Petroleum refining processes
Petroleum refining processes encompass the industrial methods used to convert crude oil—a complex mixture of hydrocarbons—into a variety of usable products, such as gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel, and petrochemical feedstocks, primarily through physical separation, chemical conversion, and purification techniques.[1] These processes occur in large-scale refineries, which are sophisticated facilities that handle vast quantities of crude oil daily, transforming it via multi-stage operations to meet market demands for high-value fuels and materials. The foundational step is atmospheric distillation, where heated crude oil (typically to 350–400°C) enters a tall fractionation tower, allowing hydrocarbons to separate based on boiling points: lighter fractions like liquefied petroleum gases and naphtha vaporize and rise to the top, while heavier residues such as kerosene, gas oils, and bitumen collect at the bottom.[1] Vacuum distillation often follows to process the heavy residues under reduced pressure, preventing thermal decomposition and yielding additional valuable cuts like vacuum gas oil.[1] Subsequent conversion processes rearrange molecular structures to maximize yields of desirable lighter products from heavier feedstocks. Catalytic cracking, a key thermal-chemical method, employs heat, pressure, and catalysts (often zeolites) to break large hydrocarbon molecules into smaller ones, significantly boosting gasoline production—accounting for about 40–50% of a typical refinery's output.[1] Complementary techniques include catalytic reforming, which uses platinum-based catalysts at high temperatures (around 500°C) to upgrade low-octane naphtha into high-octane gasoline components and aromatics, and alkylation, where small olefin molecules from cracking are combined with isobutane under acidic conditions to form branched alkanes ideal for aviation and motor gasoline blending.[1] Hydrocracking, a hydrogen-assisted variant, further enhances diesel and gasoline yields while reducing sulfur content.[1] Treating or purification steps ensure product quality and compliance with environmental regulations by removing impurities. Hydrotreating, for instance, reacts feedstreams with hydrogen over catalysts to eliminate sulfur, nitrogen, and metals, producing low-sulfur fuels essential for modern emissions standards.[1] Finally, blending combines treated streams with additives (e.g., detergents, oxygenates) to achieve precise specifications for octane rating, volatility, and performance, resulting in end products like ultra-low sulfur diesel and premium gasoline.[1] Overall, refining yields a diverse portfolio of outputs, with gasoline comprising roughly 44% of products in U.S. refineries as of 2023, followed by distillate fuels (diesel and heating oil) at 28%, and smaller shares for jet fuel, asphalt, and petrochemicals.[2] These processes have evolved since the late 19th century, with innovations like fluid catalytic cracking in the 1940s revolutionizing efficiency, enabling modern refineries to process over 500,000 barrels of crude per day while adapting to varying crude qualities and global energy needs.[1]Overview
Definition and Objectives
Petroleum refining encompasses a series of physical and chemical processes that transform crude oil—a complex mixture of hydrocarbons—into a range of usable products, including transportation fuels like gasoline and diesel, heating fuels, lubricants, asphalt for paving, and feedstocks for petrochemicals.[1] Physical processes, such as distillation, separate the crude oil into fractions based on boiling points, while chemical processes, including cracking and reforming, convert heavier hydrocarbons into lighter, more valuable ones using heat, pressure, catalysts, and hydrogen.[1] The ultimate aim is to yield products suitable for end-use applications, from powering vehicles and generating electricity to manufacturing plastics and chemicals.[1] The primary objectives of petroleum refining are to maximize the yield and value of high-demand products such as gasoline and diesel, which command premium prices in the market, while minimizing waste and byproducts like heavy residues.[3] Refineries also focus on producing streams that meet stringent product specifications for performance, such as octane ratings for gasoline or cetane indices for diesel, alongside compliance with environmental standards to reduce sulfur, nitrogen, and other pollutants in emissions and fuels.[4] This optimization ensures efficient resource utilization and aligns output with consumer and regulatory demands.[3] Petroleum refining holds central economic importance as the linchpin of the global energy supply chain, converting raw crude oil into the petroleum products that power transportation, industry, and households worldwide.[5] As of 2023, global refining capacity stood at approximately 103.5 million barrels per day, underscoring the industry's scale and its role in meeting daily energy needs amid fluctuating supply and demand.[6] Key challenges in petroleum refining include managing variability in crude oil feedstocks, which differ in composition, density, and sulfur content depending on origin, thereby requiring adaptable processing to maintain product consistency.[4] Refineries must also balance these variations with evolving product demands driven by market shifts toward lighter fuels and align operations with stringent regulatory compliance for emissions and fuel quality, which often necessitates costly upgrades to treatment units.[4]Basic Flow and Principles
