Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Occlusion effect

The occlusion effect is a perceptual auditory phenomenon characterized by an increase in the loudness of low-frequency sounds, particularly self-generated ones like one's own voice or chewing, when the external ear canal is blocked or occluded.^[1] This results in a distinctive hollow, booming, or barrel-like quality to the sounds, often experienced by users of hearing aids, earplugs, or in-ear devices.^[2] The effect primarily stems from bone-conducted vibrations—transmitted through the skull and soft tissues—that generate air pressure waves trapped within the occluded ear canal, which then drive the tympanic membrane and inner ear more efficiently.^[3] In a normally open ear canal, low frequencies (below approximately 1 kHz) are attenuated by a natural high-pass filtering mechanism due to acoustic radiation impedance; occlusion eliminates this filter, boosting sound pressure levels at the eardrum by 10–25 dB in the low-frequency range.^[1] The magnitude is greatest with shallow occlusions in the cartilaginous portion of the canal and diminishes with deeper placements reaching the bony section or in cases of middle ear disorders, where sound transmission to the cochlea is impaired.^[2] In audiology and otolaryngology, the occlusion effect holds clinical significance for accurate bone conduction threshold testing, hearing aid fittings, and user comfort, as it can lead to complaints of overly amplified own-voice perception and reduced satisfaction with amplification devices.^[3] Mitigation strategies include incorporating vents (at least 2 mm in diameter) in ear molds to allow low-frequency escape, using canal extension tips for bony contact, or advanced receiver-in-canal designs that minimize canal resonance, often reducing the effect to near-zero levels.^[2] Research continues to refine models of this effect, emphasizing its role in both diagnostic assessments and the design of modern hearing technologies.^[1]

Definition and Characteristics

Definition

The occlusion effect is an auditory phenomenon characterized by the perceived enhancement of low-frequency sounds, particularly those generated by one's own body such as voice or chewing, when the ear canal is partially or fully obstructed by devices like earplugs, hearing aids, or helmets. This blockage creates a sensation of increased intensity, often described as a hollow, boomy, or echoing quality in the affected sounds.^[2]^[4] The effect primarily impacts frequencies below 2 kHz, where bone-conducted sounds—transmitted through the skull rather than air—are amplified due to the sealed environment of the occluded canal. It is most prominent with self-generated noises like speech, swallowing, or mastication, as these involve significant bone conduction components that resonate within the trapped space.^[5]^[6] Initial observations of the occlusion effect date back to the early 19th century in audiology and acoustics studies, first reported by the English physicist Charles Wheatstone in 1827, who observed enhanced bone-conducted sounds with occluded ears.^[7] The term gained prominence in hearing protection and audiological research by the early 20th century, as investigations into earplugs and hearing devices highlighted its implications for user comfort.^[8]^[1]

Perceptual Effects

The occlusion effect manifests perceptually as an altered sensation of one's own voice, often described by users as sounding muffled, bass-heavy, boomy, hollow, or akin to speaking in a barrel. This distortion arises from the amplification of low-frequency components in self-generated sounds, leading to reports of increased loudness and unnatural timbre that can evoke discomfort and self-consciousness during verbal interactions. Additionally, it may reduce the perceived clarity of speech production, prompting individuals to adjust their speaking volume or style unconsciously.^[9] In daily activities, the occlusion effect disrupts natural communication, making conversations feel strained or artificial, especially in noisy environments or prolonged discussions where voice monitoring is essential. This issue is particularly evident in bilateral hearing aid fittings, where the effect is subjectively rated as more intense compared to unilateral configurations, exacerbating the sense of auditory isolation.^[10] Perceptual variations occur across individuals, with the effect being more pronounced in those with normal hearing or mild low-frequency hearing loss, as their intact sensitivity amplifies the trapped bone-conducted sounds compared to those with significant hearing impairment who may perceive less deviation.^[9]

