Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ohio Attorney General

The Attorney General of Ohio serves as the chief law officer of the state, responsible for providing legal representation to state departments, agencies, and commissions, issuing legal opinions upon request, and enforcing state laws through litigation and oversight of specialized divisions. Elected statewide to a four-year term during midterm elections, the position carries a limit of two consecutive terms, with the office tracing its origins to a congressional addressing territorial interests that evolved into Ohio's formal structure upon statehood in 1803. Key responsibilities encompass defending state interests in court, combating corruption, protecting consumers via complaint resolution and advocacy, supporting through lab services and investigations, and safeguarding vulnerable populations such as residents. As of 2025, holds the office, having secured re-election in 2022 with the highest vote total for any Ohio attorney general in history.

Role and Responsibilities

Constitutional and Statutory Authority

The office of the Ohio is established as one of five principal officers under Article III, Section 1 of the Ohio Constitution, which vests power in the , , , of State, and . These officers are elected statewide for four-year terms commencing on the first Monday in January following election on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Article III, Section 5 further specifies that no person may be elected to the office more than twice consecutively. The Constitution does not delineate specific duties for the , instead providing that such powers and responsibilities "shall be prescribed by law," thereby delegating authority to the General Assembly for statutory definition. Statutory authority is primarily outlined in Chapter 109 of the Revised Code, which designates the Attorney General as the chief law officer of the state and its departments. Under Section 109.02(A), the Attorney General represents in all courts, including the and federal tribunals, in civil and criminal cases where the state has an interest; this encompasses appearances before boards, commissions, or federal agencies. Section 109.02(B) mandates representation of the state in the for felony and misdemeanor prosecutions on behalf of the state, excluding instances where a county prosecuting attorney is a party. Additionally, Section 109.02(C) requires the Attorney General to prosecute any person indicted for a upon the Governor's written request. Beyond courtroom representation, Chapter 109 confers investigative and prosecutorial powers in specialized domains. Section 109.12 authorizes the Attorney General to furnish to state officers, boards, commissions, and institutions upon request. Sections such as 109.81 empower action in antitrust matters, including appointment of , while 109.83 enables investigations into organized criminal activity at the direction of the or . The office also oversees enforcement against abuses (Section 109.24), violations (Section 109.84), and fraud (Section 109.85), with authority to witnesses, administer oaths, and compel production of relevant documents. Administrative duties under Chapter 109 include appointing assistants and (Sections 109.03 and 109.07), managing the Bureau of Criminal Identification and Investigation (Sections 109.51–109.57), and administering funds such as the Crime Victims Assistance Program (Section 109.91) and Rape Crisis Trust Fund (Section 109.921). These provisions, enacted and amended over time by the General Assembly, reflect an expansion from core common-law functions of legal representation to broader enforcement and oversight roles, without superseding the constitutional framework of an elected, independent office.

Core Duties and Functions

The Attorney General functions as the chief law officer for the state and all its departments, with primary responsibilities centered on legal representation, enforcement, and advisory roles as delineated in Ohio Revised Code Chapter 109. This position ensures centralized legal authority, prohibiting state officers, boards, or department heads from employing private counsel except in narrowly specified circumstances, such as certain functions or legislative inquiries. In judicial matters, the Attorney General represents the state in all civil and criminal cases before the , maintaining exclusive authority in such proceedings. The office is also obligated to appear on behalf of the state in any court or tribunal upon directive from the or , extending representation to protect state interests in litigation involving agencies, boards, commissions, and institutions. For criminal enforcement, the Attorney General prosecutes individuals indicted for offenses when formally requested in writing by the , focusing on high-level or state-priority cases. Advisory functions include providing written legal opinions to the , other elected state officers, or specified legislative leaders upon request, interpreting statutes, constitutional provisions, and administrative actions to guide executive decision-making. The office further supports state operations by preparing contracts, collecting debts owed to the state, and pursuing civil recovery actions, such as in and antitrust enforcement under statutes like Ohio Revised Code Sections 1345.01–1345.13 and 1331. These duties emphasize proactive legal safeguarding of public funds and compliance, with the Attorney General empowered to initiate investigations and suits to remedy violations affecting state revenue or citizen welfare. Enforcement extends to specialized areas, including oversight of charitable organizations, securities regulation, and environmental compliance, where the office conducts audits, mediates disputes, and litigates to deter and abuse. Overall, these functions prioritize the state's interests, balancing litigation defense with offensive actions to uphold laws without supplanting local prosecutors, whose is preserved except in delegated state-level matters.

Organizational Structure and Divisions

The Ohio Attorney General's Office (AGO) is headed by the elected Attorney General and supported by administrative leadership, including a senior appointed officer who oversees legal, investigatory, and operational functions across the agency. The office employs roughly 1,500 personnel and operates through more than 30 specialized sections and divisions, each tasked with discrete responsibilities such as litigation, agency representation, enforcement actions, and public services. These units are grouped into categories like service divisions for state client representation, legal advisory sections, and investigative bureaus, enabling focused handling of civil, criminal, and regulatory matters under Revised Code Chapter 109. Service divisions primarily provide legal counsel and representation to state entities. The Executive Agencies Section represents departments including Administrative Services, , , and Public Safety, managing litigation and advisory services for over two dozen boards and bureaus. The Constitutional Offices Section advises elected officials, the General Assembly, and , serving 26 clients such as the Controlling Board, , and under authorities like Ohio Revised Code Chapters 127 and 2501. The Health and Human Services Section handles cases for agencies like the Department of Health and , focusing on and enforcement. Enforcement and protection sections address public welfare and compliance. The Section enforces laws against deceptive practices, comprising administrative, education, and outreach subunits to investigate complaints and pursue remedies. The Charitable Law Section regulates nonprofits, ensuring compliance with solicitation and representing related agencies like the Department of Commerce's liquor and gaming divisions. Antitrust and Environmental Enforcement Sections promote fair competition and environmental statutes, while the Section litigates claims under the Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation. Legal advisory and appellate units include the Opinions Section, which issues formal interpretations on public officials' queries per Ohio Revised Code Section 109.12, and the , which manages high-court appeals and complex litigation. The Special Prosecutions Unit assists local prosecutors with resources for complex cases, such as public corruption. Investigative arms feature the Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI), a special division with subunits for , , law enforcement support (OHLEG), special investigations, and technical services, processing criminal records and forensic statewide. Support sections like Constituent Services, Crime Services, and Civil handle public inquiries, victim compensation, and enforcement, respectively. Additional units cover , Taxation, Public Utilities, and Collections Enforcement, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the AG's statutory mandate as chief law officer.

