Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Reterritorialization

Reterritorialization denotes the reconstitution and recoding of flows—such as desire, capital, or signification—that have been deterritorialized, or stripped of prior territorial constraints, into novel assemblages or axiomatic structures. Introduced by philosophers and in their collaborative volumes (1972) and (1980), the concept elucidates how and other forces propel decoding processes only to recapture them through state apparatuses or transcendent organizations, forming relative or absolute reterritorializations that stabilize intensities within milieus. In Deleuze and Guattari's framework, reterritorialization operates alongside as a dual movement inherent to rhizomatic becomings, where lines of flight escape rigid segmentarities but risk recapture, exemplified in the axiomatization of decoded monetary flows under capitalist regimes or the psychic reterritorialization of familial Oedipal structures. The process underscores a non-dialectical , rejecting Hegelian in favor of perpetual and destratification, with absolute marking potential lines of escape toward , though often immanently limited by axiomatic overcodings. Beyond , reterritorialization has informed analyses in and , describing the reconfiguration of spatial and territories amid , such as euroregional integrations or rescalings that reassert control over deterritorialized borders and economies. In these applications, it highlights causal dynamics of power wherein transnational flows prompt new territorial fixes, though empirical validations remain interpretive rather than strictly quantitative, reflecting the concept's roots in speculative rather than positivist methodologies.

Origins and Philosophical Foundations

Deleuze and Guattari's Core Concepts

In Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (1972), and posit reterritorialization as the correlative movement to within the production of desire and social machines, where decoded flows—such as those of labor, wealth, and signification—are recaptured and reassembled into novel codings or axiomatic structures rather than reverting to prior territorial forms. This process underscores their critique of , framing Oedipal reterritorialization as a molar confinement of schizophrenic processes, which both unleashes through decoding and redirects via an axiomatic that operates without full recoding into despotic laws. Expanding this in (1980), describe reterritorialization as inseparable from , forming a dual vector in the formation of assemblages: every decoding of territorial strata prompts a reterritorializing movement that reestablishes consistencies, whether through habits, refrains, or faciality systems that stabilize molecular becomings into molar identities. For instance, in their analysis of smooth and striated spaces, reterritorialization striates nomadic flows, converting lines of flight into segmentary lines that enforce state-like organizations, yet it can also fold back upon itself in absolute forms, aligning with the to evade capture. The distinction between relative and absolute reterritorialization further refines this dynamic, with relative forms coupling directly to relative deterritorializations to reconfigure norms and identities on shifted grounds—such as capitalist axiomatization replacing codes—while reterritorialization escapes such relays, propelling irreversible becomings that dismantle axiomatic captures altogether. This highlights Deleuze and Guattari's emphasis on processual intensities over static structures, where reterritorialization neither fully restores nor abolishes but modulates the perpetual tension between aggregations and molecular proliferations.

Relation to Deterritorialization and Territorialization

Reterritorialization forms a dialectical counterpart to deterritorialization within Deleuze and Guattari's framework, where the latter denotes the disruption and decoding of fixed codes, strata, and territories—such as social, biological, or signifying systems—releasing flows of desire, matter, or signs into lines of flight. This process of deterritorialization, as elaborated in Anti-Oedipus (1972), fractures repressive fixations and enables variation, but it does not culminate in dissolution; instead, it precipitates reterritorialization, which recaptures these decoded elements into novel assemblages or regulatory structures, often distinct from the originating territory. Thus, reterritorialization restores a form of unity or order, transforming the potential anarchy of deterritorialized flows into stabilized milieus, as seen in capitalist axiomatization that recodes decoded economic flows without reverting to prior despotic codes. Territorialization, by contrast, encompasses the broader mechanisms of and that initially establish and maintain territories across strata, providing the baseline stability against which operates. position reterritorialization not as mere restoration of this territorialization but as a specific modality intertwined with it: reterritorialization actively follows and modulates , preventing absolute lines of flight from escaping into pure while engendering new territorial dynamics. In (1980), they describe these as coupled processes, where relative —tied to transcendent references—pairs with reterritorialization to form relays of becoming, whereas absolute resists such recapture, aligning with the and immanent planes. This triad underscores a perpetual movement: no territory endures statically, as territorialization invites its own , prompting reterritorialization to reconfigure rather than merely repair. The interrelation manifests empirically in social formations, such as migratory flows that deterritorialize ethnic or national identities only to reterritorialize them in diasporic communities or state policies, illustrating how reterritorialization axiomatizes the decoded without full reversion to original territorial codes. emphasize that this coupling avoids both rigid arborescent structures and chaotic nomadism, fostering rhizomatic multiplicities where reterritorialization, though stabilizing, harbors latent potentials for further deterritorializations.

