Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nidal Ayyad


Nidal Ayyad is a Kuwaiti-born convicted for his participation in the , a terrorist attack executed by Islamist extremists that detonated a 1,200-pound bomb in the underground garage of the North Tower, killing six people and injuring over 1,000.
Ayyad, who had immigrated to the and worked in the , joined a of radicals affiliated with by procuring gas cylinders, , and other precursors for the explosive under false pretenses, as well as renting storage space and facilitating communications for the plotters.
Arrested by the FBI on , 1993, at his residence just two weeks after the attack, Ayyad was among the first suspects charged with conspiracy to use a , assault on federal officers, and related offenses; following a federal trial in the Southern District of , he was found guilty in March 1994 and sentenced to 240 years' imprisonment without parole.

Early Life and Background

Family Origins and Childhood

Nidal Ayyad was born in 1968 to a Palestinian family with ties to the and . His relatives resided near , in Palestinian areas outside , , reflecting a background shaped by displacement common among Palestinian communities in the region. His mother, , and maternal grandfather, Abdul Aziz Mustafa Ayyad, were part of this familial network, which maintained strong connections across and the . Ayyad had at least one brother, . Ayyad's childhood and early upbringing emphasized devout Islamic traditions, with family members later describing him as a committed Muslim who regularly read the Koran in his spare time. Despite these roots, specific details about his pre-adolescent years remain limited in available records, though his family's insistence on Eastern customs persisted even after his relocation. He adhered to conservative values, preferring a religiously observant spouse, as evidenced by his in facilitated by his mother. At approximately age 17, Ayyad immigrated to the around 1985, marking the transition from his Middle Eastern family environment to American life, where he pursued while retaining ties to his origins. Family members in and the portrayed him as non-political and morally upright, rejecting any association with extremism during his formative years.

Education and Professional Career

Ayyad immigrated to the from in 1985 at age 17 and enrolled at in , where he earned a in . His academic training included coursework on the principles of explosives. Following graduation, Ayyad secured employment in 1991 as a process engineer at Allied-Signal Inc., a New Jersey-based advanced-technology firm involved in defense contracting. He resided in , and was 25 years old at the time of his on March 10, 1993.

Ideological Radicalization

Influences from Islamist Networks

Nidal Ayyad's engagement with Islamist networks centered on the radical milieu surrounding Sheikh , an Egyptian cleric affiliated with al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya who entered the in July 1990 despite prior involvement in the assassination of Egyptian President . Rahman established influence through sermons at mosques in and Jersey City, issuing fatwas that justified violence against American targets as retaliation for U.S. support of and secular Muslim regimes. This network, which included veterans of the Afghan jihad against the Soviets, operated from hubs like the Al-Kifah Refugee Center in , initially focused on fundraising for but shifting toward domestic plots by the early 1990s. Ayyad, a Kuwaiti-born of Palestinian descent who had studied at , connected to this circle through co-conspirators in the plot, particularly Mohammad Salameh, who attended Rahman's gatherings and absorbed his anti-Western ideology. At least five of the seven bombing suspects, including Ayyad, maintained ties to Rahman, reflecting the sheikh's role as a and operational for the group's motivations rooted in jihadist interpretations of Islamic doctrine. Prosecutorial evidence from the bombing trial established that the conspirators operated within Rahman's orbit, where discussions of (declaring Muslims apostates) and attacks on symbols of U.S. power were normalized. While Ayyad lacked direct documented attendance at Rahman's sermons, his logistical contributions—such as procuring and for the bomb—aligned with the network's operational tactics, influenced by Afghan jihad alumni who trained in explosives and shared resources among Rahman followers. The broader conspiracy, later prosecuted under charges against Rahman and associates, underscored how this network fused transnational Islamist ideology with local recruitment, drawing in educated professionals like Ayyad through personal ties rather than overt proselytizing. This environment, characterized by opposition to U.S. foreign policy, provided the ideological framework for Ayyad's shift from a secular professional life to active participation in .