Mechanisms

Physiological Mechanisms

The occlusion effect arises primarily through the bone conduction pathway, where mechanical vibrations generated by sources such as the jaw, skull, or one's own voice are transmitted directly through the bones of the skull to the cochlea, bypassing the outer and middle ear to stimulate the inner ear's sensorineural structures.^[11] In normal conditions with an open ear canal, a portion of these vibrations radiates as sound energy into the external auditory canal (EAC) and vents outward, reducing the overall intensity perceived at the cochlea.^[12] However, when the ear canal is occluded—such as by an earplug, hearing aid, or earmold—this venting is blocked, trapping the radiated sound energy within the canal and amplifying its transmission to the inner ear via air conduction pathways, resulting in heightened perception of low-frequency bone-conducted sounds, typically by 10-20 dB below 1000 Hz.^[12] This enhancement occurs because the trapped energy reinforces the bone-conducted signal through additional compressional mechanisms involving the EAC walls and mandible vibrations.^[12] The prevailing understanding attributes this to sound pressure waves generated by vibrations of the canal walls and adjacent structures, such as the mandible, which are trapped in the occluded volume and drive the tympanic membrane, reinforcing the cochlear input.^[1] Anatomically, the ear canal functions as a resonator for low-frequency sounds, with its cartilaginous outer third particularly responsive to vibrations from adjacent structures like the mandible, which exhibits resonance around 200 Hz during speech or chewing.^[12] Occlusion alters pressure dynamics in the canal, leading to increased sound pressure that drives the tympanic membrane and ossicular chain (malleus, incus, and stapes) more vigorously, thereby enhancing the inertial and compressional forces on the cochlear fluids and basilar membrane.^[11] The ossicles play a key role in this process by converting the elevated canal pressure into mechanical motion that couples with bone-conducted vibrations, contributing to the overall threshold shift observed in occluded conditions.^[12] These anatomical interactions explain the effect's prominence at low frequencies, where long wavelengths lead to uniform pressure buildup in the closed canal volume from trapped vibrations.^[13] Two historical theories have sought to explain the physiological basis of the occlusion effect, though both have faced challenges. The outflow theory, proposed by Ernst Mach in the mid-19th century, posits that internal physiological sounds generated near the cochlea propagate outward through the open ear canal, and occlusion prevents this outflow, causing a buildup of pressure that intensifies perception at the inner ear.^[14] This theory was later invalidated by experiments showing the effect diminishes with deeper occlusions, suggesting it does not fully account for the trapped radiation mechanism.^[14] The masking theory, advanced by Georg von Békésy in the 1930s, argues that ambient environmental noise normally masks the faint bone-conducted vibrations radiating into the ear canal from its vibrating walls; occlusion reduces external noise ingress, thereby unmasking these internal sounds and making them more audible.^[14] However, this was refuted in 1960 by Egbert Huizing's anechoic chamber tests, which demonstrated the occlusion effect persists even in complete silence, highlighting the dominance of canal-trapped energy over masking alone.^[14]

Acoustic Principles

The occlusion effect arises from the acoustic behavior of sound waves within an enclosed space, such as the ear canal when blocked by an object like an earplug or hearing aid component. When occluded, the ear canal functions as a closed acoustic cavity, altering the propagation and reflection of sound waves. This closure prevents sound energy from radiating outward, leading to increased sound pressure levels inside the cavity, particularly for low frequencies where the wavelength exceeds the canal dimensions, resulting in uniform pressure buildup from bone-conducted vibrations.^[13] A key acoustic principle underlying this phenomenon is the pressure amplification in the closed cavity, where the occluded ear canal traps air pressure waves generated by vibrations of the canal walls due to bone conduction. The canal—typically approximately 2.5 cm in length—behaves as a closed volume that enhances pressure from incoming low-frequency vibrations, such as those in the 200–1000 Hz range, by 10–20 dB, as the trapped air reinforces transmission to the eardrum.^[15]^[13] The ear canal's resonances occur at higher frequencies (around 3–7 kHz, depending on the exact boundary conditions), but the occlusion effect is most prominent below 1 kHz due to efficient trapping without radiation loss. The effect is frequency-specific, with amplification diminishing above 2 kHz as shorter wavelengths no longer result in uniform pressure and experience more dissipation or leakage. This transition highlights how the occluded cavity's acoustic impedance shifts, favoring low-frequency retention while higher frequencies experience less enhancement. Bone-conducted vibrations contribute to this pressure rise but are amplified primarily through these acoustic trapping mechanisms.^[13]

