Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

National Knowledge Commission

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was a high-level advisory body constituted on 13 June 2005 by Prime Minister to the , chaired by telecommunications expert , tasked with recommending policies to transform the country into a vibrant and globally competitive . Over its operational period, initially set for three years but extending into the early , the NKC submitted approximately 300 recommendations across 27 focus areas, emphasizing enhancements in , , research institutions, , , public libraries, , and intellectual property rights to foster knowledge creation, dissemination, and application. Notable proposals included revitalizing public libraries through a national mission, establishing a for high-speed connectivity among research institutions, reforming governance by advocating against regulatory fragmentation, and promoting via innovation incubators. While some ideas influenced subsequent initiatives like infrastructure expansions, the commission encountered controversies, including the 2006 resignations of two members—Deepak Nayyar and —protesting the government's caste-based reservation policies in , which they argued undermined merit-based access and quality. Critiques highlighted uneven implementation of its reforms, with resistance from entrenched educational bureaucracies and limited follow-through on ambitious targets like increasing gross enrollment ratios or diversifying financing. The NKC's work underscored first-principles needs for institutional , public-private partnerships, and but revealed challenges in overcoming systemic inertia in India's knowledge ecosystem.

Establishment

Formation and Context

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was established on June 13, 2005, by the under as a high-level advisory body directly reporting to the Prime Minister's Office. Its formation addressed the need to accelerate India's transition toward a knowledge-driven economy amid rapid post-liberalization growth, where gross domestic product expansion averaged around 7-8% annually but lagged in innovation and utilization compared to global leaders. Sam Pitroda, a telecommunications expert and advisor to previous Indian governments, was appointed chairman, with the commission given a three-year operational timeframe from October 2, 2005, to October 2, 2008, to formulate recommendations on knowledge-related reforms. This structure emphasized consultative processes involving consultations with stakeholders in education, research, and industry, rather than executive authority, reflecting the advisory nature intended to influence policy without direct implementation powers. The context for the NKC's creation stemmed from India's evolving economic landscape in the early 2000s, including the IT sector's export surge to over $20 billion by and recognition that sustained competitiveness required bolstering access to , vocational skills, and ecosystems, as traditional agrarian and bases proved insufficient for long-term prosperity. Policymakers viewed as a critical multiplier for productivity, drawing parallels to advanced economies where R&D investment exceeded 2% of GDP, while India's hovered below 1%, prompting the commission to prioritize systemic enhancements over incremental changes.

Initial Mandate

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was constituted on June 13, 2005, through a notification, with an initial three-year timeframe from October 2, 2005, to October 2, 2008, later extended. Its core mandate focused on sharpening India's " edge" by advising on policies and strategies for production, use, and dissemination across economic and social sectors. The Commission aimed to transform into a knowledge-based society and economy capable of addressing 21st-century challenges through enhanced competitiveness, innovation, and inclusivity. The , explicitly defined in the June 13 notification, encompassed three primary objectives: first, building excellence in the to meet global knowledge demands and bolster India's position in the ; second, fostering new knowledge creation by reinforcing education, domestic research and innovation in science and technology laboratories, rights management, and international research collaborations for global ; third, applying knowledge capabilities to render government services more effective, transparent, and accountable while encouraging citizen participation in knowledge and widespread access to learning resources. These directives emphasized systemic reforms rather than incremental changes, prioritizing evidence-based strategies to bridge gaps in research output, educational quality, and sectoral applications such as and . At its , the NKC's centered on five interconnected focus areas—access, concepts, creation, applications, and services—to holistically address knowledge ecosystems. involved expanding availability through like libraries and networks; targeted and pedagogical reforms for deeper understanding; emphasized and incentives; applications focused on practical deployment in , , and ; and services aimed at efficient and . This guided the Commission's advisory , supported by a technical group of young experts from premier institutions and oversight from a Prime Minister-chaired steering group, with logistical backing from the Planning Commission. The initial blueprint sought radical overhauls, including tripling capacity and elevating enrollment ratios, to position as a global knowledge leader without reliance on unverified projections.

