Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Non-invasive ventilation

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), also known as non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, is a therapeutic modality that provides mechanical ventilatory support by delivering through a tight-fitting mask or other external interface, without requiring invasive procedures such as endotracheal or tracheostomy. This approach augments alveolar ventilation, improves , and reduces the in patients with acute or chronic , while avoiding the complications associated with invasive , such as and airway trauma. The origins of NIV trace back to the early with early experiments in positive pressure delivery, but it gained clinical prominence in the late 1980s following advancements during the epidemics of the 1950s, when devices like the were largely supplanted by positive pressure techniques. Today, NIV is widely used in both and home settings, with primary indications including acute hypercapnic due to (COPD) exacerbations (where it is strongly recommended for patients with pH ≤ 7.35 and PaCO₂ > 45 mmHg), cardiogenic . It is also conditionally recommended for hypoxemic in immunocompromised patients and for chronic hypercapnic conditions in neuromuscular diseases or . Common modes of NIV include (CPAP), which maintains a constant to stent open airways and improve oxygenation, and bilevel (BiPAP), which provides distinct inspiratory and expiratory pressures to assist , available in spontaneous (S), timed (T), or spontaneous/timed (S/T) settings. Interfaces typically consist of nasal masks, oronasal masks, full-face masks, nasal pillows, or helmets, selected based on patient comfort, leak minimization, and clinical needs, with equipment often incorporating humidifiers and oxygen blenders for enhanced efficacy. Clinically, NIV has demonstrated significant benefits, including reduced rates of endotracheal (by up to 50% in COPD exacerbations), shorter stays, lower mortality in select populations (e.g., 25% reduction in cardiogenic ), and improved long-term outcomes in chronic hypercapnic failure when used at home. However, success depends on careful patient selection, as contraindications include cardiac or , inability to protect the airway, severe , or uncontrolled , and complications such as skin breakdown, gastric distension, or may occur if not monitored properly. Ongoing continues to refine its application, particularly in resource-limited settings and during pandemics like , where it has shown variable efficacy in managing hypoxemic failure.

Definition and Principles

Definition

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) refers to the provision of ventilatory support through the patient's upper airway using a noninvasive , such as a nasal , full-face , or nasal prongs, without requiring endotracheal or tracheostomy. This approach delivers positive pressure to the airways, facilitating respiratory assistance while preserving the natural airway anatomy and reducing the risks associated with invasive procedures. The primary purposes of NIV include alleviating respiratory distress, enhancing gas exchange by improving oxygenation and ventilation, reducing the patient's work of breathing, and averting the progression to invasive mechanical ventilation. By applying external positive pressure, NIV supports alveolar recruitment and stabilizes the respiratory system, particularly in scenarios of acute or chronic respiratory insufficiency. NIV is delivered via intermittent or , which can be adjusted to match the patient's ventilatory needs without direct airway . Unlike supplemental , which primarily addresses by increasing inspired oxygen concentration, NIV actively augments and through pressure support, thereby providing more comprehensive respiratory aid.

Physiological Principles

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) primarily exerts its effects through the application of positive pressure to the airway, which generates (PEEP) to maintain and prevent derecruitment at end-expiration. This PEEP counteracts the natural tendency for alveoli to collapse, reducing and thereby improving oxygenation by increasing and redistributing lung volumes more evenly. In conditions involving airflow obstruction, such as , NIV-derived PEEP also counterbalances intrinsic auto-PEEP, thereby decreasing the inspiratory threshold load and facilitating easier initiation of breaths. NIV augments ventilation by increasing and , which directly contributes to the correction of through enhanced CO2 elimination. A study in stable hypercapnic COPD patients demonstrated that NIV increased by approximately 180 mL on average after 3 weeks of use, leading to significant reductions in PaCO2 levels. Additionally, by providing pressure support during inspiration, NIV unloads the respiratory muscles, particularly the , reducing the and mitigating that arises from prolonged or increased respiratory drive. This unloading occurs through two mechanisms: decreasing the number of spontaneous efforts required and lowering the effort per breath for a given . Furthermore, NIV improves ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching by recruiting previously collapsed lung units, which reduces shunt and , enhancing both uptake and CO2 elimination. Physiological studies highlight NIV's role in stabilizing the upper airway, particularly in , where positive pressure acts as a pneumatic splint to prevent pharyngeal collapse during sleep by countering negative intraluminal pressures generated by inspiratory efforts. This stabilization maintains airway patency, reduces upper , and averts apneic events, as evidenced by improved and reduced arousal frequency in controlled trials.

Types of Non-invasive Ventilation

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

(CPAP) is a mode of non-invasive ventilation that provides a fixed level of throughout the entire respiratory cycle in spontaneously breathing patients. This constant pressure, typically delivered via a tight-fitting or nasal interface connected to a flow generator, maintains during both inspiration and expiration to prevent upper airway collapse and alveolar derecruitment. By stenting open the pharyngeal airways and distal alveoli, CPAP increases , improves oxygenation through better ventilation-perfusion matching, and reduces the without providing additional inspiratory pressure support. Unlike bilevel modes, CPAP does not vary pressure levels, focusing solely on continuous airway support to address rather than ventilatory drive. CPAP settings are titrated based on tolerance and oxygenation goals, with pressures commonly ranging from 5 to 20 cmH₂O. Initial pressures often start at 5-10 cmH₂O for most applications and are adjusted upward as needed to achieve target levels, typically aiming for SpO₂ >92% while monitoring for discomfort or hemodynamic effects. In acute hypoxemic settings, such as cardiogenic , pressures of 8-12 cmH₂O have shown optimal efficacy in improving without excessive risk. No separate inspiratory pressure is applied, distinguishing CPAP from modes that augment . CPAP is primarily indicated for hypoxemic conditions where maintaining airway patency and alveolar recruitment is key, including (OSA), acute cardiogenic , and prevention of postoperative . In OSA, CPAP effectively splints the upper airway to eliminate apneic events during sleep, reducing daytime and cardiovascular risks. For acute cardiogenic , it rapidly alleviates dyspnea by decreasing preload and while enhancing oxygenation. Postoperatively, CPAP helps prevent in at-risk patients by counteracting anesthesia-induced lung collapse and improving postoperative . The advantages of CPAP include its in setup and operation, making it suitable for both and environments, as well as its lower cost compared to more complex ventilatory modes. Its ease of use has facilitated widespread adoption for chronic conditions like OSA, promoting long-term adherence with portable devices. Clinical trials, including meta-analyses of randomized studies, have demonstrated that CPAP reduces the need for endotracheal by 60% in patients with acute cardiogenic , alongside trends toward lower mortality and shorter stays.

Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)

Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is a mode of non-invasive ventilation that delivers two distinct levels of positive airway pressure to support breathing in patients with respiratory insufficiency. It provides a higher inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) during the inspiratory phase to assist with ventilation and a lower expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) during expiration to maintain airway patency, with the difference between these levels known as pressure support (PS = IPAP - EPAP). This dual-pressure mechanism allows for spontaneous breathing while augmenting tidal volume and facilitating carbon dioxide elimination, distinguishing it from single-level pressure systems. BiPAP operates in different modes, including spontaneous (S) mode, where breaths are patient-triggered; timed (T) mode, which delivers breaths at a set rate; and spontaneous/timed (S/T) mode, which combines patient-triggered breaths with a backup rate if needed. These modes are selected based on the patient's respiratory drive and synchrony needs. Typical BiPAP settings are titrated based on patient tolerance and clinical response, with IPAP commonly ranging from 8 to 25 cmH₂O to provide adequate ventilatory support and EPAP from 4 to 12 cmH₂O to prevent alveolar collapse, similar to (PEEP) in maintaining . A backup , often set around 12 breaths per minute, ensures synchrony in patients with weak respiratory drive or irregular patterns. These parameters are adjusted incrementally to achieve target oxygenation and ventilation while minimizing discomfort or air leaks. BiPAP is particularly suited for conditions involving hypercapnic respiratory failure, such as acute exacerbations of (COPD), where it enhances CO₂ clearance more effectively than (CPAP) by providing active inspiratory assistance. It is also applied in neuromuscular diseases like or to counteract and fatigue, and in weaning from invasive to prevent reintubation in high-risk patients. Compared to CPAP, BiPAP's variable pressure support improves abnormalities and reduces the need for endotracheal intubation in these scenarios. Randomized controlled trials have established BiPAP's efficacy in reducing mortality and rates in acute COPD exacerbations with hypercapnic . A seminal trial demonstrated that face mask BiPAP significantly lowered mortality from 29% in conventional therapy groups to 9% in the BiPAP group, alongside improved and PaCO₂ normalization. Subsequent meta-analyses of multiple randomized trials confirm these benefits, showing consistent reductions in hospital mortality and invasive ventilation needs across diverse patient cohorts.

Clinical Indications

Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) is characterized by an arterial partial pressure of (PaCO₂) greater than 45 mmHg accompanied by (pH <7.35), resulting from ventilatory pump failure that impairs alveolar ventilation. This condition often arises in acute settings due to increased respiratory load, reduced respiratory muscle strength, or impaired neural drive, leading to CO₂ retention and acid-base imbalance. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) serves as a primary indication for managing AHRF, particularly in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), where it is the most extensively studied etiology. Other key indications include obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS) and acute-on-chronic respiratory failure, where NIV supports ventilatory assistance to correct hypercapnia and acidosis. In COPD exacerbations, bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is the preferred NIV mode due to its ability to provide inspiratory and expiratory pressure support tailored to ventilatory demands. Major clinical guidelines, including those from the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS) and British Thoracic Society/Intensive Care Society (BTS/ICS), recommend NIV as first-line therapy for in selected patients, emphasizing its role in averting endotracheal intubation. Evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses demonstrates that NIV reduces the need for intubation by 50-70% in exacerbations, with success often indicated by pH improvement to above 7.30 within the first hour of initiation. Patient selection for NIV in AHRF focuses on those with a respiratory rate exceeding 25 breaths per minute and moderate acidosis (pH 7.25-7.35), alongside preserved consciousness and ability to protect the airway. Outcomes include reduced hospital length of stay by approximately 3-4 days and lower in-hospital mortality rates compared to standard oxygen therapy alone, particularly in and cases.

Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Other Acute Conditions

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) is defined as severe hypoxemia, typically characterized by a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤300 mmHg, in the absence of significant . This condition often arises from parenchymal lung diseases that impair , leading to reduced arterial oxygenation despite adequate or increased . Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) aims to improve oxygenation by applying positive to recruit alveoli, reduce shunt, and alleviate in these patients. Key indications for NIV in AHRF include community-acquired or , mild cases of (ARDS), cardiogenic , and post-extubation respiratory support. In pneumonia-related AHRF, NIV has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the need for endotracheal , particularly when initiated early in hemodynamically stable patients. For select mild ARDS cases (PaO2/FiO2 200-300 mmHg), NIV success rates reach approximately 70%, though efficacy drops in moderate to severe de novo ARDS, with success rates around 45-58% and higher risks of failure leading to delayed if not monitored. In cardiogenic , NIV, often via (CPAP), achieves moderate success, avoiding in over 60% of cases by rapidly improving and oxygenation compared to standard . Additionally, NIV serves as prophylactic support post-extubation in high-risk patients with hypoxemic failure, lowering reintubation rates by enhancing ventilatory mechanics and preventing . Despite these applications, NIV's role in AHRF remains limited by variable outcomes and alternatives like high-flow (HFNC), which provides comparable intubation avoidance and mortality benefits in hypoxemic patients while being better tolerated. Predictors of NIV failure include high illness severity, such as Simplified Acute Physiology Score II () greater than 35, which correlates with increased needs and mortality in de novo AHRF. Close monitoring for signs of deterioration, including persistent or rising respiratory effort, is essential to timely transition to invasive ventilation when NIV proves ineffective.

