Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Qibya raid

The Qibya raid was an Israeli Defense Forces operation conducted on the night of October 14–15, 1953, targeting the village of Qibya in the Jordanian-controlled West Bank as a reprisal for a cross-border infiltration attack two days prior that killed an Israeli woman and her two young children in the Yehud settlement via grenade thrown into their home.^[1]^[2] Commanded by Ariel Sharon and executed primarily by the elite Unit 101 commando force, the raid involved mortar and artillery shelling followed by infantry assaults that demolished 45 houses, a school, and a mosque with explosives, resulting in the deaths of 69 villagers—predominantly civilians, including two-thirds women and children—while Israeli forces suffered no fatalities.^[3]^[4] The action exemplified Israel's early post-independence policy of disproportionate reprisals aimed at deterring fedayeen infiltrations, which had violated the 1949 armistice agreement over 1,600 times by mid-1954, claiming at least 124 Israeli lives through murders, thefts, and sabotage originating from Jordanian territory.^[3] Though approved by Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion to signal resolve against unchecked border violence, the raid's scale and civilian toll—many trapped and killed when structures collapsed on occupants—provoked UN condemnation as a "massacre" and strained Israel's relations with the United States and Jordan, prompting Foreign Minister Moshe Sharett's private dismay over its excess despite public defense.^[5]^[6] Domestically, it fueled debate on military ethics and proportionality, later influencing Unit 101's merger into paratrooper units while cementing Sharon's reputation as a bold but ruthless commander amid a context of existential threats from hostile neighbors.^[1]

Historical Context

Armistice Violations and Fedayeen Infiltrations

The Israel-Jordan General Armistice Agreement, signed on April 3, 1949, delineated the armistice demarcation line (later known as the Green Line) and explicitly prohibited crossing the line for military purposes or engaging in acts of armed hostility, while establishing the Israel-Jordan Mixed Armistice Commission (MAC) to investigate and adjudicate violations.^[7] Despite these provisions, the agreement failed to prevent recurrent breaches, as Arab states, including Jordan, maintained a doctrine of ongoing belligerency and did not transition to peace negotiations, viewing the armistice as a temporary military truce rather than a basis for normalization.^[8] Infiltrations across the Jordanian frontier into Israel began immediately after the agreement's implementation, initially driven by individual or small-group motives such as reclaiming abandoned property, revenge for displacements during the 1948 war, or economic desperation among refugees, but evolving into more systematic sabotage, theft, and attacks on civilians.^[9] By the early 1950s, these cross-border movements had escalated in scale and organization, with Palestinian fedayeen—irregular guerrilla fighters operating from bases in Jordanian-controlled West Bank villages and refugee camps—conducting raids aimed at disrupting Israeli settlements, infrastructure, and security. Jordanian authorities, though occasionally attempting patrols or MAC complaints against Israeli responses, proved unable or unwilling to effectively curb the infiltrations, which numbered in the thousands annually during peak years like 1950–1953; overall, from 1949 to 1956, approximately 70,000 border crossings were recorded across Israel's frontiers, many originating from Jordanian territory and contributing to a pattern of low-intensity warfare.^[10] Fedayeen tactics included ambushes, grenade attacks, and mining roads, often targeting isolated kibbutzim and civilian traffic near the border, resulting in hundreds of Israeli deaths; estimates indicate around 400–500 Israelis (civilians and security personnel combined) killed by such cross-border violence from all neighboring states during 1949–1956, with Jordanian-sourced incidents comprising a substantial portion due to the porous 300-kilometer frontier.^[11] The MAC documented mutual violations but highlighted the asymmetry, with Arab infiltrations vastly outnumbering Israeli crossings in volume and initiating most escalatory cycles; for instance, Israeli complaints to the MAC regarding Jordanian-side breaches reached hundreds by mid-decade, far exceeding reciprocal claims. This persistent failure of enforcement—exacerbated by Jordan's limited control over armed Palestinian elements and tacit tolerance in some Arab League contexts—undermined the armistice's deterrent value, prompting Israel to adopt a policy of deterrence through reprisals to signal the costs of unchecked aggression.^[8] Primary sources from UN observers and declassified Israeli records affirm the causal link between these violations and the border's instability, though Arab narratives often framed infiltrations as legitimate resistance rather than breaches of international commitments.^[12]

