Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pressure support ventilation

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a mode of positive pressure mechanical ventilation in which the patient triggers every breath, with the ventilator providing a preset level of inspiratory pressure support to augment spontaneous respiratory efforts.^[1] This patient-initiated mode can be applied invasively via an endotracheal tube or non-invasively through a mask, making it versatile for both acute and chronic respiratory support.^[1] In PSV, the ventilator delivers a flow of gas based on a clinician-set driving pressure (typically measured in cmH₂O), which assists the patient's inspiratory efforts until the inspiratory flow decreases to approximately 25% of its peak value, at which point the breath cycles off.^[1] The resulting tidal volume varies depending on the patient's lung compliance, airway resistance, and inspiratory time, while overall minute ventilation is determined by the patient's respiratory rate combined with the support level.^[1] Key adjustable parameters include the pressure support level, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂), allowing customization to individual needs without guaranteeing a minimum ventilation rate.^[1] PSV is indicated for managing hypoxemic, hypercapnic, or mixed respiratory failure, as well as facilitating spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) to assess readiness for extubation in critically ill patients.^[1] It is particularly useful during weaning from mechanical ventilation, where it supports gradual reduction in ventilator dependence while preserving patient autonomy.^[1] Contraindications are relative and include conditions with depressed respiratory drive (e.g., heavy sedation or neuromuscular blockade), high oxygen consumption, or significantly elevated airway resistance, as these may lead to inadequate ventilation.^[1] Among its advantages, PSV enhances patient-ventilator synchrony, reduces the work of breathing, and improves comfort compared to fully controlled modes, often allowing for decreased sedation requirements.^[1] However, potential disadvantages include the absence of mandatory breaths, which risks hypoventilation or hypoxemia if the patient's respiratory drive falters, necessitating close monitoring by an interprofessional team.^[1] Clinically, PSV's efficacy is supported by protocol-driven strategies and care bundles, with studies emphasizing its role in safe weaning and long-term outcomes in intensive care settings.^[1]

Overview and Principles

Definition

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a mode of positive pressure mechanical ventilation in which the patient initiates every breath through their own respiratory effort, triggering the ventilator to deliver a preset level of inspiratory pressure support.^[1] This patient-triggered, flow-cycled mode augments spontaneous breathing by providing additional inspiratory flow to achieve the targeted pressure, with the tidal volume varying based on the patient's effort, lung compliance, and airway resistance.^[1] Unlike mandatory ventilation modes, PSV relies entirely on the patient's respiratory drive and does not include backup rates or guaranteed minute ventilation, making it suitable for weaning or partial ventilatory support.^[1] In contrast to fully controlled modes such as volume-controlled or pressure-controlled ventilation, where breaths are machine-initiated and timed regardless of patient effort, PSV allows the patient full control over respiratory rate, inspiratory time, and flow pattern, promoting better synchrony and comfort.^[2] Controlled modes deliver fixed volumes or pressures on a set schedule, potentially leading to asynchrony if the patient's neural breathing pattern differs, whereas PSV's spontaneous nature minimizes such issues by aligning ventilator delivery with patient demand.^[2] Introduced in the mid-1980s as a partial support modality to facilitate the transition from full mechanical ventilation to unassisted spontaneous breathing, PSV was first described in clinical studies evaluating its impact on respiratory function.^[3] The mode's core mechanism involves the ventilator sensing the patient's inspiratory trigger—typically a negative airway pressure or flow change—and then rapidly increasing flow to maintain the set pressure until a flow-cycling criterion is met, such as a drop to 25% of peak inspiratory flow.^[1] By reducing the work of breathing associated with spontaneous efforts against ventilator circuitry, PSV serves as a bridge to extubation in various clinical settings.^[4]

