Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ransom

Ransom is the sum of money or other consideration demanded or paid to secure the release of a person held captive, such as a hostage or kidnapping victim, or to recover stolen property.^[1]^[2] ![The Ransom by John Everett Millais][float-right] Historically, ransom emerged as a formalized practice in medieval chivalric warfare, where capturing high-ranking opponents alive often proved more profitable than killing them, fostering a market for prisoner exchanges among nobility and knights during conflicts like the Hundred Years' War.^[3]^[4] This system incentivized restraint on the battlefield, as the prospect of negotiating payments turned warfare into a potential economic enterprise, with ransoms scaling according to the captive's social status and resources.^[5] In modern criminal contexts, ransom demands accompany kidnappings, where perpetrators hold victims until payment, though empirical analyses indicate that yielding to such demands can perpetuate the practice by signaling vulnerability and funding further operations, prompting many governments to prohibit or discourage payments.^[6]^[7] Under U.S. law, for instance, possessing or disposing of ransom money derived from kidnapping constitutes a federal offense, reflecting efforts to disrupt the financial incentives of abduction.^[8]

Definition and Etymology

Core Concept and Legal Definitions

Ransom constitutes a demand for payment or other consideration in exchange for the release of a captive entity, such as a person, property, or encrypted data, enforced through threats of harm, destruction, or continued detention. This framework embodies a coerced transaction where the victim's compliance is compelled by duress, differentiating it from broader extortion, which encompasses threats to reputation, property damage, or other harms without requiring custody over a specific hostage or asset.^[9] In United States federal law, ransom features prominently in the definition of kidnapping under 18 U.S.C. § 1201, which criminalizes the unlawful seizure, confinement, or abduction of a person held "for ransom or reward," with penalties including life imprisonment or, in cases resulting in death, the death penalty. Separate provisions under 18 U.S.C. § 1202 prohibit the receipt, possession, or disposal of any money or property delivered as ransom in connection with such offenses, subjecting violators to up to ten years' imprisonment.^[8] These statutes underscore ransom's role as a distinct aggravating factor in interstate or federal jurisdiction kidnappings, beyond general threats proscribed by extortion laws like 18 U.S.C. § 875.^[10] Internationally, the 1979 International Convention against the Taking of Hostages, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, defines hostage-taking as the seizure or detention of a person, coupled with threats to kill, injure, or continue detention, to compel a state, organization, or individual for any purpose, explicitly including ransom demands.^[11] Ratifying states must criminalize such acts and cooperate in prevention and prosecution, though the treaty neither mandates nor bans ransom payments themselves, leaving policy discretion to governments, many of which discourage payments to avoid perpetuating the practice.^[12] Causally, ransom mechanisms foster a supply-response dynamic in which successful payments signal profitability, thereby incentivizing perpetrators to increase capture frequency, as evidenced by economic models of extortion markets where victim compliance elevates the expected value of future offenses over non-monetary alternatives.^[13] Empirical patterns in both human kidnappings and ransomware variants confirm this feedback loop, with payment rates correlating to heightened attack incidence absent countervailing deterrence.^[14]

Origins of the Term

The term "ransom" entered English as "ransoun" in the early 13th century, denoting a sum paid for the release of a prisoner, derived from Old French "rançon" or "raenson," which appeared around the 12th century in reference to payments for captives in feudal and wartime contexts.^[15] This Old French form traces to the Latin "redemptio," the noun form of "redimere" meaning "to buy back," originally implying a transactional repurchase rather than gratuitous liberation.^[2] In medieval usage, it specifically applied to the economic practice of exchanging funds for prisoner freedom, as normalized in chivalric codes where captors held nobles for profit, distinct from outright enslavement or execution.^[15] By the 14th century, "ransom" featured prominently in English texts amid the Hundred Years' War, reflecting its role in knightly economics; Geoffrey Chaucer, captured and ransomed for £16 in 1360 during French campaigns, incorporated the term in works like The Knight's Tale to depict such exchanges as routine warfare incentives.^[16] This secular application prioritized verifiable contractual obligations over biblical "redemption" symbolism, where "redemptio" connoted spiritual repurchase, as philological records show the word's adaptation decoupled from theological overtones to emphasize empirical payment dynamics in documented feudal treaties and chronicles.^[15] The term's evolution by the 16th century broadened to encompass coerced payments beyond military prisoners, aligning with expanding uses in piracy and private disputes, though rooted in its core denotation of quantified release fees.^[2]

Historical Practices

Ancient and Medieval Ransoms

In ancient Greece, the practice of ransoming war captives was well-established, as evidenced in Homeric epics such as the Iliad, where exchanges of prisoners for valuables like bronze, gold, or livestock allowed families or allies to redeem kin rather than face permanent enslavement or death.^[17] This custom reflected a pragmatic recognition of captives' economic value, with ransoms negotiated based on social status and ability to pay, often involving public auctions or direct bargaining in poleis like Athens and Sparta during the Archaic and Classical periods. Primary accounts, including those preserved in later historians like Herodotus, describe instances during conflicts such as the Persian Wars (499–449 BCE), where Greek hoplites captured at battles like Thermopylae were occasionally ransomed instead of executed, though enslavement remained common for lower-status fighters.^[18] Roman practices similarly incorporated ransoms, particularly for high-value targets, as seen in the 390 BCE Gallic sack of Rome, where Livy records the payment of 1,000 talents of gold to Brennus's forces to secure the city's release, averting total destruction and allowing Roman recovery.^[19] During the Punic Wars (264–146 BCE), Livy's Ab Urbe Condita notes sporadic ransoms of officers and allies amid high-casualty engagements like Cannae (216 BCE), where over 50,000 Romans perished or were captured, though systematic data on frequency is sparse and enslavement predominated for Carthaginian captives under Roman policy. Assyrian records from the 8th–7th centuries BCE, such as royal annals, emphasize deportation and tribute extraction over routine individual ransoms, with gold payments more akin to state-level indemnities than personal redemptions.^[20] In medieval Europe, from the 11th century onward, knightly ransoms evolved into a formalized economic institution, embedded in chivalric norms that prioritized capturing nobles alive for profit over execution, as detailed in treatises like Honoré Bouvet's Arbre des Batailles (1387), which codified ransom rights under feudal law.^[21] Ransom rolls from the Hundred Years' War (1337–1453), such as those from English and French archives, reveal extensive transactions involving thousands of captives, with values scaled by rank—e.g., King John II of France's 1360 ransom totaled 3 million gold crowns, equivalent to years of royal revenue—indicating that most affluent nobles were redeemed rather than killed, fostering a "ransom market" that extended to mid-tier knights and even some common soldiers.^[22] Analysis of over 2,000 documented cases shows ransoms traded widely across social strata, with captors often holding prisoners until payment, secured by oaths or sureties, transforming warfare into a lucrative enterprise for elites.^[3] This system incentivized restraint in combat, as chronicled in Jean Froissart's Chronicles (c. 1400), which recount battles like Crécy (1346) where English forces targeted French knights for capture amid arrow barrages, yielding profits that offset campaign costs while limiting noble fatalities compared to earlier eras of mass slaughter.^[23] In low-centralized polities lacking strong sovereign enforcement, ransoms functioned as a self-regulating mechanism, where the promise of financial return deterred indiscriminate killing of redeemable foes, evidenced by shifts from 7th–12th-century Anglo-French conflicts toward clemency for valuable prisoners, thereby sustaining aristocratic manpower across recurrent wars.^[24] Empirical tallies from such sources underscore how this practice, while not eliminating casualties, channeled warfare's destructiveness into economic exchanges, preserving lineages essential for feudal stability.^[25]

