Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

New Left

The New Left comprised a loose array of radical youth movements and intellectual tendencies that gained prominence in the United States and Western Europe during the late 1950s and 1960s, diverging from the "Old Left" by de-emphasizing traditional proletarian class struggle and bureaucratic socialism in favor of cultural transformation, anti-authoritarian direct action, and advocacy for participatory democracy.^[1]^[2] Disillusioned with revelations of Soviet atrocities and the perceived stagnation of established labor parties, its adherents rejected hierarchical organization and economic materialism, instead prioritizing personal liberation, opposition to imperialism, and critiques of consumerist society.^[3]^[4] Key organizations such as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) in the U.S. exemplified this shift, with their 1962 Port Huron Statement calling for a renewed left committed to combating apathy, alienation, and corporate power through grassroots engagement.^[5]^[6] The movement mobilized large-scale protests against the Vietnam War, racial injustice, and gender inequalities, contributing to policy shifts like expanded civil rights legislation and heightened environmental awareness, yet it also faced internal fragmentation, escalation to militant tactics by splinter groups, and public backlash that limited its electoral success.^[7]^[8] Its enduring legacy lies in reshaping leftist priorities toward identity-based grievances and institutional critique, profoundly influencing academia and cultural norms despite critiques of fostering intolerance and detachment from working-class concerns.^[2]

Definition and Ideology

Core Principles and Distinction from Old Left

The New Left emerged in the late 1950s and 1960s as a movement that critiqued the bureaucratic and authoritarian tendencies of traditional socialist organizations, prioritizing instead a holistic revolution encompassing cultural, psychological, and personal liberation alongside economic change. Central to its principles was the rejection of orthodox Marxist economic determinism, which the Old Left emphasized through class struggle led by industrial workers and vanguard parties; the New Left argued that advanced capitalist societies had integrated the proletariat via consumer affluence and mass media, rendering traditional labor movements ineffective. Influenced by thinkers like Herbert Marcuse, who posited in works such as One-Dimensional Man (1964) that modern society imposed "repressive tolerance" by co-opting dissent, New Left adherents advocated for the "Great Refusal"—a total opposition to systemic alienation through direct action, consciousness-raising, and the mobilization of marginalized groups including students, intellectuals, and racial minorities.^[9]^[10] In contrast to the Old Left's focus on seizing state power to redistribute resources via centralized planning, the New Left championed anti-hierarchical, participatory structures, viewing authority itself—whether capitalist or socialist—as a form of domination requiring dismantling. This distinction manifested in practices like sit-ins, teach-ins, and commune experiments, which eschewed formal party discipline for spontaneous, decentralized protest, as seen in the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) emphasis on prefigurative politics where means mirrored desired ends. The movement's cultural orientation, drawing from Frankfurt School critical theory, targeted the family, education, and sexuality as sites of repression, promoting sexual liberation and identity-based struggles over purely economic ones; for instance, while the Old Left largely upheld traditional social norms in pursuit of proletarian revolution, New Left figures critiqued these as reinforcing false consciousness.^[2]^[11] This shift reflected disillusionment with Soviet-style communism following revelations like Nikita Khrushchev's 1956 "Secret Speech" denouncing Stalin's crimes and the subsequent suppression of the Hungarian Revolution, events that discredited the Old Left's alignment with Moscow. New Left principles thus incorporated anti-imperialism and anti-militarism, particularly against the Vietnam War, but framed them within a broader assault on technocratic rationality and consumerist ideology rather than narrow anti-capitalist economics. Empirical data from movement histories indicate that New Left groups achieved influence through cultural permeation—altering norms in universities and media—rather than electoral or union gains typical of the Old Left, though this often led to internal fragmentation due to rejection of disciplined organization.^[10]^[4]

Intellectual Foundations and Influences

The intellectual foundations of the New Left were rooted in critical theory developed by the Frankfurt School, which sought to extend Marxist critique beyond economic determinism to encompass cultural and psychological dimensions of advanced capitalism. Founded in 1923 as the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, Germany, the School's key figures, including Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno, integrated elements of Freudian psychoanalysis with Hegelian dialectics and historical materialism to analyze the "culture industry" as a mechanism of mass deception and social control.^[12]^[13] This approach critiqued both fascist totalitarianism and liberal democratic societies for fostering conformity and alienating individuals from authentic needs, influencing New Left activists to prioritize cultural revolution over traditional proletarian class struggle.^[14] Herbert Marcuse, a prominent Frankfurt School affiliate, emerged as a pivotal influence on the New Left through works like Eros and Civilization (1955), which reinterpreted Freud to argue for libidinal liberation as a path to overcoming repressive societal structures, and One-Dimensional Man (1964), which posited that technological rationality in affluent societies manufactured false consciousness and neutralized revolutionary potential.^[9]^[15] Marcuse's concepts, such as "repressive tolerance," advocated selective intolerance toward right-wing ideas to enable radical change, resonating with 1960s student movements that viewed established institutions as inherently oppressive.^[16] His emphasis on marginalized groups—students, minorities, and the Third World—as new revolutionary subjects shifted focus from industrial workers, a departure from orthodox Marxism.^[17] In the United States, C. Wright Mills contributed significantly by challenging the post-World War II consensus on the "end of ideology" and highlighting the concentration of power in a military-industrial elite. His 1956 book The Power Elite exposed interlocking corporate, military, and political leadership as undermining democracy, while his 1960 "Letter to the New Left," published in Studies on the Left, urged intellectuals and youth to lead transformative politics beyond labor unions.^[18]^[19] This resonated with early New Left formations like Students for a Democratic Society, fostering an anti-establishment ethos that critiqued bureaucratic liberalism and Soviet-style communism alike.^[20] Existentialist philosophy, particularly from Jean-Paul Sartre, further shaped New Left thought by emphasizing individual authenticity, freedom, and rejection of deterministic historical narratives, encouraging personal commitment to social action over passive acceptance of structures.^[21] Sartre's engagement with Marxism in works like Critique of Dialectical Reason (1960) influenced anti-colonial struggles and participatory democracy ideals, though his support for authoritarian regimes drew criticism from New Left humanists.^[21] These diverse strands—critical theory's cultural pessimism, Marcuse's utopian eroticism, Mills' sociological realism, and existentialism's voluntarism—collectively underpinned the New Left's departure from Old Left economism toward a holistic assault on hierarchy, authority, and alienation.^[22]

Emphasis on Culture, Identity, and Anti-Hierarchy

The New Left distinguished itself through a pronounced focus on cultural critique and transformation, viewing culture as a primary arena for challenging capitalist domination rather than solely economic structures. Influenced by Frankfurt School theorists, particularly Herbert Marcuse, New Left thinkers argued that advanced industrial societies exerted control via cultural apparatuses and consumerist ideology, fostering conformity and suppressing revolutionary potential. In his 1964 work One-Dimensional Man, Marcuse contended that technological rationality had integrated the working class into the system, necessitating a cultural revolt to disrupt this "one-dimensional" existence and enable multidimensional liberation.^[16]^[23] This perspective inspired student movements to target cultural institutions, such as universities, as sites of ideological reproduction, promoting countercultural practices to erode established norms.^[24] Central to the New Left's ideology was an anti-hierarchical ethos, manifested in advocacy for participatory democracy as an alternative to representative systems perceived as alienating and elitist. The Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) outlined this in the Port Huron Statement of June 1962, which demanded direct participation in decision-making to eliminate bureaucratic hierarchies and empower individuals against passive citizenship.^[5] This approach emphasized consensus-oriented, decentralized organization, rejecting top-down leadership in favor of collective processes to foster authentic self-governance.^[25] Such principles influenced anti-war protests and campus occupations, where activists dismantled formal authority structures to model egalitarian alternatives, though this often led to internal factionalism due to the challenges of scaling non-hierarchical coordination.^[26] The New Left also pioneered an emphasis on identity as a locus of oppression and resistance, laying groundwork for subsequent identity-based politics by framing personal and group identities—racial, gender, and sexual—as intertwined with systemic power dynamics. Emerging from 1960s activism, this shift prioritized cultural recognition and affirmation of marginalized identities over universal class solidarity, influencing movements like Black Power, second-wave feminism, and gay liberation.^[27] For instance, New Left groups increasingly viewed intersections of identity with hierarchy, advocating dismantling patriarchal, racial, and heteronormative structures through cultural subversion rather than state-centric reforms.^[28] This focus, while mobilizing diverse constituencies, diverged from traditional Marxist priorities, contributing to a fragmented left by the 1970s as identity claims competed with economic analyses.^[29]

Historical Context

Post-World War II Disillusionment

Following the Allied victory in World War II in 1945, a growing number of left-wing thinkers and militants in Western Europe and North America became disillusioned with the Soviet Union's brand of communism, as evidence mounted of its totalitarian practices, including mass repression and the suppression of genuine workers' control. The rapid Stalinization of Eastern Europe—marked by rigged elections in Poland in 1947, the communist coup in Czechoslovakia in February 1948, and the show trials across the region—revealed the Kremlin's prioritization of geopolitical control over socialist ideals, alienating those who had hoped for diverse paths to socialism free from Moscow's dictation.^[30]^[31] This disillusionment extended to Western social democracy, which, despite implementing ambitious welfare programs amid post-war reconstruction, appeared increasingly co-opted by capitalist stability and bureaucratic inertia. In Britain, Clement Attlee's Labour government (1945–1951) nationalized key industries like coal and steel, established the National Health Service in 1948, and expanded social insurance, yet by the early 1950s, rising affluence and full employment fostered a consumer-oriented society that dulled class antagonisms without eradicating exploitation or inspiring further radical transformation.^[32] Critics on the left argued that such reforms represented "socialism from above," mirroring Stalinism's top-down authoritarianism by substituting state management for participatory democracy, thus failing to address alienation in advanced industrial societies.^[32] Intellectual currents amplified this critique, with figures like Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer, in their 1947 work Dialectic of Enlightenment, diagnosing how instrumental reason under both liberal capitalism and Soviet bureaucracy led to new forms of domination, including the culture industry's pacification of the masses. In the United States, the Old Left's labor unions and communist organizations faced marginalization amid the Cold War's anti-communist purges, such as the Smith Act prosecutions starting in 1949, which exposed the vulnerabilities of hierarchical party structures and economic determinism without cultural or anti-imperialist dimensions. This dual rejection of Stalinist rigidity and social democratic complacency created intellectual space for rethinking leftist strategy, emphasizing grassroots participation over vanguardism.^[33]

