Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

One-way traffic

One-way traffic, also known as uni-directional traffic, is a transportation regulation used worldwide that restricts vehicles to traveling in a single direction along a designated roadway, typically enforced through official signage, pavement markings, and legal statutes to organize flow and minimize conflicts at intersections. Signage varies by country; for example, in the United States, the standard R6-1 ("ONE WAY") sign indicates the permitted direction, while many European countries use rectangular signs with a white arrow on a blue background.^[1] This system applies to streets, highways, or ramps where bidirectional movement would cause congestion or safety issues. In the United States, such designations are governed by state vehicle codes, requiring operators to adhere strictly to the indicated direction under penalty of law.^[2] The widespread adoption of one-way traffic systems in urban areas began in the early to mid-20th century, evolving from pre-World War II street designs that balanced automobiles, streetcars, and pedestrians toward vehicle-centric networks after the 1956 Federal-Aid Highway Act spurred suburban growth and freeway construction.^[3] By the 1930s through the 1950s, many American cities converted two-way downtown streets to one-way pairs or grids to expedite commuter traffic, aiming to boost capacity amid rising car ownership. This peaked in the 1980s, but led to unintended consequences like downtown economic decline due to disrupted local access, prompting a reevaluation starting in the 1990s and continuing into the 2020s as cities prioritize multi-modal use, with recent conversions to two-way streets in places like Louisville, Indianapolis, and Portland to improve safety and walkability.^[3]^[4] One-way traffic offers benefits such as increased roadway capacity, enhanced safety by reducing certain collisions, and opportunities for added parking, but also drawbacks including longer travel distances for local trips, increased pedestrian-vehicle conflicts, and reduced access to retail areas.^[3]^[5]

Fundamentals

Definition and Purpose

One-way traffic refers to a traffic management system that designates a roadway or path for vehicles or pedestrians to travel in a single direction only, thereby prohibiting movement in the opposite direction. This configuration simplifies the overall flow on the designated route by eliminating bidirectional conflicts.^[6]^[7] The primary purposes of one-way traffic include enhancing traffic efficiency by reducing potential conflicts at intersections, where opposing flows might otherwise cause delays or hazards. It also increases the effective capacity of roadways in densely populated areas by allowing more streamlined progression of vehicles without the need to accommodate counterflow. Additionally, one-way systems minimize collision risks, particularly from head-on encounters or crossing paths, contributing to overall road safety.^[7]^[8]^[9] Direction in one-way traffic is enforced through a combination of physical barriers, such as bollards or medians, signage indicating the permitted flow, and pavement markings that delineate lanes for unidirectional use. For instance, a simple conversion might involve restriping an existing two-way street to allocate all lanes for one direction, supplemented by barriers at key points to prevent unauthorized turns.^[10]^[7]

Advantages and Disadvantages

One-way traffic systems provide notable safety benefits by reducing the number and severity of crashes. By eliminating head-on collisions and minimizing conflicting turning movements at intersections, these systems have been shown to decrease overall accidents by 20 to 30 percent in multiple urban studies.^[11] Additionally, one-way configurations simplify intersections, lowering the potential for vehicle-pedestrian conflicts and enhancing driver predictability.^[12] In terms of operational efficiency, paired one-way streets can significantly boost network throughput. These setups allow for optimized signal timing and the addition of dedicated lanes, potentially increasing capacity by up to double in coordinated urban grids by reducing delays from opposing flows.^[13] This leads to faster average travel times, particularly for longer trips, and simplifies navigation for drivers by creating more intuitive directional patterns.^[14] Emergency services also benefit from streamlined access routes in dense areas, where multiple directional options reduce response times compared to congested two-way networks.^[15] Environmentally, one-way systems contribute to lower emissions through reduced idling and smoother traffic flow. Studies on one-way management at intersections show reductions of up to 20% in emissions such as CO, HC, and NOx.^[16] Despite these gains, one-way traffic introduces several disadvantages, including increased overall travel distances for local trips. Drivers often face circuitous routes and mandatory U-turns, which can add 20-50 percent to mileage and vehicle miles traveled (VMT), elevating fuel consumption and wear.^[3] This recirculation effect also concentrates traffic volumes on collector streets, creating bottlenecks at system endpoints where merging and turning conflicts intensify.^[3] Higher speeds enabled by unidirectional flow pose risks of more severe crashes upon collision, as vehicles travel faster without opposing traffic to moderate pace.^[17] Equity concerns arise as well, with one-way designs disproportionately burdening residents in underserved neighborhoods by forcing longer detours to essential services, thereby exacerbating access disparities.^[18] Comparatively, the advantages of one-way traffic tend to outweigh disadvantages in high-density urban environments, where capacity gains and safety improvements justify the setup amid heavy volumes; in low-density settings, however, extended travel distances and underutilized capacity often render them less effective.^[19] Implementation typically involves relatively low costs primarily for signage, markings, and signal retiming.

