Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Plate heat exchanger

A plate heat exchanger (PHE) is a type of compact heat exchanger that transfers thermal energy between two fluids—typically liquids—without allowing direct mixing, achieving high efficiency rates of up to 95% through a design that maximizes contact surface area. It consists of a series of thin, corrugated metal plates (often stainless steel or titanium) stacked and clamped within a frame, creating alternating flow channels for the hot and cold fluids that flow in countercurrent or parallel directions to facilitate heat exchange via conduction across the plate surfaces. Gaskets or welds seal the channels, preventing leakage while enabling the fluids to remain separated.^[1] The modern PHE traces its origins to 1923, when Dr. Richard Seligman invented the first commercially successful gasketed plate-and-frame design in the United Kingdom, revolutionizing industrial heat transfer by offering a more efficient alternative to traditional shell-and-tube exchangers.^[2] Earlier concepts emerged in the late 19th century, with an 1878 German patent by Albrecht Dracke describing a basic plate-based system, though it was not widely adopted until Seligman's innovation enabled practical scalability and commercialization.^[3] Over the decades, advancements in materials—such as improved gasket elastomers and corrosion-resistant alloys—have expanded PHE applications beyond initial uses in milk pasteurization to broader industrial sectors.^[1] PHEs are categorized into several types based on construction: gasketed plate-and-frame models, which are disassemblable for cleaning; brazed-plate units, suitable for high-pressure refrigeration; welded-plate designs for aggressive fluids; and specialized variants like semi-welded or shell-and-plate hybrids.^[1] Their corrugated plate patterns enhance turbulence, boosting overall heat transfer coefficients (U-values) to 750–1200 Btu/hr·ft²·°F, often 3–4 times higher than shell-and-tube exchangers, while allowing approach temperatures as low as 10°F.^[4] This results in a compact footprint—occupying 10–50% less space than comparable systems—and lower material costs due to thinner plates.^[4] Key advantages of PHEs include superior thermal performance, ease of maintenance through modularity (e.g., adding or removing plates to adjust capacity), and adaptability to varying process conditions, making them robust for fouling-prone environments when regularly serviced.^[1] However, limitations exist: gasketed types are constrained to pressures below 20.4 bar and temperatures under 150°C to avoid gasket degradation, while fouling from particulates can reduce efficiency if not mitigated, and non-dismantlable brazed or welded models are harder to clean.^[1] Pressure drops are typically kept under 10 psi to balance performance and energy use.^[4] PHEs find widespread use across industries due to their versatility and efficiency. In the food and beverage sector, they excel in hygienic processes like pasteurization, sterilization, and cooling, leveraging easy disassembly for compliance with sanitation standards.^[1] Other applications include HVAC systems for heating and cooling buildings, chemical processing for reactive fluid handling, refrigeration and power generation for energy recovery, and geothermal systems for transferring heat from brines to secondary loops in space heating or hot water production.^[1] Emerging developments, such as novel plate profiles and biomimetic designs, continue to optimize performance for specialized needs like gas heat exchange or nanofluid integration; as of 2025, innovations include smart monitoring capabilities in brazed plates and new semi-welded models like Alfa Laval's TS25.^[1]^[5]^[6]

Overview

Definition and basic principles

A plate heat exchanger is a compact device designed to transfer heat between two fluids without mixing them, utilizing a series of thin, corrugated metal plates stacked alternately to form narrow channels for the fluids.^[7] These plates are typically separated by gaskets or, in some cases, welded, allowing one fluid to flow through alternate channels while the second fluid passes through the intervening spaces, thereby enabling efficient heat exchange through the plate surfaces. The corrugations on the plates promote high turbulence in the fluid flows, which enhances the convective heat transfer coefficients and maximizes the effective surface area within a small volume.^[8] The basic principles of operation rely on conduction across the thin plate material and convection within the fluid channels on either side. Heat conducts through the metal plate from the hotter fluid to the cooler one, while convection occurs as the fluids flow through the channels, driven by the temperature gradients that induce fluid motion and mixing.^[9] At a high level, plate heat exchangers can operate in counterflow configuration, where the fluids flow in opposite directions to achieve the maximum temperature difference along the exchanger length, or in parallel flow, where they move in the same direction, resulting in a more gradual temperature approach.^[10] These configurations influence the overall effectiveness of heat transfer by affecting the driving temperature difference between the fluids. The thermodynamic foundation for quantifying heat transfer in a plate heat exchanger is given by the equation Q = U A \Delta T_{lm}, where Q is the heat transfer rate (in watts), U is the overall heat transfer coefficient (in W/m²·K), A is the effective heat transfer surface area (in m²), and \Delta T_{lm} is the log mean temperature difference (in K).^[11] The overall heat transfer coefficient U accounts for the combined resistances to heat flow from convection on both sides of the plate, conduction through the plate, and any fouling layers, typically ranging from 1000 to 6000 W/m²·K for common liquid applications depending on fluid properties and flow conditions. The effective area A is the total wetted surface of the plates exposed to the fluids, which is significantly larger per unit volume than in other exchanger types due to the compact stacking.^[12] The log mean temperature difference \Delta T_{lm} provides a mean driving force for heat transfer, derived from the differential heat balance along the exchanger. For a differential element, the local heat transfer is dQ = U dA \Delta T, and integrating over the length assuming constant U and specific heat capacities yields \Delta T_{lm} = \frac{\Delta T_1 - \Delta T_2}{\ln(\Delta T_1 / \Delta T_2)}, where \Delta T_1 and \Delta T_2 are the temperature differences between the hot and cold fluids at the two ends of the exchanger (e.g., for counterflow, \Delta T_1 = T_{h,in} - T_{c,out} and \Delta T_2 = T_{h,out} - T_{c,in}).^[10] This logarithmic form arises because the temperature difference varies exponentially along the flow path under steady-state conditions, ensuring a more accurate average than an arithmetic mean, especially when the end differences are unequal. To arrive at this solution, start with the energy balance for the hot fluid dQ = - \dot{m}_h c_{p,h} dT_h and for the cold fluid dQ = \dot{m}_c c_{p,c} dT_c, equate to dQ = U \Delta T dA, separate variables, and integrate from inlet to outlet, leading to the logarithmic expression after simplification.^[11] Compared to shell-and-tube heat exchangers, plate heat exchangers offer higher thermal efficiency due to their greater surface area per unit volume—often up to five times more effective—allowing closer approach temperatures as low as 1°C.^[13] However, they are generally limited to lower operating pressures (typically up to 25 bar) and temperatures because of the gasket materials and thin plates, whereas shell-and-tube designs can handle pressures exceeding 100 bar and are preferred for high-pressure applications.^[14]

