Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Electronic flight instrument system

An Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) is a flight deck instrument display system that presents flight data electronically rather than using electromechanical instruments, integrating essential information such as attitude, airspeed, altitude, and heading into centralized digital screens to enhance pilot situational awareness.^[1] Developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s amid advancements in microprocessor technology, EFIS evolved from analog "six-pack" gauges to digital cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays, later transitioning to more reliable liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) for improved resolution and reduced power consumption.^[2] This shift was driven by the need for greater precision, reduced pilot workload, and better integration with avionics systems like autopilots and navigation aids.^[3] The core components of an EFIS typically include the Primary Flight Display (PFD), also known as the Electronic Attitude Direction Indicator (EADI), which consolidates primary flight parameters like pitch, roll, vertical speed, and navigation deviations into a single, intuitive screen.^[1] Complementing this is the Navigation Display (ND) or Multi-Function Display (MFD), formerly called the Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator (EHSI), which overlays route, weather, and terrain data on a moving map for enhanced en-route monitoring.^[1] Additional elements often encompass engine indicating and crew alerting systems (EICAS) for powerplant status and warnings, along with data processing units that interface with aircraft sensors and flight management systems (FMS).^[3] These components are certified under regulations like 14 CFR Part 25, ensuring redundancy, failure tolerance, and clear visibility in various lighting conditions.^[3] EFIS systems offer significant advantages over traditional instrumentation, including reduced panel clutter, faster data processing, and support for synthetic vision and terrain awareness to mitigate risks like controlled flight into terrain.^[2] Widely adopted in commercial transport aircraft since the 1980s—such as the Boeing 767^[4] and Airbus A320—they have become standard in general aviation,^[2] promoting safer operations through integrated alerts and customizable interfaces.^[1] Ongoing developments focus on head-up displays (HUDs)^[3] and augmented reality^[5] to further streamline pilot decision-making.

Overview and History

Definition and Purpose

An Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) is a flight deck instrument display system in which the display technology used is electronic rather than electromechanical.^[1] It integrates displays, sensors, and data processors to present flight, navigation, engine, and systems data in a unified digital format, replacing disparate analog readouts with centralized, computer-processed information.^[3]^[6] The primary purpose of EFIS is to minimize pilot workload by consolidating essential data into intuitive formats, enhance accuracy via real-time processing from multiple inputs, and allow flexible reconfiguration of displays to suit varying flight phases, such as takeoff, cruise, or approach.^[1]^[3] This integration supports improved situational awareness and reduces errors in high-stress environments.^[3] EFIS supplants traditional "steam gauge" instruments, including the attitude director indicator for pitch and roll orientation and the horizontal situation indicator for heading and navigation, which rely on individual electromechanical mechanisms.^[7] By digitizing these functions, EFIS streamlines cockpit layout and information access. EFIS serves as the foundation for "glass cockpits" in contemporary aircraft, featuring electronic displays such as the Primary Flight Display (PFD) and Multi-Function Display (MFD) to deliver comprehensive, adaptable flight information.^[8]

Historical Development

The origins of the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) trace back to the 1970s, when aviation researchers began exploring cathode-ray tube (CRT) displays to replace traditional electromechanical instruments in military aircraft. These initial experiments, drawing from NASA and U.S. Air Force initiatives, focused on integrating digital visuals for attitude, heading, and navigation data to reduce pilot workload and enhance situational awareness. The technology's transition to civilian aviation followed as advancements in computing and display reliability addressed early challenges like high failure rates and power demands.^[9] The debut of EFIS in commercial service came with the Boeing 767 in 1982, equipped by Collins Avionics for United Airlines, where it supplanted conventional attitude director indicators and horizontal situation indicators with integrated CRT-based panels. This innovation was quickly adopted by the Airbus A310 in 1983, which featured a similar EFIS configuration to streamline flight information presentation and support two-pilot operations in wide-body jets. These early implementations prioritized core flight parameters, setting the stage for broader cockpit digitization.^[10] During the late 1980s, EFIS achieved standardization across Boeing and Airbus airliners, enabling consistent digital interfaces that improved data integration and reduced panel clutter. Expansion into business aviation accelerated with the Gulfstream IV in 1987, the first such jet to incorporate a full EFIS glass cockpit using six color CRT displays for comprehensive flight and engine monitoring. By the 1990s, EFIS entered general aviation through more affordable systems, often leveraging emerging LCD technology for lighter, lower-power alternatives suitable for smaller aircraft. Honeywell's Primus EFIS suite, initially developed for turboprops and jets, and Smiths Aerospace's integrated displays for Airbus platforms were instrumental in driving these adoptions.^[11]^[12]^[13] The 2000s marked a pivotal shift in EFIS design from CRT to LCD and LED displays, motivated by CRTs' vulnerabilities to vibration, high voltage requirements, and obsolescence risks in aging fleets. This evolution, exemplified by retrofit programs from manufacturers like Thomas Global Systems, enhanced durability, cut power usage by up to 50 percent, and minimized heat generation, facilitating seamless upgrades in legacy aircraft while paving the way for advanced multifunctional interfaces.^[9]