Implementation

Signage and Markings

One-way traffic is designated through standardized signs that clearly indicate the permitted direction of travel, typically featuring directional arrows to guide drivers. In the United States, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) specifies the ONE WAY sign (R6-1 or R6-2) as a rectangular sign with a white legend and border on a green background, including an arrow pointing the direction of travel.^[1] These signs are placed at the beginning of the one-way section, at intermediate points such as intersections, and at the end to reinforce the regulation, ensuring visibility for all road users.^[1] Complementary no-entry indicators, such as the DO NOT ENTER sign (R5-1), feature a white horizontal bar on a red circular background and are positioned at prohibited entry points to prevent wrong-way travel.^[1] Road markings provide physical reinforcement of one-way designations on the pavement, enhancing comprehension through visual cues integrated into the roadway surface. Under MUTCD standards, white arrows are used to indicate the mandatory direction in lanes, while chevron patterns—consisting of diagonal white lines—mark channelizing islands or gore areas on one-way streets and ramps to emphasize separation and flow.^[20] Solid white lines delineate the right edge of travel, and solid yellow lines mark the left edge on one-way roadways, promoting consistent directional guidance.^[20] Permanent markings use durable thermoplastic or paint for longevity, whereas temporary versions, applied during construction or events, employ removable tapes or paints to accommodate short-term changes without permanent alteration.^[20] International standards introduce variations in design while maintaining core principles of clarity and symbolism, often harmonized under frameworks like the Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals. The Convention prescribes a rectangular sign with a black arrow on a white background (sign A,23) to denote one-way traffic, applicable to signatory nations across Europe and beyond, with no-entry symbolized by a red circle and horizontal bar.^[21] In the United Kingdom, regulatory one-way signs follow a blue rectangular background with a white arrow, as outlined in the Highway Code, differing from the U.S. green rectangles but similarly placed at street starts, intersections, and ends.^[22] Asian countries exhibit adaptations; for instance, Japan uses a blue sign with a white arrow for one-way traffic, aligning partially with Vienna symbols but incorporating bilingual text for local clarity, while China employs simplified red-prohibited arrows on white backgrounds for no-entry zones.^[23]^[24] To accommodate low-visibility conditions, one-way signage incorporates accessibility features such as retroreflective materials and illumination to ensure readability for drivers with visual impairments. MUTCD requires all regulatory signs, including one-way indicators, to be retroreflective or illuminated to maintain visibility at night or in poor weather, with high-contrast colors aiding those with low vision.^[25] Digital enhancements, like LED-illuminated arrows, are increasingly used in high-traffic areas to provide brighter, dynamic guidance during fog or dusk, improving detection distances without relying solely on passive reflection.^[25] While tactile elements are more common in pedestrian infrastructure, some urban implementations integrate vibrotactile or audible cues near signs for broader accessibility, though visual primacy remains standard for vehicular traffic.^[26]

Enforcement and Regulations

One-way traffic regulations are primarily established at the national and local levels, with the United States relying on state vehicle codes to mandate adherence to designated directions on roadways. For instance, California's Vehicle Code Section 21651(b) explicitly prohibits driving on the wrong side of a divided highway, classifying violations as infractions or misdemeanors depending on circumstances such as injury or recklessness.^[27] In the European Union, while one-way designations fall under member state traffic laws, harmonization efforts through directives like 2015/413 facilitate cross-border enforcement of road safety offenses, including direction violations, by standardizing vehicle registration data exchange for fines and penalties.^[28] Enforcement of one-way rules typically involves a combination of traditional and technological methods to detect and deter violations. Police patrols remain a core approach, with officers monitoring high-risk areas like urban one-way streets and highway ramps for wrong-way entries. Automated systems, such as thermal and video-analytic cameras installed at off-ramps, achieve high detection accuracy—up to 100% for thermal-based systems and 99% for advanced video perception in various conditions—triggering alerts to authorities or overhead signs to prompt driver correction.^[29]^[30] Physical barriers, including bollards and raised median curbs, provide passive enforcement by physically blocking unauthorized access to one-way zones, particularly in urban settings to separate pedestrian areas from traffic flow.^[31] Penalties for violating one-way traffic rules vary by jurisdiction but generally include monetary fines, license points, and potential license suspension for repeat offenses. In the United States, typical fines range from $100 to $500, with California's Vehicle Code imposing a base fine of $238 plus assessments for wrong-side driving infractions, escalating to up to $1,000 and one point on the driving record for misdemeanors involving recklessness.^[27] In Germany, under the Road Traffic Act (StVO), driving in the wrong direction incurs a €200 fine and two points on the license, with escalation to one-month suspension or jail time if it causes an accident.^[32] Repeat violations or those resulting in collisions often lead to heightened penalties, such as mandatory traffic school or vehicle impoundment, to emphasize deterrence. A key challenge in one-way enforcement is wrong-way driving, which contributes to approximately 430 fatalities annually (2010–2018) in the United States on divided highways, often involving impaired drivers entering exit ramps.^[33] To address this, solutions include directional rumble strips at ramp entrances, which vibrate differently to alert wrong-way drivers without affecting correct traffic, and in-vehicle GPS systems that provide real-time warnings via navigation apps or integrated vehicle alerts when a wrong-way maneuver is detected.^[34] These measures have shown effectiveness in reducing incidents by up to 70% in tested locations through enhanced driver feedback.