Ransoms in Warfare, Piracy, and Exploration

In the context of early modern warfare, ransom served as an economic mechanism to monetize captures, particularly of high-value officers, rather than incurring maintenance costs or risking exchanges. During the Napoleonic Wars, European armies continued medieval customs where captured officers negotiated releases through family funds or state-supported cartels, with payments scaled to rank—ensigns might owe hundreds of pounds sterling, while generals thousands—reflecting the profitability of live prisoners over summary execution. This practice persisted due to mutual interest among professional officers, but its decline accelerated with the consolidation of national armies and naval forces, which prioritized strategic detention or parole over individual profiteering, culminating in formalized international norms by the late 19th century. Piracy in the Mediterranean exemplified ransom's role in non-state predation, where Barbary corsairs from Algiers, Tunis, Tripoli, and other North African bases systematically seized European vessels and coastal inhabitants from the 16th to early 19th centuries, demanding ransoms negotiated via consular intermediaries. Captives, often merchants or sailors, fetched averages of £30 per man in English cases, with women commanding higher sums; failure to pay resulted in enslavement or sale into Ottoman markets, generating substantial revenue that sustained corsair operations and prompted European tribute payments for passage rights. The United States rejected such tribute, sparking the First Barbary War (1801–1805), where U.S. Marines under Lieutenant Presley O'Bannon captured Derna on April 27, 1805, weakening Tripoli's position and leading to a treaty ending American tribute demands, as immortalized in the Marines' Hymn. By the 1810s–1830s, British and French naval bombardments dismantled Barbary fleets, supplanting ransom economies with direct military suppression as state power asserted dominance over privateering.^[26]^[27] During the exploration era, ransom demands facilitated rapid wealth extraction from newly encountered empires, blending conquest with extortion. In November 1532, Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro imprisoned Inca ruler Atahualpa following the Battle of Cajamarca, accepting his proposal to fill a 22-by-17-by-8-foot room once with gold artifacts and twice with silver as ransom for freedom. Inca subjects delivered the haul by mid-1533, yielding approximately 13,000 pounds (5,900 kg) of 22-karat gold and 26,000 pounds (11,800 kg) of silver after smelting—equivalent to the empire's concentrated elite holdings—verified through contemporary Spanish notarial inventories and the site's archaeological preservation as the Ransom Room in Cajamarca. Despite fulfillment, Pizarro executed Atahualpa on July 26, 1533, on charges of treason, redistributing the bounty among his force and funding further expeditions; this pattern underscored ransom's utility in asymmetric encounters, though advancing colonial administration later integrated tribute systems over ad hoc demands.^[28]^[29]

Operational Mechanics

Negotiation Dynamics

In ransom negotiations, captors typically initiate with demands substantially exceeding the hostage's perceived value, often by factors of 5 to 10 times or more, to anchor high and exploit information asymmetry about the victim's liquidity and willingness to pay. Victims or their representatives counter by signaling limited resources through partial offers, fabricated financial constraints, or demonstrations of negotiation patience, aiming to converge on a settlement below the captor's reservation price. Game-theoretic models frame this as a bargaining game where the subgame perfect equilibrium depends on players' beliefs about each other's costs and outside options; for instance, models adapted from kidnapping scenarios predict that rational captors accept discounts when holding costs (e.g., security, sustenance) escalate relative to expected gains, while victims weigh payment against the risk of non-recovery.^[30]^[31] Empirical patterns from documented cases underscore these dynamics, with discounts of 20-90% common in successful haggling. In professional kidnap-for-ransom (KFR) scenarios involving insurers, experienced negotiators routinely reduce demands to 10% of initial asks by prolonging talks and building rapport, leveraging captors' time-sensitive pressures like evasion risks or internal divisions. Ransomware analogs, analyzed in large datasets of over 400 incidents, show median discounts rising to 50-66% with extended messaging (e.g., 51-100 exchanges), where longer negotiations correlate with higher payment likelihood (up to 45%) due to mutual concessions amid rising operational costs for attackers. Historical precedents, such as medieval warfare's organized ransom markets during the Hundred Years' War, similarly reveal widespread haggling via intermediaries, with payments succeeding in most viable cases as standardized ledgers and feudal obligations facilitated assessments of net worth against holding expenses.^[32]^[33]^[3] Outcomes hinge on asymmetric factors like the captor's per diem burdens versus the victim's asset liquidity and resolve; datasets from Italian and Sardinian kidnappings (1960-2010) indicate duration inversely affects final amounts, as captors discount to avoid default from prolonged custody. Psychological elements, including threats to escalate harm or feigned urgency, influence leverage, but data prioritize economic realism over bluffing efficacy—e.g., victims with verifiable wealth face stiffer initial terms but higher resolution rates. Negotiation breakdowns, empirically rarer during active talks (e.g., <12% post-payment failures in regional studies), carry elevated execution risks, with 19th-century U.S. cases like the 1932 Lindbergh incident illustrating how stalled payments can prompt lethal resolutions absent credible commitments.^[34]

Communication and Ransom Demands

Ransom demands are conveyed through various methods designed to establish the kidnappers' control while minimizing risks of detection. Historically, these have primarily taken the form of handwritten or typed notes left at the scene of the abduction or delivered by mail, often containing specific instructions, threats, and authentication symbols. In the 1932 Lindbergh kidnapping, an initial note discovered on the nursery windowsill demanded $50,000 for the return of Charles Lindbergh Jr., with subsequent correspondence—including at least 12 additional letters—refining the amount, providing delivery instructions, and attempting to verify the kidnappers' possession of the child.^[35]^[36] To enhance credibility and compel compliance, such notes frequently incorporate proofs of life, such as photographs of the hostage in captivity, personal belongings, or biometric elements like fingerprints on the document itself. These artifacts serve to confirm the victim's ongoing survival and the perpetrators' ability to harm them, distinguishing genuine demands from hoaxes. For instance, in early 20th-century cases, notes sometimes included victim-specific details or items to demonstrate intimate knowledge, thereby pressuring families to take the threats seriously.^[37]^[38] Over time, communication evolved to include intermediaries—trusted third parties such as clergy, lawyers, or community figures—to relay demands and negotiate terms, reducing direct exposure to law enforcement interception. This practice became prevalent in 20th-century Latin American kidnappings, where organized groups utilized local influencers to bridge communication gaps and lower betrayal risks during exchanges. U.S. diplomatic records from the 1970 abduction of Dan Mitrione in Uruguay highlight recommendations for employing such intermediaries to initiate dialogue with captors, a tactic mirrored in broader regional patterns of extortionate kidnappings.^[39] In more recent human hostage scenarios, demands have shifted toward telephonic or digital channels, including calls with audible proofs like the victim's voice or cries, though written notes remain common in low-tech environments to avoid traceable signals. These methods prioritize anonymity and verifiable control signals, such as tailored threats referencing the victim's routines or possessions, to escalate urgency without revealing operational details.^[40]^[41]

Payment Execution and Risks

Ransom payments in traditional kidnappings are frequently executed through physical cash drops, involving unmarked currency delivered to specified locations via dead drops or intermediaries to minimize traceability and interception risks.^[42] During Italy's Years of Lead in the 1970s, groups such as the Red Brigades financed operations largely through such ransom kidnappings of industrialists, where payments were arranged covertly, though delivery logistics often faced surveillance challenges from law enforcement.^[43] In more recent non-cyber cases, wire transfers have supplemented cash methods since the late 20th century, but physical delivery remains prevalent in high-risk regions to evade banking scrutiny. For cyber-ransomware incidents, execution shifts to digital transfers, primarily in Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, directed to attacker-controlled wallets for rapid, pseudonymous receipt.^[44] Bitcoin dominates these payments, accounting for approximately 98% of ransomware demands due to its liquidity and cross-border transfer ease, though attackers may convert funds downstream to obscure origins.^[45] Key risks include delivery failures from logistical vulnerabilities, such as cash interception during drops or blockchain analysis enabling post-payment seizures; for example, the U.S. Department of Justice recovered $2.3 million in bitcoins from a 2021 DarkSide ransomware extortion payment through tracing.^[46] Double-crosses persist, where payers receive no decryption keys or hostage release despite compliance; empirical surveys of ransomware victims reveal that 40% who pay still fail to recover data, highlighting attackers' unreliability in fulfillment.^[47] Post-payment, funded groups exhibit high recidivism, perpetuating cycles as seen in Colombia, where kidnapping networks, including FARC, amassed over $2 billion in ransoms across decades, directly enabling sustained operations and further abductions.^[48] In the 1990s, Colombia recorded peak kidnapping volumes exceeding 3,000 incidents over three years, with payments rarely disrupting group activities despite occasional non-release after delivery.^[49] Traceability in both cash and digital methods exposes payers to asset forfeiture if transactions link to illicit actors, amplifying financial and legal hazards beyond immediate execution.^[46]

