Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Polar Class

The Polar Class is a system of ice class notations developed by the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) to designate the icebreaking capabilities and structural requirements of ships designed for navigation in polar waters. It comprises seven categories, from PC 1—suitable for year-round operations in all polar waters, including extreme multi-year ice—to PC 7—intended for summer and autumn operations in thin first-year ice that may include old ice inclusions.^[1] These notations are defined in the IACS Unified Requirements (UR I1 and UR I2), which specify hull scantlings, machinery protections, and material standards to withstand ice loads and sub-zero temperatures, ensuring safe independent operation without icebreaker assistance.^[2] The system was first established in March 2008 to harmonize classification rules across member societies for vessels in Arctic and Antarctic conditions.^[2] Polar Class requirements are integral to the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Polar Code, a mandatory regime under the SOLAS Convention that applies to ships in polar waters north of 60°N or south of 60°S. The Code references Polar Classes for structural certification of Category A and Category B vessels, linking the notations to operational limitations, environmental safeguards, and pollution prevention measures effective from January 1, 2017.^[3] Assignments are made by recognized classification societies, influencing applications in expedition cruises, scientific research, and offshore resource activities.^[4]

Historical Development

Origins and IACS Unification Efforts

In the early 1990s, the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) recognized the need to standardize ice class notations for ships operating in polar regions, driven by increasing international maritime activities in the Arctic and Antarctic amid varying national and society-specific rules. This harmonization initiative, raised through the International Maritime Organization (IMO), aimed to address fragmentation in pre-existing systems that complicated safe and consistent polar navigation. Prior to 2000, diverse notations such as the Finnish-Swedish ice classes, designed primarily for Baltic Sea conditions, and the Russian Maritime Register of Shipping's requirements exhibited significant variations in structural strength, machinery demands, and operational applicability, often leading to inconsistencies for vessels traversing multiple polar regimes.^[5] These disparities posed risks to safety and efficiency, prompting IACS to form specialized groups for unification.^[6] A key milestone occurred in 1996 when IACS established the Ad-Hoc Group to establish Unified Requirements for Polar Ships (AHG/PSR), comprising experts focused on developing consistent standards for hull forms, structures, and machinery to support polar operations.^[7] The group's work progressed through preliminary guidelines in 1996 and draft requirements by 2000, laying the groundwork for a cohesive framework applicable across IACS members.^[7] By 2007, these efforts culminated in the development of the foundational Unified Requirements: UR I1 for polar hull forms and descriptions, UR I2 for structural requirements, and UR I3 for machinery units, which became effective in 2008 and provided the basis for subsequent polar regulations, including the IMO Polar Code.^[8]

Publication of Unified Requirements and Subsequent Updates

The International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) formally adopted the Unified Requirements (UR) for Polar Class ships—comprising UR I1 (Polar Class descriptions and application), UR I2 (structural requirements for Polar Class ships), and UR I3 (machinery requirements for Polar Class ships)—in late 2006, with uniform application by IACS member societies to ships contracted for construction on or after 1 July 2007.^[9] These requirements built upon precursor unification efforts by IACS in the 1990s to harmonize disparate ice class notations among member societies.^[10] Subsequent revisions have refined these requirements to incorporate advancements in ice load assessment and structural design. In 2016, Rev.3 of UR I2 introduced more detailed provisions for ice load modeling, including specific design ice loads for bow configurations with vertical sides and enhanced scantling requirements for framing in ice-impacted areas, aiming to better reflect realistic interaction scenarios.^[11] Rev.4 of UR I2, effective from 1 January 2021 following its adoption in December 2019, further updated structural criteria with clarified load distribution patterns and plating thickness calculations to improve survivability in multi-year ice conditions.^[12] For machinery aspects, Rev.2 of UR I3 was adopted in January 2023 and implemented from 1 July 2024, incorporating enhanced requirements for propulsion systems, steering gear, and auxiliary equipment to ensure reliability under ice-induced loads and low-temperature operations.^[13] The most recent update, Rev.5 of UR I2 adopted in June 2025, maintains core structural scantlings while specifying uniform implementation for contracts on or after 1 January 2027, with ongoing emphasis on direct calculation methods for complex hull forms.^[9] These evolutionary changes reflect IACS's commitment to aligning requirements with emerging operational data from polar voyages.^[14]

Relation to the IMO Polar Code

Adoption and Key Provisions of the Polar Code

The International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters, known as the Polar Code, was adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in November 2014 during the 94th session of the Maritime Safety Committee for its safety provisions, with environmental provisions adopted in May 2015 by the 68th session of the Marine Environment Protection Committee.^[15]^[16] These adoptions occurred through amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) by adding Chapter XIV and to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) by adding a new Polar chapter (Chapter 9).^[15] The amendments entered into force on January 1, 2017, making the Polar Code mandatory under these conventions.^[15] The Polar Code applies mandatorily to ships of 500 gross tonnage and above engaged on international voyages in polar waters, encompassing cargo ships and passenger ships carrying more than 12 passengers, while smaller vessels may apply it voluntarily.^[17] Polar waters are defined as Arctic waters or the Antarctic area. Arctic waters are the waters north of the parallel of latitude 60° N, with specific boundary adjustments (e.g., for the Bering Strait and exclusions like the Baltic Sea). The Antarctic area comprises the sea south of latitude 60° S.^[15]^[17] Ships must obtain a Polar Ship Certificate attesting compliance, classifying them into Categories A, B, or C based on anticipated ice conditions, and non-compliance may result in restrictions on operations or access to polar regions by flag states or port authorities.^[15]^[17] Key provisions of the Polar Code are divided into two parts: Part I-A addresses safety measures, including goals and functional requirements for ship design, construction, machinery, fire safety, life-saving appliances, navigation, communications, voyage planning, and crew training to mitigate risks like ice damage and low temperatures.^[15] Part II-A focuses on pollution prevention, establishing standards to prevent oil, noxious liquid substances, sewage, garbage, and air emissions in polar waters, aligned with MARPOL Annexes I-VI.^[15] These provisions employ goal-based standards supplemented by performance criteria, allowing flexibility in compliance while ensuring equivalent safety and environmental protection levels; for instance, ice strengthening requirements incorporate Polar Class notations as a means to meet design goals for operations in ice-covered areas.^[15]