History and development

Earlier concepts date back to an 1878 patent by German inventor Albrecht Dracke for a basic plate-based heat exchange system, though it was not commercially viable.^[3] The first commercially successful plate heat exchanger was invented in 1923 by Dr. Richard Seligman, a British engineer and founder of the Aluminum Plant and Vessel Company (APV), specifically to improve milk pasteurization processes by enabling efficient indirect heating and cooling of fluids.^[2] This innovation addressed the limitations of earlier tubular designs, introducing thin, corrugated metal plates sealed with rubber gaskets to create alternating flow channels for the two fluids, as detailed in Seligman's initial patents.^[15] Following World War II, plate heat exchangers saw expanded adoption in the food processing industry during the 1940s and 1950s, where their compact design and ease of cleaning supported continuous operations in dairy and beverage production.^[16] By the mid-20th century, the technology extended to chemical industries, valued for its high heat transfer efficiency in handling corrosive fluids and facilitating modular scaling.^[17] A significant material advancement occurred in the 1960s with the widespread use of stainless steel plates, enhancing corrosion resistance and durability for broader industrial applications.^[18] In the late 1970s, the introduction of brazed plate heat exchangers marked a key evolution, with Alfa Laval developing the first vacuum-brazed designs using copper to join stainless steel plates, eliminating gaskets for higher pressure and temperature capabilities.^[19] SWEP similarly commercialized brazed variants in the early 1980s, expanding their use in refrigeration and HVAC systems.^[20] The 2000s brought a shift to computerized design tools, enabling precise simulations of flow dynamics and thermal performance to optimize plate geometry and reduce development time.^[21] Post-2010 research has focused on nanomaterials, such as nano-coatings, to enhance fouling resistance by creating superhydrophilic or low-adhesion surfaces that minimize deposit accumulation.^[22] Key contributors to these advancements include pioneering companies like APV, which commercialized the original design, and later GEA Group, which refined manufacturing for diverse sectors before spinning off its heat exchanger division as Kelvion in 2015.^[2]^[23] Manufacturing evolved from labor-intensive manual assembly of plates and gaskets in the early 20th century to automated processes, including robotic FastFrame systems for rapid plate installation and laser welding for precision brazing.^[24]

Types

Plate and frame heat exchangers

Plate and frame heat exchangers consist of a series of corrugated metal plates, typically made from stainless steel or titanium and ranging from 0.5 to 1.2 mm in thickness, clamped together between a fixed frame plate (head) and a movable pressure plate (follower) using tie bolts for compression.^[7] Elastomeric gaskets seal the corner ports of each plate, forming alternating channels that direct hot and cold fluids in counter-current or co-current flow, with the plates suspended from an upper carrying bar and guided by a lower support column fixed to the frame.^[25] Each plate provides an effective heat transfer area of 0.03 to 3.5 m², and assemblies can accommodate up to 700 plates, yielding total surface areas exceeding 2400 m² for large units.^[7] This modular design offers key advantages, including scalability through the addition or removal of plates to adjust capacity without replacing the entire unit, facilitating easy maintenance and cleaning by disassembly.^[25] The configuration promotes high turbulence in the channels, which enhances heat transfer coefficients compared to tubular exchangers and reduces fouling, while its compact footprint minimizes required installation space.^[7] It is particularly suitable for handling viscous fluids or applications with large temperature differences, as the thin plate spacing allows efficient heat transfer with low hold-up volumes (80-90% less than shell-and-tube designs) and supports reliable operation with minimal wear or corrosion.^[25] Operational ranges typically include pressures up to 25 bar (357 psig) and temperatures from -35°C to 170°C, though some designs extend to 200°C and 31 bar depending on gasket materials and frame construction.^[7]^[26] Capacities vary widely, from small units handling 1 kW for laboratory or HVAC applications to industrial-scale systems exceeding several MW for chemical processing or power generation.^[27] Variants include wide-gap plate designs, which feature increased channel spacing (up to 20 mm) to accommodate slurries, fibrous media, or coarse particulates that would clog standard narrow-gap plates, maintaining flow efficiency in challenging fluids like pulp or wastewater.^[28]

Brazed and welded plate heat exchangers

Brazed plate heat exchangers consist of thin, corrugated stainless steel plates stacked and permanently joined by brazing, typically using copper filler material under vacuum conditions, which seals the edges and contact points to form alternating flow channels for the two fluids without the need for gaskets, frames, or bolts.^[29] This construction creates a compact, monolithic core that enables true countercurrent flow and enhances turbulence for efficient heat transfer.^[30] Welded variants, including fully welded and semi-welded types, employ laser or plasma welding to join the plates, often in corrosive environments where brazing is unsuitable; in semi-welded designs, pairs of plates are welded on one side while the other remains gasketed for partial serviceability.^[31]^[32] These non-disassemblable designs offer distinct advantages over gasketed plate-and-frame types, including higher pressure tolerance up to 60 bar and a significantly smaller footprint—up to 90% more compact than traditional shell-and-tube exchangers—making them ideal for space-constrained applications in refrigeration and HVAC systems.^[29]^[33] The leak-proof brazed or welded joints ensure reliable operation without cross-contamination, while the high thermal efficiency supports close approach temperatures as low as 0.1°C and heat recovery rates up to 98%.^[29] Additionally, their lightweight construction reduces installation and shipping costs compared to bulkier alternatives.^[4] Operationally, brazed and welded plate heat exchangers handle temperatures from -195°C to 350°C, accommodating cryogenic refrigeration cycles as well as high-temperature processes, with flow rates typically up to 200 gpm and heat transfer areas limited to around 200 ft² per unit.^[29]^[4] Semi-welded configurations are particularly common in applications requiring isolation of aggressive fluids, such as in chemical processing or district heating.^[31] Despite these benefits, the irreversible assembly of brazed and welded units complicates maintenance, as they cannot be disassembled for mechanical cleaning and instead require chemical methods, which may not suffice for heavily fouled systems.^[4]^[29] Copper brazing can also be susceptible to corrosion in environments with hydrogen sulfide or ammonia, potentially limiting service life to 10–12 years depending on contaminant levels.^[4] While initial costs may be lower than modular frame designs for small units, the lack of expandability and cleaning flexibility increases long-term operational challenges in variable-duty applications.^[4]

Design and components

Plate geometry and materials

The plates in a plate heat exchanger are typically thin, stamped metal sheets featuring corrugated patterns designed to enhance heat transfer by promoting turbulent flow and increasing surface area. Common corrugation patterns include chevron (also known as herringbone) and washboard designs, with chevron being the most prevalent due to its ability to generate high turbulence at relatively low flow rates. These patterns consist of intersecting V-shaped ridges that direct fluid flow in a zigzag manner, disrupting laminar flow and improving mixing between the hot and cold fluids.^[34]^[35] The chevron angle, typically ranging from 30° to 60°, plays a critical role in balancing heat transfer efficiency against pressure drop. A smaller chevron angle (e.g., around 30°) results in lower pressure drop but reduced heat transfer coefficients, making it suitable for applications with flow restrictions, while a larger angle (e.g., around 60°) enhances turbulence and heat transfer at the cost of higher pressure losses. This trade-off is evaluated using performance factors like the Colburn j-factor for heat transfer and the friction f-factor for pressure drop, with angles of 30° and 60° often showing optimal thermo-hydraulic performance in single-phase flows.^[36]^[37]^[38] Plate dimensions are standardized to fit various capacities, with typical thicknesses of 0.5 to 1.0 mm to minimize material use while maintaining structural integrity under pressure. Widths generally range from 100 mm to 1200 mm, and effective lengths (heights) extend up to 3 m, allowing for scalable heat transfer areas by stacking multiple plates. Fluid entry and exit ports, usually circular, vary in diameter from 25 mm to 300 mm depending on flow rates, positioned at the corners or edges to facilitate even distribution across the plate surface.^[39]^[40] Material selection for plates prioritizes thermal conductivity, corrosion resistance, and compatibility with process fluids to ensure long-term performance and safety. Stainless steel grades like AISI 316L are widely used for their balance of properties, offering thermal conductivity around 16 W/m·K and excellent resistance to pitting and crevice corrosion in mildly corrosive environments such as water or mild acids. Titanium is preferred for seawater or chloride-rich applications due to its superior corrosion resistance in aerated saline conditions, forming a stable oxide layer that prevents degradation even at elevated temperatures. Polymer composites, such as those based on polypropylene or polyvinylidene fluoride reinforced with graphite or carbon fibers, serve as low-cost, non-metallic alternatives for corrosive or low-temperature fluids, providing adequate thermal conductivity (up to 10-20 W/m·K in enhanced formulations) while resisting chemical attack and fouling. Key criteria include minimizing corrosion rates to reduce maintenance, ensuring fluid compatibility to avoid leaching or reactions (e.g., avoiding chlorides with non-resistant steels), and matching thermal expansion to prevent gasket failures during operation.^[41]^[42]^[43]^[44]