Adoption of Jihadist Motivations

Nidal Ayyad, a Kuwait-born who had assimilated into American professional life, aligned with Islamist extremists in the by spring 1989, joining a nascent that included Mohammed Salameh, Mahmoud Abouhalima, and Alkaisi—marking the emergence of the first documented Islamic terrorist network operating within the . This group connected to El Sayyid Nosair's circle following Nosair's 1990 assassination of Rabbi Meir Kahane, drawing Ayyad into environments promoting violent opposition to perceived enemies of , including U.S. . Ayyad's ideological shift deepened through exposure to radical preaching at mosques in and , where figures like —known for issuing fatwas endorsing attacks on U.S. interests—exerted influence after arriving in the U.S. in 1990. Abdel-Rahman's sermons framed as a collaborator in a "Zionist-Crusader" alliance suppressing Muslims, justifying jihad against its symbols and allies; Ayyad, along with other cell members, attended these sessions, absorbing calls for retaliation against U.S. support for , military presence in , and backing of secular regimes like Egypt's. This environment transformed Ayyad's motivations from personal grievance to collective Islamist militancy, prioritizing violent reprisal over legal or diplomatic channels. Evidence of Ayyad's adopted jihadist rationale surfaced in a letter he mailed on March 1, 1993, to , claiming the bombing for the "Liberation Army Fifth Battalion" and citing U.S. policies—such as aid to , sanctions on post-Gulf War, and interference in Muslim lands—as acts of against warranting terrorist response. Prosecutors traced the document to Ayyad via linguistic and , confirming his authorship and alignment with the cell's worldview that equated American actions with , thereby rationalizing mass casualty attacks as defensive . This stance echoed Abdel-Rahman's broader doctrine, which multiple bombing suspects, including Ayyad's associates, embraced through shared attendance at his radicalized congregations.

Role in the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing

Recruitment and Planning

Nidal Ayyad, a naturalized U.S. citizen and employed at , became involved in the plot through his associations with Islamist networks in , particularly the Farouq in , which served as a hub for followers of Sheikh , an Egyptian cleric advocating violent against the . Ayyad's radicalization aligned with the broader influence of Abdel-Rahman's sermons and the Al-Kifah Center's activities, where he was a regular attendee, fostering connections among aspiring jihadists. , the plot's operational leader who entered the U.S. on September 1, 1992, recruited Ayyad specifically for his technical expertise in handling explosives precursors, leveraging these networks to assemble a team for the attack. During the planning phase from late 1992 into early 1993, Ayyad contributed by procuring key bomb components, including chemicals such as , , and used to synthesize approximately 1,200 pounds of explosive, as well as gas cylinders to enhance the blast. He collaborated with co-conspirators Mohammad Salameh, who rented the van used in the attack, and Mahmoud Abouhalima, who assisted in mixing the components at a storage facility in that Ayyad helped secure. Ayyad's role extended to assembling parts of , drawing on his professional knowledge to ensure the volatile mixture's stability, though the plot's execution relied on Yousef's design for a truck bomb intended to topple the towers by structural . These preparations occurred amid internal disputes within the jihadist cell, but Ayyad remained committed, viewing the operation as retaliation for U.S. in the .

Technical Contributions to the Bomb

Nidal Ayyad, employed as a at Inc., leveraged his professional expertise to procure essential chemicals for the urea nitrate-based explosive used in the February 26, . These materials included and , which were mixed to produce the main charge of approximately 1,200 pounds of the low-velocity explosive. His actions involved placing orders with chemical suppliers in the days leading up to the attack, ensuring the availability of components consistent with forensic analysis of bomb residues. Ayyad also facilitated the acquisition of cylinders, which were incorporated into the device to enhance its destructive power through fuel-air effects when detonated alongside the nitrate fuel oil mixture, , and blasting gelatin sausages. He attempted to source gas directly from using company resources but failed, prompting purchases from external vendors. This role was critical, as demonstrated his records linking to suppliers of bomb-grade chemicals. Though not documented as physically mixing the volatile compounds—a task assigned to others like Mahmoud Abouhalima—Ayyad's background in provided the technical knowledge to select and obtain stable, effective ingredients for the . The bomb's design relied on these formulations, which produced a blast equivalent to roughly half a ton of , cratering the parking garage beneath the North Tower.