Integration of Polar Class into Polar Code Compliance

The Polar Class notations, established through the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) Unified Requirements, fulfill the goal-based standards in Part I-A of Chapter 1 (Safety Measures) of the International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Polar Code, specifically addressing requirements for polar hull forms, structural integrity, and ice navigation capabilities.^[18] These notations provide a standardized framework for ensuring ships are designed and equipped to operate safely in ice-infested polar waters, directly supporting the Polar Code's objectives for risk mitigation in extreme environments.^[10] In the certification process, recognized classification societies such as DNV, ABS, and Lloyd's Register issue the mandatory Polar Ship Certificate to vessels intending to operate in polar regions, explicitly referencing compliance with IACS Unified Requirements (UR I) for Polar Class ships.^[19]^[20]^[21] The assigned Polar Class notation (PC1 through PC7) delineates the vessel's operational limitations, such as maximum ice thickness and seasonal restrictions, thereby verifying the ship's fitness for specific polar ice conditions as required by the Polar Code. This process integrates seamlessly with the Polar Code's broader regulatory umbrella, adopted in 2014 and entering into force on January 1, 2017, to harmonize international standards for polar shipping.^[18] Since the Polar Code's entry into force in 2017, thousands of ships have been certified using Polar Class notations to meet its structural and ice capability requirements, while vessels lacking such notations must undergo alternative risk assessments, such as the IMO-endorsed POLARIS service, to demonstrate equivalent compliance.^[18]^[22] Non-Polar Class ships operating in polar waters are thus subject to case-by-case evaluations of design, equipment, and operational procedures to address potential hazards.^[19] The 2025 revisions to the IACS Unified Requirements for Polar Class ships, including Revision 5 of UR I2 published in June 2025 and effective from January 1, 2027, align with the Polar Code regime's 2024 environmental amendments, such as the prohibition on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in Arctic waters (effective 1 July 2024), which reduces black carbon and other pollutant emissions from ships operating in polar regions, including icebreakers.^[9]^[10] These updates enhance machinery and propulsion standards to support sustainable operations, reflecting IMO's ongoing efforts to integrate environmental protection with safety in polar navigation.^[23]

Definition and Purpose

Core Definition of Polar Class

Polar Class is a standardized ice class notation assigned by member societies of the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) to steel-hulled ships designed for independent navigation in ice-infested polar waters. These notations, ranging from PC1 to PC7, indicate the vessel's operational capability in specific ice conditions, determined by reinforcements to the hull structure and machinery systems to withstand ice interactions.^[24] The ice conditions defining each Polar Class are based on the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Sea Ice Nomenclature, which provides standardized terms for ice types such as multi-year ice and first-year ice to ensure consistent international application.^[24] In distinction from other ice classification systems, such as the Baltic or Finnish-Swedish rules tailored for sub-Arctic seasonal first-year ice, Polar Class addresses the more severe extremes of polar regions, including multi-year ice over 3 meters thick.^[25] These notations primarily apply to self-propelled ships enabling independent operations, while non-self-propelled vessels may receive alternative classifications.^[24]

Objectives for Safe Polar Operations

The Polar Class system, as a standardized notation developed by the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), aims to enhance ship safety, protect sensitive polar environments, and improve operational efficiency for vessels navigating ice-infested waters.^[24] These objectives address the unique challenges of polar regions, where extreme cold, thick ice, and remoteness increase risks to ships, crews, and ecosystems.^[15] Safety objectives center on preventing hull damage through robust structural designs capable of withstanding ice interactions, ensuring propulsion reliability via machinery engineered for low-temperature and ice-load conditions, and facilitating rescue operations in areas with limited infrastructure by maintaining maneuverability in severe ice.^[24] For instance, higher Polar Classes like PC1 enable year-round operations in multi-year ice, allowing vessels to reach safe havens for repairs without external assistance.^[24] Environmental goals focus on reducing the risk of oil spills and emissions in fragile polar ecosystems by strengthening hull and machinery integrity to minimize accident potential, thereby supporting broader pollution prevention efforts.^[24] This contributes to pollution prevention by minimizing risks from ice interactions.^[15] Additionally, the Polar Code's ban on heavy fuel oil in the Arctic, effective July 1, 2024, complements these goals by limiting potential emissions and spills.^[15] Operational benefits include enabling year-round access for scientific research, resource extraction, and tourism, which supports economic activities in increasingly navigable polar regions while minimizing downtime from ice delays.^[26]^[27]^[28] For example, a PC5 notation permits year-round operations in medium first-year ice with old ice inclusions, enhancing route reliability and overall efficiency compared to lower-class or escorted voyages.^[24]