Pattern of Cross-Border Attacks Prior to 1953

In the years following the 1949 Armistice Agreements, cross-border infiltrations from Jordanian-controlled West Bank territory into Israel became a persistent pattern, involving thousands of unauthorized crossings annually. These incursions encompassed a mix of unarmed refugees attempting to reclaim abandoned property or harvest crops, as well as armed groups conducting theft, sabotage, mine-laying, and targeted killings of Israeli civilians and security personnel. Israeli authorities documented over 1,000 such incidents in 1951 alone, with motivations shifting over time from individual economic desperation to organized guerrilla actions by nascent fedayeen units seeking revenge for the 1948 war or to undermine Israeli settlements near the border. The armistice terms explicitly prohibited such violations, yet Jordanian forces proved unable or unwilling to seal the porous frontier, leading to repeated condemnations by the Israel-Jordan Mixed Armistice Commission.^[13] Israeli records indicate significant casualties from these attacks, with 32 civilians and soldiers killed and 227 wounded in the 12 months preceding January 1953, primarily from Jordanian sectors. Cumulatively, from mid-1949 through early 1953, infiltrators inflicted approximately 421 Israeli casualties (killed and wounded), concentrated in rural border areas like the Jerusalem corridor and central plain, where isolated kibbutzim and villages were vulnerable to nighttime raids. Notable examples include the September 1952 ambush near Beit Guvrin, where armed infiltrators killed two Israeli civilians, and earlier 1951 assaults on farms near the Latrun salient, resulting in multiple fatalities. These figures, drawn from military and police reports, highlight a escalating threat, as infiltrators increasingly employed firearms, grenades, and coordinated tactics rather than mere opportunistic theft.^[14] The pattern reflected broader instability, with Jordan facing internal pressures from Palestinian refugees harboring grievances, yet official Jordanian efforts to curb infiltrations—such as patrols and proclamations—yielded limited results, exacerbating tensions. By 1952, fedayeen activities had formalized, with groups launching probes for future operations, prompting Israel to bolster border defenses while lodging futile protests through UN channels. This unchecked dynamic violated the armistice's demilitarized zone provisions and contributed to a cycle of low-intensity conflict, setting the stage for Israeli retaliatory measures.^[1]

Precipitating Events

The Yehud Grenade Attack

On the evening of October 12, 1953, a group of Palestinian fedayeen infiltrators crossed from Jordan into Israeli territory and targeted a civilian home in the village of Yehud, located east of Tel Aviv.^[15] The attackers threw at least one hand grenade through a window into the sleeping family's residence, causing an explosion that killed a woman named Suzanne Kinyas and two of her young children, aged approximately 18 months and 4 years.^[15] ^[2] A third child in the household sustained light injuries but survived.^[15] The perpetrators, identified as a fedayeen squad operating from Jordanian-controlled areas, fled eastward back across the border following the assault, evading immediate Israeli pursuit.^[15] This incident exemplified the recurring pattern of cross-border infiltrations, where small armed groups exploited the porous armistice lines to conduct sabotage and attacks on Israeli settlements, often with impunity due to limited enforcement by Jordanian authorities.^[15] Israeli security forces attributed the Yehud attack directly to Jordan-based fedayeen networks, which had been responsible for multiple similar grenade and shooting incidents in prior months, including strikes on nearby communities like Tirat Yehuda and Mishmar HaSharon.^[16] The attack heightened Israeli concerns over civilian vulnerability along the frontier, prompting urgent deliberations within military and political leadership about retaliatory measures to deter future incursions.^[15] No arrests or captures of the Yehud assailants were reported in the immediate aftermath, underscoring the challenges of interdicting such hit-and-run operations amid the fragile 1949 armistice regime.^[15]