Applications

Urban Environments

In urban environments, one-way traffic systems are often integrated into grid networks by converting pairs of parallel two-way streets into opposing one-way flows, enhancing overall circulation efficiency in high-density areas. This design approach reduces intersection conflicts and allows for optimized signal timing, potentially increasing street-level capacity by 10-20% compared to two-way operations.^[3] In downtown settings, such conversions can reallocate underutilized lanes from vehicular traffic to transit or cycling infrastructure, streamlining access to commercial districts while maintaining flow. For instance, the National Association of City Transportation Officials highlights how one-way downtown streets facilitate direct freeway connections and minimize turning delays, supporting denser urban land uses.^[35] Prominent case studies illustrate these applications. In New York City, the post-1950s adoption of a one-way grid on Manhattan's avenues and streets, implemented largely by 1952 following a 1949 traffic plan, optimized flow through simplified intersections and directional pairing. This system reduced overall travel delays in the dense grid by improving progression along major corridors.^[36] In Paris, Haussmann's 19th-century radial boulevards created wide avenues that reduced central congestion by distributing flows across interconnected radials, influencing later 20th-century traffic management.^[37] Beijing's ring road network channels through-traffic efficiently with multi-lane separated directions, helping manage urban sprawl and peak-hour bottlenecks in a city of over 20 million residents.^[38] Despite these benefits, one-way systems in dense urban areas present challenges, particularly heightened pedestrian-vehicle conflicts due to increased vehicle speeds and turning volumes at intersections. Studies indicate one-way streets experience higher rates of pedestrian injuries, including among children, compared to two-way streets, as drivers focus less on cross-traffic.^[39] Parking loss is another issue, as conversions often eliminate curbside spaces on one side of paired streets, impacting local businesses and accessibility. Mitigations include implementing timed reversals on select streets to restore two-way access during off-peak periods and adding protected bike lanes to separate non-motorized users, thereby reducing conflict points and enhancing multimodal safety.^[4]^[35] Contemporary urban trends leverage smart city technologies for dynamic one-way adjustments, using sensors to monitor real-time traffic and reverse lanes during peak hours. For example, pilots in Chinese cities employ movable barriers on urban arterials to create reversible one-way flows, adapting to tidal commuting patterns and reducing congestion by up to 20% in tested corridors.^[40] In broader smart city initiatives, IoT-enabled systems integrate density data from congestion clusters to dynamically allocate lane directions, optimizing capacity without permanent infrastructure changes.^[41] These approaches, often piloted in high-density zones, prioritize equity by balancing vehicle throughput with pedestrian and cyclist needs through AI-driven predictions.

Highway and Rural Systems

In highway systems, one-way traffic is integral to divided roadways designed for high-speed, long-distance travel, where opposing directions are separated by physical barriers or medians to eliminate head-on collisions. The United States Interstate Highway System, established under the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, requires freeways with at least four lanes divided into one-way pairs for each direction of travel, with access controlled via ramps and interchanges that direct vehicles unidirectionally to maintain flow efficiency. Service roads, often paralleling main highways, may also operate as one-way pairs to provide local access without disrupting through traffic, as seen in segments of Interstate 95 in Florida where frontage roads facilitate entry and exit while preserving directional integrity. Rural implementations of one-way traffic address sparse traffic volumes and challenging terrain by optimizing single-lane or narrow paths to prevent congestion. One-way bridges, common in rural areas with limited resources for dual structures, use give-way rules or passing pullouts to alternate directions based on approach, such as one-lane bridges in New Zealand's regions. In forested or outback areas, some routes enforce directional travel to manage dust, erosion, and vehicle encounters, reducing accident risks in low-visibility conditions. Safety on these systems prioritizes clear infrastructure due to elevated speeds often exceeding 100 km/h, with merges and exits designed as one-way ramps to minimize weaving and lane changes. To combat wrong-way driving, which accounts for about 1% of fatal crashes on divided highways, signage is placed at exit ramps, supplemented by red reflective markers and rumble strips. The Texas Department of Transportation reports that such measures have reduced wrong-way incidents by up to 30% on instrumented highways.^[42] Economically, one-way configurations on highways accelerate freight logistics by streamlining long-haul routes, enhancing supply chain efficiency in regions like the U.S. Midwest. However, in agricultural rural areas, these systems can complicate farm access, requiring additional turnouts or U-turn facilities that increase maintenance costs for local authorities.

