Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation Atlantic Resolve

Operation Atlantic Resolve is a United States Department of Defense contingency operation initiated in April 2014 to reassure NATO allies and partners while enhancing deterrence against Russian aggression in Europe, prompted by Russia's annexation of Crimea and support for separatists in eastern Ukraine.^[1]^[2] The operation, directed by U.S. Army Europe and Africa under U.S. European Command, deploys rotational armored brigade combat teams from the United States to NATO's eastern flank for nine-month periods, enabling persistent multinational training and exercises to build interoperability, readiness, and collective defense capabilities.^[3]^[4] Key activities include large-scale maneuvers such as Dragoon Ride, which demonstrated the U.S. Army's ability to rapidly move heavy forces across Europe from Estonia to Bulgaria, underscoring logistical sustainment and alliance cohesion.^[5] Funded largely through the European Deterrence Initiative, Operation Atlantic Resolve has prepositioned equipment, constructed infrastructure, and integrated U.S. forces with host nations like Poland, Romania, and the Baltic states, contributing to a forward posture that has adapted to heightened tensions following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.^[2]^[6] While effective in bolstering NATO's eastern defenses through empirical enhancements in troop presence and exercise tempo, the operation has drawn scrutiny over sustainment costs exceeding tens of billions and debates on long-term European burden-sharing, though official assessments affirm its role in causal deterrence amid verified Russian territorial violations.^[7]^[1]

Background and Context

Russian Aggression Triggering the Operation

Russia's annexation of Crimea began with the unannounced deployment of Russian special forces—often referred to as "little green men" due to their lack of insignia—to key sites on the peninsula starting February 27, 2014, shortly after the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych amid the Euromaidan protests.^[8] These forces, numbering in the thousands and supported by Russian naval assets from the Black Sea Fleet, rapidly seized Ukrainian military installations, airports, and government buildings, effectively paralyzing local defenses by early March. On March 16, 2014, a referendum under Russian occupation reported 97% support for accession to Russia, though international observers noted coercion, lack of legitimacy, and exclusion of pro-Ukrainian options; President Vladimir Putin formalized the annexation via treaty on March 18, 2014, incorporating Crimea and Sevastopol into the Russian Federation. ^[9] This seizure directly contravened the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, under which Russia, alongside the United States and United Kingdom, pledged to respect Ukraine's sovereignty and existing borders in return for Ukraine's relinquishment of its Soviet-era nuclear arsenal—the world's third-largest at the time.^[10] The memorandum's assurances, while not legally binding treaties, represented a post-Cold War normative commitment to territorial integrity, which Russia's actions empirically shattered by altering borders through force, prompting immediate Western sanctions and diplomatic isolation of Moscow.^[11] By mid-March 2014, Russia had amassed over 20,000 troops along Ukraine's eastern border, including in Rostov and Belgorod regions, with satellite imagery confirming concentrations of tanks, artillery, and aircraft that heightened fears of broader incursion.^[12] Parallel to Crimea, Russia instigated conflict in Ukraine's Donbas region starting April 2014, when armed groups—backed by Russian operatives, weapons convoys, and volunteers—seized administrative buildings in Donetsk and Luhansk, declaring "people's republics" on April 7 and pressing for autonomy or secession.^[13] Moscow's support included cross-border supply of heavy weaponry, such as T-72 tanks and Buk missile systems (evidenced by the July 17, 2014, downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, killing 298 civilians), alongside personnel rotations that sustained separatist offensives against Ukrainian forces.^[14] These proxy operations, which by late 2014 had caused over 6,000 deaths and displaced a million people, exploited local pro-Russian sentiments but relied on direct Russian orchestration to offset separatist military weaknesses.^[15] Russia's approach integrated hybrid warfare elements, blending conventional incursions with irregular proxies, cyber disruptions (e.g., attacks on Ukrainian grid and banks), and disinformation narratives portraying Kyiv as fascist aggressors to justify intervention and erode Western resolve.^[16] Such tactics allowed deniability while achieving territorial gains, as seen in the undetected insertion of Spetsnaz units and Wagner-linked mercenaries.^[17] Preceding these 2014 events, Russia had escalated military posturing near NATO's eastern borders, including the Zapad-2013 exercises involving 25,000 troops simulating assaults on Baltic states, alongside infrastructure buildups in occupied Abkhazia and South Ossetia post-2008 Georgia war, signaling revanchist intent beyond Ukraine.^[18] These aggressions collectively undermined European security architecture, directly catalyzing U.S. and NATO countermeasures to reassure allies of collective defense commitments against further expansionism.^[19]

NATO's Pre-Existing Posture in Eastern Europe

Prior to the 2014 establishment of Operation Atlantic Resolve, NATO's military posture in Eastern Europe consisted primarily of treaty-based collective defense commitments extended through successive enlargements, coupled with minimal rotational presence to fulfill alliance obligations without permanent basing. The 1999 accession of Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic, followed by the 2004 integration of the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) along with Bulgaria, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia, extended full Article 5 guarantees to these nations, obligating NATO members to treat an armed attack against any as an attack against all, in accordance with the North Atlantic Treaty's core provision ratified in 1949 and reaffirmed upon each enlargement.^[20] These guarantees responded to sovereign requests from Eastern European states seeking protection against potential revanchist pressures from Russia, as evidenced by their explicit pursuit of membership to secure deterrence absent during the post-Soviet era's initial instability.^[21] The 1997 NATO-Russia Founding Act shaped this posture by affirming NATO's right to enlarge while committing the alliance to exercise restraint in deploying "substantial combat forces" on new members' territory in peacetime, a pledge interpreted as precluding large permanent garrisons to foster post-Cold War cooperation with Moscow.^[22] In practice, this resulted in a light footprint: NATO maintained no standing ground combat units in the Baltics or Poland, relying instead on contingency planning, such as the 2010 regional defense plans for Poland and the Baltics under Article 5 scenarios, which emphasized rapid reinforcement over forward-deployed assets.^[23] Infrastructure investments, including airfields and prepositioned supplies in Poland and the Baltics dating back to the early 2000s, supported potential surges but hosted only transient allied personnel during exercises.^[24] A key element of pre-2014 operations was the Baltic Air Policing mission, launched in April 2004 immediately after the Baltic states' accession to monitor and intercept unidentified aircraft in their airspace, given their lack of viable fighter capabilities at the time.^[25] This rotational deployment typically involved four to eight allied fighter aircraft from bases in Lithuania or Estonia, conducted by member states like the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany on four-month rotations, logging thousands of flight hours annually to enforce peacetime airspace sovereignty without escalating to combat footing.^[26] Such measures underscored NATO's emphasis on assurance through demonstrable readiness rather than provocative permanence, aligning with the alliance's defensive doctrine amid documented Russian rhetorical and military posturing—such as large-scale exercises near borders—that Eastern members cited as rationale for integration, though declassified assessments noted Moscow's perceptions of encirclement without concrete pre-2014 invasion threats materializing.^[27] This baseline architecture prioritized collective deterrence via political solidarity and expeditionary capabilities over territorial saturation, setting the stage for adaptive enhancements in response to subsequent geopolitical shifts.