Execution and Immediate Aftermath

On February 26, 1993, at approximately 12:17 p.m., a 1,200-pound detonated in a rented van parked on the B-2 level of the World Trade Center's underground garage beneath the North Tower. The , fueled by Ayyad's of key components including 1,200 pounds of fertilizer mixed with racing fuel, , and gas cylinders to enhance effects, was assembled in a storage unit rented under an alias by co-conspirator Mohammed Salameh. , the operation's mastermind, and drove the van into the garage, parked it near a support column targeted to maximize structural collapse, lit a fuse, and fled on foot before the blast. The explosion created a 100-foot crater, severed utilities, and released toxic gases, but failed to topple the towers as intended due to the bomb's placement and composition limitations. The immediate aftermath saw over 50,000 occupants evacuate the complex amid power outages, smoke, and debris, with and Police Department responders arriving within minutes to conduct rescues and secure the site. Six people died—Robert Kirkpatrick, William Macko, Monica Rodriguez Smith (who was four months pregnant), Stephen A. Knapp, Wilfredo Mercado, and John J. Doherty—and more than 1,042 others suffered injuries ranging from to crush wounds, marking the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil prior to September 11, 2001. The closed the indefinitely, causing economic disruptions estimated at $250 million in immediate damages and lost productivity, while federal agencies like the FBI launched an that recovered the van's axle with its , tracing it back to Salameh's rental and deposit refund attempt days later. No group initially claimed responsibility, though a sent to a news service hours after the blast from a Jersey City copy shop—facilitated through Ayyad's logistical network—purportedly from the "Liberation Army Fifth Battalion" cited U.S. grievances.

Investigation, Arrest, and Legal Proceedings

FBI Pursuit and Evidence Gathering

The FBI's investigation accelerated after the March 4, 1993, arrest of Mohammad Salameh, who was linked to the rental van used in the February 26 bombing through his attempt to recover a $400 deposit. Agents analyzed Salameh's telephone records and personal contacts, identifying Nidal Ayyad—a 25-year-old Kuwaiti-born at in —as a frequent associate. Toll records revealed dozens of calls between Ayyad's office phone and those of Salameh and Mahmoud Abouhalima in the weeks preceding the attack, prompting surveillance and further tracing of Ayyad's activities. Key evidence emerged from Ayyad's professional role in procuring bomb components. Prosecutors later presented records showing Ayyad used his office phone to order approximately 1,200 pounds of pellets— a primary ingredient in the —from suppliers like a chemical firm, along with , , and gas cylinders. These purchases, totaling thousands of dollars, were made under pseudonyms or routed through intermediaries but tied back to Ayyad via addresses and call logs. Forensic matching confirmed the bomb's aligned with these materials, establishing Ayyad's technical contributions. On March 10, 1993, FBI agents arrested Ayyad without incident at his home in , charging him with the bombing. Post-arrest searches of his residence, vehicle, and workplace yielded additional documents, including receipts, notebooks with explosive formulas, and correspondence linking him to storage facilities used by the plotters. Ayyad's joint with Salameh further corroborated financial ties. These elements formed the basis of the case against him, relying heavily on circumstantial but interlocking forensic, telephonic, and transactional data rather than direct .