Mechanism of Action

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) operates as a patient-initiated mode of mechanical ventilation, where each breath begins with the detection of the patient's spontaneous inspiratory effort. The ventilator senses this effort through either a flow trigger, typically a small inspiratory flow (e.g., 2-3 L/min), or a pressure trigger, such as a drop to -0.5 to -2 cm H₂O below baseline pressure. Upon triggering, the ventilator rapidly delivers a preset inspiratory pressure (P_insp), usually rising within 0.1-0.2 seconds to the target level above positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), augmenting the patient's effort to facilitate inspiration.^[1] During inspiration, the ventilator maintains a constant airway pressure at the set P_insp level, resulting in a decelerating flow pattern that adapts to the patient's demand and the respiratory system's time constant (product of resistance and compliance). Flow starts high to quickly achieve the pressure target and then decreases as alveolar pressure approaches P_insp, continuing until a cycle-off criterion is met, commonly when inspiratory flow falls to 25% of the peak flow (though adjustable between 5-50% depending on ventilator models). This flow-cycled termination allows the inspiratory duration to vary with patient needs, promoting synchrony.^[5]^[1] Expiration follows passively once the cycle-off threshold is reached, with the ventilator opening the expiratory valve to return airway pressure to the baseline PEEP level (typically 5-10 cm H₂O), enabling unassisted exhalation driven by the elastic recoil of the lungs and chest wall. The tidal volume (V_t) achieved in PSV is not fixed but approximated by the equation V_t ≈ (P_insp - PEEP) × C_rs, where C_rs is the respiratory system compliance, though this simplifies passive conditions and underestimates variability in active patients. In practice, V_t remains highly patient-dependent due to the interplay of ventilator support and endogenous forces.^[1] Patient factors significantly influence the mechanism, as the neural respiratory drive from the brainstem determines breath timing and initiation frequency, while respiratory muscle strength modulates the magnitude of inspiratory effort, affecting both flow demand and overall V_t. Stronger neural drive and muscle effort can increase V_t by enhancing the effective transpulmonary pressure gradient, whereas weakened drive (e.g., from sedation or pathology) may result in shallower breaths despite support. These dynamics ensure PSV assists rather than overrides spontaneous breathing, with respiratory rate and depth varying to match physiological needs.^[6]^[1]

Technical Aspects

Ventilator Settings

In pressure support ventilation (PSV), the primary configurable parameters include the inspiratory pressure support level, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂). The inspiratory pressure support is typically set between 5 and 20 cmH₂O and titrated to achieve a tidal volume of 6-8 mL/kg predicted body weight, ensuring adequate ventilation while minimizing patient effort. PEEP is commonly adjusted to 5-10 cmH₂O to maintain alveolar recruitment and prevent derecruitment at end-expiration. FiO₂ is titrated to target oxygen saturation (SpO₂) levels of 88-95% in most cases, starting low (e.g., ≤40% for weaning trials) to avoid oxygen toxicity. Trigger sensitivity determines how readily the ventilator detects patient inspiratory effort to initiate a supported breath, with flow triggering preferred at 1-3 L/min or pressure triggering at -0.5 to -2 cmH₂O to balance responsiveness and prevent auto-triggering from circuit leaks or cardiac oscillations. The cycle-off criterion, which terminates inspiration and switches to expiration, is usually set as a percentage of peak inspiratory flow (25-75%), allowing adaptation to varying inspiratory demands while avoiding prolonged insufflation that could lead to air trapping or discomfort. Backup safety features are essential in PSV, including an apnea ventilation mode that activates after 10-20 seconds of detected apnea, automatically switching to a controlled full-support mode (e.g., pressure control) to prevent hypoventilation. Initial setup begins with low pressure support (e.g., 5-8 cmH₂O) and PEEP (5-8 cmH₂O), followed by titration based on patient response, such as tidal volume, respiratory rate, and comfort; rise time, the duration to reach target pressure, is adjusted between 50-200 ms to optimize flow delivery and reduce work of breathing without causing discomfort.