Classification Notations

Descriptions of PC1 to PC7

The Polar Classes (PC1 through PC7) define the operational capabilities of ships in ice-infested polar waters, with each class specifying the severity of ice conditions the vessel is designed to navigate safely. These classifications, established by the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS), are based on standardized ice nomenclature from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), using the "egg code" format to denote ice type, concentration, and other features in ice charts.^[24]^[29] PC1 represents the highest level of ice strengthening for the most extreme environments, while PC7 applies to the least severe conditions among polar operations; PC1 and PC2 are intended for the most severe multi-year ice conditions, often applied to powerful icebreakers.^[17] PC1 enables year-round operation in all polar waters, encompassing the most severe multi-year ice regimes where ice has survived at least two summers' melt, often exceeding 3 meters in thickness with high ridging and concentrations up to 10/10 (compact ice). These conditions feature heavily deformed, hummocked ice with blue-tinted, nearly salt-free surfaces and extensive drainage systems, posing immense challenges due to the ice's durability and pressure ridges that can reach several meters high. Vessels in this class must withstand continuous ramming and breaking through such extreme ice without limitations on season or location, making PC1 suitable only for missions in the central Arctic or Antarctic pack ice year-round.^[24]^[29] PC2 is designated for year-round operation in moderate multi-year ice conditions, typically involving ice 2.5 to 3 meters thick with medium concentrations (e.g., 7/10 to 8/10 close pack) and moderate ridging. This class addresses environments with surviving multi-year ice that includes smoother hummocks and irregular melt puddles, but still requires robust navigation capabilities to handle consolidated floes and occasional extreme inclusions throughout all seasons. PC2 vessels can operate in peripheral polar zones but face heightened risks from ice pressure and deformation compared to lower classes.^[24]^[29] PC3 supports year-round operation in second-year ice, which may include multi-year ice inclusions, characterized by ice up to 2.5 meters thick that has endured one summer's melt, featuring greenish-blue patches and a regular pattern of small puddles. These regimes often involve deformed ridges and concentrations of 8/10 or higher, with the potential for thicker multi-year fragments increasing navigational hazards during winter months. This class allows continuous polar access but is limited to areas where second-year ice predominates, avoiding the full extremity of pure multi-year packs.^[24]^[29] PC4 permits year-round operation in thick first-year ice, potentially with old ice inclusions, where the ice exceeds 1.2 meters in thickness and forms consolidated packs with significant ridging from pressure processes. Old ice elements, surviving at least one summer, add variability with smoother features up to 3 meters thick, requiring vessels to manage year-round exposure to these moderately severe conditions without seasonal restrictions. This class balances capability for extended operations against the risks of deformed, high-concentration ice (9/10 or more).^[24]^[29] PC5 is intended for year-round operation in medium first-year ice, which may include old ice inclusions, typically 0.7 to 1.2 meters thick with occasional thick floes and deformed ridges in concentrations up to 10/10. The presence of old ice, with its enhanced strength and hummocking, demands all-season readiness, but the regimes are less intense than those for higher classes, allowing broader application in sub-polar or marginal ice zones. Vessels in PC5 must navigate moderate packs that form through rafting and ridging of newly formed ice.^[24]^[29] PC6 allows summer and autumn operation in medium first-year ice, which may include old ice inclusions, focusing on seasonal windows when ice is 0.7 to 1.2 meters thick, with lower concentrations (e.g., 5/10 to 7/10) and reduced ridging compared to year-round classes. This class targets transitional periods with open water interspersed by deformed first-year floes and sporadic old ice, enabling operations in less consolidated packs during warmer months. Operational limits emphasize avoidance of winter thickening.^[24]^[29] PC7 is for summer and autumn operation in thin first-year ice, which may include old ice inclusions, involving ice less than 0.7 meters thick (often 0.3 to 0.7 meters) in low concentrations (1/10 to 4/10) with minimal ridging and more open water. These mild regimes feature young, less deformed ice suitable for shoulder seasons, where vessels can proceed with standard propulsion in fragmented covers, but must account for potential old ice patches that increase local resistance. This lowest polar class facilitates entry-level polar voyages during ice melt periods.^[24]^[29]

Operational Limits and Ice Condition Categories

The operational limits of Polar Class notations are defined by the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) Unified Requirements, which specify the ice conditions each class is designed to navigate safely, based on ice type, thickness, and seasonal factors.^[24] These limits draw from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Sea Ice Nomenclature, categorizing ice by stages of development related to age and thickness.^[29] Ice conditions are further qualified by concentration, expressed in tenths (1/10 to 10/10), where 1/10–3/10 indicates very open ice (water predominates), 4/10–6/10 open ice (leads and polynyas present), 7/10–8/10 close ice (floes mostly in contact), 9/10 very close ice, and 10/10 compact or consolidated ice (no visible water, floes frozen together).^[29] Ice categories relevant to Polar Class operations include new ice (<30 cm thick, such as nilas or grey ice), thin first-year ice (30–70 cm, subdivided into 30–50 cm and 50–70 cm stages), medium first-year ice (70–120 cm), thick first-year ice (>120 cm), second-year ice (surviving one summer's melt, typically up to 2.5 m thick), and multi-year ice (surviving at least two summers' melt, up to 3 m or more, often ridged or deformed).^[29] These categories may include old ice inclusions (second-year or multi-year remnants) that increase severity. Concentrations range from open water (0/10) to full pack ice (10/10), with limits tied to the specified ice types for each class. Polar Class 1 and 2 ships are intended for year-round operation in all polar waters, handling all concentrations of multi-year ice, including moderate multi-year conditions for PC2.^[24] PC3 and PC4 are designed for year-round operation in second-year ice (PC3, with multi-year inclusions) or thick first-year ice (PC4, with old ice inclusions), across all concentrations.^[24] PC5 supports year-round navigation in moderate first-year ice (medium thickness) with old ice inclusions, across all concentrations.^[24] In contrast, PC6 and PC7 are restricted to summer and autumn operations—defined as June to November in the Arctic and November to March in the Antarctic—for medium first-year ice (PC6) or thin first-year ice (PC7), both potentially with old ice inclusions and concentrations up to open or close pack levels.^[24] Ice conditions for operational planning are often reported using the WMO Egg Code notation, an oval-shaped symbol that encodes total concentration, partial concentrations by ice type (e.g., 7/10 thick first-year, 3/10 open water), and floe size distribution for concise communication.^[30] For instance, a code might indicate 1/10 concentration of multi-year ice, 3/10 of thin first-year ice, and 6/10 open water, aiding captains in assessing compliance with Polar Class limits.^[30]

Technical Requirements

Structural and Hull Design Criteria

The structural and hull design criteria for Polar Class ships are outlined in the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) Unified Requirement (UR) I2, which specifies requirements for steel hulls intended for independent navigation in ice-infested polar waters.^[9] These criteria ensure the hull can withstand ice-induced loads while maintaining structural integrity, with designs tailored to the assigned Polar Class notation from UR I1.^[24] As of November 2025, UR I2 Rev. 4 (December 2019) is applicable; Rev. 5 (June 2025) is adopted but enters into force for ships contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2027. The hull is divided into distinct regions to account for varying ice interaction risks: the bow area, forward of 0.45 times the ice length L_{UI}, is optimized for icebreaking through glancing impacts and direct crushing; the midbody region, spanning the central hull, addresses side and parallel loads from ice floes; the stern region provides protection against rotational forces during astern operations or ramming maneuvers; and a bow intermediate zone transitions between bow and midbody.^[9] Vertically, these regions are further subdivided into icebelt (primary contact zone), lower, and bottom areas to apply region-specific load magnitudes.^[9] Design employs a net scantlings approach, where structural members are dimensioned to resist ice loads without corrosion margins, and corrosion/abrasion allowances are added separately to the gross thickness.^[9] For shell plating, the net thickness t_{net} for transversely framed structures is calculated as