Arrest and Initial Charges

Nidal Ayyad, a 25-year-old Kuwaiti-born residing in , was arrested by FBI agents on March 10, 1993, at his home in connection with the February 26 bombing. This marked the third arrest in the investigation, following the apprehension of Mohammed Salameh on for attempting to reclaim the rental deposit on the van used in the attack. Ayyad's detention stemmed from investigative leads including phone records linking him to purchases of bomb components such as urea and , as well as his employment at where chemicals were allegedly obtained. Ayyad was initially charged in a complaint with the bombing, which had killed six and injured over 1,000. Authorities described him as a key figure who had assisted in acquiring materials for the 1,200-pound nitrate-fuel oil , though he was not considered the . He was ordered held without during his initial appearance on March 11, 1993, before U.S. Joel A. Pisano, who cited the severity of the charges and flight risk concerns. Ayyad, a naturalized U.S. citizen, maintained his innocence at the hearing.

Trial, Conviction, and Sentencing

Nidal Ayyad stood trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alongside co-defendants Mohammed Salameh, , and Ahmad Ajaj, for their roles in the February 26, 1993, bombing of the . The federal trial, presided over by Judge Kevin Thomas Duffy, began on September 14, 1993, and spanned roughly six months, featuring testimony from over 200 witnesses and presentation of physical evidence such as rental agreements for the bomb-laden van, receipts for precursors and hydrogen tanks purchased by the defendants, and telephone records documenting communications among the plotters. Ayyad, employed as a mechanical engineer at , was specifically linked through his use of a company fax machine to order chemicals and his calls to suppliers for detonation cord and other components essential to assembling the 1,200-pound nitrate-fuel oil explosive device. Prosecutors argued that the defendants conspired under the direction of to topple the North Tower onto the South Tower, killing thousands, though the plot failed to achieve structural collapse but resulted in six deaths, over 1,000 injuries, and $500 million in damage. Defense strategies varied: Ayyad's counsel contended he was a peripheral figure unaware of the full intent, while others alleged or FBI informants' involvement, claims rebutted by forensic matches of bomb residue to purchased materials and traces of explosives in defendants' vehicles and residences. The , after deliberating for 10 days, convicted all four on , 1994, of all 38 counts, including to bomb a building used in interstate and foreign commerce (18 U.S.C. § 844), actual bombing causing death, and related assault and weapons charges; Ayyad faced no lesser-included offenses or acquittals. On May 24, 1994, Judge Duffy imposed sentence on Ayyad and his co-defendants, each receiving 240 years' imprisonment—comprising life terms on key counts plus consecutive sentences calibrated to surpass their projected life expectancies, ensuring no possibility of release. The judge condemned the bombing as an "act of war" against civilians, rejecting pleas for leniency based on the defendants' backgrounds or purported lack of violent intent, and fined each $10,000 plus restitution. Appeals challenging evidentiary admissibility and sentencing guidelines were later upheld by the in 1998, affirming the convictions and terms.

Imprisonment and Post-Conviction Developments

Prison Assignments and Conditions

Nidal Ayyad was sentenced to 240 years in on May 24, 1994, following his conviction for roles in the , including conspiracy and assault on federal property. He has served his sentence at the Penitentiary, Administrative Maximum Facility (), a supermaximum-security in , opened in 1995 to house the most dangerous federal inmates, including high-profile terrorists. No records indicate transfers to other facilities, consistent with the Bureau of Prisons' practice of designating terrorism convicts for long-term containment in specialized units. Ayyad is confined in the H Unit of , a segregated section for jihadist posing ongoing security risks, where conditions emphasize isolation to mitigate and communication threats. in this unit spend approximately 23 hours daily in 7-by-12-foot cells, with limited to caged outdoor areas, minimal social interaction, and constant via cameras and solid doors preventing visual contact with others. As a high-risk terrorism offender, Ayyad is subject to Special Administrative Measures (SAMs) imposed by the Department of Justice, which restrict nearly all non-legal communications, including mail, visits, and phone calls, to designated cleared individuals; all correspondence is monitored or redacted to prevent coded messaging or . These measures, renewed annually based on threat assessments, have been applied to bombing conspirators to curb external influence, as evidenced by intercepted letters from Ayyad attempting contact with potential sympathizers. Legal challenges to SAMs by Ayyad and co-conspirators have upheld their use, citing imperatives over claims of undue hardship.