Chronic and Home-based Applications

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is indicated for the chronic management of stable hypercapnic (COPD), where it supports patients with persistent daytime (PaCO₂ > 45 mmHg) despite optimal medical therapy. In neuromuscular diseases such as (ALS) and , NIV addresses progressive respiratory muscle weakness leading to nocturnal and daytime symptoms like and dyspnea. For central syndromes, including congenital forms, NIV compensates for impaired central respiratory drive, preventing recurrent decompensation during sleep or under metabolic stress. In home settings, NIV typically involves nocturnal bilevel (BiPAP) delivered for 4-8 hours per night to target while minimizing daytime disruption. For chronic , BiPAP settings often include inspiratory (IPAP) of 18-25 cmH₂O and expiratory (EPAP) of 6-10 cmH₂O, titrated to achieve adequate and comfort. Clinical trials have demonstrated survival extensions in COPD patients, with one study showing a reduction in 1-year mortality from 33% to 10% when home NIV is initiated post-exacerbation. As of June 2025, the (CMS) expanded national coverage for home NIV in COPD with chronic , including respiratory assist devices with backup rates for patients with persistent post-hospitalization. Key outcomes of chronic home NIV include improved quality of life through better sleep architecture and reduced daytime , alongside fewer hospitalizations—meta-analyses report an average decrease of 1.26 admissions per year. Physiological benefits encompass normalization of PaCO₂ levels, often reducing from >52 mmHg to <45 mmHg with consistent use, which correlates with decreased exacerbation frequency. Adherence is monitored via integrated device data, tracking usage hours and mask leaks, with thresholds of >4 hours nightly linked to optimal outcomes; low adherence (<4 hours) predicts poorer survival and quality of life. Transitioning from acute to chronic NIV post-hospitalization requires criteria such as persistent hypercapnia (PaCO₂ > 45-50 mmHg) for at least 2 weeks after resolution of the , alongside symptoms of ventilatory failure and inability to wean from in-hospital NIV. Guidelines recommend initiating home therapy 2-4 weeks after discharge to ensure stability, with multidisciplinary follow-up to optimize settings and address barriers like fit. This approach has been shown to reduce 12-month readmission or death risk by approximately 50% in eligible COPD patients.

Contraindications and Complications

Absolute and Relative Contraindications

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is contraindicated in certain clinical scenarios to avoid potential harm, with distinctions made between absolute contraindications, where NIV should not be initiated, and relative contraindications, where use may be considered after careful evaluation. Absolute contraindications include cardiorespiratory arrest, where immediate is required instead of NIV. Inability to protect the airway, such as in cases of , active , or impaired and , poses a high risk of and mandates invasive ventilation. Severe or burns that prevent proper mask fitting or cause discomfort also preclude NIV use. Hemodynamic instability, particularly when requiring high-dose vasopressors (e.g., systolic <80 mmHg or uncontrolled arrhythmias), is an absolute barrier due to the potential for further deterioration without securing the airway. Relative contraindications encompass conditions where NIV might be attempted with close monitoring but carry increased risks of failure. These include claustrophobia or extreme anxiety, which can lead to poor tolerance; agitation, which may be managed with mild sedation in select cases; and excessive respiratory secretions or high aspiration risk, necessitating frequent suctioning. Recent upper gastrointestinal surgery or facial procedures also fall into this category, as they may impair interface fit or increase vomiting risk. Risk assessment for NIV involves predictors of trial failure to guide patient selection and timely escalation to intubation. For instance, persistent acidosis (pH <7.25) after 1-2 hours of NIV indicates likely failure and warrants prompt intervention. Ethically, when initiating NIV in patients with relative contraindications, informed consent should emphasize its role as a potential bridge to intubation if it fails, ensuring shared decision-making with the care team.

Common Adverse Effects and Management

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) can lead to several physiological adverse effects, primarily due to interactions between the patient and the ventilatory support system. Hypercapnia occurs in 2-10% of cases, often resulting from CO2 rebreathing caused by inadequate expiratory flow or suboptimal ventilator settings, potentially progressing to CO2 narcosis if unmanaged. Hypoxemia affects 1-5% of patients, particularly those with acute respiratory failure, and arises from mask leaks that dilute inspired oxygen concentrations. Aerophagia, involving air swallowing, and hypotension, seen in 1-3% of instances due to positive pressure impeding venous return—exacerbated by high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)—are additional concerns that may necessitate prompt intervention. Mechanical and interface-related issues are common, especially with prolonged NIV use. Skin breakdown, such as pressure injuries on the face or nasal bridge, occurs in 5-15% of patients, with higher rates in intensive care settings due to friction and prolonged mask contact; a 2025 retrospective study reported an incidence of 15.4%, linked to factors like low albumin levels and extended NIV duration. Nasal dryness affects up to 18% of users, while eye irritation and conjunctivitis stem from air leaks directing flow toward the eyes. Gastric distension, reported in 0.5-10% of cases particularly with bilevel positive airway pressure (), results from swallowed air and carries a risk of aspiration. Management strategies emphasize early recognition and targeted adjustments to minimize complications. For physiological effects, regular monitoring of arterial blood gases allows for timely ventilator setting optimization, such as increasing expiratory triggers to reduce CO2 rebreathing or addressing leaks to prevent hypoxemia; hypotension may require PEEP reduction or fluid resuscitation. Interface-related issues are mitigated through periodic mask repositioning, use of protective dressings or hydrocolloid barriers to prevent skin breakdown, and incorporation of humidification systems to alleviate nasal dryness and irritation. Patient tolerance can be improved with low-dose sedation in select cases, while switching to alternative interfaces like helmets—shown to lower skin injury and leak rates—or high-flow nasal cannulas reduces overall adverse events. A 2025 systematic review highlights that protocolized multidisciplinary care, including interface rotation and AI-assisted synchrony monitoring, decreases complication rates by up to 20% compared to standard practices. NIV failure, defined by persistent respiratory distress or worsening gas exchange, occurs in 30-50% of severe cases like , often leading to escalation to endotracheal intubation within 1-2 hours of failure detection to avoid further deterioration. Predictive factors include high baseline severity scores, and early identification through vital sign trends enables safer transitions.