Measurement and Assessment

Objective Measurement

Objective measurement of the occlusion effect involves instrumental techniques to quantify the increase in sound pressure levels within the ear canal due to occlusion, providing precise data on its acoustic impact. One primary method is real-ear measurement, which utilizes probe microphones inserted into the ear canal to record sound pressure levels (SPL) under occluded and unoccluded conditions. This approach captures the direct acoustic changes in the ear canal, typically employing a small-diameter tube connected to a sensitive microphone positioned near the tympanic membrane to minimize distortion. The procedure follows standardized protocols outlined in ANSI/ASA S3.46, which specifies methods for measuring real-ear performance characteristics of hearing aids, including occlusion-related gains. Measurements are conducted by presenting bone-conducted or low-frequency stimuli while alternating between open and occluded states, often using earmolds or inserts to simulate occlusion. This technique is particularly effective for assessing the effect across frequencies, revealing pronounced increases at low frequencies due to trapped vibrations.^[16] Another established objective method employs bone oscillator tests to evaluate the occlusion effect through bone conduction pathways. In this procedure, a bone vibrator is applied to the mastoid process behind the ear, delivering pure-tone stimuli to measure hearing thresholds with and without ear canal occlusion. The occlusion is achieved using inserts or earplugs, and thresholds are compared to determine the bone-conduction gain induced by the blockage. This quantifies the enhancement in perceived bone-conducted sound, as the occluded canal prevents energy dissipation, amplifying internal vibrations. Studies indicate that the occlusion effect typically results in a 5-15 dB increase in bone-conduction sensitivity at 500 Hz when using mastoid placement, with variations depending on occlusion type and individual anatomy. The test is standardized in clinical audiometry and helps isolate the contribution of bone-conducted signals to the overall effect.^[17]^[18] Key metrics derived from these measurements include the occlusion effect magnitude, calculated as the difference in SPL between occluded and open conditions: OE = SPL_occluded - SPL_open. This value is plotted as frequency response curves, typically spanning 125 Hz to 4 kHz, to illustrate the effect's spectral profile, which peaks in the low-frequency range before diminishing at higher frequencies. These curves provide quantitative insights into the effect's extent, aiding in the validation of acoustic models and device performance. For instance, real-ear probe measurements often show OE values exceeding 20 dB below 250 Hz, establishing critical context for low-frequency amplification needs. Such metrics ensure reproducible, instrument-based assessments independent of subjective variability. Recent advancements as of 2025 include the development of anatomically realistic acoustical test fixtures (ATF) for more precise quantification of the objective occlusion effect in simulated environments.^[19]^[20]^[21]

Subjective Evaluation

Subjective evaluation of the occlusion effect relies on self-reporting techniques to capture individuals' perceptions of altered own-voice quality, such as increased boominess or reduced naturalness, during audiological assessments.^[22] Common tools include structured questionnaires administered post-fitting, like the Hearing Aid User's Questionnaire (HAUQ), which probes satisfaction with own-voice sound and occlusion-related discomfort on a Likert-style scale.^[23] Additionally, dedicated scales such as the Occlusion Effect Scale rate the intensity of occlusion sensations during vocalization, using categories from 0 (no occlusion) to 4 (complete occlusion), often applied after sustained phonation tasks like producing the vowel /i/.^[24] Visual analog scales (VAS) provide a continuous measure for rating specific attributes, with users marking positions on a 0-10 line to indicate perceived boominess, hollowness, or naturalness of their voice while wearing hearing aids.^[25] These scales are particularly useful in clinical settings for quantifying subtle perceptual differences, as they allow nuanced self-assessment beyond categorical responses. For instance, patients may rate voice quality after comparing occluded and non-occluded conditions, highlighting how occlusion amplifies low-frequency self-generated sounds.^[26] In clinical protocols, subjective evaluation often incorporates speech-based tests where patients read aloud passages and subsequently rate their voice quality on scales assessing clarity, comfort, and realism.^[22] Another approach involves comparing preferred gain settings with and without occlusion; users adjust amplification levels to optimize comfort, revealing higher low-frequency gain reductions needed under occluded conditions to mitigate unnatural voice perception.^[25] These tests emphasize real-time feedback, enabling audiologists to tailor fittings based on individual reports of perceptual discomfort. Factors influencing subjective reports include adaptation over time, where initial occlusion sensations often diminish after 1-2 weeks of consistent hearing aid use as the auditory system acclimates to altered bone-conducted sound transmission.^[27] Bilateral occlusion typically elicits stronger subjective effects than unilateral, with users reporting greater voice unnaturalness due to symmetric low-frequency amplification in both ears.^[22] These variations underscore the importance of repeated evaluations to account for experiential changes in self-reporting accuracy.