Historical Development

Establishment and Early Years (Pre-1851 to 1900)

The role of an attorney general in Ohio's governance traces back to the territorial period, with the earliest reference appearing in the Congressional Act of June 16, 1795, which addressed legal representation for the Northwest Territory's interests. However, Ohio's first state constitution, adopted in 1802, contained no provision for a dedicated attorney general, leaving such duties ad hoc or handled by other officials. The office was formally established by statute through an act of the Ohio General Assembly in 1846, marking the creation of a centralized position to represent the state's legal interests. Henry Stanbery, affiliated with the Whig Party, was appointed as the inaugural attorney general, serving from 1846 to 1851; his tenure primarily involved organizing the nascent office, including the establishment of a case-tracking system to systematize management of state litigation and advisory functions. The adoption of Ohio's second constitution in elevated the attorney general to an elective executive office, stipulating a two-year term and requiring the holder to provide legal counsel to state officials, represent the state in court, and enforce public laws. George Ellis Pugh succeeded Stanbery as one of the first elected attorneys general, serving from 1852 to 1854 amid the office's transition to partisan electoral politics. Early duties emphasized advisory opinions on constitutional matters, prosecution of state claims, and defense against federal or private suits, reflecting the limited scope of at the time; for example, attorneys general handled disputes and fiscal obligations inherited from territorial settlement. By the latter half of the 19th century, as Ohio industrialized, the office expanded its prosecutorial role, particularly in response to corporate consolidation. Attorneys general such as Christopher Wolcott (1856–1857) and George K. Nash (1880–1883) managed growing caseloads involving public contracts, taxation, and regulatory enforcement. A notable escalation occurred under David K. Watson (1896–1900), who initiated antitrust proceedings against , alleging monopolistic trusts that violated state laws; Watson's successful suit resulted in the dissolution of the trust, establishing precedent for state-level challenges to economic concentrations predating federal interventions. These efforts underscored the office's evolution from administrative organization to active guardian of competitive markets and public welfare, though constrained by biennial elections and reliance on legislative support for resources.

Modern Expansion and Key Reforms (1900–Present)

In the early 20th century, the reorganized the Attorney General's office on March 31, 1904, centralizing legal counsel for state institutions that had previously retained separate attorneys, thereby streamlining operations and enhancing efficiency. This structural reform reflected broader progressive efforts to consolidate state administrative functions amid growing governmental complexity. Subsequently, legislative changes expanded the office's fiscal authority; by the , the Attorney General was designated as the primary collection agency for nearly all state claims, superseding the prior limited role in recovering only delinquent corporation taxes. Mid-century developments further modernized the office. In 1954, a extended the Attorney General's term from two to four years, aligning it with other executive positions and allowing for greater continuity in and policy implementation. Post-World War II growth in state responsibilities, including antitrust enforcement under the Valentine Act of 1898 and emerging regulatory oversight, prompted incremental expansions in staff and divisions, though core duties remained tied to statutory mandates. The 1970s marked a pivotal era for consumer protection reforms. The enactment of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act in 1972 empowered the Attorney General to investigate and prosecute unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable acts in consumer transactions, establishing a dedicated with civil and criminal penalties. The Consumer Protection Section was created in 1971 and significantly expanded through 1983, handling thousands of complaints annually and issuing rules defining per se violations, which shifted the office toward proactive market regulation. In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, the office pursued geographic and functional expansions. Regional offices opened, such as the branch in May 1992 under Attorney General , to improve local access and enforcement coordination. Initiatives like Fisher's Operation Crackdown in the targeted drug trafficking by shuttering hundreds of nuisance properties statewide. Under Richard Cordray (2009–2011), consumer services extended to small businesses and nonprofits, while lab processing times for law enforcement were reduced to bolster public safety efforts. These reforms, grounded in legislative and administrative adaptations, have positioned the office as a multifaceted enforcer amid evolving economic and social challenges.

Attorneys General of Ohio

Current Attorney General

Dave Yost, a Republican, has served as the 51st Attorney General of Ohio since January 14, 2019. He was elected in November 2018, defeating Democrat Steve Dettelbach, and re-elected on November 8, 2022, receiving more votes than any prior candidate for the office in state history. Yost's second term expires on January 10, 2027, after which term limits prevent him from seeking re-election. Prior to his tenure as Attorney General, Yost served as Ohio State Auditor from 2011 to 2018, where he focused on financial oversight and fraud detection. Earlier, he held positions as Delaware County Prosecutor and Delaware County Auditor. Yost earned a bachelor's degree from The Ohio State University and a Juris Doctor from Capital University Law School. Yost's administration emphasizes consumer protection, corruption investigations, environmental defense, and antitrust enforcement to maintain competitive markets. Key efforts include initiatives against opioid addiction via scientific prevention programs, expanded police training funding totaling $15 million in one fiscal year, and collaboration on law enforcement reform following high-profile incidents. In 2023, he initiated a National Association of Attorneys General program to aid reintegrating military veterans with essential services.

Chronological List and Party Affiliations (1846–Present)

TermAttorney GeneralParty
1846–1851Henry StanberyWhig
1851–1852Joseph McCormickDemocrat
1852–1854George E. PughDemocrat
1854–1856George W. McCookDemocrat
1856Francis D. KimballWhig
1856–1861Christopher P. WolcottRepublican
1861–1863James MurrayRepublican
1863–1865Lyman R. CritchfieldDemocrat
1865William P. RichardsonUnionist
1865–1866Chauncey N. OldsRepublican
1866–1868William H. WestRepublican
1868–1872Francis B. PondRepublican
1872–1878John LittleRepublican
1878–1880Isaiah PillarsDemocrat
1880–1883George K. NashRepublican
1883–1884David A. HollingsworthRepublican
1884–1886James LawrenceDemocrat
1886–1888Jacob A. KohlerRepublican
1888–1892David K. WatsonRepublican
1892–1896John K. RichardsRepublican
1896–1900Frank S. MonnettRepublican
1900–1904John M. SheetsRepublican
1904–1908Wade H. EllisRepublican
1908–1911Ulysses G. DenmanRepublican
1911–1915Timothy S. HoganDemocrat
1915–1917Edward C. TurnerRepublican
1917–1919Joseph McGeeDemocrat
1919–1923John G. PriceRepublican
1923–1927C. C. CrabbeRepublican
1927–1929Edward C. TurnerRepublican
1929–1933Gilbert BettmanRepublican
1933–1937John W. BrickerRepublican
1937–1939Herbert S. DuffyDemocrat
1939–1945Thomas J. HerbertRepublican
1945–1949Hugh S. JenkinsRepublican
1949–1951Herbert S. DuffyDemocrat
1951–1957C. William O'NeillRepublican
1957–1959William B. SaxbeRepublican
1959–1963Mark McElroyDemocrat
1963–1969William B. SaxbeRepublican
1969–1971Paul W. BrownRepublican
1971–1983William J. BrownDemocrat
1983–1991Anthony J. Celebrezze Jr.Democrat
1991–1995Lee FisherDemocrat
1995–2003Betty MontgomeryRepublican
2003–2007Jim PetroRepublican
2007–2008Marc DannDemocrat
2008–2009Nancy H. Rogers
2009–2011Richard CordrayDemocrat
2011–2019Mike DeWineRepublican
2019–presentDave YostRepublican
The Ohio Attorney General position was established in 1846, with terms initially varying in length before standardizing to four years starting in 1954. Some attorneys general served multiple non-consecutive terms, and interim appointments occurred due to resignations or other vacancies. Party affiliations reflect the primary political party at the time of service, with early officeholders including members of the and Unionist parties before the dominance of the two major parties.