Appeals and Sentence Status

Ayyad's convictions on multiple counts, including and substantive offenses related to the bombing, were affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on August 4, 1998, following challenges to evidentiary rulings, suppression motions, and trial procedures. His original sentence of 240 years' imprisonment, imposed in May 1994, was vacated on appeal due to an inadequate waiver of his during the sentencing phase, prompting a remand for resentencing. Post-remand resentencing maintained a lengthy term without eligibility, but subsequent habeas challenges led to further adjustments. In rulings aligned with U.S. precedents on sentencing and count-specific penalties, one carrying a 30-year consecutive term was vacated, contributing to an overall reduction. By , Ayyad's sentence had been shortened as part of reductions granted to four of the convicted bombers, potentially positioning him for release only if he survives to approximately age 100. Ayyad continues to serve his reduced sentence in federal custody at a supermaximum-security facility, with no reported further appeals or modifications as of the latest available judicial records.

Broader Context and Legacy

Connections to Early Al-Qaeda Activities

Nidal Ayyad's role in procuring chemicals for the aligned him with a cell led by , whose operations drew from Afghan training camps like Khaldan, which served as hubs for early jihadist networks predating 's formal structure. Yousef, the bombing's , escaped post-attack and later collaborated with —his uncle and a key operative—on plots like the 1995 Bojinka conspiracy targeting U.S. airliners, illustrating how the 1993 plotters intersected with emerging figures. However, federal investigations, including those detailed in the , found no direct operational control by or over the bombing, which was primarily inspired by Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman's Egyptian Islamic Group rather than bin Laden's Sudanese-based organization at the time. The FBI has characterized the attack as a "deadly dress rehearsal" for , 2001, due to shared tactical elements like vehicle-borne improvised explosives and targeting of U.S. economic symbols, but Ayyad's specific contributions—sourcing 1,200 pounds of and for the urea nitrate-fuel oil bomb—lacked documented ties to funding or command structures. Ayyad, a U.S.-educated radicalized through New York-area mosques and associates like Mohammed Salameh, operated within a loose network of Palestinian and Egyptian radicals rather than 's hierarchical cells. Early activities, focused on consolidating Afghan Arab fighters from the anti-Soviet (1979–1989), emphasized global recruitment and anti-Western fatwas by 1992–1996, but the 1993 bombing's perpetrators did not receive direct support from bin Laden, who was then prioritizing and operations. Analysts note ideological overlap: the bombing's fatwa-like justification for killing Americans anywhere echoed bin Laden's 1996 declaration of war, yet evidentiary gaps persist, with no intercepted communications or financial trails linking Ayyad's cell to 's headquarters. Post-conviction reviews, including Ayyad's 1994 trial testimony, revealed his motivations stemmed from perceived U.S. support for and secular Arab regimes, common to both Abdel-Rahman's group and early Salafist-jihadists, but without -specific oaths or training. This positions Ayyad's actions as part of a broader pre-9/11 jihadist ecosystem that later systematized, rather than a core early endeavor.