1956 Crises as Catalyst

The Hungarian Revolution of 1956, erupting on October 23 amid protests in Budapest demanding political liberalization and an end to Soviet domination, exposed the repressive realities of Stalinist communism to Western observers. Sparked by Nikita Khrushchev's February 1956 denunciation of Stalin at the 20th Soviet Congress, the uprising involved workers' councils and calls for multi-party democracy, but was crushed by Soviet tanks on November 4, resulting in an estimated 2,500 Hungarian deaths and over 200,000 refugees.^[34] ^[35] This invasion triggered widespread disillusionment among European and American leftists, prompting mass resignations from communist parties—such as the exodus from Britain's Communist Party, where membership halved from 35,000 to under 20,000 by 1957—and a rejection of uncritical fidelity to Moscow.^[3] The event underscored the incompatibility of Soviet-style socialism with democratic aspirations, eroding the Old Left's monolithic allegiance to the USSR and fostering demands for a socialism independent of state capitalist authoritarianism.^[36] Parallel to this, the Suez Crisis crystallized anti-imperialist critiques by revealing the anachronistic aggressions of declining European powers. Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser's nationalization of the Suez Canal Company on July 26, 1956, prompted a covert Anglo-French-Israeli invasion starting October 29, aimed at regaining control and toppling Nasser, but U.S. economic pressure and UN resolutions forced a humiliating withdrawal by December 22.^[37] The debacle, amid Britain's post-war economic strains and Eisenhower administration opposition, symbolized the erosion of formal empire and the rise of nationalist leaders in the Global South, galvanizing leftists to pivot from Eurocentric labor politics toward solidarity with decolonization struggles.^[38] Nasser's defiance, backed by Soviet rhetoric, highlighted Western hypocrisy in condemning Soviet intervention in Hungary while pursuing colonial aims, thus bridging anti-Stalinist sentiments with opposition to capitalist imperialism.^[39] These intertwined crises of 1956—Soviet brutality in the East and imperial overreach in the "West"—catalyzed the New Left's formation by dismantling Old Left paradigms, including faith in the USSR as socialism's vanguard and tolerance for social-democratic complicity in empire. In Britain, they spurred the "first New Left," with dissidents launching The Reasoner (merging into New Left Review by 1960) to advocate open, non-sectarian Marxism focused on cultural hegemony and extra-parliamentary action.^[40] ^[41] Across the Atlantic, figures like C. Wright Mills drew on the year's upheavals in Listen, Yankee (1960) to link anti-communist revelations with critiques of U.S. corporate liberalism, inspiring student radicals toward global anti-authoritarianism.^[42] The events thus marked a generational rupture, privileging empirical skepticism of power structures over ideological orthodoxy and laying groundwork for movements emphasizing identity, ecology, and participatory democracy.^[36]

Regional Developments

United Kingdom

The British New Left emerged in response to the political crises of 1956, including Nikita Khrushchev's February speech denouncing Joseph Stalin's crimes, the subsequent Hungarian Revolution crushed by Soviet tanks in October-November, and the Suez Crisis exposing Western imperialism. These events prompted a wave of disillusionment among British communists and socialists, leading to the exodus of around 5,000 members from the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB) by early 1957, including prominent historians and intellectuals who rejected Stalinist authoritarianism while seeking alternatives to both Soviet-style communism and reformist social democracy.^[43]^[40] This "First New Left" coalesced around independent journals that critiqued orthodox Marxism's economic determinism and emphasized moral, cultural, and anti-hierarchical dimensions of socialism. E.P. Thompson and others launched The New Reasoner in 1957 to advocate humanistic socialism and workers' control, drawing from the Hungarian workers' councils as models of participatory democracy. Simultaneously, younger academics produced Universities and Left Review to engage students with existentialist and anti-colonial ideas. These merged in 1960 to form New Left Review (NLR), initially edited by Stuart Hall, which became a central organ for analyzing Britain's "absent" bourgeois revolution and cultural hegemony under capitalism. Key figures included Raymond Williams, who explored working-class culture in works like Culture and Society (1958), and Ralph Miliband, whose critiques of parliamentary socialism highlighted elite capture of Labour institutions.^[44]^[3]^[45] The movement intertwined with the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), founded in 1957 amid Britain's hydrogen bomb tests, channeling anti-militarism into mass mobilization. New Left activists, including Thompson, participated in annual Aldermaston marches, which grew from 10,000 participants in 1958 to over 50,000 by 1961, fostering a fusion of ethical socialism with direct action tactics like sit-ins and teach-ins that bypassed traditional party structures. CND's unilateralist stance against NATO's nuclear posture reflected the New Left's rejection of Cold War bipolarity, prioritizing independent moral agency over geopolitical realism.^[46]^[47] By the mid-1960s, a "Second New Left" emerged, influenced by global events like the Vietnam War and May 1968 upheavals in France, shifting toward student-led radicalism and cultural critique. UK protests peaked in 1968 with occupations at the London School of Economics (LSE) in January-March, triggered by student suspensions and police violence, and the Hornsey College of Art uprising in May, where over 700 students and staff seized the campus for seven weeks demanding democratic governance and curriculum reform. These actions, documented in agitprop publications like The Black Dwarf edited by Tariq Ali, critiqued university complicity in state power and advanced anti-imperialist solidarity, though they often fractured over tactics between Trotskyist and autonomist factions. NLR under Perry Anderson from 1962 increasingly incorporated Eurocommunist and structuralist theory, influencing cultural studies at the University of Birmingham's Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, founded by Richard Hoggart and Hall in 1964.^[3]^[48]^[49] Despite galvanizing youth radicalism, the British New Left waned by the early 1970s amid internal debates over class reductionism versus identity politics and external pressures like Labour's 1970 electoral defeat and economic stagflation. Its legacy persisted in academic fields like history from below—exemplified by Thompson's *The Making of the English Working Class* (1963)—and in challenging the CPGB's dominance, though critics noted its limited penetration into industrial working-class strongholds, attributing this to an overemphasis on intellectual vanguardism rather than mass organization.^[3]

United States

The New Left in the United States developed primarily through student activism in the early 1960s, distinguishing itself from the Old Left by rejecting hierarchical structures, Stalinist legacies, and labor-focused organizing in favor of cultural critique, personal liberation, and direct democracy.^[6] It drew initial momentum from disillusionment with Cold War conformity and the perceived inadequacies of mainstream liberalism, intersecting with the civil rights movement via alliances with groups like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).^[50] The Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), established in 1960 at the University of Michigan, emerged as the movement's central organization, growing from a few dozen members to over 100,000 by 1968 through campus chapters advocating against racial injustice and university complicity in the military-industrial complex.^[51] The 1962 Port Huron Statement, drafted primarily by Tom Hayden during SDS's founding convention in Port Huron, Michigan, served as the movement's seminal manifesto, diagnosing societal "alienation" and calling for participatory democracy to replace bureaucratic apathy and corporate dominance.^[52] ^[5] This document, ratified by 60 delegates, critiqued both liberal capitalism and Soviet communism, emphasizing values formation through community action and influencing subsequent activism by framing issues like poverty and war as symptoms of deeper participatory deficits.^[53] By mid-decade, opposition to U.S. escalation in Vietnam galvanized the New Left, with SDS organizing the first major teach-in at the University of Michigan on March 24-25, 1965, drawing 3,000 participants and sparking nationwide campus events that evolved into mass protests.^[51] Key figures included Hayden, who transitioned from SDS leadership to broader political roles, and radicals like Abbie Hoffman of the Youth International Party (Yippies), who blended theatrical protest with countercultural elements to challenge authority through events like the 1967 "Exorcism of the Pentagon."^[6] The movement's tactics encompassed sit-ins, draft resistance—over 200,000 young men evaded or resisted the draft by 1970—and occupations, such as the 1968 Columbia University takeover protesting university ties to war research, which involved 1,000 students seizing buildings for a week.^[51] Influences from European thinkers like Herbert Marcuse, whose 1964 book One-Dimensional Man critiqued consumer society, resonated in U.S. campuses, promoting ideas of repressive tolerance and student-led revolution.^[54] Despite peak mobilization, including the October 1967 March on the Pentagon with 100,000 attendees, the New Left fragmented by the late 1960s due to ideological splits between nonviolent reformers and militant factions like the Weather Underground, formed in 1969 after SDS's collapse at its June convention amid factional violence.^[55] ^[51] Events like the 1968 Chicago Democratic National Convention protests, marked by clashes with police resulting in over 600 arrests, highlighted tactical extremism that alienated potential allies and public opinion, with polls showing majority support for the war until 1968 but declining tolerance for disruptive tactics.^[6] The movement waned by the early 1970s following the 1970 Kent State shootings, end of the draft in 1973, U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam in 1973, and internal burnout, though its emphasis on identity and anti-institutionalism persisted in later cultural shifts.^[55]