Special Cases

Turning Rules

In one-way traffic systems, standard turning protocols prioritize maintaining the designated flow direction while minimizing conflicts with opposing or crossing traffic. Right turns are generally permitted at intersections unless explicitly prohibited by signage, as they align with the unidirectional flow and typically do not cross oncoming vehicles.^[43] Left turns, however, are often restricted or rerouted through designated loops or alternative paths in dense one-way networks to avoid potential wrong-way entries or delays to through traffic.^[44] A notable exception to standard red-light rules in one-way systems is the left turn on red, permitted in 42 U.S. states when turning from a one-way street onto another one-way street traveling in the turn's direction, provided the driver comes to a complete stop and yields to any pedestrians, cyclists, or vehicles with the right-of-way.^[45] This maneuver mirrors the more common right turn on red, which is allowed in all U.S. states except where signed or locally prohibited otherwise, with some cities like Washington, D.C., implementing broader bans as of 2025, but it requires both streets to be one-way to eliminate oncoming traffic conflicts. As of 2025, pedestrian safety concerns have led several U.S. cities, including Washington, D.C., to ban right turns on red at most intersections.^[46] In contrast, left turns on red are prohibited across Europe, where right turns on red (the equivalent minor turn) are also generally banned unless a specific sign or arrow authorizes it, emphasizing stricter signal compliance to enhance pedestrian safety.^[47] Safety analyses indicate that permitting such turns can improve traffic efficiency by reducing intersection delays, though it elevates pedestrian and cyclist risks due to reduced visibility during yields. Other exceptions include U-turns, which are typically prohibited on one-way streets to prevent wrong-way driving hazards but allowed at designated medians or intersections without restrictive signs, requiring a full stop and yield to all approaching traffic.^[48] In New Jersey, jughandle designs serve as a specialized modification, where vehicles exit to the right onto a ramp before looping back for a left turn or U-turn, eliminating direct left-crossing conflicts at the main intersection. These configurations reduce fatality and injury crashes by 26% per million entering vehicles compared to conventional intersections and boost capacity by 20-40% under saturated conditions.^[49] Global differences in turning rules arise from whether countries use right-hand or left-hand traffic systems, affecting which turns cross oncoming flow. In right-hand traffic nations like the United States, left turns cross traffic, leading to permissive rules like left on red in one-way scenarios, while right turns do not. In left-hand traffic countries such as Japan, right turns cross oncoming vehicles and are strictly regulated, with no turns permitted on red lights unless a green arrow is displayed, prohibiting both left and right maneuvers to prioritize signal obedience and reduce intersection errors.^[50]

Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Traffic

One-way systems for pedestrians are commonly applied in high-density environments such as shopping malls and historic districts to regulate movement, prevent congestion, and enhance overall capacity for crowds. These designations direct foot traffic in a single direction along sidewalks or dedicated paths, allowing for smoother flow during peak times and reducing the risk of collisions in narrow spaces. For instance, in Venice's car-free historic center, the narrow alleys known as calli and pathways bordering the canals effectively operate as one-way routes due to their limited width and high pedestrian volumes, accommodating up to 20 million visitors annually while minimizing bottlenecks.^[51]^[52] In cycling infrastructure, one-way bike lanes form a core component of separated networks, directing cyclists parallel to or independently of motor vehicle flow to minimize interactions and enhance safety. Cities like Amsterdam integrate these lanes into their extensive 500-kilometer bike path system, where physical separation from traffic has been shown to lower injury rates compared to mixed-use conditions. Additionally, contraflow provisions—allowing bicycles to travel opposite to motor vehicle direction on one-way streets—provide essential connectivity without compromising safety; a longitudinal analysis of 508 such streets in London over 22 years revealed no increase in cyclist crash rates post-implementation, with adjusted rates stable at 8.8 per 100 years of exposure.^[53]^[54]^[55] Enforcement of these non-motorized one-way systems primarily relies on design elements rather than strict policing, including visual cues like painted floor arrows and directional signage to guide users, alongside physical barriers such as bollards or fencing to deter counterflow. In pedestrian zones, compliance is further encouraged through integrated markings compliant with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), which specify clear indicators for one-way paths. Where violations occur, such as ignoring directional cues in regulated areas, fines may apply under local traffic ordinances, typically ranging from $50 to $200 depending on the jurisdiction, though pedestrian-specific penalties are less common than those for vehicles. Accessibility is addressed by incorporating features like curb ramps and detectable warning surfaces along the designated route, ensuring compliance with Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) to support users with mobility or vision disabilities.^[56]^[57] The adoption of one-way systems for pedestrians and cyclists yields notable benefits, including heightened safety in shared urban spaces by limiting opposing movements and facilitating predictable flow. In Copenhagen's shared street designs, which often incorporate bidirectional allowances for bikes on otherwise one-way paths, cyclists' perceived safety rose from 53% to 76% between 2006 and 2016, alongside a broader decline in cycling fatalities through traffic calming and separation. These approaches also boost capacity, enabling higher volumes of non-motorized users without increased conflict. However, challenges persist, such as potential disorientation for unfamiliar visitors or those with cognitive impairments, who may struggle with unidirectional navigation, and reduced accessibility in retrofitted historic areas where space constraints limit ramp installations.^[58]^[59]^[60]

