Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Orbital plane

In astronomy and celestial mechanics, an orbital plane is the flat, two-dimensional geometric surface in which a smaller body, such as a planet, moon, or satellite, revolves around a larger central body under the influence of gravity.^[1]^[2] This plane is defined by the constant angular momentum vector of the orbiting system, which remains perpendicular to both the position and velocity vectors of the orbiting body, ensuring that the motion remains confined to that plane in the ideal two-body problem.^[2] The orientation of an orbital plane relative to a reference plane—typically the ecliptic, which is the plane of Earth's orbit around the Sun—is described by two key orbital elements: the inclination (i), the angle between the orbital plane and the reference plane (ranging from 0° for coplanar orbits to 180°), and the longitude of the ascending node (Ω), the angle from a reference direction to the point where the orbit crosses the reference plane from south to north.^[2]^[3] In the Solar System, most planets and asteroids, as well as short-period comets, share orbits close to the ecliptic, forming a thin disk that minimizes gravitational perturbations and collision risks, though long-period comets often follow highly inclined or perpendicular paths.^[1]^[3] Orbital planes play a critical role in space mission design and satellite operations; for instance, geostationary satellites are placed in Earth's equatorial plane (inclination of 0°), while sun-synchronous orbits maintain a near-constant angle to the Sun through controlled precession of their orbital plane.^[2] Perturbations from non-spherical bodies, atmospheric drag, or third-body gravity can cause slight deviations from planarity over time, necessitating ongoing adjustments in practical applications.^[2]

Fundamentals

Definition

The orbital plane is the two-dimensional geometric plane that passes through the center of the primary (central) body and fully contains the elliptical or circular path of the secondary (orbiting) body around it.^[1] In this plane, the orbit traces out a conic section, with the primary body located at one focus for bound elliptical orbits, ensuring that the motion remains confined to this flat surface under idealized conditions.^[5] This concept was first formalized in the early 17th century through Johannes Kepler's laws of planetary motion, particularly the first law, which states that planets orbit the Sun in ellipses lying within a single plane.^[5] Kepler derived these laws from meticulous observations by Tycho Brahe, establishing the orbital plane as the fundamental geometric framework for describing celestial motion and replacing earlier circular models with elliptical ones confined to a plane.^[6] The orbital plane is often visualized as an invisible disk or thin sheet slicing through three-dimensional space, with its orientation defined relative to a reference plane—such as the ecliptic for solar system bodies—via the line of nodes, the straight line where the two planes intersect.^[7] This intersection serves as a key reference for locating the plane's tilt and position in space. In the ideal two-body problem, where gravitational interaction occurs solely between the primary and secondary bodies without external influences, the orbital plane remains fixed and unchanging throughout the motion.^[8] However, real orbital systems experience perturbations from additional gravitational forces or non-gravitational effects, which can cause gradual precession or slight deviations from this plane over time.^[8] The inclination provides a quantitative measure of the orbital plane's angular deviation from a reference plane, such as the equatorial plane of the primary body.^[9]

Geometric Properties

The orbital plane of a body in orbit is defined as the flat, two-dimensional surface in three-dimensional space through which the body's trajectory lies, determined by its position and velocity vectors at any point. This plane is uniquely characterized by its normal vector, which is perpendicular to the plane and aligned with the angular momentum vector \mathbf{h} of the orbiting body, given by \mathbf{h} = \mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}, where \mathbf{r} is the position vector and \mathbf{v} is the velocity vector relative to the central body. The direction of this normal vector follows the right-hand rule convention: curling the fingers of the right hand in the direction of the orbital motion points the thumb along the positive normal, establishing a consistent orientation for the plane. The general equation of the orbital plane in Cartesian coordinates takes the form ax + by + cz = 0, where the coefficients a, b, and c represent the components of the normal vector \mathbf{n} = (a, b, c), normalized such that a^2 + b^2 + c^2 = 1 if desired for unit length. This normal vector is computed as \mathbf{n} = \frac{\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}}{|\mathbf{r} \times \mathbf{v}|}, ensuring the plane passes through the central body (origin) and contains all points along the orbit. In practice, this formulation allows for the precise determination of the plane's orientation without requiring the full elliptical path, relying solely on instantaneous state vectors. When considering the orbital plane relative to a reference plane—such as the ecliptic plane for solar system orbits or the equatorial plane for Earth-centered orbits—their intersection forms the line of nodes, a straight line passing through the central body. The points where the orbit crosses this reference plane are known as the ascending node (where the orbiting body moves from below to above the reference plane) and the descending node (the opposite crossing). These nodes delineate the boundaries of the orbital geometry in the reference frame, providing key markers for spatial alignment, though their exact positions are parameterized separately in orbital elements. This geometric intersection underpins the planar nature of orbits as described in Kepler's first law, where elliptical paths lie wholly within the orbital plane.