Applications and Contexts

In Hearing Aids

The occlusion effect is a common challenge in hearing aid use, particularly affecting users of in-the-canal (ITC) and completely-in-canal (CIC) styles, which seal the ear canal more completely than receiver-in-canal (RIC) or behind-the-ear (BTE) designs with open fittings.^[28] Studies indicate that moderate to severe own-voice problems, a primary manifestation of the occlusion effect, are reported by approximately 18% of both first-time and experienced hearing aid users.^[29] The severity is closely linked to vent size, with smaller vents (under 3 mm) exacerbating the effect by trapping low-frequency bone-conducted sounds, while larger vents reduce it by allowing acoustic venting.^[30] Similarly, shallower insertion depths in the cartilaginous portion of the canal increase the effect compared to deeper placements that better seal against soft tissue vibrations.^[31] This phenomenon significantly impacts user satisfaction and retention, as the amplified, hollow quality of one's own voice can feel unnatural and lead to discomfort during speaking, chewing, or swallowing. Surveys show that dissatisfaction with own-voice quality affects around 30% of hearing aid users, contributing to broader issues like reduced perceived naturalness and pleasantness of speech.^[32] It is especially bothersome for individuals with mild hearing loss, who retain normal low-frequency sensitivity and thus notice the distortion more acutely than those with greater losses.^[9] Consequently, closed-canal fittings, which heighten the occlusion effect, are associated with higher return rates—11.3% compared to 1.8% for open fittings—often due to these perceptual issues.^[32] The occlusion effect has been recognized in hearing aid design since the 1970s, when open earmold fittings emerged as a response to complaints of unnatural own-voice resonance in traditional occluded styles, with early studies highlighting higher dropout rates among users of fully occluded devices.^[33] This issue stems from low-frequency resonance in the occluded ear canal, amplifying bone-conducted sounds by 20-30 dB below 1000 Hz.^[31]

In Other Audio Devices

The occlusion effect manifests prominently in noise-isolating in-ear monitors (IEMs) and earbuds, where the tight seal in the ear canal traps low-frequency bone-conducted sounds, such as one's own voice or chewing noises, creating a hollow, "head in a bucket" sensation.^[34] This perceptual distortion is particularly disruptive during phone calls, music listening, or live performances, impacting musicians who rely on IEMs for stage monitoring and gamers seeking immersive audio without external distractions.^[35] Research shows that the effect is more pronounced with shallower insertions, amplifying bone-conducted speech by 10-20 dB below 1 kHz, though it diminishes with deeper fits.^[5] In protective audio equipment like earplugs and helmets, the occlusion effect arises from similar canal blockage, enhancing internal sounds in noisy environments such as industrial sites or motorsports. For instance, occlusion with in-ear devices can produce a low-frequency boost of up to 20 dB, amplifying bone-conducted vibrations and leading to discomfort and altered situational awareness for users, where earplugs are worn under helmets to attenuate external hazards while inadvertently intensifying self-generated acoustics.^[5] In virtual reality (VR) headsets, the occlusion effect compounds immersion challenges by unnaturally boosting low-frequency cues from head movements or voice, disrupting spatial audio realism.^[36] Emerging bone-conduction technologies in VR aim to bypass canal occlusion, leveraging direct skull vibration for more natural sound externalization without the typical low-end amplification.^[36]

