Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Police tactical unit

A police tactical unit is a specialized team of officers selected for advanced and equipped with specialized weaponry and tools to manage high-risk incidents, such as hostage rescues, armed barricades, threats, and counter-terrorism operations, which exceed the capabilities of standard patrol forces. These units prioritize tactical precision to minimize casualties among officers, suspects, and bystanders, employing techniques like dynamic entry, less-lethal munitions, and overwatch in scenarios where conventional policing risks or failure. Originating in the United States during the 1960s amid rising urban unrest, sniper attacks, and , the first formal tactical teams emerged from departments like the following events such as the , evolving to address gaps in handling fortified or heavily armed adversaries. Internationally, analogous units like Germany's formed in response to events such as the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre, demonstrating early successes in hostage liberation and high-stakes interventions. Key achievements include the FBI's tactical responses to and the LAPD's 1974 confrontation with the , which validated specialized training despite intense firefights. While effective in core missions, the expansion of tactical units—often fueled by federal grants for equipment—has sparked controversy over their deployment in routine warrant services, particularly no-knock raids for narcotics, correlating with increased civilian injuries and without commensurate reductions in rates. Empirical analyses indicate that militarized tactics may heighten tensions and fail to enhance or deter in non-exceptional contexts, prompting calls for stricter deployment protocols amid documented cases of operational overreach.

Definition and Purpose

Core Definition

A police tactical unit is a specialized team composed of highly trained officers equipped to manage and resolve high-risk incidents that exceed the capabilities of regular patrol personnel. These units employ advanced tactics, specialized equipment, and coordinated operations to address situations such as armed barricades, hostage crises, events, and high-risk executions. In the United States, such units are commonly designated as Special Weapons and Tactics () teams, a term originating from the in 1967, but the concept applies globally under various designations like Germany's or France's , focusing on tactical superiority in asymmetric threats. Membership typically involves rigorous selection from experienced officers, emphasizing , marksmanship, and tactical proficiency to minimize casualties and restore order efficiently.

Primary Objectives

Police tactical units, such as teams, are deployed to address high-risk incidents that surpass the operational limits of standard personnel, emphasizing the use of specialized tactics to achieve resolution with minimal force, injury, or property damage. Their core mission centers on saving lives through precise interventions in scenarios involving armed threats, where conventional policing risks escalation or failure. Primary objectives encompass hostage rescue operations, where units extract captives from captors while neutralizing threats, often in dynamic environments like hijackings or kidnappings. Another key focus is the apprehension of barricaded or armed suspects, involving containment, negotiation support, and forcible entry to prevent further violence or escape. High-risk warrant service, including searches and arrests of dangerous individuals, forms a routine objective, requiring coordinated assaults to secure compliance without broader endangerment. Tactical units also prioritize active shooter responses, rapidly neutralizing perpetrators in public spaces to halt casualties, as seen in protocols for school or workplace incidents. Counter-terrorism missions, particularly for federal or elite units like the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team, involve disrupting plots, raiding strongholds, and conducting high-stakes raids abroad or domestically. These objectives are executed with an overarching goal of public and officer safety, leveraging advanced training to de-escalate when possible or decisively engage when necessary.

Historical Development

United States Origins

The first police tactical unit in the United States, known as Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT), was established by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) in 1966. The concept originated from LAPD Sergeant John Nelson, who proposed a specialized team to handle situations where standard patrol officers were outgunned or outnumbered, presenting the idea to Inspector Daryl Gates, then a rising commander in the department. Gates refined the proposal, initially dubbing it the "Special Weapons Attack Team" before revising it to SWAT for approval from superiors, drawing on military-inspired tactics to address escalating urban threats including sniper fire and armed standoffs. This formation was directly precipitated by vulnerabilities exposed during the 1965 Watts riots, where LAPD officers faced superior firepower from snipers and rioters, highlighting the limitations of conventional policing in high-intensity confrontations. The inaugural SWAT team comprised approximately 60 officers, primarily veterans of the and Wars selected for their combat experience, equipped initially with confiscated weapons from criminals and operating from a refurbished delivery as their primary vehicle. Training emphasized discipline, marksmanship, and coordinated assaults to neutralize threats like barricaded suspects or insurgent-style violence, reflecting a causal recognition that isolated responses were causally ineffective against organized armed resistance. The unit's prioritized , control, and negotiation where feasible, but prepared for lethal force when necessary to protect officers and civilians. SWAT's first major operational test occurred on December 9, 1969, during a four-hour standoff with members at their headquarters, where the team executed no-knock warrants for illegal weapons across multiple sites, resulting in 13 arrests without SWAT-inflicted casualties after the Panthers surrendered. This deployment validated the unit's efficacy in real-world scenarios, prompting rapid adoption by other U.S. police departments; by 1975, approximately 500 teams operated nationwide, driven by analogous rises in and . The LAPD model thus established the foundational template for tactical units, emphasizing specialized personnel and equipment to restore operational superiority in asymmetric threats.

Global Evolution and Examples

![Bundesarchiv image of GSG 9][float-right]
The global evolution of police tactical units accelerated in the 1970s amid rising international , particularly following the Olympics massacre on September 5, 1972, where Palestinian militants killed 11 Israeli athletes and two German police officers, exposing deficiencies in conventional policing for counter-terrorism operations. This event prompted European nations to form dedicated elite units equipped for hostage rescue, sieges, and rapid intervention, often drawing tactical inspiration from military while remaining under civilian police oversight to maintain legal accountability. By the 1980s, similar units proliferated in response to aircraft hijackings, urban bombings, and , adapting to local threats like leftist insurgencies in or separatist violence in , with over 50 countries establishing SWAT-equivalent teams by the .
In , the Grenzschutzgruppe 9 () was established on September 26, 1972, within the Federal Border Police to prevent repeats of , focusing on counter-terrorism with rigorous selection from border guards and training emphasizing marksmanship, assault tactics, and minimal collateral damage. demonstrated its efficacy during Operation Feuerzauber on October 13, 1977, storming a hijacked in , , rescuing all 86 hostages with three militants killed and no friendly casualties, a success attributed to specialized breaching and capabilities. In , the Groupe d'Intervention de la Gendarmerie Nationale () formed in 1973 under the Gendarmerie for rural and national threats, while the Recherche, Assistance, Intervention, Dissuasion () unit of the National Police was created in 1985 for urban operations, both prioritizing alongside lethal force in over 1,800 interventions by GIGN alone through 2020. The United Kingdom's Specialist Firearms Command (SCO19), evolved from units dating to 1966 and formalized in 2005 within the Metropolitan Police, handles armed response in a context of routine unarmed policing, deploying for terrorism and barricades with an emphasis on armed support officers numbering around 2,500 by 2020. In Japan, the Special Assault Team (SAT), originating as Special Armed Police companies in 1977 and reorganized in 1996 under prefectural police, addresses hijackings and hostage crises in a low-gun-ownership society, conducting joint training with units like the U.S. FBI's HRT and executing operations such as the 1995 Tokyo subway sarin response coordination. These units reflect a causal pattern where empirical failures in high-stakes incidents drove institutional adaptations, prioritizing specialized personnel over generalist responses to mitigate risks from asymmetric threats.
![Counter-terrorism training of the Osaka Prefectural Police][center]