Core Components

Display Units

Display units in an Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) serve as the primary visual interfaces for pilots, presenting consolidated flight-critical data on electronic screens to replace traditional analog gauges. These units typically employ liquid crystal displays (LCDs) or cathode ray tubes (CRTs) in older systems, with layouts designed for rapid comprehension during high-workload phases of flight.^[1]^[3] The Primary Flight Display (PFD) is the central element of the EFIS, integrating essential attitude and navigation information into a single screen. Its core layout features an attitude horizon depicting the aircraft's pitch and roll relative to the horizon, flanked by a vertical airspeed tape on the left showing indicated airspeed in knots and a vertical altitude tape on the right displaying pressure altitude in feet. Below the horizon, a heading rose or compass rose indicates magnetic heading, often with a rotating aircraft symbol for orientation, while flight director cues—such as command bars or chevrons—provide guidance for lateral and vertical navigation modes. In commercial jet applications, PFDs ensure visibility from the pilot's seated position without obstructing forward views.^[3]^[1] The Multi-Function Display (MFD) complements the PFD by offering configurable screens for secondary but vital information, allowing pilots to switch between modes as needed. Common configurations include navigation maps showing the aircraft's position overlaid on waypoints and flight plans in a moving map format, weather radar overlays depicting precipitation and turbulence, traffic avoidance data from the Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) with intruder aircraft symbols and resolution advisories, and systems synoptics for monitoring aircraft subsystems like hydraulics or electrics. Engine monitoring modes on the MFD can display parameters such as RPM and temperatures when not dedicated to other functions.^[14]^[1] Dedicated engine and systems displays, such as the Engine Indications and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) in Boeing aircraft or the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) in Airbus models, focus on propulsion and overall aircraft status. These units present key engine parameters including fan speed (N1), exhaust gas temperature (EGT), and fuel flow in graphical trends or digital readouts for real-time assessment. Warnings and alerts are prioritized using color-coded schemes, where red indicates immediate action required for critical failures, amber signals cautions needing prompt attention, and green denotes normal operation, ensuring alerts integrate seamlessly without overwhelming the pilot.^[15]^[3] EFIS display units achieve integration through standardized avionics data buses like ARINC 429 for unidirectional, low-speed transmission of sensor data such as airspeed and altitude, and ARINC 664 (also known as AFDX) for higher-speed, deterministic networking in modern systems, enabling shared inputs from air data computers, inertial reference systems, and other sensors to populate all screens consistently.^[3]

Control Panels

Control panels in electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) serve as the primary hardware interfaces for pilots to configure displays, select operational modes, and manage system interactions. These panels typically include dedicated physical controls mounted on the instrument panel or pedestal, allowing for direct manipulation without reliance on computational intermediaries. For instance, the Display Select Panel (DSP) enables pilots to choose the active data source for navigation and flight displays, such as switching between Inertial Reference System (IRS) and Global Positioning System (GPS) inputs, ensuring accurate attitude and position information.^[16]^[3] Physical controls on EFIS panels often feature rotary knobs for adjusting display brightness and implementing declutter functions to reduce visual overload during critical phases. Brightness knobs provide manual override for luminance levels, complementing automatic adjustments based on cockpit ambient light. Declutter knobs or buttons allow selective removal of non-essential overlays, such as weather radar or terrain data, while preserving core flight parameters like airspeed and altitude. These tactile elements, including pushbuttons for mode reversion, facilitate failure recovery by automatically transferring display functions to standby instruments or multi-function displays (MFDs) when primary units fail.^[3]^[16] Electronic interfaces in modern EFIS control panels incorporate cursor control devices (CCDs) and touchscreens for menu navigation and data entry, evolving from older trackball mechanisms to integrated joysticks in contemporary systems. CCDs enable precise selection of display elements, such as highlighting navigation sources or acknowledging alerts, operable from the pilot's seated position without excessive dexterity. Touchscreens support soft controls for dynamic reconfiguration, with haptic feedback and clear labeling to minimize errors in high-workload scenarios. These interfaces integrate with data buses to feed pilot inputs directly to symbol generators, supporting seamless mode transitions.^[3] Mode selection capabilities on control panels encompass source prioritization and automated reversion protocols to enhance reliability. Pilots can manually designate navigation inputs, for example, favoring IRS for inertial navigation over GPS during signal loss, with annunciators confirming the active source to prevent disorientation. In failure scenarios, panels trigger reversionary modes, compacting primary flight display (PFD) data onto an adjacent MFD or standby instrument, often with automatic sensor switching to maintain continuity. Event recording buttons on panels like the DSP log parameters for post-flight analysis, aiding maintenance without interrupting operations.^[16]^[3]^[17] In Boeing aircraft, the Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) control panel exemplifies integrated design, featuring dedicated buttons for accessing engine parameters, system status, and alert acknowledgments on upper and lower displays. This panel supports mode selection for warning levels (e.g., Level 1-3) and includes a maintenance interface for ground diagnostics via built-in test equipment (BITE). Conversely, Airbus's Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor (ECAM) employs a keyboard-style interface on the ECAM Control Panel (ECP), with pushbuttons like CLR for decluttering messages, RCL for recalling alerts, and system selectors (e.g., ENG, BLEED) for targeted page display. The ECP's OFF/BRT knobs manage dual-display brightness and power, while EMER CANC silences aural warnings, prioritizing crew focus during anomalies.^[17]^[18]