Implications for Understanding Islamist Terrorism

Nidal Ayyad's participation in the exemplifies the operational sophistication of early Islamist terrorist cells operating within the , utilizing legally residing professionals to procure and mix explosives—approximately 1,200 pounds—derived from readily available fertilizers and chemicals. As a employed at , Ayyad leveraged his expertise to source hydrogen tanks and other components via company resources, demonstrating how jihadist networks could exploit Western technical knowledge and infrastructure for mass-casualty attacks aimed at symbolic targets like the Twin Towers, which killed six and injured over 1,000 on February 26, 1993. This case underscores the pre-9/11 infiltration of al-Qaeda-affiliated groups, led by , into American society, where plotters conducted surveillance and logistics undetected for months. The profile of Ayyad—a Moroccan-born Muslim who had lived in the U.S. for eight years, held a stable job, and was described by family as devout yet integrated—challenges reductive explanations of rooted in socioeconomic deprivation or marginalization alone. appeared tied to ideological commitment rather than personal hardship, as evidenced by his voluntary involvement despite professional success, aligning with patterns in jihadist emphasizing religious duty over material grievances. Empirical data from subsequent analyses, including the , highlight how such individuals formed the nucleus of domestic cells, blending local actors with international operatives like Yousef, whose uncle later masterminded 9/11, revealing a causal in al-Qaeda's adaptive strategy from truck bombs to aviation plots. Ayyad's conviction and 240-year sentence in , upheld on , illustrate the efficacy of evidence-based prosecutions—drawing from phone records, chemical purchases, and co-conspirator testimony—in dismantling cells, yet the case exposed systemic gaps, such as fragmented FBI-NYPD information sharing, that allowed to al-Qaeda's global to persist. This prefigures broader patterns in Islamist : the ideological allure drawing educated members into transnational networks, the underestimation of "homegrown" threats from legal immigrants, and the need for causal focus on doctrinal motivations over exogenous policy factors, as jihadist manifestos from the era prioritized establishing a through strikes on "" symbols. Mainstream academic narratives often downplay these religious drivers in favor of geopolitical framing, but primary evidence from trial documents prioritizes the perpetrators' explicit Islamist rationale.