t_{net} = \frac{500 \cdot s \cdot \left( (AF \cdot PPF_p \cdot P_{avg}) / \sigma_y \right)^{0.5}}{1 + s / (2 \cdot b)}

where s is frame spacing (m), b is frame span (m), AF is the area factor, PPF_p is the plating pressure factor, P_{avg} is average ice pressure (MPa), and \sigma_y is yield strength (MPa).^[9] Corrosion allowances t_s vary by region and Polar Class; for example, in the bow icebelt with protective coatings, t_s = 3.5 mm for PC1–PC3, 2.5 mm for PC4–PC5, and 2.0 mm for PC6–PC7.^[9] Minimum shell plate thicknesses are derived from these formulas and depend on framing orientation, hull region, and class-specific pressures, typically ranging from 15 mm in less demanding areas to over 40 mm in high-load bow zones for higher classes like PC1.^[9] Ice loads form the basis for scantling determination, with vertical loads at the bow representing the primary design force for icebreaking capability. The design vertical ice force F_{IB} is the minimum of two components:

F_{IB,1} = 0.534 \cdot K_I^{0.15} \cdot \sin^{0.2}(\gamma_{stem}) \cdot (D_{UI} \cdot K_h)^{0.5} \cdot CF_L

and F_{IB,2} = 1.20 \cdot CF_F, where D_{UI} is underwater displacement (kN), K_I and K_h are indentation and hull stiffness parameters, \gamma_{stem} is the stem angle, and CF_L, CF_F are class factors (e.g., CF_L = 7.46, CF_F = 68.60 for PC1; CF_L = 1.81, CF_F = 4.06 for PC7).^[9] Horizontal loads in the bow and midbody, arising from glancing impacts, are calculated as F_i = f_{a_i} \cdot CF_C \cdot D_{UI}^{0.64} (MN), with CF_C scaling by class (e.g., 17.69 for PC1, 1.80 for PC7); these loads typically represent 50–80% of vertical equivalents depending on aspect ratios and hull form, and are applied as pressure patches for local strength checks.^[9] The June 2025 revision (Rev. 5) of UR I2 refines load patch application in shear-critical areas, such as frame-web junctions and cut-outs, by mandating finite element method (FEM) analysis to optimize placement at locations of minimized structural capacity, enhancing overall hull efficiency without increasing material use.^[9] This update is effective for ships contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2027.^[9]

Machinery, Propulsion, and Equipment Standards

The machinery, propulsion, and equipment standards for Polar Class ships, as defined in IACS Unified Requirement UR I3 (Rev. 2, Corr. 1, December 2024), focus on ensuring operational reliability and resilience against ice interactions, low temperatures, and mechanical failures in polar environments. These requirements apply to ships contracted for construction on or after 1 July 2024 and complement the structural criteria by addressing dynamic mechanical systems for safe navigation in ice-infested waters.^[31] Propulsion systems must be robustly designed to handle ice loads, with propellers required to remain fully submerged at the load ice waterline (LIWL) and constructed in open or ducted configurations using fixed-pitch (FP) or controllable-pitch (CP) types, incorporating ice load calculations for strength and fatigue. Azimuth thrusters are preferred for their superior maneuverability in ice, enabling directed thrust to clear ice around the hull and astern operations without loss of control; however, they demand special design considerations for loads from ice block impacts on hubs and performance in oblique flows.^[31]^[32]^[31] For Polar Classes PC1 through PC5, redundancy is mandated to maintain sufficient propulsion capability following propeller damage, such as from ice impact, allowing the vessel to proceed to a safe haven or initiate evacuation procedures.^[31] Machinery standards emphasize protection from extreme cold, with cooling systems for main and auxiliary engines incorporating ice boxes—minimum capacity of 1 m³ per 750 kW—to separate ice from seawater intakes and prevent freezing; two such boxes are required for PC1 to PC5, while one suffices for PC6 and PC7.^[31] Fuel tanks and piping must be safeguarded against freezing damage through drainable designs, insulation, and heating arrangements.^[31] Redundant systems, including dual generators and independent power sources, ensure continuous essential services, with emergency power units capable of starting automatically at polar ambient temperatures and providing at least three consecutive starts, supplemented by a secondary energy source for additional attempts within 30 minutes.^[31]^[18] Auxiliary equipment requirements prioritize ice resistance and thermal protection, with bow thrusters designed to withstand ice loads and prevent ingestion of ice fragments that could damage internals. Shaft lines and couplings are engineered for extreme loads from blade failure (F_ee), applying a safety factor of at least 1.0 and requiring fatigue analysis to endure repeated ice-induced stresses, often using ice-class bearings for durability. Black water systems must incorporate measures to avoid freezing of liquids, such as trace heating and insulated piping, in accordance with polar operational requirements, while adhering to enhanced discharge prohibitions closer than 3 nautical miles from ice shelves or fast ice (for comminuted and disinfected sewage) or 12 nautical miles (for untreated) to minimize environmental impact, as per the IMO Polar Code Chapter 4, Part II-A.^[18] These standards collectively enhance survivability by integrating mechanical resilience with the hull's structural integrity for overall polar endurance.^[31]

Polar Class Ships

PC7

PC7 is the lowest designation in the Polar Class system, intended for vessels operating during summer and autumn in thin first-year ice, which may include old ice inclusions, at low concentrations. These ships are suited for occasional exposure in marginal ice zones, such as sub-Arctic routes, where ice conditions are light and navigation is primarily in open water with potential thin ice floes. Unlike higher classes, PC7 vessels lack icebreaking capability and require ice scouting or assistance for safe passage, emphasizing operational limits to avoid deliberate ice interaction. This class is commonly assigned to merchant vessels like bulk carriers and tankers that venture into light ice-infested areas for resource transport, as well as support and supply ships servicing sub-Arctic operations. For instance, bulk carriers transiting the Northwest Passage have increasingly adopted PC7 notations to facilitate summer ore shipments from Arctic mines, with numbers rising from 1 unique vessel in 2010–2014 to 104 in 2015–2019, reflecting growing commercial activity in these routes. Supply vessels in regions like the Bering Sea or Hudson Bay also frequently receive PC7 for occasional thin ice encounters during seasonal logistics. Structural requirements for PC7 ships involve minimal reinforcements compared to higher classes, focusing on basic ice strengthening in the hull's forward and midship regions to withstand light loads. Typical enhancements include shell plating thicknesses of 15-20 mm in the ice belt area, with framing designed for low ice pressures (e.g., average pressure around 1.0 MPa), ensuring the vessel can navigate thin ice without significant risk of damage. Machinery standards emphasize reliability in cold conditions, such as protected propulsion systems capable of operating in 1.5 m ice equivalents but without the power for independent breaking. Since the Polar Class rules were unified in 2008, PC7 has become the most prevalent notation for vessels entering polar regions sporadically, enabling broader access for non-specialized merchant fleets.