Orbital Elements and Parameters

Inclination

Orbital inclination, denoted as i, is defined as the angle between the orbital plane of a body and a chosen reference plane, such as the ecliptic plane for solar system orbits or the equatorial plane for Earth-centered orbits.^[10] For instance, an inclination of 0° corresponds to an equatorial orbit lying directly in the reference plane, while 90° describes a polar orbit perpendicular to it.^[10] The inclination can be mathematically determined using the formula \cos i = \frac{\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{h}}{|\mathbf{n}| |\mathbf{h}|}, where \mathbf{n} is the unit normal vector to the reference plane and \mathbf{h} is the specific angular momentum vector perpendicular to the orbital plane.^[11] This dot product yields the cosine of the angle between the two planes' normals, with the magnitude ensuring normalization. The line of nodes, formed by the intersection of the orbital and reference planes, serves as the baseline from which this tilt is measured.^[12] Inclination values range from 0° to 180°, distinguishing between prograde orbits (0° to 90°, aligned with the reference plane's rotation direction) and retrograde orbits (90° to 180°, opposite to it).^[13] Prograde inclinations facilitate energy-efficient launches in systems like Earth's, while retrograde ones, such as 180° for a fully reversed equatorial orbit, require significantly more delta-v for plane changes.^[10]

Node Positions

The ascending node is defined as the point along the orbit where the orbiting body crosses the reference plane in the direction from south to north, while the descending node is the point where it crosses from north to south. These nodes mark the intersections between the orbital plane and the reference plane, forming the line of nodes that serves as a key geometric feature for orienting the orbit. The longitude of the ascending node, denoted by the symbol \Omega, quantifies the position of the ascending node within the reference plane. It is measured as the angle from a fixed reference direction—typically the vernal equinox—to the ascending node, along the reference plane in the sense of the body's orbital motion. This parameter ranges from 0° to 360° and provides the rotational alignment of the orbital plane around the central body's polar axis. Note that \Omega is undefined for equatorial orbits (i = 0° or 180°), where the orbital plane coincides with the reference plane.^[14]^[15]^[16] In the set of classical orbital elements, \Omega works in conjunction with the inclination i to fully define the orientation of the orbital plane relative to the reference plane, where the inclination describes the tilt and \Omega specifies the azimuthal rotation.^[10]

Natural Orbits in the Solar System

Planetary Orbits

The orbits of the planets in the Solar System are remarkably coplanar, with most planetary orbital planes aligned closely to the ecliptic, which is the reference plane defined by Earth's orbit around the Sun. This near-coplanarity arises because the planets formed from a flattened protoplanetary disk of gas and dust surrounding the young Sun, where gravitational collapse and angular momentum conservation caused material to settle into a thin, rotating disk, leading to orbits that lie within a few degrees of this plane.^[17] For the eight recognized planets, orbital inclinations relative to the ecliptic range from 0° for Earth to a maximum of 7.0° for Mercury, with the others—Venus at 3.4°, Mars at 1.9°, Jupiter at 1.3°, Saturn at 2.5°, Uranus at 0.8°, and Neptune at 1.8°—exhibiting even smaller tilts, demonstrating the disk's dominant influence on orbital alignment.^[18] This coplanarity facilitates astronomical observations and modeling, as the ecliptic serves as the standard reference for measuring all planetary inclinations, simplifying the description of their paths across the sky. The slight deviations, such as Mercury's higher inclination, are attributed to dynamical interactions during the early Solar System's formation and evolution, though they remain minor compared to the overall flatness. An notable exception is Pluto, classified as a dwarf planet, whose orbital plane is inclined by 17.2° to the ecliptic, reflecting its origin in a more scattered population beyond Neptune rather than the primary protoplanetary disk.^[18] The concept of planetary orbits lying near the ecliptic was established through early modern astronomical observations in the 16th and 17th centuries. Nicolaus Copernicus, in his 1543 work De revolutionibus orbium coelestium, proposed a heliocentric model where planets move in circular orbits approximately within the plane of Earth's path around the Sun, shifting away from geocentric models and laying the groundwork for ecliptic-based descriptions. Johannes Kepler refined this in the early 17th century, using Tycho Brahe's precise data to formulate his laws of planetary motion (published 1609–1619), which described elliptical orbits with the Sun at one focus, still confined largely to the ecliptic plane, thus solidifying the observational foundation for understanding orbital planes.^[6]