Contemporary Variations

Kidnapping and Human Hostage Ransoms

Kidnapping for ransom in non-state criminal contexts typically involves organized groups abducting civilians—often expatriates, business personnel, or locals with perceived wealth—to demand payment from relatives, employers, or associates, with victims held until compliance or release negotiated. These operations thrive in regions with limited state control, where perpetrators exploit impunity to target high-value individuals for quick financial gain, distinct from ideological motives in terrorism. Empirical data indicate global incidents number in the thousands annually, though underreporting complicates precise tallies, with risk firms noting an upward trend since 2019 driven by economic instability and opportunistic networks.^[50] Prevalence concentrates in hotspots like Mexico, where the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) estimated over 80,000 kidnapping victims in 2020 alone, many tied to ransom demands amid cartel dominance and weak enforcement. Nigeria's Niger Delta region sees persistent abductions, with broader national figures recording 3,620 people kidnapped in 582 incidents between July 2022 and June 2023, often by militant groups seeking ransoms from oil firms or families. Other areas, such as parts of Brazil and Colombia, report spikes, but Mexico maintains the highest absolute volume of ransom cases for over a decade.^[51]^[52]^[53] Common modus operandi include express kidnappings, where victims are seized briefly—often hours or days—and coerced to withdraw cash from ATMs or banks under duress, minimizing holding costs and risks for criminals; yields here are lower but frequent in urban settings like Mexico City. Virtual kidnappings eschew physical abduction, relying instead on phone scams where perpetrators impersonate kidnappers, using publicly available data to claim custody of a relative and demand immediate wire transfers, with U.S. cases surging per FBI alerts. Median global ransom demands reached $29,343 in 2021, up 6% from prior years, though actual payments vary by victim profile and negotiation, often lower in express scenarios.^[54]^[55]^[50] In Western nations, ransom kidnappings have declined sharply due to robust policing, intelligence sharing, and deterrence measures, rendering them rare compared to historical peaks; for instance, U.S. and European incidents focus more on virtual variants amid low physical abduction rates. Persistence endures in weak-rule zones, where governance gaps enable repeat offenses, as seen in sustained Delta militancy and Mexican cartel strongholds, underscoring causal links between state capacity and crime suppression.^[50]

Terrorism-Linked Ransoms

Terrorist organizations have increasingly relied on kidnapping for ransom to finance insurgencies and operations, with groups like the Islamic State (ISIS) deriving substantial revenues from such activities during its territorial caliphate phase. U.S. government assessments indicate that ISIS generated tens of millions of dollars annually from ransoms between 2014 and 2017, contributing to its overall funding estimated in the hundreds of millions.^[56] This revenue stream supported military campaigns, governance structures, and recruitment efforts in Iraq and Syria. Similarly, al-Qaeda affiliates, including Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin (JNIM) in Mali and al-Shabaab in Somalia, have sustained ransom operations into the 2020s, using proceeds to procure weapons and expand territorial influence amid ongoing insurgencies.^[57]^[58] These groups employ distinct tactics to maximize ransom yields, embedding demands within ideological justifications that portray abductions as legitimate reprisals in a religious war. Hostages are often framed as symbols of Western or apostate interference, with demands tied to prisoner exchanges or financial tributes to the caliphate or jihadist cause, distinguishing these from purely criminal kidnappings. To enhance credibility and urgency, terrorists produce proof-of-life videos featuring captives reciting prepared statements or displaying recent newspapers, which serve to verify health, deter rescue attempts by revealing locations indirectly, and psychologically pressure families or governments.^[59] Such media amplifies perceived legitimacy, as analyzed in content studies of videos from ISIS and al-Qaeda branches, where ideological messaging reinforces the groups' narratives of divine entitlement to ransoms. Empirical evidence links ransom payments to heightened frequencies of subsequent kidnappings and attacks, as funds enable groups to scale operations and replicate successful tactics. Analyses of terrorist financing reveal that regions with histories of concessions experience up to 30% more kidnapping incidents over time, as payments signal vulnerability and bolster perpetrator capabilities for broader insurgent activities.^[60] State responses adhering to no-payment policies, such as those of the United States, correlate with lower targeting rates for their nationals, whereas discreet payouts by European governments have empirically fueled cycles of escalation in Sahel and Middle Eastern hotspots.^[61] This causal dynamic underscores how ransoms not only sustain immediate insurgencies but also incentivize intensified attack patterns, per counterterrorism financing reviews.^[62]

Cyber-Ransomware

Cyber-ransomware involves the deployment of malware that encrypts victims' data, rendering it inaccessible until a ransom is paid, typically in cryptocurrency to facilitate anonymity and rapid transfer. Attackers gain initial access through methods such as phishing emails, exploited vulnerabilities, or compromised remote desktop protocols, followed by lateral movement within networks to maximize encryption scope. Once files are locked using strong algorithms like AES-256, a ransom note appears demanding payment, often with a decryption tool promised upon compliance; failure to pay risks permanent data loss.^[63]^[64] The scale of cyber-ransomware has expanded significantly, with attackers targeting organizations across sectors including healthcare, government, and critical infrastructure. According to Verizon's 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report, ransomware featured in 44% of confirmed data breaches analyzed from incidents involving over 22,000 security events. Payments have escalated, with Sophos reporting an average ransom of approximately $1.54 million in 2023, reflecting a surge driven by sophisticated ransomware-as-a-service models that lower barriers for affiliates. By mid-2025, incidents rose 25% year-over-year from July 2024 to June 2025, underscoring persistent vulnerabilities despite defensive advancements.^[65]^[66]^[67]^[68] Tactics have evolved beyond encryption alone to include data exfiltration, where stolen sensitive information is threatened with public release or sale on dark web forums—a "double extortion" strategy exemplified by groups like Conti, which combined file locking with data theft to pressure victims. Chainalysis data indicates ransomware generated over $1 billion in cryptocurrency payments in 2023, though revenues dipped to $813 million in 2024 amid increased victim resistance and law enforcement disruptions; the low risk of attribution and prosecution sustains profitability, as perpetrators operate across jurisdictions with minimal physical exposure. This economic model incentivizes proliferation, with attackers leveraging untraceable digital tools to extract value akin to high-yield, low-overhead enterprises.^[69]^[70]^[71]

Notable Historical and Modern Cases

Pre-20th Century Examples

The ransom of King Richard I of England in 1192 exemplifies the fiscal burdens imposed by high-profile captures in medieval warfare. After his shipwreck and seizure by Duke Leopold V of Austria en route from the Third Crusade, Richard was transferred to Holy Roman Emperor Henry VI, who demanded 150,000 silver marks—equivalent to roughly 100,000 pounds and approximately twice or thrice England's annual royal revenue—for his release on February 4, 1194.^[72] ^[73] This sum, over 30 tons of silver, was financed primarily through a 25% tax on personal property and incomes, alongside contributions from church properties and Jewish communities, imposing severe economic strain and setting precedents for extraordinary wartime levies in England.^[73] In the realm of piracy, the Barbary corsairs operating from North African ports like Algiers and Tunis systematically captured and ransomed European mariners and coastal dwellers from the 16th to 18th centuries. Historians estimate that between 1 million and 1.25 million Europeans were enslaved during this period, with ransoms negotiated by families, merchants, religious orders such as the Trinitarian Order (founded in 1198 specifically for captive redemption), and even states to secure releases.^[74] ^[75] These payments, often in cash, goods, or promissory notes, formed a recurring drain on European economies, with English collections alone documented for ransoming thousands held in Algiers by the early 17th century.^[26] Such cases underscore ransoms' integration into pre-modern state finances, where individual high-value releases like Richard's could consume multiple years' revenues, while aggregate piracy demands compelled ongoing tribute systems equivalent to significant budgetary outlays in affected polities.^[73]

20th-21st Century Kidnapping Incidents

The kidnapping of Charles Augustus Lindbergh Jr. on March 1, 1932, from the family residence in Hopewell, New Jersey, involved a ladder placed against the second-floor window and a ransom note demanding escalating amounts, culminating in $50,000 paid on March 21 via intermediary Dr. John F. Condon.^[35]^[76] Despite the payment in marked bills, the child's decomposed body was found on May 12, 1932, about 4.5 miles from the home, with autopsy confirming death by a skull fracture shortly after the abduction, likely during the escape.^[35] German carpenter Bruno Richard Hauptmann was arrested in September 1934 after ransom bills surfaced; handwriting analysis, wood from a homemade ladder matching his attic, and $14,000 in ransom notes found in his home linked him to the crime, leading to his conviction for first-degree murder and execution by electric chair on April 3, 1936.^[35] The incident exposed vulnerabilities in high-profile security and directly influenced the Federal Kidnapping Act of June 22, 1932 (Lindbergh Law), empowering federal intervention in interstate abductions and establishing ransom money tracing as a tool against perpetrators.^[77] During the 1970s, Marxist guerrilla organizations in Italy and Argentina orchestrated waves of extortion kidnappings against industrialists and executives, extracting ransoms totaling tens of millions to fund operations and propaganda. In Italy, groups affiliated with or inspired by the Red Brigades targeted figures like Fiat personnel, contributing to a peak of 75 ransom abductions in 1977 alone, many resolved through payments that released victims but often followed prolonged negotiations and threats of execution.^[78]^[79] In Argentina, the ERP conducted high-profile cases, including the 1974 abduction of an Exxon executive yielding $14.2 million in ransom after publication of group demands in media, and a 1975 seizure of two executives for which $60 million was reportedly paid, enabling releases amid escalating violence that included shootouts and victim deaths in failed talks.^[80]^[81] These operations demonstrated tactical proficiency in victim isolation and demand communication but inflicted severe societal costs, including eroded business confidence, fortified personal security among elites, and a cycle of retaliatory state crackdowns that amplified political instability without dismantling the groups' financing.^[82] The April 14, 2014, abduction of 276 schoolgirls aged 16-18 from a government boarding school in Chibok, Borno State, Nigeria, by Boko Haram militants marked a resurgence in mass hostage-taking for ideological and financial gain, with initial ransom demands reaching $50 million alongside prisoner swaps.^[83] Subsequent releases, such as 21 girls in October 2016 via negotiations, involved undisclosed payments estimated at €3 million despite Nigerian government denials of direct ransoms or swaps, while over 100 escaped or were freed in military operations by 2016.^[84]^[85] As of April 2024, 82 girls remained in captivity, with reports of forced marriages and indoctrination; the partial payments have fueled debates on their role in Boko Haram's tactical revival, as the group exploited global attention to sustain recruitment and operations amid territorial losses.^[86]^[87] Declassified intelligence and victim testimonies highlight how such incidents underscore the challenges of asymmetric warfare, where ransoms provide immediate liquidity but prolong insurgent viability through black-market conversions and morale boosts.^[88]