Data Processors

Data processors serve as the computational core of the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS), transforming raw sensor data into formatted outputs for display units. These units, often referred to as symbol generators or display electronics units (DEUs), receive inputs from various aircraft subsystems and apply processing algorithms to generate graphical representations of flight parameters.^[19]^[16] The primary function of symbol generators is to convert raw data from sources such as air data computers (ADCs), which provide altitude, airspeed, and pressure information, and inertial reference systems (IRS), which supply attitude and heading data, into visual elements like synthetic horizons and navigation overlays. For instance, attitude data from the IRS is processed to render a virtual horizon line on the primary flight display (PFD), integrating pitch and roll angles for pilot situational awareness. Navigation inputs, including very high frequency omnidirectional range (VOR) signals and global positioning system (GPS) coordinates, are similarly transformed into course deviation indicators and moving maps on the navigation display (ND). This conversion ensures that disparate data streams are synthesized into coherent, real-time visuals essential for flight operations.^[16]^[20] Data fusion within EFIS processors involves integrating multiple sensor inputs to compute accurate navigation solutions, such as position and velocity estimates. Algorithms combine data from GPS, VOR, and inertial systems to mitigate individual sensor limitations, like GPS signal loss or inertial drift. At a high level, techniques like Kalman filtering enable this by recursively estimating system states—such as aircraft position and orientation—while accounting for measurement noise and uncertainties, providing robust inputs for EFIS displays without relying on a single data source.^[21]^[22] Hardware in EFIS data processors emphasizes redundancy and compliance with aviation standards for fault tolerance. Dual-channel processing units, often ARINC 653-compliant, partition software into isolated modules to prevent failures in one channel from affecting the other, supporting continuous operation in safety-critical environments. Examples include the display electronics units in systems like the Boeing 737 NG, where two DEUs handle inputs for multiple displays, ensuring availability even if one unit is compromised. These processors interface with broader avionics via standardized buses like ARINC 429 for data exchange.^[23]^[19] Key capabilities of EFIS data processors include real-time updates at rates sufficient to maintain smooth, flicker-free displays and prevent misleading motion artifacts during dynamic flight conditions. They also support generation of synoptic diagrams on multifunction displays (MFDs), which visualize system statuses like fuel or hydraulics in schematic form. Additionally, processors interface with the flight management system (FMS) to receive optimized route data, overlaying it on NDs for enhanced navigation guidance. These features collectively enable integrated, pilot-centric information presentation across the cockpit.^[3]^[16]^[24]

Monitoring and Reliability

Comparator Monitoring

Comparator monitoring refers to the self-diagnostic processes within electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) that continuously compare outputs from redundant data processing channels to identify discrepancies and preserve data integrity. These mechanisms rely on independent monitoring to detect potential faults in sensor inputs or processor computations, thereby minimizing the risk of misleading information reaching the flightcrew. By cross-verifying critical parameters across multiple channels, comparator systems ensure that only validated data is presented on primary flight displays (PFDs).^[25] The core comparator logic involves real-time cross-checking of outputs from dual or triple redundant processors, focusing on key flight data such as attitude, airspeed, altitude, and heading. For example, in altimetry comparisons, the system automatically evaluates differences between two independent sources, flagging mismatches if deviations exceed thresholds like ±100 feet. This ongoing validation prevents erroneous data propagation by isolating inconsistencies at the processor level, distinct from display-specific checks.^[26]^[25] Upon detecting a discrepancy, comparator systems generate crew alerts to prompt immediate awareness and action. Common annunciations include warnings displayed in the pilot's primary field of view, such as messages indicating data source mismatches or system faults (e.g., "ATTITUDE DISAGREE" or similar integrity alerts). These alerts are designed to be timely and unambiguous, using visual cues like flashing indicators at rates between 0.8 and 4.0 Hz to draw attention without overwhelming the crew. Simultaneously, the system initiates automatic reversion to backup channels, switching displays to alternate processing units or standby instruments to maintain operational continuity without full system degradation.^[25]^[26] The software implementing comparator monitoring must comply with RTCA/DO-178C standards for airborne systems certification, achieving appropriate development assurance levels based on failure criticality—typically Level A for functions where malfunction could lead to catastrophic events. This ensures rigorous verification, validation, and traceability in the monitoring algorithms to meet airworthiness requirements. Manufacturers are required to document these comparator functions, including alert thresholds and reversion procedures, in the aircraft flight manual or equivalent guidance.^[25]^[26] In practice, such as Boeing's implementation in dual-display EFIS configurations, comparator monitoring enables the isolation of a faulty display electronics unit (DEU) by reverting the affected displays to the surviving DEU, preserving redundancy without compromising overall system availability. This approach exemplifies how processor-level validation supports safe flight operations in multi-channel architectures.^[25]