Natural Satellite Orbits

Natural satellites, or moons, orbit their parent planets in planes that are predominantly aligned with the planet's equatorial plane, reflecting their formation processes and dynamical evolution. This equatorial alignment is a hallmark of regular satellites, which constitute the majority of larger moons in the Solar System. For instance, the four Galilean moons of Jupiter—Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto—exhibit very low orbital inclinations relative to Jupiter's equator, typically less than 1°, with Europa's orbit inclined at 0.470°.^[19] These near-coplanar orbits facilitate stable resonances and minimize perturbations from the planet's oblateness. Similarly, the Moon's orbit around Earth has an inclination of approximately 5.145° relative to the ecliptic plane, resulting in an effective inclination to Earth's equator that varies between approximately 18.3° and 28.6° over an 18.6-year precession cycle due to the 23.4° axial tilt of Earth.^[20]^[21] This relatively low inclination compared to a potential 90° polar orbit underscores the equatorial bias in satellite systems. The preference for equatorial orbits arises primarily from the formation of regular satellites within circumplanetary disks—thin, rotating disks of gas and dust that surround a young planet during its accretion phase. These disks, influenced by the planet's spin and tidal interactions with the protoplanetary nebula, align closely with the planet's equatorial plane, leading to the accretion of moons in low-inclination, nearly circular paths.^[22] As a result, most regular satellites achieve prograde orbits with inclinations under a few degrees, promoting long-term stability through mechanisms like tidal locking, where the satellite's rotation synchronizes with its orbital period, further reinforcing co-alignment.^[23] Exceptions occur when satellites are captured from external populations, such as the Kuiper Belt, or originate from collisional debris; these irregular satellites often display higher inclinations or retrograde motion. A prominent example of such an exception is Neptune's moon Triton, which orbits in a retrograde path with an inclination of 156.8° relative to Neptune's equatorial plane, indicating its capture as a Kuiper Belt object billions of years ago.^[24]^[25] This high inclination disrupts the otherwise equatorial-dominated system of Neptune's smaller prograde moons, highlighting how capture events can introduce significant deviations. For outer planets like Jupiter and Neptune, the reference plane for defining satellite orbital inclinations is the planet's equatorial plane, which can differ substantially from the ecliptic due to substantial axial tilts—Jupiter's equator is inclined 3.13° to its orbital plane, while Neptune's is about 28°.^[26]^[27] In contrast, for Earth, the ecliptic serves as a common reference due to its low axial tilt, but satellite parameters are still computed relative to the equatorial system for consistency with planetary dynamics.^[28] Impacts, such as the theorized giant collision that formed Earth's Moon, can also produce initially inclined disks that evolve toward equatorial alignment through tidal dissipation.^[23]