Continental Europe

In continental Europe, the New Left emerged as a response to the revelations of Stalinist atrocities and the Soviet suppression of the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, fostering disillusionment with orthodox Marxism-Leninism among intellectuals and students. This shift emphasized anti-authoritarian critiques of both capitalism and state socialism, drawing on thinkers like Herbert Marcuse and the Frankfurt School to prioritize cultural revolution over traditional class struggle. Movements rejected hierarchical party structures, advocating instead for participatory democracy, direct action, and opposition to imperialism, often manifesting in university occupations and protests against perceived authoritarian tendencies in post-war societies.^[36] In France, the New Left crystallized during the May 1968 events, beginning with student unrest at the University of Nanterre in March over cohabitation rules and opposition to the Vietnam War, which spread to the Sorbonne on May 3 after police intervention. By May 13, general strikes engulfed the country, with approximately 10 million workers occupying factories and demanding wage increases alongside broader social reforms, marking the largest strike wave in French history. Figures like Daniel Cohn-Bendit of the Nanterre movement and influences from the Situationist International highlighted demands for self-management and cultural liberation, though the protests subsided after President Charles de Gaulle dissolved the National Assembly and called elections on May 30, resulting in a Gaullist landslide on June 23. The [French Communist Party](/page/French_Communist Party) (PCF) and major unions, aligned with the Old Left, ultimately withdrew support, prioritizing electoral gains over revolutionary momentum.^[56]^[57] West Germany's New Left centered on the Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund (SDS), which, after its 1961 expulsion from the Social Democratic Party (SPD) for opposing rearmament, expanded to critique the 1966 Grand Coalition of SPD and CDU as a betrayal of socialist principles. Under Rudi Dutschke, the SDS promoted "long march through the institutions" to transform society from within, organizing protests against the Vietnam War, the Springer media monopoly, and proposed emergency laws seen as enabling authoritarianism. Membership surged from around 600 in the early 1960s to several thousand by 1968, with mass demonstrations following Dutschke's attempted assassination on April 11, 1968, by Josef Bachmann, which escalated confrontations with police and fueled the anti-authoritarian APO (Außerparlamentarische Opposition). The movement's emphasis on civil disobedience and grassroots organizing distinguished it from parliamentary socialism, though internal debates over Maoism and Trotskyism contributed to fragmentation by the early 1970s.^[58]^[59] In Italy, the New Left developed through operaismo (workerism), critiquing the Italian Communist Party (PCI) for its parliamentary compromises and advocating autonomous workers' councils amid rapid industrialization and labor unrest. Groups like Potere Operaio and Lotta Continua emerged in the late 1960s, organizing factory occupations and "hot autumn" strikes in 1969 that involved over 5 million workers protesting wage controls and poor conditions. The extra-parliamentary left, active from 1969 to 1976, rejected both PCI reformism and traditional union hierarchies, promoting self-reduction of prices and rent strikes as forms of direct action; however, ideological splits and infiltration by militants led some factions toward armed struggle, exemplified by the Red Brigades' formation in 1970. These movements highlighted the New Left's focus on cultural and workplace autonomy but also exposed tensions between mass mobilization and vanguardist tendencies.^[60]^[61]

Global Spread

Asia and Oceania

In Japan, the New Left arose in the late 1950s as dissident factions splintered from the Japanese Communist Party, rejecting its parliamentary focus in favor of revolutionary activism against perceived imperialism and state authoritarianism. Key groups included the Revolutionary Communist League (Kakumaru-ha) and the Bund (Communist League), which mobilized through the Zengakuren student federation to oppose the 1960 revision of the U.S.-Japan Security Treaty, sparking the Anpo protests that drew up to 5.8 million participants nationwide and forced Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi's resignation on June 16, 1960. These events marked a shift toward extraparliamentary tactics, emphasizing mass struggle over electoralism. The movement intensified during the 1968–1969 university crisis, with students occupying campuses like Tokyo University on May 18, 1969, protesting administrative control, standardized testing, and U.S. military presence; clashes culminated in the June 11–13 siege of Yasuda Auditorium, where riot police used tear gas and resulted in over 1,000 injuries and the death of student leader Michiko Kamba from a police baton strike. Factional violence among New Left sects, including assassinations and bombings by groups like the Sekigun (Red Army Faction), eroded public support, contributing to the movement's decline by 1970 amid arrests exceeding 10,000 and the rise of isolated terrorist cells such as the Japanese Red Army, which hijacked a Japan Airlines flight in 1970. Internal divisions over strategy—between "anti-imperialist" mass action and "anti-party" ultra-leftism—prevented unified action, as documented in post-mortem analyses of the era's 200-plus splinter organizations. Across other Asian contexts, New Left influences appeared sporadically but were often subsumed by local Marxist-Leninist or Maoist currents. In India, radical intellectuals drew on anti-colonial critiques akin to New Left cultural analysis during the 1967 Naxalbari peasant uprising, where Charu Majumdar's advocacy for protracted people's war echoed calls for dismantling hierarchical structures, though the movement prioritized armed rural insurgency over urban cultural revolution, leading to state suppression by 1972 with thousands killed. In South Korea, student demonstrations against the 1960 April Revolution and Park Chung-hee's 1961 coup incorporated New Left-style anti-authoritarianism, but evolved into broader democratization efforts rather than sustained cultural critique. In Oceania, Australian New Left activism centered on opposition to the Vietnam War and conscription, with the Save Our Sons (SOS) group forming in 1965 and culminating in the 1970 Moratorium protests that mobilized 200,000 in Melbourne on May 8, surpassing U.S. equivalents in per capita turnout. Influenced by imported ideas from Marcuse and Cohn-Bendit, groups like the Monash University Labor Club and the Communist Party of Australia (Marxist-Leninist), founded in 1964, blended anti-imperialism with demands for sexual liberation and indigenous rights, though factionalism between Trotskyists and Maoists limited longevity. New Zealand mirrored this with 1968–1970 protests against U.S. nuclear visits and Vietnam involvement, led by student unions at Auckland University, but scaled smaller, peaking at 10,000 in the 1969 HART (Halt All Racist Tours) anti-apartheid actions that intertwined New Left anti-racism with direct confrontation. By the mid-1970s, both nations' movements waned as economic shifts and electoral reforms co-opted demands, leaving a legacy in environmental and feminist activism but critiqued for overlooking working-class priorities in favor of middle-class radicalism.

Latin America and Africa

In Latin America, the New Left gained traction during the 1960s, diverging from orthodox Marxism-Leninism by critiquing bureaucratic socialism and emphasizing cultural transformation, anti-imperialism, and grassroots mobilization influenced by the 1959 Cuban Revolution.^[62] Thinkers developed dependency theory, arguing that peripheral economies like those in Latin America perpetuated underdevelopment through unequal exchange with core capitalist nations, as articulated by economists such as Raúl Prebisch of the Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLA) and later neo-Marxists like André Gunder Frank.^[63] This framework rejected modernization theory's linear progress narrative, positing instead structural obstacles rooted in global capitalism.^[64] Student-led protests erupted across the region in 1968, marking a high point of New Left activism: in Mexico, demonstrations against government repression culminated in the Tlatelolco massacre on October 2, where security forces killed an estimated 300-400 protesters; in Brazil, under military rule since 1964, university occupations and strikes challenged authoritarianism; and in Uruguay, unrest fueled the rise of urban guerrilla groups like the Tupamaros, who conducted bank expropriations and kidnappings from 1963 onward.^[65] These movements often blended anti-authoritarian cultural critique with calls for revolutionary violence, drawing inspiration from global counterparts while adapting to local contexts of U.S. interventionism and domestic dictatorships.^[62] By the 1970s, however, many splintered into armed factions, contributing to cycles of state repression and electoral left-wing resurgence later, though empirical outcomes showed limited socioeconomic gains amid persistent inequality.^[66] Parallel developments included liberation theology, formalized in Gustavo Gutiérrez's 1971 work A Theology of Liberation, which integrated Marxist class analysis with Catholic doctrine to prioritize the "preferential option for the poor," influencing activist priests and base communities in countries like Peru and Brazil. While sharing New Left emphases on oppression and praxis, it diverged through religious framing, facing Vatican condemnation in 1984 for Marxist reductions of eschatology to historical materialism, as critiqued by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger.^[67] In Africa, New Left influences were more diffuse, primarily manifesting through post-independence student movements that echoed global 1968 unrest by demanding democratic reforms against one-party authoritarianism and neocolonial structures.^[68] In Senegal, student strikes in May-June 1968, sparked by university fee hikes, escalated into a nationwide crisis involving workers, forcing President Léopold Sédar Senghor's government concessions and highlighting youth radicalism against elite pacts.^[69] Similar protests occurred in nations like Ethiopia (1960s student opposition to Haile Selassie's monarchy), Nigeria (university-led anti-corruption campaigns), and Zimbabwe (pre-independence youth mobilization), often blending anti-imperialist rhetoric with cultural critiques of traditional authority.^[68] In South Africa, white student groups within the National Union of South African Students (NUSAS) adopted New Left-style anti-hierarchical tactics in the late 1960s, organizing against apartheid through teach-ins and solidarity with black consciousness movements, though black-led resistance remained dominant via organizations like the African National Congress.^[69] Overall, African variants prioritized national liberation over Western New Left's cultural focus, with limited empirical success in averting military coups or fostering sustained egalitarianism, as post-colonial states frequently consolidated power through co-optation or suppression.^[70]