PC6

Polar Class 6 (PC6) denotes ships designed for summer and autumn operations in medium first-year ice, which may include old ice inclusions. This class balances enhanced ice navigation capabilities with operational efficiency for vessels not requiring year-round polar access, allowing independent transit through consolidated medium ice during favorable seasons without the need for heavy icebreaker support in most conditions. PC6 vessels are particularly suited for coastal patrols and scientific expeditions in polar regions, where they can support environmental monitoring, resource surveys, and logistical missions in ice-covered coastal zones. These ships feature reinforced hulls to withstand ice impacts, with design ice loads calculated for bow, midship, and stern areas to ensure structural integrity during ramming or crushing interactions. Operational limits emphasize avoidance of intentional ramming for ships with vertical-sided or bulbous bows, as noted in classification certificates, prioritizing safe passage through multi-year inclusions via cautious maneuvering. Representative examples include the Viking Octantis and Viking Polaris, expedition cruise ships launched in 2022 by Viking Cruises, certified to PC6 for polar voyages supporting scientific and exploratory activities in Arctic and Antarctic waters. Another is the Scenic Eclipse, a luxury expedition yacht commissioned in 2018, equipped for PC6 operations in medium ice during summer expeditions, highlighting the class's applicability to versatile polar tourism and research platforms. Additionally, the HMNZS Aotearoa, a New Zealand Navy replenishment oiler delivered in 2019, holds PC6 notation for supporting patrol and sustainment missions in sub-Antarctic and polar-adjacent areas. Many PC6 ships incorporate diesel-electric propulsion systems for improved maneuverability and redundancy in icy conditions, enabling sustained operations with low-speed icebreaking capabilities. Hull designs typically include ice-strengthened plating in the ice belt region, often 25-30 mm thick in critical areas, to resist abrasion and deformation from medium ice encounters. Progressing from PC7's focus on thin first-year ice, PC6 extends suitability to slightly thicker, deformed formations for more regular polar access.

PC5

Polar Class 5 (PC5) vessels are designed for year-round operations in medium first-year ice, which may include occasional old ice inclusions for enhanced endurance in polar regions without the need for heavy icebreaking capabilities. These ships feature reinforced hull structures to withstand glancing ice impacts, with shell plating thickness calculated based on design ice loads, area factors, and material yield strength, often resulting in net thicknesses augmented by corrosion margins of 2.5 to 5.0 mm in critical ice belt areas. Machinery and propulsion systems must support continuous independent navigation through such conditions, including provisions for ice-protected sea chests and propellers capable of handling backward ice forces up to specified limits based on vessel speed and diameter. PC5 is one of the more commonly assigned notations for expedition and research vessels operating persistently in polar waters, particularly for moderate multi-year ice scenarios up to 1-1.5 m with occasional thicker inclusions, enabling reliable presence without extreme icebreaking demands. Notable examples include the South African research vessel S.A. Agulhas II, launched in 2012, which supports Antarctic expeditions with capabilities for breaking 1 m ice at 5 knots and serves as a platform for oceanographic and biological studies. Another prominent class is the Canadian Harry DeWolf-class offshore patrol vessels, with all six ships commissioned by 2025, designed for Arctic sovereignty patrols and equipped with diesel-electric propulsion for independent operations in broken ice environments. These vessels are widely used in tourism and offshore support, allowing for year-round navigation in fragmented ice fields typical of coastal polar routes, where they provide stable platforms for passengers and equipment without requiring escort by heavier icebreakers. The notation emphasizes balanced structural integrity and propulsion reliability, making PC5 suitable for sustained polar presence in conditions beyond seasonal first-year ice but short of extreme multi-year pack.

PC4

PC4 ships are certified for year-round operation in thick first-year ice, which may include old ice inclusions, enabling reliable performance in challenging Arctic environments. These vessels are particularly suited for summer and autumn operations in medium multi-year ice conditions, where they support seasonal resource transport such as bulk cargo and oil products along routes like the Northern Sea Route. Operations in these conditions require ice forecasting to navigate edges and avoid heavier multi-year formations, ensuring safe transit during the shorter ice-free periods. Representative examples include the MV Nunavik, a 28,500 DWT Canadian bulk carrier built in 2014 by Nantong COSCO KHI Ship Engineering in China for Fednav Limited, featuring a double-acting design with Azipod propulsion for efficient icebreaking in PC4 conditions. Another example is the Finnish icebreaker Polaris, delivered in 2016 by Arctech Helsinki Shipyard, equipped with LNG propulsion and rated PC4 Icebreaker for assisting commercial traffic in the Baltic Sea and potential Arctic support roles. These ships highlight the versatility of PC4 notation for commercial and support vessels in polar regions. These vessels typically incorporate ice-strengthened hulls with plating thicknesses around 35-40 mm in critical areas to withstand ice impacts. PC4 ships, such as bulkers and ice-strengthened tankers, are essential for seasonal Arctic trade, with hull designs emphasizing resistance to glancing blows from ice floes.

