of implementation of mid day meal scheme in the state revealed several deficiencies. There were savings against budget provision, diversion of funds and ...
  110. [110]
    It isn't just Bihar,states across India ignored mid-day meal complaints
    Jul 30, 2013 · Bihar may be in the spotlight for its mismanagement of the Mid-day Meal ... Corruption,misappropriation of funds and other irregularities are ...
  111. [111]
    Midday meal scheme: Aadhaar exposes 4.4 lakh 'ghost students ...
    Apr 26, 2017 · The 12-digit Aadhaar number has helped states strike off 4.4 lakh “ghost students” from schools across Jharkhand, Manipur and Andhra Pradesh, ...
  112. [112]
    2 lakh ghost students served midday meal in Bihar, 251 ...
    May 15, 2017 · “The two lakh students, who were shown to being served midday meal , had never attended schools. Most of them either did not exist or were ...Missing: beneficiaries | Show results with:beneficiaries<|separator|>
  113. [113]
  114. [114]
    [PDF] The Hidden Trade-offs of India's School Feeding Scheme
    Our analysis reveals that exposure to the midday meal program leads to a significant reallocation of parental educational investment, without any perceptible ...
  115. [115]
    PM-POSHAN vs reality: How India's midday meal programme ...
    Jul 4, 2025 · It replaced the earlier midday meal scheme, launched in 1995, which focused on universalising primary education. PM-POSHAN's cost is shared by ...