Petroleum refining transforms crude oil into usable products through a sequence of interconnected stages that leverage physical and chemical principles to separate, convert, and purify hydrocarbons. The primary stages include separation, conversion, treatment, and finishing. Separation primarily involves distillation, which exploits differences in boiling points to fractionate crude oil into components like gases, naphtha, kerosene, diesel, and residues.[1] Conversion processes, such as cracking and reforming, restructure larger hydrocarbon molecules into lighter, more valuable ones to meet market demands for fuels like gasoline.[7] Treatment removes impurities through purification techniques, while finishing entails blending treated streams with additives to produce final specifications-compliant products.[1] At the core of these stages are fundamental principles rooted in physical chemistry. Separation relies on the varying boiling points of hydrocarbons, where lighter fractions vaporize at lower temperatures than heavier ones, allowing isolation based on volatility differences.[8] Conversion employs catalytic reactions to break or rearrange molecular bonds; for instance, cracking uses catalysts and heat to cleave long-chain alkanes into shorter alkenes and alkanes, while reforming isomerizes or aromatizes naphtha molecules to boost octane ratings.[7] Treatment often utilizes hydrogenation, where hydrogen gas reacts with impurities like sulfur or nitrogen compounds over catalysts to form removable byproducts, ensuring environmental and performance standards are met.[1] The simplified process flow begins with crude oil input, followed by pretreatment to remove salts and water, then proceeds to distillation for initial fractionation. Downstream processing applies conversion and treatment to these fractions, culminating in blending and storage of finished products like gasoline and diesel.[7] This linear yet integrated flow maximizes yield and efficiency, with recycle streams often returning unconverted materials for further processing.[1] Distillation relies on the principles of vaporization and condensation, where heated crude oil produces vapors that rise in the column and condense at different heights based on their boiling points. Lighter, more volatile components remain gaseous longer and are drawn off higher in the column, while heavier ones liquefy sooner and collect lower.[7]Historical Development
Early Innovations (19th Century)
The discovery of kerosene distillation is credited to Polish pharmacist Ignacy Łukasiewicz, who in 1853 successfully separated kerosene from crude oil through fractional distillation in Lwów (now Lviv, Ukraine), enabling its use as a clean-burning fuel in lamps that provided brighter illumination than traditional whale oil or coal-based alternatives.[9] Łukasiewicz patented the process and constructed the first kerosene lamp, which he demonstrated in a local pharmacy and later in a hospital operating theater, marking a pivotal shift toward practical petroleum utilization for lighting across Europe.[10] In the United States, the first known petroleum refinery was established by Samuel M. Kier in the 1850s in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, where he refined crude oil into illuminating oil using a one-barrel cast-iron still heated by a wood fire.[11] Following Edwin Drake's groundbreaking 1859 well—the first commercial oil well in the country—the Seneca Oil Company built a dedicated refinery in 1861 near Titusville, Pennsylvania, employing simple atmospheric distillation to extract kerosene from the light Pennsylvania crude. This rudimentary operation processed oil in small batches using iron stills heated by wood or coal fires, yielding approximately 50% kerosene by volume, with the remainder consisting of lower-value naphtha, lubricants, and heavy residues often discarded as waste.[11][12] Early refiners faced significant hurdles, including labor-intensive batch processing that limited output to mere barrels per day, inconsistent yields due to variable crude quality, frequent fires from open-flame distillation, and environmental disposal issues from unutilized residues, all of which constrained scalability amid rising demand for lamp fuel.