Establishment and Objectives

Initiation and Initial Directives (2014)

Operation Atlantic Resolve was formally launched by the United States European Command in April 2014, shortly after Russia's annexation of Crimea on March 18, 2014, to reassure NATO allies through visible military presence and training rotations in Eastern Europe.^[28]^[29] The initial directive emphasized rapid deployment of U.S. airborne forces to Poland and the Baltic states, enabling joint exercises with host nations to enhance interoperability and demonstrate alliance solidarity amid Russian troop buildups along Ukraine's borders.^[30] On April 23, 2014, the first contingent of approximately 150 paratroopers from Company C, 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team, arrived at Swidwin Air Base in Poland, marking the operation's on-the-ground commencement.^[30] These forces, supported by public affairs teams deployed within 48 hours of activation orders, conducted immediate tactical exercises focused on airborne operations and reassurance activities, extending to Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.^[31] The deployments prioritized agility, with units rotating from U.S. bases in Italy and Germany to avoid permanent stationing while maintaining persistent presence.^[32] NATO coordination advanced at the Wales Summit on September 4–5, 2014, where leaders issued a declaration adopting the Readiness Action Plan to bolster collective defense, including multinational training, prepositioned equipment, and adaptive force posture adjustments in response to the regional security environment.^[33] This framework integrated U.S.-led Operation Atlantic Resolve efforts with alliance-wide measures, such as increased air policing and exercise frequency, without establishing permanent battlegroups at the time. Early phases under the operation involved scaling to several thousand U.S. personnel across rotational units by late 2014, centered on deterrence signaling through visible, expeditionary capabilities rather than large-scale buildup.^[19]

Strategic Goals: Deterrence, Assurance, and Readiness

Operation Atlantic Resolve seeks to deter Russian aggression against NATO territory by demonstrating U.S. military resolve through sustained forward presence and capabilities in Europe.^[34] This deterrence objective is rooted in maintaining credible forces that impose higher costs on potential adversaries, signaling that incursions would provoke a collective NATO response.^[34]^[35] Assurance focuses on reinforcing the commitment of the United States to NATO allies, particularly those on the eastern flank, under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which stipulates collective defense.^[36] Rotational deployments and visible support mechanisms aim to bolster allied confidence in U.S. reliability, countering perceptions of abandonment amid Russian pressure.^[37]^[38] Readiness entails enhancing the operational preparedness of U.S. forces for European contingencies while improving interoperability with NATO partners through structured training frameworks.^[2] This includes sustaining combat-effective units capable of rapid reinforcement and integration, ensuring seamless joint operations.^[39] Over time, these goals have evolved to address hybrid threats, incorporating measures to build resilience against cyber intrusions, disinformation campaigns, and irregular tactics that blend conventional and unconventional warfare.^[6] Such adaptations reflect recognition that Russian strategies extend beyond kinetic aggression, necessitating multifaceted defensive postures.^[6]

Operational Framework

Rotational Deployments and Forward Presence

Operation Atlantic Resolve employs a rotational model for U.S. armored brigade combat teams (ABCTs), deploying units from the United States to Europe on approximately nine-month cycles to maintain a persistent armored capability without permanent stationing.^[40] ^[41] These rotations, initiated in 2014, involve brigades such as the 1st ABCT, 1st Infantry Division, and the 3rd ABCT, 1st Cavalry Division, which arrive via ports like Alexandroupolis, Greece, before dispersing to training and presence sites across Eastern Europe.^[42] The approach ensures continuous forward-deployed forces capable of rapid response, with units replacing predecessors to sustain operational tempo.^[43] A notable demonstration of rotational mobility occurred in 2015 with Operation Dragoon Ride, conducted by the 2nd Cavalry Regiment's 3rd Squadron, involving over 400 soldiers and approximately 120 Stryker vehicles in a 1,100-mile road convoy from Estonia through Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia to Germany.^[44] ^[45] This capstone event for the regiment's Atlantic Resolve rotation tested cross-border logistics, including fuel resupply and coordination with host nations, highlighting the feasibility of large-scale ground movements across Europe to reinforce forward positions.^[46] These rotations underpin NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP), establishing multinational battlegroups in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, and Romania to provide persistent deterrence on the eastern flank.^[47] By July 2017, four battlegroups—each comprising around 1,000 troops from multiple NATO allies—were operational in the Baltic states and Poland, totaling approximately 4,000 personnel, with a similar framework extended to Romania.^[24] ^[48] U.S. rotational forces integrate with these battlegroups, enhancing collective capabilities through shared infrastructure. Logistical sustainment relies on pre-positioned stocks of equipment and materiel in Europe, enabling rapid reinforcement of rotating units via rail and road networks.^[49] These Army Prepositioned Stocks (APS) sites, expanded under Atlantic Resolve, allow incoming brigades to draw armored vehicles and supplies efficiently, reducing deployment timelines and supporting high-mobility operations across host nations.^[50] Multinational coordination facilitates seamless transitions, with exercises validating the movement of heavy equipment over long distances to forward sites.^[51]

Joint Exercises and Training Activities

Joint exercises and training activities under Operation Atlantic Resolve have emphasized multinational participation to enhance tactical proficiency and coordination among U.S., NATO, and partner forces in Eastern Europe. These events simulate rapid reinforcement scenarios, including airborne insertions and extended ground maneuvers, drawing on rotational U.S. units deployed to the region. Annual iterations typically involve troops from over 20 nations, with scales reaching tens of thousands to test logistics, command structures, and combined arms operations across host nations like Poland, the Baltic states, and beyond.^[52] The Saber Strike series, a U.S. Army Europe-led exercise held biennially in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland, exemplifies recurring drills focused on defensive positioning and interoperability. Saber Strike 18, conducted from June 3 to 15, mobilized approximately 18,000 troops from 19 NATO Allies and partners, incorporating live-fire training and maneuvers in the Suwalki Gap to practice rapid alliance response. Earlier, Saber Strike 17 in June 2017 engaged 11,000 service members from 20 countries across multiple training areas, prioritizing foundational partnerships through joint fire support coordination and defensive establishment.^[53]^[54] Polish-led Anakonda exercises have integrated U.S. and NATO elements for large-scale field training, stressing national defense integration with allied contributions. Anakonda 16, launched on June 7, 2016, involved over 31,000 soldiers from 24 countries, including extensive vehicle convoys and multinational command exercises to refine collective defense procedures. These activities featured combined operations simulating territorial defense, with U.S. forces providing key enablers for Polish-hosted scenarios.^[55] Defender-Europe initiatives have incorporated airborne assaults and reinforcement simulations, such as paratrooper drops in Poland to seize objectives. In May 2014, U.S. and Canadian paratroopers executed a combined parachute assault onto Bledowska Drop Zone as part of early Atlantic Resolve training, involving the 173rd Airborne Brigade alongside Polish forces to practice airfield seizures. Complementing these, Operation Dragoon Ride in March-April 2015 conducted an 1,800-kilometer road march by the 2nd Cavalry Regiment's 3rd Squadron, traversing Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic, and Germany with over 150 vehicles to validate cross-border mobility and sustainment under simulated wartime conditions.^[56]^[45] After-action evaluations from these exercises, including joint reviews in Saber Strike iterations, have documented gains in synchronized operations, with participating units reporting streamlined communication protocols and reduced friction in multinational task forces. Such training has recurrently honed capabilities for swift deployment from continental U.S. bases to European theaters, as seen in Defender-Europe's emphasis on transatlantic logistics rehearsals.^[57]

Deployed Assets and Capabilities

Aerial and Air Support Elements

The United States Air Force initiated aerial contributions to Operation Atlantic Resolve in 2014 with the deployment of twelve F-16 Fighting Falcon jets to Poland on March 13 for a training rotation aimed at reassuring NATO allies amid Russian actions in Ukraine. These deployments supported air policing tasks in the Baltic region and Poland, with subsequent rotations involving F-16s operating alongside Polish counterparts from Łask Air Base starting in 2015.^[58] A-10 Thunderbolt II close air support aircraft followed, including twelve A-10Cs arriving at Ämari Air Base in Estonia on September 21, 2015, to conduct patrols and deterrence flights over the Baltic states.^[59] Additional A-10 rotations occurred in Romania from early 2015, with twelve aircraft based there to counter regional threats through forward presence.^[60] F-35A Lightning II stealth fighters joined these efforts later, performing air policing sorties from Šiauliai Air Base in Lithuania as of March 2022, integrating fifth-generation capabilities into NATO's airspace monitoring.^[61] Rotary-wing support under Operation Atlantic Resolve has emphasized training and rapid mobility, with AH-64 Apache attack helicopters deployed to forward sites in Germany. In February 2017, multiple Apaches were transported via airlift and assembled for operational readiness within 24 to 48 hours of arrival, enabling aviation brigade rotations across Europe.^[62] The U.S. Army's 1st Combat Aviation Brigade, including Apache units, conducted its second OAR rotation starting in 2021, focusing on interoperability with host nations.^[63] Strategic airlift via C-17 Globemaster III transports has underpinned these deployments by enabling swift equipment transfers. During the Iron Dragon airlift in Powidz, Poland, on November 8, 2017, C-17s facilitated the loading and movement of eight AH-64 helicopters, marking an initial effort to preposition aviation assets for rotational forces.^[64] Such missions, often in coordination with Polish air forces, have sustained U.S. airlift commitments to NATO partners since 2016.^[65] Aerial operations integrate with NATO's E-3 Sentry AWACS fleet for real-time surveillance, with U.S. contributions enhancing radar coverage over Eastern Europe. NATO AWACS flights increased in the region following 2014, including visits to forward bases amid heightened tensions, providing airborne command and control to monitor Russian air activity.^[66] This collaboration supports continuous airspace vigilance without fixed U.S. AWACS basing under OAR.^[26]