Historical Development

Early Origins

The concept of directing traffic flow in a single direction has roots in ancient urban planning, particularly evident in the city of Pompeii, preserved by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 CE. Archaeological evidence reveals a sophisticated street network where many narrow lanes—comprising about 84% of the total—were designed as one-way thoroughfares for carts and pedestrians, limiting two-way traffic to only 16 wider streets to prevent congestion and facilitate efficient movement of goods and people. These restrictions were enforced through physical barriers like raised curbs and step-over blocks at intersections, which controlled vehicle access and prioritized flow during peak market hours.^[61]^[62] In medieval Europe, formal one-way streets were rare, but early flow restrictions emerged in bustling market towns to manage crowds and carts. Regulations often dictated priority based on load—such as requiring empty carts to yield to full ones on shared highways—or customary practices of keeping to the left side of the road to reduce collisions on narrow paths. These rules addressed congestion in commercial hubs without dedicated signage, relying instead on enforcement by local authorities.^[63] The 19th century marked the emergence of explicit one-way systems amid rapid urbanization and the rise of horse-drawn carriages in industrial cities. In London, Albemarle Street in Mayfair became one of the city's earliest designated one-way streets for carriage traffic around the early 1800s, prompted by severe congestion caused by crowds attending scientific lectures at the nearby Royal Institution, where horse carriages blocked access during peak times. Earlier examples existed, such as the 1617 city order designating Pudding Lane and other lanes near the Thames as one-way for carts to ease congestion. This measure in Albemarle eased traffic for omnibuses and private vehicles, reflecting broader efforts to handle the swelling urban horse traffic, which numbered over 300,000 animals by mid-century, exacerbating street chaos in growing metropolises like London.^[64]^[65]^[66] Early one-way implementations faced significant limitations due to the absence of standardization and robust enforcement mechanisms. Without uniform signage or legal codes, drivers often ignored directional rules, leading to confusion and disputes, as local bylaws varied widely and relied on rudimentary policing by watchmen rather than dedicated traffic control. These systems, while innovative for their era, lacked the coordinated infrastructure that would later define modern traffic management.^[67]

Modern Adoption and Changes

The rise of the automobile in the early 20th century prompted the adoption of one-way traffic systems in US cities to accommodate growing volumes of vehicles like the Ford Model T. In Detroit, recognized as an early pioneer, the city experimented with one-way streets as early as 1911 around Belle Isle to improve traffic flow and facilitate commercial deliveries amid rising auto use, with further implementations in the 1920s as urban grids adapted to motorized traffic.^[68] By the 1950s, federal policy accelerated this trend through the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956, which funded the Interstate Highway System designed with divided lanes for one-way flow in each direction to enable high-speed travel and reduce congestion on national routes.^[69] Post-World War II reconstruction and economic growth extended one-way systems globally. In Europe, West Germany repaired and expanded its Autobahn network starting in the 1950s, incorporating divided highways with one-way carriageways to handle surging vehicle ownership and support industrial recovery.^[70] In Asia, rapid urbanization during the 1980s contributed to broader traffic management efforts in cities amid economic booms and population influxes.^[71] The 1960s urban traffic crises, marked by severe congestion in growing metropolises, influenced policy shifts toward more directional controls. Amendments to the Federal-Aid Highway Act, including the 1968 version, emphasized urban planning standards that encouraged one-way arterials to mitigate bottlenecks, prompting studies and implementations in response to rising car dependency. By 2000, one-way streets had become prevalent in downtowns of major US cities, with conversions from two-way systems reaching epidemic levels between 1950 and 1980, often comprising significant portions of central grids to prioritize vehicular throughput.^[72] In recent decades, adaptations have included reversions to two-way streets for enhanced livability and integrations of advanced technology. In the 2010s, San Francisco launched pilots through initiatives like Livable City's Complete Streets program, converting streets such as portions of Haight, Folsom, Howard, and Eddy from one-way to two-way to reduce speeds, improve transit access for over 20,000 daily riders, and foster pedestrian-friendly environments.^[73] Concurrently, AI-driven optimizations have emerged to refine one-way flows, using algorithms for real-time route adjustments and evacuation planning in constrained networks, as demonstrated in models simulating urban one-way orientations to minimize congestion.^[74] This trend toward two-way conversions has continued into the 2020s, with cities like Louisville, Kentucky, and Indianapolis, Indiana, implementing projects to restore two-way traffic on downtown streets to enhance pedestrian safety, reduce speeding, and support local businesses, as part of broader efforts to prioritize multi-modal transportation as of 2025.^[75]^[76]