Frame and gasket assembly

The frame of a plate heat exchanger provides the structural enclosure that supports and compresses the plate pack, ensuring containment of fluids under pressure. It typically consists of a fixed frame plate, which serves as the stationary end and is mounted to a support column, and a movable pressure plate that applies compression to the assembly. Upper carrying bars suspend the plates vertically, allowing them to be slid into position, while lower guiding bars maintain alignment and prevent lateral shifting during handling. Tightening bolts, positioned along the carrying bars between the fixed and movable plates, generate the compressive force needed to seal the pack.^[25]^[45] Gaskets form the sealing system that directs fluid flow through alternating channels while preventing cross-contamination between the two media. These elastomeric seals are embedded in grooves around the periphery and port areas of each plate. Common materials include nitrile butadiene rubber (NBR) for oil-resistant, general-purpose applications up to 140°C; ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) for steam and water services, handling temperatures up to 170°C; and fluorocarbon (Viton) for aggressive chemicals and elevated temperatures beyond 200°C. Double-gasket designs enhance reliability by incorporating a secondary seal with a signal hole or leak chamber, enabling early detection of failures through external leakage rather than internal mixing. Gasket placement alternates port seals and channel seals to create separate flow paths for hot and cold fluids.^[25]^[46]^[47]^[48] The assembly process begins with individual plates, each fitted with gaskets, being hung sequentially on the upper carrying bar and aligned via the lower guiding bar to form the plate pack. The pack is then compressed between the fixed frame plate and movable pressure plate using the tightening bolts, which are torqued crosswise to specific values (e.g., 900–3300 Nm depending on bolt size) to achieve uniform contact pressure on the gaskets, typically 100–200 bar. This compression ensures leak-tight seals without deforming the plates. The modular nature of the design permits on-site expansion or reconfiguration by loosening the bolts, adding or removing plates, and retightening, facilitating capacity adjustments without full disassembly.^[49]^[45] Safety features integrated into the frame and gasket assembly mitigate risks during operation and maintenance. Pressure relief valves are installed on the frame or connected piping to vent excess pressure exceeding the design rating (typically up to 25 bar), preventing structural failure. Alignment pins or extended guiding bars ensure precise plate positioning during compression and reopening, reducing the chance of gasket damage or uneven loading. These elements collectively enhance operational integrity and ease of servicing.^[50]^[49]

Operation and flow characteristics

Flow arrangements and distribution

In plate heat exchangers, flow arrangements determine how the two fluids traverse the plate stack to facilitate heat transfer while managing pressure losses. Single-pass arrangements allow each fluid to flow through the exchanger only once, typically in a parallel or counterflow manner relative to the other fluid, promoting simplicity and lower pressure drops but potentially limiting effectiveness for large temperature differences. Multi-pass configurations, in contrast, route one or both fluids through multiple sections of the plate stack, enabling higher thermal effectiveness by increasing the number of flow path crossings, though at the cost of increased complexity and pumping power.^[51] Common inlet and outlet configurations include U-type and Z-type designs. In a U-type arrangement, the inlet and outlet ports for a fluid are on the same side of the exchanger, causing the fluid to enter and exit through adjacent ports while reversing direction within the plate channels via a U-turn at the opposite end; this setup is prevalent in single-pass operations for its compact porting. The Z-type configuration positions the inlet and outlet ports on opposite sides, allowing straight-through flow without reversal, which reduces dead zones and pressure losses but may require larger frame dimensions. These configurations influence overall flow uniformity and are selected based on space constraints and fluid properties.^[51]^[52] Effective flow distribution is critical to prevent maldistribution, where uneven fluid allocation across channels leads to inefficiencies such as bypassing—where some fluid shortcuts through low-resistance paths—and reduced contact time in others. Inlet ports and distribution manifolds direct fluid into the plate channels via strategically placed nozzles and gaskets, ensuring even partitioning; optimized port designs, such as tapered or multi-nozzle inlets, mitigate maldistribution by promoting uniform velocity profiles and minimizing recirculation zones. Maldistribution effects can result in 3-6% reductions in heat transfer performance, depending on configuration, with potential for higher losses in severe cases; these are exacerbated at low flow rates or with viscous fluids but can be alleviated through computational fluid dynamics-guided manifold shaping.^[53] Channel hydraulics in plate heat exchangers are governed by narrow flow gaps, typically 2-5 mm between plates, which induce high fluid velocities to enhance turbulence and mixing despite the compact geometry. These gaps yield a hydraulic diameter D_h approximately equal to twice the gap width (D_h \approx 2b), where b is the mean channel spacing, promoting Reynolds numbers (Re) greater than 100 to achieve transitional or turbulent flow regimes essential for efficient heat transfer. The Reynolds number is calculated as \mathrm{Re} = \frac{\rho v D_h}{\mu}, with \rho as fluid density, v as mean velocity, and \mu as dynamic viscosity; values above 100 ensure sufficient eddy formation to disrupt laminar boundary layers.^[55] Pressure drop across the channels arises primarily from frictional losses and is quantified using the Darcy-Weisbach equation:

\Delta P = f \cdot \frac{L}{D_h} \cdot \frac{\rho v^2}{2}

This equation derives from the momentum balance in steady, incompressible pipe flow, where the pressure gradient balances wall shear stress \tau_w = f \cdot \frac{\rho v^2}{8}. Integrating along the channel length L yields the head loss h_f = f \cdot \frac{L}{D_h} \cdot \frac{v^2}{2g}, and multiplying by \rho g converts to pressure drop \Delta P = \rho g h_f. Here, f is the dimensionless Darcy friction factor, dependent on Re and channel geometry; for corrugated plates, f is obtained from PHE-specific empirical correlations, with typical values ranging from 0.02 to 0.8 depending on Re and plate design; L is the effective flow path length along the plate; D_h is the hydraulic diameter, defined as D_h = \frac{4 \cdot A_c}{P_w} with A_c as cross-sectional area and P_w as wetted perimeter (for rectangular channels, D_h = \frac{2 b w}{b + w} where w is channel width, simplifying to $2b for w \gg b); \rho is density; and v is velocity. This formulation allows prediction of pumping requirements, with typical \Delta P ranging from 10-100 kPa depending on flow rate and geometry.^[56]^[55]

Heat transfer mechanisms

In plate heat exchangers, heat transfer occurs primarily through a combination of convection from the fluids to the plate surfaces and conduction across the thin metal plates separating the hot and cold streams. The convective heat transfer on each side of the plate is enhanced by the turbulent flow induced in the narrow, corrugated channels, while conduction through the plate provides a low-resistance path due to the thin material thickness, typically 0.5–1 mm for stainless steel plates with thermal conductivity k \approx 15–17 W/m·K. Fouling layers, formed by deposits on the plate surfaces, introduce additional thermal resistance R_f, which is particularly relevant in applications involving untreated water or viscous fluids.^[57]^[58] The overall heat transfer coefficient U quantifies the combined effect of these mechanisms and is calculated as:

\frac{1}{U} = \frac{1}{h_\text{hot}} + \frac{d}{k} + \frac{1}{h_\text{cold}} + R_f,

where h_\text{hot} and h_\text{cold} are the local convective coefficients on the hot and cold sides, d/k represents the conductive resistance of the plate, and R_f is the total fouling resistance (often R_{f,\text{hot}} + R_{f,\text{cold}}, with typical values of 0.0001–0.0004 m²·K/W for clean water service). For water-to-water applications under clean conditions, U typically ranges from 2000 to 5000 W/m²·K, reflecting the high efficiency of plate designs compared to shell-and-tube exchangers. The conduction term d/k is usually small (≈0.00005–0.0001 m²·K/W), making convection and fouling the dominant resistances in most cases.^[59]^[60]^[61] Convective coefficients h are derived from Nusselt number correlations tailored to the turbulent flow in chevron-patterned channels, where the corrugations promote mixing and turbulence at Reynolds numbers Re > 100–200. A widely adopted empirical correlation for single-phase turbulent flow is:

Nu = 0.14 \, Re^{0.78} \, Pr^{0.11} \left( \frac{\mu}{\mu_w} \right)^{0.14},

valid for $600 < Re < 10,000 and $2 < Pr < 6 in water-like fluids with chevron angles around 60°, with the hydraulic diameter based on channel spacing. This relation, developed from experimental data on chevron plates with angles of 30°–60°, shows the strong dependence on flow velocity (m = 0.78) and moderate influence of fluid properties (n = 0.11). Here, Nu = h D_h / k_f, Re = \rho v D_h / \mu, and Pr = \nu / \alpha, where D_h is the hydraulic diameter, typically 2–5 mm for commercial units.^[57] In counterflow configurations, common in plate heat exchangers for maximizing efficiency, the fluid temperatures approach each other exponentially along the flow path, leading to a logarithmic mean temperature difference. The performance is often evaluated using the effectiveness-NTU method, where the number of transfer units is

NTU = UA / C_\min

and the capacity ratio is

C_r = C_\min / C_\max

(with C = \dot{m} c_p). For pure counterflow, the effectiveness \varepsilon (ratio of actual to maximum possible heat transfer) is:

\varepsilon = \frac{1 - \exp[-NTU(1 - C_r)]}{1 - C_r \exp[-NTU(1 - C_r)]},

for C_r < 1; when C_r = 1, it simplifies to \varepsilon = NTU / (1 + NTU). This formulation allows prediction of outlet temperatures without iterative solving of differential equations, assuming constant U. Multi-pass arrangements in plate heat exchangers approximate counterflow behavior, with effectiveness approaching 80–95% for NTU > 3 in balanced flows.^[62]^[63]

Performance evaluation

Key metrics and calculations

Key performance metrics for plate heat exchangers include the heat transfer effectiveness (ε), the number of transfer units (NTU), the pressure drop (ΔP), and the fouling factor (R_f). These parameters quantify the efficiency, capacity, and operational constraints of the exchanger, enabling engineers to assess thermal performance and hydraulic losses under various flow conditions.^[64] The heat transfer effectiveness ε represents the ratio of the actual heat transfer rate to the maximum possible rate for the given inlet conditions and fluid capacities, typically ranging from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better utilization of the temperature driving force.^[63] NTU, a dimensionless measure of the exchanger's heat transfer capacity relative to the minimum fluid heat capacity rate, is defined as NTU = UA / C_min, where U is the overall heat transfer coefficient, A is the heat transfer area, and C_min is the smaller fluid heat capacity rate; it directly influences ε through established correlations.^[64] Pressure drop ΔP across the exchanger, which affects pumping requirements, is calculated using Darcy-Weisbach-type formulations adapted for chevron plate geometries, such as ΔP = (f G^2 L) / (2 ρ D_hyd), where f is the friction factor, G is the mass velocity, L is the flow length, ρ is the fluid density, and D_hyd is the hydraulic diameter; typical values for plate heat exchangers range from 10 to 100 kPa depending on flow rates and plate patterns.^[64] The fouling factor R_f accounts for thermal resistance due to deposits on plate surfaces and is incorporated into the overall heat transfer coefficient as 1/U = 1/h_hot + R_f,hot + t/k_w + R_f,cold + 1/h_cold, where h is the convective coefficient, t is plate thickness, and k_w is plate thermal conductivity; for plate heat exchangers, R_f values are typically low, such as 0.0002–0.0004 m²·K/W, due to turbulent flow and easy cleaning access, compared to higher values in tubular designs.^[4]^[65] Sizing calculations begin with determining the required heat transfer area A using the log-mean temperature difference (LMTD) method: A = Q / (U ΔT_lm), where Q is the heat duty, U is the overall heat transfer coefficient (often 3000–7500 W/m²·K for water-water service^[66]), and ΔT_lm is the logarithmic mean temperature difference, defined as ΔT_lm = (ΔT_1 - ΔT_2) / ln(ΔT_1 / ΔT_2) for counterflow arrangements.^[11] Once A is known, the number of plates N is computed as N = A / (w · L_eff) + 1, where w is the effective plate width (typically 65–74% of the frame width) and L_eff is the effective vertical length for heat transfer (accounting for port and margin areas); for example, a 100 m² area requirement with plates of w = 0.3 m and L_eff = 0.8 m yields N ≈ 417 plates.^[67]^[68] The ε-NTU method provides an alternative to LMTD for performance evaluation, particularly useful when outlet temperatures are unknown. For counterflow configurations, common in plate heat exchangers for optimal efficiency, the effectiveness is given by:

\varepsilon = \frac{1 - \exp[-NTU(1 - C_r)]}{1 - C_r \exp[-NTU(1 - C_r)]}

where C_r = C_min / C_max is the capacity ratio (0 ≤ C_r ≤ 1); this relation allows direct computation of ε from NTU and C_r, with counterflow yielding the highest ε for a given NTU compared to parallel flow.^[63] Specialized software facilitates these calculations by integrating proprietary correlations and iterative simulations. HTRI's Xphe program rates, simulates, and designs plate-and-frame heat exchangers using two-dimensional incrementation for heat transfer and pressure drop, incorporating fouling factors and ε-NTU analyses to predict performance under variable conditions.^[69] Similarly, Aspen Plate Exchanger supports design optimization and simulation of gasketed and welded plate types, leveraging experimental correlations to compute U, ΔP, and area requirements while integrating with process simulators like Aspen HYSYS for overall system evaluation.^[70]

Testing and standards

Plate heat exchangers undergo rigorous testing protocols to ensure structural integrity, thermal efficiency, and operational safety. Hydrostatic pressure tests are a primary method, where the exchanger is filled with water and pressurized to 1.5 times the design pressure to detect leaks or weaknesses in plates, gaskets, and frames. This test, mandated under ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section VIII Division 1, verifies the unit's ability to withstand operational stresses without deformation or failure. Thermal performance trials evaluate heat transfer rates and pressure drops under simulated conditions, following guidelines in ASME PTC 12.5 for single-phase heat exchangers, which specify instrumentation accuracy and data correction procedures to confirm rated capacities. Industry standards govern the rating and certification of plate heat exchangers to ensure consistent performance and comparability. The AHRI Standard 400 (I-P) establishes test methods for liquid-to-liquid heat exchangers, including gasketed plate types used in refrigeration and HVAC applications, requiring laboratory verification of thermal capacity within 5% of published ratings and hydraulic performance within specified tolerances.^[71] Leak detection during manufacturing or maintenance employs sensitive techniques such as helium mass spectrometry, where the unit is pressurized with helium tracer gas and scanned for escapes as small as 10^{-6} mbar·L/s, or dye penetration tests using fluorescent indicators to visually locate gasket or plate defects.^[72] These methods comply with ISO 15547-1 recommendations for inspection and testing of plate-and-frame designs. In-situ evaluation of installed plate heat exchangers focuses on ongoing monitoring to assess degradation over time. Temperature and pressure sensors are integrated into inlet/outlet ports to track real-time performance deviations, enabling early detection of fouling or inefficiencies by comparing against baseline NTU values. Ultrasonic thickness gauging provides non-destructive corrosion assessment, measuring plate wall thinning with resolutions down to 0.1 mm by emitting high-frequency waves and analyzing echoes, particularly useful for stainless steel constructions in corrosive environments. Such techniques align with general nondestructive testing practices for heat exchangers as outlined in ASME and ISO standards. Certification ensures compliance with regulatory frameworks for pressure containment and safety. In the European Union, plate heat exchangers are certified under the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) 2014/68/EU, categorizing units by fluid group, pressure, and volume to determine conformity assessment modules, often requiring notified body approval for higher-risk categories. In North America, adherence to ASME Section VIII Division 1 certifies them as pressure vessels, mandating material traceability, nondestructive examinations, and pressure relief provisions, with the U stamp indicating compliance for unfired pressure vessels like heat exchangers. These certifications facilitate global deployment by verifying design margins against rupture or leakage.