PC3

The Polar Class 3 (PC3) designation, as defined by the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) Unified Requirements, enables year-round operations in second-year ice conditions that may include multi-year ice inclusions. These vessels are engineered for demanding polar environments characterized by high ridging and multi-year ice incursions in extreme summer and autumn scenarios, making them suitable for deep scientific missions in regions like the Arctic and Antarctic where sustained independent navigation is essential. PC3 ships prioritize robust structural integrity and propulsion systems to handle these conditions, distinguishing them from lower classes by their ability to maintain continuous speeds in thicker, more consolidated ice formations. Structural demands for PC3 vessels include enhanced hull plating to withstand ice impacts, with thicknesses typically ranging from 40 to 45 mm in critical areas such as the bow and ice belt, as exemplified by the Norwegian research icebreaker Kronprins Haakon, which features steel plating up to 40 mm thick. Propulsion requirements emphasize high power-to-weight ratios to ensure reliable performance, often exceeding 1.5 kW per tonne of displacement; for instance, Kronprins Haakon delivers 21 MW of power from its diesel-electric system on an 11,500-tonne hull, achieving approximately 1.8 kW/t, while the Chinese vessel Xue Long 2 provides 23.2 MW total installed power on a 13,996-tonne displacement for a ratio of approximately 1.7 kW/t. These specifications ensure the hull form and machinery allow independent operations without external assistance, with bows designed to avoid vertical sides or excessive bulbous features that could impede icebreaking efficiency. Primarily heavy research and government icebreakers dedicated to polar exploration rather than commercial use are assigned PC3. Notable examples include the Kronprins Haakon, launched in 2018 by Norway's Polar Institute as a 100-meter-long icebreaker for year-round Arctic and Antarctic research, equipped with advanced scientific facilities including a moonpool and dynamic positioning. Similarly, China's Xue Long 2, commissioned in 2019, serves as a 122-meter polar research vessel capable of supporting expeditions to Antarctic stations, with azimuth thrusters enabling precise maneuvering in ice. These vessels represent high-impact contributions to polar science, facilitating data collection in remote areas inaccessible to lesser classes. In terms of operational capabilities, PC3 ships can independently break through 1.5 meters of level ice at speeds of 2 to 3 knots, allowing sustained progress in consolidated pack ice during scientific deployments. They play a critical role in Antarctic resupply missions, such as escorting supply ships to stations like McMurdo during the austral summer, where their icebreaking prowess ensures access through fast ice and ridges up to several meters thick via ramming techniques if needed. For example, Kronprins Haakon has supported Norwegian Antarctic logistics by navigating heavy ice fields for resupply and research, while Xue Long 2 has conducted similar operations to bolster China's polar presence.

PC2

Polar Class 2 (PC2) ships are designed for year-round operations in moderate multi-year ice conditions, enabling continuous heavy-duty polar security and exploration missions. These vessels feature advanced structural reinforcements, including hull plating thicknesses of 45-50 mm in critical areas to withstand ice pressures, and incorporate dual propulsion systems such as diesel-electric or hybrid-electric setups with multiple azimuth thrusters for enhanced maneuverability in dense ice fields. The PC2 notation specifically denotes capability for year-round navigation in medium multi-year ice, distinguishing it from lower classes limited to seasonal or thinner ice operations. Notable examples include the French luxury expedition vessel Le Commandant Charcot, launched in 2021 by Ponant for polar research and tourism, which is the world's first PC2-rated passenger ship and utilizes a hybrid-electric propulsion system to access remote areas like the Geographic North Pole. In the United States, the U.S. Coast Guard's Polar Security Cutter (PSC) program is constructing heavy icebreakers classified as PC2 with enhanced notation, featuring triple azimuth thrusters and a displacement of approximately 23,000 tons; however, construction delays have pushed initial deliveries beyond 2028, with the first vessel expected around 2030. These ships exemplify the class's rarity, reflecting the high technical and cost barriers to building such specialized vessels. PC2 ships possess full polar circuit capabilities, allowing year-round transits across Arctic and Antarctic routes, supported by endurance exceeding 60 days in continuous ice operations for sustained missions like sovereignty patrols and scientific expeditions. For instance, the PSCs are engineered for 90-day endurance overall, with robust fuel and provisioning systems tailored for prolonged ice engagements, ensuring reliable performance in extreme environments.

PC1

Polar Class PC1 represents the pinnacle of ice class notations under the International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) Unified Requirements, intended for year-round operation in all polar waters, encompassing the most severe ice conditions such as extreme multi-year ice within full ice packs. This class demands hull and machinery designs capable of independent navigation through the harshest Arctic and Antarctic environments, with an ice strength index of 1.2 to ensure structural integrity against immense crushing and ramming loads. The structural criteria for PC1 ships require reinforced plating and framing throughout the ice belt and bow areas to resist ice pressures far exceeding those of lower classes, often resulting in shell plating thicknesses calculated to exceed 50 mm in critical zones, alongside frame spacings optimized for transverse or longitudinal systems to distribute loads effectively. Propulsion systems must maintain continuous forward speeds in these extreme conditions, typically necessitating installed power capacities over 100 MW for ultimate icebreakers, though exact values depend on vessel dimensions and operational profiles. These demands position PC1 as the theoretical standard for vessels like heavy nuclear-powered icebreakers, but the associated costs and complexity have prevented practical implementation. As of November 2025, no ships have been constructed or are under construction to meet full PC1 specifications, with existing heavy icebreakers like the U.S. Coast Guard's USCGC Polar Star operating under equivalent but pre-IACS capabilities rather than formal PC1 certification. Conceptual designs, such as Russia's proposed Project 10510 Leader-class nuclear icebreakers, aim toward PC1-level performance with capabilities for 4.5-meter ice breaking, but remain in planning stages without confirmed classification. The absence of built examples underscores PC1's status as an unattained benchmark, with PC2 serving as the highest routinely certified class for year-round multi-year ice operations. In hypothetical PC1 operations, vessels would exhibit complete autonomy in worst-case scenarios, enabling ramming of thick floes over 3 meters, sustained breaking through consolidated packs, and escort duties in regions inaccessible to lower classes, prioritizing safety through redundant systems and ice-resistant machinery arrangements.