Equipment and Delivery

Interfaces and Ventilatory Devices

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) systems utilize specialized patient interfaces to deliver positive airway pressure through the upper airway without endotracheal intubation. These interfaces connect to ventilatory devices via circuits and are designed to ensure effective gas exchange while maximizing patient comfort and minimizing complications such as leaks or pressure sores. The choice of interface significantly influences therapy success, with options tailored to acute or chronic applications. Common interfaces include nasal masks and prongs, which are lightweight and cover only the nose, making them ideal for continuous positive airway pressure () therapy in obstructive sleep apnea () due to their high tolerance and allowance for oral activities like eating or speaking. Full-face masks, which enclose both the nose and mouth, are widely used for bilevel positive airway pressure () in patients who mouth-breathe, such as those with hypercapnic conditions, as they reduce intentional leaks and support higher pressure delivery. Helmets, transparent polyvinyl enclosures sealed at the neck, facilitate prolonged NIV in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure by distributing pressure evenly and lowering the incidence of facial skin injuries compared to traditional masks. Oral appliances, including mouthpieces, serve as alternatives in chronic settings for patients with nasal obstruction, though they require adaptation and are less common in acute care. Ventilatory devices for NIV encompass CPAP units, bilevel machines, and portable ventilators, each optimized for specific clinical environments. CPAP devices provide fixed positive pressure via a single-limb circuit and are standard for home OSA management, with models supporting flow rates up to 130 L/min for stable delivery. Home bilevel machines, such as the ResMed VPAP series, alternate between inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) and expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) through a vented circuit, enabling chronic support for conditions like obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Portable ventilators, often used in critical care units, offer multi-mode capabilities including pressure support ventilation and are electrically powered for mobility without requiring external gas sources. Essential features across these devices include leak compensation circuits that adjust for up to 180 L/min of intentional venting to maintain target pressures, and integrated alarms for detecting apnea, low pressure, or circuit disconnection. Selection of interfaces and devices is guided by patient-specific factors to optimize fit and efficacy. Anatomical considerations, such as facial hair, dentition, or skeletal structure, influence mask sealing, with custom-fitted options preferred for irregular features to prevent leaks. Tolerance plays a key role, as nasal interfaces enhance comfort in chronic users by reducing claustrophobia, while full-face options ensure compliance in acute scenarios requiring robust seal. The underlying condition dictates choices, for example, full-face masks for hypercapnia to accommodate mouth opening, and portable devices for acute care due to their robustness, whereas cost-effective, lightweight bilevel units are prioritized for home portability. Innovations in NIV hardware have focused on improving accessibility and reducing interface-related issues, particularly in response to pandemic demands. High-flow nasal hybrids, such as the noninvasive open ventilation (NIOV) system with nasal pillows, combine high-flow nasal cannula elements (up to 50 L/min humidified gas) with targeted tidal volume delivery (50-250 mL) for enhanced exercise tolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Disposable interfaces, including single-use masks and hoods, have gained adoption for infection control in hospital settings, minimizing cross-contamination risks during aerosol-generating procedures. Advanced bilevel devices now incorporate volume-assured modes like intelligent volume-assured pressure support (iVAPS), which dynamically adjust IPAP (6-26 cmH₂O) to achieve preset tidal volumes (6-8 mL/kg), improving synchrony in variable respiratory patterns.

Initiation, Settings, and Monitoring Protocols

Initiation of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) begins with positioning the patient in a semi-recumbent or semi-upright position at 30-45 degrees to optimize comfort and ventilation. After explaining the procedure and potential complications to the patient, a well-fitted interface, such as a full-face mask, is selected and applied to minimize leaks while ensuring tolerance. Initial ventilator settings are set conservatively, typically starting with expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP) at 4-6 cmH₂O and inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) at 10-12 cmH₂O in bilevel mode, with a backup respiratory rate of 12-16 breaths per minute and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) titrated to achieve adequate oxygenation. Therapy is then initiated gradually, allowing the patient time to acclimate, and pressures are titrated upward in increments of 1-2 cmH₂O every 5-10 minutes based on patient comfort and response. Optimization of NIV settings focuses on achieving key physiological targets, including a respiratory rate below 25 breaths per minute, oxygen saturation (SpO₂) greater than 92% (or 88-92% in hypercapnic conditions like ), and normalization of arterial pH toward 7.35-7.45. IPAP is increased to improve ventilation and reduce hypercapnia, aiming for a pressure support (IPAP minus EPAP) of 6-10 cmH₂O, while EPAP is adjusted to enhance oxygenation without excessive leaks or discomfort; maximum pressures rarely exceed IPAP 20-25 cmH₂O or EPAP 8-10 cmH₂O. Auto-titrating devices may be employed in select cases to dynamically adjust pressures based on real-time respiratory patterns, particularly for patients with variable needs. Adjustments continue until tidal volumes of 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight are achieved with minimal patient-ventilator asynchrony. Monitoring during NIV involves frequent assessments to evaluate efficacy and detect failure early. Vital signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate, and SpO₂, are checked hourly, alongside evaluations of patient comfort, interface fit, and signs of agitation or distress. Arterial blood gases (ABGs) are obtained at 1 hour post-initiation and repeated as needed (e.g., every 1-2 hours initially) to assess improvements in pH, PaCO₂ (target reduction of at least 10-20%), and PaO₂. Indicators of potential failure, such as worsening pH below 7.25, persistent respiratory rate above 30-35 breaths per minute, hemodynamic instability, or increased agitation, prompt consideration of intubation. Protocols for NIV vary by setting, with initiation preferred in monitored environments like the emergency department (ED) or intensive care unit (ICU) to allow close supervision by trained staff. In the ED, rapid assessment and setup occur for acute presentations, transitioning to ICU if severe acidosis (pH <7.25) or multiorgan involvement is present; ICU protocols emphasize continuous waveform monitoring for leaks and asynchrony. Weaning begins once stability is achieved, typically after 24 hours of normalized ABGs (pH ≥7.35, PaCO₂ decrease ≥10%), respiratory rate <25 breaths per minute, and minimal support requirements (e.g., IPAP 8-10 cmH₂O, EPAP 4-5 cmH₂O). Gradual reduction in usage time or pressures is preferred, with daily reassessments to prevent relapse.