Conceptual Framework

Definitions and Processes

Reterritorialization, as developed by and , denotes the recapture and reorganization of flows, signs, or elements that have been detached from their original territorial assemblages through , thereby forming new codings or strata within social, psychological, or cultural formations. This process operates within the broader dynamics of territorialization-deterritorialization-reterritorialization, where territories—understood as organized milieus of expression and content—are not static but subject to continual decoding and recoding, as elaborated in their 1980 work . Unlike mere restoration of prior states, reterritorialization often generates novel assemblages, such as when capitalist axiomatization recodes decoded flows from primitive territorial codes into abstract monetary or state mechanisms. The processes of reterritorialization are inherently coupled with , forming an inseparable vector of movement rather than sequential stages; lines of flight from one prompt immediate or proximate reterritorializations on another, preventing pure into . In relative terms, this involves transcendent references to existing territories, enabling recoding— for instance, linguistic shifts in "minor literature" where deterritorialized elements from a major reassemble into subversive expressions, as in Kafka's works. Social examples include historical enclosures that deterritorialized peasants from , only for them to reterritorialize as wage laborers in factories, illustrating how economic processes harness decoded desires into stratified productions. These dynamics underscore a causal in Deleuze and Guattari's framework: reterritorialization arises from the inherent instability of territories, driven by intensive differences rather than external impositions, though it risks axiomatic overcoding that stifles further lines of flight. Absolute reterritorialization, by contrast, resists immediate recapture, aligning with immanent planes that produce undecidable or smooth spaces, such as the "Body without Organs" where deterritorialized intensities evade stratification altogether. Yet, even here, processes may loop back through experimental becomings, like nomadic war machines that reterritorialize on deterritorialization itself, maintaining fluidity over rigid hierarchies. Empirical applications in ethology or capitalism reveal these as non-voluntarist: animal packs reterritorialize scents and markings after migrations, mirroring how global capital reterritorializes deterritorialized labor into networked enterprises, with verifiable shifts observable in post-1970s financialization trends. This interplay privileges neither process but highlights their mutual causation in generating multiplicity over unified origins.

Relative versus Absolute Reterritorialization

Relative reterritorialization accompanies relative deterritorialization, functioning as a compensatory mechanism that recodes decoded flows within the same stratified order, as seen in capitalist axiomatization where abstract quantities of labor and money replace despotic codes without fully escaping molar structures. In Anti-Oedipus (1972), Deleuze and Guattari describe this process as capitalism's perpetual decoding of flows followed by immediate reterritorialization on transcendent axioms, preventing absolute flight while maintaining hierarchical segmentarities like the Oedipal family or State apparatus. This relative form preserves continuity with prior territories, subordinating lines of flight to residual or artificial encodings that reinforce the status quo, such as symbolic reterritorializations in mass media or linguistic structures. Absolute reterritorialization, by contrast, emerges from deterritorialization's radical rupture, effecting a productive reconfiguration on an immanent plane of consistency rather than restorative coding, often invoking the creation of a "new earth" or "people to come" as in geophilosophy. , in A Thousand Plateaus (), position this as a vector of becoming-revolutionary, where thought deterritorializes to the point of , reterritorializing not on stratified forms but on molecular multiplicities or the , eschewing axiomatic capture. Unlike relative variants tied to interstratic movements, absolute reterritorialization operates on extrastratic lines, enabling schizoanalytic practices that affirm over , though it risks fascist recapture if not pushed to ethical consistency. The distinction underscores Deleuze and Guattari's caution against conflating the two: relative reterritorialization sustains paranoid investments in transcendent limits, while absolute demands vigilance against re-stratification, aligning with their of affirmative experimentation over dialectical . Empirical applications, such as in postcolonial dynamics or artistic refrains, reveal relative forms dominating restorative , whereas absolute potentials surface in minoritarian becomings that evade majority capture.

Applications in Social and Cultural Theory

In Capitalism and Economic Flows

In Deleuze and Guattari's framework, functions as a decoding machine that deterritorializes economic flows—encompassing , circulation, and —by abstracting them from the concrete codes and territorialities of prior formations, such as tribal or feudal systems, thereby unleashing fluid lines of desire and value. This process replaces substantive territorial codes with an of quantifiable equations, enabling the free movement of , labor, and commodities across boundaries, yet it inherently provokes reterritorialization to avert uncontrolled lines of flight that could dismantle the system itself. Reterritorialization in this context operates relatively, recoding decoded flows through immanent mechanisms like market imperatives and , which reassert control without reverting to despotic overcoding. Economic flows under exemplify this : for instance, the of labor detaches workers from land-based ties, deterritorializing them into abstract wage earners, but reterritorializes them within disciplinary structures of or , where is axiomatized via metrics and contracts. Similarly, financial capital flows, intensified since the deregulation waves of the 1970s–1980s, represent accelerated through speculative abstractions, yet are reterritorialized via regulatory frameworks, central banks, and risk-management instruments that channel them back into accumulative circuits. These reterritorializations prevent the absolute dissolution of flows, maintaining 's stability by subordinating them to the dominance of extraction. Empirical manifestations include special economic zones (SEZs), which emerged globally from the late 1970s, such as India's and zones established in 1965 and 1972 but operationalized amid 1980s liberalization, functioning as enclaves that international trade flows while reterritorializing them through localized fiscal incentives, infrastructure, and labor controls to integrate peripheral economies into global . The nation-state complements this by reterritorializing transnational flows through monetary policies and trade agreements, as seen in the European Union's , which axiomatizes intra-regional economic movements while imposing border controls on labor migration. Such dynamics underscore 's paradoxical operation: perpetual deterritorialization fuels expansion, but requisite reterritorializations—via corporate monopolies or supranational bodies—ensure the recapture and stratification of flows for sustained profitability.