Organization and Personnel

Selection Criteria and Composition

Selection into police tactical units, such as teams, prioritizes candidates with demonstrated patrol experience, superior physical conditioning, marksmanship accuracy, and sound judgment under stress. In the United States, a minimum of two to three years of prior service is required by 81% of agencies, ensuring applicants possess foundational operational knowledge before advancing to specialized roles. Candidates undergo rigorous assessments, including physical proficiency tests (used by 82.4% of teams), firearms qualification (81.4%), and oral interviews (78.1%), which evaluate tactical and team compatibility. Psychological evaluations, though less universal at 17.5% adoption, screen for resilience and , while some processes incorporate tabletop tactical scenarios to test problem-solving in simulated high-risk environments. Written examinations remain uncommon (11.8%), as emphasis falls on practical competencies over academic metrics. Physical tests often feature obstacle courses mimicking entry and breaching demands, such as climbing and timed maneuvers under gear weight, with failure thresholds calibrated for legal defensibility. Marksmanship evaluations extend beyond standard qualifications to include dynamic shooting under movement and pressure, revealing not only skill but also adaptability and integrity. Final selections hinge on commander discretion, balancing technical ability with character traits like humility and teamwork, as poor interpersonal fit can undermine in life-or-death operations. Tactical unit composition varies by agency size and jurisdiction but typically features 15 officers on average, supplemented by 2-3 sergeants and a lieutenant or captain for oversight. Over 89% of U.S. teams operate part-time, with members retaining primary duties in patrol or investigations to maintain broad departmental integration and cost efficiency. Personnel are assigned specialized roles to optimize mission execution: team commanders coordinate overall strategy; entry operators handle close-quarters assaults and breaching; long riflemen provide overwatch and precision fire; while support positions include medics, armorers, and containment specialists for perimeter security. Larger teams may incorporate grenadiers for less-lethal munitions and crisis negotiators, though the latter often form a parallel unit. About 60% of agencies maintain independent teams, with 31% relying on multi-jurisdictional collaborations to pool resources and expertise. This structure ensures redundancy and role-specific proficiency, derived from job analyses confirming interdependent tasks demand tailored skills.

Training Protocols and Specialization

Police tactical units implement intensive protocols designed to build proficiency in high-risk operations, emphasizing physical endurance, marksmanship, (CQB), and scenario-based simulations. The National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA) outlines standards requiring annual training plans with lesson plans, schedules, and verification processes to ensure mission capability through synchronized team efforts. These protocols typically mandate 40 to 80 hours of quarterly training per operator, focusing on task-oriented drills assessed for performance. In the United States, teams often follow guidelines from state commissions like California's Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST), which specify training in legal considerations, , safety measures, and post-incident evaluations, alongside practical skills in dynamic entries and less-lethal munitions. The FBI's (HRT) exemplifies elite protocols: candidates, after at least three years as special agents, complete a two-week selection course followed by a six- to eight-month New Operators Training Course covering advanced marksmanship, breaching, rappelling, and medical response. Internationally, units like Germany's Grenzschutzgruppe 9 (GSG 9) require a 22-week program post-selection, divided into 13 weeks of basic training in weapons handling, tactical simulations, and physical conditioning—such as 6 km runs under 26 minutes—and 9 weeks of advanced modules including climbing and navigation. Training incorporates after-action reviews to refine causal factors in failures, prioritizing empirical feedback over rote repetition. Specialization divides responsibilities to enhance , with roles assigned based on and ongoing . Common positions include snipers for long-range , breachers for or entries, tactical medics trained in hemorrhage under fire, and grenadiers managing flashbangs or chemical agents. Armorers maintain equipment integrity, while some units integrate canine handlers for detection in confined spaces. Crisis negotiators, though often a parallel specialty, receive tactical familiarization to support entry teams. These roles demand recertification, typically annually, to sustain proficiency amid evolving threats.

Equipment and Capabilities

Armaments and Protective Gear

Police tactical units standardize protective gear to mitigate ballistic, environmental, and physical hazards during high-risk operations. Operators typically wear NIJ-certified , including Level IIIA soft vests for handgun threats, often augmented with Level III or IV hard rifle plates inserted into plate carriers for rifle-round protection in and 2 teams. Ballistic helmets, rated to NIJ Level IIIA, incorporate integrated white lights and provide fragmentation and handgun resistance. Additional includes impact-resistant eyewear or goggles, hearing protection, elbow and knee pads, gloves, and NIOSH-approved air-purifying respirators or gas masks for chemical, biological, or smoke exposure. Uniforms consist of (BDU)-style clothing adapted to local climates, with flame-retardant materials and identifiers for operational . Armaments emphasize versatility for entry, suppression, and precision engagements, with agencies required to maintain policies for selection, maintenance, and inventory of functional equipment. Sidearms include holstered handguns equipped with night sights, mounted white lights, and at least three magazines. Primary long arms comprise rifles or submachine guns fitted with holographic or red-dot optics, backup iron sights, weapon-mounted lights, adjustable slings, and three magazines per operator. Shotguns serve for breaching and less-lethal munitions delivery. Sniper systems for Tier 1 and 2 units feature precision rifles with magnified optics, bipods, and spotting scopes for long-range observation. Less-lethal and diversionary tools integrate with lethal options to enable graduated force responses. Short-range conducted energy devices, 12-gauge impact munitions, and 37/40mm launchers provide non-penetrating incapacitation at varying distances. Noise-flash diversionary devices (flashbangs), including single-use grenades and bang poles, disorient suspects without permanent harm. Chemical agents, such as / irritants, deploy via throwable canisters, 12-gauge rounds, or 37/40mm systems. Team-level gear extends to Level III/IV ballistic shields for cover during advances, alongside breaching tools like rams, pry bars, and cutters. All equipment undergoes annual recertification and operator training, with minimum proficiency standards tied to agency policies.