Patient-Ventilator Interaction

Patient-ventilator interaction in pressure support ventilation (PSV) refers to the dynamic coordination between the patient's spontaneous respiratory efforts and the ventilator's delivery of support, which is crucial for optimizing outcomes during mechanical ventilation. When synchrony is achieved, the ventilator's trigger and cycle-off criteria align closely with the patient's neural inspiratory and expiratory timing, leading to improved patient comfort by reducing the sensation of breathlessness and enhancing overall ventilatory efficiency through better matching of support to demand.^[1] This alignment minimizes unnecessary work imposed on respiratory muscles and promotes a more natural breathing pattern, as evidenced in studies comparing PSV to other modes where synchrony correlates with lower sedation requirements and higher patient satisfaction.^[7] Despite these benefits, asynchronies—mismatches between patient effort and ventilator response—are common in PSV, occurring in up to 25% of breaths in critically ill patients and potentially exacerbating discomfort or prolonging ventilation duration. Trigger asynchrony arises when the patient's inspiratory effort fails to initiate a breath (ineffective triggering) or when ventilator cycling occurs without patient effort (auto-triggering), often due to leaks or circuit artifacts. Flow asynchrony manifests as inadequate ventilator flow delivery relative to the patient's inspiratory demand, resulting in persistent negative pressure deflections during inspiration. Cycle asynchrony involves premature termination of support before neural inspiration ends, leading to double-triggering where a single effort prompts multiple breaths, or delayed cycling that causes air trapping and incomplete exhalation, particularly in patients with airflow obstruction.^[8]^[9]^[10] Detection of these asynchronies primarily relies on real-time waveform analysis of pressure, flow, and volume loops displayed on the ventilator screen, allowing clinicians to identify specific patterns without advanced equipment. For instance, ineffective triggering appears as negative pressure dips in the airway pressure waveform without a corresponding flow increase, indicating effort without breath delivery. Double-triggering is visible as closely spaced flow peaks following a single effort, while delayed cycling shows prolonged inspiratory flow tails extending into expiration. This visual method enables bedside quantification of asynchrony index—the percentage of asynchronous breaths relative to total efforts—and has been validated as a reliable tool for routine monitoring in intensive care settings.^[8]^[10] Several factors influence the quality of patient-ventilator interaction in PSV, including the patient's respiratory rate and effort intensity, which can overwhelm ventilator response times if demands exceed set parameters, as well as inherent delays in trigger activation typically ranging from 50 to 100 milliseconds. Ventilator response time, determined by sensitivity settings and circuit compliance, plays a critical role; overly sensitive triggers may cause auto-cycling, while insensitive ones lead to missed efforts. In patients with obstructive lung diseases, auto-positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) heightens asynchrony risk by increasing the effort required to initiate breaths, as trapped air raises the threshold for triggering.^[11]^[7]^[8] Mitigation strategies focus on real-time adjustments to ventilator parameters informed by waveform monitoring to restore synchrony. Increasing trigger sensitivity (e.g., to -1 to -2 cmH2O for pressure triggers) can reduce ineffective efforts, while fine-tuning the cycle-off criterion—often set as a percentage of peak inspiratory flow (25-50% in adults)—helps address premature or delayed cycling by better matching expiratory onset. In cases of persistent flow asynchrony, shortening rise time delivers support more rapidly, and for auto-PEEP-related issues, titrating external PEEP to counter intrinsic levels improves triggering without overdistension. These interventions, when applied iteratively, have been shown to lower asynchrony indices by up to 50% in responsive patients.^[8]^[10]

