Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Primary flight display

A Primary Flight Display (PFD) is an electronic instrument in modern aircraft cockpits that serves as the pilot's primary reference for critical flight information, integrating data from multiple traditional gauges into a single digital screen to display attitude, airspeed, altitude, heading, and vertical speed.^[1] As a core component of the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS), the PFD uses technologies like cathode ray tubes (CRT) or liquid crystal displays (LCD) to present this information in a standardized layout, enhancing pilot situational awareness and reducing the need to scan multiple instruments.^[2] The evolution of the PFD traces back to the late 1970s, when advancements in microprocessors and digital display technology began replacing analog "six-pack" instruments—such as the attitude indicator, altimeter, and airspeed indicator—with integrated electronic systems, marking the onset of glass cockpits in aviation.^[3] This transition, accelerated in the 1980s with the adoption of EFIS in commercial and general aviation aircraft, addressed limitations of mechanical gauges, including inaccuracy, high maintenance, and cluttered panels, while improving data accuracy and reliability.^[3] By the 2000s, PFDs had become standard in most new aircraft designs, incorporating features like color-coded speed ranges, flight director guidance, and synthetic vision for low-visibility operations.^[4] Key elements of a typical PFD include a central attitude director indicator (ADI) showing pitch and roll relative to the horizon, flanked by vertical tapes for airspeed (with color bands indicating safe operating limits) and altitude (including vertical speed trends), as well as a heading rose or compass arc at the bottom for navigation reference.^[1] Additional symbology covers lateral and vertical deviations from navigation sources like instrument landing systems (ILS) or flight management systems (FMS), along with annunciations for autopilot, autothrottle, and approach modes.^[4] These features collectively minimize cognitive load during flight, particularly in instrument meteorological conditions, and support advanced functionalities such as traffic collision avoidance and terrain awareness.^[2] Despite variations by manufacturer—such as Garmin, Honeywell, or Rockwell Collins—PFD layouts adhere to human factors principles for intuitive use across aircraft types.^[1]

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

A primary flight display (PFD) is a modern electronic instrument that consolidates essential flight information into a single screen, typically utilizing liquid crystal display (LCD) or cathode ray tube (CRT) technology. It integrates the functions of the traditional "six pack" of analog gauges—attitude indicator, altimeter, airspeed indicator, heading indicator, turn coordinator, and vertical speed indicator—providing pilots with a unified view of primary flight parameters. This design replaces disparate mechanical instruments with a digital interface, enabling clearer visualization and reducing cockpit clutter. The primary purpose of the PFD is to deliver critical real-time data, including aircraft attitude (pitch and roll), airspeed, altitude, heading, and vertical speed, in an intuitive format that enhances pilot situational awareness during all phases of flight. By presenting this information synthetically, often through graphical symbols like horizon lines and flight path vectors, the PFD minimizes the need for pilots to scan multiple instruments, thereby reducing head-down time and improving safety in high-workload environments. This consolidated display supports rapid decision-making, particularly in instrument meteorological conditions where visual references are limited. The PFD represents an evolution from standalone mechanical instruments to digital formats within glass cockpits, streamlining pilot workflow by allowing seamless integration with other avionics systems for a more efficient monitoring process. As a core component of glass cockpit architectures, it has become standard in commercial airliners since the 1980s, business jets, and general aviation aircraft such as the Cirrus SR-series, which incorporated integrated glass cockpits starting in 2003.

Historical Development

Prior to the 1970s, aircraft cockpits relied on separate analog instruments known as the "basic six" or "six pack," which included the attitude indicator, altimeter, airspeed indicator, heading indicator, turn coordinator, and vertical speed indicator, arranged for efficient pilot scanning.^[5] This configuration originated in the 1930s with the development of key gyroscopic and pitot-static instruments, becoming standardized after World War II for both military and civilian aviation to provide essential flight data in mechanical cockpits.^[6] The shift toward digital primary flight displays (PFDs) began in the 1970s with the introduction of cathode-ray tube (CRT) technology in military applications, enabling the integration of multiple instruments into electronic formats, followed by commercial adoption driven by advances in computing power and display reliability.^[7] A pivotal milestone occurred in 1982 with the debut of the Boeing 767, the first wide-body airliner featuring a two-crew glass cockpit with CRT-based PFDs that consolidated attitude, airspeed, altitude, and heading information, reducing panel clutter and enhancing crew efficiency.^[8] Early implementations retained mechanical backup instruments to mitigate reliability concerns associated with electronic failures, such as power loss or display malfunctions, ensuring redundancy in critical flight phases.^[9] Widespread adoption in general aviation accelerated in the early 2000s, exemplified by Cirrus Aircraft's SR-series, which made the Avidyne Entegra PFD standard equipment starting in March 2003, marking the first certified piston aircraft with integrated glass cockpits.^[10] This transition was propelled by improvements in liquid crystal display (LCD) technology for brighter, more reliable screens, alongside aviation regulations from bodies like the FAA that certified these systems for reduced workload and improved safety, while still mandating backup options.^[7]