Optimization and applications

Design optimization techniques

Design optimization techniques for plate heat exchangers (PHEs) aim to maximize heat transfer efficiency while minimizing pressure drop and operational costs through systematic iterative methods. Genetic algorithms (GAs) are widely employed to optimize key parameters such as plate count and chevron angle, which influence flow patterns and thermal performance. For instance, GAs can determine an optimal chevron angle of approximately 60° and a corrugated pitch-to-plate height ratio of approximately 4.74 to enhance overall heat transfer under commercial vehicle constraints.^[73] Similarly, these algorithms integrate geometrical and hydrodynamical variables to minimize entropy generation, yielding designs that balance thermal effectiveness and energy losses.^[74] Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations play a crucial role in achieving flow uniformity, addressing maldistribution that reduces exchanger efficiency. By modeling three-dimensional fluid flow and thermal fields, CFD helps identify optimal inlet configurations for even velocity distribution across plates.^[75] These simulations also evaluate chevron patterns in PHEs, predicting pressure drops and heat transfer coefficients to refine designs before prototyping.^[75] A primary trade-off in PHE optimization involves balancing enhanced heat transfer against increased pumping power, often addressed via multi-objective approaches. These methods simultaneously maximize the overall heat transfer coefficient (U) and minimize pressure drop (ΔP), using tools like non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) to generate Pareto-optimal solutions.^[76] For example, multi-objective optimization frameworks target thermal performance, pressure losses, and material weight to improve efficiency.^[76] Advanced techniques integrate pinch analysis into process networks to optimize PHE placement within broader heat exchanger systems, minimizing energy targets and utility demands. In geothermal district heating, pinch point analysis combined with genetic methods sizes PHEs to achieve cost-effective heat recovery, reducing external energy needs by aligning temperature profiles across the network.^[77] Post-2020, AI-driven approaches, including machine learning surrogates like neural networks, have accelerated sizing by predicting performance metrics from limited data, enabling rapid iterations for latent heat storage-integrated PHEs.^[78] These models optimize thermal efficiency in mechanical systems, cutting design time while enhancing heat transfer predictions.^[79] In retrofitting scenarios, optimized PHE configurations yield significant energy savings in HVAC systems, such as 20-30% reductions through indirect evaporative pre-cooling modules that leverage plate designs for efficient heat recovery.^[80] Optimized configurations in upgraded systems support energy efficiency gains.^[80]

Industrial applications and case studies

Plate heat exchangers find widespread application in the food and beverage industry, where they are essential for processes such as pasteurization of milk, juices, and other liquids, leveraging their ability to handle viscous fluids efficiently while maintaining hygiene standards. This sector accounts for a key portion of the global market, driven by the need for compact, easy-to-clean designs that support high-throughput operations like sterilization and cooling. In chemical processing, these exchangers facilitate solvent recovery, reaction cooling, and distillation, offering precise temperature control and resistance to corrosive fluids through specialized materials like stainless steel or titanium. The HVAC and refrigeration sectors represent the largest end-use segment, utilizing plate heat exchangers in chillers, evaporators, and district heating systems to optimize energy transfer in commercial and industrial cooling applications. A notable case study involves a major Scandinavian dairy producer implementing Alfa Laval's gasketed plate heat exchangers enhanced with Extend™ technology, which applies a low electrical current to reduce fouling and extend cleaning intervals from 8 to 12 hours. This installation resulted in annual energy savings of 100,000 kWh for pumping and heating, alongside water reductions of 7,000 m³ and a 90–99% decrease in bacterial buildup, boosting uptime by 50% and cutting cleaning chemical use by 35 tonnes.^[81] In the offshore oil and gas sector, compact brazed plate heat exchangers, such as Alfa Laval's AlfaRex series, have been deployed on platforms to manage cooling and heating duties in space-limited environments; these units are up to 75% smaller than traditional shell-and-tube designs and can handle flow rates exceeding 1,000 m³/h under high-pressure conditions, enhancing operational reliability in harsh marine settings.^[82]^[83] Emerging applications include renewable energy systems, where plate heat exchangers integrate solar thermal collectors with geothermal heat pumps to improve overall efficiency; for instance, a hybrid system demonstrated a coefficient of performance of 7.0, compared to 5.4 for standalone geothermal operation, by effectively transferring low-grade heat.^[84] In pharmaceuticals, they enable sterile processing for drug manufacturing and support sustainable heating via solar thermal integration, as evidenced by installations in European facilities that replace fossil fuel-based process heat with solar-derived energy, reducing operational costs while complying with stringent sanitary requirements.^[85] These exchangers scale effectively from laboratory prototypes managing kilowatt-level thermal duties to industrial-scale units in power plants handling megawatt capacities, accommodating diverse flow rates and pressures across sectors.

Advantages, limitations, and maintenance

Benefits and drawbacks

Plate heat exchangers offer significant benefits in terms of compactness, providing 2 to 5 times higher heat transfer surface area per unit volume compared to traditional shell-and-tube designs, which enables smaller footprints and reduced material usage in space-constrained applications.^[86] This compactness stems from the thin, closely spaced plates that maximize heat transfer efficiency while minimizing overall size. Additionally, frame-type plate heat exchangers are designed for easy disassembly, allowing straightforward cleaning and inspection without specialized tools, which is particularly advantageous in industries requiring frequent maintenance to prevent efficiency losses.^[87] Cost savings are another key advantage, with plate heat exchangers typically requiring 80-85% less material than shell-and-tube equivalents due to their efficient design, leading to lower initial capital expenditures.^[88] Despite these strengths, plate heat exchangers have notable drawbacks, including their limitation to relatively clean fluids, as the narrow channels between plates make them highly susceptible to fouling from particulates or sediments, which can rapidly reduce performance if not managed.^[89] Gaskets in these units are prone to degradation under extreme temperatures or pressures, accelerating aging and risking leaks, which necessitates careful selection of operating conditions to avoid premature failure.^[90] Furthermore, their initial design process involves higher complexity, requiring precise calculations for plate geometry, flow distribution, and pressure drops to ensure optimal performance across varying loads.^[91] In comparisons with alternatives, plate heat exchangers excel over tube-in-tube designs for applications needing close temperature approaches, often achieving differences as low as 2°F due to their pure counter-current flow configuration, enabling greater energy recovery with less equipment.^[92] Relative to air-cooled heat exchangers, plate units provide superior thermal efficiency through water-based cooling, but they require access to water resources, making them less suitable in water-scarce environments.^[93] From an economic perspective, lifecycle cost analyses of plate heat exchangers often reveal favorable payback periods of 2-6 years in efficient industrial setups, driven by reduced energy consumption and maintenance needs that offset initial investments over time.^[13]