[13] The Pennsylvania oil boom of the 1870s, triggered by the proliferation of wells following Drake's success, spurred rapid industry expansion and technological refinement, culminating in the adoption of continuous distillation stills that linked multiple units in series for uninterrupted operation and higher efficiency.[11] Innovators like Max Livingston introduced practical continuous systems by the mid-1870s, allowing fresh crude to feed sequentially into heated stills while vapors condensed into fractions, thereby boosting throughput from tens to hundreds of barrels daily and reducing waste through better residue management. This advancement transformed refining from artisanal batch efforts into a proto-industrial process, supporting the output of millions of barrels of kerosene annually by decade's end and laying the groundwork for the global petroleum trade.[12]20th Century Advancements
The 20th century marked a transformative era for petroleum refining, shifting from simple distillation to sophisticated conversion processes that dramatically improved yields and product quality to meet the rising demand for gasoline and other fuels driven by the automobile boom and global conflicts. Early in the century, innovations focused on breaking down heavier crude oil fractions into lighter, more valuable products like gasoline, which initially yielded only about 15-20% from straight-run distillation. These advancements laid the foundation for modern refineries, enabling higher efficiency and the production of high-octane fuels essential for aviation and automotive applications. A pivotal breakthrough came in 1913 with the invention of thermal cracking by William Merriam Burton, a chemist at Standard Oil of Indiana. Burton's process involved heating crude oil residues under high pressure and temperature (around 700-750°F and 90 psi) to break long hydrocarbon chains into smaller molecules, more than doubling gasoline yields to approximately 40%.[14] This method, patented as the Burton process, was rapidly adopted across U.S. refineries, addressing the growing shortage of gasoline as automobile ownership surged.[15] Building on thermal cracking, the 1930s introduced catalytic cracking, pioneered by Eugene Houdry in 1936. Houdry's fixed-bed process used silica-alumina catalysts to rearrange hydrocarbon molecules at lower temperatures than thermal methods, producing gasoline with significantly higher octane ratings—up to 88 compared to 70 from thermal cracking—while yielding similar volumes but with reduced coke formation.[16] Commercialized through partnerships with Socony-Vacuum and Sun Oil, this innovation enhanced fuel quality for higher-compression engines, marking a shift toward catalyst-driven refining.[17] The fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) process, developed in 1942 by researchers at Standard Oil of New Jersey and Texas Company, revolutionized the industry by enabling continuous operation through a fluidized catalyst bed. Unlike Houdry's semi-continuous fixed-bed system, FCC circulated powdered catalysts (zeolites and clays) in a riser reactor, achieving gasoline yields exceeding 50% from heavy feeds while minimizing downtime and improving energy efficiency.[18] The first commercial FCC unit in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, began processing 17,000 barrels per day by mid-1942, quickly scaling to meet wartime needs.[19] Postwar developments in the 1940s and 1950s further refined conversion technologies. In 1949, Universal Oil Products introduced platforming, a catalytic reforming process using platinum catalysts on alumina to upgrade low-octane naphtha into high-octane gasoline components rich in aromatics, boosting reformate octane to 95-100.[20] This semi-continuous method produced not only premium fuels but also valuable hydrogen byproducts for other refinery operations. Complementing this, hydrocracking emerged in the 1950s, with the first commercial unit operational in 1959 by Standard Oil of California. Operating under high hydrogen pressure with bifunctional catalysts (acids and metals like nickel), hydrocracking converted heavy residues into clean diesel and kerosene, yielding up to 80-90% middle distillates while saturating impurities for better stability.[21] World War II accelerated these advancements through rapid U.S. refinery expansion to supply high-octane aviation gasoline, critical for Allied air superiority. Demand for 100-octane fuel prompted the construction of over 100 new catalytic units between 1941 and 1945, increasing U.S. refinery capacity by about 30% to over 5 million barrels per day by war's end, with innovations like alkylation and isomerization integrated to meet military specifications.[22] This wartime scaling not only ensured victory but also established the infrastructure for postwar economic growth.[23]Post-2000 Developments