Organizational Structure

Leadership and Membership

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was chaired by , a telecommunications innovator who had previously developed India's public information infrastructure during the 1980s and served as an advisor to the on knowledge-related initiatives. Appointed by upon the commission's formation on June 2, 2005, Pitroda led the body as a high-level advisory panel reporting directly to the Prime Minister's Office, with a focus on providing non-binding recommendations rather than executive authority. Early in its tenure, the commission briefly had a vice-chairman in Dr. P. M. Bhargava, founder of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, who resigned in 2007 citing policy disagreements with the government. Membership consisted of eight individuals, including the chairman, selected for their expertise across , , , , and to ensure multidisciplinary input into enhancement strategies. All members served on a part-time, honorary basis without , supplemented by a small secretariat of young professionals and seconded officials for operational support. Initially announced with six members besides the chairman—Nandan , Deepak Nayyar, Ashok Ganguly, André Béteille, Jayati , and Pratap Bhanu (as member-secretary)—the composition evolved to incorporate additional specialists like P. Balaram and others as the commission's work progressed through 2009. The following table outlines the primary members and their key affiliations at the time:
MemberBackground and Expertise
(Chairman)Telecommunications and innovation policy advisor
Ashok GangulyCorporate leader, former director at and ICICI
P. BalaramDirector, ; bioorganic chemistry
Economist, professor at
Deepak NayyarEconomist, former vice-chancellor of University of Delhi
Co-founder and CEO of ; IT industry leader
Mathematician, professor at
Amitabh MattooInternational relations expert, vice-chancellor of
This structure emphasized cross-sectoral perspectives to address knowledge gaps, though the part-time nature limited full-time engagement and enforcement capabilities.

Operational Framework

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) functioned as a non-statutory, high-level advisory body to the , established on 13 June 2005 with operations commencing on 2 October 2005 for an initial three-year term, though it continued producing outputs beyond 2008. It lacked executive or enforcement powers, instead influencing policy through evidence-based recommendations derived from consultative processes, with the Planning Commission serving as the nodal agency for coordination. The Commission comprised approximately 25-30 part-time members drawn from diverse fields including academia, industry, and public service, supported by a compact secretariat of technical staff and executive directors to facilitate administrative and research tasks. Operations centered on a structured methodology involving the identification of 27 priority focus areas, such as education reforms, intellectual property rights, libraries, , and . For each area, the NKC constituted specialized working groups of 5-10 experts, often chaired by domain specialists like Justice M. Jagannadha Rao for or for , which convened over 3-4 months to analyze issues. These groups undertook empirical assessments, including nationwide surveys (e.g., innovation surveys among firms), pilot programs, and reviews of global precedents like the Bayh-Dole Act for public-funded research. Consultation formed the core of the framework, with working groups engaging stakeholders through over 60 workshops, seminars, and regional meetings across 26 states and 3 union territories, involving government officials, academics, industry representatives, NGOs, and . State-level nodal officers were appointed to facilitate inputs, ensuring recommendations reflected diverse regional contexts, such as initiatives or protection. Draft white papers and reports from these groups were then debated at full Commission meetings to achieve consensus, leading to approximately 300 actionable recommendations prioritized by feasibility and impact, including financial implications. Recommendations were formalized in periodic reports submitted directly to the via letters, with broader dissemination through public documents like the Report to the Nation 2007 (covering 20 subjects by December 2007) and the comprehensive 2006-2009 report, translated into 10 languages and shared via seminars and the NKC website. These outputs advised central and state governments on integration into frameworks like the Eleventh , though implementation depended on executive agencies, with follow-up tracking limited to advisory engagements rather than binding oversight.