Notable Figures and Their Contributions

Henry Stanbery, Ohio's first from 1846 to 1851, organized the nascent office by implementing a case-tracking system and standardizing uniform crime report formats, which improved administrative efficiency. In 1848, the granted him authority to negotiate settlements with state debtors, facilitating more effective collection of public funds. Stanbery later served as U.S. Attorney General under President from 1866 to 1868. Christopher Wolcott, who held the office from 1856 to 1861, earned recognition for his legal argument in the 1859 Wellington Fugitive Slave case before the Ohio Supreme Court, where his advocacy against the enforcement of the federal Fugitive Slave Act was commended for its rigor. In 1862, President appointed him assistant secretary of war, where he contributed to mobilization efforts during the . David K. Watson, attorney general from 1888 to 1892, secured a landmark victory in a lawsuit against the Trust, leading to its dissolution in and curbing monopolistic practices in the . In 1893, President appointed him as special counsel to prosecute U.S. claims against Pacific railroads for land grant forfeitures. C. William O'Neill, serving from 1951 to 1957, conducted a major investigation into narcotics trafficking in and drafted a comprehensive narcotics control bill enacted in 1955, strengthening state enforcement against illegal drug distribution. William J. Brown, who served an extended term from 1971 to 1983, established the first Consumer Protection Section within the office, enhancing safeguards for residents against deceptive business practices.

Election Process

Term Limits, Qualifications, and Procedures

The Attorney General of Ohio is elected to a four-year term, commencing on the second Monday of January following the election. The officeholder is limited to two successive terms, after which a minimum of four years must elapse before eligibility for reelection to a successive term; only terms served since January 1, 1995, count toward this limit. This consecutive term restriction applies regardless of whether terms were completed or abbreviated. Candidates for Attorney General must meet the qualifications of an elector as defined in the Ohio Constitution: citizenship, attainment of age 18, state residency for such period as provided by law (generally 30 days prior to the election), and registration as a voter for at least 30 days preceding the election. No statutory or constitutional requirement mandates admission to the bar or prior legal experience, though all individuals elected to the office since its establishment have been licensed attorneys. Elections occur statewide on the first after the first Monday in of even-numbered years, coinciding with gubernatorial contests. primaries, held in of the election year, nominate major-party candidates; to participate, a candidate files a declaration of candidacy and a party nominating bearing at least 1,000 signatures from qualified electors registered with that party, submitted to the by noon on the 90th day before the primary (typically early February). candidates file a nominating with 5,000 signatures from qualified electors by noon on the 75th day before the general (mid-August), without a primary. The general winner is determined by plurality vote, with no runoff provision; results are certified by the approximately three weeks after the . Vacancies arising more than one year before term end trigger a special ; otherwise, the appoints a successor to serve the remainder.

Historical Voting Patterns and Partisan Control

The partisan control of the Ohio Attorney General's office has fluctuated in tandem with the 's competitive political landscape, with frequent shifts in the giving way to longer periods of dominance by one party in the 20th and 21st centuries. From , when the position became elective under the with two-year terms, until around 1900, control alternated between Democrats and Republicans roughly every few terms, mirroring 's status as a with divided voter loyalties; for instance, Democrats held it from to 1856 under Joseph McCormick and George E. Pugh, followed by Republican Christopher Wolcott from 1856 to 1861. Republican dominance emerged in the early , spanning from 1915 to 1971 with only isolated Democratic interruptions, such as Timothy S. Hogan's 1911–1915 term amid reforms and Mark McElroy's 1959–1963 service during a brief national Democratic surge. This era reflected GOP strength in Ohio's industrial and rural base, with incumbents often winning re-election by leveraging enforcement of antitrust and tax laws. A notable reversal came in 1970, when Democrat William J. Brown captured the office amid anti-incumbent sentiment tied to War-era discontent, initiating 24 years of continuous Democratic control through 1995 under Brown (1971–1983), Jr. (1983–1991), and (1991–1995), during which the office expanded efforts. The 1994 Republican national wave, driven by the and voter backlash against Democratic governance, propelled Betty D. Montgomery to victory in 1994, restoring GOP control that has persisted since 1995 aside from a 2007–2011 Democratic interval under Marc Dann (elected 2006 but resigned amid scandal) and (elected 2010). Republicans Montgomery, Jim Petro (2003–2007), (2011–2019), and (2019–present) have held the post, benefiting from Ohio's gradual rightward tilt in statewide races, where AG contests often yield wider GOP margins than gubernatorial ones due to the office's emphasis on and litigation against federal overreach.
Election YearWinner (Party)Vote ShareOpponent Vote ShareMargin
1970William J. Brown (D)~52%Paul W. Brown (R) ~48%Narrow D flip
1994Betty D. Montgomery (R)54.6% (D) 43.6%R wave victory
2018 (R)51.8%Steven Dettelbach (D) 46.1%Modest R hold
2022 (R)60.1%Jeffrey A. Crossman (D) 39.9%Strong R hold
Recent voting patterns underscore resilience, with Yost's 2022 re-election exceeding 60% amid high turnout and alignment with cultural issues like litigation, contrasting narrower GOP wins in other row offices and signaling the office's role as a conservative bulwark in a state where urban Democratic strongholds are offset by suburban and rural GOP gains. Term lengths shifted to four years in , reducing turnover and enabling entrenched control, though scandals like Dann's 2008 highlight vulnerabilities.