Mitigation and Solutions

Design Strategies

Venting techniques represent a primary engineering strategy to mitigate the occlusion effect by incorporating acoustic vents or tubes into earpieces, which permit low-frequency sounds generated by the user's own voice to escape the ear canal rather than being amplified internally. These vents create a controlled acoustic pathway that balances sound leakage with necessary isolation for amplified audio delivery. Studies have shown that vent diameters in the range of 2 to 4 mm can reduce the occlusion effect by approximately 10 dB at low frequencies (around 250-500 Hz), particularly for in-the-ear and in-the-canal hearing aid shells, without substantially compromising noise isolation or feedback control.^[37] For instance, increasing vent diameter by 1 mm typically yields a 4 dB reduction in objective occlusion measures, allowing designers to optimize based on frequency response requirements.^[9] Open-fit designs further address occlusion by employing receiver-in-canal (RIC) or behind-the-ear (BTE) configurations with non-occluding tips, such as vented domes or skeleton-style earmolds, which maintain partial openness of the ear canal to prevent full sealing. In RIC styles, the receiver is positioned deeper in the canal while the housing sits externally, connected via thin tubing that minimizes blockage and incorporates phase-cancellation ports to counteract internal sound buildup by aligning destructive interference for low-frequency bone-conducted vibrations.^[9] BTE open-fit variants use similar tubing to route sound without enclosing the canal, reducing occlusion by up to 15-20 dB compared to fully occluded styles, while preserving natural sound localization and own-voice quality.^[38] These designs are particularly effective for users with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss, as they prioritize low-frequency venting over complete canal occlusion.^[9] Material and shape innovations enhance these strategies through the use of soft silicone tips that enable partial occlusion, conforming to the ear canal's contours while allowing subtle air escape to dampen resonance amplification. Ultra-soft silicone domes, often with integrated venting, achieve occlusion levels comparable to an open ear, minimizing the boomy sensation by distributing pressure evenly across the canal walls.^[39] Complementary advances involve computational modeling of ear canal geometries using finite element analysis to simulate acoustic propagation and customize tip shapes, predicting occlusion reductions tailored to individual canal variations for up to 5-10 dB improvement in low-frequency response.^[40] Such modeling integrates 3D scans to optimize vent placement and material compliance, ensuring devices balance attenuation of external noise with occlusion mitigation.^[41]

Clinical Approaches

Clinical approaches to managing the occlusion effect emphasize patient-centered strategies employed by audiologists during hearing aid fitting and follow-up care. Fitting protocols typically begin with initial real-ear verification using probe microphone measurements to objectively assess the occlusion effect by comparing the real-ear unaided response (REUR) to the real-ear occluded response (REOR), ensuring the coupling does not excessively amplify low-frequency bone-conducted sounds.^[42] This is followed by subjective scaling, where patients rate their own-voice perception using validated tools like the Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) to identify discomfort levels and guide adjustments.^[43] Trial periods, often lasting 1-2 weeks, incorporate adjustable vents—such as flexible or collection vents—to iteratively reduce occlusion while monitoring patient feedback for optimal balance between own-voice naturalness and external sound amplification.^[23] Adaptation training plays a crucial role in helping patients acclimate to the altered voice perception caused by occlusion. Audiologists provide counseling to explain the temporary nature of the effect, typically resolving within 1-2 weeks as the brain adapts to the new auditory input, thereby reducing reported subjective discomfort.^[23] Additionally, digital signal processing (DSP) features are utilized to equalize voice frequencies by applying targeted low-frequency gain reductions (e.g., 3-5 dB), verified through follow-up real-ear measures, to restore a more natural own-voice quality without compromising overall audibility.^[43] For cases where standard adjustments prove insufficient, advanced interventions include fabricating custom molds that extend into the bony portion of the ear canal to minimize low-frequency trapping, often combined with integrated feedback cancellation to prevent whistling that can exacerbate perceived occlusion.^[43] If anatomical issues, such as narrow ear canals or excessive cerumen impaction, are identified during otoscopy and contribute to persistent occlusion, audiologists refer patients to an otolaryngologist (ENT) for further evaluation and potential medical intervention.^[44] Post-fitting follow-ups, scheduled at 2-4 weeks, involve reassessing occlusion via subjective questionnaires and objective measures, with counseling to reinforce adaptation and address any residual concerns.^[43]