Core Objectives and Recommendations

Enhancing Access to Knowledge

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC), established on , 2005, identified enhancing to as one of its five core priorities, alongside knowledge concepts, creation, applications, and services, aiming to build a by leveraging India's of over 600 million people under age 25. Key recommendations focused on revitalizing physical and digital infrastructure to democratize dissemination, including public libraries, high-speed connectivity, repositories, and multilingual translation efforts. These proposals sought to address low penetration—under 5% of the population at the time—and fragmented mechanisms through public-private partnerships and targeted funding. A primary initiative involved reforming public libraries to serve as community knowledge hubs. The NKC recommended establishing a National Mission on Libraries as an independent statutory body with an initial three-year term, convertible to a permanent entity, to oversee modernization and expansion. It proposed a National Census of all libraries within one year to establish baseline data on infrastructure and usage, alongside revamping library and information science education via a dedicated Indian Institute of Library and Information Science. To support these, a Central Library Fund of Rs. 1,000 crores was suggested, matched by private contributions over three to five years, emphasizing ICT integration such as national catalog networking, digitization of resources, and open-source software adoption. These measures aimed to preserve private collections through 10 regional centers and re-assess staffing needs for diverse library types. The NKC also advocated for the (NKN), a gigabit-capable to interconnect universities, institutions, libraries, laboratories, healthcare facilities, and agricultural centers, managed by a special-purpose with stakeholder input. This network was envisioned to facilitate resource sharing and high-speed local area networks with initial government capital support, ultimately approved by the Cabinet Committee on in March 2010 with an outlay of Rs. 5,990 crores, connecting over 1,500 institutions including IITs and IIMs. To promote digital openness, the NKC urged open access to publicly funded research outputs, recommending that peer-reviewed papers be archived in standard formats and accessible via a national academic portal. It further proposed digitizing non-copyrighted books and periodicals, leveraging global , and developing sector-specific national web portals for , , and , translated into all languages to broaden reach. Complementing this, a National Translation Mission was recommended to bridge linguistic barriers and enhance knowledge exchange across India's diverse languages. These efforts, part of approximately 300 recommendations across 27 focus areas submitted between 2006 and 2009, prioritized empirical infrastructure over regulatory mandates to foster inclusive knowledge ecosystems.

Education and Research Reforms

The National Knowledge Commission recommended enacting a central Right to Education legislation to guarantee free and compulsory education up to Class VIII, with justiciable provisions and financial commitments from the government, estimating costs at approximately Rs. 1,51,273 crore over 2008-2012. It endorsed universal access to secondary education within 10 years, proposing a fivefold increase in secondary education spending and targeted strategies for disadvantaged groups such as girls, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, Muslims, and migrants. To enhance quality, the Commission advocated curriculum reforms shifting from rote learning to comprehension and skills development, including introducing English from Class I alongside regional languages and activity-based learning. In teacher training, it called for improved pre-service and in-service programs, minimum qualifications, and training 4 million teachers in English proficiency through short-term courses, while strengthening institutions like District Institutes of Education and (DIETs). Vocational education reforms included establishing Livelihood Centres in secondary schools for skill and , with flexible entry/exit options and certification linked to mainstream education. A national evaluation body was proposed to monitor school quality through infrastructure norms, teacher-student ratios, and teaching methods. For higher education, the Commission targeted a Gross Enrollment Ratio (GER) of 15% by 2015, advocating expansion through 1,500 universities and shifting from affiliated colleges to university campuses. It recommended establishing 50 National Universities as centers of excellence and upgrading select colleges to deemed universities with government support within five years to foster quality and research integration. Financing proposals included allocating 1.5-2.0% of GDP to higher education, diversifying sources via private participation—already dominant in engineering (86.8%) and medical (47.5%) colleges as of 2006—and encouraging public-private partnerships. Regulatory reforms emphasized an Independent Regulatory Authority for (IRAHE) to oversee standards, , and degree-granting, while promoting institutional by eliminating the affiliating system by and reducing political interference in . To address low output—India produced 23,398 scientific papers in 2004 compared to China's 57,378—the Commission urged integrating into , increasing Ph.D. production, and reversing the separation of standalone institutions. On research, the Commission proposed a uniform legal framework for public-funded research, granting ownership and patent rights to universities and institutions, with royalty sharing among inventors and reinvestment in R&D, while retaining government march-in rights for public good and national security exceptions. It recommended a nationwide innovation survey to identify barriers like skill shortages and establishing a National Science and Social Science Foundation to fund knowledge creation across disciplines. Integration with education involved fostering university-industry collaborations for commercialization, IPR cells in institutions, and public-private partnerships to bridge skill gaps and enhance R&D in engineering and vocational training.