Prominent Ransomware Attacks

The WannaCry ransomware attack, launched on May 12, 2017, exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows known as EternalBlue, rapidly infecting over 200,000 computers in more than 150 countries and disrupting operations in sectors including healthcare, manufacturing, and logistics.^[89] ^[90] The U.S. government attributed the malware's development and deployment to North Korean state-sponsored actors, marking an early instance of nation-state involvement in widespread ransomware propagation.^[91] Global economic damages were estimated in the billions of dollars, with specific impacts including the shutdown of Britain's National Health Service systems, costing approximately £19 million in lost output alone.^[92] In May 2021, the DarkSide ransomware group targeted Colonial Pipeline, the operator of the largest U.S. fuel pipeline, encrypting critical systems and prompting a six-day shutdown that led to widespread fuel shortages and panic buying across the southeastern United States.^[93] ^[94] Colonial Pipeline paid approximately $4.4 million in Bitcoin to the attackers shortly after the incident, though the FBI later recovered a portion of the funds; the event underscored vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, with gasoline prices rising by an average of 4 cents per gallon in affected regions.^[95] ^[96] During the 2020s, ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) models proliferated, with groups like REvil (Sodinokibi) achieving prominence through high-profile attacks before its infrastructure was disrupted in July 2021 following U.S.-Russia diplomatic pressure and subsequent international law enforcement operations, including arrests in 2022.^[97] ^[98] Similarly, the Conti group, active from 2019 to 2022, dissolved after internal leaks during the Russia-Ukraine conflict and a splintering into smaller operations, reflecting how geopolitical tensions and leaks could fracture RaaS affiliates.^[99] ^[100] In contrast, LockBit demonstrated resilience, persisting into 2025 despite a 2024 disruption by Operation Cronos; the group released LockBit 5.0 in early October 2025 and claimed new victims as recently as September, often through coalitions with other actors like Qilin and DragonForce to enhance attack efficacy.^[101] ^[102] ^[103] This evolution highlights a shift from loosely coordinated wiper-like attacks to professionalized, profit-driven syndicates capable of rapid adaptation amid enforcement pressures.

Legal and Policy Dimensions

International Law and Prohibitions

The International Convention against the Taking of Hostages, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 17, 1979, and entering into force on June 3, 1983, defines hostage-taking as an offense and obligates states parties to criminalize it under domestic law, establish jurisdiction (including over acts committed on their territory or by their nationals), and either prosecute or extradite perpetrators.^[11] The convention requires preventive measures against such acts but does not explicitly mandate or forbid ransom payments; however, when hostage-takers are affiliated with terrorist groups, such payments constitute prohibited financing of terrorism under complementary instruments like United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 (2001), which requires states to freeze assets and prohibit direct or indirect funding to entities involved in terrorist acts. This framework treats ransom facilitation to terrorists as a punishable offense, with states required to cooperate in suppression efforts.^[12] For cyber-ransomware variants, the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime—commonly known as the Budapest Convention—opened for signature on November 23, 2001, and entering into force on July 1, 2004, harmonizes substantive criminal law across parties by requiring offenses such as illegal system access (Article 2), data interference (Article 4), and forgery (Article 7), which directly encompass ransomware deployment and extortion tactics. Ratified by over 60 states beyond Europe, it mandates procedural powers for investigations, including preservation of electronic evidence, and promotes extradition and mutual legal assistance for cross-border prosecutions, addressing the transnational nature of ransomware operations.^[104] Sanctions mechanisms further prohibit ransom facilitation to designated actors; the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) enforces restrictions under executive orders and statutes barring U.S. persons from transactions with Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs), including Hamas, which faced expanded designations in October 2023 following its attacks on Israel, effectively criminalizing any ransom payments that provide funds or assets to such groups.^[105] Similar prohibitions apply via national implementations of UN sanctions regimes, targeting financial support to terrorist financing networks. Enforcement of these international prohibitions reveals persistent gaps, particularly in extraterritorial application and cross-border scenarios, where jurisdictional conflicts, attribution difficulties, and uneven domestic implementation impede effective prosecution; analyses highlight that traditional law enforcement responses often prove inadequate against agile, state-harboring actors, with limited convictions in multi-jurisdictional ransomware or hostage cases due to cooperation barriers.^[106]^[107]

National Policies on Ransom Payments

The United States adheres to a longstanding "no concessions" policy prohibiting ransom payments or prisoner releases to terrorists, formalized during the Reagan administration in the 1980s and reinforced through subsequent executive directives and legislation such as the 2012 National Security Presidential Directive on hostage recovery.^[108] ^[13] This approach, mirrored by the United Kingdom's equivalent stance under the Terrorism Act 2000 and Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office guidelines, aims to deprive terrorist groups of funding and reduce incentives for abductions.^[109] ^[110] Empirical data from security analyses indicate that this policy correlates with lower abduction rates for U.S. and U.K. citizens relative to those from paying nations; for instance, U.S. victims of terrorist kidnappings in regions like the Sahel remained limited in number post-2012, even as European counterparts faced heightened targeting amid reported payments exceeding $125 million to Al-Qaeda affiliates between 2008 and 2014.^[111] ^[112] France and Italy represent exceptions, with evidence of covert government-facilitated payments despite official denials; France disbursed at least $17 million in 2010 to secure hostages from Al-Qaeda-linked groups in Mali, contributing to over $50 million in total payouts to such networks during the 2010s and subsequent spikes in attacks on French nationals.^[113] ^[112] Italy similarly authorized millions in ransoms, including €12 million in 2015 for aid workers held in Syria and Somalia by Islamist militants, patterns corroborated by investigative reporting and linked by think tanks to elevated risks for their citizens.^[114] In the domain of cyber-ransomware, U.S. policy aligns with non-payment recommendations from the FBI, which in its 2023 Internet Crime Report emphasized that ransoms fail to ensure data recovery—often yielding no decryptors—and incentivize repeat victimization, with total payments reaching $1 billion globally that year despite such advisories.^[115] ^[116] ^[70]

Debates, Evidence, and Impacts

Arguments For and Against Paying Ransoms

Advocates for paying ransoms emphasize the immediate preservation of life in hostage situations, arguing that direct financial concessions often result in swift releases. Professional hostage negotiators report a success rate exceeding 97% in resolving kidnappings through ransom payments, as these transactions provide captors with their primary incentive while minimizing risks to victims during prolonged standoffs.^[117] This approach aligns with a utilitarian perspective prioritizing acute threats, particularly when intelligence indicates imminent harm, as withholding payment could lead to executions that payment might avert.^[118] Opponents contend that such payments establish a moral hazard by signaling vulnerability, thereby incentivizing more frequent and targeted abductions. Governments adhering to no-concessions policies, such as Australia's, assert that ransom transactions demonstrably heighten the risk of future kidnappings by validating the tactic's profitability for perpetrators. Empirical analyses further highlight how payments bolster terrorist financing, with U.S. Treasury officials identifying them as the largest non-state source of funds for groups like al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula and Islamic Maghreb, enabling expanded operations and recruitment.^[119] In ransomware contexts, payments similarly perpetuate cycles of attacks by rewarding cybercriminals without deterring reinvestment in sophisticated malware, as victims' compliance sustains the ecosystem's viability.^[120] As an alternative to monetary ransoms, negotiators pursue non-financial resolutions, such as prisoner exchanges or assurances of safe passage, which contribute to overall hostage crisis success rates of 90-95% through de-escalation and rapport-building rather than capitulation.^[121] These methods avoid direct funding of adversaries but yield variable outcomes, with success depending on captors' motivations beyond profit; for instance, ideological groups may reject swaps lacking propaganda value, though containment strategies still resolve most incidents without fatalities.^[122] Critics of payments note that while non-cash tactics demand patience, they disrupt the causal chain of economic reinforcement that ransoms perpetuate.^[6]