Artificial Orbits

Earth-Centric Orbits

Artificial satellites orbiting Earth are engineered with specific orbital planes to optimize mission objectives, including regional coverage, global monitoring, and communication stability. The inclination of these planes, defined as the angle between the orbital plane and Earth's equatorial plane, is a key parameter influencing accessibility and performance. Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites, typically at altitudes below 2,000 km, frequently utilize inclinations aligned with launch site latitudes to minimize energy requirements during ascent. For instance, launches from Kennedy Space Center at 28.5° N latitude commonly achieve an inclination of 28.5° for efficient payload delivery to LEO.^[13] This configuration supports missions requiring frequent passes over mid-latitudes, such as Earth observation. Alternatively, polar LEO orbits at 90° inclination enable comprehensive global coverage by allowing satellites to overfly all latitudes, including the poles, which is essential for environmental monitoring and reconnaissance.^[29] Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) satellites, positioned at approximately 35,786 km altitude, operate exclusively in the equatorial plane with 0° inclination to maintain a fixed position relative to a specific longitude on Earth's surface.^[10] This zero-inclination setup results in stationary ground tracks, providing uninterrupted coverage for telecommunications, broadcasting, and weather forecasting over equatorial and tropical regions. Any deviation from the equatorial plane would cause the satellite to trace a figure-eight pattern, disrupting its geostationary utility.^[10] For enhanced global distribution, satellite constellations employ multiple orbital planes arranged in patterns like the Walker Delta configuration, where satellites are phased within planes of uniform inclination to ensure continuous worldwide service. The Global Positioning System (GPS) exemplifies this, with its 24 satellites distributed across six equally spaced orbital planes at a 55° inclination, enabling precise navigation and timing signals from medium Earth orbit.^[30] This Walker pattern, originally designed with 18 satellites in three planes at 55°, optimizes redundancy and minimizes gaps in coverage by evenly spacing ascending nodes and intra-plane positions.^[31] Such multi-plane designs are scalable for applications like broadband internet or imaging networks. Launch constraints fundamentally shape the selection of Earth-centric orbital planes, as the initial plane is established by the launch azimuth—the direction of liftoff relative to north—and cannot achieve an inclination lower than the launch site's latitude without significant propellant expenditure for post-launch adjustments. For a due-east launch, the resulting inclination matches the site's latitude exactly, maximizing efficiency; deviations to higher inclinations are possible by adjusting azimuth, but lower ones require dogleg maneuvers that reduce payload capacity. Sites like Kennedy Space Center thus favor missions with inclinations of 28.5° or greater, while polar launches from Vandenberg Space Force Base support near-90° orbits for sun-synchronous applications.

Orbits Around Other Bodies

Artificial satellites and probes orbiting non-Earth celestial bodies employ mission-specific orbital planes tailored to scientific objectives, gravitational characteristics, and operational constraints. For lunar missions, the Apollo program utilized low-inclination orbits closely aligned with the Moon's equatorial plane to support landings at near-equatorial sites, enabling efficient descent and ascent maneuvers; for instance, Apollo 11 achieved an inclination of approximately 1.25° relative to the lunar equator following orbital insertion adjustments.^[32] In contrast, the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) mission adopted a near-polar orbital plane with a 90° inclination to enable comprehensive global gravity mapping by passing over all latitudes.^[33] Planetary orbiters often select inclinations that balance coverage needs with fuel efficiency and communication geometry. The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) operates in a near-polar orbit with an inclination of 93.1° to the Martian equator, facilitating repeated high-resolution imaging and atmospheric profiling across the planet's surface as it rotates beneath the spacecraft.^[34] Similarly, the Cassini mission to Saturn began with an initial orbital plane nearly coincident with the planet's equatorial plane after insertion, but subsequent gravity-assist maneuvers from Saturn's moons inclined the orbit progressively, reaching up to 50.1° relative to the equator during the high-inclination phase to study the rings and poles from varied perspectives.^[35] Missions to asteroids and comets frequently incorporate specialized orbital planes to mitigate perturbations from irregular shapes and weak gravity. The OSIRIS-REx spacecraft entered a "frozen" terminator orbit around the asteroid Bennu, with the plane aligned perpendicular to the Sun-Bennu line to counteract solar radiation pressure and maintain a stable, low-altitude path for sample collection without frequent corrections.^[36] Node positions during approach are precisely targeted to align the insertion plane with these terminator conditions, minimizing eccentricity growth. A key challenge in these orbits arises from the non-spherical gravity fields of planets and asteroids, which introduce higher-order harmonics that perturb the orbital plane post-insertion, often necessitating immediate adjustments via thruster firings to stabilize inclination and prevent rapid precession or decay.^[37] These effects are particularly pronounced around elongated asteroids, where the irregular mass distribution can shift the effective gravitational center, requiring dynamic modeling for sustained mission phases.^[38]