Vehicles, Technology, and Support Systems

tactical units utilize armored vehicles to provide ballistic protection and mobility during high-risk deployments. tactical teams commonly inventory armored personnel carriers and other armored vehicles, with nine teams reporting access to personnel carriers and six to general armored variants. The series exemplifies such equipment, featuring Mil-Spec steel armor certified to defeat multi-hit attacks from 7.62 AP to .50 BMG rounds, along with enhanced underbody blast protection; these vehicles support operations including counter-terrorism and personnel extraction, accommodating teams in variants like the G3 for off-road capability. Unmanned and manned systems extend tactical reach. Nine teams employ off-road vehicles for , while six integrate unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) for aerial support and three use manned such as helicopters. Ground-based tactical robots, available to 11 teams, enable remote audio and video in hazardous environments, minimizing personnel risk. Surveillance technologies enhance . devices equip 23 teams, and thermal imaging systems support 15, facilitating operations in low-light or obscured conditions. Drones further this capability by delivering real-time overwatch, thermal imaging, and interior scouting in scenarios like standoffs and responses; for instance, they have enabled suspect neutralization without officer entry and safe room clearing, as demonstrated in operations by departments including Police and Police. Support systems include integrated medical and communication frameworks. Tactical emergency medical services (TEMS) deliver on-site urgent care during extended high-risk missions, preserving operator safety through specialized protocols like Tactical Casualty Care. Communication relies on tactical headsets and radio systems for clear, duplex transmission over distances up to 400 meters, ensuring coordinated actions in dynamic environments. Logistics elements, such as equipment maintenance and command vehicle integration, sustain operational continuity.

Operational Roles

High-Risk Warrant Service and Arrests

High-risk warrant service refers to the execution of search or arrest warrants by police tactical units in scenarios presenting elevated threats, such as suspects with histories of armed violence, fortified locations, or potential for booby traps and evidence destruction. These operations prioritize and public safety through specialized tactics, contrasting with routine patrols that lack such capabilities. Deployment criteria typically include indicating greater-than-normal risks, like violent criminal records or narcotics-related fortifications, to minimize casualties from resistance. Planning for these operations involves comprehensive risk assessments, surveillance of suspect patterns, and selection of optimal execution times and locations to exploit predictability while avoiding civilian exposure. Teams conduct rehearsals, establish perimeter containment, and integrate support elements like negotiators or less-lethal munitions to de-escalate. Intelligence gathering focuses on interior layouts, occupant numbers, and weaponry, informing whether to employ deliberate entry (methodical clearing) or dynamic entry (rapid breach) based on threats like imminent destruction of evidence or harm to innocents. In execution, tactical units surround the target, announce presence where feasible, and breach using tools like or explosives, followed by systematic securing of the site. No-knock entries are reserved for exigent circumstances, such as risks of weapon access or evidence loss, though standards emphasize limiting dynamic tactics to verified high-threat cases. Empirical data from U.S. agencies indicate high-risk service constitutes the predominant SWAT deployment type, averaging 15.6 such operations per team annually. Across surveyed teams from 2009-2013, mean activations for high-risk warrants ranged from 14.13 to 17.04 per year, underscoring their frequency in managing armed threats. Effectiveness metrics show resolution with restrained force: teams fire shots in under 10% of incidents, averaging 0.12 shootings per team yearly, and employ less-lethal options eight times more often than lethal force, correlating with lower injury rates than non-specialized responses. Field observations confirm these operations fulfill objectives of neutralizing dangers while limiting escalation, as suspects' gunfire (259 shots in analyzed cases) prompted fewer SWAT discharges (171 shots).

Hostage Rescue and Barricaded Suspect Scenarios

Police tactical units, such as teams, are deployed in hostage rescue operations when suspects hold captives, often following failed negotiations, to prioritize the safe extraction of victims while neutralizing threats. These scenarios typically involve high-stakes environments like buildings or vehicles where immediate action is required to prevent harm, with units employing dynamic entry tactics including flash-bang devices, ballistic shields, and precision rifle fire to overwhelm captors. The primary objective is to minimize casualties among hostages and officers, guided by standards that emphasize intelligence gathering, containment, and deliberate force only when surrender is improbable. In practice, hostage situations begin with teams establishing communication to de-escalate and secure releases, achieving resolution without assault in approximately 95% of cases, avoiding fatalities to hostages or suspects. When becomes necessary, units conduct rehearsals, use tools like robots or drones for , and execute breaches coordinated with snipers for . Empirical data indicate that in assaults, hostages are 2.3 times more likely to be rescued successfully than killed, though operations carry inherent risks of or failed entries. Barricaded suspect scenarios differ in lacking confirmed hostages, focusing instead on fortified individuals posing potential threats, such as armed fugitives or those in who refuse to . Tactical responses prioritize perimeter , prolonged , and non-lethal options like chemical agents or acoustic devices to compel compliance without entry. LAPD guidelines stress assessing mental state, using throw phones for dialogue, and staging for prolonged sieges, with assaults reserved for active violence indicators. Studies of such incidents show yields high success rates, with predictive tools identifying escalation risks in 80% of cases to inform decisions. Both scenario types underscore the integration of negotiation and tactical elements, with units for urban complexities like multi-room structures or vehicle assaults, where mobility challenges demand specialized breaching and cover tactics. FBI protocols highlight adaptability across environments, from hijackings to sieges, ensuring readiness for evolving threats while adhering to legal thresholds for force. Overall, these operations reflect a balance of patience and precision, with data-driven protocols enhancing outcomes in life-threatening standoffs.

Counter-Terrorism and Active Shooter Responses

Police tactical units respond to incidents by prioritizing the immediate neutralization of the perpetrator to halt ongoing casualties, often forming entry teams for buildings or facilities where the threat persists. Following the April 20, 1999, shooting, which resulted in 13 deaths and exposed delays in entry, protocols evolved to emphasize rapid offensive action by arriving officers, with specialized tactical teams supporting complex breaches, victim rescue, and securing secondary threats. In FBI analysis of 160 events from 2000 to 2013, arrived while the attack was underway in 57 percent of cases, frequently stopping the shooter upon direct confrontation, with median victim counts of four when officers engaged compared to higher numbers in unresolved incidents. Counter-terrorism operations by these units mirror responses but account for potential coordinated tactics, explosives, or hostage elements, typically involving containment, intelligence integration, and dynamic assaults. In the December 2, , where killed 14 people at a workplace holiday party, San Bernardino Police Department teams established a perimeter around the suspects' facility after initial patrol engagement, prepared breaching operations, and pursued the fleeing perpetrators in a subsequent that ended with both terrorists killed. Similarly, during the June 12, 2016, Pulse nightclub attack in Orlando, where murdered 49, Orange County Sheriff's Office breached the barricaded venue after three hours of negotiation and initial response, neutralizing the shooter amid booby-trap risks. These responses underscore the units' role in bridging immediate patrol action with sustained tactical operations, where empirical outcomes demonstrate that prompt correlates with reduced fatalities, though challenges like suspect fortification and multi-site coordination persist. FBI tactical teams, evolving since the , have adapted for threats, incorporating enhanced training in and interagency synchronization to address evolving risks.