References

[1]
Chapter 2B - MUTCD 2009 Edition - FHWA
### Summary of One-Way Traffic Signs and Regulations from MUTCD 2009 Edition, Chapter 2B
[2]
TRANSPORTATION CODE CHAPTER 545. OPERATION AND ...
(b) On a roadway that is designated and on which signs are erected for one-way traffic, an operator shall drive only in the direction indicated. (c) An operator ...
[3]
[PDF] Are We Strangling Ourselves on One-Way Networks? - NACTO
One-way streets also offer the opportunity to control their traffic flow at signalized intersection approaches by a single signal phase, freeing up green time ...
[4]
[PDF] One-Way Streets
Traffic Safety Possible decrease in pedestrian crashes. Advantages. • Separates pedestrians and vehicles. • Very effective at reducing pedestrian/vehicle ...
[5]
Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS)
Nov 7, 2014 · One-Way – A one-way is a roadway with traffic moving in one direction, only. Two-Way – A road with two-way traffic during non-rush hours.
[6]
[PDF] One-Way and Two-Way Street Conversions - AustinTexas.gov
Jun 5, 2025 · One-way and two-way street configurations each offer distinct operational and design trade-offs that influence multimodal mobility, safety, ...
[7]
One-Way Streets - Traffic - City of San Antonio
Converting two-way streets to one-way streets can help reduce cut-through traffic when there is a dominant direction in traffic flow.
[8]
One-Way or the Other? Two-Way Traffic Conversion Requires Study
Mar 28, 2023 · Cities have used short segments of one-way traffic for hundreds of years to try to improve traffic flow and move higher volumes of traffic ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[9]
Chapter 2B. Regulatory Signs - MUTCD
At unsignalized intersections, ONE WAY signs shall be placed on the near right and the far left corners of the intersection facing traffic entering or crossing ...
[10]
[PDF] Safety of One-Way Urban Streets - Transportation Research Board
Most of the studies report an accident decrease of 20 to 30 percent (2,4-6). The number of midblock accidents is generally reduced more than the number of ...
[11]
One Way Network - Road Safety Toolkit
A one-way network removes one direction of traffic to reduce crashes, reduce congestion, and create access-only streets, but may increase speed and confuse non ...
[12]
[PDF] ONE-WAY STREETS - Mobility Division
Increase safety by reducing the number and severity of crashes by eliminating head-on crashes and reducing some types of intersection conflicts. One-way ...
[13]
One-way or two-way streets more efficient? It depends on what you ...
Feb 11, 2013 · One-way streets correlate with higher speeds and decreased levels of driver attention. Pedestrians prefer crossing two-way streets since drivers ...<|separator|>
[14]
Smart Growth Streets and Emergency Response | US EPA
Mar 4, 2025 · Increased street connectivity also improves emergency responders' access, offering multiple route options for answering emergency calls.Missing: one- throughput navigation
[15]
How road network transformation may be associated with reduced ...
This evidence shows that well-designed road networks have great potential to reduce carbon emissions and create a more environmentally friendly and sustainable ...Missing: savings | Show results with:savings
[16]
Are One-Way Streets Really That Bad? - Strong Towns
Apr 19, 2017 · ... 10-20% due to the significantly increased number of required turning movements and travel distance to reach and depart destinations. There's ...
[17]
One-Way Streets Have Worse Crashes, Higher Crime and Lower ...
Aug 22, 2025 · One-way streets offer a quick way to get to major roads and freeways, but make it more difficult to access local businesses or make unplanned ...
[18]
[PDF] Evaluating Transportation Equity
Sep 18, 2025 · These tend to increase with travel speeds, and faster travel tends to induce more vehicle travel which also increases external costs. User ...
[19]
Two-Way Street Networks: More Efficient than Previously Thought?
Feb 14, 2018 · Two-way networks are often more efficient than one-way, especially for short trips, and can be more efficient even with lower vehicle capacity. ...
[20]
[PDF] Traffic Management Systems
the United States traffic signals are typically retimed every 3-5 years at a cost of $5,600 per intersection.7,8. Traffic detection technology, like ...
[21]
2009 Edition Chapter 3B. Pavement and Curb Markings - MUTCD
... one-way streets or ramps. The diagonal markings shall be white when used on right-hand shoulders. Guidance: 05 The chevrons and diagonal lines used for ...
[22]
[PDF] Vienna Convention on Road Signs and Signals - UNECE
... traffic was carried on a one-way road or on a road comprising several one-way traffic carriageways, shall be given by the symbol A, 23. (b). The sign bearing ...
[23]
[PDF] The Highway Code: traffic signs - GOV.UK
Signs with blue circles but no red border mostly give positive instruction. One-way traffic. (note: compare circular 'Ahead only' sign). Ahead only.
[24]
Guide To Traffic Signs in Japan
Both of these signs prohibit any kind of vehicle to enter the road or the area. One Way (一方通行) This white arrow in a blue sign means one-way traffic and ...
[25]
Road and Traffic Signs in China - What You Need to Know
See all road signs in China including Warning, Prohibitory, Mandatory, Informational and Priority road signs in China.
[26]
https://www.access-board.gov/ada/guides/chapter-7-signs/
[27]
Chapter 7: Signs - Access Board