Physiological Impacts

Effects on Oxygenation

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) primarily enhances oxygenation through its integrated positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) component, which sustains functional residual capacity (FRC) by preventing alveolar collapse at the end of expiration.^[1] This maintenance of FRC reduces atelectasis, particularly in dependent lung regions, thereby improving ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) matching and facilitating more efficient oxygen diffusion across the alveolar-capillary membrane.^[1] In contrast to unsupported spontaneous breathing, PSV augments inspiratory efforts, promoting deeper tidal volumes that further aid in alveolar recruitment and distribution of ventilation to well-perfused areas. Key oxygenation parameters, such as the PaO2/FiO2 ratio, demonstrate notable improvement with PSV, often reflecting better lung recruitment and reduced shunt fraction compared to unassisted breathing.^[12] For instance, in patients with acute respiratory failure, PSV has been shown to increase PaO2/FiO2 from baseline levels of approximately 248 mmHg to 286 mmHg in subgroups with adequate extravascular thermal volume, underscoring its role in enhancing arterial oxygenation without mandatory breaths.^[12] These gains arise from the mode's ability to deliver consistent pressure augmentation, which stabilizes end-expiratory lung volume and minimizes cyclic derecruitment.^[13] Higher levels of pressure support in PSV elevate mean airway pressure, which can further boost oxygenation by recruiting additional lung units and improving overall oxygen delivery.^[1] However, excessive pressure support risks alveolar overdistension, potentially leading to heterogeneous ventilation and impaired V/Q matching in non-compliant lungs.^[14] Clinically, PSV facilitates targeting peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) in the 88-95% range for most patients, particularly those with hypoxemic respiratory failure, while enabling progressive reduction in fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) during weaning to minimize oxygen toxicity.^[15] Despite these benefits, PSV exhibits limitations in severe hypoxemic failure, where persistent shunting through consolidated or flooded lung regions may render it less effective than controlled ventilation modes that guarantee tidal volumes.^[1] In such cases, the reliance on patient-initiated breaths can fail to overcome significant intrapulmonary shunts, necessitating escalation to full ventilatory support for adequate oxygenation.^[16]

Effects on Ventilation

In pressure support ventilation (PSV), ventilatory support is provided through patient-initiated breaths where the respiratory rate and effort determine the timing and magnitude of inspiration, resulting in tidal volumes typically ranging from 6 to 10 mL/kg of ideal body weight.^[1]^[17] The minute ventilation (VE), calculated as VE = RR × Vt (where RR is the respiratory rate and Vt is the tidal volume), varies dynamically based on the level of pressure support applied, allowing for individualized adjustment to meet ventilatory demands without mandatory breaths.^[1]^[18] Carbon dioxide clearance in PSV is generally adequate when the support level sufficiently overcomes airway resistance and elastic recoil, facilitating PaCO2 maintenance within the normal range of 35-45 mmHg.^[1] This is achieved through enhanced alveolar ventilation, as the mode promotes better alveolar recruitment—particularly when combined with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)—which reduces physiological dead space by preventing alveolar collapse and improving ventilation-perfusion matching.^[1] However, hypoventilation remains a risk if patient respiratory effort weakens due to fatigue, sedation, or underlying conditions, potentially leading to CO2 retention.^[1] A key advantage of PSV is its adaptability, enabling spontaneous respiratory rate adjustments in response to metabolic needs, which contrasts with fixed-rate modes and supports more natural breathing patterns to optimize ventilatory adequacy.^[1] Monitoring ventilatory effects involves serial assessment of end-tidal CO2 (EtCO2) as a noninvasive surrogate for PaCO2 and arterial blood gases (ABG) to confirm CO2 elimination and overall efficacy.^[1]^[19]

Effects on Work of Breathing

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) reduces the inspiratory work of breathing (WOB) by augmenting the patient's spontaneous efforts with a preset positive pressure that offsets the elastic recoil and airway resistance encountered during inhalation. This offloading mechanism lowers the total WOB by approximately 50-70% relative to unsupported spontaneous breathing, depending on the support level and patient characteristics.^[20]^[21] The WOB in PSV is partitioned between the patient and the ventilator, allowing quantification of each contribution to the total respiratory effort. The patient's portion is primarily determined by the pressure-time integral of pleural pressure swings, expressed as