Execution of the Operation

Unit 101 and Leadership

Unit 101 was established in mid-1953 as an elite commando unit of the Israeli Defense Forces, specifically tasked with conducting deep-penetration retaliatory raids to counter fedayeen infiltrations from neighboring territories.^[17] Founded and commanded by Major Ariel Sharon, the unit emphasized aggressive tactics, surprise assaults, and psychological impact to deter cross-border attacks that had intensified since the 1949 armistice agreements.^[18] Sharon, drawing from his experience in earlier IDF operations, selected personnel for their combat prowess and instilled a doctrine prioritizing initiative and minimal regard for collateral risks in pursuit of mission objectives.^[19] The unit's initial composition numbered around 20 soldiers, recruited from veterans of disbanded IDF special subunits, who underwent rigorous training in navigation, close-quarters battle, ambush techniques, and small-unit infiltration.^[17] Under Sharon's leadership, with Shlomo Baum as second-in-command, Unit 101 operated with a flat hierarchy that rewarded audacity, fostering a reputation for executing high-risk missions that regular infantry could not.^[18] This structure enabled rapid deployment and adaptability, aligning with broader IDF reprisal policy shifts under Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan toward disproportionate responses to restore deterrence.^[19] For the Qibya operation on October 14, 1953, Sharon directly commanded the assault force, comprising Unit 101's core elements reinforced by a paratroop company for added manpower, totaling approximately 130 men.^[17] Sharon's on-site leadership involved coordinating the infiltration across the Jordanian border, systematic house-to-house clearances, and explosive demolitions targeting infrastructure linked to infiltration routes, reflecting the unit's mandate to maximize destruction as a signal of resolve.^[18] The command's execution prioritized operational success over restraint, consistent with Sharon's pre-raid briefings emphasizing total commitment to neutralizing threats.^[19]

Tactical Details of the Raid

The raid, codenamed Operation Shoshana, involved approximately 130 soldiers primarily from the Israeli Defense Forces' elite Unit 101, commanded by Major Ariel Sharon, with support from Paratroop Battalion 890.^[20] The force crossed the Israel-Jordan armistice line undetected at approximately 9:30 p.m. on October 14, 1953, advancing several kilometers to the outskirts of Qibya village under cover of darkness.^[3] ^[20] Paratroopers initially secured elevated positions outside the village, exchanging fire with Jordanian National Guard defenders positioned about 100 meters from a perimeter fence, while Unit 101 elements assaulted the village center, including the police station.^[20] The attackers employed automatic weapons, grenades, and small arms to suppress resistance, establishing roadblocks on access routes as villagers attempted to flee.^[20] Demolition squads, equipped with around 1,500 pounds of explosives, then systematically targeted structures suspected of harboring infiltrators or arms caches.^[20] Prior to detonations, soldiers used flashlights and megaphones to search homes and issue evacuation warnings, rescuing at least two children from targeted buildings; 43 houses were ultimately demolished over three hours using TNT charges placed internally.^[20] The operation concluded with the force withdrawing intact before dawn on October 15, having neutralized local defenses without significant Israeli casualties.^[3] Sharon's pre-raid directive emphasized conquering the village, maximizing damage to infrastructure and personnel, and prioritizing the unit's safe return.^[21]

Outcomes

Casualties and Destruction

The Qibya raid on October 14–15, 1953, resulted in substantial civilian casualties among the village's Palestinian inhabitants, with Jordanian reports and United Nations assessments citing 66 deaths, predominantly women and children.^[5] Initial U.S. diplomatic estimates from the scene placed the death toll at 45 civilians killed and 15 wounded, also noting the majority as women and children.^[1] No Israeli personnel were reported killed or wounded during the operation.^[1] Destruction was extensive, centered on residential structures and infrastructure; approximately 40 houses were demolished by explosives, along with the village school, mosque, and a water reservoir.^[5] Contemporary U.S. observations confirmed 39 houses razed in Qibya itself, with additional demolitions in nearby villages like Budros to impede Jordanian reinforcements.^[1] The systematic use of dynamite to collapse buildings, often after occupants had been cleared or trapped inside, contributed to both the casualty figures and the scale of material loss, rendering much of the village uninhabitable in the immediate aftermath.^[5]^[1]