In the early 2000s, petroleum refining underwent significant transformations driven by stringent environmental regulations, particularly the adoption of advanced hydrotreating processes to produce ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD). In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency's 2006 rule mandated that refiners reduce sulfur content in on-road diesel from 500 ppm to 15 ppm, requiring widespread upgrades to hydrotreating units to remove sulfur compounds like thiophenes and mercaptans through hydrogenation.[24] Similarly, in the European Union, Directive 98/70/EC and subsequent amendments enforced a phased reduction to 10 ppm sulfur by 2009, compelling refineries to enhance hydrodesulfurization capabilities and integrate deeper catalytic treatments to meet Euro 4 and later standards.[25] These changes not only minimized SOx emissions from vehicle exhausts but also improved catalyst performance in downstream cracking units, marking a shift toward cleaner fuel production across major markets.[26] Parallel to regulatory pressures, the integration of biorefining elements emerged as a key sustainability innovation, with co-processing of vegetable oils and animal fats in existing hydrocrackers gaining traction since around 2010. This approach involves blending renewable feedstocks, such as waste cooking oil or soybean oil, with vacuum gas oil in hydrotreating and hydrocracking units, yielding hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) or renewable diesel that meets conventional fuel specifications while reducing lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions by up to 90% compared to fossil diesel.[27] Early commercial implementations in Europe, including projects in Spain and facilities operated by companies like Preem in Sweden, demonstrated the viability of up to 10-20% renewable co-feed rates without major unit modifications, leveraging the same hydrogenation chemistry used for ULSD production.[28] By the mid-2010s, this technology expanded globally, enabling refineries to diversify feedstocks and access incentives like renewable fuel credits, thereby bridging conventional refining with bioenergy pathways.[29] Digital advancements, particularly artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, have revolutionized refinery operations in the 2020s, focusing on process optimization and predictive maintenance to enhance efficiency and reliability. ExxonMobil, for instance, deployed AI systems like Sofia—an intelligent operations assistant powered by voice recognition and self-learning algorithms—at its Baton Rouge and Baytown refineries starting in 2021, enabling real-time analysis of variables such as production rates and unit pressures to optimize yields, cut energy consumption, and lower emissions.[30] These tools predict equipment failures by monitoring sensor data from pumps, valves, and compressors, reducing unplanned downtime by up to 20% and supporting proactive maintenance schedules across global assets.[31] Broader industry adoption of AI-driven digital twins and cognitive vision systems has similarly improved flare gas management and reaction control, aligning with net-zero goals by minimizing waste and emissions.[32] Efforts to mitigate refining's carbon footprint advanced through carbon capture and storage (CCS) pilots, exemplified by Shell's Quest project at the Scotford Upgrader in Alberta, Canada, which commenced operations in August 2015. Integrated into hydrogen manufacturing units—a core component of hydrotreating and cracking processes—Quest captures approximately 1 million metric tons of CO2 annually from flue gases, equivalent to removing emissions from over 200,000 passenger vehicles, and injects it into deep saline aquifers for permanent storage.[33] By 2020, the facility had sequestered 5 million tons ahead of schedule; as of mid-2025, cumulative storage exceeded 9 million tonnes, demonstrating scalable CCS integration in upgrader operations that process heavy oil sands bitumen into synthetic crude.[34][35] Such initiatives have informed subsequent projects, highlighting CCS as a viable bridge for emissions reduction in refining amid rising climate pressures.[36] While the global average Nelson Complexity Index has remained around 6, many new facilities, particularly in Asia and the Middle East, achieved values over 10 by 2023, enabling higher yields of valuable products like gasoline and petrochemicals from heavier crudes.[37] This evolution, driven by investments in advanced conversion units, has enhanced flexibility to process diverse feedstocks, including renewables, while adapting to market demands for low-carbon outputs.[38]Feedstock and Preparation
Crude Oil Composition