Recent and Upcoming Elections

In the 2018 election for Ohio Attorney General, held on November 6, Republican defeated Democrat . Yost received 2,272,440 votes (52.16%), while Dettelbach garnered 2,084,593 votes (47.84%). This victory marked Yost's transition from to , amid a midterm cycle where Republicans maintained control of the office despite national Democratic gains.
CandidatePartyVotesPercentage
Dave Yost2,272,44052.16%
Steve Dettelbach2,084,59347.84%
Yost secured re-election on November 8, , defeating Jeff Crossman by a wider margin. Yost obtained 2,484,753 votes (60.13%), compared to Crossman's 1,647,644 votes (39.87%), setting a state record for the most votes received by any candidate. The result reflected Ohio's rightward shift in statewide races that year, with Republicans sweeping major executive offices.
CandidatePartyVotesPercentage
Dave Yost2,484,75360.13%
Jeff Crossman1,647,64439.87%
The 2026 election, scheduled for November 3 with primaries on May 5, will feature an open seat due to term limits prohibiting Yost's third consecutive run. As of October 2025, no major candidates have formally announced, though the party holds a structural advantage in Ohio's midterm elections for the office. On the Democratic side, former state Representative Elliot Forhan declared his candidacy on February 27, 2025, emphasizing and antitrust enforcement, followed by attorney John Kulewicz on September 11, 2025. The race remains early-stage, with potential contenders influenced by Yost's pivot to a gubernatorial bid before withdrawing in 2025.

Consumer Protection and Economic Enforcement

The Ohio Attorney General's office enforces over 25 state consumer protection laws, including the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (OCSPA), which prohibits suppliers from committing unfair or deceptive acts in consumer transactions, such as misrepresentations or unconscionable practices. The Section investigates complaints from tens of thousands of Ohio residents annually, mediating disputes and pursuing civil actions against violators, with remedies including cease-and-desist orders, restitution to consumers, civil penalties up to $25,000 per violation, and injunctions. Through multi-state collaborations and federal partnerships, the section has secured landmark settlements yielding millions in penalties and consumer relief. Enforcement actions often target scams, defective products, and deceptive marketing. In 2023, the office sued appliance suppliers for consumer fraud involving undelivered or misrepresented goods, building on a 2019 case that barred a repeat offender from the industry. Under Attorney General Dave Yost, the office established a Robocall Enforcement Unit in 2020 to combat illegal telemarketing, prioritizing do-not-call violations and pursuing fines against persistent offenders. Recent lawsuits include three July 2025 filings against businesses for failure-to-deliver schemes, a September 2025 action against a Cincinnati firm for deceptive practices, and participation in a 33-state $1 million settlement in October 2025 with an online clothing retailer over misleading advertising. In economic enforcement, the Antitrust Section applies Ohio's Valentine Act—mirroring federal Sherman and Clayton Acts—to prevent monopolization, price-fixing, and anticompetitive mergers, conducting investigations into bid-rigging, market allocation, and predatory pricing. The office offers a Business Review Program, issuing advisory letters on proposed conduct's antitrust compliance since the 1980s, and has joined national efforts against tech platform abuses and healthcare consolidations. However, in September 2024, Yost led a coalition of 12 Republican attorneys general in a brief challenging the Federal Trade Commission's authority to block the Kroger-Albertsons merger, arguing it exceeded statutory limits and that state-level review suffices for competition concerns. This stance reflects a view prioritizing procedural limits on federal overreach over expansive intervention, contrasting with more aggressive antitrust postures in other states.

Public Safety and Corruption Prosecutions

The Attorney General's office plays a key role in public safety by supporting local prosecutors through the Special Prosecutions Section, which handles complex cases involving multiple jurisdictions, such as homicides, child sex offenses, and . This includes providing resources for investigations into , where the office leads the Human Trafficking Commission and Initiative, resulting in legislative efforts to enhance victim support and enforcement. Under , initiatives have expanded to include school threat assessment training programs that integrate , educators, and experts to identify and mitigate risks. In addressing and broader criminal trends, collaborates with state leaders on technology-sharing programs to aid local agencies in solving firearm-related crimes, announced in a 2022 joint effort with Governor . Additional support comes via grants, such as $279,750 allocated in October 2025 for free advanced training in traffic safety, impaired driving detection, and crash investigations through the Ohio Peace Officer Training Academy. The Bureau of Criminal Investigation further bolsters public safety by maintaining databases for unsolved homicides, missing persons, and unidentified remains, while offering investigative assistance in officer-involved critical incidents. On corruption, the Attorney General's office prioritizes high-level public integrity cases, including and schemes that span counties. A prominent example is the prosecution stemming from the 2019 House Bill 6 nuclear bailout scandal, the largest case in history, where Yost's office filed state charges against former House Speaker in August 2024 for related to over $60 million in bribes from Corp. The office secured a $20 million settlement with in August 2024, with $19.5 million directed to the state's general revenue fund, following federal convictions of key figures. Historically, Attorney General Gilbert Bettman (1929–1933) personally led a voter probe in , securing convictions that underscored the office's early mandate. These efforts emphasize complex white-collar offenses, with the Section providing expertise in public prosecutions.

Interstate and Federal Challenges

The Ohio Attorney General's office has frequently participated in multi-state coalitions led by attorneys general to address cross-jurisdictional issues, such as violations and antitrust concerns, often resulting in settlements benefiting consumers. For instance, in June 2024, Attorney General joined 42 other states in securing a $700 million settlement with over deceptive talc powder marketing practices, allocating $27.7 million to for victim compensation and abatement programs. Similarly, in October 2023, Yost co-led a multistate action yielding a $49.5 million settlement with for notification failures affecting residents. In antitrust and regulatory matters, the office has challenged federal interpretations through amicus briefs and coalitions. In September 2024, Yost and 11 other attorneys general filed a brief in federal court arguing against the constitutionality of the Federal Trade Commission's administrative complaint process in the Meta-Within merger case, contending it exceeded statutory authority under the Federal Trade Commission Act. Earlier, in December 2023, Yost led a seven-state lawsuit against the NCAA, alleging its transfer eligibility rule violated federal antitrust laws by restricting athlete mobility and suppressing competition in college sports. Federal challenges have targeted executive branch policies perceived as overreaching state authority, particularly in and . In August 2024, Yost joined 15 other Republican-led states in suing the Department of Homeland Security over a "parole-in-place" program granting to approximately 1.3 million undocumented immigrants, arguing it bypassed congressional immigration statutes and strained state resources. In May 2024, Yost filed suit against the Department of Education's revisions to regulations, claiming they improperly expanded the definition of sex discrimination to include , infringing on to define sex-based protections in education and athletics. Additionally, Ohio, under prior administrations, challenged EPA air quality plans in Ohio v. EPA (2024), where the D.C. Circuit partially vacated a waiver reinstatement for emission standards affecting Midwest states' compliance burdens. These actions reflect a pattern of leveraging interstate partnerships to amplify enforcement against national corporations and contest federal policies diverging from state priorities, with outcomes including monetary recoveries exceeding hundreds of millions for Ohio in and settlements since 2023.