References

[1]
[PDF] Polar Class Descriptions and Application - Hull Classification Surveys
I1.1.1 The IACS Unified Requirements for Polar Class ships Ships apply to ships constructed of steel and intended for independent navigation in ice-infested ...
[2]
IACS Unified Requirements for Building Polar Class Vessels
Jan 14, 2010 · Section 13 details machinery requirements for Polar Class ships, such as the main propulsion, steering gear, emergency and auxiliary systems.
[3]
None
Summary of each segment:
[4]
[PDF] Definitions of Parameters for Polar Class Ship - ClassNK
IACS Unified Requirement (UR) I2 stipulates classification requirements regarding the hull structures of polar class ships.
[5]
[PDF] Ice classed ships
This is because the Russian ice class system has different requirements for engine output compared to the. Finnish-Swedish ice class. For example, the Russian ...
[6]
IACS working groups at a glance - Riviera Maritime Media
To meet the technical requirements of the IMO Guidelines, IACS established an ad-hoc group (known as the AHG/PSR group) to develop the Unified Requirements ...Missing: origins 1990
[7]
Marine Design & Safety Congress | PDF | Oil Tanker | Risk - Scribd
In 1996 IACS established an Ad-Hoc group to establish Unified Requirements for Polar Ships (AHG/PSR). The efforts of the group has resulted in three sets of ...
[8]
Bulletin No.: 04/2009 - Transports Canada
Oct 27, 2016 · IACS Unified Requirements ( URs ) for Polar Class Ships ( UR I1, I2 and I3) took effect in March 2008. New ships built to these URs will be ...
[9]
[PDF] I2 Structural Requirements for Polar Class Ships I2 - ClassNK
Jun 5, 2025 · UR I2 applies to ships contracted for construction on or after 1 July 2007. 2. Rev.1 of this UR is to be uniformly applied by IACS Societies on ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[10]
UR I Archives - Safer and Cleaner Shipping - IACS
UR I2 Rev4 CLN. VIEW PDF . DOWNLOAD FILE . HF&TB VERSIONS. UR I2 Structural Requirements for Polar Class Ships – Rev.4 Dec 2019 Clean. Note: Rev.5 will come ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[11]
[PDF] Hull Structures of Polar Class Ships - ClassNK
In order to make the URs more detailed,. IACS carried out a review of each and added new requirements such as design ice loads for bows with vertical sides and ...Missing: changes | Show results with:changes
[12]
UR I2 Rev4 CLN - Safer and Cleaner Shipping - IACS
UR I2 Structural Requirements for Polar Class Ships – Rev.5 June 2025 Underlined. Technical Background. History File & Technical Background for UR I2 Rev5 CLN.
[13]
[PDF] Machinery Requirements for Polar Class Ships - ClassNK
Jan 2, 2023 · In order to obtain blade ice loads for a reversing propeller, load case 5 shall also be covered for propellers, where reversing is possible.
[14]
Unified Requirements: Minimum Safety Standards for Ships - IACS
Unified Requirements are adopted resolutions on matters directly connected to or covered by specific Rule requirements and practices of classification societies ...UR W · UR E · UR S · UR ZMissing: history | Show results with:history
[15]
International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code)
The Polar Code entered into force on 1 January 2017. The Polar Code and SOLAS amendments were adopted during the 94th session of IMO's Maritime Safety ...Missing: UR I3 date
[16]
IMO adopts mandatory Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters
Nov 21, 2014 · The expected date of entry into force of the SOLAS amendments is 1 January 2017, under the tacit acceptance procedure. It will apply to new ...
[17]
[PDF] IMO Polar Code Advisory - American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
If a ship has a Polar Class notation, IACS UR I2 contains ice class-dependent prescriptive material requirements that should be used. The second functional ...Missing: file | Show results with:file
[18]
https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Safety/Pages/Polar-Code.aspx
[19]
IMO Polar Code operation - DNV
A key objective of the Polar Code is to ensure a ship is fit for its intended operation in polar waters. The Code does not provide a one-size-fits-all solution.
[20]
Polar Code - American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
The Polar Code introduces the first formal IMO recognition of design temperatures for ships operating in cold environments.
[21]
Polar Code | LR - Lloyd's Register
The Polar Code is in two mandatory Parts, Part IA addresses safety aspects and Part IIA relates to environmental protection.
[22]
POLARIS | PAME
The POLARIS methodology was agreed at IMO as 'interim guidance' providing for a review four years after the entry into force of the Polar Code in 2017, in order ...
[23]
An IMO Commitment to Polar Fuels Could Cut Black Carbon ...
Jan 22, 2025 · Following IMO discussions in 2024 regarding the concept of 'polar fuels' - fuels acceptable for use in polar waters due to the lower emissions ...Missing: icebreakers | Show results with:icebreakers
[24]
[PDF] Requirements concerning POLAR CLASS
I1.1.2 Ships that comply with the UR I2 and UR I3 can be considered for a Polar Class notation as listed in Table 1. The requirements of UR I2 and UR I3 are ...Missing: draft | Show results with:draft
[25]
[PDF] Ice Reinforcement Selection in Different World Navigation Areas
Sep 30, 2013 · This Guidance Note on the ice reinforcement selection in different world areas is aimed to provide advice on the Ice Class or Polar Class ...
[26]
Polar Icebreakers in a Changing World: An Assessment of U.S. Needs
Ice retreat increases the cost-effectiveness of using the Northern Sea Route (primarily north of Russia) and the Northwest Passage (primarily north of Canada) ...
[27]
[PDF] SEA ICE NOMENCLATURE
Apr 4, 2011 · In 2009 the WMO Sea-ice Nomernclature was formally provided to the WMO. Secretariat linguistic department and is now available as a part of the ...
[28]
Egg Code
3.4 The Egg Code. The basic data concerning concentrations, stages of development (age) and form (floe size) of ice are contained in a simple oval form.Missing: notation | Show results with:notation
[29]
[PDF] Machinery Requirements for Polar Class Ships I3 - ClassNK
Dec 1, 2024 · This UR is to be uniformly applied by IACS Societies on ships contracted for construction on and after 1 March 2008. 2. The “contracted for ...Missing: Unified | Show results with:Unified<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
Azipod® propulsion ideal for ice management | News center - ABB