Display Monitoring

Display monitoring in electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) encompasses diagnostic mechanisms designed to verify the integrity and performance of visual interfaces, ensuring that pilots receive accurate and reliable flight information. These systems incorporate self-diagnostic routines to detect anomalies in display hardware, such as cathode ray tubes (CRTs) or liquid crystal displays (LCDs), preventing hazardous misinterpretations during flight operations.^[3] Built-in tests (BIT) form a core component of display monitoring, providing on-board hardware-software diagnostics for fault identification and location, including error detection and correction in electronic displays. These tests typically initiate during power-up, performing self-checks for pixel integrity by rendering test patterns to identify dead or stuck pixels, brightness calibration to ensure visibility under ambient lighting conditions ranging from 5 to 10,000 foot-Lamberts, and symbol rendering to ensure fonts and graphics tolerate single-element losses without misleading outputs. For instance, in systems like the FlightLogic EFIS, a successful BIT sequence displays a "Push any Key to Continue" prompt after verifying sensor initialization and database integrity, while failures trigger alerts such as "BIOS error" or blank screens. Continuous monitoring during operation flags degraded performance, such as contrast ratio deviations or chromaticity shifts, in accordance with standards like SAE ARP4256A.^[27]^[3]^[28] Common failure modes in EFIS displays include blackouts, where the screen goes blank, or freezes, where the image stalls, potentially obscuring critical primary flight information like attitude or airspeed. To mitigate these, systems employ independent detection mechanisms—separate from the primary failure pathway—to annunciate issues, such as overlaying an "X" or removal flag on the affected display, ensuring pilots recognize the anomaly within one second. Handling often involves automatic reconfiguration or reversionary modes; for example, if a primary flight display (PFD) fails, the multifunction display (MFD) can automatically transfer PFD functions, displaying attitude and navigation data in a consistent format without trajectory deviation. In dual-display setups, manual switching via a single pilot action serves as a backup, prioritizing essential information visibility.^[3]^[29]^[28] Redundancy enhances display monitoring by incorporating standby instruments and shared data pathways to sustain critical visibility during failures. Standby attitude indicators, independent of the main EFIS, provide backup gyroscopic or solid-state references for pitch and roll, activating automatically in reversionary modes to display basic horizon cues. Shared processing allows data from multiple attitude and heading reference systems (AHRS) or air data computers (ADC) to cross-feed unaffected displays, with miscompare alerts (e.g., for altitude differences exceeding 50 feet) ensuring data integrity. This architecture maintains at least one usable source of attitude, airspeed, altitude, and heading for both pilots post-failure, as required for instrument flight rules (IFR) operations.^[3]^[29]^[28] Certification standards from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) mandate rigorous reliability for primary displays, classifying failures that could lead to loss of control as "extremely improbable" (probability less than 10^{-9} per flight hour). Compliance involves demonstrating through safety analysis under 14 CFR § 25.1309 and CS-25 that displays provide continuous, plainly visible information without misleading errors, including environmental testing per RTCA/DO-160 for vibration, temperature, and electromagnetic interference. Technical Standard Orders (TSOs) like TSO-C113 further specify performance criteria, ensuring BIT and redundancy features achieve high availability without common-mode vulnerabilities.^[3]^[29]

Legacy Practices

Early implementations of electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) predominantly relied on cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, which were susceptible to phosphor burn-in from prolonged exposure to static images and required high-voltage operations that posed reliability challenges in the aviation environment. To mitigate burn-in, certification standards recommended techniques such as slow-rate dithering, where the entire display image was subtly shifted to prevent degradation of stationary symbology on the phosphor-coated screen. These CRTs, often operating at voltages exceeding 20,000 volts, were prone to failures in high-vibration aircraft settings, contributing to maintenance demands and potential single-point failures in critical flight displays.^[30]^[3] Data handling in pre-1990s EFIS systems frequently employed discrete wiring for sensor inputs and inter-system communication, resulting in significantly higher wiring weights compared to modern digital buses—early configurations involved significant wiring weights for avionics integration, with studies indicating potential reductions exceeding 1,400 pounds through digital bus adoption. This approach, common in hybrid analog-digital setups like those in initial Boeing models, increased overall aircraft weight and installation complexity, with limited multiplexing leading to redundant cabling for each instrument parameter. Reconfiguration of these systems was typically manual, requiring pilots to physically switch display modes or verify settings via control panels without automated failover, which heightened workload during dynamic flight phases.^[31] Transitioning from these legacy systems presented challenges in multi-sensor fusion, where early EFIS processors struggled to integrate data from disparate sources like inertial reference systems and air data computers, often resulting in mode confusion or incomplete situational displays that necessitated pilot cross-verification against analog backups. For instance, the original Boeing 767 EFIS, introduced in the early 1980s, lacked integrated traffic collision avoidance system (TCAS) displays, relying instead on separate radar indicator units for threat visualization, which fragmented pilot attention and delayed responses. These limitations underscored the need for enhanced automation and digital integration in subsequent designs to reduce verification burdens and improve fusion accuracy.^[32]^[33]