WOB_\text{patient} = \int P_\text{es} \, dt

where P_\text{es} is the esophageal pressure and the integral is taken over the inspiratory phase; the ventilator's share corresponds to the applied pressure support integrated over the same period.^[22]^[21] This partitioning enables clinicians to titrate support to achieve balanced unloading without fully suppressing patient effort. Appropriate PSV levels maintain diaphragmatic electromyographic activity and contractile function, thereby preserving respiratory muscle integrity and mitigating atrophy associated with disuse during extended mechanical ventilation.^[23] In contrast, suboptimal settings can elevate WOB, such as inadequate pressure support that fails to sufficiently counter loads, patient-ventilator asynchrony that prolongs inspiratory efforts, or intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (auto-PEEP) that increases the threshold for triggering breaths and amplifies muscle workload.^[24]^[8] WOB alterations during PSV are assessed via invasive esophageal balloon catheters to monitor P_\text{es} swings as a surrogate for pleural pressure, or noninvasively through derived indices like the pressure-time product (PTP), defined as the area under the P_\text{es} waveform per breath or minute (PTP = \int P_\text{es} \, dt).^[25]^[26] These metrics provide objective insights into effort reduction, guiding adjustments to optimize muscle loading while avoiding overassistance.

Clinical Applications

Indications and Contraindications

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is primarily indicated for patients with acute respiratory failure who retain an intact respiratory drive, allowing spontaneous breathing while augmenting tidal volumes and reducing the work of breathing. Common applications include weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation via spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs), where PSV at levels of 5-8 cm H₂O with minimal PEEP assesses extubation readiness in patients meeting criteria such as FiO₂ ≤40%, PEEP ≤8 cm H₂O, hemodynamic stability, and arterial pH >7.25. It is also used for post-extubation support to prevent reintubation in high-risk patients, particularly those with hypercapnic failure from conditions like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations or postoperative respiratory insufficiency. In noninvasive settings, PSV combined with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is effective for hypercapnic respiratory failure, improving gas exchange and averting intubation in select cases of acute exacerbations.^[1]^[27] Patient selection for PSV emphasizes those with adequate mental status (e.g., Glasgow Coma Scale ≥13), sufficient cough strength, and minimal secretions to ensure airway protection and effective ventilation. Clinical trials support its efficacy; for instance, a multicenter randomized trial of 969 patients found PSV during SBTs led to higher extubation rates within 24 hours (77.7% vs. 72.2%) compared to T-piece trials, though reintubation rates were similar (14.9% vs. 13.6%). Another trial in 1,153 adults showed PSV achieved higher successful extubation rates (82.3% vs. 74.0%) than extended T-piece trials, with comparable reintubation (11.1% vs. 11.9%), underscoring PSV's role in facilitating weaning and potentially reducing reintubation in appropriate candidates. Meta-analyses further confirm PSV's superiority over T-piece for weaning success in simple-to-wean patients, lowering reintubation risks when integrated into protocols.^[1]^[28]^[29] Contraindications for PSV include absent or depressed respiratory drive, such as in deeply sedated patients, those under neuromuscular blockade, or with severe neurologic injury (e.g., encephalopathy with Glasgow Coma Scale <10), as the mode relies on patient-initiated breaths without guaranteed minute ventilation. It is also contraindicated in cases of severe hemodynamic instability, high aspiration risk, or inability to protect the airway, including upper airway obstruction, excessive secretions, or recent facial trauma/surgery. Relative contraindications encompass very high oxygen demands (e.g., shock states), elevated airway resistance (e.g., severe obstructive lung disease), or nonrespiratory organ failures like active gastrointestinal bleeding, where PSV may exacerbate hypoventilation or asynchrony.^[1]^[27]^[30] In special populations, PSV is adapted for pediatric use with lower pressure supports (typically 4-10 cm H₂O) in noninvasive ventilation for acute or chronic respiratory support, particularly in children with neuromuscular diseases to correct nocturnal hypoventilation and improve sleep quality. For chronic settings, home-based PSV via noninvasive interfaces benefits patients with neuromuscular disorders like Duchenne muscular dystrophy, reducing hospitalization rates, enhancing survival, and preventing thoracic deformities when initiated early based on polysomnography findings of hypercapnia.^[27]^[31]