References

  1. [1]
    World Trade Center Bombing 1993 - FBI
    World Trade Center Bombing 1993. World Trade Center Attack in 1993. On February 26, 1993, at about 17 minutes past noon, a thunderous explosion rocked lower ...
  2. [2]
    National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States
    The FBI arrested him there on March 4, 1993. In short order, the Bureau had several plotters in custody, including Nidal Ayyad, an engineer who had acquired ...
  3. [3]
    US v. Rahman, et al. - The Investigative Project on Terrorism
    [SDNY] In May 1994, four men--Mohammed Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Mahmud ... In October 1995 Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, a blind cleric who preached at ...
  4. [4]
    #078 World Trade Center Bombing Suspect Apprehended in Pakistan
    Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, a fugitive indicted for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing in New York City, has been arrested abroad and returned to the United States.
  5. [5]
    United States of America, Appellee, v. Mohammad A. Salameh ...
    ... convictions for crimes related to the bombing of the World Trade Center. ... Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Ahmad Mohammad Ajaj, and Mahmoud Abouhalima were convicted ...
  6. [6]
    THE TWIN TOWERS; Family Calls Engineer Devout Man Of Tradition
    Mar 12, 1993 · Despite his eight years in America, Nidal A. Ayyad, the 25-year-old chemical engineer arrested this week in the World Trade Center bombing ...
  7. [7]
    BOMBING SUSPECT'S FAMILY SAYS HE 'IS NOT WICKED'
    Mar 12, 1993 · AMMAN, JORDAN, MARCH 12 -- Nidal Ayyad, the second suspect charged in the World Trade Center bombing, is not a terrorist, say family members ...
  8. [8]
    CHEMICAL ENGINEER IS HELD IN THE TRADE CENTER BLAST
    Mar 11, 1993 · A chemical engineer who had immigrated from the Mideast in 1985 and who had studied the principles of explosives was arrested and charged ...
  9. [9]
    Suspect worked for N.J. company - Tampa Bay Times
    He is a Rutgers University graduate who has worked since 1991 as a process engineer for Allied-Signal Inc., an advanced-technology company and defense ...
  10. [10]
    N.J. Engineer Arrested in Blast at Trade Center - Los Angeles Times
    Mar 11, 1993 · A 25-year-old chemical engineer of Palestinian descent was arrested Wednesday in connection with the World Trade Center bombing, ...
  11. [11]
    Special Preview: When Jihad Came to America - FDD
    Jun 13, 2011 · On May 2 and 3, 1990, the U.S. embassy in Cairo alerted its counterpart in Khartoum that Egypt's “leading radical,” Omar Abdel Rahman, was on ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT - GovInfo
    ... Family Liaison. Leonard R. Hawley. Professional Staff Member. L. Christine Healey. Senior Counsel & Team Leader. Karen Heitkotter. Executive Secretary. Walter T ...
  13. [13]
    Past Drew Bomb Suspects Into Circle - The New York Times
    Mar 26, 1993 · They lent their support to a fund-raising office for the Afghan rebels fighting the infidel Soviet-installed government, an office that moved ...
  14. [14]
    7 Facts About the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing - History.com
    Aug 24, 2021 · A search of Salameh's apartment led to the arrests of three more suspects, including Nidal Ayyad ... Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, a radical ...
  15. [15]
    TIES TO SHEIK OMAR ABDEL RAHMAN - The Washington Post
    Jul 10, 1993 · Five of the seven World Trade Center bombing suspects and at least seven of the 10 suspects charged in the alleged New York City bombing ...Missing: connections | Show results with:connections
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Crimes Committed by Terrorist Groups: Theory, Research and ...
    displayed in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Background. Around noon on Friday, February 26, 1993, a group of Islamic extremists drove a bomb- laden van ...
  17. [17]
    The 1993 World Trade Center Bombing - Oxford Academic
    Chapter 3 addresses the events following February 1993, when Islamist militants set off a car bomb in the underground garage of the World Trade Center in Lower ...Missing: background origins<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    The Trail of the Sheikh | The New Yorker
    Apr 5, 1993 · I had come to Cairo to learn about a fiery religious leader named Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, who lived in obscurity in Jersey City but was very ...
  19. [19]
    LETTER EXPLAINED MOTIVE IN BOMBING, OFFICIALS NOW SAY
    Mar 28, 1993 · Law-enforcement officials said yesterday that the suspects in the World Trade Center bombing mailed a letter around the time of the attack claiming ...Missing: justification | Show results with:justification
  20. [20]
    Prosecutors Link Blast Letter to Defendant - The New York Times
    Dec 15, 1993 · Ayyad. An F.B.I computer specialist, Elizabeth Louise James, who was called to the stand yesterday by the prosecution, said she had searched ...
  21. [21]
    FOREIGN TERRORISTS IN AMERICA
    Each defendant was sentenced to a total of 240 years' imprisonment. ... In mid October, Salameh opened a joint bank account with co- defendant Nidal Ayyad, who ...
  22. [22]