Immediate Military Results

The Qibya raid, conducted on the night of October 14–15, 1953, succeeded tactically in penetrating Jordanian territory undetected, overcoming initial resistance from village defenders, and systematically demolishing key infrastructure including approximately 45 houses and a water cistern before withdrawing intact.^[3] The Israeli force, comprising around 130 troops from Unit 101 and paratroopers, inflicted casualties on local armed elements while suffering no fatalities or serious injuries, demonstrating effective surprise, firepower, and coordination under Ariel Sharon's command.^[3] This operational success established a precedent for Israel's reprisal doctrine, signaling to Arab states the risks of hosting or tolerating fedayeen bases, and prompted Jordan to intensify internal security measures, including the arrest of over 1,000 suspected infiltrators and expanded Arab Legion patrols along the border.^[20] U.S. diplomatic assessments noted Jordan's subsequent "keen determination" to suppress cross-border raids, reflecting the raid's coercive impact on Jordanian policy.^[20] In the immediate aftermath, fedayeen activity diminished, with Israeli civilian and military deaths from infiltrations falling to 33 in 1954 from higher pre-raid levels, indicating a short-term deterrent effect amid ongoing armistice violations.^[20] However, the raid's focus on punitive destruction rather than targeted elimination of fedayeen networks meant it did not eradicate the underlying infiltration threat, as sporadic attacks persisted until broader policy shifts in the mid-1950s.^[3]

Reactions

Jordanian and Arab Responses

The Jordanian government lodged a formal complaint with the United Nations Security Council immediately following the raid, characterizing it as a deliberate massacre that posed a grave threat to regional peace and security.^[5] On October 19, 1953, Jordan reported the incident to the Israel-Jordan Mixed Armistice Commission, which investigated and attributed responsibility to Israeli forces.^[22] Jordan's UN representative, Dr. Yusuf Haikal, addressed the Security Council on November 17, 1953, detailing the raid's brutality, including the deaths of 69 villagers—predominantly women and children—and the destruction of 45 houses, while rejecting Israeli claims of spontaneous resistance.^[23] King Hussein I of Jordan visited the devastated village of Qibya on November 9, 1953, to assess the damage and demonstrate solidarity with the affected population, marking his first on-site inspection since the attack.^[24] This gesture underscored Jordan's commitment to defending its territory and civilians against cross-border incursions, amid ongoing armistice violations that Jordan documented as exceeding 600 incidents between 1949 and 1953.^[25] Across other Arab states, the raid elicited strong denunciations, with governments portraying it as an escalation of Israeli aggression culminating in civilian slaughter, though specific diplomatic actions beyond support for Jordan's UN appeal were limited.^[5] The incident fueled pan-Arab outrage, reinforcing narratives of Israeli expansionism and prompting calls for heightened vigilance along shared borders, but did not trigger unified military retaliation from entities like the Arab League.^[25]

International Diplomatic Fallout

The United Nations Security Council addressed the Qibya raid through Resolution 101, adopted unanimously on November 24, 1953, by a vote of 9-0 with two abstentions.^[26] The resolution determined that Israel's retaliatory action from October 14-16, 1953, violated the ceasefire provisions of the 1949 General Armistice Agreement and prior Security Council mandates, while noting unauthorized crossings of the demarcation line by individuals from both sides that often resulted in violence.^[26] It strongly censured Israel, urged both parties to implement effective measures against future violations, and called for enhanced cooperation with the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) to prevent infiltration and ensure local security forces' compliance.^[26] The United States, United Kingdom, and France co-sponsored draft resolution S/3139, introduced on November 17, 1953, which formed the basis for Resolution 101 and explicitly censured Israel based on evidence of its forces' responsibility.^[27] U.S. officials viewed the raid as culpable and sought UN action to deter repetitions, amid concerns that it exacerbated Arab distrust of American impartiality and undermined armistice stability.^[27] The British government lodged a formal protest with Israel, criticizing the operation as disproportionate and likely to intensify regional hostility rather than foster reconciliation. The censure contributed to short-term diplomatic strain on Israel, including heightened scrutiny of its reprisal policy in international forums, though it did not result in sanctions or material aid interruptions.^[27] Israeli representatives, including Abba Eban, defended the raid in UN debates by contextualizing it within ongoing Jordanian infiltration threats but faced limited success in shifting focus from the operation's execution.^[27] The episode underscored Western allies' preference for UN-mediated security enhancements over unilateral Israeli actions, prompting calls for bilateral talks under UNTSO auspices to address border violations systematically.^[27]