Signs covered by the Standards must meet specifications for visual requirements so that they are accessible to people with low vision. Several categories of ...
[28]
Vehicle Code 21651 (b) VC | Driving on the Wrong Side of the Road
A fine of no more than $1,000. 3.2 When is a violation of VC 21651 (b) charged as a felony? In California, a felony is a crime that carries ...<|separator|>
[29]
FAQ: EU Cross Border Enforcement Directive - ETSC
Mar 31, 2015 · Following the ruling a new Directive 2015/413 was adopted in March 2015 with a legal basis under the EU transport policy[3]. EU Member ...Missing: regulations codes
[30]
[PDF] Evaluation of Wrong-Way Driving Detection Technologies
Overall, the detection system accuracy for the thermal camera-based detection system and video-analytic system was 100 percent and 84.6 percent, respectively.
[31]
Righting the wrong-way driving problem
In the U.S., 350 people die in 265 wrong-way driving crashes every year on average. Wrong-way driving crashes are especially lethal, causing 24 more fatalities ...Missing: rumble strips GPS
[32]
https://howtogermany.com/transport/traffic/traffic-violations-and-fines/
[33]
German Traffic Violations and Fines - How To Germany
Jul 13, 2023 · Turning/reversing/driving in wrong direction. 200. 2. 1 month. Parking ... Driving privileges revoked immediately, possibility of jail time and/or ...
[34]
Fatal Wrong-Way Crashes on Divided Highways
Results show that between 2010 and 2018 there were 2,921 fatal wrong-way crashes resulting in 3,885 deaths—an average of 430 deaths per year. Over half of these ...
[35]
[PDF] Field Implementation of Direction Rumble Strips for Deterring Wrong
This report presents the field implementation results of three directional rumble strip (DRS) patterns designed to deter wrong-way (WW) freeway entries.
[36]
Downtown 1-Way Street - NACTO
Many 2-way downtown streets were converted to 1-way operation to streamline traffic operations, reduce conflicts, and create direct access points to newly ...Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
[37]
Traffic Flow - Greatest Grid - Museum of the City of New York
The 1949 plan used one-way streets and simple intersections to optimize traffic flow, estimated to speed cars by 40%. The plan was mostly in effect by 1952.Missing: post- 1950s delay reduction
[38]
The revolution that built the streets of Paris - BBC
Jul 21, 2013 · In other words, Haussmann's avenues and boulevards helped to prevent routes becoming funnelled through the congested city centre, and gave Paris ...
[39]
[PDF] A traffic management system for Beijing
Each major road such as the ring roads consist of a grade separated road with a parallel one way service road on each side and a cycle path next to this.
[40]
The Problems with One-Way Streets - Car Free America
Jan 24, 2025 · Fewer intersection conflicts and more efficient signal timing. In theory, fewer and less severe crashes (e.g. by eliminating head-on crashes).
[41]
One-Way Streets Are the Wrong Way to Tame Downtown Traffic
Sep 4, 2025 · The 1999 TRB report noted that one-way streets require half of the pedestrians to face away from traffic's flow, which is less safe. Retailers ...
[42]
China uses reversible lanes to reduce traffic congestion - Facebook
Aug 6, 2025 · These special lanes are designed to change direction based on traffic flow, typically during rush hours. In the morning, when most vehicles are ...
[43]
Dynamic Lane Reversal Strategy in Intelligent Transportation ... - MDPI
Aug 25, 2023 · In this paper, to cope with tidal traffic, we propose a dynamic lane reversal strategy (DLRS) based on the density of congestion clusters over the total road ...
[44]
(PDF) Dynamic Lane Reversal Strategy in Intelligent Transportation ...
Aug 18, 2023 · In this paper, to cope with tidal traffic, we propose a dynamic lane reversal strategy (DLRS) based on the density of congestion clusters over ...
[45]
Section 6: Navigating the Roads - California DMV
A single solid white line marks traffic lanes going in the same direction. This includes one-way streets. Double Solid White Lines. Double solid white lines ...
[46]
One-Way Streets Explained | Zutobi Drivers Ed
These signs direct traffic flow in a single direction, warning drivers not to make any left turns or U-turns into the one-way at an intersection. Drivers ...
[47]
Safety Impact of Permitting Right-Turn-on-Red: A Report to Congress
The report presents a brief summary of the current status of State implementation of laws permitting right and left turns at red lights.
[48]
Behind the European Wheel: Driving Tips and Road Rules
No Right on Red. Across Europe, it's illegal to turn right on a red light, unless a sign or signal specifically authorizes it (most common in Germany).
[49]
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/07032/
[50]
Traffic Performance of Three Typical Designs of New Jersey ...
Mar 8, 2016 · The jughandle ramp has only one lane. The forward jughandle ramp terminus widens to permit two lanes at its intersection with the crossroad. The ...
[51]
For Motor Vehicles - japan automobile federation (jaf)
In Japan, no car is in principle allowed to turn left when a traffic light is red. You also cannot turn right when the light is red. However, you can move in ...
[52]
Why is Venice a pedestrian city?
Jun 10, 2023 · Modern Venice has more roads and fewer canals than ancient Venice. Venice of yore simply didn't have the full road network need to get around.