Weaning Protocols and Monitoring

Weaning from pressure support ventilation (PSV) involves structured protocols to assess patient readiness for discontinuation of mechanical support, aiming to minimize complications while facilitating timely extubation. A key component is the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), typically conducted at low PSV levels of 5-8 cmH₂O with 5 cmH₂O positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for 30-120 minutes to evaluate tolerance without excessive respiratory distress.^[32]^[33]^[34] During the SBT, the rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI), calculated as respiratory rate divided by tidal volume (f/Vt in breaths/min/L), is a validated predictor of success; an RSBI less than 105 breaths/min/L indicates high likelihood of successful weaning, as established in seminal studies on extubation outcomes.^[35]^[36] Progression in weaning often employs gradual reduction of pressure support in increments of 2-5 cmH₂O daily, contingent on patient tolerance during monitoring periods, to allow progressive respiratory muscle recovery.^[33]^[37] Extubation criteria emphasize clinical stability, including arterial blood gas (ABG) values showing adequate oxygenation (PaO₂/FiO₂ >150-200 mmHg) and ventilation (PaCO₂ <50 mmHg with pH >7.32), alongside minimal support requirements such as PSV ≤8 cmH₂O and no signs of fatigue.^[38]^[39] Daily SBTs are recommended to reassess readiness, with failure prompting return to higher support levels. Ongoing monitoring during PSV weaning focuses on key parameters to detect intolerance early. Vital signs, including heart rate and blood pressure, are tracked continuously, with respiratory rate maintained below 30 breaths per minute signaling acceptable effort.^[1] Tidal volume consistency (typically 6-8 mL/kg ideal body weight) and minute ventilation are evaluated to ensure stability, while ventilator graphics help identify patient-ventilator asynchrony events, such as ineffective triggering or double cycling, which may necessitate adjustments.^[1]^[33] Effective PSV weaning protocols have demonstrated clinical benefits, including reduced duration of mechanical ventilation by up to 46% and shortened intensive care unit (ICU) stays by approximately 1-2 days compared to non-protocolized approaches.^[40]^[41] However, weaning failure occurs in 10-20% of cases, often leading to reintubation within 48-72 hours due to respiratory muscle fatigue or underlying cardiopulmonary issues, underscoring the need for vigilant post-extubation surveillance.^[29]^[42] Advanced noninvasive tools enhance weaning assessment by quantifying diaphragmatic function and fatigue. Diaphragmatic ultrasound, measuring excursion (typically >1 cm) and thickening fraction (>20-30% during inspiration), provides real-time evaluation of respiratory muscle performance, aiding prediction of weaning success and early detection of dysfunction in critically ill patients.^[43]^[44]