Crude oil, the primary feedstock for petroleum refining, is a complex mixture of hydrocarbons and non-hydrocarbon compounds derived from ancient organic matter. Its composition varies significantly depending on geological origins, but it predominantly consists of carbon and hydrogen, with typical elemental breakdowns of approximately 83-87% carbon and 10-14% hydrogen by weight.[39] The remaining components include heteroatoms and trace elements that influence refining processes and product yields. Understanding this makeup is essential, as it determines the efficiency and economics of downstream separation and conversion steps. The hydrocarbon fraction of crude oil is categorized into several classes based on molecular structure. Paraffins (straight-chain and branched alkanes) typically comprise 15-60% of the total, providing straight-chain molecules that yield high-quality gasoline and diesel upon refining. Naphthenes (cycloalkanes) make up 30-60%, contributing to the cyclic structures that enhance stability in fuels but require cracking for lighter products. Aromatics (benzene-ring compounds) account for 3-30%, valued for their use in petrochemicals but limited due to environmental regulations on benzene content. In heavier crudes, asphaltenes and resins—complex, polar polycyclic structures—constitute the remainder, often 5-20%, forming viscous residues that pose challenges in processing.[40] These proportions reflect the ternary classification system, where paraffinic crudes emphasize alkanes, naphthenic types favor cycloalkanes, and aromatic-asphaltic variants dominate in heavy oils.[41] Non-hydrocarbon impurities, though minor, significantly affect refinery operations by poisoning catalysts and corroding equipment. Sulfur compounds, present as mercaptans, sulfides, and thiophenes, range from 0.05% to 6% by weight, with most crudes falling between 0.1% and 5%.[42] Nitrogen, primarily in heterocyclic forms like pyridines, varies from 0.1% to 0.9%, often below 0.2% in lighter oils but higher in bituminous sources. Oxygen appears in carboxylic acids, phenols, and furans at less than 2% by weight, contributing to acidity and instability. Metals such as vanadium and nickel, bound in porphyrin complexes, can reach several hundred ppm, with vanadium up to about 1200 ppm in some heavy crudes, accumulating in heavy fractions and deactivating catalysts during cracking.[43][42][44][45] Crude oils are classified by density and sulfur content, which dictate processing complexity. Light crudes have an API gravity greater than 31° (density <0.870 g/cm³), flowing easily and yielding more valuable light products, while heavy crudes exhibit API gravity below 22° (density >0.922 g/cm³), requiring extensive upgrading. Sweet crudes contain less than 0.5% sulfur, facilitating simpler refining, whereas sour types exceed 1% sulfur, necessitating desulfurization to meet fuel standards. For instance, West Texas Intermediate (WTI), a benchmark light sweet crude from U.S. shale plays, has an API gravity of 39.6° and 0.24% sulfur, making it highly desirable for gasoline production. In contrast, Venezuelan heavy crudes, such as those from the Orinoco Belt, typically feature API gravities around 8-16° and sulfur contents of 2.5-4%, exemplifying sour heavy feedstocks that demand advanced hydrotreating.[46][47][48] Compositional variability arises from source rock geology, maturation, and migration history, profoundly impacting refining economics. Middle Eastern crudes, often intermediate in density (API 28-35°) with moderate sulfur (1-3%), differ from light, low-sulfur shale oils like those from the Bakken formation (API >40°, sulfur <0.1%), which yield higher gasoline volumes but may contain more paraffins prone to waxing. Heavy crudes from Venezuelan or Canadian oil sands, rich in asphaltenes and metals, incur 20-50% higher processing costs due to the need for coking or hydrocracking units, reducing margins compared to light sweet feeds that align with simpler refinery configurations. This source-dependent diversity drives global crude assays and influences market premiums, with light sweet oils commanding prices $5-10 per barrel above heavy sours.[49][46]Desalting and Pretreatment
Desalting and pretreatment represent the initial stages in preparing crude oil for further refining, focusing on the removal of impurities such as salts, water, and solids to prevent corrosion, fouling, and catalyst poisoning in downstream units.[50] Crude oil arriving at refineries often contains 0.1 to 2 wt% water and significant salt levels, primarily as sodium chloride emulsions, which must be reduced to protect equipment.[50] These processes ensure the feedstock meets specifications for efficient distillation, with desalting typically achieving salt contents below 1 pound per thousand barrels (ptb).[51] The desalting process involves water-washing the crude oil to dissolve and extract chloride salts and minerals, followed by separation of the water-oil emulsion.[50] Electrostatic separation is commonly employed, where an electric field coalesces water droplets dispersed in the oil, facilitating their settling and removal.[52] Demulsifiers, chemical surfactants injected at 50 to 100 ppm, are added to break the emulsion by reducing interfacial tension between oil and water phases, enhancing separation efficiency up to 99% for salts.