Ground Forces and Equipment

![US Army 3rd Squadron, 2nd Cavalry Regiment during Dragoon Ride in Operation Atlantic Resolve][float-right] Operation Atlantic Resolve features rotational deployments of U.S. Army Armored Brigade Combat Teams (ABCTs) equipped with M1A2 Abrams main battle tanks and M2A3 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles to enhance deterrence in Eastern Europe.^[39] A typical ABCT deployment, such as the 1st ABCT of the 1st Infantry Division in 2021, includes approximately 80 M1A2 Abrams tanks and 120 M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, along with variants like Bradley Fire Support Team vehicles.^[67] Similarly, the 3rd ABCT of the 4th Infantry Division in 2022 deployed with around 90 Abrams tanks.^[68] These heavy armored assets provide credible combat power for rapid reinforcement of NATO's eastern flank. In addition to ABCTs, lighter Stryker Brigade Combat Teams contribute mobility and versatility, with deployments including up to 75 Stryker wheeled armored vehicles based in Germany for training in Eastern Europe.^[69] Early rotations, such as in 2015, prepositioned sets of 29 Abrams tanks and 33 Bradleys for incoming units, enabling quick surge capabilities to brigade scale.^[70] Prepositioned stocks under Army Prepositioned Stocks-2 (APS-2) in Europe further support scalability, including additional armored vehicles for rapid issuance to deploying forces.^[34] Artillery enablers integrated into these ground formations include M109 Paladin self-propelled howitzers, with approximately 15 per ABCT rotation providing mobile fire support.^[68] Defensive depth is augmented by rotational ground-based systems such as Patriot air defense batteries and High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), though specific deployment numbers vary by rotation and are often tied to multinational exercises. Overall, forward-deployed ground assets typically exceed 80 tanks and 100 infantry fighting vehicles, with prepositioned equipment allowing expansion to full brigade combat teams for heightened readiness.^[34]

Expansion and Evolution

Response to 2022 Russian Invasion of Ukraine

Following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022, Operation Atlantic Resolve expanded to reinforce NATO's deterrence posture along the alliance's eastern flank, doubling U.S. troop levels in Europe to over 100,000 personnel by mid-2022 through additional rotational deployments and prepositioned equipment.^[71] This surge integrated enhanced training with Eastern European allies and rapid response capabilities to counter potential spillover threats.^[34] Concurrently, at NATO's extraordinary summit in Brussels on March 24, 2022, allies activated four additional multinational enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) battlegroups in Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia, scaling up from the original Baltic and Polish deployments to cover the southeast flank under U.S.-led coordination within OAR frameworks.^[24]^[48] OAR served as the operational umbrella for channeling U.S. security assistance to Ukraine, encompassing equipment transfers drawn from DoD stocks to sustain Ukrainian defenses without direct U.S. combat involvement.^[72] By early 2024, this included over $44 billion in committed security aid, featuring thousands of Javelin anti-tank guided missiles for close-range armor defeat and multiple M142 HIMARS rocket artillery systems for precision strikes on Russian logistics and command nodes.^[29] These transfers prioritized systems with proven battlefield efficacy against Russian armored advances, reflecting empirical assessments of Ukraine's tactical needs over broader political considerations.^[73] To coordinate multinational contributions, the U.S. established the Ukraine Defense Contact Group—also known as the Ramstein format—on April 26, 2022, at Ramstein Air Base in Germany, involving over 50 nations in monthly meetings to align donations and avoid duplication.^[74] This group facilitated synchronized pledges, including artillery munitions and air defense interceptors, under OAR oversight mechanisms like the Special Inspector General for Operation Atlantic Resolve, which tracks accountability for aid flows amid concerns over corruption risks in recipient channels.^[75] The format emphasized capability gaps identified through real-time combat data, such as Russia's reliance on massed artillery, rather than unverified narratives from biased institutional sources.^[76]

Integration of Aid, Oversight, and Broader Support Mechanisms

The Department of Defense, through the Defense Security Cooperation Agency and military services, administers the Presidential Drawdown Authority under Operation Atlantic Resolve to facilitate expedited transfers of defense articles from U.S. inventories to Ukraine, bypassing standard procurement timelines for urgent needs. This authority has supported 55 drawdowns since its invocation for Ukraine, delivering approximately $31.7 billion in equipment and services from October 2021 to January 2025, including munitions, vehicles, and advisory support.^[34]^[77]^[78] Complementing drawdowns, the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative funds longer-term capacity building, such as training and procurement of systems tailored to Ukrainian requirements, integrated into OAR's administrative framework to sustain operational readiness. Oversight mechanisms, led by the Special Inspector General for Operation Atlantic Resolve and coordinated Lead Inspectors General from the Departments of Defense, State, and USAID, produce quarterly reports assessing aid accountability, including end-use monitoring challenges and delivery timelines. These evaluations, modeled on prior contingency oversight like SIGAR, emphasize tracking equipment serial numbers and storage conditions but highlight persistent gaps in full accountability for high-value items amid wartime conditions.^[79]^[80]^[81] Broader support under OAR extends to hybrid threat mitigation, where U.S. contributions include intelligence sharing with NATO partners to counter Russian-linked sabotage operations targeting European infrastructure, such as arson and cyber intrusions documented in 2024-2025. Resilience programs, coordinated via OAR channels, enhance allied capabilities against subversion through joint assessments and prepositioned response assets, distinct from direct Ukraine aid flows. These efforts prioritize deterrence of non-kinetic aggression, with oversight reports noting improved coordination but underscoring risks from evolving Russian tactics.^[82]^[83]^[6]

Strategic Impacts and Achievements

Effects on NATO Cohesion and Readiness

Operation Atlantic Resolve has bolstered NATO cohesion by fostering sustained U.S. rotational deployments to Eastern Europe, which have reassured allies of collective defense commitments under Article 5 and prompted increased defense investments among members. By March 2025, 23 of NATO's 32 members met or exceeded the 2% of GDP defense spending guideline, a marked rise from pre-2014 levels when fewer than half complied.^[84] These efforts, integrated with NATO's Readiness Action Plan initiated in 2014, have enhanced alliance solidarity through multinational training that builds trust and shared operational understanding across diverse national forces.^[85] Readiness metrics demonstrate tangible gains, including accelerated reinforcement capabilities via prepositioned equipment and streamlined reception processes in host nations, reducing deployment timelines from weeks to days for rapid response forces.^[19] Participation in joint exercises has surged post-2014, with NATO conducting 162 military training and exercise events that year alone, escalating further to include large-scale drills like Steadfast Defender 2024 involving 90,000 personnel from all allies and partners.^[86]^[87] These activities have validated quicker mobilization, contrasting with pre-Operation Atlantic Resolve vulnerabilities exposed by Russia's 2014 actions in Ukraine. Interoperability has advanced through standardized technical, procedural, and human elements, enabling effective command in multinational enhanced Forward Presence battlegroups led by various allies in the Baltic states and Poland.^[39] This framework supports seamless integration across over 30 nations, as evidenced by successful combined defensive operations in exercises that mirror real-world contingencies.^[88] Empirically, the absence of Russian military incursions into NATO territory since 2014 underscores heightened deterrence, attributable to these readiness enhancements that have fortified the alliance's eastern flank against potential aggression.^[24]