Technical Components

Core Display Elements

The core display elements of a primary flight display (PFD) integrate essential flight instruments into a single electronic screen to provide pilots with critical real-time information for aircraft control and navigation.^[11] According to FAA regulations under 14 CFR § 61.129(j)(1), a PFD in technically advanced airplanes must include, at a minimum, an airspeed indicator, turn coordinator, attitude indicator, heading indicator, altimeter, and vertical speed indicator (VSI), ensuring compliance for commercial pilot training.^[12] These elements are derived from data sources such as pitot-static systems for airspeed and altitude measurements.^[11] At the center of the PFD is the attitude director indicator (ADI), which depicts the aircraft's pitch and roll relative to the horizon using an artificial horizon line separating sky (typically blue) from ground (brown or black).^[11] The ADI includes a flight path marker (FPM), a dynamic symbol representing the aircraft's velocity vector or actual flight path angle, aiding in precise trajectory awareness.^[11] Bank angle is shown via a rotating scale or pointer on the ADI, with warnings for excessive angles approaching stall conditions.^[11] Airspeed is presented on a vertical tape typically positioned to the left of the ADI, featuring a scrolling scale with the current speed aligned to a fixed index, often in knots.^[11] This tape includes color-coded ranges, such as green for normal operating speeds, amber for caution zones like low-speed awareness below 1.3 V_S, and red for limits including V-speeds (e.g., stall speed V_S or maximum operating speed V_MO).^[11] Altitude appears on a similar vertical tape to the right of the ADI, displaying height above sea level in feet with selected altitude bugs (e.g., magenta markers) indicating target levels for climb or descent.^[11] The vertical speed indicator (VSI) is integrated as a vertical tape or pointer adjacent to the altitude display, showing climb or descent rates in feet per minute, with scales matching typical aircraft performance ranges.^[11] The heading display, usually at the bottom of the PFD, utilizes a compass rose or digital tape to indicate magnetic heading, incorporating track deviation indicators for navigation alignment.^[11] Additional elements enhance predictive and coordinative awareness: trend vectors project short-term changes in attitude, airspeed, or altitude (e.g., arrows indicating future position over 6-10 seconds), with smooth motion to avoid pilot distraction.^[11] The slip/skid indicator, often a segmented ball or trapezoid on the ADI, reveals uncoordinated flight by showing sideslip, with alerts for excessive conditions.^[13]

Data Sources and Processing

The primary data for airspeed, altitude, and vertical speed on a primary flight display (PFD) is derived from the aircraft's pitot-static system, which consists of a pitot tube to measure total (ram plus static) pressure and static ports to capture ambient static pressure. These pressure differentials are used to compute indicated airspeed, pressure altitude, and vertical speed, providing essential aerodynamic and vertical navigation information to the PFD.^[13]^[14] Attitude (pitch and roll) and heading information for the PFD are sourced from an inertial reference system (IRS) or attitude heading reference system (AHRS), which employ ring laser gyros and accelerometers to detect three-dimensional accelerations and maintain orientation relative to a reference frame. The IRS establishes a vertical reference via gravity sensing during alignment and detects Earth's rotation for true north alignment, outputting pitch, roll, yaw, and heading data to the PFD for real-time attitude depiction. In modern systems, AHRS often incorporates solid-state sensors and magnetometers for enhanced precision in providing these parameters.^[13]^[15] Raw sensor inputs from the pitot-static system, IRS/AHRS, and outside air temperature probes are processed by the air data computer (ADC), a dedicated unit that converts pressures and inertial data into display-ready formats such as calibrated airspeed, Mach number, baro-corrected altitude, and true airspeed. The ADC applies corrections for non-standard temperature and pressure conditions—using total air temperature to derive static air temperature and adjusting for density variations—to ensure accurate computations, which are then transmitted to the PFD and other avionics. In integrated setups like Airbus's Air Data Inertial Reference Unit (ADIRU), the ADC combines with IRS functions for streamlined processing.^[14]^[13] For improved heading and track accuracy, PFD data processing integrates inputs from navigation systems such as GPS, which aids AHRS/IRS by providing position and velocity corrections to mitigate gyro drift over time. Backup mechanisms include redundant sensors, such as dual ADCs and AHRS units, ensuring continued PFD operation; in case of primary failure, the system reverts to standby instruments or a secondary source within one second, maintaining essential flight parameters via independent power and data paths. Despite the shift to digital PFDs, traditional pitot-static hardware remains indispensable, as it supplies the fundamental pressure data that electronic processing cannot fully replicate without physical sensing.^[16]^[15]^[13]