References

[1]
A bone-conduction occlusion effect theory | Acta Acustica
The occlusion effect is commonly experienced by in-ear device wearers as an increased loudness sensation of bone-conducted low frequency sounds.
[2]
Solving the Occlusion Effect | The Hearing Review
The occlusion effect is the sensation of increased loudness (sound pressure level), especially in the low frequencies, a person experiences to self-generated ...
[3]
Occlusion Effect in Response to Stimulation by Soft Tissue ... - NIH
Dec 4, 2020 · ... defined as the enhancement of the threshold to BC resulting from occlusion of the external auditory canal [3]. The OE is thought to derive ...
[4]
Hearing aid occlusion effect: Causes & solutions - Miracle Ear
Feb 6, 2023 · The hearing aid occlusion effect is when self-generated noises like talking, chewing, swallowing or walking sound amplified or hollow to a person wearing ...
[5]
The Effect of Stimulation Position and Ear Canal Occlusion on ... - NIH
Oct 5, 2022 · The occlusion effect was defined as the difference between the hearing threshold with occlusion and the hearing thresholds with an open ear. The ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[6]
Towards a practical methodology for assessment of the objective ...
Jun 21, 2022 · The occlusion effect (OE) occurs when the earcanal becomes occluded by an in-ear device, sometimes leading to discomforts experienced by the users.
[7]
Chapter I: Effect of Occlusion of the External Meatus
Tortual discovered the occlusion effect likewise in 1827, when he noticed that a watch kept against the teeth, is best heard in the ear that is closed off. A ...
[8]
Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review ... - NIH
The subjective occlusion effect can be described as the change in perception of one's own voice when wearing the hearing aid, for example, its “hollowness” or ...
[9]
The occlusion effect in unilateral versus bilateral hearing aids
The subjective occlusion effect was reduced with the more open vent designs in both the unilateral and bilateral conditions.
[10]
"The effects of age, gender, race and ear canal area on normative ...
We observed a wide range of adult ear-canal areas and found that ear-canal area increases with age and male ear-canals tend to be larger than female ear-canals.Missing: occlusion | Show results with:occlusion<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
Bone Conduction Evaluation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Bone conduction refers to the phenomenon in which vibrations are transmitted through the bones of the skull to the cochlea and the associated sensorineural ...
[12]
[PDF] Bone Conduction: Anatomy, Physiology, and Communication - DTIC
Occlusion Effect; Bone Conduction Speech Audiometry using Forehead and Mastoid Placement. Audiology 1977, 16, 522-529. Knudsen, V.O.; Jones, I.H. Bone ...
[13]
[PDF] When Hearing our own Voice is Disturbing: the Occlusion Effect
Sep 28, 2020 · At the time, the occlusion effect could not be precisely quanti ... His theory was therefore invalidated. Masking Theory. In the early ...
[14]
A model of the occlusion effect with bone-conducted stimulation
Aug 7, 2025 · An acoustical model using simplified ear anatomy was designed to predict the ear-canal sound pressure occlusion effect in humans.
[15]
[PDF] Measurement Apparatus and Modelling Techniques of Ear Canal ...
Nov 24, 2008 · The ear canal acts like a quarter-wave resonator and hence am- plifies the resonance frequencies.
[16]
https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/asa/ansiasas3462013
[17]
Insert Phones, Masking, and Occlusion Effect - Ask the Experts 450
Apr 10, 2006 · Having one ear occluded can improve BC thresholds, which will give a false result. Once unmasked bone conduction thresholds have been obtained, ...
[18]
Binaural Hearing Using the ADHEAR Bone Conduction System in ...
Aug 8, 2023 · Introduction: The study aimed to investigate binaural cues in the rehabilitation of unilateral occluded ears with a bone conduction hearing ...
[19]
Probe Microphone Measurements: 20 Years of Progress - PMC - NIH
Probe-mic measures provide precise ear canal SPL information regarding the occlusion effect ... Real-Ear Performance Characteristics of Hearing Aids (ANSI S3.46).
[20]
Real-Ear Measurement: Basic Terminology and Procedures
May 7, 2001 · Formal Definition (ANSI S3.46-197): Difference in decibels between the SPL, as a function of frequency, at a specified measurement point in the ...
[21]
The Occlusion Effect in Unilateral versus Bilateral Hearing Aids
The subjective occlusion effect was significantly higher for bilateral hearing aids with all vent designs with the exception of a non-occluding eartip option.
[22]
Occlusion and Own-Voice Issues: Protocols and Strategies
... Hearing Aid User's Questionnaire (HAUQ). J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 67-79. 6. Dempsey J: The occlusion effect created by custom canal hearing aids. Amer ...
[23]
(PDF) Subjective and objective measures of occlusion for open fit ...