Dynamics and Perturbations

Precession of the Orbital Plane

Precession of the orbital plane, known as nodal precession, involves the gradual rotation of the line of nodes around the primary body's equator due to applied torques, altering the orientation of the orbital plane without changing its inclination. This phenomenon arises primarily from the non-spherical mass distribution of the central body or external gravitational influences, leading to a secular change in the right ascension of the ascending node, denoted as \dot{\Omega}. The inclination i influences the precession rate, with the effect vanishing at equatorial (i = 0^\circ) or polar (i = 90^\circ) orbits where \cos i = 0. For orbits around oblate bodies like Earth, the dominant cause is the gravitational perturbation from the body's equatorial bulge, quantified by the second zonal harmonic coefficient J_2 in the gravitational potential expansion. The secular nodal precession rate due to this J_2 term is given by

\dot{\Omega} = -\frac{3}{2} J_2 \left( \frac{R_E}{p} \right)^2 n \cos i,

where R_E is the equatorial radius of the primary, p = a(1 - e^2) is the semi-latus rectum with semi-major axis a and eccentricity e, and n = \sqrt{\mu / a^3} is the mean motion with gravitational parameter \mu. This formula derives from first-order perturbation theory applied to the J_2 potential. Apsidal precession, which rotates the line of apsides within the orbital plane, can indirectly influence the plane's orientation by modulating eccentricity, though its effect on nodal motion is secondary. In low Earth orbits, such as those of the International Space Station, J_2-induced precession occurs rapidly, on timescales of days; for instance, sun-synchronous orbits are engineered to precess at approximately $0.986^\circ per day to maintain consistent solar illumination. For more distant orbits, the rate slows considerably due to the (R_E / p)^2 scaling, extending timescales to years or centuries. The Moon's orbital plane around Earth precesses at about $19.35^\circ per year (full cycle in 18.6 years), but this is dominated by solar gravitational torques on the inclined Earth-Moon system rather than Earth's J_2, as the lunar distance minimizes oblateness effects. Similarly, Mercury's orbital plane experiences slow nodal regression of roughly $3.4'' per century due to the Sun's oblateness (J_2).

External Influences

External influences on the orbital plane encompass various gravitational and non-gravitational forces that can cause deviations from the ideal Keplerian orientation, leading to wobbles, tilts, or other alterations without inducing pure rotational precession. Gravitational perturbations from third bodies, such as the Sun and Moon acting on Earth-orbiting satellites, introduce significant effects on the orbital plane. For circular synchronous satellites, lunisolar perturbations can result in maximum latitude changes of up to 1.67° over approximately three years in a 12-hour orbit at 30° inclination, effectively causing plane wobbles of similar magnitude.^[39] In high-eccentricity missions like the Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) spacecraft, these perturbations lead to equatorial inclination variations of about 0.3° at apogees around 12 Earth radii, with larger changes at higher apogees due to the Lidov-Kozai mechanism coupling eccentricity and inclination oscillations over 6- to 13-year cycles.^[40] Non-gravitational forces, particularly in low Earth orbits (LEO), further contribute to gradual changes in the orbital plane. Atmospheric drag, arising from interactions with the residual upper atmosphere, primarily decays the semi-major axis but also induces secular shifts in inclination due to the Earth's rotating atmosphere and non-spherical density distribution. For elliptic orbits with perigee altitudes dropping from 400 miles to 100 miles (initial apogee 2000 miles), the total secular inclination change is approximately -0.195° (negative for prograde orbits), with contributions of -0.173° during the precessing ellipse phase and -0.022° in the quasi-steady spiral phase.^[41] Solar radiation pressure (SRP), though secondary to drag in LEO, exerts a perturbative force that can resonate with the orbital motion, leading to long-period variations in inclination for certain configurations. Analytical models show that SRP induces secular effects on the argument of perigee and eccentricity, indirectly influencing plane tilt through coupling with Earth's oblateness (J2 term), with resonance conditions amplifying changes in low-altitude, near-circular orbits.^[42] These effects cause gradual plane decay or non-rotational tilts, typically on the order of fractions of a degree over mission lifetimes, without significant rotational components. Artificial plane adjustments are achieved through dedicated maneuvers, which require precise delta-v budgeting to rotate the velocity vector and reorient the orbital plane. For a simple inclination change Δi in a circular orbit, the required delta-v is given by