[53]
Walking through calli an campi to see Venice like a local
There are about three thousand calli (back alleys): just rely on your instinct or your heart and get lost in this maze of campielli, fondamente and salizade.
[54]
The safety of physically separated cycle tracks compared to marked ...
Aug 7, 2025 · This study sets out to assess whether providing physically separated cycle tracks along distributor roads, as prescribed in Dutch design guidelines and the ...<|separator|>
[55]
Contraflows and cycling safety: Evidence from 22 years of data ...
Contraflow cycling on one-way streets is a low cost intervention that research shows can improve the cycling experience and increase participation.
[56]
Constrained Bike Lanes - NACTO
This is a common condition for contraflow bike lanes along bike boulevards with one-way motor vehicle operations. Where additional right-of-way exists but a ...
[57]
[PDF] CHAPTER 2B. REGULATORY SIGNS, BARRICADES, AND GATES ...
Dec 4, 2023 · If used at unsignalized intersections with one-way streets, ONE WAY signs shall be placed on the ... Pedestrian and Bicyclist Actuation Signs (R10 ...Missing: visual cues
[58]
Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right ...
Aug 8, 2023 · The purpose of these guidelines is to ensure that pedestrian facilities located in the public right-of-way are readily accessible to and usable by pedestrians ...
[59]
How Copenhagen Became a Cycling City - Tools of Change
The city's Bicycle Strategy 2011–2025 included safety as one of its four core areas. Between 2006 and 2016, cyclists' sense of safety increased from 53% to 76%.
[60]
Safe System approach for cyclists in the Netherlands: Towards zero ...
The present study explores the backgrounds of the decline of cycling safety and investigates options to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries among ...
[61]
Exploring perceived walkability in one-way commercial streets - NIH
While one-way roads are often introduced to facilitate smooth traffic flow on narrow roads, providing safe and walkable environments for pedestrians on the one- ...
[62]
Pompeii Had Some Intense Rush Hour Traffic Too - Forbes
Oct 16, 2017 · In the book, Poehler discovers that a key part of the traffic system at Pompeii is the use of one-way streets: “One-lane streets are 84% of the ...
[63]
The Traffic Systems of Pompeii | April 2018 (122.2)
Just 16 streets could accommodate two-way traffic, accounting for more than one-third of the street network (149). These actions in relation to drainage ...
[64]
Unique evidence of medieval traffic rules! - ca. 1230 Germany
Aug 13, 2023 · “The king's highway shall be wide enough that one cart can leave room for another: an empty cart shall make way for a full one, and the one with ...
[65]
Why do the British drive on the left? - Historic UK
This 'rule of the road' was officially sanctioned in 1300 AD when Pope Boniface VIII declared that all pilgrims travelling to Rome should keep to the left.
[66]
Where's London's oldest…one-way street?
May 8, 2017 · Albemarle Street in Mayfair is generally believed to be the first street in London made into a one-way street.Missing: Paris | Show results with:Paris
[67]
London's first one-way street that came about because science ...
Sep 26, 2021 · London's first one-way street that came about because science-obsessed women caused chaos. Humphrey Davy's science demonstrations caused quite ...
[68]
Traffic safety in the 19th century - Woodstock History Center
Feb 21, 2020 · Before 1900, there weren't any traffic laws in regular use ... one-way streets, crosswalks for pedestrians, stop signs and safety islands.
[69]
Hazardous traffic: The early years - The Detroit News
Apr 24, 2015 · In 1911, Detroit claimed to be the first city to successfully experiment with one-way streets, including the route around Belle Isle. ...
[70]
The Greatest Decade 1956-1966: Part 1 Essential to the National ...
Jun 30, 2023 · The two lanes would carry traffic in both directions until an additional two lanes were built on the other side of a wide median to allow ...
[71]
How German Autobahns changed the world | CNN
After the war, most existing Autobahns in West Germany were repaired and put back into use, with an expansion program starting in the 1950s.
[72]
The Urban Restructuring Process in Tokyo in the 1980s
Aug 7, 2025 · In the 1980s Tokyo experienced drastic urban restructuring. Since a transnationalization of Japanese capital made Tokyo an economic centre on both western ...Missing: conversions | Show results with:conversions
[73]
Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968 - Wikipedia
It established three new programs: a National Bridge Inspection Program, funding and fair housing standards for those displaced by federally funded highway ...
[74]
Cities benefit from restoring two-way traffic | CNU
Jul 9, 2019 · Two-way streets prove safer, more walkable, and more supportive of business than one-way streets for Midwestern cities.
[75]
Complete Streets Initiative - Livable City
Apr 9, 2012 · Livable City's strategy for reclaiming the central city includes: street reclaiming; one-way to two-way street conversion, widen sidewalks ...Missing: reversions | Show results with:reversions
[76]
Evolutionary artificial intelligence algorithms for the one-way road ...
The new presented encoding scheme with four algorithms can be used to effectively solve the one-way road orientation planning problem for the evacuation of ...