In Anthropology and Cultural Dynamics

In , reterritorialization denotes the reconfiguration and re-embedding of cultural practices, identities, and relations into new spatial or institutional forms after initial disrupts traditional ties to place and territory. Drawing from Deleuze and Guattari's framework, anthropologists apply the concept to examine "assemblages" of power, desire, and territoriality that enable cultural becoming, particularly in contexts of flux such as urban poverty or institutional breakdown, where individuals invent immanent fields of action amid . This process counters the weakening of culture-place linkages under or by fostering adaptive, localized structures, such as community-based inclusion replacing national welfare systems. A prominent example is the religion, derived from Yoruba traditions in , which underwent via the Atlantic slave trade and reterritorialized in through syncretism with Catholic saints and churches, masking African deities to evade colonial suppression; this pattern repeated in the United States, where the faith adapted to urban diasporic contexts while retaining ethnic and ritual cores. Similarly, migrant groups in , , engage in reterritorialization by producing ethnic foods in public spaces, asserting cultural visibility and identity against host-society pressures. In broader cultural dynamics, the concept illuminates post-colonial revivals, such as the re-production of ancestral temples in rural , where state policies and local agency interplay to renegotiate amid modernization, blending traditional rituals with contemporary governance. also facilitate reterritorialization by reintegrating cultural ontologies with land, countering anthropocentric exploitation that severs nature from human practice, as seen in efforts to restore relational ecologies in . These applications underscore reterritorialization's role in enabling , though empirical cases reveal it as provisional and contested, often entailing hybrid forms rather than pure restorations of prior territories.

In Mass Media and Communication

In the framework of Deleuze and Guattari's analysis, functions as a primary apparatus for reterritorialization by recoding deterritorialized flows of , desire, and signification into stratified, axiomatic structures that sustain capitalist and state assemblages. exemplifies this process through its deployment of the faciality machine, which reterritorializes decoded bodies onto a of face and landscape, as seen in the use of close-ups and broadcasts that impose white, patriarchal signifying regimes on diverse expressive potentials. This recoding stabilizes flows that initially deterritorializes, channeling them into commodified content that generates without direct labor, as viewers are integrated into machinic enslavement via passive reception and feedback loops. Mass media further reterritorializes by transmitting order-words—semiotic acts that perform incorporeal transformations across social fields, such as announcements or advertisements that attribute new capacities or identities to bodies instantaneously. , for instance, erect sonic territories around households, marking boundaries with refrains that deterritorialize molecular perceptions only to reterritorialize them within ecumenical machines, evoking McLuhan's notion of global villages that paradoxically foster neotribal enclosures. These media scramble terrestrial forces into "fuzzified" assemblages, closing off lines of flight and redirecting them toward black holes of or , thereby maintaining the balance between decoding and recoding essential to late . In journalistic practice, reterritorialization manifests methodologically as the construction of territories from rhizomatic, deterritorialized lines of , where reporters map affective multiplicities rather than adhering to linear, objective strata. This approach, drawing on Deleuze and Guattari's cartographic imperatives, produces provisional existential territories that interconnect subjective experiences, countering the overcoding of traditional narratives while still risking recapture within institutional axioms. Empirical applications, such as student-led reports emphasizing personal loss over generalized facts, illustrate how such reterritorialization fosters non-hierarchical communication flows, though they remain vulnerable to broader media-capitalist re-stratification.

Extensions to Politics and Contemporary Society

In Migration and Identity Formation

Reterritorialization in the context of entails the reconstitution of disrupted social, cultural, and spatial assemblages following induced by , enabling migrants to forge new identities or reinforce existing ones through adaptive practices. This process often manifests as the establishment of community networks, ritualistic routines, and place-based affiliations that recapture flows of belonging detached during transit. Empirical analyses, drawing from Deleuze and Guattari's , highlight how migrants navigate these dynamics to stabilize self-concepts amid host society rhythms. Among Romanian migrants in the post-2007 EU accession, reterritorialization of the self emerges through the synchronization of daily rhythms—such as employment schedules, housing arrangements, and familial interactions—with local temporalities, countering initial fragmentation from cultural . Migrants reconstruct identities by forming interpersonal networks that blend origin-tied habits with adaptive behaviors, fostering forms of rather than wholesale . Similarly, in refugee contexts like the resettlement of 52,000 northern displaced in 1990 from Sri Lanka's Northern Province to camps, reterritorialization involves leveraging village structures for solidarity and resource control, thereby preserving ethnic identities while negotiating tensions with host populations over land . Diasporic reterritorialization further shapes boundaries via transnational conflict engagements, as seen in and migrant organizations in from 2013 to 2016, where pro- stances during the conflict redefined ethnic affiliations, prioritizing attitudinal alignments over ancestral ties in collaborative formations. Interviews with 38 individuals revealed that such reterritorializations intensify boundary-making, mobilizing diasporas into solidified groups that extend homeland narratives into host territories. These cases underscore reterritorialization's dual potential: enabling resilient reconstruction or entrenching parallel enclaves, contingent on local power dynamics and integration barriers.