Performance and Effectiveness

Deployment Frequency and Statistical Data

In the United States, where police tactical units such as teams are most extensively documented, comprehensive national deployment data remains limited due to decentralized reporting across thousands of agencies, but surveys provide key estimates. A multi-method study funded by the , drawing from operational reports by hundreds of teams, found that annual deployments averaged 3.5 for barricaded suspects, 0.5 for hostage incidents, 14.1 for warrant service, and 2.1 for miscellaneous operations per team by the late , with warrant service showing the sharpest rise—from a mean of 4.7 per team in 1986 to 14.6 in 1998 across reporting agencies. This contributed to broader estimates of tens of thousands of total operations nationwide annually during that period, adjusted for non-reporting agencies. Subsequent analyses indicate sustained or increased frequency, with criminologist Peter B. Kraska estimating 50,000 to 80,000 operations per year by the early 2010s, reflecting expansion tied to the and high-risk warrant protocols. A 2016 national survey of teams corroborated this scale, reporting an average of 15.6 high-risk warrant deployments per team annually, the most common operation type. Across studies, 80-90% of deployments involve search or arrest warrants, often narcotics-related, while traditional scenarios like hostage rescue or barricaded suspects account for under 10%, underscoring a shift toward proactive enforcement over reactive crisis response. Federal tactical units, comprising a smaller subset, logged 5,175 SWAT deployments by the FBI alone from fiscal years 2015 to 2019, with 73% for warrants and 12% for protection details; other agencies like U.S. Park Police reported 1,569 operations in the same period, mostly protective. State-level data, such as Maryland's 514 SWAT callouts in 2022 (92% for search warrants), aligns with per-team averages but highlights variability by jurisdiction. Recent national figures post-2020 remain scarce, as no mandatory tracking exists, though agency-specific trends suggest stability amid debates over usage thresholds.

Empirical Outcomes and Success Case Studies

Empirical assessments of police tactical units indicate that deployments in high-risk scenarios, such as rescues, often result in successful resolutions with minimal casualties when supported by specialized training and intelligence. A multi-method by the analyzed operations across multiple agencies, finding that teams frequently neutralized armed threats while limiting unnecessary force, though comprehensive success rates vary by context and data availability. Research on differential training protocols has shown that enhanced preparation correlates with improved rescue effectiveness, reducing risks to civilians and officers compared to standard responses. A prominent success case is the GSG 9 operation during the 1977 hijacking of Flight 181. On October 18, 1977, in , , the German federal police tactical unit stormed the aircraft after it was seized by four Palestinian terrorists demanding the release of imprisoned militants. The assault, coordinated with Somali forces, lasted minutes and resulted in the rescue of all 86 passengers and four crew members unharmed, with three terrorists killed and one captured. This operation validated GSG 9's training efficacy, achieving zero hostage fatalities in a high-stakes international counter-terrorism scenario. The FBI's () demonstrated similar proficiency in the 2013 Midland City, , hostage crisis. On February 12, 2013, operators breached a where Jimmy Lee Dykes held five-year-old Ethan Gilman captive for nearly a week following the boy's abduction from a . The rescue neutralized Dykes without injuring the child, leveraging precise intelligence and tactical entry techniques. This outcome underscored 's capability in domestic barricaded suspect incidents, with no civilian casualties despite the confined environment and armed threat.

Controversies and Criticisms

Allegations of Militarization and Overreach

Critics of police tactical units, particularly teams in the United States, have alleged that their increasing adoption of military-grade equipment and tactics constitutes excessive militarization, transforming routine into paramilitary operations. This concern intensified following the expansion of the Department of Defense's 1033 program, which transferred surplus hardware—such as armored vehicles, automatic weapons, and grenade launchers—to local agencies without cost, with transfers valued at over $5 billion between 2006 and 2014. Proponents of these allegations, including organizations, argue that such equipment fosters a warrior mindset among officers, prioritizing confrontation over and blurring the distinction between domestic policing and combat roles. A primary claim of overreach centers on the routine deployment of teams for non-emergency tasks, such as serving search , rather than their original intent for high-threat scenarios like rescues or barricaded suspects. An of over 800 SWAT raids across 20 states from 2010 to 2013 revealed that approximately 79% were for warrant service, predominantly in drug investigations, with only 14% involving hostages or barricades. In these operations, teams employed forced entry tactics, such as battering rams or explosives, in 65% of drug-related searches, often executing no-knock warrants that heightened risks of surprise encounters and potential violence. Critics contend this pattern reflects , where tactical units justify their existence through frequent, low-level deployments, leading to unnecessary escalation in communities. Allegations also highlight disproportionate impacts on minority populations, with data from the same review indicating that 42% of individuals affected by SWAT warrant services were and 12% Latino, fueling claims of racial in deployment decisions. Empirical studies have reinforced concerns about ineffectiveness, finding no association between militarized equipment use and reduced rates or fewer assaults on officers; one analysis of U.S. counties from 2012 to 2014 concluded that such tactics may instead erode public trust in , particularly among non-White respondents who perceive as aggressive posturing. Further critiques argue that militarization incentivizes aggressive policing strategies, potentially increasing civilian injuries and deaths, as evidenced by patterns where equipped units correlate with higher rates of application in non-lethal encounters. These allegations have prompted policy debates, with organizations asserting that the domestic application of counterinsurgency-derived tactics undermines constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and erodes the civilian nature of policing. While some studies question the causal links to broader outcomes like reduction, the core contention remains that over-reliance on tactical units for everyday deviates from principles of proportionate , potentially fostering a of communities as territories rather than areas requiring community-oriented policing.