References

[1]
Pressure Support Ventilation - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a mode of positive pressure mechanical ventilation in which the patient triggers every breath.
[2]
History of Mechanical Ventilation. From Vesalius to ... - ATS Journals
Mar 2, 2015 · In the 1980s and 1990s, there was a paradigm shift from controlled ventilation to partial ventilation support, then to pressure support ...
[3]
A Comparison of Four Methods of Weaning Patients from ...
Feb 9, 1995 · In the 1980s, pressure-support ventilation became available; it provides a titratable pressure boost to every inspiratory effort, and weaning is ...<|separator|>
[4]
Impact of Expiratory Trigger Setting on Delayed Cycling and ...
Jul 7, 2004 · During pressure-support ventilation, the ventilator cycles from inspiration to expiration when inspiratory flow decreases to a given percentage ...<|separator|>
[5]
A physiology-based mathematical model for the selection of ...
V t , v e n t = P S V - V TH R E RS . The control parameter PSV represents the inspiratory pressure above PEEP applied by the ventilator to deliver a tidal ...
[6]
Pressure support, patient effort and tidal volume - Critical Care
Nov 6, 2024 · Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a form of partially assisted ventilation which has become frequently used in the acute phase of critical ...
[7]
Patient–Ventilator Interactions. Implications for Clinical Management
Dec 12, 2012 · Synchronous support means that the ventilator's timing and pressure–flow delivery respond promptly to patient effort, provide pressure and flow ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
Patient-ventilator asynchrony - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Jul 16, 2018 · Patient-ventilator asynchrony can be defined as a mismatch between the patient, regarding time, flow, volume, or pressure demands of the patient ...
[9]
Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ... - PubMed
Results: Fifteen patients (24%) had an asynchrony index greater than 10% of respiratory efforts. Ineffective triggering and double-triggering were the two main ...
[10]
Patient-ventilator asynchronies: types, outcomes and nursing ... - NIH
Effects of propofol on patient-ventilator synchrony and interaction during pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist. Crit Care ...
[11]
Patient-ventilator asynchrony - PubMed
Alterations in respiratory drive, timing, respiratory muscle pressure, and respiratory system mechanics influence the interaction between the patient and the ...
[12]
Effects of pressure support and pressure-controlled ventilation on ...
In the presence of IAH, PSV improved oxygenation; decreased alveolar collapse, interstitial edema, and diffuse alveolar damage; and increased expression of ...
[13]
Efficacy of pressure support ventilation dependent on extravascular ...
In the subgroup with ETV less than 11 ml/kg (n = 15), PSV significantly improved PaO2/FIO2 (248 to 286 mm Hg), RI (1.55 to 1.22), ITBV (801 to 888 ml/m2), ...
[14]
Effects of Different Levels of Variability and Pressure Support ...
Oct 21, 2021 · Variable pressure support ventilation (vPSV), compared with conventional PSV, improved oxygenation in the experimental models of ARDS (Gama de ...
[15]
Effect of intra‐operative pressure support vs pressure controlled ...
Dec 21, 2009 · Our data show that intra-operative PSV provides superior oxygenation to PCV in overweight patients. However, PSV resulted in a significantly ...
[16]
[PDF] ARDSnet - NHLBI ARDS Network
PART II: WEANING. A. Conduct a SPONTANEOUS BREATHING TRIAL daily when: 1. FiO2 ≤ 0.40 and PEEP ≤ 8 OR FiO2 < 0.50 and PEEP < 5.
[17]
Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure (AHRF, ARDS) - Merck Manuals
Pressure support ventilation can also be used (with similar levels of PEEP). The initial inspiratory airway pressure delivered should be sufficient to rest ...
[18]
Delivery of average assured pressure support (AVAPS) through ...
Dec 9, 2023 · The recommended range of a tidal volume of 6–10 mL/kg of ideal body weight was used. Ventilation was delivered using a Philips Trilogy 100 ...
[19]
Ventilator Modes - Anaestheasier
Jul 10, 2025 · Pressure support ventilation. Trigger = Patient; Cycling = Flow; Limit ... Adjust the inspiratory pressure to get a tidal volume of 6-10 ml/kg ...
[20]
Correlation of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide with Arterial Carbon ... - NIH
End-tidal CO2 monitors are used to estimate arterial CO2 pressure (PaCO2), but appropriate use of this noninvasive method of assessing blood gases in ventilated ...
[21]
Pressure-Support versus Proportional-Assist Ventilation
Feb 16, 1999 · The level of pressure (during PSV) and percentage of unloading (during PAV) were set to obtain a 60 to 70% decrease in PTP/min of the diaphragm ...
[22]
Pressure Support Ventilation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Pressure support is a method of assisting spontaneous breathing in a ventilated patient, either partially or fully. The patient controls all parts of the breath ...Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
[23]
Work of breathing and its components | Deranged Physiology
Dec 18, 2023 · Work is the product of force and distance, and is measured in Joules (1J = 1N per 1m). In respiratory physiology, work is the product of ...