Layout and Symbology

Standard Layout Conventions

The standard layout of a primary flight display (PFD) follows a conventional "T" configuration, with the attitude indicator or sphere positioned centrally to dominate the pilot's visual focus, airspeed tape arranged vertically on the left side, altitude tape on the right side, heading indicator or rose at the bottom center, and vertical speed indicator (VSI) integrated adjacent to the altitude tape.^[1]^[13] This arrangement prioritizes the most critical flight parameters in a manner that facilitates rapid cross-checking, retaining the spatial relationships of traditional analog instruments while integrating them into a single electronic screen.^[17] Symbology on PFDs adheres to standardized color coding to enhance interpretability, where green typically indicates normal operating ranges (such as safe airspeeds), amber denotes cautionary conditions approaching limits, and red signals warnings like overspeed or stall proximity.^[11] Dynamic scaling is employed on tapes for airspeed and altitude, where the numerical resolution expands automatically near critical values—such as V-speeds or decision altitudes—to provide greater precision during high-workload phases like approach and landing.^[11] These visual cues ensure consistent meaning across displays, minimizing cognitive load by aligning with pilots' expectations from training.^[18] Navigation aids are incorporated directly into the PFD layout for seamless integration, including instrument landing system (ILS) glideslope and localizer deviation needles scaled to the attitude sphere, as well as flight director command bars that overlay the horizon line to guide pitch and bank deviations.^[1] These elements appear in the central and upper portions of the display, allowing pilots to monitor lateral and vertical guidance without shifting gaze to separate instruments.^[13] Influenced by international standards such as ARINC 661, which defines interfaces and formatting for cockpit display systems in commercial aviation, PFD layouts emphasize ergonomic principles that mimic the familiarity of analog dials while enabling efficient scanning of primary parameters.^[18]^[11] This design supports efficient eye movement patterns, with the central attitude director serving as the anchor for sequential checks of speed, height, and direction, thereby reducing pilot workload and enhancing situational awareness during instrument flight.^[17]

Variations by Manufacturer

Boeing's primary flight displays (PFDs) in aircraft like the 787 Dreamliner utilize tape-style formats for airspeed and altitude indications, drawing from traditional electromechanical designs to maintain pilot familiarity while integrating cues from multifunction displays (MFDs) for enhanced situational awareness.^[19] These PFDs consist of five 9-by-12-inch liquid crystal displays arranged across the instrument panel, with software hosted on a common core system that supports seamless data sharing between PFDs and MFDs.^[19] Synthetic vision systems, which provide 3D terrain rendering, are available as an optional enhancement for the 787's flight deck, tested in collaboration with NASA to improve low-visibility operations.^[20] Airbus incorporates innovative symbology on the PFDs of the A350-1000, introduced in 2018, featuring a flightpath vector that indicates the aircraft's actual trajectory relative to the horizon and an energy cue to aid in energy management during approach.^[21] This harmonized symbology aligns with head-up display (HUD) elements, promoting consistent visual cues across the cockpit for improved energy management.^[21] In general aviation, Garmin's G1000 system employs circular attitude indicators on its PFDs, mimicking traditional analog instruments with a blue-over-brown horizon line for intuitive pitch and roll depiction, tailored for smaller aircraft like the Cessna 172.^[22] The G1000 PFD supports customizable softkeys along the bottom bezel, allowing pilots to configure displays for functions such as navigation sources, terrain alerts, or weather overlays, enhancing adaptability in general aviation environments.^[22] Honeywell and Rockwell Collins (now Collins Aerospace) emphasize modular PFD designs in business jets, enabling scalable integration and software updates without full system overhauls, as seen in Honeywell's Primus Epic platform with high-resolution DU-1310 displays serving as primary or multifunction units.^[23] These systems prioritize redundancy through dual PFD configurations, such as the four-display setup in Rockwell Collins' upgrades for aircraft like the Beechjet 400A/XP, where two dedicated PFDs ensure continued operation if one fails.^[24] Collins Aerospace's Pro Line Fusion further supports this modularity with touchscreen PFDs that allow customizable layouts for business jet cockpits, focusing on intuitive access to flight data.^[25] Recent advancements as of 2024 include Honeywell's next-generation Integrated Cockpit System, featuring enhanced PFD symbology for improved resolution and integration, and Garmin's G5000 Prime for large aircraft, incorporating advanced touchscreen interfaces and dynamic symbology updates.^[26]^[27]