Historical Development and Guidelines

Evolution of Non-invasive Ventilation

The development of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) traces its roots to early 20th-century negative-pressure devices designed to support respiration without intubation. In 1928, Philip Drinker and Louis Shaw invented the iron lung, a full-body enclosure that created alternating negative pressure to mimic breathing, primarily for polio patients during epidemics in the 1950s. The polio epidemics of the 1950s highlighted limitations of negative-pressure devices, prompting early explorations into positive-pressure ventilation techniques that laid the foundation for later NIV advancements. Similarly, cuirass ventilators, which applied negative pressure to the chest via a shell-like device, emerged as precursors in the late 1920s, with patents by R. Eisenmenger in 1928 and refinements by the 1940s for home use. These bulky machines laid the groundwork for non-invasive respiratory support but were limited by size and efficacy in acute settings. A pivotal shift occurred in the 1980s with the advent of positive-pressure NIV. In 1981, Colin Sullivan and colleagues introduced continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered via a nasal mask, revolutionizing treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by splinting open the upper airway without invasive measures. This innovation, detailed in Sullivan's seminal Lancet paper, marked the beginning of modern NIV for chronic conditions. Building on this, Respironics introduced bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) in 1989, providing distinct inspiratory and expiratory pressures to ease patient comfort and expand applications beyond OSA. The 1990s and 2000s saw NIV's expansion into acute care, driven by landmark trials demonstrating mortality benefits. A 1995 randomized controlled trial by in patients with acute exacerbations of showed NIV reduced the need for intubation by 74% and lowered mortality compared to standard therapy. This was complemented by , which confirmed NIV's efficacy on general wards for COPD exacerbations, reducing intubation rates from 27% to 15% without increasing complications. These studies, led by influential figures like Brochard and Plant, spurred widespread adoption in hypercapnic respiratory failure, shortening ICU stays and averting invasive ventilation risks. In the 2010s, technological advancements focused on portability for home-based NIV, with bilevel turbine-driven devices enabling chronic management outside hospitals. The COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 to 2023 accelerated NIV's role in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF), with marked increases in U.S. usage correlating to reduced reliance on invasive mechanical ventilation and improved survival rates in select cases. This period highlighted NIV's scalability in resource-limited settings, solidifying its evolution from niche therapy to standard care.

Current Evidence-based Guidelines

The British Thoracic Society (BTS) and Intensive Care Society (ICS) guidelines for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults, originally published in 2017 with subsequent corrections and endorsements through 2023, provide a foundational framework for NIV application in acute settings. These guidelines strongly recommend bilevel NIV as first-line therapy for patients with acute exacerbations of presenting with pH ≤7.35 and hypercapnia, citing high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrating reduced mortality and intubation rates compared to standard medical therapy. For chronic applications, the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) clinical practice guideline on long-term noninvasive ventilation in chronic stable hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, issued in 2020 and reaffirmed in subsequent updates through 2022, conditionally recommends nocturnal NIV added to usual care for patients with persistent hypercapnia (PaCO₂ >52 mmHg) despite optimal therapy. This recommendation is based on moderate certainty evidence from trials showing improvements in , daytime PaCO₂ levels, and reduced hospital admissions, though without consistent survival benefits. In 2025, the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) collaborated with the to expand national coverage determinations for home-based NIV in COPD patients with chronic . The updated CMS policy, finalized in June 2025, covers noninvasive positive pressure ventilation devices for stable COPD patients with (PaCO₂ ≥52 mmHg) documented at least two weeks post-exacerbation or during stable periods, aiming to improve access and reduce rehospitalizations based on evidence from longitudinal studies. Evidence-based recommendations emphasize strong endorsement for NIV in hypercapnic due to COPD exacerbations, graded as strong with high certainty (Grade A equivalent) in both / and ERS/ATS frameworks, supported by meta-analyses of over 20 randomized trials showing 46-60% in and mortality. For hypoxemic (ARDS), recommendations are conditional with moderate certainty (Grade B), advising NIV trials in mild cases (PaO₂/FiO₂ >200) under close monitoring, as larger trials indicate variable success without clear superiority over high-flow (HFNC) in severe . In select hypercapnic cases, such as post-extubation , NIV is preferred over HFNC based on network meta-analyses demonstrating lower reintubation rates ( 0.52, 95% CI 0.43-0.63). Emerging trends as of 2025 highlight ongoing controversies surrounding NIV use in pandemic-like scenarios, such as COVID-19-associated , where initial high failure rates (up to 91% in early waves) prompted shifts toward HFNC, though later meta-analyses show improved success (30%) with refined protocols emphasizing early intervention and helmet interfaces. Integration of telemonitoring with NIV is gaining traction, with 2025 guidelines from ERS and ATS advocating remote PaCO₂ and adherence tracking via wearable sensors to optimize home therapy and reduce emergency visits, supported by cohort studies reporting 20-25% lower readmission rates. concerns in low-resource settings persist, with WHO-aligned reports noting NIV underutilization due to costs and gaps, prompting calls for simplified, solar-powered devices in . Key evidence gaps include the paucity of large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in non-COPD acute hypoxemic (AHRF), where current data from meta-analyses of 15-20 studies show inconsistent benefits and highlight the need for trials targeting predictors like the HACOR score to identify responders. Overall NIV failure rates, estimated at 20-30% across acute applications in recent 2024-2025 meta-analyses, underscore the urgency for research on interface optimization and weaning strategies to minimize progression to invasive ventilation.