Movements, Organizations, and Tactics

Student Activism and Protests

Student activism constituted a primary vehicle for New Left mobilization in the 1960s, with universities serving as incubators for dissent against the Vietnam War, university governance, and broader societal hierarchies. Emerging from disillusionment with both establishment politics and orthodox communism, these protests emphasized participatory democracy, cultural liberation, and anti-imperialism, often employing tactics like sit-ins, teach-ins, and occupations.^[51]^[71] In the United States, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) spearheaded campus activism after its founding in 1960 at the University of Michigan. The group's 1962 Port Huron Statement articulated a vision of "participatory democracy" critiquing corporate liberalism and advocating grassroots organizing. SDS membership expanded rapidly amid escalating U.S. involvement in Vietnam, reaching 25,000 protesters at events by 1965 and 50,000 members nationwide by 1968, coordinating over 900 antiwar marches and teach-ins. Key actions included the April 1968 Columbia University protests, where SDS members occupied buildings for seven days to oppose military research affiliations and gym construction in Harlem, drawing 1,000 participants and resulting in 700 arrests.^[72]^[73]^[74] European student movements paralleled U.S. efforts, fusing anti-authoritarian demands with New Left critiques of capitalism and legacy fascism. In France, unrest ignited in May 1968 when students at Nanterre University protested dormitory visitation rules and exam structures, leading to Sorbonne occupations on May 3 that police violently suppressed, injuring hundreds. These escalated into a general strike involving 10 million workers by mid-May, paralyzing the economy and nearly toppling President Charles de Gaulle's government, though demands centered more on cultural freedoms than traditional leftist economic reforms.^[75]^[76] In West Germany, protests from 1966 to 1969 targeted media monopolies like Axel Springer's empire and perceived continuities with Nazi-era authoritarianism. The June 1967 visit by Iran's Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi provoked clashes in West Berlin, with police killing student Benno Ohnesorg on June 2, galvanizing the extraparliamentary opposition (APO). The April 1968 assassination attempt on SDS leader Rudi Dutschke triggered riots in major cities, including arson attacks on department stores, underscoring tensions between peaceful advocacy and emerging militancy.^[77]^[78] These protests achieved limited immediate policy victories—such as minor university reforms—but amplified New Left ideas through media coverage, fostering long-term cultural shifts while exposing internal divisions over violence and strategy that fragmented the movements by 1969.^[51]^[79]

Counterculture and Direct Action

![A demonstrator offers a flower to military police during an anti-Vietnam War protest at the Pentagon]float-right The New Left drew on countercultural impulses to challenge established authority, integrating cultural rebellion with political activism against capitalism and militarism. Influenced by Herbert Marcuse's critique in One-Dimensional Man (1964), which argued that advanced industrial societies repressed human potential through consumerism and conformity, activists viewed personal liberation—via sexual openness, communal living, and psychedelic experimentation—as a front for broader societal transformation.^[15] Marcuse endorsed countercultural practices, such as those of hippies, as a "Great Refusal" embodying utopian resistance to one-dimensional existence.^[80] This synergy manifested in antiwar festivals and lifestyle protests, though purist New Left elements sometimes dismissed hippie escapism as insufficiently revolutionary. Direct action tactics prioritized immediate confrontation, including sit-ins, building occupations, and street theater, over institutional reform. In the United States, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) orchestrated the April 23–30, 1968, Columbia University protests, where around 1,000 students seized five buildings to oppose university affiliations with Vietnam War research via the Institute for Defense Analyses and a controversial gymnasium project encroaching on Harlem.^[81] ^[82] Police clearance on April 30 resulted in over 700 arrests and numerous injuries, galvanizing campus radicalism.^[81] In France, May 1968 direct actions escalated from student occupations at Nanterre and Sorbonne universities—sparked by demands for university democratization and against Vietnam involvement—into a general strike paralyzing the economy, with approximately 10 million workers participating in factory occupations and seeking autogestion (self-management).^[83] ^[84] The unrest, blending New Left ideology with syndicalist tactics, nearly toppled President Charles de Gaulle's government before elections restored order.^[85] The Youth International Party (Yippies), fusing counterculture with New Left agitation, exemplified disruptive symbolism; at the August 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, leaders Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin nominated a pig, Pigasus, for president and staged a "Festival of Life" protest, provoking police riots that injured hundreds and exposed state repression to a national audience. ^[86] These actions underscored the New Left's emphasis on spectacle and civil disobedience to provoke systemic exposure, though they often alienated moderates and invited backlash.

Key Organizations and Figures

In the United States, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) served as the central organization of the New Left, established in 1960 through a merger of student groups at the University of Michigan and growing to over 100 chapters by 1968, emphasizing participatory democracy, anti-war activism, and civil rights.^[87]^[88] The group's 1962 Port Huron Statement, drafted primarily by Tom Hayden, critiqued bureaucratic alienation and called for a rejection of Cold War-era complacency, influencing thousands of student activists.^[6] SDS splintered in 1969 amid ideological conflicts, giving rise to factions like the Weather Underground, which pursued militant tactics.^[88] The Youth International Party (Yippies), co-founded in 1967 by Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, integrated countercultural spectacle with New Left politics, staging theatrical protests such as nominating a pig for president at the 1968 Democratic National Convention to highlight anti-war sentiments and cultural rebellion.^[89]^[90] Hoffman, a former organizer with the Liberty House community action program, authored "Revolution for the Hell of It" in 1968, advocating disruptive humor as a strategy against establishment power.^[86] Intellectually, Herbert Marcuse, a German-American philosopher and Frankfurt School affiliate, shaped New Left ideology through critiques of capitalism's repressive tolerance in works like "One-Dimensional Man" (1964), which argued that advanced industrial societies neutralized dissent via consumer affluence, inspiring student radicals to view liberation as requiring cultural upheaval.^[9]^[15] In West Germany, the Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund (SDS) functioned as the primary New Left student group, peaking at around 15,000 members by 1968 and organizing protests against the Vietnam War and perceived authoritarianism in post-war society.^[91] Rudi Dutschke, a key SDS leader, promoted the concept of a "long march through the institutions" in 1967, envisioning gradual infiltration of cultural and educational bodies to foster socialist transformation, though he was assassinated in an attempt on April 11, 1968, sparking widespread unrest.^[92] During France's May 1968 events, Daniel Cohn-Bendit emerged as a prominent student leader at Nanterre University, galvanizing protests that escalated into nationwide strikes involving 10 million workers, challenging Gaullist authority through demands for university reform and worker self-management.^[93]^[75] Cohn-Bendit, expelled from France on May 23, 1968, symbolized the fusion of libertarian socialism and anti-authoritarian revolt central to European New Left dynamics.^[94]

Controversies and Criticisms

Internal Divisions and Fragmentation

The Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), a flagship organization of the American New Left, fragmented decisively at its national convention from June 18 to 22, 1969, in Chicago, where the Revolutionary Youth Movement (RYM) caucus expelled members of the Progressive Labor Party (PL) and its Worker-Student Alliance (WSA).^[95] The core disputes centered on PL's rejection of black nationalism, women's liberation, and RYM's emphasis on anti-imperialist armed struggle in support of national liberation movements, contrasting with PL's worker-centric, anti-nationalist Maoist orientation.^[95] This bureaucratic maneuver, bypassing democratic norms, produced two rival SDS entities—RYM-aligned SDS with 700-800 delegates and WSA/PL with 400-500—exacerbating campus-level factionalism and eroding the group's peak membership of around 100,000 from 1968.^[95] Ideological rifts extended beyond organizational tactics to foundational tensions between cultural transformation and class-based revolution, with RYM factions like the Weathermen prioritizing identity-driven militancy and personal liberation over traditional proletarian organizing, alienating potential working-class allies.^[96] These conflicts, fueled by extremism in defense of abstract ideals rather than pragmatic strategy, mirrored broader New Left debates where cultural revolutionaries dismissed Old Left class analysis as outdated, yet failed to forge a coherent alternative, leading to further splintering into violent underground groups and ineffective sects.^[96] In Europe, similar divisions plagued groups like West Germany's Außerparlamentarische Opposition (APO), where student-led protests against authoritarianism fragmented into competing Maoist, Trotskyist, and autonomist K-Groups by the early 1970s, undermining unified opposition to the establishment.^[97] The resulting disunity, compounded by intolerance for dissent and overreliance on ideological purity, contributed to the New Left's rapid decline; SDS effectively dissolved post-split, with offshoots turning to terrorism that repelled mainstream support, while European counterparts devolved into marginal cadre organizations by the mid-1970s.^[95] Empirical assessments highlight how such fragmentation prevented scalable mobilization, as evidenced by the movement's inability to sustain mass protests beyond 1968-1969 peaks or influence electoral politics durably.^[98] This internal entropy, rather than external repression alone, underscores the causal role of unresolved strategic contradictions in the New Left's failure to transition from protest to power.^[96]