Innovation and Institutional Development

The National Knowledge Commission emphasized institutional reforms to cultivate an , recommending a National Innovation Policy that promotes competition, facilitates knowledge diffusion, and supports early-stage technology development through targeted incentives and reduced regulatory barriers. This policy aimed to address skill gaps in by integrating problem-solving and experimentation into educational curricula, fostering synergies among , , , and institutions. Surveys conducted under NKC auspices revealed rising innovation-related revenues in firms, underscoring the need for scalable institutional support to translate into economic value. To enable these goals, NKC proposed the creation of an Independent Regulatory Authority for Higher Education (IRAHE), a single national body to replace fragmented oversight, thereby granting institutions greater in , , and operations while minimizing entry barriers for new universities. IRAHE would include specialized standing committees for disciplines like , and to enforce quality standards via accreditation and periodic grading by independent agencies such as or ICRA. Complementing this, NKC advocated establishing 50 National Universities within three years, targeting an expansion to 1,500 universities by 2015 to achieve a 15% , supported by increased public spending to 1.5% of GDP and diversified financing including fees, , and public-private partnerships. These reforms sought to prioritize research-intensive institutions with flexible systems, revised every three years, and incentives for to pursue PhDs and collaborations. Research infrastructure was central to NKC's vision, with proposals for a National Science and Foundation (NSSSF) endowed with an annual budget of 1,250 to fund 200-400 long-term, interdisciplinary projects aimed at breakthrough outcomes. This body would unify funding across natural and social sciences, promoting domestic innovation in laboratories and enterprises. NKC also recommended a with gigabit-speed connectivity linking over 5,000 institutions to accelerate data sharing and collaborative R&D. In , institutional enhancements included raising R&D spending to 1% of GDP, strengthening linkages between research stations and farmers via ICT-enabled village centers, and modernizing bodies like the through competitive grants and decentralized management. Intellectual property rights reforms were positioned as critical enablers of , with NKC urging modernization of offices through e-filing, real-time databases, and staffing incentives like fast-track promotions to handle a growing . Key initiatives included establishing an IPR Tribunal for disputes, a National Institute of Management for training, and legislation modeled on the Bayh-Dole Act to grant public-funded researchers ownership of inventions, with provisions for government "march-in" rights and royalty sharing. For , NKC supported expanding the and creating a dedicated fund from revenues to incentivize and benefits. Entrepreneurship received targeted institutional backing, including simplified business clearances via single-window systems, commercial courts for faster , and a Global Technology Acquisition Fund to aid in licensing foreign . NKC workshops on SME and , held in cities like , , and between November 2006 and January 2007, highlighted the need for skill-aligned talent pipelines and industry-academia partnerships to build a robust . These measures collectively aimed to shift toward a knowledge-driven by embedding within reformed institutions, though depended on subsequent adoption.

Implementation and Outcomes

Policy Influences

The National Knowledge Commission's recommendations played a pivotal role in shaping India's elementary , particularly by advocating for a central to guarantee free and for all children aged 6 to 14, which directly informed the framework of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act enacted on August 26, 2009. This included proposals for universal access, improved teacher quality through enhanced training and accountability, and curriculum reforms emphasizing and vocational skills, elements that aligned with expansions in programs like . In , the NKC influenced directions by recommending an increase in public funding to elevate the gross enrollment ratio from approximately 10% in 2005 to 15% by 2012, alongside measures for institutional , diversification of financing sources beyond government budgets, and the creation of new research-focused universities. These ideas contributed to subsequent government initiatives, such as enhanced allocations for to upgrade and attract , though full realization depended on fiscal and regulatory follow-through. The Commission's over 300 recommendations across 27 subjects, submitted via letters to the between 2006 and 2009, extended to policies, including reforms to foster through simplified business environments and stronger IPR enforcement, which were integrated into strategies for development. Additional influences appeared in and domains, with calls for a virtual network and revitalized public libraries prompting pilot programs and funding reallocations in select states. Overall, while adoption varied by ministry, the NKC's emphasis on evidence-based reforms informed the 11th Five-Year Plan's (2007-2012) knowledge initiatives, prioritizing and R&D investments.