References

  1. [1]
    Noninvasive Ventilation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation involves the delivery of oxygen into the lungs via positive pressure without the need for endotracheal intubation.
  2. [2]
    Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is mechanical ventilatory support delivered to the airways in the absence of invasive devices such as an endotracheal tube or ...
  3. [3]
    Noninvasive Ventilation: Overview, Methods of Delivery, General ...
    Jun 18, 2020 · Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) refers to the administration of ventilatory support without using an invasive artificial airway (endotracheal tube or ...
  4. [4]
    Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation ...
    Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is widely used in the acute care setting for acute respiratory failure (ARF) across a variety of aetiologies. This ...Introduction · Methods · PICO questions and... · Conclusions
  5. [5]
    Physiologic Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation | Respiratory Care
    May 22, 2019 · NIV has a number of physiologic effects similar to invasive ventilation. The major effects are to augment minute ventilation and reduce muscle loading.
  6. [6]
    Clinical review of non-invasive ventilation - ERS Publications
    Additionally, NIV increases functional residual capacity, which helps with alveolar recruitment, decreases shunt and improves ventilation/perfusion matching.<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Effects of noninvasive ventilation on lung hyperinflation in stable ...
    Tidal volume (VT) increased by 181 (110–252) mL. All of the above changes were significant compared with sham NIMV. Changes in Pa,CO2 were significantly related ...
  8. [8]
    LAPLACE'S LAW AND THE ALVEOLUS: A MISCONCEPTION OF ...
    Laplace's law states that the pressure inside an inflated elastic container with a curved surface, e.g., a bubble or a blood vessel, is inversely proportional ...
  9. [9]
    Physiologic Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation during Acute Lung Injury
    Feb 23, 2004 · Noninvasive pressure-support ventilation combined with positive end-expiratory pressure is needed to reduce inspiratory muscle effort.
  10. [10]
    The effects of long-term noninvasive ventilation in hypercapnic ...
    Nov 18, 2011 · This phenomenon can explain the increase in oxygenation seen in the NIV group as a consequence of improved ventilation–perfusion (V/Q) match.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    The Role of Non-Invasive Ventilation in Sleep-Related Breathing ...
    Sep 24, 2024 · CPAP therapy works by maintaining a continuous positive pressure in the airway, preventing the collapses that cause apneas and hypopneas. This ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of sleep-related breathing ...
    NIV has been used during the night in patients with stable chronic lung diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea, the overlap syndrome (COPD and obstructive ...
  13. [13]
    Continuous Positive Airway Pressure - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivers a continuous flow of air to open the airways in individuals who are spontaneously breathing.
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation
    Jun 4, 2015 · In CPAP, the ventilator delivers a constant airway pressure throughout the respiratory cycle. Some ventilators automatically reduce the airway ...
  16. [16]
    CPAP Pressure Settings - SleepApnea.org
    Aug 4, 2025 · Many CPAP machines can operate at pressures ranging from 4 to 20 cm H2O. While there is considerable variation between individuals, the average ...
  17. [17]
  18. [18]
    Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the respiratory system
    Jan 3, 2023 · In OSA, the CPAP device works to splint the airway open and prevent the collapse of the upper airway that is the cardinal event of OSA leading ...
  19. [19]
    Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
    Previous trials have indicated that the physiological improvement seen with noninvasive ventilation results in a reduction in the rate of tracheal intubation.
  20. [20]
    Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Postoperative ...
    Feb 2, 2005 · Several studies have shown that, in patients with postoperative hypoxemic respiratory failure, CPAP improves gas exchange, minimizes atelectasis ...
  21. [21]
    Non-invasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure ...
    Jan 31, 2023 · Its simplicity makes CPAP highly cost-effective in the emergency context and easily used outside of intensive care since ventilators are not ...
  22. [22]
    Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
    Conclusions Noninvasive ventilation reduces the need for intubation and mortality in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Although the level of ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    The Impact of BiLevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) Application ...
    Dec 31, 2022 · Bilevel-positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is a form of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) that is used to help and facilitate breathing [1,2]. It is ...
  24. [24]
    Biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP)--a new mode ... - PubMed
    BIPAP can be described as pressure controlled ventilation in a system allowing unrestricted spontaneous breathing at any moment of the ventilatory cycle.
  25. [25]
    Clinical review: Biphasic positive airway pressure ... - PubMed Central
    APRV and BiPAP ventilate by time-cycled switching between two pressure levels in a high flow or demand valve continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) circuit, ...Missing: Bilevel definition
  26. [26]
    Starting non-invasive ventilation (CPAP and BiPAP)
    The aim is to commence BiPAP at settings of 12 cmH2O/4cmH2O (IPAP of 12, EPAP of 4) and escalate the IPAP: Start EPAP at 4 or 5 cmH2O · Setting changes should be ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] NON-INVASIVE VENTILATION MADE RIDICULOUSLY SIMPLE
    – Fixed IPAP and EPAP. – Pressure range 4-25 cm H20. – Ex: IPAP 15 cm H20, EPAP 12 cm H20 or “15/12”. □ Auto Bi-level. – Variable pressures according to ...
  28. [28]
    Critical Care Device Series: Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
    May 2, 2023 · Respiratory rate is set as a back-up, typically around 12. Ideally the patient continues to breathe spontaneously and triggers IPAP/EPAP by ...
  29. [29]
    Non‐invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic ...
    Non‐invasive ventilation (NIV) with bi‐level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) is commonly used to treat patients admitted to hospital with acute hypercapnic ...
  30. [30]
    Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: which recipe for ...
    The COPD obstructive framework is typically associated with abnormalities of pulmonary gas exchange, ventilation/perfusion ratio (V′/Q′) inequality, dynamic ...
  31. [31]
    Successful Extubation After Weaning Failure by Noninvasive ...
    Jun 29, 2017 · Weaning often fails for mechanically ventilated patients who have chronic ventilatory failure from various causes. These include neuromuscular ...
  32. [32]
    Comparison between continuous positive airway pressure and ...
    BIPAP has a superior efficacy in correcting gas exchange abnormalities and avoiding endotracheal intubation than CPAP.