Human Factors

Information Clutter

Information clutter in electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) arises primarily from the dense presentation of data on primary flight displays (PFDs), where overlapping symbols can obscure critical elements like the artificial horizon, thereby increasing pilot workload and reducing situational awareness.^[3] Additionally, mode confusion occurs due to frequent automatic reconfigurations of the display, which can lead pilots to misinterpret current flight modes during high-stress phases, exacerbating cognitive demands.^[34] To mitigate these issues, EFIS designs incorporate declutter modes that allow pilots to selectively remove non-essential data, such as navigation waypoints or weather overlays, particularly during high-workload operations like takeoff or approach, ensuring focus on primary flight parameters.^[3] Prioritization hierarchies further address clutter by assigning display prominence to safety-critical information, such as attitude and airspeed indicators, over secondary data like engine parameters, based on task analysis to minimize processing time and error rates.^[34] FAA human factors reports highlight how display clutter contributes to aviation incidents by elevating cognitive load and impairing decision-making, with studies demonstrating increased pilot errors in cluttered multifunction displays during simulated abnormal situations.^[34] Design guidelines, including ARINC 661 standards for cockpit display systems, promote scalable symbology through modular widgets that adapt to varying zoom levels and operational contexts, thereby reducing cognitive load by enabling customizable, less intrusive data presentation without compromising functionality.^[3] Color coding can serve as a complementary aid in clutter management by differentiating alert levels, though it must be integrated judiciously to avoid perceptual overload.^[34]

Color and Visual Cues

In electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS), color standards are employed to prioritize and convey the urgency of information, enhancing pilot situational awareness. According to SAE ARP 4032B, warnings are typically displayed in red to indicate immediate hazards requiring action, cautions in amber or yellow for conditions needing prompt attention but not immediate intervention, and normal or safe operations in green or white to signify standard functioning.^[35] These conventions align with FAA Advisory Circular AC 25-11B, which endorses a progression from green to amber to red to represent escalating threats in display symbology.^[3] In the Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting System (EICAS), for instance, red alerts denote critical engine or system failures demanding immediate response, amber signals highlight potential issues like low fuel pressure, and green indicates nominal parameters, ensuring alerts are processed hierarchically without overwhelming the crew.^[3] Visual enhancements in EFIS leverage graphical elements alongside color to provide intuitive representations of flight data, mitigating cognitive load during complex operations. Trend lines and tape-style scales, such as vertical speed tapes or altitude ladders, use color gradients—often green for nominal ranges and amber/red for deviations—to depict dynamic changes over time, allowing pilots to anticipate trajectory adjustments at a glance. Synthetic vision systems (SVS) further integrate these cues by rendering 3D terrain and attitude horizons in realistic colors, with blue skies and green/brown earth to mimic natural visual references, thereby improving spatial orientation in low-visibility conditions.^[36] Design principles emphasize avoiding the "Christmas tree" effect, where excessive simultaneous alerts could create visual overload; instead, prioritization through color and selective highlighting ensures only critical elements dominate the display, as recommended in human engineering guidelines for aircraft displays.^[35] Human factors research underscores the efficacy of these color and visual strategies in glass cockpits. NASA evaluations from the 1980s, including studies on redundant color coding in airborne CRT displays, demonstrated that integrating color with shape or location cues reduced response times and enhanced performance in dual-task scenarios, with improvements in accuracy up to 28% under high symbol density conditions.^[37] Specifically, Luder and Barber's 1984 experiment on fuel monitoring tasks showed that redundant color coding decreased identification times compared to shape-only displays, supporting faster decision-making in simulated flight environments.^[38] To address accessibility for color-deficient pilots, who comprise about 8% of males, EFIS designs incorporate shape and pattern alternatives, such as dashed lines for amber cautions or geometric icons for warnings, ensuring reliable interpretation regardless of color perception limitations, as outlined in EASA guidelines on color vision requirements.^[39]