Israeli Internal Debates

The decision to conduct the Qibya raid was made by a small ministerial committee comprising Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, Foreign Minister Moshe Sharett, Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon, and IDF Chief of Staff Mordechai Makleff, bypassing discussion by the full cabinet.^[2] Sharett expressed reservations about the operation prior to its execution on October 14–15, 1953, arguing that Jordan had offered cooperation in investigating the preceding Yehud grenade attack and that retaliation risked escalation without curbing infiltration.^[28] Despite his opposition, Ben-Gurion and Lavon overruled him, prioritizing a demonstration of resolve against cross-border violence that had killed over 120 Israelis since 1949.^[3] Following the raid's execution, which destroyed over 45 houses and killed 69 Jordanian civilians, internal recriminations intensified amid swift international condemnation from the United States and United Kingdom. In a cabinet meeting on October 18, Sharett denounced the operation's scale as presenting Israel "to the entire world as bloodthirsty bandits," warning it undermined diplomatic efforts and failed to achieve deterrence, and proposed issuing a statement of regret while mandating prior cabinet approval for future reprisals. Ben-Gurion rejected regret, insisting on a narrative attributing the attack to vigilante actions by border residents rather than the IDF, a cover story the cabinet endorsed despite Sharett's objections that it eroded credibility. The next day, October 19, Ben-Gurion broadcast this version publicly, denying organized military involvement and framing the raid as spontaneous retribution, while privately acknowledging the policy's risks.^[29] The debates exposed broader fissures within Israel's leadership between advocates of restraint, led by Sharett, who favored diplomatic and economic measures like refugee compensation to reduce infiltration incentives, and proponents of aggressive reprisals, including Ben-Gurion, Lavon, and IDF figures like Moshe Dayan and Ariel Sharon, who viewed forceful responses as essential to restoring deterrence amid 1,612 Jordanian armistice violations since 1949.^[3] Sharett's push for cabinet oversight on retaliatory actions gained partial traction in subsequent discussions, with Dayan later conceding in December 1953 that Qibya had yielded negative strategic outcomes and exploring alternatives like fortified borders. However, the raid's internal defenders, including Sharon—who commanded Unit 101 and later argued in his memoirs that villagers had resisted with arms, complicating adherence to orders targeting legionnaire houses—maintained it exemplified necessary resolve against fedayeen threats.^[30] Public and media reactions within Israel largely aligned with the government's hawkish stance, with major newspapers justifying the operation as a legitimate response to persistent infiltration and portraying critics as undermining national security, though a minority voiced concerns over ethical and diplomatic costs.^[2] These internal tensions contributed to Makleff's resignation as IDF chief in December 1953, partly attributed to policy disagreements over reprisal scale, paving the way for Dayan's appointment and a sustained, if moderated, doctrine of border deterrence.^[31]