\Delta v = 2 v \sin\left(\frac{\Delta i}{2}\right),

where v is the orbital velocity at the node of maneuver; this formula derives from the vector difference between initial and final velocities, minimizing fuel use by performing the burn at the ascending or descending node.^[43] Such maneuvers are costly, with a 60° change demanding delta-v equal to the full orbital velocity (e.g., ~7.5 km/s in LEO), often combined with other transfers to optimize efficiency.^[44] In extreme astrophysical environments, relativistic effects from general relativity can subtly alter orbital planes. Frame-dragging, or the Lense-Thirring effect, occurs around spinning massive bodies like black holes, where the rotation drags spacetime and induces precession-like twists in nearby orbits. Observations of the black hole in H1743-322 reveal frame-dragging causing the accretion disk to wobble, with the orbital plane deviating significantly from perpendicularity to the spin axis, at rates up to 90° per second—far exceeding terrestrial analogs.^[45] Similarly, in systems like GRO J1655-40, the inner disk edge at ~2 Schwarzschild radii precesses at ~300 Hz due to this effect, altering the plane orientation for tightly bound orbits around rapidly spinning black holes (up to 93% of maximal spin).^[46] These influences are negligible for solar system orbits but dominate in strong-field regimes.

References

[1]
Orbital Plane - National Geographic Education
Apr 4, 2024 · An orbital plane is the flat, disk-shaped space that connects the center of the object being orbited with the center of the orbiting objects.
[2]
None
Summary of each segment:
[3]
What Is the Plane of the Ecliptic? - NASA
Mar 23, 2008 · The ecliptic plane is defined as the imaginary plane containing the Earth's orbit around the sun. NASA.
[4]
Kepler's laws of planetary motion | Definition, Diagrams, & Facts
Kepler's three laws of planetary motion can be stated as follows: (1) All planets move about the Sun in elliptical orbits, having the Sun as one of the foci. (2) ...
[5]
Orbits and Kepler's Laws - NASA Science
May 21, 2024 · Kepler's three laws describe how planetary bodies orbit the Sun. They describe how (1) planets move in elliptical orbits with the Sun as a focus.
[6]
line of nodes - Glossary - NASA
Definition. The line of intersection between the orbit plane and the plane of the ecliptic (the Earth's orbit plane). (Not defined if orbit lies exactly in the ...
[7]
Celestial mechanics - Perturbations, Two Bodies, Physics | Britannica
Celestial mechanics involves perturbations, the two-body problem, and the approximate nature of Kepler's laws, where the Sun is not fixed and planets attract ...
[8]
Orbital Plane - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The orbital plane is defined as the plane of motion that contains the position and velocity vectors of two perfectly-spherical masses in planar motion, as ...
[9]
Chapter 5: Planetary Orbits - NASA Science
An inclination of 90 degrees indicates a polar orbit, in which the spacecraft passes over the north and south poles of the planet. An inclination of 180 degrees ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[10]
[PDF] Spacecraft Dynamics and Control - Lecture 12: Orbital Perturbations
Perturbations can be good or bad. • Perturbations allow us to break free of the ∆v budget. • There is not much flexibility in the restricted two-body problem.
[11]
[PDF] University of Michigan Space Physics Research Laboratory
If required the orbital inclination, i, may be determined from the spacecraft position and velocity. The orbital inclination is cosi = hz r h ⋅ r h where r.
[12]
Of inclinations and azimuths | The Planetary Society
Apr 11, 2012 · An orbit with an inclination between 0 and 90 degrees is considered prograde ... An orbit with an inclination between 90 and 180 is retrograde ...
[13]
Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion - NASA Earth Observatory
Jul 7, 2009 · In an attempt to prove his theory, Brahe compiled extensive astronomical records, which Kepler eventually used to prove heliocentrism and to ...
[14]
What are orbital elements? - Catalina Sky Survey
Orbital elements describe the precise nature of an orbit, with six elements describing the shape and orientation of the orbit.
[15]
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - JPL Solar System Dynamics
... (ω) is the argument of perihelion, and upper case omega (Ω) is the longitude of the ascending node. The symbol to the far left (the rams horn - symbol of ...