Association with Violence and Extremism

While the New Left initially emphasized non-violent protest and cultural critique against capitalism, imperialism, and traditional authority, radical fringes radicalized toward armed struggle, viewing violence as a catalyst for revolution inspired by anti-colonial models like those in Algeria and Vietnam. These groups, emerging from student movements and organizations such as Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) in the United States, justified urban guerrilla tactics as "bringing the war home" to challenge state power. By the early 1970s, this shift manifested in terrorist acts including bombings, kidnappings, and assassinations, which, though limited in scale compared to state responses, resulted in dozens of deaths and widespread property damage, ultimately discrediting broader New Left aims through public revulsion and security crackdowns.^[99]^[100] In the United States, the Weather Underground Organization (WUO), a militant splinter from SDS formed in 1969, conducted over two dozen bombings between 1970 and 1975 targeting symbols of perceived oppression, such as the Pentagon on May 19, 1972, and the U.S. Capitol on March 1, 1971, to protest the Vietnam War and racism. The group detonated a bomb at the State Department headquarters on January 29, 1975, causing structural damage but no fatalities after an accidental explosion in a Greenwich Village townhouse on March 6, 1970, killed three members and prompted a strategic pivot away from lethal intent. Though the WUO claimed responsibility for property-focused attacks to minimize casualties, their actions, documented in FBI records, exemplified how New Left anti-war fervor evolved into domestic terrorism, with manifestos advocating "days of rage" and armed resistance.^[101]^[101]^[102] In West Germany, the Red Army Faction (RAF), originating from the 1968 student protests—a core New Left milieu—escalated to a campaign of assassinations and bombings from 1970 until its dissolution in 1998, killing 34 people including politicians, judges, and industrialists, such as the 1977 murder of Attorney General Siegfried Buback. Rooted in critiques of American imperialism and West German "fascism," the RAF, also known as Baader-Meinhof Gang, conducted high-profile operations like the 1977 hijacking of Lufthansa Flight 181 during the "German Autumn," which ended with a commando raid killing three RAF militants. Their violence, analyzed in comparative studies with U.S. counterparts, reflected a shared New Left ideology of anti-capitalist guerrilla warfare but alienated sympathizers by prioritizing symbolic terror over mass mobilization.^[103]^[104]^[105] Italy's Red Brigades (Brigate Rosse), formed in 1970 amid extraparliamentary left-wing agitation tied to New Left factory occupations and student unrest, perpetrated approximately 14,000 acts of violence in their first decade, including kidnappings and executions to dismantle the "bourgeois state." The group's 1978 abduction and murder of Prime Minister Aldo Moro after 55 days in captivity marked a peak of escalation, with Moro's body left in a Rome street on May 9, symbolizing their Maoist-inspired "people's war." Emerging from the same 1960s-1970s ferment as broader New Left currents, the Brigades' tactics, per declassified analyses, blended ideological purity with pragmatic terror, contributing to Italy's "Years of Lead" era of over 400 murders by left-wing extremists, though their failure to ignite revolution underscored the strategic limits of such extremism.^[106]^[107]^[106]

Ideological and Strategic Flaws

The New Left's ideological framework, influenced by thinkers associated with the Frankfurt School such as Herbert Marcuse, emphasized cultural hegemony and the critique of "repressive tolerance" in liberal democracies, often subordinating economic materialism to psychological and symbolic liberation. This approach critiqued capitalism not primarily through class exploitation but via its alleged perpetuation of authoritarian personalities and consumerist false consciousness, yet it frequently devolved into moral relativism by equating Western imperialism with Soviet or Maoist totalitarianism.^[108] Such equivalence undermined principled anti-communism, as evidenced by the New Left's romanticization of Third World revolutions despite empirical evidence of their repressive outcomes, including the Cultural Revolution's death toll estimated at 1-2 million between 1966 and 1976.^[108] A core ideological flaw lay in the movement's elitist orientation, dominated by university students and intellectuals who increasingly dismissed the industrial working class as complicit in systemic oppression. This perspective, articulated in manifestos like the 1962 Port Huron Statement by Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), prioritized participatory democracy and anti-hierarchical ideals but alienated blue-collar workers perceived as culturally conservative, contributing to the latter's support for figures like George Wallace, who garnered 13.5% of the national vote in the 1968 presidential election.^[109] Christopher Lasch, in his 1969 analysis The Agony of the American Left, attributed this detachment to the left's absorption of Freudian therapeutic models, which fostered individualistic "do-your-own-thing" ethos over disciplined mass organizing, eroding the populist foundations of earlier socialist movements.^[110] Strategically, the New Left's rejection of vanguard organization and parliamentary paths in favor of spontaneous direct action and "prefigurative politics" precluded the construction of durable institutions capable of wielding power. Organizations like SDS exemplified this, fracturing at its 1969 National Convention in Chicago over debates between revolutionary praxis and electoral engagement, leading to splinter groups like the Weatherman faction and the group's effective dissolution by year's end.^[111] This anti-institutional bias, critiqued by Tom Kahn as a failure to learn from prior leftist defeats like the Socialist Party's marginalization post-World War I, resulted in tactical overreach—such as the disruptive protests at the 1968 Democratic National Convention, which polls showed alienated 56% of Americans who viewed demonstrators unfavorably.^[108]^[108] The movement's emphasis on cultural provocation over coalition-building exacerbated these shortcomings, as symbolic gestures like campus occupations failed to translate into broad electoral gains or policy leverage. Empirical assessments indicate that while anti-Vietnam protests correlated with declining public support for the war (from 61% approval in 1965 to 28% by 1971), strategic missteps, including violence-prone tactics, galvanized conservative backlashes, evidenced by Richard Nixon's 1972 landslide victory with 60.7% of the popular vote amid "silent majority" appeals to working-class voters.^[112] Ultimately, the absence of a pragmatic strategy for power consolidation left the New Left vulnerable to co-optation or irrelevance, with core groups collapsing by the mid-1970s without establishing lasting alternatives to the two-party system.^[111]

Legacy and Reassessment

Institutional Infiltration and Cultural Shifts

A core strategy of the New Left in the late 1960s involved pursuing gradual subversion through established power structures, encapsulated in German activist Rudi Dutschke's 1967 slogan of a "long march through the institutions." This approach, drawing from Antonio Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony—which emphasized winning ideological dominance via civil society organs like education and media over direct proletarian revolution—aimed to erode capitalist norms from within.^[113]^[114] New Left adherents, many emerging from 1960s student movements, increasingly entered academia, particularly in humanities and social sciences departments, facilitating a shift toward critical theory and postmodernist frameworks influenced by Frankfurt School thinkers like Herbert Marcuse and Theodor Adorno. Surveys indicate a marked decline in conservative faculty representation in U.S. universities: the proportion identifying as conservative fell from 27% in 1969 to 12% by 1999, coinciding with the tenure of former radicals who prioritized cultural critique over empirical traditionalism.^[115] This infiltration correlated with curriculum changes emphasizing identity-based oppression narratives, deconstructing Western canon works as inherently power-laden, and promoting concepts like "repressive tolerance," where tolerance of dissenting views was reframed as enabling systemic injustice.^[116] Cultural shifts extended beyond campuses, influencing media and entertainment through New Left alumni who advanced narratives prioritizing cultural over economic materialism. In Britain, the New Left's integration of Gramscian ideas into cultural studies programs at institutions like the University of Birmingham fostered a "cultural Marxism" that naturalized Marxist analysis in historiography and media criticism, prioritizing hegemony over class struggle.^[117] Empirical data on contemporary faculty affiliations reveal stark imbalances, with liberals vastly outnumbering conservatives—often by ratios exceeding 10:1 in elite institutions—suggesting sustained ideological capture rather than merit-based diversity. Critics, including surveys from Heterodox Academy, attribute phenomena like speech codes and cancellation practices emerging in the 1980s to this entrenchment, where institutional norms increasingly penalized heterodox views under guises of equity.^[115] While proponents view these changes as progressive enlightenment, causal analysis reveals trade-offs: heightened polarization, with student ideological conformity rising alongside administrative bloat dedicated to diversity enforcement, and empirical underperformance in fields prioritizing activism over falsifiability. In media, similar patterns appeared, as 1960s countercultural figures shaped Hollywood's post-blacklist output toward anti-establishment themes, though direct New Left metrics remain sparser than academic ones. This long-term embedding yielded measurable hegemony in elite discourse but faced pushback amid declining public trust in infiltrated bodies, evidenced by Gallup polls showing confidence in higher education dropping from 57% in 2015 to 36% by 2023.

Influence on Modern Political Movements

The New Left's pivot from orthodox Marxist class struggle to cultural critique and identity-based mobilization established foundational elements of modern identity politics, emphasizing group-specific oppressions tied to race, gender, and sexuality as primary axes of conflict. This shift, evident in the New Left's support for splinter movements like black power and women's liberation during the late 1960s, manifested in contemporary activism by framing systemic issues through intersectional lenses that prioritize representational equity over economic redistribution. For instance, the Black Lives Matter movement, formalized in 2013 after the Trayvon Martin killing, echoes New Left tactics in its decentralized structure and focus on racial injustice as a cultural hegemony to dismantle, drawing ideological continuity from the era's rejection of colorblind liberalism in favor of affirmative group advocacy.^[27]^[118] Modern protest movements such as Occupy Wall Street (launched September 17, 2011, in New York City's Zuccotti Park) inherited the New Left's participatory democracy models and anti-corporate rhetoric, employing consensus-based decision-making reminiscent of Students for a Democratic Society's 1962 Port Huron Statement to critique financial elites and inequality. Similarly, environmental activism traces direct lineage to New Left-inspired events like the first Earth Day on April 22, 1970, which mobilized 20 million participants and evolved into global efforts by 2000 encompassing 350 million, influencing parties like the U.S. Green Party founded in 1984. Antifa networks, while rooted in interwar European anti-fascism, revived New Left-style direct action in the U.S. during the 2010s, using confrontational tactics against perceived far-right threats in events like the 2017 Charlottesville rally, thereby perpetuating an anti-authoritarian ethos that prioritizes street-level disruption over electoral engagement.^[119]^[118]^[120] The New Left's "long march through the institutions," a strategy articulated by Rudi Dutschke in 1967 to subvert established power structures from within, has exerted lasting influence by embedding its worldview in academia and media, where faculty political affiliations skew heavily leftward—over 60% identifying as liberal in recent surveys, with ratios exceeding 78:1 Democrats to Republicans at institutions like Yale as of 2024. This institutional entrenchment sustains modern movements through ideologically aligned education, fostering campus protests such as the 2024 pro-Palestinian encampments that disrupted operations at over 50 U.S. universities, mirroring 1960s student upheavals but amplified by New Left-derived narratives of institutional complicity in oppression. Critics, including analyses of protest legacies, argue this influence has amplified cultural liberalization—evident in shifts like declining opposition to premarital sex from 68% in 1979 Gallup polls—but at the cost of deepened societal fragmentation and selective application of tolerance principles.^[121]^[122]^[123]^[118]