[53] The crude is heated to 120-150°C to lower viscosity and promote droplet coalescence, with wash water added at 3-10% of the crude volume.[54] Target salt levels are often below 0.5 ptb in modern operations to minimize downstream issues.[51] Dehydration is a key component of pretreatment, aimed at removing free and emulsified water from the crude to levels below 0.5 wt%.[50] This is achieved by heating the crude to 120-150°C in a settling vessel or treater, allowing water to separate by gravity after emulsion breaking.[55] Typical incoming crude contains 0.5-1% water, which is reduced through single or multi-stage settling to prevent hydrate formation and ensure safe handling.[50] Additional pretreatments address specific impurities. Stabilization involves flashing off volatile gases like methane and light hydrocarbons in separators or stabilization columns to lower the vapor pressure of the crude, typically to below 10 psia Reid vapor pressure, enhancing safety and storage stability.[56] Desalting equipment typically consists of two- or three-stage horizontal vessels, where each stage uses electrostatic grids operating at 15-35 kV to enhance separation.[57] Two-stage desalters handle most crudes, achieving 95-98% salt removal, while three-stage units are used for heavier or more contaminated feeds.[58] These units consume energy primarily for heating and pumping.[59]Separation Processes
Atmospheric Distillation
Atmospheric distillation serves as the initial and primary separation step in petroleum refining, where pretreated crude oil is fractionated into various hydrocarbon streams based on differences in boiling points under atmospheric pressure. The process begins with desalted crude oil, which has undergone desalting and pretreatment to remove salts, water, and sediments that could cause corrosion or fouling in downstream equipment.[60] This separation exploits the volatility of lighter components, producing gaseous and liquid fractions that form the feedstocks for subsequent refining operations.[61] In the process, the desalted crude oil is first preheated through a series of heat exchangers to recover heat from product streams and then further heated in a fired furnace to approximately 350–400°C. At this temperature, a significant portion of the crude—typically 50–70%—vaporizes, creating a two-phase mixture of vapor and liquid that is introduced into the base of a fractionation tower operating at atmospheric pressure. The tower, equipped with 30–60 trays to facilitate vapor-liquid contact, allows vapors to rise and condense progressively at different levels based on their boiling points, while descending liquid reflux enhances separation through countercurrent flow. Steam stripping in side drawers removes entrained lighter hydrocarbons from heavier fractions, improving purity.[60][61][62] The fractionation yields distinct cuts corresponding to specific boiling ranges: gases comprising C1–C4 hydrocarbons, naphtha boiling between 35–180°C, kerosene from 180–240°C, diesel or gas oil in the 240–350°C range, and a heavy residue exceeding 350°C. These fractions are withdrawn as overhead vapors for gases and naphtha, side streams for kerosene and diesel, and bottoms for residue, with pumparound loops providing additional cooling to maintain temperature profiles across the tower.[61][63] Typical yield distributions vary with crude oil type and specific gravity but generally include 0–10% gases, 20–30% naphtha, 10–20% kerosene, 20–30% diesel or gas oil, and 30–50% residue by volume. For instance, lighter crudes (specific gravity around 0.80) yield higher proportions of naphtha and kerosene, while heavier crudes (specific gravity 0.92) produce more residue.[64][65] Key operational parameters influencing the sharpness of separations include tray efficiency, which measures the effectiveness of mass transfer on each tray and typically ranges from 60–80% for optimal performance, and the reflux ratio, often maintained at levels that balance energy use with product purity, such as through controlled overhead returns. These parameters are adjusted to minimize overlap between adjacent fractions and maximize throughput without thermal cracking of heavier components.[63][62]Vacuum Distillation
Vacuum distillation serves as a secondary separation process in petroleum refining, targeting the heavier fractions remaining after atmospheric distillation to recover valuable high-boiling-point components without causing thermal decomposition.[66] The unit operates on the reduced crude or atmospheric residue, employing reduced pressure to lower the boiling points of hydrocarbons, allowing distillation at temperatures below those that would induce cracking.[60] In the process setup, the feed is preheated through heat exchangers and then further heated in a fired furnace to 370–425°C before entering the vacuum column.[66] The column pressure is maintained at 10–100 mmHg using steam ejectors, which create the vacuum by entraining vapors through a venturi effect, often supplemented by intercondensers to remove condensable vapors and sustain low pressure.