Key Achievements

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) produced approximately 300 recommendations across 27 focus areas between 2005 and 2009, many of which directly informed policy implementation in knowledge dissemination and institutional development. A primary achievement was the establishment of the National Translation Mission (NTM) in , following NKC's advocacy for systematic translation efforts to standardize terminology in languages and bridge knowledge gaps in scientific, , and domains; the NTM has since facilitated translations of key texts into multiple regional languages, enhancing for non-English speakers. Another tangible outcome was the operationalization of the (NKN), recommended by the NKC to interconnect over 1,500 educational and research institutions via high-speed , enabling resource sharing, collaborative research, and e-learning; launched in 2010, the NKN has expanded to support virtual labs, remote education, and data exchange among universities and labs. In the realm of libraries, NKC's detailed blueprint for revitalization—emphasizing , networking, and public access—paved the way for the National Mission on Libraries (NML) approved in 2012, which has upgraded over 7,000 public libraries with digital infrastructure, trained librarians, and established model libraries in districts, thereby increasing resource utilization and literacy support. The Commission's higher education reforms influenced expansions in and , including recommendations to raise the gross from 10% to 15% by 2015 through new and research funding, which contributed to a subsequent rise to around 27% by 2020 via aligned policies like the expansion of institutions under the University Grants Commission. Overall, these initiatives advanced India's knowledge ecosystem by fostering innovation in areas like intellectual property rights and , with several ministries acting on NKC inputs to integrate technology into public services.

Criticisms and Controversies

Lack of Enforcement Mechanisms

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC), established on June 13, 2005, functioned exclusively as a high-level advisory body to the , without statutory powers, regulatory , or dedicated mechanisms to monitor or compel implementation of its recommendations. This recommendatory structure meant that adoption of its proposals—spanning access to knowledge, reforms, and institutional —depended entirely on voluntary alignment by central and state governments, ministries, and agencies, often leading to fragmented or stalled progress. Implementation challenges were exacerbated by the absence of follow-up oversight, such as binding timelines, accountability frameworks, or inter-ministerial coordination mandates, resulting in policy gaps despite the NKC's issuance of over 30 reports between 2006 and 2009. For example, the Development Ministry delayed or avoided enacting several -related suggestions, attributing inaction to insufficient among stakeholders, which underscored the Commission's limited leverage beyond persuasion. Similarly, the Central of rejected a majority of the NKC's proposals in 2009, including those aimed at regulatory overhaul, due to concerns over feasibility without enforceable directives. Critics, including education policy analysts, argued that this enforcement vacuum permitted bureaucratic inertia and competing priorities to undermine the NKC's vision, with only partial uptake in areas like library missions while core reforms in research funding and institutional autonomy remained largely unaddressed. The lack of such mechanisms not only diluted the impact of specific recommendations—such as increasing public funding for to 2% of GDP—but also contributed to the body's eventual abolition in July 2014 by the incoming government, amid perceptions of ineffectiveness in driving systemic change.

Political and Bureaucratic Challenges

The National Knowledge Commission's recommendations encountered significant bureaucratic resistance, characterized by a risk-averse entrenched in outdated procedures prioritizing perks and privilege over . This manifested in reluctance to adopt re-engineering, external interventions, and enhanced transparency, as highlighted in the Commission's own assessments of reforms, where government levels exhibited persistent opposition to experimentation and new ideas. Such hurdles delayed the translation of advisory outputs into policy actions, particularly in sectors requiring inter-ministerial coordination, where tortuous administrative systems impeded swift implementation. A prime example was the stalled creation of the National Commission for Higher Education and Research (NCHER), intended to consolidate regulatory bodies like the UGC and AICTE into a single entity to streamline oversight and foster autonomy. Introduced as a in 2010 following NKC's blueprint, it faced bureaucratic entanglements and replication of efforts across agencies, ultimately lapsing without passage due to entrenched interests. Critics within and regulatory circles argued it threatened institutional , while states resisted provisions perceived as centralizing control, exacerbating delays in broader educational reforms. Politically, the NKC grappled with fragmented consensus in India's federal democracy, where state-level opposition and shifting priorities undermined sustained commitment. Key proposals, including public-private partnerships in , drew concerns from apex policy bodies as early as 2009, reflecting ideological divides over market-oriented changes. The Commission's dissolution in July 2014 by the incoming government, following the UPA's tenure, symbolized this volatility, as the new administration withdrew the pending NCHER legislation amid a of predecessor initiatives, prioritizing alternative frameworks without fully institutionalizing NKC's vision. This abrupt end underscored how electoral transitions could eclipse advisory bodies lacking enforcement teeth, limiting long-term impact despite over 300 recommendations across 27 areas.