Empirical Evaluation of Achievements and Failures

The New Left's primary objectives included ending the Vietnam War, dismantling capitalist structures, and fostering participatory democracy, yet empirical assessments reveal limited causal success in these domains. While protests amplified public opposition to the war—Gallup polls indicate approval for U.S. involvement fell from 61% in 1965 to 28% by 1971—their direct role in prompting withdrawal remains contested, as military setbacks like the 1968 Tet Offensive and over 58,000 U.S. fatalities exerted greater pressure on policymakers.^[124]^[125] Scholarly analyses argue that anti-war demonstrations had no decisive impact on termination, with President Nixon's 1968 electoral victory occurring amid peak protests, and full U.S. combat withdrawal in 1973 stemming more from strategic Vietnamization than domestic unrest.^[126] Similarly, efforts to achieve economic redistribution faltered, as U.S. income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, rose from 0.39 in 1968 to 0.41 by 1980, contradicting goals of egalitarian reform. In policy spheres, modest gains emerged in environmental regulation, where New Left-inspired activism contributed to the first Earth Day on April 22, 1970, mobilizing 20 million participants and facilitating the EPA's establishment that December, alongside the Clean Air Act of 1970, which reduced U.S. air pollutants by 78% in major cities from 1970 to 2019. However, causal attribution is diluted, as bipartisan congressional action and pre-existing industrial concerns also drove these outcomes. Feminist initiatives yielded legal advancements, such as no-fault divorce laws adopted in California in 1969 and spreading nationwide by 1985, enabling easier marital dissolution, but this correlated with divorce rates doubling from 2.2 per 1,000 population in 1960 to 5.2 by 1980, exacerbating child poverty rates that climbed from 16% in 1960 to 22% by 1980 among single-parent households. Failures predominate in organizational durability and societal metrics. The movement's aversion to hierarchical structures led to fragmentation, with groups like Students for a Democratic Society splintering by 1969 into factions including the violent Weather Underground, which conducted over 25 bombings but failed to sustain mass membership beyond 100,000 at peak.^[127] Long-term cultural shifts tied to countercultural ethos—promoting sexual liberation and familial experimentation—coincided with violent crime surging 124% from 1960 to 1970, murder rates rising over 50% in the decade, and social trust plummeting from 77% interpersonal trust in 1960 to 25% by 2000, per General Social Survey data.^[128] These trends, while not solely attributable, reflect causal realism in how rejection of traditional norms undermined social cohesion without replacing it with viable alternatives, yielding no net reduction in inequality or authoritarianism as envisioned.^[129]

