Niagara Movement
The Niagara Movement was a short-lived African American civil rights organization founded in 1905 by W. E. B. Du Bois, William Monroe Trotter, and a group of twenty-nine intellectuals and activists who convened secretly in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, to evade U.S. segregation laws preventing their assembly on the American side of Niagara Falls.[1][2] The movement explicitly rejected the accommodationist philosophy of Booker T. Washington, which prioritized vocational education and economic self-help over immediate demands for political equality, instead issuing a Declaration of Principles that insisted on "manhood suffrage," the eradication of "caste distinctions," equal civil rights, and the right to work without discrimination, while also emphasizing personal duties such as voting, obeying laws, and self-respect among members.[3][4] This principled stance highlighted causal realities of persistent disenfranchisement and violence against Blacks in the post-Reconstruction South, where empirical data from lynchings and poll taxes underscored the failure of gradualism to secure basic liberties.[5] Key Achievements and InfluenceThe Niagara Movement organized annual conferences from 1906 to 1909, peaking with over 100 delegates in 1907, and produced pamphlets and speeches that mobilized opposition to racial injustice, laying essential groundwork for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) formed in 1909 by former members including Du Bois.[6][7] Despite its dissolution in 1910 due to financial shortages, internal divisions—such as Trotter's uncompromising militancy clashing with Du Bois's evolving pragmatism—and Washington's covert efforts to undermine it through his control of Black philanthropy networks, the movement's insistence on uncompromised equality influenced subsequent civil rights strategies by demonstrating that principled agitation could challenge entrenched power structures without reliance on white benefactors' approval.[5][4] Its legacy endures in the empirical validation of direct confrontation over appeasement, as evidenced by the NAACP's longevity and legal victories that Niagara's framework anticipated.[2]