Dissolution and Legacy

Abolition in 2014

The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was formally abolished in July 2014 by the incoming Narendra Modi-led government following its victory in the May 2014 Indian general elections. This action discontinued the advisory body, which had been established in June 2005 under the previous administration to provide recommendations on knowledge-related reforms. The NKC's operations, including its website launched in 2006, ceased thereafter, rendering it defunct without renewal or extension. The abolition occurred amid the new government's broader of inherited institutions and commissions, though no explicit rationale specific to the NKC—such as , gaps, or misalignment—was detailed in contemporaneous announcements. Critics, including some associated with the prior regime's initiatives, viewed the move as abrupt, potentially overlooking the NKC's prior outputs like over 300 recommendations across 27 subjects submitted to the Prime Minister's Office between 2006 and 2009. Proponents of the dissolution argued it streamlined advisory structures, aligning with efforts to rationalize non-statutory bodies lacking enforcement powers. The decision effectively shifted focus to integrated frameworks under ministries rather than standalone commissions.

Long-Term Influence

The National Knowledge Commission's recommendations on enhancing access, quality, and inclusivity in education exerted enduring effects on India's policy landscape, shaping reforms in school and even after its 2014 dissolution. Its advocacy for universal elementary education, vocational training, and curriculum modernization informed the Right to Education Act of 2009, which mandated free and compulsory schooling for children aged 6–14 and remains a cornerstone of elementary as of 2025. Similarly, proposals for integrating information and communication technology () into teaching and administration have persisted in subsequent initiatives, fostering programs and e-learning platforms across states. In and , the commission's emphasis on expanding institutional capacity and promoting influenced the proliferation of autonomous universities and research networks, with over 300 recommendations across 27 subjects guiding partial reforms in areas like teacher certification and . The , recommended for interconnecting educational and research institutions, was established in 2010 and continues to facilitate high-speed among more than 1,500 nodes as of recent updates, supporting collaborative scientific endeavors. These elements contributed to India's positioning in the global , with gross enrollment ratios in rising from approximately 8% in 2005 to over 28% by 2023, though attribution is shared with broader economic factors. Despite these impacts, the commission's long-term influence waned post-2014 due to the absence of dedicated enforcement and the new government's prioritization of alternative frameworks, such as the National Education Policy of 2020, which echoed but did not directly extend NKC's specific visions. Critics note that bureaucratic inertia and political discontinuities limited fuller realization, with many proposals—such as comprehensive revitalization and reforms—achieving only fragmentary adoption. Nonetheless, the NKC's foundational push for evidence-based knowledge dissemination informed ongoing debates on innovation policy, evident in sustained investments in funding, which reached 0.7% of GDP by 2023.