Notable Incidents Involving Use of Force

On March 12, 2020, Montgomery County Police Department's team executed a at approximately 4:45 a.m. targeting 21-year-old Duncan S. Lemp for suspected illegal possession of firearms, prompted by an anonymous tip. Lemp was fatally shot five times by an officer after police claimed he raised a toward them upon entry into his bedroom; his family maintained he was asleep and unarmed at the time, with no footage of the shooting released. Prosecutors declined to charge the officer, citing the perceived threat from Lemp's actions and his prohibited status as a felon in possession of three s and two handguns recovered at the scene. In the Waco siege from February 28 to April 19, 1993, the FBI's (HRT), a federal tactical unit, managed a 51-day standoff with after an initial ATF raid killed four agents and six sect members. The operation culminated in an assault involving armored vehicles inserting and, controversially, pyrotechnic grenades that may have contributed to a fire killing 76 Davidians, including 25 children; critics alleged excessive force and tactical errors, while official reviews attributed most deaths to the group's actions amid evidence of and illegal weapons stockpiles inside the compound. The incident fueled debates on federal overreach, with subsequent inquiries confirming HRT's use of military-style tactics but exonerating intentional by agents. On February 2, 2022, a joint and St. Paul SWAT team conducted a at 6:45 a.m. in a downtown apartment targeting a suspect, entering after a 22-second muffled announcement. Amir Locke, 22, unrelated to the target but present and sleeping on a couch wrapped in a , emerged armed after about 10 seconds, prompting an to fire twice, killing him; footage showed no verbal commands before the shots. No charges were filed against the , as prosecutors determined the shooting was justified by Locke's movement with a in a high-risk entry, though the case intensified scrutiny of no-knock tactics amid Locke's lack of criminal involvement. These cases highlight recurring concerns over pre-dawn no-knock entries by tactical units, where rapid escalations led to civilian fatalities despite intelligence on armed suspects, prompting policy shifts like Minnesota's 2023 restrictions on such warrants following Locke's death. Empirical data from 2010–2016 indicate at least 81 civilian deaths in U.S. forced-entry raids, underscoring risks even when units follow protocols for high-threat scenarios.

Counterarguments from Data and Operational Necessity

A multi-method study of operations from 1986 to 1998 across multiple agencies found that civilians were far more likely to die by during tactical interventions than to be killed by officers, with suspect rates exceeding officer-inflicted fatalities by a significant margin. This low incidence of collateral harm underscores the precision of trained tactical responses in high-stakes environments, where untrained officers would face elevated risks of . In hostage rescue scenarios, data from analyzed SWAT deployments indicate that hostages are 2.3 times more likely to be successfully rescued than killed during the operation, demonstrating the units' capacity to neutralize threats while preserving innocent lives. Similarly, for barricaded suicidal suspects—a common callout type—individuals are 10.5 times more likely to be taken into than to complete when tactical teams intervene, highlighting the de-escalatory potential of specialized and over prolonged standoffs by general officers. Operational necessity for tactical units stems from the inherent dangers of scenarios involving armed or fortified , where standard policing lacks the protective gear, marksmanship, and coordinated entry tactics required to mitigate lethal threats to responders. Over 95% of line-of-duty deaths occur in non-tactical contexts, but in the subset of high-risk tactical incidents, specialized teams reduce exposure to gunfire, with data showing that officer-involved shootings remain a minority outcome compared to . Critics alleging over-militarization often discount these metrics, yet the empirical record supports deployment protocols that prioritize containment and minimal force application, averting broader casualties from unchecked actions.

Deployment Guidelines and Decision-Making

Deployment of police tactical units is restricted to high-risk incidents that exceed the safe response capabilities of regular patrol officers, such as armed barricaded s, situations, events, high-risk warrant executions, and terrorism-related threats. Agencies must maintain written activation policies specifying these criteria, with deployment decisions hinging on a preliminary threat assessment that weighs suspect armament, volatility, location , and potential harm to bystanders against available alternatives like or containment. For example, National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA) standards classify operations into tiers, with teams (minimum 26 personnel) reserved for critical incidents like rescues in dynamic environments, while Tier 2 (19 personnel) handles similar scenarios excluding planned high-stakes extractions. Decision-making follows a structured command protocol aligned with the , where the on-scene incident commander initiates activation requests, often requiring approval from a SWAT commander or higher authority. This process incorporates rapid intelligence gathering, establishment of a secure command post, and evaluation of risks via models prioritizing officer and civilian safety over expediency. Tactical plans are developed pre-deployment when feasible, including medical contingencies and perimeter control by interim teams, with emphasis on proportionality—escalating force only after fails. In multi-jurisdictional responses, memoranda of understanding facilitate automatic notifications and shared command to avoid delays. Jurisdictional variations persist, as evidenced by surveys of over 250 U.S. agencies showing differences in activation thresholds and oversight, though best practices from organizations like NTOA and the International Association of Chiefs of Police advocate uniform standards for training, selection, and post-operation reviews to mitigate misuse. Legal frameworks, such as those in state commissions like California's , mandate documentation of rationales to support accountability, ensuring deployments align with constitutional requirements for reasonable force. Empirical reviews indicate that rigorous pre-activation assessments reduce unnecessary escalations, with federal analogs like analyses of tactical teams reinforcing the need for mission-specific justifications excluding routine patrols or drills.

Oversight Mechanisms and Reforms

Internal oversight of police tactical units emphasizes standardized policies for activation, deployment, and post-operation review to ensure operational necessity and compliance with legal standards. The National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA) recommends that agencies establish explicit policies outlining approval processes, often requiring command-level authorization from a officer or executive, such as a chief, prior to deployment. These mechanisms aim to limit use to high-risk scenarios like barricaded suspects, situations, or active shooters, with mandatory after-action critiques to evaluate decision-making, tactics, and outcomes. In states like , the Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) commission provides guidelines for team formation, training oversight, and operational protocols, including annual needs assessments to align capabilities with departmental policy. External oversight varies by jurisdiction but typically involves civilian review boards or independent auditors empowered to investigate complaints arising from tactical operations, though their authority over specialized units remains limited compared to general patrol functions. Federal agencies like the () have examined tactical teams, noting policies for tracking deployments and training but highlighting inconsistencies in reporting across local and federal levels. Legislative frameworks, such as state laws governing warrant requirements and use-of-force reporting, provide additional checks, with courts holding agencies liable for deployments violating Fourth Amendment protections. However, sources critical of tactical units, including groups, often advocate for expanded access to deployment records, though empirical on such boards' impact on reducing in high-stakes operations is sparse and contested. Reforms to tactical unit oversight have accelerated following high-profile incidents, focusing on curbing perceived overreach in equipment acquisition and deployment thresholds. Post-2014 and subsequent Department of Justice reviews prompted temporary federal restrictions on surplus military gear transfers via the program, aiming to reduce , though these were later rescinded in 2017 amid arguments that such equipment enhances officer safety in asymmetric threats. After the 2020 Breonna Taylor shooting involving a no-knock entry, several states including and enacted bans or limits on such warrants, indirectly affecting tactical entries by mandating knock-and-announce protocols unless exigent circumstances exist. Despite these changes, operational data indicates persistent resistance to broad demilitarization, with agencies citing necessity for specialized gear in rising incidents—over 300 mass shootings annually in recent years—suggesting reforms driven more by public scrutiny than causal evidence of reduced efficacy. National studies recommend enhanced training in integrated with tactical protocols, but implementation remains uneven, with internal audits showing most deployments resolve without force.