Advantages

Situational Awareness Benefits

The primary flight display (PFD) consolidates essential flight parameters such as attitude, airspeed, altitude, and heading into a single integrated screen, significantly reducing the time pilots spend scanning multiple analog gauges in traditional cockpits. This consolidation minimizes head movements and cognitive load by presenting correlated data in a unified format, allowing for quicker cross-checking and more efficient monitoring during critical flight phases. Enhanced visualization features on the PFD, including trend lines for parameters like airspeed and altitude, as well as predictive symbols such as velocity vectors, enable pilots to anticipate deviations and maintain precise control. The velocity vector, which indicates the aircraft's actual flight path relative to the horizon, supports intuitive steering and improves overall path tracking accuracy without requiring constant reference to separate instruments. Studies demonstrate that such symbology enhances situation awareness by facilitating proactive decision-making in dynamic conditions.^[28] In low-visibility environments, the integration of synthetic vision systems (SVS) on the PFD overlays realistic 3D terrain, runway, and obstacle depictions, providing pilots with an intuitive out-the-window view that mitigates risks like controlled flight into terrain. This capability markedly improves terrain awareness and path compliance, with flight tests showing SVS achieving lateral path errors of 0.05 nautical miles (95% of the time) compared to 0.25 nautical miles for baseline displays.^[29] Quantitative assessments indicate a 20% reduction in pilot workload during instrument approaches when using advanced PFD symbology, as measured by NASA Task Load Index scores.^[30] In glass cockpits, the PFD's alignment with navigation displays delivers consistent attitude and positional cues, helping to prevent spatial disorientation by countering misleading vestibular sensations in instrument meteorological conditions. SVS enhancements on the PFD further bolster this by offering realistic 3D perspectives that low-time pilots rated highest for spatial awareness in simulated low-visibility scenarios.^[31]

Integration in Glass Cockpits

In glass cockpits, the Primary Flight Display (PFD) serves as the central component of the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS), working alongside Multi-Function Displays (MFDs) to consolidate critical flight parameters such as attitude, airspeed, and altitude while MFDs handle supplementary data like navigation and weather information.^[11] This integration ensures a unified presentation of flight information, reducing pilot workload by minimizing the need to scan disparate instruments.^[11] The PFD shares real-time data with the Flight Management System (FMS) to provide autopilot engagement cues, trajectory predictions, and performance calculations, enabling seamless automation of flight path guidance.^[11] In the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, for instance, the PFD interfaces with the FMS through the Common Core System (CCS), which processes and distributes data via ARINC 661 protocols over Ethernet, allowing the PFD to display FMS-derived guidance while feeding performance metrics into the Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) for integrated engine monitoring and alerts.^[32] Similarly, in the Airbus A380, the PFD forms part of the electronic flight instrument system within a fully integrated modular avionics architecture, linking to the FMS via keyboard cursor control units and contributing data to the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) for system status and checklist management.^[33] For reliability, glass cockpits incorporate reversion modes where PFD failure prompts automatic transfer of its data to an adjacent MFD or standby instruments, maintaining access to essential flight information without reconfiguration.^[34] This backup integration, often triggered by sensor or display faults, ensures continued operation by populating standby attitude indicators or compact formats on surviving displays.^[11] A key synergy involves head-up display (HUD) mirroring of PFD symbology, projecting critical elements like attitude, airspeed, and flight path vectors onto the windshield for head-up operations without diverting the pilot's gaze from the external view.^[32] In systems like the Airbus A330neo and A350, this mirroring extends to harmonized PFD designs that replicate HUD cues, such as energy chevrons and trajectory symbols, fostering consistency across head-up and head-down displays.^[35]

Drawbacks and Limitations

Potential Failure Modes

Primary flight displays (PFDs) can experience several common failure modes, including screen blackouts due to electrical or hardware malfunctions, unreliable data from sensor issues such as pitot tube icing or blockage, and software glitches that result in erroneous or frozen indications.^[36]^[11]^[37] These failures often stem from dependencies on air data computers and attitude heading reference systems (AHRS), where a single point of failure in data processing can propagate misleading information across the display.^[36] Such malfunctions significantly increase pilot workload, as crews must revert to scattered backup analog gauges like standby attitude indicators, potentially leading to spatial disorientation, especially in instrument meteorological conditions (IMC).^[36]^[37] Loss of primary attitude and airspeed data has been a contributing factor in numerous loss-of-control incidents, with pilots reporting confusion from conflicting indications between captain and first officer displays.^[36] To mitigate these risks, modern aircraft incorporate redundant dual PFDs, allowing essential flight information to remain available to both pilots following a single failure, and automatic reversionary modes that transfer PFD symbology to adjacent multifunction displays (MFDs) or activate a basic attitude director indicator (ADI) configuration.^[11]^[36]^[37] These systems include failure flags and monitoring to detect and isolate faults, ensuring that catastrophic misleading data is extremely improbable.^[11] A notable example is the 2009 crash of Air France Flight 447, where pitot tube icing caused temporary blockage, resulting in unreliable airspeed indications on the PFDs and contributing to crew confusion and eventual loss of control in IMC.^[38]^[39] PFD failure rates are generally low, with mean time between failures (MTBF) for systems like the Garmin G1000 at approximately 10,000 hours, though their criticality escalates in IMC where backup reliance becomes essential.^[37] Between 1996 and 2006, incorrect instrument indications, including unreliable airspeed, contributed to approximately 300 aviation accidents worldwide.^[36]