Benefits and Advances

Operational Advantages

Electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) offer significant versatility in cockpit design by allowing a single display, such as the primary flight display (PFD), to handle multiple functions including attitude, heading, altitude, airspeed, and navigation data, which can revert to alternative modes like navigation or engine monitoring as needed.^[1] This integration replaces numerous electromechanical gauges with fewer electronic screens, substantially reducing instrument panel space and clutter compared to traditional analog setups.^[6] EFIS enhances pilots' situational awareness through consolidated, real-time integrated views that combine critical data such as altitude trends with terrain proximity alerts and navigation guidance on a single interface, minimizing the need for cross-referencing multiple instruments.^[1] For instance, the system's ability to overlay terrain and obstacle information with flight path data supports proactive avoidance of controlled flight into terrain (CFIT) incidents by providing immediate visual cues during low-visibility approaches or unfamiliar terrain navigation.^[3] This improved awareness addresses potential human factors issues like information overload by prioritizing essential alerts without excessive clutter.^[40] In terms of cost savings, EFIS contributes to lower long-term maintenance expenses through built-in self-diagnostic capabilities that continuously monitor display integrity and sensor inputs, enabling early fault detection and reducing the frequency of manual inspections required for mechanical instruments.^[3]

Technological Developments

Since the early 2010s, electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) have seen a gradual transition in display technology toward higher resolutions and advanced panel types to enhance visibility and power efficiency in diverse lighting conditions. High-resolution liquid crystal displays (LCDs) with LED backlighting remain dominant, but organic light-emitting diode (OLED) and active-matrix OLED (AMOLED) technologies are emerging for their superior contrast ratios, wider viewing angles, and lower power consumption compared to traditional LCDs. For instance, avionics manufacturers like CMC Electronics are actively integrating OLED into future cockpit displays to leverage these advantages, with market projections indicating significant growth in aviation glass cockpit OLED adoption by the mid-2020s.^[41]^[42]^[43] In parallel, touch-enabled interfaces have become standard in general aviation EFIS, reducing reliance on physical controls and improving pilot interaction. The Garmin G3000, introduced in 2009 and updated as G3000 PRIME in 2024, exemplifies this with its edge-to-edge, multi-touch glass displays supporting up to 10 simultaneous inputs, enabling intuitive control in aircraft like the Pilatus PC-12 PRO. In March 2025, Garmin announced the G3000 PRIME as the integrated flight deck for the Pilatus PC-12 PRO, with deliveries expected to begin later in 2025.^[44]^[45] These advancements address legacy limitations of cathode ray tube (CRT) displays, such as bulkiness and high power draw, by offering sunlight-readable, fingerprint-resistant surfaces.^[45] System integrations have evolved to link EFIS seamlessly with flight management systems (FMS), automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast (ADS-B), and autopilots, enabling predictive displays that forecast aircraft states. For example, the Genesys Aerosystems IDU-680 EFIS incorporates ADS-B data overlays and predictive wind and terrain visualizations to anticipate maneuvers, while energy management graphs in modern flight decks project fuel and power trends based on current trajectories. These integrations, as explored in research on civil flight deck displays, use extrapolated data to provide forward-looking cues, enhancing decision-making without overwhelming the pilot.^[46]^[47]^[48] From 2020 to 2025, key innovations include AI-driven anomaly detection integrated into avionics for real-time fault identification and synthetic vision enhancements. AI models now analyze flight data streams to detect deviations, such as unusual sensor patterns, supporting predictive maintenance and reducing in-flight risks, as demonstrated in business aviation applications where AI bolsters anomaly explainability for troubleshooting. In 2022, Collins Aerospace achieved technical standard order (TSO) certification for its combined vision system (CVS), fusing synthetic 3D terrain with enhanced imaging for low-visibility operations, marking a milestone for Class III-equivalent approvals in business jets.^[49]^[50]^[51] Looking ahead, EFIS trends point to augmented reality (AR) overlays on heads-up displays (HUDs) and adaptations for reduced-crew operations in urban air mobility (UAM). AR systems project critical data like terrain and traffic directly into the pilot's view, improving situational awareness in dense urban environments, while UAM vehicles incorporate simplified EFIS for single-pilot or autonomous flights below 2,000 feet. These developments, aligned with extended reality applications in advanced air mobility, aim to support scalable, low-emission transport by 2030.^[52]^[53]^[54]