    Witness in Trade Center Trial Describes Hydrogen Delivery - The ...
    Earlier testimony has established that another defendant, Nidal A. Ayyad, bought chemicals consistent with those used in the bomb in the days before the blast.Missing: purchased | Show results with:purchased
  23. [23]
    Witnesses Identify Shards From Bomb Site at Trial - The New York ...
    Mr. Ayyad, the prosecutor contended then, tried to get the gas from his own company, Allied-Signal, but when he could not, succeeded in getting it somewhere ...
  24. [24]
    United States of America, Appellee, v. Mohammed A. Salameh ...
    Salameh, Nidal Ayyad, Mahmoud Abouhalima, Alsoknown As Mahmoud Abu Halima, Ahmad Mohammad Ajaj,also Known As Khurram Khan, Defendants-appellants,ramzi Ahmed ...
  25. [25]
    World Trade Center Disaster Study Reports and Other Publications
    Publications Related to 1993 World Trade Center Bombing ... On February 26, 1993, shortly after noon, a bomb exploded in a subterranean garage below the World ...
  26. [26]
    The Investigation of the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing
    The FBI searched his apartment and the information obtained led to the arrests of three co-conspirators: Ahmad Ajaj, Nidal Ayyad, and Mahmoud Abouhalima.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBING SUSPECTS (POST 5 APRIL 93)
    Charged with obstruction and possessing fraud- ulent passports. Ayyad's office phone. Agents learned that Salameh and Ayyad had a joint account at a local bank.
  28. [28]
    Chemical Sales Described in Blast Case - The New York Times
    Nov 19, 1993 · The owner of a Jersey City chemical company described in court yesterday how he had sold large quantities of the ingredients that the Government says were used ...
  29. [29]
    Third arrest in World Trade Center bombing - UPI Archives
    Mar 10, 1993 · Nidal Ayyad was arrested by FBI agents about 6:45 a.m. at his home in suburban Maplewood, N.J., about 20 miles west of New York City.Missing: acid | Show results with:acid
  30. [30]
    WORLD TRADE CENTER BOMBING SUSPECTS ... - CIA
    BILAL ALKAISI, 26 Jordanian. New York area resident arrested March 25. Charged with aiding and abetting the bombing. NIDAL AYYAD, 25 Kuwaiti. Maplewood, N.J., ...Missing: conviction | Show results with:conviction
  31. [31]
    Third Suspect Arrested in Trade Center Bombing
    Mar 11, 1993 · 26 bombing of New York's World Trade Center. Nidal Ayyad, 25, a chemical engineer living in Maplewood, N.J., was arrested at his home early ...
  32. [32]
    SECOND MAN HELD IN BOMBING
    He was the second suspect linked directly to the fatal blast. Nidal A. Ayyad, 25, was arrested at his suburban Maplewood home by an FBI SWAT team. Authorities ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    EXPLOSION AT THE TWIN TOWERS; 4 ARE CONVICTED IN ...
    Mar 5, 1994 · A Federal jury yesterday convicted all four of the men on trial in the bomb attack that killed six people at the World Trade Center last ...
  34. [34]
    Four for Four - Time Magazine
    Mar 14, 1994 · To each of the 38 charges, the forewoman of the jury gave the same answer. On conspiracy to bomb buildings: “Guilty.Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    TRADE CENTER BOMBERS GIVEN 240 YEARS EACH
    May 25, 1994 · NEW YORK, MAY 24 -- An outraged federal judge today sentenced each of four men convicted in the World Trade Center bombing to 240 years in ...
  36. [36]
    Trade Center Bombers Get Prison Terms of 240 Years
    May 25, 1994 · The four men convicted of bombing the World Trade Center were sentenced yesterday to prison ... Ayyad, Mahmud Abouhalima and Ahmad M. Ajaj ...
  37. [37]
    The 1993 World Trade Center bombers: Where are they now?
    Feb 26, 2013 · 26, 1993, an ugly new phase of terrorism was ushered in when Jordanian Eyad Ismoil drove Kuwaiti Ramzi Yousef and a 1,300-pound nitrate-hydrogen ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] National Security Case Studies - Federal Judicial Center |
    ... Nidal Ayyad, a chemical engineer, acquired the explosives.13. On February 23 ... supermax—in Flor- ence, Colorado, but Odeh is now in another prison.297.
  39. [39]
    At the Federal Supermax, When Does Isolation Become Torture?
    a place for jihadists, ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Special Administrative Measures and Extreme Isolation in the ...
    Sep 11, 2017 · The imposition of SAMs extends beyond convicted prisoners. Federal prosecutors regularly request that the Attorney General place defendants ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] The Federal Bureau of Prisons' Monitoring of Mail for High-Risk ...
    Sep 19, 2006 · This issue received widespread public attention in March 2005 when media reports disclosed that three convicted terrorists incarcerated at the ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] THIS IS STILL A PROFESSION: SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE ...
    at 8 (citing the Declaration of Nidal Ayyad at 35, Ayyad, No. ... Supermax Prison?, CNN (June 25, 2015), http://www ... Colorado Supermax, NBC NEWS (Apr.
  43. [43]
    4 men convicted in 1993 WTC bombing have had sentences cut
    Decades after going to prison, some of the men responsible for the World Trade Center bombing that killed six people 28 ...