Empirical Data on Outcomes and Incentives

Empirical analyses of ransom payments in kidnapping cases reveal mixed but suggestive evidence of increased incidence following concessions. A RAND Corporation study examining U.S. no-concessions policy from 1970 to 2016 documented 356 kidnappings of Americans abroad, averaging eight per year, with no clear decline attributable solely to the policy; however, a 2016 analysis in the European Journal of Political Economy indicated that no-concessions approaches correlate with an 87% smaller increase in kidnapping rates compared to nations permitting payments.^[111] Concessions have been linked to recidivism in specific contexts, such as Argentina's post-payment waves and Italy's Red Brigades series in the 1970s-1980s, where repeated demands followed initial successes despite eventual policy shifts.^[111] These patterns align with game-theoretic models of repeated interactions, where victims' payments signal vulnerability, perpetuating attacker incentives akin to defection in multi-player prisoner's dilemmas across potential targets.^[123] In cybersecurity, ransomware data from 2020 onward underscores how payments exacerbate long-term threats over short-term recovery. Sophos' annual reports indicate that while 49% of victims paid ransoms in 2025 (down from prior peaks), those payments averaged $1 million, with total recovery costs (excluding ransom) at $1.53 million—often higher for payers due to incomplete decryptors and subsequent re-attacks.^[124] Non-payers relying on backups achieved data restoration in approximately 60-70% of cases across sectors, per aggregated industry analyses, avoiding direct funding of attackers while mitigating downtime through pre-existing resilience measures.^[125] Evidence ties payments to ecosystem expansion: ransomware gangs grew 40% from 68 in 2023 to 95 in 2024, fueled by prior payout revenues exceeding $1 billion annually, enabling variant proliferation and targeted reconnaissance.^[126] The FBI attributes this perpetuation to payments providing operational capital, validating predictions from repeated prisoner's dilemma frameworks where aggregate victim "cooperation" (payment) sustains attacker "defection" (attacks) indefinitely.^[115] Quantitative models further debunk short-term payment rationales by quantifying incentives. World Bank-adjacent economic studies on conflict zones model ransom concessions as inflating kidnapping risk premiums by 20-40% in permissive regions, as seen in Colombia where elevated rates inversely correlated with investment deterrence rather than resolution speed.^[127] Post-major payout events, attack volumes surged—e.g., a 700% rise in ransomware incidents from mid-2019 to mid-2020 amid rising payments—demonstrating causal reinforcement loops where funded groups scale operations, targeting backups and escalating demands.^[128] No-pay stances, as enforced by U.S. policy analogs in cyber advisories, correlate with 25-30% lower recidivism in longitudinal victim cohorts, prioritizing apprehension and disruption over episodic yields.^[111]

Broader Economic and Societal Effects

Ransom payments, encompassing both physical kidnappings and cyber extortion, impose substantial systemic economic burdens. Global ransomware attacks alone generated estimated damage costs of $40-50 billion in 2024, incorporating recovery expenses, lost productivity, and indirect effects beyond direct payments, which totaled approximately $813 million that year.^[129]^[130] Kidnapping-for-ransom activities, while harder to quantify comprehensively due to underreporting, support a services and insurance market valued at around $1.9 billion in 2024, reflecting the scale of negotiations, security, and payouts in high-risk regions.^[131] These costs ripple through insurance markets and investment decisions. Cyber insurance premiums surged by 34% in late 2021 amid ransomware spikes and have continued rising at 15-20% annually, pushing the global market toward $23 billion by 2026, as insurers adjust for heightened claim risks where ransomware accounts for the majority of losses despite fewer overall claims.^[132]^[133] In kidnapping-prone areas, such as Nigeria's oil sector, persistent ransom demands have eroded business confidence, draining household wealth and deterring foreign direct investment by increasing operational risks for expatriates and firms.^[134] Societally, ransom economies perpetuate instability by channeling funds to organized groups, enabling territorial control and undermining governance. Annual ransomware revenues, exceeding $1 billion in peak years like 2023, sustain cybercriminal networks that exploit vulnerabilities globally, while kidnapping proceeds—such as Nigeria's confirmed N2.56 billion ($1.66 million) in payments over 12 months—bolster local syndicates, fostering environments where state authority erodes and economic development stalls.^[70]^[135] This dynamic incentivizes further predation, as profits rival small-scale illicit economies and reduce incentives for deterrence, amplifying long-term societal costs through heightened insecurity and capital flight.^[136]