References

[1]
Modern Jewish History: The New Left
The New Left was a wave of left-wing radicalism which attracted many students and other young people in the United States and Western Europe, especially in the ...<|separator|>
[2]
[PDF] Old Left vs. New Left
While the Old Left focused on labour movements and unionization, aligned with traditional Marxist ideals, and emphasized class struggle, the New Left had a more ...
[3]
The New Left - History Workshop
Its point of origin is clear, amid the profound political crises of 1956, but the movement was never defined by party or organisation and so its boundaries are ...
[4]
[PDF] Herbert Marcuse, Volume 3: The New Left and the 1960s Edited by ...
The New. Left sought to join change of consciousness with the change of society, the personal with socio-political liberation. The New Left, in Marcuse's view,.
[5]
The Port Huron Statement - Teaching American History
SDS called for the creation of a “New Left,” that is, a new kind of liberalism. As a Cold War document, the Port Huron Statement is significant for several ...
[6]
The New Left - Digital History
During the 1960s, Tom Hayden became one of the key figures in the New Left. In 1968, he flew to North Vietnam in protest of the Vietnam War. The next year ...
[7]
[PDF] STUDENT ACTIVISTS FROM THE NEW LEFT MOVEMENT WHO ...
Rather, she focuses on the positive gains made by the New Left such as greater awareness of minority issues, the contributions the Movement made to end the ...
[8]
[PDF] FBI Investigations into the Civil Rights Movement and the New Left
There were groups the FBI investigated. There were groups that were intent on tearing down the government and causing disruption in the government.
[9]
Herbert Marcuse - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Dec 18, 2013 · He was often referred to as the Guru of the New Left (a title which he rejected). During the late 1970s through the 1990s, Marcuse's popularity ...
[10]
Old Left, New Left, What's Left? - Paul Mattick, Jr. | libcom.org
Dec 7, 2021 · By calling itself the New Left, the student movement of the Sixties raised the question of its relation to the radical movements of the past.
[11]
[PDF] The New Left in the Sixties: Political Philosophy or Philosophical ...
Nov 1, 2016 · What are the main differences between the “Old” Left and “New” Left? To what extent did the New. Left represent a new potent political trend?Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
[12]
Frankfurt School and Critical Theory
The Institute was founded in 1923 thanks to a donation by Felix Weil with the aim of developing Marxist studies in Germany. After 1933, the Nazis forced its ...
[13]
Critical Theory (Frankfurt School)
Dec 12, 2023 · This effort to combine Marx and Freud is one of the distinctive features of the Frankfurt School; exactly how to integrate psychoanalytic theory ...
[14]
Origins of the New Left - Claremont Review of Books
The Frankfurt School fused Marx's view of socio-economic alienation with Freudian psychology, and it brought forth, particularly in the writings of Adorno and ...
[15]
Marcuse Publishes Foundational New Left Works | Research Starters
Herbert Marcuse was a prominent philosopher and social theorist who significantly contributed to the intellectual underpinnings of the New Left movement in ...
[16]
Full article: Herbert Marcuse as a Critical Intellectual: The New Left ...
Mar 15, 2022 · Separation from the lives of the working class and the inherited bourgeois-class positions of the Frankfurt School are thus key features ( ...
[17]
[PDF] The New Left and the 1960s: Herbert Marcuse, Collected Papers of ...
He has been remembered as one of the most influential social critical theorists inspiring the radical political movements in the 1960s and 1970s.
[18]
The autonomy of theory: A short history of New Left Review
Sep 10, 2013 · C. Wright Mills, an American sociologist who had great influence on the early New Left, wrote Letter to the New Left in which he described ...
[19]
American Marxism Got Lost on Campus - Jacobin
Dec 8, 2024 · Wright Mills illuminates the trajectory of American Marxism in the postwar years. ... In 1960, Mills wrote a “Letter to the New Left” and, two ...
[20]
[PDF] COUNTER-REVOLUTION, OR AUTHENTIC SOCIALISM?
Similarly, in 1960, the forefather of the New Left in the US, C. Wright Mills, warned against the end-of-ideology approach since “it stands for the refusal to ...
[21]
Philosophical Origins and Intellectual Heroes of the New Left
Besides Sartre, the existentialist to whom the New Left turns most often is Albert Camus. A better artist than Sartre (and differing considerably with the ...
[22]
[PDF] A CHRONOLOGY OF THE NEW LEFT AND ITS SUCCESSORS, OR
It is true that the British New. Left was in some important respects distinctive, especially because here the radicalism of the sixties, while converging with ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[23]
[PDF] Herbert Marcuse and America's Cultural Revolution - Craig Calhoun
He launched the cultural revolution and inspired the New Left, Black radi- cals, and a range of others to carry it forward.
[24]
The Man Who Made Cultural Marxism - Chronicles Magazine
May 1, 2024 · Herbert Marcuse saw the transformation of the culture as the sine qua non of revolutionary change. He understood that the working classes of ...
[25]
[PDF] Participatory Democracy in Social Movements - UC Irvine
Blackwell. Participatory democracy refers to an organizational form in which decisionmaking is decentralized, nonhierarchical, and consensus-oriented. It can ...
[26]
Participatory Democracy in Social Movements - Wiley Online Library
Sep 27, 2022 · Participatory democracy refers to an organizational form in which decision-making is decentralized, nonhierarchical, and consensus oriented.
[27]
Endgame Identity? Mapping the New Left Roots of Identity Politics
This essay is an attempt to map the New Left origins of identity politics and to reflect, not only on the accomplishments of that movement, but [End Page 627] ...
[28]
[PDF] Identity Politics and the Left
Since the 1970s there has been a tendency—an increasing tendency— to see the Left essentially as a coalition of minority groups and interests: of race, gender, ...
[29]
The Left, Lost in the Politics of Identity, by Todd Gitlin
Unable to go beyond the logic of identity politics, the disparate constituencies of the cultural left have ceded much political high ground to the right.
[30]
Adapting to a new era: the post-WWII Fourth international
Aug 6, 2025 · The betrayal of the reformist and Stalinist leaders had provided the political basis for economic recovery in Europe and the United States ...Missing: welfare | Show results with:welfare
[31]
Confronting the Stalinist legacy - Marxist Left Review
Stalinism transformed the way the left viewed revolution, leadership, states and classes, and their role in social struggle. It grotesquely distorted Marxism, ...
[32]
Stalinism's long shadow - International Socialism
Jan 10, 2022 · For some of those disillusioned with Labour's inability to challenge the system and the left leadership's failure to confront the party's right, ...Missing: WWII welfare
[33]
Ted Grant - Stalinism in the Postwar World - Marxists Internet Archive
Verbal gestures to the left no more transform the regime to that of a healthy workers' state than the sometimes correct Stalinist criticism of reformism and ...Missing: WWII welfare
[34]
Hungary, 1956 - state.gov
In October, 1956, the Soviet Union ordered its troops to crush a nascent rebellion in Budapest, the capital of the Soviet satellite state of Hungary.
[35]
Remembering '56: The Hungarian Revolution | Origins
Oct 25, 2016 · From Khrushchev's denunciation of Stalin to the Suez Crisis, 1956 was a year of momentous changes and crises in the Cold War world. Yet no other ...
[36]
The New Left as a Global Current since the Late 1950s (Chapter 25)
Several formative historical events played crucial roles in the crystallization of a New Left in western Europe, where the term 'New Left' first became ...
[37]
Why Was The Suez Crisis So Important? | Imperial War Museums
Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev attacked 'British imperialism', threatening to attack London with rockets, as well as sending troops to Egypt, potentially ...
[38]
Gareth Stedman Jones, The Specificity of US Imperialism, NLR I/60 ...
Apr 1, 1970 · American imperialism has been characterized by the concealment of American imperial interests behind a shield of supranational or inter- ...
[39]
The Suez Crisis and the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, Cold War ...
In this essay, we will summarize what we know about the connection between the two parallel crises.
[40]
1956—The British New Left and the “Big Bang” Theory of Cultural ...
Centered on the geopolitical flashpoints of the Hungarian Revolution and the Suez Crisis, it was the year that catalyzed the British new left, and thus, the ...
[41]
[PDF] The New Left and the Present Crisis
In 1956 and for about five or six years afterwards, the first 'new left' tried to create such an open, unsectarian and broadly-based politics of the left, ...
[42]
C. Wright Mills and the Emergence of a Global New Left, 1956-1962
While of little enduring intellectual significance, it had an important cultural and political impact. Mills sought (and found) educated readers who would, he ...<|separator|>
[43]
Stuart Hall, Life and Times of the First New Left, NLR 61, January ...
Feb 1, 2010 · The 'first' New Left was born in 1956, a conjuncture—not just a year—bounded on one side by the suppression of the Hungarian Revolution by ...
[44]
A Brief History of New Left Review 1960–2010
NLR was founded in 1960, from a merger between the Boards of Universities and Left Review and The New Reasoner—two journals that had emerged out of the ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[45]
Perry Anderson, Origins of the Present Crisis ... - New Left Review
British society is in the throes of a profound, pervasive but cryptic crisis, undramatic in appearance, but ubiquitous in its reverberations.
[46]
Nuclear disarmament, the New Left – and the case of EP Thompson
The nuclear disarmament movement finally began to mobilize with the British government's announcement in 1957 that it was to develop the hydrogen bomb. The ...
[47]
Stuart Hall: his significance for CND
Oct 31, 2024 · CND in its early years was inextricably linked to the social radicalisation of the time and it became a magnet and a focus for radical politics ...Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
[48]
The Black Dwarf, the British New Left, and 1968
The speeches were calls for greater unity amongst the factions, demands for the students to declare their objectives, assurances from militant workers that ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[49]
50 years ago: May 1968 and the British art school uprising
May 4, 2018 · 1968 witnessed a brief period of intense global student insurrection: Prague, Japan, West Germany, Mexico, Paris, and in London at the LSE and Hornsey.
[50]
The New Left and Labor in the 1960s - University of Illinois Press
Early in the 1960s, the New Left and labor had cooperated to fight for civil rights and anti-poverty programs. But diverging opinions on the Vietnam War created ...
[51]
New Left and Antiwar Movement History and Geography
Founded by black and white students at the University of Chicago, the Congress of Racial Equality pioneered key tactics of the modern civil rights movement.Missing: figures | Show results with:figures
[52]
The Port Huron Statement (1962) | The American Yawp Reader
The Port Huron Statement was a 1962 manifesto by the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), written primarily by student activist Tom Hayden.Missing: hierarchy | Show results with:hierarchy
[53]
[PDF] The Port Huron Statement, written by Tom Hayden for the Students ...
In short, the theory of government "countervailing" business neglects the extent to which government influence is marginal to the basic production decisions, ...
[54]
Political Ideologies In Action: Socialism: The New Left - LibGuides
Apr 16, 2025 · The New Left was a broad political movement mainly in the 1960s and 1970s consisting of activists in the Western world who campaigned for a broad range of ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[55]
The Making of the New Left | The New Yorker
Mar 15, 2021 · The New Left was born in the early nineteen-sixties as a revolt against the modern university, and it died less than ten years later, in the ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
[56]
What Happened in France in May 1968? - Frenchly
After the Left Bank riots, factory workers joined the fight on May 13 by barricading their places of work. Unions had called for a one-day strike, but workers ...
[57]
1968: a chronology of events in France and internationally | libcom.org
A brief chronology of the events which swept France in May and June 1968. Starting as a student revolt, the events culminated in mass workplace occupations and ...
[58]
Rudi Dutschke's Internationalism Is Still a Subversive Creed - Jacobin
Feb 8, 2024 · Any account of Dutschke's legacy must also consider the Socialist German Students' League (SDS), one of the New Left's most militant ...
[59]
Rudi Dutschke and the German student movement in 1968
Apr 29, 2008 · The SDS had been expelled from the SPD in 1961 for “left deviation”. In the early 1960s the SDS had about 600 members in 30 universities, ...
[60]
The Italian Extra-Parliamentary Left Movement and Brigate Rosse ...
The chapter analyzes the episode of contention of the extra-parliamentary left movement in Italy, particularly the emergence of the Red Brigades during the ...Upward Political Opportunities... · Outbidding: “Strategy Of...
[61]
extraparliamentary Left | 62 | Encyclopedia of Contemporary Italian Cu
As a significant political force, the extraparliamentary Left in Italy covered the period 1969-76. However, its intellectual inspirations predate 1969 and ...
[62]
https://oxfordre.com/latinamericanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199366439.001.0001/acrefore-9780199366439-e-89
[63]
Dependency Theory in Latin American History - Oxford Bibliographies
Jan 15, 2019 · Dependency theory seeks to explain the characteristics of dependent development in Latin America, although it also includes consideration of Asia and Africa.
[64]
Dependent Capitalist Development in Latin America