In Political Power and State Structures

In the framework of Deleuze and Guattari's , reterritorialization within state structures denotes the recapture and recoding of deterritorialized social, economic, and migratory flows by apparatuses of , transforming fluid processes into fixed hierarchies of and . The , as a "territorial ," imposes axiomatic codes—such as laws, bureaucracies, and military enforcement—to stratify these flows, countering the decoding effects of or global integration. This process reinforces centralized control, where political manifests through border enforcement, codification, and suppression of nomadic or rhizomatic resistances, ensuring the state's on legitimate within delimited spaces. Empirical reveals this dynamic in responses to globalization's erosion of , where states deploy institutional reforms to reassert causal primacy over rather than yielding to supranational . Contemporary state reterritorialization often aligns with nationalist resurgence, as seen in the 2016 Brexit vote, where 51.9% of UK voters endorsed to reclaim legislative from ' integrative structures, reversing decades of pooled authority over trade, , and lawmaking. This act recoded economic and political flows previously deterritorialized by EU single-market axioms, prioritizing national borders and parliamentary , with subsequent data showing a 15% drop in EU migrant inflows by 2019 compared to peak levels. Similarly, under U.S. President , executive actions from January initiated 700 miles of border barrier expansion along the U.S.- frontier, aiming to reterritorialize unauthorized flows that had surged to 851,000 apprehensions in fiscal year 2000, framing the wall as a physical and symbolic recoding of territorial against global mobility. These measures, while contested for efficacy—apprehensions fell to 405,000 by partly due to deterrence signaling—illustrate states leveraging to enforce causal over demographic and vectors. In authoritarian contexts, reterritorialization intensifies through direct suppression of internal deterritorializations, as exemplified by China's 2020 National Security Law in , which centralized Beijing's juridical authority over the semi-autonomous territory, criminalizing secessionist activities amid pro-democracy protests that peaked at 2 million participants in June 2019. Enforced by over 10,000 arrests by mid-2023, the law recoded Hong Kong's post-1997 "" hybridity into unified state axioms, diminishing extraterritorial legal flows and reintegrating the territory under mainland structures. Parallel efforts toward involve military posturing, with incursions into Taiwan's air defense zone exceeding 1,700 in 2022 alone, signaling intent to reterritorialize claimed historical spaces against independence sustained since 1949. Such cases underscore how states, facing empirical threats like identity fragmentation or external influence, prioritize reterritorializing power through coercive apparatuses, often at the expense of pluralistic flows, though academic interpretations of these as purely "fascist" overlook underlying causal drivers like security dilemmas verifiable in defense expenditure data—China's rose 7.2% to $230 billion in 2023. This meta-awareness highlights biases in left-leaning scholarship that may downplay state agency in favor of globalist narratives, privileging instead raw metrics of border enforcement efficacy and retention.

Criticisms and Alternative Perspectives

Philosophical and Methodological Critiques

Critics of Deleuze and Guattari's conceptualization of reterritorialization argue that it exemplifies the obscurity often attributed to their collaborative works, where terms borrowed from ethology and extended metaphorically to social and economic processes lack rigorous definitional boundaries, leading to interpretive ambiguity in application. For instance, analyses of Anti-Oedipus highlight how the interplay of deterritorialization and reterritorialization is presented through dense, allusive prose that prioritizes stylistic experimentation over analytical clarity, complicating efforts to delineate when a flow is recaptured versus merely transformed. Philosophically, the framework has been faulted for positing an of pure positivity and multiplicity that elides negativity, , and dialectical tension, reducing reterritorialization to a perpetual, harmonious recoding without for irreducible contradictions in social formations. , in his examination of Deleuze and Guattari's nomadology, contends that this approach celebrates molecular becomings and axiomatic reterritorializations as liberatory while ignoring the molar structures of and lack that structure historical , thereby rendering the concept ideologically complacent rather than radically subversive. Such critiques, rooted in Hegelian and Lacanian traditions, emphasize that reterritorialization's immanentist assumptions fail to explain persistent hierarchies or ruptures, privileging descriptive flux over substantive of power dynamics. Methodologically, reterritorialization resists due to its non-falsifiable character; any observed stabilization or recoding can be retroactively labeled as such, devoid of testable criteria distinguishing it from routine adaptation or stasis. This elasticity, while enabling broad interpretive flexibility, undermines its utility in empirical , where require measurable indicators for validation, as opposed to the post-structuralist emphasis on rhizomatic proliferation over structured inquiry.

Empirical and Causal Realism Challenges

Critics aligned with critical realism contend that Deleuze and Guattari's conceptualization of reterritorialization operates within a flat, immanent that privileges processual flows and multiplicities over stratified causal mechanisms, thereby obscuring the real, emergent powers generating social structures. Unlike approaches emphasizing generative structures—such as relations or institutional hierarchies that produce enduring effects—reterritorialization is depicted as a decoding-recoding dynamic without specifying underlying real conditions or powers that could be empirically isolated and tested. This transcendental , focused on subjective intensities rather than objective mechanisms, yields descriptive richness but evades causal explanation, as processes like the reterritorialization of economic flows under are asserted as axiomatic without delineating verifiable pathways from deterritorializing disruptions to stabilized assemblages. Empirical applications of reterritorialization further reveal challenges in and , with scholarly uses predominantly interpretive and qualitative, lacking predictive models or quantitative metrics to distinguish the concept from ad hoc narratives. For example, analyses of cultural dynamics or state power invoke reterritorialization to frame formations or enforcements, yet provide no longitudinal datasets or controlled comparisons demonstrating causal precedence of deterritorializing forces over explanations like path-dependent institutions or rational actor incentives. Marxist-oriented critiques, including those from the tradition, highlight how this framework underemphasizes capitalism's totalizing reterritorializations, treating as liberatory without empirical accounting for intensified exploitation or control, as evidenced by persistent wage stagnation and regimes post-1970s neoliberal reforms despite claims of fluid global flows. In political and societal extensions, the absence of causal realism manifests in overgeneralized attributions, such as linking migration-induced to novel identity reterritorializations without disentangling variables like interventions or economic incentives, which econometric studies attribute more directly to regulations than abstract rhizomatic processes. This reliance on metaphorical deployment, prevalent in academia's post-structuralist currents, often bypasses rigorous hypothesis-testing, rendering the resilient to disconfirmation but empirically inert for or predictive purposes. Realist alternatives, by contrast, demand identification of intransitive mechanisms—e.g., how specific asymmetries causally reterritorializing efforts—supported by stratified analyses absent in Deleuze and Guattari's .