References

[1]
Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
An Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) is a flight deck instrument display system in which the display technology used is electronic rather than ...
[2]
From Analog Instruments to Digital EFIS Displays | Genesys ...
The Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) is a crucial component of modern aircraft, providing pilots with essential flight information in real time ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[3]
[PDF] AC 25-11B - Electronic Flight Displays
Jul 10, 2014 · electronic flight deck displays, components, and systems for transport category airplanes. As a minimum, this includes—. • General ...
[4]
Electronic Flight Deck Systems in Modern Aircrafts - eInfochips
Mar 25, 2022 · The setup of EFIS will follow the sequence: Displays; Controls; Data Processors. In this section, we shall discuss the different kinds of ...
[5]
[PDF] Chapter 8 - Flight Instruments - Federal Aviation Administration
Electronic flight displays have replaced free-spinning gyros with solid-state laser systems that are capable of flight at any attitude without tumbling.
[6]
Glass Cockpit | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
A glass cockpit uses Electronic Flight Displays (EFDs) like PFDs and MFDs, instead of separate gauges, to show flight data.Missing: basis | Show results with:basis
[7]
The Evolution of Civil Aviation Displays | Avionics Digital Edition
a technology that grew out of NASA and U.S. Air Force research in the 1970s and 1980s — was first certified by Honeywell in 2009 as part of ...Synthetic Vision · Crt To Lcd · Avionics, It Modification
[8]
A Century in Review: The 1980s | Aviation International News
Aug 6, 2008 · In 1982, Collins introduced EFIS (electronic flight instrument system) to airline service aboard United Airlines' 767s, and business aviation ...
[9]
Meeting the FANS | News | Flight Global
Jun 17, 1997 · ... (EFIS) using Smiths Industries' 5ATI-size LCDs which replace the conventional electromechanical instruments. Certification is scheduled to ...
[10]
Gulfstream G-IV Overview (1987 – 1992) - Jetcraft
Jun 29, 2023 · The Gulfstream G-IV also became the first business jet to have an entire glass cockpit with an advanced EFIS avionics suite and six-color CRT ...Missing: standardization Boeing 1980s 1990s
[11]
https://www.flightglobal.com/meeting-the-fans/3028.article
[12]
[PDF] Chapter 4 - Engine Ignition & Electrical Systems
Engine Indicating & Crew Alerting System. (EICAS). An engine indicating and crew alerting system (EICAS) performs many of the same functions as an ECAM system.
[13]
None
### Summary of EFIS Control Panels and Related Systems from Module 05
[14]
[PDF] Digital Techniques Electronic Instrument Systems - Aircraft Spruce
EICAS uses built-in-test equipment (BITE) for systems and components . A maintenance control panel is included for technicians . When the aircraft is on the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
A320 ECAM CONTROL PANEL - AviationHunt
Used to turn the ECAM DUs on and off, and to control their brightness (automatic adjustment of brightness for ambient light conditions is superimposed on this ...Missing: ECP | Show results with:ECP
[16]
[PDF] Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) - TheAirlinePilots.com
An electronic flight instrument system (EFIS) is a flight deck instrument display system in which the display technology used is electronic rather than ...
[17]
Flight Instruments :: EFIS
The EFIS uses information provided by a variety of aircraft systems to generate the appropriate visual presentations on the ADI and HSI.
[18]
[PDF] Introduction to inertial navigation and Kalman filtering - NavLab.net
A Kalman filter is a recursive algorithm for estimating states in a system. Examples of states: – Position, velocity etc for a vehicle. – pH-value, temperature ...
[19]
[PDF] Navigation Filter Best Practices
Apr 18, 2018 · The use of Kalman Filtering techniques in the on-board navigation systems for the Apollo Command Module and the Apollo Lunar Excursion Module ...
[20]
INTEGRITY-178 tuMP RTOS - CMC Electronics - Green Hills Software
Equipped with ARINC-653 compliant platform services, the MFD-3068 Smart Display is capable of hosting multiple high-demanding software applications ...
[21]
Flight Management System | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Display of aircraft status is provided on either EFIS or conventional instrumentation and is where the effect of FMS aircraft control is principally visible.
[22]
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20180003657/downloads/20180003657.pdf
[23]
https://www.ghs.com/products/safety_critical/integrity_178_success-cmc.html
[24]
Built-in Test (BIT) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
Built-in test (BIT) is defined as an on-board hardware-software diagnostic means to identify and locate faults and includes error detection and correction ...Missing: EFIS display
[25]
[PDF] FlightLogic EFIS Pilot's Operating Guide and Reference
EFIS products clearly and concisely present ONLY necessary information. This reduces pilot workload, decreases task complexity, and minimizes confusion. The ...
[26]
[PDF] AC 23.1311-1C - Federal Aviation Administration
Nov 17, 2011 · many electronic flight instrument systems will use magnetically stabilized direction indicators (or electric compass systems) to measure and ...
[27]
https://skybrary.aero/articles/built-test-bit
[28]
[PDF] Systems Study for an Integrated Digital/Electric Aircraft (IDEA)