References

[1]
ransom | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Ransom is money or other consideration paid to or demanded by someone in exchange for the release of a kidnapped person or stolen property.
[2]
RANSOM Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
1. a consideration paid or demanded for the release of someone or something from captivity 2. the act of ransoming
[3]
Medieval warfare had well-organised 'ransom market' - BBC News
Jan 24, 2013 · Medieval prisoners of war were much more widely traded for ransoms than has been previously recognised, according to University of Southampton research.
[4]
History and Legal Status of Prisoners of War - National Park Service
Oct 26, 2022 · During the Middle Ages, when the concept of ransom was developed, it became beneficial for warriors to capture wealthy soldiers. Holding ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
Ransoming prisoners of war became widespread in the Hundred ...
Jan 24, 2013 · A new book on prisoners of war during the Hundred Years War argues that the practice of ransoming was widespread among all soldiers.
[6]
Why concessions should not be made to terrorist kidnappers
Logistical success involves the terrorists securing one or more of their kidnapping victims. When one or more hostages are kidnapped and secured, the government ...
[7]
[PDF] Does the U.S. No-Concessions Policy Deter Kidnappings of ... - RAND
The most important factor in reducing further kidnap- pings appears to be the fate of the kidnappers. Where they are apprehended and face stiff penalties and ...
[8]
18 U.S. Code § 1202 - Ransom money - Law.Cornell.Edu
Whoever receives, possesses, or disposes of any money or other property, or any portion thereof, which has at any time been delivered as ransom or reward.
[9]
U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1201 | FindLaw
Whoever unlawfully seizes, confines, inveigles, decoys, kidnaps, abducts, or carries away and holds for ransom or reward or otherwise any person, except in the ...
[10]
18 U.S. Code § 875 - Interstate communications - Law.Cornell.Edu
Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any demand or request for a ransom or reward for the release of any kidnapped ...
[11]
[PDF] International Convention against the taking of hostages
International Convention against the taking of hostages. Adopted by the General Assembly of the United. Nations on 17 December 1979. Authentic texts: English ...
[12]
International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages - Main Page
While some States refuse to negotiate with terrorists or to pay ransoms as a matter of policy, the Convention neither requires nor prohibits either step ...
[13]
Remarks of Under Secretary David Cohen at Chatham House on ...
Oct 5, 2012 · Refusing to pay ransoms or to make other concessions to terrorists is, clearly, the surest way to break the cycle, because if kidnappers ...
[14]
(PDF) On the Economics of Ransomware - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · In this paper, we develop, to the best of our knowledge, the first game-theoretic model of the ransomware ecosystem.
[15]
Ransom - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Originating from Old French and Latin, "ransom" means payment for release or redemption, derived from Latin redemptio, meaning "to buy back or redeem."
[16]
Ransoms in the Hundred Years War | A Writer's Perspective
Aug 15, 2021 · In 1360 a ransom of £16 was paid for Geoffrey Chaucer, who was captured by the French while he was out foraging. This was still 960 days worth of labour.Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
[17]
[PDF] The Enslavement of War Captives by the Romans to 146 BC
ransom, both ancient and modern, have overwhelmingly focussed on Greek practices. Even at. Rome itself, the subject of ransom in popular culture was largely ...
[18]
[PDF] The Slave Systems of Greek and Roman Antiquity
The first four chapters of this new synthesis (chap- ters I-IV) cover the history of enslavement practice in the period of the free Greek polities. This ...
[19]
[PDF] The Gallic ransom and the Sack of Rome
It has repeatedly been suggested that the ransom agreement between Rome and the Gauls reported by. Livy in his account of the Gallic attack on Rome in ( ...
[20]
[PDF] ancient records of Assyria and Babylonia
These two volumes, containing a complete English version of the historical records of ancient Assyria, represent the resumption of a long-interrupted plan for ...Missing: ransom | Show results with:ransom
[21]
Chapter 1 - Law, ransom and the status of the prisoner of war
It is striking to note, in these studies, how the status of prisoner of war is intimately connected with the laws of ransom: from this legal perspective the two ...
[22]
[PDF] Ransom Culture in the Late Middle Ages
Prisoners and ransoms the fate of prisoners of war in the Middle Ages is intimately connected with the growth of the practice of ransoming. ransoming has ...
[23]
The Chronicles of Jean Froissart - jstor
“No one could face the heavy, rapid fire of the English archers, who in that encounter killed and wounded many who found no chance of offering ransoms or ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[24]
Killing or Clemency? Ransom, Chivalry and Changing Attitudes to ...
Jul 15, 2014 · Killing or Clemency? Ransom, Chivalry and Changing Attitudes to Defeated Opponents in Britain and Northern France, 7-12th centuries.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[25]
Prisoners of War in the Hundred Years War: Ransom Culture in the ...
The status of prisoners of war was firmly rooted in the practice of ransoming in the Middle Ages. By the opening stages of the Hundred Years War, ...
[26]
Barbary Pirates and English Slaves - Historic UK
... ransom and release of English captives. He paid on average £30 per man (women were more expensive to ransom) and managed to free some 250 people before he ...Missing: amounts Admiralty 16th- 19th<|separator|>
[27]
April 27, 1805: U.S. Marines attacked Derna: “To the Shores of Tripoli”
Feb 12, 2021 · It is notably recalled in the first verse of the Marines' Hymn: "From the Halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli, we fight our country's ...Missing: tribute | Show results with:tribute
[28]
Where Is the Lost Treasure of the Inca? - ThoughtCo
Jul 19, 2019 · When it was melted down and counted, there were over 13,000 pounds of 22 karat gold and twice that much silver. The loot was divided among the ...
[29]
Pizarro and Atahualpa: The Curse of the Lost Inca Gold
Jul 29, 2014 · It's difficult to be certain, but we know a tremendous amount of gold and silver was delivered to the Spaniards. There are the historical ...
[30]
To pay or not: game theoretic models of ransomware
In this article, we review and develop the game theoretic literature on kidnapping in order to gain insight on ransomware.
[31]
[PDF] Dynamics of targeted ransomware negotiation - arXiv
In this paper, we examine how game theory can be applied to the growing threat of targeted ransomware. We construct a model of ransom negotiations as a game.
[32]
How kidnapping insurance keeps a lid on ransom inflation
May 26, 2018 · The best can get a ransom down to 10% of the initial demand. They can also calm criminals who may consider harming hostages to induce distraught ...
[33]
[PDF] An Empirical Study of the Six Stages of Ransomware Negotiations
Table 2: Negotiation Outcome by Initial Ransom and Discount Percentage. Cell values represent counts, shaded by intensity. Initial Ransom. 0–25%. 26–50%. 51–75 ...
[34]
(PDF) Understanding Ransom Kidnappings and Their Duration
Aug 9, 2025 · A unique data set covering all kidnappings for ransom in Sardinia between 1960 and 2010 is analyzed. Factors related to the ability to pay and ...
[35]
Lindbergh kidnapping - Wikipedia
Despite his conviction, Hauptmann continued to profess his innocence, but all appeals failed and he was executed in the electric chair at the New Jersey State ...The Lindbergh Kidnapping Case · Bruno Richard Hauptmann · John F. CondonMissing: rates | Show results with:rates
[36]
Lindbergh Kidnapping - FBI
The Kidnapping. Charles Augustus Lindbergh, Jr., 20-month-old son of the famous aviator and Anne Morrow Lindbergh, was kidnapped about 9:00 ...
[37]
Ransom Notes, Responses And Other Communications
I offer $1,000 which I have saved from my salary as additional to the suggested ransom of $50,000 which is said to have been demanded by Col. Lindbergh. I ...
[38]
Real-life ransom notes - CBS News
Jan 5, 2013 · From the Lindbergh baby to JonBenet Ramsey, a look at some real ransom notes written over the years.Missing: historical proofs fingerprints
[39]
Famous Cases Solved with Fingerprinting Technology - FingerMetrics
Sep 9, 2025 · The Lindbergh Kidnapping (USA, 1932). When Charles Lindbergh's baby was kidnapped, ransom notes containing fingerprints helped investigators ...Missing: examples life photos
[40]
https://medium.com/una-nca-snapshots/kidnapping-and-ransom-an-old-and-new-business-c1d6493e8a4f
[41]
Kidnapping and Ransom, an Old and New Business | by UNA-NCA
Nov 18, 2021 · Today, techniques for hostage negotiation are a subject of conferences, conventions, instruction guides and shared strategies. Probably the ...
[42]
How Do Kidnappers Make A Ransom Demand?
How do Kidnappers make a ransom demand? Is it a Ransom Note? A Secure email? A Phone call or through a chat room? What are the risks?
[43]
Understanding the Intersection Between Technology and Kidnapping
Jun 10, 2023 · Payments can be made through physical cash drops (where victims would drop off cash and co-conspirators would pick it up and bring it to the ...
[44]
The Red Brigades and the Years of Lead in Italy - Pointless Violence ...
Jan 28, 2024 · The group also kidnapped industrialist Vallarino Gancia for ransom, which was its main source of income by kidnapping industrialists ...Missing: drops success rate records
[45]
Ransomware payments in the Bitcoin ecosystem - Oxford Academic
Ransomware can prevent a user from accessing a device and its files until a ransom is paid to the attacker, most frequently in Bitcoin.Introduction · State of the art · The impact of ransomware · Conclusions
[46]
[PDF] Ransomware: Paying Cyber Extortion Demands in Cryptocurrency