  33. [33]
    Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Exacerbations of Chronic ...
    Sep 28, 1995 · One recent prospective, randomized study reported a reduction in mortality with the use of nasal ventilation in patients with chronic ...
  34. [34]
    Efficacy of non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary ...
    Oct 22, 2025 · Our meta-analysis demonstrates that NIV significantly improves clinical outcomes in patients with COPD, including reduced mortality, intubation ...
  35. [35]
    Comparative Effectiveness of Noninvasive and Invasive Ventilation ...
    Several randomized control trials and meta-analyses found a reduction in intubation rate, hospital-acquired pneumonia and mortality when NIV was added to ...
  36. [36]
    BTS/ICS guideline for the ventilatory management of acute ... - Thorax
    AHRF results from an inability of the respiratory pump, in concert with the lungs, to provide sufficient alveolar ventilation to maintain a normal arterial PCO2 ...
  37. [37]
    Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic ...
    Jul 13, 2017 · AHRF was defined by a mean admission pH < 7.35 and mean partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) > 45 mmHg (6 kPa). Primary review outcomes ...
  38. [38]
    Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure ...
    Jun 22, 2012 · Late NIV failure was defined as a new episode of AHRF with respiratory acidosis at least 48 hours after initial stabilization (22). If NIV ...
  39. [39]
    Noninvasive ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure ...
    Dec 15, 2012 · Patients with OHS can be treated with NIV during an episode of AHRF with similar efficacy and better outcomes than patients with COPD.
  40. [40]
    Non‐invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic ...
    Jul 13, 2017 · On average, risk of dying was reduced by 46% and risk of needing intubation was reduced by 65%. Reviewers rated the quality of evidence for both ...<|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Time to NIV and mortality in AECOPD hospital admissions
    Aug 5, 2019 · Length of hospital stay for patients treated with NIV for AECOPD reduced significantly, 13.4 days in 2008 to 10.6 days in 2014 (p≤0.001).
  42. [42]
    Noninvasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure - NIH
    Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), also referred to as type 1, is defined by severe hypoxemia, typically characterized by a PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mmHg, ...
  43. [43]
    Non-invasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure ...
    Oct 22, 2022 · Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), delivered as either pressure support or continuous positive airway pressure via interfaces like face masks and ...
  44. [44]
    Noninvasive Ventilation in Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
    Jan 16, 2003 · The use of noninvasive ventilation prevented intubation, reduced the incidence of septic shock, and improved survival in these patients compared ...METHODS · RESULTS · DISCUSSION
  45. [45]
    Noninvasive Ventilation of Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress ...
    Jun 29, 2016 · Although success rates of NIV in mild ARDS were 78%, this decreased to 58% in moderate and 53% in severe ARDS, consistent with previous findings ...Methods · Results · Discussion
  46. [46]
    Non-invasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema - PMC
    NIV or CPAP should be considered as a first-line strategy in the management of patients with CPE because both techniques have been proven to decrease the need ...
  47. [47]
    Noninvasive respiratory support after extubation: a systematic ...
    Noninvasive respiratory support may be useful for preventing, but not treating, post-extubation respiratory failure in ICU patients.Introduction · Methods · Results · Discussion
  48. [48]
    High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation as Initial ...
    May 8, 2024 · The largest trial found that for ICU patients with pure hypoxemic respiratory failure, HFNC decreased mortality compared with NIV (13). Other ...
  49. [49]
    Predictors of Non-Invasive Ventilation Failure in Severe Respiratory ...
    Patients in the de novo group who failed NIV had more severe scores (CURB 65 and SAPS II), more extensive radiological findings (Opravil score), and more severe ...Missing: AHRF | Show results with:AHRF
  50. [50]
    Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Stable Hypercapnic ...
    This expert panel provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the use of NIV in patients with COPD and chronic stable hypercapnic respiratory failure.
  51. [51]
    Respiratory Management of Patients With Neuromuscular Weakness
    Mar 13, 2023 · An individualized approach to NIV settings may benefit patients with chronic respiratory failure and sleep-disordered breathing related to NMD.
  52. [52]
    Guidelines for diagnosis and management of congenital central ...
    Sep 21, 2020 · Central hypoventilation may be secondary to use of drugs or to central nervous system diseases such as cerebrovascular accidents, trauma, ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Long-term non-invasive ventilation in patients with chronic ...
    May 7, 2021 · RESULTS: There is supportive evidence for the use of long-term NIV to improve survival in patients with stable COPD with significant chronic ...
  54. [54]
    Why Home Noninvasive Ventilation Should Begin in the Hospital ...
    Jan 25, 2024 · The 1-year mortality rate decreased from 33% to 10% with home NIV. Murphy and colleagues also demonstrated that home NIV in patients with ...Missing: extension | Show results with:extension
  55. [55]
    Fact Sheet: New Coverage Guidelines for Noninvasive Ventilation in ...
    Aug 20, 2025 · On June 10, 2025, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services finalized a new national coverage document that establishes Medicare coverage ...Missing: expansions | Show results with:expansions
  56. [56]
    Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Stable Hypercapnic ...
    Aug 15, 2020 · Patients receiving NIV had a decrease in hospitalizations (MD, 1.26 fewer; 95% CI,. 2.59 fewer to 0.08 more hospitalizations; low certainty), ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Optimal NIV Medicare Access Promotion: Patients With COPD
    most important factor associated with a poor outcome was low adherence (NIV use < 4 h per day).21 For this reason, we recommend adaptation of adherence criteria.<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) in the Home for ...
    Long-term NIV should be used in chronic stable hypercapnic patients (PaCO2 > 7 kPa [52.5 mm Hg]) with severe COPD. Long-term NIV should be implemented after an ...
  59. [59]
    Initiation of Home Noninvasive Ventilation in Hypercapnic Chronic ...
    They recommend NIV initiation 2–4 weeks after discharge and resolution of the acute respiratory failure. This recommendation is driven mainly based on findings ...
  60. [60]
    Effect of Home Noninvasive Ventilation With Oxygen Therapy vs ...
    Adding home noninvasive ventilation to home oxygen therapy prolonged the time to readmission or death within 12 months.Missing: survival | Show results with:survival
  61. [61]
    Noninvasive Ventilation Procedures - Medscape Reference