The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of measured and selfrated occlusion effect for 3 open-fit hearing aids. Measured occlusion effect was ...Missing: descriptions | Show results with:descriptions
[24]
Perceived Sound Quality Dimensions Influencing Frequency-Gain ...
Feb 9, 2021 · ... aids: Effects of signal properties, compression settings ... Variability of Preference-Based Adjustments on Hearing Aid Frequency–Gain Response.<|separator|>
[25]
Perception of One's Own Voice After Hearing-Aid Fitting for ... - NIH
Dissatisfaction with the sound of one's own voice is common among hearing-aid users. Little is known regarding how hearing impairment and hearing aids ...
[26]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7887686/
[27]
The Occlusion Effect: Its Impact and Solutions for Hearing Aid Users
Jan 8, 2025 · This blockage traps sound, especially low-frequency noises (200-400 Hz), causing them to echo within the ear. This leads to sounds like the ...
[28]
Effect of Hearing Aids on Phonation and Perceived Voice Qualities
Mar 3, 2025 · The aim of this paper is to compare hearing aid users' perception of their own voice with and without hearing aids and any effect on phonation.
[29]
Occlusion and coupling effects with different earmold designs
Mar 7, 2022 · Ear canal occlusion by a hearing aid leads to an unnatural sound of the own voice due to a level increase of bone-conducted low-frequency ...Subjects And Earmold Designs · Results And Analysis · Earmold Designs Options And...Missing: gender | Show results with:gender
[30]
A Technique for Estimating the Occlusion Effect for Frequencies ...
The level of bone-conducted sound in the auditory meatus is increased at low frequencies by occlusion of the meatus, for example by the earmold of a hearing aid ...
[31]
[PDF] Perceived occlusion and comfort in receiver-in-the-ear hearing aids
The occlusion effect can increase the low frequency sound pressure level by more than 25. dB, compared to a completely open ear canal (Goldstein & Hayes, 1965).Missing: descriptions | Show results with:descriptions
[32]
Open Earmold Hearing Aid Fittings - A Brief History
Jan 26, 2016 · Most earmold laboratories had 'open' or 'non-occluding' earmolds back in the 1970's and 1980's and are common today. Some of these were referred ...
[33]
In-Ear Monitors: Tips of the Trade - Article 902 - AudiologyOnline
Oct 13, 2008 · Although pulling the IEM partially out of the ear canal may alleviate occlusion, it also breaks the seal, destroying bass response and ...
[34]
Insert Earphone Depth and the Occlusion Effect - ASHA Journals
Abstract. Twenty individuals were tested to determine the occlusion effect caused by supraaural earphones and by insert earphones with shallow and deep ...Missing: headphones earbuds paper
[35]
Externalization of Virtual Sound Sources With Bone and Air ... - NIH
Sep 17, 2025 · However, occluding the ear canal can lead to an occlusion effect, which enhances low-frequency sound perception (Stenfelt & Reinfeldt, 2007).
[36]
Probe-Tube Microphone Measures of Vent Effects With In-the-Canal ...
Ear-simulator vent responses have suggested that the greatest low frequency enhancement (approximately 10 dB) occurs for 2 mm diameter vents regardless of the ...
[37]
The Effects of Venting on In-the-Ear, In-the-Canal, and Completely ...
The acoustic effects of 1-, 2-, and 3-mm vents were investigated with in-the-ear, in-the-canal, and completely-in-the-canal hearing aid shells.Missing: mitigation techniques
[38]
The Acoustics of Instant Ear Tips and Their Implications for Hearing ...
Jun 23, 2022 · A common measure to reduce the occlusion effect is to drill a venting hole through the earmold, thereby opening up the ear canal to the ...Missing: mitigation | Show results with:mitigation
[39]
3D finite element modeling of earplug-induced occlusion effect in ...
Jun 10, 2024 · A 3D finite element model of the human ear including a 3-chambered spiral cochlea was employed to simulate the OE caused by foam and aerogel earplugs.Missing: geometries | Show results with:geometries
[40]
Modeling an Ear Canal's Acoustics to Optimize In-Ear Audio Products
Jul 7, 2020 · Known as the occlusion effect, this phenomenon also affects the performance and comfort provided by hearing aids, and in turn, their acceptance ...
[41]
Can Verification Be Used to Tell Whether an Open Fitting is Truly ...
May 15, 2017 · Yes, verification techniques can help determine whether or not a given hearing instrument and its associated coupling occludes the ear or not.
[42]
Guidelines for the Audiologic Management of Adult Hearing ...
This guideline is to provide a set of statements, recommendations, and strategies for best practice in the provision of a comprehensive treatment plan.
[43]
[PDF] Guideline for the Audiologic Management of Adult Hearing Impairment
This document was prepared by the American Academy of Audiology Task Force for. Guidelines for the Audiologic Management of Adult Hearing Impairment.