References

  1. [1]
    Tactics - FBI
    Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) · storming barricaded buildings · breaching locks · arresting dangerous suspects · rescuing hostages · climbing or rappelling in ...
  2. [2]
    SWAT (SPECIAL WEAPONS AND TACTICS)
    A SWAT TEAM IS A GROUP OF SELECTED POLICE OFFICERS TRAINED TO HANDLE CERTAIN CRISIS SITUATIONS (E.G., SNIPERS, BARRICADED SUBJECTS, HOSTAGE SITUATIONS, ...
  3. [3]
  4. [4]
    Police Tactical Units (From Police Source Book 2, 1985 , P 231-248 ...
    The earliest tactical units were formed to counter armed persons presenting a danger to the public or police. The increase in worldwide political terrorism in ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    SWAT at 50 - FBI
    Dec 12, 2023 · The FBI's SWAT program began in a handful of field offices in 1973 to better prepare agents for tactical responses. Today's modern SWAT is ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] What is the Future of SWAT Teams in Law Enforcement? - FDLE
    In 1973, the whole country watched as the Los Angeles Police Department SWAT team took on the Symbionese Liberation Army in what was probably the single ...
  7. [7]
    Militarization fails to enhance police safety or reduce crime but may ...
    Aug 20, 2018 · Advocates claim militarized policing protects officers and deters violent crime, while critics allege these tactics are targeted at racial ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] War Comes Home: The Excessive Militarization of American Policing
    Jun 1, 2014 · SWAT raids are undoubtedly violent events: numerous. (often 20 or more) officers armed with assault rifles and grenades approach a home, break ...
  9. [9]
    SWAT - Police | seattle.gov
    SWAT stands for Special Weapons And Tactics. This unit is highly-trained and provides 24/7 response to: barricaded persons; active shooting scenes; high risk ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Tactical Response and Operations Standard
    2.2. Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) and Tactical Response (TRT) teams are designated law enforcement teams, whose members are recruited, selected, trained, ...
  11. [11]
    Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT) Team
    The SWAT Team is called upon to respond for service of high-risk search and arrest warrants; incidents involving barricaded suspects, hostage rescues, or active ...
  12. [12]
    SWAT Team | Southaven Police, MS
    The primary objective of the SWAT Team is the resolution of high-risk situations with a minimum of force, personal injury, or property damage.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Team - PowerDMS
    2 SWAT TEAM MISSION. The mission of the SWAT team is to save lives. The primary focus of SWAT is to provide tactical solutions that increase the likelihood ...
  14. [14]
    SWAT - El Paso County Sheriff's Office
    Its main purpose is to provide ballistic protection to officers and citizens in situations where such protection is needed.<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Utah County Sheriff's Office SWAT
    The primary focus and responsibility of the team is for handling high risk search warrants, barricaded subjects, hostage situations, active shooter incidents, ...
  16. [16]
    SWAT (Special Weapons and Tactics) Team Manual
    The mission of the SWAT team is to provide ready response to situations beyond the capabilities of normally equipped and trained law enforcement agency ...
  17. [17]
    Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT) | City of Paducah
    The primary responsibility of the Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT) is to respond to and resolve high-risk, critical incidents in a tactical manner.
  18. [18]
    SWAT History a Series of Highs, Lows in L.A. - NPR
    Jul 22, 2005 · DEL BARCO: Former police chief Daryl Gates formed the first SWAT team back in 1966 after LA police found themselves outgunned by snipers during ...
  19. [19]
    The Controversial History of the LAPD SWAT Team | Coffee or Die
    Feb 18, 2022 · In the 1960s, law enforcement around the country saw a shift in criminal behavior. Local police departments struggled to deal with a rise in ...
  20. [20]
    Police History: How SWAT got its start - Police1
    Sep 10, 2015 · The first members of SWAT were veterans of the Vietnam and Korean Wars. They were issued a variety of weapons confiscated from criminals. Their ...
  21. [21]
    GSG 9 | German Counterterrorism Unit & History - Britannica
    Oct 15, 2025 · GSG 9, that exists within Germany's Federal Police (Bundespolizei). It was formed in the wake of the massacre at the Munich 1972 Olympic Games.
  22. [22]
    GSG 9: Germany's Counterterrorist Elite Police Tactical Unit | SOFREP
    Sep 10, 2025 · Grenzschutzgruppe 9 (GSG 9, or Border Protection Group 9) was officially formed less than three weeks later, on September 26, 1972, at Sankt ...
  23. [23]
    GIGN: The Hostage Rescue Primacy of the Gendarmerie ...
    The unit serves as France's primary counterterrorism and hostage rescue unit, being internationally renowned for its skill.Introduction · History of the GIGN · Organisation of the GIGN · Equipment
  24. [24]
    RAID: The Black Panthers of French Police Nationale
    In June 1985, the French Police Nationale formed RAID to combat the rising violent crime and terrorism sweeping Europe and France.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  25. [25]
    SCO19: The 'Trojans' of London - Grey Dynamics
    The Specialist Firearms Command (SCO19) is the firearms unit of the Metropolitan Police Force: the police force of the Greater London region.
  26. [26]
    Special Assault Team (SAT): Japanese equivalent to the FBI HRT
    Their origins trackback to 1977 when they existed as a Special/”Zero” Company. In 1996 they were reorganized and known as the Special Assault Team (SAT).
  27. [27]
    [PDF] POLICE OF JAPAN
    Eight prefectural police headquarters have their respective Special Assault Teams (SAT) specially trained to deal with hijackings and hostage crises. Page ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] National Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Study:
    Other criteria used by a small number of agencies included a written test (nationwide 11.8%;. East 12.1%; Central 10.9%; and West 12.7%), a psychological ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    [PDF] SWAT Team Structure and Leadership
    A SWAT team includes a Team Commander, Team Leader, Scout/Assistant Team Leaders, additional entry members, Long Rifle/Observer, and Containment Teams.
  31. [31]
    The tactical specialties of a modern SWAT team - Police1
    May 20, 2024 · Tactical team leaders prepare plans for the tactical resolution of the problems faced at each callout and submit them to the officers in charge.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] SWAT Team Composition and Effectiveness
    A typical. SWAT team will include tactical officers specializing in particular areas of expertise (e.g., sniper). The highly specialized nature of roles within ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] NTOA TROS 2023