[24]
Lung- and Diaphragm-Protective Ventilation - ATS Journals
Mar 16, 2020 · An open-loop, physiological model based decision support system can reduce pressure support while acting to preserve respiratory muscle function ...<|separator|>
[25]
Patient-ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation
Aug 1, 2006 · A high pressure support level, high tidal volume, and alkalosis were associated with ineffective triggering. Patients with a high incidence of ...Missing: inadequate | Show results with:inadequate
[26]
Monitoring Patient Respiratory Effort During Mechanical Ventilation
Mar 24, 2020 · The gold standard measurement of respiratory effort is the integral of Pmus over the duration of inspiration (pressure-time product [PTP]) (Fig.
[27]
Esophageal Pressure Measurement: A Primer - PMC - NIH
1: Start of breath by Pes; 2: start of the mechanical ventilation breath; 3: end of breath by Pes; 4: end of mechanical ventilation breath. A is the end- ...
[28]
Pressure Support - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Jan 27, 2024 · Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a mode designed to maintain spontaneous breathing in patients with both acute and chronic requirements.Continuing Education Activity · Introduction · Function · Issues of Concern
[29]
Spontaneous-Breathing Trials with Pressure-Support Ventilation or ...
Spontaneous-breathing trials can be performed with the use of either pressure-support ventilation (PSV) or a T-piece.
[30]
Effect of Pressure Support vs T-Piece Ventilation Strategies During ...
Jun 11, 2019 · Nevertheless, another meta-analysis found that PSV resulted in higher rates of successful extubation than T-piece SBTs. Moreover, the latest ...
[31]
[PDF] Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure
When NPPV is initiated outside the ICU, failure to improve gas exchange, pH, respiratory rate, or dyspnea, or deterio- ration in hemodynamic or mental status, ...
[32]
Non-invasive Ventilation in Children With Neuromuscular Disease
Nov 16, 2020 · NIV and/or intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) have been shown to prevent thoracic deformities and consequent thoracic and lung ...
[33]
Liberation from the ventilator - EMCrit Project
Apr 18, 2023 · The typical settings for a spontaneous breathing trial are pressure support ventilation, with 5 cm pressure support and 5 cm PEEP (“5/5”).<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
[PDF] AARC Clinical Practice Guideline: Spontaneous Breathing Trials for ...
Mar 5, 2024 · When pressure support ventilation. (PSV) was introduced, spontaneous breaths during SIMV could be supported with PSV. Alternatively, PSV could.
[35]
Breathing Easier: Evolving Strategies in Ventilator Liberation ...
Jun 13, 2024 · A spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is a period of spontaneous breathing typically lasting 30 to 120 minutes with little to no positive pressure ...
[36]
A Prospective Study of Indexes Predicting the Outcome of Trials of ...
May 23, 1991 · Rapid shallow breathing, as reflected by the f/VT ratio, was the most accurate predictor of failure, and its absence the most accurate predictor ...
[37]
The Usefulness of the Rapid Shallow Breathing Index in Predicting ...
Jun 25, 2021 · We included 48 studies involving RSBI measurements of 10,946 patients. Pooled sensitivity for RSBI of < 105 in predicting extubation success ...
[38]
Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation - LITFL
Jul 6, 2024 · The 'wean screen' should be performed daily. This indicates patients suitable for a spontaneous breathing trial, those who pass also to be assessed for ...
[39]
Ventilator Weaning - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
Weaning from mechanical ventilation is a straightforward process. That usually entails extubation after the passage of the first spontaneous breathing trial ( ...
[40]
Weaning from mechanical ventilation | European Respiratory Society
Weaning from mechanical ventilation is an essential and universal element in the care of critically ill intubated patients receiving mechanical ventilation.
[41]
Decrease in Ventilation Time With a Standardized Weaning Process
Protocol-guided weaning from mechanical ventilation leads to more rapid extubation than physician-directed weaning and has great potential for cost savings.
[42]
Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients
Feb 28, 2024 · The RCTs also showed a significantly shorter ICU length of stay in patients whose care teams followed a weaning protocol (MD, –1.49 days; 95% CI ...
[43]
T-piece versus pressure-support ventilation for spontaneous ...
Nov 24, 2020 · ... reintubation. The overall rate of reintubation after planned extubation is around 10% but may exceed 20% in patients at high risk of ...
[44]
A narrative review of diaphragm ultrasound to predict weaning from ...
Feb 28, 2019 · The aim of this narrative review is to briefly describe the common methods of diaphragmatic function assessment using ultrasound techniques.<|control11|><|separator|>
[45]
Diaphragm dysfunction during weaning from mechanical ventilation
Mar 20, 2018 · Ultrasound may help to better recognize and manage diaphragm dysfunction during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Some preventive strategies ...