Maintenance and fouling considerations

Fouling in plate heat exchangers manifests in several forms, including scaling from mineral deposits, biofouling due to microbial growth, and particulate fouling from suspended solids, each contributing to reduced thermal efficiency.^[94]^[95]^[96] These deposits form an insulating layer on the plate surfaces, increasing thermal resistance and potentially reducing the overall heat transfer coefficient U.^[97] Maintenance routines are essential to restore performance and extend equipment life. Disassembly cleaning, often supplemented by clean-in-place (CIP) methods using chemical agents like acids or alkalis, effectively removes accumulated foulants without full teardown in many cases.^[98] Gaskets, critical for sealing plate channels, typically require replacement every 2-5 years to prevent leaks and ensure containment, with frequency adjusted based on operating temperatures and pressures.^[99] Preventive measures focus on fluid management and surface protection to minimize fouling onset. Water treatment processes, such as softening or filtration, reduce scaling propensity by controlling hardness and dissolved solids.^[100] Maintaining fluid velocities above 0.5 m/s enhances shear forces that scour particulates and limit deposition.^[101] Recent advancements in anti-fouling coatings, including graphene-based nanofluids applied post-2015, have shown efficacy in inhibiting crystallization and biofouling by altering surface wettability and reducing adhesion.^[102] Ongoing monitoring involves tracking differential pressure trends across the exchanger, as fouling increases flow resistance and elevates pressure drops, signaling the need for intervention.^[103] With diligent adherence to these practices, plate heat exchangers can achieve an expected operational lifespan of 10-20 years.^[104]