    These areas guide administrators in command of tactical teams of minimum capabilities based on their TIER status as defined and indicated in this document.<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Training Management for SWAT
    Effective SWAT training is task-oriented, performance-based, planned, assessed, and produces mission-capable individuals, with a focus on synchronized effort ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] SWAT Operational Guidelines and Standardized Training ...
    Jul 12, 2019 · The guidelines cover legal and practical issues, personnel selection, planning, safety, after-action evaluation, logistics, uniforms, firearms, ...
  36. [36]
    Hostage Rescue Team: The Crucible of Selection - FBI
    Feb 12, 2013 · “The process is designed to identify individuals who will perform the best in a crisis situation,” said FBI Deputy Director Sean Joyce, a former ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  37. [37]
    Hostage Rescue Team: Training for Every Contingency - FBI
    Feb 19, 2013 · Each new generation of recruits must undergo eight months of intensive training before joining the team and deploying on missions.
  38. [38]
    GSG 9: "To Protect the Fatherland" - Grey Dynamics
    GSG 9 is a core member of the counterterrorism ATLAS Network, like other European intervention units. The 1972 Munich Massacre demonstrated the need for a ...
  39. [39]
    Special Response Teams | ATF
    Nov 18, 2024 · They often serve in various roles such as crisis negotiators, team leaders, tactical operators, snipers, operator medics and canine handlers.
  40. [40]
    [PDF] FEDERAL TACTICAL TEAMS Characteristics, Training ...
    Sep 10, 2020 · Tactical teams reported having various types of firearms, tactical equipment, and tactical vehicles in their inventories. Team members generally ...
  41. [41]
    SWAT Trucks & Police Tactical Vehicles | Lenco
    Every Lenco SWAT truck and tactical vehicle is built with Mil-Spec steel armor plate, certified to defeat multi-hit attacks from 7.62 AP to .50 caliber BMG ...
  42. [42]
    Drones in Tactical Crisis Response - Police Chief Magazine
    Jun 5, 2024 · Drones are used to provide overwatch of the entire scene to track activity and movement around the incident.
  43. [43]
    What is Tactical Medicine? | Tactical and Law Enforcement ... - ACEP
    Tactical Medicine is a medical specialty providing emergency support to preserve the safety and well-being of military and law enforcement personnel in ...
  44. [44]
    TEMS | NTOA
    Tactical Emergency Medical Support is the provision of preventative urgent and emergent medical care during high-risk, extended duration and mission-driven law ...
  45. [45]
    SWAT headsets, radio & communication gear - INVISIO
    See our range of tactical headsets, radio and comms gear enabling swat teams, special forces and other professionals to operate and communicate clearly and ...
  46. [46]
    High Risk Warrant Service | Office of Justice Programs
    The selection of a tactically sound location is the primary consideration, followed by the selection of time of day when the subject's movement patterns can be ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] A Multi-Method Study Of Special Weapons And Tactics Teams
    Known most commonly as Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams,1 such units ... security detail for the transfer of a suspected international terrorist from one ...
  48. [48]
    High Risk Warrant Operation Tactics - Scholarly Works @ SHSU
    Law enforcement units tasked with high risk search and arrest operations should limit the application of dynamic entry tactics to situations where innocent ...
  49. [49]
    National SWAT Study Reveals Insights about Agencies Across the ...
    May 24, 2016 · The most common type of deployment was for high-risk warrants (with an average of about 15.6 per team per year). Commanders held most of the ...
  50. [50]
    Hostage negotiations: Psychological strategies for resolving crises
    May 22, 2007 · In fact, containment and negotiation strategies yield a 95% success rate in terms of resolving a hostage crisis without fatalities to either ...Missing: missions | Show results with:missions
  51. [51]
    Fifty Years of FBI Crisis (Hostage) Negotiation - LEB
    Aug 6, 2024 · This adaptation further enhanced our success rate, which we soon statistically determined to be in the mid- to high-90th percentile.3 Few things ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] SWAT Team: A Life-Saving Not a Life-Taking Police Operation
    Aug 15, 2014 · The data show that on average, hostages are 2.3 times more likely to be successfully rescued by the SWAT team than killed during a hostage ...
  53. [53]
    NTOA: 14 barricaded suspect response tips from LAPD SWAT
    Oct 7, 2022 · Consider these tips to update tactical team training and procedures for barricaded suspects and hostage rescue operations in your ...
  54. [54]
    Leveraging Data to Predict Outcomes in Hostage and Barricade ...
    Jul 7, 2022 · Tool 1 correctly predicts violence after onset in 4 out of every 5 incidents, and tool 2 correctly predicts successful resolution by negotiation or surrender ...
  55. [55]
    10 tactical considerations for a bus assault - Police1
    Nov 2, 2010 · Hostage rescue operations in a mobile environment is perhaps the toughest challenge any tactical team can encounter.
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Active Shooter Response Training Protocols Since ...
    On April 20, 1999, two active shooters attacked Columbine High School. This attack became a catalyst that changed the manner in which law enforcement prepared ...
  57. [57]
    Addressing the Problem of the Active Shooter | FBI - LEB
    May 7, 2013 · In 57 percent of the shootings, an officer arrives while the shooting is still underway.15; The shooter often stops as soon as he hears or sees ...
  58. [58]
    Lessons Learned from the Police Response to the San Bernardino ...
    Abstract: In the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino and Orlando, the first responders were patrol and traffic officers, investigators, and command ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    FBI Active Shooter Safety Resources
    Recent active shooter incidents have underscored the need for a coordinated response by law enforcement and other first responders to save lives. The FBI is ...
  60. [60]
    Shedding light on the use of SWAT teams - The Washington Post
    Feb 17, 2014 · The criminologist Peter Kraska has estimated that there are are somewhere between 50,000 and 80,000 SWAT raids per year now in America, and that ...
  61. [61]
    To Terrify and Occupy | American Civil Liberties Union
    Aug 14, 2014 · Every year now, there are approximately 50,000 SWAT raids in the United States, according to Professor Pete Kraska of Eastern Kentucky ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    [PDF] GAO-20-710, FEDERAL TACTICAL TEAMS