Aug 1, 1972 · The theory of imperialist capitalism, as is well known, has so far attained its most significant treatment in Lenin's works.
[65]
The New Left in Latin America - Latin American Studies
Oct 28, 2011 · A transnational analysis of the 1968 protest movements that took place in Brazil, Mexico, and Uruguay. Presents the movements as constituted by ...
[66]
[PDF] Latin America: The Resurgence of the Left
The first wave of the contemporary Left began in the 1960s and contin- ued into the mid-1970s. It included mass social movements, guerrilla armies and electoral ...
[67]
Liberation theology - Wikipedia
Liberation theology is a Christian theological approach emphasizing the liberation of the oppressed. The term originated among Latin American Catholic ...
[68]
The Dead End of Liberation Theology - New Politics
Aug 4, 2021 · In summary, liberation theology is ultimately incoherent and hazardous as a basis for left-wing politics. Arguing that the left should ease its ...Missing: connection | Show results with:connection
[69]
Africa's student movements: history sheds light on modern activism
Feb 18, 2019 · After independence, generations of university students in countries like Uganda, Kenya, Angola and Zimbabwe mobilised for change.
[70]
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26571947
[71]
Introduction: student activism in an era of decolonization - jstor
Scholarship on student activism in Africa has tended to be understood according to broader historical periodizations of elite African politics.
[72]
The student movement and the antiwar movement - Khan Academy
The student movement arose to demand free speech on college campuses, but as the US involvement in the Vietnam war expanded, the war became the main target ...
[73]
SDS Chapters 1962-1969 - Mapping American Social Movements ...
The Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) and the Student Nonviolent ... In 1965, SDS organized a sequence of antiwar protests and membership surged.
[74]
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) - PBS
By 1965, the SDS can easily assemble 25,000 protestors; by '68 there are 50,000 SDS members. Growth brings conflict. In 1969, the last SDS convention ...
[75]
Columbia in Crisis : Causes: Students for a Democratic Society (SDS)
The March 1968 disciplinary action against the “Low Six,” the continued protest against IDA and open recruitment on campus, and the heated debates ensuing about ...
[76]
French Students and Workers Rebel Against the Political Order
In May and June 1968, France experienced a significant uprising known as the May '68 events, where students and workers rebelled against the prevailing ...
[77]
HIST 276 - Lecture 23 - May 1968 - Open Yale Courses
The student protests of May 1968 in France were linked to international protests against the American war in Vietnam and other political and social ...
[78]
German students campaign for democracy, 1966-68
On 14 April, 12,000 people marched in Berlin to protest Springer. Dutschke's attempted murder (he recovered with extensive brain damage) sparked an ...
[79]
1968: The year of cultural revolution – DW – 05/04/2018
May 4, 2018 · Ludwig Binder's photos covered the events that led to the 1968 student revolts in Germany, from the Shah's visit to the Rudi Dutschke attack.
[80]
Student Movements of the 1960s - New Georgia Encyclopedia
Opposed to U.S. political leadership and dissatisfied with American culture, student activists held demonstrations across the state and experimented with ...
[81]
Marcuse, 'New Left' philosopher, dies
Aug 20, 1979 · But Marcuse stressed the importance of “utopian thinking” and practices in the present, which led him to praise the “hippie” and “counter- ...
[82]
The Protests : The First Day - April 23, 1968
This SDS announcement of the April 23 Sun Dial Rally focuses on the fate of the "IDA Six", the right to indoor demonstrations and the right to free speech.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[83]
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/fifty-years-later-france-still-debating-legacy-its-1968-protests-180968963/
[84]
Fifty Years Later, France Is Still Debating the Legacy of Its 1968 ...
May 4, 2018 · In an activist era, millions of French students and workers demanded radical change.
[85]
May '68: The Effectiveness of Students and Industrial Workers ...
French students began protesting at Nanterre University through the March 22 Movement. Driven by the ideology of the New Left (Nouvelle Gauche), students ...
[86]
May 1968: The French Revolution That Never Was
The mass demonstrations and strikes in France in May 1968 severely challenged De Gaulle's legitimacy and even fears of revolution.
[87]
Making Yippie! -- an excerpt from Chicago '68 by David Farber
Yippie began as a dope joke, as a half-cocked combination of hippie ethos and New Left activism, only the real joke was that the inventors meant it.
[88]
Origins of the New Left · Exhibit - Michigan in the World
Inspired by the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950's and the 1960's, as well as by the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), students sought to ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[89]
Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) | Research Starters - EBSCO
As the Vietnam War escalated, SDS increasingly directed its efforts towards antiwar activism, organizing protests and teach-ins on college campuses. During its ...
[90]
Jerry Rubin, Abbie Hoffman, and the Yippie Experiment, 1967-1969
Yippie was founded by Jerry Rubin and Abbie Hoffman in 1967 as an attempt to fuse the antiwar politics of the New Left with the theatrics and lifestyle of the ...
[91]
Evidence 26: Yippie Flyer - Digital History Reader
The Youth International Party, or the Yippies, as they were called, was the brainchild of Abbie Hoffman and Jerry Rubin, two brash cultural revolutionaries.
[92]
[PDF] The Theory and Praxis of the West German Student Movement
Rudi Dutschke, a member of both Subversive Aktion and the SDS, and Dieter. Kunzelmann of Subversive Aktion initiated the concept of the Kommune I, but. Dutschke ...<|separator|>
[93]
The Attack on Rudi Dutschke: A Revolutionary Who Shaped a ...
Apr 11, 2008 · Forty years ago on April 11, 1968, Rudi Dutschke, the face of Germany's active and influential student movement, was gunned down by a house painter named Josef ...
[94]
[PDF] Daniel Cohn-Bendit 189 - H-France
Daniel Cohn-Bendit emerged in May 1968 as a key figure in the student revolt, rapidly achieving the status of symbol and celebrity via a series of public ...
[95]
May 1968: Workers and students together
On May 9, nearly 6,000 people packed in to hear Ernest Mandel and Daniel Cohn-Bendit on students and socialist revolution. As the government took an active role ...
[96]
The split at the SDS national convention
It also showed that the “new left,” like the Communist Party and social democracy, is entirely capable of violating the basic democratic rights of members – ...Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
[97]
SDS's Imploded 50 Years Ago — A Triumph of Extremism - Medium
Jun 11, 2019 · Fifty years ago, this June, the Students for a Democratic Society held its last united National Convention. It was torn apart by ideologically driven factions.
[98]
[PDF] The Rise and Fall of the West German Left
The presence of the pds in the newly elected Bundestag thus adds a new dimension to the Left's fragmentation. By contrast the Free Democrats and Christian.
[99]
[PDF] Dapprich, Matthias (2013) The historical development of West
There is a gap in the existing literature as to why the New Left in West Germany entered a phase of rapid decline by the end of the 1970s.
[100]
Evading the FBI: The Weather Underground Organization
Oct 26, 2016 · In protest of American racism and the Vietnam War, they detonated more than two dozen dynamite bombs between 1970 and 1975, and hit some ...
[101]
Bringing the War Home: The Weather Underground, the Red Army ...
In this first comprehensive comparison of left-wing violence in the United States and West Germany, Jeremy Varon focuses on America's Weather Underground a.<|separator|>
[102]
Weather Underground Bombings - FBI
Hours later, another bomb was found at a military induction center in Oakland, California, and safely detonated. A domestic terrorist group called the Weather ...
[103]
Analysis: Weathermen Manifesto | Research Starters - EBSCO
The "Weathermen Manifesto" emerged from the radical faction of the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) during the late 1960s, a period marked by ...
[104]
Who were Germany's Red Army Faction militants? - BBC News
Jan 19, 2016 · The BBC News website looks at the long terror campaign by Germany's most notorious far-left guerrilla group, also known as the Baader-Meinhof ...
[105]
Targeted by Germany's Red Army Faction - ADST.org
The Red Army Faction (RAF) was a leftist terrorist organization operating in Germany from 1970 to 1998. Having roots in the German student movement.
[106]
Chapter 3. The Red Army Faction: Pursuing Palestinian Partners
Chapter 3. The Red Army Faction: Pursuing Palestinian Partners was published in Why Terrorist Groups Form International Alliances on page 103.
[107]
[PDF] THE RED BRIGADES: A PRIMER - CIA
The formation of the Red Brigades in 1969 coincided Founders of the Red Brigades with a time of ferment and violence in Italy. Student marches had failed ...
[108]
[PDF] An Historical Case Study of the Italian Red Brigades
cated violence as a means to pursue class warfare. The development of these ... 6 Donatella della Porta, Terrorism in Context: Left-Wing Terrorism in Italy, ed.
[109]
The Problem of the New Left - Commentary Magazine
The class origins of the New Left lie at the root of two characteristics of the movement: its anti-materialism and its anti-intellectualism. As to the first ...
[110]
How the New Left Damaged Democrats in the 1960s and 1970s
Feb 5, 2024 · During the 1960s, the New Left came to see the white working class as the reactionary bulwark supporting the war in Vietnam and white supremacy.
[111]
The Agony of the American Left | News - The Harvard Crimson
Discussing the decline of the Socialists after the First World War, Lasch argues that their downfall can be traced to the rise of Bolshevism within the movement ...
[112]
(PDF) Paths to failure: The dialectics of organization and ideology in ...
Paths to failure: The dialectics of organization and ideology in the New Left ... issues. Organizationally, the new left rejected the traditional ...
[113]
Critique of the New Left Movement | libcom.org
This plethora of fragmentary issues finds its echo in the desire for decentralization and leaderlessness (which is less the absence of leaders than the creation ...
[114]
The Long March Through the Corporations | The Heritage Foundation
Mar 26, 2021 · ... long march through the institutions.” That campaign was conceived in the late 1960s by the violent German activist Rudi Dutschke, a disciple ...
[115]
Antonio Gramsci - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jan 13, 2023 · Antonio Gramsci (1891–1937) has been enormously influential as a Marxist theorist of cultural and political domination in “developed” capitalism.
[116]
The Disappearing Conservative Professor | National Affairs
When the Carnegie Foundation conducted its faculty survey in 1999, it found that a mere 12% of professors were conservatives, down from 27% in 1969. Using a ...
[117]
How Marxist Left Captured Higher Education
Oct 3, 2023 · The culturally Marxist Left has increasingly used racial and sexual characteristics as determinants of victimhood status.
[118]
Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain: History, the New Left, and ... - jstor
In the early 196os, Marxist and New Left intellectual culture in Britain consisted of handfuls of scholars and writers who worked as individuals in hostile ...
[119]
[PDF] Legacy and Impact of the American New Left
As a result, the influence of protest movements belonging to the New Left might not have been necessarily positive for civil rights and individual liberties ...
[120]
[PDF] From Students for a Democratic Society to Occupy Wall Street
This text examines the politi- cal legacy of the New Left on the alterglobalization movement and Occupy. Wall Street in the United States. It argues that the ...
[121]
'Antifa' Grows as Left-Wing Faction Set to, Literally, Fight the Far Right
Aug 17, 2017 · Sabaté is an adherent of a controversial force on the left known as antifa. The term, a contraction of the word “anti-fascist,” describes the ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[122]
https://buckleyinstitute.com/faculty-political-diversity-report-2024/
[123]
NEW: Faculty Political Diversity at Yale: Democrats Outnumber ...
Sep 23, 2024 · The report identified 312 Democrat faculty (88%) and only 4 Republicans (1.1%), a ratio of around 78 to 1.<|control11|><|separator|>
[124]
More Than 60 Percent of Harvard FAS Faculty Identify as Liberal on ...
Sep 3, 2025 · Approximately 29 percent of faculty respondents said they were “very liberal” and 34 percent said they were “somewhat liberal.” Just 9 percent ...
[125]
Public Opinion and the Vietnam War | ROPER CENTER
We can explore some of these dynamics using public opinion data regarding the Vietnam War. Because control of the White House changed from Democrat Lyndon ...
[126]
Americans Look Back at Vietnam War - Gallup News
Nov 17, 2000 · The latest Gallup poll shows 72% of Americans believe that the people of the United States have not treated Vietnam veterans well in the years ...
[127]
[PDF] Price, Imogen. “Were Anti-war Protesters Successful in Ending the ...
Jul 10, 2025 · Overall, the antiwar movement made no decisive impact on ending the war in Vietnam, and in particular, 1970 stands out as year where the antiwar ...
[128]
[PDF] Paths to Failure The Dialectics of Organization and Ideology in the ...
The new left simply failed to appreciate its own weakness, and the weakness of the social movements with which it worked. At the turning point in its.<|separator|>
[129]
Crime and the Counterculture - Mother Jones
Nov 27, 2017 · The rise in “black pathologies” starting in the 1960s is the fault of blacks themselves and the pernicious effects of 60s counterculture, not white racism and ...
[130]
Community and Organization: The New Left and Michels' "Iron Law"
the new left derived from the existing literature about the new left-literature w most uniformly critical particularly on the grounds of organizational failure.