Bitcoin accounts for approximately 98% of ransomware payments. Whether an organization pays the ransom or attempts to recover the data independently, a clear.Missing: execution | Show results with:execution
[47]
Department of Justice Seizes $2.3 Million in Cryptocurrency Paid to ...
Jun 7, 2021 · The Department of Justice today announced that it has seized 63.7 bitcoins currently valued at approximately $2.3 million.Missing: double- cross
[48]
https://colombiareports.com/colombia-kidnapping-and-extortion-statistics/
[49]
Kidnapping and extortion statistics - Colombia Reports
Jun 8, 2022 · According to the prosecution, the FARC alone received more than $2 billion through ransom payments over the decades. The revenue from ransom ...
[50]
Kidnappings Soar in Latin America, Threatening Region's Stability
Apr 7, 1995 · Of 3,625 reported cases of kidnapping in Colombia in the last three years, the police rescued only 11 percent of hostages. For these crimes, ...
[51]
Kidnap for ransom in 2022 - Control Risks
Apr 19, 2022 · The average global ransom demand in 2021 was 43% higher than the pre-pandemic average recorded in 2019. This trend was reflected across all ...Missing: discounts datasets
[52]
Kidnap and extortion pressures continue in Mexico
Jun 16, 2022 · “Mexico's National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI) estimates that there were over 80,000 kidnapping victims in the country in 2020 ...
[53]
Why mass kidnappings still plague Nigeria a decade after Chibok ...
Apr 3, 2024 · It said between July 2022 and June 2023, 3,620 people were abducted in 582 kidnapping cases with about 5 billion naira ($3,878,390) paid in ...
[54]
Mexico: Kidnappings continue to increase - Open Doors International
Mexico has been the number one country in the world for kidnap-for-ransom in absolute terms for more than a decade, and this situation is not likely to change.Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[55]
Types Of Kidnappings - Threatrate
EXPRESS KIDNAPPING. The victim is abducted, then forced to withdraw their own ransom from a bank or ATM. If all goes well, the victim is released afterwards ...
[56]
Virtual Kidnapping - FBI
Oct 16, 2017 · Unlike traditional abductions, virtual kidnappers have not actually kidnapped anyone. Instead, through deceptions and threats, they coerce ...
[57]
- TERRORIST FINANCING AND THE ISLAMIC STATE - GovInfo
[House Hearing, 113 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] TERRORIST FINANCING AND THE ISLAMIC STATE ...Missing: 2014-2019 | Show results with:2014-2019
[58]
How an al-Qaeda offshoot became one of Africa's deadliest militant ...
Jul 6, 2025 · JNIM has emerged as the deadliest jihadist group in West Africa as armies struggle to stem the attacks.Missing: Somalia | Show results with:Somalia
[59]
Conflict With Al-Shabaab in Somalia | Global Conflict Tracker
Sep 15, 2025 · Al-Shabaab in Somalia remains one of al-Qaeda's strongest and most successful affiliates. The terrorist organization continues to exploit the Somalian ...Missing: ransoms Mali
[60]
A content analysis of initial proof of life hostage videos released by ...
Nov 25, 2018 · & Terrorism,34, 267–294. Forest, J. J. (2012). Kidnapping by terrorist groups, 1970–2010: Is ideological orientation relevant? Crime ...Missing: proofs- | Show results with:proofs-
[61]
Funding Terrorism: The Problem of Ransom Payments
Ransom payments strengthen terrorist organizations and fund future kidnappings, leading to calls for a ban, but current measures lack enforcement.
[62]
[EPUB] Does the U.S. No-Concessions Policy Deter Kidnappings of ...
Terrorists take hostages to extract ransom or other concessions from other governments, to attract attention and make themselves important players in the region ...
[63]
Following the Money - CNAS
Jun 9, 2017 · Terrorist financing entails the raising and moving of funds intended for terrorist causes. The number and type of terrorist groups and the ...Missing: 2014-2019 | Show results with:2014-2019
[64]
Ransomware Revealed: From Attack Mechanics to Defense Strategies
Dec 15, 2023 · Ransomware is malicious software that encrypts files on a device, rendering them inaccessible, and demands a ransom for their decryption. It ...
[65]
[PDF] Ransomware, extortion and the cyber crime ecosystem
Ransomware is a type of malware which prevents you from accessing your device and the data stored on it, usually by encrypting your files. A cyber criminal will ...
[66]
2025 Data Breach Investigations Report - Verizon
Help prevent ransomware attacks, linked to 75% of system-intrusion breaches reported in this year's DBIR, with scalable, customizable security solutions. Watch ...
[67]
Verizon DBIR Shows Ransomware Involved in 44% of Data Breaches
Apr 23, 2025 · The decline in ransom amounts may be tied to a shift in victim behavior. In 2024, 64% of organizations refused to pay ransoms, up from 50% in ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[68]
The 2023 State of Ransomware Report - Everchain
2023 Ransomware Stats. The average ransom payment was $1,542,333; 40% of payments were over $1 million or more (compared to 11% in 2022); 30% of ransomware ...
[69]
https://www.darktrace.com/blog/the-double-extortion-business-conti-ransomware-gang-finds-new-avenues-of-negotiation
[70]
Conti Ransomware Strategies in Modern Cybercrime - Darktrace
Dec 7, 2021 · Uncover the strategies behind the Conti ransomware gang's double extortion methods and what it means for businesses facing cyber threats.
[71]
Ransomware Hit $1 Billion in 2023 - Chainalysis
Feb 7, 2024 · Ransomware payments in 2023 surpassed the $1 billion mark, the highest number ever observed. Although 2022 saw a decline in ransomware payment ...<|separator|>
[72]
Crypto Ransomware 2025: 35.82% YoY Decrease in ... - Chainalysis
Feb 5, 2025 · The total volume of ransom payments decreased year-over-year (YoY) by approximately 35%, driven by increased law enforcement actions, improved international ...Ransomware Activity Shifts... · Ransomware Case Studies · Iranian Ransomware...<|separator|>
[73]
4 February 1194: Richard the Lionheart is ransomed - MoneyWeek
Feb 3, 2021 · But business is business, after all, and in June 1193 at Worms, the ransom was set at 150,000 silver marks, which was up to three times the ...
[74]
Richard the Lionheart Ruins England - CoinsWeekly
Oct 14, 2009 · The emperor demanded a colossal sum from England – over 30 tons of silver. That was almost three times the yearly revenue of the Crown. However, ...<|separator|>
[75]
The History of Slavery, Part 3: Christian Slaves and Muslim Masters ...
It was the capture of Europeans by north-African Muslims. Barbary Pirates enslaved an estimated 1 million Europeans in the period from 1500 to 1800.
[76]
The Barbary Pirates and Their Impact Across Europe
Sep 2, 2024 · The Barbary Pirates, also known as corsairs, would storm ashore, capture men, women, and children, and whisk them away to North Africa.Missing: amounts Admiralty logs
[77]
Lindbergh baby kidnapping | History & Facts - Britannica
Sep 6, 2025 · A ransom note demanding $50,000 was left during the abduction of Charles Lindbergh, Jr., on March 1, 1932.
[78]
Lindbergh Kidnapping Law: Understanding Its Legal Impact
What is the Lindbergh Kidnapping Law? ... It is a federal law that makes it a crime to kidnap someone for ransom and transport them across state lines or ...
[79]
Ransom kidnapping: the anonymous underworld of the Italian ...
Mar 1, 2016 · This article offers a comparative analysis of the phenomenon of ransom kidnapping in Italy between the late 1960s and the late 1990s.
[80]
The Phenomenology of Captivity in Italian Ransom Kidnapping
Feb 19, 2025 · In 1977, before Moro's abduction, the number of ransom kidnappings reached its peak: seventy-five in a single year. 1 Political kidnapping was ...
[81]
Exxon Subsidiary Pays $14.2‐Million Argentine Ransom - The New ...
Mar 14, 1974 · El Mundo, left‐wing newspaper, agrees to run People's Revolutionary Army ad detailing ransom payments in connection with kidnapping of Exxon ...
[82]
Argentine Ransom Is Put at $60‐Million - The New York Times
Jun 21, 1975 · A ransom of $60‐million has been plaid for the release of two Argentine executives, according to members of the left‐wing Peronist guerrilla group that ...
[83]
The Rise and Fall of Ransom Kidnappings in Argentina - InSight Crime
Jun 1, 2023 · Surprisingly, ransom kidnappings have decreased despite Argentina's economic woes, with only one ransom kidnapping per month so far in 2023.
[84]
Boko Haram wants $50m to free Chibok girls-Report
The terror sect, Boko Haram, is asking for a ransom of nearly $50million from the Federal Government for the release of the 219 Chibok schoolgirls who were ...Missing: debated | Show results with:debated
[85]
https://www.france24.com/en/20161015-boko-haram-liberation-21-chibok-girls-raises-ransom-questions
[86]
Nigerian officials deny paying ransom to free 21 Chibok girls from ...
Oct 15, 2016 · Nigerian officials have denied reports that the release of 21 schoolgirls kidnapped by Boko Haram in 2014 was secured by ransom payments or a prisoner swap.
[87]
Nigeria: Decade after Boko Haram attack on Chibok, 82 girls still in ...
Apr 14, 2024 · The Nigerian authorities must ramp up efforts to ensure the safe release and return of the remaining 82 Chibok school girls abducted by Boko Haram fighters in ...Missing: ransom payments debated resurgence
[88]
Ten years on from Chibok, what happened to the 276 Nigerian girls ...
Apr 11, 2024 · While some were freed or escaped, the authorities' waning interest and ongoing mass abductions by militants has left campaigners and ...
[89]
The Terrorist Calculus in Kidnapping Girls in Nigeria: Cases from ...
Mar 7, 2018 · Abstract: Nearly four years since Boko Haram's kidnapping of 276 schoolgirls in Chibok, Nigeria, Nigerian jihadis again carried out a mass ...Missing: debated resurgence
[90]
WannaCry is Not History | CyberPeace Institute
May 12, 2021 · Within 24 hours of its detection, the ransomware had spread to around 150 countries, roasting thousands of computers in over 200,000 ...
[91]
Press Briefing on the Attribution of the WannaCry Malware Attack to ...
Dec 19, 2017 · The malware encrypted and rendered useless hundreds of thousands of computers in hospitals, schools, businesses, and homes in over 150 countries ...
[92]
Indicators Associated With WannaCry Ransomware - CISA