Controversies and Criticisms

Partisan Use of the Office

The Ohio Attorney General's office has been criticized for utilization, particularly through participation in multi-state litigation that aligns with the political priorities of the officeholder's party, often targeting federal executive actions from administrations of the opposing party. Such actions, while legally permissible, have raised concerns about prioritizing national battles over Ohio-specific interests, as state attorneys general increasingly coordinate through party-affiliated groups like the Republican Attorneys General Association (). Under Republican Attorney General Dave Yost (2019–present), the office has joined or led numerous lawsuits against Biden administration policies, including a 2022 challenge to federal threats to withhold school nutrition funding from districts not complying with updated Title IX interpretations on gender identity, and a 2025 suit with Alabama, Kansas, and West Virginia to exclude certain non-citizens from census apportionment counts. Yost also co-led a 2023 antitrust suit against the NCAA's transfer eligibility rules alongside attorneys general from Tennessee, Florida, South Carolina, and others, predominantly Republican-led states, and joined 18 other Republican AGs in 2025 to pressure Costco over diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Critics, including Democratic challengers, have argued these efforts reflect political posturing to appeal to Republican bases on issues like immigration and cultural policies, rather than direct threats to Ohio's sovereignty. A notable controversy involved Yost's 2023 prosecution of a Brazilian immigrant with over 30 years of legal U.S. residency for illegally in the ; a County judge dismissed the case and rebuked the AG's office for treating the defendant as a "political prop" to highlight voter fraud narratives amid national partisan debates. Similarly, Democratic members of the Ohio Board accused Yost in 2024 of disregarding minority-party legal rights in proceedings over proposed initiatives, suggesting favoring positions. A 2020 lawsuit by for Media and Democracy further alleged Yost withheld public records on his coordination with and other conservative groups for amicus briefs in election-related cases, such as of v. Boockvar. Democratic attorneys general in , such as Marc Dann (2007–2008) and (2009–2011), faced fewer federal opposition suits due to alignment with the Obama administration, but their tenures drew partisan scrutiny for aggressive consumer enforcement perceived as targeting Republican-aligned industries. Dann prioritized reforms and extended statutes for civil rights claims, actions praised by progressive groups but criticized by business interests as overreach. His resignation in May 2008 followed an investigation into workplace by staff and his own admitted extramarital affair, which opponents framed as emblematic of Democratic mismanagement unfit for the office's impartial prosecutorial role. Cordray, meanwhile, sued 14 major servicers in 2011 over foreclosure abuses during the , securing settlements but drawing Republican accusations of using the office to advance a national Democratic regulatory agenda. These cases illustrate a pattern where partisan control influences enforcement priorities, though outright misuse claims have been more prominent in Republican-led challenges to federal Democratic policies given recent political dynamics.

Specific High-Profile Disputes

One notable dispute involved the Ohio Attorney General's intervention in the State Teachers Retirement System (STRS) board composition amid allegations of fiduciary breaches and potential corruption. In May 2024, Attorney General Dave Yost filed a lawsuit in Franklin County Common Pleas Court seeking to remove board members William Steen, a retired teacher, and Rudy Fichtenbaum, president of the Ohio Conference of AAUP, claiming they violated their duties by supporting the hiring of a third-party firm with undisclosed conflicts of interest, which contributed to controversial private equity investments yielding low returns for retirees. The suit arose from broader scrutiny of STRS decisions, including a shift toward activist investment advisors, with Yost arguing the actions undermined the fund's $95 billion portfolio serving over 600,000 educators. In August 2024, Yost escalated by issuing subpoenas to board members and investment firms, probing claims of bribery and self-dealing in a deal involving a $150 million commitment to a firm linked to board influencers. Critics, including union representatives, contended the removals targeted pro-labor voices, while Yost maintained the actions protected taxpayer-backed pensions from mismanagement. Another high-profile conflict centered on a voter prosecution that drew judicial rebuke for alleged politicization. In May 2025, Franklin County Common Pleas Jaiza criticized Yost's office during sentencing in State v. Silva, where Larissa Silva, a national who had legally resided in the U.S. for over 30 years but was not a citizen, pleaded guilty to unlawfully in the 2020 election after registering via a utility bill. accused prosecutors of leveraging the case as a "political prop" to advance narratives on election integrity, noting the office's press releases highlighted it despite Silva's minor role and lack of intent to defraud, amid Yost's broader push for voter ID enforcement. Yost's team had secured a conviction under Ohio's election laws, but the imposed over time, emphasizing disproportionate emphasis compared to similar cases. This episode fueled debates over the office's , with supporters viewing it as upholding electoral safeguards and detractors as theater in a . Yost's office also faced contention in defending state restrictions on medical interventions for minors identifying as . In response to federal challenges, Yost filed legal arguments in 2024 upholding Ohio's law prohibiting irreversible procedures like blockers and surgeries for those under 18, enacted via House Bill 68 and dubbed the "SAVE Adolescence Act" by proponents. The filings asserted empirical evidence of long-term risks, citing European countries like and the that curtailed such treatments due to insufficient data on benefits versus harms, including and loss. Opponents, including medical associations, argued the ban infringed on parental rights and standard care, leading to ongoing litigation in federal courts where Yost contended the policy aligned with precautionary principles absent randomized controlled trials proving efficacy. A protracted access battle reached the Ohio Supreme Court in January 2025, pitting Yost against the watchdog group (CREW). The dispute originated from CREW's 2021 requests for communications related to Yost's donor lists and campaign activities, which the office partially withheld citing exemptions for deliberative materials and personal privacy under Ohio's . Yost defended the redactions as necessary to prevent of private individuals, while CREW alleged evasion to shield potential influences, with the case highlighting tensions between mandates and executive protections in state agencies. The litigation, spanning multiple lower court rulings, underscored criticisms of the AG's office self-policing compliance, as it both enforces the law and resists disclosure in its own operations.