Training and Standardization Issues

The variability in primary flight display (PFD) layouts and symbology across manufacturers, including subtle differences in flight director bars and attitude indicators between Boeing and Airbus systems, requires pilots to undergo type-specific training, which can complicate transitions between aircraft fleets and increase the risk of errors during initial familiarization.^[40]^[41] To address these inconsistencies, industry efforts have focused on standardization through ARINC 661, which defines interfaces and basic symbology for cockpit display systems to promote uniformity in PFD presentation across avionics implementations.^[42] Complementing this, FAA Advisory Circular 25-11B and EASA CS-25 guidelines establish minimum requirements for PFD symbology consistency, ensuring essential elements like attitude and airspeed indications remain predictable while allowing manufacturer-specific enhancements.^[11]^[43] Pilot training for PFD operation typically involves simulator sessions that emphasize developing efficient scan patterns, such as the "T-scan" or "cross-check" methods to monitor attitude, airspeed, and altitude indicators sequentially, alongside failure recognition exercises to identify degraded modes like amber warnings or blanked data fields.^[44]^[45] A key focus is "scan discipline," where instructors stress maintaining a rhythmic visual flow to avoid fixation on any single element, often reinforced through eye-tracking feedback in advanced simulations to optimize attention allocation during high-workload phases like approach and landing.^[46] One significant challenge is pilots' over-reliance on PFDs, which can lead to skill atrophy in interpreting analog backup instruments, such as standby attitude indicators, potentially compromising performance during display failures.^[47]^[48] To mitigate this, FAA Part 61 mandates recurrent training, including biennial flight reviews that incorporate glass cockpit proficiency checks to sustain manual flying skills and backup instrument usage.^[49]^[7] Following the widespread adoption of glass cockpits in the post-2000s era, particularly after their introduction in light aircraft around 2003, certification training hours for PFD-equipped aircraft have increased, with transition programs typically requiring 2 to 50 hours, averaging 17 hours, beyond traditional analog training to build familiarity and reduce accident risks associated with unfamiliar interfaces.^[7]^[50]^[51]

Modern Developments

Advanced Features

Modern primary flight displays (PFDs) have advanced through the integration of synthetic vision systems (SVS), which overlay 3D terrain rendering directly onto the attitude indicator to provide pilots with enhanced situational awareness during poor weather conditions like fog or heavy rain.^[29] These systems draw from high-resolution onboard databases to depict surrounding terrain, obstacles, and runways in a realistic, wireframe or photo-textured format, allowing for precision navigation where natural visibility is limited to as low as 1,000 feet.^[52] Flight tests have demonstrated that SVS reduces lateral navigation errors by up to 67 feet and vertical errors by up to 40 feet compared to traditional displays, meeting Required Navigation Performance (RNP) standards for terrain-challenged approaches.^[29] Post-2018 implementations, such as those in Honeywell's Anthem avionics suite, further refine SVS with high resolution and 3D symbology for stabilized approaches and traffic avoidance.^[53] A key enhancement in PFD symbology appeared with the Airbus A350-1000 in 2018, introducing harmonized flightpath vectors and energy cues centered on the display to show the aircraft's predicted trajectory and real-time energy margins.^[21] The flightpath vector illustrates the actual and anticipated flight path relative to the horizon, while the energy cue provides a vertical indicator of excess or deficit energy based on speed, altitude, and configuration, helping pilots maintain optimal performance without over-relying on autopilot cues.^[21] This optional feature, available across the A350 fleet, promotes consistent pilot training and reduces mode confusion by replacing traditional flight director bars with more intuitive predictive elements.^[21] Augmented reality (AR) overlays have elevated PFD capabilities by fusing enhanced vision systems (EVS) with infrared imaging to enable runway visualization in zero-visibility scenarios.^[52] Systems like Universal Avionics' ClearVision combine multispectral infrared cameras with symbology on split-screen PFDs or head-up displays, projecting runway outlines, thresholds, and taxiway edges for landings as low as Category III conditions.^[52] This integration supports full low-visibility operations without external aids, with the elements dynamically adjusting to aircraft position for seamless transition from approach to rollout.^[53] Post-2023 innovations incorporate AI-assisted predictions to create adaptive PFDs that dynamically adjust symbology based on flight phase, such as emphasizing descent profiles during approach or energy cues in cruise.^[53] AI algorithms process real-time data from sensors and flight parameters to prioritize critical information, reducing cognitive load.^[53] These adaptive features, part of broader cockpit roadmaps like the FAA's 2024 Adaptive Cockpit initiative, use machine learning to model aircraft status and pilot biometrics, ensuring symbology evolves contextually without overwhelming the display.^[54] As of 2025, advancements include AI enhancements in EVS for object detection and alerts on PFD-like displays.^[55] Beyond core symbology, post-2018 PFD advancements emphasize seamless integrations, such as Universal Avionics' InSight suite, which embeds SVS and engine performance data into a unified interface for holistic monitoring during all flight phases.^[53] Touch-enabled elements in systems like Thales' adaptive interfaces further customize displays in real time, enhancing usability in high-workload scenarios.^[53]