Jun 7, 2018 · This Alert has been updated to reflect the U.S. Government's public attribution of the "WannaCry" ransomware variant to the North Korean ...Missing: cost | Show results with:cost
[93]
A retrospective impact analysis of the WannaCry cyberattack on the ...
Oct 2, 2019 · A recent report published by the DHSC has estimated that the cost to the NHS during the attack was approximately £19 m because of lost output ...Missing: victims | Show results with:victims<|separator|>
[94]
The Attack on Colonial Pipeline: What We've Learned & What ... - CISA
May 7, 2023 · On May 7, 2021, a ransomware attack on Colonial Pipeline captured headlines around the world with pictures of snaking lines of cars at gas stations across the ...
[95]
Cybersecurity Policy Responses to the Colonial Pipeline ...
Mar 7, 2023 · The attack shut down Colonial Pipeline's operations for approximately five days, causing localized shortages of gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet ...
[96]
Colonial Pipeline confirms it paid $4.4m ransom to hacker gang after ...
May 19, 2021 · The operator of the nation's largest fuel pipeline confirmed it paid $4.4m to a gang of hackers who broke into its computer systems.
[97]
Cyberattack on Colonial Pipeline affected gas prices far less than ...
Dec 16, 2021 · Tsvetanov discovered the Colonial Pipeline incident only led to a 4-cents-per-gallon increase in average gasoline prices in affected areas.
[98]
REvil, Hacking Group Behind Major Ransomware Attack, Disappears
Jul 13, 2021 · Just days after President Biden demanded that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia shut down ransomware groups attacking American targets, ...Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution
[99]
International Law Enforcement Operation Takes Down REvil ...
Oct 27, 2021 · In July 2021, the notorious REvil (Sodinokibi) ransomware gang appeared to have ceased operations, with both its Tor payment site and data ...Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution<|separator|>
[100]
Conti Ransomware Operation Shut Down After Splitting into Smaller ...
May 24, 2022 · The notorious cybercrime gang officially took down its attack infrastructure in favor of migrating their malicious cyber activities to other ancillary ...
[101]
The rise and fall of the Conti ransomware group | Global Initiative
Jun 27, 2023 · The message pledged allegiance and support for the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, announced by Russian President Vladimir Putin the day ...Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution
[102]
https://www.aha.org/news/headline/2025-10-03-notice-warns-new-lockbit-50-ransomware-variant
[103]
Notice warns of new LockBit 5.0 ransomware variant | AHA News
Oct 3, 2025 · A Health-ISAC (Information Sharing and Analysis Center) bulletin released Oct. 1 warns of a recently released LockBit 5.0 ransomware variant ...
[104]
LockBit, Qilin, and DragonForce Join Forces to Dominate the ...
Oct 8, 2025 · The coalition is seen as an attempt on the part of the financially motivated threat actors to conduct more effective ransomware attacks, ...
[105]
About the Convention - Cybercrime - The Council of Europe
The Budapest Convention on Cybercrime is a framework for cooperation, that can be used as a guideline, and any state can accede to it.
[106]
Following Terrorist Attack on Israel, Treasury Sanctions Hamas ...
Oct 18, 2023 · To date, Treasury has targeted nearly 1,000 individuals and entities connected to terrorism and terrorist financing by the Iranian regime and ...
[107]
International Law's Role in Combating Ransomware? - Just Security
Aug 23, 2021 · Acknowledging the magnitude of the ransomware problem and the fact that the law enforcement response paradigm alone has proved inadequate, ...
[108]
https://warontherocks.com/2019/02/no-concessions-a-closer-look-at-u-s-hostage-recovery-policy/
[109]
'No Concessions'? A Closer Look at U.S. Hostage Recovery Policy
Feb 27, 2019 · Qatar, well-known for its staggering ransom payments and terrorist financing, played a key, murky role in bringing kidnapped American journalist ...
[110]
'We do not negotiate with terrorists' – but why? | Chatham House
Jan 13, 2022 · There is a moral argument that governments should not negotiate with terrorists. Paying ransoms, for instance, helps terrorist groups maintain control over ...
[111]
Safety and security - Togo travel advice - GOV.UK
The Terrorism Act (2000) makes payments to terrorists illegal. Terrorist kidnapping is infrequent in Togo, but may occur. FCDO advises against all travel to ...
[112]
Does the U.S. No-Concessions Policy Deter Kidnappings? - RAND
Jan 8, 2018 · The question of whether the United States should ever pay ransom to terrorists holding hostages is a persistent one. Should government save ...
[113]
Paying Ransoms, Europe Bankrolls Qaeda Terror
Jul 29, 2014 · Kidnapping Europeans for ransom has become a global business for Al Qaeda, bankrolling its operations across the globe.
[114]
France 'paid $17 million' ransom for Mali hostages - France 24
Feb 8, 2013 · According to a former US ambassador to Mali, France paid 17 million dollars in 2010 to free four French hostages still being held by their Salafist kidnappers.
[115]
Exclusive: Italy paying ransoms in Syria and Somalia - Al Jazeera
Oct 9, 2015 · Al Jazeera's Investigative Unit finds Italian government paying millions in ransoms ... The money secured the release of kidnapped aid workers ...
[116]
Ransomware - FBI
The FBI does not support paying a ransom in response to a ransomware attack. Paying a ransom doesn't guarantee you or your organization will get any data back.
[117]
[PDF] 2023 INTERNET CRIME REPORT
Dec 12, 2023 · The FBI does not encourage paying a ransom to criminal actors. Paying a ransom may embolden adversaries to target additional organizations, ...
[118]
The business of kidnapping: inside the secret world of hostage ...
Jan 25, 2019 · This process makes the negotiations credible by dragging them out. This is not just about minimising the payout by the insurance company.Missing: discounts | Show results with:discounts
[119]
What Hostage Negotiations Can Teach Business Negotiators - PON
Jun 17, 2025 · Business negotiations often fail; meanwhile, hostage negotiations have an incredibly high success rate—up to 94%.
[120]
Remarks of Under Secretary Cohen at CSIS - Treasury Department
Jun 2, 2014 · Aside from state sponsorship of terrorism, ransom payments are the greatest source of terrorist funding today. Groups such as AQAP, AQIM ...
[121]
Reducing Ransomware Crime: Analysis of Victims' Payment Decisions
(2019) viewed extortion as a form of kidnapping of victim's files and concluded that the bargaining power of the offenders lies within the victim's willingness ...
[122]
Fifty Years of FBI Crisis (Hostage) Negotiation - LEB
Aug 6, 2024 · This adaptation further enhanced our success rate, which we soon statistically determined to be in the mid- to high-90th percentile.3 Few ...Missing: non cash
[123]
Hostage negotiations: Psychological strategies for resolving crises
May 22, 2007 · In fact, containment and negotiation strategies yield a 95% success rate in terms of resolving a hostage crisis without fatalities to either ...
[124]
Ransomware attacks as n-person prisoner's dilemmas
May 14, 2021 · A game theoretical perspective on ransomware attacks as n-person prisoner's dilemmas, and why forced cooperation isn't the answer.Missing: repeated | Show results with:repeated
[125]
State of Ransomware 2025 - Sophos
The report covers why organizations fall victim, how they recover, the average $1.0M ransom, $1.5M recovery cost, and the human impact on IT/cybersecurity ...
[126]
Nearly Half of Companies Opt to Pay the Ransom, Sophos Report ...
Jun 24, 2025 · While ransom payments are high, they declined by 50% from $2 million in 2024 to $1 million in 2025.
[127]
500+ Ransomware Statistics (October-2025) - Bright Defense
Oct 16, 2025 · Check out 500+ verified ransomware statistics for 2025 detailing attack growth, ransom demands, and recovery costs.Missing: kidnapping discounts<|separator|>
[128]
The Impact of Kidnappings on Corporate Investment in Colombia
Apr 19, 2006 · After the increase in kidnappings during the 1990s, Colombia became the country with the highest absolute number of kidnappings and the highest ...
[129]
Ransomware Payments - Understanding Their Impact - Sepio
The number of ransomware attacks between mid-2019 to mid-2020 also increased at an alarming rate: by more than 700%, according to cybersecurity researchers.
[130]
The Average Cost Of Ransomware Attacks (Updated 2025)
May 24, 2025 · From 2019 to 2024, the average ransom demand has increased by 4,559%. Threat actors are getting bolder with their attacks and their demands.
[131]
Ransomware Payout Statistics 2025: Trends, Costs & Industry Insights
Aug 4, 2025 · Global Ransom Payments Dropped 35%: Total payments fell from a record $1.1 billion in 2023 to approximately $813 million in 2024.Missing: history | Show results with:history
[132]
Kidnap And Ransom Services Market Research Report 2033
According to our latest research, the global kidnap and ransom services market size reached USD 1.92 billion in 2024, with a robust year-on-year growth ...
[133]
Cyber Insurance Premiums See Sharp Increase - The Mahoney Group
Average premium increases for cyber insurance increased a stunning 34.3% in the fourth quarter of 2021, a magnitude not seen since 9/11.
[134]
Cyber Insurance Market Outlook 2025: Cycle Manage - S&P Global
Nov 27, 2024 · Annual cyber insurance premiums are likely to increase by 15% to 20% per year to a total of about $23 billion by the end of 2026, ...
[135]
Nigerians pay billions in ransom as kidnapping industry thrives
Aug 27, 2025 · The report warned that ransom payments are not only draining household wealth but also weakening business confidence and stunting investment.
[136]
Kidnap-for-ransom industry costs Nigeria N2.56bn in one year
Aug 26, 2025 · “Nigeria's kidnapping crisis has evolved into a lucrative criminal enterprise, with N2.56 billion ($1.66 million) confirmed in ransom payments ...
[137]
FATF report highlights evolving terrorist financing risks and warns of ...
Jul 8, 2025 · The report, Comprehensive Update on Terrorist Financing Risks, reveals terrorists' persistent ability to exploit the international financial ...