Legacy

Influence on Israeli Defense Policy

The Qibya raid of October 14–15, 1953, exemplified and accelerated Israel's shift toward a formalized policy of large-scale reprisal operations as a cornerstone of border defense strategy. Ordered by Chief of Staff Moshe Dayan in response to escalating fedayeen infiltrations, including the recent murder of a Israeli woman and her two children near Nahalin, the operation targeted not only military objectives but also village infrastructure to impose collective deterrence on Jordanian authorities and local populations. This approach reflected Dayan's doctrine of extracting a "high price" for Israeli casualties, aiming to compel Arab states to curb cross-border attacks by making the costs politically untenable.^[20]^[32] Military assessments post-raid deemed the operation successful in disrupting infiltration networks and signaling resolve, with infiltration incidents declining in the immediate aftermath, thereby validating the reprisal model's efficacy despite the loss of approximately 69 Jordanian villagers, mostly civilians, and the destruction of 45 houses. Dayan and Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, overriding Foreign Minister Moshe Sharett's objections, integrated lessons from Qibya into broader IDF doctrine, expanding Unit 101's tactics—such as night raids, explosive demolitions, and overwhelming force—into paratrooper brigades and future operations like Nahalin and Beit Liqya. This entrenched a proactive "active defense" paradigm, prioritizing cross-border strikes over static border patrols to deter threats at their source.^[32]^[28] The raid's influence extended to institutionalizing reprisals as state policy through 1956, with over 40 major operations conducted, escalating tensions but credited by Israeli commanders with reducing annual infiltration deaths from hundreds to dozens by mid-decade. It highlighted intra-governmental tensions, as Sharett advocated restraint to preserve international standing, yet the military's perceived successes—rooted in causal deterrence via disproportionate response—prevailed, shaping IDF training emphases on commando units and rapid retaliation. This framework prefigured escalatory dynamics leading to the 1956 Sinai Campaign, underscoring reprisals' role in transitioning from defensive posture to offensive deterrence amid persistent Arab non-state threats.^[32]^[31]

Controversies and Viewpoint Analyses

The Qibya raid sparked intense debate over its proportionality and morality, with critics labeling it a deliberate massacre of civilians while defenders framed it as a calibrated reprisal to deter cross-border infiltrations that had killed Israeli civilians. On October 13, 1953, Jordanian infiltrators threw a grenade into a house in Yehud, Israel, killing a woman and her two children, prompting the Israeli cabinet—chaired by Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion—to authorize a retaliatory operation targeting Qibya, a village identified as a base for such attackers.^[3] The raid, executed by Unit 101 under Major Ariel Sharon, involved blowing up 45 houses with dynamite, many containing occupants, resulting in 69 deaths, of which at least 46 were women and children.^[20] Israeli military reports later acknowledged that troops encountered resistance from armed villagers but proceeded to maximize destruction to instill fear and prevent future harboring of infiltrators, a tactic rooted in the empirical pattern of over 1,200 Israeli civilian deaths from infiltrations since 1948.^[32] From an Israeli hawkish perspective, the operation exemplified necessary deterrence in a causal chain of escalating border violence, where passive defenses had failed to stem fedayeen attacks originating from Jordanian territory; Sharon, in post-event assessments, justified the intensity as essential to breaking the cycle, arguing that lighter responses had only emboldened aggressors.^[33] Empirical data post-raid supported this view, as Jordanian authorities intensified efforts to curb infiltrations, reducing their frequency in subsequent months, though at the cost of international backlash that strained Israel's nascent diplomacy.^[20] Dovish Israeli figures, including Foreign Minister Moshe Sharett, decried the raid's excess in private diaries, viewing it as counterproductive vengeance that alienated global opinion and undermined moral legitimacy, with Sharett noting cabinet divisions where Ben-Gurion's interim leadership prioritized security over restraint.^[6] Critics, including Jordanian officials and UN observers, portrayed the raid as a premeditated atrocity violating the 1949 armistice agreements, with UN reports citing evidence of systematic house demolitions trapping non-combatants and estimating the force as reinforced battalions rather than a limited squad.^[1] The U.S. State Department condemned it as a "massacre," highlighting the disproportionate civilian toll—over twice the provocation's fatalities—and Israel's initial denial of IDF involvement, which fueled accusations of deception before cabinet admission on October 19.^[5] Arab narratives, amplified in Jordanian media, emphasized the raid's role in a broader pattern of Israeli expansionism, often omitting the infiltratory context while inflating victim counts, a framing reflective of state propaganda amid territorial disputes.^[15] Scholarly analyses note that while the raid's brutality exceeded tactical necessity—Sharon's orders for "maximal killing" deviated from prior guidelines—its causal intent was deterrence, not ethnic cleansing, though it entrenched reprisal doctrines that prioritized short-term security gains over long-term ethical costs.^[6]^[31]