Deterrence Outcomes Against Russian Expansionism

Operation Atlantic Resolve, initiated in April 2014 following Russia's annexation of Crimea, has coincided with a period of Russian restraint against direct territorial aggression toward NATO member states in Eastern Europe. Despite ongoing hybrid threats, including airspace violations in the Baltic region peaking at over 60 incidents annually between 2014 and 2016, and submarine incursions near Swedish waters in 2014, Russia has not escalated to full-scale invasions of NATO territory.^[89]^[90] This pattern holds even amid heightened tensions, such as the 2022 sabotage of undersea cables in the Baltic Sea attributed to Russian actors, where responses remained below the threshold of armed conflict with NATO allies.^[91]^[92] The forward-deployed U.S. forces and rotational presence under OAR, totaling up to 12,000 troops across Eastern Europe by 2021, function on the principle that visible military capabilities impose prohibitive costs on potential aggressors by complicating rapid gains and invoking Article 5 collective defense.^[34] Russian military doctrine explicitly recognizes NATO's conventional superiority, designating the alliance as the primary external threat and a peer competitor capable of precision strikes and force buildup that could overwhelm Russian operations in theater.^[93] This assessment aligns with observed Russian behavior, where doctrinal emphasis on escalation dominance and anti-access/area-denial strategies prioritizes avoiding direct confrontation with reinforced NATO flanks over Baltic or Black Sea states.^[94] Over the longer term, OAR's demonstration of U.S. commitment has catalyzed a sustained upward trajectory in European NATO allies' defense expenditures, with the share of non-U.S. allies meeting the 2% GDP guideline rising from 3 out of 28 in 2014 to 23 out of 32 by 2024.^[95] Total NATO defense spending excluding the U.S. increased by approximately 72% in real terms from 2014 to 2023, enhancing regional deterrence postures through improved interoperability and rapid response capabilities.^[96] These shifts, while also responsive to Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, trace roots to the 2014 Wales Summit pledges prompted by OAR's early reassurance measures, fostering a more balanced burden-sharing environment that raises the baseline risks for Russian expansionism.^[97]

Criticisms, Controversies, and Alternative Viewpoints

Russian and Pro-Russia Perspectives on Provocation

Russian officials and state-affiliated media have portrayed Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) as a component of NATO's aggressive eastward expansion, which they assert contravenes informal assurances provided by Western leaders in the early 1990s during negotiations on German reunification.^[98] According to this narrative, figures such as U.S. Secretary of State James Baker and NATO Secretary-General Manfred Wörner verbally promised Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that the alliance would not enlarge beyond a unified Germany, a commitment allegedly extended to Eastern Europe more broadly.^[99] Moscow contends that OAR's rotational deployments of U.S. troops and equipment to Eastern Europe since 2014 exemplify this "encirclement," escalating tensions and prompting Russian military modernizations as a defensive response to perceived threats.^[100] Pro-Russian outlets such as RT and Sputnik have amplified these views by framing OAR training exercises as provocative rehearsals for anti-Russian operations, depicting multinational drills involving thousands of troops and armored units as offensive posturing rather than routine interoperability training.^[101] Russian discourse often links OAR to a broader "hybrid war" against Russia, claiming the operation's prepositioning of assets near borders fuels an arms race and justifies Moscow's countermeasures, including snap exercises and force enhancements in Kaliningrad and western districts.^[102] These portrayals emphasize NATO's buildup as the root cause of instability, inverting causality to argue that alliance activities, not prior Russian actions, drive confrontation. Counter to these claims, archival evidence and participant accounts confirm no legally binding or formal pledge against NATO enlargement was ever documented in treaties like the 1990 Two-Plus-Four Agreement or subsequent accords; assurances, where given, pertained specifically to East German territory and were not codified.^[103] Gorbachev himself has acknowledged in later interviews that no such blanket prohibition existed, undermining assertions of betrayal.^[99] Moreover, OAR was explicitly launched on April 23, 2014, as a direct reaction to Russia's annexation of Crimea in March 2014 and support for separatists in Donbas, rather than as an unprovoked expansion; prior NATO enlargements in 1999 and 2004 preceded these events without triggering OAR.^[4] The operation's defensive character—focused on rotational, non-permanent forces under NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence framework—contrasts with Russian characterizations, as exercises maintain scales consistent with alliance deterrence postures rather than invasion preparations, with troop numbers peaking at around 10,000 U.S. personnel across Europe by 2022.^[34] State media like RT and Sputnik, as Kremlin-controlled entities, systematically prioritize narratives aligning with official policy over empirical verification, often omitting context such as Russia's own pre-2014 military reforms and incursions.^[101]

US Domestic and Isolationist Critiques

Critics from isolationist and restraint-oriented perspectives within the United States have questioned the sustainability of Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR), arguing that its expanded commitments since 2014, particularly post-2022, represent an overextension of American resources and strategic focus. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), a prominent voice in these debates, has repeatedly opposed large-scale, unconditional aid packages under OAR oversight, such as blocking a $40 billion Ukraine supplemental in May 2022 until provisions for auditing expenditures were included, emphasizing that "blank checks" undermine fiscal accountability and divert funds from domestic priorities like border security. By October 2025, total U.S. allocations for Ukraine-related security assistance—coordinated through OAR mechanisms—reached approximately $182.8 billion since Russia's full-scale invasion, a figure isolationists cite as evidence of escalating costs without clear endpoints or reciprocal burden-sharing from European allies.^[104]^[105] These viewpoints highlight strategic overstretch, contending that OAR's emphasis on European deterrence pulls U.S. military assets and attention away from the Indo-Pacific, where China poses a more direct peer-level threat to American interests. Advocates of restraint, such as Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), have argued that prioritizing Ukraine risks neglecting China's military buildup, stating in 2023 that "we cannot afford to be distracted" from the primary adversary capable of challenging U.S. primacy. The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank skeptical of overseas entanglements, has called for a European-led NATO capable of deterring Russia independently, proposing in a 2025 analysis that U.S. troop presence on the continent is unnecessary and that allies should assume responsibility for their defense to avoid subsidizing free-riding.^[106]^[107] Effectiveness critiques often invoke moral hazard, with detractors asserting that sustained U.S. support under OAR reduces Ukraine's incentives for diplomatic compromise, potentially prolonging the conflict without achieving verifiable strategic gains like a stable peace. This perspective posits that aid flows encourage intransigence by signaling indefinite backing, contrasting with empirical observations of battlefield deterrence—such as Russia's failure to advance further into NATO territory despite hybrid provocations—yet questioning whether such stasis justifies indefinite commitments absent allied reforms or negotiated outcomes. While OAR has enjoyed bipartisan congressional backing historically, with appropriations passing via broad majorities, Republican support has eroded, reflecting a right-leaning emphasis on terminating "endless" overseas obligations unless tied to concrete American benefits, as evidenced by widening partisan divides where only 44% of Republicans favored continued aid in late 2024 surveys.^[108]

Debates on Cost-Effectiveness and Long-Term Risks

Critics contend that Operation Atlantic Resolve imposes significant opportunity costs on the United States, with annual expenditures for troop rotations, multinational exercises, and prepositioned stocks in Eastern Europe totaling billions of dollars, diverting funds from domestic priorities or other theaters like the Indo-Pacific.^[109] Broader security assistance coordinated under the operation, including post-2022 enhancements, has escalated to an average of approximately $60 billion per year through 2024, encompassing not only deployments but also equipment transfers and training programs.^[105] Isolationist perspectives, such as those from U.S. domestic analysts, argue these outlays strain federal budgets without proportional returns, especially given European allies' historical underinvestment in defense capabilities prior to recent spending increases.^[110] Assessments of cost-effectiveness remain divided, with empirical data indicating enhanced NATO interoperability and rapid response postures that have arguably contained Russian advances to Ukraine, avoiding broader continental spillover.^[31] However, skeptics question the sustainability of rotational deployments, which studies show are more expensive than permanent basing due to logistics and personnel turnover, potentially yielding diminishing deterrence returns if perceived as reversible.^[109] Proponents cite metrics like increased exercise participation—such as Defender-Europe iterations involving over 40,000 troops—as evidence of value in building credible forward presence, though without direct counterfactuals, claims of averted invasions rely on causal inference from Russia's restraint toward NATO members.^[34] Long-term risks center on escalation dynamics, where intensified U.S. and NATO military footprints in proximity to Russian borders heighten chances of miscalculation, such as through hybrid incidents or airspace incursions that could spiral into direct confrontation.^[71] Russian nuclear saber-rattling since 2022 has amplified these concerns, with analysts warning that forward deployments might embolden inadvertent clashes absent robust de-escalation channels, though incident data shows no progression to armed conflict despite provocations.^[111] ^[112] Alternatives like intensified sanctions and diplomacy alone have proven insufficient empirically, as evidenced by Russia's 2014 Crimea annexation and 2022 Ukraine incursion amid pre-existing economic pressures, underscoring the causal role of visible military deterrence in shaping opportunistic aggressor behavior.^[113]