[60] Stripping steam is injected at the bottom of the multitray column to enhance vaporization and prevent partial condensation, while the column internals, such as valve trays or structured packing, minimize pressure drop and promote efficient fractionation.[67] The primary products from vacuum distillation include vacuum gas oil (VGO), which boils in the 350–550°C range and serves as feedstock for downstream cracking processes; lubricating oil base stocks derived from specific side streams; and vacuum residue, often processed into asphalt or pitch.[60] Light and heavy VGO fractions are typically separated, with the former used for lighter products and the latter for heavier feeds or lubes.[67] Typical yields from the atmospheric bottoms vary by crude type but generally include 20–40% VGO, 10–30% lubricating oil base stocks in lube-oriented refineries, and 30–50% vacuum residue, reflecting the distribution for medium to heavy crudes with specific gravities around 0.84–0.92.[64] These yields optimize the recovery of middle distillates while directing the heaviest material to further treatment.[68] The key advantages of vacuum distillation lie in its ability to separate high-boiling hydrocarbons at reduced pressures, preventing coke formation and thermal cracking that would occur at atmospheric conditions, thus enabling the production of higher-quality heavy products and improving overall refinery efficiency.[66] By operating at lower temperatures relative to boiling points, the process minimizes equipment fouling and extends operational reliability.[60]Conversion Processes
Thermal and Catalytic Cracking
Thermal and catalytic cracking are key conversion processes in petroleum refining that transform heavy hydrocarbon fractions, such as vacuum gas oil (VGO) derived from vacuum distillation, into lighter, more valuable products like gasoline by breaking carbon-carbon bonds.[1] These methods increase the yield of transportation fuels from crude oil, addressing the imbalance between heavy distillates and market demand for light ends.[69] Thermal cracking is a non-catalytic process that relies on high temperatures and moderate pressures to induce pyrolysis, decomposing large alkane molecules into shorter chains, olefins, and some aromatics via free radical mechanisms.[70] Operating at temperatures of 450–550°C and pressures around 3.5–17.6 kg/cm² (approximately 50–250 psi), it is particularly suited for processing heavy feeds like topped crude or vacuum residues.[69] A prominent application is visbreaking, a mild form of thermal cracking designed to reduce the viscosity of vacuum distillation residues for easier handling as fuel oil, while generating 10–20% light products including naphtha and middle distillates.[71] This process minimizes coke formation compared to more severe thermal methods but still produces some heavy byproducts.[69] Catalytic cracking, in contrast, employs acid catalysts to enhance selectivity and efficiency at lower severity conditions, with fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) being the dominant variant in modern refineries.[72] FCC operates at reactor temperatures of 470–525°C and low pressures of 1.5–3 atm, using a fluidized bed of fine catalyst particles (typically 60–75 μm) contacted with preheated gas oil feed and steam.[69] Since the introduction of zeolite catalysts in 1965, FCC has achieved higher activity and selectivity, yielding 40–50% gasoline rich in branched alkanes and olefins, along with light cycle oil and slurry oil.[73] Zeolites, such as ZSM-5, promote carbocation intermediates for targeted C-C bond cleavage, resulting in high-octane gasoline (research octane number >90).[73] Both processes involve C-C bond cleavage to produce smaller hydrocarbons, but they generate coke as a byproduct—typically 5–10% of the feed in FCC—through dehydrogenation and polymerization on the catalyst surface or reactor walls.[72] In FCC, coke deposits deactivate the catalyst, necessitating continuous regeneration by burning it off with air in a separate vessel at 590–675°C, which supplies heat for the endothermic cracking reactions.[69] Thermal cracking produces less coke due to its radical pathway but requires higher temperatures (500–700°C overall range) for comparable conversion.[74] The primary differences lie in feedstock suitability and product quality: thermal cracking excels with very heavy residues for viscosity reduction and modest light product yields, while catalytic cracking offers superior selectivity for gasoline from mid-range feeds like VGO, enabling octane numbers exceeding 90 and olefin production for petrochemicals.[75] Thermal methods are less selective, often yielding more gases and lower-value fuels, whereas FCC's catalyst system allows flexible operation and higher conversion efficiency in complex refineries.[76]Hydrocracking and Reforming