References

[1]
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
At 2130 hours Israeli force estimated reinforced battalions strength attacked Qibya located over mile inside Jordan, shelling village with mortar and artillery ...Missing: raid "UN
[2]
The Israeli Press and the Qibya Operation, 1953 - jstor
A small minority of infiltrators crossed in order to kill Israelis or sabotage Israeli targets. On 14 October, the Israel-Jordan Mixed Armistice Commission.
[3]
The War of Independence: Israeli Attack on Qibya
Between June 1949 and October 1954, Israel accused Jordan of violating the armistice agreement 1,612 times, killing at least 124 Israelis, wounding hundreds ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
[4]
Dayr Yasin and Qibya - MERIP
The mention of Qibya along with Dayr Yasin refers to the first operation of Ariel Sharon's Unit 101. On October 14, 1953, 69 Arabs were killed in this Arab ...
[5]
Attack on West Bank village Qibya - Question of Palestine - UN.org.
The gravity of the situation provoked by the Qibya massacre continues to constitute a threat to peace and security in all the area.
[6]
The 1953 Qibya Raid Revisited: Excerpts From Moshe Sharett's ...
Moshe Sharett (1894–1965), Israeli Mapai leader, was the second head of the. Political Department of the Jewish Agency (1933–48), Israel's first foreign ...
[7]
Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949 (1)
The establishment of an armistice between the armed forces of the two Parties is accepted as an indispensable step toward the liquidation of armed conflict and ...Missing: 1949-1953 fedayeen
[8]
THE FAILURE OF THE ARMISTICE Ministry of Foreign Affairs - Gov.il
Aug 13, 2000 · On 14 February 1951, Syria protested to the Mixed Armistice Commission, claiming that the armistice agreement was being violated by Israel; ...Missing: 1949-1953 fedayeen
[9]
Qibya massacre | Military Wiki - Fandom
Along the 1949 armistice line, infiltrations, armed or otherwise, were frequent from both sides. ... Israel-Jordan General Armistice Agreement was adopted by a ...
[10]
Attacks from Gaza Were Common From 1948 to 1956; Here's How ...
Nov 13, 2023 · Between 1949 and 1956, there were approximately 70,000 cases of infiltration. During the peak years of border conflict, from 1950 to 1953, there ...
[11]
Reprisal operations (Israel) | Military Wiki - Fandom
Casualties 1949–1956. Between 1949 and 1956 cross border attacks from Israel's neighbours killed around 200 Israelis, with perhaps another 200 Israeli soldiers ...
[12]
Reprisal operations - Wikipedia
... Israeli territory, but the number of complaints filed by Israel over infiltrations from the West Bank show a considerable reduction, from 233 in the first ...
[13]
Mideast situation - Violations of the Armistice Agreements - UNTSO ...
Mar 11, 2019 · On 18 February, the Mixed Armistice Commission condemned Israel and Jordan for firing across the de-marcation line on 14 February near Deir el ...Missing: 1949-1953 fedayeen
[14]
Israel-Jordan Armistice Agreement (1949) - Jewish Virtual Library
On April 3, the agreement was signed, fixing the armistice line of the West Bank, transferring to Israel a number of Arab villages in the central part of the ...Missing: 1949-1953 | Show results with:1949-1953
[15]
ARAB INFILTRATION LISTED BY ISRAELIS; Figures for 12-Month ...
Israel repts on Arab infiltrations into Israel ... killed and 227 wounded, during raids into Israeli territory by Arab infiltrators during the twelve months from ...
[16]
The Israeli Press and the Qibya Operation, 1953
On the night of 12-13 October 1953, a squad of infiltrators from Jordan crossed the border into Israel and lobbed a grenade into the home of a sleeping family.Missing: 14 retaliation details
[17]
1953 - Israel - Cambridge University Press & Assessment
Grenade attacks on homes in Beit Nabala, Deir Tarif, Beit 'Arif. 9 June. Grenade attack on home in Tirat Yehuda. 10 June. Grenade attack on home in Mishmar ...
[18]
Special Forces Unit 101 Is Formed | CIE - Center for Israel Education