References

[1]
Plate Heat Exchanger - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A plate heat exchanger (PHE) is defined as a type of heat exchanger commonly used in the food industry, known for its high efficiency of up to 95%.
[2]
[PDF] Heat Exchangers - Chapter 11 - OSTI.GOV
1. Superior thermal performance. Plate heat exchangers are capable of nominal approach temperatures of 10oF compared to a nominal 20oF for shell and tube ...
[3]
100 Years of APV: Engineering the Future with Plate Heat Exchangers
APV proudly produced the world's first commercially successful plate heat exchanger in 1923, thanks to the visionary mind of Dr. Richard Seligman.<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
Who invented the heat exchanger? | Sterling TT
Nov 8, 2022 · In 1878, the first recorded patent for a plate heat exchanger was awarded to Albrecht Dracke of Germany. However, the first modern and ...
[5]
PLATE AND FRAME HEAT EXCHANGERS - Thermopedia
The plate and frame heat exchanger (see Figure 1) consists of a frame in which closely spaced metal plates are clamped between a head and follower.
[6]
Plate Heat Exchangers Working Principle - Wieland Onda Srl
Plate heat exchangers use parallel plates with channels for fluid flow. Hot and cold fluids alternate through channels, with one side always in contact with ...
[7]
[PDF] The theory behind heat transfer - U-Cursos
A heat exchanger follows this principle in its endeavour to reach equalisation. With a plate type heat exchanger, the heat penetrates the surface, which.
[8]
Arithmetic and Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference
The calculator below can be used to calculate Arithmetic and Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference of counter-flow an parallel-flow heat exchangers.
[9]
Plate heat exchanger calculation method - Alfa Laval
LMTD = log mean temperature difference. T1 = Inlet temperature - hot side. T2 = Outlet temperature - hot side. T3 = Inlet temperature - cold side. T4 = Outlet ...
[10]
Heat exchanger - processdesign
Feb 19, 2016 · A heat exchanger is used for two process streams to exchange heat, changing the temperature of each, often with a shell and tube geometry.
[11]
https://www.alfalaval.com/microsites/gphe/tools/calculation-method/
[12]
Plate and frame heat exchanger vs shell and tube - Tranter
Oct 8, 2025 · Compare plate and frame vs shell and tube heat exchangers. Discover key differences in efficiency, cost, size, and maintenance for your ...
[13]
History of gasketed plate heat exchanger - HMZexport
Oct 15, 2024 · The first recognizable gasketed plate heat exchanger was invented in 1923 by Dr. Richard Seligman in the United Kingdom.
[14]
A 100-Year Review: A century of dairy processing advancements ...
Improving on the double-tube regenerative holder of the 1910s, regenerative plate heat exchangers were first introduced in 1923 (Henderson, 1971e; Hall, 1976).
[15]
Plate heat exchangers: Recent advances - ScienceDirect.com
Plate heat exchanger (PHE) is now commonly used in a wide range of chemical process and other industrial applications with a particular attention from the food ...
[16]
Let's talk about the history of PHE - LinkedIn
Jul 27, 2018 · 132 years ago, the plate heat exchanger was invented in German. Not until 1923 did APV Company begin to batch production of plate heat exchangers with cast ...
[17]
[PDF] Brazed plate heat exchangers - Alfa Laval
Material. The brazed plate heat exchanger (BHE) consists of thin corrugated stainless steel plates vacuum brazed together using copper as the brazing material.
[18]
6.8 Brazed plate heat exchanger evaporators - SWEP
Since the copper brazed plate heat exchanger became commercially available in the early 1980's, new applications have been found every year.
[19]
An educational computer‐aided tool for heat exchanger design - Tan
Jul 25, 2006 · This paper presents the development of an educational computer-aided design tool for the shell and tube heat exchanger.
[20]
Investigating the effect of nanocoating on fouling in the plate heat ...
Oct 17, 2025 · Reduction of milk fouling inside gasketed plate heat exchanger using nano-coatings. Article. Dec 2010; FOOD BIOPROD PROCESS.
[21]
GEA Heat Exchangers becomes Kelvion - New Food magazine
Nov 11, 2015 · Since November 2015 the former subsidiaries of GEA Heat Exchangers have been operating as a standalone company under the name of Kelvion.
[22]
Plate Heat Exchanger Automated FastFrame™ - SPX Flow
The APV Plate Heat Exchanger Automated FastFrame means quick and easy access to plates with just the push of a button. Our electrically-driven ...
[23]
Gasketed plate-and-frame heat exchangers
### Summary of Gasketed Plate-and-Frame Heat Exchangers (Alfa Laval)
[24]
[PDF] BRINGING EFFICIENCY TO HEAT TRANSFER - Harrington-Robb
Typical ratings are 338°F. (170°C) at low pressures and 357 psig (25 barg) at moderate temperatures, depending on application conditions. Clip-On gaskets seat ...
[25]
Selecting a Process Heat Exchanger for Your Application
Jun 10, 2019 · The most common type of plate-and-frame heat exchanger is a gasketed plate-and-frame design. Shell-and-Tube Design. Most people are familiar ...Missing: gap | Show results with:gap
[26]
WideGap gasketed plate-and-frame heat exchangers - Alfa Laval
The heat transfer area of a gasketed plate-and-frame heat exchanger consists of a series of corrugated plates, assembled between the frame and pressure plates, ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
[27]
[PDF] BRAZED PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERS (BPHEs) - LUTPub
Jun 26, 2009 · The importance with the new development and material is to increase the operating pressure and temperature of the plate heat exchanger.
[28]
[PDF] Advantages of Brazed Heat Exchangers in the Gas Processing ...
Even with relatively clean process fluids, brazed exchangers are constrained by operating pressure and temperature limitations. Above ambient temperatures ...
[29]
[PDF] Alfa Laval – plate technology - ProThermal Inc
Glue-free gaskets provide fast and easy gasket replacement on site. Welded. Completely welded plates expand temperature and pressure limitations to. 350°C (650° ...
[30]
[PDF] Schmidt-Bretten SIGMAWIG All Welded Plate Heat Exchangers
This greatly increases the maximum operating temperature and pressure. The welded plate pack is clamped into either a stainless steel or epoxy painted carbon.
[31]
Brazed plate heat exchangers for high efficiency - SWEP
Brazed plate heat exchangers are compact, use stacked plates with brazed joints, and transfer heat between two media, and are up to 90% smaller than shell-and- ...Missing: limitations | Show results with:limitations
[32]
[PDF] The characteristics of brazed plate heat exchangers with ... - ajer.org
Compact heat exchangers consist of plates embossed with some form of corrugated surface pattern, usually the chevron (herringbone) geometry[1].The plates ...
[33]
[PDF] MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF CORRUGATED PLATE HEAT ...
The chevron or herringbone design is the most commonly used surface pattern in. PHEs. Inclination angle, corrugation shape, amplitude and wavelength, plate ...
[34]
GPHE plate technology - Alfa Laval
The heat exchanger plates are pressed in a so-called herringbone corrugation pattern. ... Smaller chevron angle; Lower pressure drop; Less heat transfer ...Missing: geometry | Show results with:geometry
[35]
Effect of geometrical parameters on the performance of plate heat ...
The thermo-hydraulic performance of PHE is evaluated using the JF factor, showing that the chevron angles, β = 30° and β = 60°, perform better respectively in ...
[36]
Heat Transfer Equipment - processdesign
Plate heat exchangers utilize metal plates to perform heat transfer between two fluids. They are composed of a lot of thin metal plates compressed together by ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[37]
Plate and frame heat exchanger
For plates: *Plate Port diameter 29mm to Port diameter 328mm, plate width from 125mm to 995mm, height from 429mm to 2245mm,thickness from 0.5-1.0mm.Missing: dimensions length
[38]
Dimensions of 110 types of plate heat exchangers (SWEP and ARES)
Dimensions may vary by several cm depending on the pressure class. Details are in the enclosed catalog sheets. Gasketed plate exchangers Alfa Laval. Size, Width ...
[39]
Heat Exchanger Materials - Thermal Conductivities
Typical heat exchanger materials and their thermal conductivities. ; Red Brass (85 Cu - 15 Zn), 159 ; Stainless Steel, type 316 (17 Cr - 12 Ni - 2 Mo), 16.
[40]
[PDF] Selection of Materials for Heat Exchangers - INIS-IAEA
- Low corrosion rate to minimise the corrosion allowance (and also radioactivity control in heat exchangers for nuclear industry) - Resistance to corrosion ...
[41]
Replacing Titanium In Sea Water Plate Heat Exchangers - OnePetro
Mar 14, 2010 · Titanium alloys are usually the preferred choice for seawater cooled heat exchangers because of their outstanding corrosion resistance even in hot aerated ...
[42]
[PDF] Polymer-Based Materials for Heat Exchangers - Department of Energy
Other relevant properties such as strength, fluid compatibility, permeability, and flammability were also evaluated. The results were presented in a database of ...Missing: criteria | Show results with:criteria
[43]
[PDF] Plate Heat Exchangers Construction | Assembly - Pragya Associates
Plate heat exchanger components. The components consist of a fixed end plate, connections and a loose pres- sure plate, with carrier bars mounted between them.
[44]
Parts & accessories for Plate heat exchangers from Tranter
Browse our inventory of parts & accessories for Heat Exchangers. Parts suitable for Plate And Frame , Shell and plate, and welded plate heat exchangers.
[45]
Replacement Gasket For All Brands Plate Heat Exchanger Gasket
Rating 4.6 (80) For PHE gaskets, the standard materials are Nitrile rubber (NBR), EPDM and VITON. We also supply FDA gaskets for sanitary plate heat exchangers, plate ...
[46]
Double Wall Plate Heat Exchanger - AF pipe solutions
AF Pipes applies a special design for dual gasketing, and gasket leakge detection failure (visual) in this area for full double wall safety.
[47]
[PDF] Instruction Manual - Gasketed plate heat exchangers - Alfa Laval
Compress the plate pack between the frame plate and the pressure plate. The ... Open the plate heat exchanger until the plate pack measure is 1.25×A. 5 ...
[48]
[PDF] PLATE AND FRAME HEAT EXCHANGER INSTALLATION AND ...
The core of the plate heat exchanger is the thin metal corrugated thermal plates that both enhance and conduct heat transfer through them. These thermal plates ...
[49]
Modeling and Design of Plate Heat Exchanger - IntechOpen
Jul 29, 2015 · This is the most widely used single-pass design, known as the U-arrangement. There is also a single-pass Z-arrangement, where there is input ...
[50]
Flow Arrangement - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
I-type arrangement exhibited lowest pressure drop and flow MLD followed by Z-type and U-type, respectively. The MLD parameters for U, Z, I-type flow ...
[51]
[PDF] Experimental Study on Port to Channel Flow Distribution of Plate ...
The study found non-uniform flow distribution in plate heat exchangers, increasing with flow rate and decreasing with port diameter. This maldistribution is ...