Ideological Biases and Normalized Misapplications

has critiqued the Deleuzo-Guattarian framework of deterritorialization and reterritorialization for ideologically mirroring the perpetual flux of late capitalism, where capital itself decodes and recodes territories in pursuit of profit, rendering the concepts complicit rather than subversive. In Organs Without Bodies (2004), Žižek argues that celebrating lines of flight and becomings as emancipatory overlooks how capitalism operationalizes these processes, axiomatizing desire into endless modulation without true escape, thus normalizing neoliberal deterritorialization under a veneer of radical nomadism. This bias privileges productive flows over structural antagonism, potentially excusing empirical inequalities, such as the concentration of global capital in deterritorialized networks that exacerbate wealth disparities, with U.S. top 1% income share rising from 10% in to 20% by 2020 amid financial deregulation. Alain Badiou identifies a vitalist in Deleuze's thought, where reterritorialization emerges from immanent multiplicities rather than evental ruptures, biasing the toward an all-encompassing One of life-forces that subordinates to organic continuity. Badiou's The Clamor of Being (1997) posits this as an ideological evasion of mathematics-based multiplicity, favoring expressive that ideologically aligns with pre-evental harmony over fidelitous truths, as evidenced in Deleuze's rejection of for differential flows. Such framing can misapply reterritorialization to downplay discrete political interventions, empirically evident in how post-structuralist appropriations ignore causal breaks like the 1989 , which reterritorialized through state reconstructions rather than seamless becomings. Normalized misapplications depoliticize these ideas in applied fields, co-opting anti-capitalist intent for managerial ideologies; for instance, literature adapts rhizomatic reterritorialization to promote organizational flexibility, as in Robert Chia's (1999) reinterpretation that ignores critiques, or Anders Dysvik's (2018) use for innovation without addressing capture mechanisms. Empirical failures underscore this: Michael Porter's (2001) territorial models underestimated digital , correlating with revenues plummeting from $19 billion in 1999 to $3 billion by 2013 due to unharnessed flows. In , influenced by post-structuralist dominance, the concepts are routinely stretched to frame reterritorializations (e.g., enforcements) as fascistic axiomatizations, while corporate variants are normalized as adaptive, reflecting a selective against hierarchical stability despite evidence from conflict zones like (2011–present), where territorial voids fueled proxy wars and displacement exceeding 13 million by 2023.

Recent Developments and Empirical Cases

In Digital Platforms and Economy

Digital platforms initially facilitate deterritorialization by decoupling economic activities from traditional geographic constraints, enabling global flows of labor, data, and capital through algorithms and networks; however, they simultaneously engender reterritorialization by restructuring these flows into platform-specific assemblages that reinscribe spatial hierarchies and control mechanisms. This dual process manifests in the as interactive expansions where users and platforms co-produce territorialized labor practices, rather than purely extractive dynamics, as observed in ethnographic studies of gig workers adapting to platform logics in localized contexts. For instance, ride-hailing apps like deterritorialize mobility but prompt reterritorialization through data-driven zoning of urban spaces, where algorithmic governance recodes streets into proprietary territories contested by drivers and regulators. In content creation economies, reterritorialization occurs via physical-digital hybrids, such as houses in during 2022-2023, where dispersed online labor coalesced into shared living-production spaces to optimize algorithmic visibility and monetization, countering the illusion of placeless digital work. These setups reterritorialized virtual content flows by anchoring creators in proximate physical environments, facilitating collaborative editing, trend synchronization, and brand sponsorships tied to localized cultural outputs, though structural disruptions like wartime instability later undermined these assemblages. Similarly, in rural extensions of platform economies—termed "platform ruralism"—digital services like and delivery apps address neoliberal spatial fixes by reterritorializing agrarian landscapes into networked peripheries, integrating remote populations into global supply chains via infrastructure investments in logistics hubs as of 2022 onward. Regulatory interventions further exemplify reterritorialization, as seen in the European Union's (), enforced from March 2024, which seeks to reassert national and supranational control over platform dominance by mandating interoperability and , thereby recoding transnational digital flows into bounded jurisdictional territories. This contrasts with platform firms' counter-strategies, such as geospatial data analytics that tether virtual economies to physical sites, exemplified by Amazon's warehouse networks, which by 2023 had reterritorialized into over 1,000 global fulfillment centers optimized for just-in-time delivery. Empirical analyses indicate that such reterritorializations often reinforce inequalities, as platforms' spatial power—simultaneously untethered from and embedded in locales—prioritizes high-density urban cores, marginalizing peripheral economies despite rural outreach efforts.