After infiltrators kill a woman and her two children, Sharon leads a Unit 101 raid on the West Bank village of Qibya on Oct. 14, 1953. Unit 101, supported ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[19]
SOF Spotlight: Israel's Unit 101 - Gone But Not Forgotten - SOFREP
Nov 7, 2023 · Unit 101, a trailblazing Israeli special forces unit formed in 1953 and led by Ariel Sharon, was instrumental in shaping modern military ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[20]
Background & History of Israel's Special Forces Units
Unit 101 was commanded by Ariel Sharon, but only existed for five months. It was disbanded after a raid in which the unit's members killed dozens of unarmed ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
[21]
The Qibya massacre: The difference between deterrence and ...
The commander of Unit 101, Ariel Sharon, led 130 men into the village, which appeared deserted. Participants claim they checked houses thoroughly; victims ...
[22]
His finest hours: On Sharon's murderous legacy - +972 Magazine
Jan 13, 2014 · He served as the commander of Unit 101, which carried out a series of war crimes, as its members began to admit years later. One of the most ...<|separator|>
[23]
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
Against this background such events as sudden move of Foreign Ministry to Jerusalem, refusal comply with Bennike's request and Qibya raid were source of grave ...Missing: "UN | Show results with:"UN
[24]
Excerpts From Jordan's Reply at U. N. to Israel on Kibya Attack
16-Following are excerpts from the statement made before the Security Council today by Dr. Yusuf Haikal, representative of Jordan, on the Kibya case and other ...
[25]
JORDAN'S KING VISITS ISRAELI ATTACK SCENE - The New York ...
KIBYA, Jordan, Nov. 9—King Hussein of Jordan paid his first visit to the devastated village of Kibya today since Israeli forces attacked the frontier settlement ...
[26]
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
Resentment in Jordan against US appears stronger today, November 4, [apparent omission] remaining reservoir of goodwill is lower than at any time since the US ...Missing: raid primary casualties<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
United Nations Security Council Resolution, November 24, 1953
Finds that the retaliatory action at Qibya taken by armed forces of Israel on 14-16 October 1953 and all such actions constitute a violation of the ceasefire ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
[28]
Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
U.N. doc. · The pending draft resolution on the Qibya incident, sponsored by France, the United Kingdom, and the United States, was introduced as S/3139. · For ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
[29]
[PDF] The 1953 Qibya Raid Revisited: Excerpts from Moshe Sharett's Diaries
Moshe Sharett (1894–1965), Israeli Mapai leader, was the second head of the. Political Department of the Jewish Agency (1933–48), Israel's first foreign ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
Attack on West Bank village Qibya - Verbatim record/Revision
Held on 9 November 1953, at 3 p.m. Provisional agenda (S/Agenda/635/Rev.1) 1. Adoption of the agenda. 2. The Palestine question Compliance with and ...
[31]
A brutal soldier who came to know the limits of force | Ariel Sharon
Jan 5, 2006 · Thirty years later, as prime minister, Sharon deployed F16 fighters and Hellfire missiles over the same camps, targeting a new breed of Islamist ...
[32]
Making Endless War - Project MUSE
From Retaliation to Anticipation, Reconciling Reprisals and Self-Defense in the Middle East and Vietnam, 1949–65.Missing: details | Show results with:details<|separator|>
[33]
Qibya | Israel's Border Wars 1949-1956 - Oxford Academic
Oct 31, 2023 · In the course of the early 1950s, as strife along the borders continued, two schools of thought emerged in Jerusalem about the proper response to Arab ...Missing: cabinet | Show results with:cabinet
[34]
The 1953 Qibya Raid Revisited: Excerpts from Moshe Sharett's Diaries
... raid on the village of Qibya in the West Bank, then Jordan, by IDF unit 101 led by Ariel Sharon during which 69 villagers were blown up in their homes. The ...