Recent Developments (2023–2025)

Funding Allocations and Oversight Reports

By mid-2025, Congress had made available approximately $187.2 billion in supplemental funding for Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) and the broader U.S. response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine since February 2022, with major appropriations occurring in fiscal years 2023 through 2025 to sustain NATO ally support, military exercises, and security assistance.^[75] Of this total, at least $153.37 billion—or 82 percent—had been obligated for execution, leaving roughly $33.8 billion unobligated across security, humanitarian, and economic aid categories as of June 2025.^[75] These funds supported enhanced U.S. military presence in Europe, including $47.43 billion for European Deterrence Initiative activities such as prepositioned stocks and multinational training rotations.^[34] Oversight of these allocations is coordinated through quarterly reports and audits by the Lead Inspectors General for OAR, involving the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General (DoD OIG), U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) OIG, and Department of State OIG.^[79] From January to March 2025 alone, these entities issued 25 oversight reports assessing aid delivery, procurement processes, and accountability, including audits of USAID's energy security procurements in Ukraine that recommended enhanced monitoring of equipment deliveries.^[88] The Fiscal Year 2025 Joint Strategic Oversight Plan outlines ongoing audits of foreign military financing backfills and humanitarian localization efforts to ensure funds align with U.S. priorities and mitigate risks of waste or diversion.^[114] In response to fiscal pressures and efficiency concerns, U.S. aid delivery under OAR experienced targeted pauses in 2025. A 90-day suspension of foreign development assistance, including portions supporting Ukraine, was enacted in January 2025 to evaluate programmatic efficiencies and alignment with national interests.^[115] Subsequent pauses in July 2025 halted shipments of certain munitions, such as air defense interceptors, amid reviews of U.S. stockpiles and broader military aid expenditures to prioritize domestic readiness.^[116] These measures reflect adaptations toward more scrutinized, sustainable funding mechanisms, with oversight reports emphasizing backfill authorities like Foreign Military Financing to leverage existing stocks rather than indefinite supplemental draws.^[117]

Ongoing Adaptations to Hybrid Threats

In 2023–2025, U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) under Operation Atlantic Resolve identified Russian intelligence services and proxies as a persistent hybrid threat, prompting adaptations such as bolstered intelligence sharing and defensive training rotations to counter sabotage and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) incursions into NATO airspace.^[34] The Department of Defense's 2025 Worldwide Threat Assessment highlighted Russia's combined use of one-way attack UAVs and long-range missiles against Ukrainian infrastructure, leading to U.S.-led enhancements in allied air defense interoperability, including rapid-response protocols for incidents like the September 2025 Polish airspace violations involving multiple Russian drones.^[118]^[119] NATO and EU measures have since prevented further maritime sabotage attempts, though Russian drone provocations escalated in early 2025, necessitating integrated counter-drone systems in forward deployments.^[120] U.S. support has facilitated Ukraine's naval adaptations in the Black Sea, where uncrewed surface vessels have targeted Russian warships, oil terminals, and gas infrastructure, compelling the Russian Black Sea Fleet to relocate assets eastward and reducing its operational dominance as of mid-2025.^[121] U.S. intelligence provision has aided these long-range strikes on Russian energy targets, aligning with broader Operation Atlantic Resolve objectives to degrade hybrid maritime threats without direct kinetic engagement.^[122] This asymmetric approach, informed by Ukraine's development of a drone-centric "technological navy," has shaped NATO exercises incorporating sea drone tactics to deter Russian hybrid naval coercion.^[123] Looking to fiscal year 2026, Operation Atlantic Resolve rotations are set to incorporate advanced AI and cyber defenses, with the Department of Defense requesting $66 billion for IT and cyberspace activities, including new AI programs at U.S. Cyber Command to counter hybrid intrusions.^[124] The FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act emphasizes AI integration across operations, enabling predictive analytics for threat detection in European rotations and oversight mechanisms to address evolving Russian tactics like GPS jamming.^[125]^[126] These evolutions prioritize disruptive technologies to sustain deterrence amid persistent non-kinetic pressures.^[127]