In Environmental and Agricultural Reterritorialization

Reterritorialization in environmental and agricultural contexts involves the reestablishment of localized connections between food production, , and ecosystems, countering the deterritorializing effects of globalized supply chains by promoting territorial food systems that prioritize and . This process emphasizes redefining relationships between and specific locales, including local farming, , short supply chains, and community-supported models, to foster material, identity-based, and organizational ties beyond mere proximity. Such efforts aim to enhance environmental outcomes like preservation and reduced transport-related emissions through diversified, place-specific practices such as and . In , reterritorialization manifests through instruments that integrate with strategies, facilitating access to farmland for local producers and supporting like food hubs and incubators. A 2024 analysis of 39 French territorial food projects found that 27 targeted improved local production and 24 focused on supply chain development, predominantly via economic tools such as local processing facilities (in 13 projects) and farm incubators (in 12), though regulatory measures like farmland preservation were less common (in 7 projects). These policies often serve as catalysts for ecological transitions, with collective catering adaptations in 6 projects promoting local sourcing and farmer establishment, yet only 13 projects incorporated explicit environmental instruments, mostly informational rather than . Empirical cases in illustrate environmental dimensions, as in Normandy's natural parks, which combine land-use regulations with support for environmentally attuned farming, and Occitania's use of pre-emptive land rights for eco-friendly operations in water-vulnerable zones, alongside dedicated market gardening areas. These approaches enable product diversification and sustainable practices but face challenges from entrenched power dynamics favoring conventional, export-oriented , limiting broader ecological impacts. Broader recommendations stress multi-level co-governance to align and policies, drawing from reviews of 161 publications emphasizing synergies in land access and farming methods for resilient territorial systems.

In Global Conflicts and Boundaries

In global conflicts, reterritorialization manifests as or non-state actors reasserting control over disputed territories through , , or boundary reinforcement, often countering deterritorializing effects like ethnic fragmentation or international norms favoring fluid . This process transforms abstract geopolitical tensions into concrete territorial claims, as seen in analyses of how conflicts revert to fixed logics despite globalization's border-eroding tendencies. Russia's annexation of Crimea exemplifies such dynamics: following the deployment of unmarked Russian troops ("little green men") in late February 2014 amid Ukraine's , a on March 16, 2014, yielded a reported 96.77% vote for reunification with (with 83% turnout), leading to formal incorporation by on March 18, 2014. Scholars interpret this as reterritorializing the conflict, recasting Ukraine's internal upheaval into a state-sovereignty dispute rooted in historical Russian presence and protection of ethnic kin, though the 's legitimacy was contested internationally due to the absence of monitors and coercion claims. Parallel efforts appear in boundary fortifications amid asymmetric conflicts and migration-linked security threats, where states erect physical barriers to reimpose territorial exclusivity. Globally, border wall construction accelerated post-2000, rising from about 15 major barriers during the to 77 by 2020, including the U.S.- frontier expansions (over 700 miles by 2021), Hungary's 109-mile fence completed in 2015 to halt Balkan migrant flows (reducing crossings by 99%), and Arabia's 1,100-mile wall by 2014 to curb infiltration. These structures causally respond to via uncontrolled cross-border movements, reinscribing state control through and denial of passage, though their efficacy varies and often escalates tensions with neighbors.