Sep 25, 2014 · Azimuthing thrusters offer excellent maneuverability and are able to manage growlers and bergy bits using the directed propeller wash effect. If ...Missing: preferred | Show results with:preferred<|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] Analysis of Changing Levels of Ice Strengthening (Ice Class) among ...
The increase in PC7 bulk carriers is especially evident by the fact that bulk carriers travelling within the NWP comprised. 96% of traffic for that vessel type ...
[32]
[PDF] I2 Structural Requirements for Polar Class Ships I2
UR I2 applies to ships contracted for construction on or after 1 July 2007. 2. Rev.1 of this UR is to be uniformly applied by IACS Societies on ships contracted ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[33]
[PDF] Publication 122/P – Requirements for Baltic Ice Class and Polar ...
Jul 1, 2024 · Publication 122/P – Requirements for Baltic Ice Class and Polar Class for Ships under PRS Supervision – July 2024 are based on Finnish-Swedish ...
[34]
[PDF] Polar Code | UNOLS
Category A and B ships are built and ice-strength- ened in accordance with the IACS Polar ice classes, or to a standard offering an equivalent level of safety.
[35]
[PDF] Requirements concerning POLAR CLASS
IACS Req. 2016. CONTENTS. I1. Polar Class Descriptions and ... 2.2 The Polar Class notation is used throughout the Unified Requirements for Polar Class.
[36]
What is a Cruise Ship's Polar Class Rating? - Cruise Critic
Aug 2, 2023 · According to IACS, a PC5-rated ship should be able to operate year-round in medium first-year ice, which might include some chunks of old ice ...
[37]
[PDF] Polar expedition ships: - ABB
The required. Polar Class notation is defined by the ice conditions and the season in which a ship will operate (see Table 1). Table 1. Definition of IACS Polar ...
[38]
Sailing through the ice HMNZS Aotearoa is our purpose-built polar ...
May 8, 2025 · It is ice- strengthened to Polar Class 6, meaning it has a higher grade of steel plating to withstand cold temperatures, plus an extra thickness ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[39]
[PDF] Guidance Notes on Ice Class - American Bureau of Shipping (ABS)
Oct 1, 2024 · POLARIS establishes RVs for the seven. (7) IACS Polar Classes, four (4) Finnish-Swedish Ice Classes, and non-ice strengthened ships. For example ...
[40]
S.A. Agulhas II - Deltamarin
IMO number 9577135 ; Classification society DNV ; Ice class DNV / PC5 ; Special features Polar supply and research vessel ...
[41]
Harry DeWolf class Arctic and Offshore Patrol Vessel AOPV
The vessels' ice class is Polar Class 5, but the bow region is further strengthened to higher Polar Class 4 level. The vessels will have a hangar and flight ...
[42]
Navigability of the Northern Sea Route for Arc7 ice-class vessels ...
In the 2010s, the navigation season for Open Water (OW) vessels and Polar Class 4 (PC4) ice-class vessels along the NSR increased to 92 ± 15 and 338 ± 26 d, ...
[43]
Polaris icebreaker - CruiseMapper
Rating 5.0 (15) The vessel is PC4/Polar Class 4 intended for year-round operations in thick first-year ice. The class also signifies the ship can be operated as an escort ...
[44]
MV Nunavik: from Quebec to China via the Northwest Passage
Sep 22, 2014 · It's rated as a Polar Class 4 vessel, which means it's capable of year-round operations in thick, first-year ice. It boasts the first ...
[45]
RV Kronprins Haakon – Norway's ice-class research vessel
RV Kronprins Haakon – Norway's ice-class research vessel · State-of-the-art research facilities · Low emissions and excellent safety.
[46]
Kronprins Haakon Polar Research Vessel - Ship Technology
May 4, 2018 · The hull form is optimised for improved seakeeping, low noise and reduced resistance. The ship is 100m-long and 21m-wide, with a gross ...Missing: plating | Show results with:plating
[47]
XUE LONG 2 - Aker Arctic
The highly advanced polar research icebreaker for China will allow scientists to move to and from Antarctica. China has four permanent research stations ...
[48]
RV Kronprins Haakon - ARICE
Kronprins Haakon is a PC 3 class icebreaker built according to the new polar code rules. The ship is designed for year-round operation in second-year ice.
[49]
Xue Long 2 - Wikipedia
She follows the naming of Xue Long, China's first polar research vessel. ... Her ice class is Polar Class 3 and she is able to break ice while traveling ...
[50]
[PDF] Xue Long 2 enters into service - Aker Arctic
Xue Long 2 is a Polar Class 3 vessel designed and built to break 1.5 metres thick ice in the polar areas. Photo Source: PRIC Polar Research Institute of China ...
[51]
Appendix D: Icebreaking Polar Research Vessels and Heavy ...
Chapter: Appendix D: Icebreaking Polar Research Vessels and Heavy Icebreakers ; PC1, Year-round operation in all polar waters. ; PC2, Year-round operation in ...
[52]
China Launches Domestically-Built “Xue Long 2” Icebreaker
Sep 11, 2018 · Xue Long 2 is highly maneuverable. The Polar Class 3 icebreaker is capable of breaking through ice up to 1.5 meters thick at a speed of 2-3 ...
[53]
https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives/2023/field/icebreakers/
[54]
Polar Icebreaker - Seaspan
The Mission Canada's new Polar Icebreaker will be the Canadian Coast Guard's multi-role vessel and is designed with a high degree of operational flexibility.Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[55]
Polar Classes - Transports Canada
Jan 14, 2010 · PC 1, Year-round operation in all Polar waters ; PC 2, Year-round operation in moderate multi-year ice conditions ; PC 3, Year-round operation in ...Missing: PC1 | Show results with:PC1
[56]
Le Commandant Charcot by Ponant : navigating through the ice
The only passenger ship in the world with a PC2 polar-class hull, ensuring safe passage through ice, inaccessible to other expedition ships. The most powerful ...
[57]
Coast Guard Polar Security Cutter (PSC) and Arctic ... - Congress.gov
The Coast Guard plans to acquire new heavy (PSC) and medium (ASC) polar icebreakers to expand its fleet, which currently has two ships.
[58]
Polar Regions Ship Considerations - Cruise Critic
Aug 28, 2022 · The lowest classification PC-7 allows for summer and autumn operations in thin first year ice.
[59]
Polar Security Cutter (PSC) - Naval Technology
Dec 10, 2019 · The propulsion system will also integrate two proven ABB Azipod drives, a shafted centreline propeller and three redundant generator sets. It ...
[60]
U.S. Coast Guard Sees Interest from Finnish, Canadian Yards for ...
Apr 22, 2025 · The current fleet is one PC1 class Polar Star, one PC2 Healy and one PC3 Alviq icebreakers. The replacement program is for 3 icebreaker/patrol ...Missing: few | Show results with:few