References

  1. [1]
    Knowledge Commission - Sam Pitroda
    The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was a high-level advisory body to the Prime Minister of India, with the objective of transforming India into a ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] National Knowledge Commission - IP India
    In the last three years NKC has submitted around. 300 recommendations on 27 subjects in the form of letters to the Prime Minister. These have been widely.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Knowledge-Commission-Report-20071.pdf
    National Knowledge Commission. Report to the Nation 2007. Government of India. Page 3. Foreword ... Most of our recommendations on Education, Vocational ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] National Knowledge Commission (NKC) of India: An Overview
    India to become global R&D destination. ▫. Improve governance. ▫. Improve public libraries and think-tanks. ▫. Bold recommendations to improve mathematics,.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  5. [5]
    Two knowledge panel members resign - Hindustan Times
    May 22, 2006 · Two members of the National Knowledge Commission have resigned on Monday over the ongoing reservation controversy, stating that quotas in ...
  6. [6]
    National Knowledge Commission, Report to the Nation, 2006
    The government of India appointed the National Knowledge Commission – chaired by telecommunications expert Sam Pitroda – on June 13, 2005, to serve as an ...
  7. [7]
    [Solved] National knowledge commission was established in the year
    It was constituted on 13 June 2005, by the then Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh. Objectives : The overall task before the National Knowledge Commission ...
  8. [8]
    National Knowledge Commission of India - College of Liberal Arts
    The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) is a high-level advisory body to the Prime Minister of India, which was established in 2005.
  9. [9]
    [Solved] The vision of National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was to-
    NKC was established in 2005 by the Government of India to advise the Prime Minister on how to transform India into a knowledge society. The NKC submitted ...<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    National Knowledge Commission - ADS - Astrophysics Data System
    India's National Knowledge Commission (NKC) established by the prime minister is focused on building institutions and infrastructure in Education, Science and ...
  11. [11]
    National Knowledge Commission constituted - English Releases
    Jun 2, 2005 · The mandate of the Commission is to sharpen India's "knowledge edge". ... The National Knowledge Commission will be assisted by a Technical ...
  12. [12]
    Knowledge Commission Report | All India Council for Technical ...
    Keeping this scenario in mind, the National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was ... The Terms of Reference of NKC are: Build excellence in the educational ...
  13. [13]
    Dr PM Bhargava is vice chairman of National Knowledge Commission
    Dr PM Bhargava is vice chairman of National Knowledge Commission. Dr PM Bhargava is vice chairman of National Knowledge Commission. July 07, 2005 ...
  14. [14]
    Obituary: Pushpa Mitra Bhargava, a conscientious scientist and ...
    Aug 2, 2017 · He quit as Vice-chairman of the National Knowledge Commission (NKC) following difference of opinion, during the UPA regime and returned his ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] NKC Recommendations on Libraries
    A key task in this initiative is to open doors to knowledge, skills, imagination and ideas presently and potentially available, or accessible, to the people.
  16. [16]
    Home | National Knowledge Network, Government of India
    In March 2010, the Cabinet Committee on Infrastructure (CCI) approved the establishment of the National Knowledge Network (NKN) at an outlay of Rs 5990 Crore, ...
  17. [17]
    National Knowledge Commission by Sam Pitroda - online note bank
    Sep 16, 2024 · National Knowledge Commission by Sam Pitroda ... submitted around 300 recommendations on 27 focus areas during its three and a half year term.<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    India's NKC recommends OA for publicly-funded research
    Jan 12, 2007 · Peer reviewed research papers resulting from publicly funded research should also be made available through open access channels, subject to ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Recommendations on School Education - Centre for Policy Research
    NKC endorses the speedy enactment of a central legislation that will ensure the right of all children in the country to good quality school education up to ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Report of the National Knowledge Commission on Higher Education
    In most of these cases, the report is a knowledgeable analysis of the inadequacies and ills of the system and not an attempt at providing implementable steps ...
  21. [21]
    Recommendations on Legal Framework for Public Funded Research
    Nov 20, 2008 · National Knowledge Commission's Blog. Open forum to discuss NKC's Recommendations. Recommendations on Legal Framework for Public Funded Research.
  22. [22]
    The Impact of National Knowledge Commission (2006-2009) on ...
    Dec 25, 2023 · The National Knowledge Commission represented a landmark effort to reimagine India's education system for the 21st century knowledge economy. ...
  23. [23]