References

  1. [1]
    None
    Below is a merged response summarizing the discussion of media, television, journalism, or mass communication in relation to reterritorialization or deterritorialization in *A Thousand Plateaus* by Deleuze and Guattari. Given the volume of information and the need for a dense representation, I will use a table in CSV format to consolidate key details from all segments, followed by a narrative summary that integrates the findings. The table will capture page references, concepts, specific mentions, and insights, while the narrative will provide an overarching analysis.
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Deterritorializing Conflict, Reterritorializing Boundaries - DiVA portal
    I use the theoretical concepts of deterritorialization and reterritorialization as introduced by Deleuze and Guattari (1987 (1980)) to answer the following.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The State of Territory under Globalization - Progressive Geographies
    Deterritorialization/Reterritorialization. There are a number of ways in which these terms are used in the work of Deleuze and. Guattari. As Ronald Bogue has ...
  4. [4]
    The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari
    Processes of deterritorialization are differentiated again by GUATTARI into 'relative' and 'absolute' deterritorializations: whereas relative ...
  5. [5]
    (PDF) The State of Territory under Globalization: Empire and the ...
    The State of Territory under Globalization: Empire and the Politics of Reterritorialization. January 2006. Authors: Stuart Elden at University of Warwick.
  6. [6]
    Deleuze and the deterritorialization of strategy - ScienceDirect.com
    This paper develops three of Deleuze and Guattari's main concepts for understanding the strategic movements within contemporary capitalism.
  7. [7]
    Anti-Oedipus (3) - Duke University
    Revolutionary practice is to push capitalism from a relative deterritorialization to an absolute one. Finally, somewhat out of order to the narrative I've ...
  8. [8]
    Entry on 'Territorialization / Deterritorialization / Reterritorialization'
    The concepts of territorialization, deterritorialization, and reterritorialization, introduced by Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, explore the dynamic ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Deterritorialization It is Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari who have ...
    They used the term deterritorialization to indicate the fracturing of and freeing from repressive fixations and despotic arrangements of a certain milieu, be it ...
  10. [10]
    The Political and Theoretical Stakes of Deterritorialization
    The concept of deterritorialization, fashioned by Deleuze and Guattari in Anti-Oedipus and beyond, is at first glance precisely what we need to come to ...<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Deterritorialization—A key concept in the philosophy of Deleuze and ...
    The 'Conclusion' of A Thousand Plateaus further distinguishes in abstract fashion between 'relative' and 'absolute' types of deterritorialization (1987: 508-10) ...Missing: versus | Show results with:versus
  12. [12]
    Deleuze and Anarchism | The Anarchist Library
    In A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari outline two forms of deterritorialisation – relative and absolute – whose interplay characterise the kinds of ...
  13. [13]
    Music semiotics in a minor key: Deleuze and Guattari's refrain and ...
    nents during the 18th century is a relative reterritorialization into the forms and structures of the galant style which gained prominence via the comic ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Deleuze and Guattari's Geophilosophy - Philippiniana Sacra
    The absolute deterritorialization of thought calls for a people-to-come or missing people. Meanwhile, while it is true that the absolute reterritorialization of ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Nine Notes on the Refrain - La Deleuziana
    Refutation: each deterritorialization is recoded onto a reterritorialization. Lobsters reach their destina- tion. Perhaps we then need a more fundamental ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  16. [16]
    Deleuze and Guattari's Geophilosophy: The Fabulation of a People ...
    The demos belongs to capitalism's historical process of relative reterritorialization. For Deleuze and Guattari, the demos'(actual people) capitalist ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] On Lines of Flight: A Study of Deleuze and Guattari's Concept
    Guattari also write of lines of relative and absolute deterritorialization that: “The former are stratic or interstratic, whereas the latter concern the ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Reflection of “Territory” in the Thoughts of Deleuze and Guattari ...
    Deleuze and. Guattari see deterritorialization as having two stages: “relative” and “absolute.” From their perspective, initially, relative deterritorialization.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Deleuze and the Deterritorialization of Strategy - DiVA portal
    Keywords: Strategy, power, resistance, Deleuze, Guattari, deterritorialization, smooth ... This works in opposition to a vector of. 'reterritorialization ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  20. [20]
    [PDF] DELEUZE AND GUATTARI MEET SAMIR AMIN
    Abstract: The goal of this article is to develop a critical comparison between. Deleuze and Guattari's analysis of capitalism on a “global scale” and the ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The Sources of Neoliberal Globalization
    Indeed, recent globalization has been closely connected with certain forms of reterritorialization such as regionalization and the proliferation of offshore ...
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Capitalism and ecology - UvA Scripties
    Jul 12, 2021 · ... reterritorialization, and brings the flows under the dominance of a single flow capable of overcoding them” (ibid: 220). The capitalist ...
  23. [23]
    Zones of reterritorialization: India's free trade zones in comparative ...
    Oct 18, 2017 · Zones of reterritorialization: India's free trade zones in comparative perspective, 1947 to the 1980s* ... economic flows.Footnote This article ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Decoding and deterritorialization. Capitalism and state in the ...
    The purpose of the text is to present the thought of Deleuze and. Guattari in the context of the capitalist state and the relations between capitalism and state ...
  25. [25]
    Deleuze and the Anthropology of Becoming
    For Deleuze and Guattari, assemblages are contingent and shifting interrelations among “segments”—institutions, powers, practices, desires—that constantly, ...
  26. [26]
    De-Territorialization and Re-Territorialization of “the social”. A debate.
    Jan 1, 2008 · Deterritorialization has been used as an anthropological concept ... Drawing on Deleuze and Guattari, de-territorialization processes ...
  27. [27]
    Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of the Orisha Religion in ...
    Jun 28, 2008 · This article deals with the relationship of religion to space, ethnicity and political domination, through the case of the Orisha religion ...
  28. [28]
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07352166.2025.2551631
  29. [29]
    ‪Ningning Chen‬ - ‪Google Scholar‬
    Beyond the everyday? · Governing rural culture: agency, space and the re-production of ancestral temples in contemporary China.
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Contributions of Indigenous Knowledge to the Reterritorialization of ...
    Dec 12, 2023 · When nature is separated from culture, when it loses its soul, according to anthropologist Philippe Descola, nothing prevents us from exploiting ...
  31. [31]
    Methodological Reterritorialization of Journalistic Narratives