Regulatory Standards

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates primary flight displays (PFDs) under 14 CFR Part 25, which establishes airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes, including requirements for the reliability of flight instruments and provisions for backup systems to ensure continued safe operation in the event of primary display failure.^[11] Specifically, §25.1309 mandates that equipment, systems, and installations, such as PFDs, must be designed to perform intended functions under foreseeable operating conditions without unacceptable risk, with advisory circular AC 25-11B providing guidance on demonstrating compliance for electronic flight displays through failure analysis and redundancy measures.^[11] The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) imposes equivalent standards via Certification Specifications (CS-25) for large aeroplanes, which emphasize consistency in human-machine interfaces to minimize pilot error and ensure intuitive operation of displays like PFDs.^[43] CS-25.1303, for instance, requires instruments to be plainly visible and arranged to permit efficient crew coordination, with additional guidance in CS-25 Amendment 25 for evaluating human factors in display design to support safe flight path management.^[43] Certification of PFDs involves rigorous processes outlined in RTCA DO-178C for software assurance, which categorizes development and verification objectives based on design assurance levels (DAL A-E) to mitigate errors in airborne software controlling display functions.^[56] Complementing this, RTCA DO-160 specifies environmental testing procedures for displays, including categories for temperature, vibration, electromagnetic interference, and altitude to verify performance under operational stresses.^[57] Internationally, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) harmonizes these through Annex 6, Part I, which sets operational guidelines for PFDs in all-weather flights by requiring aircraft to carry approved instruments for instrument flight rules (IFR) operations, such as attitude indicators and airspeed displays, to enable safe low-visibility approaches. These standards promote global interoperability, with guidance in the Manual of All-Weather Operations (Doc 9365) detailing PFD integration for precision approaches. Post-2023 regulatory updates have intensified focus on cybersecurity for digital PFDs, with the FAA proposing amendments to 14 CFR Part 25 in 2024 to mandate vulnerability assessments and protection against unauthorized access to aircraft systems, including displays.^[58] Similarly, EASA's Regulation (EU) 2023/203 introduces Part-IS requirements for information security management in aviation, requiring organizations to implement cybersecurity measures for digital flight systems by 2025-2026.^[59] For integration with unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), emerging FAA rules under 14 CFR Part 107 and proposed beyond visual line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations (as of August 2025) extend PFD-equivalent standards to remote pilot stations, mandating certified displays for situational awareness in automated flights.^[60]