References

[1]
[PDF] FY 2024 Joint Strategic Oversight Plan For Operation Atlantic Resolve
Oct 18, 2023 · M, 12/29/2022. Operation Atlantic Resolve began in 2014, when the United States began an effort to reassure and bolster the NATO alliance in ...
[2]
[PDF] Fact Sheet: Atlantic Resolve
Since April 2014, U.S. Army Europe has led the Department of Defense's Atlantic. Resolve land efforts by bringing units based in the U.S. to Europe for nine ...
[3]
Atlantic Resolve - U.S. Army Europe and Africa
Atlantic Resolve provides rotational deployments of combat-credible forces to Europe to show our commitment to NATO while building readiness.
[4]
Operation Atlantic Resolve: a year in review - Army.mil
May 5, 2015 · April 23, 2015, marked the one year anniversary of the announcement to begin a series of exercises now known as Operation Atlantic Resolve.
[5]
DoD Announces Operation Atlantic Resolve Brigade Rotation
Aug 13, 2014 · The brigade will be the next unit to take part in ongoing land forces exercises that fall under the umbrella of Operation Atlantic Resolve, he ...
[6]
[PDF] Operation Atlantic Resolve Quarterly Report to Congress, July ... - DoD
Nov 15, 2024 · We are pleased to present this Special Inspector General report to Congress on Operation Atlantic. Resolve (OAR). This report discharges our ...
[7]
[PDF] Operation Atlantic Resolve, April 1, 2025-June 30, 2025 - DoD
Aug 15, 2025 · This seventh quarterly report submitted by the Special Inspector General for Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) summarizes U.S. Government support.
[8]
Conflict in Ukraine: A timeline (2014 - eve of 2022 invasion)
Aug 22, 2023 · Russia's annexation of Crimea, 2014 Toward the end of February 2014, unidentified military figures, later confirmed to be Russian personnel, ...
[9]
A timeline of Crimea's annexation - The Week
Mar 17, 2022 · 16 March 2014: disputed referendum. On 16 March, a disputed referendum found that an overwhelming number of voters in Crimea supported joining ...
[10]
Ukraine, Nuclear Weapons, and Security Assurances at a Glance
The United States, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine called the action a blatant violation of the security assurances in the 1994 Budapest Memorandum.
[11]
Budapest Memorandum at 25: Between Past and Future
Russia breached these commitments with its annexation of Crimea in 2014 and aggression in eastern Ukraine, bringing the meaning and value of security assurance ...
[12]
Russian Troops Mass at Border With Ukraine - The New York Times
Mar 13, 2014 · Russia massed troops and armored vehicles in at least three regions along Ukraine's eastern border on Thursday, alarming the interim Ukraine government about a ...<|separator|>
[13]
Ukraine: Conflict at the Crossroads of Europe and Russia
Ukraine became a battleground in 2014 when Russia annexed Crimea and began arming and abetting separatists in the Donbas region in the country's southeast.<|separator|>
[14]
Conflict in Ukraine's Donbas: A Visual Explainer
Between September 2014 and February 2015, Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany signed several iterations of the so-called Minsk agreements, which eventually ...
[15]
Understanding the situation in Ukraine from 2014 to 24 February 2022
In March 2014, armed groups without insignia under Russian control supported demonstrators calling for the independence of these regions. On 11 May, the de ...
[16]
The Evolution of Russian Hybrid Warfare: Ukraine - CEPA
Jan 29, 2021 · The hybrid war just after Russia's annexation of Crimea in March of 2014 included clear and coordinated Russian actions inside Ukraine, along ...
[17]
Hybrid Warfare: the 21st Century Russian Way of Warfare - DTIC
Hybrid warfare, as demonstrated by Russia in Ukraine, is a powerful tool for an era of limited war, and is arguably the modern Russian way of warfare. Read ...
[18]
NATO Expresses Concern After Report Of New Russian Military ...
Sep 10, 2015 · So if you look at 2013, 2014, even for example not even going to 2015, we see a mass buildup of construction zones and military bases within ...
[19]
Operation Atlantic Resolve Fact Sheet
Jul 16, 2014 · Operation Atlantic Resolve is a series of actions designed to reassure NATO allies and partners.
[20]
Topic: Collective defence and Article 5 - NATO
Jul 4, 2023 · Article 5 provides that if a NATO Ally is the victim of an armed attack, each and every other member of the Alliance will consider this act of violence as an ...Missing: enlargement | Show results with:enlargement
[21]
[PDF] Impact of NATO Enlargement on Eastern Europe Security
During the Cold War, NATO's objective and function was to contain the Soviet Union and deter it ideally without provoking it; the goal was to establish the ...
[22]
5/15/97 Fact Sheet: NATO-Russia Founding Act - State Department
The Act makes clear that Russia has no veto over alliance decisions and NATO retains the right to act independently when it so chooses. The Act has no impact on ...
[23]
Wikileaks reveal Article 5 contingency plans to defend Baltics and ...
A regional “contingency plan” to defend the Baltics and Poland against Russian threats was agreed in January 2010.<|separator|>
[24]
https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_136388.htm
[25]
NATO – BALTIC AIR-POLICING – BAP - EMAD
The NATO Air-Policing mission in the Baltic began in 2004 following the admission of the Baltic States into NATO. This implied the extension of the allied ...
[26]
NATO Air Policing
Aug 8, 2025 · NATO Air Policing is a peacetime mission that aims to preserve the security of Allied skies. It is a collective task and involves the continuous presence – 24 ...
[27]
NATO Expansion: What Yeltsin Heard | National Security Archive
Mar 16, 2018 · He believes that at present Russia is not a threat to Eastern Europe and seconds Havel's belief that CEE countries want to join NATO for ...
[28]
Where Are U.S. Forces Deployed in Europe?
Feb 27, 2025 · The Department of Defense launched Operation Atlantic Resolve [PDF] in April 2014 to send U.S.-based troops to eastern European NATO member ...
[29]
[PDF] Operation Atlantic Resolve - Office of Inspector General
Jan 10, 2024 · Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) began in April 2014 when the United States launched an ... brigades, deployed to Poland, and one infantry brigade ...<|separator|>
[30]
173rd paratroopers arrive in Poland, Baltics for unscheduled exercises
May 16, 2014 · The first group of paratroopers, from Company C, 1st Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, landed at Swidwin Air Base in Poland, April 23, to ...
[31]
[PDF] Operation Atlantic Resolve: A Case Study in Effective ...
Within 48 hours of the order being issued,. USAREUR deployed a team of public affairs personnel to Poland before the arrival of the first deploying U.S. forces.
[32]
Operation Atlantic Resolve jumpstarts Europe's regional alignment
Dec 1, 2014 · Howell reflected on the deployment of an Army Contingency Response Force (ACRF) out of the 173rd to Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia as ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
[33]
Wales Summit Declaration issued by NATO Heads of State and ...
Jul 4, 2022 · We will establish an enhanced exercise programme with an increased focus on exercising collective defence including practising comprehensive ...
[34]
[PDF] Operation Atlantic Resolve - DoD
Aug 7, 2025 · Developing a joint strategic plan to conduct comprehensive oversight of the operation. Ensuring independent and effective oversight of programs ...
[35]
NATO, Operation Atlantic Resolve: The art of assurance ... - Army.mil
NATO, Operation Atlantic Resolve: The art of assurance and deterrence. By Sgt ... goal is to create the best assurance effect without becoming overly provocative".Missing: strategic readiness
[36]
U.S. European Command Posture Statement 2016
Feb 25, 2016 · Reassurance Measures: Operation ATLANTIC RESOLVE supports the mission to assure and defend NATO, enhance our Allies' and partners' abilities to ...
[37]
Assurance Measures - U.S. Mission to the North Atlantic Treaty ...
Jan 1, 2015 · At NATO's Wales Summit in September 2014, Allied leaders approved a Readiness Action Plan (RAP) to ensure the Alliance is ready to respond ...Missing: forward | Show results with:forward
[38]
U.S. Assurance and Deterrence Efforts in Support of NATO Allies
Jul 8, 2016 · ERI ensures that all U.S. military services will augment their presence and enhance deterrence in Europe through stepped-up rotations and ...Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
[39]
Readiness and Interoperability in Operation Atlantic Resolve
The SRM seeks to increase the number of ground forces available for use by requiring commanders to maintain their combat readiness over time instead of allowing ...
[40]
Army announces ninth Atlantic Resolve armored rotation mission
Dec 22, 2021 · The 3rd ABCT, stationed at Fort Carson, Colorado, will replace the 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, as part of a regular rotation of ...
[41]
1st ABCT, 1ID arrives for Atlantic Resolve - DVIDS
Jul 9, 2021 · The 1st ABCT will replace 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division, and will conduct multinational training in support of Atlantic Resolve.
[42]
Alexandroupolis, Greece - United States European Command
Jul 29, 2021 · The 1st ABCT is the eighth armored brigade to deploy to Europe in support of Atlantic Resolve. Following initial staging at the port, the ...<|separator|>
[43]
1/1 ABCT Redeploys from Europe on ARC's M/V Endurance
Jul 18, 2022 · The “Devil Brigade” completed an 11-month deployment in support of NATO allies supporting Atlantic Resolve, an ongoing series of rotational ...
[44]
Dragoon Ride: 2d Cav. Regt. returns home to Germany - Army.mil