    Jul 22, 2017 · This paper presents a methodological proposal for journalistic work in the academy, using the assumptions made by Foucault, Latour, Deleuze and Guattari, among ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    A rhythmanalysis of the (de)/(re)territorialisation of self in ...
    This paper reflects on some of the ways in which the intertwined rhythms of education, work, housing, home, place, family and body combine and contribute to ...
  33. [33]
    Reterritorilizing the Relationship Between People and Place in ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The article discusses different conceptions of space and place in refugee studies, especially contributions from anthropology and geography.
  34. [34]
    Deleuze and the deterritorialization of strategy - ResearchGate
    May 2, 2017 · This paper develops three of Deleuze and Guattari's main concepts for understanding the strategic movements within contemporary capitalism: i) ...<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    https://oxfordre.com/internationalstudies/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.001.0001/acrefore-9780190846626-e-493
  36. [36]
    Reterritorialization — Part 1. The State | Bleeding Into Reality
    Feb 23, 2019 · The post-war settlement of national sovereign states is increasingly being undermined by technology, which knows no borders.
  37. [37]
    Full article: Sovereignty, Territory, and the Mapping of Mobility
    Deleuze and Guattari's insights regarding the continuing function of reterritorialization through boundary drawing and boundary crossing are important because ...
  38. [38]
    The World Is Witnessing a Rapid Proliferation of Border Walls
    Mar 2, 2022 · This article reviews the ancient and recent history of border walls to show the rapid increase in construction since the turn of the millennium.
  39. [39]
    President Trump's border wall - Brookings Institution
    President Trump's proposed wall along the US-Mexican border threatens to damage crucial cooperation between the two countries without solving unauthorized ...
  40. [40]
    As China Strengthens Grip on Hong Kong, Taiwan Sees a Threat
    Sep 18, 2020 · The sweeping new security law in Hong Kong has further eroded what little support there was in Taiwan for unifying with the mainland.
  41. [41]
    The Hong Kong-Taiwan Nexus in the Shadow of China
    Sep 15, 2022 · This article explores the political impact of the Hong Kong-Taiwan civil society nexus from the early 2010s, through the Umbrella Movement (2014), to the Anti- ...
  42. [42]
    China Increasing Its Regional Power : State of the World from NPR
    Mar 19, 2024 · In the Philippines, China's attempts to expand its territorial waters are being met with increasingly fiery rhetoric from senior officials.
  43. [43]
    Geopolitical events and fascist machines: Trump, Brexit and the ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · In contrast to the legalism of much paradiplomacy literature, a recent focus on Deleuzean thought in international relations and political ...
  44. [44]
    Nationalism and the transformation of the state - Wiley Online Library
    Jun 17, 2024 · This article reports findings from an EU-funded research project that uses historical maps covering borders of states and ethnic groups to show how nationalism ...
  45. [45]
    DELEUZE AND OBSCURITY | AGENT SWARM
    Dec 2, 2015 · The book contains a well-argued sustained critique of this synthesis, but expressed in a wild language, and containing many references that ...Missing: vagueness | Show results with:vagueness
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Nomadology or Ideology? Zizek's Critique of Deleuze1 Robert ...
    We should recall that the Deleuzo-Guattarian concept of molecular becoming cannot be isolated from the “molar” processes and structures that Zizek identifies as ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] A critique based on the work of Deleuze, Guattari and Bhaskar
    This article takes two paths of explication to these changes, one through the combined work of Deleuze and Guattari, the other through the critical realism of ...
  48. [48]
    What are some solid criticisms of Deleuze and Guattari's philosophy?
    Jun 6, 2021 · The most sustained critique you'll find will be from the marxist tradition. The main theorists of the Frankfurt School, for example, are implicitly ...Maybe I'm just not reading him correctly, but I don't get why Deleuze ...To what extent did Deleuze and Guattari disagree on anything? How ...More results from www.reddit.comMissing: obscurity | Show results with:obscurity
  49. [49]
    Guattari, Deleuze, and Cultural Studies - Taylor & Francis Online
    Sep 16, 2018 · This essay maps the changing ways that the concepts and writings of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari have been mobilized in the journal Cultural Studies over ...
  50. [50]
    (PDF) Europeanization as the Reterritorialization of the State
    What is missing is a unified conceptual understanding that includes the diverse aspects of these processes. This paper offers an innovative view of the ...Missing: absent | Show results with:absent
  51. [51]
    https://plijournal.com/files/laerke_pli_8.pdf
  52. [52]
    Platform-driven deterritorialization and reterritorialization processes ...
    Sep 3, 2025 · This section sheds light on how weather, geography, and water ecologies reterritorialize these deterritorializing forces, ultimately revealing ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    Full article: Minor geographies of resistance in platform cities
    ABSTRACT. Platform cities is a term that describes the phenomenon of urban spaces becoming increasingly produced through the mediations of digital platforms.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Spatializing Digital Economy: TikTok Houses as Agents of Labor ...
    This thesis argues that physical place is not transcended in the digital economy, using Ukrainian TikTok houses to show reterritorialization of digital work.
  55. [55]
    Platform ruralism: Digital platforms and the techno-spatial fix
    Aug 6, 2025 · In this article, we focus on “platform ruralism” and place the unfolding of digital platforms in rural areas in the neoliberal globalization ...
  56. [56]
    EU regulation of the digital economy as a catalyst for US retaliation
    Jun 23, 2025 · The US views EU's DMA as a burden, a trade barrier, and a potential tax on US companies, potentially leading to retaliation.
  57. [57]
    Spatialization of Digital Platforms - Lianrui Jia, 2025 - Sage Journals
    Feb 19, 2025 · Digital platforms are now powerful economic, social, and political actors and their power is simultaneously tethered and untethered to space.
  58. [58]
    Governing the reterritorialization of agricultural activities
    In this paper, reterritorialization refers to the redefinition of the relationship between food and territory, the reinforcement of social ties, and a new ...
  59. [59]
    Integrating Land-Use and Food Planning for the Re-territorialisation ...
    Aug 8, 2025 · The re-territorialisation of agricultural activities (RAA) refers to the promotion of local food production and its diversification geared ...
  60. [60]
    The Crimea crisis and reterritorialization of international conflicts
    Jun 19, 2015 · Against this background, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia requires academic investigation and the assessment of its significance for ...
  61. [61]
    Territorial Orders and War | Shifting Grounds - Oxford Academic
    Aug 24, 2023 · Among many similar cases, the modern Siamese experience constitutes another example of internally driven reterritorialization: as Winichakul ...
  62. [62]
    Five years after Crimea's illegal annexation, the issue is no closer to ...
    Mar 18, 2019 · But Russia has expressed no interest in annexing Donbas. While the seizure of Crimea proved very popular with the broader Russia public, the ...
  63. [63]
    The conflicting logics of cross-border reterritorialization: Geopolitics ...
    This paper examines cross-border reterritorialization from a geopolitical perspective informed by multi-scalar conceptualizations of political territoriality.