    Sep 23, 2024 · Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) can be defined as a ventilation modality that supports breathing by delivering mechanically assisted breaths ...Background · Indications · Contraindications
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
    Noninvasive ventilation in adults with acute respiratory failure
    Apr 28, 2025 · Hypoxemic nonhypercapnic respiratory failure ... Data that support NIV use in adult patients with acute respiratory failure are discussed here.
  64. [64]
    Adverse Events in Non-invasive Ventilation Approaches - NIH
    Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) plays a critical role in the management of acute and chronic respiratory failure, offering benefits over invasive mechanical ...
  65. [65]
    Incidence and Risk Factors of Noninvasive Ventilation Device ... - NIH
    May 15, 2025 · The incidence of NIVDRPIs was high, as 15.4% and patients with low albumin levels and long duration on noninvasive ventilator were more likely to develop ...
  66. [66]
    Mask‐related pressure injury prevention associated with non ...
    Jun 2, 2024 · The results of our study show the effectiveness of preventive methods in reducing the incidence of pressure injuries caused by masks. Given the ...
  67. [67]
    Predictors of Non-invasive Ventilation Failure and Associated ... - NIH
    Dec 12, 2023 · This study aimed to identify the predictors and associated factors of NIV failure in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients admitted to an intensive care ...
  68. [68]
    Equipment needs for noninvasive mechanical ventilation
    This article deals with the equipment needs for NIV; in particular the major ventilator types and modes, monitoring, different interfaces and supplies.<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Clinical review of non-invasive ventilation - PMC - PubMed Central
    Nov 7, 2024 · Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the mainstay to treat patients who need augmentation of ventilation for acute and chronic forms of respiratory failure.
  70. [70]
    Practical Guide to Management of Long-Term Noninvasive ...
    These machines support pressure targeted bi-level ventilation, typically delivered through the same single-limb circuit that is used for CPAP therapy.
  71. [71]
    Indications and practical approach to non-invasive ventilation in ...
    Non-invasive ventilation (NIV), the application of positive intrathoracic pressure through an interface, has shown to be useful in the treatment of moderate to ...
  72. [72]
    A comprehensive guide to noninvasive ventilation (NIV)
    Noninvasive positive‑pressure ventilation involves the delivery of oxygen into the lungs via positive pressure without the need for endotracheal intubation. It ...
  73. [73]
    Non Invasive Ventilation - Physiopedia
    Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the delivery of oxygen (ventilation support) via a face mask and therefore eliminating the need of an endotracheal airway.Introduction · Non-Invasive Positive-Pressure · Negative-Pressure Ventilation...
  74. [74]
    Applying Noninvasive Ventilation in Treatment of Acute ... - NIH
    Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses conclude that NIV in AECOPD reduces length of hospital stay, intubation, and mortality,2, 3, 4, 5 ...
  75. [75]
    Noninvasive Ventilation Procedures Technique - Medscape Reference
    Sep 23, 2024 · NIV helps avoid associated adverse side effects of invasive ventilation (eg, ventilator-associated pneumonia, excessive sedation, barotrauma, ...
  76. [76]
  77. [77]
    ISCCM Guidelines for the Use of Non-invasive Ventilation in Acute ...
    NIV can be used for patients with ARF due to COPD cardiogenic pulmonary, post-operative ARF, palliation in the setting of advanced cancer or other terminal ...
  78. [78]
    History of Mechanical Ventilation. From Vesalius to ... - ATS Journals
    Mar 2, 2015 · The origins of modern mechanical ventilation can be traced back about five centuries to the seminal work of Andreas Vesalius.Introduction · Evolution of Mechanical V. · Lung-Protective Ventilato. · The Future
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Non-invasive Ventilation – A century of experience Frank van ...
    The major evolution of NIV took place in the period ranging from the late 1980's and early 1990's to the present day in the fields of both chronic and acute ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] Respironics, Inc. Fact Sheet - News & Insights Global
    Dec 20, 2007 · 1985 and the first bi-level continuous positive airway pressure (BiPAP®) unit in 1989. • Received the U.S. patent for bi-level technology in ...
  81. [81]
    Various Aspects of Non-Invasive Ventilation in COVID-19 Patients
    Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is primarily used to treat acute respiratory failure. However, it has broad applications to manage a range of other diseases ...
  82. [82]
    NIV | British Thoracic Society | Better lung health for all
    BTS/ICS Guideline for the Ventilatory Management of Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure in Adults · Links.
  83. [83]
    Long-Term Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Stable Hypercapnic ...
    We suggest not initiating long-term NIV during an admission for acute-on-chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, favoring instead reassessment for NIV at 2–4 ...
  84. [84]
    American College of Chest Physicians Leads Landmark Effort to ...
    Sep 16, 2025 · CHEST efforts lead to a CMS proposal that includes substantial changes to federal coverage guidelines for NIV devices used in the home.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation ...
    Recommendations. We recommend bilevel NIV for patients with ARF leading to acute or acute-on-chronic respiratory acidosis (pH ⩽7.35) due to COPD ...
  86. [86]
    High-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation for acute ...
    Jun 17, 2025 · The study concluded that HFNC did not meet non-inferiority criteria compared to NIV and was associated with a higher incidence of treatment ...Missing: hybrid | Show results with:hybrid<|control11|><|separator|>
  87. [87]
    Non-Invasive Ventilation: When, Where, How to Start, and How to Stop
    Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is a cornerstone in the management of acute and chronic respiratory failure, offering critical support without the risks of ...
  88. [88]
    Telemedicine and Mortality Reduction During COVID-19 - NIH
    Proactive at-home telemonitoring correlates with reduced mortality in COVID-19 patients. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted telemedicine's potential as a vital ...
  89. [89]
    current controversies and emerging trends in non-invasive ...
    Oct 5, 2025 · Guidelines support the cautious implementation of NIV for patients with mild ARDS under continuous observation for any signs of deterioration.
  90. [90]
    Noninvasive ventilation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
    Experimental evidence suggests that higher PEEP levels can mitigate lung injury by redistributing pleural pressure more uniformly and reducing the magnitude of ...
  91. [91]
    Comparison of clinical outcomes between high-flow nasal cannula ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · HFNC therapy showed a trend towards a higher treatment failure rate compared to NIV, though the difference was not statistically significant. No ...Missing: hybrid interfaces