[52]
Flow Distribution in Plate Heat Exchangers and Consequences on ...
In general, flow maldistribution brings about an increase in pressure drop and decrease of the thermal performance in heat exchangers. This deterioration is ...
[53]
[PDF] Numerical Simulation of Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Plate ...
The hydraulic diameter is specified as twice the mean flow channel gap. Most ... loss is a function of both the Reynolds number and the pipe roughness.
[54]
Plate Heat Exchangers pressure drop calculation - PowderProcess.net
Pressure drop in the channels of a plate heat exchanger. With. ΔPchannel ... Dh = hydraulic diameter = [4*l*dplate] / [2*(l+dplate)] (m) l = width of the ...
[55]
[PDF] Experimentally Validated Correlations for Heat Transfer and ...
Experiments were conducted on a herringbone-type plate heat exchanger with a chevron angle of 65°. This part of their work was intended to support two-phase ...
[56]
Heat Exchangers - Fouling and Reduced Heat Transfer
Heat-transfer in heat exchangers are reduced by fouling. During operation with liquids and gases a dirt film may build up on the heat exchanger surfaces.
[57]
[PDF] Review of Nusselt Number Correlation for Single Phase Fluid Flow ...
The objective of this paper is to review, the. Nusselt number correlations of plat heat exchanger available to date, to understand how it is used, to evaluate.
[58]
Engineering Page > Heat Exchangers > Typical Fouling Factors
Fouling factors vary based on cooling water conditions, water type (e.g., sea, brackish), and fluid type (e.g., oil, gasoil, hydrogen). For ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[59]
Plate Heat Exchanger Design Calculation & Simulator - Hisaka
The LMTD is a logarithmic average of the temperature difference between the hot and cold feeds at each end of heat exchanger. For a given heat exchanger with ...
[60]
Derivation of the counterflow effectiveness-NTU relation
May 19, 2023 · The basic essence of this derivation is that we have two energy balances (equations that look like Q = m c Δ T ) and a form of the heat transfer ...
[61]
ε–NTU relationships in parallel–series arrangements: Application to ...
Apr 25, 2016 · The ε–NTU method was used to obtain a general algebraic expression of the effectiveness of PHEs in the pass-1 pass configuration as a function of the heat ...
[62]
None
### Summary of Key Metrics and Calculations for Gasketed Plate Heat Exchangers
[63]
[PDF] Design and Analysis of a Newly Installed Plate Heat Exchanger ...
Heat exchangers are the devices used to transfer heat between one or more fluids and serve as an important processing equipment in various industrial processes ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[64]
[PDF] Plate Heat Exchanger Sizing Considerations
To calculate the actual surface area from the drawing and number of plates, please follow the step by step instructions below. FILE NO.: 9.1130. DATE: Dec. 12, ...
[65]
Plate Heat Exchangers design : calculation method
From there, the Engineer can chose a plate size, design, and calculate the number of plates required. N = S/s. With. N = number of plates required. S = total ...Missing: L_eff) | Show results with:L_eff)
[66]
Xphe | HTRI
Xphe is a program to rate, simulate, and design plate-and-frame heat exchangers, using HTRI's methods and 2D incrementation. It has rating, simulation, and ...
[67]
Aspen Plate Exchanger - AspenTech
Aspen Plate Exchanger allows design, simulation, and optimization of plate heat exchangers, with potential cost savings up to 30%, and is part of a ...
[68]
[PDF] ANSI/AHRI Standard 400 (IP)
Nov 6, 2015 · ANSI/AHRI Standard 400 (IP) is a 2015 standard for the performance rating of liquid to liquid heat exchangers, approved by ANSI on November 6, ...Missing: ISO 14511
[69]
Non-Destructive Leak Test of Plate Heat Exchangers (PHE) - INFICON
The test begins by pressurizing the heat exchanger with forming gas at operating pressure and placing it in a chamber. A fan placed inside the chamber ensures ...Missing: protocols hydrostatic
[70]
Multi-objective optimization of plate heat exchanger for commercial ...
It was found that the optimal parameters were the chevron angle of 60° and the p/h (corrugated pitch/plate height) of 2.73. Under some restrictions, Jiang et ...
[71]
Optimizing chevron plate heat exchangers based on the second law ...
Aug 28, 2019 · The optimization is carried out by using genetic algorithm and taking into account all of the geometrical and hydrodynamical parameters. Finally ...
[72]
CFD Simulation on Flow Distribution in Plate-Fin Heat Exchangers
The absolute degree of fluid flow nonuniformity in plate-fin heat exchanger has reduced from 3.47 to 0.32 by changing the header configuration. The numerical ...<|separator|>
[73]
(PDF) 3D CFD fluid flow and thermal analyses of a new design of ...
The paper presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) numerical study for a new design of a plate heat exchanger with two different flow patterns.
[74]
Thermal-hydraulic optimization of plate heat exchanger: A multi ...
Maximization of overall heat transfer coefficient and minimization of total pressure drop considered simultaneously as objective functions during multi- ...
[75]
A Framework for Multi-Objective Optimization of Plate-Fin Heat ...
Dec 2, 2021 · Hence, three independent objective functions are treated in this work: thermal efficiency, overall pressure drop, and unit weight. Thermal ...2. Modeling Framework · 3. Use Case: Pfhe Design... · 5. Results And Discussion
[76]
Optimization design of plate heat exchangers (PHE) for geothermal ...
Aug 9, 2025 · Over the years research has investigated a variety of methods to improve the design of PHXs such as pinch point analysis [17] and genetic ...
[77]
Machine Learning for Design Optimization and PCM-Based Storage ...
This review critically examines the intersection of machine learning (ML), plate heat exchangers (PHEs), and latent heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) ...
[78]
(PDF) AI-Driven Thermal Optimization: Applying Neural Networks to ...
Oct 28, 2025 · This study investigates the application of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) as a surrogate modeling and optimization tool for enhancing heat ...
[79]
Making TFA Units Energy Efficient with Indirect Evaporative Pre ...
Apr 25, 2025 · In many cases, energy savings of 20–30% can be achieved ... Fresh air first passes through the IEC heat exchanger, where it is pre-cooled.
[80]
How Can Heat Exchangers Lower Energy Costs? - Venwiz
They provide several benefits, like saving 30% on energy efficiency, lowering running costs, and reducing the environmental impact of energy generation.Missing: retrofitting 20-30%
[81]
[PDF] Multi-Domain Analysis and Optimisation of Plate Heat ... - Theses
The compactness and the high thermal efficiency ... coefficient that is 5 to 10 times higher than that of traditional heat exchangers [2]. ... the plate heat ...
[82]
Which Heat Exchanger Is Best? The Three Main Types Explained
Plate Heat Exchanger PHEs are overtaking shell and tube options in many sectors due to their compactness, efficiency, and ease of maintenance. If you need to ...
[83]
GPHE vs shell-and-tube | Alfa Laval
Plate heat exchangers are up to five times more efficient than shell-and-tube designs with approach temperatures as close as 1°F. Heat recovery can be increased ...
[84]
Reducing Plate Heat Exchanger Fouling | Eng-Tips
Jan 14, 2003 · A requirement for plate frame exchangers is that they require clean fluids, or they will easily foul or plug the small flow passages within the ...
[85]
Plate heat exchanger gasket aging or damage causes - Knowledge
Apr 17, 2024 · Prolonged high temperature will accelerate the aging of the rubber sealing gasket, should ensure that the heat exchanger in the rubber gasket ...
[86]
A Project Engineer's guide to properly sizing a plate heat exchanger
Oct 30, 2023 · Mastering the complexities of plate heat exchangers is not just about understanding their operational nuances but also ensuring they align ...
[87]
[PDF] Specification Tips to Maximize Heat Transfer | Xylem
Maximum weight percentage of 20% solids with particle size not exceeding 50% of the free channel space are typical limits. •. The plate and frame design is best ...
[88]
Air vs Water Cooled Finned Tube Heat Exchangers: Which to Choose?
Aug 13, 2025 · As a result, water cooled systems are often more efficient than air cooled ones, especially in high-heat applications. Lower Power Consumption.
[89]
[PDF] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost of Heat Exchangers
The payback time considers all costs during the heat exchangers life cycle and the operating cost savings. ViFlow´s heat exchangers have the shortest ...
[90]
Fouling of Heat Exchangers: An Overview - Alfa Laval
Corrosion fouling is a type of fouling that occurs in heat exchangers when the materials used to construct the heat exchanger react with the fluids being ...
[91]
Fouling in Heat Exchangers | IntechOpen
Biofouling has a great influence on the thermal performance of heat exchangers, due to the accumulation of biotic deposits with insulating characteristics in ...
[92]
8.6 Fouling - SWEP - NOT FOR COMMERCIAL USE
Scaling is a type of fouling caused by inorganic salts in the water circuit of the heat exchanger. It increases the pressure drop and insulates the heat ...Water Scaling Tendency · Particulate Fouling · Fouling Due To Corrosion<|control11|><|separator|>
[93]
(PDF) Fouling in Plate Heat Exchangers: Some Practical Experience
Reduction of milk fouling inside gasketed plate heat exchanger using nano-coatings. December 2010 · Food and Bioproducts Processing. Ali Bani ...Missing: post | Show results with:post
[94]
Chemical cleaning in place (CIP) | Heat Exchanger CIP System
A chemical cleaning in place (CIP), done at the right time with the right chemical removes scaling and fouling from heat exchangers.Missing: lifespan | Show results with:lifespan
[95]
How Often Should You Replace Plate Heat Exchanger Gaskets?
Jul 24, 2025 · In general, gaskets should be replaced every 3 to 5 years under normal operating conditions. However, this is not a one-size-fits-all rule. Your ...
[96]
Physical Water Treatment for Fouling Prevention in Heat Exchangers
Physical water treatment (PWT) is an attempt to treat hard water for the purpose of preventing or mitigating fouling using a physical means, without adding ...Missing: plate anti- graphene
[97]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221927711_Fouling_in_Plate_Heat_Exchangers_Some_Practical_Experience
[98]
Fouling and fouling mitigation of mineral salt using bio-based ...
Jun 29, 2020 · The present research investigated the mitigation of calcium carbonate scaling by applying functionalized graphene nano-platelets (FGNP) nanofluids as additives.
[99]
Differential Pressure Measurement for Heat Exchangers - OleumTech
Fouling refers to the buildup of unwanted material on heat transfer surfaces during heating and cooling processes. This issue can be caused by several factors, ...
[100]
Service and parts for plate heat exchangers - gesmex
Heat exchangers are usually designed for a lifetime of 20 or 25 years. In fact, they are often in service for much longer. Plate heat exchangers with fully ...