References

  1. [1]
    Section 109.02 - Ohio Revised Code - Ohio Laws
    The attorney general is the chief law officer for the state and all its departments and shall be provided with adequate office space in Columbus.Missing: responsibilities | Show results with:responsibilities
  2. [2]
    Attorney General of Ohio - Ballotpedia
    The attorney general provides legal representation and advice to all state government departments, agencies and commissions, provides legal opinions at the ...
  3. [3]
    History - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The earliest reference to an Attorney General in Ohio can be found in the Congressional Act of June 16, 1795, which provided for the interests of the ...
  4. [4]
    Service Divisions - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Among other things, the office offers state crime lab assistance, resolves consumer complaints, protects nursing home residents and advocates for Ohioans' civil ...Criminal Justice · Constituent Services · Workers' Compensation · Employment LawMissing: responsibilities | Show results with:responsibilities
  5. [5]
    Legal - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The office's work brings criminals to justice, preserves Ohioans' rights and protects the interests of state government and the citizens it serves. The office ...<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Biography - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Yost's goal is to “do big good” for the people of Ohio by protecting consumers, rooting out corruption, defending the environment, ensuring an open and ...Missing: responsibilities | Show results with:responsibilities
  7. [7]
    Dave Yost - National Association of Attorneys General
    Dave Yost was re-elected as Ohio's 51st attorney general on Nov. 8, 2022, receiving more votes than any other attorney general in the state's history.
  8. [8]
    Article III, Section 1 - Ohio Constitution - Ohio Laws
    Article III, Section 1 | Executive department; key state officers. Ohio Constitution. / ... attorney general, who shall be elected on the first Tuesday after the ...
  9. [9]
    Article III, Section 2 | Term of office of key state officers - Ohio Laws
    The governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, treasurer of state, and attorney general shall hold their offices for four years commencing on the ...
  10. [10]
    Chapter 109 - Ohio Revised Code
    The attorney general is the chief law officer for the state and all its departments and shall be provided with adequate office space in Columbus.
  11. [11]
    Section 109.24 - Ohio Revised Code - Ohio Laws
    The attorney general is empowered to require the production of any books or papers which are relevant to the inquiry. Each such request shall be in writing, and ...
  12. [12]
    Section 109.03 - Ohio Revised Code - Ohio Laws
    The attorney general may appoint a first assistant attorney general, a chief counsel, and assistant attorneys general, each of whom shall be an attorney at law.<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Opinions - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The Attorney General's Office does not prepare opinions for private citizens. ... Pursuant to Ohio Constitution Article II, Section 20, prohibiting in-term ...Opinions Archive · Opinions Requested · Formal Opinions Process
  14. [14]
    Administration - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Jonathan Blanton is the senior appointed officer to Attorney General Dave Yost and is responsible for overseeing the legal and investigatory work of the office.Missing: responsibilities | Show results with:responsibilities
  15. [15]
    About the AGO - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The team works hard to fight crime and help victims heal, to support law enforcement and consumers, to safeguard those in need, and much more. The public- ...History · Service Divisions · Office of the Solicitor General · Executive Agencies
  16. [16]
    FAQ: Power of the Attorney General of Ohio
    Are there term limits? The Attorney General of Ohio is elected every four years during midterm elections. According to the Ohio Constitution, an attorney ...
  17. [17]
    Executive Agencies - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Executive Agencies. The section's clients include Ohio's departments of Administrative Services, Agriculture, Commerce, Development, Public Safety, and numerous ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  18. [18]
    Constitutional Offices - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Ohio Attorney General Home Page · Publications · FAQ · Media · Contact · Foreign ... About the AGO > Service Divisions > Constitutional Offices. Constitutional ...
  19. [19]
    Organization of the office of the Ohio attorney general, consumer ...
    The office of the Ohio attorney general, consumer protection section shall be comprised of administrative, and education and community outreach, ...
  20. [20]
    About the Charitable Law Section
    The Charitable Law Section also represents several administrative agencies or divisions that deal mainly with liquor and gambling: the Department of Commerce, ...
  21. [21]
    Office of the Solicitor General - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Following is a list of the attorneys currently employed ... Ohio Attorney General's Office in the Environmental Enforcement and Criminal Justice sections.<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Special Prosecutions - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The Special Prosecutions Section in the office of Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost seeks to offer prosecutors statewide the support and resources they need.
  23. [23]
    Constituent Services - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Ohio Attorney General Office Logo. Service Divisions. About the AGO > Service Divisions > Constituent Services. Constituent Services. Contact the Help Center to ...
  24. [24]
    1846-1865 - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    George Ellis Pugh was Ohio's first elected attorney general. When the Mexican War broke out in 1846, he left his private law practice in Cincinnati to serve as ...Missing: establishment date 1846-1900
  25. [25]
    Henry Stanbery (1866–1868) - Miller Center
    From 1846 to 1851, Stanbery served as the first attorney general of Ohio, returning to private practice in 1853, this time in Cincinnati. For the next thirteen ...
  26. [26]
    Timeline - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Timeline: Early Years and Statehood: 1787–1850, American Civil War: 1851–1865, Industrialization and Urbanization: 1866–1900, The Age of Progress: 1901–1928.
  27. [27]
    Past Ohio Attorney Generals
    George Ellis Pugh was Ohio's first elected attorney general. When the Mexican War broke out in 1846, he left his private law practice in Cincinnati to serve as ...
  28. [28]
    1880-1892 - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    In 1851, he represented the Democratic Party at the Constitutional Convention. ... He was one of the first to take action against illegally organized and ...Missing: basis | Show results with:basis
  29. [29]
    1911-1927 - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Although he lost bids for Congress in 1896 and attorney general in 1908, he was again nominated for attorney general by the Democratic Party in 1910 and was ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Antitrust - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The Antitrust Section's attorneys work to foster competition in the marketplace by enforcing both state and federal antitrust laws.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] H.B. 681: An Amendment to Ohio's Consumer Sales Practices Act
    Effective Date: August 11, 1978. Sponsor: Brooks (H). Committees: Judiciary Committee (H & S). 68. Consumers still have access to all remedies developed in ...
  32. [32]
    Regional Office History - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Ohio Attorney General Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr. first opened offices in the Youngstown area in 1990. At that time, the office functioned solely as a regional ...Missing: date 1846-1900
  33. [33]
    Historical Preservation - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The award-winning Operation Crackdown program was created by Attorney General Lee Fisher and closed down hundreds of drug houses throughout Ohio.
  34. [34]
    2003-2019 - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Petro's term as Attorney General was highlighted by his various initiatives directed at protecting Ohio's children and elderly populations and providing ...
  35. [35]