References

[1]
Primary Flight Display (PFD) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
A Primary Flight Display or PFD, found in an aircraft equipped with an Electronic Flight Instrument System, is the pilot's primary reference for flight ...
[2]
Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
The Primary Flight Display (PFD) is an instrument which integrates and depicts, on a single display, all of the information that was historically presented on a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
From Analog Instruments to Digital EFIS Displays | Genesys ...
Analog displays were the primary means of presenting flight information before the advent of digital technology from the late 1970's and onward.
[4]
How it works: Meet the primary flight display - AOPA
Jul 22, 2020 · A primary flight display or PFD provides a digital display of important flight information that goes far beyond just an electronic attitude display.
[5]
Get Your “Six Pack”: Aircraft Instrumentation, Communication and ...
Apr 5, 2021 · Decades ago, the only navigation instruments that planes had were rudimentary radios (operated by vacuum tubes), a clock, and a compass. Today, ...Missing: 1970s | Show results with:1970s
[6]
Flight Instruments Explained - 6 Pack vs Glass Cockpit - Pilot Institute
May 18, 2023 · Primary Flight Display (PFD) The PFD is a digital display typically located in front of the pilot. It shows the aircraft's attitude, airspeed, ...
[7]
[PDF] Introduction of Glass Cockpit Avionics into Light Aircraft - NTSB
Cirrus Design Corporation began the transition to glass cockpits in Federal Aviation. Administration (FAA)-certified light aircraft in 2003 when it started ...
[8]
Boeing 767 1982-present - Delta Flight Museum
Digital "glass cockpit" that included 40 computers. Flight deck design similar to the Boeing 757, so the FAA allowed pilots who flew the 767 to also fly the ...
[9]
Glass Cockpit Reliability - Aviation Safety Magazine
Primary flight displays are all but standard equipment in new airplanes, although some doubt their reliability. Avidyne says those worries are misplaced.
[10]
G1 (1999-2003) - Plane & Pilot Magazine
Sep 13, 2022 · The Cirrus SR20, first delivered in 1999, revolutionized general ... The first Avidyne Primary Flight Display (PFD) was introduced in March 2003.
[11]
[PDF] AC 25-11B - Electronic Flight Displays
Jul 10, 2014 · 50 Head-Down Display (HDD):. A primary flight display located on the airplane's main instrument panel directly in front of the pilot in the ...
[12]
14 CFR 61.129 -- Aeronautical experience. - eCFR
... components: (1) An electronic Primary Flight Display (PFD) that includes, at a minimum, an airspeed indicator, turn coordinator, attitude indicator, heading ...
[13]
[PDF] Chapter 8 - Flight Instruments - Federal Aviation Administration
The ASI indicates an airspeed greater than the actual airspeed. 3. The VSI shows a momentary climb and then stabilizes if the altitude is held constant. Each ...
[14]
Air Data Computer (ADC) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
This computer, rather than individual instruments, can determine the calibrated airspeed, Mach number, altitude, and altitude trend data from an aircraft's ...
[15]
Inertial Reference System (IRS) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Inertial Reference System (IRS) refers to a solid-state unit of three Ring Laser Gyros detecting accelerations in 3 dimensions.
[16]
[PDF] AC 23.1311-1C - Federal Aviation Administration
Nov 17, 2011 · For example, a primary flight display may have indicators for attitude, altitude, airspeed, heading, and navigation. z. Instrument: An ...
[17]
[PDF] Aircraft Controllability and Primary Flight Displays 301013
Airbus standard flight display layout (Airbus). We see that the relationship between the ADI and the other flight instruments are retained in the “basic–T ...Missing: ARINC 810
[18]
Understanding ARINC 661 - Avionics Display Standards
Nov 13, 2024 · ARINC 661 defines a comprehensive framework for the design and implementation of interactive cockpit display systems (CDS) in aviation.
[19]
Boeing 787: Integration’s Next Step - Avionics International
### Summary of Boeing 787 PFD Information
[20]
Boeing, NASA to Test NextGen Synthetic Vision in 787 Sims
they provide pilots with a virtual representation of the out-the-window view from a cockpit ...Missing: tape- style
[21]
Airbus Introduces HUD Symbology On Primary Flight Display
May 21, 2018 · Airbus is introducing “harmonized” symbology on primary flight displays (PFD)—centering on a flightpath vector and, for the first time, an ...Missing: innovative | Show results with:innovative
[22]
[PDF] Aircraft Energy Management during Approach - SKYbrary
The level of energy of an aircraft is a function of the following primary flight parameters and of their rate of change (trend):. Airspeed and speed trend;.
[23]
[PDF] G1000 Pilot's Guide - Garmin
This manual reflects the operation of System Software version 0563.30 or later for Cessna 172R, 172S, 182T, J182T, T182T, 206H, and. T206H aircraft. Some ...
[24]
Cockpit and Flight Displays | Honeywell Aerospace
The DU-1310 Cockpit Display unit provides business aviation operators equipped with the Primus Epic platform a high-resolution primary or multifunction liquid ...Missing: Rockwell Collins design redundancy
[25]
Rockwell Collins, Nextant Aerospace and Constant Aviation Launch ...
Sep 29, 2025 · The upgrade includes the only four-display option available in the industry –comprised of two Primary Flight Displays and two Multifunction ...Missing: modular | Show results with:modular
[26]
Pro Line Fusion® | Collins Aerospace
Pro Line Fusion isn't just an avionics systems – it's a pilot's partner in the flight deck, helping overcome complexity, navigate with precision.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[27]
Development and evaluation of an airplane electronic display format ...
A primary objective of aligning the display format with the velocity vector was to take advantage of a velocity-vector control-wheel steering system to provide ...
[28]
[PDF] Synthetic Vision Enhances Situation Awareness and RNP ...
A major thrust of the SVS Project is to develop and demonstrate affordable, certifiable display configurations which provide intuitive out-the-window terrain ...
[29]
[PDF] Effects of Primary Flight Symbology on Workload and Situation ...