    National Knowledge Commission--A Step towards India's Higher ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · 1. Increase in GER · 2. Diversification of Sources of Financing: In addition to increased public spending, this would · 3. Creation of ...
  24. [24]
    NKC Recommendations for Transforming Indian Education
    Dec 27, 2023 · The NKC recommended allocating more resources to public universities, enabling them to upgrade infrastructure, attract top talent, and conduct ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  25. [25]
    Origin - National Translation Mission
    The idea of National Translation Mission (NTM) came originally from Dr. Manmohan Singh, the Prime Minister of India. In the first meeting of the National ...
  26. [26]
    Recommendations on Translation
    Nov 17, 2008 · It is envisaged that a National Translation Mission performing these activities could be set up during the XIth Plan, with a proposed budget of ...
  27. [27]
    Recommendations on Knowledge Network
    Nov 17, 2008 · We commissioned an expert to examine what it would take to create a National Knowledge Network. NKC also held detailed discussions with the ...
  28. [28]
    Public Policy - Sam Pitroda
    National Knowledge Commission, Chairman. The National Knowledge Commission is a high-level advisory body to the Prime Minister of India, with the objective ...
  29. [29]
    Analysis Of India's National Mission On Libraries, 2012 - impri
    Oct 2, 2024 · One of the standout achievements of the NML is the development of the NVLI which provides open access to a wealth of knowledge resources, ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] National Knowledge Commission
    The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was constituted as an advisory body to the. Prime Minister to help restructure knowledge.
  31. [31]
    https://sampitroda.com/knowledge-commission
  32. [32]
    Apex body on education policy rejects most NKC proposals
    Feb 10, 2009 · India News: The Central Advisory Board of Education rejected a majority of recommendations made by the National Knowledge Commission.
  33. [33]
    Critique of Knowledge Commission - jstor
    The National Knowledge Commission presents a wide-ranging set of prescriptions on the issues relating to the current state of higher education system in the ...Missing: dissolution controversies
  34. [34]
    https://prsindia.org/theprsblog/revamping-indias-higher-education-system
  35. [35]
    National Knowledge Commission - Wikipedia
    It was constituted on 13 June 2005, by the then Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh.
  36. [36]
    Sam Pitroda's change challenges - Business Standard
    Oct 27, 2015 · Sam Pitroda's change challenges. Advertisement. Image. Sekhar Raha. Last ... National Knowledge Commission, set up to explore and recommend ...
  37. [37]
    States oppose key provisions of NCHER bill - Deccan Herald
    May 9, 2010 · Key provisions of a draft bill for setting up an overarching body in higher education has not found favour with many states which have ...
  38. [38]
    Mixed reactions to NCHER proposal | India News - Times of India
    Two major areas of concern emerged at the meeting: How effective will be the system of having a registry of vice-chancellors proposed in the NCHER draft Bill ...
  39. [39]
    &quot;NCHER Bill undermines autonomy&quot; - The Hindu
    Perhaps the weakness of the UGC was its inability to establish this connection and therefore it failed to be academically innovative and creative. Could you ...
  40. [40]
    National Knowledge Commission, Shaping India's ... - Physics Wallah
    Jul 11, 2024 · The commission was constituted by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on June 13, 2005, with a mandate to recommend reforms in the education sector, ...
  41. [41]
    The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) - lis test series
    Jul 25, 2023 · Sad to Hear this: The National Knowledge Commission was abolished by the new Indian government that took office in the summer of 2014, so as of ...Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution
  42. [42]
    Knowledge Pentagon focused in NKC 2006-09
    Jul 14, 2017 · As of July 2014, the National `Knowledge Commission is defunct as the incoming Modi Government, elected in the summer of 2014, discontinued.
  43. [43]
    National Knowledge Commission; National Mission on Libraries
    National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was constituted on 13th June 2005 with a ... Dissolved: July 2014 (Modi). Recommendations: 300. Set up a National ...
  44. [44]
    C.R.Kesavan on X
    Feb 26, 2025 · Sam Pitroda was the Chairman of the National Knowledge Commission ... Thankfully & rightfully,NKC was abolished in July 2014. Quote. Square ...
  45. [45]
    National Knowledge Commission (NKC) and Its Influence on School ...
    Oct 4, 2024 · The National Knowledge Commission (NKC) was a transformative force in shaping India's school education landscape. Its focus on improving ...
  46. [46]
    A temporal review of global recognition of India's knowledge‐based ...
    The main aim of this paper is to analyse the attraction of India's talented, skilled workforce serving global firms from low‐cost maintenance services to ...
  47. [47]
    Revamping India's Higher Education System
    Mar 21, 2022 · The two most recent recommendations were made by the National Knowledge Commission (NKC) formed in 2005 under the chairmanship of Mr Sam ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] INDIA—The Next Frontier - American Council on Education
    The latest of these, the National Knowledge Commission, faces simi- lar hurdles. While many laud its recommendations, the jury is still out on whether they will ...