    Attorney General Dave Yost - Official Roster of Ohio Officers
    Edition 2023-2024 Official Roster of Federal, State and County Officers. Attorney General Dave Yost. (R). The Seal of the Attorney General of State of Ohio<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Attorney General Dave Yost | The Ohio Channel
    Attorney General Dave Yost - Launching Scientific Initiatives to Prevent Opioid Addiction. Oct 3, 2019. |. 34:57. BuyPlay · Attorney General Dave Yost ...
  37. [37]
    NAAG Announces Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost's Presidential ...
    Apr 19, 2023 · Yost's initiative focuses on enhancing attorneys general efforts to help connect soldiers returning home with timely and relevant services for successful re- ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Dave Yost - Ballotpedia
    The attorney general's office has devoted $15 million for police training this year. We have funded, trained and expanded new technology in drug testing, ...
  39. [39]
    Attorneys General of the State of Ohio: 1846 - present
    The office of Attorney General was established as an elective office by the Constitution of 1851, and the term of office was two years.Missing: date early
  40. [40]
    1951-1983 - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    During his term as Ohio Attorney General, William Saxbe supported capital punishment and argued for longer prison sentences when a gun was used to commit a ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
  41. [41]
    Section 3501.01 - election officials definitions. - Ohio Laws
    As used in the sections of the Revised Code relating to elections and political communications: (A) "General election" means the election held on the first ...
  42. [42]
    Section 109.01 - Ohio Revised Code
    The attorney general shall be elected quadrennially, and shall hold his office for a term of four years. The term of office of the attorney general shall ...
  43. [43]
    2022 Attorney General General Election Results - Ohio
    Attorney General Candidate, Political Party, Popular Vote. Dave Yost, Republican, 2,484,753, 60.13%. Jeffrey A. Crossman, Democratic, 1,647,644, 39.87%.
  44. [44]
    2018 Attorney General General Election Results - Ohio
    2018 Attorney General General Election Results - Ohio * - Data for this Contest was Contributed by on 2018-12-15 ...
  45. [45]
  46. [46]
    Dave Yost bests Jeff Crossman in Ohio Attorney General race
    Nov 9, 2022 · Republican Dave Yost is projected to defeat Democrat Jeff Crossman in his bid for a second term as Ohio attorney general, according to unofficial election ...
  47. [47]
    Who is running for Ohio attorney general in 2026?
    Sep 29, 2025 · Yost cannot run for reelection in 2026 because of term limits. He backed off his plan to run for governor when fellow Republican Vivek Ramaswamy ...
  48. [48]
    Former state lawmaker announces run for Ohio Attorney General
    Feb 27, 2025 · Lawyer and former state Rep. Elliot Forhan became the first Democrat to announce a campaign for Ohio Attorney General in 2026 on Thursday, ...
  49. [49]
    Columbus-area lawyer joins Democratic race for Ohio attorney ...
    Sep 11, 2025 · John Kulewicz, a retired attorney and Upper Arlington City Council member, is the second Democrat who has filed to run for Ohio AG next ...
  50. [50]
    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost launches 2026 bid for governor
    Jan 23, 2025 · Republican Attorney General Dave Yost is running for Ohio governor. The 68-year-old Yost's announcement Thursday comes between the exit from ...
  51. [51]
    Attorney General Dave Yost drops out of Ohio's 2026 race for governor
    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has dropped out of the 2026 race for Ohio governor. Yost announced that he was ...
  52. [52]
    Laws Protecting Consumers - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The Ohio Attorney General has enforcement authority over more than 25 consumer protection laws, which are listed below with a brief overview of key protections ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  53. [53]
    Chapter 1345 - Ohio Revised Code
    (B) The attorney general may: (1) Conduct research, make inquiries, hold public hearings, and publish studies relating to consumer transactions;. (2) Adopt, ...Section 1345.01 · Section 1345.09 | Private... · Section 1345.02 | Unfair or...
  54. [54]
    Consumers - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Tens of thousands of consumers turn to the Ohio Attorney General's Office each year for help resolving consumer issues, tips on scams and deceptive practices.File a Consumer Complaint · Consumer Protection · Laws Protecting ConsumersMissing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  55. [55]
    Ohio Consumer Law Overview - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Inform the public about actions that are unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable. Obtain relief for consumers (such as refunds or changes in contracts). Request ...
  56. [56]
    Consumer Protection - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    The division consists of four attorneys and three investigators who are dedicated solely to criminal investigations. Additionally, the division is able to draw ...Melissa Wright · Who We Are · J. Bartley Cosgrove · Lisa TrelevenMissing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  57. [57]
    Appliance Supply Businesses Targeted in Consumer Fraud Case
    Rating 5.0 (150) Nov 8, 2023 · The Ohio Attorney General filed a lawsuit against one of the owners in 2019, citing similar violations and prohibited the owner from working as ...
  58. [58]
    Consumer Protection: Just Don't Answer Robocalls - Ohio Attorney ...
    May 4, 2020 · The Ohio Attorney General's office has created a Robocall Enforcement Unit to make it harder for illegal robocallers to operate in Ohio.
  59. [59]
    Attorney General Yost opens 3 lawsuits for 'failure to deliver'
    Jul 2, 2025 · Attorney General Dave Yost opened three new lawsuits this week against businesses who allegedly ripped off their consumers.
  60. [60]
    AG Yost today announced a consumer protection lawsuit against a ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · AG Yost today announced a consumer protection lawsuit against a ... Profile photo of Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost. Ohio Attorney ...
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    What We Investigate - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Clayton Act: A federal antitrust statute passed in 1914 as a supplement to the Sherman Act. The Clayton Act is aimed at specific forms of anticompetitive ...
  63. [63]
    Antitrust Business Review Program - Ohio Attorney General
    The office will in certain instances review proposed business plans and state its enforcement intentions under the antitrust laws.
  64. [64]
    Ohio attorney general leads brief that would sap federal antitrust ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · Ohio attorney general leads brief that would sap federal antitrust enforcement. Republican AGs are trying to push through a grocery mega-merger.
  65. [65]
    Amid federal uncertainty, advocates and officials highlight state-level ...
    Jan 17, 2025 · The renewed focus on antitrust enforcement follows a four-decade lull in which conservative economic thinkers argued that allowing corporations ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    HTI Team & Commission - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Attorney General's Human Trafficking Commission, Human Trafficking Initiative, Leaders & contacts, Partners, Legislative initiatives, Human Trafficking ...Missing: safety | Show results with:safety
  67. [67]
    Highlights: Attorney General Dave Yost's Priorities
    Highlights: Attorney General Dave Yost's Priorities · Protecting the Unprotected · Building Trust in Law Enforcement · Taking on the Big Dogs · Going to Bat for ...
  68. [68]
    Governor DeWine, Attorney General Yost Announce Joint Initiative ...
    Mar 31, 2022 · Richard Fambro to announce a joint initiative that will give local law enforcement officers increased access to valuable technology to help them ...Missing: prosecutions | Show results with:prosecutions
  69. [69]
    Ohio grants $280K for free advanced traffic safety, impaired driving ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · Ohio AG Dave Yost announces $279750 grant for free OPOTA training in traffic safety, impaired driving, and crash investigation through ...
  70. [70]
    Law Enforcement - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Open Investigations. BCI seeks tips in ongoing investigations via three databases: Missing Persons, Unsolved Homicides and Unidentified Remains. · Aiding School ...Ohio Law Enforcement Gateway · Ohio Sheriffs · Ohio Chiefs of Police · Chiefs