Apr 2, 2015 · More than 400 Soldiers assigned to U.S. Army Europe's 2d Cavalry Regiment completed a historic 1100 mile road march across Eastern Europe ...Missing: 2nd details
[45]
2nd Cavalry Regiment begins major convoy for Operation Atlantic ...
Mar 23, 2015 · This road march, which the squadron has named Dragoon Ride, will travel through Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Czech Republic and ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[46]
Fueling Dragoons - The 16th SB supports Operation Dragoon Ride
Apr 15, 2015 · Dragoon Ride was a capstone exercise for 3-2 Cav.'s rotation under Atlantic Resolve-North, where units under U.S. Army Europe train with allied ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[47]
[PDF] NATO's Enhanced Forward Presence
May 9, 2017 · NATO is enhancing its forward presence in the eastern part of the Alliance, with four multinational battlegroups in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania ...
[48]
Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) - Allied Land Command - NATO
In line with the 2016 Warsaw Summit decisions, by July 2017, four multinational battlegroups were deployed in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. Allies ...
[49]
Establishing Europe's Army pre-positioned stocks | Article - Army.mil
Aug 28, 2017 · Atlantic Resolve is changing the way the Army stores and distributes pre-positioned equipment.Missing: rapid reinforcement
[50]
US and NATO Troops Are Working on Logistics Capabilities in Europe
Jun 13, 2021 · New prepositioned stocks for the Army and the Air Force's new deployable airbase system also allow US troops arriving in Europe to "immediately ...
[51]
Dragoon Ride mission complete - European Command
Apr 2, 2015 · Before reaching their home station, 2nd Cavalry Regiment drove 1,800 km from Estonia through Lithuania, Poland, Latvia, the Czech Republic and ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[52]
'Strong Europe' | Article | The United States Army
Phase Two consists of Major Combat Operations including Exercises Combined Resolve and Saber Strike. Phase Three potentially consists of follow-on NATO lead ...
[53]
19 NATO Allies and partners wrap up exercise Saber Strike 2018
Jun 18, 2018 · The exercise, which began on 3 June, mobilised around 18,000 troops from 19 NATO Allies and partners. It provided an opportunity for forces to ...
[54]
U.S., NATO Conclude Saber Strike 17 Exercise
Jun 26, 2017 · About 11,000 U.S. and NATO service members from 20 countries concluded the Saber Strike 17 exercise here on June 24. The exercise took place ...Missing: troops | Show results with:troops
[55]
Anakonda '16 launches with Warsaw ceremony | Article - Army.mil
Jun 7, 2016 · With over 31,000 soldiers from 24 countries in attendance, Antoni Macierewicz, the Polish minister of defense, opened the ceremony by welcoming ...
[56]
American, Canadian paratroopers jump in to Poland for exercise
May 16, 2014 · American and Canadian paratroopers conducted a combined parachute operation onto Bledowska Drop Zone, Poland, May 5, 2014, to begin combined ...
[57]
Saber Strike: An exercise in foundational partnership - Army.mil
Apr 26, 2024 · The exercise culminated with a regrouping of forces as NATO allies worked with 2CR to establish defensive positions in the Suwalki Gap. Members ...
[58]
U.S. & Polish Fighter Jets Launch • Operation Atlantic Resolve
Jun 18, 2015 · U.S. and Polish F-16 fighter jets takeoff from Lask Air Base in Poland during Operation Atlantic Resolve and Exercise Eagle Talon.Missing: deployments | Show results with:deployments
[59]
Dozen A-10 "tankbusters" deployed to Estonia - Estonian World
Sep 23, 2015 · Twelve A-10C Thunderbolt IIs of the United States Air Force (USAF) were deployed to Ämari Air Base in Estonia on 21 September, in support of ...Missing: patrols | Show results with:patrols
[60]
U.S. Deploys Twelve A-10s to Romania to Deter Russian Aggression
Apr 1, 2015 · The U.S. has deployed 12 A-10 Warthog planes to Romania as part of a theater-security effort to counter Russian aggression in Ukraine – all ...
[61]
US F-35s and allies conduct air policing operations out of Baltic ...
Mar 3, 2022 · Footage released by NATO Mar. 2 showed Air Force F-35s conducting flight operations at Šiauliai Air Base in Lithuania.Missing: Atlantic Resolve
[62]
Apache helicopters flown to Germany for Operation Atlantic Resolve
Feb 24, 2017 · "From the time the helicopters are downloaded from the aircraft to the time they take flight is anywhere between 24 to 48 hours," Roundtree said ...Missing: 17 | Show results with:17
[63]
US Army's 1st CAB returns to Europe - Key Aero
Jun 8, 2021 · The US Army's 1st Combat Aviation Brigade (CAB) is on its second deployment to Europe for Operation Atlantic Resolve.Missing: airlift AWACS
[64]
Iron Dragon Airlift a first for Powidz, Atlantic Resolve | Article - Army.mil
Nov 8, 2017 · During the weekend-long process, four AH-64s were carefully loaded into a U.S. Air Force C5, with another four being loaded later on two C17 ...
[65]
U.S., Polish Airmen collaborate for Operation Atlantic Resolve
Nov 10, 2016 · Two rotations usually include airlift units and the other two include fighter units. The airlift missions here demonstrate the U.S. resolve ...
[66]
Amid raising tension with Russia NATO E-3A AWACS aircraft visit ...
Oct 14, 2016 · After Russia moved nuclear-capable missiles to NATO's doorstep, NATO surveillance planes make cameo visit to Eastern Europe.
[67]
1st ABCT, 1 ID arrives for Atlantic Resolve | Article - Army.mil
Jul 9, 2021 · The 1st ABCT is deploying with approximately 3,800 Soldiers, 80 tanks, 120 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, 10 Bradley (Variant) Fire Support Team ...Missing: IFVs | Show results with:IFVs
[68]
[PDF] Fact Sheet: - U.S. Army Europe
Aug 24, 2022 · ... armored brigade combat team in support of Atlantic. Resolve. • 3ABCT, 4ID has approximately: o 4,000 Soldiers o 15 Paladins o 90 Abrams tanks.Missing: ABCT numbers IFVs
[69]
U.S. troops resume Atlantic Resolve training in Eastern Europe
Atlantic Resolve training involves about 550 European-based American personnel and 75 Stryker vehicles. The Stryker group is based in Germany. The Army 2nd ...Missing: equipment Abrams Bradley HIMARS
[70]
Army expands Operation Atlantic Resolve to six countries
Feb 20, 2015 · ... equipment, including 29 Abrams tanks and 33 Bradleys. This set is meant to be used by troops coming into the region from the United States.Missing: ground deployments Bradley Stryker HIMARS
[71]
Deterring Russia: U.S. Military Posture in Europe - CSIS
Jan 27, 2025 · Shifting the current rotational ABCT from Operation Atlantic Resolve to a permanent presence in Poland should be part of a 4+2 posture in Europe ...
[72]
Operation Atlantic Resolve > Ukraine Oversight > Article Display
This third quarterly report submitted by the Special Inspector General for Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) summarizes US Government support to Ukraine.
[73]
[PDF] U.S. Security Assistance to Ukraine - Congress.gov
May 22, 2024 · FY2024 security assistance packages are being funded mostly via $28.8 billion in supplemental appropriations. Division B of P.L. 118-50 includes ...
[74]
30th Ramstein: How the Ukraine Defense Contact Group meetings ...
Sep 9, 2025 · The Ministry of Defence of Ukraine provides an overview of the evolution of the Ramstein format and the key agreements made during the meetings.
[75]
Operation Atlantic Resolve > Ukraine Oversight > Article Display
Russian Forces Suffer Heavy Losses. Russian casualties exceeded 1 million, with 250,000 dead and 750,000 wounded. Russia has taken 5,000 sq km of territory ...
[76]
UK and Germany to convene Ramstein group meeting on 15 October
Oct 2, 2025 · For reference: The Ramstein format was established in March 2022 by the United States as a platform to coordinate military aid to Ukraine, ...
[77]
Operation Atlantic Resolve > Ukraine Oversight > Article Display
The U.S. has provided $30.2B in direct budget support to the Ukrainian government, out of $115.2B provided by international partners. G7 nations announced $50B ...Missing: Javelin HIMARS
[78]
Use of Presidential Drawdown Authority for Military Assistance for ...
The Secretary has exercised authority delegated by the President to direct 55 drawdowns of defense articles and services totaling approximately $31.7 billion ...Missing: Atlantic Resolve<|separator|>
[79]
Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) - DoDIG.mil.
Aug 12, 2025 · This report also discusses the planned, ongoing, and completed oversight work conducted by the DoD, State, and USAID Offices of Inspector ...Missing: aid | Show results with:aid
[80]
[PDF] operation atlantic resolve - USAID OIG's
Feb 5, 2025 · Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) is the Department of Defense (DoD) operation in the. U.S. European Command (USEUCOM) area of responsibility to ...
[81]
Security Assistance - Ukraine Oversight
US security assistance to Ukraine and European partners provides essential military resources, funding, and training in support of Operation Atlantic Resolve.
[82]
Russia's Shadow War Against the West - CSIS
Mar 18, 2025 · Russia is conducting an escalating and violent campaign of sabotage and subversion against European and US targets in Europe led by Russian military ...
[83]
How the US and Europe can deter and respond to Russia's ...
Oct 15, 2025 · Information and intelligence sharing is critical to achieving a common threat perception among NATO allies and partners. Expanded information ...
[84]
[PDF] operation atlantic resolve - USAID OIG's
Mar 2, 2025 · There was no change to the Operation Atlantic Resolve (OAR) mission, strategic objectives, or desired end states during the quarter.11. U.S. ...