Hydrocracking is a catalytic process that upgrades heavy petroleum fractions, such as vacuum gas oil (VGO), into lighter, higher-value products like diesel and gasoline through the combined actions of hydrogenation and cracking.[77] It employs dual-function catalysts, typically consisting of platinum (Pt) or palladium (Pd) metals supported on acidic zeolites, which facilitate hydrogenation on the metal sites and cracking on the acid sites.[78] The process operates at temperatures of 350–450°C and hydrogen pressures of 100–200 atm, enabling high conversion rates exceeding 90% while producing low-sulfur fuels due to the saturating effect of hydrogen.[78] Hydrogen consumption in hydrocracking typically ranges from 500 to 2000 standard cubic feet per barrel (scf/bbl) of feed, accounting for both chemical incorporation into products and recycling needs.[78] A simplified representation of the hydrocracking reaction involves the cleavage of a heavy alkane into lighter hydrocarbons in the presence of hydrogen: \text{C}_{10}\text{H}_{22} + \text{H}_2 \rightarrow \text{C}_7\text{H}_{16} + \text{C}_3\text{H}_8 This equation illustrates the general hydrogen-assisted breaking of carbon-carbon bonds, though actual reactions in the process yield a complex mixture of isomers and saturates.[79] Catalytic reforming, in contrast, processes lighter naphtha feeds to produce high-octane gasoline components and aromatic hydrocarbons, enhancing the quality of motor fuels.[80] It utilizes platinum-based catalysts, often promoted with rhenium or other metals, to promote reactions such as dehydrogenation of naphthenes to aromatics, isomerization of paraffins, and cyclization, all at temperatures of 450–550°C and moderate pressures.[80] The primary output is reformate rich in benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX) aromatics, with yields of 80–90% gasoline-range liquids from the naphtha feed, significantly boosting octane ratings without substantial hydrogen consumption beyond that generated internally.[81] Unlike hydrocracking, reforming emphasizes restructuring molecules for aromatic content rather than deep conversion of heavy residues.[80]Treatment and Finishing Processes
Hydrotreating and Desulfurization
Hydrotreating is a critical purification process in petroleum refining that removes heteroatoms such as sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen from intermediate distillate streams to produce cleaner fuels and meet environmental regulations.[82] This process involves reacting the feedstock with hydrogen over heterogeneous catalysts in fixed-bed reactors, minimizing cracking while selectively targeting impurities.[83] Feedstocks typically include naphtha, kerosene, diesel, and gas oils derived from upstream distillation units.[82] The hydrotreating process utilizes bifunctional catalysts, primarily cobalt-molybdenum (CoMo) supported on alumina for sulfur removal and nickel-molybdenum (NiMo) for nitrogen removal, operating at temperatures of 300–400°C and hydrogen partial pressures of 30–100 atm.[82] A key reaction is hydrodesulfurization (HDS), where organosulfur compounds like thiols are converted to hydrocarbons and hydrogen sulfide via the simplified mechanism:\ce{R-SH + H2 -> RH + H2S}
where R denotes an alkyl group.[84] This removes up to 99% of sulfur under typical conditions, producing H₂S as a byproduct.[85] For producing ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) with sulfur content ≤15 ppm, as mandated by the U.S. EPA's 2006 highway diesel rule, deep desulfurization employs more severe conditions and advanced catalysts.[86] Post-2006 developments include trimetallic NiMoW catalysts on supports like TiO₂ or hierarchical mesoporous alumina, which enhance hydrogenation of refractory sulfur compounds such as 4,6-dimethyldibenzothiophene by improving dispersion and acidity.[87] These catalysts achieve near-complete desulfurization at slightly higher temperatures (up to 380°C) and hydrogen pressures, often requiring two-stage reactor designs to handle inhibition from polyaromatics.[87] Hydrotreating also encompasses hydrodenitrogenation (HDN), which converts nitrogen compounds like quinolines to ammonia through sequential hydrogenation and C-N bond cleavage, typically requiring more hydrogen than HDS due to the stability of N-heterocycles.[85] Olefin saturation occurs concurrently, hydrogenating double bonds to improve fuel stability and cetane number, though it is exothermic and controlled to avoid excessive heat release.[83] Hydrogen consumption in hydrotreating varies from 200 to 1000 standard cubic feet per barrel (scf/bbl) of feedstock, higher for heavier feeds due to greater impurity levels and side reactions like hydrocracking.[85] The resultant H₂S is separated from the treated effluent and recovered as elemental sulfur via the Claus process, which oxidizes about one-third of the H₂S to SO₂ for reaction with the remainder, yielding up to 97% sulfur recovery efficiency.[88]