[16]
Chapter 3 – The Classical Orbital Elements (COEs)
A satellite in a polar orbit has an inclination of 90° and hence travels over the north and south geographical poles. This type of orbit allows for maximum ...
[17]
Solar System: Facts - NASA Science
### Summary of Why Planets' Orbits Are Nearly Coplanar
[18]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
ESA - Types of orbits - European Space Agency
A low Earth orbit (LEO) is, as the name suggests, an orbit that is relatively close to Earth's surface. LEO is considered to be under altitudes of 2000 km, this ...Geostationary orbit (GEO) · Low Earth orbit (LEO) · Medium Earth orbit (MEO)
[20]
Space Segment | GPS.gov
The satellites in the GPS constellation are arranged into six equally-spaced orbital planes surrounding the Earth. Each plane contains four "slots" occupied by ...Missing: Walker | Show results with:Walker
[21]
[PDF] A STUDY OF THREE SATELLITE CONSTELLATION DESIGN ...
In Walker constellations, all satellites are placed in circular orbits at the same altitude. All of the orbit planes have the same inclination i., and the ...
[22]
[PDF] APOLLO 11 MISSION REPORT NOVEMBER 1969
during Apollo 10 to 0 .078 degree in Apollo 11 by biasing the lunar orbit ... lunar passes with the orbit plane constrained to the latest , one-pass.
[23]
[PDF] TRANSFERS TO LOW LUNAR ORBITS - DESCANSO
design such orbit insertions, assuming that the mission performs lunar orbit insertion. (LOI) at an altitude of 100 km and an inclination of 90 degrees (deg).
[24]
[PDF] Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter - DESCANSO
Finally, the Sun itself subtends 10.5 deg in the sky, as viewed from Earth, and can completely block the line-of-site signal path to the MRO spacecraft if the ...
[25]
Cassini Significant Events 01/01/2014 - 01/07/2014 - NASA Science
Jan 1, 2014 · Cassini is orbiting Saturn with a 31.9-day period in a plane inclined 50.1 degrees from the planet's equatorial plane.
[26]
[PDF] maneuver strategy for osiris-rex proximity operations
The. M3A maneuver is targeted to insert the spacecraft into a 2 X 1.5 km frozen orbit about Bennu in the terminator plane. The design of the frozen orbit is as ...
[27]
[PDF] ORBIT MECHANICS ABOUT SMALL ASTEROIDS
The special challenges faced by spacecraft missions to these bodies are the relatively strong solar radiation pressure (SRP) forces that act on a spacecraft, ...
[28]
[PDF] AAS 15-616 RAPID GENERATION OF OPTIMAL ASTEROID ...
Challenges that arise from designing an asteroid powered descent trajectory include complicated nonlinear gravity fields, small rotating bodies and low thrust ...
[29]
[PDF] perturbations of circular synchronous satellite orbits
This is due to lunar and solar perturbations of the orbital inclination, An upper bound for this is obtained also. The upper bounds for A V and hL combine to ...
[30]
[PDF] LUNISOLAR PERTURBATIONS OF HIGH-ECCENTRICITY ORBITS ...
However, around midway through the campaign to raise apogee radius to 25 RE, the third-body effects produced by the Sun and Moon [7] became significant.
[31]
[PDF] Theory of the effect of drag on the orbital inclination of an earth satellite
The motion of an earth satellite relative to the earth's atmosphere produces a secular change in the inclination of the orbit. In predicting this change it is ...Missing: LEO | Show results with:LEO
[32]
[PDF] An Analytical Theory for the Perturbative Effect of Solar Radiation ...
tan ω =к · ZI к · ˆYI. (3.40). The time derivatives of these equations ... argument of latitude, and u0 is the argument of latitude of the Sun position ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
[PDF] Orbital plane change (inclination) It is an orbital maneuver aimed at ...
When both orbits are circular (i.e. e = 0) and have the same radius the Delta-v (Δvi) required for an inclination change (Δvi) can be calculated using: where: • ...
[34]
Plane Change Maneuvers - Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics
Similarly, a plane change of 60° requires a Δ v equal to the current spacecraft velocity! In LEO, the velocity is approximately 7.5 km/s. A plane change of 60°, ...
[35]
General relativity caught in action around black hole - Science News
Dec 17, 2015 · Researchers captured the extreme frame dragging by analyzing X-rays emanating from a disk of star debris swirling around a black hole about ...
[36]
Frame Dragging?
### Summary of Frame-Dragging Effect on Orbital Planes Around Spinning Black Holes