Less wiring yields a direct weight savings and also results ha production, Lrmtallatton, and checkout cost avoidance for the miles of elimhaated wiring. A ...
[29]
[PDF] Human Factors of Advanced Technology ("Glass Cockpit") Transport ...
The limitations of the air traffic control. (ATC) system on the ability to utilize the advanced features of the new aircraft is discussed. In.
[30]
[PDF] WHAT YOU SEE ON A TCAS TRAFFIC DISPLAY IS NOT ... - SKYbrary
Even if aircraft are detected by TCAS, they may not be displayed, since some installations limit the number of displayed targets or provide relative altitude ...
[31]
[PDF] Human Factors Design Guidelines for Multifunction Displays
This report was designed to provide background and guidelines for Federal Aviation Administration aviation safety inspectors approving multifunction ...
[32]
ARP4032B - Human Engineering Considerations in the Application ...
30-day returnsThis document is intended for the application of color to cathode-ray-tube (CRT) displays, liquid crystal displays (LCD) and other types of display ...Missing: coding | Show results with:coding
[33]
[PDF] Aspects of Synthetic Vision Display Systems and the Best Practices ...
May 1, 2008 · The earliest flight display work in both technologies (synthetic vision and pathway displays) was limited graphically to connected straight line ...
[34]
[PDF] The Efficacy of Color-Coded Symbols to Enhance Air-Traffic Control ...
Luder and Barber (1984) found that color as a redundant code decreased response time and improved flying performance on airborne. CRT displays. Silverstein ...Missing: NASA glass cockpit
[35]
Redundant Color Coding on Airborne CRT Displays - Sage Journals
An experiment is described that compares the use of redundant color coding for search and identification tasks under dual-task conditions; subjects made ...
[36]
[PDF] regarding the colour vision requirements for aircrew - EASA
This literature review study aims to assess the possible need to mitigate the risk to flight safety resulting from colour deficient pilots by means of colour ...
[37]
Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) - AviationHunt
Feb 24, 2025 · Core Components of an EFIS · 1. Primary Flight Display (PFD) · 2. Multi-Function Display (MFD) · 3. Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System ( ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[38]
Advances in Avionics Displays - Aerospace Innovations™
Oct 16, 2025 · “As high-resolution LCDs, micro-LED and OLED displays are becoming more mature, CMC Electronics is actively working on adopting many of these ...
[39]
Aerospace OLEDs - OLED-Info
Aviation display technology specialist Rosen Aviation is increasing its line of high-end OLED displays, and is set to introduce a 97-inch WOLED panel, the ...Missing: adoption | Show results with:adoption
[40]
Aviation Glass Cockpit OLED Display Market Consumption Trends
Rating 4.8 (1,980) Oct 30, 2025 · The global Aviation Glass Cockpit OLED Display market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach an estimated $6,500 million by ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[41]
G3000® PRIME Integrated Flight Deck - Garmin
G3000 PRIME features new, edge-to-edge, fingerprint-resistant glass touchscreen displays for seamless control of essential flight functions. MORE FUNCTIONALITY.Missing: developments 2010 OLED interfaces
[42]
Garmin G3000 PRIME unveiled as integrated flight deck for the new ...
Mar 17, 2025 · G3000 PRIME's new advanced multi-touch touchscreen interface, capable of recognizing up to 10 touchscreen inputs at once, allows both pilot and ...
[43]
[PDF] IDU-680 9.0B (Fixed Wing) Pilot Guide - Genesys Aerosystems
EFIS/FMS Description ... ADS-B data products are available to be individually selected for display as.
[44]
[PDF] FlightLogic EFIS Pilot's Operating Guide and Reference
brightness knob while turning adjusts the button and slip indicator ... Manual declutter settings will be retained upon power down. Page 234. Section ...
[45]
https://www.garmin.com/en-US/newsroom/press-release/aviation/garmin-g3000-prime-unveiled-as-integrated-flight-deck-for-the-new-pilatus-pc-12-pro-aircraft/
[46]
Can AI-Assisted Avionics Bolster Business Aviation Safety? - NBAA
Apr 29, 2025 · “Similarly, for en route and post-flight phases, AI and its explainability are key to enhance directed troubleshooting and anomaly detection ...Missing: JetWave EFIS 2023
[47]
Predictive AI Systems Could Revolutionize Aviation Maintenance
Nov 5, 2024 · According to Domaleski, key concepts in predictive maintenance include using AI for anomaly detection by identifying patterns that deviate from ...
[48]
Collins Aerospace Receives Milestone Certification for Combined ...
Oct 19, 2022 · Collins Aerospace has achieved a technical standard order (TSO) for its combined vision system (CVS) for business aviation aircraft.<|separator|>
[49]
The State of Augmented Reality in Aerospace Navigation and ...
The newer generation of EFIS, referred to as the glass cockpit, uses a standard set of display units including a Primary Flight Display (PFD), a Navigational ...
[50]
A comprehensive review of extended reality and its application in ...
Aug 1, 2025 · This comprehensive review explores the current state of XR technologies, their development and evaluation methodologies, and their diverse applications across ...
[51]
How augmented reality in the cockpit makes flying safer - ZEISS
Jan 8, 2025 · Thanks to augmented reality, important information is projected directly into the field of view. The result: a safer and more comfortable flying experience.Missing: EFIS urban mobility