[85]
Topic: Readiness Action Plan - NATO
Apr 3, 2025 · The Readiness Action Plan (RAP) was a comprehensive package of assurance and adaptation measures that was agreed in 2014 and became part of the overall baseline
[86]
The Secretary General's Annual Report 2014 - NATO
Jan 30, 2015 · ... changing environments, the number of exercises undertaken in 2014 significantly increased. With 162 events under the Military Training and ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates
[87]
[PDF] Exercising NATO's evolving strategy for deterrence and defence - FOI
Apr 21, 2025 · Steadfast Defender 24 was a multinational exercise series, incorporating 14 associated exercises and involv- ing 90,000 participants from all ...Missing: rates post
[88]
[PDF] operation atlantic resolve - Office of Inspector General
Mar 2, 2025 · supports the forward deployment of U.S. military forces and prepositioned stocks in Eastern. Europe to deter aggression against NATO allies.Missing: road | Show results with:road
[89]
Topic: Deterrence and defence - NATO
Sep 19, 2025 · In response, NATO has undertaken the biggest reinforcement of its collective defence in a generation, significantly increasing the number of ...
[90]
All Quiet on the Eastern Front: NATO Civil-Military Deterrence of ...
Apr 14, 2022 · Russia's 2014 invasion of and continued threats (and now active war) ... hybrid warfare threats, often at a level much higher than other NATO ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[91]
De-bunking Russian disinformation on NATO
Oct 24, 2024 · In response to Russia's illegal and illegitimate annexation of Crimea and military build-up close to Alliance borders, NATO has deployed ...
[92]
Putin is escalating Russia's hybrid war against Europe. Is Europe ...
Sep 23, 2025 · Russia now appears intent on exploiting growing divides within the Western camp and intimidating Europe with thinly-veiled threats of possible ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[93]
Russian Assessments and Applications of the Correlation of Forces ...
Apr 20, 2020 · From the Russian perspective, the critical force correlation is NATO's capability to build up forces and execute conventional precision strikes ...
[94]
[PDF] TRADOC G2, How Russia Fights in LSCO (Aug 25) - Army.mil
Aug 27, 2025 · While China is identified as our pacing threat, Russia remains a near-peer competitor with a global intelligence apparatus, a robust nuclear ...
[95]
[PDF] Defence Expenditure of NATO Countries (2014-2023)
Defence expenditure as % of GDP. %. %. NATO guideline 2%. NATO guideline 20%. Median 27.80%. Median 1.82%. Page 3. Graph 3 : Defence expenditure as a share of ...
[96]
Defence expenditures and NATO's 5% commitment
Aug 27, 2025 · Previously, in 2014, NATO Heads of State and Government had agreed to commit 2% of their national GDP to defence spending, to help ensure the ...
[97]
Defense Budgets in an Uncertain Security Environment - CSIS
Sep 16, 2025 · Between 2014 and 2022, NATO's total defense spending, as reported by the alliance, increased 12 percent in real terms at a compound annual ...<|separator|>
[98]
Russia's belief in Nato 'betrayal' – and why it matters today
Jan 12, 2022 · In 1997 at the time of the Nato-Russia Founding Act, a treaty designed to create a new relationship between the alliance and Russia, foreign ...
[99]
NATO Expansion: What Gorbachev Heard - National Security Archive
Dec 12, 2017 · Western leaders gave multiple assurances against NATO expansion to Gorbachev in 1990-1991 according to declassified American, Russian, ...
[100]
Did NATO 'betray' Russia by expanding to the East? - France 24
Jan 30, 2022 · The Kremlin claims the West broke a promise it made in the 1990s not to expand NATO, and is now using this claim to justify threats to invade Ukraine.
[101]
(Un)Powerful Propaganda: Russia's Ineffective Use of Information ...
Oct 5, 2023 · First, Russia used its state-controlled media to construct and project a narrative that NATO's presence in the Baltics was aggressive. Whereas ...
[102]
Russian Certainty of NATO Hostility: Repercussions in the Arctic
This article investigates Russian official discourse on NATO engagement in Europe post-Crimea (2014), and its impact on security interaction in the Arctic. We ...
[103]
'There was no promise not to enlarge NATO' - Harvard Law School
Mar 16, 2022 · “I was in those meetings, and Gorbachev has [also] said there was no promise not to enlarge NATO,” Zoellick recalls. Soviet Foreign Minister, ...
[104]
Rand Paul blocks quick passage of $40 billion Ukraine aid package
May 12, 2022 · Rand Paul blocks quick passage of $40 billion Ukraine aid package. The legislation has been approved overwhelmingly by the House and has ...
[105]
How much money has the US given Ukraine since Russia's invasion?
Mar 14, 2025 · Since February 2022, the United States has allocated $182.8 billion in emergency funding to support Ukraine and the region.<|separator|>
[106]
Sen. Josh Hawley on China and Ukraine | The Heritage Foundation
Remarks from Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, entitled China and Ukraine: A Time for Truth, presented here at The Heritage Foundation in February of 2023.<|separator|>
[107]
https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/their-own-two-feet
[108]
US support for Ukraine continues to divide Republicans, Democrats
Nov 25, 2024 · Americans' views about US support for Ukraine have shifted little in recent months, but there continue to be wide partisan differences.Missing: isolationist | Show results with:isolationist
[109]
It's (still) more expensive to rotate military forces overseas than base ...
Dec 18, 2024 · Rotating US military forces overseas for continuous nine-month deployments costs more than forward stationing them in allied countries.
[110]
Time to Reassess the Costs of Euro-Atlantic Security - RAND
Feb 17, 2025 · If Europeans fail to invest more now to deter Russia and China, the alliance will face far greater expenses and risks.
[111]
https://warontherocks.com/2025/10/no-cause-for-alarm-the-case-for-a-measured-response-to-russian-air-incursions/
[112]
Understanding the Risk of Escalation in the War in Ukraine - RAND
Sep 21, 2023 · Greater escalation is another, including attacking NATO directly, intensifying the use of Russian air forces against Ukraine, and using chemical weapons.
[113]
Averting acute escalation in Russia's war against Ukraine
Sep 5, 2025 · Russia's full-scale war against Ukraine and western military support in its defence have threatened to escalate to the use of nuclear weapons or ...
[114]
Fiscal Year 2025 Joint Strategic Oversight Plan For Operation ...
Sep 30, 2024 · This plan represents our steadfast commitment to work together to provide Congress and the American public with transparent, timely and comprehensive oversight.
[115]
Reevaluating And Realigning United States Foreign Aid
Jan 20, 2025 · 90-day pause in United States foreign development assistance for assessment of programmatic efficiencies and consistency with United States foreign policy.
[116]
Ukraine arms freeze part of wider military aid review, Pentagon says
Jul 2, 2025 · The decision to pause the delivery of some munitions to Ukraine "was made to put America's interest first," a White House spokesperson said.
[117]
[PDF] operation atlantic resolve - USAID OIG's
Aug 7, 2025 · began through FY 2024 and currently total $133.90 billion. ... State, responses to State OIG request for information, 6/20/2024,. 6/20/2025, and 6 ...
[118]
[PDF] 2025 Worldwide Threat Assessment
Simultaneously, Russia is targeting critical Ukraine infrastructure with a combination of one-way attack UAVs and long-range missiles to degrade its national ...
[119]
Statement by the North Atlantic Council on recent airspace violations ...
Sep 23, 2025 · On 10 September, the Council held consultations in response to the large-scale violation of Polish airspace by Russian drones. Several other ...Missing: countermeasures strikes sabotage
[120]
NATO and the EU Respond to Russian Maritime Sabotage - PISM
As a result, further incidents have been prevented since the beginning of 2025, but Russia is escalating the situation by using drones for provocations. NATO ...
[121]
Ukraine's Drone War Over the Black Sea Is Heating Up
Oct 14, 2025 · Ukraine's naval drones have sunk warships, hit oil terminals, and even downed Russian helicopters and fighter jets over the Black Sea.
[122]
U.S. Intelligence Helps Ukraine Strike Russian Energy Infrastructure
Oct 12, 2025 · The United States has been providing Ukraine with intelligence to help plan long-range drone strikes on Russian energy infrastructure, ...Missing: naval | Show results with:naval
[123]
Step by Step, Ukraine Built a Technological Navy - U.S. Naval Institute
Ukraine has built a tech navy of sea drones that wages a classic asymmetric campaign for control of the Black Sea.Missing: oil gas
[124]
Defense FY 2026 IT and Cyberspace Activities Budget Highlights
Sep 18, 2025 · The Pentagon has requested more than $66B in IT funding for FY 2026, distributed among unclassified and classified IT and cyber operations.
[125]
Artificial Intelligence Provisions in the Fiscal Year 2026 House and ...
Sep 11, 2025 · Both the House and Senate versions of the FY 2026 NDAA prioritize the adoption and integration of AI across military operations, logistics, and ...
[126]
Cyber Command creates new AI program in fiscal 2026 budget
Jul 7, 2025 · U.S. Cyber Command's budget request for fiscal 2026 includes funding to begin a new project specifically for artificial intelligence.
[127]
Strategic Innovation in the DoD FY 2026 RDTE Budget: Leveraging ...
Jul 8, 2025 · The DoD FY 2026 RDTE budgetary investment in disruptive technology is a transformative step and a major leap forward in S/T integration in ...