Aug 29, 2002 · This paper reports the results of a study in which HUD-experienced pilots flew simulated complex precision approaches to landing in three ...
[30]
[PDF] Preliminary Effect of Synthetic Vision Systems Displays to Reduce ...
An experimental investigation was conducted to study the effectiveness of Synthetic Vision. Systems (SVS) flight displays as a means of.
[31]
National Aviation Day: Looking Back at How Boeing Integrated the ...
Aug 19, 2022 · The B787 has two primary displays and two navigational displays for the two pilot positions and a display in the center console, also referred ...<|separator|>
[32]
Cockpit mock-up shows off A380's avionics integration - FlightGlobal
Apr 14, 2003 · The KCCU/MFD is comparable with the multifunction control and display units on existing aircraft, which are the primary interfaces with the FMS.
[33]
Broken Glass - Aviation Safety Magazine
The PFD and MFD talk to each other and, usually, a total failure of the PFD screen will trigger a reversion mode that takes over the MFD, displaying PFD ...
[34]
[PDF] A330neo cockpit – commonality with A350 innovations - Airbus
The new hPFD flight director symbology will show the actual trajectory of the aircraft alongside the energy cues. This allows the pilots to better understand ...
[35]
Degraded Flight Instrument Display: Guidance for Flight Crews
EFIS systems usually provide automatic reversion in the event of screen failure. For example, if a pilot's Primary Flight Display (PFD) fails, the adjacent ...
[36]
When Glass Goes Dark - Aviation Safety Magazine
One of the great selling points of glass cockpit displays is the mean time between failures (MTBF)—or average number of operating hours an individual unit ...
[37]
[PDF] Final Report - Federal Aviation Administration
Jun 1, 2009 · Air France was programmed to perform scheduled flight AF 447 ... 1.6.9.6 Consequences of a blocked Pitot probe on the flight parameters.
[38]
Blocked Pitot Tubes - Plane & Pilot Magazine
Sep 9, 2009 · The crash of Air France Flight 447, an Airbus A330, in the Atlantic ... pitot tube contamination and the subsequent loss of air data for the PFD.
[39]
Airbus vs Boeing Design Philosophy | FlightDeckFriend.com
We review the big differences between Airbus and Boeing, specifically with regards to their design philosophy which determines how the pilots operate them.
[40]
The Difference between Airbus and Boeing - Pilot Institute
Apr 29, 2023 · Airbus planes emphasize automation and computerized systems, reducing pilot workload but offering less hands-on control. This difference in ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[41]
661P1-9 Cockpit Display System Interfaces to User ... - ARINC IA
Feb 8, 2024 · ARINC 661 defines logical interfaces to Cockpit Display Systems (CDS) used in all types of aircraft installations.
[42]
https://aviation-ia.sae-itc.com/standards/arinc661p1-9-661p1-9-cockpit-display-system-interfaces-user-systems-part-1-avionics-interfaces-basic-symbology-behavior
[43]
[PDF] Flight Crew Visual Scanning Techniques on Transport Category ...
This project aims to help fill this gap with the goal to inform design and training interventions that better support flight crews in monitoring their flight ...
[44]
[PDF] Analysis of airline pilots' gaze patterns in a manual instrument flight ...
The aim of this study was to analyze pilots' visual scanning in a manual approach and landing scenario. Manual flying skills suffer from increasing use of ...
[45]
Visual scanning strategies in the cockpit are modulated by pilots ...
In this study, the pilots who achieved the best flight performance made shorter fixations on the heads-down tactical display and alternated more frequently ...
[46]
[PDF] Digital Training to Analog Flying: Assessing the Risks of a Stark ...
Transitioning from digital to analog flying may cause impaired skills, decreased situational awareness, and a study showed 95% of TAA trained students had ...
[47]
Use It or Lose It - Flight Safety Foundation
Mar 4, 2015 · Extensive use of automated cockpit systems causes pilots to lose proficiency in some cognitive skills required for manually flying an airplane.
[48]
14 CFR Part 61 -- Certification: Pilots, Flight Instructors, and Ground ...
This Special Federal Aviation Regulation (SFAR) applies to all persons who seek to manipulate the controls, act as pilot in command, provide ground training or ...61.61 – 61.77 · 61.211 – 61.217 · 61.401 – 61.429 · 61.1Missing: glass | Show results with:glass
[49]
[PDF] Transition to Glass: Pilot Training for High-Technology Transport ...
B. C. D. Introduction. Research methods in flight training. Difficulties in transition training programs. Training considerations.
[50]
[PDF] Training Levels and Methodologies for Glass Cockpit Training in ...
The authors sampled 42 four-year collegiate flight-training programs to determine their current program emphasis on "glass cockpit" training and plans for ...
[51]
ClearVision™ Enhanced Flight Vision System - Universal Avionics
Improve low-visibility landings with a complete Enhanced Flight Vision System, integrating HUD, split-screen displays, and multispectral cameras.Missing: augmented reality primary runway
[52]
Advances in Avionics Displays - Aerospace Innovations™
Oct 16, 2025 · This is why primary flight displays now support synthetic vision and 3D symbology to provide better stabilized approaches, traffic ...Missing: post- 2018
[53]
[PDF] Adaptive Cockpit - MIT Technology Roadmapping - FAA Safety
Dec 5, 2024 · Components of the adaptive cockpit are AI for interpreting and modeling data to determine aircraft and pilot status (4AI), Biometric Sensors ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[54]
DO-178() Software Standards Documents & Training - RTCA
DO-178(), originally published in 1981, is the core document for defining both design assurance and product assurance for airborne software.
[55]
DO-160 - RTCA
The original DO-160 standard was published in 1975 to provide standard test methods which would ensure new aviation equipment would function appropriately.
[56]
Easy Access Rules for Information Security (Regulations (EU) 2023 ...
The EAR for Information Security are available for free download on the European Union Aviation Safety Agency's website as pdf, online dynamic publications with ...
[57]
Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of ...
Aug 7, 2025 · This action proposes performance-based regulations for the design and operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) beyond visual line of sight ( ...