  71. [71]
    AG Yost announces state charges against former Speaker Larry ...
    Aug 9, 2024 · Ohio Attorney General Home Page · Publications · FAQ · Media · Contact · Foreign ... AG Yost announces state charges against former Speaker Larry Householder. AG ...
  72. [72]
    1929-1949 - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    His service as attorney general won him the Republican nomination for governor in 1936 and he was elected for three consecutive terms. As governor, Bricker took ...
  73. [73]
    Prosecution - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    From pre-indictment investigation, to trial preparation and prosecution, to appellate assistance, the Attorney General's Office is a one-stop resource.Missing: safety | Show results with:safety
  74. [74]
    Yost Secures $27.7 Million for Ohio as Part of Multistate Settlement ...
    Jun 12, 2024 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and 42 other attorneys general secured a $700 million settlement with Johnson & Johnson over allegations related to marketing.
  75. [75]
    AG Yost Announces $49.5 Million Multistate Settlement with ...
    Oct 5, 2023 · The settlement resolves allegations from the attorneys general that Blackbaud violated state consumer protection laws, breach-notification laws ...Missing: lawsuits | Show results with:lawsuits
  76. [76]
    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost leads brief that would sap federal ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · On Monday, Yost and 11 colleagues filed a brief challenging the very constitutionality of the mechanism the FTC used to try to stop the merger.<|control11|><|separator|>
  77. [77]
    AG Yost Leads Multistate Lawsuit Against NCAA Over Anti ...
    Dec 7, 2023 · Led by Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, seven states filed a federal antitrust lawsuit today challenging the NCAA's transfer eligibility rule.
  78. [78]
    AG Yost Challenges Biden Administration's Illegal Attempt at Blanket ...
    Aug 23, 2024 · The lawsuit challenges the department's recent “parole-in-place” program, which seeks to provide blanket amnesty to 1.3 million illegal aliens.Missing: interstate | Show results with:interstate
  79. [79]
    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost sues Department of Education ...
    May 3, 2024 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost sued the US Department of Education this week over recent changes to Title IX, the law that prohibits sex-based discrimination ...
  80. [80]
    Ohio v. EPA, No. 22-1081 (D.C. Cir. 2024) - Justia Law
    The case involves a challenge to a decision by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to reinstate a waiver granted to California under the Clean Air Act.<|separator|>
  81. [81]
    AG Yost Announces $102 Million Settlement with Maker of Opioid ...
    Jun 2, 2023 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and 41 of his counterparts today announced a $102.5 million multistate settlement with the maker of Suboxone – Indivior Inc.
  82. [82]
    AG Yost Secures $49.1 Million Settlement In Price-Fixing Cases ...
    Mar 26, 2025 · Consumers who were charged too much for certain generic drugs may be eligible for compensation from a $49.1 million settlement with two manufacturers.
  83. [83]
    How State AGs Became a Check on the President
    Sep 30, 2021 · Republican attorneys general have already filed more than a dozen joint lawsuits against the Biden administration. All presidents should ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] State Attorneys General, Political Lawsuits, And Their Collective ...
    Mar 28, 2022 · general initiated multistate lawsuits, including whether the new partisan lawsuits are furthering polarization in this country and whether ...
  85. [85]
    Watchdog Group Files Suit Against Ohio AG Dave Yost for ...
    Dec 1, 2020 · Most recently, Yost and other RAGA Attorneys General filed amicus briefs with the U.S. Supreme Court in Republican Party of Pennsylvania v.
  86. [86]
    AG Yost Sues Biden Administration for Threatening to Withhold ...
    Jul 26, 2022 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost is pushing back on the Biden administration's policy updates that compel schools receiving federal nutritional assistance.Missing: partisan | Show results with:partisan
  87. [87]
    Ohio AG joins three other states in lawsuit to keep certain ...
    Jan 22, 2025 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has joined Ohio with three other states in a federal lawsuit seeking to keep certain immigrants from being counted in the US ...Missing: interstate challenges
  88. [88]
    Ohio AG Dave Yost pushing Costco to ditch DEI efforts
    Jan 30, 2025 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost along with 18 other Republican attorneys general sent a letter to Costco this week, calling on them to get rid of their ...
  89. [89]
    Dave Yost faces challenger Jeff Crossman in Ohio attorney general ...
    Oct 10, 2022 · Democrat Jeff Crossman says incumbent Republican Dave Yost uses the office for political fights, rather than to serve all Ohioans.
  90. [90]
    Judge: Ohio AG Dave Yost used immigrant as political prop
    May 19, 2025 · Franklin County judge says the timing of Ohio AG Dave Yost's prosecution ... fraud” in the 2020 presidential election. “Doesn't that just seem a ...Missing: corruption | Show results with:corruption
  91. [91]
    Yost Ignores Democrats' Legal Rights in Ethically ... - Ohio Senate
    Aug 27, 2024 · A letter to Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost detailing his blatant disregard for the legal rights of the minority members of the Ohio Ballot Board.Missing: partisan | Show results with:partisan
  92. [92]
    Watchdog Group Sues Ohio Attorney General For Records ... - WOSU
    Dec 2, 2020 · The Center for Media and Democracy has filed a lawsuit to compel Yost to turn over documents related to work he's done with the Republican ...Missing: federal | Show results with:federal
  93. [93]
    Marc Dann: Destined To Defend | Attorney at Law Magazine
    Apr 25, 2017 · He introduced legislation that became a national model for regulating predatory lenders, led an effort to extend the statute of limitations for ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  94. [94]
    Ten years ago, Ohio had its own attorney general scandal
    May 14, 2018 · Ten years ago today, Democrat Marc Dann stood before a bank of TV cameras and announced he was resigning as Ohio attorney general.
  95. [95]
    Scandal-Plagued Ohio Attorney General Resigns | Law.com
    Ohio's attorney general resigned Wednesday under threat of impeachment because of a sexual harassment investigation in his office and his extramarital affair ...<|separator|>
  96. [96]
    Richard Cordray - Ballotpedia
    The following candidates ran in the general election for Governor of Ohio on November 6, 2018. Candidate. %. Votes. ✓. Image of Richard Michael DeWine.Biography · Political career · Elections · Campaign themes
  97. [97]
    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost files lawsuit to remove members of ...
    May 16, 2024 · Wednesday morning, Yost filed a lawsuit to remove Steen and Rudy Fichtenbaum, saying they have failed their role in protecting the pension fund.
  98. [98]
    Ohio Attorney General Yost defends lawsuit amid teachers' pension ...
    Sep 2, 2024 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost is defending and explaining his lawsuit against individuals accused of attempting to usurp the teachers' pension fund.
  99. [99]
    Ohio AG Yost files subpoenas in teachers pension scandal
    Aug 26, 2024 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has filed a slew of subpoenas against individuals he has accused of bribery as a major scandal brews inside the retired ...
  100. [100]
    Ohio Attorney General Yost defends lawsuit amid teachers' pension ...
    Aug 29, 2024 · Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost is defending and explaining his lawsuit against individuals accused of attempting to usurp the teachers' pension fund.
  101. [101]
    News Releases - Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost
    Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and 32 other attorneys general today announced a $1 million multistate settlement with an online fashion retailer that ...
  102. [102]
    Ohio Supreme Court hears arguments in records dispute
    Jan 8, 2025 · The Ohio Supreme Court heard arguments in a long-running public records dispute involving state Attorney General Dave Yost and a watchdog group.