    Sep 10, 2020 · To describe tactical team deployments, we requested that each tactical team provide data on team deployments for fiscal years 2015 through. 2019 ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] GOCPYVS; 2022 Report on SWAT Team Deployment and No-Knock ...
    Oct 12, 2023 · A total of 64 (72.7%) no-knock search warrants were executed under circumstances in which a police officer made forcible entry into a building, ...
  64. [64]
    Special Weapons and Tactics operations: Examining the effects of ...
    May 2, 2018 · PDF | Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test the effects of differential police training on hostage rescue effectiveness.
  65. [65]
    Hijacking of Lufthansa Flight 181 and brilliant GSG 9 rescue operation
    The operations carried out by GSG 9 were ended at 0212 hours by local time, and it was entirely successful. GSG 9 had proved itself on the world scene by saving ...
  66. [66]
    Operation Fire Magic - ASDNews
    Oct 18, 2017 · Led by their commander, Ulrich K. Wegener, the GSG 9 freed all 86 passengers unharmed during the successful commando operation in Mogadishu.
  67. [67]
    GSG-9 Storms Lufthansa Flight 181 in Somalia, Frees 86 Hostages
    Oct 18, 2017 · West German counter-terrorist commandos from the GSG-9 stormed a hijacked airliner in Mogadishu, Somalia during Operation Fire Magic (Feuerzauber) and freed 86 ...<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Successful HRT Hostage Rescue in Alabama: SOF Breakdown
    The FBIs highly trained special operations unit, the Hostage Rescue Team, conducted a successful rescue operation in Midland City, Alabama on February.
  69. [69]
    Hostage Rescue Team: Held to a Higher Standard - FBI
    Mar 8, 2013 · One of the FBI's first HRT members reflects on his experiences as the team turns 30.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] The Case Against Police Militarization
    According to a comprehensive report by the ACLU, 79 percent of. SWAT deployments are for serving warrants, an activity far removed from their original purpose.Missing: allegations overreach
  71. [71]
    Poisoning Our Police: How the Militarization Mindset Threatens…
    Jun 9, 2020 · And as a 2017 study showed, in law enforcement agencies that use military equipment, officers are more likely to display violent behavior and ...
  72. [72]
    Militarization Fails to Enhance Police Safety or Reduce Crime but ...
    Advocates claim milita-rized policing protects officers and deters violent crime, while critics allege these tactics are targeted at racial minorities.Missing: allegations empirical
  73. [73]
    Police safety, killings by the police, and the militarization of US law ...
    Police militarization increases killings by the police and reduces police safety, resulting in 64 more killings, 12,440 assaults, and 2653 injuries annually.
  74. [74]
    Citizens, Suspects, and Enemies: Examining Police Militarization
    Dec 15, 2020 · 171 Utah data indicate that, in 2,370 deployments from 2014 to 2018, suspects brandished weapons in 85 cases, officers fired shots in 14 cases, ...Missing: allegations overreach
  75. [75]
    [PDF] The Rise of Police Militarization and Impact on Civilians
    The rise of paramilitary units like S.W.A.T. has affected policing by introducing a military-like mindset into civilian police forces (Balko, 2006). Some have ...Missing: allegations overreach
  76. [76]
    No charges for police in death of 'boogaloo' movement martyr
    Dec 31, 2020 · Detectives obtained the no-knock warrant to search Lemp's home after receiving an anonymous tip that he illegally possessed firearms, police ...
  77. [77]
    Duncan Lemp shooting: Maryland SWAT officer cleared in fatal no ...
    Dec 31, 2020 · Prosecutors say officer fired five rounds at Lemp, 21, after he raised a rifle. Lemp has become a martyr among government extremists around ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  78. [78]
    Report to the Deputy Attorney General on the Events at Waco, Texas
    One of the FBI's major concerns during the standoff was to maintain the security of the perimeter around the compound. The HRT maintained the inner perimeter, ...
  79. [79]
    FBI agents on scene of Waco standoff reveal new details about the ...
    Feb 28, 2023 · FBI agents on scene of Waco standoff reveal new details about the deadly 1993 siege · Former Aurora SRO released on bond; FBI seeks victims in ...
  80. [80]
    Minneapolis police kill a Black man while executing a no-knock ...
    Feb 4, 2022 · Body camera footage shows that police shot and killed Amir Locke while he was on a couch, wrapped in a blanket, on Wednesday morning.
  81. [81]
    No charges filed in no-knock warrant killing of Amir Locke | PBS News
    Apr 6, 2022 · Minnesota prosecutors declined to file charges Wednesday against a Minneapolis police SWAT team officer who fatally shot Amir Locke while executing an early ...
  82. [82]
    The police killing of Amir Locke | MPR News
    The use of no-knock warrants dove after 2023 state law restriction · Appeals court says Locke family's wrongful death lawsuit against officer can move forward.
  83. [83]
    Examining the Risks of No-Knock Raids
    Apr 14, 2022 · Between 2010 to 2016, 81 civilians and 13 law enforcement officers were killed in forced-entry searches. Officers represented 10% of fatalities ...
  84. [84]
    No More Preventable Law Enforcement Deaths - ACEP
    Apr 16, 2020 · Indeed, over 95% of incidents resulting in law enforcement deaths occurred in non-tactical circumstances.
  85. [85]
    National Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Study
    This report reveals the results of the research studies and looks into the composition of SWAT teams, protocols, practices, training procedures, community ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] SWAT - California POST
    • Standards for the selection and training of tactical dispatchers. • Criteria for the activation and deployment of tactical dispatchers. • Identification of ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Local Democratic Oversight of Police Militarization
    Police militarization has four main aspects: (1) the “1033 program” (launched in the 1990s, this program authorizes the U.S. Defense Depart- ment to transfer ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Citizen Review of Police : Approaches and Implementation
    The most active citizen oversight boards investigate allegations of police misconduct and recommend actions to the chief or sheriff. Other citizen boards review ...
  89. [89]
    State Policing Reforms Since George Floyd's Murder
    May 21, 2021 · In reaction, 12 states and DC have created a duty for law enforcement officers to intervene in cases of excessive or illegal force or misconduct ...Missing: tactical units
  90. [90]
    Expert looks at how and why police resist reforms to militarization
    Mar 3, 2023 · Many seeking reforms, including abolitionists, see demilitarization as a step toward replacing policing with other systems of public safety, or, ...